NEWBURYPORT — Support for new projects addressing combined sewage overflows and updates on ongoing ones were discussed by dozens of local and state officials during Thursday’s meeting at the Newburyport Senior/Community Center.
As the administration of Gov. Ron DeSantis prepares to make Florida the first state to remove school vaccine mandates, deep concern is spreading among doctors, parents and public health workers for the safety of children and others who might be vulnerable in a disease outbreak.
This page requires Javascript.
Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.
Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
[ad_2]
By JEFF MARTIN, MIKE SCHNEIDER and DANIEL KOZIN – Associated Press
It’s been a tumultuous week for U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He and the Trump Administration fired Susan Monarez, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), just a month after she was confirmed, which triggered a series of high-profile resignations within the agency. Days later, nine former CDC leaders called on Kennedy to resign. Underlying this tumult is Kennedy’s vaccine-skeptical agenda, and on Sept. 4, Kennedy defended his controversial actions at HHS during a Senate hearing—in which he also maintained his skepticism about vaccines.
“When were you lying, Sir: when you told this committee that you were not anti-vax, or when you told Americans that there’s no safe and effective vaccine?” Sen. Tina Smith, a Democrat from Minnesota, asked Kennedy, referring to a podcast appearance in which he questioned the safety of vaccines.
“Both are true,” he replied.
Kennedy’s time as HHS secretary has been marred with controversy. In June, he fired all of 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP), which develops vaccine recommendations for the CDC to consider, and then replaced them with new members, some of whom have expressed skepticism about vaccines. In early August, he canceled $500 million in funding for mRNA vaccine development, even though that technology led to the development of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Under his watch, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decided to limit approval for COVID-19 shots to adults 65 and older or those at high risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes. And in late August, he fired Monarez, the CDC director, for refusing to rubber-stamp ACIP’s vaccine recommendations in advance, she wrote in her Sept. 4 opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren directly asked Kennedy about his interaction with Monarez in the hearing.
“Did you tell the head of the CDC that if she refused to sign off on your changes to the childhood vaccine schedule, that she had to resign?” Warren said.
“No, I told her that she had to resign because I asked her, ‘Are you a trustworthy person?’ and she said, ‘No,’” Kennedy responded.
“So you’re saying she’s lying?” Warren said.
“Yes,” Kennedy replied.
Warren also questioned Kennedy about the FDA’s decision to recommend the updated COVID-19 vaccine only for people 65 or older and children and adults with risk factors for developing severe disease. Those recommendations have caused much confusion, and both CVS and Walgreens have limited access to the vaccines in some states to people with a prescription.
“Last November, while you were under consideration to become Secretary of Health and Human Services, Mr. Kennedy, you said, ‘If vaccines are working for somebody, I’m not going to take them away,’” Warren said. “Then last week, you announced the COVID-19 vaccine is no longer approved for healthy people under the age of 65. Obviously, both things cannot be true at the same moment.”
“Anybody can get the booster,” Kennedy said.
“So you’re saying that is now the official rule of HHS: anybody is eligible to get a booster by just walking into the pharmacy?” Warren asked.
“It’s not recommended for healthy people,” he said. “No.”
Almost all Republican members of the Senate voted to confirm Kennedy earlier this year. But in the Senate hearing, some challenged Kennedy’s recent actions on vaccines. They included Sen. Bill Cassidy, a physician from Louisiana who had said he had “reservations” about Kennedy’s past positions about vaccine safety at the confirmation hearing, but who ultimately supported Kennedy’s nomination.
Cassidy began by saying he believed that President Trump deserved a Nobel Prize for Operation Warp Speed, the public-private partnership that accelerated the development of the COVID-19 vaccine. He then asked Kennedy if he agreed; Kennedy said he did.
That “surprises me,” Cassidy said. “You canceled—or HHS did, but apparently under your director—$500 million in contracts using the mRNA vaccine platform that was critical to Operation Warp Speed—again, an accomplishment that I think President Trump should get a Nobel Prize for.”
Cassidy also read letters he had received from friends and doctors who expressed concern about the confusion surrounding who was able to get a COVID-19 vaccine. One friend said that his wife, who has Stage IV lung cancer, was unable to get the vaccine at CVS “thanks to the mess at HHS.” Another wrote Cassidy that doctors are confused about who can get the COVID-19 vaccine, and that they are turning to attorneys to get opinions.
“I would say, effectively, we’re denying people vaccines,” Cassidy concluded.
“You’re wrong,” Kennedy said.
Sen. John Barrasso, a physician and Republican from Wyoming, said that he, too, had gotten messages from concerned doctors he used to work with.
“There are real concerns that safe, proven vaccines like measles, like Hepatitis B and others, could be in jeopardy, and that would put Americans at risk and reverse decades of progress,” he said.
Kennedy’s clearest statements about where he stands on vaccines came during an exchange with Sen. Michael Bennet, a Democrat from Colorado, who questioned one of the new members Kennedy appointed to the vaccine advisory panel, Dr. Retsef Levi. “Are you aware that another one of these new members, Dr. Levi, wrote that ‘Evidence is mounting and indisputable that mRNA vaccines cause serious harm including death, especially among young people’?” Bennet asked.
“I wasn’t aware that he said it, but I agree with it,” Kennedy answered.
It’s not true,” Bennet said. “It wasn’t true when he said it. It’s not true when you said it.”
Thom Tillis, a Republican Senator from North Carolina, brought up the exchange later in the hearing, seemingly surprised that Kennedy so blatantly called into question a technology that had been lauded by President Trump.
“Apparently, in the exchange with Senator Bennet, you said you agreed with Dr. Levi’s statements, who said that the mRNA vaccine causes serious harm, including death, particularly in young people. They said you agreed with that comment. Did you agree with that comment or not?” Tillis asked.
(CNN) — Florida will move to end all vaccine mandates in the state, Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo announced Wednesday.
The move would make Florida the first state to end a longstanding – and constitutionally upheld – practice of requiring certain vaccines for school students.
The state health department will immediately move to end all non-statutory mandates in the state, Ladapo said at a news conference. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who was also at the event, said state lawmakers would then look into developing a legislative package to end any remaining mandates.
Ladapo said that every vaccine mandate “is wrong and drips with disdain and slavery.”
All 50 states have had school immunization requirements since the beginning of the 1980s, with incoming kindergartners needing shots to protect against diseases including measles, polio and tetanus. No states require a Covid-19 vaccine for schoolchildren.
All states allow medical exemptions from these school vaccine mandates, and most also allow for exemptions due to personal or religious beliefs. Exemption rates have been on the rise for years in the US, with a record share of incoming kindergartners skipping the required shots in the 2024-25 school year.
“We are concerned that today’s announcement will put children in Florida public schools at higher risk for getting sick, which will have a ripple effect across our communities,” Dr. Rana Alissa, president of the Florida Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said in a statement.
“For many kids, the best part of school is being with friends – sharing space, playing on the playground, and learning together. Close contact makes it easy for contagious diseases to spread quickly,” she said. “When everyone in a school is vaccinated, it is harder for diseases to spread and easier for everyone to continue learning and having fun. When children are sick and miss school caregivers also miss work, which not only impacts those families but also the local economy.”
A study published last year by the CDC estimated that routine childhood vaccinations – such as those included in school mandates – will have prevented about 508 million illnesses, 32 million hospitalizations and 1,129,000 deaths among children born between 1994 and 2003. They also were estimated to avert $540 billion in direct costs.
Ladapo said that vaccination should be an individual choice.
“People have a right to make their own decisions, informed decisions,” he said. “What you put into your body is because of your relationship with your body and your god. I don’t have that right. Government does not have that right.”
But experts say that freedom comes with responsibilities.
“We’re all routinely subject to rules that enable us to live together safely, and I personally want those rules in place to protect me and the people I care about. We abide by speed limits, traffic lights, infant car seat and seatbelt laws – all requirements that have expanded over the years as safety technology and engineering has improved,” said Dr. Kelly Moore, president and CEO of immunize.org, a nonprofit organization focused on vaccine access.
“I share with many other people the belief that all children who are required to attend school should also have a right to the best possible defense from vaccine-preventable diseases while they are there,” she said.
Some vaccine mandates in Florida can be rolled back unilaterally by the state health department, Ladapo said, but others will require coordination with lawmakers.
Experts who oppose the move to end vaccine mandates emphasize that the change is not final and that timing is critical.
With the announcement coming after the start of the school year, Floridians will have a chance to experience and reflect on what a year of low vaccination coverage looks like, Moore said.
