ReportWire

Tag: Reproductive Freedom

  • Congress does not come back with a warrant

    Congress does not come back with a warrant

    [ad_1]

    In this week’s The Reason Roundtable, editors Matt Welch, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Nick Gillespie, and Peter Suderman contextualize Iran’s retaliatory strike against Israel before bemoaning the recent vote in Congress on the renewal of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

    02:20—Iran’s retaliatory strike on Israel

    13:05—House votes to reauthorize Section 702 of FISA.

    29:21—Weekly Listener Question

    42:00—Arizona Supreme Court rules on law that would ban nearly all abortions.

    47:23—This week’s cultural recommendations

    Mentioned in this podcast:

    Iran Attacks Israel,” by Liz Wolfe

    Biden Sends U.S. Forces To Protect Israel’s Borders for the First Time Ever,” by Matthew Petti

    What’s the Root Cause of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict?” by Eli Lake and Jeremy Hammond

    After Hamas Attack, There Are No Good Options in the Middle East,” by Matt Welch, Katherine Mangu-Ward, Nick Gillespie, and Peter Suderman

    The Iranian Coup that Led to 67 Years of Reckless Intervention,” by Nick Gillespie

    Come Back With a Warrant,” by Eric Boehm

    Biden Hints at Freedom for Julian Assange,” by J.D. Tuccille

    Edward Snowden: The Individual Is More Powerful Today Than Ever Before,” by Nick Gillespie

    ‘Selective Surveillance Outrage’ and ‘Situational Libertarianism’ Isn’t Good Enough, Congress!” by Nick Gillespie

    Why We Get the Police State We Deserve—and What We Can Do to Fix That,” by Nick Gillespie

    Supreme Court Says Officials Who Block Critics on Social Media Might Be Violating the First Amendment,” by Jacob Sullum

    Everyone Agrees Government Is a Hot Mess. So Why Does It Keep Getting Bigger Anyway?” by Nick Gillespie

    In Defense of Roe” by Nick Gillespie

    Abortion & Libertarianism: Nick Gillespie, Ronald Bailey, Mollie Hemingway, & Katherine Mangu-Ward

    Trump’s Abortion Stance Is Convenient, but That Does Not Mean He’s Wrong,” by Jacob Sullum

    What Leaving Abortion Up to the States Really Means,” by Elizabeth Nolan Brown

    William F. Buckley, RIP,” by Jacob Sullum

    Radical Squares,” by Nick Gillespie

    FDR: A One-Man Show,” by Chris Elliott

    The Big Guy’s Last Drink,” by Peter Suderman

    The Libertarian Moment, UFC300 edition (Renato Moicano invokes Mises)

    Send your questions to roundtable@reason.com. Be sure to include your social media handle and the correct pronunciation of your name.

    Today’s sponsor:

    • What’s the first thing you’d do if you had an extra hour in your day? A lot of us spend our lives wishing we had more time. The question is, time for what? If time was unlimited, how would you use it? The best way to squeeze that special thing into your schedule is to know what’s important to you, and make it a priority. Therapy can help you find what matters to you, so you can do more of it. If you’re thinking of starting therapy, give BetterHelp a try. It’s entirely online. Designed to be convenient, flexible, and suited to your schedule. Just fill out a brief questionnaire to get matched with a licensed therapist, and switch therapists any time for no additional charge. Learn to make time for what makes you happy, with BetterHelp. Visit BetterHelp.com/roundtable today to get 10 percent off your first month.

    Audio production by Ian Keyser

    Assistant production by Hunt Beaty

    Music: “Angeline,” by The Brothers Steve


    [ad_2]

    Matt Welch

    Source link

  • Kari Lake keeps changing her tune on abortion

    Kari Lake keeps changing her tune on abortion

    [ad_1]

    When it comes to messaging on abortion and reproductive rights, U.S. Senate candidate Kari Lake appears to be holding fast to an infamous alt-right adage: “Flood the zone with shit.”

    Lake, the fiery loser of the 2022 Arizona governor’s race, is running for the Senate against Democratic Rep. Ruben Gallego. They both aim to replace Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, an independent who announced on March 5 she won’t run for reelection. Though Lake faces Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb in the July 30 primary, she is considered the frontrunner for the nomination.

    Lake is known for modeling her political brand after former President Donald Trump, who endorsed her and whose Mar-a-Lago residence she tends to haunt. Just like Trump, her political brand seems to demand frequent shifts in messaging, making it difficult for voters and reporters to know her position.

    NBC News, for one, seems to be falling for Lake’s strategy, writing on March 2 that Lake “is seeking to moderate her position” on abortion after she told the news outlet that she doesn’t support a national ban.

    While true on its face, the statement lacks context.

    This isn’t the first time, after all, that Lake has sought to “moderate her position.”

    Before Roe v. Wade’s demise, Lake called the 1864 Arizona law that banned abortion in almost all cases, including rape and incest, a “great law.”

    In January 2022, she tweeted, “ALL Baby Lives Matter — every single heartbeat is a gift from God & we will never stop fighting to protect life. We must make Arizona a Sanctuary State for the unborn.”

    A few months later, she called abortion “the ultimate sin.”

    Her message began oscillating after the landmark Roe v. Wade decision was overturned in June 2022, resulting in a national backlash against strong antiabortion stances. Lake commented in an interview on KTAR’s Mike Broomhead Show that abortion should be “rare and legal,” but soon afterward, Lake spokesperson Ross Trumble had to walk back that statement. Within weeks of a judge ruling that prosecutors could enforce the 1864 near-total ban on abortion, Trumble clarified that Lake did not want any changes to abortion law.

    Whether or not the 1864 law has supremacy over a 2022 law that bans abortion after 15 weeks is being weighed by the Arizona Supreme Court, with a decision expected any day.

    Lake lost the governor’s race to Katie Hobbs in November 2022 by more than 17,000 votes but never conceded, claiming she was the real winner. Lake’s sometimes-extreme stances on abortion likely played a role in her loss.

    click to enlarge

    Supporters of an abortion access ballot measure gathered signatures at the Bigger Than Roe National Women’s March in Phoenix on Jan. 20. Abortion is likely to be a key issue in November elections, including the U.S. Senate race in Arizona.

    Mary Berkstresser

    ‘I haven’t changed, actually’

    While launching her U.S. Senate run on Oct. 10, 2023, Lake seemed to strike a softer tone on abortion. She suggested providing more government assistance to pregnant women so they didn’t feel financial pressure to have an abortion.

    “We gotta get our priorities straight. If we’re gonna be for saving babies’ lives, we gotta be for helping women,” Lake said.

    But weeks later, she couldn’t stick to her new story.

    On Nov. 1, she was asked to explain the evolution of her stance on abortion by an ABC 15 reporter.

    “I haven’t changed, actually,” Lake said.

    More confusion followed.

    In a Feb. 19 interview on KTAR, Lake stated that “I support what the people of Arizona support” concerning the two laws being considered by the Arizona Supreme Court and the ballot initiative that would guarantee a right to abortion if approved in November by voters. She also said she would not vote for a national ban on abortion.

