ReportWire

Tag: Remote Workers

  • Five plead guilty to helping North Koreans pretend to be US-based IT workers

    [ad_1]

    The US Department of Justice has announced that five people have pleaded guilty to helping North Koreans defraud US companies by pretending to be US-based remote workers. North Korea has previously used fake identities and the direct manipulation of US cybersecurity workers to circumvent international sanctions and funnel money into the country.

    In this case, the people knew they were helping North Koreans, the DOJ says, and “provided their own, false, or stolen identities” to help the remote workers get jobs. They also “hosted U.S. victim company-provided laptops at residences across the United States” to hide the workers’ location. In the case of at least two “facilitators,” they also took company drug tests on the workers’ behalf.

    Audricus Phagnasay, Jason Salazar and Alexander Paul Travis each pleaded guilty to one wire fraud conspiracy for their role in the scam. Travis was paid “at least $51,397” for participating, while Phagnasay and Salazar earned “at least $3,450 and $4,500, respectively.” Another facilitator, Erick Ntekereze Prince, used his company to contract certified IT workers to other US companies, fully knowing the workers were using stolen identities. He earned “more than $89,000” for his participation in the scam and pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud conspiracy.

    The final facilitator, Oleksandr Didenko, pleaded guilty for one count of wire fraud conspiracy and one count of aggravated identity theft for participating in an extensive identity theft operation. Didenko helped foreign IT workers fraudulently gain employment at 40 US companies, the DOJ says, and he’s forfeiting $1.4 million as part of his plea.

    “These prosecutions make one point clear: the United States will not permit the DPRK to bankroll its weapons programs by preying on American companies and workers,” U.S. Attorney Jason A. Reding Quiñones said in the DOJ announcement. “We will keep working with our partners across the Justice Department to uncover these schemes, recover stolen funds, and pursue every individual who enables North Korea’s operations.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Building an Agile Remote Team Is No Easy Feat — But It’s About to Get a Whole Lot Easier Thanks to This Transformative Tool. | Entrepreneur

    Building an Agile Remote Team Is No Easy Feat — But It’s About to Get a Whole Lot Easier Thanks to This Transformative Tool. | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    In a post-Zoom world, the question, “Are the right people in the room?” persists, even if only metaphorically. However, having all the relevant cross-functional team members present remotely may not eliminate the danger of silos as effectively as everyone being physically present. Yet, there is a solution beyond the old debate about returning to the office. The tools of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) have the potential to create fully immersive environments that give business leaders the best of both worlds.

    In my experience helping mid-level and senior managers in the tech industry become better leaders of their teams, I have found that applying agile methodology is the best way to align teams, but it has proven challenging in remote environments. “Agile” is a project-management methodology that grew out of the software development industry in the early 2000s as a means of delivering work incrementally and collaboratively to allow for frequent course corrections. Its lessons are especially applicable to industries where there is a need for adaptability and responsiveness to change, such as e-commerce and marketing.

    However, remote team members with different expertise tend to communicate blindly without fully understanding each other’s capabilities. This is where the metaverse comes into the picture. Those issues could be solved in a digital universe where employee avatars collaborate in a simulated office and interact directly with products and services in this virtual space. By adopting core best practices developed for the agile methodology now, such as more frequent feedback and cross-functional collaboration, business leaders are setting the stage to take advantage of this evolution.

    Related: Exploring How Virtual Reality is Changing Startups

    Unlock efficiency and collaboration

    The metaverse is not the stuff of science fiction. Advocates of the next internet say it is poised to shift our working lives in the same way that social media and mobile devices did in the web’s first iteration. With 61% of managers citing communication as the biggest challenge of remote work, the metaverse promises to re-introduce some of the elements of in-person collaboration.

    In a video environment, extra effort is required to engage directly and transparently about the expectations and capabilities of each person. However, the metaverse could enhance the ability of everyone to continuously move toward a shared goal. Last year, the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Lower Saxony, Germany, piloted workshops in a virtual environment designed and constructed by PwC. In the resulting study, participants wearing VR headsets found the metaverse process far more agile and efficient than videoconferencing, and their sense of closeness with colleagues rose by 58%.

    Customized virtual offices may have a unique role in meeting the agile ideal, where every person on the team, including the product manager, has an equal opinion. But you don’t have to wait for this tech to go mainstream to experience the benefits of agile. The key is to give teams clear visibility into project roadmaps and identify where and why teams are not escalating issues promptly.

    Drive value from being fully present

    The daily “stand-up” is the most important aspect of the popular agile scrum framework. Teams get 15 minutes of daily face time, and it must be quick and easy: Here’s what a person did yesterday, this is what they’re doing today, and these are their “blockers” (obstacles). The team operates as equals, while the single point of contact — the scrum master — can assist in making priority decisions.

    But when teams lose face-to-face time in digital collaborative spaces, they lose the stand-up. Before, if someone stated a blocker, the entire team would be present to discuss a way around it. This system was designed to allow agile teams to solve problems on the spot. The challenge for remote teams is retaining the same speed of agile in an environment where people often aren’t as engaged.

    When the metaverse comes around, “standing up” will again become possible through avatars and a virtual scrum board. Until then, managers need to encourage open communication and ensure the right individuals are empowered to make decisions. I also suggest demonstrating to people, not just telling them, that mistakes are learning opportunities in a blameless culture.

    Break down silos virtually

    If a virtual workspace is well-designed with optimized visibility, teams may find themselves naturally drawn towards breaking down silos through open, transparent communication. That means evaluating whether the team can keep track of what the problems really are as the market shifts, as well as looking at the team’s execution style.

    Begin to experiment with this approach by ensuring that people are not left to tackle problems alone. That is when they tend not to escalate, and everything slows down. If you are not already using daily stand-ups, use these sprint sessions to allow the entire team to know the tasks, the problems, and how the problems might be blocking individuals from completing the tasks.

    People need to feel confident owning their decisions because businesses don’t have the luxury of time anymore. As we head into our brave new future, having all components of a virtual workplace reflect change in real-time will bring everyone up to speed and leverage the values of simulated face-to-face interactions.

    Related: The Metaverse Has Definitely Lost Steam — But Is It Dead?

    Paving the way for confident decision-making

    In an enterprise metaverse environment, asking if everyone is in the room can once again be asked more literally — enhanced by audio-spatial technology that means the person to your right really sounds like they are to your right. Comfort with conflict and confident decision-making may prove easier with everyone more present. To leaders considering experimenting with metaverse platforms, McKinsey suggests adopting a test-and-learn mindset. Start small by integrating select elements, such as virtual whiteboards or project rooms, into your existing workflows to not only see how your team responds — but to gauge the potential of this technology. Where digital collaboration tools pose challenges, an enterprise metaverse promises to help companies build highly engaged remote teams that are quick on their feet and able to swiftly work toward a profitable MVP.

    [ad_2]

    Mary Hubbard

    Source link

  • Yes, We're Still Messing Up Hybrid Work. Here's Where Exactly We're Going Wrong. | Entrepreneur

    Yes, We're Still Messing Up Hybrid Work. Here's Where Exactly We're Going Wrong. | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Is your team truly prepared for the hybrid work revolution? This question might unsettle many business leaders, but it’s one we must confront. The recent shift to hybrid work models has been seismic, yet a staggering number of managers find themselves navigating uncharted waters without a compass. Surveys paint a concerning picture: A vast majority of managers acknowledge the need for new skills in this flexible work era, but astonishingly, nearly half feel ill-equipped and untrained for the task.

    Related: 68% of Companies Are Making This Critical Mistake in Their Approach to Hybrid Work — Are You?

    The cost of untrained leadership

    The cost of this oversight is more than just operational hiccups. Gallup’s research is a wake-up call, revealing that 80% of hybrid workers and 73% of their leaders are sailing in the same rudderless boat. The impact of this unpreparedness on team engagement and well-being is not just significant; it’s exponential. An effective manager’s influence on a team’s engagement is four times more potent than the physical work environment, according to Gallup. This statistic serves as a clarion call for immediate action.

    Delving deeper into the skills gap issue, the findings by From Another’s research shed light on a critical disconnect in the current corporate landscape. While 81% of managers recognize the necessity to adapt, 44% confess to lacking the right training and tools. This gap represents a systemic failure to adapt to the evolving work environment.

    The impact of this lack of preparedness extends beyond operational inefficiencies. It seeps into the very core of team dynamics, affecting engagement, morale, and ultimately, productivity. Consider the role of an effective manager – they are not just task supervisors; they are motivators, problem-solvers, and the bridge between the organization’s goals and the team’s aspirations. When such a pivotal role is undermined by inadequate training, the consequences are profound. Employee disengagement can skyrocket, leading to higher turnover rates, reduced productivity, and a dampened team spirit.

    Investing in managers for organizational resilience

    The investment in managerial training should be seen as a critical pillar for building organizational resilience in the evolving landscape of work. In the hybrid work model, the role of a manager transcends traditional boundaries, becoming more complex and multifaceted. A well-trained, well-equipped manager becomes the key driver in steering this model towards success.

    Firstly, it is important to recognize that the effectiveness of managers in a hybrid environment has a direct and significant impact on the overall health of the organization. Managers who are adept at navigating the nuances of hybrid work can effectively align their teams with the organization’s goals, regardless of physical location. This alignment is crucial for maintaining operational efficiency, fostering innovation, and ensuring a competitive edge in the market.

    Furthermore, investing in managerial training is an investment in employee engagement and retention. Managers play a pivotal role in shaping the work experience of their team members. When they are equipped with the right skills to manage, motivate, and support their team members, it leads to higher levels of job satisfaction, loyalty, and productivity. This, in turn, translates to lower turnover rates and a stronger employer brand, attracting top talent to the organization.

    This investment also signals a commitment to continuous improvement and adaptation. By prioritizing managerial training, organizations demonstrate a forward-thinking mindset, acknowledging that the skills needed yesterday may not be sufficient for tomorrow. This approach fosters a culture of learning and adaptability, which is essential in today’s fast-paced business environment.

    Moreover, well-trained managers are better equipped to identify and mitigate risks associated with hybrid work, such as communication breakdowns, team fragmentation, and burnout. By foreseeing and addressing these challenges proactively, they contribute to the overall resilience and sustainability of the organization.

    Redefining managerial training for a hybrid world

    As I tell my clients when developing management training programs for hybrid work, effective training for hybrid work transcends traditional boundaries, requiring a comprehensive and nuanced approach. It’s not just about the technical know-how of handling virtual meetings or scheduling tools. Instead, it calls for a more holistic development of skills that are often overlooked but crucial in a hybrid setting.

    Firstly, emotional intelligence takes center stage. In a hybrid environment, understanding and managing emotions – both one’s own and those of team members – is vital. This skill becomes even more crucial when direct, in-person interactions are limited. Managers need to be trained to pick up on subtle cues in virtual settings, cues that are often more nuanced and less apparent than in face-to-face interactions. This training should include recognizing signs of stress or disengagement in team members, effectively communicating empathy, and fostering an inclusive environment where every team member feels valued and heard.

    Digital proficiency is another critical area. While most managers are familiar with basic digital tools, the hybrid environment demands a deeper understanding and more strategic use of these tools. Training should focus on leveraging technology not just for task management but for fostering collaboration, creativity, and connection among team members. This includes using project management software more effectively, understanding the best practices for virtual meetings, and being aware of and utilizing digital tools that can enhance team interaction and productivity.

    Additionally, an adaptive leadership style is crucial. Hybrid work environments are dynamic, and what works one day may not be effective the next. Managers must be trained to be flexible in their leadership approach, adapting to the varying needs of their team members. This adaptability also means being open to feedback and willing to continuously learn and evolve their management style. It involves understanding the unique challenges and opportunities of managing remote and in-office team members and being adept at creating a cohesive team culture that bridges the physical divide.

    Honing communication skills is another key focus. In a hybrid setup, clear and inclusive communication is paramount. Managers need to be adept at conveying their messages effectively across various digital platforms, ensuring that every team member, whether remote or in-office, feels equally involved and informed. This involves not just verbal and written communication skills but also an understanding of non-verbal cues in virtual settings. Training should cover aspects like active listening, clear and concise messaging, and the use of visual aids to enhance understanding.

