ReportWire

Tag: Public media

  • Corporation for Public Broadcasting votes itself out of existence

    [ad_1]

    Leaders of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a private agency that has steered federal funding to PBS, NPR and hundreds of public television and radio stations across the country, voted Monday to dissolve the organization that was created in 1967.

    CPB had been winding down since Congress acted last summer to defund its operations at the encouragement of President Donald Trump. Its board of directors chose Monday to shutter CPB completely instead of keeping it in existence as a shell.

    “CPB’s final act would be to protect the integrity of the public media system and the democratic values by dissolving, rather than allowing the organization to remain defunded and vulnerable to additional attacks,” said Patricia Harrison, the organization’s president and CEO.

    Many Republicans have long accused public broadcasting, particularly its news programming, of being biased toward liberals but it wasn’t until the second Trump administration —- with full GOP control of Congress — that those criticisms were turned into action.

    Ruby Calvert, head of CPB’s board of directors, said the federal defunding of public media has been devastating.

    “Even at this moment, I am convinced that public media will survive, and that a new Congress will address public media’s role in our country because it is critical to our children’s education, our history, culture and democracy to do so,” Calvert said.

    CPB said it was financially supporting the American Archive of Public Broadcasting in its effort to preserve historic content, and is working with the University of Maryland to maintain its own records.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Court settlement calls for NPR to get $36M in government funding

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — National Public Radio will receive approximately $36 million in grant money to operate the nation’s public radio interconnection system under the terms of a court settlement with the federal government’s steward of funding for public broadcasting stations.

    The settlement, announced late Monday, partially resolves a legal dispute in which NPR accused the Corporation for Public Broadcasting of bowing to pressure from President Donald Trump to cut off its funding.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm~? |2C49 ad[ %CF>A D2:5 2E 2 ?6HD 4@?76C6?46 E92E 96 H@F=5 “=@G6 E@” 567F?5 }!# 2?5 !q$ 3642FD6 96 36=:6G6D E96J 2C6 3:2D65 😕 72G@C @7 s6>@4C2ED]k^Am

    kAm}!# 244FD65 E96 r!q @7 G:@=2E:?8 :ED u:CDE p>6?5>6?E 7C66 DA6649 C:89ED H96? :E >@G65 E@ 4FE @77 :ED 2446DD E@ 8C2?E >@?6J 2AAC@AC:2E65 3J r@?8C6DD] }!# 2=D@ 4=2:>D %CF>A[ 2 #6AF3=:42?[ H2?ED E@ AF?:D9 :E 7@C E96 4@?E6?E @7 :ED ;@FC?2=:D>]k^Am

    kAm~? pAC:= a[ E96 r!q’D 3@2C5 :?:E:2==J 2AAC@G65 2 E9C66J62C[ C@F89=J Sbe >:==:@? 6IE6?D:@? @7 2 8C2?E 7@C }!# E@ @A6C2E6 E96 “:?E6C4@??64E:@?” D2E6==:E6 DJDE6> 7@C AF3=:4 C25:@] }!# 92D 366? @A6C2E:?8 2?5 >2?28:?8 E96 !F3=:4 #25:@ $2E6==:E6 $JDE6> D:?46 `hgd]k^Am

    kAmqFE 4@CA@C2E:@? @77:4:2=D C6G6CD65 4@FCD6 2?5 2??@F?465 E92E E96 7656C2= 7F?5D H@F=5 8@ E@ 2 6?E:EJ 42==65 !F3=:4 |65:2 x?7C2DECF4EFC6] k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^DE@C286]4@FCE=:DE6?6C]4@>^C642A^8@G]FD4@FCED]545]ag_hdb^8@G]FD4@FCED]545]ag_hdb]df]`]A57Qm}!# 4=2:>65k^2m E96 r!q H2D F?56C >@F?E:?8 AC6DDFC6 7C@> E96 %CF>A 25>:?:DEC2E:@? H96? E96 286?4J C65:C64E65 E96 >@?6J E@ !|x[ 2 >65:2 4@2=:E:@? E92E 5:5?’E 6I:DE 2?5 H2D?’E DE2EFE@C:=J 2FE9@C:K65 E@ C646:G6 E96 7F?5D]k^Am

    kAmr!q 2EE@C?6JD 56?:65 E92E E96 286?4J C6E2=:2E65 282:?DE }!# E@ 2AA62D6 %CF>A] %96J 925 k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^DE@C286]4@FCE=:DE6?6C]4@>^C642A^8@G]FD4@FCED]545]ag_hdb^8@G]FD4@FCED]545]ag_hdb]ed]_]A57Qm2C8F65 E92E }!#’D 4=2:>Dk^2m 2C6 724EF2==J 2?5 =682==J >6C:E=6DD]k^Am

    kAm~? |2J `[ %CF>A :DDF65 2? 6I64FE:G6 @C56C E92E 42==65 7@C 7656C2= 286?4:6D E@ DE@A 7F?5:?8 7@C }!# 2?5 !q$] %96 D6EE=6>6?E 5@6D?’E 6?5 2 =2HDF:E 😕 H9:49 }!# D66A=6>6?E2E:@? @C 6?7@C46>6?E @7 %CF>A’D 6I64FE:G6 @C56C] &]$] s:DEC:4E yF586 #2?5@=A9 |@DD 😀 D4965F=65 E@ AC6D:56 @G6C 2?@E96C 962C:?8 7@C E96 42D6 @? s64] c]k^Am

    kAm%96 D6EE=6>6?E D2JD }!# 2?5 r!q 28C66 E92E E96 6I64FE:G6 @C56C 😀 F?4@?DE:EFE:@?2= 2?5 E92E r!q H@?’E 6?7@C46 :E F?=6DD 2 4@FCE @C56CD :E E@ 5@ D@]k^Am

    kAm}!#[ >62?H9:=6[ 28C665 E@ 5C@A :ED C6BF6DE 7@C 2 4@FCE @C56C 3=@4<:?8 r!q 7C@> 5:D3FCD:?8 7F?5D E@ !|x F?56C 2 D6A2C2E6 8C2?E 28C66>6?E]k^Am

    kAmz2E96C:?6 |296C[ }!#’D AC6D:56?E 2?5 rt~[ D2:5 E96 D6EE=6>6?E 😀 “2 G:4E@CJ 7@C 65:E@C:2= :?56A6?56?46 2?5 2 DE6A E@H2C5 FA9@=5:?8 E96 u:CDE p>6?5>6?E C:89ED @7 }!# 2?5 E96 AF3=:4 >65:2 DJDE6>]”k^Am

    kAm!2EC:4:2 w2CC:D@?[ E96 4@CA@C2E:@?’D rt~[ D2:5 r!q 😀 A=62D65 E92E E96 =:E:82E:@? 😀 @G6C “2?5 E92E @FC :?G6DE>6?E 😕 E96 7FEFC6 E9C@F89 !|x >2C65:2]”k^Am

    kAm~? pF8] `[ r!q 2??@F?465 :E H@F=5 E2<6 DE6AD E@H2C5 4=@D:?8 :ED6=7 5@H? 27E6C 36:?8 567F?565 3J r@?8C6DD]k^Am

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Court settlement calls for NPR to get $36M in government funds to operate US public radio system

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — National Public Radio will receive approximately $36 million in grant money to operate the nation’s public radio interconnection system under the terms of a court settlement with the federal government’s steward of funding for public broadcasting stations.

    The settlement, announced late Monday, partially resolves a legal dispute in which NPR accused the Corporation for Public Broadcasting of bowing to pressure from President Donald Trump to cut off its funding.

    On March 25, Trump said at a news conference that he would “love to” defund NPR and PBS because he believes they are biased in favor of Democrats.

    NPR accused the CPB of violating its First Amendment free speech rights when it moved to cut off its access to grant money appropriated by Congress. NPR also claims Trump, a Republican, wants to punish it for the content of its journalism.

    On April 2, the CPB’s board initially approved a three-year, roughly $36 million extension of a grant for NPR to operate the “interconnection” satellite system for public radio. NPR has been operating and managing the Public Radio Satellite System since 1985.

    But corporation officials reversed course and announced that the federal funds would go to a entity called Public Media Infrastructure. NPR claimed the CPB was under mounting pressure from the Trump administration when the agency redirected the money to PMI, a media coalition that didn’t exist and wasn’t statutorily authorized to receive the funds.

    CPB attorneys denied that the agency retaliated against NPR to appease Trump. They had argued that NPR’s claims are factually and legally meritless.

