[ad_1]
Market Update: WYNN, ABNB
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
A Canadian retiree’s main decision with this Sun Life product is the age they want the funds to last until (the maturity age). They can choose from 85, 90, 95 or 100 (or select a few with a combination of ages); but they can also start drawing down as early as age 50. Sun Life recalculates the client payments annually, at the start of each year, based on the account’s balance. That has the firm looking at the total amount invested, payment frequency, number of years remaining before the selected maturity age, estimated annual rate of return (expected return is 5.5% but a conservative 4.5% rate is used in the calculations) and any annual applicable regulatory minimums and maximums.
Birenbaum says holders of MyRetirementIncome can arrange transfers to their bank accounts anywhere from biweekly to annually. While the payment amount isn’t guaranteed, they can expect what Sun Life calls a “steady income” to maturity age, so the payment isn’t expected to change much from year to year. If the client’s circumstances change, they can alter the maturity date or payment frequency at any time. While not available inside registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs), most other account types are accommodated, including registered retirement income funds (RRIFs), life income funds (LIFs), tax-free savings accounts (TFSAs) and open (taxable) accounts.
In a telephone interview, Eric Monteiro, Sun Life’s senior vice president of group retirement services, said, in MyRetirementIncome’s initial implementation, most investments will be in RRIFs. He expects that many will use it as one portion of a retirement portfolio, although some may use it 100%. Initial feedback from Canadian advisors, consultants and plan sponsors has been positive, he says, especially about its flexibility and consistency.
As said above, unlike life annuities, the return is not guaranteed, but Monteiro says “that’s the only question mark.” Sun Life looked at the competitive landscape and decided to focus on simplicity and flexibility, “precisely because these others did not take off as expected.” The all-in fee management expense ratio (MER) is 2.09% for up to $300,000 in assets, but then it falls to 1.58% beyond that. Monteiro says the fee is “in line with other actively managed products.”
Birenbaum lists the pros to be simplicity and accessibility, with limited input needed from clients, who “simply decide the age to which” they want funds to last. The residual balance isn’t lost at death but passes onto a named beneficiary or estate. Every year, the target withdrawal amount is calculated based on current market value and time to life expectancy, so drawdowns can be as sustainable as possible. This is helpful if the investor becomes unable to competently manage investments in old age and doesn’t have a trusted power of attorney to assist them.
As for cons, Birenbaum says that it’s currently available only to existing Sun Life Group Retirement Plan members. “A single fund may not be optimal for such a huge range of client needs, risk tolerance and time horizons.” In her experience, “clients tend to underestimate life expectancy” leaving them exposed to longevity risk. To her, Sun Life’s approach seems overly simplistic: you “can’t replace a comprehensive financial plan in terms of estimating sustainable level of annual draws with this product.”
In short, there is “a high cost for Sun Life doing a bit of math on behalf of clients… This is a way for Sun Life to retain group RRSP savings when their customers retire … to put small accounts on automatic pilot supported by a call centre, and ultimately, a chatbot. For a retiree with no other investments, it’s a simple way to initiate a retirement income.”
However, “anyone with a great wealth advisor who provides planning as well as investment management can do better than this product,” Birenbaum says. “For those without advisors, a simple low-cost balanced fund or ETF in a discount brokerage will save the client more than 1% a year in fees in exchange for doing a little annual math.”
[ad_2]
Jonathan Chevreau
Source link

[ad_1]
>> 82 YEAR-OLD HORSEBACK RIDERS SADDLING UP FOR HIS NEXT COMPETITION. IF SUCCESSFUL, HE WOULD BECOME PART OF AN EXCLUSIVE CLUB OF RIDERS. NBC TWO’S RACHEL WHALEN SHOWS US HOW IT’S NEVER TOO LATE TO PURSUE YOUR PASSIONS. IN TONIGHT’S STORY, TO SHARE. >> ONE THING ABOUT HENRY WATSON. HE’S GOT TO TELL IT TO YOU STRAIGHT. YES, STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSE’S MOUTH. GENERALLY SPEAKING OUT, A LOT PEOPLE OR COURSES. WE HAVE NEVER LOTTERY. IF THEY’RE AFRAID THEY’LL TEAR. >> IF THEY’RE THEY WON LAUGHTER. WE MET HENRY AND HIS HORSE SMOOTH BULLET TO GET AT THE HIDDEN HAVEN RANCH IN NORTH FORT MYERS, DOING TRICKS. GOOD BOY AND PRACTICING FOR THE NEXT SOUTHWEST FLORIDA JURORS. SASHA, LET ME SHOW YOU HOURS CAN DO. >> THAT’S THE ESSENCE WHERE THEY’LL BE JUDGED ON HOW THEY PERFORM A SERIES OF MOVES. LOT TO HIM HERE NOW AND SEE WHAT HE DID. YOUR COOKIE. >> YOU WANT TO OKAY? I DON’T HAVE >> WHEN HENRY AND BULLETS COMPETES ON SATURDAY OCTOBER. 26 MIL OFFICIALLY BE A PART OF THE CENTURY CLUB BECAUSE BULLETS IS 20 AND HENRY IS 82. IT’S NEVER TOO LATE. AND THAT’S THIS CENTURY RIDE IS ALL ABOUT. IN FACT, HENRY DIDN’T EVEN START COMPETING INTO HIS GOLDEN YEARS. HE BOUGHT HIS FIRST HORSE AT 70 YEARS OLD. SOMETHING ALWAYS WANTED ALWAYS DREAMED ABOUT WRITTEN BOOKS ABOUT, YOU KNOW, LOOK, WATCH THEM ON TV AND >> THAT KIND OF THING. YOU’RE JUST. BUT IT WAS NEVER. POSSIBLE. BULLETS BEEN BY HIS SIDE EVER SINCE THROUGH A COUPLE HURRICANES AND HEALTH SCARES. >> LAST MARCH BULLET SPENT 12 DAYS IN THE HOSPITAL. IT LIKE ONE OF MY CHILDREN. HAD A LIFE-THREATENING SITUATION BECAUSE YOU. >> AS A RETIRED PERSON IN BECOME YOUR FAMILY. NOW BULLET IS BACK HEALTHY AND READY TO COMPETE. >> THE COMPETITION’S KEPT HENRY VIBRANT TO FROM MIKE TOLD ME THIS ONE HOURS. GETTING RID YOUR TIME TO REMEMBER WHO IT WAS, SHARES YOU BETTER FIND SOMETHING TO DO TO GET INVOLVED YOU DON’T GO HOME AND SIT ON THE COUCH OR YOU DIE. THAT’S PICKLEBALL SO GREAT. IT REALLY IS JUST KEEPING PEOPLE OUT ALIVE. I DON’T LIKE >> OPT FOR THE HORSES. >> IN FORT MYERS, RACHEL WHALEN NBC 2 THAT. WORDS OF WISDOM. YOU GOT TO KEEP DOING STUFF TH
An 82-year-old equestrian’s secret to staying young
