ReportWire

Tag: Procter & Gamble Co

  • Layoffs are piling up, raising worker anxiety. Here are some companies that have cut jobs recently

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — It’s a tough time to be looking for a job.

    Amid wider economic uncertainty, some analysts have said that businesses are at a “no-hire, no fire” standstill. That’s caused many to limit new work to only a few specific roles, if not pause openings entirely. At the same time, sizable layoffs have continued to pile up — raising worker anxieties across sectors.

    Some companies have pointed to rising operational costs spanning from President Donald Trump’s barrage of new tariffs and shifts in consumer spending. Others cite corporate restructuring more broadly — or, as seen with big names like Amazon, are redirecting money to artificial intelligence.

    Federal employees have encountered additional doses of uncertainty, impacting worker sentiment around the job market overall. Shortly after Trump returned to office at the start of the year, federal jobs were cut by the thousands. And the record 43-day government shutdown also left many to work without paychecks.

    The impasse put key economic data on hold, too. In a delayed report released Thursday, the Labor Department said U.S. employers added a surprising 119,000 jobs in September. But unemployment rose to 4.4% — and other troubling details emerged, including revisions showing the economy actually lost 4,000 jobs in August. There’s also growing gender and racial disparities. The National Women’s Law Center notes women only accounted for 21,000 of September’s added jobs — and that Black women over the age of 20, in particular, saw unemployment climb to 7.5% for the month.

    The shutdown has left holes in more recent hiring numbers. The government says it won’t release a full jobs report for October.

    Here are some of the largest job cuts announced recently:

    Verizon

    In November, Verizon began laying off more than 13,000 employees. In a staff memo announcing the cuts, CEO Dan Schulman said that the telecommunications giant needed to simplify operations and “reorient” the entire company.

    General Motors

    General Motors moved to lay off about 1,700 workers across manufacturing sites in Michigan and Ohio in late October, as the auto giant adjusts to slowing demand for electric vehicles. Hundreds of additional employees are reportedly slated for “temporary layoffs” at the start of next year.

    Paramount

    In long-awaited cuts just months after completing its $8 billion merger with Skydance, Paramount plans to lay off about 2,000 employees — about 10% of its workforce. Paramount initiated roughly 1,000 of those layoffs in late October, according to a source familiar with the matter.

    In November, Paramount also announced plans to eliminate 1,600 positions as part of divestitures of Televisión Federal in Argentina and Chilevision in Chile. And the company said another 600 employees had chosen voluntary severance packages as part of a coming push to return to the office full-time.

    Amazon

    Amazon said last month that it will cut about 14,000 corporate jobs, close to 4% of its workforce, as the online retail giant ramps up spending on AI while trimming costs elsewhere. A letter to employees said most workers would be given 90 days to look for a new position internally.

    UPS

    United Parcel Service has disclosed about 48,000 job cuts this year as part of turnaround efforts, which arrive amid wider shifts in the company’s shipping outputs. UPS also closed daily operations at 93 leased and owned buildings during the first nine months of this year.

    Target

    Target in October moved to eliminate about 1,800 corporate positions, or about 8% of its corporate workforce globally. The retailer said the cuts were part of wider streamlining efforts.

    Nestlé

    In mid-October, Nestlé said it would be cutting 16,000 jobs globally — as part of wider cost cutting aimed at reviving its financial performance amid headwinds like rising commodity costs and U.S. imposed tariffs. The Swiss food giant said the layoffs would take place over the next two years.

    Lufthansa Group

    In September, Lufthansa Group said it would shed 4,000 jobs by 2030 — pointing to the adoption of artificial intelligence, digitalization and consolidating work among member airlines.

    Novo Nordisk

    Also in September, Danish pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk said it would cut 9,000 jobs, about 11% of its workforce. The company — which makes drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy — said the layoffs were part of wider restructuring, as it works to sell more obesity and diabetes medications amid rising competition.

