ReportWire

Tag: public finance

  • Beverly faces nearly $4 million budget shortfall this spring

    BEVERLY — The city is facing a nearly $4 million shortfall in funding the fiscal 2027 operating budget.

    That number — $3,921,385, to be exact — was in a report by Beverly’s Financial Forecasting Committee released this month.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 4@>>:EE66 >6E D6G6C2= E:>6D E9:D 72== 2?5 62C=J H:?E6C E@ 56E6C>:?6 7:?2?4:2= 8@2=D 2?5 @3;64E:G6D 29625 @7 E96 4:EJ’D DAC:?8 3F586E D62D@?] p=D@[ E@ >2<6 C64@>>6?52E:@?D @? 9@H @77:4:2=D D9@F=5 DECF4EFC6 E96 7:D42= a_af 3F586E]k^Am

    kAm~?6 724E DE@@5 @FE — E92E “E9:D 567:4:E 7@C642DE 😀 BF2=:E2E:G6=J 5:776C6?E” E92? E9@D6 D66? 😕 AC6G:@FD J62CD[ E96 4@>>:EE66 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“%96 2CD6?2= @7 DEC2E68:6D E@ 4=@D6 E96 AC@;64E65 567:4:E 7@C E96 7:CDE E:>6 😕 564256D C6BF:C6D C2:D:?8 766D^@C 4FEE:?8 D6CG:46D H:E9 F?AC64656?E65 :>A24E[” E96 3@5J HC@E6 😕 :ED C6A@CE]k^Am

    kAm“%96 u:?2?4:2= u@C642DE r@>>:EE66 H2?ED E@ 6>A92D:K6 2 D6?D6 @7 FC86?4J] q6G6C=J A@=:4J >2<6CD[ 2?5 E96 4@>>F?:EJ 2D 2 H9@=6 ?665 E@ C64@8?:K6 E92E 5:77:4F=E 564:D:@?D H:== 92G6 E@ 36 >256]”k^Am

    kAm%@ 4=@D6 E96 82A[ E96 C6A@CE 7@4FD65 @? :>AC@G:?8 E96 4:EJ’D C6G6?F6 DEC62>D[ 2?5 C65F4:?8 E96 67764E @7 8C@H:?8 6IA6?5:EFC6D]k^Am

    kAm%96 >F?:4:A2= D:56 @7 E96 3F586E 😀 6IA64E65 E@ D66 2 E@E2= 6IA6?5:EFC6 @7 ;FDE F?56C Sgg]b >:==:@? 😕 7:D42= a_af[ 2 c]ebT :?4C62D6 7C@> E96 AC6G:@FD 7:D42= J62C[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 C6A@CE] ~? E96 D49@@=D D:56[ q6G6C=J 😀 2?E:4:A2E65 E@ DA6?5 ;FDE F?56C Sh_ >:==:@?[ 2 d]afT :?4C62D6]k^Am

    kAm%96D6 C:D6D AC:>2C:=J 4@>6 7C@> 9:896C 4@DED @7 4@==64E:G6 32C82:?:?8 28C66>6?ED H:E9 E96 4:EJ’D F?:@?D[ A6?D:@? 4@DED 2?5 9:DE@C:42==J 9:89 :?4C62D6D 😕 E96 4:EJ’D 962=E9 :?DFC2?46 3:==D[ 2== 2>@F?ED E92E 92G6 ?@ H:88=6 C@@> 😕 7F?5:?8]k^Am

    kAmq6G6C=J 😀 2=D@ DECF88=:?8 H:E9 DE2E6 2:5 ?@E <66A:?8 A246 H:E9 :?7=2E:@?[ =:>:E65 C6G6?F6 DEC62>D[ :?7=2E:@?2CJ 724E@CD E92E 2C6 9:896C E92? E2I=:>:E:?8 !C@A@D:E:@? a½ 42? 4@G6C[ E96 9:89 4@DED @7 DA64:2= 65F42E:@?[ 2 `b]eT :?4C62D6 E@ E96 4@DE @7 D6?5:?8 DEF56?ED E@ G@42E:@?2= D49@@=D W?2>6=J tDD6I %649X 2?5 @E96C 7:I65 4@DED[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 C6A@CE]k^Am

    kAm|@DE @7 E96 AC6DDFC6D 2C6 3F586E 492==6?86D 7@C DFCC@F?5:?8 4@>>F?:E:6D E@@[ >2<:?8 E9:D FA4@>:?8 J62C 6DA64:2==J E@F89 7@C 7F?5:?8 >F?:4:A2= 3F586ED @? E96 }@CE9 $9@C6]k^Am

    k9bm#64@>>6?52E:@?D 7@C 7:==:?8 E96 82Ak^9bm

    kAm%96 4@>>:EE66 C64@>>6?565 q6G6C=J 4@?D:56C C65F4:?8 DE277 😕 D49@@=D 2?5 @? E96 4:EJ D:56[ 2D H6== 2D :?4C62D6 C6G6?F6 DEC62>D]k^Am

    kAm%@ C2:D6 C6G6?F6[ E96 8C@FA 😕 E96 C6A@CE AC@A@D65 C2:D:?8 E96 EC2D9 766[ :?4C62D:?8 D@>6 D49@@=C6=2E65 766D E9C@F89 E96 $49@@= r@>>:EE66 2?5 DEF5J:?8 H96E96C A2C<:?8 766D 2?5 7:?6D 42? 36 :?4C62D65]k^Am

    kAm%96 4@>>:EE66 ?@E65 E96D6 24E:@?D H@F=5 :>AC@G6 E96 4FCC6?E 3F586E D:EF2E:@?[ 3FE 6G6?EF2==J[ E96D6 C6G6?F6 DEC62>D H:== DE28?2E6 2D 2 C6DF=E @7 :?4C62D65 =23@C 4@DED 2?5 E96 4@DED @7 8@@5D D@=5]k^Am

    kAm%96 E@E2= 86?6C2= 7F?5 C6G6?F6D E96 4:EJ 2?E:4:A2E6D E@ 4@==64E 😕 7:D42= a_af 😀 23@FE S`fg]h >:==:@?[ 2 a]hfT :?4C62D6 7C@> E96 =2DE 7:D42= J62C] %96 A6C46?E286 😀 2 D>2==6C :?4C62D6 E92? H92E q6G6C=J 92D C6A@CE65 😕 AC:@C J62CD[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 C6A@CE]k^Am

    kAm%96 4@>>:EE66 D2:5 :E 6IA64ED E96 4:EJ E@ C2:D6 E96 E2I =6GJ 3J E96 >2I:>F> a]dT 😕 7:D42= a_af 2?5 D66 2? 255:E:@?2= S`]ad >:==:@? 😕 ?6H 8C@HE9] %96 r:EJ r@F?4:= 92D G@E65 E@ <66A E2I C2E6D 2E E96 =:>:E D:?46 a_a`]k^Am

    kAm|@?6J 7@C >2:?E2:?:?8 C@25D 2?5 D:56H2=6 7C@> E96 4:EJ’D 7C66 42D9 2>@F?E 😕 E96 7FEFC6 3642FD6 @7 C:D:?8 =23@C 4@DED[ C2E96C E92? 7C@> E96 86?6C2= 7F?5 2D :E 92D 😕 E96 A2DE[ E96 4@>>:EE66 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmu@C q6G6C=J E@ <66A :ED 7C66 42D9 2>@F?E 36EH66? :ED E2C86E65 bTgT @7 E96 @G6C2== 86?6C2= 7F?5[ E96 4@>>:EE66 C64@>>6?5D[ 2D :E FDF2==J 5@6D[ E@ 6DE:>2E6 E96 FA4@>:?8 7:D42= J62C’D C6G6?F6D 4@?D6CG2E:G6=J]k^Am

    kAm%96 4@>>:EE66 2=D@ AC@A@D65 4:EJ @77:4:2=D 4@?D:56C C65F4:?8 E96 E2C86E A6C46?E286 D@ q6G6C=J 42? :?4C62D6 @A6C2E:@?2= 6IA6?5:EFC6D[ 2 >@G6 E92E 4@F=5 36 ?646DD2CJ 😕 E96 D9@CE E6C>[ 3FE E92E H@F=5 4C62E6 >@C6 AC6DDFC6D @? E96 @A6C2E:?8 3F586E 😕 E96 7FEFC6]k^Am

    kAm%96C6 H2D 2=D@ 4@?46C? 7C@> 4@>>:EE66 >6>36CD E92E E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E H:== DF3DE2?E:2==J 4FE D49@@= 7656C2= 8C2?ED 2?5 @E96C AC@8C2>D FD65 3J q6G6C=J !F3=:4 $49@@=D] %96 5:DEC:4E C646:G6D 23@FE Sa]d >:==:@? 😕 DF49 7F?5D 2??F2==J]k^Am

    kAm“$9@F=5 E96C6 36 2 C65F4E:@? 😕 E96D6 7F?5D[ E96 4:EJ @7 q6G6C=J H@F=5 7:?5 :E 2== 3FE :>A@DD:3=6 E@ C6A=6?:D9 E96D6 7656C2= 2H2C5D H:E9:? E96:C 3F586E2CJ 42A24:EJ[” E96 4@>>:EE66 D2:5]k^Am

    kAm|6>36CD @7 E96 4@>>:EE66 2C6 (2C5 d r:EJ r@F?4:=@C 2?5 r92:C z2E9=66? u6=5>2?[ ‘:46 r92:C 2?5 s:C64E@C @7 u:?2?46^r:EJ pF5:E@C qCJ2?E pJ=6D[ (2C5 c r@F?4:=@C $4@EE w@FD6>2?[ q6G6C=J !F3=:4 $49@@=D s:C64E@C @7 u:?2?46 t>>2 !F8=:D:[ (2C5 b $49@@= r@>>:EE66 >6>36C z22C:? #@3:?D@?[ (2C5 c $49@@= r@>>:EE66 >6>36C y677C6J $:=G2[ s@>:?:4 r@A6=2?5[ z2C6? u@82CEJ 2?5 !2F= |2?K@]k^Am

    kAmk6>mr@?E24E r2C@=:?6 t?@D 2Ek^6>m k6>mk2 9C67lQ>2:=E@irt?@Do?@CE9@73@DE@?]4@>Qmrt?@Do?@CE9@73@DE@?]4@>k^2mk^6>mk6>m]k^6>mk^Am

    By Caroline Enos | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Healey signs $2.3B closeout budget

    BOSTON — Gov. Maura Healey signed a $2.3 billion supplemental budget Tuesday that plugs revenue gaps from the previous fiscal year and buoys the state’s Medicaid program with federal funding cuts looming on the horizon.

    The spending plan, approved by the Legislature before it recessed last week for winter break, calls for closing out the previous fiscal year’s books by providing more money for health care, education and the state’s life sciences industry.