    On May 1, Trump issued an executive order that called for federal agencies to stop funding for NPR and PBS. The settlement doesn’t end a lawsuit in which NPR seeks to block any implementation or enforcement of Trump’s executive order. U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss is scheduled to preside over another hearing for the case on Dec. 4.

    The settlement says NPR and CPB agree that the executive order is unconstitutional and that CPB won’t enforce it unless a court orders it to do so.

    NPR, meanwhile, agreed to drop its request for a court order blocking CPB from disbursing funds to PMI under a separate grant agreement.

    Katherine Maher, NPR’s president and CEO, said the settlement is “a victory for editorial independence and a step toward upholding the First Amendment rights of NPR and the public media system.”

    Patricia Harrison, the corporation’s CEO, said CPB is pleased that the litigation is over “and that our investment in the future through PMI marks an exciting new era for public media.”

    On Aug. 1, CPB announced it would take steps toward closing itself down after being defunded by Congress.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What to know about the BBC’s latest crisis after its apology to Trump

    [ad_1]

    LONDON — The BBC has issued a public apology to U.S. President Donald Trump over a misleading edit of his speech on Jan. 6, 2021, but said it “strongly disagreed there is a basis for a defamation claim.”

    Since it was established more than a century ago, Britain’s public broadcaster has been no stranger to controversy. Over the past week, it has been embroiled in one of its deepest-ever crisis as its director general stepped down, its head of news quit, questions were raised over the veracity of its journalism and Trump said he is mulling a billion-dollar lawsuit.

    Here’s what to know.

    Pressure on the broadcaster has been growing since the right-leaning Daily Telegraph newspaper published parts of a dossier compiled by the BBC’s adviser on standards and guidelines on Nov. 3.

    As well as criticizing the BBC’s coverage of transgender issues and raising concerns of anti-Israel bias in the BBC’s Arabic service, the dossier said that an edition of the BBC’s flagship current affairs series “Panorama” — titled “Trump: A Second Chance?” — broadcast days before the 2024 U.S. presidential election was misleading.

    Specifically, it showed how the third-party production company that made the film spliced together three quotes from two sections of the Jan. 6, 2021 speech into what appeared to be one quote in which Trump urged supporters to march with him and “fight like hell.”

    By doing so, it made it look like Trump was giving the green light to his supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol as Congress was poised to certify President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election that Trump falsely alleged was stolen from him.

    The outcry from opponents of the BBC — and there are many both in the U.K. and abroad — was immediate and vociferous.

    The broadcaster, which is funded by an annual license fee of 174.50 pounds ($230) paid by all U.K. households who watch live TV or any BBC content, was accused of bias against Trump, symptomatic of they say an inherent liberal bias within the organization.

    For days, the BBC said very little, saying it did not report to leaked reports. Many thought that was a misjudgement as it allowed the narrative around the edit to be led by its opponents.

    By Nov. 9, the pressure on the BBC was becoming increasingly acute, prompting its top executive, Tim Davie, and head of news Deborah Turness to resign over what the broadcaster called an “error of judgment.”

    It was also revealed that Trump was demanding a retraction, apology and compensation over the sequence. “I guess I have to,” Trump said when asked about whether he would go through with his legal threat. “Because I think they defrauded the public and they’ve admitted it.”

    Trump had set a deadline of Friday, Nov. 14 for the BBC to respond to his challenge.

    While the BBC said earlier in the week that the edited portion in the program was an “error of judgement,” it did not apologize to Trump directly until Thursday evening.

    In a statement, it said its chair, Samir Shah, had personally sent a letter via a letter from its chair over the misleading edit but said it had not defamed him.

    While the BBC statement doesn’t respond to Trump’s demand that he be compensated for “overwhelming financial and reputational harm,” the headline on its news story about the apology said it refused to pay compensation.

    The U.S. president has yet to respond to the BBC’s apology and its rejection of of his demands for compensation.

    Legal experts have said that Trump would face challenges taking the case to court in the U.K. or the U.S. They said that the BBC could show that Trump wasn’t harmed because he was ultimately elected president in 2024.

    While many legal experts have dismissed the president’s claims against the media as having little merit, he has won some lucrative settlements against U.S. media companies and he could try to leverage the BBC mistake for a payout, potentially to a charity of his choice.

    However this latest crisis pans out in the days and weeks ahead, the heat will remain on the BBC, especially in its newsrooms where any mistake, or seeming bias, will no doubt be picked up opponents.

    As a public broadcaster, the BBC has to be impartial in the way it covers news events. It’s a fine balancing act that often gets the BBC into trouble. Some think it leans too much to the right, while others think it goes the other way. Whatever the truth of the matter, many think that the BBC is often cowed in its coverage, particularly on domestic political matters.

    Not only does it need to find a new director-general and head of news, it has to negotiate its future with the government.

    The left-of-center Labour government, which is considered to one of the most pro-BBC political parties in the U.K., will soon start the once-a-decade process of reviewing the BBC’s governing charter, which expires at the end of 2027.

    Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said the government would ensure the BBC is “sustainably funded (and) commands the public’s trust,” but did not say whether the license fee might be scaled back or scrapped.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alabama Public Television considers cutting ties with PBS

    [ad_1]

    MONTGOMERY, Ala. — Each day, PBS programming fills the airwaves of Alabama Public Television with shows such as “Sesame Street,” “Daniel Tiger’s Neighborhood,” “Antiques Roadshow” and “PBS Newshour.” Alabamians could lose access to those programs on state airwaves if the Alabama Educational Television Commission opts to become the first state network to sever ties with PBS.

    The Alabama commission last month discussed the possibility of dropping PBS and is expected to discuss the matter again its Nov. 18 meeting.

    The possibility comes after President Donald Trump and Congress in July withdrew funding for the nonprofit The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides grants to public radio and television, and as some state commissioners accused PBS of being an unneeded expense or politically biased.

    “We have to figure out what our options are,” said Ferris W. Stephens, the chairman of the commission. “Before we decide those things, I just think we need a lot more information.” Stephens said he does not expect a vote at the November meeting.

    Alabama Public Television Executive Director Wayne Reid said some commissioners asked him to research the possibility and ramifications of ending the contract with PBS. Ending the affiliation would cause APT to lose access to popular programs such as “Sesame Street” and “PBS NewsHour”, as well as its ability to distribute content on streaming platforms. Reid said the state network would have to buy other programming to replace it.

    “If we cut ties, all of that would be gone. Right now, we’re doing a ton of research. Everybody here is working on what it would take to replace the things that are affected by PBS,” Reid said.

    Reid said he was also asked to research if they could keep PBS but drop the news programs “PBS NewsHour” and “Washington Week.” Reid said the decision ultimately belongs to the commission.

    No other statewide network has cut ties with PBS to date, a spokesperson for PBS confirmed.

    The possibility prompted a backlash from Alabama public television viewers and donors.

    Jennifer Greer, a retired writer and educator, is one of the volunteers helping to mount a postcard campaign to urge the state to keep the PBS affiliation. Preschoolers, students and adults across the state benefit each day from PBS programs, she said.

    “When you take one of the most effective tools in the public education toolkit, and you defund it and you make it so only the wealthy can afford it, that’s just responsible. That’s a step backward,” Greer said.

    Petitions and posts were shared across social media urging people to “Save PBS for Alabama Children” urging people to attend the upcoming meeting.

    The Corporation for Public Broadcasting provided about $2.8 million for Alabama Public Television although the money is not directly used to purchase PBS programming. Alabama Public Television pays about $2.2 million to purchase PBS programming. The amount was discounted after the federal funding cut.

    Greer and others said they are concerned that dropping PBS would put Alabama Public Television in a downward financial spiral. Public media gets a substantial part of its funding from memberships and donations. “If we separate from PBS, our contributions are going to plummet, and that could jeopardize the stability of the whole operation,” she said.

    Commissioners were divided at an Oct. 28 meeting, according to the Alabama Reflector and al.com.

    “I just, I don’t want to fund it, PBS has made themselves the enemy of what I stand with, and so I do not like them, and I don’t follow the philosophy of feeding the beast,” commission member Les Barnett said during the meeting according to the Alabama Reflector. Barnett did not return an email from The Associated Press.

    J. Holland, another commission member, said he is interested in exploring if the state can begin buying PBS programming on an a la carte basis, picking some shows but not others. The current PBS contract does not allow that.

    Pete Conroy, another commission member, said they should keep PBS. He said he is concerned that some commissioners are “acting politically.”

    “I know how much PBS programming is used in our public schools, private schools and churches. It’s always about the kids. These children need to be lifted up with this kind of programming,” Conroy said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bob Ross paintings to be auctioned to support public TV stations after federal cuts

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES — LOS ANGELES (AP) — Thirty paintings created by the bushy-haired, soft-spoken Bob Ross will soon be up for auction to defray the costs of programming for small and rural public television stations suffering under cuts in federal funding.