    ConocoPhillips

    Oil giant ConocoPhillips announced plans in September to lay off up to a quarter of its workforce, as part of broader efforts from the company to cut costs. Between 2,600 and 3,250 workers were expected to be impacted, with most layoffs set to take place before the end of 2025.

    Intel

    Intel has moved to shed thousands of jobs — with the struggling chipmaker working to revive its business. In July, CEO Lip-Bu Tan said Intel expected to end the year with 75,000 “core” workers, excluding subsidiaries, through layoffs and attrition. That’s down from 99,500 core employees reported the end of last year. The company previously announced a 15% workforce reduction.

    Microsoft

    In May, Microsoft began laying off about 6,000 workers across its workforce. And just months later, the tech giant said it would be cutting 9,000 positions — marking its biggest round of layoffs seen in more than two years. The company has cited “organizational changes,” but the labor reductions also arrive as the company spends heavily on AI.

    Procter & Gamble

    In June, Procter & Gamble said it would cut up to 7,000 jobs over the next two years, 6% of the company’s global workforce. The maker of Tide detergent and Pampers diapers said the cuts were part of a wider restructuring — also arriving amid tariff pressures.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Layoffs are piling up, raising worker anxiety. Here are some companies that have cut jobs recently

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — It’s a tough time for the job market.

    Amid wider economic uncertainty, some analysts have said that businesses are at a “no-hire, no fire” standstill. That’s caused many to limit new work to only a few specific roles, if not pause openings entirely. At the same time, some sizeable layoffs have continued to pile up — raising worker anxieties across sectors.

    Some companies have pointed to rising operational costs spanning from President Donald Trump’s barrage of new tariffs and shifts in consumer spending. Others cite corporate restructuring more broadly — or, as seen with big names like Amazon, are redirecting money to artificial intelligence.

    Federal employees have encountered additional doses of uncertainty, impacting worker sentiment around the job market overall. Shortly after Trump returned to office at the start of the year, federal jobs were cut by the thousands. And many workers are now going without pay as the U.S. government shutdown nears its fourth week.

    “A lot of people are looking around, scanning the job environment, scanning the opportunities that are available to them — whether it’s in the public or private sector,” said Jason Schloetzer, professor business administration at Georgetown University’s McDonough School. “And I think there’s a question mark around the long-term stability everywhere.”

    Government hiring data is on hold during the shutdown, but earlier this month a survey by payroll company ADP showed that the private sector lost 32,000 jobs in September.

    Here are some companies that have moved to cut jobs recently.

    General Motors

    General Motors moved to lay off about 1,700 workers across manufacturing sites in Michigan and Ohio on Wednesday, as the auto giant adjusts to slowing demand for electric vehicles.

    Hundreds of additional employees are reportedly slated for “temporary layoffs.” And GM has recently moved to downsize other parts of its workforce, too — including 200 layoffs mostly impacting engineers in Detroit, and other 300 job cuts at a Georgia IT Innovation Center, which it is also shuttering.

    Paramount

    In long-awaited cuts just months after completing its $8 billion merger with Skydance, Paramount is going to lay off about 2,000 employees — about 10% of its workforce.

    Paramount initiated roughly 1,000 of those layoffs on Wednesday, according to a source familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The rest of the cuts will be made at a later date.

    Amazon

    Amazon will cut about 14,000 corporate jobs as the online retail giant ramps up spending on artificial intelligence.

    Amazon said Tuesday that it will cut about 14,000 corporate jobs, close to 4% of its workforce, as the online retail giant ramps up spending on AI while trimming costs elsewhere. A letter to employees said most workers would be given 90 days to look for a new position internally.

    CEO Andy Jassy previously said he anticipated generative AI would reduce Amazon’s corporate workforce in the coming years. And he has worked to aggressively cut costs overall since 2021.

    UPS

    United Parcel Service has disclosed about 48,000 job cuts this year as part of turnaround efforts, which arrive amid wider shifts in the company’s shipping outputs.

