ReportWire

Tag: pritzker

  • Illinois Gaming Pioneer Rick Heidner Running for Governor

    [ad_1]

    Posted on: October 22, 2025, 12:11h. 

    Last updated on: October 22, 2025, 12:17h.

    • Illinois VGT businessman Rick Heidner is running for governor
    • Heidner has supported Democrats and Republicans, but will run as a Republican
    • Gov. JB Pritzker is the early 2026 front-runner

    One of Illinois’ most successful businessmen, whose wide-ranging interests include a major stake in the state’s slot-like video gaming terminals (VGT) industry, is seeking to replace one of the state’s wealthiest citizens as the top lawmaker in the Land of Lincoln.

    Illinois VGT Rick Heidner
    Illinois businessman Rick Heidner is seeking to run on the Republican ticket to oust JB Pritzker as governor. Much of Heidner’s wealth stems from his video gaming terminal business, Gold Rush Gaming. (Image: Rick for Illinois)

    Illinois is one of only 13 states without term limits on governors. Gov. JB Pritzker (D), whose mass wealth stems from his family’s ownership of the Hyatt Hotels Corporation, plans to seek a third term in 2026.

    Pritzker, worth an estimated $4 billion, will eagerly await his opponent as the Republican Primary plays out. The latest to throw his name in the GOP gubernatorial pool is Rick Heidner, 65, whose business empire includes Gold Rush Gaming.

    Founded in 2012, Gold Rush Gaming operates over 700 VGT locations in Illinois, distributing thousands of the slot-like gaming terminals. The VGT host businesses include liquor stores, truck stops and gas stations, hotels, restaurants and bars, and fraternal organizations.

    In a D-I Statement of Organization filing made public this week by the Illinois State Board of Elections, Heidner registered a new political action committee to support his candidacy to become governor.

    Gaming Magnate Has Various Businesses

    Heidner’s Gold Rush is the third-largest VGT operator in Illinois. As of September, the Illinois Gaming Board said there were 8,758 VGT establishments with a combined 49,552 machines. Accel Entertainment is by far the largest VGT firm in Illinois, with 2,775 locations.

    Along with Gold Rush, Heidner’s business conglomerate entails managing over 280 commercial properties in the US. He also owns Prairie State Energy and Ricky Rockets Fuel Centers.

    Heidner’s betting big that his next venture will be in an elected position. His state campaign filing for “Rick for Illinois” shows the committee was formed with a $1 million contribution from Heidner. He lists his occupation as “real estate developer – entrepreneur.”

    Heidner hasn’t yet responded to numerous media inquiries for comment.

    In the past, Heidner has given money to both Democrats and Republicans. He contributed to Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson’s 2023 election and the Democratic campaigns for Illinois Senate President Don Harmon and Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle.

    Heidner also supported Republican Richard Irvin’s failed 2022 gubernatorial bid. Irvin was the mayor of Aurora from 2017 through May 2025.

    GOP Faces Long Odds in Illinois

    Pritzker is expected to run unchallenged on the Democratic ticket. Along with Heidner, the 2026 Illinois Republican Primary pool includes declared candidates Darren Bailey, a former state senator, and DuPage County Sheriff James Mendrick.

    Whomever is the GOP nominee will face long odds of upsetting the incumbent. Since 2003, Republicans have occupied the governor’s office for just four years (Gov. Bruce Rauner, January 2015 – January 2019).

    Illinois hasn’t voted for a Republican presidential candidate since 1988.

    [ad_2]

    Devin O’Connor

    Source link

  • Without the Texas National Guard’s help, Broadview protests are calm Wednesday night

    [ad_1]

    With the Texas National Guard training nearly 50 miles away, Broadview police maintained control of protesters outside a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center Wednesday.

    Local authorities ordered about two dozen protesters to leave the village’s “free speech zone” — an area specifically designated for demonstrations against the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement mission — about 20 minutes after the city’s 6 p.m. curfew passed.

    As the police counted down the time left to depart, officers threatened citations and arrests. The demonstrators begrudgingly retreated to the street corner.

    They congregated again there for several minutes before police again ordered them to move.

    “I’ll leave when you answer this question: Do we have rights?” a protester told a Broadview officer who was trying to usher them away.

    The officer unsheathed a pair of pink handcuffs from his right back pocket.

    “Do you want to be the first one?” he replied.

    The protester walked away. The crowd dissipated as night fell.

    The uneventful protest came as Broadview Mayor Katrina Thompson said she expected the Texas National Guard to be in town soon, despite the long-standing objections of state and local officials.

    “The president is blabbing incoherently on national TV about an ‘insurrection’ and the need for ‘protection’ of ICE agents,” she said in a statement. “What nonsense. This is about a military occupation of Broadview. This is about intimidation.”

