ReportWire

Tag: Prison

  • US prisoners part of a hidden workforce linked to hundreds of popular food brands

    US prisoners part of a hidden workforce linked to hundreds of popular food brands

    [ad_1]

    A hidden path to America’s dinner tables begins here, at an unlikely source – a former Southern slave plantation that is now the country’s largest maximum-security prison.

    Unmarked trucks packed with prison-raised cattle roll out of the Louisiana State Penitentiary, where men are sentenced to hard labor and forced to work, for pennies an hour or sometimes nothing at all. After rumbling down a country road to an auction house, the cows are bought by a local rancher and then followed by The Associated Press another 600 miles to a Texas slaughterhouse that feeds into the supply chains of giants like McDonald’s, Walmart and Cargill.

    Intricate, invisible webs, just like this one, link some of the world’s largest food companies and most popular brands to jobs performed by U.S. prisoners nationwide, according to a sweeping two-year AP investigation into prison labor that tied hundreds of millions of dollars worth of agricultural products to goods sold on the open market.

    They are among America’s most vulnerable laborers. If they refuse to work, some can jeopardize their chances of parole or face punishment like being sent to solitary confinement. They also are often excluded from protections guaranteed to almost all other full-time workers, even when they are seriously injured or killed on the job.

    The goods these prisoners produce wind up in the supply chains of a dizzying array of products found in most American kitchens, from Frosted Flakes cereal and Ball Park hot dogs to Gold Medal flour, Coca-Cola and Riceland rice. They are on the shelves of virtually every supermarket in the country, including Kroger, Target, Aldi and Whole Foods. And some goods are exported, including to countries that have had products blocked from entering the U.S. for using forced or prison labor.

    Many of the companies buying directly from prisons are violating their own policies against the use of such labor. But it’s completely legal, dating back largely to the need for labor to help rebuild the South’s shattered economy after the Civil War. Enshrined in the Constitution by the 13th Amendment, slavery and involuntary servitude are banned – except as punishment for a crime.

    That clause is currently being challenged on the federal level, and efforts to remove similar language from state constitutions are expected to reach the ballot in about a dozen states this year.

    Some prisoners work on the same plantation soil where slaves harvested cotton, tobacco and sugarcane more than 150 years ago, with some present-day images looking eerily similar to the past. In Louisiana, which has one of the country’s highest incarceration rates, men working on the “farm line” still stoop over crops stretching far into the distance.

    Willie Ingram picked everything from cotton to okra during his 51 years in the state penitentiary, better known as Angola.

    During his time in the fields, he was overseen by armed guards on horseback and recalled seeing men, working with little or no water, passing out in triple-digit heat. Some days, he said, workers would throw their tools in the air to protest, despite knowing the potential consequences.

    “They’d come, maybe four in the truck, shields over their face, billy clubs, and they’d beat you right there in the field. They beat you, handcuff you and beat you again,” said Ingram, who received a life sentence after pleading guilty to a crime he said he didn’t commit. He was told he would serve 10 ½ years and avoid a possible death penalty, but it wasn’t until 2021 that a sympathetic judge finally released him. He was 73.

    The number of people behind bars in the United States started to soar in the 1970s just as Ingram entered the system, disproportionately hitting people of color. Now, with about 2 million people locked up, U.S. prison labor from all sectors has morphed into a multibillion-dollar empire, extending far beyond the classic images of prisoners stamping license plates, working on road crews or battling wildfires.

    Though almost every state has some kind of farming program, agriculture represents only a small fraction of the overall prison workforce. Still, an analysis of data amassed by the AP from correctional facilities nationwide traced nearly $200 million worth of sales of farmed goods and livestock to businesses over the past six years – a conservative figure that does not include tens of millions more in sales to state and government entities. Much of the data provided was incomplete, though it was clear that the biggest revenues came from sprawling operations in the South and leasing out prisoners to companies.