    In a Tuesday regulatory filing, UPS said it’s cut about 34,000 operational positions — and the company announced another 14,000 role reductions, mostly within management. Combined, that’s much higher than the roughly 20,000 cuts UPS forecast earlier this year.

    Target

    Last week, Target that it would eliminate about 1,800 corporate positions, or about 8% of its corporate workforce globally.

    Target said the cuts were part of wider streamlining efforts — with Chief Operating Officer Michael Fiddelke noting that “too many layers and overlapping work have slowed decisions.” The retailer is also looking to rebuild its customer base. Target reported flat or declining comparable sales in nine of the past eleven quarters.

    Nestlé

    In mid-October, Nestlé said it would be cutting 16,000 jobs globally — as part of wider cost cutting aimed at reviving its financial performance.

    The Swiss food giant said the layoffs would take place over the next two years. The cuts arrive as Nestlé and others face headwinds like rising commodity costs and U.S. imposed tariffs. The company announced price hikes over the summer to offset higher coffee and cocoa costs.

    Lufthansa Group

    In September, Lufthansa Group said it would shed 4,000 jobs by 2030 — pointing to the adoption of artificial intelligence, digitalization and consolidating work among member airlines.

    Most of the lost jobs would be in Germany, and the focus would be on administrative rather than operational roles, the company said. The layoff plans arrived even as the company reported strong demand for air travel and predicted stronger profits in years ahead.

    Novo Nordisk

    Also in September, Danish pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk said it would cut 9,000 jobs, about 11% of its workforce.

    Novo Nordisk — which makes drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy — said the layoffs were part of wider restructuring as the company works to sell more obesity and diabetes medications amid rising competition.

    ConocoPhillips

    Oil giant ConocoPhillips has said it plans to lay off up to a quarter of its workforce, as part of broader efforts from the company to cut costs.

    A spokesperson for ConocoPhillips confirmed the layoffs on Sept. 3, noting that 20% to 25% of the company’s employees and contractors would be impacted worldwide. At the time, ConocoPhillips had a total headcount of about 13,000 — or between 2,600 and 3,250 workers. Most reductions were expected to take place before the end of 2025.

    Intel

    Intel has moved to shed thousands of jobs — with the struggling chipmaker working to revive its business as it lags behind rivals like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices.

    In a July memo to employees, CEO Lip-Bu Tan said Intel expected to end the year with 75,000 “core” workers, excluding subsidiaries, through layoffs and attrition. That’s down from 99,500 core employees reported the end of last year. The company previously announced a 15% workforce reduction.

    Microsoft

    In May, Microsoft began began laying off about 6,000 workers across its workforce. And just months later, the tech giant said it would be cutting 9,000 positions — marking its biggest round of layoffs seen in more than two years.

    The latest job cuts hit Microsoft’s Xbox video game business and other divisions. The company has cited “organizational changes,” with many executives characterizing the layoffs as part of a push to trim management layers. But the labor reductions also arrive as the company spends heavily on AI.

    Procter & Gamble

    In June, Procter & Gamble said it would cut up to 7,000 jobs over the next two years, 6% of the company’s global workforce.

    The maker of Tide detergent and Pampers diapers said the cuts were part of a wider restructuring — also arriving amid tariff pressures. In July, P&G said it would hike prices on about a quarter of its products due to the newly-imposed import taxes, although it’s since said it expects to take less of a hit than previously anticipated for the 2026 fiscal year.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These 5 portfolio stocks outperformed the market’s incredible run since our September Monthly Meeting

    These 5 portfolio stocks outperformed the market’s incredible run since our September Monthly Meeting

    [ad_1]

    Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

    Angela Weiss | AFP | Getty Images

    It’s been a stellar month for the U.S. stock market, driven largely by easing monetary policy.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Earnings will drive the stock market in the week ahead. That’s a good thing

    Earnings will drive the stock market in the week ahead. That’s a good thing

    [ad_1]

    A view of the New York Stock Exchange building in the Financial District in New York City on Aug. 5, 2024.