    Ross, a public television stalwart in the 1980s and ’90s, “dedicated his life to making art accessible to everyone,” said Joan Kowalski, president of Bob Ross Inc. “This auction ensures his legacy continues to support the very medium that brought his joy and creativity into American homes for decades.”

    Bonhams in Los Angeles will auction three of Ross’ paintings on Nov. 11. Other auctions will follow in London, New York, Boston and online. All profits are pledged to stations that use content from distributor American Public Television.

    The idea is to help stations in need with licensing fees that allow them to show popular programs that include “The Best of Joy of Painting,” based on Ross’ show, “America’s Test Kitchen,” “Julia Child’s French Chef Classics” and “This Old House.”

    As desired by President Donald Trump, Congress has eliminated $1.1 billion allocated to public broadcasting, leaving about 330 PBS and 246 NPR stations to find alternative funding sources. Many launched emergency fund drives. Some have been forced to lay off staff and make programming cuts.

    The beloved Ross died in 1995 of complications from cancer after 11 years in production with “The Joy of Painting.” His how-to program was shown on stations around the U.S. and around the world. The former Air Force drill sergeant known for his calm demeanor and encouraging words enjoyed a resurgence in popularity during the lockdowns of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ross spoke often as he worked on air about painting happy little clouds and trees, and making no mistakes, only “happy accidents.”

    The thirty paintings to be auctioned span Ross’ career and include landscapes depicting serene mountain vistas and lake scenes, his signature aesthetic. He created most of the 30 on-air, each in under 30 minutes, which was the span of a single episode.

    Bonhams sold two early 1990s mountain-and-lake scenes of Ross in August for $114,800 and $95,750. The auctions of the 30 paintings soon to be sold have an estimated total value of $850,000 to $1.4 million, Bonhams said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • PBS ‘Masterpiece’ series ‘The Gold’ explores Britain’s biggest heist in history

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — In 1983, six thieves muscled their way into a warehouse near Heathrow Airport, expecting to find a large sum of foreign currency. They got much more than they bargained for — 26 million pounds worth of gold bars.

    What happened in the days and years next is the subject of PBS’ “Masterpiece” enthralling series “The Gold,” which traces the ripple effects of Britain’s biggest robbery, going from a local search to infiltrating an international money laundering cartel. It starts airing Sunday.

    “From the minute the show starts, the pressure’s on,” says showrunner Neil Forsyth. “There’s a clock ticking, there’s a net tightening and all these things. So it’s lovely to write characters under that continual pressure.”

    The so-called Brinks-Mat heist rocked Britain, leading to changes in banking laws, policing and shining a light on official corruption. Much of the gold was never located. It was melted down and sold back into the financial system, with the proceeds laundered into real estate.

    “It’s literally in the bricks and mortar and the architecture that surrounds people everywhere,” says Emun Elliott, who plays one of the detectives. “There might be a piece of that stolen gold in your wedding ring. It is everywhere.”

    To tell the sprawling story of “The Gold,” Forsyth streamlined timelines, combined real-life figures and adjusted events to fit the drama. Viewers are told the series was “inspired by real events.”

    “It’s not a strict factual drama,” he says. “I don’t find that a very attractive route to go down creatively because I like having the space to create and that’s extremely important if you’re going to create something that’s truly entertaining, truly gripping.”

    One real person who is portrayed in the series is Brian Boyce, the principled and determined lead investigator, played by “Downton Abbey” star Hugh Bonneville.

    Boyce “was known to be a safe pair of hands,” says Bonneville, who met the retired officer to prepare for the role. Boyce knew some officers in the department were corrupt and picked a lean, insular team to track down the gold and money.

    “He absolutely was adamant that not on his watch would police corruption thrive,” Bonneville says. “He’s a real man of integrity and I think that comes through. You’ve got him against all odds trying to steer a level course and get this job done.”

    Forsyth says the series’ first episode attracted some 10 million viewers in the U.K. — or 1 in 5 of the adult population. He says he was in a restaurant with his wife once when the nearby table spent the whole meal discussing it, which was “somewhat unnerving.”

    Forsyth was only 5 and living in Scotland at the time of what he calls the “iconic heist.” Despite its impact on British society, no one had pieced it all together in a dramatization or an all-encompassing documentary until now.

    It takes two seasons to unspool fully and has a soundtrack that features songs of the era by the likes of Echo & The Bunnymen, New Order, The Smiths and The Stranglers.

    Forsyth frames the robbery against large social forces that were clashing in then-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s Britain — the rise of a new money class hoping to buy their way to the top versus the upper classes and aristocracy, determined to stop them.

    “This country doesn’t change,” says one old money character. “There is nothing the system likes more than those who take it on. That’s when it gets to show its strength.”

    Though Elliott plays a detective who has vowed to track down the missing gold, he knows the viewer may be switching allegiances while watching.

    “It’s like you kind of want them to get away with it and then the next episode maybe you want them to get caught,” he says. “That back and forth is just a thrilling kind of place to sit.”

    “The Gold” is all about greed, of course. It shows how legitimate people got sucked into money laundering, how banks were complicit and how 1980s hubris kept it going.

    “A big part of ‘The Gold’ story is people being out of their depth — people being overly ambitious and finding themselves out of the depth,” Forsyth says.

    That includes the robbers themselves, who suddenly had to find a way to move and cash in on 6,800 gold bars. They were stick-up guys now way out of their depths.

    “They just didn’t know what to do with the proceeds. They didn’t fit into this new world of money laundering and deregulation and the opportunities that it brought for criminality,” says Forsyth.

    “It was the greatest victory for traditional crime, but it was also kind of its funeral really, and it got replaced by something far murkier.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New Mexico Democrats rush to shore up safety net programs after federal cuts

    [ad_1]

    SANTA FE, N.M. — New Mexico’s Democratic lawmakers were set to meet Wednesday to begin shoring up safety net spending in response to President Donald Trump’s recent cuts in a top state for participation in Medicaid and federal food assistance.

    Legislators are seeking new food assistance spending, while Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham is calling for a quick response to federal Medicaid and tax cuts signed by Trump. She wants to provide state grants that can stabilize health care services in rural areas where clinics and hospitals often rely heavily on Medicaid.

    The governor also wants to expand state insurance subsidies on the Affordable Care Act exchange. Exchange subsidies are a sticking point in the federal budget standoff in Washington.

    “We’re not going stand by while Washington abandons New Mexico families,” Lujan Grisham said Tuesday. “This special session is about protecting the people who need help most.”

    Leading Democratic legislators also want to backfill federal spending cuts to public broadcasting. New Mexico could also become the latest state to break with the federal government on vaccine policy and recommendations.

    Nearly one-fourth of New Mexico residents receive food assistance through the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program.

    “It’s really the first line of defense. It’s not our only solution to food insecurity, but it’s a big one,” said Sovereign Hager, legal director at the New Mexico Center on Law and Poverty.

    New Mexico legislators are considering a quick infusion of state spending on food assistance through SNAP, as well as support for food banks and distribution networks.

    Trump plans to expand work and reporting requirements for SNAP participants, end eligibility for many noncitizens, and alter deductions.

    Jasmin Jaquez of Sunland Park says SNAP changes are looming over her final year at New Mexico State University. She said she and her 7-year-old son rely on the program.

    “It’s one big, huge help that’s getting me through college, and attending full-time,” she said.

    Grants have been proposed to help services continue at rural health clinics and hospitals that rely heavily on Medicaid spending. Rural health care providers across the country are preparing to lose billions of dollars from Trump’s signature tax and spending cut bill signed into law this summer.

    Trump’s bill sets aside $50 billion over five years for rural hospitals, providers and clinics — but that doesn’t offset significant cuts. The stakes are high in New Mexico, where about 38% of residents rely on Medicaid.

    New Mexico may also expand subsidies toward the federal insurance exchange that covers about 75,000 state residents.

    Democratic House Speaker Javier Martínez of Albuquerque acknowledges that many federal health care changes don’t kick in until 2027 or later, but says that funds for rural health care and to offset other cuts are urgent.

    New Mexico expects to lose about $200 million annually because of new federal tax cuts, but starting this fiscal year, it still has a large surplus thanks to booming oil production.

    Many Democratic-led states have begun making their own recommendations for who should be vaccinated for seasonal respiratory viruses, including the flu and COVID-19, saying the Trump administration has jeopardized public health by politicizing the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    New Mexico lawmakers are considering a similar shift to state standards for the immunization of children and adults.