“This timing gives leaders several months to reconsider whether this is what’s best for Florida families. It’s quite likely that Floridians will have reasons to regret that decision as time goes by and outbreaks disrupt learning,” she said.
The American Medical Association “strongly opposes” the plan to end vaccine mandates, Dr. Sandra Adamson Fryhofer, an internal medicine physician and member of the professional organization’s board of trustees, said in a statement.
“This unprecedented rollback would undermine decades of public health progress and place children and communities at increased risk for diseases such as measles, mumps, polio, and chickenpox resulting in serious illness, disability, and even death,” she said. “While there is still time, we urge Florida to reconsider this change to help prevent a rise of infectious disease outbreaks that put health and lives at risk.”
For months, President Donald Trump’s Administration has launched a full-scale attack, led by his Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., on America’s public-health system. In the past week, however, the efforts escalated: Kennedy, who rose to fame in part owing to his conspiracy theories about vaccinations, pushed to fire Susan Monarez, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which is part of H.H.S. This came after Monarez refused to follow the lead of Kennedy’s advisers, who have tried to restrict vaccine access. (Trump has now named a Kennedy deputy, Jim O’Neill, as her replacement; Monarez’s lawyer claims that her firing was “legally deficient.”) The Trump Administration has already tried to limit access to COVID vaccines; earlier this month, the F.D.A. approved updated COVID vaccines but limited access to them to people sixty-five and older, and those with certain preëxisting conditions that put them at risk of severe illness. In mid-September, a C.D.C. advisory committee will meet and is expected to make a recommendation on who should be able to get the shots.
I spoke about the crisis at the C.D.C. with Paul Offit, the director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and a professor of pediatrics at the Perelman School of Medicine, at the University of Pennsylvania. During our conversation, which has been edited for length and clarity, we discussed the extent to which the federal government can deter or restrict vaccine access, what Kennedy is really trying to accomplish, and why making it more difficult for pharmacies to inoculate patients may change public health in America.
How important are C.D.C. recommendations to vaccine uptake? How centralized a process is this?
Everyone who is involved in administering vaccines looks to the C.D.C. for their recommendations. So the Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.) is a licensing body. It says a company can sell their vaccine, but it’s the C.D.C., specifically the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (A.C.I.P.), that gives specific recommendations. They say, O.K., now that it’s licensed, you can administer this vaccine to these people at these time intervals. And they have always been the central source, so they’re critical. They are the group that people look to for advice.
And so, when you say “people,” you’re talking about doctors, pharmacies, insurance companies, everyone, essentially.
Yes. I think parents look to their doctors for advice, but I think the doctors and the pharmacists and others are looking to the A.C.I.P. for advice.
I imagine there will be a lot of doctors, a majority of doctors in the United States, who are going to end up disagreeing with the Trump Administration’s guidance about vaccines. What, then, do doctors have the ability or inability to do, based on what the C.D.C. does?
So, for example, the C.D.C.—prior to Kennedy becoming the Secretary of H.H.S.—had recommended that young children receive a vaccine based on data that were presented in April of this year showing that thousands of children were being hospitalized, that one in five of those children hospitalized were being sent to the intensive-care unit, that a hundred and fifty-two children had died, that virtually none who died were vaccinated, and that half who died were previously healthy. Most of those children were less than four years old, and many were less than six months of age. So therefore there was a clear, firm recommendation by the C.D.C. to vaccinate young children. Then, at the end of May, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., stood and said H.H.S. is no longer recommending the COVID vaccine for healthy young children and for pregnant women, even though children under six months of age could only be protected by vaccinating their mother [during pregnancy].
That threw a wrench into the system, and here’s how it played out. The American Academy of Pediatrics is going to publish a clear recommendation in its journal saying that all children six months and older who have not been vaccinated should be; and that children less than two years of age should clearly be vaccinated because of the data showing that COVID can be a serious and occasionally fatal infection in that age group. Then the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists stood up in the defense of pregnant women and said that pregnant women should receive a vaccine.
The only vaccine available for children less than five is Moderna’s vaccine. And that is licensed only for children in a high-risk category. So now you’re stuck. You’re wondering, Is insurance going to cover this? Is insurance going to cover a young child, a healthy child getting a vaccine? Are physicians going to feel comfortable, in terms of liability, giving that? And, for the most part, physicians are covered by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, so, more important, are pharmacists going to feel comfortable? And, even though that act does not include COVID vaccines, another act does. I talked to two lawyers and my understanding is that it doesn’t cover pharmacists, so they are being left in the lurch. It’s all confusing, and I think that’s the point. I think Kennedy’s point is to make it confusing.
Why is Moderna the only one making a vaccine for kids, and why did they only recommend it for kids who are not healthy?
Moderna and Pfizer initially had a vaccine approved under an emergency-use authorization (E.U.A.), and then Moderna advanced that from the emergency-use authorization to a licensed product. But that licensure through the F.D.A. unfortunately only included children who were at high risk, because what the Trump F.D.A. did was they basically usurped the role of the C.D.C. The job of the F.D.A. is to say, O.K., if this vaccine is safe and effective, then it’s licensed and the company can sell it. Then it’s up to the C.D.C. to say, O.K., looking at the epidemiological data that we have, it looks like all children older than six months benefit. But the F.D.A. preëmpted that, and basically they took over the role of the C.D.C. Project 2025 wants to eliminate C.D.C. as a recommending body. And one way to do this is what the F.D.A. just did, which is to limit the vaccines to just those children who are at high risk. Pfizer’s vaccine was approved through an emergency-use authorization for children less than five years old, but they just didn’t advance the license quickly enough. And so Kennedy saw an opportunity and basically said, We’re not going to approve anything through E.U.A. anymore. And that eliminated Pfizer’s vaccine for children.
I have read that some countries in Europe have a more relaxed attitude to children’s vaccinations than we did before Trump. Is that accurate? And do you think that there’s anything to be said for that?
The goal of the vaccine is to keep people out of the hospital, keep them out of the intensive-care unit, keep them out of the morgue. You’re not going to be protected against mild to moderate disease for long after either a natural infection or a vaccination. Four to six months later, your antibody response will fade; you’re still going to be protected against severe disease for a fairly long time, but you’ll still be at risk for mild to moderate disease. So then the question becomes who’s getting hospitalized? Who’s dying? That’s who you’re trying to protect. It really falls into four groups: people who are pregnant, people who are over seventy-five, people who are immunocompromised, and people who have high-risk medical conditions like chronic lung or heart disease. The logical response is to say, O.K., let’s just target those groups. Let’s give the vaccine every year to those groups, the groups most likely to be hospitalized or suffer serious illness.
We didn’t. We just kept saying everybody over six months of age should get a yearly vaccine—and I think that was wrong. Very early on, actually, I started to say that we should target the groups who are being hospitalized. That’s the goal of the vaccine. I was getting a lot of criticism for saying that we should just target the high-risk groups. I suddenly had gotten off the bus, and I think, in the public-health world, you’re either on the bus or off the bus. Someone I talked to in that world said that would be seen as a nuanced recommendation, which is going to be seen as a garbled recommendation. And the best way to get everybody vaccinated who should be vaccinated is to make a universal recommendation. I guess it’s a testable hypothesis, but I don’t agree with that. And so it was always seen as a messaging issue. And the A.C.I.P., in April of this year, started to discuss whether they should just target high-risk groups. But then those people got fired and replaced by this group with members who are science-averse and anti-vaccine.
In the fall of 2024, I predicted that America might be on the brink of having its “raw milk moment” given now Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s political elevation. Since then, hardly a week has passed without unpasteurized milk making headlines across the country. A recent bacterial outbreak in Florida has now heightened the controversy and further solidified raw milk’s central role in America’s broiling culture wars.
The Florida Department of Health (DOH) issued a press release in early August detailing acampylobacter and E. coli outbreak in the Sunshine State. Officials alerted that “there have been 21 cases since January 24, 2025, including six children under the age of 10, and seven hospitalizations linked to consumption of raw milk.” The DOH explicitly identified Keely Farms Dairy, a small family farm, as the source of the outbreak.
Weeks later, a Florida woman, represented by a self-described “national food poisoning law firm,” filed suit against Keely Farms, alleging that its raw milk caused her two-year-old son to contract a bacterial infection and fall ill. The woman further alleges that she fell ill herself and developed sepsis, which eventually led to the loss of her pregnancy.
The details from the lawsuit are heartbreaking, but the more we learn about the situation surrounding Keely Farms, the more bizarre the story becomes. Despite DOH’s definitive declaration that Keely Farms was the source of the bacterial outbreak, it was later found that the agency had reached this conclusion despite not conducting a single test at the farm, nor alerting the farm that it was under investigation. In a Facebook post, Keely Farms said that the department’s press release “blindsided” them. (The DOH’s press release stated that it would “continue working with Keely Farms Dairy,” insinuating that the relevant parties had been working together throughout.)
