ReportWire

Tag: Research

  • Man living with cancer goes door-to-door in effort to keep research going

    [ad_1]

    SIGNATURES TO PUSH LAWMAKERS TO DO SOMETHING TO GET THAT MONEY BACK. DOCTOR PETER BRIDGMAN IS SPENDING HIS HOLIDAYS GOING DOOR-TO- DOOR CHATTING WITH HIS NEIGHBORS. HE’S THANKFUL FOR THE CANCER TREATMENTS THAT ARE KEEPING HIM ALIVE. THE 72-YEAR-OLD FORMER NEUROLOGIST WAS DIAGNOSED IN 2013 WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA – A BONE MARROW CANCER – TREATABLE WITH INFUSION THERAPIES. HE’S DOING WELL…BUT WORRIES ABOUT THE DAY HE MIGHT NEED MORE ADVANCED TREATMENT OPTIONS CURRENTLY UNDER DEVELOPMENT AT THE “NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH” – AND THE “NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE.” THE AGENCIES ARE FORCED TO CUT BILLIONS OF DOLLARS NOW THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP’S BUDGET HAS PASSED. “NIH AND THE NCI EXPECTED SMALL CUTS LIKE FIVE OR TEN PERCENT, BUT THEY WERE COMPLETELY FLOORED BY THE 37-PERCENT CUT TO THE NCI.” “ACTIVE RESEARCH IS GOING ON AND THAT MIGHT BE CURTAILED. SO, BY THE TIME I NEED IT, IT MAY NOT BE THERE FOR ME.” SO, HE’S ASKING HIS NEIGHBORS TO SIGN AN ON-LINE PETITION CALLING FOR FUNDS TO BE RESTORED TO PREVIOUS LEVELS. “IN ORDER TO SAVE LIVES, WE HAVE TO RESTORE FUNDING TO CLOSE TO WHAT IT WAS BEFORE. IF WE LET THE FUNDING BOUNCE UP AND DOWN, RESEARCHERS WILL GO TO OTHER COUNTRIES. THEY’LL GO TO THE EUROPEAN UNION. THEY’LL GO TO CHINA. AND WE’LL LOSE ALL OF THAT. IT WOULD TAKE DECADES TO BUILD IT BACK. SO, THAT’S THE RISK. THAT’S THE SERIOUS RISK.” HIS NEIGHBOR, JOHN AUBLE WAS HAPPY TO SIGN. WAS HAPPY TO SIGN. “OVERALL, I THINK CANCER IN UNDER FUNDED SO EVERY TIME WE HAVE SOMEBODY WHO IS WILLING TO PUT IN THE TIME THAT HE DOES – IT’S REALLY TOUCHING. WE NEED MORE PETERS.” IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN LEARNING MORE ABOUT THE PETITION – YOU CAN VISIT WWW.FIGHTCANCER.ORG “NEXT TUESDAY AFTERNOON DR. BRIDGMAN AND OTHERS FROM THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY WILL HAND DELIVER THOSE PETITION SIGNATURES TO SENATOR SUSAN COLLINS HERE AT HER PORTLAND OFFICE. AND THEY WAIT FOR CONGRESS TO RECONVENE AND HOPE THAT RESEARCH FUNDI

    Man living with cancer goes door-to-door in effort to keep federal research going

    Updated: 12:13 PM PST Nov 29, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Dr. Peter Bridgman, a retired neurologist who has cancer, is a man on a mission to get funding restored for federal agencies that are conducting cancer research.Bridgman, 72, was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2013. Multiple myeloma is a bone marrow cancer that is treatable with infusion therapies.The Yarmouth resident said he is doing well and is thankful for the treatments that are keeping him alive, but he is concerned about the future of cancer research.Advanced cancer treatment options are under development at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Cancer Institute (NCI), but the federal agencies face funding cuts in the billions.”NIH and the NCI expected small cuts like five or 10 percent, but they were completely floored by the 37 percent cut to the NCI,” Bridgman said. “Active research is going on and that might be curtailed. So by the time I need it, it may not be there for me.”Bridgman is now going door-to-door and asking his neighbors to sign an online petition calling for NIH and NCI funds to be restored to previous levels.”In order to save lives, we have to restore funding to close to what it was before. If we let the funding bounce up and down, researchers will go to other countries. They’ll go to the European Union. They’ll go to China, and we’ll lose all of that,” Bridgman said. “It would take decades to build it back, so that’s the risk. That’s the serious risk.”John Auble, one of Bridgman’s neighbors, said he was happy to sign the petition.”Overall, I think cancer is underfunded. So every time we have somebody who is willing to put in the time that he does, it’s really touching,” Auble said. “We need more Peters.”People who are interested in learning more about the petition can visit fightcancer.org.On Tuesday, Dec. 2, Bridgman and others from the American Cancer Society will hand deliver the petition signatures they have collected to U.S. Sen. Susan Collins’ office in Portland. They will then wait for Congress to reconvene and hope that research funding will be restored.

    Dr. Peter Bridgman, a retired neurologist who has cancer, is a man on a mission to get funding restored for federal agencies that are conducting cancer research.

    Bridgman, 72, was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2013. Multiple myeloma is a bone marrow cancer that is treatable with infusion therapies.

    The Yarmouth resident said he is doing well and is thankful for the treatments that are keeping him alive, but he is concerned about the future of cancer research.

    Advanced cancer treatment options are under development at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Cancer Institute (NCI), but the federal agencies face funding cuts in the billions.

    “NIH and the NCI expected small cuts like five or 10 percent, but they were completely floored by the 37 percent cut to the NCI,” Bridgman said. “Active research is going on and that might be curtailed. So by the time I need it, it may not be there for me.”

    Bridgman is now going door-to-door and asking his neighbors to sign an online petition calling for NIH and NCI funds to be restored to previous levels.

    “In order to save lives, we have to restore funding to close to what it was before. If we let the funding bounce up and down, researchers will go to other countries. They’ll go to the European Union. They’ll go to China, and we’ll lose all of that,” Bridgman said. “It would take decades to build it back, so that’s the risk. That’s the serious risk.”

    John Auble, one of Bridgman’s neighbors, said he was happy to sign the petition.

    “Overall, I think cancer is underfunded. So every time we have somebody who is willing to put in the time that he does, it’s really touching,” Auble said. “We need more Peters.”

    People who are interested in learning more about the petition can visit fightcancer.org.

    On Tuesday, Dec. 2, Bridgman and others from the American Cancer Society will hand deliver the petition signatures they have collected to U.S. Sen. Susan Collins’ office in Portland. They will then wait for Congress to reconvene and hope that research funding will be restored.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Want to Learn ‘Anything You Want’? Neuroscience Says 7 Sessions Is All It Takes

    [ad_1]

    Maybe you think you don’t possess the talent for finance. For design. For programming. For learning any skill you want to possess.

    That may be because you confuse talent with skill. According to HubSpot co-founder Dharmesh Shah:

    • Talent is the rate at which you can acquire a particular skill, while
    • Skill is something that’s learnable

    Here’s an example. Compared to my wife, to whom any computation seems to come intuitively, I have zero talent for math. One day I was struggling to determine the correct angle to set a miter saw for cutting baseboards with unusual angles. She thought for a second, worked it out, and came up with the equation: 180 minus measured angle divided by 2. Boom: perfect cuts.

    She’s always been better at math than most people. She acquired her math skills more easily than people like me. That doesn’t mean I can’t get there, though; it just seems to take me longer.

    Why “seems”? The difference lies in our starting points.

    According to a study titled “An Astonishing Regularity in Student Learning Rate” published by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University, students improve in academic performance at the same rate with each study/practice session.

    “Whereas initial knowledge varies substantially across students,” the researchers write, “we found learning rate to be astonishingly similar across students.” The real difference tends to lie in initial knowledge, or talent: with practice, any student can reach “mastery” level.

    How long does it take to master a particular knowledge component? On average, about seven sessions. 

    Stay the course, and as the researchers write:

    Our evidence suggests that given favorable learning conditions for deliberate practice, and given the learner invests effort in sufficient learning opportunities, anyone can learn anything they want (my bold.)

    Granted, our ceilings may vary. My initial talent for math is probably lower than yours. Since I’m decidedly average, so is your talent for, well, probably anything. So while we both may learn at the same rate, my math skills will likely never match yours.

    Unless you stop trying to learn. That’s where perseverance kicks in, because in many pursuits the person who “wins” is the last person to give up.

    But still: as Shah says, most of the things you may want to achieve require skill, not talent. Take software engineering, something he knows juuust a little about. While a highly complex skill, at a fundamental level software engineering involves functional decomposition: taking a problem, determining the highest order of function required, then breaking it down into smaller supporting functions until, as Shah says, “individual functions at the atomic level are so simple they’re trivial.”

    Like determining a cut angle.

    The good news? Most pursuits, no matter how complex, can be broken down the same way.

    Say you want to start a business. At its highest order of function — creating a thriving company with dozens or even hundreds of employees — the skills challenge might seem overwhelming, especially if you don’t feel you have a “talent” for business.

    The key is to break it down into lower-level functions. Accounting. Sales. Marketing. Management. Customer Service. Operations. Fulfillment. 

    Still sound daunting? Keep breaking each into smaller and smaller functions. Take accounting; at the simplest level, you just need a way — a notebook or a spreadsheet works fine — to track your expenses and revenue. My wife and I run our rental property and property development business off a couple of spreadsheets.

    It doesn’t take seven practice sessions to learn how to track expenses and revenue.

    Later, it might take few more sessions to get a handle on the ins and outs of cash flow forecasting. But that’s okay, because accounting — at least to the degree required to run a small business — is, to paraphrase Shah, just a bunch of individual functions that at an atomic level are really simple. Regardless of the math or financial talent level you bring to the table, as long as you you invest in sufficient learning opportunities, you’ll get there. 

