ReportWire

Tag: raids

  • Chicago activists share blueprint for resisting Border Patrol: ‘Chicago clearly is front and center’

    It’s a story repeating itself: Border Patrol agents flooding immigrant neighborhoods, showing dramatic force, storming Home Depot parking lots and preying on people at courthouses. 

    Those arrests erupted in Chicago. Then they were 750 miles away in Charlotte, North Carolina. And they will keep roving across the country. 

    But no matter where they go, Chicagoans will try to stop them. 

    As President Donald Trump’s ramped-up Border Patrol action hits city after city, Chicago’s immigration-focused community organizers are following. They aim to pass on what they learned to foster pushback in Operation Midway Blitz.

    The resistance effort, which was backed by top elected officials in Illinois, provides a blueprint for immigration activists nationwide: lawsuits, whistles, cellphone cameras and more.

    Chicago’s immigration advocacy groups, which played an integral role organizing on-the-ground rapid responders, are now sharing their information nationwide. 

    Veronica Castro, deputy director at the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, said she has been in at least half a dozen calls with organizations, mutual aid groups and government entities outside of Chicago, including Boston and North Carolina on best ways to prepare for immigration enforcement. 

    “We definitely want to share information with other folks,” she said. Earlier in the year, Castro and her team reached out to Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., to prepare for the immigration crackdown in Chicago and is now circling back to them to “compare notes.”

    Casa Central, a Hispanic social services agency in Chicago, is planning a conference call with 304 invited affiliates of Unidos US to discuss rapid response tactics and insights from immigration enforcement in Chicago, according to Unidos’ director of immigrant integration, Laura Vázquez.

    The call will feature information on the long-lasting humanitarian impact of what happens to family members after some of them, often the primary income earners, are detained, said Vázquez.

    “There is tremendous value in bringing people together so organizations can learn lessons and effective tactics,” said Vázquez, who noted interest went beyond North Carolina, from New Orleans to New York City, where threats of similar immigration operations loom.

    The federal action centered in Charlotte last week, where Trump’s Border Patrol chief, Gregory Bovino, led a weeklong arrest spree that quickly started after agents left Chicago.

    Pooja Ravindran, who lived for a decade in North Carolina and is now chief of staff for Chicago City Council’s Committee on Immigrant and Refugee Rights, once again couldn’t look away as the arrests hushed cherished hometown bakeries, coffee shops and an elementary school in Charlotte. 

    Ravindran has met online around 10 times with groups in Charlotte to present tactics learned organizing alongside Ald. Andre Vásquez, the committee’s chair.  

    “I can’t be at all places at once, I can’t be in all of the areas where I call home to prep everyone,” Ravindran said. “To see the resistance, but also the devastation, there is just a whirlwind of emotions.” 

    Inside Chicago’s growing resistance movement against Operation Midway Blitz: ‘Small acts have huge consequences’

    Earlier this week, Protect Rogers Park community organizer Gabe González said he planned to travel to Charlotte, where he was set to speak with hundreds to try to pass the information baton. 

    “We learned from Los Angeles and D.C. and it’s our turn to share what we learned with the cities facing it now,” said González, co-founder of Protect Rogers Park. 

    Just as González was preparing to discuss safe resistance techniques with the North Carolina crowd, Border Patrol reportedly ended its operations in Charlotte dubbed “Charlotte’s Web.” But González is skeptical that the actions will truly end.

    “Today it’s in Charlotte, tomorrow it might be in New Orleans, and in March it might be back in Chicago,” said González, who is also in touch with community organizers in New Orleans and Memphis, Tennessee.

    Chicago’s top elected leaders have gotten involved too, from the City Hall to Springfield. 

    Gov. JB Pritzker spoke to North Carolina’s Gov. Josh Stein about dealing with masked federal agents, tear gas deployment and documenting activity when rights were being violated, his office said in a statement. 

    The governor has stayed in touch with California, Oregon and other states in an effort to “push back against these authoritarian power grabs and curb normalizing the militarization of American communities,” the statement said.

    On Friday, Beatriz Ponce de León, Chicago’s deputy mayor for immigrant, migrant and refugee rights, met with leaders in St. Paul, Minnesota, where federal agents arrested over a dozen people Tuesday at a manufacturing plant. 

    Ponce de León shared strategies Mayor Brandon Johnson’s administration has used to push back, like lawsuits, executive orders and close collaboration with community groups.

    “Chicago clearly is front and center in the response to these militarized immigration tactics,” she said. “We are all in this together … Why would we not share what we learned?” 

    When other cities reach out, Ponce de León often offers advice she got from people in Washington, D.C.: “This is a moment to be very clear and bold and not to shrink away.” 

    The quick response from Charlotte community groups to respond to and document arrests occurred in part because of what people there learned from Chicago, she said. And someday, the connections made by City Hall now could shape its own response if federal agents return en masse. 

    “As the federal actions evolve, we all have to evolve and be as prepared as possible to maintain and to protect the things that are important to us and to our cities,” she said. 

    West Chicago brothers are on the front lines against ‘Operation Midway Blitz.’ And they’re only teenagers.