    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm“%9:D 3F586E C6AC6D6?ED @FC 4@>>:E>6?E E@ 56=:G6C:?8 7@C A6@A=6 @? H92E >2EE6CD 😕 E96:C =:G6D[” w62=6J D2:5 😕 2 AC6A2C65 DE2E6>6?E] “xE H:== >2<6 E9:?8D >@C6 277@C523=6[ AC@>@E6 G244:?6 2?5 962=E9 42C6 2446DD 7@C @FC <:5D 2?5 72>:=:6D 😕 E96 7246 @7 2EE24 E96 7656C2= 8@G6C?>6?E[ 2?5 AC@E64E AF3=:4 D276EJ 😕 @FC 4@>>F?:E:6D]k^Am

    kAm“(9:=6 !C6D:56?E %CF>A 😀 :?4C62D:?8 4@DED 2?5 4FEE:?8 7F?5:?8 7C@> DE2E6D[ E9:D 3F586E 😀 32=2?465 2?5 AC@E64ED E2IA2J6C 5@==2CD[” E96 s6>@4C2E 25565]k^Am

    kAm%96 3F=< @7 E96 DA6?5:?8[ @C 23@FE Sa 3:==:@?[ H@F=5 36 56G@E65 E@ |2DDw62=E9 – E96 DE2E6’D |65:42:5 AC@8C2> 7@C =@H:?4@>6 C6D:56?ED – 3FE =68:D=2E:G6 =6256CD D2J E96 ?6E 4@DE E@ E2IA2J6CD H@F=5 36 Sdc_ >:==:@? 27E6C 7656C2= C6:>3FCD6>6?ED]k^Am

    kAm%96 3:== 42==D 7@C DA6?5:?8 2? 255:E:@?2= Sd_ >:==:@? @? 9@FD:?8 DE23:=:K2E:@? AC@8C2>Dj Sbc >:==:@? 7@C 4@==64E:G6 32C82:?:?8 28C66>6?ED H:E9 F?:@?:K65 AF3=:4 D64E@C H@C<6CDj S`a]d >:==:@? 7@C E96 “?@4@DE 42==D” AC@8C2> 7@C AC:D@? :?>2E6Dj 2?5 S`c >:==:@? 😕 2:5 7@C 2=4@9@= 255:4E:@? EC62E>6?E E9C@F89 $64E:@? bd AC@8C2>D]k^Am

    kAmqFE w@FD6 2?5 $6?2E6 3F586E 49:67D H:E996=5 S`ea >:==:@? C6BF6DE65 3J 4@F?EJ D96C:77D E@ 4@G6C 4@DED 7@C E96:C @A6C2E:?8 3F586ED 😕 E96 AC6G:@FD 7:D42= J62C 2>:5 4@?46C?D 23@FE E96 “7:?2?4:2= 2?5 @A6C2E:@?2= :?E68C:EJ” @7 E96:C @77:46D]k^Am

    kAmw@FD6 2?5 $6?2E6 3F586E 49:67D 4=2:> E96 DE2E6’D `c D96C:77’D @77:46D 4@==64E:G6=J @G6CDA6?E E96:C 2AAC@AC:2E:@?D 3J >@C6 E92? S`ea >:==:@? 😕 E96 AC6G:@FD 7:D42= J62C]k^Am

    kAm%96 |2DD249FD6EED $96C:77D pDD@4:2E:@? 5:DAFE6D E96 4=2:>D[ 4=2:>:?8 E96 567:4:E 😀 4=@D6C E@ Shd >:==:@? 32D65 @? AC@;64E65 4@DED[ 4@?EC24EF2= @3=:82E:@?D[ 2?5 E96 :>A24E @7 DE2E6>2?52E65 :?:E:2E:G6D DF49 2D “?@4@DE” :?>2E6 4@>>F?:42E:@?[ 4@==64E:G6 32C82:?:?8 :?4C62D6D 2?5 6IA2?565 EC62E>6?E D6CG:46D]k^Am

    kAm%96 =68:D=2E:@? 😀 2=D@ A24<65 H:E9 A@=:4J 492?86D[ :?4=F5:?8 2 AC@A@D2= E@ D6E $6AE] `[ a_ae[ 2D E96 DE2E6H:56 AC:>2CJ 6=64E:@? 52J[ H9:49 E96 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@? D2:5 H@F=5 6?DFC6 E96 D64C6E2CJ @7 DE2E6 92D 6?@F89 E:>6 E@ >66E DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= 32==@E 5625=:?6D]k^Am

    kAmp?@E96C @FED:56 D64E:@? @7 E96 DA6?5:?8 3:== :?4=F56D 2 >@C2E@C:F> @? 6G:4E:@?D 2?5 7@C64=@DFC6D 7@C 7656C2= H@C<6CD 27764E65 3J E96 cb52J D9FE5@H?] w62=6J 2=D@ FD65 96C 6I64FE:G6 A@H6CD E@ 6IE6?5 E96 >@C2E@C:F> 7@C fd 52JD F?E:= y2?] ae]k^Am

    kAm%96 3:== 2=D@ 4C:>:?2=:K6D E96 72=D6 :>A6CD@?2E:@? @7 2 7656C2= @77:4:2=[ :?4=F5:?8 xrt 286?ED 2?5 FA52E6D E96 DE2E6 =2H E@ 6?DFC6 E92E DE2E6 A@=:46 A6C>2?6?E=J :?;FC65 😕 E96 =:?6 @7 5FEJ C646:G6 E96:C 7F== 4@>A6?D2E:@? 2D A6?D:@? F?E:= E96J C6249 C6E:C6>6?E 286]k^Am

    kAm%96 DFAA=6>6?E2= 3F586E 😀 D=:>>6C E92? 2 Sa]cd 3:==:@? @?6 7:=65 3J w62=6J 😕 pF8FDE[ H9:49 :?4=F565 >@?6J 7@C E96 D96C:77D 2?5 @E96C 7F?5:?8 AC:@C:E:6D C6>@G65 7C@> E96 >62DFC6 3J w@FD6 2?5 $6?2E6 ?68@E:2E@CD]k^Am

    kAmk6>mr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^6>mk^Am

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Report: Mass. cities, towns face ‘historic’ fiscal crisis

    BOSTON — Massachusetts cities and towns are facing a “historic fiscal crisis” amid rising operating costs, lackluster state aid and restraints on property tax increases, according to a new report.

    The “Perfect Storm” report, released by the Massachusetts Municipal Association, found that while state government spending has increased by an average of 2.8% per year since 2010 to meet its needs, restraints on local revenue sources – including Proposition 2 1⁄2 – have held city and town spending to just 0.6% per year.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmp?5 H9:=6 DE2E6 2:5 E@ 4@>>F?:E:6D :?4C62D6D D=:89E=J 6G6CJ J62C[ :E C6>2:?D adT =@H6C E92? :E H2D 😕 a__a H96? 25;FDE65 7@C :?7=2E:@?[ E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“|F?:4:A2=:E:6D 92G6 366? 7CF82=[ 2?5 2?J 4FED E96J’C6 7@C465 E@ >2<6 2C6 ?@H 4FEE:?8 3@?6[” p52> r92A56=2:?6[ ||p’D 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “tG6? H:E9 E96 >@DE G2=:2?E 677@CED E@ @A6C2E6 677:4:6?E=J[ 4:EJ 2?5 E@H? =6256CD D:>A=J 42?’E @G6C4@>6 E96 =2C86C EC6?5D E92E 2C6 7@C4:?8 E96> E@ >2<6 5C2DE:4 C65F4E:@?D[ 76=E 3J =@42= C6D:56?ED 2?5 =@42= 3FD:?6DD6D]”k^Am

    kAm%96 C6A@CE 7@F?5 E92E >F?:4:A2=:E:6D 92G6 76H @AE:@?D E@ 7:== H:56?:?8 7:D42= 82AD] u@C @?6[ E96J 2C6 32CC65 3J DE2E6 =2H 7C@> 4@==64E:?8 =@42= :?4@>6 @C D2=6D E2I6D – @FED:56 @7 D6EE:?8 =@58:?8 2?5 >62=D E2I6D – =62G:?8 AC@A6CEJ E2I6D 2D E96:C >2:? D@FC46 @7 C6G6?F6]k^Am

    kAm|62?H9:=6[ !C@A@D:E:@? a½ =:>:ED AC@A6CEJ E2I C6G6?F6 E92E 2 4@>>F?:EJ 42? C2:D6 E@ ?@ >@C6 E92? a]dT @G6C E96 AC6G:@FD J62C[ :CC6DA64E:G6 @7 :?7=2E:@?[ E96 C6A@CE D2:5]k^Am

    kAm}62C=J E9C66 @FE @7 7@FC |2DD249FD6EED >F?:4:A2=:E:6D 2C6 2E hdT E@ hhT @7 E96:C =6GJ =:>:E – E96 2>@F?E @7 AC@A6CEJ E2I6D E96J 42? 86?6C2E6 367@C6 ?665:?8 E@ C6D@CE E@ 2 4@DE=J !C@A@D:E:@? a½ @G6CC:56 42>A2:8?[ E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 8C@FA D2:5 2 DE2E6H:56 !C@A@D:E:@? a`⁄a @G6CC:56 42>A2:8? 😀 2 “?@?DE2CE6C” 7@C E96 >2;@C:EJ @7 |2DD249FD6EED 4:E:6D 2?5 E@H?D]k^Am

    kAm{@42= 8@G6C?>6?ED 92G6 366? <66A:?8 3F586ED 32=2?465 3J 4FEE:?8 @C C65F4:?8 6DD6?E:2= D6CG:46D[ H9:49 27764ED D49@@=D[ =:3C2C:6D[ C@25D 2?5 AF3=:4 D276EJ[ 2?5 “42? C6DF=E 😕 2? @G6C2== D9C:?<:?8 @7 4@>>F?:EJ G:3C2?4J[” E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 8C@FA D2:5 :ED C6A@CE 😀 >62?E E@ 96=A DE2<69@=56CD[ DE2E6 A@=:4J>2<6CD 2?5 E96 AF3=:4 “36EE6C F?56CDE2?5” E96 7@C46D AFD9:?8 >2?J >F?:4:A2=:E:6D “?62C 2 7:D42= 3C62<:?8 A@:?E]” xE A=2?D E@ C6=62D6 2 D6E @7 A@=:4J C64@>>6?52E:@?D =2E6C E9:D J62C E@ “AFE 4:E:6D 2?5 E@H?D 324< @? 2 A2E9 E@H2C5 =@?8E6C> 7:?2?4:2= DFDE2:?23:=:EJ]”k^Am

    kAm“%96 DF446DD @7 E96 r@>>@?H62=E9 😀 E:65 5:C64E=J E@ E96 DF446DD @7 :ED 4:E:6D 2?5 E@H?D[” p>6D3FCJ |2J@C z2DD2?5C2 v@G6[ ||p’D G:46 AC6D:56?E[ D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “|2DD249FD6EED 42??@E E9C:G6 :7 >F?:4:A2=:E:6D 2C6 DECF88=:?8 E@ AC@G:56 E96 7F?52>6?E2= D6CG:46D E92E C6D:56?ED ?665 6G6CJ D:?8=6 52J]”k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Federal shutdown impact NH being assessed

    The state has almost 10,000 residents who are federal workers, and many will be working without pay, laid off or perhaps terminated due to the federal government shutdown this week and statements from the White House.