    Charly Triballeau | Afp | Getty Images

    The good times are still rolling on Wall Street. An intensifying earnings season will put that momentum to the test.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The stock market flips and tech falls out of favor — why this move may be hard to stop

    The stock market flips and tech falls out of favor — why this move may be hard to stop

    [ad_1]

    Every weekday, the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer releases the Homestretch — an actionable afternoon update, just in time for the last hour of trading on Wall Street.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Palo Alto Networks will see further upside as hacking threats intensify from overseas

    Palo Alto Networks will see further upside as hacking threats intensify from overseas

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Warren Buffett’s Berkshire trimming holdings, keeping new stock secret

    Warren Buffett’s Berkshire trimming holdings, keeping new stock secret

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why the post-earnings Morgan Stanley sell-off is an overreaction

    Why the post-earnings Morgan Stanley sell-off is an overreaction

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Here’s a rapid-fire update on all 35 stocks in the Club’s portfolio, including a new buy

    Here’s a rapid-fire update on all 35 stocks in the Club’s portfolio, including a new buy

    [ad_1]

    Jim Cramer ran through all 35 Club stocks during our September Monthly Meeting on Thursday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: Intel, Roku, Procter & Gamble and more

    Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: Intel, Roku, Procter & Gamble and more

    [ad_1]

    Signage outside Intel headquarters in Santa Clara, California, on Monday, Jan. 30, 2023.

    David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Check out the companies making headlines before the bell.

    Intel — Shares popped 6.7% after the chipmaker posted better-than-expected second-quarter results and a return to profitability after two consecutive losing periods. Intel’s forecast for the third quarter also came in above analyst expectations. The company reported adjusted earnings of 13 cents a share on revenues of $12.95 billion.

    Roku — The streaming stock rallied nearly 10% after reporting a narrower-than-expected loss for the second quarter. Roku reported a loss of 76 cents a share and revenues of $847 million. Analysts polled by Refinitiv had anticipated a loss of $1.26 per share and $775 million in revenue.

    Biogen — Biogen shares moved slightly lower after the biotechnology company said it’s acquiring Reata Pharmaceuticals for $172.50 per share, in a cash deal valued at about $7.3 billion. Shares of Reata soared more than 51% on the news.

    Procter & Gamble — The consumer giant saw shares rise more than 1% in premarket trading after the company reported quarterly earnings and revenue that beat analysts’ expectations. However, P&G released a gloomy outlook for its fiscal 2024 sales that fell short of Wall Street’s estimates.

    Exxon Mobil — Shares moved slightly lower after the oil stock posted mixed second-quarter results. The company reported earnings of $1.94 a share, excluding items, that fell short of the $2.01 expected by analysts, per Refinitiv. Revenues came in at $82.91 billion, above the expected $80.19 billion.

    Chevron — The oil stock lost nearly 1% even after reporting a beat on the top and bottom lines for the second quarter. Earnings fell from a year ago due to a drop in oil prices.

    First Solar – Shares soared 12% after the solar company posted earnings per share of $1.59 on revenue of $811 million for the second quarter. Those results beat Wall Street expectations of 96 cents per share on revenue of $721 million, according to Refinitiv. The company also announced plans to invest up to $1.1 billion to build a fifth manufacturing facility in the United States.

    Enphase Energy – Shares of Enphase dropped more than 15% after the company posted second-quarter revenue Thursday of $711 million that fell short of analyst estimates of $722 million, according to Refinitiv. The stock also faced a wave of downgrades Friday morning from Deutsche Bank, Wells Fargo and Roth MKM.

    Sweetgreen – Shares of the salad chain slid more than 13% after the company posted weak sales that missed Wall Street expectations in the second quarter and a net loss of $27.3 million, or 24 cents per share. Sweetgreen did say it’s aiming to turn a profit for the first time by 2024.

    Ford Motor – The automaker said adoption of electric vehicles is going more slowly than the company forecast and that it expects to lose $4.5 billion on the EV business this year, widening losses from roughly $3 billion a year earlier. Otherwise, Ford posted strong quarterly earnings that beat Wall Street expectations and raised its full-year guidance. Shares were flat in premarket trading.