Confusing things further, Keely Farms was recently inspected by the Florida Department of Agriculture. “We passed, as always,” Keely Farms posted.
Selling raw milk for human consumption is illegal in Florida. As a result, milk that has not been pasteurized—the process of heating the liquid to a specific temperature for five to 30 seconds to kill harmful bacteria—can only be sold for livestock feed. Keely Farms’ raw milk was appropriately labeled as “not for human consumption,” meaning that the 21 Floridians who allegedly drank the farm’s milk (and those who also gave it to their children) chose to do so despite this warning.
It’s unclear how the current litigation involving Keely Farms will ultimately play out, although it’s likely that more follow-on suits will be filed, using the DOH’s press release as evidentiary fodder.
Politico recently noted that raw milk has gone from “the darling of the organic liberals, deserving of sympathetic coverage…to the conservative culture war signal that is a sweetheart of deep-red state legislatures.” This is on display in Florida. Despite the DOH targeting Keely Farms for its raw milk, Florida’s Surgeon General Joseph A. Ladapo—an appointee of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and the head of the DOH—recently expressed support for human consumption of raw milk in a social media post.
On the other hand, Florida’s agriculture commissioner, who was endorsed by President Donald Trump, has encouraged Floridians to only drink pasteurized milk, citing the dangers of raw milk. This means that the head of the Florida agency that targeted Keely Farms’ raw milk products is unexpectedly pro-raw milk, while the head of the state agency that inspected and greenlighted Keely Farms’ operations is against raw milk.
This confusion highlights how raw milk has become a political flashpoint. The state health agency blamed Keely Farms while skipping basic investigative steps, the agriculture department cleared the farm, and their leaders publicly contradicted their own agencies.
When policy decisions are filtered through the lens of culture wars, the result is not clarity or safety but a muddle of mixed signals. Floridians are left unsure whether raw milk is a health risk, a personal freedom, or just another pawn in America’s endless red vs. blue standoff.
The Trump administration’s cuts to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funding for state and local health departments had vastly uneven effects depending on the political leanings of a state, according to a KFF Health News analysis. Democratic-led states and select blue-leaning cities fought back in court and saw money for public health efforts restored — while GOP-led states sustained big losses.
The Department of Health and Human Services in late March canceled nearly 700 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention grants nationwide — together worth about $11 billion. Awarded during the covid-19 pandemic, they supported efforts to vaccinate people, reduce health disparities among demographic groups, upgrade antiquated systems for detecting infectious disease outbreaks, and hire community health workers.
Initially, grant cancellations hit blue and red states roughly evenly. Four of the five jurisdictions with the largest number of terminated grants were led by Democrats: California, the District of Columbia, Illinois, and Massachusetts.
But after attorneys general and governors from about two dozen blue states sued in federal court and won an injunction, the balance flipped. Of the five states with the most canceled grants, four are led by Republicans: Texas, Georgia, Oklahoma, and Ohio.
In blue states, nearly 80% of the CDC grant cuts have been restored, compared with fewer than 5% in red states, according to the KFF Health News analysis. Grant amounts reported in an HHS database known as the Tracking Accountability in Government Grants System, or TAGGS, often don’t match what states confirmed. Instead, this analysis focused on the number of grants.
The divide is an example of the polarization that permeates health care issues, in which access to safety-net health programs, abortion rights, and the ability of public health officials to respond to disease threats diverge significantly depending on the political party in power.
In an emailed statement, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the agency “is committed to protecting the health of every American, regardless of politics or geography. These funds were provided in response to the COVID pandemic, which is long over. We will continue working with states to strengthen public health infrastructure and ensure communities have the tools they need to respond to outbreaks and keep people safe.”
The money in question wasn’t spent solely on covid-related activities, public health experts say; it was also used to bolster public health infrastructure and help contain many types of viruses and diseases, including the flu, measles, and RSV, or respiratory syncytial virus.
“It really supported infrastructure across the board, particularly in how states respond to public health threats,” said Susan Kansagra, chief medical officer of the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials.
The Trump cutbacks came as the U.S. recorded its largest measles outbreak in over three decades and 266 pediatric deaths during the most recent flu season — the highest reported outside of a pandemic since 2004. Public health departments canceled vaccine clinics, laid off staff, and put contracts on hold, health officials said in interviews.
After its funding cuts were blocked in court, California retained every grant the Trump administration attempted to claw back, while Texas remains the state with the most grants terminated, with at least 30. As the CDC slashed grants in Texas, its measles outbreak spread across the U.S. and Mexico, sickening at least 4,500 people and killing at least 16.
Colorado, which joined the lawsuit, had 11 grant terminations at first, but then 10 were retained. Meanwhile, its neighboring states that didn’t sue — Wyoming, Utah, Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma — collectively lost 55 grants, with none retained.
In Jackson, Ohio, a half-dozen community health workers came to work one day in March to find the Trump administration had canceled their grant five months early, leaving the Jackson County Health Department half a million dollars short — and them without jobs.
“I had to lay off three employees in a single day, and I haven’t had to do that before. We don’t have those people doing outreach in Jackson County anymore,” Health Commissioner Kevin Aston said.
At one point, he said, the funding helped 11 Appalachian Ohio counties. Now it supports one.
Marsha Radabaugh, one employee who was reassigned, has scaled back her community health efforts: She’d been helping serve hot meals to homeless people and realized that many clients couldn’t read or write, so she brought forms for services such as Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to their encampment in a local park and helped fill them out.
“We would find them rehab places. We’d get out hygiene kits, blankets, tents, zero-degree sleeping bags, things like that,” she said. As a counselor, she’d also remind people “that they’re cared for, that they’re worthy of being a human — because, a lot of the time, they’re not treated that way.”
Sasha Johnson, who led the community health worker program, said people like Radabaugh “were basically a walking human 411,” offering aid to those in need.
Radabaugh also partnered with a food bank to deliver meals to homebound residents.
Aston said the abrupt way they lost the funds — which meant the county unexpectedly had to pay unemployment for more people — could have ruined the health district financially. Canceling funding midcycle, he said, “was really scary.”
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime anti-vaccine activist and promoter of vaccine misinformation, has called the CDC a “cesspool of corruption.” At HHS, he has taken steps to undermine vaccination in the U.S. and abroad.
Federal CDC funding accounts for more than half of state and local health department budgets, according to KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. States that President Donald Trump won in the 2024 election received a higher share of the $15 billion the CDC allocated in fiscal 2023 than those that Democrat Kamala Harris won, according to KFF.
The Trump administration’s nationwide CDC grant terminations reflect this. More than half were in states that Trump won in 2024, totaling at least 370 terminations before the court action, according to KFF Health News’ analysis.
The Columbus, Ohio, health department had received $6.2 million in CDC grants, but roughly half of it — $3 million — disappeared with the Trump cuts. The city laid off 11 people who worked on investigating infectious disease outbreaks in such places as schools and nursing homes, Columbus Health Commissioner Mysheika Roberts said.
She also said the city had planned to buy a new electronic health record system for easier access to patients’ hospital records — which could improve disease detection and provide better treatment for those infected — but that was put on ice.
“We’ve never had a grant midcycle just get pulled from us for no reason,” Roberts said. “This sense of uncertainty is stressful.”
Columbus did not receive its money directly from the CDC. Rather, the state gave the city some funds it received from the federal government. Ohio, led by Republican Gov. Mike DeWine and a Republican attorney general, did not sue to block the funding cuts.
Columbus sued the federal government in April to keep its money, along with other Democratic-led municipalities in Republican-governed states: Harris County, Texas, home to Houston; the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County in Tennessee; and Kansas City, Missouri. A federal judge in June blocked those cuts.
As of mid-August, Columbus was awaiting the funds. Roberts said the city won’t rehire staff because the federal funding was expected to end in December.
Joe Grogan, a senior scholar at the University of Southern California’s Schaeffer Institute and former director of the White House Domestic Policy Council in Trump’s first term, said state and local agencies “are not entitled” to the federal money, which was awarded “to deal with an emergency” that has ended.
“We were throwing money out the door the last five years,” Grogan said of the federal government. “I don’t understand why there would ever be a controversy in unspent covid money coming back.”
Ken Gordon, Ohio Department of Health spokesperson, wrote in an email that the $250 million in grants lost had helped with, among other things, upgrading the disease reporting system and boosting public health laboratory testing.