    U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-NH, is among others who have introduced three bills aimed at emergency financial relief.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 !@CED>@FE9 }2G2= $9:AJ2C5 D2:5 @? :ED H63D:E6i “%96 >@DE C646?E 2AAC@AC:2E:@?D 7@C E96 s6A2CE>6?E @7 (2C 6IA:C65 2E “idh A]>] ts% @? $6AE] b_[ a_ad] |:=:E2CJ A6CD@??6= H:== 4@?E:?F6 😕 2 ?@C>2= 5FEJ DE2EFD[ H:E9@FE A2J[ F?E:= DF49 E:>6 2D 2 4@?E:?F:?8 C6D@=FE:@? @C 2AAC@AC:2E:@?D 2C6 A2DD65 3J r@?8C6DD 2?5 D:8?65 :?E@ =2H] r:G:=:2? A6CD@??6= ?@E 6?82865 😕 6I46AE65 24E:G:E:6D H:== 36 A=2465 😕 2 ?@?H@C<[ ?@?A2J DE2EFD]”k^Am

    kAmv6@C86 r@A25:D[ 4@>>:DD:@?6C @7 t>A=@J>6?E $64FC:EJ E@=5 v@G] z6==J pJ@EE6 2?5 E96 DE2E6 tI64FE:G6 r@F?4:= @? (65?6D52J E92E D6G6C2= E9@FD2?5 >:89E 36 =2:5 @77[ 😕 2 E:>6 H96? E96 DE2E6 92D 76H6C E92? c[___ C646:G:?8 F?6>A=@J>6?E] %92E ?F>36C 4@F=5 5@F3=6 :7 E96J 2C6 E6C>:?2E65]k^Am

    kAm|2?J 7656C2= 6>A=@J66D 2C6 H@C<:?8 C:89E ?@H H:E9@FE A2J F?E:= E96 D9FE5@H? 😀 @G6C 2?5 E96? H:== 36 A2:5] xE C6>2:?D F?4=62C 9@H >2?J A6@A=6 2C6 :>A24E65[ 9@H >2?J H:== 36 =2:5 @77 2?5 9@H =@?8 E9:D H:== =2DE]k^Am

    kAm}]w] p5;FE2?E v6?6C2= s2G:5 |:<@=2:E:6D 2=D@ E@=5 E96 4@F?4:= E92E 2=>@DE `[___ 4:G:=:2? 2?5 >:=:E2CJ A6CD@??6= 😕 }6H w2>AD9:C6 D9@H65 FA E@ H@C< @? 52J @?6 @7 E96 D9FE5@H? 2?5 H:== H@C< H:E9@FE A2J F?E:= :E 6?5D]k^Am

    kAmw6 D2:5 E96C6 😀 D@>6 7:?2?4:2= 2DD:DE2?46 2G2:=23=6 😕 2? 6>6C86?4J 2DD:DE2?46 AC@8C2> 2?5 96 9@A6D E96 D9FE5@H? 😀 3C:67 27E6C r@?8C6DD 72:=65 E@ A2DD 2 DA6?5:?8 82A >62DFC6 2?5 E96 8@G6C?>6?E C2? @FE @7 >@?6J @? ~4E] `]k^Am

    kAm$92966? 92D D:8?65 @? E@ E96 t>6C86?4J #6=:67 7@C u656C2= (@C<6CD p4E[ E96 t>6C86?4J #6=:67 7@C u656C2= r@?EC24E@CD p4E 2?5 E96 u2:C !2J 7@C u656C2= r@?EC24E@CD p4E[ E92E H@F=5 DFAA@CE 7656C2= 6>A=@J66D 724:?8 7:?2?4:2= 92C5D9:AD 5FC:?8 2 8@G6C?>6?E D9FE5@H?]k^Am

    kAm“sFC:?8 2 8@G6C?>6?E D9FE5@H? E96 >2;@C:EJ @7 7656C2= 6>A=@J66D 2?5 >2?J H@C<6CD 2E 7656C2= 4@?EC24E@CD 2C6 7@C465 E@ H@C< H:E9@FE A2J[” D2:5 $6?] $92966?] “%92E 42? 36 2 9F86 2?5 F?6IA64E65 7:?2?4:2= 3FC56? E92E >2?J 72>:=:6D 42?’E 277@C5[ 6DA64:2==J 2E 2 E:>6 H96? 4@DED 2C6 2=C625J E@@ 9:89] %96D6 4@>>@? D6?D6 3:==D H@F=5 3C@256? E96 C6D@FC46D 2G2:=23=6 E@ 7656C2= H@C<6CD 2?5 4@?EC24E@CD 5FC:?8 2 D9FE5@H?[ AC@G:5:?8 D@>6 >F49?66565 7:?2?4:2= C6=:67]”k^Am

    kAm%96 t>6C86?4J #6=:67 7@C u656C2= (@C<6CD p4E H@F=5 2==@H 7656C2= 6>A=@J66D E@ H:E95C2H 7F?5D 7C@> E96:C %9C:7E $2G:?8D !=2? H:E9@FE 36:?8 A6?2=:K65 :7 E96 8@G6C?>6?E D9FE5@H? 😀 AC@=@?865[ H9:=6 6?DFC:?8 E92E 7F?5D 4@F=5 36 C64@?EC:3FE65 =2E6C @?] sFC:?8 A2DE D9FE5@H?D[ >2?J 7656C2= 6>A=@J66D EFC?65 E@ E96:C %$! C6E:C6>6?E 244@F?ED E@ >2<6 92C5D9:A H:E95C2H2=D E@ 4@G6C 3:==D] w@H6G6C[ E96C6 2C6 A6?2=E:6D 7@C H:E95C2H:?8 E96D6 7F?5D[ 2?5 32CC:6CD E@ C64@?EC:3FE:?8 7F?5D @?46 E96 8@G6C?>6?E C6@A6?D]k^Am

    By Paula Tracy | InDepthNH.org

    Source link

  • Report: Mass. taxpayers to get big tax cut in 2026

    BOSTON — Massachusetts taxpayers will receive a big break next year under President Donald Trump’s recently enacted spending package, according to a new report.

    The Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan Washington-based think tank, estimates that Bay Staters will see their taxes cut by an average of $5,139 in 2026 under Trump’s so-called One Big Beautiful Bill – the third-largest reduction in the nation following Wyoming and Washington state.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 E2I H2E495@8 8C@FA AC@;64ED E9@D6 4FED H:== 5C@A D=:89E=J E@ 2? 2G6C286 @7 Sc[fad 😕 a_af[ Sc[eae 😕 a_ag 2?5 Sc[_`b 😕 a_ah 2D D@>6 >62DFC6D 😕 E96 >2DD:G6 E2I 2?5 A@=:4J 3:== 6IA:C6[ 367@C6 :?4C62D:?8 E@ Sc[dgc 😕 a_bd] %9@D6 4FED C2?86 7C@> :?4C62D65 DE2?52C5 565F4E:@?D E@ C2:D:?8 E96 42A @? DE2E6 2?5 =@42= E2I 565F4E:@?D[ E96 8C@FA D2:5]k^Am

    kAm%96 AC@;64E65 E2I 4FED G2CJ 3J 4@F?EJ[ H:E9 |:55=6D6I r@F?EJ 6IA64E65 E@ D66 E96 =2C86DE 2G6C286 564C62D6 – Sf[_gd ?6IE J62C[ E96 C6A@CE’D 2FE9@CD D2:5] x? tDD6I r@F?EJ[ E96 2G6C286 E2I 4FE ?6IE J62C H:== 36 Sc[hee[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 C6A@CE]k^Am

    kAm%96 ?6H =2H 😀 2=D@ 6IA64E65 E@ 4C62E6 2E =62DE af[h_h ;@3D 😕 |2DD249FD6EED[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 %2I u@F?52E:@?]k^Am

    kAm}2E:@?H:56[ E96 2G6C286 E2I 4FE 7@C a_ae H:== 36 Sb[fda 3642FD6 @7 %CF>A’D DA6?5:?8 A24<286[ H9:49 😀 6IA64E65 E@ 4C62E6 ?62C=J ` >:==:@? ;@3D[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 %2I u@F?52E:@?]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A D:8?65 9:D ~?6 q:8 q62FE:7F= q:==[ E96 46?E6CA:646 @7 9:D 64@?@>:4 286?52[ :?E@ =2H @? yF=J c 27E6C :E A2DD65 3@E9 E96 w@FD6 @7 #6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 2?5 $6?2E6 😕 2 =2C86=J A2CE:D2? G@E6]k^Am

    kAm|6>36CD @7 E96 DE2E6’D 2==s6>@4C2E 4@?8C6DD:@?2= 56=682E:@?[ :?4=F5:?8 #6AD] $6E9 |@F=E@? 2?5 {@C: %C292?[ G@E65 282:?DE E96 DA6?5:?8 3:==]k^Am

    kAmv@G] |2FC2 w62=6J 2?5 @E96C DE2E6 =6256CD H2C? E96 3:==’D AC@G:D:@?D 4@F=5 7@C46 E96 DE2E6 E@ 4FE 36?67:ED 7@C E6?D @7 E9@FD2?5D @7 =@H:?4@>6 |65:42:5 C64:A:6?ED 2?5 5:D>2?E=6 7@@5 :?D64FC:EJ AC@8C2>D E92E 92G6 D66? 56>2?5 DFC86 😕 E96 H2<6 @7 E96 A2?56>:4]k^Am

    kAm%96J D2J E96 =68:D=2E:@?’D Shb_ 3:==:@? 4FE E@ 7656C2= |65:42:5 7F?5:?8 H:== 7@C46 |2DD249FD6EED 2?5 @E96C DE2E6D E@ >2<6 4@CC6DA@?5:?8 4FED E@ E96:C AC@8C2>D @C A:4< FA 2 8C62E6C D92C6 @7 @3=:82E:@?D]k^Am

    kAm%96 3:==’D A92D6@FE @7 |65:42:5 AC@G:56C E2I6D 2?5 5:C64E A2J>6?ED[ H9:49 DE2E6D FD6 E@ 96=A 7F?5 E96:C D92C6 @7 AC@8C2> 4@DED[ H@F=5 2=D@ 9FCE[ @77:4:2=D D2J]k^Am

    kAm%CF>A’D 3:== H@F=5 2=D@ 7@C46 DE2E6D E@ A:4< FA 2 =2C86C A@CE:@? @7 4@DED 7@C E96 7656C2==J 7F?565 “7@@5 DE2>A” AC@8C2>[ H9:49 DE2E6 =6256CD 2?5 25G@42E6D D2J H:== 9FCE ?665J 72>:=:6D 2?5 3FD:?6DD6D]k^Am

    kAm%96 w62=6J 25>:?:DEC2E:@? D2:5 E96 492?86D 4@F=5 4@DE |2DD249FD6EED FA E@ Sf`_ >:==:@? 2 J62C[ H9:49 E96 DE2E6 42??@E 277@C5]k^Am

    kAmqFE E2IA2J6CD 😕 |2DD249FD6EED 2?5 @E96C DE2E6D 2C6 6IA64E65 E@ 36?67:E 7C@> 2 AC@G:D:@? @7 E96 =2H E92E C2:D6D E96 42A @? DE2E6 2?5 =@42= E2I 565F4E:@?D @G6C E96 ?6IE 7:G6 J62CD E@ Sc_[___ 7@C E9@D6 >2<:?8 =6DD E92? Sd__[___ A6C J62C[ 6IA2?565 49:=5 E2I 4C65:E 2?5 DE2?52C5 565F4E:@?D[ 2?5 2 C65F4E:@? 😕 E96 E2I @? E:AD 2?5 @G6CE:>6 A2J[ 2>@?8 @E96CD]k^Am

    kAm%96 (9:E6 w@FD6 E@FE65 E96 %2I u@F?52E:@?’D C6A@CE 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E[ 42==:?8 E96 ?6H =2H E96 >@DE D:8?:7:42?E =68:D=2E:G6 492?86D E@ 7656C2= E2I A@=:4J D:?46 E96 a_`f %2I rFED 2?5 y@3D p4E[ H9:49 H2D A2DD65 😕 %CF>A’D 7:CDE AC6D:56?4J]k^Am

    kAm“!C6D:56?E %CF>A’D ~?6 q:8 q62FE:7F= q:== 😀 E96 =2C86DE[ >@DE 4@?D6BF6?E:2= E2I 4FE @? E96 >:55=6 4=2DD 6G6C] }@H[ E96 %2I u@F?52E:@? – E96 =625:?8 ?@?A2CE:D2? E2I A@=:4J ?@?AC@7:E – 4@?7:C>D E92E[” (9:E6 w@FD6 56AFEJ AC6DD D64C6E2CJ p??2 z6==J D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E] “q6EH66? =@H6C :?7=2E:@?[ >2DD:G6 :?G6DE>6?ED[ 2?5 9:DE@C:4 E2I 4FED[ 2== p>6C:42?D 2C6 C62A:?8 E96 36?67:ED @7 E96 %CF>A t4@?@>J – 2?5 E96 v@=56? p86 92D ;FDE 368F?]”k^Am

    kAmr9C:DE:2? |] (256 4@G6CD E96 |2DD249FD6EED $E2E69@FD6 7@C }@CE9 @7 q@DE@? |65:2 vC@FAUCDBF@jD ?6HDA2A6CD 2?5 H63D:E6D] t>2:= 9:> 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>Qm4H256o4?9:?6HD]4@>k^2m]k^Am

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • State uncovers $2.3M in welfare, food stamp fraud

    State uncovers $2.3M in welfare, food stamp fraud

    BOSTON — Investigators uncovered more than $2.3 million in welfare fraud in the most recent quarter, according to state Auditor Diana DiZoglio’s office.