    At the online meetings Ravindran helps organize, other cities are getting everything from advice on how to fight for more legal protection funds in budgets to tweakable scheduling documents for volunteer patrols outside schools.  

    “People were just so grateful that they didn’t have to think about protocol,” Ravindran said. “This documentation has created the opportunity for them to spend more time doing the actual recruitment of folks.” 

    It was an emotional homecoming for Ravindran, who first engaged in community organizing as a University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill student and then continued that work in Charlotte. 

    But the incremental progress does not erase what Ravindran has witnessed in one home, then another. 

    “It’s really hard to see, the detentions in your community, over and over again.”

    Chicago Tribune’s Olivia Olander contributed.

    Laura Turbay, Jake Sheridan

    Source link

  • ‘¿Conoces a la migra?’: Fear of ICE raids creating anxiety for Arlington students – WTOP News

    At Cardinal Elementary, volunteer Martin Moreno witnessed the fears immigrant children face about ICE raids and deportations. Many students expressed anxiety over family separation and safety.

    Martin Moreno was volunteering at Virginia’s Cardinal Elementary School on a recent Friday afternoon when he was asked a familiar series of questions.

    The two students he was working with, one from Mexico and the other from Guatemala, inquired about his favorite soccer players and where he’s from.

    Moreno and his friends help during the hourlong after-school program that allows students to interact with art. After the introductory questions, a girl he was working with asked, “¿Conoces a la migra?”

    The interaction, Moreno said, is the latest in a series of conversations he’s had with fellow students about fears and anxieties surrounding U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids and deportation efforts. Those feelings, he said, extend to his classmates who were born in the U.S., but are still worried about being bullied or having their family separated.

    Moreno attends Yorktown High School in Arlington.

    “It’s terrifying hearing the stories … including people in my grade and younger kids, talk about ICE, the fear they have, and how they don’t want to be deported,” Moreno said. “All these sort of things are traumatizing. For the past few months, it’s just been terrible.”

    The interaction with the elementary schoolers caught Moreno off guard. But with the kids seemingly enjoying the art exercises, he didn’t want to ask them any follow-up questions.

    When the students finished the activity, Moreno asked them whether they felt safe where they are.

    “These kids are 8 years old,” Moreno said. “They do know about the fear of being deported, and not just being deported, but ICE and all these sorts of things. They’re really interesting, the way they talk about it and the things they know.”

    According to statistics from the Department of Homeland Security, over 520,000 people have been deported as of October of this year. It’s all part of the Donald Trump administration’s efforts to expel millions of individuals who are in the U.S. without legal permission.

    Though it’s difficult to pinpoint how many children have been separated from families that have been deported, migrant children and children of parents without legal status can be sent to shelters for nearly a year.

    Moreno said he has spoken to teachers about the anxieties he’s heard about, but in most cases, educators aren’t “allowed to talk about personal things with students. Therefore, they can’t really help with that.”

    When he hears directly from someone about a similar worry, he recommends a distraction and urges them not think about it.

    “But it seems like they’ll always have this trauma and they can’t stop talking about it,” Moreno said.

    The conversation at Cardinal Elementary motivated Moreno to write a story about his experience.

    “It’s not just about the immigrants itself, it’s also about how the U.S. has always been a place for people to come, and now it feels like it’s not our place anymore,” Moreno said. “We’re seeing this a lot with kids. Kids don’t even feel safe, or they don’t feel welcome in their own country.”

    “As a country, it’s really devastating to see these things happening,” Moreno said.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    Scott Gelman

    Source link

  • Chicago day care teacher arrested by ICE released: ‘I am so grateful’

    Federal agents released preschool teacher Diana Patricia Santillana Galeano on Wednesday night, freeing the beloved local educator whose arrest at a North Center day care made international news.

    Diana Santillana Galeano, who was detained by federal agents at Rayito de Sol Spanish Immersion Early Learning Center on the North Side of Chicago. (Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym., Ltd.)

    Santillana will return to Rayito De Sol Spanish Immersion Early Learning Center on Friday morning, where members of the community have rallied to show her support

    “I am so grateful to everyone who has advocated on my behalf, and on behalf of the countless others who have experienced similar trauma over recent months in the Chicago area,” Santillana Galeano said in a statement released by her lawyers. “I love our community and the children I teach, and I can’t wait to see them again.”

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement released her after a federal judge ruled that her mandatory detention without bond was illegal.

    Santillana’s case has generated widespread backlash. In a video circulated online, federal agents are seen pulling the screaming woman, a mother of two from Colombia, through the glass vestibule at the Rayito de Sol Spanish Immersion Early Learning Center in North Center, in the early morning hours of Nov. 5.

    School officials said Santillana, who cares for infants, had authorization to work in the day care and had undergone a background check. An agent did not present a warrant when he entered the building, the school’s staff said.

    In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security said Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents targeted her in a traffic stop as she and an unidentified male passenger were driving early Wednesday.

    It said she illegally entered the U.S. on June 26, 2023, and “was encountered by Border Patrol,” and that “the Biden administration released her into the U.S.”