    Juniper Networks — Shares of the technology company fell 8% after Juniper’s third-quarter guidance came in lighter than expected. The company said it expects earnings per share between 49 cents and 59 cents, with revenue between $1.34 billion and $1.44 billion. Analysts had penciled in 62 cents per share and $1.48 billion of revenue. The company’s second-quarter results did come in slightly above expectations.

    AstraZeneca — U.S. listed shares of the drugmaker added more than 5% before the bell. The U.K.-based company reported second-quarter earnings of $2.15 per share on $11.42 billion in revenue. That surpassed the EPS of $1.95 expected by analysts polled by Refinitiv on revenues of $11.03 billion. AstraZeneca also said it would buy a portfolio of preclinical rare disease gene therapies from Pfizer for up to $1 billion.

    Xpeng — The Chinese electric vehicle stock jumped more than 6% in the premarket. Jefferies upgraded shares to a buy from a hold, citing Xpeng’s joint development plan with Volkswagen

    New York Community Bancorp — The regional bank stock rose about 2% before the bell after JPMorgan upgraded New York Community Bancorp to an overweight rating from neutral. The Wall Street firm called the company a “massive market share taker” in its upgrade.

    Mondelez International — Mondelez International added 2.7% before the bell on strong second-quarter results. The snack maker on Thursday reported earnings of 76 cents a share, excluding items, on $8.51 billion in revenue. Analysts polled by Refinitiv had estimated EPS of 69 cents and revenues of $8.21 billion.

    — CNBC’s Tanaya Macheel, Yun Li and Jesse Pound contributed reporting

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Jim Cramer says ‘it’s really a mistake not to be a buyer’ of these 2 bank stocks

    Jim Cramer says ‘it’s really a mistake not to be a buyer’ of these 2 bank stocks

    [ad_1]

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: Don’t be fooled by big banks’ earnings

    CNBC Daily Open: Don’t be fooled by big banks’ earnings

    [ad_1]

    Workers erect a construction barrier in front of JPMorgan Chase & Co. headquarters in New York, U.S., on Friday, Jan. 11, 2019.

    Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our new, international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    On Friday three big U.S. banks reported better-than-expected first-quarter earnings. But investors realized this wasn’t an unambiguously good sign for markets.

    What you need to know today

    • JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citi reported earnings Friday. All three big U.S. banks handily beat profit and revenue expectations. JPMorgan’s numbers were the most impressive, with profit surging 52% in the first quarter.
    • U.S. markets fell Friday as weak retail sales overshadowed banks’ stellar earnings. Asia-Pacific stocks were mixed Monday. China’s Shanghai Composite rose 1.21% on the back of two pieces of good news: The country’s economy is expected to expand 4% in the first quarter, and its home prices grew the fastest, month over month, in almost two years.
    • PRO Markets this week will mostly be influenced by earnings reports, writes CNBC Pro’s Scott Schnipper. One important tip: Investors shouldn’t assume all better-than-expected numbers are good — because earnings forecasts have been negative for so long.

    The bottom line

    Investors weren’t misled by big banks’ bonanza of incredible earnings.

    Yes, profit and revenue for all three banks that reported Friday rose compared with a year earlier. JPMorgan reported a record revenue of $39.34 billion, a 25% jump that beat analysts’ estimate by more than $3 billion. Wells Fargo’s revenue popped 17%, and Citi’s rose 12%.

    Investors rewarded the banks for their sterling balance sheets: JPMorgan soared 7.55% and Citi added 4.78% — though Wells Fargo dipped 0.05%, not because its numbers were bad but, I suspect, because it didn’t beat Wall Street expectations as much as the other two banks.

    Why were the figures so good? They had to thank rising interest rates, which allow banks to charge more for loans they make, while keeping the interest on saving accounts low. Banks pocket the difference, which is known as net interest income. It seems banks will continue benefiting from today’s high interest-rate environment: JPMorgan predicted net interest income will be $7 billion more than the bank had previously forecast.

