ReportWire

Tag: ProPublica

  • Vigil held to honor the life of Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller on the anniversaries of their deaths 

    [ad_1]

    Three years have passed since the tragic death of Amber Nicole Thurman, a Georgia mother. A year has passed since Candi Miller, also a mother, lost her life. Both women lost their lives due to Georgia’s extreme abortion ban.

    Amber’s mother, Shannette Williams, and Candi’s sister, Turiya Tomlin-Randall, joined alongside Free&Just, community members, and local leaders for a vigil at Free & Just’s mural in Atlanta to mark the third anniversary of Amber’s passing and demand justice for all those impacted by abortion bans.

    In November 2024, ProPublica reported on the preventable deaths of Amber and Candi.

    Details included in reports from Georgia’s Maternal Mortality Review Committee, which investigates pregnancy-related deaths in the state, confirm both women’s deaths were preventable and the result of limited access to prompt medical care. 

    Williams only learned of the details of her daughter’s passing after ProPublica’s investigation surfaced previously withheld information. In response to ProPublica’s reporting, officials in Georgia dismissed all members of the state’s Maternal Mortality Review Committee, which investigates the deaths of pregnant women across the state.

    Instead of working to keep Georgia women safe or addressing the state’s alarmingly high maternal mortality rate among Black women, Georgia health authorities are being called out for circling the wagons and attempting to make it more difficult to understand how and why pregnant women across Georgia are suffering poor pregnancy outcomes and even preventable deaths.

    Abortion bans are killing women across the country, and instead of working to expand access to care, Trump and extremists in Congress have jammed through dangerous cuts that will strip millions of people from health care, leaving more lives at risk.  

    Williams also says her grief turned into a fight when she learned the truth about her daughter’s death. 

    “The discovery of what happened to Amber is what made my grief turn into a fight, not to harm, but an advocacy for rights,” she said.

    Amber Nicole Thurman’s mother, Shannette Williams (in yellow), and Candi Miller’s sister, Turiya Tomlin-Randall (left), joined alongside Free&Just, community members, and local leaders for a vigil at Free & Just’s mural in Atlanta to mark the third anniversary of Amber’s passing and demand justice for all those impacted by abortion bans. Photo by Isaiah Singleton/The Atlanta Voice

    Williams says she is at a loss for words and has mixed emotions, but it doesn’t stop the fight.

    “I am just taken by the fact that I must go to the cemetery to visit my baby. Amber’s death was preventable, and the fact that I hear crickets now, considering the President and Vice President acknowledged her death was preventable. Yet, they are not doing anything to save the other women,” she said.

    She adds that the Trump administration is trying to strip women of everything that could save them. Williams also says her daughter Amber was affected as other women are being affected now, and that it’s her earthly purpose, goal, and breath she takes to make sure she fights for justice for Amber and all the other women who have been affected or lost their lives.

    “Bringing other women together by my strength empowers me to keep going. I don’t have a ‘give up’ bone in my body because our family has suffered a tremendous loss,” she said. “When my grandson expresses how much he misses his mom and breaks out in tears, and we cannot console him… do you know what it means to be a grandmother to go to all lengths and measures to ensure her grandchildren are happy? I can’t quit.”

    She also said this is what happens when the community allows politicians to have a voice and sends a message to Georgia politicians and the Trump administration to “get the h—out of our business.”

    “Can anyone tell me, as a man, what I’m going through at this point? The relationship between me and my physician has been tainted because I don’t trust them anymore, and that’s a profession I’ve been in over half my life,” she said.

    With experience in the healthcare field, Williams says she, without a doubt, knows women may have the same symptoms, but each woman is different, and their body is not the same.

    “We don’t even trust the people that took the oath to say, ‘we’re not going to do any harm, but we’ll do whatever it takes to save lives,’ that statement has been tainted,” she said.

    Tomlin-Randall said she doesn’t go a day without thinking about her sister, and, unfortunately, she and Shannette had to meet under these circumstances.

