ReportWire

Tag: retirement planning

  • What is Sun Life’s new decumulation product? – MoneySense

    What is Sun Life’s new decumulation product? – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    A Canadian retiree’s main decision with this Sun Life product is the age they want the funds to last until (the maturity age). They can choose from 85, 90, 95 or 100 (or select a few with a combination of ages); but they can also start drawing down as early as age 50. Sun Life recalculates the client payments annually, at the start of each year, based on the account’s balance. That has the firm looking at the total amount invested, payment frequency, number of years remaining before the selected maturity age, estimated annual rate of return (expected return is 5.5% but a conservative 4.5% rate is used in the calculations) and any annual applicable regulatory minimums and maximums.

    Birenbaum says holders of MyRetirementIncome can arrange transfers to their bank accounts anywhere from biweekly to annually. While the payment amount isn’t guaranteed, they can expect what Sun Life calls a “steady income” to maturity age, so the payment isn’t expected to change much from year to year. If the client’s circumstances change, they can alter the maturity date or payment frequency at any time. While not available inside registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs), most other account types are accommodated, including registered retirement income funds (RRIFs), life income funds (LIFs), tax-free savings accounts (TFSAs) and open (taxable) accounts.

    Compare the best RRSP rates in Canada

    Emphasis on simplicity and flexibility

    In a telephone interview, Eric Monteiro, Sun Life’s senior vice president of group retirement services, said, in MyRetirementIncome’s initial implementation, most investments will be in RRIFs. He expects that many will use it as one portion of a retirement portfolio, although some may use it 100%. Initial feedback from Canadian advisors, consultants and plan sponsors has been positive, he says, especially about its flexibility and consistency. 

    As said above, unlike life annuities, the return is not guaranteed, but Monteiro says “that’s the only question mark.” Sun Life looked at the competitive landscape and decided to focus on simplicity and flexibility, “precisely because these others did not take off as expected.” The all-in fee management expense ratio (MER) is 2.09% for up to $300,000 in assets, but then it falls to 1.58% beyond that. Monteiro says the fee is “in line with other actively managed products.”

    Birenbaum lists the pros to be simplicity and accessibility, with limited input needed from clients, who “simply decide the age to which” they want funds to last. The residual balance isn’t lost at death but passes onto a named beneficiary or estate. Every year, the target withdrawal amount is calculated based on current market value and time to life expectancy, so drawdowns can be as sustainable as possible. This is helpful if the investor becomes unable to competently manage investments in old age and doesn’t have a trusted power of attorney to assist them. 

    As for cons, Birenbaum says that it’s currently available only to existing Sun Life Group Retirement Plan members. “A single fund may not be optimal for such a huge range of client needs, risk tolerance and time horizons.” In her experience, “clients tend to underestimate life expectancy” leaving them exposed to longevity risk. To her, Sun Life’s approach seems overly simplistic: you “can’t replace a comprehensive financial plan in terms of estimating sustainable level of annual draws with this product.” 

    In short, there is “a high cost for Sun Life doing a bit of math on behalf of clients… This is a way for Sun Life to retain group RRSP savings when their customers retire … to put small accounts on automatic pilot supported by a call centre, and ultimately, a chatbot. For a retiree with no other investments, it’s a simple way to initiate a retirement income.”

    However, “anyone with a great wealth advisor who provides planning as well as investment management can do better than this product,” Birenbaum says. “For those without advisors, a simple low-cost balanced fund or ETF in a discount brokerage will save the client more than 1% a year in fees in exchange for doing a little annual math.”

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Chevreau

    Source link

  • How to plan for taxes in retirement in Canada – MoneySense

    How to plan for taxes in retirement in Canada – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    The impact of your marginal tax rate

    It’s important to clarify, Ken, that if you have a minimum RRIF withdrawal with no tax withheld, that does not mean that income is tax-free. When you report your RRIF and other income sources on your tax return for the year, you may still owe tax.

    Canada has progressive tax rates so that higher levels of income are taxed at higher rates. For example, in Ontario, the first $12,000 or so you earn has no tax. The next roughly $3,000 has 15% tax. And the next $36,000 of income after that has about 20% tax. The type of income you earn may change these rates, as will tax deductions and credits. But if we kept going to higher incomes, there would be incremental increases in tax rates.

    If you have a higher income, your entire income is not taxed at the higher tax rate. Incremental tax rates lead to income being taxed at different rates as you move up through the tax brackets.

    This is why retirees tend to have tax owing. If you have a $10,000 pension, you may have no tax withheld at source. But if you have $60,000 of other income, you might owe 30% tax on that pension income.

    Getting ahead of tax installment requests

    If you owe more than $3,000 of tax in two consecutive years (or $1,800 in tax for two years in Quebec), the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) (or Revenu Quebec) will start asking you to prepay your tax for the following year. This is called a quarterly income tax installment request.

    Installments—along with OAS clawbacks—tend to be the two cursed tax issues for retirees.

    You can reduce your installments by requesting higher withholding tax on your CPP, OAS, pension or RRSP/RRIF withdrawals, Ken. This optional tax withholding might be preferable if you would rather not owe tax or prefer to limit your installment requirements. If you can get your withholding tax rate estimated accurately, you may be able to better spend money coming into your bank account because it is all yours, and not accruing a tax liability.

    The choice is yours

    Many retirees do not have sufficient tax withheld by default. So, quarterly tax installments are common at that stage of life. But owing tax does not have to be a given if you prefer to increase your optional withholding tax.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Heath, CFP

    Source link

  • What to do with a small pension in Canada – MoneySense

    What to do with a small pension in Canada – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Many Canadian employers see DB plans, where retirees receive a guaranteed payout every month (sometimes indexed to inflation), as too expensive. And while the average time spent working for the same employer has actually risen over the last five decades, according to Statistics Canada data, spending a lifetime at one job—and collecting decades of pensionable earnings in the process—is a rarity these days. 

