ReportWire

Tag: racism

  • Activist and Congressman Bobby Rush retiring after decades in House

    Activist and Congressman Bobby Rush retiring after decades in House

    [ad_1]

    Activist and Congressman Bobby Rush retiring after decades in House – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A Chicago political legend, Bobby Rush held firm control of a seat in the U.S. House for 30 years with a backstory unlike any other. At 76, Rush is ready to step back. Scott MacFarlane takes a look at his career.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Mass shootings compound loss felt by marginalized groups

    Mass shootings compound loss felt by marginalized groups

    [ad_1]

    ATLANTA — Pulse was more than a safe space for Brandon Wolf and his friends. The nightclub was a haven for members of Orlando, Florida’s LGBTQ community — a place to be themselves without fear.

    “It’s probably the first place I ever held hands with somebody I had a crush on,” Wolf said. “Without looking over my shoulder first, it’s one of the first places I ever wore my skinniest pair of jeans without being afraid of what someone might call me.”

    On June 12, 2016, a gunman targeting the club’s patrons killed 49 people there, including two of Wolf’s best friends, and wounded 53. “It’s left such a hole in our hearts,” Wolf said.

    After mass shootings, the loss felt by marginalized groups already facing discrimination is compounded. Some public health experts say the risk for mental health issues is greater for these groups — communities of color and the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community among them.

    The trauma is especially acute when the shootings happen at schools, churches, clubs or other places that previously served as pillars of those communities — welcoming and accepting spaces that are difficult to replace due to a lack of resources or the sociological and historical impact they have had.

    “Folks from marginalized communities are already dealing with the burden of … discrimination and racism … and the emotional toll that they take,” said Dr. Sarah Lowe, a professor with the Yale School of Public Health and a clinical psychologist who has researched the long-term mental health consequences of mass shootings and other traumatic events. “All these other stressors can not only increase risk for mental health problems following a mass shooting, but they also increase risk for further loss of resources.”

    As a result, there is the potential for members of such marginalized communities to leave or for the community itself to shut down, said Alan Wolfelt, a grief counselor and educator at the Center for Loss and Life Transition in Fort Collins, Colorado.

    “That is why it is vital to support these communities, acknowledge their grief openly and honestly, and then help them rebuild their community in terms of meaning and purpose while realizing they have been totally transformed,” said Wofelt, who provides mental health services and education for individuals and communities that have experienced loss.

    Club Q, a gay nightclub in Colorado, says it will eventually reopen at the same location, but with a new design and a permanent memorial, to honor five people killed last month in a targeted shooting. Club Q was a sanctuary for the LGBTQ community in the mostly conservative city of Colorado Springs, patrons said.

    Pulse will not reopen. The site where it operated is now a memorial, and supporters plan to convert it into a permanent museum. The club’s closure has deeply scarred the LGBTQ community, which has tried to “re-create the sense of belonging” that Pulse had, Wolf said.

    “I live next to a few other LGBTQ establishments and those are really important, but there was something truly special about Pulse and the community that we were able to create here,” he said. “For communities like ours, safe spaces are lifelines. They’re the refuges we carve out in a world that threatens violence against us every time we walk out the door.”

    In some cases, traumatic events threaten basic necessities for marginalized groups, increasing the risk for mental health issues, said Lowe, the clinical psychologist.

    Tops Friendly Market in Buffalo, New York, was closed for two months after 10 Black shoppers and workers were fatally shot during a racist rampage. During that time, there was no grocery store on the East Side.

    Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, South Carolina, was founded in 1816 and became a pillar of the African American community in the state’s Lowcountry region.

    On June 17, 2015, a self-avowed white supremacist who targeted a Bible study at the church killed nine Black congregants. One of the victims was minister Myra Thompson, sister of South Carolina State Rep. JA Moore.

    “My sister was a servant to the other parishioners at the church, and she dedicated a lot of her life and her love to serving others through the church,” Moore said.

    The church reopened for Sunday services four days after the massacre. It was important to send a message, he said.

    “Even seven years later, the church is still resilient and still rebuilding and still serving,” Moore said. “I think the message that reopening up after such a horrific event is the story of African Americans in this country, the history of this country, where no matter our trauma and our pain and the horrors that we have to endure, we recognize that it’s an obligation as Americans to continue to push forward.”

    Wolf, now 34, has also pushed forward. Following the shooting at Pulse, he became an advocate and activist for the LGBTQ community and now works as press secretary for Equality Florida.

    He said Orlando nonprofit organizations that support the LGBTQ community have expanded their services, and other LGBTQ-owned bars and restaurants have grown their customer base. Wolf believes the city has become more inclusive since the shooting.

    “While I think there’s a hole and there will always be something missing where Pulse used to be, I also think it’s beautiful that we’ve chosen to take the important components of what made Pulse, Pulse, and infuse them into every which way we live our lives in this city,” he said.

    ———

    Associated Press journalists Cody Jackson in Miami and Lekan Oyekanmi in Houston contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • I Regret To Inform You That TikTok Found the Worst Lego Knockoffs | The Mary Sue

    I Regret To Inform You That TikTok Found the Worst Lego Knockoffs | The Mary Sue

    [ad_1]

    As someone who didn’t grow up with money, I’m firmly pro-Lego knockoffs. In addition to their accessibility, other Lego-type materials have existed forever because people like to build things, including children. Also, Lego has become a brand like Google or Kleenex, where the word itself comes to reference many things that serve the same purpose. However, some things push the limits, and these knockoffs from the Mormon community are one such example.

    Before getting into why these are so awful and offensive, let’s start with the name of the company— Brick’em Young. I see the first vision, okay. The brand is named after Brigham Young, the second president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (a.k.a. the LDS Church, a.k.a. the Mormon Church) and the most famous person associated with the religion. The former governor of the Utah territory is the reason the Mormon community grew into a large industry, and the state’s main (and infamous) university is named Brigham Young University (BYU).

    However, “brick” is also a verb used in relation to throwing a brick at someone or something, and more famously online in regards to a very erect penis and the sexual activities related to it. Now, why would you name a toy company aimed at kids “brick ’em young!” Do we see the problem here? Especially in a religion that has a child sex scandal every other year, to say nothing of the child brides and the predators, who aren’t held accountable because the church has been caught suppressing stories to protect predators.

    Mormon Lego, not-Lego Sets

    Anyways, the main issue beyond the terrible name is the sets they actually sell. They have the expected sets of different temples and biblical stories. Because it’s the holiday time, they’ve been pushing nativity scenes, and that’s why I’ve brought you here today.

    @the_jenc I got questions #weird #lego #legotiktok I’m not #exmormon but I feel like y’all will want to see this#greenscreen ♬ original sound – Jen

    Yes, you saw that correctly: The “traditional” nativity scene is very, very white except for two of the wise men. Unfortunately, this is a common thing in most religions that utilize nativity scenes, including Catholicism and Protestantism, despite the story being set in the Middle East. The real kicker is that, if you take issue with it, the Mormon not-Lego company has got you covered with an “African Nativity” and “Asian Nativity”—white is the default, and everyone else is “DiVeRsItY.”

    In the African Nativity, the wife has lighter skin than the husband (because, of course, colorism is free) and the scene is set in a hut. The Asian Nativity scene looks like a generic scene of China, but I can’t be sure. I can’t with these. The more I see them, the more I want to scream.