    “Meeting Shannette has been one of the greatest blessings I’ve had because she gave me courage to come forward on behalf of Candi. Who would be if I wasn’t her voice?” she said. “Adriana, Candice, Amber, and all of the other women we don’t know about, no one should have to do this.”

    She continues saying Candi’s name was not a talking point, and not just a memory, because when everyone stopped saying their names, their loved ones had to wake up every day facing it.

    “The biggest loss is for her children who would never get to see their mother again, especially her then-three-year-old, who was in the bed with her when she passed because she was too afraid to go to the hospital because Georgia law said if she took an abortion pill, she would be in prison,” she said. “It’s unthinkable, and the worst part is I didn’t even know for a, almost two years, year and a half the real cause of her death; Clayton County waited almost six months to give me an autopsy, to make it make sense.”

    Photo by Isaiah Singleton/The Atlanta Voice

    Senator Jon Ossoff also made an appearance to speak a few words and said it’s hard to believe it’s been three years since the death of Amber. He also said he has reflected on parenthood over the last few months as he and his wife introduced their second child, a baby girl, into the world recently.

    “You pour everything into your child. There is nothing more precious in your life, there’s no relationship or possession that can rival the irreplaceable value of a child,” he said. “To lose a child in an unnecessary death because of decisions made by selfish, foolish politicians, it’s a burden that both Shannette and Turiya have borne with such tremendous grace, strength, and tenacity.”

    He also says to both Shannette and Turiya, the community, himself, people across the country and state are determined to do whatever they can to support them as they continue to bear their losses.

    Additionally, Williams says she wants to bombard the Trump administration and the Supreme Court because they are the ones responsible for overturning Roe V. Wade.

    “Why aren’t we in their faces? Why is it so hard to get to them? Half of my family is ripped apart because my daughter is gone, and we were once a strong, solid family,” she said. “I’m beyond standing on the podium, I want to see politicians face to face. I want to see change now.”

    As for advice, Williams says she wants every mother who is experiencing loss and thinks they do not have a voice, or has just buriedd thinks their child is forgotten, to muster the strength to make the world remember thei their child, anr child.

    “You must muster up the strength to make the world remember your child. We went through nine months of connection and how old your child is before death,” she said. “Why would you quit? Why would you not fight? Why would you let your child’s name and memories be forgotten and buried with them? You must fight as a mother, it’s what we do.”

    Furthermore, Williams said this fight is not just about her and her family, but she stands on the strength of God to bring change for every woman.

    “A ‘no’ to me doesn’t mean a thing. Looking at what’s going on at the White House, I could care less because my God is the President and he made a promise and he will not break his promise,” she said. “Together we stand, and we will get through it, and we’re going to get change.”

    [ad_2]

    Isaiah Singleton

    Source link

  • IRS apologizes to billionaire Ken Griffin for leaking his tax records

    IRS apologizes to billionaire Ken Griffin for leaking his tax records

    [ad_1]

    The IRS issued a rare apology to billionaire investor Ken Griffin for releasing his tax records to the press, as well as to other taxpayers whose information was breached, the tax agency said in a statement on Tuesday.

    “The Internal Revenue Service sincerely apologizes to Mr. Kenneth Griffin and the thousands of other Americans whose personal information was leaked to the press,” the IRS said.

    The apology stems from the case of a former IRS contractor named Charles Littlejohn, who was sentenced earlier this year to five years in prison for unauthorized disclosure of tax returns. Littlejohn had provided tax return information for Griffin and other wealthy Americans to nonprofit news organization ProPublica. 

    In a statement to CBS MoneyWatch, Griffin said, “I am grateful to my team for securing an outcome that will better protect American taxpayers and that will ultimately benefit all Americans.” 

    Beginning in 2021, ProPublica published a series called “The Secret IRS Files,” which included the details of tax returns for thousands of rich taxpayers, including Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Tesla founder and CEO Elon Musk. The coverage explored how some of the wealthiest Americans minimize their taxes.

    Littlejohn “violated the terms of his contract and betrayed the trust that the American people place in the IRS to safeguard their sensitive information,” the agency said in Tuesday’s statement. “The IRS takes its responsibilities seriously and acknowledges that it failed to prevent Mr. Littlejohn’s criminal conduct and unlawful disclosure of Mr. Griffin’s confidential data.”