The troops arrived earlier this week after being federalized by President Donald Trump following a series of intense confrontations between protesters and federal immigration officers taking part in “Operation Midway Blitz.” The majority of clashes have occurred in Broadview, where Immigration and Customs Enforcement has a processing center in the west suburb. Dozens of protesters have been arrested there while trying to impede vehicles and federal agents coming in and out of the facility.

Texas soldiers spent the day drilling at their makeshift base in the far southwest suburbs. The troops could be seen carrying shields and lining up in formation at the U.S. Army Reserve Training Center in Elwood, the sprawling 3,600-acre property expected to house as many as 250 guard members in the coming weeks.

Their arrival has been met with criticism from several Will County officials. About 75 politicians and community leaders gathered in Joliet Wednesday to offer support to immigrant families and stand against ICE operations and the recent arrival of National Guard troops from Texas.

“When I heard the Texas National Guard was staging in Elwood, I felt what so many of us felt — anger, disbelief, heartbreak,” Will County Board member Destinee Ortiz, a Democrat, said during a news conference organized by the Will County Rapid Response Network. “We know what this means … we’ve seen what happens when our government treats families like threats instead of human beings.”

Ortiz this week introduced a resolution asking state and federal authorities to prohibit immigration enforcement activities in courthouses, schools and other community gathering areas. The proposed measure is aimed at reaffirming that “every person deserves dignity, fairness and safety” regardless of their birthplace or background, Ortiz said Wednesday.

Joliet Township Supervisor Cesar Guerrero said he has received calls on a daily basis from residents concerned for their safety.

“Everyday I get calls and messages from concerned neighbors wondering if it is safe to leave their home, if it is safe to go to work today, if it is safe to take their children to school,” he said. “And everyday, I am inspired by the courage and resilience of our community members who find new ways to support each other.”

He lauded Ivette Nunez, property manager at Azteca de Oro, a Joliet banquet facility. Nunez called Joliet police recently when she noticed ICE agents were using her parking lot as a staging area. Joliet police confirmed they responded to the call and asked immigration officials to leave the business’ parking lot.

“I just wanted the community to know we’re supporting our community,” said Nunez, who noted the property has no trespassing signs posted in the parking lot.

The Will County news conference comes just hours before the deadline for the federal government to respond to a lawsuit filed by the state to block the Trump administration from mobilizing National Guard troops here. In court documents filed Monday, the state argued “the American people, regardless of where they reside, should not live under the threat of occupation by the United States military, particularly not simply because their city or state leadership has fallen out of a president’s favor.”

A White House spokeswoman said Trump has used “his lawful authority to protect federal officers and assets.”

Gov. JB Pritzker maintains that there is no emergency in Chicago or elsewhere in Illinois that would warrant deployment of the National Guard and that Trump’s move to do so over his objections is unconstitutional.

With the state awaiting a ruling from a federal judge, possibly as soon as Thursday, on its request for a temporary order blocking Trump’s deployment of Texas and Illinois National Guard members in the Chicago area, Pritzker said the administration “has not communicated with our state in any way whatsoever about what their troop movements are going to be.”

“I can’t believe I have to say ‘troop movements’ in a city in the United States, but that is what we’re talking about,” he said.

Shortly before 8 p.m. in Broadview, a bright floodlight shined down on a lone state police cruiser parked outside the crowd control fence.

There wasn’t a protester in sight.

Originally Published:

[ad_2]

Caroline Kubzansky, Jake Sheridan

Source link

  • Trump says Chicago mayor, Illinois governor should be jailed amid militarized campaign

    [ad_1]

    Chicago is emerging as the latest testing ground for President Trump’s domestic deployment of military force as hundreds of National Guard troops were expected to descend on the city.

    The president said Wednesday that Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson should be jailed for failing to support federal agents, and continued to paint a dark and violent picture of both Chicago and Portland, Ore., where Trump is trying to send federal troops but has so far been stonewalled by the courts.

    “It’s so bad,” Trump said at the White House on Wednesday. “It’s so crazy. It’s like the movies … where you have these bombed-out cities and these bombed-out people. It’s worse than that. I don’t think they can make a movie as bad.”

    Pritzker this week characterized Trump’s depiction of Chicago as “deranged” and untrue. Federal agents are making the community “less safe,” the governor said, noting that residents do not want “Donald Trump to occupy their communities” and that people of color are fearful of being profiled during immigration crackdowns.

    Trump has taken issue with Democrats in Illinois and Oregon who are fighting his efforts, and has twice said this week that he is willing to use the Insurrection Act of 1807 if local leaders and the courts try to stop him. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller also contended this week that a court ruling blocking Trump’s deployments to Portland amounted to a “legal insurrection” as well as “an insurrection against the laws and Constitution of the United States.”

    In a televised interview Monday, Miller was asked about his remarks and asked whether the administration would abide by court rulings that stop the deployment of troops to Illinois and Portland. Miller responded by saying the president has “plenary authority” before going silent midsentence — a moment that the host said may have been a technical issue.