    I still have to ask my wife how to calculate certain percentages, but I’ve gained enough accounting skills to run my business, and to make decisions regarding the financial and tax complexities involved in our property businesses. Given my wife’s talent, her initial knowledge, she got there faster, and she will always be ahead of me… but I learned what I needed to know, and am still building on that knowledge.

    That’s the really, really good news: you can learn anything you want to learn. As the researchers write:

    Some readers may object that near-constant student-learning rate unrealistically implies that everyone can master advanced level calculus or interpret abstract data. Indeed, not everyone has favorable learning conditions nor will everyone choose to engage in the substantial number of practice opportunities required.

    However, our results suggest that if a learner has access to favorable learning conditions and engages in the many needed opportunities, they will master advanced level calculus.

    Even so, you don’t have to become an expert in your pursuit. Take business; you don’t have to be the Sara Blakely of sales, and the Mark Cuban of venture capital, and the Jensen Huang of computer processing.

    You need to be good at a number of things, and great at one or two. 

    So don’t let the feeling that you’re not talented at a certain pursuit hold you back. Break it down into lower-level functions. Then commit to studying, practicing, and getting feedback on your performance. (A simple way is to test yourself, because testing yourself significantly increases long-term retention.) 

    As Shah says, regarding starting a business:

    Figure out what set of skills you need to acquire. Some you’ll be good at acquiring, because you have the talent. Others you’ll have to grind it out more than other people may… but it’s doable. It’s a doable thing.

    If I can do it, anyone can do it.

    The last line from Shah is clearly self-deprecating — building a $19 billion company stretches my definition of “doable” — but as research shows, also accurate. Depending on your initial knowledge, your level of talent, it may take a while. It may take five, six, or even seven sessions to gain a firm grasp on a particular skill.  

    And that’s okay. Because you may not have the talent, but if you keep workign at it, you can always acquire the skill.

    Any skill.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    The final deadline for the 2026 Inc. Regionals Awards is Friday, December 12, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply now.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • Treating sleep apnea early may help prevent Parkinson’s disease, study finds

    [ad_1]

    Catching and treating a common sleep disorder early may help prevent Parkinson’s disease, a new study shows.

    Parkinson’s is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that causes tremor, stiffness, slow movement, as well as sleep and mental health issues. About 1.1 million people in the United States have Parkinson’s with the number expected to rise to 1.2 million by 2030, according to the Parkinson’s Foundation.


    MORE: The brain has 5 stages, but ‘adulthood’ doesn’t begin until age 32, scientists say


    Obstructive sleep apnea, a sleep disorder affecting approximately 30 million people in the United States, occurs when throat muscles relax, causing people to temporarily stop breathing and briefly wake up as many as five times an hour throughout the night.

    A study published Monday in JAMA Neurology describes a link between untreated sleep apnea and Parkinson’s that may help identify those with the highest risk for the neurological disease, which has no cure.

    Using health data collected between 1999 and 2022 from more than 11 million U.S. veterans, researchers found that about 14% of them were diagnosed with sleep apnea. Six years after being diagnosed, the veterans with untreated sleep apnea were almost twice as likely to have Parkinson’s than those who got treatment, according to the study.

    Having sleep apnea is “…not at all a guarantee that you’re going to get Parkinson’s, but it significantly increases the chances,” the study’s co-author, Dr. Gregory Scott, said.

    Conversely, treating sleep apnea with a continuous positive airway pressure – or CPAP – machine seems reduce the risk of developing Parkinson’s, researchers found. A CPAP machine blows air through a tube into a mask that fits over the face to keep airways open during sleep.

    “If you stop breathing and oxygen is not at a normal level, your neurons are probably not functioning at a normal level either,” the study’s lead author, Dr. Lee Neilson, said. “Add that up night after night, year after year, and it may explain why fixing the problem by using CPAP may build in some resilience against neurodegenerative conditions, including Parkinson’s.”

    [ad_2]

    Courtenay Harris Bond

    Source link

  • Online channel drives October uptick in observed consumer spending | Insights | Bloomberg Professional Services

    [ad_1]

    The data included in these materials are for illustrative purposes only. The Bloomberg Second Measure services are made available by Bloomberg Second Measure LLC (“BBSM”). BBSM’s parent company, Bloomberg L.P. (“BLP”), provides BBSM with global marketing and operational support. Nothing in the Services shall constitute or be construed as an offering of financial instruments by BBSM, BLP or their affiliates, or as investment advice or recommendations by BBSM, BLP or their affiliates of an investment strategy or whether or not to “buy”, “sell” or “hold” an investment. BLOOMBERG, BLOOMBERG SECOND MEASURE, BLOOMBERG TERMINAL, BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL, BLOOMBERG MARKETS, BLOOMBERG NEWS, BLOOMBERG TRADEBOOK, BLOOMBERG BONDTRADER, BLOOMBERG TELEVISION, BLOOMBERG RADIO, BLOOMBERG.COM and BLOOMBERG ANYWHERE are trademarks and service marks of Bloomberg Finance L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, or its subsidiaries. Absence of any trademark or service mark from this list does not waive Bloomberg Finance L.P.’s or its affiliates’ intellectual property rights in that name, mark or logo. For each company, the predictive accuracy of Bloomberg Second Measure’s estimates will typically vary over time. BBSM does not guarantee that the accuracy levels, trends or correlations illustrated by the examples in this document will recur for any company in the future. The estimates have been generated by running a standard nonproprietary formula on analytical data about past consumer transactions. BBSM makes available information about this formula to Bloomberg Second Measure clients and the analytical data is also accessible to such clients. All rights reserved. ©2025 Bloomberg.
    The Bloomberg Second Measure U.S. Consumer Spend Index is not administered by Bloomberg’s benchmark administration business and is not intended for use as a financial benchmark.

    [ad_2]

    Bloomberg

    Source link

  • Science Says Sleeping in a Really Dark Room Will Make You Smarter

    [ad_1]

    You probably already know you need at least seven hours of sleep a night to function at your best. (And don’t say, “Not me. I do just fine on five or six hours.” According to a study published in Cell Research, only a tiny fraction of the population functions well on less than seven hours.)

    Why? A 2018 study published in Sleep says if you only sleep for five to six hours you’re 19 percent less productive than people who regularly sleep for seven to eight hours. If you only sleep five hours a night? You’re nearly 30 percent less productive.

    That’s especially true for entrepreneurs: a study published in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice found that lack of sleep makes people more likely to start a business on impulse or whim rather than on a solid, well-considered idea. More broadly, a study published in Journal of Business Venturing found that lack of sleep causes you to come up with worse ideas.

    And to believe your bad ideas are actually good ideas. ​

    So yeah: getting enough sleep is actually a competitive advantage.

    Especially if you take it one step farther. According to a 2022 study published in Sleep, sleeping in as close to total darkness as possible can not only improve the quality of your sleep, it can also improve your memory and alertness. 

    After just two nights of wearing a sleep mask, participants:

    • displayed significantly better learning skills,
    • displayed significantly better physical reaction times, and
    • learned new motor skills more quickly.

    Why? One explanation could be the “synaptic homeostasis hypothesis,” the theory that increased slow-wave activity during sleep (which is promoted by darkness) promotes the “down-scaling” of synapses that became saturated while you were awake and restores your capacity for encoding new information. 

    Or, in non researcher-speak, a dark night’s sleep primes both your cognitive and motor skills for the next day. The same holds true for feeling (and actually being) more alert.

    That doesn’t mean I’m eager to embrace a sleep mask. It feels weird to have a mask on, and it made me feel like I didn’t sleep as well. But I’m probably wrong; as the researchers write: 

    It deserves mention that even though participants reported that sleeping with the control mask was more uncomfortable in comparison with the eye mask, this did not impact self-reported sleep quality, morning alertness, or sleep parameters.

    So even if you don’t love the idea of a mask, the mask will still — in terms of the benefits it provides — love you back. 

    But you don’t have to wear a mask. Draw your blinds. Consider room-darkening curtains. Turn off device notifications and leave them face-down on your nightstand. The darker you make your bedroom — the more you limit the presence of ambient or intermittent light that can disturb your sleep — the more you’ll benefit in terms of memory performance and alertness the next day.

    As the researchers write:

    Given the current climate of life-hacking, sleep monitoring, and cognitive enhancers, our findings suggest the eye mask as a simple, economical, and noninvasive way to get more out of a night of sleep.

    And so is a really dark room.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    The final deadline for the 2026 Inc. Regionals Awards is Friday, December 12, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply now.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • What Is Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Learning Theory? – TeachThought

    [ad_1]

    November 19, 2025

    What Is Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Learning Theory?

    by TeachThought Staff

    What did Vygotsky say about learning?

    Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory describes learning as a fundamentally social process and locates the origins of human intelligence within cultural activity. A central theme of this framework is that social interaction plays a primary role in cognitive development: knowledge is first constructed between people and later internalized by the individual (Vygotsky, 1978).

    Also known as the Sociohistorical Theory, Vygotsky’s model emphasizes how cultural context, shared activities, and especially language shape the development of higher mental functions. Learning and development are inseparable from the social and cultural environments in which individuals participate.

    Vygotsky argued that learning unfolds on two levels—initially through interaction with others and then within the learner’s internal psychological processes. As he explained: “Every function in the child’s cultural development appears twice: first, on the social level, and later, on the individual level; first, between people (interpsychological) and then inside the child (intrapsychological)… All the higher functions originate as actual relationships between individuals” (Vygotsky, 1978).

    • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Concept Brief Explanation Classroom Example
    Zone of Proximal Development The space between what a learner can do alone and what they can do with guidance. A student solves multi-step math problems only after the teacher models the first step.
    Social Interaction Learning develops through guided interaction with more knowledgeable others. Peers discuss a science concept and clarify it for each other using everyday language.
    Cultural Tools & Mediation Language, symbols, and cultural practices shape thinking and problem-solving. A teacher models how to read a graph, and the student later uses the same conventions independently.
    Scaffolding Temporary instructional support that fades as the learner gains mastery. Students begin with sentence starters but later write independently as supports fade.
    Private Speech Self-directed speech that becomes internalized and guides problem-solving. A child whispers instructions to themselves while assembling a puzzle.

    Let’s take a look at the principles of his learning theory.

    Key Concepts of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory

    1. Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)

    According to Vygotsky, the Zone of Proximal Development “is the distance between the actual developmental level as determined by independent problem-solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem-solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers.” This idea aligns with broader perspectives on cognition described in Learning Theories for Teachers.”

    Through collaborative interactions, a more skilled person, such as a teacher or a peer, can provide support to scaffold the learner’s understanding and skills. This emphasis on guided learning is similar to principles discussed in Principles of Social Learning Theory.

    This ‘zone’ is a level of understanding or ability to use a skill where the learner is able, from a knowledge or skill standpoint, to grasp or apply the idea but only with the support of a More Knowledgeable Other (Briner, 1999).

    Example: A student can solve multi-step math problems only when the teacher models the first step; over time, the student internalizes the process and completes similar problems independently. Another example is a reader who can summarize a text when guided with prompts (“What happened first?”) but not alone.

    This ‘MKO’ can be another student, parent, teacher, etc.—anyone with a level of understanding or skill that allows the student to master a knowledge or skill that could not otherwise be mastered. Strategies that support work in this Zone of Proximal Development include modeling, direct instruction, collaborative learning (closely related to the distinctions discussed in The Difference Between Constructivism and Constructionism, the Concept Attainment Model, Combination Learning, and more.

    2. Social Interaction

    Vygotsky emphasized the importance of social interactions in cognitive development. He believed that learning occurs through interactions with others, particularly more knowledgeable individuals. Language plays a central role in these interactions, as it enables communication, the transmission of knowledge, and the development of higher mental processes. These ideas connect to the learner-centered approach described in Constructionism (See above).

    Example: A student learning a new science concept becomes more proficient after discussing it with a peer who explains it in everyday language. Similarly, a teacher-led think-aloud during a reading activity models how to analyze a text, helping students internalize the reasoning process.

    Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory said that “Learning occurs through vicarious reinforcement–observing a behavior and its consequences (which have social ramifications).” Vygotsky shares this idea.

    3. Cultural Tools and Mediation

    Vygotsky argued that cultural tools, including language, symbols, artifacts, and social practices, mediate learning and development. These tools are products of a particular culture and are used by individuals to think, communicate, and solve problems. Through cultural tools, individuals internalize and construct knowledge, transforming their cognitive processes. This broader perspective is elaborated in Learning Theories for Teachers.

    Every function in the child’s cultural development appears twice: first on the social level, and later on the individual level (Vygotsky, 1978, p. 57).

    Example: A student initially learns how to interpret a graph by watching a teacher model how to read axes and identify patterns; later, the student uses those same conventions independently. Another example is a child using teacher-provided sentence frames (“I predict that…”) before eventually generating their own academic language.

    4. Scaffolding

    Scaffolding is any help, assistance, or support provided by a more competent individual (e.g., a teacher) to facilitate a learner’s understanding and skill development. The scaffolding occurs by gradually adjusting the level of support according to the learner’s needs, and transferring responsibility to the learner as their competence increases. These ideas align with principles of adult learning described in Andragogy

    Example: A teacher initially solves a writing prompt alongside students, then provides sentence starters, and eventually removes supports as students gain confidence. Another example is using guided questions (“What might you try next?”) during problem-solving before stepping back to let the learner take full control.

    Scaffolding, and similar ideas like The Gradual Release of Responsibility Model: Show Me, Help Me, Let Me, also support the kinds of thinking described in Levels of Integration for Critical Thinking.

    5. Private Speech and Self-Regulation

    In his research (see also Types of Questions) Vygotsky noticed that young children often engage in private speech, talking to themselves as they carry out activities.

    He believed private speech is important in self-regulation and cognitive development—a truth clear to parents and teachers but significant here as a data point observed by a neutral researcher. Over time, this private speech becomes internalized and transforms into inner speech, which is used for self-guidance and problem-solving.

    Example: A child assembling a puzzle might whisper, “This piece goes here… no, try the corner,” using speech to guide their actions before eventually solving puzzles silently. Another example is a student verbalizing the steps of a math problem (“First multiply… then add…”) before learning to manage those steps internally.

    References

    • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).
      Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
      Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Bandura, A. (1977).
      Social learning theory.
      Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    • Knowles, M. S. (1980).
      The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy.
      New York, NY: Cambridge Books.

    [ad_2]

    TeachThought Staff

    Source link

  • Support groups for alcohol use disorder are more effective when they are attended in person

    [ad_1]

    Much of life went virtual during the COVID-19 pandemic — work, school and even some doctor’s appointments. So did many support groups for people with alcohol use disorder.

    But people who attended Alcoholic Anonymous, SMART Recovery, Women for Sobriety and other mutual-help groups in person were “significantly” more likely to maintain sobriety than people who participated in these groups only online, a recent study shows.


    MORE: Nurse who beat hard-to-treat cancer says she stayed strong by thinking of herself as a ‘survivor’


    “Online meetings are convenient and widely available, so they could theoretically support many people who face barriers to in-person attendance, such as young people and rural populations,” Sarah Zemore, the study’s principal investigator, said in a statement. “Unfortunately, attending online meetings exclusively was associated with poorer outcomes.”

    The study, led by researchers at Stanford University and the Alcohol Research Group, used data from more than 1,000 adults who took part in a previous study conducted between 2015 and 2021. It found that people who only attended mutual-help groups online were about half as likely to report that they had maintained their sobriety. At a three-month follow-up, people who attended only online were three times more likely to report problems with alcohol.

    People who attended groups in person and online were as likely to maintain abstinence as people who only went to meetings in person.

    One of the reasons why people attending only online may have had worse outcomes may have been because they reported lower participation levels in the meetings, researchers said.

    Nearly 28 million people in the United States have alcohol use disorder. They have trouble stopping or controlling their consumption of alcohol despite adverse effects on relationships, careers and overall health.

    Two years ago, the World Health Organization declared that no level of drinking is safe – not even moderate drinking. In January, former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy issued an advisory about alcohol consumption increasing the risk for seven types of cancer. He called for warning labels on alcohol about its carcinogenic risk.

    Several medications are available to treat alcohol use disorder, including naltrexone, which helps decrease cravings and reduce the amount of alcohol consumed during drinking episodes. Therapy and group supports are also important parts of a full recovery program for alcohol use disorder.

    [ad_2]

    Courtenay Harris Bond

    Source link

  • Scientists uncover an ant assassination scheme that helps a parasitic queen rise to power

    [ad_1]

    Scientists say they have for the first time unlocked how a parasitic ant uses chemical warfare to take over the nest of a different species, by tricking workers into an unlikely assassination.The deadly scheme unfolds like a Shakespearean drama. In an ant colony, the queen is dying, under attack by her own daughters. Meanwhile, the true enemy — an invader queen from another ant species — waits on the sidelines. Her plan is simple: Infiltrate the nest and use chemical weapons brewed inside her body to deceive the worker ants into mistaking their rightful ruler for an imposter.In a few hours, the nest’s queen will fall. Once the former matriarch is dead, the invader will assume the role of the colony’s new leader.Matricide in an ant colony is not unheard of — it typically happens when a colony produces multiple queens or when a solo queen reaches the end of her fertility. But this particular scenario, in which an outsider queen turns workers into her proxy assassins, has never been described in detail before, researchers reported Monday in the journal Current Biology.In fact, this strategy is yet to be documented in any other animal species, said the study’s senior author, Keizo Takasuka, an assistant professor in the department of biology at the University of Kyushu in Japan.”Inducement of daughters to kill their biological mother had not been known in biology before this work,” Takasuka told CNN in an email.The researchers observed this behavior among ants in the Lasius genus, documenting invasions and worker manipulation by queens in the species L. orientalis and L. umbratus.”Prior studies had reported that, after a new L. umbratus queen invaded a host colony of L. niger, host workers killed their own queen,” Takasuka said. “But the mechanism remained entirely unknown until our study.”Scent of a worker antAnts communicate through smell, which is how they distinguish between nestmates and foes. When researchers previously observed parasitic ant queens near a colony’s foraging trails, they saw that the parasite would snatch up a worker ant and rub it on her body, disguising her scent and allowing her to slip into the nest undetected.For the new study, coauthors Taku Shimada and Yuji Tanaka — both citizen scientists in Tokyo — each raised an ant colony and introduced parasitic queens. Shimada observed an L. orientalis queen in an L. flavus colony, and Tanaka recorded an L. umbratus queen invading a colony of L. japonicus.In both experiments, the scientists first co-housed an invading queen with host workers and cocoons “so that she acquired the nestmate odour,” Takasuka said. “This allowed her to gain nestmate recognition and avoid retaliation upon entry.” The scientists then released the queen into the colony.Both parasite queens followed a similar plan of attack. After disguising their smell, the queens entered the colonies’ feeding areas. Most workers ignored the interloper. Some even fed her mouth-to-mouth.But the invading queens weren’t there for dinner — they had an assassination to set in motion. After locating the resident queen, the invader sprayed her with abdominal fluid that smelled of formic acid. The scent agitated workers, with some of them turning on their queen immediately and attacking her. Multiple sprays followed, and the attacks became more brutal.”The host workers eventually mutilated their true mother after four days,” the scientists reported.All in the familyThe death of the true queen was the invader’s cue to start producing hundreds of eggs, attended by her newly adopted “daughters.” Over time, her biological daughters would number in the thousands, usurping the colony until none of the original species remained.”It’s refreshing to see a very careful observational study that discovers something interesting that we — ‘we’ meaning ant researchers — suspected but had never confirmed,” said Jessica Purcell, a professor in the department of entomology at the University of California, Riverside.”I was really struck by this discovery, especially the use of a chemical compound to elicit that behavior by the workers,” said Purcell, who was not involved in the research.Social insects like ants gather and store resources for the colony to share. That makes them an attractive target for social parasites — species seeking well-stocked nests that they can exploit. Some ant species kidnap the colony’s offspring and enslave them. Others, such as L. orientalis and L. umbratus, set up shop in the colony, where they eliminate the existing queen and take her place.”There’s all of this amazing diversity,” Purcell told CNN. “What we didn’t know a lot about before this study is the various ways that socially parasitic queens might go about assassinating the host queen. People had done some observations of direct killing, where the infiltrating queen would go and cut off the head of the existing queen. But this is astonishing that they can actually use chemical manipulation to cause the workers to do it.”Violence within families is often described in fairy tales and myths, with wicked adults — typically desperate parents or jealous stepparents — conspiring to harm or kill children. Rapunzel is imprisoned in a tower; Snow White is hunted and then poisoned by an apple; Hansel and Gretel are abandoned in the forest and captured by a witch, who imprisons them and fattens Hansel for her supper.But while such stories include plenty of violence, the killing of a mother in folklore — let alone children being tricked into matricide — is almost nonexistent, said Maria Tatar, a professor emerita of folklore and mythology at Harvard University who was not involved in the new study.In that respect, Takasuka noted, the grim tale of the invading, manipulative ant queens stands out even more.”Sometimes, phenomena in nature outstrip what we imagine in fiction,” he said.