Some of the canceled HHS funding wasn’t slated to end for years, including four grants to strengthen public health in Indian Country, a grant to a Minnesota nonprofit focused on reducing substance use disorders, and a few to universities about occupational safety, HIV, tuberculosis, and more.
Brent Ewig, chief policy and government relations officer for the Association of Immunization Managers, said the cuts were “the predictable result of ‘boom, bust, panic, neglect’ funding” for public health.
The association represents 64 state, local, and territorial immunization programs, which Ewig said will be less prepared to respond to disease outbreaks, including measles.
“The system is blinking red,” Ewig said.
Methodology
KFF Health News’ analysis of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention grants sought to answer four questions: 1) How many grants have been terminated in the U.S. under the Trump administration since March? 2) Which states saw the most grants cut? 3) What were the grants for? and 4) Did the grant terminations affect blue, red, and purple states differently? This follows a similar analysis by KFF Health News for an article on nationwide NIH grant terminations.
Our primary data source was a Department of Health and Human Services website showing grant terminations. We compared an initial list of grant terminations from April 3 with one from July 11 to determine how many grants had been restored. The USAspending.gov database helped us track grants by state.
To classify states politically, we followed the same steps from our April coverage of National Institutes of Health grant terminations. States were “blue” if Democrats had complete control of the state government or if the majority of voters favored Democratic presidential candidates in the last three elections (2016, 2020, 2024). “Red” states were classified similarly with respect to the Republican Party. “Purple” states had politically split state governments and/or were generally considered to be presidential election battleground states. The result was 25 red states, 17 blue states, and eight purple states. The District of Columbia was classified as blue using similar methods.
This analysis does not account for potential grant reinstatements in local jurisdictions where the funds were awarded indirectly rather than directly from the CDC; it accounts only for the recipients’ location, and excludes grants terminated from Compacts of Free Association states and other foreign entities that received grants directly from the CDC. At least 40 CDC grants were terminated that were meant for global health efforts or assisting public health activities in other nations following the Trump administration’s order for the CDC to withdraw support for the World Health Organization.
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.
Related
[ad_2]
Henry Larweh, Rachana Pradhan, Rae Ellen Bichell and KFF Health News
The January wildfires left many scars on the city of Los Angeles, from rubble-reduced homes to torched abandoned vehicles. Though cleanup crews quickly cleared much of the debris, one alarming invisible impact lingered over the city for months, a new study suggests.
In late March—more than two months after the flames died out—researchers detected levels of carcinogenic hexavalent chromium (a.k.a. chromium-6) 200 times greater than baseline levels for LA air. If this pollutant sounds familiar, you’re probably thinking of the 2000 film Erin Brockovich, a dramatization of a true story about hexavalent chromium water contamination. Though the levels the researchers detected fell below certain safety thresholds, the particles’ unusually small size immediately raised concerns.
The study is currently available on the preprint server Research Square, but it has been reviewed by the LA Health Consortium, lead author Michael Kleeman, an environmental engineer at the University of California Davis, told Gizmodo in an email. Though it has yet to go through formal peer review, he and his colleagues chose to release the findings to alert policymakers and the public to this potentially hazardous pollutant as soon as possible.
In a statement to Science Magazine, the South Coast Air Quality Management District emphasized that the study’s sampling was limited and that its own data do not suggest there is an immediate health risk from hexavalent chromium.
Fire activates chromium’s toxicity
Chromium is a heavy metal that naturally occurs in soil, plants, and rocks, but it’s also present in some building materials, including stainless steel, chrome plating, pigments, and cement. In its common form, chromium III is an essential nutrient that helps the body break down fats and carbohydrates.
When oxidized, chromium III becomes toxic hexavalent chromium. Certain levels of exposure to this pollutant may increase the risk of lung, nasal, and sinus cancer, according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Research has shown that fire can drive the oxidation of chromium III, and a 2023 study found that hexavalent chromium can be present in wildfire smoke and ash.
Thus, Kleeman and his colleagues expected to find hexavalent chromium when they sampled air from debris cleanup zones around the Eaton and Palisades fires. They detected concentrations ranging from 8.1 nanograms to 21.6 nanograms per cubic meter in the neighborhoods most affected by the fires: Altadena and the Pacific Palisades. This is well below the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health’s workplace exposure limit of 200 nanograms per cubic meter of air but above the EPA’s indoor limit of 0.1 nanogram per cubic meter.
What they didn’t expect was the puny size of the particles. “It is really surprising to find all of the hexavalent chromium in the LA fire debris cleanup zones concentrated in particles smaller than 56 nanometers,” Kleeman said.
Smaller particles, bigger hazard
The main pollutant of concern in wildfire smoke is PM2.5—hazardous particles smaller than 2.5 micrometers wide. Their size allows them to lodge themselves deep inside the lungs, causing tissue damage and inflammation. The hexavalent chromium nanoparticles Kleeman and his colleagues detected are an order of magnitude smaller.
“Nanoparticles smaller than 50 nanometers can cross cell membranes, meaning they can get deeper into our bodies than larger particles,” he explained. “Nanoparticles can circulate in our blood and get to all of our major organs.” Still, the specific health risks from hexavalent chromium nanoparticles remain uncertain. “The current findings warrant caution, but not panic,” Kleeman said.
He plans to return to Altadena and the Palisades to determine whether airborne hexavalent chromium levels have returned to normal and identify potential sources and exposure hotspots. Understanding this newly realized threat is more important than ever as global temperatures rise.
“California is in a new reality where climate change is driving wildfires into major urban areas,” Kleeman said. “We all need to work together to adapt to this new reality.”
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. is facing a call to be questioned on the heels of the firing of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Director Susan Monarez on Wednesday.
Newsweek reached out to HHS via online form Thursday for comment.
Why It Matters
Monarez’s exit signals an extraordinary rupture between scientific leadership at the CDC and political leadership at HHS during a period of major policy change to vaccine advisory structures and funding.
President Donald Trump nominated RFK Jr. to head the department, which he has since pushed forward under the campaign of Making America Healthy Again.
What To Know
In a statement posted to X on Thursday, Independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders said in part, “In just six months, Secretary Kennedy has completely upended the process for reviewing and recommending vaccines for the public… He has unilaterally narrowed eligibility for COVID vaccines approved by the FDA, despite an ongoing surge in cases. He has spread misinformation about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines during the largest measles outbreak in over 30 years. He continues to spread misinformation about COVID vaccines. Now he is pushing out scientific leaders who refuse to act as a rubber stamp for his dangerous conspiracy theories and manipulate science,” Sanders said.
The senator also asked HELP Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, a Louisiana Republican, to initiate a public hearing to “compel” both Secretary Kennedy and Monarez, along with recently resigned CDC officials, to testify about the firing, the statement noted.
The confrontation coincided with the resignations of multiple senior CDC officials.
The three other senior CDC officials who resigned around the same time—Dr. Debra Houry, Dr. Daniel Jernigan and Dr. Demetre Daskalakis—cited concerns about the politicization of science and changes in agency direction.
Democratic Senator Patty Murray of Washington also called for RFK Jr. to be fired in the aftermath of the news. “I had serious doubts about CDC Director Monarez’s willingness to stand up against RFK Jr.’s personal mission to destroy public health in America—I’m glad that I was wrong. If there are any adults left in the White House: we cannot let RFK Jr. burn what’s left of CDC. FIRE HIM,” the lawmaker said in part on X Wednesday night.
RFK Jr. is pushing out scientific leaders who refuse to act as a rubber stamp for his dangerous conspiracy theories and manipulate science.
Today, I am calling for a bipartisan congressional investigation into the firing of CDC Director Dr. Monarez. pic.twitter.com/rX8nRDO768
Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky on X on Thursday: “Good riddance to these extremists at CDC. There is NO medical evidence that the COVID vaccine changes transmission or health outcome for healthy children. Senior CDC officials quit after director ousted by RFK Jr.”
Rapid Response 47 X account on X on Thursday: “The President and @SecKennedy are committed to restoring trust and transparency and credibility to the CDC… We’re going to make sure that folks that are in positions of leadership there are aligned with that mission.”
Daskalakis on X in part on Wednesday: “This decision has not come easily, as I deeply value the work that the CDC does in safeguarding public health and am proud of my contributions to that critical mission. However, after much contemplation and reflection on recent developments and perspectives brought to light by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., I find that the views he and his staff have shared challenge my ability to continue in my current role at the agency and in the service of the health of the American people. Enough is enough.”