    “My dad worked for a bank for 35 years. That was the only job he ever had,” says Kenneth Doll, a fee-only Certified Financial Planner based in Calgary. “Those days are gone.” 

    Many Canadians must make do on partial pension coverage: either a small pension based on a decade or so of service, a defined (DC) contribution plan—where employers don’t provide backup funding if a plan underperforms—or a group registered retirement savings plan (RRSP), possibly with matching funding from their employer. Some Canadians don’t have a pension at all. “There is a massive decrease over the past 30 years in the number of defined-benefit pensions,” says Adam Chapman, financial planner and founder of YESmoney in London, Ont. 

    These pensions won’t pay all the bills like a traditional defined-benefit plan. So, what can people with insufficient pension coverage do? Ultimately, the answer lies in balancing the small (or not so small) guaranteed income from a pension and pushing the limits of other income streams. 

    How to plan your retirement now

    Every Canadian’s circumstances are different, and financial planners avoid speaking in generalities. But the earlier you start planning for retirement, the better. This applies whether you have nothing except the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS), a DB plan indexed to inflation and guaranteed for life, or something in between. 

    First of all, sit down and figure out how much you plan to spend on life in retirement. Joseph Curry, a financial planner and president of Matthews Associates in Peterborough, Ont., says that when clients come to him, he maps out these details—as well as their expected income from CPP and OAS. All other income sources, including any pension income, are thrown in there, too. 

    “We have clients who would spend as little as, you know, $2,000 a month, all-inclusive,” Curry says. “And we have clients who would be spending in excess of $200,000 a year in retirement.” 

    One trick that works well is to max out any RRSP contribution room, then take the tax savings and throw them into a tax-free savings account (TFSA) for future retirement income. This can be tricky for Canadians with existing pensions, because their own and their employer’s pension contributions are deducted from their RRSP contribution room. For robust defined-benefit plans like the Ontario government’s Public Sector Pension Plan, it can remove thousands of dollars worth of contribution room a year. 

    [ad_2]

    Brennan Doherty

    Source link

  • How to consolidate your registered accounts for retirement income in Canada – MoneySense

    How to consolidate your registered accounts for retirement income in Canada – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    There is a spousal attribution rule with spousal RRSPs that applies if you take withdrawals within three years of your spouse contributing. This may result in the withdrawals being taxed back to the contributor.

    When you combine an RRSP and a spousal RRSP, whether you like it or not, the new account must be a spousal RRSP. As a result, you would typically transfer an RRSP into the existing spousal RRSP. 

    There are no tax differences between an RRSP and a spousal RRSP for withdrawals, other than the aforementioned attribution rules. 

    Even if you separate or divorce, your spousal RRSP cannot be converted to a personal RRSP. 

    As a result, Steve, your wife could combine her RRSP and her spousal RRSP by converting them both to a spousal RRIF. I would be inclined to do this. 

    Combining LIRAs with other registered accounts

    Locked-in RRSPs have different withdrawal and consolidation rules than regular and spousal RRSPs. The locking-in provisions of your wife’s locked-in retirement account (LIRA) are meant to prevent large withdrawals. These funds would have come from a pension plan she previously belonged to. Pension money is treated differently from personal retirement savings, such that locked-in accounts have maximum withdrawals as well as minimum withdrawals. 

    In some provinces, an account holder may be able to unlock their locked-in account if the balance is below a certain threshold. This may apply for your wife, Steve, as you mentioned the account is small. Some provinces also allow a one-time unlocking of a portion of the account when you convert a LIRA to a life income fund (LIF), which is essentially a RRIF equivalent for a LIRA. 

    As a result, Steve, your wife may be able to get some or all of her LIRA account transferred to the same RRIF as her RRSP and spousal RRSP. If not, she will have to settle for having a RRIF and a LIF. 

    [ad_2]

    Jason Heath, CFP

    Source link

  • New to Canada and no pension: How to save for your retirement – MoneySense

    New to Canada and no pension: How to save for your retirement – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    The difficulties facing newcomers to Canada with respect to retirement planning are particularly acute. Given how Canada’s immigration points system works, economic immigrants are usually in their late 20s or early 30s—and they face unique challenges:

    1. Depleted savings: If you’re a 30-year-old newcomer, chances are you’ve used a large portion—if not all—of your savings to set up your new life in Canada. So, you’re behind in the retirement savings game. If retirement savings were a 100-metre race, lifelong Canadians have a 20- to 30-metre head start over newcomers.
    2. Lower income: If you’re a newcomer to Canada, you’ve probably had to restart your career a few rungs lower on the corporate ladder because of your lack of Canadian work experience. This means you’re not earning as much as others your age who have similar experience. Consequently, your ability to save for retirement is lower.
    3. Lack of knowledge: You need to understand Canada’s financial and tax systems to maximize its retirement planning opportunities, and gathering this knowledge takes time.
    4. Reduced contributions: Joining the Canadian workforce later in life than their Canadian-born peers, immigrants have fewer years to contribute to the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and build up registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) and tax-free savings account (TFSA) contribution room. For this reason, they rely on less tax-efficient unregistered savings and investment vehicles to sustain their retirements to a greater degree than their neighbours.

    But there’s good news. As Toronto-based financial advisor Jason Pereira points out, “Canada’s retirement system does not discriminate against newcomers. The rules are the same for everybody.” So, with the right knowledge and expertise, you can work towards building a strong retirement plan. 