    Qatar Economic Forum 2024 Opening Day
    Ken Griffin, founder and CEO of hedge fund Citadel, at the Qatar Economic Forum, on Tuesday, May 14, 2024.

    Christopher Pike/Bloomberg via Getty Images


    Griffin, the founder of the hedge fund Citadel, is worth almost $42 billion, making him the world’s 34th richest person, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The IRS’ apology comes after Griffin on Monday dropped a lawsuit against the agency and the U.S. Treasury Department that he had filed in December over the breach. 

    ProPublica didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 

    The IRS said it has made “substantial investments in its data security to strengthen its safeguarding of taxpayer information.”

    It added, “The agency believes that its actions and the resolution of this case will result in a stronger and more trustworthy process for safeguarding the personal information of all taxpayers.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Warren Buffett’s followers just got a rare peek inside his personal stock portfolio. Here’s what they learned from a new report.

    Warren Buffett’s followers just got a rare peek inside his personal stock portfolio. Here’s what they learned from a new report.

    [ad_1]

    Warren Buffett.Mario Anzuoni/Reuters

    • Warren Buffett’s disciples got a rare peek inside his personal stock portfolio this week.

    • The investor sold nearly $500 million of stocks over 20 years, ProPublica reported, citing IRS data.

    • Buffett’s private holdings have reportedly included Wells Fargo, Walmart, and Johnson & Johnson.

    Warren Buffett’s followers got a rare glimpse inside his personal stock portfolio this week, revealing the famed investor and Berkshire Hathaway CEO has counted Wells Fargo, Walmart, and Johnson & Johnson among his private holdings over the years.

    Buffett’s disciples also gained a sense of the scale of his personal bets. The 93-year-old centibillionaire sold at least $466 million of shares between 2000 and 2019, and disposed of government and corporate bonds worth far more during that period, ProPublica reported this week, citing leaked data from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

    ProPublica’s story accused Buffett of breaking his own rules at Berkshire, which bar employees with inside knowledge of what the company is buying, selling – or planning to buy or sell – from trading those securities. Buffett’s also stated that when it comes to his personal investments, he avoids the securities on Berkshire’s radar or in its portfolio given the potential conflicts of interest.

    Buffett reportedly sold $20 million of Wells Fargo stock in April 2009, even though he was publicly talking up the bank as one of its largest shareholders at the time, and Berkshire boosted its stake during the next quarter.

    He sold $25 million of Walmart stock four months later, during a quarter when Berkshire bolstered its position.

    Finally, he disposed of $35 million of Johnson & Johnson stock in October 2012, shortly before Berkshire revealed it had trimmed its stake in the same company.

    ProPublica said Buffett didn’t respond to questions about the trades. Berkshire didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from Insider.

    Adam Mead, the author of “The Complete Financial History of Berkshire Hathaway,” shared one possible explanation for the trades on X.

    “It kinda feels like Buffett wanted to get out of WFC and Walmart so Berkshire could have the shares and he wouldn’t be personally taking a seat at the shareholders table,” Mead said. “And I think he got out of J&J after BRK was done selling. I could be wrong. Hopefully he clears it up.”

    Paying the bills

    Regardless of any alleged impropriety, Buffett’s reported sales are noteworthy. They suggest that over a period of years, he personally owned at least $80 million worth of just three stocks.

    It’s safe to say his portfolio is worth multiples of that, given Buffett is a long-term investor who doesn’t sell often, and the fact his bond disposals were much larger in dollar terms, according to ProPublica.

    The fresh details of Buffett’s portfolio help explain how he pays his bills. After all, he only collects a $100,000 salary from Berkshire, and pays back half that amount to the company each year.

    Moreover, he has never sold a share of his $100 billion-plus of Berkshire stock. Dividends and income from a portfolio that’s likely worth hundreds of millions of dollars, if not billions, probably help keep him afloat.

    The presence of Wells Fargo, Walmart, and Johnson & Johnson in Buffett’s portfolio won’t surprise his acolytes.

