ReportWire

Tag: QQQ

  • SK Wealth Management LLC Acquires Shares of 1,316 Invesco QQQ $QQQ

    SK Wealth Management LLC acquired a new position in Invesco QQQ (NASDAQ:QQQFree Report) during the third quarter, Holdings Channel.com reports. The firm acquired 1,316 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock, valued at approximately $803,000.

    A number of other institutional investors and hedge funds also recently added to or reduced their stakes in the business. Kingstone Capital Partners Texas LLC raised its stake in shares of Invesco QQQ by 704,593.7% during the 2nd quarter. Kingstone Capital Partners Texas LLC now owns 67,615,365 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $37,299,340,000 after buying an additional 67,605,770 shares during the last quarter. 1832 Asset Management L.P. raised its position in Invesco QQQ by 100.0% during the second quarter. 1832 Asset Management L.P. now owns 2,115 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $1,167,000 after acquiring an additional 40,999,982 shares in the last quarter. Symphony Financial Ltd. Co. acquired a new position in Invesco QQQ in the second quarter valued at approximately $1,236,482,000. HRT Financial LP lifted its holdings in Invesco QQQ by 118.3% in the second quarter. HRT Financial LP now owns 3,145,578 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $1,735,226,000 after acquiring an additional 1,704,600 shares during the period. Finally, JPMorgan Chase & Co. boosted its position in Invesco QQQ by 42.4% in the 2nd quarter. JPMorgan Chase & Co. now owns 4,895,265 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock worth $2,700,424,000 after purchasing an additional 1,457,109 shares in the last quarter. 44.58% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.

    Invesco QQQ Stock Up 1.3%

    Shares of NASDAQ QQQ opened at $617.05 on Monday. The firm’s 50 day simple moving average is $614.14 and its 200-day simple moving average is $584.06. Invesco QQQ has a 12 month low of $402.39 and a 12 month high of $637.01.

    Invesco QQQ Increases Dividend

    The company also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Wednesday, December 31st. Investors of record on Monday, December 22nd will be given a dividend of $0.7941 per share. This is a boost from Invesco QQQ’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.69. This represents a $3.18 annualized dividend and a yield of 0.5%. The ex-dividend date is Monday, December 22nd.

    Invesco QQQ News Roundup

    Here are the key news stories impacting Invesco QQQ this week:

    • Positive Sentiment: Shareholders approved converting QQQ to an open‑ended ETF and Invesco immediately cut QQQ’s expense ratio by about 10%, lowering ongoing costs for holders and improving QQQ’s competitiveness — a likely catalyst for inflows. Invesco cuts QQQ expense ratio by 10% after shareholders approve open-ended ETF conversion
    • Positive Sentiment: Invesco’s broader “modernization” of QQQ (approved by investors) enables operational flexibility and a more standard ETF structure, which should make the fund more attractive to large institutional and retail buyers over time. Invesco QQQ Gets Green Light For Modernization
    • Positive Sentiment: Softer-than-expected November inflation helped lift growth names and ETFs tied to the Nasdaq‑100 by increasing the odds of Fed rate cuts next year — a key macro driver behind the recent bounce in QQQ. QQQ ETF News, 12-19-2025
    • Neutral Sentiment: QQQ remains above its 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages and close to its 52‑week high, indicating positive momentum, but that also raises the bar for additional upside without a fresh catalyst. (Context: recent market commentary and CPI reads.)
    • Negative Sentiment: A technical bearish signal on the Nasdaq‑100 chart was flagged today, suggesting a possible short‑term pullback or consolidation risk for QQQ after this rally; traders should watch support levels and volume for clues. The Nasdaq-100 ETF just flashed a bearish chart signal. Here’s what happens next.

    Invesco QQQ Company Profile

    (Free Report)

    PowerShares QQQ Trust, Series 1 is a unit investment trust that issues securities called Nasdaq-100 Index Tracking Stock. The Trust’s investment objective is to provide investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Trust provides investors with the opportunity to purchase units of beneficial interest in the Trust representing proportionate undivided interests in the portfolio of securities held by the Trust, which consists of substantially all of the securities, in substantially the same weighting, as the component securities of the Nasdaq-100 Index.

    See Also

    Want to see what other hedge funds are holding QQQ? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Invesco QQQ (NASDAQ:QQQFree Report).

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Invesco QQQ (NASDAQ:QQQ)



    Receive News & Ratings for Invesco QQQ Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Invesco QQQ and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Prestige Wealth Management Group LLC Sells 30 Shares of Invesco QQQ (NASDAQ:QQQ)

    Prestige Wealth Management Group LLC Sells 30 Shares of Invesco QQQ (NASDAQ:QQQ)

    Prestige Wealth Management Group LLC reduced its stake in shares of Invesco QQQ (NASDAQ:QQQFree Report) by 11.1% in the second quarter, according to its most recent filing with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 241 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock after selling 30 shares during the period. Prestige Wealth Management Group LLC’s holdings in Invesco QQQ were worth $116,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

    Several other institutional investors and hedge funds have also recently modified their holdings of QQQ. Ballentine Partners LLC boosted its holdings in Invesco QQQ by 0.3% during the second quarter. Ballentine Partners LLC now owns 39,092 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock worth $18,730,000 after purchasing an additional 115 shares during the last quarter. Ellis Investment Partners LLC boosted its stake in shares of Invesco QQQ by 0.9% in the 2nd quarter. Ellis Investment Partners LLC now owns 43,165 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock worth $20,681,000 after buying an additional 405 shares during the last quarter. Valence8 US LP grew its holdings in shares of Invesco QQQ by 14.9% in the second quarter. Valence8 US LP now owns 76,711 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $36,753,000 after acquiring an additional 9,951 shares in the last quarter. Arlington Trust Co LLC grew its holdings in shares of Invesco QQQ by 3.4% in the second quarter. Arlington Trust Co LLC now owns 1,636 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $784,000 after acquiring an additional 54 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Koss Olinger Consulting LLC purchased a new stake in shares of Invesco QQQ during the second quarter valued at approximately $2,447,000. 44.58% of the stock is owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.

    Invesco QQQ Price Performance

    QQQ stock opened at $448.69 on Monday. The stock’s fifty day simple moving average is $472.43 and its two-hundred day simple moving average is $456.33. Invesco QQQ has a 1-year low of $342.35 and a 1-year high of $503.52.

    Invesco QQQ Increases Dividend

    The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Wednesday, July 31st. Investors of record on Monday, June 24th were given a dividend of $0.7615 per share. The ex-dividend date was Monday, June 24th. This represents a $3.05 annualized dividend and a yield of 0.68%. This is a positive change from Invesco QQQ’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.57.