    How to start retirement planning as an immigrant

    To plan for retirement, you need to know:

    • How much money will you need each month in retirement? The simplest method to estimate your income requirement in retirement is to consider it to be 70% to 80% of your current income. For example, if you earn $75,000 a year today, 70% of that is $52,500—that’s $4,375 per month—in today’s dollars. Alternatively, you could estimate the amount you’d need in retirement using this tool.
    • How much you’ll receive from government pension and aid payments: You need to estimate approximately how much you’ll get from the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and other government programs: Old Age Security (OAS) and the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS). The tool at this link will help you do so. Ayana Forward, an Ottawa-based financial planner, notes that “some home countries for newcomers have social-security agreements with Canada, which can help newcomers reach the eligibility requirements for OAS.”
    • How much you’ll receive from your employer-sponsored retirement plan: Workplaces without a defined benefit pension plan sometimes offer a registered investment account (usually a group RRSP), with contributions made by you and your employer or only your employer. If you have a group RRSP from your employer, what will its estimated future value be at the time of your retirement? You could use a compound interest calculator to find out.
    • How to make up for a shortfall: The CPP, OAS, GIS and your group RRSP likely won’t be enough to fund your retirement. You’ll need to make up for the shortfall through your personal investments or additional sources of income.

    Sample retirement cash flow for a 35-year-old (retirement age 65)

    This table illustrates the types of income you could have in retirement. The amounts used in the table are hypothetical estimates. (To estimate your retirement income, try the various tools linked to above.)

    Amount (today’s value) Amount (inflation adjusted)
    A Amount needed $52,500 $127,400
    B Government pension and aid payouts
    (CPP, OAS, GIS)    		 $22,000 $53,400
    C Employer-sponsored pension plan
    (group RRSP)    		 $8,000 $19,400
    D B + C $30,000 $72,800
    E Shortfall (A – D) $22,500 $54,600
    F Needed value of investments in the year of retirement (E divided by 4%, based on the 4% rule) $562,500 $1,365,000
    G Needed flat/constant monthly investment amount from now to retirement $969

    In the example above, the person faces an annual shortfall of $22,500. In other words, this person needs to generate an additional $22,500 per year to meet their retirement income needs, after accounting for the typical government pension or aid payouts and their employer-sponsored retirement plan. To do this, they’d need to invest about $969 per month, assuming an 8% annual rate of return from now to retirement 30 years later. How could they fill this gap and meet their shortfall? Enter self-directed investments, real estate and small-business income.

    Build your own retirement portfolio

    An obvious and tax-efficient way to cover your retirement income shortfall is to build your own investment portfolio from which to draw income in your retirement years. These investments can be held in registered or non-registered accounts. Registered accounts, such as the TFSA and RRSP, offer useful tax advantages—such as a tax deduction and/or tax-free or tax-sheltered gains, depending on the account—but the amount you can contribute to these accounts is limited. Non-registered accounts have no contribution limits but offer no tax advantages. 

    Newcomers often have lower TFSA and RRSP contribution room compared to their peers because they’ve lived and worked in Canada for a shorter period. “TFSA contribution room starts accruing the year of becoming a resident of Canada,” Forward explains. “RRSP contribution room is based on earned income in the previous year.”

    Your TFSA and RRSP contribution room information is available on your Notice of Assessment from the Canada Revenue Agency, which you’ll receive after you file your tax return. To check your TFSA limit, you can also use a TFSA contribution room calculator.

    [ad_2]

    Aditya Nain

    Source link

  • How to plan for retirement when you have no pension – MoneySense

    How to plan for retirement when you have no pension – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Retirement

    OAS payment dates in 2024, and more to know about Old Age Security

    Here’s how Canada’s Old Age Security pension program works, who’s eligible for OAS, when you can start receiving OAS,…

    [ad_2]

    Michael McCullough

    Source link

  • How to manage as a single parent with no pension – MoneySense

    How to manage as a single parent with no pension – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    “If someone’s not lucky enough to have a company pension, it’s that much more crucial for them to be building up savings on their own,” says Millie Gormely, a Certified Financial Planner at IG Wealth Management in Thunder Bay, Ont. “But that’s really hard to do when you’re supporting yourself and your kids, because you’re having to stretch that income that much further.”

    As of 2022, there were about 1.84 million single-parent families in Canada, and they face unique financial challenges. For starters, the primary caregiver may be covering more than their share of the responsibility and cost of raising their kids, footing bills for everything from food to clothing and childcare. And, thanks to inflation, we all know the cost of living has gone way up in recent years. Plus, a single parent may also be shouldering the burden of saving for their kids’ education (read about RESP planning), taking on medical expenses and more. And then there’s the fact that single parents tend to have less income to work with in the first place. According to Statistics Canada, lone-parent families with two kids report an average household income that’s only about a third of what dual-earner families of four bring in. (Not half, a third.) 

    All this financial strain can be a serious hurdle to retirement planning, but it doesn’t mean it’s impossible to save for your future. 

    Pinpoint your goals

    The first step is to identify your long-term goals (consulting a financial planner can help with this part). You’ll want to figure out your desired income in retirement and how much saving you’ll need to do to reach your goal. The next step is to take a hard look at your spending habits and your budget to find funds you can set aside for your retirement. 

    You may wish to review past bank and credit card statements to get a clear picture of what you’re spending on essentials (which can include rent, groceries, transportation and daycare). You’ll also want to get a clear picture of your debts like credit card balances, personal lines of credit and mortgage instalments to help you identify your fixed costs. All of this will help you figure out a budget you can live with—and what you have left over for retirement savings.

    If what’s left isn’t much, don’t despair. Even a small monthly savings will help you in the long run, says Gormely. “Contributing something rather than nothing on a regular basis is going to put you so much further ahead than if you just throw up your hands,” she says.

    Assess potential sources of retirement income

    You may have more options than you realize. A registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) is a long-term investing account that is registered with the Canadian federal government and helps you save for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. It allows for plenty of room to help your money grow. For example, your RRSP contribution limit for 2024 is equal to 18% of your 2023 earned income (or $31,560, whichever is lower). You also can tap into unused contribution room from past years.