    Racism in the LDS Church

    This is equally disgusting and very much not surprising. Mormons of all races and ethnicities exist because, like Evangelicals, they are proselytizing people. There are so many memes about the men and women dressed up with a Bible or other religious text in hand, knocking door to door. Missionary and colonizing work is big both here and abroad. Also embedded in the Mormon religion’s founding is that Black people are the “cursed” children of God and fence-sitters in a Holy War. Yeah, so we should be so lucky as to get a racist-ass, knockoff lego set.

    According to The Washington Post, “[Young] enforced it enthusiastically as the word of God, supporting slavery in Utah and decreeing that the ‘mark’ on Cain was ‘the flat nose and black skin.’ Young subsequently urged immediate death to any participant in mixing of the races.” While the 1982, anti-Mormon cartoon The God Makers has been criticized for its inaccurate portrayal of the faith (by many people, not just Mormons), the section about Black people lines up with popular Mormon belief before the 1950s.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XoOnSVnnLQ

    Within the church, Black people weren’t allowed to be priests until 1978, and the religion’s main publisher continued to print a 1950s book defending the ban (Mormon Doctrine) until 2010. In a 2016 survey, 62% of self-identified Mormons say they either “know” or “believe” this ban to be God’s will. The number was 70% among non-white Mormons, though there’s likely a larger margin of error because of the small sample size.

    As with other communities experiencing racism and anti-Blackness, this isn’t something that’s just “dying out” because young people are expressing softer versions of the same views. One of the most popular non-sports or Greek-related college group TikTok accounts is the Black Menaces at BYU, and they reveal to the world how bigoted beliefs still permeate the LDS church by asking basic questions regarding gender, race, and sexuality. They even have a knockoff game inspired by Billy Eichner, where they ask students to name a Black historical figure, which goes about as well as the Lego set. The questions extend to Mormon history, like when they recite a quote and ask who said it—Brigham Young or Adolf Hitler?

    Related to the priesthood question and status of progress, many students will make excuses for the policy and say it’s a “product of its time” while claiming the church and community aren’t racist anymore—and offering just as much imagination as those janky bricks.

    (via TikTok, featured image: Warner Bros.)

    The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    [ad_2]

    Alyssa Shotwell

    Source link

  • 3 men in South Africa charged for racist attack at swim pool

    3 men in South Africa charged for racist attack at swim pool

    [ad_1]

    JOHANNESBURG — Three white men in South Africa have been charged with crimes including attempted murder after an alleged racist attack on two Black boys that has sparked public outrage.

    The men were caught on video assaulting the Black teenagers who were using a swimming pool at the Maselspoort resort in the Free State province.

    The men were trying to prevent the teenagers from swimming, claiming that the pool was reserved for white people.

    In the video, widely viewed on social media in South Africa, the men shouted at the boys and hit them. One of the men pushed one of the boys underwater.

    Further security video footage shows the men attempting to prevent the teenagers from entering the pool and the group of white people that were swimming at the time exiting the pool as soon as the Black teenagers entered it.

    According to police, Johan Nel, 33, and Jan Stephanus van der Westhuizen, 47, were released on a warning and are expected to appear again in court next year.

    “The two appeared in court on charges of assault common and crimen injuria and the matter was postponed to 25 January 2023 while being released on warning,” said Police Commissioner Baile Motswenyane.

    The third suspect was expected to appear in court on Thursday, where various political parties and activities were protesting outside the courthouse.

    The incident has been widely condemned, including by President Cyril Ramaphosa.

    “As Black and white South Africans, we should be united in condemning all manifestations of racism and attempts to explain or defend such crimes. Racism is not a problem to be fought by Black South Africans only,” Ramaphosa said in a statement.

    Members of the leftist Economic Freedom Fighters party visited the resort and demanded answers from the manager, who claimed the resort did not have a racial segregation policy.

    Racism remains a thorny issue in South Africa nearly 30 years after South Africa’s transition from white-minority rule, known as apartheid, to democracy.

    In 2018, real estate agent Vicky Momberg was sentenced to three years in prison for shouting racial insults at a Black policeman in a landmark judgment that was the first to imprison a person for a racist act.

    In 2020, Adam Catzavelos, a white man, was convicted of crimen injuria and given a suspended sentence after using racist slurs in a video that circulated on social media.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Politico’s Article on ‘Narcissists’ is a Thinly-Veiled Hit Job on Meghan Markle

    Politico’s Article on ‘Narcissists’ is a Thinly-Veiled Hit Job on Meghan Markle

    [ad_1]

    On Monday, Politico published an op-ed by Joanna Weiss called “2022 Is the Year We All Finally Got Tired of Narcissists.” From the title, you’d think the piece would be a cathartic read. We were subjected to some titanic narcissists this year, weren’t we? Donald Trump hawked trading cards depicting him as a superhero! Elon Musk carried a kitchen sink through the front door of Twitter before firing half its staff! Ye declared that he liked Hitler!

    Except the article isn’t about any of that stuff. Sure, it devotes a few paragraphs to malignant narcissists like Trump, Musk, and Ye, but the main focus of the article, taking up about half of its total word count, is Weiss’s hatred of the Netflix documentary Harry & Meghan. “It struck me,” Weiss writes, “that the overreach that led to the Sussexes’ critically panned mega-series is the same impulse that turned Elon Musk into a terror on Twitter, that prompted Ye to up the ante of outrageous behavior until he crossed the line into blatant antisemitism, that sent Bankman-Fried from the top of the world to a Bahamian jail.”

    But … it’s not, though. It’s not the same impulse at all. Harry and Meghan had to leave not one, but two homes after being hounded by racist attacks and death threats. The British royal family fed Meghan to the tabloids in order to draw media attention away from other family members. You can critique Harry & Meghan as a production, but its purpose—along with the Oprah interview—was to set the record straight and allow Meghan to tell her side of the story. Anyone with a modicum of common sense can plainly see that.

    Weiss spoke to a political scientist who gave her a definition of “grandiose narcissists.” “They believe they’re the absolute best at what they do,” Weiss writes. “They go to great lengths to protect and defend their egos. They strive to be unique and promote themselves energetically.” Weiss then claims that “that’s the story, in a nutshell, of Harry and Meghan.”

    It’s not the story of Trump, with those astonishingly infantile NFTs? Not Musk, who just yesterday compared himself to Batman? It’s Harry and Meghan who are “grandiose narcissists” for pushing back against racists? Okay.

    And if you still have any seed of doubt that this is about race, consider the image that accompanied the article. Even though Weiss claims that she’s equally disgusted with Meghan and Harry, it’s Meghan’s photo that’s plastered right in the center of Weiss’s lineup of narcissists. It’s almost as unhinged as Jeremey Clarkson’s desire to see Meghan paraded through the streets naked.

    Racists are frothing at the mouth at the idea of a Black princess, and it shows. If you want to see some real narcissism, look no further than white people like Joanna Weiss.

    (featured image: Netflix)

    The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    [ad_2]

    Julia Glassman

    Source link

  • Colorado man arrested after racist, homophobic rant in California In-N-Out goes viral on TikTok

    Colorado man arrested after racist, homophobic rant in California In-N-Out goes viral on TikTok

    [ad_1]

    A Colorado man was arrested Monday after allegedly going on a racist and homophobic rant against two college students, who were eating at an In-N-Out in the Bay Area on Christmas Eve. The students, Arine Kim and Elliot Ha, filmed the encounter in a now-viral TikTok.