    Developing strategies for remote team building is equally important. Hybrid work models can lead to a sense of disconnection among team members. Managers should be equipped with strategies to foster team cohesion and a sense of community, regardless of physical location. This could include virtual team-building activities, regular check-ins, and creating opportunities for informal interactions among team members. The training should also emphasize the importance of celebrating team achievements and milestones, which can significantly boost morale and team spirit.

    These training programs should not be static; they need to be dynamic and evolve with the changing landscape of hybrid work. They should include regular updates and refresher courses to keep managers abreast of the latest tools and strategies. Additionally, offering a platform for managers to share their experiences and learn from each other can be invaluable.

    Related: Employers: Hybrid Work is Not The Problem — Your Guidelines Are. Here’s Why and How to Fix Them.

    Understanding cognitive biases in hybrid work management training

    In the context of hybrid work and managerial training, understanding the impact of cognitive biases is crucial. These biases can significantly influence how managers perceive and address the challenges and opportunities of hybrid work environments. Let’s delve into two specific biases: status quo bias and empathy gap, and explore their implications in this setting.

    Status quo bias is the tendency to prefer things to remain the same or to resist changes, especially when the benefits of change are uncertain. In the realm of hybrid work management, this bias can manifest in several ways. Managers might be inclined to stick with traditional management practices, hesitant to adopt new strategies or tools that are better suited for hybrid work environments. This resistance can stem from a discomfort with change or an underestimation of the new skills required in a hybrid setting.

    For instance, a manager might continue to evaluate employee performance based on time spent working, disregarding the productivity and efficiency of outcomes-focused metrics. This bias can hinder the adoption of more effective performance metrics that are tailored to hybrid work models. The status quo bias can also lead to a reluctance to invest in necessary training for managing hybrid teams, as it deviates from traditional training models.

    The empathy gap refers to the difficulty in understanding or predicting others’ emotions, especially when they are in a different situation or context. In hybrid work environments, this can lead to managers underestimating or misjudging the challenges faced by remote team members. For example, a manager who primarily works on-site might struggle to fully grasp the communication barriers, feelings of isolation, or work-life balance issues experienced by remote employees.

    This gap can result in ineffective communication strategies or insufficient support for remote team members, leading to disengagement and decreased productivity. Managers might overlook the need for regular check-ins or fail to create inclusive meeting formats that ensure remote employees feel as involved as their in-office counterparts.

    Incorporating an understanding of these biases into managerial training programs is essential. Training should not only focus on imparting new skills but also on raising awareness of these cognitive biases and their impact on managing hybrid teams. Managers should be encouraged to challenge their preconceptions, critically evaluate their management approaches, and adopt more flexible, inclusive strategies that cater to the diverse needs of hybrid teams.

    For instance, training programs can include exercises that simulate remote work scenarios, helping managers to experience and understand the challenges faced by remote employees, thereby bridging the empathy gap. Similarly, discussions and case studies can be used to illustrate the pitfalls of the status quo bias, encouraging managers to embrace and adapt to the changing dynamics of the workplace.

    Conclusion

    The move to hybrid work isn’t a temporary shift; it’s the future of work. As we navigate this new landscape, the need for adequately trained managers cannot be overstated. It’s time for organizations to step up and equip their leaders with the skills and tools needed to thrive in this new era. Let’s not just adapt to hybrid work; let’s master it with well-trained managers leading the charge.

    [ad_2]

    Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link

  • Want Employees Back in the Office? What Leaders Are (Still!) Getting Wrong About This Ask | Entrepreneur

    Want Employees Back in the Office? What Leaders Are (Still!) Getting Wrong About This Ask | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    For all the reports of loneliness and isolation experienced during the pandemic, it’s no secret that a significant portion of the workforce became habituated to working from home. Many found the increased time autonomy, the lack of commute and the flexibility refreshing, if not freeing.

    Well, the party’s over.

    Last year, people began returning to the office en masse. According to Build Remote, in 2022 approximately 34% — twice that of the previous year — of all Fortune 100 companies requested their employees return to the office. For those still working at home, the news gets worse; Resume Builder reports that 90% of companies plan to be back at the office by the end of 2024.

    This presents its own set of problems. For business leaders, one of these is the question of how to ask employees to come back. But armed with the knowledge of what others have done right (or drastically wrong), it would behoove them to think about how they approach communications on this.

    As a business leader who supports other business leaders with how they communicate with stakeholders, I’ve seen firsthand how taking a compassionate approach to communicating policy changes can further the employer-employee bond, energize a workforce and take the edge off challenging conversations. Yes, including the RTO ask.

    Here are some tips to get it right.

    Related: 3 Mistakes You May Not Realize You’re Making When Bringing Employees Back to the Office

    Dig deep

    It sounds simple, but before asking their employees to return to the office, leaders should ask themselves: Why do I really want this?

    Is it because returning to a work environment is what everyone else is doing? Or because it seems like the correct course to take? Or is it even due to control issues? If your motivations are rooted in a scarcity rather than an abundance mindset or impulsive feelings, it’s worth taking a second look and ensuring they aren’t informing strategy that could do more damage in the long term.

    One of many dangers of not thinking through your own motivations is coming across as unclear and out of touch. In a virtual town hall recorded in April, Clearlink CEO James Clarke awkwardly praised an employee for selling the family dog after hearing about the company’s RTO policy and questioned whether single mothers or primary caregivers could really work full-time jobs.

    This was a textbook example of somebody who was making an ask from a lens of control and operational scarcity, who was not clear on the data, and who was throwing out confusing and alienating concepts to justify the return to work. Not only was this ineffective, but his communication blunder led to widespread negative coverage for his organization and his leadership.

    Look to the data

    While personal reflection is a good starting point, one of the benefits of no longer being in the immediate post-pandemic period is that leaders now have access to some telling numbers around barriers and motivations for returning to a physical workplace.

    According to a 2022 Microsoft Work Trend Index, the main attraction of coming back is the social aspect: 85% of employees say they would be motivated to go into the office to rebuild team bonds, while 84% indicated they would return to work for the chance to socialize with coworkers.

    This is gold for business leaders. CEOs and company heads who emphasize human connection and collaboration in the workplace are more likely to receive buy-in. No matter how comfortable and convenient your employees’ home offices might be, they may still miss the water-cooler chitchat about the latest hit streaming show and the sense of mission that comes from being around like-minded people. Simply put: Framing an office come-back of any duration as an aspirational opportunity for collaboration and connectedness vs. a punitive measure rooted in control is a great place to start.

    Related: We Know Return to Office Mandates Backfire — So Why Are Tech Giants Like Amazon, IBM and Zoom Reinstating This Outdated Policy?

    Use humility and empathy as a North Star

    Words like empathy and humility get thrown around a lot, but they do matter here. If you want people to show up for you, show up for them.

    Put yourself in your employees’ shoes. What kind of challenges do they face? Arm yourself with the information before you make that choice and that call. If you have a people team or access to HR data, leverage those things to get more insight into what is keeping employees at home and what would incentivize them to come back. Figure out their barriers to entry. Do they need childcare options? A less costly commute?

    Also keep in mind that the blending of home and work life during the pandemic fundamentally may have changed things for people, particularly for caregivers. Acknowledging and accounting for the added stress that a return to the office may bring reassures them that the reality of their experience isn’t being erased by the renewed physical barrier between home and work.

    Commit to being present, too

    Finally, business leaders have to walk the walk as well as talk the talk. I’ve heard many stories of CEOs asking employees to come back, while rarely coming in themselves. Not a good look.

    Obviously, as a leader with travel and business obligations, you’re not going to be able to be in the office 24/7 — and you wouldn’t have been before this situation, either. But it is important that, especially in those early days of asking people to come back in, you are intentional about being present, making your face known (and seen) and demonstrating that enthusiasm that you’re asking others to bring.

    Related: 3 Simple Ways to Motivate a Remote Workforce

    That means everything from welcoming people back personally to showing your face around the office to, when possible, attending town halls and meetings in person. And it means continuing to ensure that whatever policy you have instituted is still working. Keeping those lines of communication open and responding to changes as they come up are ways that leaders can continue to show that this is a journey for them, too.

    Growing pains — or in this case, returning pains — are inevitable after a paradigm-shifting event like the pandemic. But by being clear and intentional in your communications, embracing empathy and leveraging data, your RTO ask might actually energize and inspire your workers.

    [ad_2]

    Caroline Carter-Smith

    Source link

  • The Most Important Shift Hybrid Workforces Need to Thrive Is the One Most Are Ignoring | Entrepreneur

    The Most Important Shift Hybrid Workforces Need to Thrive Is the One Most Are Ignoring | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    By the end of this year, 39% of all global knowledge workers will be hybrid workers.

    That’s a forecast from Gartner, and it’s more than just a statistic; it’s a harbinger of a seismic shift in our work culture.

    Some business leaders may mistake this trend as a partial return to “the way it was.” But that is shortsighted. The hybrid model isn’t just “old office life” for half the week, and it also isn’t a free-form, work-from-home life for half the week. To embrace the hybrid work model means reimagining the very fabric of our work environment. The pandemic taught us that work is not a place you go; it’s something you do — so the office must now serve as a hub for collaboration and innovation, not a factory for rote tasks.

    [ad_2]

    Dr. Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link

  • The Importance of Building Trust When Working Remotely or From Home | Entrepreneur

    The Importance of Building Trust When Working Remotely or From Home | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Before the pandemic, one of the most pressing questions about work was whether working from home was feasible. Now, with the crisis having accelerated the adoption of newer technologies by up to seven years, the question for most businesses is not whether working from home is possible but whether working from home or going into the office is better.

    Employers have many points to consider in this decision, such as their budget, the nature of the work, and the number of employees. But the most important factor that weighs into the equation is trust.

    Related: 3 Ways to Build Trust Among Employees

    Workers are adults, so treat them as such

    Consider a parent and their child. If the parent didn’t trust their child, they might not send the child to school or let them explore the world. Instead, they would micromanage and tell the child what to do about everything.

    Good parents want to build a trusting relationship that matures to a level where, even though the parent and child eventually might not be together, the parent knows the child is doing well and has learned enough to be successful on their own.

    The employer-employee relationship is much the same. Employees are already at their own level of success. They have learned enough that they do not need the employer to micromanage everything for them. So, why would an employer want to make the employee dependent on the employer to make the work-from-home decision? The employees are capable of making that decision for themselves. The simple answer is trust. They need employers to trust them if they are going to keep growing and doing their best work.

    Underneath this point, there is a difference between micromanaging and mentoring. Micromanaging means that the person in authority forces someone to act or think a certain way and gives them no choice. But with mentoring, directives and boundaries are respectfully done. The person being mentored has clear guidance, but they are free to make their own decisions and learn from their wins and losses. A mentoring employer would clearly explain to workers the pros and cons of each setup and trust that workers will make the decision that gets good outcomes for both the workers and the employer.

    Related: 10 Tips to Unlock Better Collaboration and Creativity for Remote Workers

    Finding the truth about what’s happening

    Employers have many legitimate reasons why they might want to bring workers back to the office. People need emotional and physical contact — workers might genuinely miss each other. There might be some gap in digital communication that cannot be felt until people see each other — perhaps they are missing the water cooler effect.

    Many employers have said their plan to bring employees back into the office is due to productivity. But even looking at productivity can be misleading. An employer might be convinced that the organization is not getting as much return as it would if workers were in the office. They might think that, by bringing people back to the office, they can train, supervise, and make those people better employees.

    But it could be that some of the workers the employer is measuring may not have been that productive initially. It’s just that having the workers work from home forced the employer to do a formal measurement of productivity, which made the lack of productivity from those workers more obvious. Employers need to examine their situations holistically and be open-minded to alternative explanations for what they see to ensure their assessment of what is going on is accurate.

    Related: We Know Return to Office Mandates Backfire — So Why Are Tech Giants Like Amazon, IBM and Zoom Reinstating This Outdated Policy?