    A tax-free savings account (TFSA) is another option. Like an RRSP, a TFSA can hold any combination of eligible investment vehicles, including stocks, bonds, cash and more, and the growth will be tax-sheltered. “In general, for someone at a lower income level, they might be better off maxing out their TFSA first, and then looking at their RRSP as a source of retirement income,” says Gormely.

    [ad_2]

    Karen Robock

    Source link

  • Which savings should retirees draw down first? – MoneySense

    Which savings should retirees draw down first? – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Working as a financial planner, I am often asked, “What is the most tax-efficient way to draw down on investments?” From the outset, I question if a decumulation plan based on tax efficiency is the best use of someone’s money. I wonder whether it is even possible to design “the best” long-term, tax-efficient withdrawal strategy.  

    I have modelled many different combinations of withdrawal strategies, such as RRSP first, non-registered first, blending the two, depleting registered retirement income funds (RRIFs) by age 90, dividends from a holding company, integrating tax-free savings accounts (TFSAs), and so on. In most cases, there is no significant difference to the estate over a 25- or 30-year retirement period, with the odd exception.

    You may have read articles suggesting the right withdrawal strategy can have a major impact on your retirement. The challenge when reading these articles is you don’t know the underlying assumptions. For example, if the planner is using a 5% annual return, is it all interest income and fully taxable? What is the mix of interest, dividends, foreign dividends, capital gains and turnover rate that makes up the 5% return? There is no standard all planners use, which leads to confusion and can make things seem more complicated than they need to be.

    Think spending, not decumulation

    Here is my approach to designing a decumulation plan. First, think about my opening. You have about 20 years of active living left to get the most out of your money. What do you want to do? Twenty years from now, do you want to look back on your life and say, “I sure was tax-efficient,” or would you rather say, “I had a great time, I did this and that and I helped…” I write this because it is not uncommon for me to see people be too restrictive on their spending in the name of tax efficiency, or not wanting or having the confidence to draw down their investments when they could.

    Stop thinking decumulation; that puts the focus on the money. Instead, think spending. How do you want to spend your money? I know you can’t predict over 20 years, so focus on this year. How can you make this a fantastic year while living within your means? Do you even know the limit to your means? 

    Now prepare an expense sheet so you can see where you are spending your money and where you want to spend it. This is where a financial planner with sophisticated software can help. Have your expenses modelled and projected over time. Will your income and assets support your ideal lifestyle or even allow you to enhance your lifestyle?

    Now do the math

    Once you have a spending plan supported by your income and assets, do the projections showing different withdrawal strategies. You need the spending plan first, because the amount and timing of your spending dictates the withdrawal plan. Plus, detailing your spending gives you a better view behind the curtain to see the impact of spending amounts and frequency on tax and capital changes of different withdrawals. What does spending on things like vehicles, special vacations and renovations mean?

    I suspect that as you work through this exercise, ideally with a planner capable of using sophisticated software, you will see that the withdrawal order doesn’t matter too much and can be easily influenced by various assumptions. If that is your result, you are in a good position. It allows you to manage your affairs so you are tax-efficient each year. 

    [ad_2]

    Allan Norman, MSc, CFP, CIM

    Source link

  • OAS payment dates in 2024, and more to know about Old Age Security – MoneySense

    OAS payment dates in 2024, and more to know about Old Age Security – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    For example, for income year 2023, the threshold amount is $86,912. If your income in 2023 was $120,000, then your repayment would be 15% of $33,088 (the difference between $120,000 and $86,912). That comes out to $4,963.20.

    OAS clawbacks are paid off in 12 monthly payments, starting in July of the following tax year (in this case, 2024) and ending the next June (2025, in this example). This July-through-June period is called the “recovery tax period.” Continuing our example: $4,963.20 divided by 12 is $413.60. That’s how much you would repay each month from July 2024 to June 2025. (See the OAS recovery tax thresholds for income years 2022 and 2024.)

    How can I avoid OAS clawbacks?

    With some planning, it may be possible to reduce or avoid OAS clawbacks. One strategy is splitting pension income with a spouse who has a lower marginal tax rate. Another strategy is to base withdrawals from your registered retirement income fund (RRIF) on the younger spouse’s age—your minimum withdrawals may be lower. Keep in mind that different kinds of investment income are taxed differently, too. (Learn more about how passive income is taxed.) Consider speaking to a financial advisor or tax planner about these and other strategies. 

    What is the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS)?

    The Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) is a part of the OAS program that provides an additional, non-taxable monthly payment to Canadian residents who receive the OAS and whose previous-year income is below a certain threshold. Like OAS, the GIS is indexed to inflation.

    The income threshold changes annually. For example, from July to September in 2024, the threshold is $21,768 for a single person. If your 2023 income was less than that, you may qualify for the GIS. 

    For couples, the maximum income thresholds for combined annual income in 2023 are:

    • $28,752 if your spouse/common-law partner receives the full OAS pension
    • $52,176 if your spouse/common-law partner does not receive OAS
    • $40,272 if your spouse/common-law partner receives the Allowance benefit (a non-taxable payment for Canadians aged 60 to 64 whose partner is eligible for the GIS and your combined income is below the threshold for the Allowance)

    If you don’t receive a letter from the government about the GIS, you can submit an application through a My Service Canada Account or by filling out a paper form and submitting it to Service Canada. You can apply for OAS and the GIS at the same time. Learn more about applying for the GIS.