    Changes are needed for access, consistency on childhood vaccines and to give the state’s health department flexibility so that residents can have options, said Democratic state Sen. Majority Leader Peter Wirth of Santa Fe.

    New Mexico legislators are considering spending millions of dollars for public broadcasters in television and radio as federal funds dry up.

    The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which finances NPR and PBS, has announced its closure after being defunded by Congress. Trump also signed federal legislation in July that rescinds more than $1 billion earmarked for public broadcasters.

    The claw-back sent shock waves through at least 13 public public radio and television broadcasters across New Mexico, said Franz Joachim, General Manager at New Mexico PBS.

    “We no longer had two years to figure out how to survive, we had two months,” said Joachim, who oversees a staff of 50.

    Small public radio stations serving remote areas of the country, often beyond internet or cell service, are confronting an uncertain future. Many, including five tribal radio stations in New Mexico, relied on community public service grants from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, said Loris Taylor, president of Native Public Media.

    She warned of stark consequences for public safety initiatives, including the recent deployment of emergency broadcast alert systems for missing and murdered Indigenous people.

    “They’re communication hubs, and they’re also safety hubs,” she said of New Mexico’s public radio stations. “What you want are informed citizens.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • PBS, NPR stations struggle with funding cuts

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Coping with a sudden loss in federal funding, PBS affiliate KSPS in Spokane, Washington, faced a surprise extra hurdle. Many of its contributing members — at one point almost half — lived in Canada, and they were withdrawing support out of anger at President Donald Trump’s desire to make the country the 51st member of the United States.

    When Congress decided this summer to eliminate $1.1 billion allocated to public broadcasting, it left some 330 PBS and 246 NPR stations, each with unique issues related to their communities and history, to figure out what that means.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm|2?J =2F?4965 6>6C86?4J 7F?5 5C:G6D 2?5 2C6 962CE6?65 3J E96 C6DA@?D6] %96 ?2E:@?2= }!# 2?5 !q$ ?6EH@C6?ED[ 2?5 2 A9:=2?E9C@A:4 677@CE 7@4FD65 @? E96 92C56DE9:E DE2E:@?D 😀 E2<:?8 D92A6] }@ DE2E:@?D 92G6 D9FE 5@H?[ 3FE ;@3 2?5 AC@8C2>>:?8 4FED 2C6 2=C625J 368:??:?8]k^Am

    kAmx? $A@<2?6[ z$!$ 92D 2=H2JD EC:65 E@ <66A :ED C6BF6DED 7@C >6>36C 5@?2E:@?D D6A2C2E6 7C@> 2AA62=D 7@C AF3=:4 7F?5:?8] }@E 2?J>@C6] r@?8C6DD =67E E96 DE2E:@? H:E9 2 S`]a >:==:@? 9@=6 E@ 7:==[ 23@FE `gT @7 :ED 3F586E[ 2?5 E96 DE2E:@? 😀 FD:?8 E92E 2D 2 AC6E6IE E@ D66< 96=A 7C@> =:DE6?6CD]k^Am

    kAm“(6 92G6 567:?:E6=J D66? D@>6 2EEC:E:@? 7C@> @FC r2?25:2? >6>36CD[” D2:5 $ 86?6C2= >2?286C]k^Am

    kAmk2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^5@86A3D?AC6=@?ECF>A>FD<hh2c_36e4336ghba_cf276bf`7h`754dQm{@?8 DFDA:4:@FDk^2m @7 2 =:36C2= 36?E E@ AF3=:4 >65:2 ?6HD 4@G6C286[ #6AF3=:42?D 😕 r@?8C6DD k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^ECF>AC6AF3=:42?D3F586E4FEDA6A72CA3D?ACcge7_7dgf`_eg7`c5hf63c4c5f7h33ggQmC6DA@?565 E@ !C6D:56?E s@?2=5 %CF>A’D H:D96Dk^2m 😕 yF=J 2?5 6=:>:?2E65 7F?5:?8 7@C E96 DJDE6>D] %96 r@CA@C2E:@? 7@C !F3=:4 qC@2542DE:?8[ H9:49 5:DEC:3FE6D E96 7F?5:?8[ 92D k2 9C67lQ9EEADi^^2A?6HD]4@>^2CE:4=6^AF3=:43C@2542DE:?8567F?5:?8A3D?AChcf_g773gb`b5cg“72e42`hh76cdc25QmE2<6? DE6AD E@ D9FE 5@H?k^2m]k^Am

    kAmx? D@>6 A2CED @7 E96 4@F?ECJ[ E96 2?DH6C E@ A=62D 7@C 96=A 92G6 6I466565 6IA64E2E:@?D] !F3=:4 C25:@ DE2E:@? (w”# 😕 (:=>:?8E@?[ }]r] C2:D65 >@C6 E92? Sa__[___ 😕 E9C66 52JD[ 7:==:?8 2 S`fc[___ 9@=6 2?5 E96? D@>6] xE’D 2 D>2== 4@>>F?:EJ 8C@H:?8 72DE H:E9 2? :?7=FI @7 C6E:C66D[ >2?J H9@ 56A6?5 @? E96 DE2E:@?’D ?6HD E@ =62C? 23@FE E96:C ?6H 9@>6[ D2:5 86?6C2= >2?286C z6G:? rC2?6]k^Am

    kAm(:E9 Sdad[___ 8@?6 7C@> :ED 3F586E[ w2H2:: !F3=:4 #25:@ 92D 2=C625J C2:D65 Sed_[___ 😕 2? 6>6C86?4J 7F?5 5C:G6] “xE’D 2 G2=:52E:@? E92E H92E J@F’C6 5@:?8 😀 6DD6?E:2= E@ E96 4@>>F?:EJ 2?5 😀 2AAC64:2E65 3J E96 4@>>F?:EJ[” D2:5 |6C65:E9 pCE=6J[ AC6D:56?E 2?5 rt~] %96 a_ab H:=57:C6D 😕 |2F: 2?5 E96:C 27E6C>2E9 H6C6 4@G6C65 DE625:=J 3J w2H2:: !F3=:4 #25:@ ?6HD C6A@CE6CD]k^Am

    kAm“%96 :?:E:2= C6DA@?D6 😕 E6C>D @7 DFAA@CE 7@C 3@E9 DE2E:@?D 2?5 E96 }!# ?6EH@C< 92D 366? 6IEC2@C5:?2CJ[” D2:5 z2E96C:?6 |296C[ }!# AC6D:56?E] “!6@A=6 5:5 2 =@E @7 H@C< =625:?8 FA E@ E96 G@E6[ 😕 24E:@?D 2?5 42==D] (96? E92E 5:5 ?@E AC@G6 4@?G:?4:?8[ E96J EFC?65 E@ 5:C64E DFAA@CE]”k^Am

    kAm$E2E:@?D 24C@DD E96 4@F?ECJ 92G6 DE@C:6D E92E >2<6 E96> D>:=6i E96 J@F?8DE6C 7C@> u=@C:52 H9@ 4@==64E65 >@?6J 7@C AF3=:4 DE2E:@?D 😕 p=2D<2[ D6?5:?8 2 ?@E6 HC:EE6? 😕 4C2J@?j E96 C68F=2C Sb__ 5@?@C H9@ 42>6 😕 E@ !q$ $@r2= H:E9 2 S`__[___ 4964<[ @?6 @7 E9C66 D:I7:8FC6 5@?2E:@?D E96 DE2E:@? 92D C646:G65]k^Am

    kAm|@DE DE2E:@?D 2C6?’E 😕 2C62D H:E9 D@ >2?J H62=E9J 5@?@CD] |@DE DE2E:@? >2?286CD 2C6 =:<6 y677 w2?:==:@? E@ A2J 7@C E9:?8D =:<6 9:D DE2E:@?’D ?:89E=J ?6HD42DE[ 2 AC:>2CJ ?6HD D@FC46 7@C 46?EC2= 2?5 ?@CE96C? |:??6D@E2]k^Am

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    By DAVID BAUDER – AP Media Writer

    Source link

  • PBS, NPR stations working to cope with — and survive — government funding cuts

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Coping with a sudden loss in federal funding, PBS affiliate KSPS in Spokane, Washington, faced a surprise extra hurdle. Many of its contributing members — at one point almost half — lived in Canada, and they were withdrawing support out of anger at President Donald Trump’s desire to make the country the 51st member of the United States.

    When Congress decided this summer to eliminate $1.1 billion allocated to public broadcasting, it left some 330 PBS and 246 NPR stations, each with unique issues related to their communities and history, to figure out what that means.