    Challenge, connect and collaborate

    Even though the senior-most person might not have enough experience to make a decision, they often do make the decision because it is expected. With work-from-home, this might mean that an executive who has never handled a work-from-home setup decides workers should return to the office only because many companies are doing it.

    But in an open-minded organization, other people are allowed to brainstorm with the senior-most person. They will examine and challenge the executive’s decision, not to denigrate but to improve the outcome. Collaborative brainstorming allows leaders at all levels to properly articulate who should consider coming into the office, when, why, and so on, rather than simply handing down the decision.

    To grasp why this is so important, think of an employee who loves their job but has moved two hours away because the employer said they were okay with a work-from-home setup. If a leader then says the employee has to come back to the office, that employee might be scared they are going to lose their job. They might say to themselves, “I don’t want to sell my house. I don’t want to uproot my family and move.”

    So employers need to understand that people are not all the same. Workers all have different attitudes, aptitudes, experiences and education. They each thrive in their own environment, and if an employer puts them out of their environment, they become like whales stranded on an island — they don’t fit. If employers and employees take the time to get to know each other online and offline, they will understand these differences better, making the work-from-home decision easier and improving buy-in.

    Because employees must get to know each other, employers must figure out the best way to encourage people to meet, bond, and collaborate during work hours. There are many tools to unite employees, and what works for one organization might not work for another. Workers might try having an online pizza party where the team members might not be physically present but are all participating in their homes on video. Workers need to have opportunities to train in a way that matches their rhythm to the rhythm of the other employees.

    Related: The Most Common Work From Home Problems — And How to Solve Them.

    All for one and one for all

    Every organization has its own resources, goals and cultural expectations. So workers and leaders must approach the work-from-home decision objectively and think about what’s best for their own business. However, employers should not force the decision authoritatively on their workforce. Instead, they should make people part of the decision-making process so that, regardless of whether workers stay home or come back to the office, it’s clear that there is reciprocal trust serving as a foundation for the choice. The more people are willing to learn about each other, the more natural this collaboration will feel, and the more positive the results will be. My 2 cents: to make this happen, a certain number of leaders need to be together, like an office, to bring strategies that benefit all stakeholders to reality.

    [ad_2]

    Par Chadha

    Source link

  • The Gender Pay Gap Is About to Widen as Companies Adopt a ‘Men First’ Work Policy Without Realizing It | Entrepreneur

    The Gender Pay Gap Is About to Widen as Companies Adopt a ‘Men First’ Work Policy Without Realizing It | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Is your organization walking back decades of progress in gender equity with a snap of its fingers? The question may sting, but the data tells an uncomfortable truth: forced Return to Office (RTO) policies may unintentionally roll back the progress we’ve made toward gender equality in the workplace.

    By scrapping the gains in flexible working environments made during the pandemic, firms are essentially establishing a “men first” hiring policy, whether they realize it or not. An inflexible RTO approach is pushing women out, which in turn fosters an environment that is even more exclusive. This exclusivity cycles back as a self-fulfilling prophecy, putting yet another layer of glass on that notorious ceiling.

    Gains on the gender pay gap: A precarious progress

    McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.Org recently published their Women in the Workplace report for 2023. The study spans an impressive 27,000 employees, 270 senior HR leaders, and 270 companies. We are inching toward equality, however reluctantly. Women make up 28% of the C-suite, a historical peak. But before we uncork the champagne, let’s not overlook the asterisks that accompany this headline. The journey to this milestone has been arduous, and the path ahead is fraught with stumbling blocks that threaten to undo this progress.

    Women reaching the C-suite represents a powerful narrative of hard-won battles in boardrooms, oftentimes against a backdrop of systemic obstacles. Yet, even as we celebrate the 28%, we must grapple with the glaring disparity that women of color comprise just 6% of this top-level leadership. It’s a somber footnote that screams: our work is far from done. And unfortunately, the barriers are not just confined to the boardroom — they infiltrate every level of the corporate hierarchy.

    Let’s talk about mid-tier promotions, a critical inflection point in anyone’s career, but especially for women. This is the stage where the corporate ladder starts to narrow significantly, and every rung upwards becomes exponentially more competitive. According to the report, for every 100 men promoted from entry-level to managerial positions, only 87 women achieve the same elevation. Break it down by race, and the numbers are even more bleak — 73 women of color get promoted for every 100 men.

    We can’t talk about progress without addressing microaggressions. They’re the tiny pebbles in the shoe, easily dismissed but impossible to ignore. Women are 1.5 times more likely than men to have a colleague take credit for their work and twice as likely to endure unsolicited commentary about their emotional state. Consequently, the majority of women — particularly women of color — adapt their appearance or behavior to circumvent these demeaning experiences. And guess what? Those who do are three times more likely to contemplate leaving their jobs.

    What these numbers don’t show are the invisible forces at play: the quiet sidelining of women during key project assignments, the unconscious biases coloring performance reviews, and the systemic hurdles in networking opportunities. Put bluntly, the system is rigged, and the odds are skewed heavily against women, even more so against women of color.

    Given the existing imbalances, the question becomes: can we afford to destabilize this precarious progress? Because what’s at stake isn’t just a few percentage points in a C-suite representation chart—it’s about shifting the entire cultural narrative around what leadership looks like. And more practically, it’s about leveraging the full extent of available talent in an increasingly competitive business landscape.

    Related: We’re Now Finding Out The Damaging Results of The Mandated Return to Office — And It’s Worse Than We Thought.

    Why a forced return to office is a gender issue

    And now for the gut punch: all this hard-won progress is on the brink of unraveling. Why? Because a mandatory return to office is hitting women harder.

    At first glance, bringing people back to the office seems like an equitable move — everyone, irrespective of gender, resumes the daily commute. Yet, it’s anything but. The consequences of this seemingly uniform policy are essentially hitting the rewind button on the modest gains we’ve made.

    To understand this, let’s take a look at a recent survey of over 1,000 UK CTOs and CIOs conducted by Nash Squared, which revealed a disturbing trend. Companies that mandated employees to be in the office at least four days a week had a conspicuously lower rate of hiring women — comprising just one in five new hires. Contrarily, firms that allowed more flexible work arrangements saw a 50% higher hiring rate for women. That’s a staggering difference, one that exposes the underlying biases and systemic issues at play.

    Other research shows similar findings. A Deloitte and Workplace Intelligence survey focusing on the financial sector illustrates that if leaders have caregiving responsibilities, they are 30% times more likely to exit if their remote work options are rescinded. And unfortunately, women still are much more likely to be caregivers.

    The blow to women from an inflexible return to office applies especially to high-paying, high-pressure jobs that demand workers be available at unusual times outside their contracted hours. The recent Nobel Award winner in economics, Claudia Golden, calls these “greedy jobs” and pointed out that flexibility during the pandemic allowed women to take more of these roles, helping narrow the gender pay gap. Reversal of RTO naturally reverses these gains.

    What explains such disparities? Forced RTO policies neglect the existing social inequalities and pressures disproportionately faced by women. Talking about childcare responsibilities, the flexibility to work from home helps mitigate these challenges, allowing women to integrate their professional and personal lives more effectively. With RTO, the juggling act becomes more precarious, leading many to opt out of full-time roles or sidestep promotional opportunities that demand more in-office presence.

    Moreover, women, especially women of color, often have to deal with microaggressions in the workplace, from being interrupted during meetings to having credit for their work usurped by male colleagues. The option to work from home doesn’t entirely eliminate these issues, but it does offer some level of insulation. Forced RTO means a return to these exhausting daily battles, which could lead to attrition among women who are already three times more likely to consider quitting when experiencing such microaggressions.

    Now, let’s bring it back to the data. If women make up only one in five new hires in an RTO-enforced environment, imagine the ripple effect this will have on the already dismal ratios of women in mid-tier and senior roles. And if they are 30% more likely to exit, they are much less likely to be retained.

    So, as we navigate the ever-shifting terrains of the post-pandemic workplace, it’s crucial to scrutinize the unintended consequences of our choices. Forced RTO isn’t just a logistics or productivity issue; it’s a dire gender issue with the potential to reverse years of slow but consistent progress. It’s a pivotal moment that calls for conscious decision-making, weighing the allure of returning to “business as usual” against the cost of squandering the inclusive workplaces we’ve started to build.

    That’s why I tell the clients I work with to determine their RTO policies to focus on the impact of RTO on all categories of employees, not only white males. Doing so helps inform more inclusive decisions considerate of the needs of all employees.

    The unintended consequences of RTO policies

    Let’s not kid ourselves. The thought behind a return-to-office policy often stems from a well-intended desire to reestablish workplace culture, foster team dynamics, and reclaim some sense of “normalcy.” But in achieving these objectives, are companies factoring in the regressions that might occur in other equally crucial areas, like gender equality? The balance of power is already skewed; the flexibility in work arrangements is one of the few equalizing factors we’ve managed to introduce. Strip that away, and you’re not just affecting logistics — you’re altering career trajectories.

    Enough with the doom and gloom. Here’s the wake-up call: this isn’t about appeasing any one group; it’s about ensuring that your talent pool is as rich, diverse and dynamic as it can possibly be. Make gender neutrality a cornerstone of your RTO policy. Use advanced analytics to monitor promotion rates across gender and racial lines. Equip your managers to recognize and counteract microaggressions.

    Is this hard work? Absolutely. But if we let forced RTO policies dismantle what progress we’ve made in gender equality, then we aren’t just failing our women; we are failing our organizations.

    So, are you in, or are you out?

    [ad_2]

    Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link

  • CEOs Are Tricking Employees Into Spending More Time In The Office — But Here’s Why They’re Only Fooling Themselves. | Entrepreneur

    CEOs Are Tricking Employees Into Spending More Time In The Office — But Here’s Why They’re Only Fooling Themselves. | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Why are CEOs intent on killing the golden goose that is hybrid work? Remember the fable of boiling the frog? Well, it seems traditionalist CEOs are turning up the heat to trick employees into spending more time in the office, but at what cost?

    In a dramatic shift, companies like Chipotle and BlackRock are nudging their in-office mandates from three days a week to four. Nike, not to be left behind, has pivoted its return-to-office strategy, insisting that employees “just do it” and be in the office four days a week, up from the previous three. The rationale? A spokesperson from Nike expressed a yearning for “the power and energy that comes from working together in person.”

    Let’s talk about Amazon for a moment. The tech behemoth’s three-day in-office requirement hasn’t exactly been smooth sailing. With a senior executive conceding it hasn’t “been perfect” and 30,000 workers signing an anti-return-to-office petition, the company still thought it wise to empower managers to fire those who refuse to comply with its hybrid mandate. Are these changes a natural evolution or a regression into an antiquated working model?

    Related: Workers Are Disengaged. Here’s How Employers Can Win Them Back.

    CEOs’ mirage of a pre-pandemic world

    According to KPMG’s 2023 CEO Outlook survey, 64% of CEOs at large companies see a return to pre-pandemic office routines in the next three years. Staggeringly, 87% aim to use financial rewards and promotion opportunities as carrots to lure employees back to their cubicles. But the question looms large: Are these CEOs out of touch with what their employees actually want?

    It’s not like we don’t have data. A recent BCG survey laid it bare: nine in 10 global office-based workers consider flexible work crucial when job-hunting. Employees disenchanted with their current work model are 2.5 times more likely to consider leaving within the next year. So why are CEOs choosing to ignore these glaring signals?

    The employee’s sacrifice for flexibility: A wake-up call for CEOs

    Now, let’s layer in some more compelling data that amplifies just how much employees value flexibility. According to a recent report, a staggering 62% of employees would accept a pay cut of 10% or more just to maintain the ability to work remotely or in a hybrid setting. And if you think that’s eye-opening, consider this: 4% would go so far as to quit their job if this flexibility were revoked.

    These figures should be a siren call for any CEO orchestrating a retreat to office-centric work. When a majority of your talent pool is willing to take a financial hit to preserve their work-life balance, it’s more than a trend — it’s a clarion call for a new social contract between employers and employees. Ignoring this can have real-world consequences, ranging from a hollowed-out talent pipeline to a disengaged workforce. So, who’s really winning when companies decide to turn the dial back on flexible work arrangements?