Sanders, in his letter to Cassidy, in part: “Enough is enough. We have got to make it clear to Secretary Kennedy that his actions to double down on his war on science and disinformation campaign must end. Too many lives are at stake. Yesterday, you called for oversight of the firings and resignations at the agency. I agree. As a start, the American people should hear directly from Secretary Kennedy and Dr. Monarez and every member of our committee should be able to ask questions and get honest answers from them. I urge you to call a hearing immediately on these actions.”
The Trump Administration named Jim O’Neill, a top deputy to RFK Jr., as the new acting chief of the CDC after Monarez’s ouster.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. can be seen speaking during a cabinet meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump in the Cabinet Room of the White House on August 26, 2025, in… Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. can be seen speaking during a cabinet meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump in the Cabinet Room of the White House on August 26, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Susan Monarez is no longer the director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, according to a post by the official Department of Health and Human Services X account. She had been in the position for just a month. In the wake of her apparent ouster, several other CDC leaders have resigned.
Named acting CDC director in January, Monarez was officially confirmed to the position by the Senate on July 29 and sworn in two days later. During her brief tenure, the CDC’s main campus in Atlanta was attacked by a gunman who blamed the Covid-19 vaccine for making him sick and depressed. A local police officer, David Rose, was killed by the suspect when responding to the shooting.
In a statement Wednesday evening Mark Zaid and Abbe David Lowell, Monarez’s lawyers, alleged that she had been “targeted” for refusing “to rubber-stamp unscientific, reckless directives and fire dedicated health experts.” The statement further says that Monarez has not resigned and does not plan to, and claims that she has not received notification that she’s been fired.
According to emails obtained by WIRED, at least three other senior CDC officials resigned Wednesday evening: Demetre Daskalakis, director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases; Debra Houry, chief medical officer and deputy director for program and science; and Daniel Jernigan, director of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases.
More resignations are expected to become public soon, say CDC with knowledge of the departures.
“I worry that political appointees will not make decisions on the science, but instead focus on supporting the administration’s agenda,” says one CDC employee, who was granted anonymity out of concerns over retribution. “I worry that the next directors will not support and protect staff.”
President Donald Trump’s original pick to lead the CDC was David Weldon, a physician and previous Republican congressman from Florida who had a history of making statements questioning the safety of vaccines. But hours before his Senate confirmation hearing in March, the White House withdrew Weldon’s nomination. The administration then nominated Monarez.
The CDC leadership exits come amid recent vaccine policy upheaval by HHS secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who in May removed the Covid-19 vaccine from the list CDC’s recommended vaccines for healthy children and pregnant women. The following month, he fired all 17 sitting members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a group of independent experts that makes science-based recommendations on vaccines.
In their place, he installed eight new members, including several longtime vaccine critics. “A clean sweep is necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science,” Kennedy said in a statement at the time.
Earlier this month under Kennedy’s leadership, HHS canceled a half billion dollars in funding for research on mRNA vaccines. This month HHS also announced the reinstatement of the Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines, a federal advisory panel created by Congress in 1986 to improve vaccine safety and oversight for children in the US. The panel was disbanded in 1998, when it issued its final report. Public health experts worry that the panel is a move to further undermine established vaccine science.
WASHINGTON — A Trump administration proposal to reverse a landmark finding that climate change is dangerous to the public relies heavily on a report from the Department of Energy that dozens of scientists say is flawed.
The Environmental Protection Agency is seeking to use the DOE’s work to overturn the climate concept known as the “endangerment finding.” If the administration succeeds, many laws and rules aimed at reducing or restricting greenhouse gas emissions could be eliminated.
The most common critique from 64 scientists who responded to questions from AP was that the administration’s reports ignored, twisted or cherry-picked information to manufacture doubt about the severity and threat of climate change. Fifty-three of the 64 scientists criticized the quality of the reports.
The Department of Energy report said Arctic sea ice has declined about 5% since 1980. That number is accurate for Antarctica, while Artic sea ice actually declined more than 40% in the period.
Jennifer Marlon, director of data science at the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, highlighted a section on U.S. wildfires that acknowledged that fire data from before 1960 isn’t reliable for comparisons. Yet the administration used that unreliable data in a chart going back to 1920, leaving readers with the impression that wildfire rates were higher many decades ago than they are now, Marlon said.
Experts repeatedly said the reports were biased. Nineteen scientists used variations of the phrase “cherry pick” to describe citations in the administration reports.
Francois Bareille, a French economist, has done work concluding that previous estimates about climate-related crop losses in French agriculture were overly pessimistic. The administration’s reports cited that work, but Bareille said it shouldn’t have because it’s wrong to generalize his findings to other regions.
Climate scientist Zeke Hausfather said the reports pulled a single figure from his work on climate modeling to build a case that the models scientists use are often overly pessimistic. Hausfather said his research actually concluded that climate models have performed quite well.
He called the government’s process a “farce.”
The authors of the report said any errors found will be corrected.
In a joint statement, authors of the Energy Department report said the document clearly says it’s not meant to be a comprehensive review of climate science. Instead, the authors said, it’s focused on data and topics that the media and others have underreported and overlooked.
A handful of scientists contacted by AP spoke positively about the report.
One expert cited in the work praised it, saying it departed from unnecessarily alarmist findings of other national and international climate assessments.
James Davidson, a professor at the University of Exeter focused on economics, has published work that disputes the mainstream consensus that rising carbon dioxide levels in the past caused warming.
He said the Department of Energy report is giving voice to beliefs that were previously shut out.
Mainstream scientists have already mobilized to respond. A few have voiced criticism on social media. The National Academy of Sciences, a collection of private, nonprofit institutions set up to provide independent and objective analysis, is preparing a fast-tracked special report on the latest evidence about whether greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health.
The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Public health professionals from Alaska, Colorado, District of Columbia, Kentucky, Nebraska, New York, and Washington receive highest honors
ATLANTA, August 26, 2025 (Newswire.com)
– Each year, the Safe States Alliance honors its members and partners for their contributions to the field of injury and violence prevention (IVP). This year’s award winners collectively demonstrate commitment to innovation, excellence, and vision to advance the field of IVP.
From rising stars to seasoned veterans, the following public health professionals will be honored for their significant contributions during the Safe States 2025 Annual IVP Conference, which will take place virtually September 9-11.
Alex Kelter Vision Award: Ming Qu, PhD, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (Lincoln, NE) for his lifetime contributions, bringing vision and leadership to the field of IVP. Dr. Qu is honored for his dedication to advancing the practice of epidemiology for nearly 30 years, including leading the development of a comprehensive statewide information system to address pressing public health issues.
Advancing Health Equity Award: Hillary Strayer, MPH, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (Anchorage, AK) for her unwavering commitment to advancing the collection and understanding of Alaska Native and American Indian data sets.
Ellen R. Schmidt Award: Michael Bauer, MS, New York State Department of Health (Albany, NY) for his outstanding service to Safe States and significant contributions to the field of injury and violence prevention for more than 20 years.
Injury and Violence Prevention Achievement Award: Josephine Peterson, MPH, NYU Langone Hospital (Long Island, NY) for her dedication to advancing injury and violence prevention at Long Island’s Level 1 Trauma Center through evidence-based initiatives that promote injury prevention, support trauma recovery, and improve safety across the lifespan.
Journey Award: Xinyao deGrauw, MD, PhD, MPH, Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center (Seattle, WA) for her significant contributions to injury research and surveillance in Washington state and nationally.
Partner of the Year Award: Liz Voyles, MPA, Brass Ring Communications (Washington, DC) for her tireless support of Safe States and commitment to building public support for injury and violence prevention.
President’s Award: Paul Bonta, Safe States Alliance (Breckenridge, CO) for demonstrating excellence in organizing efforts and developing relationships that strengthen and expand Safe States’ policy and advocacy footprint.
Rising Star Award: Jessica Brown, AICP, MPA, UofL Health – UofL Hospital J. David Richardson Trauma Center (Goshen, KY) for her great strides as an early career injury and violence prevention professional, leading partnerships and programs that address the top causes of traumatic injury in Louisville.
Formed in 1993, the Safe States Alliance is the only national non-profit organization and professional association comprised of public health IVP professionals representing all U.S. states and territories dedicated to strengthening the practice of IVP.
Health officials in Mississippi have declared a public emergency over the state’s rising infant mortality rate, which is the highest it’s been in a decade. Data from 2024 show that for every 1,000 infant births in the state, there were 9.7 deaths within the first year of life—up from 8.9 in 2023.
“Every single infant loss represents a family devastated, a community impacted and a future cut short,” said state health officer Dr. Dan Edney in a statement declaring the public health emergency, which allows the state to mobilize resources more quickly than it otherwise would have.