    Corrections officials and other proponents note that not all work is forced and that prison jobs save taxpayers money. For example, in some cases, the food produced is served in prison kitchens or donated to those in need outside. They also say workers are learning skills that can be used when they’re released and given a sense of purpose, which could help ward off repeat offenses. In some places, it allows prisoners to also shave time off their sentences. And the jobs provide a way to repay a debt to society, they say.

    While most critics don’t believe all jobs should be eliminated, they say incarcerated people should be paid fairly, treated humanely and that all work should be voluntary. Some note that even when people get specialized training, like firefighting, their criminal records can make it almost impossible to get hired on the outside.

    “They are largely uncompensated, they are being forced to work, and it’s unsafe. They also aren’t learning skills that will help them when they are released,” said law professor Andrea Armstrong, an expert on prison labor at Loyola University New Orleans. “It raises the question of why we are still forcing people to work in the fields.”

    A SHADOW WORKFORCE WITH FEW PROTECTIONS

    In addition to tapping a cheap, reliable workforce, companies sometimes get tax credits and other financial incentives. Incarcerated workers also typically aren’t covered by the most basic protections, including workers’ compensation and federal safety standards. In many cases, they cannot file official complaints about poor working conditions.

    These prisoners often work in industries with severe labor shortages, doing some of the country’s dirtiest and most dangerous jobs.

    The AP sifted through thousands of pages of documents and spoke to more than 80 current or formerly incarcerated people, including men and women convicted of crimes that ranged from murder to shoplifting, writing bad checks, theft or other illegal acts linked to drug use. Some were given long sentences for nonviolent offenses because they had previous convictions, while others were released after proving their innocence.

    Reporters found people who were hurt or maimed on the job, and also interviewed women who were sexually harassed or abused, sometimes by their civilian supervisors or the correctional officers overseeing them. While it’s often nearly impossible for those involved in workplace accidents to sue, the AP examined dozens of cases that managed to make their way into the court system. Reporters also spoke to family members of prisoners who were killed.

    One of those was Frank Dwayne Ellington, who was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after stealing a man’s wallet at gunpoint – a result of Alabama’s habitual offenders act. In 2017, Ellington, 33, was cleaning a machine near the chicken “kill line” in Ashland at Koch Foods – one of the country’s biggest poultry-processing companies – when its whirling teeth caught his arm and sucked him inside, crushing his skull. He died instantly.

    During a yearslong legal battle, Koch Foods at first argued Ellington wasn’t technically an employee, and later said his family should be barred from filing for wrongful death because the company had paid his funeral expenses. The case eventually was settled under undisclosed terms. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration fined the company $19,500, saying workers had not been given proper training and that its machines had inadequate safety guards.

    “It’s somebody’s child, it’s somebody’s dad, it’s somebody’s uncle, it’s somebody’s family,” said Ellington’s mother, Alishia Powell-Clark. “Yes, they did wrong, but they are paying for it.”

    The AP found that U.S. prison labor is in the supply chains of goods being shipped all over the world via multinational companies, including to countries that have been slapped with import bans by Washington in recent years. For instance, the U.S. has blocked shipments of cotton coming from China, a top manufacturer of popular clothing brands, because it was produced by forced or prison labor. But crops harvested by U.S. prisoners have entered the supply chains of companies that export to China.

    While prison labor seeps into the supply chains of some companies through third-party suppliers without them knowing, others buy direct. Mammoth commodity traders that are essential to feeding the globe like Cargill, Bunge, Louis Dreyfus, Archer Daniels Midland and Consolidated Grain and Barge – which together post annual revenues of more than $400 billion – have in recent years scooped up millions of dollars’ worth of soy, corn and wheat straight from prisons, which compete with local farmers.

    The AP reached out for comment to the companies it identified as having connections to prison labor, but most did not respond.

    Cargill acknowledged buying goods from prison farms in Tennessee, Arkansas and Ohio, saying they constituted only a small fraction of the company’s overall volume. It added that “we are now in the process of determining the appropriate remedial action.”