    The data-backed optimum for employee engagement

    Before CEOs rush to imprint their will on company policies, they should pay close attention to a revelatory study from Gallup. The data doesn’t just suggest — it lays bare that the sweet spot for employee engagement lies in a two to three-day on-site workweek.

    Beyond this balanced approach, the numbers reveal an alarming drop in engagement rates. For highly collaborative jobs that benefit from real-time interactions, engagement plunges from 49% to a lackluster 40% when the office time goes from three to four days a week. Engagement for more independent roles takes a dive from 39% to 34% when these roles are confined to an office setting for four days instead of three days.

    This is not merely a numbers game; it’s a psychological dynamic that can ricochet through the corridors of an organization, well-known by now through the term “quiet quitting.” When engagement dips, so does productivity, creativity, and, ultimately, profitability. The Gallup data serves as a glaring red flag that increasing time in the office beyond a balanced threshold can lead to burnout and a higher intent to leave the organization. Are CEOs really prepared to stake their companies’ future on policies that actively erode the foundations of employee engagement and organizational health?

    It’s not simply retention and engagement that are endangered: it’s innovation and progress. The EY Technology Pulse Poll recently revealed that an overwhelming 78% of high-ranking technology executives contend that remote work environments are actually conducive to sparking innovation. Ken Englund of EY suggested that’s because remote work not only obliterates geographical limitations in talent acquisition but also recharges the workforce by eradicating the grind of daily commuting.

    This insight couples alarmingly well with the previously discussed Owl Labs report. Employees don’t just want flexibility — they’re empirically proven to work better within its confines. It stands to reason, then, that any deviation towards old-school, rigid work schedules isn’t merely ignoring employee preferences; it’s actively undermining the data-proven pathways to a healthy, robust and engaged organization. CEOs must ask themselves: Is enforcing greater in-office attendance worth the cascading repercussions it triggers, including eroding trust, diminishing engagement, and ultimately, draining talent?

    Boiling the frog: A losing strategy

    The notion of boiling the frog represents a stealthy but dangerous approach. Laszlo Bock, former Google HR chief and current CEO of Humu, suggested that this method is designed to subtly erode hybrid mandates, aiming to make the office-centric schedule the new normal. But here’s the kicker: It might be a pyrrhic victory for CEOs, as Bock warns that this approach could actually destroy trust and morale.

    It’s becoming increasingly evident that by reverting to pre-pandemic norms, CEOs may be sacrificing the long-term well-being of their organizations for immediate gains. Fostering a culture that doesn’t adapt to the changing work landscape is a gamble. Is it worth rolling the dice when employee satisfaction, productivity and even mental health are at stake?

    While another day in the office might seem trivial to some, it’s a significant shift in policy that ripples across various facets of organizational dynamics—from employee engagement and trust to talent retention. If we assess the costs holistically, it’s not just about losing a day of remote work; it’s about disregarding the preferences of a workforce that has tasted the freedom and effectiveness of a more flexible model.

    Related: Our Brains Will Never Be The Same Again After Remote Work. Forcing Your Employees To Readapt to The Office Is Not The Answer.

    Seizing competitive advantage

    It’s time for companies to buck the trend. Some forward-thinking organizations are already embracing permanent remote work or extremely flexible hybrid models, and they’re reaping the benefits in employee satisfaction and productivity. CEOs clinging to the past need to ask themselves: Is the temporary thrill of control worth the long-term sacrifice of losing the talent wars, a company full of quiet quitters, and the decimation of innovation?

    Traditionalist CEOs may think they’re boiling the frog slowly, but my clients who have veered off that well-trodden path are showcasing that embracing a modern hybrid work environment is not just possible but remarkably rewarding. One of my clients, a Fortune 500 company in the tech sector, took the plunge by committing to a flexible hybrid model, and the dividends have been remarkable. Despite initial resistance from upper management, they decided to trust the data over gut instinct. Not only did they see a 15% increase in overall productivity within the first six months, but they also noticed a 22% boost in employee engagement metrics. They’ve become a magnet for top-tier talent who are fleeing more rigid competitors.

    Consider another case: a mid-size financial services firm in the New York City area was feeling the heat of high attrition rates. They decided to counter the trend of Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan and adopt a flexible hybrid model. The result? They not only reversed the attrition trend but also increased quarterly profits by 11%, an upswing they directly attribute to heightened employee engagement and innovation.

    Lastly, the largest law firm in a Midwestern city became a surprising torchbearer. Skeptical at first, they conducted a six-month trial period of a flexible work model. The outcome was unambiguous: a 35% drop in the use of sick days, a 17% boost in retention, and a 20% uptick in billable hours, effectively quashing every preconceived notion about the inefficacy of remote work in the legal sector.

    So, while traditionalist CEOs are stuck playing checkers, my visionary clients are playing 4D chess. They’re not only responding to employee needs but also using the hybrid and remote work models as strategic assets. The results speak for themselves: higher employee satisfaction, greater innovation, and, yes, a healthier bottom line. If that’s not future-proofing a company, I don’t know what is.

    Conclusion

    So, are we going to let the frog boil? It’s time for corporate America to recognize that what seemed like a temporary disruption in the work environment has paved the way for transformative, sustainable change. CEOs — take note: Turning back the clock could very well be a ticking time bomb for your organization’s future.

    [ad_2]

    Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link

  • Prepare For This Seismic Shift in Employee Expectations — Or Say Goodbye to Your Top Talent. | Entrepreneur

    Prepare For This Seismic Shift in Employee Expectations — Or Say Goodbye to Your Top Talent. | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Let’s be brutally honest: Would you stick with your company if it failed to prioritize your wellbeing? You’re not alone if the answer is a resounding “no.” Workers are sending a clear message to the corporate world — wellbeing is non-negotiable. Forget the antiquated notion that a hefty paycheck is the ultimate carrot on the stick. The data is in, and it’s irrefutable: workers really care about their wellbeing and flexibility, and corporations better listen if they want to win the talent wars.

    Workers are working less voluntarily

    The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis recently released a paper that delves into why the U.S. labor market has tightened post-pandemic. It focuses on two prongs of this phenomenon: The declining number of workers and the receding number of hours those workers are willing to commit to their jobs.

    In the realm of academic endeavors, one line from this paper feels like a bombshell: “Circumstantial and direct evidence indicates that the hours reduction among workers [from 2019 to 2022] is voluntary. In addition, although the reduction may have been caused by the pandemic situation, it is expected to persist.” This is not a fleeting, reactionary change. Rather, it’s an enduring shift in worker behavior and priorities, revealing a collective reassessment of what’s truly valuable in life.

    This shift is most pronounced among men, particularly those with college degrees and those in their main working years. It signals that the individuals who traditionally occupied power seats in the corporate world are stepping back, reassessing their options, and consciously opting for a reality that allows them to live fuller lives outside their cubicles. And here’s where it gets interesting: It’s those men who were already logging in more hours and earning more who have chosen to pull back the most. What does that tell us? These are not decisions of necessity but are based on the realization of an unspoken need for balance, wellness and, dare we say it, happiness.

    What was merely a hunch or a buzzword in corporate seminars is now backed by empirical evidence: Workers are not just saying they desire more from life than work — they are manifesting these desires through tangible actions. This act of self-determination is altering the landscape of labor availability, making this a two-edged sword. On one hand, we are moving toward a more balanced and humane concept of work; on the other, it brings about challenges of labor shortages that cannot be ignored.

    In the corporate arena, this leads to a potentially seismic shift. If you are a business leader failing to account for this fundamental transformation in worker attitudes, prepare for a rude awakening. Worker wellbeing is no longer a “nice-to-have,” it’s a “must-have” if you hope to attract and retain the top-tier talent needed to fuel innovation and growth in an increasingly competitive market.

    This paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis doesn’t merely add an interesting viewpoint to the dialogue about the future of work. It serves as a clarion call for the immediate reevaluation of long-held assumptions about what motivates people to commit their time and energy to an organization. The time to act is now because, as the Fed suggests, this is not a temporary phenomenon; it’s a deeply rooted, long-lasting transformation that is expected to endure. Ignore it at your own peril.

    Related: Workers Are Disengaged. Here’s How Employers Can Win Them Back.

    The numbers don’t lie

    Gympass’ annual State of Work-Life Wellness Report this October has gifted us some startling figures from a survey of over 5,000 global employees that reinforce the Fed’s findings. A whopping 87% said they would consider jumping ship from a company that disregards employee wellbeing, a notable increase from 77% just a year ago. Moreover, 93% equate wellbeing with salary in terms of importance, up 10 points from last year’s 83%. The clincher? An overwhelming 96% will consider only those companies that give prime importance to employee wellbeing for their next job hunt.

    When it comes to wellbeing and the workplace, there’s a myth that has long been shattered: One size fits all. In reality, our surroundings wield considerable influence on our emotional and psychological states.

    Employees operating in work environments that don’t resonate with their preferences for flexibility — such as remote-capable workers forced to do in-office work due to a top-down mandate against their will — are not just mildly inconvenienced: many are categorically struggling. According to Gympass, workers who find themselves in such discordant settings are twice as likely to describe their condition as “struggling” or “really struggling” than those fortunate enough to be in their ideal work environments. Let’s pause to consider the weight of that statement. It means that a vast swath of employees are grappling with a work setup that not only affects their daily satisfaction but potentially curtails their longer-term mental wellbeing.

    But the report doesn’t stop there; it draws a stark picture of how drastically our sense of wellbeing can be impacted. While 77% of employees working in their preferred flexible environments feel equipped to take care of their wellbeing, this percentage nosedives to a startling 65% for those who don’t have the luxury of such alignment. That 12% differential isn’t merely statistical noise; it’s the loud cry of an unsatisfied and disengaged workforce. And more than a third of employees wish they worked in a different work environment that aligns with their preference.

    Let’s call it what it is: this is a seismic shift in employee expectations. Flexible work arrangements are no longer just attractive benefits to be dangled in front of potential hires. They have transitioned into non-negotiable components of an employment package. Why is this so vital? Because of the nexus between flexibility and wellbeing underpinning workplace satisfaction, engagement, and productivity.

    And herein lies the vulnerability to cognitive biases that can hamstring effective decision-making. One major obstacle is the status quo bias, an innate preference for keeping things the way they are. Business leaders clinging to conventional work arrangements risk not just falling out of step with current trends but also substantially diminishing their appeal to top talent. Another cognitive trap is the empathy gap, wherein decision-makers underestimate the emotional needs and responses of others—particularly their employees. This bias could lead to underestimating just how essential flexibility is to staff wellbeing.

    Related: Back In The Office? Why Your Company’s One-Size-Fits-All Approach Is Destined to Fail.

    Strategies for a wellbeing-centric, flexible work ecosystem

    Many corporate leaders are acutely aware of the shifting sands but often stumble when it comes to implementing concrete measures. In my consultancy, Disaster Avoidance Experts, I’ve honed in on specific strategies that businesses can adopt to make a tangible difference. The confluence of wellbeing and work flexibility is more than a passing trend; it’s the new cornerstone of sustainable, profitable operations. Here are some action steps that I strongly advocate for when serving clients.

    First, it’s time to let go of your traditional “nine-to-five, in-the-office” mindset, a relic that is increasingly at odds with today’s dynamic workforce. For those still clinging to a rigid structure, this might feel like a leap into the abyss. However, the alternative is a debilitating anchoring bias — relying too heavily on the first piece of information encountered (in this case, traditional work models) when making decisions. Shake off this outdated mooring and embrace hybrid and even fully remote work options. Use this as an opportunity to gather data on productivity, engagement and wellbeing, adjusting your course as needed.

    Second, pivot to a team-led model for flexibility, where collective decision-making takes precedence over a one-size-fits-all approach. Allow teams to collaboratively determine their work environment — be it remote, in-office or hybrid. This not only fosters a sense of ownership and engagement but also optimizes the unique strengths and requirements of each team. Teams can decide when face-to-face interactions are most beneficial for creative brainstorming or complex problem-solving and when remote work can maximize individual focus and productivity. This approach transcends mere optimization of individual roles; it creates an ecosystem where the team, as a cohesive unit, is empowered to make decisions that maximize its collective effectiveness.