    The office’s Bureau of Special Investigations looked into more than 1,235 cases during the final quarter of the fiscal year, from April 1 to June 30, and identified at least 176 instances of public assistance fraud, about 80% of which was in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, previously known as food stamps.

    The bureau, which has the power to investigate welfare fraud, said benefits paid from the food stamp program amounted to more than $1.9 million of the fraudulent activity in the previous quarter. At least $245,858 in fraudulent activity was related to MassHealth, the state’s Medicaid program, the agency said.

    Another $138,081 was uncovered in the state’s primary cash assistance program, known as Transitional Aid to Families with Dependent Children, DiZoglio’s office reported.

    Of the $2 million in welfare fraud, federal and state courts have so far recovered only $103,142 in restitution, the auditor’s office said.

    In the previous fiscal year, the auditor’s office uncovered more than $12.3 million worth of welfare fraud from about 780 cases that were looked into by investigators.

    DiZoglio said the bureau’s investigations are “making government work better by identifying fraud, waste, and abuse of tax dollars so that residents actually in need have access to support and services.”

    In fiscal 2022, the auditor’s office uncovered more than $13.5 million worth of welfare fraud from about 600 cases that were investigated.

    That was a 120% increase in the dollar value from a year earlier, when investigators uncovered about $6.1 million in fraud.

    Demand for food stamps and other public assistance has risen amid the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic, and has remained high amid inflationary costs.

    As of April, more than 111,000 people in Massachusetts were receiving basic welfare benefits from the state’s main cash assistance program, according to the latest state data.

    Meanwhile, an additional 1 million people were getting food stamps as of March, according to the latest federal data. That’s more than double the pre-pandemic average of about 450,000 recipients.

    Under current law, a recipient is limited to receiving welfare for two years in any five-year period. A family of three in the program collects roughly $593 per month.

    In the fiscal year that gets underway July 1, the state plans to spend more than $300 million on cash assistance programs for welfare recipients.

    The state has tightened its welfare fraud rules in recent years following previous audits showing widespread abuse, including the names of dead people being used to claim benefits. The penalty for welfare fraud is up to 10 years in prison, in addition to repayment of the money.

    Advocates for the benefits programs point out that welfare fraud only accounts for a fraction of the cash assistance the state provides every year. They argue that the money devoted to investigating fraud would be better spent on expanding benefits for the needy.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Auditor: No tax rebates issued this year

    Auditor: No tax rebates issued this year

    It’s official: Massachusetts’ taxpayers won’t be getting a break this year from a decades-old tax rebate law, the state’s fiscal watchdog says.

    State Auditor Diana DiZoglio said a review by her office has determined that the net state tax revenues of more than $39 billion in fiscal 2023 were below the allowable amount of $44.4 billion, “resulting in no excess state tax revenues.”

    The auditor’s report is based on data from the state Department of Revenue, which also concluded that taxpayers won’t be getting any extra refunds this year.

    In 2022, the state returned $3 billion to more than 3.6 million taxpayers under the voter-approved Chapter 62F law, which requires Massachusetts to refund money when tax revenues grow by more than wages and salaries.

    But lawmakers approved changes to the law as part of a $1 billion tax relief package, signed by Gov. Maura Healey in October, that exempted collections from the new “millionaires tax” – which sets a 4% surtax on incomes above $1 million – from the calculation.

    In the previous year, the state collected nearly $2.2 billion from the tax, according to the report.

    Last year, DiZoglio’s office determined that the net state tax revenues of nearly $37 billion in fiscal 2023 were below the allowable amount of $41.4 billion, which was also below the threshold to trigger the rebate law.

    The Chapter 62F law was overwhelmingly approved by voters in 1986. Besides 2022, the rebate law had only been triggered once since it was approved – in fiscal 1987 – when the state’s actual revenues exceeded allowable revenues by nearly $30 million.

    As part of the tax relief plan, lawmakers also tweaked the Chapter 62F law to require that any future rebates be paid out “equally” among taxpayers, and married taxpayers who file a joint return with the federal government must also file a joint state return.

    That change was prompted by concerns raised by liberal groups that “loopholes” in state law would allow wealthy households to skirt the “millionaires tax”.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Teachers union blasts use of ‘millionaires tax’ money

    Teachers union blasts use of ‘millionaires tax’ money

    BOSTON — Backers of the state’s “millionaires tax” are accusing the Healey administration of defying the will of voters by tapping into proceeds from the tax to close out the previous fiscal year budget.

    A supplemental budget filed by Gov. Maura Healey aimed at closing out the previous fiscal year budget calls for spending $225 million in “millionaires tax” proceeds to cover costs for grants to child care programs, universal free school meals, transportation service expansions and other items.

    But the Massachusetts Teachers Association, a chief proponent of the tax, is blasting the proposal to use the money this way, saying the funding needs should have been covered by other revenue sources.

    “Fair Share funds must be used to build upon the existing spending for public education and transportation, and not become dollars lost on balance sheets,” MTA President Max Page said in a statement. “Gov. Healey’s supplemental budget proposal defies the will of the voters and the spirit of Fair Share, which is raising money to grow our public education and transportation systems.”

    Voters approved the so-called Fair Share proposal in the 2022 elections, setting a new 4% surtax on people with incomes above $1 million a year. The state collected more than $2.1 billion from the tax in the previous year, exceeding projections by budget writers.

    A spokesman for the state’s Executive Office of Administration and Finance defended the governor’s proposal, saying the spending is in line with the intent of the voter-approved tax and the state budget.

    “Our administration has consistently demonstrated our commitment to fulfilling the will of the voters who approved the Fair Share surtax to support our education and transportation systems,” the agency said in a statement. “The supplemental budget filed by the Governor maintains that commitment by proposing to use a limited amount of surplus surtax for education and transportation programs like universal school meals and child care provider grants.”

    The approach, the agency said, “aligns with how surtax revenue was budgeted in Fiscal Year 2025 and is necessary to close Fiscal Year 2024 in balance.”

    Healey’s $714 million supplemental spending plan, which requires legislative approval, seeks to close funding gaps for public health, substance use treatment and education, and fund collective bargaining agreements with labor unions.

    It also calls for overhauling how Massachusetts approves renewable energy infrastructure projects, which has also drawn criticism from lawmakers who view it as an end-run around a stalled clean energy bill.

    The issue of how billions of dollars in proceeds from the tax will be spent by the state government was a key issue in the debate over the proposal.

    A chief criticism was claims by tax proponents that the money will be devoted exclusively to transportation and education spending were misleading.

    A 2022 report by Tufts University’s Center for State Policy Analysis ahead of the tax’s approval by voters warned that while the plan clearly stated the money must be devoted to education and transportation, not all the surtax revenue is likely to be spent in those areas.

    “The problem is fungibility, or the ease with which lawmakers can shift money between programs,” the report’s authors wrote. “There is nothing illegal or untoward about this approach; it’s a common part of legislative horse-trading.”

    The report estimates that for every dollar raised by the surtax, spending on the stated earmarks is likely to increase by 30 cents to 70 cents, with the remainder being “diverted to other areas of the budget,” they wrote.

    It also noted that revenue from the tax would be “highly volatile” and is likely to rise or fall sharply, depending on the economic conditions. The number of people paying the tax will increase gradually over time, the report noted.

    Supporters say taxing the rich means more money to improve neglected public schools, expand child care options, and fix potholed roads and crumbling bridges.

    Opponents argue the tax is hurting businesses and driving away corporate investment and job creators, while putting a drag on the state’s economy as it recovers from residual impacts of the pandemic.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Former owner of popular sandwich shop pleads guilty to tax fraud

    Former owner of popular sandwich shop pleads guilty to tax fraud

    SALEM — The former owner of Red’s Sandwich Shop in Salem has pleaded guilty to tax fraud after failing to pay more than $1.5 million in state meals taxes and causing employment tax losses of more than $400,000, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

    John Drivas, 66, who lives in Hampton, New Hampshire, pleaded guilty in federal court on Sept. 6 to five counts of failure to collect and pay employment taxes owed to the IRS and four counts of wire fraud for state meals taxes he collected from restaurant customers but failed to pay over to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue.

    The offenses took place over a six-year period between January 2016 and October 2022 at Red’s Sandwich Shop and two other restaurants owned and operated by Drivas — Red’s Kitchen and Tavern in Peabody and Red’s Seabrook in Seabrook, New Hampshire.

    Drivas was the sole shareholder of the Salem restaurant until he sold it to an employee in September 2022. He was the 100% owner of the Peabody restaurant with his wife, and the 52% owner of the Seabrook restaurant with his children.

    U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick scheduled sentencing for Dec. 5. The charge of failure to pay taxes carries a maximum potential sentence of five years in prison and a fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss and restitution. Each wire fraud charge is punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

    According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Drivas collected more than $1.5 million in state meals taxes paid by restaurant customers that he failed to pay over to the state as required by law. In Massachusetts, all owners and operators of restaurants and bars are required to collect 6.25% sales taxes on meals. Salem and Peabody also require restaurants and bar to collect an additional 0.75% local option meals excise tax.

    Although Drivas collected the taxes from customers, he intentionally withheld $1,596,775 of those taxes from monthly reports and payments owed to the state Department of Revenue.

    Drivas also paid wages to numerous employees of the restaurants partly by payroll checks and partly in cash. He did not report the cash wages to the IRS or pay employment taxes on them, causing employment tax losses of $439,341. Federal tax law requires employers to withhold from any employee wages an amount for income taxes and other amounts for Social Security and Medicare taxes.

    Drivas’ guilty plea was announced by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Boston Field Office, and the Insurance Fraud Bureau of Massachusetts.

    By News Staff

    Source link

  • Methuen council taking another vote on Searles Estate

    Methuen council taking another vote on Searles Estate

    METHUEN — The City Council will likely vote on the purchase of the historic Searles Estate for the second time next month.

    The council voted against the purchase of the property for $3.25 million last week, which would typically mean the end of the proposed resolution. But after recent legal advice from City Solicitor Kenneth Rossetti, Chair Joel Faretra said he will bring the matter back for another vote at the council’s next meeting in September.