    Berkshire was a Wells Fargo shareholder for more than 30 years prior to 2022, and counted the lender among its top five positions for most of that time.

    It first invested in Johnson & Johnson more than a decade ago, and still owned the pharmaceutical stock as of June.

    Buffett’s company also owned Walmart for many years, and the mega-retailer ranked among its biggest bets at points.

    Read the original article on Business Insider

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Is the Media Finally Waking Up to a New Kind of Supreme Court Coverage?

    Is the Media Finally Waking Up to a New Kind of Supreme Court Coverage?

    [ad_1]

    Josh Gerstein says he didn’t expect Politico’s leaked Dobbs draft opinion to be an inflection point in Supreme Court coverage. When Gerstein, Politico’s senior legal affairs reporter, and national security reporter Alexander Ward obtained and published the initial draft majority opinion ending federal protections for abortion last year, “I thought they would just sort of batten down the hatches and pretend like nothing was going on—and I guess I kind of felt like the press would respond in the same way,” he tells me. After the historic scoop came out—never in the modern history of the Court had an entire draft decision of this magnitude been leaked to the press—Gerstein remembers “at least one editor” saying to him, “Oh, no, this is gonna change the way the Supreme Court is covered from here on out.”

    Indeed, in the year or so since the Dobbs leak, and amid increasing calls for deeper, more sustained coverage, we have seen “a dramatic increase in the amount of resources that they put into it,” Gerstein notes. The job of the Supreme Court reporter has traditionally been to track cases, and translate the final opinions to readers. But this term, as the conservative supermajority ruled on hot-button issues including affirmative action, LGBTQ+ rights, and student-debt relief, reporters both on the SCOTUS beat and beyond took a broader approach, with more scrutiny of the justices’ business dealings, relationships, and ethical issues. ProPublica published a series of revelatory stories about Justice Clarence Thomas’s undisclosed gifts from billionaire GOP mega-donor Harlan Crow and Justice Samuel Alito’s undisclosed luxury fishing trips with billionaire GOP mega-donor Paul Singer, who later had cases before the Court. Politico reported how Justice Neil Gorsuch in 2017 failed to disclose a property sale to a CEO whose law firm has since argued at least 22 cases before the Court. The Associated Press examined the ethics practices behind Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s staff prodded colleges and libraries to buy her books.

    “To some extent this coverage has existed, just not on a consistent basis,” says investigative reporter Jesse Eisinger, the editor of ProPublica’s SCOTUS coverage. Back in 2004, the Los Angeles Times reported on the “wealth of gifts” that Thomas had disclosed. Some details of his relationship with Crow have emerged over the years too. “People understood that the Court had politicking, but not politics,” says Eisinger. “The end result of the coverage focused on the opinions, and not the influence and politics that went into the making of those opinions.” The Court’s most recent session highlighted these gaps in coverage as well; just days before the high court essentially gave some businesses the right to discriminate against LGBTQ+ patrons, The New Republic published a remarkable article that raised the possibility that the plaintiff’s lawyers—a conservative anti-LGBTQ+ legal advocacy group—had falsified evidence. (The reporter Melissa Gira Grant called up the allegedly gay man cited in the Court filing as a client who requested a same-sex wedding website from a website design business owner, only to find the man claiming to have never made such a request, and married to a woman.) The eleventh hour report begs the question: Shouldn’t mainstream outlets give similar scrutiny to the origins of cases in the Supreme Court’s docket from the get-go?

    Perhaps now, Eisinger wonders, the post-Dobbs public is more primed for this kind of coverage. “Maybe the reason why it’s resonating has nothing to do with us, but just the moment—that people were ready to read it and see it and acknowledge it. Sometimes you just have to have that. The reporting is much less important than the readers.”