According to state data, 3,527 babies have died in Mississippi before age 1 since 2014. The state saw a particularly high increase in neonatal deaths, which occur during the first month of life, and a very high overall infant mortality rate for Black families: 15.2 per 1,000 live births, compared to 5.8 per 1,000 live births in white families.
Poor outcomes for both mothers and babies are not new for Mississippi, which received an “F” on a 2024 March of Dimes report card that ranked maternal and infant health by state. Mississippi had the highest infant mortality rates in the country in 2024, according to the report card, and the highest rates of preterm births, when a baby is born before 38 weeks of pregnancy. (Being born preterm is associated with an increased risk for many short-term and long-term health conditions.) Some of the contributing factors to these bad outcomes include poor physical health of mothers and subpar access to care for both moms and babies.
“Mississippi has historically ranked low when it comes to these birth outcomes,” says Dr. Michael Warren, chief medical and health officer for the March of Dimes, in an interview with TIME. “But they’re not alone.”
Between 2023 and 2024, infant mortality rates worsened in 24 states, including Arkansas and Louisiana, Warren says. “This is reflective of a large trend.”
These states had already been struggling with maternal and infant heath, but outside factors are likely worsening these outcomes. Many rural counties have lost ob-gyns or hospital maternity services in recent years, so women have to travel further for prenatal and maternity care. More than half of counties in Mississippi and one-third of counties in the U.S. are considered maternity-care deserts, which means they have no hospitals providing obstetric care, no ob-gyns, and no certified nurse midwives.
In Mississippi and in the South, ob-gyns are leaving because of low Medicaid and private insurance compensation rates that make it difficult to keep a practice open. Practices that remain open are often short-staffed, and providers sometimes burn out after being on a 24/7 call schedule. As a result, women having emergencies during childbirth may not be able to get to a doctor in time.
Mississippi and many other states in the South have also not expanded Medicaid, meaning women may be going into pregnancy less healthy than they would if they had more access to health care. If women do not have health insurance, they may not be visiting a doctor regularly to control chronic conditions like obesity or diabetes. One of the big factors leading to more infant deaths, Warren says, is that many are born premature, and much of prematurity is driven by a mom’s health before she even becomes pregnant.
“Taking care of those chronic diseases before pregnancy matters,” Warren says, “so that when a person chooses to become pregnant, they’re in an optimal state of health, and they’re going to have the best chance of a good outcome for them and the baby.”
In the public-health emergency announcement, Mississippi says that it is planning to cut down on the number of ob-gyn deserts by increasing prenatal care opportunities in certain counties. It also plans to expand a community health worker program to connect moms and babies to care near their homes.
“Mississippi has the knowledge, the resources and the resilience to change this story,” said Edney, the state health officer, in a statement. “It will take all of us—policymakers, healthcare providers, communities and families—working together to give every child the chance to live, thrive and celebrate their first birthday.”
Texas health officials on Aug. 18 declared the end of a measles outbreak that had sickened more than 760 people across the state and killed two children. Doctors and public-health officials involved in the outbreak, most of whom had previously never encountered a measles patient, are now taking stock of what they’ve learned about the virus and the best ways to prevent and control outbreaks of the disease.
Measles, they say, is as contagious as feared, and unvaccinated people are the most vulnerable. But while vaccination remains the best way to prevent measles, Texas public-health officials say they could have adopted a more inclusive approach when engaging with vaccine-hesitant communities about the virus and its risks. More investment is also needed, they say, into building trust between rural communities and health officials.
These insights should be taken to heart as measles cases continue to rise in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, say public-health experts who fear that measles may now be here to stay. More than 1,300 measles cases have been reported nationally this year, the highest number since the disease was declared eliminated in the U.S. in 2000.
“Even though the Texas outbreak looks to be under control, we’re still seeing a lot of cases,” says Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University School of Public Health. “The measles situation is not over.”
Here are some lessons learned from the Texas measles outbreak.
Measles is as dangerous, contagious, and vaccine-preventable as expected
“What surprised me was how textbook measles is,” says Katherine Wells, the public health director of Lubbock, Texas, where many measles patients were treated during the recent outbreak.
Wells has been in public health for almost 25 years and had never before seen a measles case. But as patients streamed into Lubbock’s hospitals and clinics, a clear clinical pattern—which Wells had learned about in the medical literature—emerged. Unvaccinated people with measles first develop a runny nose and conjunctivitis, then a high fever and rash.
The disease also proved to be as contagious as feared. In Lubbock, an unvaccinated child became ill with the virus after sitting in the same waiting room as someone with measles, Wells says. “Seeing those cases on the ground confirmed what was in the books.”
About one in five measles cases are severe, says Dr. Leila Myrick, a family medicine and obstetrics physician in Seminole, Texas, who treated more than 20 people with measles this year, most of them children. Several of Myrick’s patients developed pneumonia and required breathing treatments including supplemental oxygen, she says.
Almost 100 people, mostly children, were hospitalized in Texas because of complications from measles. Most people who have contracted measles in the U.S. this year have been unvaccinated.
Throughout the outbreak, U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. downplayed the risk of measles, saying in a Fox News interview in March that it’s “very, very difficult for measles to kill a healthy person.” The two children in Texas who died from the disease were unvaccinated but had no preexisting conditions, officials have said.
“Measles is not a little cold. It can cause very high fever that can become very rapidly life-threatening,” said Richard Plemper, a Georgia State University biomedical scientist whose lab is developing an antiviral treatment for the virus family that includes measles. There is currently no approved treatment for the disease.
About 0.1% of measles cases in developed countries are fatal, Plemper says. “Yes, that’s a small number, but if it’s your child, what comfort is that? Measles is vaccine-preventable. In a country like the U.S., nobody has to die from measles.”
Public-health experts say there is still more to learn about the disease’s longer-term effects on patients who have recovered. Measles can cause yearslong “immune amnesia,” in which the body forgets how to fight other infections. In very rare cases, the disease can also cause a deadly type of brain inflammation that strikes several years after the initial infection.
Better testing and wastewater surveillance can hinder disease spread
At the start of the Texas outbreak, measles testing was a major hurdle, state public-health officials say. It took up to a week for test results to come back, which stymied efforts to curb the spread of the virus.
It wasn’t until about six weeks into the outbreak that testing capabilities improved, and people were able to get test results the next day, says Wells, the Lubbock public-health director.
Wastewater surveillance for measles could also have been instituted earlier, public-health experts say. Such testing, which was started midway through the Texas outbreak, can flag the presence of a disease even before people come forward with symptoms. Recently in Idaho, wastewater surveillance detected measles activity at least a week before the state’s first case in 30 years was reported.
Pushing vaccination is important—but so is meeting people ‘where they are’
The Texas outbreak started in a Mennonite community in Gaines County where vaccination rates are low. State health officials say they pushed hard to get people in the community vaccinated, setting up mobile vaccine clinics and educating people on the safety and efficacy of the shot.
In the end, more than 300 people in the county were vaccinated as part of this campaign, says Zach Holbrooks, executive director of the South Plains Public Health District, which includes Gaines County.
But officials said they could have done a better job at providing not just vaccines but also information and other resources that could have helped families that chose not to vaccinate and had sick kids at home. Many children showed up to the hospital with dehydration, for instance, and could have benefited from information on the importance of keeping children hydrated, Wells says.
The Texas Department of State Health Services said in an emailthat in future outbreaks, it would continue to share information about the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, but it might also introduce more general messaging that does not focus on vaccines, such as when people with measles symptomsshould seek emergency care, sooner.
“We have to meet people where they are,” says Lori Freeman, CEO of the National Association of County and City Health Officials, which represents local health departments across the country.
Freeman says that building trust with communities—and doing so before an emergency strikes—is indispensable. “Our work is only as successful as our ability to partner with communities,” she says.
People do listen to official advice, and the quality of that advice matters
The Texas outbreak demonstrated that the public does heed official recommendations, says Plemper of Georgia State University, and highlights the heavy responsibility that health leaders shoulder when doling out advice.
For instance, Kennedy repeatedly said that supplementing with vitamin A could effectively treat measles. Vitamin A is not an approved measles treatment, and while some research has shown that people with vitamin A deficiencies can get sicker from the disease, there is no evidence that people who aren’t deficient will benefit from it.
Taking too much vitamin A, however, can cause organ damage. Several children in Texas were reportedlyhospitalized earlier this year after taking too much vitamin A.
Nuzzo of Brown’s Pandemic Center says Kennedy—who has long questioned the safety of the MMR vaccine and provided misleading information about the outbreak—did little to help curb the outbreak in Texas.