    Many launched emergency fund drives and are heartened by the response. The national NPR and PBS networks are reducing expected dues payments, and a philanthropic effort focused on the hardest-hit stations is taking shape. No stations have shut down, but job and programming cuts are already beginning.

    In Spokane, KSPS has always tried to keep its requests for member donations separate from appeals for public funding. Not anymore. Congress left the station with a $1.2 million hole to fill, about 18% of its budget, and the station is using that as a pretext to seek help from listeners.

    “We have definitely seen some attrition from our Canadian members,” said Skyler Reep, the station’s interim general manager.

    Long suspicious of a liberal bent to public media news coverage, Republicans in Congress responded to President Donald Trump’s wishes in July and eliminated funding for the systems. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes the funding, has taken steps to shut down.

    In some parts of the country, the answer to pleas for help have exceeded expectations. Public radio station WHQR in Wilmington, N.C. raised more than $200,000 in three days, filling a $174,000 hole and then some. It’s a small community growing fast with an influx of retirees, many who depend on the station’s news to learn about their new home, said general manager Kevin Crane.

    With $525,000 gone from its budget, Hawaii Public Radio has already raised $650,000 in an emergency fund drive. “It’s a validation that what you’re doing is essential to the community and is appreciated by the community,” said Meredith Artley, president and CEO. The 2023 wildfires in Maui and their aftermath were covered steadily by Hawaii Public Radio news reporters.

    “The initial response in terms of support for both stations and the NPR network has been extraordinary,” said Katherine Maher, NPR president. “People did a lot of work leading up to the vote, in actions and calls. When that did not prove convincing, they turned to direct support.”

    Stations across the country have stories that make them smile: the youngster from Florida who collected money for public stations in Alaska, sending a note written in crayon; the regular $300 donor who came in to PBS SoCal with a $100,000 check, one of three six-figure donations the station has received.

    Most stations aren’t in areas with so many wealthy donors. Most station managers are like Jeff Hanks of PBS’ LPTV in Lakeland, Minnesota. He lies awake wondering where he will find $1 million to pay for things like his station’s nightly newscast, a primary news source for central and northern Minnesota.

    “These are extremely, extremely challenging times,” Hanks said. “We’re fighting hard every way we can.”

    He knows membership donations won’t make up for what is missing. Both PBS and NPR have taken steps to reduce the annual dues that stations pay for programming and other services. At PBS, it’s an average 15% reduction, but needy stations get more — in one case, more than half of next year’s dues will be forgiven, said PBS president Paula Kerger.

    NPR is encouraging donors in wealthier areas to adopt stations in poorer ones, perhaps in an area where a contributor has emotional ties.

    Public media leaders are also working with a group of philanthropists led by the Knight and MacArthur foundations that is hoping to raise some $50 million to support stations in areas hardest hit be the cuts. Ed Ulman, president and CEO of Alaska Public Media, which represents nearly two dozen radio and television stations in the largest state, said he’ll be seeking money from this fund.

    Ulman said he’s been buoyed by the response from Alaskans in their effort to raise $15 million through various sources by October. The services their stations provide is free, and citizens see its value.

    “I’ve never been worried about the future of public television or radio because our community needs us,” he said, “and what we’ve seen in Alaska is an outcry about that.”

    Still, Alaska Public Media has suspended the weekly public affairs television show “Alaska Insight,” which isn’t returning after a summer hiatus. The future of “Indie Alaska,” a weekly video series highlighting the lives of Alaskans, is also in danger.

    Some stations are already making the difficult decisions of cutting staff, In Spokane, for example, 12 of KSPS’s 35 staff members have either been laid off, had their hours reduced or pay cut. Reep is also considering that future seasons of local shows like “Northwest Profiles” or the arts showcase “Inland Sessions” will have fewer episodes.

    Similar programming decisions are also being weighed on a national level. While several upcoming shows, like Ken Burns’ six-part miniseries “The American Revolution” scheduled for November, are completed, PBS will have to consider making shorter seasons of its series, Kerger said.

    “We’re working very hard so that the public doesn’t feel that there’s a change,” Kerger said.

    Between an increase in donations and “rainy day” resources set aside, the initial impact of the government action may be minimized. But that brings its own worries: It’s unlikely public media will be able to count on sympathy donors to the same extent in the future. And there’s a risk that some politicians will feel the response proves that public support isn’t necessary.

    The bigger reckoning may come a year from now, Kerger said. “I am a realist,” she said. “I have to believe that there are some vulnerable stations that are not going to make it.”

    The crisis is forcing some public stations to work together, searching for ways to share services in areas not before contemplated, in things like finances, management and programming, said Andy Russell, president and CEO of PBS SoCal. Public stations in Washington are meeting to see if they can get state financing.

    In Los Angeles, PBS SoCal has shared some of its templates for fundraising appeals with other stations. Several celebrities — people like Kerry Washington, Jack Black, Ziggy Marley, John Lithgow and John Leguizamo — have volunteered to film pitches, and the station is making them available nationwide, too, said Maura Daly Phinney, senior vice president for membership engagement and strategy.

    “We’re going to make it,” Phinney said. “The system is going to be different. But we’re going to make it.”

    ___

    David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • By moving to podcasts, Harris and Trump are turning away from legacy media to spread their messages

    By moving to podcasts, Harris and Trump are turning away from legacy media to spread their messages

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Among the legacy news outlets that have come up empty in their efforts to interview Kamala Harris and Donald Trump during the general election campaign: NPR, The New York Times, PBS and The Washington Post.

    Yet Harris chose to meet with Alex Cooper for her “Call Her Daddy” podcast and talk a little Bay Area basketball with the fellows on “All the Smoke.” Trump rejected “60 Minutes,” but has hung out with the bros on the “Bussin’ With the Boys” and “Flagrant.” Harris sat Thursday for an interview in Georgia with former NFL player Shannon Sharpe for his podcast “Club Shay Shay.”

    During this truncated campaign, some of the traditional giants of journalism are being pushed aside. The growing popularity of podcasts and their ability to help candidates in a tight race target a specific sliver of the electorate is a big reason why.

    There are certainly exceptions. Harris spoke to NBC News’ Hallie Jackson on Tuesday and held a CNN town hall on Wednesday. But political columnist John Heilemann of Puck noticed what he called “an ancient, dying beast railing against the diminishment of its status and stature in the new world.”

    “The campaigns have their structures and their media plans are very carefully thought through, even if we don’t agree with them,” said Sara Just, senior executive producer of the PBS “NewsHour.” “Obviously, we hope they will do long, probing interviews with PBS.”

    Journalists consider that an important service. Said Eric Marrapodi, vice president for news programming at NPR: “I think Americans deserve to hear the candidates have their ideas challenged.”

    That sounds like a campaign staff’s worst nightmare, infinite opportunities for their candidates to trip up and have an unplanned story dominate the news cycle. And to what end? Most legacy news organizations don’t have the reach they used to, and their audience skews old.

    For half a century, a “60 Minutes” interview near the election was considered a key stop for presidential candidates. But Trump shunned broadcast television’s most influential news show this year, and has criticized the way its interview with Harris was edited.

    The former president has stuck largely to what he perceives as friendly venues with direct access to his base audience, and continually feeds interviews to Fox News Channel despite grumbling he doesn’t find the network loyal enough. Indeed, Fox has also proven important to the Democratic ticket, which believes that appearing on its shows demonstrates willingness to deal with a hostile environment.

    Harris’ interview with Bret Baier was so contentious that it became fodder for a “Saturday Night Live” parody. After her running mate, Tim Walz, was interviewed by Shannon Bream on “Fox News Sunday” earlier this month, the campaign sought and received a return engagement the next week.

    “I was a little surprised,” Bream admitted to Walz. “What’s that about?”

    In general, television networks don’t have the audience they once did. CNN, for example, reached 1.24 million viewers per evening during the third quarter of 2016, when Trump first ran, and 924,000 this year, according to the Nielsen company. Broadcast networks are so named for their ability to reach a broad audience; sometimes candidates need that, often they don’t.

    The picture is more dire at newspapers, which collectively boasted 37.8 million in Sunday circulation in 2016 and dropped to 20.9 million by 2022, the Pew Research Center said. Candidates once submitted to tough interviews with newspaper editorial boards in the hope of winning an endorsement; now many newspapers don’t even bother making that choice.

    For years, candidates have been able to target advertising messages with great specificity — a swing state, even competitive cities, for example. The media now offers more opportunities to micro-message in the same way. Eager to shore up support among Black men, Harris appeared on Charlamagne Tha God’s influential radio program — CNN and MSNBC even simulcast it — and was interviewed by MSNBC’s Al Sharpton.

