ReportWire

Tag: Raise the Age

  • Gov. Roy Cooper vetoes juvenile crime bill, saying it ‘begins to erode’ NC’s reforms

    Gov. Roy Cooper vetoes juvenile crime bill, saying it ‘begins to erode’ NC’s reforms

    [ad_1]

    Gov. Roy Cooper presides over the monthly Council of State meeting Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2022 at the NCDOT building in Raleigh.

    Gov. Roy Cooper presides over the monthly Council of State meeting Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2022 at the NCDOT building in Raleigh.

    North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper took out his veto stamp to oppose a bill that would require more teenagers facing criminal charges to be tried initially as adults.

    House Bill 834 requires 16- and 17-year-olds who commit certain felonies to be tried first as adults in the state’s superior courts.

    Currently, these teenagers are tried in the state’s juvenile court after a petition is filed. They are transferred over to the state’s superior courts after probable cause is found or they are indicted. The bill includes a mechanism for these cases to be transferred back to juvenile court, The News & Observer previously reported.

    In his statement Friday evening, the Democratic governor wrote that “most violent crimes, even when committed by teenagers, should be handled in adult court. However, there are cases where sentences would be more effective and appropriate to the severity of the crime for teenagers if they were handled in juvenile court, making communities safer. This bill makes this important option highly unlikely and begins to erode our bipartisan ‘Raise the Age’ law we agreed to four years ago.”

    “While a number of Senators worked to make this legislation better than the original bill, I remain concerned that this new law would keep some children from getting treatment they need while making communities less safe. Instead, the legislature should invest significantly more in our juvenile justice system to ensure resources are available to help prevent crimes and appropriately deal with children who break the law,” he wrote.

    Cooper’s veto is unlikely to hold. The General Assembly has a Republican supermajority, allowing it to override Cooper’s stamp if three-fifths of the members of both legislative chambers vote together.

    In the House, all GOP lawmakers voted in support of the latest version of the bill except for Rep. John Faircloth of Guilford County. All but seven Democrats opposed the bill.

    Among those who voted in the Senate, all Republicans and all but four Democrats backed the bill. Those opposing it were Democratic Sens. Mary Wills Bode, Lisa Grafstein, Natalie Murdock and Gladys Robinson.

    Raise the Age and juvenile court

    Raise the Age was passed into law in 2017 and implemented in 2019. It pulled 16- and 17-year-olds accused of misdemeanors and low-level felonies in North Carolina from the adult system into the juvenile justice system.

    During debates in committees and on the House floor before the vote, multiple Democratic lawmakers expressed concerns with the bill rolling back these juvenile protections.

    Those in favor have said the bill is a procedural change allowing the juvenile justice system to function more smoothly. A main proponent of the bill, Robeson County Republican Sen. Danny Britt, said in mid-May during a Senate floor vote that the bill is “trying to deal with these violent A-E felonies, trying to deal with these individuals that are mostly prosecuted in superior court but through a lengthy transfer process, a very convoluted transfer process. What we’re not doing is rolling back Raise the Age.”

    With Raise the Age, “we had the goal of rehabilitating many of the youth who had committed crimes,” said Rep. Amos Quick, a Greensboro Democrat, during a House debate.

    “I don’t think anyone in here is in favor of crime. I certainly am not in favor of crime, but I am in favor of juveniles. Juveniles who commit offenses need rehabilitation, not to have the book thrown at them,” he said. This legislation “is the wrong move to make,” he said.

    The ACLU of North Carolina sent a letter to Cooper urging him to veto the bill.

    “Prosecuting children as adults causes significant harm to young people and does nothing to address the underlying causes of youth crime,” says the letter.

    “The juvenile justice system requires far more accountability, counseling, education, and family involvement than the adult system and it works better,” it says. “Recidivism is significantly higher when children go through the adult system rather than receive the services and punishment from the juvenile system.”

    Under the Dome

    Get the latest news about North Carolina politics from The News & Observer’s award-winning team. Get the free digest sent to your inbox by signing up here.