“We have an HHS Secretary who was pushing false narratives about the vaccine and the virus,” she says. “It was controlled despite him.”
Who wouldn’t want to avoid a hangover after a night of drinking alcohol? You may have heard ads on podcasts or seen them on social media: A relatively new class of products claims to allow you to enjoy your night out partying, without suffering hangover symptoms the next day—that is, if you swallow the products before or after imbibing.
Different products contain different ingredients. These might include electrolytes, antioxidants, probiotics, certain vitamins, minerals, or other nutrients—in the form of powders, capsules, or drinks—that companies claim mitigate the effects of alcohol on your body.
For example, ZBiotics’ pre-alcohol probiotic drink claims to help your body break down acetaldehyde, a byproduct of alcohol metabolism. Myrkl contains prebiotics, probiotics, the amino acid L-cysteine, and vitamin B12 to supposedly help your body process alcohol and reduce post-drinking fatigue. Capsulyte Pregame contains dihydromyricetin (DHM), a flavonoid found in many plants, as well as milk thistle extract, polyphenols, and n-acetyl cysteine (NAC), a precursor to the antioxidant glutathione, to help reduce the effects of alcohol on your body, the company claims. And WaterBoy’s Weekend Recovery and DripDrop’s Electrolyte Powder Packets contain electrolytes (such as potassium, magnesium, and sodium) to help you stay hydrated.
Testimonials about their benefits are abundant, but scientific evidence supporting their purported perks is scant. “The gold standard of effectiveness is the controlled, double-blind clinical trial—none of these have that standard of proof,” says Dr. Robert Swift, a professor of psychiatry and human behavior and public health at Brown University who has conducted clinical and laboratory research on the pharmacological treatment of alcohol and drug abuse and dependence. Some of these products target dehydration, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re effective for preventing hangovers, Swift adds.
A small 2022 study, which was funded by Myrkl’s parent company DeFaire Medical AB, found that after 24 people took the supplements twice a day for a week, less alcohol was absorbed into their bodies after drinking, leading to a 70% reduction in blood alcohol levels when they did have a drink. However, there was no difference in a cognitive function test among people who did or did not take the supplement before drinking alcohol—and the study didn’t specifically address hangover symptoms.
In a 2022 review of 21 placebo-controlled randomized trials that tested a broad swath of purported hangover-prevention ingredients, researchers concluded “only very low quality evidence of efficacy is available to recommend any pharmacologically active intervention for the treatment or prevention of alcohol-induced hangover.”
What causes hangovers—and can these products really do anything about it?
Hangovers are typically brought on by a combination of several factors. For one thing, drinking alcohol can lead to dehydration, as well as electrolyte imbalances. “Alcohol is a diuretic, so it makes you urinate more,” says Dr. Michael Weaver, medical director of the Center for Neurobehavioral Research on Addiction at UTHealth Houston.
In addition, “alcohol is very pro-inflammatory,” Swift says. This is partly because “alcohol makes the intestines leaky—bacteria in the intestines that produce inflammation can get into the bloodstream and cause inflammation” throughout the body. Inflammation contributes to hangover symptoms like fatigue and headache.
Alcohol consumption can also disturb your sleep, which can exacerbate all of these symptoms. And as the liver breaks down alcohol, a byproduct called acetaldehyde is produced; at high levels, acetaldehyde can cause inflammation as well as nausea, vomiting, headaches, and other hangover symptoms, Swift says.
Some of the pre-alcohol products address one or more of these various issues. But “most of them are fluids and electrolytes—they provide a fancier way of doing what people should be doing anyway, which is staying hydrated,” says Weaver.
The idea behind including probiotics in some of these products is that, theoretically, ingesting bacteria that contain enzymes that destroy acetaldehyde in the stomach may help prevent hangover symptoms. But even if these probiotics were able to get rid of acetaldehyde in the stomach, “you also have it in the liver and the brain,” Swift notes.
As far as other ingredients go, B vitamins can help people metabolize alcohol, allowing them to “get rid of it a little quicker,” Swift says. And DHM and flavones have anti-inflammatory activity, which could be helpful for dealing with headaches and other inflammatory symptoms.
But, again, existing studies have not robustly proven that the formulations on the market effectively combat hangovers.
The bottom line
While the jury is still out on whether these pre-alcohol products can actually prevent a hangover, there are other concerns related to how they might affect someone’s drinking habits. “For some people, a hangover may provide a natural biological deterrent for heavy drinking,” Swift says. Even if they did work as advertised—and Swift doubts that they do—“eliminating that biological check might not be good for you,” he says.
Indeed, there’s some concern that regular use of these types of products, broadly, could inadvertently promote excessive drinking: A study published in 2023 in the journal Alcohol and Alcoholism found that young adults who use over-the-counter hangover remedies—which include a wide array of supplements—tend to have more problematic drinking patterns such as binge drinking.
“The best way to avoid a hangover is not to drink alcohol,” says Weaver. The second-best way? “If you’re going to drink, don’t just drink alcohol—drink other things besides alcohol, such as water or non-sugary beverages, and alternate alcoholic drinks with non-alcoholic drinks.”
To prevent a hangover, it’s also smart to slow your body’s absorption of alcohol by eating a meal or substantial snack before you drink. In other words, Weaver says, heed the advice you knew about long before products like these hit the market: “Don’t drink on an empty stomach.”
In August 2023, downed power lines on Maui, Hawaii, sparked a wildfire that quickly exploded into multiple, fast-moving blazes fanned by high winds. Over several days, the fires reduced much of the town of Lāhainā to ashes, displacing thousands and killing more than 100 people.
New research published Thursday, August 22, in the journal Frontiers in Climate suggests this disaster also caused a population-wide increase in mortality beyond what the official death count captured. By calculating the all-cause excess fatality rate—how many more deaths took place over a given period than expected—scientists found a 67% increase in the local mortality rate for August 2023. During the deadliest week of the blaze, the local death rate was 367% higher than expected. These findings underscore a need for improved disaster preparedness that incorporates Native Hawaiian ecological knowledge, the researchers concluded.
What excess death rate reveals
Looking at the excess death rate offered a fuller picture of the fire’s impact, co-first author Michelle Nakatsuka, a medical student and researcher at New York University’s Grossman School of Medicine, told Gizmodo in an email. “The official numbers mostly count direct causes, like burns or smoke inhalation, but excess deaths capture [the] true toll better by telling us how many more people died than would have otherwise been expected in the month of the Lāhainā fires,” she explained.
Disasters like wildfires often cause deaths in indirect ways that affect communities over time. When clinics shut down and roads are blocked off, people can’t refill their prescriptions or get dialysis treatments, Nakatsuka explained. Stress and displacement can worsen chronic conditions, and power or communication failures can delay emergency responses. “These impacts are amplified in under-resourced settings and [are] disproportionately suffered by vulnerable groups, like the elderly or people of color,” she said.
The tragic toll of the Maui fires
Even with this knowledge, Nakatsuka and her colleagues were surprised by the increase in excess mortality during the month of August 2023. Their analysis included all causes of death except covid-19. “While we anticipated an increase in excess deaths, seeing more than 80 additional deaths in the month of the Lāhainā fires was striking,” Nakatsuka said. “It was also surprising to see that the proportion of those deaths occurring outside of medical settings was larger than expected,” she added.
Indeed, the number of deaths that didn’t take place in a medical context—such as the emergency room—rose from 68% in previous months to 80% in August 2023. These people died in homes or public locations, suggesting that many were unable to reach medical care because of the fires.
A path to resilience
While all-cause excess mortality is useful for correlating increased fatalities with natural disasters, it offers little insight into the details of these deaths, Nakatsuka clarified. “The main limitation here is that we can’t say exactly which deaths were caused by the fires or look into Lāhainā-specific excess mortality; we can only measure the overall increase in deaths,” she said, adding that future research should analyze death records alongside medical and toxicology reports to identify causes of death.
Still, these findings reveal a need to improve Maui’s disaster preparedness and invest in wildfire mitigation strategies rooted in Indigenous knowledge, Nakatsuka said. “Native Hawaiian practices center around caring for the land (mālama ʻāina) in ways that naturally reduce fire risk, like restoring native plants, maintaining diverse ecosystems, and managing water resources,” she said. “Bringing Indigenous knowledge together with modern climate prediction tools will minimize risk of future climate crises and center the community’s voice at the heart of disaster prevention and recovery efforts.”
More than 750 public health workers sent a letter to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday, urging him to “stop spreading inaccurate health information” and guarantee employees’ safety, in the wake of a shooting at the headquarters of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) earlier this month.