    Jordan Douglas Krah, 40, has been charged with two counts of committing a hate crime, according to a statement from the San Ramon Police Department.

    In the video, Krah is allegedly seen harassing Kim and Ha, making comments about their sexualities and asking questions about their racial identities and ethnicities, even returning to question the duo after walking away. He then threatens to spit in their faces before saying, “See you outside.”

    “Elliot and I were shaking and stuttering towards the end of it,” Kim told CBS Bay Area, who said that after the pair exited the restaurant, Krah continued to stare at them for “ten to fifteen minutes.”

    “We made sure to ask the workers, could you guys walk us to our cars, we need to make sure that he’s not still around. And the workers were just super helpful,” Ha told CBS Bay Area.

    According to the San Ramon Police Department, it was the viral nature of the video that helped police identify both the victims and the suspect. 

    After seeing the TikTok, which had nearly ten million views as of Monday night, police reached out to Kim and Ha via social media and began a criminal investigation.

    “Through the help of social media, we were contacted by one of the individuals in this video,” wrote San Ramon Police Chief Denton Carlson on Twitter.

    Krah has been booked at the County Jail in Martinez, California, where he remained in custody as of 4 p.m. local time Monday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Black Italian Rugby Player Calls Out Teammates For ‘Racist’ Secret Santa Gift

    Black Italian Rugby Player Calls Out Teammates For ‘Racist’ Secret Santa Gift

    [ad_1]

    A Black Italian rugby player said Wednesday that a Secret Santa gift exchange turned offensive when teammates gave him a rotten banana.

    Cherif Traore, a 28-year-old prop for Benetton Treviso, wrote that he anonymously received the present in a trash bag during a Christmas dinner with other players.

    “Apart from finding it an offensive gesture, what hurt me the most was to see that most of my teammates who were present were laughing. As if it was all normal,” he said, per Reuters.

    “I haven’t slept all night,” he continued.

    Cherif Traore

    David Rogers via Getty Images

    In an English translation of his Instagram post about the incident (see below), Traore, who originally hails from Guinea but has lived in Italy since age 7, said he does not normally respond to “racist jokes” to keep the peace.

    “I have decided not to remain silent this time to ensure that episodes like this don’t happen again to prevent other people finding themselves in my current situation in the future,” he wrote in Italian. “And hoping the sender will learn a lesson.”

    The United Rugby Championship has ordered Benetton to launch a full investigation and punish those responsible, the Guardian reported.

    Benetton Rugby told Reuters it condemns discrimination and that it gathered members of the rugby union squad to apologize to Traore. Traore accepted the apologies, the Associated Press reported.

    On Wednesday, Benetton Rugby posted a video of Traore, with a tweet that said his teammates understood their mistake.

    Traore has also played for Italy’s national team.

    Bigoted behavior against Black athletes in Italy has reportedly been rampant in its most popular sport, soccer. It’s also a problem in volleyball and basketball.

    Cherif Traore's entry about the incident, translated into English on Instagram.
    Cherif Traore’s entry about the incident, translated into English on Instagram.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The 31 Best Books Fashion People Read in 2022

    The 31 Best Books Fashion People Read in 2022

    [ad_1]

    Between the covers of any good book are pages that transport and enrich the mind of its reader. In 2022, leaders in the fashion industry turned to various texts to inspire their upcoming collections, deepen the knowledge behind their curations and find personal liberty within their identity.

    Major book releases swept the fashion community this year, like Editor-in-Chief of British Vogue’s Edward Enninful’s memoir, “A Visible Man,” in September. Other books like Safia Minney’s made an urgent call to regenerative fashion and a closer look at today’s fashion system. 

    [ad_2]

    Andrea Bossi

    Source link

  • High school football incidents spark racism talks, programs

    High school football incidents spark racism talks, programs

    [ad_1]

    Superintendent Torie Gibson felt she had no choice but to make the unpopular decision. When learning Amador High’s team had a group chat titled, “Kill the Blacks,” filled with derogatory language and racial slurs, she ended the Northern California school’s varsity season.

    That meant the 100-year anniversary game between rivals Amador and Argonaut was called off.

    “We canceled the season, and we did it for all the right reasons because the behavior is not acceptable,” said Gibson, who oversees the Amador County Unified School District. “However, football is an extracurricular activity. It is not a given. It is not a right. It is strictly extra.”

    The discipline was swift and abrupt. Moments before Amador was to play Rosemont — a predominantly Black and Latino school in nearby Sacramento — the game was called off.

    There was more fallout. Amador’s football coach, athletic director and principal were put on leave.

    In Gibson’s mind, the discipline was the easy part. The hard part will be setting the table for real change, and the key will be presentation. The school is based in a mostly white, rural area an hour’s drive east of Sacramento. Amador has just four Black students out of about 750.

    “I think if we roll it out correctly and we provide the necessary support and we don’t shame people for who they are and we work it out so that we celebrate everyone, but really, truly look at our blind spots and our differences, I think it’ll make a big difference,” said Gibson, who is white.

    The incident at Amador was one of several alarming examples of racism against Black people that occurred this fall in high school football around the nation. Athletes in the past were able to leave racism and other issues off the field, but today not even sports settings are immune from real world problems.

    Administrators in some cases have used these incidents to start conversations about race that have been hard for them to bring up before and roll out programs they hope will have lasting impact.

    A TikTok video created by players at River Valley High School in Yuba City, California, featured a mock slave auction. A social media post circulated showing five white males from West Laurens High School, a central Georgia school a little more than a two-hour drive southeast of Atlanta, at a football game wearing shirts that spelled out a racial slur targeting Black people. And at Guilderland High School in New York, about a half-hour’s drive west of Albany, several classmates showed up to a football game wearing black facepaint, prompting about 100 students to walk out of classes days later.

    Richard Lapchick, the founder of The Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport at Central Florida, is using social media to draw attention to weekly examples of racism in sports and elsewhere. He said the institute, also known as TIDES, found 58 articles in its first week of searching, and he highlighted 11 on his Twitter feed.

    “White supremacist acts have been unleashed across the nation in the current political climate,” Lapchick said. “I don’t think the general public knows how extensive it is.”

    Gibson, the superintendent in Northern California, feels she has to start with implicit bias work in her district. She said she was encouraged by the fact that the school already has strong transgender and gay and lesbian advocacy groups.

    “I think we are going to have a great opportunity to really make some change and to do some great work,” she said.

    The mock slave auction at River Valley was done as a prank, but there was nothing funny about the repercussions. The varsity football team forfeited the remainder of its season after suspensions left it with too few players to continue.

    The Greater Sacramento NAACP chapter hosted a meeting calling for systemic change and players apologized for their involvement. During the meeting, a Black player said he did not want to participate in the mock slave auction, but he was the only Black player left in the locker room and everyone focused on him. He said he tried to leave, but could not. He was told the video would not be published, but it was.

    River Valley Principal Lee McPeak said the district is working with a professional to implement programs to help learn from the incident.

    “There are vital messages about race, discrimination and systemic changes that are necessary to help us turn important corners toward equity, respect and compassion, critical for our schools today,” he said.

    At Guilderland High in New York, some students were outraged when some of their classmates showed up to a game in blackface. Administrators met with students through small group, roundtable discussions. The school said it was a “culminating moment” for students who had experienced discriminatory issues and injustices.