    The press has treated the Supreme Court with a unique reverence compared to the other two branches of government. Among the legal experts who have made this point is Slate’s Dahlia Lithwick, who in a recent essay, titled “Imagine if the Press Covered the Supreme Court Like Congress,” noted that the SCOTUS press corps “has been largely institutionalized to treat anything the court produces as the law, and to push everything else—matters of judicial conduct, how justices are chosen and seated, ethical lapses—off to be handled by the political press.” Lithwick points to scoops related to the Court, aside from Gerstein, largely coming from reporters not directly on the beat. “It speaks volumes about the way the Court has been covered that only in the past year have some legacy news outlets hung out ‘Help Wanted’ ads seeking reporters to cover the Court as though it’s an actual branch of government and not the oracle at Delphi.”

    To Lithwick’s point, The New York Times indicated it was rethinking its approach to the beat in hiring Abbie VanSickle of the Marshall Project to, as the announcement put it, “cover the world of the court including its role in politics and the lives of the justices.” The role, Times spokesperson Charlie Stadtlander told me, “is new, expanding the Times’ coverage of the court.” Earlier this month, the Times’ Sunday front page was devoted to an investigative piece—co-bylined by VanSickle—into Thomas’s ethical standards and relationship with an elite circle of “extraordinarily wealthy, largely conservative members,” to whom Thomas granted “unusual access to the Supreme Court.” The Washington Post, too, has been putting more energy into SCOTUS ethics reporting, from scoops on the tens of thousands of dollars that conservative judicial activist Leonard Leo told Kellyanne Conway to pay Ginni Thomas, wife of Clarence, to analysis of justices’ long-running tensions over ethics.

    [ad_2]

    Charlotte Klein

    Source link

  • Justice Samuel Alito took luxury trip with billionaire GOP donor, report finds

    Justice Samuel Alito took luxury trip with billionaire GOP donor, report finds

    [ad_1]

    Justice Samuel Alito took luxury trip with billionaire GOP donor, report finds – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    A new report from ProPublica found that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito took an extravagant vacation in 2008 aboard a private jet owned by hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer, whose hedge fund came before the Supreme Court at least eight times. Nikole Killion has the details.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Billionaire Harlan Crow Bought Property From Clarence Thomas. The Justice Didn’t Disclose the Deal.

    Billionaire Harlan Crow Bought Property From Clarence Thomas. The Justice Didn’t Disclose the Deal.

    [ad_1]

    This story was originally published by ProPublica.

    In 2014, one of Texas billionaire Harlan Crow’s companies purchased a string of properties on a quiet residential street in Savannah, Georgia. It wasn’t a marquee acquisition for the real estate magnate, just an old single-story home and two vacant lots down the road. What made it noteworthy were the people on the other side of the deal: Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his relatives.

    The transaction marks the first known instance of money flowing from the Republican megadonor to the Supreme Court justice. The Crow company bought the properties for $133,363 from three co-owners — Thomas, his mother and the family of Thomas’ late brother, according to a state tax document and a deed dated Oct. 15, 2014, filed at the Chatham County courthouse.

    The purchase put Crow in an unusual position: He now owned the house where the justice’s elderly mother was living. Soon after the sale was completed, contractors began work on tens of thousands of dollars of improvements on the two-bedroom, one-bathroom home, which looks out onto a patch of orange trees. The renovations included a carport, a repaired roof and a new fence and gates, according to city permit records and blueprints.

    A federal disclosure law passed after Watergate requires justices and other officials to disclose the details of most real estate sales over $1,000. Thomas never disclosed his sale of the Savannah properties. That appears to be a violation of the law, four ethics law experts told ProPublica.

    The disclosure form Thomas filed for that year also had a space to report the identity of the buyer in any private transaction, such as a real estate deal. That space is blank.

    “He needed to report his interest in the sale,” said Virginia Canter, a former government ethics lawyer now at the watchdog group CREW. “Given the role Crow has played in subsidizing the lifestyle of Thomas and his wife, you have to wonder if this was an effort to put cash in their pockets.”

    Thomas did not respond to detailed questions for this story.

    In a statement, Crow said he purchased Thomas’ mother’s house, where Thomas spent part of his childhood, to preserve it for posterity. “My intention is to one day create a public museum at the Thomas home dedicated to telling the story of our nation’s second black Supreme Court Justice,” he said. “I approached the Thomas family about my desire to maintain this historic site so future generations could learn about the inspiring life of one of our greatest Americans.”