    About Invesco QQQ

    (Free Report)

    PowerShares QQQ Trust, Series 1 is a unit investment trust that issues securities called Nasdaq-100 Index Tracking Stock. The Trust’s investment objective is to provide investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Trust provides investors with the opportunity to purchase units of beneficial interest in the Trust representing proportionate undivided interests in the portfolio of securities held by the Trust, which consists of substantially all of the securities, in substantially the same weighting, as the component securities of the Nasdaq-100 Index.

    Featured Stories

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Invesco QQQ (NASDAQ:QQQ)

    Receive News & Ratings for Invesco QQQ Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Invesco QQQ and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Here’s an easy way to make a more concentrated play on the ‘Magnificent Seven’ stocks

    Here’s an easy way to make a more concentrated play on the ‘Magnificent Seven’ stocks

    Investors in index funds have been well rewarded by a high concentration in the largest technology companies over the past decade. But there are also continuing warnings about the risk of such heavy concentrations, even in index funds that track the S&P 500. Solutions are offered to limit this risk, but if you expect Big Tech to continue to drive the broad market returns over the coming years, why not make an even more focused bet?

    Comparisons of three index-fund approaches highlight how successful concentration in the “Magnificent Seven” has been.

    The Magnificent Seven are Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    +0.16%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +0.72%
    ,
    Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    -2.03%
    ,
    Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    +2.17%
    ,
    Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    -0.27%

    GOOG,
    -0.32%
    ,
    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    +9.37%

    and Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +1.67%
    .
    We have listed them in the order of their concentration within the Invesco S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    which tracks the S&P 500
    SPX.
    The U.S. benchmark index is weighted by market capitalization, as is the Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP
    and the Russell indexes.

    SPY is 27.6% concentrated in the Magnificent Seven. One way to play the same group of 500 stocks but eliminate concentration risk is to take an equal-weighted approach to the index, which has worked well for certain long periods. But here, we’re focusing on how well the concentrated strategy has worked.

    Let’s take a look at the group’s concentration in three popular index approaches, then look at long-term performance and consider what happened in 2022 as rising interest rates helped crush the tech sector.

    Here are the portfolio weightings for the Magnificent Seven in SPY, along with those of the Invesco QQQ Trust
    QQQ,
    which tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
    NDX
    and the Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
    XLG
    :

    Company

    Ticker

    % of SPY

    % of QQQ

    % of XLG

    Apple Inc.

    AAPL,
    +0.16%
    7.05%

    10.85%

    12.46%

    Microsoft Cor.

    MSFT,
    +0.72%
    6.65%

    9.53%

    11.76%

    Amazon.com Inc.

    AMZN,
    +2.17%
    3.30%

    5.50%

    5.84%

    Nvidia Corp.

    NVDA,
    -2.03%
    3.02%

    4.44%

    5.33%

    Alphabet Inc. Class A

    GOOGL,
    -0.27%
    2.17%

    3.12%

    3.83%

    Alphabet Inc. Class C

    GOOG,
    -0.32%
    1.88%

    3.11%

    3.32%

    Tesla Inc.

    TSLA,
    +9.37%
    1.79%

    3.10%

    3.17%

    Meta Platforms Inc. Class A

    META,
    +1.67%
    1.77%

    3.60%

    3.12%

    Totals

     

    27.63%

    43.25%

    48.83%

    Sources: Invesco Ltd., State Street Corp.

    The same group of seven companies (eight stocks with two common share classes for Alphabet) is at the top of each exchange-traded fund’s portfolio, although the top seven for QQQ aren’t in the same order as those for SPY and XLG. QQQ’s weighting was changed recently as the underlying Nasdaq-100 underwent a “special rebalancing” last month.

    Here’s a five-year chart comparing the performance of the three approaches. All returns in this article include reinvested dividends.


    FactSet

    QQQ has been the clear winner for five years, but it is also worth noting how well XLG has performed when compared with SPY. This “top 50” approach to the S&P 500 incorporates many stocks that aren’t listed on the Nasdaq and therefore cannot be included in QQQ, which itself is made up of the largest 100 nonfinancial companies in the full Nasdaq Composite Index
    COMP,
    +0.45%
    .

    Examples of stocks held by XLG that aren’t held by QQQ include such non-tech stalwarts as Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
    BRK.B,
    +0.77%
    ,
    Johnson & Johnson
    JNJ,
    +0.79%
    ,
    Procter & Gamble Co.
    PG,
    +0.94%
    ,
    Home Depot Inc.
    HD,
    -0.12%

    and Nike Inc.
    NKE,
    -0.42%
    .

    Now let’s go deeper into long-term performance. First, here are the total returns for various time periods:

    ETF

    3 Years

    5 Years

    10 Years

    15 Years

    20 Years

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY
    40%

    69%

    223%

    370%

    531%

    Invesco QQQ Trust
    QQQ
    41%

    113%

    430%

    882%

    1,158%

    Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
    XLG
    41%

    85%

    262%

    404%

    N/A

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each ETF, company or index.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    There is no 20-year return for XLG because this ETF was established in 2005.

    For five years and longer, QQQ has been the runaway leader, but for 5, 10 and 15 years, XLG has also beaten SPY handily, with broader industry exposure.

    Something else to consider is that during 2022, when SPY was down 18.2%, XLG fell 24.3% and QQQ dropped 32.6%.

    For disciplined long-term investors, the tech pain of 2022 may not seem to have been a small price to pay for outperformance. And it may have been easier to take the pounding when holding SPY or even XLG that year.

    Here’s a look at the average annual returns for the three ETFs:

    ETF

    3 years

    5 years

    10 years

    15 years

    20 years

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY
    11.8%

    11.0%

    12.4%

    10.9%

    9.6%

    Invesco QQQ Trust
    QQQ
    12.0%

    16.3%

    18.2%

    16.4%

    13.5%

    Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
    XLG
    12.2%

    13.1%

    13.7%

    11.4%

    N/A

    Source: FactSet

    So the question remains — do you believe that the largest technology companies will continue to lead the stock market for the next decade at least? If so, a more concentrated index approach may be for you, provided you can withstand the urge to sell into a declining market, such as the one we experienced last year.

    Here is something else to keep in mind. In a note to clients on Monday, Doug Peta, the chief U.S. investment strategist at BCA, made a fascinating point: “The only novel development is that all the heaviest hitters now hail from Tech and Tech-adjacent sectors and are therefore more prone to move together than they were at the end of 2004, when the seven largest stocks came from six different sectors. “

    Nothing lasts forever. Peta continued by suggesting that investors who are tired of big tech taking all the glory “need only wait.”