    In the wake of all the incidents, the work toward learning and changing is just starting.

    “It’s going to take us time,” Gibson said. “It’s going to be years of work. There’s no magic button to just fix it.”

    ———

    Follow Cliff Brunt on Twitter: twitter.com/CliffBruntAP

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jeremy Clarkson

    Jeremy Clarkson

    [ad_1]

    British television presenter Jeremy Clarkson said Monday he is “horrified to have caused so much hurt” with a scathing column about Prince Harry’s wife, Meghan, that attracted a flood of complaints.

    Clarkson, who hosts motoring show “The Grand Tour” on Amazon, wrote in tabloid newspaper The Sun that he hated Meghan Markle “on a cellular level” and dreamed of her being paraded naked through British towns “while the crowds chant ‘Shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her.”

    Media watchdog the Independent Press Standards Organization said it had received more than 12,000 complaints about the column by Monday — close to the total number of complaints it received in all of 2021.

    The column was removed from The Sun’s website on Monday.

    Clarkson, who made his name as the combative host of the BBC car show “Top Gear,” said the public shaming image was “a clumsy reference” to a scene in “Game of Thrones.”

    “Oh dear. I’ve rather put my foot in it. In a column I wrote about Meghan, I made a clumsy reference to a scene in Game of Thrones and this has gone down badly with a great many people,” he tweeted on Monday. “I’m horrified to have caused so much hurt and I shall be more careful in future.”

    Clarkson’s column followed the release of a six-part Netflix documentary about Harry and Meghan’s acrimonious split from the British royal family. The couple quit royal duties and moved to California in 2020, citing a lack of support from the palace and racist press treatment of Meghan, who is biracial.

    Clarkson’s column was condemned by public figures including Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, who called it “deeply misogynist and just downright awful and horrible.”

    Clarkson’s daughter Emily Clarkson posted on Instagram that “I stand against everything that my dad wrote about Meghan Markle and I remain standing in support of those that are targeted with online hatred.”

    Asked about the article, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said that “for everyone in public life, language matters.” He added that “I absolutely don’t believe that Britain is a racist country.”


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Netflix Harry and Meghan series top takeaways: Claims of

    Netflix Harry and Meghan series top takeaways: Claims of

    [ad_1]

    The second half of Netflix’s documentary miniseries on Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, hit servers around the world Thursday morning. In it, the couple paint a stark picture of the animosity that grew between themselves and Harry’s closest family members amid what they say was racist and defamatory coverage by the British media. All of which, they say, drove them away.

    Harry says the tension — which he and Meghan blame on the rigidity and self-preservation-at-all-cost mentality of the royal family, along with the mercilessness of Britain’s tabloid press — exploded in a meeting with his father, now King Charles III, and his brother Prince William shouting at him while his grandmother Queen Elizabeth II sat and looked on.

    The royal family has declined to respond to the allegations in the series thus far, but it has denied Harry and Meghan’s allegations of racism and said the issues raised by the couple, “particularly that of race, are concerning.” Buckingham Palace has said it would address the matters privately.

    Below are the top takeaways from the final instalments of the show, which has become Netflix’s most-streamed documentary ever. You can read here about the highlights from the first three episodes, which dropped last week.

    “Stealing the limelight”

    The couple say Harry’s family became unhappy during their trip to Australia, when Meghan started exuding star power. There were perceptions, they say – which echoed sentiments felt about Harry’s mother Diana during her marriage to then-Prince Charles – that the royal outsider was taking too much attention away from the more senior members of the family.


    Harry & Meghan documentary hits U.K.

    01:59

    “The issue is when someone who’s marrying in, who should be a ‘supporting act,’ is then stealing the limelight or is doing the job better than those who were born to do this, then upsets people – it shifts the balance” Harry says in episode four of the series.

    It was around then, the couple says, that the British tabloids started criticizing Meghan, and in particular painting her in a negative light against her sister-in-law Kate.

    The couple have said for years that the negative media coverage took on racist overtones and had a deep impact on Meghan’s mental health. In the documentary, they say it hit her particularly hard when she realized that much of the British public accepted what the U.K. tabloids were printing as fact.

    Meghan: “I needed help, but I wasn’t allowed”

    Both Harry and Meghan portrayed the royal family as extremely reluctant to show any public signs of vulnerability — to the extent that Meghan claims she was told not to seek mental health support when she needed it most. The couple first revealed Meghan’s struggles with mental health during their interview with Oprah Winfrey last year.

    Harry recounts a moment many years ago in the Netflix series when he said his mother Diana was crying in a car and her husband Charles told her she had “30 seconds” to straighten out her makeup, put on a smile and emerge to face the press.

    Meghan, they say, found herself under the same kind of pressure, from both the press and the family, and it led her to suicidal thoughts.

    “I thought if I wasn’t around anymore, this all stops,” she says in episode four.

    “I remember her telling me that — that she’d thought about taking her own life,” says her mother, Doria Ragland, breaking down in tears in the episode. “That broke my heart… That’s not an easy one for a mom to hear.”

    “I needed help, but I wasn’t allowed to,” says Meghan. “They were worried how it would look for the institution.”

    Prince Harry says he knew his wife “was struggling,” but he “never thought it would get to that stage. I felt angry and ashamed. I didn’t deal with it very well… what took over my feelings was my royal role.”

    “You are making people want to kill me”

    Meghan and Harry have maintained for years that the British press deliberately attacked the mixed-race American duchess, casting her as an intruder and detractor.

    “I saw cartoons of me on all fours and Meghan holding a dog collar,” recalls Harry in the series.  

    Meghan blames such reports for whipping up hatred of her that leaked from the press onto social media, pointing to one tweet in particular that said she “just needs to die, someone should do it.”

    “You are making people want to kill me,” Meghan says in episode five of the press attacks. “It’s not just a tabloid, it’s not just some story, you are making me scared… That night, to be up and down in the middle of the night checking on security, that’s real — are my babies safe? And you’ve created it for what? Because you’re bored, or because it sells your papers? It’s real what you’re doing, and that’s what I don’t think people understand.”

    The former head of counterterrorism policing in Britain said recently that the threats Meghan faced were indeed “disgusting and very real,” coming largely from the far-right.   

    A miscarriage, and “the unravelling”

    Harry, Meghan and their associates say in episode five of the Netflix series that “everything changed” about their relations with other royal family members after the couple’s decision to take on Britain’s powerful tabloid press over what they saw as a barrage of negative, unfair articles.

    It was sparked by the Daily Mail tabloid reprinting parts of a letter that Meghan wrote to her father — which she says in the series she was advised to write by “senior members of the family.”

    “It was horrendous,” Meghan says, referring to the leaking of the letter to the media and the Daily Mail newspaper’s selective printing of portions of it. If the paper had printed the entire letter, she says, “it would it have painted a completely different picture,” as she says they removed “everything that described the media as manipulating” her father.

    The couple say they met with senior royals and lawyers and pushed for quick legal action against the newspaper’s publisher.

    “We had to draw a line,” says Meghan. But she says the royal family did nothing. 

    Recalling a conversation with Prince Charles, Harry says in the docuseries: “My father said to me: ‘Darling boy, you can’t take on the media, the media will always be the media.’” 

    That was a point on which Harry says he and his father “fundamentally disagree.”  