    “Plenary authority” is a legal term that indicates someone has limitless power.

    The legality of deployments to Portland and Chicago will face scrutiny in two federal courts Thursday.

    The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals will hear an appeal by the Trump administration in the Portland matter. A Trump-appointed judge, Karin Immergut, found the White House had not only violated the law in activating the Oregon National Guard, but it also had further defied the law by attempting to circumvent her order, sending the California National Guard in its place.

    That three-judge appellate panel consists of two Trump appointees and one Clinton appointee.

    Meanwhile, in Illinois, U.S. District Judge April Perry declined Monday to block the deployment of National Guard members on an emergency basis, allowing a buildup of forces to proceed. She will hear arguments Thursday on the legality of the operation.

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom, one of Trump’s top political foes, has joined the fight against the president’s deployment efforts.

    The Trump administration sent 14 members of California’s National Guard to Illinois to train troops from other states, according to court records filed Tuesday. Federal officials have also told California they intend to extend Trump’s federalization of 300 members of the state’s Guard through next year.

    “Trump is going on a cross-country crusade to sow chaos and division,” Newsom said Wednesday. “His actions — and those of his Cabinet — are against our deeply held American values. He needs to stop this illegal charade now.”

    By Wednesday evening, there were few signs of National Guard troops on the streets of Chicago. But troops from other states, including Texas’ National Guard, were waiting on the sidelines at an Army Reserve Center in Illinois as early as Tuesday.

    In anticipation of the deployment, Pritzker warned that if the president’s efforts went unchecked, it would put the United States on a “the path to full-blown authoritarianism.”

    The Democratic governor also said the president’s calls to jail him were “unhinged” and said Trump was a “wannabe dictator.”

    “There is one thing I really want to say to Donald Trump: If you come for my people, you come through me. So come and get me,” Pritzker said in an interview with MSNBC.

    As tensions grew in Chicago, Trump hosted an event at the White House to address how he intends to crack down on antifa, a nebulous left-wing anti-facist movement that he recently designated as a domestic terrorist organization.

    At the event, the president said many of the people involved in the movement are active in Chicago and Portland — and he once again attacked the local and state leaders in both cities and states.

    “You can say of Portland and you can say certainly of Chicago, it is not lawful what they are doing,” Trump said about the left-wing protests. “They are going to have to be very careful.”

    Johnson, the mayor of Chicago, slammed Trump for saying he should be jailed for his actions.

    “This is not the first time Trump has tried to have a Black man unjustly arrested,” Johnson posted on social media. “I’m not going anywhere.”

    Pritzker continued to attack Trump’s efforts into the evening, accusing the president of “breaching the Constitution and breaking the law.”

    “We need to stand up together and speak up,” the governor said on social media.

    Times staff writer Melody Gutierrez in Sacramento contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Ana Ceballos, Michael Wilner

    Source link

  • National Guard troops are outside Chicago and could be in Memphis soon in Trump’s latest deployment

    [ad_1]

    National Guard troops are positioned outside Chicago and could also be in Memphis by Friday, as President Donald Trump’s administration pushes ahead with an aggressive policy — whether local leaders support it or not.Video above: Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson says Trump is “out of control”Troops’ presence at an Illinois Army Reserve center came despite a lawsuit and vigorous opposition from Democratic elected leaders. Their exact mission was not clear, but the Trump administration launched an aggressive immigration enforcement operation in the nation’s third-largest city last month, and protesters have frequently rallied at an immigration building in nearby Broadview.Trump has called Chicago a “hellhole” of crime despite police statistics showing significant drops in crime, including homicides.In Tennessee, Republican Gov. Bill Lee has said troops will be deputized by the U.S. Marshals Service to “play a critical support role” for law enforcement, though that hasn’t been defined yet.Memphis Police Chief Cerelyn Davis said a small group of commanders was already in the city, planning for the arrival of Guard troops.Illinois and Chicago are urging a federal judge to stop “Trump’s long-declared ‘War’” on the state. A court hearing on their lawsuit is scheduled for Thursday. An appeals court hearing over the government’s bid to deploy the Guard to Portland, Oregon, is also scheduled for Thursday. A judge there blocked those efforts over the weekend.Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker has predicted that National Guard troops from the state would be activated, along with 400 from Texas. He has accused Trump of using troops as “political props” and “pawns,” and said he didn’t get a heads-up from Washington about their deployment.The Associated Press on Tuesday saw military personnel in uniforms with the Texas National Guard patch at the U.S. Army Reserve Center in Elwood, 55 miles (89 kilometers) southwest of Chicago. Trucks marked Emergency Disaster Services dropped off portable toilets and other supplies. Trailers were set up in rows. Extra fencing was spread across the perimeter.The Federal Aviation Administration ordered flight restrictions over the Army Reserve Center for security reasons until Dec. 6, meaning the Guard could be there for two months.Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has barred federal immigration agents and others from using city-owned property as staging areas for enforcement operations.The nearly 150-year-old Posse Comitatus Act limits the military’s role in enforcing domestic laws. However, Trump has said he would be willing to invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows a president to dispatch active duty military in states that are unable to put down an insurrection or are defying federal law.Since starting his second term, Trump has sent or discussed sending troops to 10 cities, including Baltimore, the District of Columbia, New Orleans, and the California cities of Oakland, San Francisco and Los Angeles.Most violent crime around the U.S. has declined in recent years, however. In Chicago, homicides were down 31% to 278 through August, police data shows. Portland’s homicides from January through June decreased by 51% to 17 this year compared with the same period in 2024.In Portland, months of nightly protests at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility continued on Tuesday night. In June, police declared a riot, and there have been smaller clashes since then.Oregon Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek said Tuesday she told Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem there’s “no insurrection” in the state.Noem said on Fox News that she told Portland Mayor Keith Wilson that DHS would “send four times the amount of federal officers” if the city did not boost security at the ICE building, get backup from local law enforcement and take other safety measures.Portland police Chief Bob Day said Tuesday that the department needs to work more closely with federal agents. Fernando reported from Chicago. Associated Press reporters Claire Rush in Portland, Oregon, Adrian Sainz in Memphis, Tennessee, Sarah Raza in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Scott Bauer in Madison, Wisconsin, Ed White in Detroit, and Hallie Golden in Seattle contributed to this story.