    “[I]f history is any guide, their time at the top of the capitalization scale will be short,” he wrote.

    Don’t miss: These four Dow stocks take top prizes for dividend growth

    Source link

  • Here are 4 of the biggest changes to the Nasdaq 100 from Monday’s special rebalancing

    Here are 4 of the biggest changes to the Nasdaq 100 from Monday’s special rebalancing

    New weightings for the largest stocks in the Nasdaq 100 are taking effect on Monday following the index’s second “special rebalancing” in 25 years.

    See: Nasdaq rebalancing is coming, and it’s boosting interest in Friday’s $2.3 trillion option expiration

    These new levels were shared ahead of time with Goldman Sachs Group Chief U.S. Equity Analyst David Kostin. Kostin and his team have published a report on the changes that was shared with Goldman clients and the press last week.

    Here are four of the most important shifts highlighted in Kostin’s note:

    • The seven stocks with the heaviest weightings in the Nasdaq 100 are seeing their collective weight reduced to 44% from 56%.

    • At the sector level, information technology will continue to account for roughly half of the index, but the sector’s weight will decline to 49% from 51%.

    • Apple Inc.
      AAPL,
      +0.56%

      and Microsoft Corp.
      MSFT,
      +0.19%

      will remain the index’s largest constituents, but their index weights will be reduced by roughly four percentage points — to 12% and 10%, respectively.

    • Broadcom’s index weight is seeing the biggest increase, and will see its weighting increase by 64 basis points to 3%.

    The Goldman analyst summarized how the new weightings would impact the index’s 25 largest constituents in the chart below.


    GOLDMAN SACHS

    According to Nasdaq representatives, the Nasdaq 100 is the most popular of the exchange’s indexes. So far this year, it has outperformed the Nasdaq Composite, a broader index including every company traded on the exchange. The Nasdaq 100 is up 41.2%, to the Composite’s 34.4%, according to FactSet data.

    EPFR data show $261 billion in mutual fund and exchange-traded fund assets are benchmarked to the Nasdaq 100, including the Invesco QQQ Trust Series
    QQQ,
    +0.11%
    ,
    better known by its ticker QQQ. More than $250 billion of this money is invested in passive benchmark-tracking strategies.

    Nasdaq decided to implement the special rebalancing earlier this month to try and ward off concentration risk after its seven largest components surged earlier this year. According to its official index-management methodology, Nasdaq aims to keep the combined weighting of its largest constituents to 40%.

    Kostin said he doesn’t expect these changes to have much of an impact on markets, arguing that the previous special rebalancing didn’t move the index much, either.

    Both the Nasdaq 100 and Nasdaq Composite were slightly lower on Monday as big-tech names continued to lag the S&P 500 and suddenly high-flying Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.57%
    ,
    just like they did last week.

    Nasdaq 100-tracking QQQ
    QQQ,
    +0.11%

    was off by 0.2% at $374 per share Monday morning, while the Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +0.19%

    was down 0.2% at 14, 013.

    Source link

  • 3 Reasons Sirius XM Stock Just Surged 42%

    3 Reasons Sirius XM Stock Just Surged 42%

    3 Reasons Sirius XM Stock Just Surged 42%

    Sirius XM Holdings stock surged 42% Thursday on an apparent combination of short covering, an unwinding of a spread trade involving Liberty SiriusXM, and possible buying related to a rebalancing of the Nasdaq 100 index.

    An error has occurred, please try again later.

    Source link

  • Nasdaq is making a big change to its most popular index. Here’s how it might impact your portfolio.

    Nasdaq is making a big change to its most popular index. Here’s how it might impact your portfolio.

    Big Tech has gotten too big for Nasdaq’s liking.

    So the exchange has decided to make some changes to the Nasdaq 100 index, its most popular index, according to company representatives, ostensibly to diminish the concentration risk that accompanies having an index that derives more than half of its value from just seven companies.

    Nasdaq announced late last week that the Nasdaq 100
    NDX,
    +1.24%

    will undergo a special rebalancing that will take effect prior to the market open on July 24. It’s only the third time that Nasdaq has announced such an impromptu rejiggering of how much individual stocks contribute to the index. Although Nasdaq can also reconstitute the index regularly every December, and there’s also a mechanism to rebalance every quarter as well.

    In a statement announcing the move, the exchange alluded to the fact that the largest companies in the technology sector have too much sway over the index’s price. Nasdaq said special rebalancing can be implemented “to address overconcentration in the index by redistributing the weights.”

    The rebalancing comes at a critical time. The Nasdaq 100 has risen 40% since the start of 2023, largely thanks to the “Magnificent Seven,” a handful of megacap technology names that have powered much of the U.S. stock market’s rally this year.

    These gains have pushed the index to its highest level since mid-January 2022, meaning that Big Tech has now retraced nearly all of last year’s losses, and might soon be headed for the all-time highs from November 2021.

    As of Thursday, the Magnificent Seven stocks — Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    +3.53%
    ,
    Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    +0.90%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +1.42%
    ,
    Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    +1.57%
    ,
    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    +0.82%
    ,
    Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +3.70%

    and Alphabet Inc.’s Class A
    GOOGL,
    +1.53%

    and Class C
    GOOG,
    +1.62%

    shares — accounted for 55% of the Nasdaq 100’s market capitalization, while the top five names account for more than 45%.

    According to Nasdaq’s official methodology, the goal is to keep the aggregate weighting of the biggest stocks below 40%. In fact, it’s possible that Tesla Inc. surpassing 4.5% of the index earlier this month triggered the Nasdaq’s rebalancing announcement, according to analysts from UBS Group AG
    UBS,
    +1.87%
    .

    Exactly how it plans to accomplish this isn’t yet known. Nasdaq said the new weighting scheme will be unveiled on Friday, likely after the U.S. market close. But the UBS team has an educated guess.

    “The quarterly reviews would dictate that the aggregate weight to securities exceeding 4.5% be set to 40%. If that’s the approach Nasdaq takes, then we’d expect the weights of Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, and Tesla to be reduced,” the team said in a note shared with MarketWatch.

    For investors trying to anticipate how this might impact their portfolios, here the answers to a few key questions.

    Could the rebalancing kill the U.S. stock market rally?

    Not likely. Or rather: if the rally in Big Tech does falter, history suggests it won’t be because of the rebalancing.

    Here’s more on that from Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, who discussed the topic in commentary emailed to MarketWatch on Wednesday.

    “…[T]here is the natural inclination to think that the upcoming special reweighting is a sign that large cap disruptive tech is set to roll over because a handful of names have so handily outpaced the rest of its notional peers,” Colas said.