    Related stories from Charlotte Observer

    Luciana Perez Uribe Guinassi is a politics reporter for the News & Observer. She reports on health care, including mental health and Medicaid expansion; higher education; hurricane recovery efforts and lobbying.Luciana previously worked as a Roy W. Howard Fellow at Searchlight New Mexico, an investigative news organization.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rollback of reforms? Advocates express concerns with new NC juvenile justice proposal

    Rollback of reforms? Advocates express concerns with new NC juvenile justice proposal

    [ad_1]

    A proposal that would require some 16- and 17-year-olds to be tried initially as adults in North Carolina’s courts took a step forward on Tuesday, despite concerns by some that it would roll back protections for youths.

    Currently, juveniles under 18 are tried in the state’s juvenile court after a petition is filed.

    If a 16- or 17-year-old juvenile commits a Class A through G felony, then the case must be transferred from juvenile court — after probable cause is found or the teen is indicted — to the state’s superior courts to be tried as an adult. A prosecutor may also decline to transfer certain felonies to superior court.

    Class A-G felonies range from high-level offenses such as murder to mid-level felonies such as committing a robbery using threats or force.

    But a new bill that has bipartisan backing would change this transfer process.

    Changes under the proposal

    House Bill 834, among other provisions, would modify the state’s definition of a delinquent juvenile to exclude 16 to 18-year-olds who commit Class A-E felonies.

    This means these cases will now start in superior court.

    The bill would make sure “that the proper cases, if they do exist, can be sent to juvenile court,” said Chuck Spahos, a lobbyist for the N.C. Conference of District Attorneys, a state-funded association that lobbies the legislature.

    Critics said these changes would reverse criminal justice reforms, including provisions passed into law in 2017 and implemented in 2019 known as Raise the Age.

    Proponents, however, called it a procedural change that would streamline processes.

    ‘Raise the age’ concerns

    The Raise the Age law pulled 16- and 17-year-olds accused of misdemeanors and low-level felonies like larcenies, break-ins and other nonviolent crimes, from the adult system into the juvenile justice system.

    Under the law, all criminal cases for juveniles up to age 18 begin in juvenile court, with a requirement that higher-level felonies be transferred to adult court following a hearing or indictment..

    “We are kind of reversing the order of operation we have now,” Sen. Lisa Grafstein, a Raleigh Democrat said Tuesday during a committee hearing at the General Assembly.

    “This seems to be a fairly significant rollback of ‘Raise the Age,’ which I think we made a broad commitment to. I just wanted to highlight this because it’s concerning,” Grafstein said.

    Spahos said there are “less than 500 cases a year that are transferred now to superior court. This is not a mass undoing of Raise the Age.”

    “These are the cases that end up in superior court anyways, and it’s agreed by everyone that’s been involved in this,” including the state Division of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, “that this is just cutting some of the procedural parts of that out while making sure that the proper cases, if they do exist, can be sent to juvenile court,” Spahos said.

    Sen. Danny Britt, a Robeson County Republican, echoed this, saying “the majority of these violent crimes are actually being processed in superior court anyways.”

    “When you have a district like Robeson County, for example, what you have is an extreme backlog of juvenile court cases in the juvenile court that are there unnecessarily longer than what they should, bogging down the docket,” he said.

    Kerwin Pittman with social justice advocacy group Emancipate NC echoed Grafstein’s concerns on the rollback of Raise the Age and said ”this isn’t just a procedural change.”

    This will put “juveniles essentially in a position where they will no longer be able to regain a sense or restorative justice for them because it’s gonna take them to an adult setting.”

    Tara Muller with Disability Rights North Carolina said this bill will affect children with disabilities who make up the vast majority of the youth in the criminal justice system.

    The bill — which has already passed the House — was approved by a Senate judiciary committee following amendments and now moves to the rules committee, where bills often go prior to moving to the floor for a vote, if approved.

    Related stories from Raleigh News & Observer

    Luciana Perez Uribe Guinassi is a politics reporter for the News & Observer. She reports on health care, including mental health and Medicaid expansion; higher education; hurricane recovery efforts and lobbying.Luciana previously worked as a Roy W. Howard Fellow at Searchlight New Mexico, an investigative news organization.

    [ad_2]

    Luciana Perez Uribe Guinassi

    Source link