    And who knows what she told wealthy QAnon conspiracy theory backers at a private fundraiser in February, where tickets ranged from $50 to $13,200 per person.

    So, has she changed or hasn’t she?

    With the November election quickly approaching and abortion rights a key issue for Arizona voters, especially with the large pool of independents in the state, it’s no surprise that Lake had to adapt her formerly extreme stance.

    But why draw attention to that change when she may risk losing the loyal, extreme base she has preached to for years?

    If Lake were to win in November’s election, which version of her would show up on the floor of the Senate?

    Gallego, her opponent, has pounced on Lake’s inconsistent rhetoric during stops on the campaign trail, arguing that voters shouldn’t have faith in Lake’s word because of her ever-shifting stance on abortion.

    “How can you trust someone who only months ago was saying it’s OK to arrest providers of abortion care?” Gallego asked at a Feb. 21 event.

    [ad_2]

    TJ L’Heureux

    Source link

  • Penis fibroblasts crucial for erection, underestimated.

    Penis fibroblasts crucial for erection, underestimated.

    [ad_1]

    Regular erections could be important for maintaining erectile function, according to a new study on mice published in Science by researchers at Karolinska Institutet. “We discovered that an increased frequency of erections leads to more fibroblasts that enable erection and vice versa, that a decreased frequency results in fewer of these cells,” says principal investigator Christian Göritz.

    Newswise — In a new study on mice, researchers at Karolinska Institutet and Uppsala University in Sweden show that connective tissue cells called fibroblasts have a previously unknown and very important function in mediating erection.

    “Fibroblasts are the most abundant cells in the penis of both mice and humans, but they have been neglected in research,” says Eduardo Guimaraes, researcher at the Department of Cell and Molecular Biology at Karolinska Institutet and first author of the paper. “Now we can show, using a very precise method called optogenetics, that they have a very important role in regulating blood flow in the penis, which is what makes the penis erect.”

    The study shows that fibroblasts mediate erection by taking up the neurotransmitter noradrenaline, which leads to the widening of blood vessels in the penis. How effective this process is depends on the number of fibroblasts.

    The body adapts

    The researchers were also able to show that the number of fibroblasts in the penis is affected by the frequency of erections. The more frequent the more fibroblasts and vice versa; a lower frequency of erections reduced the number of fibroblasts.

    “It’s not so strange really. If you exert yourself a lot, your body adapts. If you run regularly, it will eventually become easier to breathe while running,” says Christian Göritz, senior researcher at the Department of Cell and Molecular Biology at Karolinska Institutet, who led the study.

    In terms of what conclusions can be drawn for humans from studies on mice, Christian Göritz says that in this case there are significant similarities.

    “The basic mechanisms of erection are very similar in all mammals regarding anatomy, cell structure and so on,” he says. “However, there is one difference between humans and most mammals – they have a bone in their penis. This means that effective blood flow regulation is probably even more important for human reproduction.”

    Fewer fibroblasts with age

    Older mice had fewer fibroblasts in the penis, which was also reflected in lower blood flow. The ability to get an erection decreases with age also in humans, which could be partly due to fewer fibroblasts in the penis. The researchers therefore believe that it could be possible to train the ability to get an erection to counteract impotence in the same way as you can train your strength or fitness at the gym.

    “This is not something we have shown in our study, so it is a bit speculative, but a reasonable interpretation is that it gets easier if you have regular erections,” says Christian Göritz.

    He hopes that the new knowledge of the role of fibroblasts in erection may also lead to new treatments for erectile dysfunction.

    The research was mainly funded by the Bertil Hållsten Foundation and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation. There are no reported conflicts of interest.


    Facts: Erectile dysfunction, or impotence, affects between 5 and 20 per cent of all men, with the incidence increasing with age. Erectile dysfunction often negatively affects the quality of life and physical and psychosocial health, both for the patient and their family. Common risk factors, apart from age, are similar to those for cardiovascular disease: inactivity, obesity, hypertension, smoking, high cholesterol levels and metabolic syndrome. Source: Region Stockholm knowledge support Viss.nu.


    Publication: “Corpora cavernosa fibroblasts mediate penile erection”, Eduardo Linck Guimaraes, David Oliveira Dias, Wing Fung Hau, Anais Julien, Daniel Holl, Maria Garcia-Collado, Soniya Savant, Evelina Vågesjö, Mia Phillipson, Lars Jakobsson, Christian Göritz. Science, online 8 February 2024, doi: 10.1126/science.ade8064.



    [ad_2]

    Karolinska Institute

    Source link

  • Menstrual products contain endocrine disruptors: tampons, pads, liners.

    Menstrual products contain endocrine disruptors: tampons, pads, liners.

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — The average menstruator will use over 11,000 tampons or sanitary pads in their lifetime. Vaginal and vulvar tissue that touch pads and tampons is highly permeable. Through this permeable tissue chemicals are absorbed without being metabolized, which makes endocrine-disrupting chemicals potentially dangerous when found in menstrual products. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals can interfere with human hormones and cause medical issues, including gynecological conditions such as endometriosis and uterine fibroids. 

    Joanna Marroquin, a Mason PhD in Public Health student, and Associate Professor Anna Pollack, reviewed studies conducted since 2103 that measured chemicals in menstrual products and that measured human biomarkers of chemical exposure and determined that endocrine-disrupting chemicals were found in menstrual products including tampons, pads, and liners. 

    “Identifying chemicals in menstrual products that menstruators regularly use is important because exposure through these products can impact menstruators’ reproductive health,” said Marroquin, the paper’s first author.  

    The study found that menstrual products contain a variety of endocrine-disrupting chemicals including phthalates, volatile organic compounds, parabens, environmental phenols, fragrance chemicals, dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. 

    This issue is even more relevant thanks to the Robin Danielson Menstrual Product and Intimate Care Product Safety Act of 2023, which was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives in October 2023. The Act would establish a program of research regarding the risks posed by the presence of dioxins, phthalates, pesticides, chemical fragrances, and other components in menstrual products and intimate care products. 

    This literature reviewed 15 papers published between 2013 and 2023 that tested menstrual products in the U.S., Japan, and South Korea. The researchers note that there are few publications available that measure chemicals in menstrual products.  

    Additionally, though forever chemicals (PFAS) have been found in menstrual underwear, there is a lack of peer-reviewed research on menstrual underwear and other newly-popular-in-the-U.S. products such as menstrual cups and discs. 

    Chemicals in menstrual products: A systematic review was published in BJOG, an international journal of obstetrics and gynecology in September 2023. Additional authors include Marianthi-Anna Kiomourtzoglou from Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University and Alexandra Scranton from Women’s Voices for the Earth.  

    The research was supported by Pollack’s National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences R01ES31079 award.  

    [ad_2]

    George Mason University

    Source link

  • What's at stake in the Supreme Court's abortion pill case

    What's at stake in the Supreme Court's abortion pill case

    [ad_1]

    The Supreme Court announced this morning that it would take up a pair of cases concerning access to mifepristone, the first pill in a two-pill regimen commonly used to induce abortion. Mifepristone has been the subject of a high-profile legal battle throughout the past year.