    However, questions remain whether the woman had been targeted prior to the traffic stop.

    Gregory Royal Pratt

    Source link

  • Do ICE officers have ‘federal immunity’?

    Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller told Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents they are legally protected from prosecution and local officials cannot arrest them.

    Fox News host Will Cain questioned Miller during an Oct. 24 interview. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, Cain said, “talked about interfering with, arresting, ICE agents in Illinois.”

    Cain asked Miller under what federal authority the Trump administration could arrest Pritzker if the governor tried to arrest ICE agents.

    “To all ICE officers, you have federal immunity in the conduct of your duties,” Miller said. “And anybody who lays a hand on you or tries to stop you or tries to obstruct you is committing a felony.”

    Miller said his answer applied to any local or state official “who conspires or engages in activity that unlawfully impedes federal law enforcement conducting their duties.” 

    The day before Miller’s comments Pritzker signed an executive order establishing the Illinois Accountability Commission to document federal law enforcement actions and refer possible law violations to local and state agencies for investigation. Chicago is the latest target in the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown, and agents have arrested more than 3,000 people there.

    Pritzker acknowledged in an Oct. 16 interview that “federal agents typically have federal immunity, but they’re not immune from the federal government holding them accountable and responsible.”

    His statement is less sweeping than Miller’s and Pritzker noted that the federal government can prosecute federal agents. 

    Immigration agents, like other law enforcement officers, have broad protections when conducting official duties. That doesn’t mean they can’t be held legally accountable if they break state or federal law.

    “Federal officials are not categorically immune from state criminal prosecution, even while on duty,” Bryna Godar, attorney at University of Wisconsin’s State Democracy Research Initiative, wrote in a July 17 report.

    When contacted for comment, the White House pointed PolitiFact to an Oct. 23 letter U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche wrote California officials. 

    “The Department of Justice views any arrests of federal agents and officers in the performance of their official duties as both illegal and futile,” Blanche wrote. 

    He cited several federal laws and provisions including the U.S. Constitution’s supremacy clause. The clause limits when states can prosecute federal agents who break state law, but it does not act as blanket immunity, legal experts said.

    Miller’s statement is “wrong on its face,” Steve Vladeck, a Georgetown University constitutional law professor, wrote in his Oct. 27 newsletter.

    The federal government can prosecute immigration agents who break the law 

    Federal immigration agents can’t break the law with impunity.

    In 2024, a federal judge convicted and sentenced to federal prison a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent for using excessive force against two people at the southern border. Department of Homeland Security watchdog offices investigated the case.

    The federal government has cited its power to hold agents accountable in court arguments. After a Border Patrol agent shot and killed a 15-year-old Mexican boy at the southern border in 2010, the Justice Department said in a 2019 Supreme Court brief that the federal government investigates allegations of excessive force by agents “and may bring a federal criminal prosecution where appropriate.”

    Non-government organizations also can sue the federal government for its agents’ actions. Several groups in Chicago, including journalism organizations, sued the Trump administration saying federal agents are using “a pattern of extreme brutality in a concerted and ongoing effort to silence the press and civilians.”

    In that case, federal District Judge Sara Ellis ordered immigration agents not to use tear gas and other riot control tactics unless people are posing an immediate threat. If the agents are going to use tear gas, they are required to give a verbal warning first.

    After reports that agents weren’t following the court order, Ellis ordered Gregory Bovino, the senior Border Patrol official overseeing the federal immigration actions in Chicago, to meet with her every weeknight to report all confrontations officers have with the public. (After this story published, a federal appeals court temporarily paused Ellis’ order.)

    Vladeck wrote that even if the Trump administration does not investigate or prosecute immigration agents who might have broken the law, it doesn’t mean the federal government doesn’t have the power to do so.

    Pritzker said his state’s commission seeks to document actions that could be prosecuted in the future.

    State governments aren’t barred from prosecuting federal agents

    State governments also can prosecute immigration agents if they break state law. However, there is a limitation known as supremacy clause immunity which comes from the U.S. Constitution’s clause that says federal law supersedes conflicting state laws. 

    Protections against state prosecution for federal agents date back to an 1890 Supreme Court decision. David Neagle, a U.S. marshal assigned to protect a Supreme Court justice, shot and killed a man who assaulted the justice. California arrested Neagle and charged him with murder. The Supreme Court ruled that the state couldn’t prosecute Neagle because he was carrying out official duties.

    Generally, federal agents are protected from state prosecution if their actions were authorized by federal law, and if the actions were “necessary and proper” for agents to fulfill their duties.

    A federal court ruled in 1990 that a customs agent was immune from state charges for speeding while driving during a drug operation. The agent acted under U.S. laws and was justified in concluding speeding was necessary to fulfill his duties, the court said.

    But a U.S. marine wasn’t given immunity in 1990 after he killed a person in a car accident while he was driving in a military convoy in North Carolina.

    “In short, while Supremacy Clause immunity grants federal officials a partial shield from state prosecution, that immunity is not absolute,” Godar wrote.