An 82-year-old horseback rider is saddling up for his next competition. If successful, he’ll become a part of an exclusive club of riders.”Generally speaking, I don’t like people. I like horses,” said Henry Watson.Hearst sister station WBBH met Watson and his horse Smooth Bullet at Hidden Haven Ranch in North Fort Myers as they were doing tricks and practicing for the next Southwest Florida dressage show. They’ll be judged there for a series of moves. “Let me show you what my horse can do. That’s the essence of it,” said Watson.When Watson and Smooth Bullet compete on Saturday, Oct. 26, they will officially become a part of the Century Club. That’s when the age of the rider and their horse equals 100. Henry is 82 and Smooth Bullet is 20. “It’s never too late, and that’s what this Century ride is all about,” said Watson.Watson started competing in these shows during his golden years. He bought his first horse at 70 years old. “It was something I always wanted, always dreamed about,” said Watson.Smooth Bullet has been by his side ever since, even through a couple of hurricanes and a health scare. Last March, Smooth Bullet spent 12 days in the hospital for a colic. “It was like one of my children had a life-threatening situation because, as a retired person, they become your family. They’re not livestock,” said Watson.Now, Bullet is back to being healthy and ready to compete. The competition has kept Watson healthy, too. “Somebody told me this when I was getting ready to retire, and I don’t even remember who it was. He says, ‘You better find something to do, to get involved in. You don’t go home and sit on the couch, or you die.’” said Watson. “That’s why pickleball is so great. It really is. It’s keeping people alive. I don’t like it. I prefer the horses.”
An 82-year-old horseback rider is saddling up for his next competition. If successful, he’ll become a part of an exclusive club of riders.
“Generally speaking, I don’t like people. I like horses,” said Henry Watson.
Hearst sister station WBBH met Watson and his horse Smooth Bullet at Hidden Haven Ranch in North Fort Myers as they were doing tricks and practicing for the next Southwest Florida dressage show. They’ll be judged there for a series of moves. “Let me show you what my horse can do. That’s the essence of it,” said Watson.
When Watson and Smooth Bullet compete on Saturday, Oct. 26, they will officially become a part of the Century Club. That’s when the age of the rider and their horse equals 100. Henry is 82 and Smooth Bullet is 20. “It’s never too late, and that’s what this Century ride is all about,” said Watson.
Watson started competing in these shows during his golden years. He bought his first horse at 70 years old. “It was something I always wanted, always dreamed about,” said Watson.
Smooth Bullet has been by his side ever since, even through a couple of hurricanes and a health scare. Last March, Smooth Bullet spent 12 days in the hospital for a colic.
“It was like one of my children had a life-threatening situation because, as a retired person, they become your family. They’re not livestock,” said Watson.
Now, Bullet is back to being healthy and ready to compete. The competition has kept Watson healthy, too.
“Somebody told me this when I was getting ready to retire, and I don’t even remember who it was. He says, ‘You better find something to do, to get involved in. You don’t go home and sit on the couch, or you die.’” said Watson. “That’s why pickleball is so great. It really is. It’s keeping people alive. I don’t like it. I prefer the horses.”
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
But just because you’re on a tight budget doesn’t mean you’re stuck with your dated décor and dysfunctional layout. There are options, even for those who can’t tap into a steady flow of extra cash. Let’s explore what’s possible.
For many people, the first thought when looking to finance home renovations is a traditional mortgage or a home equity line of credit (HELOC). But for seniors living on a fixed income, this may not be a viable option. Why? Simply put, qualifying for a new mortgage or HELOC typically requires a strong, stable income. When your income is limited to Canada Pension Plan (CPP), Old Age Security (OAC) and Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS), qualifying for new credit can be tough.
Now, what about seniors who set up a HELOC before they retired? If that’s you, you might think you’re in the clear. However, it’s essential to weigh the pros and cons of using a HELOC for home renovations. On the plus side, a HELOC allows you to borrow against your home’s equity, and you typically only pay interest on the amount you use. This can make it a flexible option if you’re planning to do renovations in stages. On the flip side, because HELOCs have variable interest rates, your monthly payment could increase over time. And with limited income, even small increases can hit your budget hard.
Answer a few quick questions to get a personalized quote, whether you’re buying, renewing or refinancing.
If traditional mortgages or HELOCs aren’t in the cards, don’t worry—there are other ways to finance those much-needed home upgrades. Here’s a breakdown of some alternatives:
If you’ve built up some savings in stocks, bonds or other investments, cashing out a portion could be an option. This approach allows you to avoid taking on debt entirely, which is a big plus. However, it’s important to consider the long-term impact on your financial security. Selling investments too soon can reduce your future income and potential growth. Also, depending on how your investments are structured, you might face tax consequences. If you have funds in a tax-free savings account (TFSA), you might consider using those to minimize the tax hit. Always consult with a financial advisor before making any big decisions.
A reverse mortgage allows homeowners aged 55 and up to convert part of their home equity into cash, which can be used to fund renovations. You don’t have to pay back the loan as long as you live in your home, making it a good option when your cash flow is constrained. However, reverse mortgages can be complicated and come with fees. Plus, the loan balance increases over time, which means less equity to pass on to your loved ones or pay for your own long-term care. Still, for seniors who want to stay in their homes as long as possible, this can be a useful tool.