    National Guard troops are positioned outside Chicago and could also be in Memphis by Friday, as President Donald Trump’s administration pushes ahead with an aggressive policy — whether local leaders support it or not.

    Video above: Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson says Trump is “out of control”

    Troops’ presence at an Illinois Army Reserve center came despite a lawsuit and vigorous opposition from Democratic elected leaders. Their exact mission was not clear, but the Trump administration launched an aggressive immigration enforcement operation in the nation’s third-largest city last month, and protesters have frequently rallied at an immigration building in nearby Broadview.

    Trump has called Chicago a “hellhole” of crime despite police statistics showing significant drops in crime, including homicides.

    In Tennessee, Republican Gov. Bill Lee has said troops will be deputized by the U.S. Marshals Service to “play a critical support role” for law enforcement, though that hasn’t been defined yet.

    Memphis Police Chief Cerelyn Davis said a small group of commanders was already in the city, planning for the arrival of Guard troops.

    Illinois and Chicago are urging a federal judge to stop “Trump’s long-declared ‘War’” on the state. A court hearing on their lawsuit is scheduled for Thursday. An appeals court hearing over the government’s bid to deploy the Guard to Portland, Oregon, is also scheduled for Thursday. A judge there blocked those efforts over the weekend.

    Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker has predicted that National Guard troops from the state would be activated, along with 400 from Texas. He has accused Trump of using troops as “political props” and “pawns,” and said he didn’t get a heads-up from Washington about their deployment.

    The Associated Press on Tuesday saw military personnel in uniforms with the Texas National Guard patch at the U.S. Army Reserve Center in Elwood, 55 miles (89 kilometers) southwest of Chicago. Trucks marked Emergency Disaster Services dropped off portable toilets and other supplies. Trailers were set up in rows. Extra fencing was spread across the perimeter.

    The Federal Aviation Administration ordered flight restrictions over the Army Reserve Center for security reasons until Dec. 6, meaning the Guard could be there for two months.

    Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has barred federal immigration agents and others from using city-owned property as staging areas for enforcement operations.

    The nearly 150-year-old Posse Comitatus Act limits the military’s role in enforcing domestic laws. However, Trump has said he would be willing to invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows a president to dispatch active duty military in states that are unable to put down an insurrection or are defying federal law.

    Since starting his second term, Trump has sent or discussed sending troops to 10 cities, including Baltimore, the District of Columbia, New Orleans, and the California cities of Oakland, San Francisco and Los Angeles.

    Most violent crime around the U.S. has declined in recent years, however. In Chicago, homicides were down 31% to 278 through August, police data shows. Portland’s homicides from January through June decreased by 51% to 17 this year compared with the same period in 2024.

    In Portland, months of nightly protests at a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility continued on Tuesday night. In June, police declared a riot, and there have been smaller clashes since then.

    Oregon Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek said Tuesday she told Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem there’s “no insurrection” in the state.

    Noem said on Fox News that she told Portland Mayor Keith Wilson that DHS would “send four times the amount of federal officers” if the city did not boost security at the ICE building, get backup from local law enforcement and take other safety measures.

    Portland police Chief Bob Day said Tuesday that the department needs to work more closely with federal agents.