    [ad_2]

    Keph Senett

    Source link

  • 40 and no pension: What do you do? – MoneySense

    40 and no pension: What do you do? – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    It’s not as big a problem as you might think. The key is to try to mimic the pay-yourself-first approach by setting up an automatic contribution to your registered retirement savings plan (RRSP) to coincide with your payday. A good rule of thumb to strive for is 10% of your gross income. Remember, in most cases the employees blessed with a defined-benefit pension are contributing around the same 10% rate (sometimes more) to their pension plan. You need to match those pensioners stride-for-stride.

    How much to save when you’re 40 and have no pension

    Let’s look at an example of pension-less Johnny, a late starter who prioritized buying a home at age 35 and has not saved a dime for retirement by age 40. Now Johnny is keen to get started and wants to contribute 10% of his $90,000-per-year gross income to invest for retirement.

    He does this for 25 years at an annual return of 6% and amasses nearly $500,000 by the time he turns 65.

    Source: getsmarteraboutmoney.ca

    Keep in mind this doesn’t take any future salary growth into account. For instance, if Johnny’s income increased by 3% annually, and his savings rate continued to be 10% of gross income, the dollar amount of his contributions would climb accordingly each year.

    This subtle change boosts Johnny’s RRSP balance to just over $700,000 at age 65.

    How government programs can help those without a pension

    A $700,000 RRSP—combined with expected benefits from the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS)—is enough to maintain the same standard of living in retirement that Johnny enjoyed during his working years.

    That’s because when his mortgage is paid off, he’s no longer saving for retirement, and he can expect his tax rate to be much lower in retirement.

    40-year-old Johnny spends $40,000 per year, plus mortgage until the mortgage is fully paid off at age 60. Johnny retires at age 65 and continues spending $40,000 per year (inflation-adjusted) until age 95.

    CPP and OAS will add nearly $25,000 per year to Johnny’s annual income (in today’s dollars), if he takes his benefits at age 65. Both are guaranteed benefits that are paid for life and indexed to inflation. 

    [ad_2]

    Robb Engen, QAFP

    Source link

  • Why a reverse mortgage should be a last resort for Canadian retirees – MoneySense

    Why a reverse mortgage should be a last resort for Canadian retirees – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    “This leaves a total outstanding now of $204,939, with the interest owing being 25% of the balance owing after only five years,” says Ardrey. “As time goes on, this can overtake the entire value of the home. Thankfully, they do note that there is no negative equity, but there is not much left at the end of the day for the home owner or their heirs.” 

    Heath points to the fact that reverse mortgage rates tend to be much higher than traditional sources. “A borrower can expect to pay at least a couple percentage points more than mortgages and lines of credit. But if you read the fine print in your home equity line of credit agreement, the lender typically reserves the right to decrease your limit or even call the outstanding balance.”

    So, homeowners should not count on their HELOC being available when they need it.

    Right now, reverse mortgage variable rates are in the 9.5% range, while 5-year variable mortgage rates are about 6% and 5-year fixed mortgage rates are about 5%. HELOC rates are generally 1% above prime, so they’re currently around 7.95%. “There is definitely a premium paid to take advantage of reverse mortgages,” says Heath.  

    Ardrey raises another concern: how retirement living care can be paid for. “Often a home can be sold when a senior moves into retirement living, allowing them to pay for this care. In this example, the ability to use the home for this purpose would be significantly impaired.”

    He suggests that instead of using a reverse mortgage that could cripple the financial future, retirees need to look honestly at their situation and the lifestyle they can afford. “Though it may not be preferable to sell their home and live somewhere else, it may also be their financial reality. This speaks to the value of planning ahead to avoid being house-rich and cash-poor.”

    What are the alternatives to a reverse mortgage for Canadian retirees?

    Allan Small, senior investment advisor with IA Private Wealth Inc., says reverse mortgages “have not played a part in any of the retirement plans and retirement planning that I have done so far in my career. I think the reverse mortgage idea or concept, for whatever reason, has not caught on.” Also, “those individual investors I see usually have money to invest, or they have already invested. Most downsize their residence and take the equity out that way versus pulling money out of the property while still living in it.” 

    Finance professor and author Moshe Milevsky told me in an email, that when it comes to reverse mortgages—or any other financial strategy or product in the realm of decumulation—“I always ask this question before giving an opinion: Compared to what?” He worries about the associated interest-rate risk, which is “difficult to control, manage or even comprehend at advanced ages with cognitive decline.”  

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Chevreau

    Source link

  • David Miller Certified Financial Planner – MoneySense

    David Miller Certified Financial Planner – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Miller’s goal is to safeguard the financial dreams of his clients. He strives to protect the assets they have worked hard to accumulate throughout their lifetime. Miller provides objective advice based on his deep and thorough understanding of each client’s personal situation. He delivers comprehensive cross-border financial planning advice while making it easy to understand. He is bound by a fiduciary standard. He places his clients’ interests first, above all else.

    Who does he work with? For the last 20 years Miller has been committed to assisting families, business owners, and retirees on both sides of the border. He works alongside a highly experienced, independent, wealth management team at Cardinal Point Wealth Management.

    Services • Financial Planning
    • Investment Planning & Implementation
    Specializations • Cross-border Planning (Canada/U.S.)
    • Comprehensive Financial Planning
    • Discretionary Portfolio Management
    Payment Model • Fees paid by clients based on assets managed by advisor
    • Fees paid by clients for advice (not based on assets)
    Languages written and spoken • English

    Why did you become a planner?

    “After reading Rich Dad Poor Dad (Warner Books, 2000), I realized that there’s a significant need for financial literacy in this country.”

    What is your approach to financial planning?

    “It’s always goals-based planning, client-first advice and evidence-based investing.”

    What is your proudest achievement as a financial planner?

    “Being nominated to the board of the Institute of Advanced Financial Planners.”

    What would you do if money were no object?

    “I would help individuals and families become more confident with their finances through financial education.”

    What is the best money advice you ever received?

    “Focus on what you can control—stop worrying about the rest.”