    Crucially, the Court will not consider whether the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) erred in its initial 2000 approval of the Mifeprex (a brand name version of mifepristone) or its subsequent generic approval in 2019—which means the pill should remain legal no matter what SCOTUS decides. Rather, the Court will consider whether subsequent FDA rules regarding mifepristone’s prescription are valid.

    At stake is whether doctors may prescribe mifepristone virtually, whether prescriptions can be shipped by mail, and whether it can be prescribed up to 10 weeks of pregnancy (instead of stopping at seven weeks).

    Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas held in April that the whole approval process was tainted. According to Kacsmaryk, the FDA erred when it approved the drug initially and when it approved generics in 2019. The judge also agreed with the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine—the group that brought the case—that the FDA’s subsequent loosening of rules around prescribing mifepristone had been wrong.

    Kacsmaryk suspended access to the pill entirely, but the Supreme Court paused enforcement of this decision while appeals were being resolved.

    On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit rejected Kacsmaryk’s ruling with regard to the initial FDA approval and its later generic approval. But the 5th Circuit upheld his ruling with regard to the later loosening of prescription rules, including the FDA’s decisions to allow lower-dose prescriptions, virtual prescriptions, and shipping the drug through the mail.

    Following the 5th Circuit’s ruling, the Biden administration and Mifeprex maker Danco Laboratories asked the Supreme Court to take up the case and find that the 5th Circuit was wrong with regard to the parts of Kacsmaryk’s decision that it upheld. The Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine asked the Court to take up the case and find that the 5th Circuit was wrong with regard to the parts of Kacsmaryk’s decision that it rejected. The justices met last week to decide what to do.

    Today, the Court announced that it would hear the issue, consolidating the cases from Danco laboratories and the Biden administration. It declined to hear the cross-petition filed by the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine.

    “What’s most important to know is that SCOTUS will not be looking at the original challenge to FDA approval of the drug,” notes Jessica Valenti of the Abortion Every Day substack. “Instead, they’ll review the 2016 and 2021 changes to restrictions around mifepristone, and whether or not the Alliance of Hippocratic Medicine (the anti-abortion group who brought the lawsuit) has standing.”

    “The decision here will undoubtedly affect the availability of mifepristone, but the case no longer includes the question of whether the FDA should have approved mifepristone for the purpose of terminating pregnancies in the first place,” explains Jonathan H. Adler at The Volokh Conspiracy.

    This is—as Law Dork’s Chris Geidner points out—”a best-case scenario for abortion rights supporters.” It leaves intact the general approval of mifepristone while opening up the possibility of reversing the 5th Circuit’s ruling regarding eased access to the drug.

    [ad_2]

    Elizabeth Nolan Brown

    Source link

  • Texas’ abortion law test

    Texas’ abortion law test

    [ad_1]

    Texas’ medical exemption law gets tested: Kate Cox is a 31-year-old mother of two who is 20 weeks pregnant with her third child and seeking an abortion.

    The baby has trisomy 18, which means it will most likely either be stillborn or die early in infancy. Cox has been to the emergency room several times during this pregnancy, and is arguing in court that continuing the pregnancy will risk her health, thus falling under the exception to the Texas abortion law, which does not generally permit abortions but allows them if the mother’s life is in danger or if an abortion would prevent the “substantial impairment of major bodily function.”

    Last week, a trial judge ruled that Cox could receive an abortion in the state, but Texas’ Supreme Court put a hold on the trial judge’s ruling this past Friday.

    Then yesterday, the state Supreme Court ruled that Damla Karsan, Cox’s doctor, hadn’t sufficiently made the case that the medical exemption applied to her patient.

    “Our ruling today does not block a life-saving abortion in this very case if a physician determines that one is needed under the appropriate legal standard, using reasonable medical judgment,” wrote the high court. “But when she sued seeking a court’s pre-authorization, Dr. Karsan did not assert that Ms. Cox has a ‘life-threatening physical condition’ or that, in Dr. Karsan’s reasonable medical judgment, an abortion is necessary because Ms. Cox has the type of condition the exception requires.”

    “Some difficulties in pregnancy, however, even serious ones, do not pose the heightened risks to the mother the exception encompasses,” continued the ruling. Now, Cox says she will go out of state to get the abortion immediately.

    Cox is one of the first who has sought a court-ordered exception since the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ruling which overturned Roe v. Wade and allows states to dictate their own abortion laws. Her case is unique, too, because she is doing so in advance of getting the abortion. Another suit, which attempts to clarify the legal limits surrounding what qualifies as a medical exemption, is being brought before the state of Texas right now as well. And, in three other states, abortion is coming before Supreme Courts this week, as plaintiffs continue to challenge laws to suss out what each state’s new abortion regime permits.

    Prior to abortion being made illegal in Texas, there were roughly 50,000 performed annually, down from an almost 80,000 high in 2006. In 2023, there have been 34. University of Texas at Austin researchers note that the vast majority of Texas abortion-seekers choose to get abortions out-of-state (or via securing pills from Mexico), but that Texas’ restrictive laws are associated with a roughly 10 percent reduction in the number of abortions performed.

    Zelenskyy’s fundraising drive: Today, President Joe Biden will host Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who has traveled to the U.S. to hold out his hands for some funds for his country’s war against Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invasion. “A bipartisan group of senators is struggling to finalize an agreement to tighten border security in exchange for more Ukraine funding,” reports Politico, “and the chamber is scheduled to go into recess at the end of this week.” It’s likely that, if such a bill is drafted up at all, Biden will have to acquiesce to restrictions on asylum seekers as a condition for doling out more aid to Ukraine.

    The New York Times characterizes Zelenskyy’s visit as a “last-ditch pitch,” which seems about right. A CNN poll from August shows how Americans have soured on supporting funding Ukraine’s war effort, with roughly 55 percent saying that Congress should not authorize any additional spending and 51 percent saying the U.S. has done enough as-is. Contrast this with the 62 percent, right after Putin’s invasion, who supported the U.S. doing more to help Zelenskyy.

    “We refuse to allow our tuition dollars to fund apartheid.” Columbia students are holding a tuition strike for the spring 2024 semester in an attempt to get their school to “refuse to invest in ethnic cleansing and genocide abroad” and for “divestment from companies profiting from or otherwise supporting Israeli apartheid and Columbia’s academic ties to Israel.”

    They also want the school to “immediately remove Board of Trustees members whose personal investments, financial commitments, employment, or other forms of business involvement entail profit from or support for Israeli apartheid” and changes to campus policing.

    They say “it’s highly unlikely that students participating in the tuition strike would face disciplinary action of any kind,” and that “it would be absurd for the university to suspend, expel, or punish a student for this lateness.” Therein lies the problem: Students at elite universities seem to think they’re untouchable, and administrators have set a mighty dangerous precedent by spending the last decade communicating to students that their every need for psychological safety from political beliefs with which they disagree can be accommodated. (More from Reason‘s Jacob Sullum.)


    Scenes from New York: This past Friday, a federal appeals court ruled in favor of New York’s restrictive gun law, which denies people the right to carry in certain public places (like parks) and allows local authorities broad discretion in denying gun rights to people they deem dangerous, only permitting licenses to people “of good moral character.” What this actually does is create hoops for law-abiding gun owners to jump through, while doing very little to prevent violence from criminals who own and use guns. (I wrote about Times Square’s silly gun-free zone last year.) 