The letter—signed by both named and anonymous current and former staffers at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), CDC, and National Institutes of Health who noted they signed the letter in their “own personal capacities”—said the attack on the CDC’s headquarters in Atlanta on Aug. 8 “was not random.”
“The attack came amid growing mistrust in public institutions, driven by politicized rhetoric that has turned public health professionals from trusted experts into targets of villainization—and now, violence,” public health workers said in the letter, which was also addressed to members of Congress. “CDC is a public health leader in America’s defense against health threats at home and abroad. When a federal health agency is under attack, America’s health is under attack. When the federal workforce is not safe, America is not safe.”
The public health workers went on to accuse Kennedy, a prominent vaccine skeptic, of being “complicit in dismantling America’s public health infrastructure and endangering the nation’s health by repeatedly spreading inaccurate health information.” They cited several statements and actions that Kennedy has made in recent months, pointing to his claim that mRNA vaccines “fail to protect effectively” against upper respiratory infections such as COVID-19—despite years of research showing that the shots are both safe and effective—and his announcement that HHS would be winding down mRNA vaccine development. They also condemned his decision to remove all the experts from a critical vaccine advisory committee. And they said some of Kennedy’s past comments—such as claiming that there is a “cesspool of corruption at CDC”—were “sowing public mistrust” in the health agency.
The public health workers expressed their wish to honor police officer David Rose, who was killed while responding to the attack on the CDC headquarters in August.
HHS said in a statement to TIME that Kennedy “is standing firmly with CDC employees—both on the ground and across every center—ensuring their safety and well-being remain a top priority.” The agency added that, after the shooting earlier this month, Kennedy traveled to Atlanta and called the CDC “a shining star” among the world’s health agencies.
“For the first time in its 70-year history, the mission of HHS is truly resonating with the American people—driven by President Trump and Secretary Kennedy’s bold commitment to Make America Healthy Again,” HHS said. “Any attempt to conflate widely supported public health reforms with the violence of a suicidal mass shooter is an attempt to politicize a tragedy.”
Law enforcement officials said they found evidence that the suspect in the August shooting, who they identified as Patrick Joseph White of Georgia, blamed the COVID-19 vaccine for his health ailments. White was found dead at the scene, and authorities later said that he died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound.
CDC Director Susan Monarez noted the dangers posed by misinformation in a staff meeting in the wake of the attack. “We know that misinformation can be dangerous,” she said, according to NBC News. “Not only to health, but to those that trust us and those we want to trust. We need to rebuild the trust together.”
The day after the shooting, Kennedy expressed his condolences to Rose’s family in a post on X.
“We know how shaken our public health colleagues feel today. No one should face violence while working to protect the health of others,” he said. “We are actively supporting CDC staff on the ground and across the agency. Public health workers show up every day with purpose—even in moments of grief and uncertainty. We honor their service. We stand with them. And we remain united in our mission to protect and improve the health of every American.”
In their letter, public health workers claimed Kennedy’s “dangerous and deceitful statements and actions have contributed to the harassment and violence experienced by CDC staff.” They implored him to take three steps by Sept. 2 to “uphold his pledge to safeguard the health of the American public,” including asking him to “stop spreading inaccurate health information,” particularly regarding vaccines, infectious disease transmission, and the country’s public health institutions. They also urged him to affirm the scientific integrity of the CDC and guarantee the safety of HHS employees, such as through emergency procedures and alerts.
“The deliberate destruction of trust in America’s public health workforce puts lives at risk,” they wrote in the letter. “We urge you to act in the best interest of the American people—your friends, your families, and yourselves.”
A South Lake Tahoe resident has tested positive for the plague — yes, the same pest-transmitted disease estimated to have killed 25 million Europeans in the Middle Ages.
It is believed that the person contracted the rare and dangerous disease after being bitten by an infected flea while camping in the South Lake Tahoe area, according to El Dorado County health officials. The patient is under the care of a medical professional and recovering at home, health officials said.
“Plague is naturally present in many parts of California, including higher-elevation areas of El Dorado County,” Kyle Fliflet, the county’s acting director of public health, said in a statement. “It’s important that individuals take precautions for themselves and their pets when outdoors, especially while walking, hiking and/or camping in areas where wild rodents are present.”
Plague is a very serious disease but can be treated with easily available antibiotics, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The sooner a patient is diagnosed and receives treatment, the greater their chances of making a full recovery, according to the CDC.
The disease is caused by the bacterium Yersinia pestis and is most commonly spread to humans by bites from infected fleas, according to El Dorado County health officials. The disease can also be spread by infected-rodent bites or by exposure to infected dogs and cats.
The disease is extremely uncommon and infects on average seven people in the U.S. per year, according to the CDC. Nevertheless, it must be taken seriously because of the high potential for death if left untreated.
The last plague case reported in El Dorado County was in 2020 and was also believed to be transmitted in the South Lake Tahoe area, health officials said. Two California plague cases were reported in 2015, probably caused by bites from an infected flea or rodent in Yosemite National Park. All three patients received treatment and made a full recovery, health officials said.
There were 45 ground squirrels or chipmunks recorded with evidence of exposure to the plague bacterium in the Lake Tahoe Basin from 2021 to the present, according to the California Department of Public Health, which routinely monitors rodent populations for plague activity across the state.
El Dorado County health officials urged residents and visitors to take steps to avoid exposure to rodents or ticks when exploring the wilderness around Lake Tahoe. Measures include wearing long pants tucked into boots, using a bug repellent with DEET, never feeding or touching rodents, refraining from camping near animal burrows or dead rodents, and leaving dogs at home when possible.
More than 80% of plague cases in the U.S. have been in the bubonic form, from which patients will develop swollen, painful lymph nodes called buboes, according to the CDC. This form of the disease typically results from an infected-flea bite, and symptoms such as buboes, fever, headache, chills and weakness develop within two to eight days, according to the CDC.
In July, an Arizona resident died of the pneumonic form of the plague, which can develop when bacteria spread to the lungs of a patient with untreated bubonic plague. This is the most serious form of the plague and can have an incubation period of just one day. It’s also the only form of the plague that can spread from human to human.
During the Middle Ages, infected rats were to blame for the Black Death in Europe in the 14th century. The last urban rat-infected plague outbreak in America took place in Los Angeles in 1924 and 1925, according to the CDC.
The Food and Drug Administration has warned the public not to consume certain frozen shrimp products sold at Walmart due to possible contamination with Cesium-137, a radioactive isotope.
It said the warning affects the Great Value brand of raw frozen shrimp sold at the superstore, adding that anyone who purchased the products should dispose of them.
A statement from the agency said the FDA was “actively investigating reports of Cesium-137 (Cs-137) contamination in shipping containers and frozen shrimp products” shipped from Indonesia.
It said that the U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) had detected Cs-137 in shipping containers at four U.S. ports: Los Angeles, Houston, Savannah, and Miami. Containers that tested positive for the isotope have been denied entry to the U.S.
The FDA added that although it had not confirmed the presence of contamination in any commercial product in the United States, the shrimp products appear “to have been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby it may have become contaminated with Cs-137 and may pose a safety concern.”
“If you have recently purchased raw frozen shrimp from Walmart that matches this description, throw it away. Do not eat or serve this product,” the FDA statement added.
The FDA said limited exposure to Cs-137 can cause “an elevated risk of cancer, resulting from damage to DNA within living cells of the body.”
The amount of Cs-137 the FDA detected is below its “levels of concern” for imported foods, it said. Even so, the agency said that the recall attempts to address concerns related to “longer term, repeated low dose exposure.”
The FDA recommended that anyone who has bought or who sells the products throw them out. Walmart similarly advised customers with the products in their possession to discard them. The company confirmed to TIME that it immediately recalled the products from impacted stores and said customers who had already purchased them could visit any Walmart store for a full refund.
“The health and safety of our customers is always a top priority,” a Walmart spokesperson said in a statement. “We have issued a sales restriction and removed this product from our impacted stores. We are working with the supplier to investigate.”
Cs-137 is the most common radioactive isotope of Cesium, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It is produced via nuclear fission in order to be used in medical devices and gauges, and it is often used in radiation therapy to treat cancer.
Cs-137 can also be a waste product of nuclear reactors and has been found near nuclear accidents.
People are often exposed to small quantities of Cs-137 due to the isotope remaining in the environment following nuclear weapons testing in the mid-20th century. Cs-137 can last in soil for years, which means that it often ends up in the food cycle and in foods that people ingest. Typically this is at extremely low levels that are not harmful to people—though as the FDA emphasized in its statement, even low levels of Cs-137 radiation can eventually build up and become harmful.