    Contrary to Miller’s statement, Vladeck wrote, it’s not a felony “for local or state authorities to arrest someone who they have probable cause to believe committed a state crime.”

    If a state brought charges against federal immigration agents, the court would have to determine whether an officer reasonably would have thought the actions were necessary to carry out federal duties. 

    “That’s a generous standard, to be sure,” Vladeck wrote. “But it is by no means a get-out-of-prosecution-free card.”

    Our ruling

    Miller said, “To all ICE officers, you have federal immunity in the conduct of your duties.”

    Immigration agents, like other law enforcement officers, have broad protections when they’re conducting official duties. But they’re not immune from prosecution if they break state or federal law.

    The federal government can and does prosecute federal officers who break the law. 

    States can’t prosecute agents for breaking state law if the agents were acting under the reasonable confines of their official duties. But those restrictions aren’t absolute.

    The statement contains an element of truth; federal immigration agents have some immunity from state prosecution. But the protections aren’t as sweeping as Miller made them sound, giving a different impression. Federal agents can and have been prosecuted by states.  

    We rate Miller’s statement Mostly False.

    UPDATE, Oct. 29, 2025: This story was updated to include an appeals court decision that happened after publication.​

    Source link

  • Students walk out of Little Village schools, hold march in protest of recent ICE activity

    Barbers paused haircuts to look out windows and bakers in aprons peered out doorways along West 26th Street in Little Village to the sounds of whistles and chants from young voices echoing down the street.

    Since the Trump administration’s Operation Midway Blitz began in September, whistles have been used as warnings that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is nearby. But on Tuesday, the whistle-blowing coincided with students carrying Mexican flags and signs during a staged walkout of local schools.

    In an over 2-mile walk, hundreds of students made their way from Little Village Lawndale High School to the La Villita or Little Village Arch, denouncing recent ICE action and supporting immigrant communities.

    Immigration enforcement descended on Little Village last week, resulting in multiple people being taken into custody. The sobering effect the arrival of federal officers had on the community inspired the walkout, student organizer and Social Justice High School senior Lia Sophia Lopez said.

    “They hurt us like they’ve never hurt us before. They attacked our community, they surrounded the parks, they surrounded our school, I’ve never felt more unsafe in my life than that day,” Lopez said. “We need to protect our people’s peace. We need to protect their freedom and dignity. Because if we don’t, no one else will.”

    Lopez and other students organized the walkout, which included her peers from the four schools on Little Village Lawndale High School’s campus – Multicultural Academy of Scholarship High School, World Language High School, Greater Lawndale High School for Social Justice, and Infinity Math, Science, and Technology High School.

    Students from the Little Village Lawndale High School campus march along West 26th Street to protest recent immigration enforcement actions in the area, Oct. 28, 2025. (Armando L. Sanchez/Chicago Tribune)

    With less than a week of planning, Lopez said she was pleased with the large turnout and made sure her fellow students knew the risks of protesting, including the presence of federal agents, telling them “they will not stop because you are children” and “they do not care,” she said.

    Still, fear did not stop students accompanied by Chicago police officers as they moved along the route. Chants of “say it loud, say it clear, immigrants are welcome here,” and “the people united, will never be divided” drew honks from cars stopped along the marchers’ path.

    The march through the village drew people to the sidewalks, cheering and blowing whistles in solidarity with students as they passed. Others hung out of windows that overlooked the streets or pressed themselves against storefront windows, smiling and recording. The community engagement was not lost on Lopez, who said her “beautiful, vibrant home” has gone quiet amid the recent federal action.

    “I’ve seen so many people come out and smiling and feeling safe, which is something we haven’t felt in months. And that’s what I want. That is all I want,” Lopez said. “This protest was just for us to get peace, to be able to walk down the street again without being scared, to be able to live your life.”

    For Lopez, protesting was worth whatever potential consequences. When her peers and family expressed concerns, she pushed back.

    “I said to them, I don’t care if I get expelled, I don’t care if I get detained. … I will do this for my people, for my community, because they deserve it,” Lopez said. “They deserve people to speak out for them. They deserve people to show the love and appreciation that they give to us and to our students, Social Justice and Little Village Lawndale High School as a whole.”

    Kate Perez

    Source link

  • Gov. JB Pritzker says Texas National Guard expected to join troops from Illinois as deportations escalate

    President Donald Trump’s administration plans to deploy 300 Illinois National Guard troops to the Chicago region for at least 60 days, according to a memo from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to Illinois National Guard leadership and obtained by the Tribune.

    In addition, likely hundreds of National Guard members from Texas were preparing to be sent to Illinois, Gov. JB Pritzker said late Sunday.

    “This evening, President Trump is ordering 400 members of the Texas National Guard for deployments to Illinois, Oregon, and other locations within the United States,” Pritzker said, adding that the Illinois National Guard was informed of the Texas deployments and that no officials from the federal government had called him directly to discuss or coordinate. “We must now start calling this what it is: Trump’s Invasion. It started with federal agents, it will soon include deploying federalized members of the Illinois National Guard against our wishes, and it will now involve sending in another state’s military troops.”