    Fernando reported from Chicago. Associated Press reporters Claire Rush in Portland, Oregon, Adrian Sainz in Memphis, Tennessee, Sarah Raza in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Scott Bauer in Madison, Wisconsin, Ed White in Detroit, and Hallie Golden in Seattle contributed to this story.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump plans to deploy National Guard in Illinois, governor says

    [ad_1]

    The Trump administration plans to federalize 300 members of the Illinois National Guard, Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker said Saturday.Related video above: “Full force, if necessary:” Why President Trump is sending troops to Portland, OregonPritzker said the guard received word from the Pentagon in the morning that the troops would be called up. He did not specify when or where they would be deployed, but President Donald Trump has long threatened to send troops to Chicago.“This morning, the Trump Administration’s Department of War gave me an ultimatum: call up your troops, or we will,” Pritzker said in a statement. “It is absolutely outrageous and un-American to demand a Governor send military troops within our own borders and against our will.”The governor’s office did not immediately respond to a request for additional details. The White House and the Pentagon did not respond to questions about Pritzker’s statement.The escalation of federal law enforcement in Illinois follows similar deployments in other parts of the country. Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles over the summer and as part of his law enforcement takeover in Washington, D.C. Meanwhile Tennessee National Guard troops are expected to help Memphis police.California Gov. Gavin Newsom sued to stop the deployment in Los Angeles and won a temporary block in federal court. The Trump administration has appealed that ruling that the use of the guard was illegal, and a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has indicated that it believes the government is likely to prevail.Pritzker called Trump’s move in Illinois a “manufactured performance” that would pull the state’s National Guard troops away from their families and regular jobs.“For Donald Trump, this has never been about safety. This is about control,” said the governor, who also noted that state, county and local law enforcement have been coordinating to ensure the safety of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Broadview facility on the outskirts of Chicago.Federal officials reported the arrests of 13 people protesting Friday near the facility, which has been frequently targeted during the administration’s surge of immigration enforcement this fall.Trump also said last month that he was sending federal troops to Portland, Oregon, calling the city war-ravaged. But local officials have suggested that many of his claims and social media posts appear to rely on images from 2020, when demonstrations and unrest gripped the city following the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police.City and state officials sued to stop the deployment the next day. U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut heard arguments Friday, and a ruling is expected over the weekend.Trump has federalized 200 National Guard troops in Oregon, but so far it does not appear that they have moved into Portland. They have been seen training on the coast in anticipation of a deployment. Associated Press reporter Rebecca Boone contributed.

    The Trump administration plans to federalize 300 members of the Illinois National Guard, Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker said Saturday.

    Related video above: “Full force, if necessary:” Why President Trump is sending troops to Portland, Oregon

    Pritzker said the guard received word from the Pentagon in the morning that the troops would be called up. He did not specify when or where they would be deployed, but President Donald Trump has long threatened to send troops to Chicago.

    “This morning, the Trump Administration’s Department of War gave me an ultimatum: call up your troops, or we will,” Pritzker said in a statement. “It is absolutely outrageous and un-American to demand a Governor send military troops within our own borders and against our will.”

    The governor’s office did not immediately respond to a request for additional details. The White House and the Pentagon did not respond to questions about Pritzker’s statement.

    The escalation of federal law enforcement in Illinois follows similar deployments in other parts of the country. Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles over the summer and as part of his law enforcement takeover in Washington, D.C. Meanwhile Tennessee National Guard troops are expected to help Memphis police.

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom sued to stop the deployment in Los Angeles and won a temporary block in federal court. The Trump administration has appealed that ruling that the use of the guard was illegal, and a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has indicated that it believes the government is likely to prevail.

    Pritzker called Trump’s move in Illinois a “manufactured performance” that would pull the state’s National Guard troops away from their families and regular jobs.

    “For Donald Trump, this has never been about safety. This is about control,” said the governor, who also noted that state, county and local law enforcement have been coordinating to ensure the safety of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Broadview facility on the outskirts of Chicago.

    Federal officials reported the arrests of 13 people protesting Friday near the facility, which has been frequently targeted during the administration’s surge of immigration enforcement this fall.

    Trump also said last month that he was sending federal troops to Portland, Oregon, calling the city war-ravaged. But local officials have suggested that many of his claims and social media posts appear to rely on images from 2020, when demonstrations and unrest gripped the city following the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police.

    City and state officials sued to stop the deployment the next day. U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut heard arguments Friday, and a ruling is expected over the weekend.

    Trump has federalized 200 National Guard troops in Oregon, but so far it does not appear that they have moved into Portland. They have been seen training on the coast in anticipation of a deployment.

    Associated Press reporter Rebecca Boone contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • President Donald Trump’s DOJ argues against gun ban signed by Gov. JB Pritzker after Highland Park shooting

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice weighed in Monday against the ban on high-powered firearms that Illinois and Gov. JB Pritzker passed after the Highland Park Fourth of July mass shooting in 2022 but found itself on the defensive as an appellate court justice grilled an assistant attorney general about whether “facts matter” as she tried to justify the administration’s position.