    But high interest rates are a double-edged sword. Even though higher rates fueled big banks’ earnings, they also expose weaknesses in balance sheets, as Dimon himself warned. This means that regional banks, lacking the financial heft of bigger ones to cushion possible losses — that’s essentially how SVB failed — might not have such good news to share when they report earnings next week.

    In other words, what’s good for big banks’ income is not necessarily good for the economy. Indeed, data released Friday showed the economy is slowing down. Retail sales in March declined 1%, two times more than economists had expected, according to an advanced reading. Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser said on an investor call that the bank saw a “notable softening” in consumer spending this year.

    Despite the excitement over the big banks’ earnings, then, investors kept a cool head, causing the three major indexes to fall. The S&P 500 lost 0.21%, the Dow Jones Industrial Index slid 0.42% and the Nasdaq Composite fell 0.35%.

    Further earnings this week will give investors a clearer sense of markets.

    Here are some key reports to look out for: Charles Schwab on Monday; Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Netflix on Tuesday; Morgan Stanley, IBM and Tesla on Wednesday; American Express on Thursday; Procter & Gamble on Friday. By the end of this week, investors should know if the disconnect between a profitable corporate America and a flagging economy is limited to big banks — or if it’s another side effect of the strange times we live in.

    Subscribe here to get this report sent directly to your inbox each morning before markets open.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Here’s what I want to see before buying in a stock market that stumbled on solid bank earnings

    Here’s what I want to see before buying in a stock market that stumbled on solid bank earnings

    [ad_1]

    People walk past a Wells Fargo branch on January 10, 2023 in New York City.

    Leonardo Munoz | View Press | Corbis News | Getty Images

    We just had three fantastic quarters from three disparate banks, and I didn’t read a good word about them.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: Don’t be misled by the big banks

    CNBC Daily Open: Don’t be misled by the big banks

    [ad_1]

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. headquarters in New York, US, on Wednesday, Jan. 18, 2023.

    Gabby Jones | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our new, international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    On Friday three big U.S. banks reported better-than-expected first-quarter earnings. But investors realized this wasn’t an unambiguously good sign for markets.

    What you need to know today

    • JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citi reported earnings Friday. All three big U.S. banks handily beat profit and revenue expectations. JPMorgan’s numbers were the most impressive, with profit surging 52% in the first quarter.
    • PRO Markets this week will mostly be influenced by earnings reports, writes CNBC Pro’s Scott Schnipper. One important tip: Investors shouldn’t assume all better-than-expected numbers are good — because earnings forecasts have been negative for so long.

    The bottom line

    Investors weren’t misled by big banks’ bonanza of incredible earnings.

    Yes, profit and revenue for all three banks that reported Friday rose compared with a year earlier. JPMorgan reported a record revenue of $39.34 billion, a 25% jump that beat analysts’ estimate by more than $3 billion. Wells Fargo’s revenue popped 17%, and Citi’s rose 12%.

    Investors rewarded the banks for their sterling balance sheets: JPMorgan soared 7.55% and Citi added 4.78% — though Wells Fargo dipped 0.05%, not because its numbers were bad but, I suspect, because it didn’t beat Wall Street expectations as much as the other two banks.

    Why were the figures so good? They had to thank rising interest rates, which allow banks to charge more for loans they make, while keeping the interest on saving accounts low. Banks pocket the difference, which is known as net interest income. It seems banks will continue benefiting from today’s high interest-rate environment: JPMorgan predicted net interest income will be $7 billion more than the bank had previously forecast.

    But high interest rates are a double-edged sword. Even though higher rates fueled big banks’ earnings, they also expose weaknesses in balance sheets, as Dimon himself warned. This means that regional banks, lacking the financial heft of bigger ones to cushion possible losses — that’s essentially how SVB failed — might not have such good news to share when they report earnings next week.