    QUICK HITS

    • Harvard President Claudine Gay has come under fire for repeatedly plagiarizing and improperly attributing written passages over the course of her academic career.
    • The Biden administration’s “latest salvo” in the war against pro-lifers, writes Mike Pence at National Review, “is a proposed rule that would cut off Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funds to pro-life pregnancy resource centers.” Cutting government funding for organizations that can surely operate privately is fine, but doing so in a way that attempts to punish politically disfavored groups is not.
    • Every member of the K-pop band BTS is now doing mandatory military service.
    • Inside NASA’s wormy font choices.
    • Google loses its antitrust battle against Epic Games.
    • The government could have simply not cracked down on single room occupancy units in the first place, instead of now coughing up a bunch of money to try to incentivize landlords to fix ’em up.
    • To be fair, stoned boomers would pose a threat to the economics of the all-you-can-eat buffets on cruise ships, so I can see why cruise lines are cracking down on pot.
    • Lawyers for Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny say he has disappeared from prison and cannot be found.
    • Ugh, no:
    • Just say no (to price controls):

    [ad_2]

    Liz Wolfe

    Source link

  • These bats use their penis as an “arm” during sex but not for penetration

    These bats use their penis as an “arm” during sex but not for penetration

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — Mammals usually mate via penetrative sex, but researchers report November 20 in the journal Current Biology that a species of bat, the serotine bat, (Eptesicus serotinus) mates without penetration. This is the first time non-penetrative sex has been documented in a mammal. The bats’ penises are around seven times longer than their partners’ vaginas and have a “heart-shaped” head that is seven times wider than the vaginal opening. Both the penises’ size and shape would make penetration post-erection impossible, and the researchers show that, rather than functioning as a penetrative organ, the bats use their oversized penises like an extra arm to push the female’s tail sheath out of the way so that they can engage in contact mating—a behavior that resembles “cloacal kissing” in birds.

    “By chance, we had observed that these bats have disproportionately long penises, and we were always wondering ‘how does that work?’,” says first author Nicolas Fasel of the University of Lausanne. “We thought maybe it’s like in the dog where the penis engorges after penetration so that they are locked together, or alternatively maybe they just couldn’t put it inside, but that type of copulation hasn’t been reported in mammals until now.”

    Very little is known about how bats have sex, and most previous observations of bats mating have only perceived the backs of mating pairs. In this study, the researchers were able to observe the bats’ genitalia during copulation by using footage from cameras that were placed behind a grid that the bats could climb on.

    Fasel collaborated with a bat rehabilitation center in Ukraine that opportunistically filmed mating pairs and with a bat enthusiast and citizen scientist, Jan Jeucken, who filmed hours of footage of serotine bat in a church attic in the Netherlands. Altogether, the team analyzed 97 mating events—93 from the Dutch church and 4 from the Ukrainian bat rehabilitation center.

    The video recordings revealed that the bats do not engage in penetrative sex. The researchers did not observe penetration at any point during the recorded mating events and noted that the erectile tissues of the penis were enlarged before they made contact with the vulva. During mating, the male bats grasped their partners by the nape and moved their pelvises (and fully erect penises) in a probing fashion until they made contact with the female’s vulva, at which point they remained still and held the females in a long embrace. On average, these interactions lasted less than 53 minutes, but the longest event extended to 12.7 hours. Following copulation, the researchers observed that the female bats’ abdomens appeared wet, suggesting the presence of semen, but further research is needed to confirm that sperm was transferred during these putative mating events.

    The researchers also characterized the morphology of serotine bat genitalia by measuring the erect penises of live bats that were captured as part of other research studies (serotine and other vesper bats are conveniently known to get erections under anesthesia) and by performing necropsies on bats that died at bat rehabilitation centers. Their measurements showed that, when erect, serotine bat penises are around seven times longer and seven times wider than serotine bat vaginas, and about a fifth as long as the bats’ head-body length. The bats also have unusually long cervixes, which could help female bats select and store sperm.

    The researchers speculate that the bats may have evolved their oversized penises in order to push aside the female bats’ tail membranes, which females may use to avoid sex. “Bats use their tail membranes for flying and to capture the insects, and female bats also use them to cover their lower parts and protect themselves from males,” says Fasel, “but the males can then use these big penises to overcome the tail membrane and reach the vulva.”

    Next, the researchers plan to study bat mating behavior in more natural contexts, and they are also investigating penis morphology and mating behavior in other bat species. “We are trying to develop a bat porn box, which will be like an aquarium with cameras everywhere,” says Fasel.

     

    ###

    This research was supported by the National Science Centre of Poland, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Oleksandr Feldman Foundation.

    Current Biology, Fasel et al., “Mating without intromission in a bat, a novel copulatory pattern in mammals” https://cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(23)01304-0

    Current Biology (@CurrentBiology), published by Cell Press, is a bimonthly journal that features papers across all areas of biology. Current Biology strives to foster communication across fields of biology, both by publishing important findings of general interest and through highly accessible front matter for non-specialists. Visit: http://www.cell.com/current-biology. To receive Cell Press media alerts, contact [email protected].

    [ad_2]

    Cell Press

    Source link

  • Abortion’s big night

    Abortion’s big night

    [ad_1]

    Voters show up for abortion rights: Yesterday, voters across the country made clear that they oppose Republican-backed abortion restrictions. Andy Beshear, Kentucky’s Democratic incumbent, won his reelection bid for governor after repeatedly hammering his opponent’s opposition to abortion. In Ohio, both weed and abortion won when put to the people via ballot measures—the latter by 12 points. In Virginia, Democrats won control of both the House and the Senate. In Pennsylvania, Democrats won a state Supreme Court seat. (Both states saw a lot of abortion-related campaigning.)

    “Abortion is the No. 1 issue in the 2024 campaign,” Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, a Democrat, who publicly supported the abortion efforts in Ohio and Virginia, said Tuesday. In Ohio, Issue 1—which amends the state constitution to protect abortion up until the point of fetal viability, or around weeks 22-24—won, which means that Republicans will be thwarted in their attempts to ban abortion at six weeks of pregnancy. (Former Roundup writer/Ohioan Elizabeth Nolan Brown covered some of the Issue 1 controversy here.)

    Many libertarians will find these abortion wins encouraging. I do not. 

    Although some of the language gestures toward freedom, much of it misrepresents the objections of pro-lifers. “Ohioans know that no matter how you feel about abortion personally, government should not have the power to make these personal medical decisions for the people you love,” said one Issue 1 organizer. But how you feel about abortion frequently dictates whether you believe government intervention to be warranted, since one of the few defensible functions of government is protecting innocent beings from being aggressed against. The language of bodily autonomy—which we saw plenty of in the lead-up to these elections—focuses only on the rights of the mother, but never on the rights of the baby. Surely people on both sides can admit that the issue is so fraught because these rights come into conflict, with no easy resolution.