Another option to consider is a personal line of credit, which works like a HELOC but isn’t tied to your home’s equity. You can borrow a certain amount of money, pay it back and borrow again as needed. The main advantage here is flexibility. But like any form of credit, it’s crucial to keep an eye on the interest rate, which can vary depending on your credit score. (Because there’s no collateral, the rate will always be higher than a HELOC’s and your credit limit will likely be lower.) It’s also important to avoid borrowing more than you can afford to repay, as this could lead to financial trouble down the road.
If you’re lucky enough to have family or friends who have money to lend, a private mortgage could be another way to finance your renovations. With a private mortgage, someone you trust lends you money and you agree on the repayment terms. This option can be more flexible and personalized than dealing with a bank or lender, but it’s also important to formalize the agreement to avoid misunderstandings or family tension. As with any financial agreement, make sure both parties are clear about the terms and conditions.
[ad_2]
Sean Cooper
Source link

[ad_1]
It’s important to clarify, Ken, that if you have a minimum RRIF withdrawal with no tax withheld, that does not mean that income is tax-free. When you report your RRIF and other income sources on your tax return for the year, you may still owe tax.
Canada has progressive tax rates so that higher levels of income are taxed at higher rates. For example, in Ontario, the first $12,000 or so you earn has no tax. The next roughly $3,000 has 15% tax. And the next $36,000 of income after that has about 20% tax. The type of income you earn may change these rates, as will tax deductions and credits. But if we kept going to higher incomes, there would be incremental increases in tax rates.
If you have a higher income, your entire income is not taxed at the higher tax rate. Incremental tax rates lead to income being taxed at different rates as you move up through the tax brackets.
This is why retirees tend to have tax owing. If you have a $10,000 pension, you may have no tax withheld at source. But if you have $60,000 of other income, you might owe 30% tax on that pension income.
If you owe more than $3,000 of tax in two consecutive years (or $1,800 in tax for two years in Quebec), the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) (or Revenu Quebec) will start asking you to prepay your tax for the following year. This is called a quarterly income tax installment request.
Installments—along with OAS clawbacks—tend to be the two cursed tax issues for retirees.
You can reduce your installments by requesting higher withholding tax on your CPP, OAS, pension or RRSP/RRIF withdrawals, Ken. This optional tax withholding might be preferable if you would rather not owe tax or prefer to limit your installment requirements. If you can get your withholding tax rate estimated accurately, you may be able to better spend money coming into your bank account because it is all yours, and not accruing a tax liability.
Many retirees do not have sufficient tax withheld by default. So, quarterly tax installments are common at that stage of life. But owing tax does not have to be a given if you prefer to increase your optional withholding tax.
[ad_2]
Jason Heath, CFP
Source link

[ad_1]
California’s public retirement system, also known as CalPERS, confirmed on Thursday its closely reviewing a request to divest from Tesla. Two organizations, the civil rights group Latino Justice and the National Institute for Workers’ Rights, sent the request in a letter to California State Controller Malia Cohen. Part of their reasoning included Elon Musk’s previous comments that diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs should “d-i-e.” “These are serious issues, and we are closely reviewing the details of the letter,” said CalPERS spokesperson James Scullary. “CalPERS believes that the employees of every company in which we invest have the right to a safe and healthy work environment, one in which their fundamental human rights are respected.” “We’ve known about Tesla’s record discrimination against people of color for a while,” said Jason Soloman, the director of the National Institute for Workers’ Rights, in an interview with KCRA. “The CEO, Elon Musk, has tried to get all companies to follow his lead and give up on trying to prevent discrimination through sensible, diversity and inclusion efforts.” “CalPERS leadership has made statements supporting those values, they have publicly committed to advancing those values. But they have to put their money where their values are,” Soloman added. Musk has not commented on the request. The divestment request also comes as Musk continues to quarrel with the state of California, this time over the Coastal Commission’s decision to block his Space X rocket company from launching on the central coast. Members of the commission allegedly raised concerns about Space X’s employment practices and other political-related issues. See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter
California’s public retirement system, also known as CalPERS, confirmed on Thursday its closely reviewing a request to divest from Tesla.
Two organizations, the civil rights group Latino Justice and the National Institute for Workers’ Rights, sent the request in a letter to California State Controller Malia Cohen.
Part of their reasoning included Elon Musk’s previous comments that diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs should “d-i-e.”
“These are serious issues, and we are closely reviewing the details of the letter,” said CalPERS spokesperson James Scullary. “CalPERS believes that the employees of every company in which we invest have the right to a safe and healthy work environment, one in which their fundamental human rights are respected.”
“We’ve known about Tesla’s record discrimination against people of color for a while,” said Jason Soloman, the director of the National Institute for Workers’ Rights, in an interview with KCRA. “The CEO, Elon Musk, has tried to get all companies to follow his lead and give up on trying to prevent discrimination through sensible, diversity and inclusion efforts.”
“CalPERS leadership has made statements supporting those values, they have publicly committed to advancing those values. But they have to put their money where their values are,” Soloman added.
Musk has not commented on the request.
The divestment request also comes as Musk continues to quarrel with the state of California, this time over the Coastal Commission’s decision to block his Space X rocket company from launching on the central coast.
Members of the commission allegedly raised concerns about Space X’s employment practices and other political-related issues.
See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
Registered education savings plans (RESPs) are used to save for a child’s post-secondary education. Contributing to an RESP can give you access to government grants, including up to $7,200 in Canada Education Savings Grants (CESGs), typically requiring $36,000 of eligible contributions. The federal government provides matching grants of 20% on the first $2,500 in annual contributions. You can catch up on shortfalls from previous years, to a maximum of $2,500 of annual catch-up contributions. But there is a lifetime limit of $50,000 for contributions for a beneficiary.
If a child is a teenager and there are a lot of missed contributions, the year-end could be a prompt to catch up before it’s too late. The deadline to contribute and be eligible for government grants is December 31 of the year that a child turns 17. And you need at least $2,000 of lifetime contributions, or at least four years with contributions of at least $100 by the end of the year a beneficiary turns 15, to receive CESGs in years that the beneficiary is 16 or 17.