    What is the worst money advice you ever received?

    “Put your trust in the banks.”

    [ad_2]

    Special to MoneySense

    Source link

  • Annuity vs. GIC: What makes sense for retiring? – MoneySense

    Annuity vs. GIC: What makes sense for retiring? – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    As you know, of course, annuities and GICs are not the same thing. An annuity provides a guaranteed income for life, or a set time period, and it can be purchased from insurance companies, agents and brokers. And a GIC is primarily a savings vehicle, which can be bought from banks, trust companies, credit unions and investment firms.

    In most cases, purchasing an annuity means exchanging your capital—a lump sum of money—for a lifetime payment that is similar to a pension. It’s a fixed, guaranteed income for life, with no more worries about interest rates, stock market crashes, running out of money, etc.

    On the other hand, purchasing an annuity means making a long-term commitment to an unknown future. And you will no longer have access to your original capital.

    Consider this example: If you want to buy a new car, you can’t go to the insurance company and ask for a little extra money. It’s not your money anymore.

    I’m guessing you’re thinking about GICs as an alternative because you’re aware of the longer-term risks associated with an annuity, and you may want to maintain control and flexibility over your money.

    A GIC can give you a guaranteed income over the length of the term and control of your capital; however, there is no guarantee on future interest rates or a lifetime income. You may also find it difficult to draw a monthly income from a GIC portfolio. This will prompt you to create a GIC ladder with different maturity dates so there is cash available when needed. The laddered approach may have an overall return that is less than the five-year return you are using to compare to an annuity.

    Think about the different ways you—and the world for that matter—may change in the next 25 years. Look at interest rates, inflation, your lifestyle and spending habits, and so on. Inflation is likely the biggest risk you’ll face when purchasing a life annuity.

    If you purchase a $100,000 annuity, what other financial resources do you now have? What will be coming to you in the future? What can you use to deal with any changes in your life? It’s important for you to know the answers to these questions.

    [ad_2]

    Allan Norman, MSc, CFP, CIM

    Source link

  • CPP payment dates this year, and more to know about the Canada Pension Plan – MoneySense

    CPP payment dates this year, and more to know about the Canada Pension Plan – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    About the Canada Pension Plan (CPP)

    The Canada Pension Plan is a retirement pension that offers replacement income once a person retires from working life. The CPP is a social insurance plan, and it’s one “pillar” of the retirement income system for Canadians—the other three are Old Age Security (OAS), the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) and personal savings. The CPP is funded by contributions from workers, employers and self-employed individuals. It’s not paid for by the government, despite what many Canadians may think.

    A federally administered program, the CPP is mandatory, meaning that all Canadian workers and employers must contribute. The plan covers all of Canada except for Quebec, which has the Quebec Pension Plan (QPP) for residents of that province. Below are the remaining 2024 CPP payment dates.

    CPP payment dates for 2024

    • January 29, 2024
    • February 27, 2024
    • March 26, 2024
    • April 26, 2024
    • May 29, 2024
    • June 26, 2024
    • July 29, 2024
    • August 28, 2024
    • September 25, 2024
    • October 29, 2024
    • November 27, 2024
    • December 20, 2024

    Where does the CPP money come from?

    Unlike OAS and the GIS, the CPP is funded by employers and employees, and by self-employed people. These contributions, which show up as deductions on a paycheque, are aggregated and invested. For self-employed people, the CPP owed on your net business income is added to your tax bill. The principal plus any revenue earned goes back into the program.

    In January 2024, CPP contributions were raised as part of a seven-year government initiative, started in 2019, to increase retirement income. Read more about the CPP enhancement to see how much more you will pay as an employee or a freelancer.

    Who manages the CPP’s investment portfolio?

    The pension plan’s investments are managed by CPP Investments, a Crown corporation operating at arm’s length from the government. Every three years, the Office of the Chief Actuary of Canada evaluates the sustainability of the plan; the next review will be in 2025. “The CPP is projected to be financially sustainable for at least the next 75 years,” CPP Investments states on its website.

    Am I eligible for CPP?

    If you’re at least 60 years old and have made at least one contribution to the CPP, you are eligible to receive CPP payments. You may also be eligible if you’ve received CPP credits from a former partner or spouse who paid into the plan. CPP benefits are available to Canadian citizens, permanent residents, legal residents or landed immigrants.

    Should I apply for CPP or QPP?

    If you contributed to both the CPP and/or the QPP in Quebec during your working years, your residency at the time of your application determines which plan you’re eligible for—if you’re a Quebec resident, you apply for your pension from the QPP. Otherwise, you apply to the CPP.

    When you can start receiving your CPP

    You’re eligible to start receiving your pension anytime between the ages of 60 and 70 years old, but the younger you are when you begin receiving CPP, the smaller your monthly payouts will be. Many Canadians choose to begin receiving payouts at age 65.

    [ad_2]

    Keph Senett

    Source link

  • How much money should I have saved by age 40? – MoneySense

    How much money should I have saved by age 40? – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    All the while, you’ve got a serious case of FOMO every time you check social media—all those friends who are jetting off on lavish vacations, buying new cars and splurging on cottages. How are ordinary Canadians actually doing this? And how can you get ahead and save more?

    What’s the average savings for Canadians in their 30s? How much should they have saved?

    A lot of Canadians are managing to save, despite the above financial challenges and obligations. According to Statistics Canada’s 2019 figures (the most recent available), the average person under age 35 had saved $9,905 towards retirement (RRSPs only) and held $27,425 in non-pension financial assets. For Canadians aged 35 to 44, these numbers are $15,993 and $23,743, respectively.

    The table below shows the average savings for individuals and economic families, which Statistics Canada defines as “a group of two or more persons who live in the same dwelling and are related to each other by blood, marriage, common-law union, adoption or a foster relationship.” In 2019, the average household savings rate was 2.08%.