    Still, it’s undeniable that this is a galvanizing political issue and that Republicans haven’t known how to message their beliefs—and allay people’s fears about the consequences that stem from abortion bans—post-Dobbs. Generally speaking, the country is profoundly divided on abortion, with 61 percent believing it ought to be legal in all or most cases, and 37 percent believing it ought to be illegal in all or most cases. People tend to be broadly supportive of allowing abortion in the first trimester, but broadly opposed to permitting it in the second and third trimesters.

    But “in states where abortion is prohibited, the share of people who say access to abortion should be easier has increased since August 2019,” reported Pew in April. “About a third of adults (34%) say it should be easier for someone in the area where they live to obtain an abortion, an 8-point increase since 2019.” Almost 20 percent of those surveyed, per Pew, say their views on abortion have changed in the last year or so since the Dobbs decision was handed down by the Supreme Court.

    Interestingly, in Ohio, “the victory for Yes on Issue 1 was not driven by remarkable Democratic turnout—but by a significant share of voters in Republican-leaning counties casting their ballots for abortion rights,” per a Politico analysis of the results.

    Beyond abortion: Ohio just became the 24th U.S. state to legalize recreational weed (more from Reason‘s Jacob Sullum). Colorado’s TABOR—which requires excess property tax revenue to be returned to the people—changes were defeated (more from Reason‘s Eric Boehm). And in Virginia, Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin—who had tried to get a really solid legislative majority for his party—did not succeed. More here.

    RFK Jr.’s second wind: The, uh, antiestablishment candidate made waves earlier in the presidential campaign season, then faded for a while, but he’s back again—this time, pissing his former pals off with his recent comments on free speech while also polling surprisingly well. A New York Times/Siena College poll found significant support for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. when up against Donald Trump and Joe Biden in battleground states and with younger voters:

    “When asked about the likeliest 2024 matchup, Mr. Biden versus Mr. Trump, only 2 percent of those polled said they would support another candidate,” reports The New York Times. “But when Mr. Kennedy’s name was included as an option, nearly a quarter said they would choose him.”

    “The findings suggest that Mr. Kennedy is less a fixed political figure in the minds of voters than he is a vessel to register unhappiness about the choice between Mr. Biden and Mr. Trump.”

    Though I am not very fond of RFK Jr. (as previously established, to many people’s chagrin), I am intrigued by people’s possibly growing comfort with rejecting the awful front-runners put forth by the two major parties. I’m not optimistic that such polling data will convert to Election Day results, though.


    Scenes from New York:

    The fact that it mentions Brooklyn is bizarre (unless the sentiment is just plain old antisemitism). Lefty gentrification discourse—the idea that any neighborhood could be “owned” by any particular ethnic group, or that one has a claim to a place simply by nature of having lived there the longest—has never made sense because it feels reminiscent of far-right nativism. It also ignores that little thing we call property rights, in which you can buy a home or a tract of land and then decide what you do with it and who you allow to live on it, random people’s feelings aside.


    QUICK HITS

    • Local reporter and solid tax-hater Lily Wu, who seems libertarian-ish, was just elected mayor of Wichita, Kansas.
    • No! You can’t access LaGuardia by subway, minus 10 points for city planners.
    • More on whether the Hamas-controlled health ministry is reliable at reporting death tolls: “There is even close consistency for MoH and UN totals for the 2008, 2014 and 2021 Gaza Wars,” reports Action on Armed Violence. “In short, the MoH figures for the total numbers of Gazan fatalities in previous Israel-Hamas confrontations have proven reliable.”
    • A third of the buildings in the northern part of Gaza, where Israeli troops now have a stronghold, have reportedly been either destroyed or significantly damaged.
    • The better thing would be for her to get perma-booted by voters, but this will have to do for now:
    • Don’t forget to stock up on booze—there’s a GOP debate tonight, at 8 p.m. Eastern.
    • It’s the Erewhon cult content you’ve been waiting for.
    • The only thing more hilarious than the fact that USA Today hired a full-time Taylor Swift reporter is that it’s a dude, so now people are big mad.
    • Yep:

    [ad_2]

    Liz Wolfe

    Source link

  • What similarities exist between new moms and roaches?

    What similarities exist between new moms and roaches?

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — Researchers are studying the dramatic physical transformation that some insects undergo to give birth to live young.

    This includes suppressing their immune systems to accommodate babies, which is something some insects and people have in common. Understanding how these systems work can help improve treatments for fibromyalgia and other immune disorders.

    Biologists at the University of Cincinnati were part of an international team examining the complex structural and physiological changes that take place in Hawaii’s beetle-mimic cockroaches, which give birth to live young.

    “It’s not just immunology,” co-author and UC College of Arts and Sciences Professor Joshua Benoit said.

    Biologists see similar changes in the insect’s trachea, its immune system and the outer layer of its exoskeleton called a cuticle, which transforms to make room for the babies.

    The study was published in the journal iScience.

    Cockroach mothers not only incubate their babies until they are the equivalent size of a 2-year-old human toddler, but they also feed them a milk-like nutrient they produce through secretory glands.

    Nature has devised a myriad of reproductive strategies across the animal kingdom, said Bertrand Fouks, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Muenster and the study’s lead author. From birds and reptiles to fish, lots of animals lay eggs. In mammals, egg laying is limited to echidnas, sometimes known as spiny anteaters, and the platypus.

    “The beetle-mimic cockroach is one of the rare insects which has developed a complex structure to host the growing embryo similar to placenta in mammals, which made it a perfect model to investigate the evolution of live-birth,” Fouks said.

    Beetle-mimic cockroaches have big advantages compared to those that hatch from eggs, Benoit said. Tinier babies that hatch from eggs are exposed to the elements where they’re vulnerable to far more parasites and predators and must immediately find food on their own.

    “The class of predators really narrows when you give birth to live young,” Benoit said.

    But live births require a far bigger parental commitment.

    “It’s a pretty big investment. They can produce 10 juveniles per reproductive cycle compared to 70 to 150 eggs for other roaches,” Benoit said. “So their strategy is to produce fewer higher-quality individuals compared to more individuals with less investment.”

    Researchers sequenced the genome of the Pacific beetle-mimic cockroach, the only roach that gives birth to live young. They performed comparative analysis with tsetse flies and aphids, which do likewise, to unravel the genomic basis underlying this transition from laying eggs to birthing babies.

    They found that the biological changes that allow beetle mimic cockroaches to give birth to live young are similar to those found in aphids and tsetse flies, demonstrating convergent evolution, Benoit said.

    Whether it’s a cow, a lizard or a roach, all undergo remarkably similar urinary and genital organ remodeling, enhanced heart development and altered immunity to accommodate their growing babies, the study found.

    Researchers are interested in the link between our immune system and pregnancy. Women are less susceptible to infectious diseases but are far more likely than men to have autoimmune disorders such as lupus.

    Benoit said some genes dealing with the immune system are down-regulated (the process of reducing or suppressing a response to a stimulus) during pregnancy. That can explain why some women who suffer from autoimmune disorders might see symptoms go away during pregnancy.

    Benoit said they see similar effects in the cockroaches.

    “These changes may facilitate structural and physiological changes to accommodate developing young and protect them from the mother’s immune system,” he said.