    Third, invest substantively in employee wellbeing through targeted financial support. In an era where 93% of employees view their wellbeing as equally important to salary, your investment in wellness programming is more than just an employee perk — it’s a strategic imperative. Consider offering stipends for mental health support, from licensed therapy to mindfulness apps. Subsidize fitness memberships or offer in-house wellness programs ranging from nutrition seminars to stress management workshops. Financially support ongoing education, not just in terms of professional development but also in areas that contribute to general wellbeing, such as financial literacy courses or parenting classes. By dedicating actual dollars to these initiatives, you’re not only enhancing the quality of life for your employees but also setting a cultural tone that prioritizes wellbeing as much as quarterly earnings. After all, when employees feel their wellbeing is taken seriously, they’re more engaged, productive and less likely to seek opportunities elsewhere.

    Finally, for those concerned about the economic implications of reduced hours, as highlighted by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, it’s important to recognize that wellbeing and productivity often exist in a symbiotic relationship. My advice? Focus on outcomes rather than hours. Assess performance through deliverables and milestones instead of the antiquated metric of “time spent at the desk.”

    These steps are not mere suggestions; consider them a call to action. Given the skyrocketing significance workers are placing on wellbeing and flexibility, executives and decision-makers can no longer afford to be passive bystanders. Your company’s relevance, appeal, and, ultimately its success are bound up in how adeptly you navigate this paradigm shift. It’s a jigsaw puzzle with many pieces, but the picture it forms is unmistakable: a more humane, flexible and productive future of work.

    Conclusion

    It’s not just about beanbags, free lunches or casual Fridays anymore. The Fed and Gympass data illustrate that wellbeing and flexibility are directly proportional to how engaged, happy and productive employees are. After all, who wants to give their best to a company that treats them as expendable? Your workforce is your most invaluable asset; treat them as such. It is simply illogical to expect top-tier performance from employees who feel neglected and undervalued.

    [ad_2]

    Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link

  • This Workplace Policy Is Igniting Fiery Debates In The Boardroom — Here’s Why. | Entrepreneur

    This Workplace Policy Is Igniting Fiery Debates In The Boardroom — Here’s Why. | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    What’s the biggest battle in the corporate boardroom? Perhaps it’s about adopting Generative AI? Or maybe about DEI or perhaps ESG? The biggest flashpoint, as revealed by a recent Gartner survey, is the return-to-office (RTO) strategies that are stirring the pot, igniting fiery debates among top-tier executives. The survey unveils a startling revelation: 74% of HR executives believe RTO policies are the biggest breeding grounds for boardroom clashes. The next most popular candidate, at 52%, is workplace flexibility. And investors are watching. Increasingly, they are using RTO and work-from-home policies to decide whether to invest. Boardroom clashes are definitely not attractive for investors.

    Why unraveling cognitive bias is the first step to resolving conflict

    As we delve deeper into the anatomy of this discord, we stumble upon cognitive biases that cloud the judgment of the corporate crusaders. The first culprit is confirmation bias, a veil that blinds leaders to any evidence that contradicts their preconceived notions about RTO strategies. A leader, once hooked on the allure of a full-office comeback, may turn a blind eye to alternative flexible work models, thus sowing seeds of discord among the leadership ranks.

    On the flip side, the anchoring bias is the invisible chain that shackles leaders to the first piece of information encountered. In the throes of RTO strategy deliberations, the initial proposals often cast a long shadow over subsequent discussions. This cognitive entrapment stifles creativity and fosters a breeding ground for conflict as leaders entrench themselves in their anchored positions.

    The journey towards boardroom accord demands a deliberate unraveling of the cognitive biases that obscure the path. The first stride involves cultivating an awareness and understanding of these biases among the leadership. A culture of open discourse could serve as the beacon of hope, illuminating the path toward a consensus on RTO strategies. This discourse should be enriched with a diverse array of insights, shredding the veil of confirmation and anchoring biases.

    Related: We’re Now Finding Out The Damaging Results of The Mandated Return to Office — And It’s Worse Than We Thought.

    How to facilitate an open dialogue to resolve boardroom discord

    The odyssey towards harmonizing the boardroom on RTO strategies is a nuanced endeavor, often requiring a blend of strategic acumen and empathic understanding. My journey with various clients across diverse sectors provides a window into the practical facets of navigating the RTO quagmire.

    A mid-sized tech firm was embroiled in internal debates surrounding the adoption of an appropriate RTO strategy. The board was polarized, with one faction advocating for a complete return to the office while the other supported a hybrid model that allowed for more flexible work arrangements. The stalemate was hindering strategic decision-making and threatening to erode the cohesive culture of the organization.

    Upon engagement, my approach involved orchestrating structured discussions between the opposing factions to thoroughly understand their concerns and perspectives. I facilitated dialogues that encouraged open communication and presented evidence-based data showcasing the merits of a hybrid work model, especially focusing on productivity, employee satisfaction and operational efficiency.

    Furthermore, I introduced them to successful RTO implementations in similar tech firms, which provided a practical perspective on the feasibility and benefits of a hybrid model. Over time, these discussions led to a more informed and collaborative decision-making process. Eventually, the board reached a consensus on adopting a balanced RTO strategy that accommodated the concerns of both factions and used a data-based approach to adopt a flexible hybrid model. This resolution significantly reduced boardroom discord and positioned the firm on a path toward a smoother transition to the new working model.

    In another case, a regional banking institution found itself in a quandary due to differing views within the leadership regarding the RTO policies. The divergent stances were causing operational disruptions and affecting the overall morale within the organization. My intervention started with conducting workshops aimed at identifying and addressing the cognitive biases influencing the decision-making process. Through these workshops, I fostered an environment that encouraged open communication and objective evaluation of different RTO models.

    Additionally, I provided insights on how similar financial institutions had navigated RTO transitions successfully. We explored various RTO models, evaluating their impact on operational efficiency, employee satisfaction and client service delivery. This process allowed the leadership to have a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of their RTO decisions. Gradually, a consensus emerged around a flexible RTO model that balanced the need for in-office collaboration with the flexibility of remote work. This consensus significantly eased the boardroom tensions and set the stage for a more harmonized operational transition.

    Related: Conflict Is Inevitable But Necessary. Here’s How to Stay Calm During an Argument and Rebuild Afterward.

    Steps you can take to resolve RTO strategy debates

    Addressing boardroom conflicts over RTO strategies requires a decisive and structured approach. Start by fostering a culture of open dialogue in the boardroom. Ensure every member voices their concerns and opinions on RTO strategies. Make it clear that you value all perspectives in the decision-making process.

    Use data to steer your discussions. Present empirical evidence from reputable sources or case studies from similar organizations to shift the debate from personal biases towards a fact-based dialogue.

    If necessary, bring in a neutral facilitator, preferably an external consultant with expertise in RTO strategies and organizational change, to guide the discussions. A neutral facilitator can keep discussions constructive, focused, and free from personal disputes.

    Engage the board in scenario planning. Discuss the implications of various RTO models by exploring potential scenarios and their impact on the organization. This visual representation of potential outcomes can aid in more informed decision-making.

    Encourage compromise and demonstrate a willingness to adapt. Finding a middle ground that addresses the major concerns of the board is crucial. Show that you are open to balanced solutions to resolve conflicts.

    Invest in team-building and conflict-resolution training for the board. Enhancing interpersonal relations and communication skills among board members can create a more harmonious decision-making environment.

    Lastly, once the board reaches a decision, communicate it clearly and promptly to all stakeholders within the organization, along with the rationale behind the decision. Transparency in decision-making processes can garner support for the chosen RTO strategy across the organization.

    By following these steps, you can navigate through boardroom conflicts surrounding RTO strategies, fostering a more cohesive and effective decision-making process within your organization.

    Conclusion

    The RTO-induced boardroom discord is a call to arms for organizations. It unveils the urgency of not only addressing cognitive biases but also fostering a culture of open discourse and empathy. The road ahead may be fraught with challenges, but with a compass of awareness and collaboration, the corporate ship can navigate through the stormy seas toward the calm waters of consensus and productivity.

    [ad_2]

    Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link

  • Data Breaches Cost $1 Million More When Remote Work Is Involved — Here Are 4 Steps to Protect Your Business. | Entrepreneur

    Data Breaches Cost $1 Million More When Remote Work Is Involved — Here Are 4 Steps to Protect Your Business. | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Remote work is a double-edged sword: It provides your employees with the comforts of staying at home, but it also creates additional security risks as they are more likely to use unprotected devices and connect to unsecured public networks.

    At least 20% of businesses went through a data breach caused by remote workers. As reported by IBM, the average data breach cost is $1 million higher in companies where remote work is common. It also takes 58 days longer for such organizations to discover and contain data breaches.

    Related: Entrepreneurs Beware: Remote Work Can be Fertile Ground for Cybercriminals

    Step 1: Categorize your company’s data

    Your business holds vast data, from client credit card details to employee IDs. For effective security, categorize your information. We classify ours into three: critical, restricted and confidential data.

    Critical data is what, if leaked, would seriously damage the company’s reputation, making a return to normal operations almost impossible. It includes user credentials, card security codes, client order history and customer behavior data. I would also add source code for software companies.

    Restricted data, if leaked, could seriously threaten our business. It would undermine the company’s reputation, but it’d be possible to continue operating in a limited way. Such data contains emails, locations, device info, app usage insights and many other kinds of data from our customers.

    The last category, confidential data, includes the organization’s trade secrets. Such leaks would harm the company’s operations but would have a smaller impact on its reputation. It comprises the team members’ data, company policies and procedures, recruitment process details, source code, financial statements and more.

    Step 2: Calculate the cost of a breach and create policies

    We all hate bureaucracy— I know that. Yet for a business to work, its members must follow certain rules (i.e. policies). To create a good cybersecurity policy for remote workers, you need accurate data. I recommend calculating the cost of potential data breaches using real money.

    Be sure to take into account all types of losses. A company’s data breach results in direct expenses like investigation and compensation, indirect costs from recovery efforts and lost revenue and opportunity costs due to reputational damage and lost potential business.

    After calculating the costs of a data breach, design policies. Standard procedures usually include policies on how you label and share data, what security controls you must have and what training your workers must attend.

    Related: How Do You Manage Cybersecurity With Employees Across the Globe? Here’s Your Answer.

    Step 3: Reduce the risks of remote work

    First, ensure the security of your computers. Make it so your remote workers access corporate resources from corporate devices only. Have your helpdesk specialists configure all devices according to your information security standards. They’ll need special administration tools for the task like JAMF.

    Second, monitor the state of your corporate devices. Handle the installation of patches, security updates and the latest versions of OS and software. Use special monitoring tools like JAMF and encourage employees to keep their working stations up-to-date. Last, install an Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) or Antivirus (AV) agent to track malicious activities on your corporate computers. An example of such a system would be CrowdStrike.

    Third, control the access to corporate resources. Remote workers should only have access to resources necessary for their work. Make it so they can interact with them only with the corporate VPN turned on. I recommend also enabling IPS or IDS on the VPN to look out for network anomalies.

    Don’t forget about multi-factor authentication. It’ll add one more layer of security to your company’s data and decrease the chance of unauthorized access, and you can use ready-made MFA solutions.

    Step 4: Encourage your remote workers to be responsible

    Truth bomb: The actions above aren’t enough to protect your business from security risks. About 60% of attacks succeed because average employees make mistakes. It’s your duty to help your employees understand the importance of cybersecurity.

    First, encourage them to use special apps that track whether their device is safe. They can be in the form of a security checklist, which dynamically checks various system indexes and is easy to understand.

    Second, motivate workers to keep the corporate VPN turned on. You can also make their lives a lot easier by making the VPN connect automatically when the system starts up. If you don’t have a business VPN, use a regular one from a trusted provider.

    Last, don’t forget about training. Encourage your workers to learn, but make it exciting. Monotonous video lectures won’t do — add gamification and interactivity. Your company’s security rests with your team; build a strong human firewall by instilling best practices and fostering vigilant behaviors.