    “History suggests otherwise. The last 2 one-off reweights were in 2011 and 1998. Neither proved to be the end of a Nasdaq 100/tech stock bull market. Not even close, really.”

    More immediately, ETF experts expect trading around the rebalancing will be relatively muted.

    “While it sounds scary, Investors are well positioned — this has been well bantered about,” said David Lutz, head of ETF Trading at Jones Trading, in comments emailed to MarketWatch.

    How could this benefit investors?

    Since megacap technology stocks don’t pay much, if anything, in dividends, the rebalancing could increase the amount of dividends that ETF investors receive each year, according to a team of analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    Since the largest constituents pay a dividend yield well below the index average, the redistribution of weight from them to the rest of the index will result in a “meaningful boost” to the regular payouts received by investors, which will boost the total return of Nasdaq 100-tracking ETFs and mutual funds.

    Will there be any short-term costs associated with the rebalancing?

    There might be. Since the new index weightings will be announced in advance, investors will have plenty of time to front-run the rebalancing trade.

    Still, there are plenty of hedge funds and proprietary trading firms that run strategies explicitly designed to profit from rebalancing. These firms profits have to come from somewhere, and the logical place would be the fund managers of the Invesco QQQ exchange-traded fund
    QQQ,
    +1.26%

    QQQM,
    +1.27%
    .

    “There are prop traders and hedge funds that run the strategy of providing liquidity to indexes with the expectation that they’ll earn profits,” said Roni Israelov, president and CIO at Wealth Manager NDVR, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    “if they are earning profits by providing that liquidity, the expectation is those profits are being paid by investors in those funds.”

    So far at least, markets appear to have taken news of the rebalancing in stride. Megacap technology names tumbled earlier this week, but they’ve since recouped those losses and then some.

    The Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +1.15%
    ,
    another Nasdaq index that isn’t quite as heavily weighted toward Big Tech, rose 1.2% to 13,918.96.

    Source link

  • Option demand explodes in June as investors use bullish bets to chase stock-market rally

    Option demand explodes in June as investors use bullish bets to chase stock-market rally

    Trading in U.S. stock option contracts has surged in 2023 as retail and institutional traders have harnessed bullish call options to chase a runaway rally in U.S. stocks, market analysts told MarketWatch.

    As of Friday, 46 million option contracts linked to U.S. equity indexes, individual stocks and exchange-traded funds have traded hands every trading session on average this month, according to an analysis by Callie Cox, a U.S. equity strategist at eToro.

    This means that, barring a sudden drop-off in trading activity, June is on track to be the busiest month for option traders ever, Cox said. That is particularly notable given that the summer months are typically more placid on Wall Street.

    “It’s pretty incredible for a summer month. It shows how engaged investors are after such a strong rally,” said Callie Cox, a U.S. equity strategist at eToro, during an interview with MarketWatch.


    ETORO

    Much of the demand has centered on call options: trading volume in these contracts has averaged 26 million a day so far, leaving June on track for the heaviest month of call buying since November 2021, Cox said.

    Several overlapping trends have contributed to the surge in option demand, market analysts said.

    Investors wary about a rally that recently carried the S&P 500 index to its highest level in 14 months have opted to buy short-dated calls. Often these are contracts tied to the S&P 500 or the index-tracking SPDR S&P 500 exchange-traded fund with less than 24 hours left until expiration, a class of options referred to as “0DTEs” for “zero days to expiration.”

    Some traders see these cheap short-term bets as a particularly affordable, if risky, strategy for reaping gains as the market marches higher, according to market analysts and portfolio managers who spoke with MarketWatch.

    And when stocks pull back, investors often change their strategy and instead of buying calls, opt to take advantage by buying or selling put options.

    While a call represents a bet that a given index, stock or currency will rise, a put represents the opposite.

    In addition to betting on calls tied to popular equity indexes and exchange-traded funds like the S&P 500 or the Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1 ETF
    QQQ,
    -0.99%
    ,
    investors are also scooping up bullish options tied to Nvidia Corp. and other market leaders, hoping to maximize any returns from the artificial intelligence boom.

    The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week that trading in call options tied to shares of Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    -1.90%

    and two other chip stocks, Advanced Micro Devices
    AMD,
    -0.62%

    and Intel Corp.,
    INTC,
    +0.89%

    has surged fivefold since the beginning of the year, citing data from Cboe Global Markets, owner of the world’s largest options exchange.

    But demand for calls has expanded beyond megacap technology names into areas of the market that have trailed since the start of the year, including small-cap stocks and others, which have rallied in June.

    The Russell 2000
    RUT,
    -1.44%
    ,
    an index that tracks small-cap stocks traded in the U.S., is up nearly 5% year-to-date. As of the end of May, it was marginally negative for the year, options experts said.

    “With mega cap technology leading the indexes higher, investors started to play catch-up by trying to buy the second-tier and heavily shorted companies,” said Alon Rosin, head of equity derivatives at Oppenheimer, in emailed commentary shared with MarketWatch.

    This means that investors’ rush to try to keep up with the market hasn’t only benefited hot AI-stocks.

    Amy Wu Silverman, head of derivatives strategy at RBC Capital Markets, made a similar observation in a recent note to clients where she pointed out that call buying has surged for both companies expected to benefit from the AI boom, as well as stocks in an RBC basket of companies that are threatened by it — stocks like Robert Half International
    RHI,
    -0.54%
    ,
    Chegg Inc.
    CHGG,
    -4.00%

    and Yext Inc.
    YEXT,
    -2.74%
    ,
    she said.

    Silverman said heavy call buying in this group is indicative of the market’s “extreme call exuberance.”

    Call buying has helped send popular indicators of positioning like the put-call ratio and skew, which measures the cost of downside protection via puts vs. demand for upside exposure via calls, to their lowest levels of the year earlier this month.

    “People are reaching for upside via calls, and you’re seeing skew falling due to the fact that everybody has been buying calls,” said Mark Callahan, head of trading and a portfolio manager at Aptus Capital Advisors, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    Callahan manages several active exchange-traded funds that require heavy option trading.

    U.S. stocks have marched higher this year, with the S&P 500 rising for five straight weeks through June 16, its longest streak of weekly gains since November 2021. The Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    -1.01%

    has seen even stronger performance, and its eight-week win streak has been heralded as the tech-heavy index’s longest rally since 2019, according to FactSet data.

    The S&P 500 has risen more than 13% so far this year, while the Nasdaq has gained more than 30%. Both have erased much of their losses from 2022, which was the worst year for stocks since 2008. Last week, both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq hit their highest levels since April 2022.

    However, there are some signs that the torrid rally might be in the midst of a pullback as the S&P 500, Nasdaq and Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    -0.65%

    are all on track to finish the week lower on Friday.