    Crow’s statement did not directly address why he also bought two vacant lots from Thomas down the street. But he wrote that “the other lots were later sold to a vetted builder who was committed to improving the quality of the neighborhood and preserving its historical integrity.”

    ProPublica also asked Crow about the additions on Thomas’ mother’s house, like the new carport. “Improvements were also made to the Thomas property to preserve its long-term viability and accessibility to the public,” Crow said.

    Ethics law experts said Crow’s intentions had no bearing on Thomas’ legal obligation to disclose the sale.

    The justice’s failure to report the transaction suggests “Thomas was hiding a financial relationship with Crow,” said Kathleen Clark, a legal ethics expert at Washington University in St. Louis who reviewed years of Thomas’ disclosure filings.

    There are a handful of carve-outs in the disclosure law. For example, if someone sells “property used solely as a personal residence of the reporting individual or the individual’s spouse,” they don’t need to report it. Experts said the exemptions clearly did not apply to Thomas’ sale.

    The revelation of a direct financial transaction between Thomas and Crow casts their relationship in a new light. ProPublica reported last week that Thomas has accepted luxury travel from Crow virtually every year for decades, including private jet flights, international cruises on the businessman’s superyacht and regular stays at his private resort in the Adirondacks. Crow has long been influential in conservative politics and has spent millions on efforts to shape the law and the judiciary. The story prompted outcry and calls for investigations from Democratic lawmakers.

    In response to that reporting, both Thomas and Crow released statements downplaying the significance of the gifts. Thomas also maintained that he wasn’t required to disclose the trips.

    “Harlan and Kathy Crow are among our dearest friends,” Thomas wrote. “As friends do, we have joined them on a number of family trips.” Crow told ProPublica that his gifts to Thomas were “no different from the hospitality we have extended to our many other dear friends.”

    It’s unclear if Crow paid fair market value for the Thomas properties. Crow also bought several other properties on the street and paid significantly less than his deal with the Thomases. One example: In 2013, he bought a pair of properties on the same block — a vacant lot and a small house — for a total of $40,000.

    WASHINGTON, DC – APRIL 07: Tourists move through the plaza in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building April 07, 2023 in Washington, DC. According to a ProPublica report published Thursday, Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas failed to include in his financial disclosures that for decades he was treated to luxury vacations by Texas real estate magnate and Republican mega-donor Harlan Crow. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    Chip Somodevilla via Getty Images

    In his statement, Crow said his company purchased the properties “at market rate based on many factors including the size, quality, and livability of the dwellings.”

    He did not respond to requests to provide documentation or details of how he arrived at the price.

    Thomas was born in the coastal hamlet of Pin Point, outside Savannah. He later moved to the city, where he spent part of his childhood in his grandfather’s home on East 32nd Street.

    “It had hardwood floors, handsome furniture, and an indoor bathroom, and we knew better than to touch anything,” Thomas wrote of the house in his memoir, “My Grandfather’s Son.”

    He inherited his stake in that house and two other properties on the block following the death of his grandfather in 1983, according to records on file at the Chatham County courthouse. He shared ownership with his brother and his mother, Leola Williams. In the late 1980s, when Thomas was an official in the George H.W. Bush administration, he listed the addresses of the three properties in a disclosure filing. He reported that he had a one-third interest in them.

    Thomas was confirmed to the Supreme Court in 1991. By the early 2000s, he had stopped listing specific addresses of property he owned in his disclosures. But he continued to report holding a one-third interest in what he described as “rental property at ## 1, 2, & 3” in Savannah. He valued his stake in the properties at $15,000 or less.

    Two of the houses were torn down around 2010, according to property records and a footnote in Thomas’ annual disclosure archived by Free Law Project.

    In 2014, the Thomas family sold the vacant lots and the remaining East 32nd Street house to one of Crow’s companies. The justice signed the paperwork personally. His signature was notarized by an administrator at the Supreme Court, Perry Thompson, who did not respond to a request for comment. (The deed was signed on the 23rd anniversary of Thomas’ Oct. 15 confirmation to the Supreme Court. Crow has a Senate roll call sheet from the confirmation vote in his private library.)