    “After months of saying she needs to do something about this, we took our own legal advice,” says the prince. Meghan says that after she and Harry’s 2019 decision to file a lawsuit against the Daily Mail independently, “everything changed… That litigation was probably the catalyst for all of the unravelling.”

    Harry even blamed the Daily Mail article and the stress it caused to his wife for a miscarriage she suffered in July 2020.

    “Bearing in mind the stress that that caused, the lack of sleep, and the timing of the pregnancy,” says Harry, “I can say from what I saw, that miscarriage was created by what they were trying to do to her.”

    The couple eventually won their legal battle with the Daily Mail’s publisher, with British courts ruling that the paper had breached Meghan’s privacy.

    A “terrifying” meeting, without Meghan

    As the negative press coverage continued, the couple say they felt increasingly isolated from other members of Harry’s family, so they started looking west, considering a move out of the U.K. and abandoning their royal titles.

    Meghan says in episode five that they “decided we were going to be stepping back — not stepping down, but stepping back.” But before they could agree to the details of a new arrangement with the family, Harry says that “key piece of information — that we were willing to relinquish our titles — had been leaked.”

    As Meghan returned to Canada, where they were living at the time, to be with their son Archie, Harry was called to a meeting at his grandmother’s country estate in Sandringham.

    “Imagine a roundtable conversation and you as the mom and the wife — and the target in many regards — aren’t able to have a seat at the table,” Meghan says of that meeting in the documentary, with Harry adding: “It was clear they planned it so you weren’t in the room.”


    Prince Harry praises Queen Elizabeth II amid complicated relationship with royal family

    06:14

    Harry says he went in hoping to arrange a “half in, half out” royal status for his nuclear family, “but it became very clear that goal was not up for discussion or debate.” He says the meeting descended into his father and brother, both future kings, shouting at him as the queen listened in silence.

    “It was terrifying to have my brother screaming and shouting at me, and my father say things that simply weren’t true, and my grandmother quietly sit there and take it all in,” he says.

    Harry says the meeting ended “without a solidified action plan. From their perspective, they had to believe it was more about us and the issues we had as opposed to their partner — the media — and the relationship that was causing so much pain for us. They saw what they wanted to see.”

    “The saddest part of it,” Harry adds, “was this wedge created between me and my brother, so that he’s now on the institution side. And part of that I get — I understand that’s his inheritance and its already engrained in him that part of his responsibility is the survival of this institution.”

    Harry suggests what came next was a final straw. Within just hours of the tense meeting, the tabloids were out with stories “that said part of the reason we were leaving was because Meghan had bullied us out.” He says the palace released a “joint statement” about the couple’s plans, but “no one had asked me to put that out.”

    Harry says it was a sign that his family was willing to feed lies to the press to protect the royal institution — at the expense of the truth and himself and his wife.

    “Within four hours they happened to lie to protect my brother, but in three years they never would protect us,” says the prince. It was then he says he knew they had to leave Britain, though he insists in the documentary that Meghan “never asked to leave.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Harry & Meghan to vent grievances in final Netflix episodes

    Harry & Meghan to vent grievances in final Netflix episodes

    [ad_1]

    LONDON — Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan, are expected to vent their grievances against the British monarchy on Thursday, when Netflix releases the final episodes of a series about the couple’s decision to step away from royal duties and make a new start in America.

    After the first three installments of “Harry & Meghan” focused on the British media’s coverage of the couple and the way it was influenced by racism, California-based streaming giant Netflix promoted the latest episodes with a trailer in which Harry alleges the couple were victims of “institutional gaslighting.”

    “They were happy to lie to protect my brother,” Harry says in the trailer, referring to Prince William, the heir to the throne. “They were never willing to tell the truth to protect us.”

    While it is unclear who “they” are, the trailer suggests a combination of the media and palace officials are the most likely alleged culprits. The quote is delivered over a shot of Buckingham Palace and video of William and Harry walking side-by-side during the funeral of their grandfather, Prince Philip, in April 2021.

    The potentially explosive new episodes come at a crucial moment for the monarchy as King Charles III tries to show that the institution remains alive and vibrant after the death of Queen Elizabeth II, whose personal popularity damped criticism of the crown during her 70-year reign. Charles is making the case that the House of Windsor can help unite an increasingly diverse nation by personally meeting with representatives of the ethnic groups and faiths that make up modern Britain — trying to show that whatever the allegations against him, the reality is different.

    Pauline Maclaran, author of “Royal Fever: The British Monarchy in Consumer Culture,” said the royal family are likely to be awaiting the final three episodes with “bated breath” after the first three contained few direct attacks on the institution.

    “It’s very provocative and looks like there’s kind of a war being declared,” she said ahead of the release. “But let’s wait and see.”

    Harry’s 2018 marriage to the former Meghan Markle, a biracial American actress, was once seen as a public relations coup for the royal family, boosting the monarchy’s effort to move into the 21st century by making it more representative of a multicultural nation. But the fairy tale, punctuated with a horse-drawn carriage ride and massive wedding at Windsor Castle, soon unraveled amid relentless media attention, including allegations that Meghan was self-centered and bullied her staff.

    “I wasn’t being thrown to the wolves, I was being fed to the wolves,” Meghan says in one clip included in the trailer.

    The series is Harry and Meghan’s latest effort to tell their own story after the couple stepped back from royal life in early 2020 and moved to the wealthy Southern California enclave of Montecito. Their life on an estate overlooking the Pacific Ocean has been partly funded by lucrative contracts with Netflix and Spotify.

    The first three episodes featured extensive comments from Harry and Meghan, alongside interviews with friends and allies, as well as experts on race and racism in British society. There were no comments from the newspapers mentioned.

    Race became a central issue for the monarchy following Harry and Meghan’s interview with Oprah Winfrey in March 2021. Meghan alleged that before their first child was born, a member of the royal family commented on how dark the baby’s skin might be.

    Prince William defended the royal family after the interview, telling reporters, “We’re very much not a racist family.”

    Buckingham Palace faced renewed allegations of racism earlier this month when a Black advocate for survivors of domestic abuse said a senior member of the royal household interrogated her about her origins during a reception at the palace. Coverage of the issue filled British media, overshadowing William and his wife Kate’s much-anticipated visit to Boston, which the palace had hoped would highlight their environmental credentials.

    The Netflix series is problematic for the palace because Harry and Meghan are appealing to the same younger, more culturally diverse demographic that William and Kate are trying to win over, Maclaran said.

    “I think, it has to be worrying for the royal family in terms of their future, because they really need to get this young generation on their side, to an extent, if they’re going to survive,’’ she said. “They will have to make a very big effort to make themselves appear more diverse, and I think we do see that happening a little bit, but not enough.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ESPN’s Robert Griffin III Uses Highly Racist Term On Air, Says It Was Accident

    ESPN’s Robert Griffin III Uses Highly Racist Term On Air, Says It Was Accident

    [ad_1]

    ESPN football analyst Robert Griffin III used a racist slur in his defense of Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Jalen Hurts on “Monday Night Countdown.” (Watch the video below.)

    Griffin, a former Heisman Trophy winner who played quarterback in seven NFL seasons, had a message for critics of Hurts, who has led the Eagles to a 12-1 record.

    “People said that Jalen Hurts couldn’t get it done, he could not break from the pocket, he’s not the quarterback of the future,” Griffin said. “I think he proved all those jigaboos wrong.”