    Source link

  • U.S. stocks have barely budged since last summer. Where will they go next?

    U.S. stocks have barely budged since last summer. Where will they go next?

    U.S. stocks have shrugged off a number of threats since the start of the year, powering through the worst U.S. bank failures since the 2008 financial crisis, while resisting the pull of rising short-term Treasury yields.

    This helped all three main U.S. equity benchmarks finish the first quarter in the green on Friday, but that doesn’t change the fact that the S&P 500 index, the main U.S. equity benchmark, has barely budged since last summer.

    “The market has handled a lot of gut punches recently and it’s still standing in this range,” said JJ Kinahan, CEO of IG North America, owner of brokerage firm Tastytrade. “I think that’s a sign that the market is very healthy.”

    The S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    +1.44%

    traded at 4,110.41 on Sept. 12, 2022, according to FactSet data, just before aggressive Federal Reserve commentary on interest rates and worrisome inflation data triggered a sharp selloff. By comparison, the index finished Friday’s session at 4,109.31.

    Some equity analysts expect it to take months, or perhaps even longer, for U.S. stocks to break out of this range. Where they might go next also is anyone’s guess.

    Investors likely won’t know until some of the uncertainty that has been plaguing the market over the past year clears up.

    At the top of the market’s wish list is more information about how the Fed’s interest rate hikes are impacting the economy. This will be crucial in determining whether the central bank might need to keep raising interest rates in 2024, several analysts told MarketWatch.

    Stocks are volatile, but stuck in a circle

    The S&P 500 has vacillated in a roughly 600-point range since September, but at the same time, the number of outsize swings from day-to-day has become even more pronounced, making it more difficult to ascertain the health of the market, analysts said.

    The S&P 500 rose or fell by 1% or more in 29 trading sessions in the first quarter, including Friday, when the S&P 500 closed 1.4% higher on the last session of the month and quarter, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    That’s nearly double the quarterly average of just 14.9 days going back to 1928, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The S&P 500 was created in 1957, and performance data taken from before then is based on a historical reconstruction of the index’s performance.

    Stocks also look almost placid in comparison with other assets. For example, Treasurys saw an explosion of volatility in the wake of the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in March. The 2-year Treasury yield
    TMUBMUSD02Y,
    4.114%

    logged its largest monthly decline in 15 years in March as a result.

    “You can’t find any clues about where we’re going by watching the S&P 500,” said John Kosar, chief market strategist at Asbury Research, in a phone interview with MarketWatch. “Ten years ago, you could look at the movement of the S&P 500 and a simple indicator like volume and get a back-of-the-envelope idea of how healthy the market is. But you can’t do that anymore because of all this intraday volatility.”

    See: Stock-option traders are creating explosive volatility in the market. Here’s what that means for your portfolio.

    The S&P 500’s 7% advance in the first quarter of this year has helped to mask weakness underneath the surface. Specifically, only 33% of S&P 500 companies’ shares have managed to outperform the index since the start of the quarter, well below the long-term average, according to figures provided to MarketWatch by analysts at UBS Group UBS.

    Mega stocks, Fed to the rescue?

    If it weren’t for a flight-to-safety rally in large capitalization technology names like Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    +1.56%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +1.50%

    and Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    +1.44%
    ,
    the S&P 500 and Nasdaq would likely be in much worse shape.

    Advancing megacap tech stocks have helped the Invesco QQQ
    QQQ,
    +1.66%

    Trust exchange-traded fund, which tracks the Nasdaq 100, enter a fresh bull market in the past week, as the closely watched market gauge closed more than 20% above its 52-week closing low from late December, according to FactSet data. That’s helped to offset weakness in cyclical sectors like financials and real estate.

    Tech behemoths have also benefited from the hype around artificial intelligence platforms like OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

    Confusion about the Fed’s quantitative tightening efforts to reduce the size of its balance sheet also helped muddle the outlook for markets.

    For example, the size of the Fed’s balance sheet has increased again in recent weeks as banks have tapped the central bank’s emergency lending programs in the wake of the failure of two regional banks, undoing some of the central bank’s efforts to shrink its balance sheet by allowing some of its Treasury and mortgage-backed bond holdings to mature without reinvesting the proceeds.

    Some analysts said this is akin to sending the market mixed signals.

    “It seems to be both tightening and loosening right now,” said Andrew Adams, an analyst with Saut Strategy, in a recent note to clients.

    What it takes for a break out

    U.S. stocks have remained rangebound for long stretches in the past.

    Beginning in late 2014, the S&P 500 traded in a tight range for roughly two years. Between Jan. 1, 2015 and Nov. 9, 2016, the day after former President Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton to become president of the U.S., the S&P 500 gained less than 100 points, according to FactSet data.

    At the time, equity analysts blamed signs of softening economic activity in China and weakness in the U.S. energy industry for the market’s lackluster performance.

    But after once it became clear that Trump would win the White House, stocks embarked on a steady ascent as investors bet that the Republican economic agenda, which included corporate tax cuts and deregulation, would likely bolster corporate profits.

    It wasn’t until the fourth quarter of 2018 that stocks turned volatile once again as the S&P 500 wiped out its gains from earlier in the year, before ultimately finishing 2018 with a 6.2% drop for the year, according to FactSet.

    As investors brace for a flood of first-quarter corporate earnings in the coming weeks, Kinahan said he expects stocks could remain range bound for at least a few more months.

    “There’s going to be a very cautious outlook still, which should keep us in this range,” he said.

    Source link

  • The Fed and the stock market are set for a showdown this week. What’s at stake.

    The Fed and the stock market are set for a showdown this week. What’s at stake.

    Let’s get ready to rumble.

    The Federal Reserve and investors appear to be locked in what one veteran market watcher has described as an epic game of “chicken.” What Fed Chair Jerome Powell says Wednesday could determine the winner.

    Here’s the conflict. Fed policy makers have steadily insisted that the fed-funds rate, now at 4.25% to 4.5%, must rise above 5% and, importantly, stay there as the central bank attempts to bring inflation back to its 2% target. Fed-funds futures, however, show money-market traders aren’t fully convinced the rate will top 5%. Perhaps more galling to Fed officials, traders expect the central bank to deliver cuts by year-end.

    Stock-market investors have also bought into the latter policy “pivot” scenario, fueling a January surge for beaten down technology and growth stocks, which are particularly interest rate-sensitive. Treasury bonds have rallied, pulling down yields across the curve. And the U.S. dollar has weakened.

    Cruisin’ for a bruisin’?

    To some market watchers, investors now appear way too big for their breeches. They expect Powell to attempt to take them down a peg or two.