    Thomas’ financial disclosure for that year is detailed, listing everything from a “stained glass medallion” he received from Yale to a life insurance policy. But he failed to report his sale to Crow.

    WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 07: United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas poses for an official portrait at the East Conference Room of the Supreme Court building on October 7, 2022 in Washington, DC. The Supreme Court has begun a new term after Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was officially added to the bench in September. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
    WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 07: United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas poses for an official portrait at the East Conference Room of the Supreme Court building on October 7, 2022 in Washington, DC. The Supreme Court has begun a new term after Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was officially added to the bench in September. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

    Alex Wong via Getty Images

    Crow purchased the properties through a recently formed Texas company called Savannah Historic Developments LLC. The company shares an address in Dallas with Crow Holdings, the centerpiece of his real estate empire. Its formation documents were signed by Crow Holdings’ general counsel. Business records filed with the Texas secretary of state say Savannah Historic Developments is managed by a Delaware LLC, HRC Family Branch GP, an umbrella company that also covers other Crow assets like his private jet. The Delaware company’s CEO is Harlan Crow.

    A Crow Holdings company soon began paying the roughly $1,500 in annual property taxes on Thomas’ mother’s house, according to county tax records. The taxes had previously been paid by Clarence and Ginni Thomas.

    Crow still owns Thomas’ mother’s home, which the now-94-year-old continued to live in through at least 2020, according to public records and social media. Two neighbors told ProPublica she still lives there. Crow did not respond to questions about whether he has charged her rent. Soon after Crow purchased the house, an award-winning local architecture firm received permits to begin $36,000 of improvements.

    People hold signs decrying U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in front of the Supreme Court Building in Washington, U.S. April 13, 2023. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
    People hold signs decrying U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in front of the Supreme Court Building in Washington, U.S. April 13, 2023. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

    JONATHAN ERNST via Reuters

    Crow’s purchases seem to have played a role in transforming the block. The billionaire eventually sold most of the other properties he bought to new owners who built upscale modern homes, including the two vacant lots he purchased from Thomas.

    Crow also bought the house immediately next door to Thomas’ mother, which was owned by somebody else and had been known for parties and noise, according to property records and W. John Mitchell, former president of a nearby neighborhood association. Soon the house was torn down. “It was an eyesore,” Mitchell said. “One day miraculously all of them were put out of there and they scraped it off the earth.”

    “The surrounding properties had fallen into disrepair and needed to be demolished for health and safety reasons,” Crow said in his statement. He added that his company built one new house on the block “and made it available to a local police officer.”

    Today, the block is composed of a dwindling number of longtime elderly homeowners and a growing population of young newcomers. The vacant lots that the Thomas family once owned have been replaced by pristine two-story homes. An artisanal coffee shop and a Mediterranean bistro are within walking distance. Down the street, a multicolored pride flag blows in the wind.

    Do you have any tips on the courts? Justin Elliott can be reached by email at justin@propublica.org or by Signal or WhatsApp at 774-826-6240. Josh Kaplan can be reached by email at joshua.kaplan@propublica.org and by Signal or WhatsApp at 734-834-9383.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Uvalde student pleads for help in newly released 911 call

    Uvalde student pleads for help in newly released 911 call

    [ad_1]

    Uvalde student pleads for help in newly released 911 call – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    In 911 calls, frantic students and teachers describe the calls for help inside Robb Elementary School during the shooting massacre in May. Omar Villafranca shows us the new chilling and heartbreaking details we are learning from the chilling audio, obtained by The Texas Tribune and ProPublica.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • New audio captures Uvalde students’ dire 911 calls

    New audio captures Uvalde students’ dire 911 calls

    [ad_1]

    New audio captures Uvalde students’ dire 911 calls – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    In 911 calls, obtained by the Texas Tribune and ProPublica and released with the permission of victims’ families, frantic students and teachers describe the horror of the Uvalde school shooting as it happened. Warning: The clips are disturbing. Omar Villafranca reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link