Year-end may also be a prompt for withdrawals. The original contributions to an RESP can be withdrawn tax-free by taking post-secondary education (PSE) withdrawals. When investment growth and government grants are withdrawn for a child enrolled in eligible post-secondary schooling, they are called educational assistance payments (EAPs) and are taxable. If a child has a low income this year, taking additional EAP withdrawals from a large RESP may be a good way to use up their tax-free basic personal amount.
If you’re considering registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) contributions to bring down your taxable income, year-end does not bring any urgency. You have 60 days after the end of the year to make contributions that can be deducted on your tax return for the previous year.
If you are retired or semi-retired, year-end is a time to consider additional RRSP or registered retirement income fund (RRIF) withdrawals. If you are in a low tax bracket, and you expect to be in a higher tax bracket in the future, you could consider taking more RRSP or RRIF withdrawals before year-end.
If you are 64, you may want to consider converting your RRSP to a RRIF so that withdrawals in the year you turn 65 can be eligible for pension income splitting. This allows you to move up to 50% of your withdrawals onto your spouse’s or common-law partner’s tax return. If you are still working or you have variable income, this approach may not be best, since RRIF withdrawals are required every year thereafter.
If you are 71, the end of the year does bring some urgency, because your RRSP needs to be converted to a RRIF by the end of the year you turn 71. You can also buy an annuity from an insurance company. You will typically be contacted before year-end by the financial institution where your RRSP is held to open a RRIF.
For those investing or saving in a tax-free savings account (TFSA), year-end is not a significant event. TFSA room carries forward to the following year, so if you do not contribute by year-end, you can contribute the unused amount next year.
[ad_2]
Jason Heath, CFP
Source link

[ad_1]
While enthusiasm may be necessary for great accomplishments elsewhere, on Wall Street it almost invariably leads to disaster.
—Benjamin Graham
Results of a survey of Canadians older than 55 conducted in June 2022.
| I have delayed (or plan to delay) my retirement because… | |
|---|---|
| I don’t have enough savings/investments | 62% |
| Rising inflation/cost of living this year | 54% |
| I have too much debt | 40% |
| My children still require financial support | 26% |
| I love my job too much to quit | 23% |
| The COVID-19 pandemic | 21% |
| I am taking care of my partner/spouse | 13% |
| I am taking care of my partner or other family member | 10% |
The goal of this chapter is education, which, in my mind, is key to eliminating fear of the future. So, let’s look at some of these risks and what can be done to plan for each one.
When people think of the word “inflation,” they naturally recognize it as an economic term. Inflation affects all aspects of our economy, and we’ll talk about this shortly. However, lifestyle inflation is just as important to discuss.
Think about this. You have been working for a particular company for several years, and you just got hired by another business that pays you a lot more; in fact, your take-home pay has increased 30 percent overnight.
The first thing you do is think of how you are going to spend that extra money: a new car, a larger home or apartment, a vacation, new clothes—the list is endless.
Lifestyle inflation is a simple equation that most people follow: The more you earn, the more you spend. It is termed “lifestyle inflation” because one’s standard of living goes up in relation to the income earned.
The problem is that people tend to spend like there is no tomorrow instead of saving for tomorrow. And in doing so, they shortchange their financial future.
For example, if you were to spend $500 of extra pay from your new job, you could cost yourself literally years of extra work. Consider that investing $500/month over ten years at an annualized 5% rate of return would net an extra $75,000.
[ad_2]
Francis Gingras Roy, CIM
Source link

[ad_1]
If the RRIF is not set up this way, there will be immediate tax consequences, and the estate wishes of your husband may not play out as intended.
When a partner dies, the full amount of their RRIF will be added to their other income for the year and taxed at the current rate. For example, Shearer, if your husband is in Ontario and has an annual taxable income of $50,000, he would pay about $5,800 in tax, based on his marginal tax rate.
If were to die on December 31 of this year, with $300,000 in his RRIF, his total taxable income will be $350,000. And his estate would pay about $148,000 in tax, again based on his marginal tax rate. An increase of approximately $142,000, almost 50% of the value of his RRIF.
If no beneficiary or successor owner is named within the will nor RRIF documents, the RRIF proceeds will pass through the estate and will be subject to estate administration tax. If there’s a beneficiary who’s not a qualifying survivor, which I will explain later, the RRIF proceeds will pass to them tax-free, and the estate will pay the tax.
To help yourself understand that, think about what would happen if your husband has children from a first marriage. Using the $300,000 RRIF example above, the children would receive its proceeds tax-free, and your husband’s estate, possibly you, must come up with the money to pay the tax. If this is your husband’s second marriage (or yours), or either of you want to divide your assets unequally amongst your beneficiaries, make sure you understand the tax consequences you are putting on the estate and your surviving partner.
You can reduce or eliminate the tax on income from a RRIF upon your death by leaving it to a qualifying survivor. A qualifying survivor can be a:
The first one is you, Shearer. So, you’re not going to pay tax on the RRIF, if your husband passes and you succeed him. You become the owner of his RRIF or the money goes into your RRSP or RRIF.
Canadians can name a spouse as either the beneficiary or successor owner of their RRIF. As a beneficiary, Shearer, you have the choice of either paying out the RRIF to your registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) and/or RRIF or taking the cash. If you take the cash or investments in kind, the RRIF value will be included with your husband’s other income for the year, as described above.
[ad_2]
Allan Norman, MSc, CFP, CIM
Source link

[ad_1]
Many Canadian employers see DB plans, where retirees receive a guaranteed payout every month (sometimes indexed to inflation), as too expensive. And while the average time spent working for the same employer has actually risen over the last five decades, according to Statistics Canada data, spending a lifetime at one job—and collecting decades of pensionable earnings in the process—is a rarity these days.
“My dad worked for a bank for 35 years. That was the only job he ever had,” says Kenneth Doll, a fee-only Certified Financial Planner based in Calgary. “Those days are gone.”