    The developments capped a weekend of rapid-fire moves by the Trump administration as it escalated its immigration enforcement actions in Illinois and in Oregon, where Trump moved to send National Guard troops from California to evade a federal judge’s temporary restraining order. Late Sunday, that same judge during an emergency hearing again blocked Trump’s efforts, issuing a ruling to stop the president’s deployment of California National Guard troops to Portland.

    In his memo to the Illinois National Guard issued Saturday, Hegseth informed Guard leadership that up to 300 of its members will be called into federal service “effective immediately” for a two-month period.

    The president called on guard members to protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Federal Protective Service and other federal government personnel “who are performing Federal functions, including the enforcement of Federal law, and to protect Federal property, at locations where violent demonstrations against these functions are occurring or are likely to occur based on current threat assessments and planned operations,” the memo stated.

    Much of the historic move to federalize Illinois National Guard troops — over Pritzker’s objections — was laid out by Pritzker on Saturday and was soon defended by the White House, while Democrats slammed it as a power grab by the president to sow fear and division.

    Saying the Trump administration issued him an ultimatum to “Call up your troops, or we will,” Pritzker said on Saturday that he would not deploy the state’s National Guard and contended a federal deployment over his objection is illegal. He has also vowed to go to court to stop it, previously citing the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which prohibits the military from conducting law enforcement activities on U.S. soil.

    A spokesperson for Pritzker said Sunday that the governor has not communicated with Trump administration officials regarding the Illinois deployment.

    “The Governor did not receive any calls from any federal officials. The Illinois National Guard communicated to the Department of War that the situation in Illinois does not require the use of the military and, as a result, the Governor opposes the deployment of the National Guard under any status,” the governor’s spokesperson said in an emailed response.

    The White House said the troops were needed ostensibly to ensure the safety of federal agents and facilities that are part of Trump’s immigration enforcement surge that has hit the Chicago area for the past month.

    The Hegseth memo didn’t specify exactly where the deployments would take place, but said the chief of the National Guard Bureau, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the commander of U.S. Northern Command would coordinate details about the mobilization with the Illinois National Guard.

    The White House confirmed on Sunday evening that the National Guard troops being called up to the Chicago area would be working without pay until the ongoing federal government shutdown, which began on Wednesday, is resolved.

    Trump’s moves in Illinois occurred while Judge Karin Immergut — whom Trump appointed to the U.S. District Court in Oregon — on Saturday night blocked the president’s mobilization of 200 Oregon National Guard members in Portland. On Sunday, Trump sought to circumvent the temporary restraining order in Oregon by federalizing 300 National Guard members from California for deployment in Portland but late Sunday Immergut blocked that move as well.

    “How could bringing in federalized National Guard from California not be in direct contravention of the (decision) I issued yesterday?,” Immergut asked a Trump administration lawyer during a hearing on Sunday night.

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom had called Trump’s effort to send California troops to Oregon a “breathtaking abuse of power.”

    “The Trump Administration is unapologetically attacking the rule of law itself and putting into action their dangerous words — ignoring court orders and treating judges, even those appointed by the President himself, as political opponents,” Newsom said.

    Hours later, Pritzker said Trump was trying to do much of the same by likely sending hundreds of Texas National Guard members to Illinois.

    “I call on Governor Abbott to immediately withdraw any support for this decision and refuse to coordinate,” Pritzker said of Texas’ Republican governor, who has long bickered with Pritzker. “There is no reason a President should send military troops into a sovereign state without their knowledge, consent, or cooperation.

    “The brave men and women who serve in our national guards must not be used as political props. This is a moment where every American must speak up and help stop this madness,” Pritzker said.

    Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul did not have specific plans to file new lawsuits against the Trump administration following news of the Illinois National Guard deployment and the issuance of the Oregon temporary restraining order.

    Annie Thompson, a spokesperson for Raoul, said in a statement Sunday that the attorney general “is firmly committed to upholding the Constitution and defending the rule of law.”

    “Our office will not hesitate to take legal action in the event of any unlawful deployment anywhere in Illinois,” Thompson said.

    A spokesperson for Democratic Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, who filed suit seeking to block the Oregon National Guard deployment, said the office has “been in touch and coordinating” on legal strategy with Raoul’s office.

    Rayfield spokesperson Jenny Hansson also said Democratic attorneys general “have been working closely since January to hold the line on this administration.”

    Speaking Sunday outside the White House as he prepared for a naval celebration in Norfolk, Virginia, Trump intimated that Pritzker was opposing efforts to bring in the National Guard to Illinois because it would anger opponents of immigration enforcement efforts, adding that protesters in Chicago and Portland are “paid people.”

    He also said Pritzker was “afraid for his life,” apparently contending the governor does not want to run afoul of organizations and networks the administration alleges are behind the protests over enhanced immigration enforcement in the Chicago area.

    Repeating as he often does basic Chicago police blotter statistics about murders and shootings and lauding his federalization of law enforcement in Washington, D.C., Trump criticized Pritzker, a major critic of the president, for saying “what a wonderful place” Chicago is when “they need help.”