    Scientists say they have for the first time unlocked how a parasitic ant uses chemical warfare to take over the nest of a different species, by tricking workers into an unlikely assassination.

    The deadly scheme unfolds like a Shakespearean drama. In an ant colony, the queen is dying, under attack by her own daughters. Meanwhile, the true enemy — an invader queen from another ant species — waits on the sidelines. Her plan is simple: Infiltrate the nest and use chemical weapons brewed inside her body to deceive the worker ants into mistaking their rightful ruler for an imposter.

    In a few hours, the nest’s queen will fall. Once the former matriarch is dead, the invader will assume the role of the colony’s new leader.

    Matricide in an ant colony is not unheard of — it typically happens when a colony produces multiple queens or when a solo queen reaches the end of her fertility. But this particular scenario, in which an outsider queen turns workers into her proxy assassins, has never been described in detail before, researchers reported Monday in the journal Current Biology.

    In fact, this strategy is yet to be documented in any other animal species, said the study’s senior author, Keizo Takasuka, an assistant professor in the department of biology at the University of Kyushu in Japan.

    “Inducement of daughters to kill their biological mother had not been known in biology before this work,” Takasuka told CNN in an email.

    The researchers observed this behavior among ants in the Lasius genus, documenting invasions and worker manipulation by queens in the species L. orientalis and L. umbratus.

    “Prior studies had reported that, after a new L. umbratus queen invaded a host colony of L. niger, host workers killed their own queen,” Takasuka said. “But the mechanism remained entirely unknown until our study.”

    Scent of a worker ant

    Ants communicate through smell, which is how they distinguish between nestmates and foes. When researchers previously observed parasitic ant queens near a colony’s foraging trails, they saw that the parasite would snatch up a worker ant and rub it on her body, disguising her scent and allowing her to slip into the nest undetected.

    For the new study, coauthors Taku Shimada and Yuji Tanaka — both citizen scientists in Tokyo — each raised an ant colony and introduced parasitic queens. Shimada observed an L. orientalis queen in an L. flavus colony, and Tanaka recorded an L. umbratus queen invading a colony of L. japonicus.

    In both experiments, the scientists first co-housed an invading queen with host workers and cocoons “so that she acquired the nestmate odour,” Takasuka said. “This allowed her to gain nestmate recognition and avoid retaliation upon entry.” The scientists then released the queen into the colony.

    Both parasite queens followed a similar plan of attack. After disguising their smell, the queens entered the colonies’ feeding areas. Most workers ignored the interloper. Some even fed her mouth-to-mouth.

    But the invading queens weren’t there for dinner — they had an assassination to set in motion. After locating the resident queen, the invader sprayed her with abdominal fluid that smelled of formic acid. The scent agitated workers, with some of them turning on their queen immediately and attacking her. Multiple sprays followed, and the attacks became more brutal.

    “The host workers eventually mutilated their true mother after four days,” the scientists reported.

    All in the family

    The death of the true queen was the invader’s cue to start producing hundreds of eggs, attended by her newly adopted “daughters.” Over time, her biological daughters would number in the thousands, usurping the colony until none of the original species remained.

    “It’s refreshing to see a very careful observational study that discovers something interesting that we — ‘we’ meaning ant researchers — suspected but had never confirmed,” said Jessica Purcell, a professor in the department of entomology at the University of California, Riverside.

    “I was really struck by this discovery, especially the use of a chemical compound to elicit that behavior by the workers,” said Purcell, who was not involved in the research.

    Social insects like ants gather and store resources for the colony to share. That makes them an attractive target for social parasites — species seeking well-stocked nests that they can exploit. Some ant species kidnap the colony’s offspring and enslave them. Others, such as L. orientalis and L. umbratus, set up shop in the colony, where they eliminate the existing queen and take her place.

    “There’s all of this amazing diversity,” Purcell told CNN. “What we didn’t know a lot about before this study is the various ways that socially parasitic queens might go about assassinating the host queen. People had done some observations of direct killing, where the infiltrating queen would go and cut off the head of the existing queen. But this is astonishing that they can actually use chemical manipulation to cause the workers to do it.”

    Violence within families is often described in fairy tales and myths, with wicked adults — typically desperate parents or jealous stepparents — conspiring to harm or kill children. Rapunzel is imprisoned in a tower; Snow White is hunted and then poisoned by an apple; Hansel and Gretel are abandoned in the forest and captured by a witch, who imprisons them and fattens Hansel for her supper.

    But while such stories include plenty of violence, the killing of a mother in folklore — let alone children being tricked into matricide — is almost nonexistent, said Maria Tatar, a professor emerita of folklore and mythology at Harvard University who was not involved in the new study.

    In that respect, Takasuka noted, the grim tale of the invading, manipulative ant queens stands out even more.

    “Sometimes, phenomena in nature outstrip what we imagine in fiction,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Science Says Fit People’s Brains Are Built Differently (and They’re Smarter)

    [ad_1]

    You probably know that exercise helps you perform better under stress. You probably know that exercising at moderate intensity for 20 minutes elevates your mood for up to 12 hours. You might know exercise is one of the five daily habits a 30-year Harvard study shows can not only increase your lifespan by 12 to 14 years, but also cut your risk of Alzheimer’s in half.

    You might even know that exercise increases the production of a protein that supports the function, growth, and survival of brain cells.

    But what you probably don’t know is that a study published in Nature found a definite link between physical fitness and improved cognitive function, one that results in improved memory, reasoning, sharpness, and judgment. 

    Want to find out where you stand? All you have to do is take a quick walk.

    During the study, the researchers asked participants to walk as quickly as they could and measured how far they got in two minutes. The mean distances achieved were 660 feet for men and 640 feet for women. (That extrapolates to a 16-minute mile, or a pace of slightly under four miles an hour.)

    Then they asked them to take a variety of cognitive tests, and compared the results:

    It surprised us to see that even in a young population, cognitive performance decreases as fitness levels drop. We knew how this might be important in an elderly population, which does not necessarily have good health, but to see this happening in 30 year-olds is surprising.

    This leads us to believe that a basic level of fitness seems to be a preventable risk factor for brain health.

    Just as importantly, when the researchers took MRIs of participants, they found that “higher (levels of personal fitness) is associated with preserved white matter microstructure and better performance in a wide range of cognitive domains.”

    Somewhat simply put, fitter people have greater white matter integrity. White matter is made up of bundles of myelinated axons that affect learning and brain functions and coordinate communication between different brain regions.

    More simply put, fit people’s brains are built a little better, which helps them remember, reason, and decide better. White matter integrity improves episodic memory, or personal experiences. White matter integrity improves cognitive flexibility, processing speed, and fluid intelligence.

    White matter integrity helps you better draw on what you’ve learned in the past to make quicker, smarter decisions in the present.

    All from being able to walk a little farther in two minutes.

    So let’s work on that. Walk as fast as you can for two minutes and see how far you get. Where you fall on the scale — under or over 660 or 640 feet — doesn’t really matter. The goal is to work to improve on that result, because doing so should improve your white matter integrity.

    If you’re don’t exercise, start walking for 15 minutes every day. (As an added bonus, other research shows a 15-minute walk can significantly increase your lifespan.)

    But don’t do a circuit; walk away from your home for 7.5 minutes, then walk back. Over time, try to walk farther on the “out” 7.5 minutes and still make it back in 7.5 minutes.

    That will increase your speed and with it, your level of fitness. (And force you to do the whole 15 minutes; when I go for long bike rides, I always ride away from my house for half the intended distance because then I have no choice but to complete the second half if I want to make it home.) 

    Then consider exercising more. Exercising regularly also checks off an item on the Harvard list of five daily healthy habits.)