    Griffin later tweeted that he meant to say “those Bug-A-Boos.”

    “Regardless of my intention, I understand the historical context of the term that came out of my mouth and I apologize,” he wrote.

    Griffin has been in hot water before for commentary that went awry. Earlier this season, he compared an allegation of indecent exposure against former receiver Antonio Brown to the defenses of Detroit and Seattle.

    “AB showed more D than the Lions and Seahawks did today,” he wrote at the time.

    HuffPost couldn’t immediately reach ESPN for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Today in History: December 11, King Edward VIII abdicates

    Today in History: December 11, King Edward VIII abdicates

    [ad_1]

    Today in History

    Today is Sunday, Dec. 11, the 345th day of 2022. There are 20 days left in the year.

    Today’s Highlight in History:

    On Dec. 11, 1936, Britain’s King Edward VIII abdicated the throne so he could marry American divorcee Wallis Warfield Simpson; his brother, Prince Albert, became King George VI.

    On this date:

    In 1816, Indiana became the 19th state.

    In 1941, Germany and Italy declared war on the United States; the U.S. responded in kind.

    In 1946, the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) was established.

    In 1972, Apollo 17’s lunar module landed on the moon with astronauts Eugene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt aboard; they became the last two men to date to step onto the lunar surface.

    In 1980, President Jimmy Carter signed legislation creating a $1.6 billion environmental “superfund” to pay for cleaning up chemical spills and toxic waste dumps. “Magnum P.I.,” starring Tom Selleck, premiered on CBS.

    In 1997, more than 150 countries agreed at a global warming conference in Kyoto, Japan, to control the Earth’s greenhouse gases.

    In 1998, majority Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee pushed through three articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, over Democratic objections.

    In 2001, in the first criminal indictment stemming from 9/11, federal prosecutors charged Zacarias Moussaoui (zak-uh-REE’-uhs moo-SOW’-ee), a French citizen of Moroccan descent, with conspiring to murder thousands in the suicide hijackings. (Moussaoui pleaded guilty to conspiracy in 2005 and was sentenced to life in prison.)

    In 2002, a congressional report found that intelligence agencies that were supposed to protect Americans from the Sept. 11 hijackers failed to do so because they were poorly organized, poorly equipped and slow to pursue clues that might have prevented the attacks.

    In 2008, former Nasdaq chairman Bernie Madoff was arrested, accused of running a multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme that wiped out the life savings of thousands of people and wrecked charities. (Madoff died in April 2021 while serving a 150-year federal prison sentence.)

    In 2018, a Virginia jury called for a sentence of life in prison plus 419 years for the man who killed a woman when he rammed his car into counterprotesters at a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. (James Alex Fields Jr. received that sentence in July, 2019.)

    In 2020, the Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit backed by President Donald Trump to overturn Joe Biden’s election victory, ending a desperate attempt to get legal issues that were rejected by state and federal judges before the nation’s highest court. The Food and Drug Administration authorized an emergency rollout of the nation’s first COVID-19 vaccine, developed by Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech; the decision came as the U.S. recorded a new daily high in the number of coronavirus deaths. (Hours before the FDA action, according to two administration officials, a high-ranking White House official told the FDA’s chief that he could face firing if the vaccine was not cleared by day’s end.)

    Ten years ago: The Michigan Legislature gave final approval to a pair of right-to-work bills that were quickly signed by Republican Gov. Rick Snyder amid angry protests by union members and their supporters. Former NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue (TAG’-lee-uh-boo) overturned the suspensions of four New Orleans Saints players in the league’s bounty investigation but said three of the players had engaged in conduct detrimental to the league.

    Five years ago: A Bangladeshi immigrant set off a crude pipe bomb in a New York City subway passageway in a botched suicide bombing; it did not fully detonate and Akayed Ullah was the only one seriously hurt. (Ullah was convicted on terrorism charges in federal court and sentenced to life in prison.) A Southern California wildfire exploded in size again, becoming the fifth largest in state history; officials handed out masks to those who stayed behind in an exclusive community where Oprah Winfrey and other stars had homes. Chef Mario Batali stepped away from his restaurant empire and his cooking show “The Chew” as he conceded that reports of sexual misconduct “match up” to his behavior. French President Emmanuel Macron awarded millions of dollars in grants to 18 climate scientists from the U.S. and elsewhere, allowing them to relocate to France for the remainder of Donald Trump’s presidential term. The Pentagon said transgender recruits would be allowed to enlist in the military beginning Jan. 1; a ban ordered by Trump had suffered a series of legal setbacks.

    One year ago: Anne Rice, author of best-selling gothic novels including “Interview With the Vampire,” died at 80 due to complications from a stroke. Alabama’s Bryce Young won the Heisman Trophy, beating out Michigan defensive end Aidan Hutchinson to give the Crimson Tide consecutive winners of college football’s most famous individual award. Football star and TV celebrity Michael Strahan (STRAY’-han) was among the latest to ride into space aboard Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin, sharing the trip with Laura Shepard Churchley, daughter of Alan Shepard, who was America’s first astronaut.

    Today’s Birthdays: Actor Rita Moreno is 91. Pop singer David Gates (Bread) is 82. Actor Donna Mills is 82. Former Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., is 81. Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is 79. Singer Brenda Lee is 78. Actor Lynda Day George is 78. Music producer Tony Brown is 76. Actor Teri Garr is 75. Movie director Susan Seidelman is 71. Actor Bess Armstrong is 69. Singer Jermaine Jackson is 68. Rock musician Mike Mesaros (The Smithereens) is 65. Rock musician Nikki Sixx (Motley Crue) is 64. Rock musician Darryl Jones (The Rolling Stones) is 61. Actor Ben Browder is 60. Singer-musician Justin Currie (Del Amitri) is 58. Rock musician David Schools (Hard Working Americans, Gov’t Mule, Widespread Panic) is 58. Actor Gary Dourdan (DOOR’-dan) is 56. Actor-comedian Mo’Nique is 55. Actor Max Martini is 53. Rapper-actor Yasiin Bey (formerly Mos Def) is 49. Actor Rider Strong is 43. Actor Xosha (ZOH’-shah) Roquemore is 38. Actor Karla Souza is 36. Actor Hailee Steinfeld is 26.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Peru’s ex-president faced bigotry for impoverished past

    Peru’s ex-president faced bigotry for impoverished past

    [ad_1]

    LIMA, Peru — When Pedro Castillo won Peru’s presidency last year, it was celebrated as a victory by the country’s poor — the peasants and Indigenous people who live deep in the Andes and whose struggles had long been ignored.

    His supporters hoped Castillo, a populist outsider of humble roots, would redress their plight — or at least end their invisibility.

    But during 17 months in office before being ousted and detained Wednesday, supporters instead saw Castillo face the racism and discrimination they often experience. He was mocked for wearing a traditional hat and poncho, ridiculed for his accent and criticized for incorporating Indigenous ceremonies into official events.

    Protests against Castillo’s government featured a donkey — a symbol of ignorance in Latin America — with a hat similar to his. The attacks were endless, so much so that observers from the Organization of American States documented it during a recent mission to the deeply unequal and divided country.

    Castillo, however, squandered the popularity he enjoyed among the poor, along with any opportunity he had to deliver on his promises to improve their lives, when he stunned the nation by ordering Congress dissolved Wednesday, followed by his ouster and arrest on charges of rebellion. His act of political suicide, which recalled some of the darkest days of the nation’s anti-democratic past, came hours before Congress was set to start a third impeachment attempt against him.