Many Canadians must make do on partial pension coverage: either a small pension based on a decade or so of service, a defined (DC) contribution plan—where employers don’t provide backup funding if a plan underperforms—or a group registered retirement savings plan (RRSP), possibly with matching funding from their employer. Some Canadians don’t have a pension at all. “There is a massive decrease over the past 30 years in the number of defined-benefit pensions,” says Adam Chapman, financial planner and founder of YESmoney in London, Ont.
These pensions won’t pay all the bills like a traditional defined-benefit plan. So, what can people with insufficient pension coverage do? Ultimately, the answer lies in balancing the small (or not so small) guaranteed income from a pension and pushing the limits of other income streams.
Every Canadian’s circumstances are different, and financial planners avoid speaking in generalities. But the earlier you start planning for retirement, the better. This applies whether you have nothing except the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS), a DB plan indexed to inflation and guaranteed for life, or something in between.
First of all, sit down and figure out how much you plan to spend on life in retirement. Joseph Curry, a financial planner and president of Matthews Associates in Peterborough, Ont., says that when clients come to him, he maps out these details—as well as their expected income from CPP and OAS. All other income sources, including any pension income, are thrown in there, too.
“We have clients who would spend as little as, you know, $2,000 a month, all-inclusive,” Curry says. “And we have clients who would be spending in excess of $200,000 a year in retirement.”
One trick that works well is to max out any RRSP contribution room, then take the tax savings and throw them into a tax-free savings account (TFSA) for future retirement income. This can be tricky for Canadians with existing pensions, because their own and their employer’s pension contributions are deducted from their RRSP contribution room. For robust defined-benefit plans like the Ontario government’s Public Sector Pension Plan, it can remove thousands of dollars worth of contribution room a year.
[ad_2]
Brennan Doherty
Source link

[ad_1]
His career began in 1995 spending two years as a life insurance agent and two years at a bank before forming Atlantis Financial Inc. Over those years he has developed his three-step interactive approach to financial planning: life planning, financial planning, followed by financial advice around tax, investments, and insurance.
In his experience an interactive collaborative approach is much more effective than collecting your information, going away and preparing your plan, and then presenting you with the plan. Chances are it is not your plan because you weren’t there when it was created, and you won’t absorb much.
When Norman is not working, he plays ping pong, sails, skis, zips off to Miami or travels with his kids. A mild brain injury prevents his wife from travel.
If you want to experience financial planning, feel free to reach out to schedule a complimentary zoom meeting where Norman will find out more about you and what you want to achieve. After about an hour you will both know if Norman’s approach is right for you.
| Services | • Financial Planning • Investment Planning & Implementation • Insurance Planning & Implementation |
| Specializations | • Estate Planning • Comprehensive Financial Planning • Investment Management |
| Payment Model | • Fees paid by clients based on assets managed by advisor • Fees paid by clients for advice (not based on assets) • Commissions |
| Languages written and spoken | • English |
Financial planning is about helping people get what they want, and I get a lot of satisfaction from assisting people when I can.
I didn’t come into financial planning right away. My first career was land-use planning. Back in the late ’80s, real estate wasn’t booming, so I made the shift to financial planning. A book I read on penny stock investing back in high school got me started.
Behind the scenes, I am data driven and I want to see the evidence supporting my advice.
My approach to planning is based on the simple truth no one can deny: You only have so long to enjoy your money. So how can you make the best use of it?
[ad_2]
Special to MoneySense
Source link

[ad_1]
There is a spousal attribution rule with spousal RRSPs that applies if you take withdrawals within three years of your spouse contributing. This may result in the withdrawals being taxed back to the contributor.
When you combine an RRSP and a spousal RRSP, whether you like it or not, the new account must be a spousal RRSP. As a result, you would typically transfer an RRSP into the existing spousal RRSP.
There are no tax differences between an RRSP and a spousal RRSP for withdrawals, other than the aforementioned attribution rules.
Even if you separate or divorce, your spousal RRSP cannot be converted to a personal RRSP.
As a result, Steve, your wife could combine her RRSP and her spousal RRSP by converting them both to a spousal RRIF. I would be inclined to do this.
Locked-in RRSPs have different withdrawal and consolidation rules than regular and spousal RRSPs. The locking-in provisions of your wife’s locked-in retirement account (LIRA) are meant to prevent large withdrawals. These funds would have come from a pension plan she previously belonged to. Pension money is treated differently from personal retirement savings, such that locked-in accounts have maximum withdrawals as well as minimum withdrawals.
In some provinces, an account holder may be able to unlock their locked-in account if the balance is below a certain threshold. This may apply for your wife, Steve, as you mentioned the account is small. Some provinces also allow a one-time unlocking of a portion of the account when you convert a LIRA to a life income fund (LIF), which is essentially a RRIF equivalent for a LIRA.
As a result, Steve, your wife may be able to get some or all of her LIRA account transferred to the same RRIF as her RRSP and spousal RRSP. If not, she will have to settle for having a RRIF and a LIF.
[ad_2]
Jason Heath, CFP
Source link
[ad_1]
Nearly half of Americans retiring at 65 risk running out of money, Morningstar finds.
Single women face a 55% chance of depleting funds, higher than single men and couples.
Experts advise better tax planning and diversified investments to mitigate retirement risks.
If you’re aiming to retire at the standard age of 65, buckle up because you’re going to want to hear this one.
According to a simulated model that factors in things like changes in health, nursing home costs, and demographics, about 45% of Americans who leave the workforce at 65 are likely to run out of money during retirement.
The model, run by Morningstar’s Center for Retirement and Policy Studies, showed that the risk is higher for single women, who had a 55% chance of running out of money versus 40% for single men and 41% for couples.
The group most susceptible to ending up in this situation are those who didn’t save toward a retirement plan, according to Spencer Look, the center’s associate director. Still, retirement advisors say even those who think they’re prepared aren’t.
It’s a big problem, says JoePat Roop, the president of Belmont Capital Advisors, who has been helping clients set up income streams for their retirement years. What might surprise many is that one of the biggest mistakes people make isn’t so much about how much they save but how they plan around what they save.
To be more specific, Roop says what catches retirees off guard is taxes and the lack of planning around them. Many assume they will be in a lower tax bracket once they stop receiving a paycheck. But from his experience, retirees often remain in the same tax bracket or could even end up in a higher one.