    “The View” and Stephen Colbert’s “Late Show,” where Harris has appeared, enabled her to talk to people less inclined to follow the news.

    Few outlets offer the opportunity to zero in on an audience better than podcasts, which have essentially doubled in listenership since 2016.

    The format is narrowcasting at its finest, said Andy Bowers, co-founder of the on-demand audio company Spooler Media. People who listen to podcasts often feel an intense loyalty to their favorites, almost like they’re part of a club of people with similar traits and interests — and a candidate has been invited into that club for a day.

    “You’re talking to a specific audience with a specific bent and frame of mind,” said Tom Bettag, a University of Maryland journalism professor. “That’s very helpful to somebody who is trying to avoid saying the wrong thing at the wrong time.”

    For her interview with Alex Cooper on “Call Her Daddy,” Harris appeared on the most popular podcast for women. They discussed abortion, and one of Cooper’s questions sounded like a grooved pitch: “What do you think of Trump saying he will be a protector of women?”

    On the “Flagrant” podcast, hosts asked questions about Trump’s children and how he felt during his assassination attempt. Host Akaash Singh interrupted Trump at one point to compliment him on how he raised his children.

    “I think I like this interview,” Trump said. His appearance on the podcast, one of several efforts he has made to reach young men, has been seen by nearly 5.5 million people on YouTube alone.

    Issues come up during these discussions, often mixed with the personal. On “All the Smoke,” the hosts began by asking Harris about the blind date where she met her husband.

    Certainly not everyone is writing an obituary for traditional journalists and their coverage of campaigns. “I don’t view it as a big break that takes away from legacy media,” said Rick Klein, ABC’s Washington bureau chief. ABC’s opportunity to question the candidates came in the most public of forums, when the network hosted the only debate between Harris and Trump.

    Of the 10 sources of campaign news with the most views on TikTok over the past 60 days, six were legacy news outlets, according to Zelf, a social video analytics company. They were ABC News, CNN, NBC News, MSNBC, Univision and the Daily Mail.

    For a strong news organization, there’s also a lot more that goes into covering a presidential campaign than sit-down interviews with candidates.

    “I don’t think journalists should worry too much about access journalism,” said Mark Lukasiewicz, dean of the Hofstra University School of Communication and a former NBC News producer. “We should do journalism.”

    David Halbfinger, political editor of The New York Times, cautioned against drawing too many conclusions based on a campaign that was unusually short due to Harris’ late entrance into the race. The Times has followed the campaign aggressively with trend stories, investigations and spot news coverage.

    “It’s hard to know what the lessons will be,” Halbfinger said. “For a long time, candidates have tried to go around the news media. One way or another, the mainstream media does its job so I don’t know how effective that strategy is. But it will be an interesting case study someday to see.”

    ___

    David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • By moving to podcasts, Harris and Trump are turning away from legacy media to spread their messages

    By moving to podcasts, Harris and Trump are turning away from legacy media to spread their messages

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Among the legacy news outlets that have come up empty in their efforts to interview Kamala Harris and Donald Trump during the general election campaign: NPR, The New York Times, PBS and The Washington Post.

    Yet Harris chose to meet with Alex Cooper for her “Call Her Daddy” podcast and talk a little Bay Area basketball with the fellows on “All the Smoke.” Trump rejected “60 Minutes,” but has hung out with the bros on the “Bussin’ With the Boys” and “Flagrant.”

    During this truncated campaign, some of the traditional giants of journalism are being pushed aside. The growing popularity of podcasts and their ability to help candidates in a tight race target a specific sliver of the electorate is a big reason why.

    There are certainly exceptions. Harris spoke to NBC News’ Hallie Jackson on Tuesday and held a CNN town hall on Wednesday. But political columnist John Heilemann of Puck noticed what he called “an ancient, dying beast railing against the diminishment of its status and stature in the new world.”

    “The campaigns have their structures and their media plans are very carefully thought through, even if we don’t agree with them,” said Sara Just, senior executive producer of the PBS “NewsHour.” “Obviously, we hope they will do long, probing interviews with PBS.”

    Journalists consider that an important service. Said Eric Marrapodi, vice president for news programming at NPR: “I think Americans deserve to hear the candidates have their ideas challenged.”

    That sounds like a campaign staff’s worst nightmare, infinite opportunities for their candidates to trip up and have an unplanned story dominate the news cycle. And to what end? Most legacy news organizations don’t have the reach they used to, and their audience skews old.

    For half a century, a “60 Minutes” interview near the election was considered a key stop for presidential candidates. But Trump shunned broadcast television’s most influential news show this year, and has criticized the way its interview with Harris was edited.

    The former president has stuck largely to what he perceives as friendly venues with direct access to his base audience, and continually feeds interviews to Fox News Channel despite grumbling he doesn’t find the network loyal enough. Indeed, Fox has also proven important to the Democratic ticket, which believes that appearing on its shows demonstrates willingness to deal with a hostile environment.

    Harris’ interview with Bret Baier was so contentious that it became fodder for a “Saturday Night Live” parody. After her running mate, Tim Walz, was interviewed by Shannon Bream on “Fox News Sunday” earlier this month, the campaign sought and received a return engagement the next week.

    “I was a little surprised,” Bream admitted to Walz. “What’s that about?”

    In general, television networks don’t have the audience they once did. CNN, for example, reached 1.24 million viewers per evening during the third quarter of 2016, when Trump first ran, and 924,000 this year, according to the Nielsen company. Broadcast networks are so named for their ability to reach a broad audience; sometimes candidates need that, often they don’t.

    The picture is more dire at newspapers, which collectively boasted 37.8 million in Sunday circulation in 2016 and dropped to 20.9 million by 2022, the Pew Research Center said. Candidates once submitted to tough interviews with newspaper editorial boards in the hope of winning an endorsement; now many newspapers don’t even bother making that choice.

    For years, candidates have been able to target advertising messages with great specificity — a swing state, even competitive cities, for example. The media now offers more opportunities to micro-message in the same way. Eager to shore up support among Black men, Harris appeared on Charlamagne Tha God’s influential radio program — CNN and MSNBC even simulcast it — and was interviewed by MSNBC’s Al Sharpton.

    “The View” and Stephen Colbert’s “Late Show,” where Harris has appeared, enabled her to talk to people less inclined to follow the news.

    Few outlets offer the opportunity to zero in on an audience better than podcasts, which have essentially doubled in listenership since 2016.

    The format is narrowcasting at its finest, said Andy Bowers, co-founder of the on-demand audio company Spooler Media. People who listen to podcasts often feel an intense loyalty to their favorites, almost like they’re part of a club of people with similar traits and interests — and a candidate has been invited into that club for a day.

    “You’re talking to a specific audience with a specific bent and frame of mind,” said Tom Bettag, a University of Maryland journalism professor. “That’s very helpful to somebody who is trying to avoid saying the wrong thing at the wrong time.”

    For her interview with Alex Cooper on “Call Her Daddy,” Harris appeared on the most popular podcast for women. They discussed abortion, and one of Cooper’s questions sounded like a grooved pitch: “What do you think of Trump saying he will be a protector of women?”

    On the “Flagrant” podcast, hosts asked questions about Trump’s children and how he felt during his assassination attempt. Host Akaash Singh interrupted Trump at one point to compliment him on how he raised his children.

    “I think I like this interview,” Trump said. His appearance on the podcast, one of several efforts he has made to reach young men, has been seen by nearly 5.5 million people on YouTube alone.

    Issues come up during these discussions, often mixed with the personal. On “All the Smoke,” the hosts began by asking Harris about the blind date where she met her husband.

    Certainly not everyone is writing an obituary for traditional journalists and their coverage of campaigns. “I don’t view it as a big break that takes away from legacy media,” said Rick Klein, ABC’s Washington bureau chief. ABC’s opportunity to question the candidates came in the most public of forums, when the network hosted the only debate between Harris and Trump.

    Of the 10 sources of campaign news with the most views on TikTok over the past 60 days, six were legacy news outlets, according to Zelf, a social video analytics company. They were ABC News, CNN, NBC News, MSNBC, Univision and the Daily Mail.

    For a strong news organization, there’s also a lot more that goes into covering a presidential campaign than sit-down interviews with candidates.

    “I don’t think journalists should worry too much about access journalism,” said Mark Lukasiewicz, dean of the Hofstra University School of Communication and a former NBC News producer. “We should do journalism.”

    David Halbfinger, political editor of The New York Times, cautioned against drawing too many conclusions based on a campaign that was unusually short due to Harris’ late entrance into the race. The Times has followed the campaign aggressively with trend stories, investigations and spot news coverage.