    City officials aim to preserve the historic site by acquiring the property from the Sisters of the Presentation of Mary. Those opposed have cited fiscal responsibility and said the city does not have a comprehensive plan for the aging estate.

    The Searles Estate encompasses 25 acres, with 19 available for purchase by the city. The estate is valued at $10 million. The acquisition would also include $1 million in artifacts.

    The vote Aug. 5, which left the community sharply divided, included two councilor absences and an abstention, leading to a potential conflict of interest.

    Only six of nine councilors voted. Faretra, Nicholas DiZoglio, Ronald Marsan and Allison Mary Saffie voted in favor while Neily Soto and Patricia Valley were opposed.

    Faretra said he was informed that the majority party can bring an item back for a vote, rather than just the prevailing side.

    Soto said preserving the estate is important but that it should be done through a public-private partnership which places less of a burden on taxpayers.

    Twelve potential buyers have looked at the estate over the years. One developer presented a plan that would demolish the estate and build apartments, according to the city.

    Sisters of the Presentation of Mary purchased the estate in 1957 to house Presentation of Mary Academy, which closed in 2020. Since then, the religious order has endeavored to find a buyer.

    The order was founded in France in 1796 and came to the United States in 1853, according to its website.

    The estate would likely need about $250,000 in annual maintenance, according to Chief Administrative & Financial Officer Maggie Duprey.

    The Methuen Historical Society has called the estate an “irreplaceable treasure” and urged the council and the community to support the purchase.

    The next council meeting is scheduled for Sept. 3 but that date will likely be adjusted due to the state primary elections, Faretra said.

    By Teddy Tauscher | ttauscher@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • Report: Mass. taxpayer exodus continues

    Report: Mass. taxpayer exodus continues

    BOSTON — Massachusetts lost more than $3.8 billion in state-adjusted gross income between 2021 and 2022 as residents fled to New Hampshire, Florida and other low-tax states, according to new Internal Revenue Service data.

    The IRS data, based on income tax returns, shows the Bay State lost a net of more than 45,000 residents in the 2021 and 2022 calendar years – taking with them more than $3.9 billion in taxable income. That’s the fifth highest rate of domestic outmigration in the nation following New York, Illinois, New Jersey and California.

    New Hampshire and Florida were the biggest beneficiaries of Massachusetts’ transplants, the IRS data shows. More than 18,189 people moved from New York to Florida, taking $1.4 billion. An additional 23,596 Bay Staters moved to Florida, bringing more than $2.8 billion in income with them, according to the IRS.

    The Pioneer Institute, a Boston-based think tank, says the data shows the largest cohort to flee Massachusetts were 26- to 35 year-olds, with 9,500 more tax filers leaving than coming into Massachusetts in 2022, more than five times the number a decade earlier.

    “This loss of young talent hinders the state’s future innovation and economic growth, which will compound over decades,” said Mary Connaughton, Pioneer’s director of government transparency. “The cost of housing is a leading factor and the recent housing bill is not enough to address this critical challenge.”

    “We need more innovative solutions at the local level to adequately boost the state’s housing supply,” she added.

    The report is the latest in the series that highlights how Massachusetts’ population is shrinking despite a continuing influx of new arrivals, many through immigration.

    Still, the state’s outmigration appears to be slowing, with about 18,000 fewer residents leaving the state in 2023 than in 2022 – a 31% drop, according to the latest census data, released in May.

    Experts say the outmigration has less to do with politics than it does with a lack of housing, prevailing wages and access to employment.

    But federal data shows the population decline has major implications for the states, revenue and tax collections. The state has seen its revenue benchmarks from tax collections fall short over the past year.

    Massachusetts lost an estimated $4.3 billion in state-adjusted gross income in 2020-21 tax year as residents fled to other low-tax states, according to the latest IRS figures.

    On Beacon Hill, state leaders have approved proposals to cut taxes and reduce the state’s high cost of living as part of a broader effort to stop outward migration and make the state more attractive to new families and businesses.

    Gov. Maura Healey, a first-term Democrat, has expressed concerns about the exodus of residents and businesses in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Healey has pointed to a lack of housing as a primary reason people are leaving the state, making the case for expanding stock and making homes more affordable. She acknowledged the impact of the housing crunch on outmigration at an event in Lowell, where she and other officials announced $27 million in tax credits for new housing developments in Salem, Lawrence and Haverhill and other “Gateway” cities.

    “I love New Hampshire, but I want people to stay here in Massachusetts,” Healey said in remarks Tuesday. “I don’t want them going north of the border.”

    But critics point to the state’s high tax burden, including the voter-approved “millionaires tax” that set a new 4% surtax for people with incomes above $1 million a year. They say despite a tax reform package signed by Healey last year, the state needs to do more to ease the burden on residents and businesses.

    Others say concerns about outmigration are overblown and point out that people leave the state for new jobs, college and other reasons other than consternation over high taxes, the cost of living or the lack of affordable homes.

    A 2023 report by the left-leaning policy group Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center says IRS data from 2020 to 2021 shows that Massachusetts has a lower rate of outmigration among high-income households earning $200,000 or more a year than that of low- and middle-income households.

    The report’s authors say that data suggests state tax levels have had “little impact” on the decisions of high-income households.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Despite councilor’s questions, Gloucester’s $165M budget OK’d with $2.2M school budget gap

    Despite councilor’s questions, Gloucester’s $165M budget OK’d with $2.2M school budget gap

    The City Council on Tuesday approved nearly $165 million in spending for city and school budgets, various enterprise funds, Community Preservation Act money and various revolving funds for the fiscal year starting July 1.

    That budget still left a $2.2 million gap between the School Committee’s so-called level services budget hit by skyrocketing special education costs, and what the mayor’s budget provided.

    The School Committee was scheduled to take a final vote on the schools’ fiscal 2025 budget during its meeting Thursday evening, according to the agenda. The schools face a reduction of 20 positions as a result of the inability to close the funding gap.

    The gap existed even with the use of some one-time funding by the mayor, including a $1.25 million supplemental appropriation for special education expenses this year and $1 million in American Rescue Plan Act funding, to try and close what had been a more than $6 million shortfall. The city also provided a $1.75 million increase to the schools’ budget and has proposed the creation of a $750,000 special education stabilization fund next year.

    During discussion on various departmental budgets, Councilor at-Large Valerie Gilman and others noted some of the $1.94 million in requests on the city side that were pruned out of the budget.

    These cuts included $25,748 to replace a Police Department vehicle, $100,000 from the Fire Department’s overtime budget, and $30,000 for tree maintenance in the Public Works’ budget, according to a list from the treasurer/collector. The budget also trimmed $100,000 for a rooftop generator for the Rose Baker Senior Center with hope the expense could be covered through ARPA funds.

    According to Budget and Finance Chair Scott Memhard, city spending breaks down this way:

    General funds: Nearly $140 million, of which $51.488 million was set aside for schools.

    Enterprise funds: $20.8 million.

    Community Preservation Act funding: $940,000.

    Revolving funds: nearly $3.2 million.

    And while councilors in the Kyrouz Auditorium approved many of the recommendations of the council’s Budget and Finance Standing Committee unanimously, the vote on the school budget was 8-1, with Councilor-at-Large Jeff Worthley questioning the administration’s revenue projections in an attempt to steer more money to the school budget.

    Worthley started off by looking at $175,000 in free cash to stabilize the sewer rate.

    “What we are doing is taking money that was generated from taxpayers and subsidizing the sewer rate users,” he said. He asked if there as a better use for the free cash.

    Memhard said Worthley raised a valuable point, but it was a little late in the game for such a change.

    Council President and at-Large Councilor Tony Gross said this was brought up in subcommittee “and did not meet with a favorable result.”

    The vote to use free cash to subsidize the sewer rate was 8-1 with Worthley voting “no.” He also was the lone vote against the city’s revenue projections.

    “It was an unfortunate budget this year,” Councilor at-Large Jason Grow said, “certainly one obviously driven by special education costs.” It’s something he said councilors need to hold their state delegation responsible for in the future.

    “I think it’s really important to remember this budget started out $6 million off of what the school department initially requested,” Grow said. He said through one-time monies and ARPA funding, the administration was able to fill $4 million of the gap.

    “It’s $2 million too much,” Grow said, nothing the city-side budgets were also $2 million short.

    “I don’t see how to bridge that gap,” he said. “I just don’t think that we are going to get there with revenue cooking this year. Maybe we could have done a small amount, but at the end of the day we have to be responsible for the entire city budget.”

    Ward 3 Councilor Marjorie Grace thanked Worthley “for his efforts regardless of the outcome, his heart was in the right place.

    “I don’t see how we can make the call any different than what they are and I’m truly sorry for that,” Grace said, looking at the cuts made.

    Worthley said he voted against the mayor’s recommendation for the schools’ budget at Budget and Finance and he planned to do so again.

    “I really do appreciate the calls for working together,” he said, but he did not like the term “cooking the books.”

    “I think the rhetoric around that is unhelpful,” he said. He continued to question the use of about $786,000 in free cash, including the $175,000 to offset the sewer rate, and $611,000 in the budget. and he objected to revenue projections that showed significant decreases in meals and hotel taxes from year prior.

    Gross noted other revenue projections “are also in the opposite direction.” He later read from a slide presentation from the schools that said “The Gloucester Public Schools will be able to, and this is with this budget, to fully able to remain strong.”

    “In finalizing this budget, we have navigated significant challenges with $1.9 million in reductions on the city side and $2.2 million on the school side,” Mayor Greg Verga said in an email to the Times.

    “I am proud of the collaborative work that we have done with our finance team at City Hall, which has resulted in a responsible and balanced budget.

    “As I said at the City Council’s public hearing, this is not a budget without pain, but my goal has been to do the best we can with what we have and avoid making this a political issue,” Verga said. “People’s jobs should not be politicized.”

    Ethan Forman may be contacted at 978-675-2714, or at eforman@northofboston.com.

    By Ethan Forman | Staff Writer

    Source link

  • Few prepared to cover long-term care costs

    Few prepared to cover long-term care costs

    Editor’s note: The share of the U.S. population older than 65 keeps rising – and will for decades to come. Since nearly half of Americans over 65 will pay for some version of long-term health care, CNHI News and The Associated Press examined the state of long-term care in the series High Cost of Long-Term Care, which began Friday and continues this week.

    While many Americans will need long-term care as they get older, few are prepared to pay for it.

    Medicare, which provides Americans over the age 65 with health insurance, doesn’t cover most long-term care services. And Medicaid — the primary safety net for long-term care coverage — only covers those who are indigent.

    Federal estimates suggest 70% of people ages 65 and older will need long-term care before they die, but only 3% to 4% of Americans age 50 and older are paying for long-term care policies, according to insurance industry figures.

    The high cost of premiums for those private long-term care policies puts it out of reach for most people.

    Even some who have this kind of insurance find it doesn’t provide enough to cover the costs of home health aides, assisted-living facilities or nursing homes.

    “People think that long-term care insurance is for everyone — but it is not,” said Jessie Slone, executive director of the American Association for Long-term Care Insurance, an advocacy group. “It’s for a very small subset of individuals who plan, and have some retirement assets and income they can use to pay for it.”

    To qualify, applicants need to pass a health review. Slone said insurance companies have underwriting policies with “page after page” of conditions that will disqualify people from getting that coverage.”If you live a long life, the chances of you needing care are significant. So then the issue becomes who’s going to provide for that care, and who’s going to pay for it. For some, long-term care insurance is an option.”

    Prices vary, based on the age when people apply, how good their health is at the time, and how much coverage they want. “You have to start looking at this generally in your 50s or 60s,” Slone said. “Because, as you get older, you’re going to have conditions which insurers are going to look at, determine that you’re very likely to need long-term care and not give you a policy.”