    Financial assets, non-pension No private pension assets, just RRSPs Private pension assets and RRSPs
    Individual under age 35 $27,425 $9,905 $25,263
    Economic family under age 35 $105,261 $140,662 $60,305
    Individual aged 35–44 $23,743 $15,993 $39,682
    Economic family aged 35–44 $131,017 $138,488 $399,771
    Source: Statistics Canada

    The pandemic had a positive effect on savings; the disposable income of the average Canadian rose by an additional $1,800 in 2020, according to the Bank of Canada. That meant most Canadians were able to save an average of $5,800 that year.

    Despite this pandemic silver lining, most Canadians aren’t saving enough for their age groups. When CIBC polled Canadians in 2019 on how much money they’d need in retirement, on average they guessed they would need $756,000. The actual amount you’ll need depends on many factors—to estimate your own number, check out CIBC’s retirement savings calculator.

    How to prioritize financial goals and obligations in your 30s

    With so much going on in your 30s, it can be very challenging to save when you have so much to pay for. After all, you may be carrying a lot of debt due to student loans, a car loan or a mortgage. In the third quarter of 2023, Canadians aged 26 to 35 owed an average of $17,159, and Canadians aged 36 to 45 owed $26,155, according to a report from Equifax.

    Maybe debt is less of a concern for you, but you’re saving for a big goal—like a down payment on a home—and you’re feeling the strain of a high interest rate and inflation. Perhaps you’d like to start a family, but you’re worried about the costs of raising a child. Or you’ve dabbled a bit in the stock market and want to make a few more investments.

    Whatever your situation, talking to a financial planner about your finances and your priorities can help you map out a customized financial plan that factors in your immediate goals—as well as long-term savings and retirement strategies. This might include focusing on paying off high-interest debt, putting aside money for a home, shopping around for life insurance and ensuring that you save each month.

    [ad_2]

    Anna Sharratt

    Source link

  • A review and summary of Die with Zero and 4,000 Weeks – MoneySense

    A review and summary of Die with Zero and 4,000 Weeks – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Die Broke is the book where I first encountered the colourful quip about how the last cheque you write should be to your undertaker, and it should bounce. In other words, the closer you can get to spending all your money just as you die, the less you have to fork over to Uncle Sam—and for us, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA).

    Problem is, of course, that no one can accurately predict when they will die. As one unknown wag once remarked, retirement planning would be a cinch, if you just knew the day you’re dying.

    Summary of Die with Zero 

    So, it was of interest to me when an old college friend mentioned how much he enjoyed reading a book titled Die with Zero (HarperCollins, 2021), by Bill Perkins. My first reaction was that it sounded just like Die Broke, but I valued my friend’s opinion enough to check out a free copy on the Libby app and also on the paid book service Everand (formerly Scribd). The books have similar premises: there are trade-offs between time, money and health. Indeed, the Die with Zero subtitle is “Getting all you can from your money and your life.” 

    Essentially put, we exchange our time and life energy for money, which can therefore be viewed as a form of stored life energy. So, if you die with lots of money, you’ve in effect “wasted” some of your precious life energy. Similarly, if you encounter mobility issues or other afflictions in your 70s or 80s, you may not be able to travel and engage in many activities for which you had been saving up. The “money as life energy” idea is most memorably articulated in another classic book about financial independence: Your Money or Your Life (Penguin Random House, 2008). 

    But, what about the children? The issue of inheritance and leaving money to your heirs is deftly handled by Perkins in Die with Zero. The advice amounts to the old bromide that it’s “better to give with a warm hand than a cold one.” In other words, why not give them some of your money when they really need it, and you’re still healthy enough to enjoy their company, and presumably their gratitude.

    Die with Zero review

    After I read Die with Zero and started to write this column, I happened to chat with blogger Mark Seed of MyOwnAdvisor. Quite independently, he published a review of Die with Zero on the website Cashflows & Portfolios back in January 2024, along with a book giveaway promotion.

    “It was ‘OK’ in terms of content,” Mark told me in an email. “Some of the writing was not very good, but the premise is good: avoid hoarding money you could otherwise gift, spend, enjoy, etc.” The review starts with the following quote from Perkins: “The real golden years—the period of maximum potential enjoyment because we have the most health and wealth—mostly come before the traditional retirement age of 65.” The review further says that most of us know this intuitively, but “so many of us might be giving up years of semi-retirement or retirement enjoyment, only to find out we’ve saved too much or put off many valuable experiences for far too long.” The reviewers liken the main premise and the notion that it’s better to give now rather than later, but they also found it quite repetitive and lacking a real recipe for implementing the Die with Zero mantra. 

    Living the Die with Zero mantra

    If you read and absorb the thesis, you may find that the book changes your day-to-day behaviour. This happened to me recently, when my wife and I spent a few days in Fergus and Elora, Ont., for a birthday celebration. Initially, we booked a tiny room at a correspondingly tiny price. Once we checked in, we asked to look at a more spacious and luxurious room. We had both read Die with Zero and, having discussed the book, mutually decided to upgrade our room, despite the price being roughly double. It’s a small example, but it may just be the beginning for us. 

    [ad_2]

    Jonathan Chevreau

    Source link

  • ComparisonAdviser’s Latest Study Investigates Whether Selling a Home in Retirement is a Smart Move

    ComparisonAdviser’s Latest Study Investigates Whether Selling a Home in Retirement is a Smart Move

    [ad_1]

    Press Release
    •

    Jun 10, 2024

    One’s home is often their biggest and most important asset in their life. But should they sell it once they retire to bolster their funds? ComparisonAdviser examines this important decision in its most recent study.