    Related: How Safe Is Your Data While Working Remotely?

    Bonus step: What to do with your freelancers

    The problem with freelancers is that you can neither make them work on your corporate laptops nor install special security software on their devices. You can, however, manage their access to your company’s resources.

    Limit their access to essential company resources, using the least privilege principle. If feasible, avoid access altogether and establish secure data-sharing protocols. Always clarify collaboration terms in contracts and NDAs detailing data access and usage. Emphasize that violations may lead to legal consequences.

    Safeguarding your company in a remote work era is entirely achievable. Begin by discerning the types of data you possess and understanding the potential costs of breaches, tailoring security measures in response. Prioritize the integrity of your corporate devices and manage access to resources. Talk to your remote workers and implement the use of robust security tools like VPNs.

    [ad_2]

    Mykola Srebniuk

    Source link

  • Do ‘Unplug Days’ Actually Work? Research Says They Might Be the Key to Ending Burnout. | Entrepreneur

    Do ‘Unplug Days’ Actually Work? Research Says They Might Be the Key to Ending Burnout. | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    This emerging trend is designed to combat burnout and promote work-life balance, and thus boost productivity.

    [ad_2]

    Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link

  • Tips for Remote Work and Working From Home | Entrepreneur

    Tips for Remote Work and Working From Home | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Disclosure: Our goal is to feature products and services that we think you’ll find interesting and useful. If you purchase them, Entrepreneur may get a small share of the revenue from the sale from our commerce partners.

    Flexible employment arrangements like hybrid models and fully remote work are becoming the norm for many industries. Love it or hate it, the future of working may not take place in an office.

    Remote work expands the talent pool employers can pull from while providing the flexibility modern workers expect. For employees, some perks of working from home include:

    • Taking time back from commuting
    • Owning their schedule
    • The ability to take care of personal responsibilities throughout the day

    If you’re working remotely full-time or a few days out of the week, or you’re scouring job boards like ZipRecruiter looking for remote work, these tips can help you succeed and stay productive.

    Establish a routine.

    Poor work-life balance can negatively impact your happiness. Establishing a routine that works for you with defined working hours can help you distinguish between the two.

    Set a schedule and try to stick with it. Creating a to-do list can give you a set of goals to accomplish in your day and keeps a structure you can follow. Aside from your work tasks, include times when you’re exercising, eating lunch and recharging.

    Choose a dedicated workspace.

    While remote work provides flexibility, getting into a routine can be challenging when you don’t have a dedicated regular workspace. Ideally, your workstation will have a door so you can join meetings uninterrupted without worrying about people walking in and out. You’ll also want to work somewhere with limited distractions so you can be the most productive.

    Set it up with all the supplies you need ahead of time so you can get in the zone: paper, pens, cell phone charger, headphones, comfortable chair, extra monitor, reliable Wi-Fi, etc.

    Try prepping meals ahead of time.

    Cooking a nice breakfast or lunch daily can be tempting, but it can cut into valuable work time. Prepping your meals Sunday or the night before can ensure you still get a delicious, nutritious meal throughout the week. It can also save you money in the long run by helping you resist the urge to order out.

    Use a VPN.

    Security is essential to working remotely, and many businesses require a secure network outside the office. A VPN can keep your network safe while you’re on public Wi-Fi. You may want one anytime you’re working off-site in a coffee shop, co-working space, airport, etc.

    If you’re frequently working outside the office, consider asking your company to provide access to a VPN to keep sensitive information safe.

    Stay social.

    Working from an office generally presents more social opportunities than working from home. It can be tempting to stay online longer when you feel you don’t get as much face time with your team, but you need to stick with regular working hours to keep your sanity.

    To stay social while working remote, schedule virtual happy hours, attend trainings your company holds, or pop into a coffee shop or chat up the delivery courier if you need real social interaction.

    If you’re exploring hybrid or remote working roles, look for your next career move at ZipRecruiter. It’s the #1 rated job site in the U.S.1, and it’s free to sign up. You can filter open roles by in-person, hybrid or fully remote.

    ZipRecruiter leverages powerful matching technology to get your resume in front of top companies, improving the likelihood of finding the right fit. It also offers a convenient mobile app, and one-tap apply, so you can confidently apply to jobs wherever you are. Perhaps best of all, with ZipRecruiter, job seekers can create job alerts, save jobs, apply, and post your resume all for free.

    1 Based on G2 satisfaction ratings as of January 1, 2022

    [ad_2]

    Entrepreneur Deals

    Source link

  • What is The Future of Coworking Spaces in a Hybrid World? Here’s Everything You Need to Know. | Entrepreneur

    What is The Future of Coworking Spaces in a Hybrid World? Here’s Everything You Need to Know. | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    What is the future of coworking spaces in an increasingly hybrid world? As the CEO of Disaster Avoidance Experts, I’ve been at the epicenter of this seismic shift, helping companies navigate the complexities of hybrid work models. One of the most transformative trends I’ve observed is the decline of traditional office spaces and the meteoric rise of coworking spaces.

    The decline of traditional office spaces

    The traditional office, once a symbol of corporate stability and structure, is rapidly becoming an anachronism in today’s fluid work environment. As companies grapple with the complexities of a post-pandemic world, the limitations of conventional office spaces are becoming increasingly evident. The rigidity of long-term leases, the inefficiency of underutilized spaces, and the financial drain of maintaining large physical footprints are compelling companies to rethink their real estate strategies. No wonder that McKinsey Global Institute estimates that pandemic shifts could erase as much as $1.3 trillion of real estate value in big cities around the world by 2030.

    [ad_2]

    Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link

  • How TikTok’s Office Surveillance Could Backfire and Cost The Company Billions | Entrepreneur

    How TikTok’s Office Surveillance Could Backfire and Cost The Company Billions | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Recently, TikTok made headlines for the wrong reasons — introducing a badge monitoring app called MyRTO, aimed at enforcing its office attendance policy as part of a top-down return-to-office mandate. According to the New York Times, this app tracks employees’ badge swipes and can even penalize them for “deviations” from their expected attendance. While many companies are recalibrating post-pandemic work expectations, TikTok’s approach not only raises serious ethical issues but also amplifies broader concerns about its surveillance culture. Let’s deconstruct why this is a critical misstep for the platform.

    TikTok’s employee monitoring

    In an era where employee expectations have shifted toward greater work-life balance and flexibility, TikTok has chosen a path that is perilous for its brand, not to speak of employee retention, productivity, and morale. The company recently deployed an employee badge monitoring app called MyRTO. Built into TikTok’s own internal software, MyRTO monitors badge swipes as employees enter the office.

    The broad policy for TikTok employees involves coming to the office in person at least three times per week, and a smaller percentage is even required to be in five days per week. The MyRTO tool may demand explanations for absences when the employees were expected to be on-site. The data compiled by MyRTO is shared with human resources and is also made visible to the employees themselves. Notably, the company has even threatened termination for employees whose home addresses do not align with their designated office locations. The policy aims to create “transparency and clarity” about return-to-office expectations, according to a TikTok spokesperson.

    Related: It’s a Job Seeker’s Market — Here’s Why Employers Should Think Twice About Using Surveillance Technology

    The dangers of employee monitoring

    A Harvard Business Review article finds that such monitoring can have unintended consequences. The researchers conducted a survey of over 100 U.S.-based professionals — some under workplace surveillance and some not. The findings indicated a pronounced trend: employees under scrutiny were notably more prone to unauthorized break-taking, insubordination, willful property damage, stealing and purposefully working at a slow pace, among other rule-breaking behaviors.

    Of course, this survey only determined correlation — so to prove causation, the authors ran a second, experimental study. They asked another 200 U.S.-based employees to complete a series of tasks. Half of this cohort was informed they would be under electronic watch while completing specific assignments. Intriguingly, those aware of the monitoring exhibited a higher propensity for unethical conduct, such as cheating, compared to their unmonitored counterparts.

    How did the researchers explain these seemingly contradictory findings? Employees who knew they were being monitored were more likely to offload the responsibility for their actions to the authority figures conducting the surveillance. This reduction in a sense of personal agency made them more likely to act against their moral compass.

    To combat the erosion of agency and moral responsibility that the Harvard Business Review research highlights, and the harmful consequences of cheating and slacking off that results, leaders need to instill a sense of fairness in monitoring procedures. And given the employee leaks to the New York Times complaining about the MyRTO tool, TikTok clearly failed to do so.

    Moreover, other surveys reveal negative employee attitudes toward surveillance technology. A survey by 1E of 500 IT managers and 500 non-manager IT workers, for example, finds that 73% of IT managers said they wouldn’t feel comfortable instructing their staff to deploy productivity surveillance tech. More than a quarter of IT managers indicate an uptick in employees quitting (28%) and difficulty hiring new employees (27%) when these tools are in use. More than half of IT workers (52%) said they would turn down an otherwise desirable position if they knew the company used employee productivity surveillance technology. Three-quarters of IT workers say requiring them to deploy such software to track other employees would negatively impact their willingness to remain in their current position. In fact, 30% would begin actively applying for different jobs. In turn, a report from Morning Consult of a survey of 750 technology workers finds that at least 1 in 2 tech workers said they would not accept a new role in their field if the company used a surveillance technique.

    Thus, the tech workers at TikTok are highly likely to be disengaged, demotivated, and disillusioned by the MyRTO surveillance technology. It will lead to increased attrition and loss of productivity.

    Amplification of PR nightmares

    Perhaps even more problematic is the own goal of doubling down on the association of TikTok with surveillance. The social media platform has been subjected to legislative grillings in Capitol Hill sessions and dangled on the precipice of national bans — largely due to apprehensions around surveillance concerns and its alleged affiliations with the Chinese government. As such, the company is already navigating a precarious PR landscape, making it particularly vulnerable to any additional reputational tarnishes.

    The introduction of the MyRTO initiative exacerbates this fragile situation. Far beyond the physical badges, the program serves as a symbolic embodiment of a corporate culture that leans towards Orwellian control mechanisms over fostering an atmosphere of mutual trust and individual autonomy. The narrative now being constructed — whether intentionally or inadvertently — is one where TikTok is willing to sacrifice the organic relationships between management and workforce on the altar of hyper-surveillance and omnipresent oversight.

    Moreover, in our contemporary climate, where viral information can be disseminated globally within seconds, a PR misadventure of this magnitude carries exponential risks. It’s not merely a matter of immediate negative press; the long-term ripple effects can permeate stakeholder trust, impact user growth, and even invite further regulatory scrutiny. The imbued perception of a dystopian corporate environment can be a latent liability, hindering future partnerships and tarnishing the brand in ways that are complex and multifaceted, yet cumulatively catastrophic.

    So, while the MyRTO initiative might have been conceived with an eye toward enhancing the return to office mandate, its inadvertent contribution to a burgeoning narrative of corporate overreach likely outweighs any benefits the platform could hope to gain. Therefore, TikTok faces a strategic imperative to rapidly reassess its stance on employee monitoring in the interest of averting a full-blown reputational implosion.

    While TikTok claims it has invested $1.5 billion in ensuring that user data is secure and confined to U.S. soil, actions speak louder than words. The surveillance measures essentially throw gasoline on an already raging fire of mistrust and skepticism. They make it increasingly difficult for TikTok to argue against the narrative that it’s a tool for “control, surveillance and manipulation.”

    Related: Returning to The Office Without a Strategy Is The Biggest Mistake You Can Make. Follow These 4 Steps for a Perfect Transition.

    Conclusion

    In the grand scheme, the MyRTO tool might appear to be a small, internal administrative change. However, this ‘minor’ change encapsulates everything that’s potentially problematic about TikTok’s strategy and public image. The platform needs to recognize that its actions echo far beyond the confines of its offices, influencing not only its brand reputation but also the broader conversations about ethical corporate behavior and workplace culture in the 21st century.

    TikTok’s deployment of MyRTO is a tactical win but a strategic loss. While it may achieve short-term compliance from employees, it erodes trust and adds another layer to the growing wall of skepticism surrounding the company. It’s a move that reflects not adaptability and forward-thinking, but rigidity and an outmoded understanding of productivity. Companies aspiring for a resilient and favorable position in the marketplace should treat this not as a model but as a cautionary tale.