    [ad_2]

    University of Cincinnati

    Source link

  • Sexual activity and vaginal dilation associated with fewer side effects after cervical cancer treatment

    Sexual activity and vaginal dilation associated with fewer side effects after cervical cancer treatment

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — SAN DIEGO, October 1, 2023 — People who engage in sexual activity or vaginal dilation after chemoradiation treatment for cervical cancer are at lower risk for long-term side effects, according to a new study from researchers in Austria. Findings of the EMBRACE study will be presented today at the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting

    “Curing cancer is always our first priority,” said lead study author Kathrin Kirchheiner, MSc, PhD, a clinical psychologist in the department of radiation oncology at the Medical University of Vienna. “But with a growing number of relatively young cervical cancer survivors, the prevention and management of side effects becomes increasingly important to ensure a better quality of life.”

    “I hope this research helps to reduce the taboo around sexual health and makes it easier for clinicians to discuss these issues with their patients.”

    Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women globally. Patients are diagnosed most often around age 50. Standard non-surgical treatment for patients whose cancer has spread to the surrounding tissue or organs involves a combination of radiation therapy, chemotherapy and brachytherapy – inserting radioactive implants directly into the tumor.

    Advances in brachytherapy, such as the use of MRI imaging to pinpoint tumor size and location, along with the ability to deliver precise doses of radiation, have greatly improved tumor control and cure rates in recent years. The five-year survival rate for people with locally advanced cervical cancer is 74%.

    Delivering high doses of radiation to tumors near the vagina, however, can lead to vaginal stenosis – a shortening or narrowing of the vagina – and long-term changes in vaginal tissue that can complicate gynecological examinations or cause pain during intercourse. Physicians often recommend regular and ongoing vaginal dilation to mitigate these side effects and prevent scar tissue from forming, but few studies have quantified its impact.

    EMBRACE is a multi-institutional, prospective, observational study that measured physician-reported vaginal side effects and patient-reported outcomes among 1,416 people with locally advanced cervical cancer. In this sub-cohort of 882 patients, Dr. Kirchheiner and her colleagues compared side effects for people who were sexually active or used vaginal dilators on a regular basis in the years after treatment to those who did not follow this routine.

    In the five years following treatment, patients were seen for a median of 11 follow-up visits with gynecological exams to assess vaginal side effects. They also filled out questionnaires on quality of life, sexual activity and vaginal dilation. Questionnaires were completed at baseline, every three months in the first year, every six months in the second and third years and annually thereafter. The median age of patients was 49 years old.

    Regular vaginal dilation and/or sexual activity – defined as the patient reporting the practice during half or more of their follow-ups – was reported by 64% of patients and was significantly associated with lower risk for moderate grade 2 or higher vaginal shortening and narrowing five years after treatment (p≤0.001).  

    Patients who reported both dilation and intercourse had the lowest risk of grade ≥2 vaginal stenosis (18%), followed by those who were sexually active but did not use vaginal dilators (23%) and those who used dilators but were not sexually active (28%). Patients who did not engage in regular dilation or intercourse were most likely to experience moderate stenosis (37%).

    Analyses also showed that regular sexual activity and/or vaginal dilation was associated with an increased risk for other – but mild – vaginal symptoms, such as grade ≥1 dryness and bleeding.

    This is not surprising, said Dr. Kirchheiner, as vaginal dryness is more likely to be noticed as a lack of lubrication in patients engaging in some form of penetrative activity, and that minor bleeding during or after dilation or intercourse can often be caused by irritation of the vaginal lining.

    “Minor vaginal dryness and bleeding can be managed with lubricants, moisturizer and/or hormone replacement therapy,” she said. “The risk of having these minor side effects should not stop patients from dilating or having sexual intercourse, as these activities may help prevent a more serious, and irreversible, condition.”

    Among people who reported regular sexual activity and/or vaginal dilation, 72% experienced grade ≥1 vaginal dryness, compared to 67% of those who reported none or infrequent dilation/intercourse (p=0.028). Grade ≥1 vaginal bleeding occurred in 61% of patients who reported frequent sexual activity and/or vaginal dilation, compared to 34% of those who did not (p≤0.001).

    While the study’s findings point to a promising option for patients to maintain sexual health following cervical cancer treatment, Dr. Kirchheiner emphasized that this study was observational and therefore can only report correlations. Questions remain regarding the degree to which vaginal dilation and/or sexual intercourse effectively prevent shortening and narrowing, or if the development of vaginal symptoms interferes with the likelihood that patients are able to engage in these activities.

    “In clinical reality, both causal pathways likely will contribute and interact in a vicious circle. However, as we cannot and should not randomize patients in a clinical trial into groups with and without regular dilation, our findings support both clinical experience and the standard of care.”

    Next steps for this area of research, said Dr. Kirchheiner, include considering the role of sexual arousal, such as increased blood flow in the pelvic area, on tissue healing and vaginal health, given the slight advantage of intercourse over dilators in their observational study.

    Yet studies on sexual health following cancer treatment can be difficult to complete, she noted. “Sexual health is a highly individual and sensitive topic to address, both in research and in survivorship care, and it deserves a respectful and comprehensive approach.”

    ###

    See this study presented:

    • News Briefing: Monday, October 2, 11:00 a.m. Pacific time. Details here. Register here.
    • Scientific Presentation: Sunday, October 1, 9:40 a.m. Pacific time, San Diego Convention Center. Email [email protected] for access to the live stream or recording.
    • Abstract Title: Association between regular vaginal dilation and/or sexual activity and long-term vaginal morbidity in cervical cancer survivors (Abstract 4)

    Attribution to the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting is requested in all coverage. View our meeting press kit at www.astro.org/annualmeetingpress.

    ABOUT ASTRO

    The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) is the largest radiation oncology society in the world, with nearly 10,000 members who are physicians, nurses, biologists, physicists, radiation therapists, dosimetrists and other health care professionals who specialize in treating patients with radiation therapies. Radiation therapy contributes to 40% of global cancer cures, and more than a million Americans receive radiation treatments for cancer each year. For information on radiation therapy, visit RTAnswers.org. To learn more about ASTRO, visit our website and media center and follow us on social media.

    [ad_2]

    American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)

    Source link

  • Exposure to extreme heat associated with adverse health outcomes for pregnant women

    Exposure to extreme heat associated with adverse health outcomes for pregnant women

    [ad_1]

    A first-of-its-kind study led by Jun Wu, PhD, professor of environmental and occupational health at UC
    Irvine Program in Public Health, found that exposure to extreme heat had an association with severe
    maternal morbidity (SMM). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention define SMM as severe and
    unexpected conditions during labor and delivery, such as amniotic fluid embolism, acute myocardial
    infarction, acute kidney failure, cardiac arrest, disseminated intravascular coagulation, heart failure,
    severe anesthesia complications, and sepsis.

    For the past few decades, extreme heat episodes have become more and more frequent. The National
    Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration tracked July 2023 as the hottest on record ever. Women who
    started their pregnancy in the cold season from November through April might be more vulnerable, as
    they would experience the hottest period in Southern California (May-September) in their late
    pregnancy. The severity and duration of extreme heat events will continue to increase and pose more
    threats to pregnant women due to their susceptibility.