    REDMOND, Wash., June 10, 2024 (Newswire.com)
    –
    A home is one of the most valuable assets people own. As individuals transition from their working lives into retirement, a common consideration is determining whether to sell or keep the property they’ve owned throughout their adult life. In its most recent study, ComparisonAdviser examines the factors homeowners should consider when deciding what to do with their homes as they enter their post-working life, including specific reasons for and against selling and why it’s important to seek financial advice. Click this link to access the article: https://comparisonadviser.com/news-and-studies/selling-your-home-in-retirement.

    The study begins by explaining why a home can be one of the most financially significant pieces of a household’s net worth. To demonstrate this, ComparisonAdviser uses data from a survey it conducted showing reported home ownership by age. It also uses outside data both from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Census Bureau to illustrate the weight of home equity in one’s portfolio, both for those with fewer assets in general and as one progresses in age.

    As outlined in the study, there are various practical and financial reasons why someone might want to sell their house before entering retirement. For example, people may want to downsize and move somewhere with less upkeep and space to manage. Others might aim for a change of scenery and relocate to a new city or move closer to family members living elsewhere. The study also highlights that selling one’s house around retirement age can give individuals access to a large lump sum of cash that can aid other plans they may have in place, such as travel or estate planning.

    Though there are several valid arguments for selling one’s house upon retiring, the study also lays out some reasons homeowners might want to keep their equity stake into their old age. One of the primary aspects it emphasizes is that owning a home can allow one to avoid high rent prices, rent out the home to tenants while living somewhere else or protect oneself against inflation. The article also points out that the sale and moving process can be hard, especially for those who aren’t as mobile.

    Finally, the study ends by shedding light on the importance of discussing one’s decision with a skilled financial advisor with expertise in retirement or estate planning. These can offer detailed insight into how the sale of a home, or keeping it, can fit into a comprehensive retirement plan.

    Source: ComparisonAdviser

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Earning, saving and spending money in Canada: A guide for new immigrants – MoneySense

    Earning, saving and spending money in Canada: A guide for new immigrants – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    Getting started

    To get started, here’s an overview of what you need to know about moving to Canada, working in Canada and building a good credit history. 

    The more you know about Canadian money, savings and housing, the better prepared you’ll be. You can even do certain steps—such as opening a bank account—before you arrive. Learn about this and other personal finance topics, including key details about preparing to buy a home in anywhere in Canada.

    Finding a job and earning an income soon after arriving in Canada can contribute to your success. We explain who can legally work here, how to apply for a work permit, how to find credible job postings and what details to look for in a job offer. We also tell you about non-profit organizations that help immigrants find work, sign up for free English classes and more

    Moving to Canada or new to the country? These six major cities have many job opportunities in different fields—plus we look at the cost of living in each.

    From tech to health care, Canada offers plenty of jobs for newcomers—and many of them are included in national and provincial express entry immigration programs.

    Once you move to Canada, it’s important to start building a good credit history—it will have a big impact on your future here. If you plan to borrow money to buy a home or a car, for example, lenders will look at your credit report to decide if they’ll loan you money and how much interest to charge you. Employers, landlords and even cellphone companies may check your credit report. We explain how to build your credit history and how to improve your credit score.

    Some financial products in Canada are similar to what’s available in India, like fixed deposits and GICs. Check out our list.

    We’ve rounded up 15 more MoneySense articles that provide personal finance tips for different life stages—from your first steps in Canada to getting established to planning for retirement.

    [ad_2]

    MoneySense Editors

    Source link

  • Should you max out your RRSP before converting it to a RRIF? – MoneySense

    Should you max out your RRSP before converting it to a RRIF? – MoneySense

    [ad_1]

    I am guessing you have downsized your home to move to a condo and now have money to contribute more to your registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs) as a result. First, we will start with a quick rundown of how RRSP to RRIF conversion works.

    Converting an RRSP to a RRIF

    A registered retirement income fund (RRIF) is the most common withdrawal option for RRSP savings. By December 31 of the year you turn 71, you need to convert your RRSP to a RRIF or buy an annuity from an insurance company. So, the conversion must take place not by his June birthday, Chris, but by December 31, 2025. You have a little more time than you might think.

    A RRIF is like an RRSP in that you can hold cash, guaranteed investment certificates (GICs), stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and exchange traded funds (ETFs). In fact, when you convert your RRSP to a RRIF, the investments can stay the same. The primary difference is you withdraw from it rather than contributing to it. 

    Withdrawing from a RRIF

    RRIFs have minimum withdrawals starting at 5.28% the following year if you convert your account the year you turn 71. This means you have to take at least 5.28% of the December 31 account value from the previous year as a withdrawal. Those withdrawals can be monthly, quarterly or annually, as long as the minimum is withdrawn in full by year’s end. Each year, that minimum percentage rises. 

    There is no maximum withdrawal for a RRIF. Withdrawals are taxable, though. If you are 65 or older, you can split up to 50% of your withdrawal with your spouse by moving anywhere between 0% and 50% to their tax return when you file. You do this to minimize your combined income tax by trying to equalize your incomes.

    You can base your withdrawals on your spouse’s age and if they are younger, the minimum withdrawals are lower. 

    Contributions before you convert

    If you have funds available from your condo downsize, Chris, you could contribute to your husband’s RRSP. He can contribute until December 31, 2025. If you are younger than him, he can even contribute to a spousal RRSP in your name until December 31 of the year you turn 71, whereby he gets to claim the deductions, but the account belongs to you with future withdrawals made by you.

    However, just because you have money to contribute, it doesn’t mean you should. Say your husband has $10,000 of RRSP room and his taxable income from Canada Pension Plan (CPP), Old Age Security (OAS), investments, and other sources is $50,000. He could contribute and deduct that $10,000 to reduce his taxable income to $40,000. In most provinces, the tax savings would be about 20%. His tax refund would be about $2,000.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Heath, CFP

    Source link