    In other words, what’s good for big banks’ income is not necessarily good for the economy. Indeed, data released Friday showed the economy is slowing down. Retail sales in March declined 1%, two times more than economists had expected, according to an advanced reading. Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser said on an investor call that the bank saw a “notable softening” in consumer spending this year.

    Despite the excitement over the big banks’ earnings, then, investors kept a cool head, causing the three major indexes to fall. The S&P 500 lost 0.21%, the Dow Jones Industrial Index slid 0.42% and the Nasdaq Composite fell 0.35%.

    Further earnings this week will give investors a clearer sense of markets.

    Here are some key reports to look out for: Charles Schwab on Monday; Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and Netflix on Tuesday; Morgan Stanley, IBM and Tesla on Wednesday; American Express on Thursday; Procter & Gamble on Friday. By the end of this week, investors should know if the disconnect between a profitable corporate America and a flagging economy is limited to big banks — or if it’s another side effect of the strange times we live in.

    Subscribe here to get this report sent directly to your inbox each morning before markets open.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Investing Club mailbag: How to tell if a company will keep paying its dividend

    Investing Club mailbag: How to tell if a company will keep paying its dividend

    [ad_1]

    Pampers Diapers, which are manufactured by Procter & Gamble, are displayed in an Associated Supermarket in New York.

    Ramin Talai | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    How do we figure out free cash flow and how can we tell if a company can continue to pay its dividend.

    -David E.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • What the Club is watching Tuesday — more cooler inflation, Dow stock earnings, price target hikes

    What the Club is watching Tuesday — more cooler inflation, Dow stock earnings, price target hikes

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stock futures point to strong Wall Street open Tuesday as another government report points to slowing inflation.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Apple raised the price of the iPhone, but not in the U.S. and China

    Why Apple raised the price of the iPhone, but not in the U.S. and China

    [ad_1]

    Customer inspects iPhone 14 Pro Max inside an Apple store in Marunouchi, Tokyo.

    Stanislav Kogiku | SOPA Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

    Apple‘s newest iPhones, the series 14 models, come with better displays, cameras, and satellite messaging, among other features and updates. But depending on where you live, they also may come with a higher price tag.

    While some analysts projected that Apple might increase the price of its latest iPhones across the board due to continued supply chain challenges and inflation, potential buyers in the U.S. and China saw no increases compared to the series 13 models.

    But for consumers in markets like the U.K., Japan, Germany, and Australia, the newest models also came with significant price increases.

    For example, the base iPhone 14 model starts at $799 in the U.S., the same price that the company charged for the iPhone 13 at its release last year.

    In the U.K., the base iPhone 14 costs £849, or roughly $975. The base iPhone 13 was priced at £779, an increase of £70 or roughly $80.

    That price difference only increases with the more enhanced models. For example, the iPhone 14 Pro Max in the U.K. is £150 more expensive than the equivalent last year’s model.

    The reason Apple took the step to increase the price of phones in those markets has to do with currency fluctuations.

    “Essentially every currency around the world has weakened against the dollar,” Apple CFO Luca Maestri said on the company’s fourth-quarter earnings call with analysts last week. “The strong dollar makes it difficult in a number of areas. Obviously, our pricing in emerging markets makes it difficult, and the translation of that revenue back into dollars is affected.”

    While Apple reported that its revenue increased 8% in the quarter to $90.15 billion, Apple CEO Tim Cook told CNBC last week that the company would have grown “double-digits” if not for the strong dollar.

    “The foreign exchange headwinds were over 600 basis points for the quarter,” Cook told CNBC’s Steve Kovach. “So it was significant. We would have grown in double digits without the foreign exchange headwinds.” 

    Foreign currency exchange is “a very significant factor that is affecting our results, both revenue and gross margin,” Maestri said. Apple does hedge against its currency exposures “in as many places as possible around the world,” he said, but those sorts of protections do start to reduce as the company needs to continue to buy new contracts.

    But Apple also examines the foreign exchange landscape when it launches new products, Maestri said, which led to these most recent price increases.