    “I believe the politicians are under threat, because there’s no way somebody can say that things are wonderful in Chicago,” Trump said. “There’s no city in the world like that. We’re going to straighten it out. And I think that Pritzker, he’s not a stupid person. I think that Pritzker is afraid for his life.”

    Pritzker, speaking on CNN’s “State of the Union,” said it was the Trump administration and federal agents participating in the raids who “are the ones that are making it a war zone.”

    “They want mayhem on the ground. They want to create the war zone so that they can send in even more troops,” Pritzker said.

    U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Iraq War veteran who retired as a lieutenant colonel in the Illinois Army National Guard, sought to downplay potential confrontations with the Trump-ordered deployment of Illinois National Guard members.

    “So they’ll be homegrown Illinoisans, and they’re our brothers and sisters, our neighbors. I probably served with quite a number of them, certainly the leadership. And, you know, they’ll be home. We’ll welcome them,” Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat, said on CBS News’ “Face the Nation.”

    “It’s a misuse of the National Guard. They’re not needed, but we’re going to welcome them, because they’re our brothers and sisters, and we’re proud of our National Guard,” she said.

    Trump’s National Guard plans also drew opposition from a coalition of business and civic groups.

    Troop deployment could harm the “meaningful progress” being made to make Chicago safer by sowing “fear and chaos,” according to a statement from the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce, Civic Committee of the Commercial Club of Chicago and Civic Federation. The statement touted the work already underway to address violence in the city and described Trump’s plans as a threat to “our businesses’ bottom lines and our reputation.”

    In his comments outside the White House, Trump criticized Judge Karin Immergut — whom he appointed to the U.S. District Court in Oregon — for blocking the deployment of Oregon National Guard troops in Portland. Trump did not at that time mention his plans to send California National Guard members to the city.

    Immergut said Trump’s basis for deploying the guard in Portland was “simply untethered to the facts” and that historic tradition “boils down to a simple proposition: this is a nation of Constitutional law, not martial law.” Allowing the troops to be deployed risk “blurring the line between civil and military federal power — to the detriment of this nation,” Immergut wrote.

    Trump acknowledged appointing the judge but said, “I wasn’t served well.”

    “Portland is burning to the ground. You have agitators, insurrectionists. All you have to do is look at that, look at the television,” Trump said. “That judge ought to be ashamed.”

    Immergut, in the ruling, also noted that “state and local law enforcement will need to expend additional resources to quell increased civil unrest that is likely to result from the Guard’s mobilization.”

    In addition to sending guard troops to Washington, Trump previously federalized guard troops in Los Angeles after sporadic anti-ICE protests in June, a move a federal judge said was illegal for domestic law enforcement. That ruling was stayed pending an appeal, and troops have remained deployed in Southern California. Newsom said those are the troops being sent to Oregon. Trump has also announced he was deploying the guard to Memphis with the support of Tennessee GOP Gov. Bill Lee.

    Tribune reporter Jake Sheridan contributed.

    Originally Published:

    Jeremy Gorner, Rick Pearson

    Source link

  • Mexican Independence Day celebrated at California’s State Capitol amid immigration fears

    AMID IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT FEARS. YES, IT’S SMALLER, BUT STILL POWERFUL. STILL POWERFUL BECAUSE AS AS LONG AS THERE’S ONE MEXICAN, THERE’S COMMUNITY, THERE WILL BE POWER, THERE WILL BE PRIDE. A NIGHT OF MEXICAN HERITAGE BEING CELEBRATED AT THE STATE CAPITOL. MEXICO, EL GRITO RINGING AT SUNDOWN. THIS IS A BEAUTIFUL CULTURE. AS THE CONSUL GENERAL OF MEXICO IN SACRAMENTO WAVES THE MEXICAN FLAG OVER THE BALCONY. IT’S A TRADITION THAT KICKS OFF MEXICO’S INDEPENDENCE DAY. I CAME OUT HERE TO REPRESENT FOR OUR PEOPLE. I THINK RIGHT NOW, MORE THAN USUAL, IT’S VERY IMPORTANT TO SHOW OUR PRIDE AND REALLY BE HERE TOGETHER AS A COMMUNITY TO ALSO SHOW NUMBERS. THIS YEAR’S CELEBRATION, NOTABLY SMALLER THAN YEARS PAST. THE GENERAL CONSUL SCALING DOWN THE EVENT OVER FEARS OF IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT. I UNDERSTAND THAT WE’RE LIVING VERY INTERESTING MOMENTS IN TERMS THAT PEOPLE COULD HAVE FEAR. THEY COULD HAVE ANXIETY, THEY COULD FEEL STRUGGLING ABOUT THE NARRATIVES AROUND MIGRATION. THAT’S WHY OTHERS FROM DIFFERENT BACKGROUNDS CAME TO SUPPORT THE COMMUNITY AND CELEBRATE THE MEXICAN HOLIDAY. IT’S JUST IT’S NOT RIGHT. I’M JUST HERE TO SUPPORT. I LOVE THEIR FOOD AND I LOVE THEIR LIKE, OUTFITS. AND I LOVE HOW THEY DRESS. DESPITE THE SCALED DOWN CELEBRATION, MANY CAME OUT FOR THOSE WHO COULDN’T. BUT I UNDERSTAND PEOPLE’S CONCERNS AND I THINK I’M A LITTLE BIT MORE ON THE END OF LIKE, KEEP EVERYBODY SAFE AND THOSE THAT CAN SHOW UP MY COLORS NEVER GOING TO CHANGE MY HEART. ALWAYS IS IN MY COUNTRY. THEY ARE NOT ALONE. WE ARE NOT ALONE. AND WE ARE TOGETHER. EVEN IN MOMENTS LIKE THESE ONES. AND HEY, EVEN OUT HERE FOR THE PAST HOUR OR SO, THERE HAVE BEEN PEOPLE COMING OUT HERE WITH THEIR MEXICAN FLAGS, TAKING PICTURES IN FRONT OF THE STATE CAPITOL. NOW, THE ENTIRE CELEBRATION DID LAST FOR ABOUT AN HOUR OR SO, AND THEY DID HAVE SOME MARIACHIS PLAYING AS WELL. WE’RE LIVE HERE IN DOWNTOW