    If you’re under the study’s mean distance, shoot for 660 and 640 feet for men and women, respectively. And consider adding other forms of cardio, and maybe even a little strength training.

    Do that, and your results on the two-minute walking test will improve a lot faster, and with less effort, than you think.

    As a result you’ll feel better — both physically and mentally — and you could improve your memory, reasoning, decision-making, and ability to make connections and draw on past experiences.

    Can’t beat that.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    The early-rate deadline for the 2026 Inc. Regionals Awards is Friday, November 14, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply now.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • UC reaches contract agreement with 21,000 employees, averting a strike

    [ad_1]

    The University of California and a union representing 21,000 healthcare, research and technical professionals across the UC system reached a contract agreement and averted a strike, the university and union announced Saturday.

    The union, University Professional and Technical Employees (UPTE), had been bargaining with UC for 17 months for a new contract, and the two sides were in mediation for three weeks. After talks broke down earlier this week, UC said UPTE approached the mediator to re-engage with the university.

    The union was set to strike Nov. 17 and 18 and be joined by more than 60,000 supporters from two additional UC unions, AFSCME 3299 and the California Nurses Assn.

    The unions said it would have been the largest labor strike in UC history. AFSCME 3299 represents patient care technical workers, custodians, food service employees, security guards, secretaries and other workers at UC hospitals and campuses.

    UC and UPTE said details of the tentative contract, which union members must ratify, would be released next week. Prior to the agreement, UPTE workers were seeking investments from UC into retention, pay and ensuring safe working conditions to help address a staffing crisis that the union said “threatens patient care, student services, and the research mission at the heart of the UC system.”

    “The finalized agreement reflects the university’s enduring commitment and UPTE’s advocacy for our employees who play critical roles across the University,” a joint statement from UC and UPTE read. “Both parties acknowledge and appreciate the collaborative spirit that allowed us to move forward and reach a resolution that supports our valuable employees and the University of California’s mission of excellence.”

    UPTE rescinded its strike notice pending a membership ratification vote, according to a statement from Dan Russell, UPTE president and chief negotiator.

    “Our tentative agreement is a hard-won victory for 21,000 healthcare, research, and technical professionals across UC — and one that will benefit millions of UC patients and students, as well as people across the world who benefit from UC’s cutting-edge research,” Russell said. “We continue to stand with AFSCME and CNA members as they fight and strike for a similar agreement for their members.”

    Meredith Turner, the UC senior vice president of external relations and communications, said the agreement was the result of “constructive dialogue and a shared commitment to finding common ground while maintaining financial responsibility in uncertain times.”

    Turner had previously opposed the strike, saying in a video statement posted online Thursday that UC was “disappointed, but not surprised that UPTE has once again chosen disruption over dialog.”

    She said UC had been bargaining in good faith, offering “real improvements, meaningful raises, strong benefits and fair working conditions that reflect how much we value our employees.”

    UPTE previously engaged in three statewide strikes this year in addition to a fourth strike last November, which was limited to UC San Francisco.

    [ad_2]

    Kaitlyn Huamani, Jaweed Kaleem

    Source link

  • Science Says 1 Word Will Supercharge Your To-Do List

    [ad_1]

    Lots of people love their to-do lists. Take my wife: she has several going at any given time. Task lists keep her focused, on track, and for want of a better word, reassured: writing tasks down eliminates any nagging “I hope I remember to do (that)” concerns.

    Other people have a love-hate relationship with their to-do lists. Start the day with ten things on your list, “only” check off nine, and regardless of how much you did accomplish, you feel you failed. Their to-do list helps keep them on track, but it may not make them feel good about what they’ve achieved.

    Either way, to-do lists work.

    But one simple addition can make them work even better.

    study published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that students who spent a moment writing down why a particular topic had relevance to their life, or to the life of a family member or friend, were much more successful than those who did not. In short, they added a “why” to their task list.

    Interestingly, the writing exercise showed the largest benefits for student groups at greatest risk of academic failure, which makes sense: the harder the task — or the less likely you are to think you can achieve it, and therefore are more likely to quit — the more taking a few seconds to actually write down your “why?” will matter.

    It’s hard to stay the course, much less tackle an unpleasant, boring, or difficult task, when it’s “just” a task. Send an apology to an upset customer? Sift through 50 applications to choose three people to interview? Deal with a poorly performing employee? Those tasks are easy to skip, or put off.

    Until you include a “why”:

    • Apologize to the customer because it’s important to me to repair our professional and personal relationship
    • Create an interview shortlist because hiring a new production supervisor will improve our efficiency and costs, and free me up to focus on bigger-picture goals
    • Talk to the employee about his performance because he’s dragging the team down, and because I really want him to succeed

    Here’s a simple example. We have a small second-floor deck with a flat rubber roof underneath and a drain that carries away rainwater. The drain got clogged, debris from nearby trees collected under the deck… I needed to remove the deck boards, clean the rubber roof, patch a small hole that caused a leak into the room below, and put everything back together. Doesn’t sound like a big deal, but — in the same way that every to-do list has at least one item you simply don’t want to tackle — for whatever reason, it felt like a big deal to me.

    So I removed a couple of deck boards, found the hole, and patched it. The important part was done: no more water leaking into the garage. But the sub-structure of the deck was rotted, some of the flashing needed to be replaced… and I kept putting that part off.

    Until I added a “why” to the task. Since the deck is off the kitchen, my wife uses it as an herb garden. She likes growing herbs, likes grabbing a little rosemary or basil or parsley when she cooks… it’s fun for her. Once I added a why to my to-do list — “finish the deck so she can enjoy her herb garden again” — I knocked it out that afternoon. 

    Why? Because now the task had relevance to someone close to me, and therefore to me.

    That’s the beauty of a “why to-do list.” The less appealing, the more difficult, the more complicated, the less likely you are to be motivated to start — much less finish — the more taking a few seconds to write down your “why” matters.

    Try it. Add a “why” beside the items on your to-do list that seem hard, or boring, or intimidating. Write down why it matters. Write down how you, or someone around you, will benefit. Write down what you’ll learn. What you’ll gain.  

    Turn your to-do list into a why to-do list: write down the “what,” then add the “why.” 

    And then do the same for some of your bigger goals, those lingering goals that don’t make your to-do list, whose pursuit tends to get sacrificed in the service of other tasks or goals. (Or for doing things for other people; you’re probably a lot better at doing things for others than for yourself.) 

    Write down why you want to start a side hustle, or business. Write down why you want to go back to school. Write down why you want to spend more time with your family. Write down why you want to get healthier and fitter.

    Don’t just make a list of tasks. Or goals. Write down why each item matters. 

    Even though it only takes a moment, the impact on what you accomplish will be dramatic.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    The early-rate deadline for the 2026 Inc. Regionals Awards is Friday, November 14, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply now.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • Consensus minimizes Eutelsat profitability | Insights | Bloomberg Professional Services

    [ad_1]

    Consensus Ebitda-margin estimates look conservative

    The market may be underestimating Eutelsat’s fiscal-2027 government-segment sales by €50 million-plus, if organic annual revenue growth rates are 10 percentage points higher than median expectations. High-profitability incremental income could mean the adjusted Ebitda margin expands to 52.4% vs. consensus’ 51.1%, in a small move toward guidance of at least 60% in fiscal 2029. The median consensus 2027 segment sales was raised to €281 million from €252 million at the start of 2025, yet further deals with supportive European governments and thei rallies, plus likely additions to the Iris2 project, could provide further impetus.

    The company is part way through its transformation to a satellite operator focused on growing communications segments from a shrinking video-distributor with a stretched balance sheet.

    Eutelsat Scenario Analysis

    Governments show European satellite support via numerous routes

    We believe these catalysts could act as important triggers for this idea in coming months.

    Timeline of Key Catalysts:

    • 4Q: Rights Issues Bolster Eutelsat’s Balance Sheet and Its Appeal as a Reliable Government Supplier
    • Early 2026: ‘Rendezvous One’ for Iris2, Firming Up Costs, Capabilities and Timelines
    • 2026-27: Additional Government-Contract Announcements Following June’s 10-Year Agreement With France of as Much as €1 Billion for LEO Services Ahead of Iris2

    New equity coming via two-phase rights sssue

    The Sept. 30 EGM approved Eutelsat’s plan for a reserved capital increase (RCI) for the French and UK states, Bharti, CMA CGM and FSP at €4 a share (vs. a current price of €3.6), suggesting a low level of dilution for current investors. All of those participating — except Bharti and the UK government — plan to contribute such that their proportionate shareholding increases. The RCI is set to close quickly, followed by a second rights issue (open to all shareholders in the normal way) to be completed by the end of calendar 4Q.

    RCI participants have agreed to support the second capital increase in equal amounts to their post-RCI holdings. This means that of the €1.5 billion Eutelsat intends raising, only €196 million remains to be committed.

    Rights-Issue Implications

    Rights-Issue Implications

    Consensus is slightly below Eutelsat’s fiscal-2029 €1.5-€1.7 billion sales-guidance range and Ebitda-margin aim of at least 60%. That’s probably after prior guidance revisions and full-availability delays to its OneWeb, low earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellation, with global coverage not due until 2026. Eutelsat seeks to beat LEO satellite-market revenue growth in fi scal2029, which might be challenging if any of Amazon Kuiper, Telesat Lightspeed and China’s networks are in service by then. Yet Eutelsat is well placed to sell to European governments and allies.

    In the shorter term, fast revenue growth looks likely given OneWeb’s minimal market share and still-improving availability of capable user terminals and access to markets with unmet demand like India and S. Africa.