    That coverage, if you can get it, doesn’t come cheap: In 2023, the annual average cost for a policy for a couple both age 55, taking out a $165,000 initial pool growing at 3% compounded annually — ranged from a low of $5,018 to $14,695 a year, according to the association.

    But, compared to auto insurance — which most people may never use — long-term care insurance is a good investment for those who can afford it, Slone said. “Car insurance is the most expensive insurance you ever pay because the chances of you getting into a car accident are somewhat remote. But the chances of someone needing long-term care if they make it to 90 are pretty significant.”

    Lori Smetanka, executive director of the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care, a national nonprofit advocacy group, views it differently. She said the private long-term care insurance system has become a “bust” amid rising premiums and difficulties accessing benefits.

    Consider the fact that the number of companies offering long-term care insurance is declining, while payouts are steadily increasing as the baby boomer generation ages.”Most people have found it very expensive,” Smetanka said. “But, at the same time, people are finding that it wasn’t covering what they needed.”

    Last year, insurers paid a record of more than $14 billion to cover an estimated 353,000 long-term care claims, according to industry figures. That’s compared to about $11.6 billion just three years ago.

    Currently, there are about 7.5 million people in the U.S. age 65 and older with private long-term care insurance, according to industry data.

    With that incentive, some states, including Washington and California, are looking at creating long-term care social insurance pools funded by payroll taxes and other sources of funding. The effort also is being spurred, in part, by the rising costs borne by states for Medicaid long-term care coverage, which they share with the federal government.

    “More and more states are coming to the conclusion that this is an under-funded system,” said Marc Cohen, a researcher and co-director of the LeadingAge LTSS Center at the University of Massachusetts at Boston. “There are simply not enough dollars going into the system – given the needs and the demands of the growing elderly population.”

    So far, Washington is the only state to try to address the issue. A law approved by the state Legislature in 2019 created a long-term care benefit program, which provides residents with up to $36,500 to pay for costs such as caregiving, wheelchair ramps, meal deliveries and nursing home fees.

    The Cares Funds is covered by a payroll tax that deducts 0.58% out of paychecks but guarantees a $36,500 lifetime benefit for those who have paid into the fund for 10 years.

    Several other states are studying the issue. In California, a task force is looking at how to design a long-term care program, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Massachusetts, Illinois and Michigan also are weighing the costs versus benefits of creating a state long-term care benefits program.

    But the issue of imposing new taxes to pay for long-term care insurance is controversial — and politically unpopular — on both a state and federal level.

    Washington’s long-term care insurance law is facing a repeal effort from a group backed by hedge fund executive Brian Heywood that argues the system should be voluntary. Voters in November will decide whether to allow people to opt out, which supporters say would essentially gut the program.

    “There are a lot of states that are looking to see what happens in Washington,” Cohen said. “If this billionaire who is funding this repeal effort wins, it will be a real blow.”

    Cohen said efforts on a federal level to create a publicly funded insurance pool haven’t gained much traction. A long-term care program created by Congress through the CLASS Plan, which was tied to the Affordable Care Act, was voluntary. That law was repealed in early 2013.

    “It never got off the ground before it was repealed,” he said. “With the dysfunction in Congress, we’re likely to see more action on a state level than the federal.”

    Recent polls suggest there may be some public support for the move. A survey by the National Council on Aging found more than 90% of the 1,000 female respondents across party lines support the idea of creating a government program to pay for the cost of long-term care.

    “The level of support was significant, and very bipartisan,” said Howard Bedlin, a long-term care expert with the council. “People keep talking about how Congress can’t find bipartisan support. Well, the voters clearly support it.

    “The politicians just aren’t giving these issues the attention they deserve.”

    Christian M. Wade is a reporter for North of Boston Media Group.

    By Christian M. Wade | CNHI News

    Source link

  • Safety net hospital fund shortfall widening

    Safety net hospital fund shortfall widening

    BOSTON — Lawmakers are seeking more support for the state’s safety net hospitals amid rising concerns about the fiscal health of a fund that helps cover medical costs for large numbers of uninsured and low-income patients.

    Hospitals and health insurers pay into the so-called safety net fund – a pool of money that helps fund care for hundreds of thousands of low-income residents who are uninsured or underinsured – with the state chipping in additional funding. But if the fund runs low, hospitals are on the hook for the shortfall.

    The fund is projected to have a shortfall of more than $220 million in the upcoming fiscal year, hospitals say, rising to the highest level in nearly two decades.

    Without additional funding, financially challenged hospitals will be forced to cover the deficit, leaving less money to provide medical care for low-income and uninsured patients, they say.

    An amendment to the Senate’s version of the $57.9 billion state budget filed by Sen. Barry Finegold, D-Andover, would require commercial health insurance companies to cover 50% of any revenue shortfalls in the safety net fund.

    “We need to do something to help our local hospitals,” Finegold said. “This is part of a long-term problem with funding for hospitals that serve the state’s most vulnerable residents. We need to fix it.”

    Many earmarks

    Finegold’s proposal is one of more than 1,000 amendments to the Senate’s budget, many of them local earmarks seeking to divert more state money to local governments, schools, cash-strapped community groups and nonprofits. Only a handful will likely make it into the Senate’s final spending package.

    The plan faces pushback from the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans, which represents commercial insurers who would be impacted by the proposed changes to the hospital safety net program.

    Lora Pellegrini, the group’s president and CEO, said requiring insurers to cover the fund’s shortfalls would jeopardize negotiations between the state Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that seek to reduce assessments paid by medical insurance carriers.

    “This really came out of nowhere, and would be counterproductive to those efforts,” she said. “We have a committee process for a reason and that’s where these kinds of special interest issues should be vetted, not in the budget.”

    But the move is backed by the Massachusetts Health and Hospital Association, which says requiring insurers to cover the shortfall would help alleviate an “unmanageable financial burden” on the health care system “by broadening funding support for the program.”

    “The Health Safety Net is a vital component of Massachusetts’ healthcare infrastructure and its ability to cover the costs of care for low-income and uninsured patients,” Daniel McHale, MHP’s vice president for Healthcare Finance & Policy, said in a statement.

    “At this increasingly fragile time for the entire health care system, it is imperative that we take the steps needed to stabilize the safety net for the people and providers who rely on it each day.”

    Local hospitals affected

    The state’s safety net hospitals and community health centers – which include Lawrence Hospital, Salem Hospital, Holy Family Hospital in Methuen and Anna Jaques Hospital in Newburyport – serve a disproportionate percentage of low-income patients.

    Many are heavily dependent on Medicaid reimbursements, which are typically less than commercial insurance payouts.

    Nearly 30% of Lawrence General’s gross revenue is for care provided to Medicaid, or MassHealth, patients. The state average is 18%.

    Many community hospitals are collecting from low-paying government insurance programs, and getting below-average reimbursements from commercial insurers, advocates say.

    Lawmakers also swept money from the hospital safety net fund to help cover the costs of new Medicare savings programs that pay some or all of eligible senior citizen’s premiums and other health care costs, including prescriptions.

    Hospitals are also seeing increased demand from uninsured patients as hundreds of thousands of Medicaid recipients see their state-sponsored health care coverage dropped following the end of federal pandemic-related programs, which is driving up costs. Claims processing problems are another factor adding to hospital costs, they say.

    Those and other factors have widened the fund’s shortfall from $68 million in fiscal 2022 to more than $210 million in the previous fiscal year, according to the hospital association. Combined, the shortfall could reach $600 million for the three fiscal years, the association said.

    Biggest expense

    The House, which approved its $58.2 billion version of the state budget two weeks ago, proposed $17.3 million in state funding for the hospital safety net fund. The Senate, which begins debate on its version of the budget next week, has proposed a similar amount.

    In the current budget, the state allocated $91.4 million for the safety net fund.

    But the House budget didn’t include an amendment requiring insurers to help hospitals pay the shortfall. That means even if the Senate approves Finegold’s amendment, it would still need to be negotiated as part of the final budget before landing on Gov. Maura Healey’s desk for consideration.

    Health care coverage, in the meantime, is one of the state’s biggest expenses. Medicaid costs have doubled in the past decade and now account for nearly 40% of state spending.

    MassHealth serves more than 2 million people – roughly one-third of the state’s population – despite federal Medicaid redeterminations that have reduced its rolls over the past year.

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Hank Greenberg Fast Facts | CNN

    Hank Greenberg Fast Facts | CNN



    CNN
     — 

    Here is a look at the life of former AIG Chief Executive Officer Hank Greenberg.

    Birth date: May 4, 1925

    Birth place: New York, New York

    Birth name: Maurice Raymond Greenberg

    Father: Jacob Greenberg

    Mother: Ada (Rheingold) Greenberg

    Marriage: Corinne (Zuckerman) Greenberg (1950-March 17, 2024, her death)

    Children: Jeffrey, Evan, Scott and Cathleen

    Education: University of Miami, B.A., 1948; New York Law School, LL.B., 1950

    Military: US Army, Captain

    Recipient of the Bronze Star for his service during the Korean War.

    Awarded the Legion of Honor from France.

    Chairman of the Board of The Starr Foundation.

    Vice chairman of the National Committee on United States-China Relations.

    Member of the board of the Council on Foreign Relations.

    1952-1960 – Works for Continental Casualty Company.

    1960 – Is hired as a vice president for the insurance-holding company C.V. Starr & Co., Inc.

    1968 – C.V. Starr & Co., Inc. begins distributing some the firm’s subsidiaries in order to raise capital to establish American International Group, Inc. (AIG). Greenberg becomes the Chairman and CEO of AIG.

    1988-1995 – Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    1994-1995 – Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    March 2005 – Greenberg resigns as CEO and chairman of the board of AIG.

    May 2005 – New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer files a lawsuit in New York County Supreme Court against Greenberg on behalf of the state, charging him with engaging in fraud to exaggerate AIG’s finances.

    2005-present – Chairman and CEO of C.V. Starr & Co., Inc. and Starr International Company, Inc.

    September 16, 2008 – The Federal Reserve Bank of New York announces an emergency $85 billion loan to AIG to rescue the company, on the condition that the federal government own 79.9% stake in the company. Greenberg is AIG’s largest individual shareholder before the bailout, with 11% ownership in the company.

    April 2009 – The loan expands to $184.6 billion. The government eventually owns a 92% stake in the company.

    August 2009 – The Securities and Exchange Commission charges Greenberg for his involvement in the fraudulent accounting transactions that inflated AIG’s finances. Without conceding or denying the SEC charges, Greenberg agrees to pay $15 million in penalties, and AIG settles the charges by repaying $700 million plus a fine of $100 million.

    November 21, 2011 – Greenberg and his Starr International Company sue the federal government for $25 billion, claiming the 2008 takeover was unconstitutional. Starr International also sues the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in federal district court in Manhattan.

    November 2012 – Greenberg and Starr International’s lawsuit against the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is dismissed. The ruling is upheld in appeals court in January 2014.

    January 2013 – Greenberg’s book, “The AIG Story,” is released.

    May 2013 – Greenberg’s lawsuit against the federal government achieves class action status. Three hundred thousand stockholders, including AIG employees and retirees, would share the reward if they win the lawsuit.

    June 25, 2013 – A New York appeals court rules that the 2005 fraud lawsuit, filed by Spitzer, against Greenberg, will not be dismissed.

    July 2013 – Greenberg files a lawsuit against Spitzer in New York’s Putnam County Supreme Court, alleging defamation related to statements he made between 2004 and 2012.