“It’s wrong in so many ways,” Roop said. After retiring, most people’s spending habits either remain the same or go up. When you have more leisure time on your hands, more money goes toward entertainment and travel, especially in the first few years of retirement. The outcome is a higher withdrawal rate, which can push you into a higher tax bracket, he noted.
People spend their careers investing in a 401(k) or an IRA because they allow contributions before taxes. It sounds like a great perk when you can cut your taxes and defer them. The downside is that withdrawals will be taxed.
His solution is to add a Roth IRA, an after-tax account that allows gains to grow tax-free. This way, during a year when you need to withdraw a higher amount, you can resort to that account instead, he noted.
Another big mistake people make is moving money around in an inefficient way that leads them to incur more taxes than they should or lose on future returns. This can include choosing to withdraw a high amount of money from an investment account to pay off a mortgage or buy a house.
“There are rules that the IRS has set up for us, and they’re there to pay the government, not you,” Roop said.
A prime example of a big tax mistake one of Roop’s clients (let’s call him Bob) made recently was liquidating part of an IRA to buy a house.
Bob is a man of modest means retiring this year, Roop said. But a sudden breakup with his girlfriend led him to cash out some of his IRA to buy a house. He decided to withhold the tax, which could have been between $30,000 and $40,000.
“When he told us this, my mouth dropped,” Roop said. “I said, Bob, you had the money for the down payment in another account where there would’ve been no tax, and we were going to roll over your IRA and put it in a tax-deferred account.”
In this case, Roop planned to move money from Bob’s IRA to an annuity that would have paid him a bonus of 10%, or $15,000. The mistake might cost Bob between $45,000 and $55,000, between the owed taxes and the missed bonus.
The lesson: don’t be Bob.
The next big mistake is sequence risk, which is when you withdraw from your portfolio when the stock market is down.
“The S&P 500 has averaged close to 10% for the last 50 years,” Roop said. “And so it’s a true assumption that over the next 50 years, it’ll probably make between nine and 11%. But when people retire, we don’t know the sequence of returns.”
Simply put, if you retire next year with an investment portfolio worth a million dollars and the market drops by 15% that year, you now have $850,000. If you need to withdraw during that time, it will be very difficult to get back to breakeven, Roop said.
It means that owning stocks and bonds isn’t enough diversification. He noted that you must also have something that is principal-protected, such as a CD, fixed annuities, or government bond. This way, you can avoid touching your portfolio during a bad time in the market.
Gil Baumgarten, founder and CEO of Segment Wealth Management, says another big reason he sees people run out of money is the lack of appropriate risk-taking they make during their income-earning years.
A low-risk approach is earning interest on cash, a terrible form of compounding because it’s taxed higher as ordinary income with lower returns, he noted. Meanwhile, stocks could see higher returns and aren’t taxed until sold, or aren’t taxed at all if you opt for a Roth IRA.
“People don’t take into account how expensive things get over time, not realizing that they can live another 40 years in retirement. You can’t get rich investing your money at 5%,” Baumgarten said.
As for those who do take risks, it’s often the wrong kind. They chase hype and bet on highly speculative investments. They end up losing money and assume risk is bad, Baumgarten said. The right kind of risk is a higher exposure to stocks through mutual funds or index funds and even buying blue chip stocks, he noted.
Read the original article on Business Insider
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
One of the most painful issues dividing labor and management in the strike at Boeing is the loss of the traditional pension plan for union members in 2014.
The dispute has echoes of past labor disputes at Boeing, and at other companies, where workers have lost what used to be a key part of their retirement security. Employers have made, and won, demands to shift the risks associated with their workers’ retirements from their own bottom lines, to the retirees themselves.
Now unions are pushing back, demanding the return of traditional pension plans their members lost in past concession deals. That’s one of the reasons 33,000 members of the International Association of Machinists went on strike Friday after 95% voted against the tentative labor deal that would have increased the money Boeing paid into their 401(k) but would not have restored the traditional pension plan they lost 10 years ago. Restoring pension plans was an initially stated goal of the IAM, but they were not in the deal reached and rejected last week.
Jon Holden, the president of the largest union local at Boeing, said right after the vote to go on strike Thursday night that it wasn’t any one issue, but that “I know that many members haven’t healed from that wound” of losing the pension plans.
But the fact is that the traditional pension plans, once a staple of the retirement of many workers, have become exceedingly rare in the modern American workplace. And once a company drops traditional pensions plans to shift employees to a 401(k) type of retirement account, they are almost always gone for good.
While other unions have also sought to have lost pension plans restored, as the United Auto Workers union did during its successful strike at General Motors, Ford and Stellantis last fall, no American union has ever succeeded in bringing them back. Even though the auto strike produced a deal with record pay raises and other gains for the UAW, it did not restore pension plans to workers hired since 2007.
Employers frequently argue that employees and retirees can be better off with a 401(k) type of retirement plan, especially if their investments do well. During the UAW strike at the three unionized American automakers last fall, Ford CFO John Lawler called the traditional pension plans being sought by the union “a plan of the past.”
The types of retirement plan available for American workers basically fall into two categories. First, a traditional pension plan that pays retirees, or their survivors, a fixed amount of money every month until they die, known as a defined benefit plan. The other is an individual retirement account, such as a 401(k) plan, in which the employer makes contributions, typically matching a portion of a worker’s own pre-tax contributions to the accounts. Those are known as defined contribution plans. In that case, retirees can decide about the amount withdrawn from the account, as frequently as they want — at least until they run out of assets.
Defined benefit plans are only available to about 8% of workers at US businesses today, according to data from the Employee Benefit Research Institute, down from 39% in 1980. The decline has greatly mirrored the decline in union membership at businesses, from about 17% in 1983 to 6% in 2023.
Meanwhile, individual retirement accounts such as 401(k) plans have risen from only 19% of business employees to 50% today. In fact almost all private sector workers covered under traditional pension plans also have access to some kind of defined contribution plan as well. Far less than 1% have only a traditional pension plan.
One of the few remaining sectors of the economy where pensions dominate is government work. Traditional pension plans are still available for about 80% of public sector workers who work at some level of government, said Craig Copeland, director of wealth benefits research at EBRI. But even in those cases, the pension benefits aren’t as good as they used to be, he said.