    In arguing before the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, Harmeet Dhillon, the U.S. Justice Department’s assistant attorney general for civil rights, said the nation has a “strong interest” in ensuring that the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms is “not relegated to a second-class right” and criticized claims from state officials that certain guns covered by the ban are suited more for military operations than routine self-defense.

    But Judge Frank Easterbrook interrupted Dhillon early during the five minutes the court allowed her to speak even though the federal government is not a party to the case. Easterbrook noted the legal challenge from state officials resulted from a ruling by a district court in southern Illinois that determined the ban was unconstitutional, while a court in northern Illinois previously ruled a similar ban was legally sound.

    “Suppose the (southern Illinois) district court had found every contested issue of fact in favor of the state. Would that affect your review of the statute’s constitutionality?” asked Easterbrook, who was appointed to the bench in the 1980s by Republican President Ronald Reagan.

    As Dhillon began answering by saying, “It would not, your honor,” Easterbrook fired back, “So you don’t think the facts matter?”

    Dhillon, who has been a regular on Fox News, responded by saying she thinks the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals’ previous arguments that have kept Illinois’ gun ban in place are “inaccurate,” while acknowledging the adverse court decisions on similar cases are tough for the courts to navigate.

    “It is a challenge courts of appeals have to face, and harmonizing disparate factual findings is always a challenge, and ultimately, courts of appeals will have to do that,” she said. “The United States position is that AR-15s and similar weapons are clearly ‘arms’ that are protected by the Second Amendment. They are not militaristic. The militaristic analysis is not even a correct rule to apply. It is not found in Supreme Court precedent. It is not appropriate historically. And it is not appropriate in the context of today.”

    While it’s unusual for a top-ranking Justice Department official to request — and be granted — time to speak in such a case that it is not party to, Dhillon’s involvement is an indication of just how far the Trump administration is willing to go to fight Illinois’ gun ban. Pritzker, the two-term Democratic governor who has been a consistent Trump foe, has repeatedly defended the law as constitutional, reasonable and necessary.

    If the appellate court overturns the law in Illinois’ favor, gun rights groups are expected to push for the case to go before the U.S. Supreme Court. In July 2024, the 6-3 conservative-majority high court decided against taking up the case because the legal challenges to the gun ban were in their early stages. But Justice Clarence Thomas wrote at the time that the Illinois ban is “highly suspect” and that the high court should accept the full case if it comes back for review.

    Pritzker signed the ban on so-called assault weapons in January 2023 in response to the Highland Park shooting that claimed seven lives and left dozens injured. The law prohibits more than 100 semiautomatic rifles, handguns and shotguns, high-capacity magazines and other accessories, and requires gun owners who possessed these weapons prior to the ban to register them with the Illinois State Police.

    A central issue in the case has been whether the gun ban passes muster under a new constitutional test requiring gun laws to be “historically” consistent with laws on the books in the 18th century or earlier. That’s derived from the landmark 2022 U.S. Supreme Court case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, in which the 6-3 majority ruled citizens have a right to carry a handgun in public for self-defense. Bruen also holds that the Second Amendment protects firearms that are in “common use” in everyday society.

    Gun rights groups, including the National Shooting Sports Foundation, have cited the Bruen case to argue Illinois’ ban on many semiautomatic guns — requiring the trigger to be pulled once per round — is too broad because it doesn’t protect guns that are commonly used by law-abiding citizens, including AR-15- and AK-47-type guns that are subject to the Illinois ban.

    But Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul’s office argued the prohibited weapons are not considered “arms” under the Second Amendment and that they possess the same qualities as military weapons that are not commonly used for self-defense.

    Illinois Deputy Solicitor General Sarah Hunger said the prohibited guns, particularly AR-15s, should not be typical for civilian use and that if the courts say it’s constitutional for the courts to ban automatic weapons, the same principle applies to semiautomatic weapons.

    “It’s much more frequent that it’s happening recently,” Hunger said of mass shootings. “Mass shootings are a very specific type of event and this law was enacted to prevent this type of shooting.”

    Originally Published:

    [ad_2]

    Jeremy Gorner

    Source link

  • Crime stats fact-check: murder in Chicago, crime in Illinois

    [ad_1]

    The political messaging on Chicago crime is messy.

    President Donald Trump and his Republican allies have painted the Windy City as the most dangerous American city ahead of expected immigration enforcement raids and as Trump floated sending in the National Guard.

    Trump called Chicago the “murder capital of the world!” in a Sept. 2 Truth Social post.

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem focused on raw homicide numbers on CBS’ “Face the Nation” on Aug. 31, saying, “For 13 consecutive years, Chicago had more murders than any other American city.”

    Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., used a similar statistic on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” but swapped raw numbers for “murder rate” — making it inaccurate.