    Guidance and Consensus

    Guidance and Consensus

    UK government could add Iris2 to Eutelsat deal

    The 2023 all-share deal for OneWeb saw the UK government become a new Eutelsat holder. It hasn’t been a willing long-term owner of listed shares and could achieve many of its aims via a separate B share, but joining Europe’s sovereign-satellite communications network Iris2 to add to its extra investment in Eutelsat could be a cost-effective way to gain a space-systems backup (“redundancy” being a Strategic Defence Review aim).

    State ownerships also provide an opportunity for the company to boost its government-segment sales, and for European states to funnel cash to the sector alongside grants, loans and equity. The UK plans to spend €163 million in the rights issues to keep its Eutelsat stake constant.

    Eutelsat Shareholders

    Eutelsat Shareholders

    Iris2 brings significant European Union support to industry

    European satellite operators SES, Eutelsat and Hispasat are set to receive a boost from the European Union’s Iris2 network, contributing 38% of the cost among them and commercializing most of its capacity. Eutelsat targets revenue of €6.5 billion over 12 years for its share, though the EC’s only pledged “several hundred” million euro to the consortium as a whole. SES expects an internal rate of return of more than 10% from its investment.

    The companies hope to secure additional revenue from European governments and other bodies as well as international partners, which looks plausible given the common desire to reduce reliance on US technology. Outside the government segment, they may face stiff competition from SpaceX, Amazon, Telesat and Chinese networks, some of which may be available earlier.

    Iris2 Capital Cost (€10.6 Billion)

    Iris2 Capital Cost (€10.6 Billion)

    [ad_2]

    Bloomberg

    Source link

  • Concerned You Don’t Spend Enough Time With Your Kids? Science Says Quality Beats Quantity

    [ad_1]

    As Inc. colleague Jessica Stillman writes, “Work, sleep, family, or fitness: pick three.” Balance is difficult to achieve. Compromises are inevitable.

    The tradeoff that tends to make people feel the guiltiest? Spending less time than they want with their kids.

    But if you want to raise emotionally healthy kids, the quantity of time you spend with them isn’t the only factor.

    According to a classic study described in the book Total Leadership by Wharton professor Stewart Friedman, the number of hours busy people spend with their kids each day is not the best predictor of their children’s physical and emotional health

    Instead, a better predictor was whether the parents were distracted when they spent time with their kids.

    According to Friedman:

    If you’re thinking about work when you’re with your child, the child knows it and it affects him or her.

    Time and attention are not the same thing; there’s a big difference between physical presence and psychological presence. You can be spending time with people, but if you’re not psychologically present, you’re not doing anybody any good.

    In short, time is good — but focused, undistracted quality time is better. (And so is what Jerry Seinfeld calls garbage time. As Seinfeld says about spending time with his kids:

    I’m a believer in the ordinary and the mundane. These guys that talk about “quality time” — I always find that a little sad when they say, “We have quality time.”

    I don’t want quality time. I want the garbage time. That’s what I like. You just see them in their room reading a comic book and you get to kind of watch that for a minute, or a bowl of Cheerios at 11 o’clock at night when they’re not even supposed to be up. The garbage, that’s what I love.

    Because that’s when real life happens.

    Quality time or garbage time, the key is focus. You’re with your kids, and you’re not doing anything else. Thinking about anything else. Worrying about anything else. You’re just there, with them.

    But that doesn’t mean you can never be work-focused and work-driven. The study focused on what Friedman calls the inner experience of work:

    • A parent’s perceived values regarding the importance of career and family 
    • The psychological interference of work on family life (Friedman defines this as thinking about work when you’re physically with your family)
    • The apparent control over time spent working

    Those factors, rather than the quantity of time spent together, correlated with the degree children displayed behavioral problems, something Friedman feels are key indicators of mental health. After all, kids are less likely to act out when they’re relatively happy and feel good about themselves.

    That’s why undistracted time is just one piece of the puzzle. How you feel about your work also matters. According to Friedman, “To the extent that a (parent) was performing well in and feeling satisfied with their job, their children were likely to demonstrate relatively few behavior problems, again, independent of how long they were working.”

    If you love your work but are distracted, you lose the impact on your kids of your passion for your profession. 

    “A parent’s psychological availability, or presence, which is noticeably absent when they are on their digital device,” Friedman writes, “was also linked with children having emotional and behavioral problems.”

    In simple terms, 30 undistracted minutes are better than 60 minutes dipping in and out of emails.

    So how can you improve your ratio of focused time?

    One way is to block out family time the same way you block out work time. Have dinner as a family. Help your kids with their homework. Watch a movie. Get outside. Do something. Do anything.

    Just do it together, undistracted.

    It won’t be as hard as you think. Every family has peak times when they can best interact. If you don’t proactively free up that time, you’ll slip back into work stuff.

    Working when you’re home is okay. Telling your kids, “I need 15 minutes to send a few emails, and then we’ll go outside and play,” is okay — as long as you put everything else aside after those 15 minutes and just play. After all, one of the factors Friedman identified is how you feel about your work. It’s okay to show your work is important.

    You just have to show that your kids, when you’re spending time with them, are just as important.

    As Friedman writes, “We were surprised to see in our study that parents’ time spent working and on child care — variables often much harder to do anything about, in light of economic and industry conditions — did not influence children’s mental health.

    “So, if we care about how our careers are affecting our children’s mental health,” he continues, “we can and should focus on the value we place on our careers and experiment with creative ways to be available, physically and psychologically, to our children, though not necessarily in more hours with them.”

    Because you may not be able to control how much time you spend with your kids.

    But you can control how you spend it.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • Golf’s greatest mystery finally solved by physicists

    [ad_1]

    The "Golfer's Curse" is not really bad luck—just applied physics, according to the researchers behind a new study.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Obstructive sleep apnea may be linked to microbleeds in the brain

    [ad_1]

    Maybe you know you snore like a bear, but you don’t feel much urgency to look into it. Or maybe you have been told to wear a continuous positive airway pressure, or CPAP, machine for sleep apnea, but it is just so cumbersome.A new study shows that it is important to take obstructive sleep apnea seriously now –– it could impact your risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease later.Moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea is associated with a greater risk for new microbleeds in the brain, according to the study.”Cerebral microbleeds are a common finding in the aging brain,” said Dr. Jonathan Graff-Radford, professor of neurology at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, Minnesota. He was not involved in the research.Microbleeds increase with age, and people who have them have a slightly higher risk of future strokes and faster cognitive decline, Graff-Radford said. “Anything that increases microbleeds is relevant to brain aging,” he added.More evidence you need to treat sleep apneaObstructive sleep apnea is a condition in which a blockage of airways by weak, heavy or relaxed soft tissues disrupts breathing during sleep. The condition is different from central sleep apnea, in which the brain occasionally skips telling the body to breathe.There are a few ways to treat obstructive sleep apnea, including relying on oral devices that keep the throat open during sleep, regularly using a CPAP or similar machine, and having surgeries.The study has a strong methodology and should stress the importance of screening for sleep apnea to clinicians and treatment to patients, said Dr. Rudy Tanzi, professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School and director of the Genetics and Aging Research Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. He was not involved in the research.”Don’t ignore it. Do something about it,” he said. “It’s not just the immediate risk for down the road for bleeds, but also later down the road for Alzheimer’s disease as well.”Not addressing obstructive sleep apnea is a double whammy, Tanzi said. Not getting enough good-quality sleep –– which can be hard to do when your breathing is impaired during the night –– has been associated with brain aging, but the microbleeds that could result may increase the risk for dementia down the line.The study, which was published in the journal JAMA Network Open Tuesday, is observational, which means that it can only establish that obstructive sleep apnea and microbleeds are associated, not that one definitively causes the other. Further studies will need to examine if treating sleep apnea can prevent microbleeds.Know the signsWhen is it time to ask your doctor about obstructive sleep apnea?Loud, frequent snoring is a good indicator, Tanzi said. If your partner notices pauses in your breathing while you sleep or gasping and choking, that’s another sign you should look into sleep apnea.Problems during the day can be a good indicator, too. Sleepiness, trouble concentrating, irritability and increased hunger are signs you may not be getting quality sleep and that it may be time to get assessed for sleep apnea.Night sweats might also be a sign of sleep apnea, as research has shown that about 30% of people with obstructive sleep apnea have reported night sweats.Waking up at least two times in the night, teeth grinding, and morning headaches might also indicate a problem.The latest study “urges (people) to take it more seriously, because the damage that can come from obstructive sleep apnea can definitely be more severe than you think,” Tanzi said.

    Maybe you know you snore like a bear, but you don’t feel much urgency to look into it. Or maybe you have been told to wear a continuous positive airway pressure, or CPAP, machine for sleep apnea, but it is just so cumbersome.

    A new study shows that it is important to take obstructive sleep apnea seriously now –– it could impact your risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease later.

    Moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea is associated with a greater risk for new microbleeds in the brain, according to the study.

    “Cerebral microbleeds are a common finding in the aging brain,” said Dr. Jonathan Graff-Radford, professor of neurology at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, Minnesota. He was not involved in the research.

    Microbleeds increase with age, and people who have them have a slightly higher risk of future strokes and faster cognitive decline, Graff-Radford said. “Anything that increases microbleeds is relevant to brain aging,” he added.

    More evidence you need to treat sleep apnea

    Obstructive sleep apnea is a condition in which a blockage of airways by weak, heavy or relaxed soft tissues disrupts breathing during sleep. The condition is different from central sleep apnea, in which the brain occasionally skips telling the body to breathe.

    There are a few ways to treat obstructive sleep apnea, including relying on oral devices that keep the throat open during sleep, regularly using a CPAP or similar machine, and having surgeries.

    The study has a strong methodology and should stress the importance of screening for sleep apnea to clinicians and treatment to patients, said Dr. Rudy Tanzi, professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School and director of the Genetics and Aging Research Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. He was not involved in the research.