    The research findings hope to be used to build targeted interventions that can increase awareness and
    knowledge on how pregnant women can protect themselves from exposure to extreme heat.

    [ad_2]

    University of California, Irvine

    Source link

  • Find the latest expert commentary on the recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions here

    Find the latest expert commentary on the recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions here

    [ad_1]

    This Thursday, the United States Supreme Court rejected affirmative action at colleges and universities around the nation, declaring that the race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina were unlawful. Now on Friday, the Supreme Court decided to block the Biden administration’s student debt relief program and sided with a Christian web designer in Colorado who refuses to create websites to celebrate same-sex weddings out of religious objections. Despite their limited federal elected power, Conservatives have racked up more huge wins in the great political battles of the early 21st century.

    Newswise is your source for expert commentary. Below is a roundup of recent expert pitches concerning the United States Supreme Court.

    Sociologists Available to Discuss Affirmative Action Ruling in College Admissions

    – American Sociological Association (ASA)

    Law and diversity experts react to Supreme Court’s affirmative action decision

    – Tulane University

    Three important takeaways from SCOTUS decision in Groff v. DeJoy

    – University of Georgia

    SCOTUS decision on race-based admission: experts can comment

    – Indiana University

    U law expert available to comment on Supreme Court decision on affirmative action

    – University of Utah

    Recent SCOTUS decision puts to rest extreme 2020 presidential election claims, confirms state judicial input on states’ election rules

    – University of Georgia

     

     

    [ad_2]

    Newswise

    Source link

  • Patients favor telehealth for medication abortion consults

    Patients favor telehealth for medication abortion consults

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — Patients seeking medication abortion care through telehealth services are just as satisfied, if not more so, with the service they received as patients who visited a clinical facility to receive care, according to a study published this month in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

    The study involved 30 patients who sought medication abortion in Washington state from September 2021 to January 2022. Researchers found that the 20 patients who used telehealth to receive the pills for a medication abortion reported feeling more relaxed during their clinical encounters.

    Even though they reported overall satisfaction with their care, the 10 who received care in a clinic facility portrayed their consultations as lengthy, chaotic and lacking comfort, the published paper said.

    “I listened to all the interviews, and telehealth patients felt very positive about the care,” said lead author Dr. Emily Godfrey, a UW Medicine OB-GYN and family medicine doctor. “That’s because they didn’t have to struggle with transportation, which is a huge benefit. They could have the appointment, live with videos during their lunch hour or in their car, or in a private space at a friend’s home.”

    Both groups reported high satisfaction reported with their clinical experiences. In-person patients reported that they relied heavily on printed material for guidance, while online patients relied more on advice during the visit and online information about medication abortion.

    This study focused on the patients’ view of their interactions with providers, without distinguishing whether the care professional was a doctor or nurse practitioner. Patient-provider interactions are important to evaluate because they are associated with patient trust, treatment adherence, patient experience, healthcare efficiency and cost, the study noted.

    Interviewees were 20 to 38 years old.  Average gestational age at time of the visit was about seven weeks, according to the study.  

    In the United States, more than more than half of all abortions are now medication abortion; in Washington state, that figure is just under 60%.

    The rate of telemedicine visits for medication abortion increased in 2019 when the Food and Drug Administration rolled back the in-clinic rules because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade in the Dobbs decision last June, the use of telemedicine for medication abortion services has increased by 137%, according to the Society of Family Planning WeCount study.

    Patients who participated in the study were from the Cedar River Clinic in Renton, as well as sites in Yakima and Tacoma.  More patients seeking telemedicine consults had undergone a prior abortion and tended to live outside the metro areas, compared with in-person patients, Godfrey said.

    Soon, an expanded study with data from almost 2,000 patients will more fully illustrate the sociodemographics of patients receiving telemedicine versus in-person medication abortion care, Godfrey noted. Another forthcoming study will examine the decision-making process of why patients chose to travel to the clinic or pursue a telemedicine visit.

    “Generally those who were younger or may have had a medical condition were more likely to choose an in-clinic visit,” Godfrey said. She added that patients, during an initial interview, who did not know the date of their last period or who might have been experiencing conditions like an ectopic pregnancy were booked for an in-clinic visit and not included in this study.

    Next week, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will consider a reinstatement of the in-person clinic requirement for patients to obtain abortion pills, among other restrictions. 

    “Such a move would be harmful for patients in light of previous evidence about travel to clinics being a barrier to medical access — and now, coupled with this study suggesting that patients can receive quality, patient-centered care via telemedicine,” Godfrey said.

    In general, the study shows that telemedicine abortion can be provided using high-quality patient-provider communication, considered a critical element of patient-centered care.

    “Patient-centered care is essential to improving healthcare delivery and helping the nation achieve its goals of providing the best possible care to everyone, and especially those populations in rural settings or with difficulties reaching medical clinics,” she said.  

    [ad_2]

    University of Washington School of Medicine and UW Medicine

    Source link

  • Immigration experts on Title 42, analysis of immigration policies, and other migrant news in the Immigration Channel

    Immigration experts on Title 42, analysis of immigration policies, and other migrant news in the Immigration Channel

    [ad_1]

    Title 42, the United States pandemic rule that had been used to immediately deport hundreds of thousands of migrants who crossed the border illegally over the last three years, has expired. Those migrants will have the opportunity to apply for asylum. President Biden’s new rules to replace Title 42 are facing legal challenges. The US Homeland Security Department announced a rule to make it extremely difficult for anyone who travels through another country, like Mexico, to qualify for asylum. Border crossings have already risen sharply, as many migrants attempted to cross before the measure expired on Thursday night. Some have said they worry about tighter controls and uncertainty ahead. Immigration is once again a major focus of the media as we examine the humanitarian, political, and public health issues migrants must face. 

    Below are some of the latest headlines in the Immigration channel on Newswise.

    Expert Commentary

    Experts Available on Ending of Title 42

    George Washington University Experts on End of Title 42

    ‘No one wins when immigrants cannot readily access healthcare’

    URI professor discusses worsening child labor in the United States

    Biden ‘between a rock and a hard place’ on immigration

    University of Notre Dame Expert Available to Comment on House Bill Regarding Immigration Legislation, Border Safety and Security Act

    American University Experts Available to Discuss President Biden’s Visit to U.S.-Mexico Border

    Title 42 termination ‘overdue’, not ‘effective’ to manage migration

    Research and Features

    Study: Survey Methodology Should Be Calibrated to Account for Negative Attitudes About Immigrants and Asylum-Seekers

    A study analyses racial discrimination in job recruitment in Europe

    DACA has not had a negative impact on the U.S. job market

    ASBMB cautions against drastic immigration fee increases

    Study compares NGO communication around migration

    Collaboration, support structures needed to address ‘polycrisis’ in the Americas

    TTUHSC El Paso Faculty Teach Students While Caring for Migrants

    Immigrants Report Declining Alcohol Use during First Two Years after Arriving in U.S.

    How asylum seeker credibility is assessed by authorities

    Speeding up and simplifying immigration claims urgently needed to help with dire situation for migrants experiencing homelessness

    Training Individuals to Work in their Communities to Reduce Health Disparities

    ‘Regulation by reputation’: Rating program can help combat migrant abuse in the Gulf

    Migration of academics: Economic development does not necessarily lead to brain drain

    How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected immigration?