    Sign up for PolitiFact texts

    Chicago’s Democratic defenders say Republicans overlook crime in red states.

    Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, a Democrat and potential 2028 presidential candidate, said his state  fared better than many others on violent crime. “Notice (Trump) never talks about where the most violent crime is occurring, which is in red states,” Pritzker said Aug. 31 on “Face the Nation.” 

    “Illinois is not even in the bottom half of states in terms of violent crime. But do you hear (Trump) talking about Florida, where he is now from? No, you don’t hear him talking about that, or Texas. Their violent crime rates are much worse in other places.”

    It’s not unusual for politicians to choose numbers that favor their political message, and some of these statements are wrong, misleading or lack context. (We use homicide instead of murder, because it is the legal term referring to a person killing another person, including lawfully. Republicans used the more narrow term “murder,” which means an unlawful intentional killing.)

    Here are the facts to help you cut through the spin.

    Homicide rate vs. raw numbers result in different metrics 

    A single word — rate — makes a big difference for accuracy when discussing Chicago — or any city’s — crime.

    It is accurate to say Chicago has led the country’s most populous cities for sheer numbers of homicides for 13 years. But it is inaccurate that Chicago is the country’s leader for the homicide rate, the measure that is preferred by criminologists because it adjusts the count for population size, usually per 100,000 people. 

    Chicago had 573 homicides in 2024, preliminary police data shows.

    Chicago has reported the most homicides of all U.S. cities every year since 2012, according to FBI data crunched by Jeff Asher, a crime data analyst for AH Datalytics.

    The last city to have a higher homicide count than Chicago was New York City in 2011, said John Roman, director of the University of Chicago’s Center on Public Safety and Justice.

    Chicago, which has about 2.7 million residents in the city itself, excluding suburbs, is the third most populous city in the U.S., so its raw crime numbers are bound to be higher than smaller cities.

    By homicide rate, Chicago does not have the most in the U.S., or the world.

    Other cities, including small cities in red states not in the national political spotlight, have violent crime problems too. 

    The Trace, a news website about guns, found that “half of all shootings between 2014 and 2023 occurred outside large cities, in small cities and towns of fewer than 1 million people.” The Trace used data from the Gun Violence Archive, which tracks gun injuries and deaths.

    The Igarapé Institute, a Brazilian nonprofit organization, monitors homicide rates in the U.S. and around the world. In its most recent data from 2023, more than 100 cities around the world had higher homicide rates than Chicago, including Memphis, Tennessee; New Orleans; St. Louis; Baltimore; Cleveland, Detroit and Washington, D.C.

    The data showed that cities including Durán and Manta in Ecuador; Nelson Mandela Bay in South Africa; Camaçari in Brazil; and Cajeme and Tijuana in Mexico topped the list.

    Although the number of murders in Chicago has been dropping since 2022, the city still has a violent crime problem. The Trump White House sent us about two dozen local news reports about Chicago carjackings, murders and burglaries.

    RELATED: How does Washington, D.C.’s homicide rate compare with other countries?

    Pritzker misleads in Illinois-Florida comparison

    Democratic governors, including Pritzker and Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., have tried to turn the focus away from their major cities and toward their states’ overall crime rates. Through this broad lens, which includes rural areas and all violent crimes, the home turf appears safer.

    “Low-crime rural areas may ‘water down’ the effects of high-crime urban locales such that the overall state rate is low despite significant variation,” said Jacinta M. Gau, a University of Central Florida criminal justice professor. 

    Pritzker referred to a U.S. News and World Report ranking of states for violent crime rates based on 2023 FBI data. From lowest violent crime rates to highest, Florida ranked No. 22, Illinois was No. 23, and Texas was No. 34. 

    So Pritzker’s statement was technically accurate, because Illinois was not in the bottom half of states, though Florida came in a notch below Illinois.

    Academics who study crime data warned of various pitfalls. Victims underreport crime to police, and police agencies’ decisions about classifying crimes and whether to submit annual reports to the FBI can affect a state’s report.

    “The unreliability of crime data makes it easy for the numbers to be run so that the result supports the narrative that is being pushed,” Gau said.

    Illinois has had decades-long issues with reporting correct data to the FBI, Asher said. He said Illinois’ violent crime count does not fully report Chicago’s aggravated assaults. Florida, he added, has its own data reporting issues.

    There are complications to remember when comparing crime rates across cities or states.

    One reason not to make city comparisons is that city boundaries are arbitrary. 

    “Some cities (like St. Louis) incorporate only those parts of the metro that are densest, which has the practical effect of including areas with high violence but excluding wealthier areas,” which are in St. Louis County and St. Charles County,” Roman said. In other cities, those wealthier areas are within the city boundaries. 

    Comparing states avoids the boundary issue. Plus, most criminal justice law is set at the state level.

    Still, the challenges of crime data mean that politicians can selectively use or criticize the data to score political points.