    McDonald’s said it would investigate links to any such labor, while Archer Daniels Midland and General Mills, which produces Gold Medal flour, pointed to their policies in place restricting suppliers from using forced labor. Whole Foods responded flatly: “Whole Foods Market does not allow the use of prison labor in products sold at our stores.”

    Bunge said it sold all facilities that were sourcing from correction departments in 2021, so they are “no longer part of Bunge’s footprint.”

    Dairy Farmers of America, a cooperative that bills itself as the top supplier of raw milk worldwide, said that while it has been buying from correctional facilities, it now only has one “member dairy” at a prison, with most of that milk used inside.

    To understand the business of prison labor and the complex movement of agricultural goods, the AP collected information from all 50 states, through public records requests and inquiries to corrections departments. Reporters also crisscrossed the country, following trucks transporting crops and livestock linked to prison work, and tailed transport vans from prisons and work-release sites heading to places such as poultry plants, egg farms and fast-food restaurants. A lack of transparency and, at times, baffling losses exposed in audits, added to the challenges of fully tracking the money.

    Big-ticket items like row crops and livestock are sold on the open market, with profits fed back into agriculture programs. For instance, about a dozen state prison farms, including operations in Texas, Virginia, Kentucky and Montana, have sold more than $60 million worth of cattle since 2018.

    As with other sales, the custody of cows can take a serpentine route. Because they often are sold online at auction houses or to stockyards, it can be almost impossible to determine where the beef eventually ends up.

    Sometimes there’s only one way to know for sure.

    In Louisiana, an AP reporter watched as three long trailers loaded with more than 80 cattle left the state penitentiary. The cows raised by prisoners traveled for about an hour before being unloaded for sale at Dominique’s Livestock Market in Baton Rouge.

    As they were shoved through a gate into a viewing pen, the auctioneer jokingly warned buyers “Watch out!” The cows, he said, had just broken out of prison.

    Within minutes, the Angola lot was snapped up by a local livestock dealer, who then sold the cattle to a Texas beef processor that also buys cows directly from prisons in that state. Meat from the slaughterhouse winds up in the supply chains of some of the country’s biggest fast-food chains, supermarkets and meat exporters, including Burger King, Sam’s Club and Tyson Foods.

    “It’s a real slap in the face, to hear where all those cattle are going,” said Jermaine Hudson, who served 22 years at Angola on a robbery conviction before he was exonerated.

    He said it’s especially galling because the food served in prison tasted like slop.

    “Those were some of the most disrespectful meals,” Hudson said, “that I ever, in my life, had to endure.”

    THE RISE OF PRISON LABOR

    Angola is imposing in its sheer scale. The so-called “Alcatraz of the South” is tucked far away, surrounded by crocodile-infested swamps in a bend of the Mississippi River. It spans 18,000 acres – an area bigger than the island of Manhattan – and has its own ZIP code.

    The former 19th-century antebellum plantation once was owned by one of the largest slave traders in the U.S. Today, it houses some 3,800 men behind its razor-wire walls, about 65 percent of them Black. Within days of arrival, they typically head to the fields, sometimes using hoes and shovels or picking crops by hand. They initially work for free, but then can earn between 2 cents and 40 cents an hour.

    Calvin Thomas, who spent more than 17 years at Angola, said anyone who refused to work, didn’t produce enough or just stepped outside the long straight rows knew there would be consequences.

    “If he shoots the gun in the air because you done passed that line, that means you’re going to get locked up and you’re going to have to pay for that bullet that he shot,” said Thomas, adding that some days were so blistering hot the guards’ horses would collapse.

    “You can’t call it anything else,” he said. “It’s just slavery.”

    Louisiana corrections spokesman Ken Pastorick called that description “absurd.” He said the phrase “sentenced with hard labor” is a legal term referring to a prisoner with a felony conviction.

    Pastorick said the department has transformed Angola from “the bloodiest prison in America” over the past several decades with “large-scale criminal justice reforms and reinvestment into the creation of rehabilitation, vocational and educational programs designed to help individuals better themselves and successfully return to communities.” He noted that pay rates are set by state statute.