    How so? Look for Powell to be “unambiguously hawkish,” when he holds a news conference following the conclusion of the Fed’s two-day policy meeting on Wednesday, said Jose Torres, senior economist at Interactive Brokers, in a phone interview.

    “Hawkish” is market lingo used to describe a central banker sounding tough on inflation and less worried about economic growth.

    In Powell’s case, that would likely mean emphasizing that the labor market remains significantly out of balance, calling for a significant reduction in job openings that will require monetary policy to remain restrictive for a long period, Torres said.

    If Powell sounds sufficiently hawkish, “financial conditions will tighten up quickly,” Torres said, in a phone interview. Treasury yields “would rise, tech would drop and the dollar would rise after a message like that.” If not, then expect the tech and Treasury rally to continue and the dollar to get softer.

    Hanging loose

    Indeed, it’s a loosening of financial conditions that’s seen trying Powell’s patience. Looser conditions are represented by a tightening of credit spreads, lower borrowing costs, and higher stock prices that contribute to speculative activity and increased risk taking, which helps fuel inflation. It also helps weaken the dollar, contributes to inflation through higher import costs, Torres said, noting that indexes measuring financial conditions have fallen for 14 straight weeks.

    The Chicago Fed’s National Financial Conditions Index provides a weekly update on U.S. financial conditions. Positive values have been historically associated with tighter-than-average financial conditions, while negative values have been historically associated with looser-than-average financial conditions.


    Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, fred.stlouisfed.org

    Powell and the Fed have certainly expressed concerns about the potential for loose financial conditions to undercut their inflation-fighting efforts.

    The minutes of the Fed’s December meeting. released in early January, contained this attention-grabbing line: “Participants noted that, because monetary policy worked importantly through financial markets, an unwarranted easing in financial conditions, especially if driven by a misperception by the public of the Committee’s reaction function, would complicate the Committee’s effort to restore price stability.”

    That was taken by some investors as a sign that the Fed wasn’t eager to see a sustained stock market rally and might even be inclined to punish financial markets if conditions loosened too far.

    Read: The Fed delivered a message to the stock market: Big rallies will prolong pain

    If that interpretation is correct, it underlines the notion that the Fed “put” — the central bank’s seemingly longstanding willingness to respond to a plunging market with a loosening of policy — is largely kaput.

    The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite logged its fourth straight weekly rise last week, up 4.3% to end Friday at its highest since Sept. 14. The S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.25%

    advanced 2.5% to log its highest settlement since Dec. 2, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.08%

    rose 1.8%.

    Meanwhile, the Fed is almost universally expected to deliver a 25 basis point rate increase on Wednesday. That is a downshift from the series of outsize 75 and 50 basis point hikes it delivered over the course of 2022.

    See: Fed set to deliver quarter-point rate increase along with ‘one last hawkish sting in the tail’

    Data showing U.S. inflation continues to slow after peaking at a roughly four-decade high last summer alongside expectations for a much weaker, and potentially recessionary, economy in 2023 have stoked bets the Fed won’t be as aggressive as advertised. But a pickup in gasoline and food prices could make for a bounce in January inflation readings, he said, which would give Powell another cudgel to beat back market expectations for easier policy in future meetings.

    Jackson Hole redux

    Torres sees the setup heading into this week’s Fed meeting as similar to the run-up to Powell’s speech at an annual central banking symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last August, in which he delivered a blunt message that the fight against inflation meant economic pain ahead. That spelled doom for what proved to be another of 2023’s many bear-market rallies, starting a slide that took stocks to their lows for the year in October.

    But some question how frustrated policy makers really are with the current backdrop.

    Sure, financial conditions have loosened in recent weeks, but they remain far tighter than they were a year ago before the Fed embarked on its aggressive tightening campaign, said Kelsey Berro, portfolio manager at J.P. Morgan Asset Management, in a phone interview.

    “So from a holistic perspective, the Fed feels they are getting policy more restrictive,” she said, as evidenced, for example, by the significant rise in mortgage rates over the past year.

    Still, it’s likely the Fed’s message this week will continue to emphasize that the recent slowing in inflation isn’t enough to declare victory and that further hikes are in the pipeline, Berro said.

    Too soon for a shift

    For investors and traders, the focus will be on whether Powell continues to emphasize that the biggest risk is the Fed doing too little on the inflation front or shifts to a message that acknowledges the possibility the Fed could overdo it and sink the economy, Berro said.

    She expects Powell to eventually deliver that message, but this week’s news conference is probably too early. The Fed won’t update the so-called dot plot, a compilation of forecasts by individual policy makers, or its staff economic forecasts until its March meeting.

    That could prove to be a disappointment for investors hoping for a decisive showdown this week.

    “Unfortunately, this is the kind of meeting that could end up being anticlimactic,” Berro said.

    Source link

  • The Fed and the stock market are set for a showdown this week. What’s at stake.

    The Fed and the stock market are set for a showdown this week. What’s at stake.

    Let’s get ready to rumble.

    The Federal Reserve and investors appear to be locked in what one veteran market watcher has described as an epic game of “chicken.” What Fed Chair Jerome Powell says Wednesday could determine the winner.

    Here’s the conflict. Fed policy makers have steadily insisted that the fed-funds rate, now at 4.25% to 4.5%, must rise above 5% and, importantly, stay there as the central bank attempts to bring inflation back to its 2% target. Fed-funds futures, however, show money-market traders aren’t fully convinced the rate will top 5%. Perhaps more galling to Fed officials, traders expect the central bank to deliver cuts by year-end.

    Stock-market investors have also bought into the latter policy “pivot” scenario, fueling a January surge for beaten down technology and growth stocks, which are particularly interest rate-sensitive. Treasury bonds have rallied, pulling down yields across the curve. And the U.S. dollar has weakened.

    Cruisin’ for a bruisin’?

    To some market watchers, investors now appear way too big for their breeches. They expect Powell to attempt to take them down a peg or two.

    How so? Look for Powell to be “unambiguously hawkish,” when he holds a news conference following the conclusion of the Fed’s two-day policy meeting on Wednesday, said Jose Torres, senior economist at Interactive Brokers, in a phone interview.

    “Hawkish” is market lingo used to describe a central banker sounding tough on inflation and less worried about economic growth.

    In Powell’s case, that would likely mean emphasizing that the labor market remains significantly out of balance, calling for a significant reduction in job openings that will require monetary policy to remain restrictive for a long period, Torres said.

    If Powell sounds sufficiently hawkish, “financial conditions will tighten up quickly,” Torres said, in a phone interview. Treasury yields “would rise, tech would drop and the dollar would rise after a message like that.” If not, then expect the tech and Treasury rally to continue and the dollar to get softer.