    “Don’t ignore it. Do something about it,” he said. “It’s not just the immediate risk for down the road for bleeds, but also later down the road for Alzheimer’s disease as well.”

    Not addressing obstructive sleep apnea is a double whammy, Tanzi said. Not getting enough good-quality sleep –– which can be hard to do when your breathing is impaired during the night –– has been associated with brain aging, but the microbleeds that could result may increase the risk for dementia down the line.

    The study, which was published in the journal JAMA Network Open Tuesday, is observational, which means that it can only establish that obstructive sleep apnea and microbleeds are associated, not that one definitively causes the other. Further studies will need to examine if treating sleep apnea can prevent microbleeds.

    Know the signs

    When is it time to ask your doctor about obstructive sleep apnea?

    Loud, frequent snoring is a good indicator, Tanzi said. If your partner notices pauses in your breathing while you sleep or gasping and choking, that’s another sign you should look into sleep apnea.

    Problems during the day can be a good indicator, too. Sleepiness, trouble concentrating, irritability and increased hunger are signs you may not be getting quality sleep and that it may be time to get assessed for sleep apnea.

    Night sweats might also be a sign of sleep apnea, as research has shown that about 30% of people with obstructive sleep apnea have reported night sweats.

    Waking up at least two times in the night, teeth grinding, and morning headaches might also indicate a problem.

    The latest study “urges (people) to take it more seriously, because the damage that can come from obstructive sleep apnea can definitely be more severe than you think,” Tanzi said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Want to Promote the Right Person? Science Says Promote From Within

    [ad_1]

    Matters of style aside, Steve Jobs was an exceptionally effective leader at both Apple and Pixar. But would he have been as effective at, say, General Motors? Or Pepsi?

    While the old saw says a great leader can lead anywhere, still: hard skills definitely matter. A study published in Industrial and Labor Relations Review found that having a highly competent boss (defined as a person who excels at “ability to get the job done” and “employee development) has by far the largest positive influence on employee job satisfaction.

    As the researchers write, “If your boss could do your job, you’re more likely to be happy at work.”

    You’re also more likely to be happy if your boss was promoted from within, rather than hired from the outside.  A Joblist study found that nearly 70 percent of respondents preferred to be managed by a seasoned company vet who “climbed the ranks” rather than an external hire.

    Even if the external hire brought “proven talent” to the role. 

    Not only did respondents think hiring from within was the better path to growth, they also took outside hires personally: 35 percent had quit, or at least considered quitting, when passed over for someone outside the organization. 

    But wait, there’s more: internal promotions led employees to report higher productivity, greater loyalty to the organization, and that they had a better relationship with their (internally hired) manager.

    Internally hired leaders agree: they reported feeling more supported and respected by their teams, and more likely to describe their teams as high-performing. (Granted, which may have more to do with their tendency to embrace “this is how we do it around here” expectations than with objective, measurable outcomes.) 

    Keep in mind there were situations where respondents felt external hires made better sense. Like when an essential employee with specific, not internally replaceable, skills leaves the company.

    Or, although this wasn’t included in the study, if you as the employer are unhappy with your company’s culture.

    Culture isn’t what you say it is; culture is what you and your employees do. Bringing in people who embody the culture you hope to build may be the best way to effect long-term change. 

    But otherwise, you’re likely to be more successful when you promote from within, because when you get those promotions right, the effect on productivity, job satisfaction, and employee retention can be dramatic.

    survey of over 400,000 people across the U.S. found that when employees believe promotions are managed effectively, they are more than twice as likely to give extra effort at work and to plan for having a long-term future with their company.

    Plus, when employees believe promotions are managed effectively, they are more than five times as likely to believe their leaders act with integrity.

    At those companies, employee turnover rates are half that of other companies in the same industry. Productivity, innovation, and growth metrics outperform the competition. (For public companies, stock returns are almost 3X times the market average.)

    So before you reflexively look outside your business to “bring in new talent” or “benefit from outside perspectives” or “inject fresh blood into the company,” take a step back and look at the criteria you will use to make the promotion or hiring decision.

    Instead of focusing on “qualifications,” determine what the perfect person in the job will actually do.

    If teamwork matters most, promote the best team player. If productivity matters most, promote your most effective employee. Getting the right things done — whatever those outcomes may be for the open position — matters most.

    If you truly can’t find that person within your organization, then feel free to look outside. In that case, your employees will understand, and will realize that your goal is always to find the best possible person for the job. 

    And because that person knows their stuff, and uses that knowledge to get things done, they will fit in just fine.

    But then take a look at how you’re developing people: unless you’re hiring someone to fill a role new to your company, you clearly need to work harder to help the people you already have learn new skills.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • Research monkeys got loose after a truck overturned on a highway. Their owner, destination, and exact purpose remain shrouded in mystery | Fortune

    [ad_1]

    The recent escape of several research monkeys after the truck carrying them overturned on a Mississippi interstate is the latest glimpse into the secretive industry of animal research and the processes that allow key details of what happened to be kept from the public.

    Three monkeys have remained on the loose since the crash on Tuesday in a rural area along Interstate 59, spilling wooden crates labeled “live monkeys” into the tall grass near the highway. Since then, searchers in masks, face shields and other protective equipment have scoured nearby fields and woods for the missing primates. Five of the 21 Rhesus macaques on board were killed during the search, according to the local sheriff, but it was unclear how that happened.

    Key details remain shrouded in secrecy

    Mississippi authorities have not disclosed the company involved in transporting the monkeys, where the monkeys were headed or who owns them. While Tulane University in New Orleans has acknowledged that the monkeys had been housed at its National Biomedical Research Center in Covington, Louisiana, it said it doesn’t own them and won’t identify who does.

    An initial report from the sheriff described the monkeys as “aggressive” and carrying diseases such as herpes, adding to the confusion. Tulane later said the monkeys were free of pathogens, but it is still unclear what kind of research the monkeys were used for.

    The questions surrounding the Mississippi crash and the mystery of why the animals were traveling through the South are remarkable, animal advocates say.

    “When a truck carrying 21 monkeys crashes on a public highway, the community has a right to know who owned those animals, where they were being sent, and what diseases they may have been exposed to and harbored simply by being caught up in the primate experimentation industry,” said Lisa Jones-Engel, senior science adviser on primate experimentation with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

    “It is highly unusual — and deeply troubling — that Tulane refuses to identify its partner in this shipment,” Jones-Engel added.

    One thing that is known is that the 2025 Chevrolet Silverado pickup hauling the monkeys was driven by a 54-year-old Cascade, Maryland, man when it ran off the highway into the grassy median area, the Mississippi Highway Patrol said in a statement to The Associated Press. The driver wasn’t hurt, nor was his passenger, a 34-year-old resident of Thurmont, Maryland.

    Confidentiality is built into contracts, blocking information

    Transporting research animals typically requires legally binding contracts that prohibit the parties involved from disclosing information, Tulane University said in a statement to the AP. That’s done for the safety of the animals and to protect proprietary information, the New Orleans-based university said.

    “To the best of Tulane’s knowledge, the 13 recovered animals remain in the possession of their owner and are en route to their original destination,” the statement said.

    The crash has drawn a range of reactions — from conspiracy theories that suggest a government plot to sicken people to serious responses from people who oppose experimenting on animals.

    “How incredibly sad and wrong,” Republican U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said of the crash.

    “I’ve never met a taxpayer that wants their hard-earned dollars paying for animal abuse nor who supports it,” the Georgia congresswoman said in a post on the social platform X. “This needs to end!”

    Tulane center has ties to more than 155 institutions worldwide

    Tulane’s Covington center has received $35 million annually in National Institutes of Health support, and its partners include nearly 500 investigators from more than 155 institutions globally, the school said in an Oct. 9 news release. The center has been funded by NIH since 1964, and federal grants have been a significant source of income for the institution, it said.

    In July, some of the research center’s 350 employees held a ribbon-cutting ceremony to mark the opening of a new 10,000-square-foot office building and a new laboratory at the facility. This fall, the facility’s name was changed from the Tulane National Primate Research Center to the Tulane National Biomedical Research Center to reflect its broader mission, university officials announced.

    Research monkeys have escaped before in South Carolina, Pennsylvania

    The Mississippi crash is one of at least three major monkey escapes in the U.S. over the past four years.

    Last November, 43 Rhesus macaques escaped from a South Carolina compound that breeds them for medical research after an enclosure wasn’t fully locked. Employees from the Alpha Genesis facility in Yemassee, South Carolina, set up traps to capture them. However, some spent two months that winter living in the woods and weathering a rare snowstorm. By late January, the last four escapees were recaptured after being lured back into captivity by peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

    In January 2022, several cynomolgus macaque monkeys escaped when a truck towing a trailer of about 100 of the animals collided with a dump truck on a Pennsylvania highway, authorities said. The monkeys were headed to a quarantine facility in an undisclosed location after arriving at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York on a flight from Mauritius, an Indian Ocean island nation, authorities said. A spokesperson for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said all of the animals were accounted for within about a day, though three were euthanized for undisclosed reasons.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Martin, The Associated Press

    Source link

  • Want to Know If You Made a Great First Impression? Science Says Watch for Any of These 5 Tells

    [ad_1]

    Making a great first impression is relatively simple, if not always easy. You smile. Make eye contact. Listen more than you speak. Ask questions about the other person. Be what psychologists call a “positive opposite.”

    In some cases, all you have to do is believe you will make a good first impression. A study published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin shows people who expect to be “accepted” act more warmly and therefore are seen as more likable. Of course, you genuinely have to believe you will be accepted (or at least “George Costanza believe” you will be accepted), which is obviously the hard part.