    “It’s hard to know what the lessons will be,” Halbfinger said. “For a long time, candidates have tried to go around the news media. One way or another, the mainstream media does its job so I don’t know how effective that strategy is. But it will be an interesting case study someday to see.”

    ___

    David Bauder writes about media for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former prominent BBC news anchor gets suspended sentence for indecent images of children on phone

    Former prominent BBC news anchor gets suspended sentence for indecent images of children on phone

    [ad_1]

    LONDON (AP) — Former BBC news anchor Huw Edwards, once one of the most prominent media figures in Britain, was given a suspended prison sentence Monday for images of child sexual abuse on his phone.

    Edwards, 63, pleaded guilty in Westminster Magistrates’ Court in July to three counts of making indecent images of children, a charge related to photos sent to him on the WhatsApp messaging service by a man convicted of distributing images of child sex abuse.

    Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring sentenced Edwards to a six-month prison term suspended for two years. He will be listed on a sex offenders register for seven years.

    “It is not an exaggeration to say your long-earned reputation is in tatters,” Goldspring said.

    Edwards’ fall from grace over the past year has caused turmoil for the BBC after it was revealed the publicly funded broadcaster paid him about 200,000 pounds ($263,000) for five months of his salary after he had been arrested in November while on leave. The BBC has asked him to pay it back.

    “We are appalled by his crimes,” the BBC said in a statement after the sentencing. “He has betrayed not just the BBC, but audiences who put their trust in him.”

    Edwards had been one of the BBC’s top earners when he was suspended in July 2023 over separate claims made last year involving a teenager he allegedly paid for sexually explicit photos. Police investigated and decided not to bring charges.

    Although Edwards was not publicly named at the time those allegations surfaced, his wife later revealed he was the news presenter investigated and said he was hospitalized for serious mental health issues.

    He never returned to the air but the BBC kept him on the payroll until he resigned in April for health reasons.

    Edwards began his BBC career in Wales four decades ago. He went on to become lead anchor on the nighttime news for two decades and led the coverage of the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022 as well as election coverage.

    The BBC said at the time of his guilty plea that it was shocked to hear the details of the charges against him.

    More than 375 sexual images were sent to him on WhatsApp between December 2020 and August 2021. More than 40 were indecent images of children, including seven classified as “category A” — the most indecent — with children estimated to be between 13 and 15. One child was aged between 7 and 9.

    In chats with Alex Williams, who was later convicted of distributing child sex abuse images, Edwards was asked if he wanted sexual images of a person whose “age could be discerned as being between 14 and 16,” and Edwards replied, “yes xxx,” prosecutor Ian Hope said.

    “From that chat in December 2020, Alex Williams said that he had ‘a file of vids and pics for you of someone special,’” Hope said.

    Edwards asked who the subject and was then sent three images that appeared to be the same person who appeared to be aged 14 to 16, Hope said.

    Williams later sent Edwards a video in February 2021 that involved two children, one possibly as young as seven and the other no older than 13, involving penetration, Hope said.

    Edwards did not respond, but when asked by Williams if the material was too young, he said, “don’t send underage.” He also said he didn’t want him to send anything illegal.

    Defense lawyer Philip Evans said Edwards was “truly sorry” for the offenses and the damage he had done to his family.

    “He apologizes sincerely and he makes it clear that he has the utmost regret and he recognizes that he has betrayed the priceless trust and faith of so many people,” Evans said.

    Evans said Williams had reached out to Edwards on Instagram at a time when he was mentally vulnerable and began sending him images. He said Edwards never received gratification from the images and hadn’t saved them or sent them to anyone.

    Hope said Edwards paid Williams “not insignificant sums of money,” as gifts that Williams used while studying at a university.

    At one point, Williams asked for a “Christmas gift after all the hot videos” he had sent. Edwards remarked that some of the images were “amazing,” Hope said.

    Williams, 25, was given a suspended 1-year sentence in March for possessing and distributing indecent images as well as possessing prohibited images of children.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • News organizations seek unsealing of plea deal with 9/11 defendants

    News organizations seek unsealing of plea deal with 9/11 defendants

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Seven news organizations filed a legal motion Friday asking the U.S. military commission at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to make public the plea agreement that prosecutors struck with alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and two fellow defendants.

    The plea agreements, filed early last month and promptly sealed, triggered objections from Republican lawmakers and families of some of the nearly 3,000 people killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, al-Qaida attacks. The controversy grew when Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin announced days later he was revoking the deal, the product of two years of negotiations among government prosecutors and defense attorneys that were overseen by Austin’s department.

    Austin’s move caused upheaval in the pretrial hearings now in their second decade at Guantanamo, leading the three defendants to suspend participation in any further pretrial hearings. Their lawyers pursued new complaints that Austin’s move was illegal and amounted to unlawful interference by him and the GOP lawmakers.

    Seven news organizations — Fox News, NBC, NPR, The Associated Press, The New York Times, The Washington Post and Univision — filed the claim with the military commission. It argues that the Guantanamo court had failed to establish any significant harm to U.S. government interests from allowing the public to know terms of the agreement.

    The public’s need to know what is in the sealed records “has only been heightened as the Pretrial Agreements have become embroiled in political controversy,” lawyers for the news organizations argued in Friday’s motion. “Far from threatening any compelling government interest, public access to these records will temper rampant speculation and accusation.”

    The defendants’ legal challenges to Austin’s actions and government prosecutors’ response to those also remain under seal.

    The George W. Bush administration set up the military commission at the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo after the 2001 attacks. The 9/11 case remains in pretrial hearings after more than a decade, as judges, the government and defense attorneys hash out the extent to which the defendants’ torture during years in CIA custody after their capture has rendered evidence legally inadmissible. Staff turnover and the court’s distance from the U.S. also have slowed proceedings.

    Members of the press and public must travel to Guantanamo to watch the trial, or to military installations in the U.S. to watch by remote video. Court filings typically are sealed indefinitely for security reviews that search for any classified information.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • PBS’ Judy Woodruff apologizes for an on-air remark about peace talks in Israel

    PBS’ Judy Woodruff apologizes for an on-air remark about peace talks in Israel

    [ad_1]

    FILE – Judy Woodruff, anchor and managing editor of “PBS Newshour,” takes part in a panel discussion during the 2018 Television Critics Association Summer Press Tour in Beverly Hills, Calif., on July 31, 2018. (Photo by Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP, File)

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former lead BBC news presenter pleads guilty to 3 counts of making indecent images of children

    Former lead BBC news presenter pleads guilty to 3 counts of making indecent images of children

    [ad_1]

    LONDON — Huw Edwards, the BBC’s former top news presenter, pleaded guilty Wednesday to three counts of making indecent images of children.

    The offenses he pleaded guilty to at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in central London during a 26-minute hearing involved images shared on WhatsApp between December 2020 and August 2021.

    Edwards has been remanded on bail until a sentencing hearing on Sept. 16. He could face up to 10 years in prison.

    The court heard that Edwards, 62, was involved in an online chat with an adult man on the messaging service who sent him 377 sexual images, of which 41 were indecent images of children.

    The images that were sent included seven of what are known as “category A,” which are the most indecent. Of those, the estimated age of most of the children was between 13 and 15, but one was aged between 7 and 9, the court was told.

    The court also heard that the unnamed male asked Edwards on Feb. 2, 2021 whether what he was sending was too young. Edwards told him not to send any underage images. Five more, though, were sent, and the exchange of pornographic images continued until April 2022.

    Speaking in Edwards’ defense, his lawyer Philip Evans said there is “no suggestion” that his client had “in the traditional sense of the word, created any image of any sort.”

    Edwards, he added, “did not keep any images, did not send any to anyone else and did not and has not sought similar images from anywhere else.”

    Edwards was one of the BBC’s most prominent figures, as well as one of its highest-paid before he was suspended in July 2023 for separate claims made last year. He later resigned for health reasons.

    His lawyer Evans told the court that Edwards had “both mental and physical” health issues, and that he is “not just of good character, but of exceptional character.”

    In a four-decade career at the BBC, Edwards had become one of its trusted voices. He was the lead anchor on the BBC’s nighttime news and led BBC coverage of the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II in 2022.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Apple Music – Top Podcasts

    Apple Music – Top Podcasts

    [ad_1]

    Top New Shows (US):

    1. MeSsy with Christina Applegate & Jamie-Lynn Sigler, Wishbone Production

    2. Archetypes, Lemonada

    3. The Women’s Game, Wondery

    4. The Last City, Wondery

    5. Third Time’s the Charm, Underdog Fantasy

    6. The Growler, Paul Dehner Jr.

    7. The Deep End with Lecrae, Lecrae

    8. Lost Patients, NPR

    9. Eggsplorations, Fried Egg Golf

    10. Dear Felicity, The Ringer

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UK parliamentarian admits lying about lucrative pandemic contracts but says she's done nothing wrong

    UK parliamentarian admits lying about lucrative pandemic contracts but says she's done nothing wrong

    [ad_1]

    LONDON — A member of Britain’s House of Lords has acknowledged that she repeatedly lied about her links to a company that was awarded lucrative government contracts to supply protective masks and gowns during the coronavirus pandemic.