    Mexican Independence Day celebrated at California’s State Capitol amid immigration fears

    Updated: 11:20 PM PDT Sep 15, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    The State Capitol in California was illuminated in the colors of the Mexican flag Monday to celebrate Mexico’s Independence Day. But despite the bright display, other aspects of the special day were toned down.Monday night’s celebration of “El Grito” was scaled back by organizers amid immigration enforcement. “It’s maybe much smaller, but even more special, I would say, because the people that decide to show up can celebrate. It’s also about showing up about their identity, about their roots, about being proud of being Mexican,” said Christian Tonatiuh González Jiménez, the Consul General of Mexico in Sacramento.During the civic ceremony, the Consul waved the Mexican flag over the balcony, a tradition that marks the beginning of Mexico’s Independence Day celebrations. Despite the scaled-down event, the spirit of Mexican heritage was celebrated at the State Capitol.”It’s smaller but still powerful. Still powerful, because as long as there’s one Mexican, there’s community, there will be power, there will be pride,” Jiménez said.The celebration, which lasted about an hour, included vendors selling Mexican flags and food. Many attendees expressed their support for the community and the importance of showing pride in their heritage.”I came out here to represent for our people. I think right now, more than usual, it’s very important to show our pride and really be here together as a community to also show numbers,” said Karen Izquierdo.The Consul General noted the scaled-down event was due to fears of immigration enforcement.”I understand that we’re living in very interesting moments in terms that people could have fear, they could have anxiety, they could be struggling with the narratives around migration,” he said.Others from different backgrounds also came to support the community.”It’s just it’s not right. I’m just here to support,” said one supporter.Another added, “I love their food and I love their outfits, and I love how they dress.”Despite the smaller celebration, many came out for those who couldn’t.”I understand, you know, people’s concerns. And I think I’m a little bit more on the end of like keep everybody safe and those that can show up,” said Izquierdo. See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    The State Capitol in California was illuminated in the colors of the Mexican flag Monday to celebrate Mexico’s Independence Day. But despite the bright display, other aspects of the special day were toned down.

    Monday night’s celebration of “El Grito” was scaled back by organizers amid immigration enforcement.

    “It’s maybe much smaller, but even more special, I would say, because the people that decide to show up can celebrate. It’s also about showing up about their identity, about their roots, about being proud of being Mexican,” said Christian Tonatiuh González Jiménez, the Consul General of Mexico in Sacramento.

    During the civic ceremony, the Consul waved the Mexican flag over the balcony, a tradition that marks the beginning of Mexico’s Independence Day celebrations. Despite the scaled-down event, the spirit of Mexican heritage was celebrated at the State Capitol.

    “It’s smaller but still powerful. Still powerful, because as long as there’s one Mexican, there’s community, there will be power, there will be pride,” Jiménez said.

    The celebration, which lasted about an hour, included vendors selling Mexican flags and food. Many attendees expressed their support for the community and the importance of showing pride in their heritage.

    “I came out here to represent for our people. I think right now, more than usual, it’s very important to show our pride and really be here together as a community to also show numbers,” said Karen Izquierdo.

    The Consul General noted the scaled-down event was due to fears of immigration enforcement.

    “I understand that we’re living in very interesting moments in terms that people could have fear, they could have anxiety, they could be struggling with the narratives around migration,” he said.

    Others from different backgrounds also came to support the community.

    “It’s just it’s not right. I’m just here to support,” said one supporter.

    Another added, “I love their food and I love their outfits, and I love how they dress.”

    Despite the smaller celebration, many came out for those who couldn’t.

    “I understand, you know, people’s concerns. And I think I’m a little bit more on the end of like keep everybody safe and those that can show up,” said Izquierdo.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel

    Source link

  • California Implements New Cryptocurrency Laws to Combat Bitcoin ATM Scams

    California Implements New Cryptocurrency Laws to Combat Bitcoin ATM Scams

    Bitcoin (BTC) ATMs have become both convenient and worrying, with scammers taking advantage of unsuspecting victims. Authorities in the US and other jurisdictions are now waging a war against crypto-ATM-based scams.