    “Unfortunately, this is often not clear to the average person and so it can be extremely confusing and might seem like one politician is right and the other is wrong even when a discrepancy is more apples-vs.-oranges than right-vs.-wrong,” Gau said.

    PolitiFact Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this article.

    RELATED: Crime is underreported, but not just in Washington, D.C., where Trump claims data is inaccurate

    RELATED: Gavin Newsom claps back at Southern states with homicide rate comparison. Is he right?

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gov. JB Pritzker Crowns Malört the DNC’s Unofficial Shot in Chicago

    Gov. JB Pritzker Crowns Malört the DNC’s Unofficial Shot in Chicago

    [ad_1]

    Politics can be bitter, but no one was prepared for over the weekend when Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker declared Jeppson’s Malört “as the unofficial shot of the Democratic National Convention.”

    The governor announced his unofficial declaration on Saturday after appearing in a video segment with former White House press secretary Jen Psaki. The bitter and yellowish spirit is both reviled and beloved in Chicago where passionate opinions have made it a divisive topic.

    “If you come to Chicago, every Chicagoan knows you got to have a shot of Malört,” Pritzker tells Psaki. “This is a liqueur that Chicagoans take — I’m not saying it’s the best-tasting liqueur, I’m just saying that it’s the one that if you want to prove your mettle, you got to have a shot.”

    The two proceeded to ham it up while enjoying the infamous shot with the governor high-fiving Psaki and praising her, “Well done!”

    Psaki pauses as her tastebuds realize what she has done: “Whoo! That has an aftereffect.”

    This leaves an uneasy feeling for Chicagoans. There might be a portion happy to see naive politicians and journalists suffer while trying to stomach that first shock shot. But watching Pritzker’s segment, recorded in the lobby of the Hotel Zachary — with the Wrigley Field’s famous marquee in the background — it’s not hard to wonder if Malört is beginning to jump the shark. This used to be a working-class drink, one that survived tough times over nine decades. Dive bar owners were the only ones stocking the drink, often dusting off old bottles in storage for only a handful of fans who enjoy the unusual beverage once marketed as medicine. A few blocks away, Nisei Lounge — one of the few dives that survived after the Hotel Zachary opened in 2018 and remade the area — specializes in Malört infusions. It’s the kind of dimly lit tavern where Malört is best enjoyed. It’s quite a juxtaposition to the huge windows that soak up natural light at the hotel across from the Friendly Confines.

    A private pop-up, the CNN/Politico Grill, is opened during the DNC in Chicago outside the United Center.
    CNN

    The scene is particularly confusing considering that the Cubs are owned by the Ricketts family, who aren’t exactly known as allies of the Democratic party.

    Of course, dozens have chimed in with their hot takes on Malört over the years, and Chicagoans themselves even turned to the drink to celebrate Biden’s victory over Trump outside of Trump Tower in 2020. To combat Pritzker, Republican campaign strategist Kory Wood dared to call Malört “weird,” trying to appropriate a phrase the Democrats have used to attack Republicans.

    Music writer Josh Terry writes: “Jeppson’s Malört is perilously close to becoming the next culture war football.”

    The reality is Malört isn’t carried at DNC venue the United Center, confirms Tremaine Atkinson, owner of CH Distillery. That’s the company that now owns Jeppson’s Malört. Outside the arena, CNN and Politico have teamed up on a private pop-up restaurant. It’s open from 4 p.m. to 2 a.m. during the convention, set up just inside the United Center’s security perimeter, only accessible to DNC attendees. It’s called the CNN/Politico Grill. They’ve run these restaurants for 20 years outside of both Republican and Democratic national conventions, according to a rep. One popped up earlier this summer outside of Milwaukee at the RNC. They feature local vendors and food.

    The Chicago edition will feature Portillo’s Italian beef, Jay’s potato chips, and Marconi’s giardiniera. Vienna beef hot dogs, selections from Publican Quality Bread, and celebrity chef Stephanie Izard’s This Little Goat chili crunch are also available, according to a CNN rep.

    Alas, while Big Shoulders Coffee, beer from Haymarket Brewing, and boozy cider from Right Bee Cider are also available, Malört is nowhere to be found: “Damn! It would certainly liven up the conversations!” Atkinson texts.

    Coincidentally, CH — which has designs on making Malört a national brand — had already launched a marketing campaign promoting “I voted” stickers, with shirts and decals reading “I Malörted” stickers available at bars and stores.

    As Chicago has increasingly become a culinary Las Vegas — where anxious coastal elitists visit and enjoy Midwestern comfort foods without shame, without worrying about their beach bods or judgment — Malört has become part of that ritual. This is a city that embraces craft beer and breweries, cheap beer and shots at dives, and fancy drinks at cocktail lounges. What happens in Chicago stays in Chicago.

    1901 West Madison Street, , IL 60612

    [ad_2]

    Ashok Selvam

    Source link