    Hanging loose

    Indeed, it’s a loosening of financial conditions that’s seen trying Powell’s patience. Looser conditions are represented by a tightening of credit spreads, lower borrowing costs, and higher stock prices that contribute to speculative activity and increased risk taking, which helps fuel inflation. It also helps weaken the dollar, contributes to inflation through higher import costs, Torres said, noting that indexes measuring financial conditions have fallen for 14 straight weeks.

    The Chicago Fed’s National Financial Conditions Index provides a weekly update on U.S. financial conditions. Positive values have been historically associated with tighter-than-average financial conditions, while negative values have been historically associated with looser-than-average financial conditions.


    Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, fred.stlouisfed.org

    Powell and the Fed have certainly expressed concerns about the potential for loose financial conditions to undercut their inflation-fighting efforts.

    The minutes of the Fed’s December meeting. released in early January, contained this attention-grabbing line: “Participants noted that, because monetary policy worked importantly through financial markets, an unwarranted easing in financial conditions, especially if driven by a misperception by the public of the Committee’s reaction function, would complicate the Committee’s effort to restore price stability.”

    That was taken by some investors as a sign that the Fed wasn’t eager to see a sustained stock market rally and might even be inclined to punish financial markets if conditions loosened too far.

    Read: The Fed delivered a message to the stock market: Big rallies will prolong pain

    If that interpretation is correct, it underlines the notion that the Fed “put” — the central bank’s seemingly longstanding willingness to respond to a plunging market with a loosening of policy — is largely kaput.

    The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite logged its fourth straight weekly rise last week, up 4.3% to end Friday at its highest since Sept. 14. The S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.25%

    advanced 2.5% to log its highest settlement since Dec. 2, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    +0.08%

    rose 1.8%.

    Meanwhile, the Fed is almost universally expected to deliver a 25 basis point rate increase on Wednesday. That is a downshift from the series of outsize 75 and 50 basis point hikes it delivered over the course of 2022.

    See: Fed set to deliver quarter-point rate increase along with ‘one last hawkish sting in the tail’

    Data showing U.S. inflation continues to slow after peaking at a roughly four-decade high last summer alongside expectations for a much weaker, and potentially recessionary, economy in 2023 have stoked bets the Fed won’t be as aggressive as advertised. But a pickup in gasoline and food prices could make for a bounce in January inflation readings, he said, which would give Powell another cudgel to beat back market expectations for easier policy in future meetings.

    Jackson Hole redux

    Torres sees the setup heading into this week’s Fed meeting as similar to the run-up to Powell’s speech at an annual central banking symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last August, in which he delivered a blunt message that the fight against inflation meant economic pain ahead. That spelled doom for what proved to be another of 2023’s many bear-market rallies, starting a slide that took stocks to their lows for the year in October.

    But some question how frustrated policy makers really are with the current backdrop.

    Sure, financial conditions have loosened in recent weeks, but they remain far tighter than they were a year ago before the Fed embarked on its aggressive tightening campaign, said Kelsey Berro, portfolio manager at J.P. Morgan Asset Management, in a phone interview.

    “So from a holistic perspective, the Fed feels they are getting policy more restrictive,” she said, as evidenced, for example, by the significant rise in mortgage rates over the past year.

    Still, it’s likely the Fed’s message this week will continue to emphasize that the recent slowing in inflation isn’t enough to declare victory and that further hikes are in the pipeline, Berro said.

    Too soon for a shift

    For investors and traders, the focus will be on whether Powell continues to emphasize that the biggest risk is the Fed doing too little on the inflation front or shifts to a message that acknowledges the possibility the Fed could overdo it and sink the economy, Berro said.

    She expects Powell to eventually deliver that message, but this week’s news conference is probably too early. The Fed won’t update the so-called dot plot, a compilation of forecasts by individual policy makers, or its staff economic forecasts until its March meeting.

    That could prove to be a disappointment for investors hoping for a decisive showdown this week.

    “Unfortunately, this is the kind of meeting that could end up being anticlimactic,” Berro said.

    Source link

  • Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ:QQQ) Shares Sold by FinTrust Capital Advisors LLC

    Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ:QQQ) Shares Sold by FinTrust Capital Advisors LLC

    FinTrust Capital Advisors LLC trimmed its position in Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ:QQQGet Rating) by 18.7% during the 3rd quarter, HoldingsChannel.com reports. The firm owned 435 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock after selling 100 shares during the period. FinTrust Capital Advisors LLC’s holdings in Invesco QQQ Trust were worth $118,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

    Other institutional investors and hedge funds have also made changes to their positions in the company. PrairieView Partners LLC raised its stake in shares of Invesco QQQ Trust by 419.0% in the 2nd quarter. PrairieView Partners LLC now owns 109 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock valued at $30,000 after acquiring an additional 88 shares during the period. Birch Capital Management LLC purchased a new stake in Invesco QQQ Trust during the 2nd quarter worth approximately $35,000. Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo LLC increased its stake in Invesco QQQ Trust by 356.3% during the 2nd quarter. Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo LLC now owns 146 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock worth $41,000 after buying an additional 114 shares during the period. Hoese & Co LLP increased its stake in Invesco QQQ Trust by 153.8% during the 3rd quarter. Hoese & Co LLP now owns 165 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock worth $44,000 after buying an additional 100 shares during the period. Finally, Piscataqua Savings Bank purchased a new stake in Invesco QQQ Trust during the 2nd quarter worth approximately $45,000. 43.08% of the stock is owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.

    Invesco QQQ Trust Stock Down 1.3 %

    Shares of QQQ opened at $260.10 on Thursday. Invesco QQQ Trust has a fifty-two week low of $254.26 and a fifty-two week high of $403.57. The firm’s 50 day moving average price is $278.50 and its 200 day moving average price is $288.62.

    Invesco QQQ Trust Increases Dividend

    The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Friday, December 23rd. Shareholders of record on Tuesday, December 20th were given a $0.655 dividend. The ex-dividend date was Monday, December 19th. This is an increase from Invesco QQQ Trust’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.52. This represents a $2.62 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 1.01%.

    About Invesco QQQ Trust

    (Get Rating)

    PowerShares QQQ Trust, Series 1 is a unit investment trust that issues securities called Nasdaq-100 Index Tracking Stock. The Trust’s investment objective is to provide investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The Trust provides investors with the opportunity to purchase units of beneficial interest in the Trust representing proportionate undivided interests in the portfolio of securities held by the Trust, which consists of substantially all of the securities, in substantially the same weighting, as the component securities of the Nasdaq-100 Index.

    See Also

    Want to see what other hedge funds are holding QQQ? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ:QQQGet Rating).

    Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ:QQQ)

    Receive News & Ratings for Invesco QQQ Trust Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Invesco QQQ Trust and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

    ABMN Staff

    Source link

  • Tim Cook has been an excellent leader for Apple — these numbers prove it

    Tim Cook has been an excellent leader for Apple — these numbers prove it

    How good is a company’s chief executive officer at investing your money most efficiently? This is an important question for long-term investors. It may underline the difference between a steady long-term performer and a flash in the pan.

    And Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    -4.24%

    now makes up 7% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    -1.03%
    ,
    the first and largest exchange-traded fund (with $360 billion in assets), which tracks the benchmark S&P 500
    SPX,
    -1.06%
    .
    That’s close to an all-time record, and the iPhone maker has a whopping 14.1% position in the Invesco QQQ Trust
    QQQ,
    -1.95%
    ,
    which tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index
    NDX,
    -1.98%
    .
    Looking at the full Nasdaq Index
    COMP,
    -1.73%
    ,
    which has 3,747 stocks, Apple takes a 13.5% position.

    Apple now makes up 7.3% of the S&P 500 by market capitalization, close to the 8% record it set late in September.


    FactSet

    This is very much an Apple stock market, with the company topping the broad indexes that are weighted by market capitalization. You are likely to be invested in the company indirectly. You also might be feeling Apple’s impact in other ways. Apple’s App Store ecosystem drives more than $600 billion in annual revenue for developers.

    Tim Cook’s tenure as Apple’s CEO has been nothing short of breathtaking when measured by the company’s financial performance. Apple is not one of the fastest-growing companies when measured by sales or earnings — it is too big for that. But its excellent stock performance has reflected Cook’s ability to deploy invested capital with improving efficiency. Cook has also been a market trendsetter in other important ways. He has Apple repurchasing $90 billion of its shares annually, setting the pace for stock buybacks in the market. Cook’s steady hand has also helped Apple withstand the market’s tech wreck and remain a stable pillar for the teetering Nasdaq Composite index generally. For all these reasons, Cook has earned a spot on the MarketWatch 50 list of the most influential people in markets

    Apple keeps improving by this important measure

    Investors in the stock market are looking for growth over the long term. The best measure of that is whether or not a company’s share price goes up or down. But Cook isn’t just managing Apple’s stock. Digging a bit deeper into the company’s actual operating performance can provide some insight into what a good job Cook has done.

    What should a corporate manager focus on? The stock price? How about the most efficient and most profitable way to provide goods and services? There are different ways to do this, and Apple has focused on quality, reliability and excellent service to build customer loyalty.

    Apple’s commitment can be experienced by anyone who calls the company for customer service. It is easy to get through to a well-trained representative who will solve your problem. How many companies can say that at a time when it seems many companies cannot even handle answering the phone? 

    Getting back to actual performance, Cook took over as Apple’s CEO in August 2011 when Steve Jobs stepped down. The chart below shows the company’s quarterly returns on invested capital from the end of 2010 through September 2022.

    Apple’s returns on invested capital have increased markedly over the past six years.


    FactSet

    A company’s return on invested capital (ROIC) is its profit divided by the sum of the carrying value of its common stock, preferred stock, long-term debt and capitalized lease obligations. ROIC indicates how well a company has made use of the money it has raised to run its business. It is an annualized figure, but available quarterly, as used in the chart above.

    The carrying value of a company’s stock may be a lot lower than its current market capitalization. The company may have issued most of its shares long ago at a much lower share price than the current one. If a company has issued shares recently or at relatively high prices, its ROIC will be lower.

    A company with a high ROIC is likely either to have a relatively low level of long-term debt or to have made efficient use of the borrowed money.

    Among companies in the S&P 500 that have been around for at least 10 years, Apple placed within the top 20 for average ROIC for the previous 40 reported fiscal quarters as of  Sept. 1.

    As you can see on the chart, Apple’s ROIC has improved dramatically over the past five years, even as the wide adoption of the company’s products and services has led to an overall slowdown in sales growth.

    A quick comparison with other giants in the benchmark index

    It might be interesting to see how Apple stacks up among other large companies, in part because some businesses are more capital-intensive than others. For example, over the past four quarters, Apple’s ROIC has averaged 52.9%, while the average for the S&P 500 has been a weighted 12.1%, by FactSet’s estimate.

    Here are the 10 companies in the S&P 500 reporting the highest annual sales for their most recent full fiscal years, with a comparison of average ROIC over the past 40 reported quarters:

    Company

    Ticker

    Annual sales ($mil)

    Avg. ROIC – 40 quarters

    Total Return – 10 Years

    Walmart Inc.

    WMT,
    -0.02%
    $572,754

    11.0%

    142%

    Amazon.com Inc.

    AMZN,
    -3.06%
    $469,822

    6.8%

    693%

    Apple Inc.

    AAPL,
    -4.24%
    $394,328

    33.0%

    721%

    CVS Health Corp.

    CVS,
    +1.03%
    $291,935

    6.8%

    161%

    UnitedHealth Group Inc.

    UNH,
    +0.03%
    $287,597

    13.7%

    1,031%

    Exxon Mobil Corp.

    XOM,
    +1.36%
    $280,510

    9.9%

    85%

    Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B

    BRK.B,
    -1.94%
    $276,094

    8.2%

    233%

    McKesson Corp.

    MKC,
    -0.61%
    $263,966

    6.6%

    353%

    Alphabet Inc. Class A

    GOOGL,
    -4.07%
    $257,488

    16.6%

    405%

    Costco Wholesale Corp.

    COST,
    +0.57%
    $226,954

    16.2%

    558%

    Source: FactSet

    Among the largest 10 companies in the S&P 500 by annual sales, Apple takes the top ranking for average ROIC over the past 10 years, while ranking second for total return behind UnitedHealth Group Inc.
    UNH,
    +0.03%

    and ahead of Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    -3.06%
    .
    UnitedHealth has been able to remain at the forefront of managed care during the period of transition for healthcare in the U.S., in the wake of President Barack Obama’s signing of the Affordable Care Act into law in 2010.

    Here’s a chart showing 10-year total returns for Apple, UnitedHealth Group, Amazon and the S&P 500:


    FactSet

    Apple is only slightly ahead of Amazon’s 10-year total return. But what is so striking about this chart is the volatility. Apple has had a smoother ride. During the bear market of 2022, Apple’s stock has declined 18%, while the S&P 500 has gone down 20%, the Nasdaq has fallen 32% (all with dividends reinvested) and Amazon has dropped 45%.

    The broad indexes would have fared even worse so far this year without Apple.

    TO SEE THE FULL MARKETWATCH 50 LIST CLICK HERE

    Source link