    As businesses pivot to new modes of work, those that embrace transparency, employee autonomy, and ethical conduct will find themselves leading the pack, as I tell client companies who I help figure out their flexible work models. Companies caught in a time warp, clinging to surveillance and control, will likely find the path ahead much more challenging.

    [ad_2]

    Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link

  • Avoid This ‘Crazy’ Mistake When Setting Up Your Home Office | Entrepreneur

    Avoid This ‘Crazy’ Mistake When Setting Up Your Home Office | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Remote and hybrid work models are here to stay, with 58% of Americans reporting they have the opportunity to work from home at least one day a week, according to a 2022 McKinsey survey. That means setting up a home office that’s actually conducive to productivity — and general well-being — is more critical than ever before.

    And it’s something Ali Budd, president and creative director of Ali Budd Interiors and star of Hulu’s new design docuseries House of Ali, knows all about. “Covid obviously changed everything for us and how we think about working from home,” she tells Entrepreneur. “It’s always a balance between form and function, and especially [for] somewhere you’re sitting for long periods of time.”

    Related: 3 Steps to Fix a Home Office Setup That Has You Feeling Uninspired

    Budd, a veteran interior designer whose million-dollar renovations (and $20,000-$30,000 office overhauls) helped put her on the map, caught the design bug young as the daughter of two artistic parents who ran an ad agency. Her father would travel the world to stage and photograph different spaces, and from an early age, Budd had a knack for that sort of work herself — from reorganizing the basement to redecorating her room.

    “When there’s less clutter everywhere, you actually feel better mentally.”

    Budd is quick to point out that there are no hard and fast rules when it comes to designing the home office of your dreams, but paying attention to a few key details can go a long way toward cultivating the right workspace for you.

    First up? Budd suggests creating a plan to make sure you end up with a space you truly love. Things get a lot easier once you measure a room and decide which pieces of furniture you’ll need and exactly where they’ll go. It’ll also help you stay on “budget and with the overall vibe,” Budd says.

    When it comes to home office design, Budd stresses that having a separate space — even if that doesn’t include a door — is “the most important” place to start, as it helps distinguish between “your mindset for work and relaxing.”

    Related: 3 Bad Work From Home Habits That Hurt Productivity | Entrepreneur

    Next, consider what you actually need in your workspace, and don’t fall into the trap of adding a bunch of stuff unnecessarily. “We used to need filing cabinets and so many drawers in our desk,” Budd explains. “And we don’t need any of that stuff 1695960906. I watched this thing recently on the evolution of the desktop; it went from the ’50s to now [covering] what people needed on their desks. It was cool. [And] it went from 400 things on your desk [to] just your laptop. When there’s less clutter everywhere, you feel better mentally.”

    Workspace at Ali Budd Interiors headquarters in Toronto. Image Credit: Valerie Wilcox.

    “We need to remove the word ‘trend’ when it comes to interior design because it’s such a crazy notion.”

    Once you pinpoint what you need, you can start putting the space together. Again, Budd emphasizes that there are no rigid guidelines or must-dos — it’s all about adding what brings you joy. But some items worthy of consideration? A “really comfortable chair,” an aesthetically pleasing Zoom background (“even if you just set up a little sheet or something”), fresh flowers and a desk facing the room, not the wall — all the better to see the beautiful space you’ve designed and reduce the appearance of unsightly cords.

    There might not be rules when it comes to setting up your perfect space, but Budd does caution against one major faux pas: finding inspiration from whatever seems to be trending. “We need to remove the word ‘trend’ when it comes to interior design because it’s such a crazy notion,” Budd says. “You are investing in pieces you are living with every day. Why on earth would you care what a trend is? I also think if you like pink, it’s not trendy. If you like black, it’s not trendy. You love what you love.”

    Related: 8 Tips to Squeeze More Savings from Your Home Office | Entrepreneur

    Budd’s own office is a testament to that advice. Its crowning feature is a large desk that belonged to her late father. Because the desk was in storage until she found a space big enough to hold it, it was in “rough shape” — fortunately, a friend refinished it for her.

    “[The desk] just gives me such an emotional connection to [the space],” Budd says. “Because my dad was an entrepreneur as well. He ran a business for a long time; I grew up there. So to think about me trying to do that now, it’s very sentimental to me, and it’s very beautiful, and it sort of all works together.”

    [ad_2]

    Amanda Breen

    Source link

  • America’s Downtowns Are Hurting in an Era of Remote and Hybrid Work — Will They Survive? | Entrepreneur

    America’s Downtowns Are Hurting in an Era of Remote and Hybrid Work — Will They Survive? | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    Downtown areas have long been the beating heart of cities, bustling with activity and serving as economic hubs. However, the recent data from the 2023 INRIX “Return to Office” report reveals a concerning trend: 18 out of 20 downtowns in the U.S. are still experiencing fewer vehicular trips compared to pre-Covid levels. This decline has far-reaching consequences, impacting various facets of urban life.

    The decline is not uniform across cities. New York, the most job-dense downtown in the U.S., has shown resilience, with vehicular trips just 5% below pre-Covid levels. In contrast, San Francisco, the second-most employment-dense downtown, remains a staggering 41% below 2019 levels of traffic.

    A McKinsey report adds another layer: Office attendance has stabilized at 30% below pre-pandemic norms, thereby compounding the reduction in downtown traffic. Additionally, McKinsey’s data reveals that from mid-2020 to mid-2022, New York City’s urban core lost 5% of its population, while San Francisco’s lost 6%. This urban exodus has led to decreased foot traffic near stores in these metropolitan areas, remaining 10% to 20% below pre-pandemic levels. These two cities illustrate the complex dynamics at play, with local factors contributing to the varying rates of recovery.

    Overall, cities like Washington, D.C., Chicago, Seattle and San Francisco have shown the least growth. The stalled growth suggests that other local factors, such as education level, racial demographics, broadband access and local culture, maybe influencing telecommuting rates.

    Related: 45% of Millennials Now Have Plans to Buy a Home in Suburbia — and It Has Everything to Do With This Work Policy

    The impact of industry and location

    The convenience and flexibility offered by telecommuting have made it an attractive option for both employers and employees in certain industries. For example, the INRIX report finds that nearly 40% of employees in information, finance, and professional services (IFPS) are working from home nationwide.

    Yet telecommuting rates also vary widely across locations. In San Francisco, 64% of IFPS workers reported telecommuting, while in Houston, just 28% did. That suggests a clear impact of local culture, not simply industry dynamics.

    The significant decline in office attendance, particularly in superstar cities, forces a reevaluation of business real estate strategies. McKinsey’s report suggests that by 2030, the demand for office space could be 13% lower than it was in 2019 in a moderate scenario and up to 38% lower in the most severely impacted city. In this environment of reduced demand and potential oversupply, business leaders have the opportunity to negotiate more favorable lease terms or even consider relocating to prime but previously unaffordable locations.

    Downtown trips: Down and out?

    The reduction in downtown trips has had a direct and profound impact on local businesses, particularly those reliant on foot traffic. Restaurants, retail stores and hospitality services have suffered, leading to closures and financial strain. The real estate market has also felt the pinch, with headlines like “Owners are Walking Away from Downtown S.F. Buildings” highlighting the financial crisis faced by property owners.

    A vibrant downtown contributes significantly to local tax revenue. According to the International Downtown Association, downtowns deliver an average of 17% of citywide property tax revenue, 43% of hotel tax revenue, and 12% of sales tax revenue. The decline in downtown activity has led to a loss in these revenues, potentially leading to public budget cuts and negative implications for key government programs.

    Beyond the economic ramifications, the decline of downtown has a psychological impact on city residents. The once lively and energetic centers have become quieter, losing their vibrancy and appeal. This shift affects the perception of the city and can have long-term effects on community engagement and urban identity.

    The commuting conundrum

    The decline of downtown areas due to the rise of telecommuting presents a complex challenge that cannot be solved by simply forcing people back into the office. As I often emphasize to my clients in city governments, this approach is not only impractical but also fraught with negative consequences.

    Forcing employees to commute to the office can have a direct impact on their wellbeing. Long commutes are often associated with increased stress, fatigue, and dissatisfaction. The time spent in traffic or on crowded public transportation can lead to a decrease in overall life satisfaction and even contribute to mental health issues. The personal toll this takes on individuals cannot be underestimated.

    The environmental impact of increased commuting is another critical factor to consider. More cars on the road mean more emissions, contributing to air pollution and climate change. Encouraging telecommuting can be seen as an environmentally responsible choice, aligning with broader goals of sustainability and reducing carbon footprints.

    The economic argument against forcing people back to the office is equally compelling. Time spent commuting is time lost from productive work. The hours that employees spend stuck in traffic or waiting for public transportation could be better utilized, contributing to the economy. Furthermore, the cost of commuting, including fuel, vehicle maintenance, and public transportation fees, can be a significant burden on workers, reducing their disposable income and potentially impacting consumer spending.

    While the struggles of downtown areas are real and concerning, the solution is not as simple as mandating office attendance. A more nuanced and balanced approach is needed, one that takes into account the multifaceted impacts of commuting.

    City governments, in collaboration with businesses, can explore innovative solutions that encourage a healthy balance between remote and in-office work. This might include investing in public transportation to make commuting more efficient and less stressful, creating incentives for businesses to offer flexible work arrangements, and supporting the development of local amenities that make downtown areas more attractive places to work and live.

    Related: ‘Never Going Back to the Way It Was’: Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff Has a Grim Outlook on a Once Bustling Downtown

    Conclusion: A future in flux

    The remote revolution has reshaped the landscape of downtown areas, with telecommuting playing a pivotal role in the decline of vehicular trips. While some cities like New York have shown resilience, others continue to struggle with recovery. The future of downtowns is in flux, with telecommuting continuing to be a massive force in keeping both vehicular and transit trips down.

    The challenge now lies in finding a balance that allows for the vibrancy and economic vitality of downtowns to thrive while embracing the new normal of remote work. The road to recovery may be long, but with innovation, collaboration, and a keen understanding of the multifaceted influences on downtown travel patterns, cities can forge a path toward a prosperous future.

    [ad_2]

    Gleb Tsipursky

    Source link

  • Working Remotely Can Cut Your Carbon Emissions By Half: Report | Entrepreneur

    Working Remotely Can Cut Your Carbon Emissions By Half: Report | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Working remotely? You could be helping the environment.

    A recent study by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that those who work from home full-time generate less than half the greenhouse gas emissions than their office-based counterparts. Employees working exclusively from home in the U.S. were estimated to reduce their emissions by 54%, the study found.

    Working remotely one day a week only resulted in a 2% emission decrease, largely due to increased non-commuting travel on remote workdays. On the other hand, those working remotely two to four days a week saw emissions reductions of up to 29% compared to on-site workers.

    Related: 6 Meaningful Ways to Reduce Your Company’s Carbon Footprint

    The study analyzed various datasets, including Microsoft employee commuting and teleworking behavior, and was conducted by researchers from Cornell University and Microsoft. The primary contributors to emissions reduction among remote workers were decreased office energy use and fewer emissions from daily commutes.

    While remote work has the potential to reduce carbon footprints, the study underscores the need for a balanced approach, carefully considering commuting patterns, energy consumption, vehicle ownership, and non-commute-related travel to fully maximize the environmental benefits of remote work.

    “People say: ‘I work from home, I’m net zero.’ That’s not true,” Fengqi You of Cornell University, a report co-author, told The Guardian. “The net benefit for working remotely is positive but a key question is how positive. When people work remotely, they tend to spend more emissions on social activities.”

    [ad_2]

    Madeline Garfinkle

    Source link

  • The Rise and Impact of Independent Contractors in 2023 | Entrepreneur

    The Rise and Impact of Independent Contractors in 2023 | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    This story originally appeared on Readwrite.com

    The seismic shift in the global workforce towards the inclusion of independent contractors has marked the dawn of a new era in employment trends. The democratization of work, propelled by technological advancements, legislative changes, and evolving worker preferences, has paved the way for this paradigm shift. In the 2020s, these contractors— once seen as peripheral players — have gradually moved from the fringes to the heart of the modern workforce, embodying a transformative trend that promises to redefine the future of employment.