    Now with Castillo in custody and the country being led by his former vice president, Dina Boluarte, it remains to be seen if she, too, will be subjected to the same discrimination.

    Boluarte, a lawyer who worked in the state agency that hands out identity documents before becoming vice president, is not part of Peru’s political elite either. She was raised in an impoverished town in the Andes, speaks one of the country’s Indigenous languages, Quechua, and, a leftist like Castillo, promised to “fight for the nobodies.”

    The Organization of American States, in a report published last week, noted that in Peru “there are sectors that promote racism and discrimination and do not accept that a person from outside traditional political circles occupy the presidential chair.”

    “This has resulted in insults toward the image of the president,” it said.

    After being sworn in as president Wednesday, Boluarte called for a truce with the lawmakers who ousted Castillo on charges of “permanent moral incapacity.”

    Peru has had six presidents in the last six years. In 2020, it cycled through three in a week.

    Castillo, a rural schoolteacher, had never held office before narrowly winning a runoff election in June 2021 after campaigning on promises to nationalize Peru’s key mining industry and rewrite the constitution, winning wide support in the impoverished countryside.

    Peru is the second-largest copper exporter in the world and mining accounts for almost 10% of its gross domestic product and 60% of its exports. But its economy was crushed by the coronavirus pandemic, increasing poverty and eliminating the gains of a decade.

    Castillo defeated by just 44,000 votes one of the most recognizable names among Peru’s political class: Keiko Fujimori, the daughter of former strongman Alberto Fujimori, who is serving a 25-year prison sentence for the murder of Peruvians executed during his government by a clandestine military squad.

    Keiko Fujimori’s supporters have often called Castillo “terruco,” or terrorist, a term often used by the right to attack the left, poor and rural residents.

    Once in office, Castillo went through more than 70 Cabinet choices, a number of whom have been accused of wrongdoing; faced two impeachment votes, and confronted multiple criminal investigations into accusations ranging from influence peddling to plagiarism.

    Omar Coronel, a sociology professor at Peru’s Pontific Catholic University, said while the corruption accusations and criticism of Castillo’s lack of experience have merit, they were tinged with racism, “a constant in any Peruvian equation.”

    “One can criticize his political inexperience, his clumsiness, his crimes,” Coronel said. But the way in which this was framed, that it was because Castillo was from a rural community with different customs, “is a deeply racist discourse and tremendously hypocritical,” because right-wing presidents have also faced corruption allegations.

    “Social media networks have been flooded with visceral racism during all these 17 months,” Coronel said.

    Some of Castillo’s remaining supporters have protested and blocked roads across the country since his arrest. They have also gathered outside the detention facility where he and Alberto Fujimori are held.

    “They have called him all sorts of discriminatory words,” Castillo supporter Fernando Picatoste said Friday outside the prison. “It’s a racial issue. In Congress, lawmakers, who supposedly have national representation, … have the audacity to insult the president.”

    ———

    Associated Press writer Franklin Briceño contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Court upholds murder conviction in 2017 university stabbing

    Court upholds murder conviction in 2017 university stabbing

    [ad_1]

    ANNAPOLIS, Md. — The first-degree murder conviction of a white man sentenced to life in prison for stabbing a Black college student at the University of Maryland has been upheld by the state’s second-highest court.

    Sean Urbanski’s conviction was upheld by the Court of Special Appeals on Wednesday in the 2017 killing of Army 2nd Lt. Richard Collins III.

    Urbanski was initially also charged with a state hate crime, but Prince George’s County Circuit Court Judge Lawrence Hill threw out the charge, ruling prosecutors had failed to show Urbanski, who is white, stabbed Collins specifically because Collins was Black.

    Urbanski’s attorneys argued the trial judge should not have allowed jurors to consider racist memes and ties to a white nationalist Facebook group found on Urbanski’s phone, because there was no connection between the racially offensive material on the phone and the murder.

    However, the appeals panel ruled the trial judge appropriately allowed jurors to consider the material.

    “Memes depicting violence against Black people constituted relevant evidence that was probative of Appellant’s intent to violently harm Lt. Collins,” the court wrote. “Thus, this Court holds that the contested evidence was admissible to prove motive for first-degree murder and does not violate the Appellant’s First Amendment rights.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Harry and Meghan win human rights

    Harry and Meghan win human rights

    [ad_1]

    London — Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, accepted an award for their human rights work in New York on Tuesday night, just two days ahead of the release of a documentary series in which they are expected to outline their experiences as members of the British royal family. It’s widely expected that the couple will make further revelations in the Netflix series about the racism they say Meghan has suffered at the hands of Britain’s tabloid press, and even from members of the royal family.

    “They’ve stood up, they’ve talked about racial justice and they’ve talked about mental illness in a way that was incredibly brave,” Kerry Kennedy, president of the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Foundation, said at the organization’s awards gala on Tuesday night, according to Britain’s Telegraph newspaper.

    The couple was presented with the “Ripple of Hope” award alongside other honorees, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. At the event, it was announced that the couple’s Archewell Foundation would be launching a student film award for projects about women human rights defenders, in collaboration with the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Foundation.

    “For Meghan to get out there on national television and normalize discussion of mental health, at this point, is incredibly important and very brave,” Kennedy said at the gala, according to the Telegraph.

    “Together we know that a ripple of hope can turn into a wave of change,” the Sussexes said in a statement announcing the collaborative film project.

    The award came days before the release of the couple’s highly anticipated Netflix documentary series, which has prompted widespread speculation over what new accusations it might level at other members of the British royal family.


    Netflix releases “Harry and Meghan” docuseries trailer

    05:19

    Since Harry and Meghan stepped down from their roles as “working royals” and moved to the United States, they have spoken out about the racism Meghan says she experienced during her time living in the U.K., including from Harry’s family, and her struggles with her mental health.

    In one trailer for the upcoming series, Harry accuses the royal family of leaking stories to the press.

    Buckingham Palace has not commented the series.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Eye on America: Rising home energy costs, the city of Buffalo recovers, and more

    Eye on America: Rising home energy costs, the city of Buffalo recovers, and more

    [ad_1]

    Eye on America: Rising home energy costs, the city of Buffalo recovers, and more – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    We travel to Connecticut to see how homeowners can save on rising energy costs. We also visit the community of Buffalo, New York, less than a year after a tragic mass shooting. Watch these stories and more on Eye on America with host Michelle Miller.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Elon Musk ‘wanted to punch’ Kanye West after deeming the rapper’s swastika tweet an ‘incitement to violence’ 

    Elon Musk ‘wanted to punch’ Kanye West after deeming the rapper’s swastika tweet an ‘incitement to violence’ 

    [ad_1]

    Elon Musk explained on Saturday why he suspended Kanye West’s Twitter account on Friday following an antisemitic post from the rap mogul. The suspension occurred just days Musk allowed West back on Twitter. A few months earlier, West had been locked out of his account because of hate speech toward Jews.

    Musk has described himself as a “free-speech absolutist,” vowing to be less restrictive with content moderation than Twitter’s previous leadership. Advertisers, fearful of their brands appearing alongside hateful content, paused their advertising after Musk’s $44 billion takeover of Twitter on Oct. 27.