    Immigrants with Darker Skin Tones Perceive More Discrimination

     

    [ad_2]

    Newswise

    Source link

  • Uganda’s Anti-Gay Bill Imperils HIV Fight

    Uganda’s Anti-Gay Bill Imperils HIV Fight

    [ad_1]

    Newswise — [KAMPALA] Uganda’s anti-homosexuality bill, if signed into law, could lead to the withdrawal of foreign aid and threaten goals to end HIV/AIDS by 2030, advocates warn.

    Uganda’s parliament passed the revised Anti-Homosexuality Act (AHA), which criminalises homosexual conduct, with minimal amendments this week (2 May).

    The legislation was first passed at the end of March but revised in April after President Yoweri Museveni returned it to parliament for amendments.

    “If it becomes law, it will increase stigma and discrimination against LGBTQ people and men who have sex with men, further limiting prevention and treatment services.” – Richard Lusimbo, director-general, Uganda Key Populations Consortium

    The bill includes a punishment of life imprisonment for same-sex sexual conduct and up to ten years behind bars for attempted same-sex sexual acts. It also imposes the death penalty for “aggravated homosexuality” and criminalises the “promotion” of homosexuality, which many people fear will encourage homophobia.

    UNAIDS had warned that passing the bill into law would jeopardise progress in the fight against HIV/AIDS and undermine fundamental human rights including the right to health and the right to life. 

    “Uganda’s new Anti-Homosexuality bill is an outrage,” said Winnie Byanyima, executive director of UNAIDS.

    “Access to timely and quality health care is a human right – sexual orientation should not determine one’s rights.”

    Anne Githuku-Shongwe, director of the UNAIDS support team for eastern and southern Africa, said Uganda had made “excellent progress” in tackling the AIDS pandemic. “This new bill, if passed into law, would undercut that progress,” she warned.

    Human rights ‘disaster’

    According to a study published in The Lancet, HIV prevalence is significantly higher among men who have sex with men (MSM) and in African countries with laws that criminalise same sex relationships.

    “If it becomes law, it will increase stigma and discrimination against LGBTQ [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer] people and men who have sex with men, further limiting prevention and treatment services,” said Richard Lusimbo, director-general of Uganda Key Populations Consortium, a human rights organisation.

    Lusimbo explained that the bill, if passed into law, would be a disaster to the human rights of LGBTQ people, to public health and the fight against HIV/AIDS.

    The US government has threatened to withdraw funding for Uganda through its President’s Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) if the law is passed.

    “At this time, we are reviewing the possibility that the AHA, if signed, might prevent us from providing lifesaving prevention, care and treatment services equitably to all Ugandans receiving PEPFAR support,” said a US State Department spokesperson.

    PEPFAR’s annual HIV/AIDS response investment in Uganda is about US$400 million.

    Despite the pressure from the US and other governments, there is speculation that President Museveni will most likely sign the bill into law. However, the power of ascension of a bill does not lay primarily with the president.

    The Ugandan parliament can also pass the bill into law if the president does not assent to or veto a bill after it is passed by parliament within 30 days or if the bill is returned to parliament twice.

    In his speech on April 22, at conference themed ‘Protecting African culture and family values’, President Museveni thanked members of the Ugandan parliament for passing the bill.

    “It is good that you rejected the pressure from the imperialists,” he said, reflecting his support for what has been described by activists and advocates as a draconian law.

    The bill is setting the pace for other African nations as countries like Kenya, Tanzania, Ghana and others indicate readiness to introduce similar bills in solidarity with Uganda.

    Charles Brown, executive director of Preventive Care International (PCI), a Ugandan non-governmental organisation that focuses on HIV, says the bill is harsh and not well thought through. He fears it will further entrench inaccessibility of health services for people in same sex relationships.

    “Already, the landlady of one of my offices in western Uganda called me saying that she was told that our organisation promotes homosexuality and she is scared of being arrested,” Brown told SciDev.Net, fearing eviction.

    “We hope that the president doesn’t sign it into law,” he added.

    This piece was produced by SciDev.Net’s Sub-Saharan Africa English desk.

    [ad_2]

    SciDev.Net

    Source link

  • Mental distress among female individuals of reproductive age after overturning of Roe v Wade

    Mental distress among female individuals of reproductive age after overturning of Roe v Wade

    [ad_1]

    About The Study: This case control study found that for female individuals, the loss of abortion rights was associated with a 10% increase in prevalence of mental distress relative to the mean over the three months after the Supreme Court of the U.S. decision. Restricting legal abortion access may be associated with disproportionate outcomes among individuals of lower socioeconomic status and in medically underserved areas, who may experience greater economic and mental health burdens of having unwanted pregnancies due to increased travel costs of obtaining abortions. 

    Authors: Muzhe Yang, Ph.D., of Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, is the corresponding author. 

     

    Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

    #  #  #

     

    About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is an online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. On weekdays, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.

    [ad_2]

    JAMA – Journal of the American Medical Association

    Source link

  • Democracy depends on the freedom of the press: The latest news on media and journalism

    Democracy depends on the freedom of the press: The latest news on media and journalism

    [ad_1]

    “Freedom of the press is not just important to democracy, it is democracy.”

    -Walter Cronkite

    According to the Pew Research Center, more than eight-in-ten U.S. adults (86%) say they get news from a smartphone, computer or tablet. Americans say they prefer a digital platform – whether it is a news website (26%), search (12%), social media (11%) or podcasts (3%).* Traditional media remain important even for those people with the most gadgets. However, social media and non-traditional outlets are rising as the main source of how people stay informed. According to a report from the BBC, Instagram is the most popular news source among younger people.

    In this information age, it’s vital to have an open conversation on how the message is delivered. 

    Here are some of the latest stories in the Media and Journalism channel on Newswise. For a more in-depth look at social media issues, check out the Social Media channel.

    Newswise Live Event for March 15: What can we expect from AI and Chatbots in the next few years? 

    (How AI is transforming journalism)

    Study finds political campaigns may change the choices of voters – but not their policy views

    Researchers’ Model for TV Ad Scheduling Reaps Revenue Increase for Networks

    What distinguishes fans from celebrity stalkers?

    The claim that U.S. temperatures are not trending upward is false

    We cannot predict earthquakes with accuracy, despite claim

    Fact-checking the reporting of the explosion in East Palestine, Ohio

    Cinema has helped ‘entrench’ gender inequality in AI

    Experts split on ‘prebunking’ – shifting blame or empowering users?

    Geography, language dictate social media and popular website usage, study finds

    ChatGPT can (almost) pass the US Medical Licensing Exam

    Tweets reveal where in cities people express different emotions

    War tourists fighting on a virtual front, since Ukraine-Russia war

    Media literacy is an important tool in training police officers

    COVID-19 conspiracy theories that spread fastest focused on evil, secrecy

    How do news audiences respond to disclosures of preprint status?

    It isn’t what you know, it’s what you think you know

     

     

    [ad_2]

    Newswise

    Source link