Rank-and-file union membership at Boeing only narrowly approved new contract terms in 2014 that took away pensions for anyone hired after the contract ratification and froze benefits that members had already accrued in the plan.
They did so because Boeing had threatened to build its next jet, the 777X, at an out-of-state nonunion plant it said it was considering, if the deal was not passed. The members voted 2-to-1 to reject a similar offer the previous fall, then approved the offer in a second vote by with only 51% voting in favor.
Boeing soon moved to end traditional pensions for its nonunion workers as well.
The loss of that pension plan 10 years ago is a major reason rank-and-file members at Boeing nearly unamimously rejected the tentative agreement put on the table this time, even with the company offer increasing its contributions to the 401(k) plans by up to $10,800 a year.
“The company absolutely needs to address the issue of retirement security. The offer on the table didn’t go anywhere near what our members expect and demand,” said Brian Bryant, the international president of the IAM, in an interview Wednesday with CNN.
Bryant stopped short of saying that only a return of the traditional defined benefit pension plan would satisfy members though, although he added, “They’re definitely going to have to show something of the same value to workers as the defined benefit plans.”
Employers prefer 401(k) types of retirement plans, rather than the traditional pensions because it shifts the risks from the company to the workers. Under those pension plans the company agrees to make contributions into the plans, and those contributions are used to buy assets such as stocks and bonds. The contributions and the return on those assets are used to pay the benefits that are promised to the retirees. If returns are good, a company might not need to make additional contributions. But if plan assets lose value, the employer needs to come up with the additional contribution to pay the promised pension benefit.
But in plans such as a 401(k), those contributions, and the pay-outs, and the risk of the market, are entirely on the individual. If the value of retirement savings and investments in a 401(k) fall in value, the worker is the one who loses out, even if they’ve made steady contributions throughout their working life. Also, a retiree can outlive their assets in a defined contribution retirement account, whereas under a defined benefit plan, the plan has an obligation to pay only as long as the recipient, or a survivor in some cases, keeps living.
One other advantage of traditional pension plans in the private sector is that if the employer goes bankrupt and the plan doesn’t have the assets to pay benefits, the benefits are guaranteed by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. The PBGC is a premium-supported agency similar to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which backs bank deposits for customers.
The one example of a company that reopened a closed pension plan was IBM last year, but that wasn’t part of a labor negotiation. Instead, it was the result of a growth of assets in the pension plan that still existed for those hired before the plan closed to new participants in 2005 and had its benefits “frozen” for existing participants in 2008.
“With the market going up, it became greatly overfunded,” said Copeland. “If you take the assets of a defined benefit plant, it’s almost taxed at almost a 100% rate. So, you have to somehow use it within the plan. One way they could do it is by reopening the plan.”
But that move wasn’t part of a labor negotiations. Instead, it was a unilateral move by IBM.
“IBM is continually making improvements to how we support employee financial wellbeing,” said IBM in a statement when asked about the move.
But the deck is stacked against that kind of reopening of a pension plan at Boeing, even with “pension or bust” signs on the current picket lines. So even if the loss of the pension plan is one of the reasons for 33,000 union members being on strike, history says they’ll likely return to work without getting that demand satisfied.
For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com
[ad_2]

[ad_1]
NEW YORK (WABC) — It was a bittersweet night for us at WABC, as we honored someone who has been at the station for decades.
Employees gathered for a retirement party to celebrate Art Moore on Wednesday night.
You probably know Art from his appearances on “Live with Kelly and Mark,’ but he’s been an integral part of our team behind the scenes serving as our Vice President of Programming.
Art has been a part of the ABC family for 53 years. He joined us here at WABC in 1989.
He began his career at WKBW-TV in Buffalo, New York when ABC was known as Capital Cities/ABC.
He then worked as the director of programming at WPVI in Philadelphia for many years before joining WABC.
As head of programming, he has played a role in countless series and specials that helped shape WABC’s identity and the station’s enduring relationship with viewers.
Kelly and Mark will honor Art for the rest of this week — with a special celebration on Friday.
You can watch ‘Live with Kelly and Mark’ every weekday at 9 a.m. on ABC 7.
Copyright © 2024 WABC-TV. All Rights Reserved.
[ad_2]
WABC
Source link

[ad_1]
The difficulties facing newcomers to Canada with respect to retirement planning are particularly acute. Given how Canada’s immigration points system works, economic immigrants are usually in their late 20s or early 30s—and they face unique challenges:
But there’s good news. As Toronto-based financial advisor Jason Pereira points out, “Canada’s retirement system does not discriminate against newcomers. The rules are the same for everybody.” So, with the right knowledge and expertise, you can work towards building a strong retirement plan.
To plan for retirement, you need to know:
This table illustrates the types of income you could have in retirement. The amounts used in the table are hypothetical estimates. (To estimate your retirement income, try the various tools linked to above.)
| Amount (today’s value) | Amount (inflation adjusted) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Amount needed | $52,500 | $127,400 |
| B | Government pension and aid payouts (CPP, OAS, GIS) |
$22,000 | $53,400 |
| C | Employer-sponsored pension plan (group RRSP) |
$8,000 | $19,400 |
| D | B + C | $30,000 | $72,800 |
| E | Shortfall (A – D) | $22,500 | $54,600 |
| F | Needed value of investments in the year of retirement (E divided by 4%, based on the 4% rule) | $562,500 | $1,365,000 |
| G | Needed flat/constant monthly investment amount from now to retirement | $969 |
In the example above, the person faces an annual shortfall of $22,500. In other words, this person needs to generate an additional $22,500 per year to meet their retirement income needs, after accounting for the typical government pension or aid payouts and their employer-sponsored retirement plan. To do this, they’d need to invest about $969 per month, assuming an 8% annual rate of return from now to retirement 30 years later. How could they fill this gap and meet their shortfall? Enter self-directed investments, real estate and small-business income.