    June 25, 2014 – After granting a request by Spitzer to dismiss most of his statements, a judge rules that Greenberg’s defamation lawsuit against him will go to trial.

    October 6, 2014 – Greenberg and Starr International’s class action lawsuit against the government officially begins in the Court of Federal Claims in Washington, DC. Closing arguments take place on April 22, 2015.

    June 15, 2015 – Starr International wins its lawsuit against the federal government “due to the Government’s illegal exaction,” but the court awards no monetary damages.

    February 10, 2017 – Greenberg and the New York attorney general’s office reach a settlement in the 2005 civil fraud lawsuit. Greenberg agrees to pay $9 million, and former AIG Chief Financial Officer Howard Smith agrees to pay $900,000.

    September 13, 2017 – The Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division denies summary judgment for several of Greenberg’s defamation charges against Spitzer.

    January 15, 2020 – St. John’s University’s presents Greenberg with a Lifetime Leadership Award at its Annual Insurance Leader of the Year Award Dinner. The school also announces that it has voted to rename its School of Risk Management, Insurance and Actuarial Science in his honor. It is now the Maurice R. Greenberg School of Risk Management, Insurance and Actuarial Science.

    November 12, 2020 – A judge in New York’s Putnam County Supreme Court rules to dismiss Greenberg’s defamation case against Spitzer.

    January 2023 – The Starr Foundation gifts Georgia State’s J. Mack Robinson College of Business $15 million. Georgia State University announces they will rename its Department of Risk Management & Insurance to the Maurice R. Greenberg School of Risk Science in recognition of the donation.

    Source link

  • Income Tax Deadline Fast Facts | CNN

    Income Tax Deadline Fast Facts | CNN



    CNN
     — 

    Here’s a look at the annual income tax filing deadline in the United States. April 15, 2024, is the deadline to file 2023 income tax returns.

    In fiscal year 2022, the IRS amassed more than $4.9 trillion in gross tax collections.

    (Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, FY 2023)
    Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, marketplace subsidies 24%
    Social Security 21%
    National Defense 13%
    Economic security programs 8%
    Benefits for veterans & federal retirees 8%
    Interest on debt 10%
    Education 4%
    Transportation 2%
    Natural resources and agricultrue 1%
    Science and medical research 1%
    Law enforcement 1%
    International 1%
    All other 4%

    1862 – During the Civil War, the IRS is born when President Abraham Lincoln and Congress create the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and enact an income tax to pay war expenses. The first income tax levies 3% on incomes between $600 and $10,000 and 5% on anything over $10,000. This income tax lasts until 1872.

    1895 – The Supreme Court rules in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Co. that taxing incomes uniformly throughout the United States is unconstitutional.

    1913 – The 16th Amendment is ratified by the states, giving Congress the authority to enact an income tax. Congress also introduces the first 1040 form and levies a 1% tax on personal incomes over $3,000 with 6% surtax on incomes of more than $500,000.

    1954 – The tax filing deadline is moved from March 15 to April 15, to give taxpayers more time to prepare their returns.

    January 3, 1996 – Congress enacts the Taxpayer Bill of Rights to ensure relief from overzealous collection efforts on the part of IRS personnel.

    March 20, 2020 – Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin tweets that tax day is moving from April 15 to July 15 due to the coronavirus pandemic.

    March 17, 2021 – The IRS announces the filing deadline has been moved from April 15 to May 17, to allow filers more time to navigate tax situations complicated by the coronavirus pandemic.

    Source link

  • Russian banker dies suddenly from ‘heart attack’ in latest mystery death

    Russian banker dies suddenly from ‘heart attack’ in latest mystery death

    A TOP Russian banker has died suddenly from a “heart attack” at the age of 42, the latest in a series of prominent early deaths.

    Nikolay Vasyov was senior vice president of Sberbank, the country’s largest financial institution.

    1

    Top Russian banker Nikolay Vasyov has died suddenly from a ‘heart attack’ at the age of 42

    Initial analysis by doctors said his “untimely death” was due to a “heart attack”, said the bank.

    However, further details were not released on the circumstances of his death.

    “It is with deep regret that we inform you that today Nikolay Vasyov, senior vice president, Head of the B2C Customer Experience Development block of Sberbank, suddenly passed away,” a statement read.

    “According to the preliminary conclusion of doctors, death was due to a heart attack.”

    His death follows a number of prominent business and banking figures dying young or in unusual circumstances since Vladimir Putin prepared for his invasion of Ukraine.

    It comes amid deep strains in Russia’s financial sector caused by Putin’s war and the impact of Western sanctions.

    Sberbanks profits plunged almost 80 per cent last year, alone.

    A statement from Sberbank said: “The bank’s management and colleagues mourn the untimely death and express deep condolences to the family and loved ones of Nikolay Vasyov.”

    Vasyov had been closely associated with mortgages and loans at Sberbank and appeared to be close to the pro-Putin head of the bank, German Gref, a former government minister.

    “Nikolay is a passionate professional, bold in his decisions, inquisitive and open to new knowledge,” said Gref of him in 2020.

    “I thank Nikolay for his strong results.”

    Vasyov’s passing follows the mysterious death of the third top executive at Russia’s second largest oil company within a year and a half.

    Vladimir Nekrasov, 66, chairman of the Lukoil board of directors, died “suddenly” last month.

    Russian state media said at the time that the “preliminary” conclusions of doctors was that Nekrasov suffered “acute heart failure”.

    His death follows that of tycoon Ravil Maganov, 67, who fell from a window of Moscow’s elite Central Clinical Hospital, also known as the Kremlin clinic, in September last year.

    There were suspicions of murder but Maganov had been in hospital for a longstanding heart problem prior to falling from a sixth floor window, dying on the spot.

    Billionaire Alexander Subbotin, 43, also linked to energy giant Lukoil where he was a top manager, was found dead in May 2022 after “taking advice from shamans”.

    One theory is that Subbotin – who also owned a shipping company – was poisoned by toad venom triggering a heart attack.

    Among other cases during the war was wealthy Vladislav Avayev, 51, a former Kremlin official, who appeared to have taken his own life after killing his wife Yelena, 47, and daughter, 13.

    He had high level links to leading Russian financial institution Gazprombank.

    Friends disputed reports that he was jealous after his wife admitted she was pregnant by their driver.

    There were claims he had access to the financial secrets of the Kremlin elite.

    Several days later multimillionaire Sergey Protosenya, 55, was found hanged in Spain, after evidently killing his wife Natalia, 53, and their teenage daughter, Maria, with an axe.

    He was a former deputy chairman of Novatek, a company also closely linked to the Kremlin.

    As with Avayev, it is suggested this may have been an assassination  made to appear a murder-and-suicide.

    Naked Yevgeny Palant, 47, a mobile phone multi-millionaire, and his wife Olga, 50, both Ukrainian-born, were found with multiple knife wounds by their daughter Polina, 20.

    Tom Malley

    Source link

  • Interest rates are high. These are the best places to park your cash | CNN Business

    Interest rates are high. These are the best places to park your cash | CNN Business

    Editor’s Note: This is an update of an article that originally ran on September 20, 2023.


    New York
    CNN
     — 

    The Federal Reserve on Wednesday chose not to raise its key interest rate, the same decision it took following its September meeting, leaving its benchmark lending rate at its highest level in 22 years.

    Given that the Fed influences — directly or indirectly — interest rates on financial accounts and products throughout the US economy, savers and people with surplus cash still have many opportunities to get a far better return on their money than they’ve had in years — and even more importantly, a return that outpaces the latest readings on inflation.

    Here are low-risk options to get the best yield on funds you plan to use within two years, and also on cash you expect to need within the next two to five years.

    The average annual percentage yield on bank savings accounts was just 0.59%, according to an October 31 survey from Bankrate. That average is kept low by a nearly zero APY at the biggest brick-and-mortar banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, which were each offering rates of just 0.01%.

    But many online, FDIC-insured banks are offering well north of 5% on their high-yield savings accounts.

    Those accounts are a great place to deposit money that you will likely deploy within the next two years — to cover anything from a planned vacation or big purchase to an emergency expense or an unexpected change of circumstance like a job loss.

    While bank deposit account yields can change overnight, they have remained high for months and are likely to continue to do so. “In the last few months, the Fed has signaled that it intends to keep rates higher for longer. … Some banks have responded to this new ‘higher for longer’ expectation by offering promotional rate guarantees on their savings or money market accounts. In the guarantee, a competitive rate is guaranteed to last for several months on the savings or money market account,” said Ken Tumin, founder of DepositAccounts.com.

    An online savings account is what certified financial planner Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO at 2050 Wealth Partners, calls your “cushion” account. She likes the word “cushion” because it describes the flexibility and options such an account gives you to handle both what you want to do in the near term and what you might need to do.

    Another way high-yield accounts can be useful, Braxton said, is to house money you’ll need to pay off a purchase for which you’ve secured a 0% financing deal for a limited period of time. In that case, you won’t owe interest on your purchase so long as you pay it off in full before the end of the promotion period, which can be anywhere from six to 24 months. In the meantime, the money can grow by 4% to 5% a year in your high-yield account.

    For your regular household bills, Braxton recommends keeping just enough cash to cover a month or two in a regular checking account for fastest access. “Not too much, because [those accounts] won’t yield much,” she said.

    You can always link your high-yield account to your checking account to transfer funds when needed — just know it may take up to 24 hours for the transferred money to show up in your checking account, Braxton noted.

    Money market accounts and funds

    If you don’t want to set up an online savings account at another bank, your own bank may offer you a money market deposit account that pays a higher yield than your regular checking or savings accounts.

    Money market accounts may have higher minimum deposit requirements than a regular savings account, but they are more liquid than a fixed-term certificate of deposit or Treasury bill, meaning they give you access to your money more quickly while still potentially giving you some of the highest yields available, said Doug Ornstein, senior manager for integrated solutions at TIAA Wealth Management.

    But don’t confuse money market accounts with money market mutual funds, which invest in short-term, low- risk debt instruments. As of Oct 31, they had an average 7-day yield of 5.19%, according to the Crane Money Fund Index, which tracks the top 100 taxable money market funds.

    Unlike money market deposit accounts, money market mutual funds are not insured by the FDIC. But if you invest in a money market fund through a brokerage, your overall account is likely to be insured through the Securities Investor Protection Corp (SIPC), which offers protection in the event your brokerage ever goes under.

    Another high-return, low-risk investment that is great for money you likely won’t need to tap for a few months or even a couple of years are certificates of deposit.

    You can get the best returns on CDs through a brokerage such as Schwab, E*Trade or Fidelity. That’s because you can comparison shop for CDs from any number of FDIC-insured banks and will not have to set up individual accounts with each institution.

    To get the greatest benefit from a CD, you have to leave the money invested for a fixed period. You can always access your principal sooner if you need to, but if you do you will forfeit at least some interest.

    As of November 1, CDs listed on Schwab.com with durations of three months, six months, nine months, one year and 18 months were all yielding at least 5.5% .

    Say you invest $10,000 in a six-month CD with a 5.5% APY. At the end of that period, you’ll get your principal back plus nearly $274 in interest when the CD matures, according to Bankrate’s CD calculator. If you put it in a one-year CD you’d earn $555 in interest, while an 18-month term will generate $844.

    If you don’t go through a brokerage you may get a reasonable deal from your primary bank. Tumin said. For example, he noted, Citi came out with an 11-month CD Special with a rate of up to 5.65% APY. But he cautions that with any big bank CD you should take your money out at the end of the term, otherwise your bank may automatically renew it and lock you in to a much lower-yielding CD.