    California takes a stance on new cryptocurrency laws

    The state of California has introduced rules for cryptocurrency transactions. Senate Bill 401, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, means you can only make $1,000 worth of cryptocurrency transactions at ATMs each day, and starting in 2025, the maximum they can charge you is $5, or 15% of the transaction. Whichever is higher.

    Initially, some Bitcoin ATMs allowed up to $50,000 in transactions with fees ranging between 12% and 25% above the value of the digital asset. These changes are intended to protect people from scams and high fees, explained Sen. Monique Lemon, one of the co-authors.

    Scammers taking advantage of the convenience of Bitcoin ATMs have been a growing concern, with the Federal Trade Commission reporting that more than 46,000 people have lost more than $1 billion to cryptocurrency scams since 2021. New transaction limits give victims more time to spot scams before loss of money. But Charles Bell of the Blockchain Advocacy Coalition worries that these rules could hurt the cryptocurrency industry and small businesses.



    You may also like:

    Explore Australia’s rapid rise in the global cryptocurrency ATM scene

    FBI Alerts About Bitcoin ATM and QR Code Scams

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has raised the alarm about fraudulent schemes exploiting ATMs for cryptocurrencies and quick response (QR) codes for payments. These schemes take various forms, including online impersonation, romance scams, and lottery fraud, all using cryptocurrency ATMs and QR codes as tools.

    QR codes, which smartphone cameras can scan, simplify cryptocurrency payments. However, criminals are now using it to trick victims into paying money. Victims are often asked to withdraw money from their accounts and use a QR code provided by scammers to complete transactions at physical cryptocurrency ATMs.

    Once the victim makes the payment, the cryptocurrency is transferred to the scammer’s wallet, making recovery nearly impossible due to the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies. The FBI offers several tips to protect against these schemes, focusing on caution, verification, and avoiding cryptocurrency ATM transactions that promise anonymity using only a phone number or email.



    You may also like:

    Bitbuy is partnering with Canada’s largest Bitcoin ATM provider

    Cryptocurrency regulation efforts in California

    The passage of Senate Bill 401 in California is part of a broader effort to regulate the cryptocurrency industry while protecting consumers. Another law, scheduled to take effect in July 2025, will require digital financial asset companies to obtain licenses from the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. This represents a clear shift towards tightening government regulation and oversight in the world of digital finance.

    Gavin Newsom’s decision to sign these bills into law demonstrates California’s commitment to strengthening the cryptocurrency industry and protecting its citizens. Balancing innovation and security remains a challenge, especially in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.

    Bitcoin Depot’s historic debut on the NASDAQ

    In July, Bitcoin Depot, a leading bitcoin ATM operator, went public on the Nasdaq. This milestone comes after Bitcoin Depot merged with GSR II Meteora, a blank check company.

    The move to go public demonstrates the growing legitimacy and acceptance of cryptocurrencies in major financial markets.

    Authorities vs. illegal crypto ATMs

    The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is taking a strong stance against illegal cryptocurrency ATM operators. Using its power under money laundering regulations, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has carried out raids on cryptocurrency ATMs suspected of illegal activities across England.

    The measures, which follow previous operations in east London and Leeds, are part of the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) efforts to crack down on unregulated cryptocurrency operations. This highlights global pressure for stronger cryptocurrency regulation, mirroring steps taken in California. The balance between innovation and security remains a fundamental concern for regulatory bodies around the world.



    Read more:

    McLennan County Bitcoin ATM Lawsuit Resolved

    Editorial Team

    Source link

  • Major raids target marijuana transportation and illegal hookah centres in Cyberabad – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Major raids target marijuana transportation and illegal hookah centres in Cyberabad – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Rangareddy: In a major crackdown on illegal activities, the Cyberabad Police Commissionerate has initiated a series of raids to combat ganja transportation, unauthorised hookah centres, and the drug trade. These concerted efforts by specialised units and coordinated operations aim to dismantle illicit networks, apprehend perpetrators, and safeguard the community from the threats posed by these crimes.

    Law enforcement teams, including the police, Anti-Narcotics Cell, and Special Operations Team (SOT), meticulously planned targeted raids on suspected locations known for illegal activities. These joint efforts resulted in the seizure of a significant quantity of ganja and the arrest of multiple individuals involved in its transportation.

    The police are actively tracing the entire supply chain and working to apprehend all those connected to the illegal drug trade, dealing a significant blow to the network operating within the Commissionerate’s jurisdiction.

    Simultaneously, the crackdown focused on unlicensed hookah centres, known for their association with drug abuse and other unlawful activities.

    Several establishments were found operating without the required licenses and permits. Thorough investigations are underway to identify the masterminds behind these operations and ensure they face legal consequences.

    In a recent operation conducted by the Rajendranagar Zone Special Operations Team (SOT), a notorious marijuana gang involved in drug transportation was intercepted…

    Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

    MMP News Author

    Source link