    Underwear tycoon Michelle Mone said that she had made an “error” in denying connections to the company PPE Medpro, and regretted threatening to sue journalists who alleged she had ties to the firm. Her husband, Doug Barrowman, has acknowledged he led the consortium that owns the company.

    “I did make an error in saying to the press that I wasn’t involved,” Mone said in a BBC interview broadcast Sunday. “Hindsight is a wonderful thing. I wasn’t trying to pull the wool over anyone’s eyes, and I regret and I’m sorry for not saying straight out, ‘Yes, I am involved.’”

    Mone admitted that she is a beneficiary of her husband’s financial trusts, which hold about 60 million pounds ($76 million) in profits from the deal.

    But she argued that the couple were being made “scapegoats” in a wider scandal about U.K. government spending during the pandemic.

    “We’ve done one thing, which was lie to the press to say we weren’t involved,” she said, adding: “I can’t see what we’ve done wrong.”

    The case has come to symbolize the hundreds of millions of pounds wasted through hastily awarded contracts for protective equipment. The U.K. government has come under heavy criticism for its so-called VIP lanes during the pandemic — where preferential treatment for public contracts was given to companies recommended by politicians.

    Mone, founder of the Ultimo lingerie firm, was appointed to Parliament’s unelected upper house in 2015 by then Prime Minister David Cameron, who is now the U.K. foreign minister. A year ago, she said that she was taking a leave of absence from Parliament to “clear her name” over the scandal.

    She repeatedly denied reports that she used her political connections to recommend PPE Medpro to senior government officials. The newly established firm won contracts worth more than 200 million pounds ($250 million) during the height of the first COVID-19 wave in 2020.

    Millions of surgical gowns that it supplied to U.K. hospitals were never used, after officials decided they weren’t fit for use, and the government has since issued breach of contract proceedings. The National Crime Agency also is investigating allegations of fraud and bribery.

    Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden defended the so-called VIP lanes — reserved for referrals from lawmakers and senior officials — and insisted there had been “no favors or special treatment” for government cronies.

    “With any large allocation of government funds for large-scale procurement, there are going to be issues that arise subsequently,” he told the BBC.

    “You can see there is civil litigation happening, you can see there is a criminal investigation happening. So, if there is fraud, the government will crack down.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • British poet and political activist Benjamin Zephaniah dies at age 65

    British poet and political activist Benjamin Zephaniah dies at age 65

    [ad_1]

    LONDON — Benjamin Zephaniah, a British poet and political activist who drew huge inspiration from his Caribbean roots, has died. He was 65.

    Zephaniah died Thursday after being diagnosed with a brain tumor eight weeks ago, his family said in a statement on Instagram.

    “We shared him with the world and we know many will be shocked and saddened by this news,” the family said.

    Zephaniah, who was born in Birmingham in central England on April 15, 1958, was a sharp-witted and often provocative presence across British media as well as performing at political gatherings and demonstrations.

    Widely recognizable from his long dreadlocks and his local accent, Zephaniah was never shy in espousing his views on racism, refugees, revolutions — and healthy eating.

    The son of Barbadian postal worker and a Jamaican nurse, Zephaniah struggled in his early years as a result of dyslexia and he was kicked out of school at the age of 13, unable to read or write, before learning to do as an adult.

    In his 20s, he traveled to London, where his first book “Pen Rhythm” was published. He would subsequently write collections focusing on particular issues, including the U.K. legal system and Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories.

    His writing was often classified as dub poetry, which emerged in Jamaica in the 1970s combining reggae beats with a hard-hitting political message. He would also perform with the group The Benjamin Zephaniah Band, and in recent years appeared on the popular BBC television drama “Peaky Blinders.”

    In 2003, Zephaniah rejected the offer to become an Officer of the Order of the British Empire, or OBE, because of its association with the British empire and its history of slavery.

    “I’ve been fighting against empire all my life, I’ve been fighting against slavery and colonialism all my life, I’ve been writing to connect with people not to impress governments and monarchy so how could I then go and accept an honor that puts the word empire onto my name,” he said. “That would be hypocritical.”

    Zephaniah was a prolific children’s poet, and was a founding member of The Black Writers’ Guild, which said it is in “mourning at the loss of a deeply valued friend and a titan of British literature.”

    In 2018, he was nominated for autobiography of the year at Britain’s National Book Awards for his work, “The Life And Rhymes Of Benjamin Zephaniah.”

    Speaking that year, Zephaniah said he believed in radical changes to society with people policing themselves.

    “I’m an anarchist, I believe this needs to be torn down, I believe we need to start again, I don’t believe that we need governments and the kind of models that we have,” he said. “But I’m also aware that we’re not going to achieve that now.”

    During his music career, Zephaniah worked with the late Irish singer Sinead O’Connor on “Empire,” and with British musician Howard Jones and drummer Trevor Morais on his album “Naked.”

    Zephaniah was also a passionate supporter and ambassador of Premier League soccer team Aston Villa, Birmingham’s most successful club.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Emirati-designated COP28 leader forcefully denies report UAE wanted to seek oil deals in summit

    Emirati-designated COP28 leader forcefully denies report UAE wanted to seek oil deals in summit

    [ad_1]

    DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — The Emirati president-designate for the upcoming United Nations COP28 climate talks forcefully denied Wednesday a report alleging his nation planned to use the summit to strike oil and gas deals, a day before the summit was due to begin.

    Sultan al-Jaber, who also leads the massive state-run Abu Dhabi National Oil Co., called the allegations from a BBC report “an attempt to undermine the work of the COP28 presidency” before the talks begin Thursday. The report cited what it described as “leaked briefing documents” the broadcaster said showed the Emirates planned to discuss fossil fuel deals with 15 nations.

    “These allegations are false, not true, incorrect and not accurate,” al-Jaber told a small group of journalists gathered for a news conference that also was aired live. “I promise you never ever did I see these talking points that they refer to or that I ever even used such talking points in my discussions.”

    He added: “So please for once, respect who we are, respect what we have achieved over the years and respect the fact that we have been clear open and clean and honest and transparent on how we want to conduct this COP process.”

    The BBC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Adnan Amin, the conference’s chief executive and a top lieutenant of al-Jaber, said he wasn’t concerned about the possible fallout of the report and said he believed Emirati officials were determined to make progress toward limiting climate change.

    “I think they’re focused on delivering a transformational COP. They’re focused on creating a platform for everybody to have the ability to discuss ambitious climate action,” Amin, a veteran U.N. official and longtime proponent of renewable energy, told The Associated Press after hosting a pre-conference meeting with delegation chiefs.

    Immediately after al-Jaber’s remarks, a faked news release sent to The Associated Press described al-Jaber as having agreed to resign as CEO of ADNOC. COP28 organizers with the UAE delegation later confirmed it was false and al-Jaber would continue in his role.

    Each year, the country hosting the U.N. negotiations known as the Conference of the Parties — where COP gets its name — nominates a person to chair the talks. Hosts typically pick a veteran diplomat as the talks can be difficult to steer between competing nations and their interests.

    The nominee’s position as “COP president” is confirmed by delegates at the start of the talks, usually without objections. However, activists’ ire over al-Jaber’s selection could still see a turbulent start to the negotiations.

    ADNOC, the state oil company, has plans to increase its production of crude oil from 4 million barrels a day up to 5 million, boosting its production of carbon-emitting crude oil and natural gas.

    Al-Jaber, a 50-year-old longtime climate envoy, is a trusted confidant of UAE leader Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. He’s been behind tens of billions of dollars spent or pledged toward renewable energy in the federation of seven sheikhdoms on the Arabian Peninsula. Al-Jaber escorted Sheikh Mohammed through the COP28 site on Wednesday ahead of his remarks.

    But the fact that al-Jaber repeatedly defended himself and the country from activists’ criticism is incredibly telling in the Emirates, an autocratic nation that while a key U.S. business and military ally still tightly controls speech, bans political parties and criminalizes labor strikes.

    ___

    Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP’s climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    ___

    This story has been corrected to show that a purported statement on al-Jaber’s behalf was faked.

    [ad_2]

    Source link