    This article explores the journey of independent contractors, tracing their evolution from niche roles to mainstream workforce options. It analyzes how the acceleration of remote work, spurred initially by technology and later dramatically propelled by the COVID-19 pandemic, fostered an environment conducive to the growth of independent contractors. The increased reliance on the gig economy is also assessed, shedding light on its contribution to the surge of independent work.

    Related: Yes, You Can Use AI for Marketing. But Don’t Forget About the Benefit of Human Touch.

    Looking into the future, this piece explores the potential trends and challenges that independent contractors could encounter. The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation, the continued rise of the gig economy, evolving legal landscapes, and the possible impact of broader economic and societal factors are all critically examined. These elements will undoubtedly shape the future of independent contractors in the workforce.

    Employment trends in the 2020s

    As we enter the third decade of the 21st century, one of the most notable shifts in the labor market has been the rise of independent contractors. This trend is not just a minor blip on the radar but a significant shift reshaping the nature of work, employment, and business operations.

    Shift toward remote work

    The shift toward remote work has played a significant role in the rise of independent contractors. Technological advances, particularly the widespread availability of high-speed internet and the development of various digital tools and platforms have made it possible for individuals to work from anywhere in the world. This shift has increased the demand for independent contractors and created an environment where it is easier for individuals to start and operate their own businesses, often working as independent contractors themselves.

    The move toward remote work started to gain momentum in the early 2000s, but it was the COVID-19 pandemic that really accelerated this trend. As businesses were forced to close their offices and shift to remote work, they had to rethink their staffing strategies. Many found that hiring independent contractors already set up to work remotely was an effective solution. This shift has not only led to a rise in independent contractors but has also opened up a whole new world of opportunities for individuals and businesses alike.

    The gig economy

    The gig economy, characterized by short-term, flexible jobs often facilitated by digital platforms, has also contributed to the rise of independent contractors. Gig workers, who are usually classified as independent contractors, offer services per job. This includes everything from ride-share drivers to freelance writers and graphic designers.

    The gig economy has exploded in recent years, driven by the desire for flexibility and the ability to work independently. For businesses, the gig economy offers a flexible workforce that can be scaled up or down depending on demand without the overhead costs associated with traditional full-time employees. For workers, the gig economy allows the freedom to choose when, where, and how much they work.

    Changes in employment legislation

    Changes in employment legislation have also played a role in the rise of independent contractors. In many countries, employment laws have been updated or revised to reflect the changing nature of work. These changes often focus on providing more protections for independent contractors, recognizing their growing importance in the modern workforce.

    How have independent contractors changed in the past decade?

    From peripheral to mainstream: The rising role of independent contractors

    A decade ago, independent contractors were a peripheral part of the workforce. They were typically engaged in specialized tasks that were not within the core competency of organizations. However, over the years, they’ve moved from the fringes to the core of the workforce.

    Related: Do This Simple Exercise to Unlock Your Potential, Says the Psychologist Who Coined the Phrase ‘Growth Mindset’

    Today, independent contractors are integral to the functioning of many organizations. They bring in unique skills and flexibility that allow organizations to adapt quickly to changing business landscapes. The rise of independent contractors has been facilitated by several factors, including technological advancements and changing workers’ attitudes and preferences.

    Technological innovations facilitating independent work

    Technology has played a pivotal role in the rise of independent contractors. The advent of digital platforms has made it easier for organizations to connect with independent workers.

    These platforms have increased the visibility of independent contractors and made it easier for them to find work. They have also simplified managing independent workers, making it more feasible for organizations to incorporate them into their workforce.

    Additionally, the proliferation of remote work tools, like project management software and video conferencing, has enabled organizations to collaborate effectively with independent contractors, regardless of location.

    Changes in workers’ attitudes and preferences

    Alongside technological advancements, there’s been a shift in workers’ attitudes and preferences. More and more workers, especially from Generation Z, are now seeking flexibility and autonomy, which independent work offers. Independent contractors have the freedom to choose their projects, set their own rates, and work at their own pace. The traditional 9-to-5 work schedule does not bind them, and have the liberty to work from anywhere. This shift in workers’ preferences has further spurred the rise of independent contractors.

    Future trends for independent contractors

    The continued growth of the gig economy

    Looking ahead, the gig economy is expected to continue its upward trajectory, propelled by its advantages to organizations and workers. For organizations, independent contractors offer a cost-effective way to access specialized skills. They also provide the flexibility to scale up or down depending on business needs. For workers, the gig economy offers the flexibility and autonomy that many seek in their work. The continued growth of the gig economy will likely further increase the prevalence of independent contractors in the workforce.

    The role of AI and automation in independent work

    AI and automation are set to play a significant role in the future of independent work. These technologies can automate routine tasks, allowing independent contractors to focus on more complex and value-adding tasks. They can also help match independent contractors with suitable projects, making finding work more efficient. However, they also pose a threat to jobs, especially those that involve routine and repetitive tasks. Independent contractors must continually upskill and reskill to stay relevant despite these technological advancements.

    Evolving legal landscape for independent contractors

    The legal landscape for independent contractors is also evolving. Governments worldwide are grappling with the challenge of protecting independent contractors’ rights while fostering the growth of the gig economy. Some countries are introducing laws to provide independent contractors with benefits typically associated with traditional employment, like paid leave and health insurance. However, these laws also risk stifling the flexibility that makes independent work attractive. Striking the right balance will be a key challenge for policymakers.

    Potential impact of economic and societal factors

    Economic and societal factors could also impact the future of independent contractors. Economic downturns, for instance, could lead to a surge in independent work as organizations look to cut costs. Conversely, economic booms could decrease independent work as organizations have more resources to hire full-time employees. Societal factors, like changing attitudes toward work-life balance, could also influence the prevalence of independent contractors. The demand for independent work could increase if more workers prioritize flexibility and autonomy.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, the rise of independent contractors has been a significant shift in the modern workforce. This trend is likely to continue, driven by technological advancements, changing workers’ attitudes, and the evolving economic and legal landscape. As we navigate this new world of work, organizations, workers, and policymakers must understand and adapt to these changes. Independent contractors are here to stay, and they will play an increasingly important role in shaping the future of work.

    [ad_2]

    Gilad Maayan

    Source link

  • 5 Ways to Cultivate a Resilient Digital Employee Experience | Entrepreneur

    5 Ways to Cultivate a Resilient Digital Employee Experience | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    In an era of rapid technological advancements and an evolving workforce landscape, companies now encounter both previously unimaginable possibilities and difficulties. One of the pivotal challenges plaguing this digital landscape is ensuring a harmonious and satisfying experience for employees, regardless of their location or the devices they use. This is where a well-crafted and comprehensive digital employee experience (DEX) strategy comes into play.

    Related: Unhappy Customers and Employees Can Wreak Havoc on Your Business. Here’s How to Make Both Happy.

    Understanding the essence of the digital employee experience

    Gone are the days when work was confined to physical office space and a standard 9-to-5 routine. Today, employees collaborate across time zones, harnessing a surfeit of devices and applications to accomplish tasks. Before we delve into the intricacies of crafting an effective strategy, we must grasp the essence of the digital employee experience.

    The idea of a people-centric workspace has existed for some time. However, many business leaders and organizations still need clarification on what DEX entails. In simple terms, DEX is the accumulation of every interaction a workforce has with their company’s technologies and processes. However, since every interaction impacts DEX, how can organizations enhance it?

    Related: 78% of Employers Are Using Remote Work Tools to Spy on You. Here’s a More Effective (and Ethical) Approach to Tracking Employee Productivity.

    Crafting a harmonious digital employee experience is a dance of technology, creativity and genuine care. Employees more or less want three things in terms of their digital technologies. They want technology that is simple to use, dependable and effective. However, the tricky part is balancing what employees want while maintaining a resilient security posture. Here are five steps for a harmonious digital experience strategy.

    Step 1: Holistic alignment with business objectives

    Creating a harmonious digital employee experience begins with aligning your strategy with overarching business goals. Every digital initiative, whether it’s the adoption of collaboration tools or the implementation of unified endpoint management systems, should be aligned with the company’s larger purpose. This alignment ensures that the digital employee experience is seamless and contributes directly to the organization’s success.

    It’s critical to include important stakeholders from multiple divisions to accomplish this alignment. HR, IT, and upper management should collaborate to identify the most critical digital touchpoints for employees. By weaving the digital employee experience into the organization’s fabric, you create a sense of purpose that resonates with every employee.

    Step 2: Providing a seamless onboarding experience

    An employee’s experience starts from the moment they are onboarded into the company. This marks the foundation for a positive employee experience is laid. Leveraging cutting-edge solutions like Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) and Desktop as a Service (DAAS) can significantly enhance these critical phases.

    UEM allows organizations to efficiently manage and secure various devices, from laptops to smartphones and tablets, from a single console. By providing a seamless and secure onboarding experience across devices, UEM facilitates a positive initial impression for new hires. Furthermore, the implementation of DAAS streamlines the deployment of virtual desktops, guaranteeing that employees enter a uniform and well-optimized workspace right from the start, regardless of their physical whereabouts. This streamlines the onboarding process and empowers remote workers to hit the ground running, eradicating any possible frustrations stemming from technical glitches.

    Step 3: Nurturing the anywhere work environment through remote monitoring

    The modern workforce isn’t confined to a single location, making the health and performance of endpoints a troublesome endeavor.

    UEM solutions shine in this arena by offering remote monitoring capabilities that allow IT teams to watch endpoints’ health irrespective of their physical location. By proactively identifying and addressing potential issues, such as security vulnerabilities or performance bottlenecks, organizations can ensure that the remote work experience remains seamless.

    A common pain point for employees and IT teams is the cumbersome process of resolving technical issues. Waiting for the IT helpdesk to intervene in the application or endpoint problems can lead to frustration and productivity losses. Remote capabilities allow IT teams to troubleshoot these issues irrespective of a device’s location. This approach boosts productivity and demonstrates a commitment to employee well-being, reinforcing a sense of support and care.

    Step 4: Empowering employees through continuous training

    Empowerment is a cornerstone of any successful employee experience strategy. When employees are given the skills and resources to navigate digital obstacles, they develop greater independence and self-assurance in their work.

    Offering comprehensive training sessions on using digital tools, troubleshooting common problems, and staying vigilant against cyber threats can empower employees to take charge of their digital experiences. By fostering a culture of continuous learning, organizations not only enhance the skill set of their employees but also demonstrate a commitment to their growth and development.

    Related: Enough About Employee ‘Engagement’! Focus on the Digital Employee ‘Experience’ Instead.

    Step 5: Measuring DEX success through comprehensive evaluation

    In the realm of business, what is not measured often remains elusive. The digital employee experience is no different. Organizations must set up reliable assessment and feedback processes to assess the efficacy of the tactics they have adopted.

    Surveys tailored to capture employees’ sentiments provide invaluable insights into their experiences. These surveys can delve into aspects such as ease of technology usage, satisfaction with support services, and overall comfort with the digital workspace. Furthermore, leveraging tools such as End-User Experience Management (EUEM) solutions that monitor user interactions and sentiment analysis can provide qualitative feedback, real-time monitoring and a continuous benchmark system.

    Crucially, these measurement strategies should be accompanied by a commitment to iterate and adapt based on feedback. Continuous improvement is at the core of a harmonious DEX strategy, as it reflects an organization’s genuine dedication to enhancing employee well-being and efficiency.

    The way forward

    A harmonious DEX strategy extends beyond optimizing processes; its essence is nurturing feelings of affiliation, empowerment, and employee welfare. In an age where the virtual realm assumes an increasingly significant function in our professional lives, enterprises that give precedence to enhancing the digital employee encounter are better poised to attract, retain, and nurture a workforce that excels within this evolving digital landscape.

    [ad_2]

    Apu Pavithran

    Source link