    Knowing how to make a good first impression? Relatively simple. But knowing whether you actually did made a good first impression?

    According to a meta-analysis of over 50 studies published in Psychological Bulletin, the key is to look for specific nonverbal and verbal signs to determine if you’ve established some degree of rapport.  

    1. They smile, and better yet, laugh. Most people reflexively smile back when you smile. What matters is whether they smile past the initial polite-smile phase.
    2. They hold eye contact. The eyes are usually the first indication the other person is thinking about somewhere they would rather be.
    3. They maintain physical proximity. We all define personal space differently; the fact you back up half a step might just only mean I’ve slightly encroached on yours. Still, according to the researchers, physical proximity is a key indicator of likability.
    4. They start a new topic of conversation. If there’s no spark, polite people see the current topic through and try to move on. But if they bring up something else, without prompting …
    5. They unconsciously mimic your nonverbal expressions. A study published in Cognition and Emotion shows other people mimicking your nonverbal expressions indicates they understand the emotions you’re experiencing, and may even result in “emotional contagion.” (Which means, if you want to use your first impression skills manipulatively, copying the other person’s expressions and gestures can make you seem more likable.)

    The next time you meet someone new, smile. Make and hold eye contact. Laugh when appropriate. Don’t back away. Shift the conversational focus to the person you just met; one way is to use the three questions rule. The more you’re interested in what they have to say — the more you show you want to understand the other person on a deeper level — the more likely they are to turn a brief encounter into a longer conversation.

    All the while, pay attention to how the other person responds. Whether they smile, laugh, and hold eye contact.

    And more important, whether they maintain physical proximity, initiate new topics of conversation on their own, and mimic some of your nonverbal expressions.

    And then use what you learn to make a better first impression with the next person you meet.

    Because the next person you meet could turn out to be one of your most important connections. Or one of your biggest customers.

    Or, best of all, one of your closest friends.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • A Massive Study Shows Success Doesn’t Lead to Happiness–But Happiness Does Drive Success

    [ad_1]

    It’s easy to assume achievement will yield happiness. Start and build your own thriving business, be happier. Advance in your career, be happier. Get a bigger house, be happier. Finish a marathon, be happier.

    Hard work and sacrifice lead to success, and happiness is by-product. In its most productive form, living in a dynamic of conditionality (first this, then that) is delaying gratification: doing or not doing this today, so you can have, or be, that tomorrow.

    Saving money now so you can start a business down the road. Working harder than everyone around you so you can get promoted. Training and training and training so you can finally check a marathon off your bucket list.

    Choosing to do (this), because you someday want to have, or be, (that): active choices, intended to produce desired outcomes.

    That’s a good thing, both in terms of likelihood of achievement and fulfillment; after all, sometimes success is a driver of happiness.

    But more often, the opposite is true. As a study published in Psychological Bulletin that reviewed over 200 different happiness studies found, happiness is much more likely to drive success. 

    According to the researchers (long, but worth it):

    The characteristics related to positive affect include confidence, optimism, and self-efficacy; likability and positive (outlooks towards) others; sociability, activity, and energy; prosocial behavior; immunity and physical well-being; effective coping with challenge and stress; and originality and flexibility.

    What these attributes share is that they all encourage active involvement with goal pursuits.

    The success of happy people rests on two main factors. First, because happy people experience frequent positive moods, they have a greater likelihood of working actively toward new goals while experiencing those moods. Second, happy people are in possession of past skills and resources, which they have built over time during previous pleasant moods.

    Add it all up and in non-researcher-speak, happy people are primed to pursue goals — and because their happiness makes them more likely to have pursued goals in the past, they have developed skills that help them be more likely to accomplish their goals in the future.

    The result is a self-sustaining loop: happiness = success = happiness = success….

    Another example? A study published in the Journal of Happiness Studies determined employee well-being and happiness accurately predicts employee performance. The researchers spent seven years studying over 900,000 soldiers and found that high positive affect, low negative affect, and high optimism predicted awards for performance and heroism.

    Or in non-researcher-speak, happy people perform better.

    How much better? The most positive and optimistic soldiers were four times more likely to receive awards than the least positive and optimistic soldiers.

    Of course, you could argue the relationship is correlational, not causal. High performance could result in happiness since high performers tend to receive more recognition and praise, tend to feel more like part of the team, tend to get promoted more frequently, etc. (Instead of my happiness driving my performance, maybe I’m happy because I’m doing so well.)

    Except for the fact negative affect (read: I’m kinda miserable) predicted lower performance.

    In short, happiness predicted performance, and with it, success.

    So if you aren’t as happy as you would like to be, stop thinking success will be the cure. Making more money, for example, can certainly improve your well-being. But after a certain point, it won’t make you happier: the famous 2018 study published in Nature: Human Emotion found that somewhere between $60,000 and $75,000 per year is ideal for “emotional well-being.” (Feel free to adjust for inflation.) Daniel Kahneman’s famous study pegged the number at $75,000.

    More generally (and without having to worry about inflation), a Journal of Positive Psychology study shows people tend to “grossly overestimate” the impact of income on overall happiness. 

    In short, affluence (a fairly common way to measure “success”) is a terrible predictor of happiness. Financial success, past a certain point, won’t make you happier. I know at least a few incredibly rich people who say they’re miserable. Money isn’t their cause of their discontent, but nor has it helped them feel better about their lives.

    On the other hand, maintaining even a few close friendships will. A 2013 PLOS One study shows doubling your number of friends is like increasing your income by 50 percent in terms of how happy you feel. So can helping other people; a number of studies show giving can be as beneficial for the giver as the receiver.

    So can engaging in active or social forms of leisure. A 2017 PLOS One study shows working out, connecting with family or friends, or pursuing an interest are much more likely to increase levels of happiness compared with passive “activities” like vegging out or staring at your phone.

    Bottom line? If you want to be happier, do things that make you happier. Do things that leave you feeling satisfied, fulfilled, and gratified. Not only will those successes — whether professional or personal — make you feel happier, they’ll also create a foundation for future success.

    And happiness.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link

  • Steve Jobs, Perseverance, and Why Science Says Sometimes You ‘Just Shut Up and Dig the (Gosh Darned) Hole’

    [ad_1]

    Steve Jobs saw mental toughness as a key to success. According to Jobs:  

    I’m convinced that about half of what separates successful entrepreneurs from the non-successful ones is pure perseverance. It is so hard. You pour so much of your life into this thing.

    There are such rough moments… that most people give up. I don’t blame them. It’s really tough.

    Makes sense. Perseverance, the ability to push through failure and adversity and stick to your long-term passions and goals, is often what allows “ordinary” people to accomplish extraordinary things. Sometimes, the people who win are the people to give up on themselves.

    But why do some people quit when others keep going? More importantly, why are you and I sometimes able to stay the course, yet other times not?

    Researchers who conducted a study published in Wilderness and Environmental Medicine followed over than 200 participants of 155-mile, multistage, desert ultra-marathons and established a causal link between the participants’ coping strategies and whether they finished the races.

    Some used what the researchers called “adaptive coping strategies.” Instead of seeing suffering as happening them, they decided to see their extreme discomfort as a challenge, as something they chose. (Which, of course, they had.) Or finding ways to ignore or distract themselves from the pain. 

    On the flip side, some participants fell prey to “maladaptive coping strategies.” Like feeling scared by the discomfort and pain they experienced. Or seeing a certain level of pain as a clear signal to stop. (Which, to be fair, seems like a reasonable response.) 

    The bottom line? A single occurrence of a maladaptive coping strategy tripled the chances a participant would drop out of a race. We can all relate to that; sometimes one weak moment is enough to unleash an avalanche of negativity, uncertainty, and despair.

    And so we quit.

    Clearly reframing a setback or roadblock as a challenge — as just another problem to solve — can help you stay the course. So can embracing the small-world rule.

    And then there’s this. In a recent Outside magazine article, Dr. Kevin Alschuler, the lead author of the study cited above, recommends a surprising coping strategy.

    “A patient and I will talk through their options, and it’s option A or option B,” Alschuler writes. “And they want option C.” 

    Except sometimes option C doesn’t exist. “Ultra-athletes,” Alschuler says, “all seem to do a really good job of saying, ‘Well, option C is off the table, and what’s in front of me is either A or B.’”

    Searching for option C is normal. To overcome challenges, you need to think outside the box. You need to seek creative solutions. You need to never stop trying to find a way.

    That’s what I did that when I built a deck in the dune. I got tired of digging through all the roots and vines and debris, and started thinking about options. I could rent equipment. I could hire people. I could… I could do a lot of things, but none were feasible. 

    Worst of all, trying — and then failing, over and over again — to figure out an easier way made the original task seem even more insurmountable. I wasn’t just defeated by the task; I was defeated by my inability to work the problem and find an easier way.

    And I almost gave up.

    But then I remembered what my dad had told me when I was twelve or so and we were digging footers by hand for a sunroom addition. I was griping, and complaining, and groaning… until finally my dad said, “Sometimes you need to just shut up and dig the (gosh darned) hole.”

    The same was true for the dune deck. To paraphrase Ryan Holiday, the way was already in front of me: I could just keep digging. Like most things, success was just a matter of time and effort. Option B, quitting, wasn’t an option if I wanted to build the deck. Option A, keeping my head down and doing the work, would eventually allow me to level the area.

    So I accepted that fact and went back to digging. And even though it turned out I had about 20 more hours of digging ahead of me, I felt a lot lighter inside.

    Because sometimes the way isn’t option C, or D, or Z. Sometimes, the only way is option A or B.

    Or just option A.

    And when you accept that, staying the course actually gets easier, not harder — because then you won’t focus on what you don’t have, or can’t control.

    You just settle in.

    And do what you need to do.

    The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Haden

    Source link