    “In some cases, for example, customers in international markets had to … they saw some price increases when we launched the new products, which is not something that, for example, U.S. customers have seen,” he said. “And that’s unfortunately the situation that we’re in right now with the strong dollar.”

    While recent currency fluctuations versus the U.S. dollar are causing some international buyers to pay more for an iPhone, there have been instances where Apple instead absorbed those costs.

    In 2019, when the U.S. dollar also saw a rise in value compared to other currencies, Apple adjusted foreign prices in some markets and reset them to near or the same as they had been in local currencies a year prior.

    However, the reason Apple did that was due to a decline in sales as a result of the price increase. For example, in Turkey, where the local lira had fallen 33% against the dollar in 2019, Apple’s sales were down $700 million.

    “We’ve decided to go back to [iPhone prices] more commensurate with what our local prices were a year ago, in hopes of helping the sales in those areas,” Cook told Reuters in an interview at the time.

    But in 2022, Apple says it has not seen any drop off in demand in those markets. Maestri noted that it saw double-digit growth in India, Indonesia, Mexico, Vietnam, and other countries even in their respective reported currencies.

    “It’s important for us to look at how these markets perform in local currency because it really gives us a good sense for the customer response to our products, the engagement with our ecosystem, and in general, the strength of the brand,” Maestri said on the earnings call. “And I have to say, in that respect, we feel very, very good about the progress that we’re making in a lot of markets around the world.”

    The U.S dollar has also risen steadily against the Chinese yuan over the six months, but there have been some signs that demand for the new Apple iPhones in the country might be weakening. While Maestri said Apple saw new September quarter records in Greater China, a recent report from Jeffries said that China sales of the four new iPhone 14 models over their first 38 days of being sold are down by 28% compared to the iPhone 13 models over the same period of time.

    Here are some other comparisons of the prices of the base iPhone model between the 14 and 13 series:

    Australia:

    • iPhone 13: 1,349 Australian dollars
    • iPhone 14: 1,399 Australian dollars

    Japan:

    • iPhone 13: 98,800 Japanese yen
    • iPhone 14: 119,800 Japanese yen

    Germany:

    • iPhone 13: 899 euros
    • iPhone 14: 999 euros

    Companies feeling impact of strong dollar

    Apple isn’t the only company acknowledging the impact that currency headwinds are having on its business and pricing decisions.

    McDonald’s reported that currency dragged down its revenue by 7 percentage points, accounting for its 5% year-over-year decline in sales – which would have increased by 2% without the currency impact. With 60% of its sales coming from outside of the U.S., “Obviously, we’re translating those sales back into less U.S. dollars,” CFO Ian Borden said on the company’s earnings call last week.

    At P&G, the currency hit keeps getting bigger. The consumer products company reported a 6% decline in net sales due to “unfavorable foreign exchange,” which followed 3% and 4% negative currency impacts in each of its previous two quarters. The company had to raise its forecast for the exchange rate impact this year to $1.3 billion, with CFO Andre Schulten saying on the company’s earnings call last week, “Foreign exchange has continued its strong move against us.”

    James Quincey, CEO of Coca-Cola, which makes approximately 80% of its earnings outside the U.S., said the dollar has been a high single-digit headwind this year. “It’s likely to be a big headwind like that next year,” Quincey said on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” last week.

    Coca-Cola, like Apple, has looked to offset some of the currency headwinds by raising prices, something it said it expects to continue to do as the U.S. dollar shows little signs of waning. “We are expecting pricing to be ahead of normal next year on top of what’s happened this year,” Quincey said.

    So far, Coca-Cola has not reported demand dropping as a result of the higher prices, but Quincey did say there are some potential consumer concerns on the horizon.

    “We do see our consumers are beginning to respond in a traditional way they would in a recession; delaying discretionary and high-ticket discretionary items and perhaps going to more private label or discount dollar channels,” Quincey said, noting “some effects of reduction of purchasing power out there in the marketplace.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link