    Another option for money you can leave untouched anywhere from several months to a few years are short-term Treasury bills, which are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.

    Three- and six-month bills had yields of 5.46% and 5.54% respectively on November 1, while nine-month and one-year bills were offering 5.46% and 5.43%, according to rates posted on Schwab.com for a $25,000 investment.

    If you’re someone who manages your portfolio like a hawk, you may feel comfortable buying T-bills on your own from TreasuryDirect.gov. But if you don’t, it might be easier just to buy new issues through your brokerage account or invest in a short-term bond index fund or ETF, said Andy Smith, executive director of financial planning at Edelman Financial Engines.

    And if you’re looking at money that will be needed in three to five years, you might consider a diversified fund of highly rated government and corporate bonds, Ornstein said. Yields on four-year, AAA rated corporate bonds, for instance, were yielding 4.97% this week, and three-year AAA-rated municipal bonds (which are issued by local governments) had rates of 4.59%, according to Schwab.com.

    When deciding on the best accounts and investments for your specific goals and peace of mind, it may pay to consult a fee-only fiduciary adviser — meaning someone who doesn’t get paid a commission to sell you a particular investment.

    What you’ll always want to do is build in flexibility for yourself so you can easily access cash, regardless of your timeline for key goals. “What happens if something changes and you need that down payment a lot sooner — or your parents need medical care fast?” Smith said.

    That means balancing your desire for great yield with a need and desire for ease of access without penalty. Translation: Don’t chase yield for yield’s sake.

    Think of it this way, Ornstein said: Unless you have huge sums to invest or are an institutional investor, the difference between getting a 5.1% yield versus 5% is negligible, and in fact it could even cost you more if there are penalties for taking your money out early. “Most of the time convenience is really important. Give up the 0.1%,” he advised.

    Source link

  • Lionel Messi Fast Facts | CNN

    Lionel Messi Fast Facts | CNN



    CNN
     — 

    Here is a look at the life of soccer player Lionel “Leo” Messi, who plays for Argentina’s national team and Major League Soccer (MLS) club Inter Miami.

    Birth date: June 24, 1987

    Birth place: Rosario, Argentina

    Birth name: Lionel Andrés Messi

    Father: Jorge Messi, factory worker

    Mother: Celia Cuccittini de Messi

    Marriage: Antonela Roccuzzo (June 30, 2017-present)

    Children: Ciro, Mateo and Thiago

    As a young boy, Messi was diagnosed with a growth hormone deficiency. At age 13, he signed with Futbol Club Barcelona and moved to Spain. As part of the contract, FC Barcelona agreed to pay for Messi’s hormone treatments.

    All-time leading scorer of FC Barcelona and Spanish soccer league La Liga.

    Winner of the Ballon d’Or, or footballer of the year, a record eight times: a record four consecutive years (2009-2012) and again for 2015, 2019, 2021 and 2023.

    Won the European Golden Shoe award six times: 2009-10, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19.

    1995-2000 – Plays for the local club team, Newell’s Old Boys, in Rosario, Argentina.

    2000-2003 – Signs with FC Barcelona and works his way up through Barca’s youth squads.

    November 16, 2003 – Makes his team debut, as a replacement in a friendly match against FC Porto.

    October 16, 2004 – Makes his official debut for FC Barcelona against Espanyol. Barca wins 1-0.

    2007 – Establishes the Leo Messi Foundation, working to improve access to education and health care for children.

    August 2008 – Leads Argentina’s soccer team to a gold medal at the Summer Olympics in Beijing.

    March 11, 2010 – Messi is announced as a UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador.

    2011-2012 season – Sets the all-time record for most goals scored in a single season for a major European football league, with 73 goals.

    June 2013 – Prosecutors in Barcelona file tax fraud charges against Messi and his father for the period between 2007 and 2009. The complaint alleges that Messi and his father, aiming to lower their Spanish tax bill, sought to manage the player’s lucrative income from image rights through shell companies set up overseas. Messi denies all allegations of wrongdoing.

    June 25, 2013 – Prosecutors in Barcelona tell CNN that Messi paid €10 million ($13 million) in taxes to cover the tax period 2010-2011, but efforts to prosecute him for alleged tax fraud from 2007 to 2009 are still ongoing.

    August 14, 2013 – Messi and his father, Jorge Messi, make a “reparatory” payment of €5 million ($6.6 million) to Spanish authorities for allegedly committing tax fraud between 2007 and 2009.

    September 27, 2013 – Messi and his father testify in a Barcelona court in a preliminary hearing over allegations they defrauded Spanish tax authorities of more than $5 million.

    March 16, 2014 – Scores a hat-trick (three goals during a game), to become FC Barcelona’s all-time leading scorer with 371 goals, eclipsing the record set by Paulino Alcantara, who scored 369 goals.

    May 2014 – Signs a new contract with FC Barcelona for a reported annual net of €20 million ($27 million).

    June 2014 – A Spanish state prosecutor asks the judge to drop the tax fraud charges against Messi, but not his father.

    July 13, 2014 – Messi wins the Golden Ball award for the best player of the World Cup tournament.

    July 28, 2014 – A judge rules that the tax fraud case against Messi and his father will proceed, despite the Spanish state prosecutor’s June request that the charges against Messi be dropped.

    November 22, 2014 – Messi scores a hat-trick to become the Spanish league’s all-time leading goalscorer with 253 goals, surpassing Telmo Zarra’s previous record of 251 goals.

    October 8, 2015 – A Spanish court rules that Messi and his father will stand trial for tax fraud charges.

    May 31, 2016 – The tax fraud trial begins for Messi and his father.

    June 27, 2016 – Says he probably will retire from international soccer after Argentina loses the Copa America final to Chile on penalties.

    July 6, 2016 – A Barcelona court fines Messi €2 million ($2.3 million), and sentences him to 21 months in prison for tax fraud. The Spanish courts reduces Messi’s prison sentence to an additional fine of €252,000 ($287,000) in July 2017.

    August 12, 2016 – Messi announces that he will play for Argentina once again, having stated in June that he would retire from international soccer.

    July 5, 2017 – Barcelona and Messi announce a contract extension that will keep Messi at Barca until June 30, 2021, and is reportedly worth €565,000 ($645,000) a week.

    January 13, 2019 – Scores his 400th Spanish league goal in his 435th appearance, extending his record as La Liga’s all-time top scorer. Messi is the first player to score 400 times in any of Europe’s “big five” leagues.

    August 2, 2019 – Messi is banned from all competition for three months and fined $50,000 by the CONMEBOL Disciplinary Court. The punishment comes after Messi accused South American football’s governing body of corruption, suggesting the 2019 Copa America was rigged in favor of hosts Brazil.

    August 5, 2021 – Messi is leaving FC Barcelona, according to a statement from the club.

    August 10, 2021 – French club Paris Saint-Germain announces signing Messi to a two-year contract with an option of extending for a third year.

    January 2, 2022 In a statement, Paris Saint-Germain announces Messi is one of four players of the French club to have tested positive for Covid-19. The other three players are Juan Bernat, Sergio Rico and Nathan Bitumazala.

    May 30, 2022 – Speaks about his struggle to recover from Covid-19 after testing positive in January. He missed three matches: two in Ligue 1 and one in the French Cup. “It left me with after effects. It left me with after effects in my lungs. I came back and it was like a month and a half without even being able to run because my lungs were affected.”

    December 18, 2022 – Argentina defeats France to win the World Cup. Messi, playing in his fifth and final World Cup, scores twice. Later, Messi wins his second Golden Ball award.

    June 7, 2023 – Messi says he’s going to join the MLS club Inter Miami. “I made the decision that I am going to Miami. I still haven’t closed it one hundred percent. I’m missing some things but we decided to continue my journey there,” he says in an interview posted by Spanish outlets SPORT and Mundo Deportivo. On July 21, he makes his debut with the club.

    August 19, 2023 – Messi scores to lead Inter Miami past Nashville FC in a penalty kick shootout to capture the Leagues Cup title and score the club’s first trophy.

    Source link

  • IRS has collected $160 million in back taxes by cracking down on millionaires | CNN Politics

    IRS has collected $160 million in back taxes by cracking down on millionaires | CNN Politics


    Washington
    CNN
     — 

    The Internal Revenue Service has collected $160 million in back taxes this year by cracking down on millionaires who haven’t paid what they owe, the agency said Friday.

    The recent effort to target high-income individuals has been boosted by an increase in federal funding provided by Democrats last year through the Inflation Reduction Act. Republicans have criticized the amount of money the IRS is getting, and future funding is uncertain.

    In September, the IRS started seeking back taxes from about 1,600 taxpayers with income above $1 million and more than $250,000 in tax debt. So far, the IRS has closed 100 of those cases, collecting $122 million, it said Friday.

    Earlier this year, the IRS collected $38 million from more than 175 high-income earners. That brings the total to $160 million so far this year.

    “I think that the evidence that we’ve seen to date, in terms of the amount that we have recovered … points to this being a highly important effort for us,” IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said on a call with reporters.

    In one successful case, an individual was ordered to pay more than $15 million in restitution last month for falsifying personal expenses as deductible business expenses, including the construction of a 51,000-square-foot mansion complete with an outdoor pool and pool house, as well as tennis, basketball and bocce courts, according to an IRS press release. The person also falsified expenses for luxury vehicles, artwork, country club memberships and homes for his children.

    Another individual pleaded guilty last week to filing false tax returns and skimming more than $670,000 from his business. The person spent $110,000 on personal expenses and $502,000 on gambling, the IRS said.

    The agency’s effort to ramp up enforcement aims to narrow what’s known as the “tax gap,” the difference between the amount owed and the amount actually collected on time by the IRS. The most recent estimate shows that $688 billion was not collected during tax year 2021.

    The IRS plans to bring a new focus to cracking down on large corporations that have not been paying the taxes they owe.

    The agency will target US subsidiaries of foreign companies that distribute goods in the US and do not pay what they owe in taxes on the profit they earn. It will start sending compliance notices next month to about 150 subsidiaries to “reiterate their US tax obligations and incentivize self-correction,” the announcement said.

    As new accountants come on board at the IRS in early 2024, they are expected to begin 60 audits of some of the largest corporate taxpayers. The targeted corporations will be selected by the IRS accountants using a combination of artificial intelligence and subject matter expertise that will better detect tax cheating. The use of technology is meant to help avoid burdening taxpayers with needless audits.

    The Inflation Reduction Act, which included a provision to deliver $80 billion to the IRS over 10 years, has allowed the agency to begin a complete overhaul of its operations. It’s working to hire new staff, update technology, improve taxpayer services and audit tax cheats.

    The new funds have already helped improve taxpayer services at the IRS. In the 2023 filing season, it answered 3 million more calls and cut phone wait times to three minutes from 28 minutes compared with the year before.

    The IRS is currently working on building its own free tax filing program, known as Direct File, that will launch as a limited pilot program next year.

    The IRS has also put a plan in motion to digitize all paper-filed tax returns by 2025. The move is expected to cut processing times in half and speed up refunds by four weeks.

    Republicans have raised questions about whether the $80 billion investment in the IRS would lead to increased audits for average Americans. Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers were able to reclaim $20 billion of the funding in a bipartisan deal to address the debt ceiling.

    The White House argued that the cut won’t fundamentally change what the IRS can do over the next few years. Biden administration officials have also repeatedly said that taxpayers earning less than $400,000 a year won’t face an increase in audits due to the new funding.

    Source link