An obvious and tax-efficient way to cover your retirement income shortfall is to build your own investment portfolio from which to draw income in your retirement years. These investments can be held in registered or non-registered accounts. Registered accounts, such as the TFSA and RRSP, offer useful tax advantages—such as a tax deduction and/or tax-free or tax-sheltered gains, depending on the account—but the amount you can contribute to these accounts is limited. Non-registered accounts have no contribution limits but offer no tax advantages.
Newcomers often have lower TFSA and RRSP contribution room compared to their peers because they’ve lived and worked in Canada for a shorter period. “TFSA contribution room starts accruing the year of becoming a resident of Canada,” Forward explains. “RRSP contribution room is based on earned income in the previous year.”
Your TFSA and RRSP contribution room information is available on your Notice of Assessment from the Canada Revenue Agency, which you’ll receive after you file your tax return. To check your TFSA limit, you can also use a TFSA contribution room calculator.
[ad_2]
Aditya Nain
Source link

[ad_1]
Here’s how Canada’s Old Age Security pension program works, who’s eligible for OAS, when you can start receiving OAS,…
[ad_2]
Michael McCullough
Source link

[ad_1]
“If someone’s not lucky enough to have a company pension, it’s that much more crucial for them to be building up savings on their own,” says Millie Gormely, a Certified Financial Planner at IG Wealth Management in Thunder Bay, Ont. “But that’s really hard to do when you’re supporting yourself and your kids, because you’re having to stretch that income that much further.”
As of 2022, there were about 1.84 million single-parent families in Canada, and they face unique financial challenges. For starters, the primary caregiver may be covering more than their share of the responsibility and cost of raising their kids, footing bills for everything from food to clothing and childcare. And, thanks to inflation, we all know the cost of living has gone way up in recent years. Plus, a single parent may also be shouldering the burden of saving for their kids’ education (read about RESP planning), taking on medical expenses and more. And then there’s the fact that single parents tend to have less income to work with in the first place. According to Statistics Canada, lone-parent families with two kids report an average household income that’s only about a third of what dual-earner families of four bring in. (Not half, a third.)
All this financial strain can be a serious hurdle to retirement planning, but it doesn’t mean it’s impossible to save for your future.
The first step is to identify your long-term goals (consulting a financial planner can help with this part). You’ll want to figure out your desired income in retirement and how much saving you’ll need to do to reach your goal. The next step is to take a hard look at your spending habits and your budget to find funds you can set aside for your retirement.
You may wish to review past bank and credit card statements to get a clear picture of what you’re spending on essentials (which can include rent, groceries, transportation and daycare). You’ll also want to get a clear picture of your debts like credit card balances, personal lines of credit and mortgage instalments to help you identify your fixed costs. All of this will help you figure out a budget you can live with—and what you have left over for retirement savings.
If what’s left isn’t much, don’t despair. Even a small monthly savings will help you in the long run, says Gormely. “Contributing something rather than nothing on a regular basis is going to put you so much further ahead than if you just throw up your hands,” she says.
You may have more options than you realize. A registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) is a long-term investing account that is registered with the Canadian federal government and helps you save for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. It allows for plenty of room to help your money grow. For example, your RRSP contribution limit for 2024 is equal to 18% of your 2023 earned income (or $31,560, whichever is lower). You also can tap into unused contribution room from past years.
A tax-free savings account (TFSA) is another option. Like an RRSP, a TFSA can hold any combination of eligible investment vehicles, including stocks, bonds, cash and more, and the growth will be tax-sheltered. “In general, for someone at a lower income level, they might be better off maxing out their TFSA first, and then looking at their RRSP as a source of retirement income,” says Gormely.
[ad_2]
Karen Robock
Source link

[ad_1]
Working as a financial planner, I am often asked, “What is the most tax-efficient way to draw down on investments?” From the outset, I question if a decumulation plan based on tax efficiency is the best use of someone’s money. I wonder whether it is even possible to design “the best” long-term, tax-efficient withdrawal strategy.
I have modelled many different combinations of withdrawal strategies, such as RRSP first, non-registered first, blending the two, depleting registered retirement income funds (RRIFs) by age 90, dividends from a holding company, integrating tax-free savings accounts (TFSAs), and so on. In most cases, there is no significant difference to the estate over a 25- or 30-year retirement period, with the odd exception.
You may have read articles suggesting the right withdrawal strategy can have a major impact on your retirement. The challenge when reading these articles is you don’t know the underlying assumptions. For example, if the planner is using a 5% annual return, is it all interest income and fully taxable? What is the mix of interest, dividends, foreign dividends, capital gains and turnover rate that makes up the 5% return? There is no standard all planners use, which leads to confusion and can make things seem more complicated than they need to be.
Here is my approach to designing a decumulation plan. First, think about my opening. You have about 20 years of active living left to get the most out of your money. What do you want to do? Twenty years from now, do you want to look back on your life and say, “I sure was tax-efficient,” or would you rather say, “I had a great time, I did this and that and I helped…” I write this because it is not uncommon for me to see people be too restrictive on their spending in the name of tax efficiency, or not wanting or having the confidence to draw down their investments when they could.
Stop thinking decumulation; that puts the focus on the money. Instead, think spending. How do you want to spend your money? I know you can’t predict over 20 years, so focus on this year. How can you make this a fantastic year while living within your means? Do you even know the limit to your means?
Now prepare an expense sheet so you can see where you are spending your money and where you want to spend it. This is where a financial planner with sophisticated software can help. Have your expenses modelled and projected over time. Will your income and assets support your ideal lifestyle or even allow you to enhance your lifestyle?
Once you have a spending plan supported by your income and assets, do the projections showing different withdrawal strategies. You need the spending plan first, because the amount and timing of your spending dictates the withdrawal plan. Plus, detailing your spending gives you a better view behind the curtain to see the impact of spending amounts and frequency on tax and capital changes of different withdrawals. What does spending on things like vehicles, special vacations and renovations mean?
I suspect that as you work through this exercise, ideally with a planner capable of using sophisticated software, you will see that the withdrawal order doesn’t matter too much and can be easily influenced by various assumptions. If that is your result, you are in a good position. It allows you to manage your affairs so you are tax-efficient each year.
[ad_2]
Allan Norman, MSc, CFP, CIM
Source link