    Musk’s reasoning regarding West’s suspension might offer insights into where he’ll draw the lines on content moderation in the future.

    West’s account was suspended Friday after he posted an image of a swastika inside a Star of David. That followed West repeatedly praising Adolf Hitler while appearing live on far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ Infowars program, where he said “I love Nazis,” whom he insisted “did good things too.”

    Incitement to violence ‘against the law’

    “At some point you have to say what is incitement to violence because it is against the law in the U.S.,” Musk said Saturday during a live Q&A on Twitter Spaces. “Posting swastikas in what obviously is not a good way is an incitement to violence.”

    He added, “I personally wanted to punch Kanye, so that was definitely inciting me to violence. That’s not cool.”

    Musk had earlier tweeted of West, “I tried my best. Despite that, he again violated our rule against incitement to violence. Account will be suspended.”

    Musk also said in the Q&A that Apple had “fully resumed” advertising on Twitter, adding that the iPhone maker is the platform’s largest advertiser. He thanked other advertisers for returning, too. (Amazon plans to restart advertising on Twitter to the tune of about $100 million a year, according to a tweet on Saturday from a Platformer reporter, citing anonymous sources.)

    Musk’s content moderation plans for Twitter

    Musk has fired many Twitter employees involved in content moderation, increasing concerns about hateful content running rampant on the platform.

    The company told Reuters this week that it’s leaning heavily on automation to moderate content, favoring restrictions on distribution over outright removal of certain speech. 

    “Hate speech impressions (# of times tweet was viewed) continue to decline, despite significant user growth,” Musk tweeted. “Freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom of reach. Negativity should & will get less reach than positivity.”

    That followed the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a London nonprofit, saying on Friday that the number of daily tweets containing slurs was substantially higher compared to the monthly rate before Musk’s takeover. 

    Our new weekly Impact Report newsletter will examine how ESG news and trends are shaping the roles and responsibilities of today’s executives—and how they can best navigate those challenges. Subscribe here.

    [ad_2]

    Steve Mollman

    Source link

  • “Fuck Biden,” “Don’t Tread on Me,” and a Wisconsin Death Trip for Our Times

    “Fuck Biden,” “Don’t Tread on Me,” and a Wisconsin Death Trip for Our Times

    [ad_1]

    “The thing to worry about is meanings, not appearances.” —Michael Lesy, Wisconsin Death Trip, 1973

    Cecil, Wisconsin

    I went back twice to find out what the coffin meant, but though cars came and went in the driveway, nobody ever answered the door. Halloween in June, or a sign? Kitsch, or a warning? I’d been driving for a week, since the first night of the January 6 hearings, listening to them on the radio as I counted the flags. Not the American ones but the Trump ones. Trump 2024, two years ahead of time; and the red, white, and blue of the Confederacy, the yellow “Don’t Tread on Me” Gadsden. There are so many now. There’s new folk art too: handpainted “Fuck Biden” placards, homemade “Let’s Go Brandon” billboards, and DIY “Never Forget Benghazi” banners. The cities and towns still ripple with rainbow pride, their numbers are greater, but on many country roads the ugly emblems tick by like mile markers. 

    What was the coffin though? I was visiting friends in Cecil, Wisconsin, when we drove past it. They let me out to make a picture. “Careful,” they said, and, “We’ll come back for you,” because they didn’t want to linger. They sped away, leaving me in the green light. I made my picture. I waited. I read on my phone, on Twitter, that Wisconsin Republicans had blocked an effort to repeal a dormant 1849 law making any abortion—including for rape or incest—a felony. My friends returned, we fled. The next morning, the ruling came down: Dobbs v. Jackson, which overturned Roe v. Wade, and Wisconsin became the only “blue” state in which abortion is now effectively illegal.   

    In 1973—the same year the US Supreme Court decided 7–2 that Norma McCorvey, “Jane Roe,” had a constitutional “right to privacy” that included reproductive freedom—tennis champion Billie Jean King beat Bobby Riggs in the televised “Battle of the Sexes.” Richard Nixon declared, “I am not a crook.” Henry Kissinger won a Nobel Peace Prize. Also in 1973, a book appeared called Wisconsin Death Trip. It began as a staple-bound pamphlet and as a book became an unlikely mirror of its moment, even as it depicted the last 15 years of the previous century. History’s like that, sometimes, our faith in the forward motion of chronology suddenly evaporating. Death Trip was, on the surface, a benign album of seemingly ordinary photographs—portraits, patriotic displays, happy youth—from one small town in Wisconsin, Black River Falls, during the last decade of the 19th century. Interspersed are excerpts from the town newspaper, the Black River Falls Badger State Banner, and whispers from a “town gossip.” In 1973, a year of crises as varied and vast as those of this year, most white Americans still imagined the previous century as an idyll, apart from a brief interruption for civil war, fought for reasons they thought “romantic.” Virtuous country life, bustling urban industry. American greatness. The Banner spoke other truths. Epidemic disease, whole families consumed; diphtheria, the formation in the throat of a “false membrane”; “astonishing bank failure”; “incendiaries,” arsonists who loved to watch things burn; “vigilance committees”; “the private made public”; a woman, once a “model wife and mother,” who roamed the state smashing windows; soul after soul, remanded to the asylum; so many suicides; a woman who died “from a criminal operation performed upon herself” after she failed to find a doctor with the courage to help her. There was beauty in the book too, even in its carefully arranged photographs of dead infants. That’s what you did then, when your baby died. If you had the money, you hired the town photographer to make the infant’s picture, tucked into a little coffin with flowers, eyes tenderly brushed closed.

    By Jeff Sharlet.

    Thirty years ago, the book’s author, Michael Lesy, was my teacher. The book, his first, has followed me ever since. “You can get as philosophical as you want,” Michael said when I told him I was headed to Black River Falls. He mimicked cheap gravitas. “‘From the deep ground grows the tree of life… ’” Then comes the end, yours or worse, that of those you love—“and nobody likes it when it happens to them.” A death trip is a memento mori, is a reminder that everybody dies. If that seems obvious, consider the desperate denial embedded in the phrase “Make America Great Again”; the light-eating vanity of Trump; the delusion of a golden brand that will shine eternally. Consider this gloating post-Roe meme: “A thousand-year White Boy Summer starts today.” But nothing lasts forever, not even white boys. A death trip, meanwhile, summons us to the precarious real. Not the myth of greatness. The pulse of uncertainty. The living, such as we are. 

    I got the news through a Wisconsin man I’d stopped to speak with that morning, who got it by phone from his wife, who heard it from her doctor, to whom she had gone not to end a pregnancy but to prepare for one. “Mary,” who told me her story on the newly necessary condition of anonymity, had been in the stirrups when the ruling came down. She wanted a baby, and this was the next step in the reproductive technology she and her husband had chosen—until suddenly it wasn’t. Following a course of fertility drugs, Mary now possessed three mature eggs. The nurse stepped out to consult the doctor. But when the doctor entered the examination room, she said, “I’m holding back tears.” 

    “I can’t recommend you continue,” the doctor said. Three eggs meant a risk of multiples. Twins Mary could handle. Triplets she could not. Not her finances and not her body. If she went forward, there was a miniscule chance all three eggs could be fertilized. One embryo might have to be removed. And that, as of  9:11 a.m. central time, June 24, in Wisconsin, could be a felony.

    [ad_2]

    Jeff Sharlet

    Source link