    Current and former prisoners in both Louisiana and Alabama have filed class-action lawsuits in the past four months saying they have been forced to provide cheap – or free – labor to those states and outside companies, a practice they also described as slavery.

    Prisoners have been made to work since before emancipation, when slaves were at times imprisoned and then leased out by local authorities.

    But after the Civil War, the 13th Amendment’s exception clause that allows for prison labor provided legal cover to round up thousands of mostly young Black men. Many were jailed for petty offenses like loitering and vagrancy. They then were leased out by states to plantations like Angola and some of the country’s biggest companies, including coal mines and railroads. They were routinely whipped for not meeting quotas while doing brutal and often deadly work.

    The convict-leasing period, which officially ended in 1928, helped chart the path to America’s modern-day prison-industrial complex.

    Incarceration was used not just for punishment or rehabilitation but for profit. A law passed a few years later made it illegal to knowingly transport or sell goods made by incarcerated workers across state lines, though an exception was made for agricultural products. Today, after years of efforts by lawmakers and businesses, corporations are setting up joint ventures with corrections agencies, enabling them to sell almost anything nationwide.

    Civilian workers are guaranteed basic rights and protections by OSHA and laws like the Fair Labor Standards Act, but prisoners, who are often not legally considered employees, are denied many of those entitlements and cannot protest or form unions.

    “They may be doing the exact same work as people who are not incarcerated, but they don’t have the training, they don’t have the experience, they don’t have the protective equipment,” said Jennifer Turner, lead author of a 2022 American Civil Liberties Union report on prison labor.

    Almost all of the country’s state and federal adult prisons have some sort of work program, employing around 800,000 people, the report said. It noted the vast majority of those jobs are connected to tasks like maintaining prisons, laundry or kitchen work, which typically pay a few cents an hour if anything at all. And the few who land the highest-paying state industry jobs may earn only a dollar an hour.

    Altogether, labor tied specifically to goods and services produced through state prison industries brought in more than $2 billion in 2021, the ACLU report said. That includes everything from making mattresses to solar panels, but does not account for work-release and other programs run through local jails, detention and immigration centers and even drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities.

    Some incarcerated workers with just a few months or years left on their sentences have been employed everywhere from popular restaurant chains like Burger King to major retail stores and meat-processing plants. Unlike work crews picking up litter in orange jumpsuits, they go largely unnoticed, often wearing the same uniforms as their civilian counterparts.

    Outside jobs can be coveted because they typically pay more and some states deposit a small percentage earned into a savings account for prisoners’ eventual release. Though many companies pay minimum wage, some states garnish more than half their salaries for items such as room and board and court fees.

    It’s a different story for those on prison farms. The biggest operations remain in the South and crops are still harvested on a number of former slave plantations, including in Arkansas, Texas and at Mississippi’s notorious Parchman Farm. Those states, along with Florida, Alabama, South Carolina and Georgia, pay nothing for most types of work.

    Most big farms, including Angola, have largely mechanized many of their operations, using commercial-size tractors, trucks and combines for corn, soy, rice and other row crops. But prisoners in some places continue to do other work by hand, including clearing brush with swing blades.

    “I was in a field with a hoe in my hand with maybe like a hundred other women. We were standing in a line very closely together, and we had to raise our hoes up at the exact same time and count ‘One, two, three, chop!’” said Faye Jacobs, who worked on prison farms in Arkansas.

    Jacobs, who was released in 2018 after more than 26 years, said the only pay she received was two rolls of toilet paper a week, toothpaste and a few menstrual pads each month.

    She recounted being made to carry rocks from one end of a field to the other and back again for hours, and said she also endured taunting from guards saying “Come on, hos, it’s hoe squad!” She said she later was sent back to the fields at another prison after women there complained of sexual harassment by staff inside the facility.

    “We were like ‘Is this a punishment?’” she said. “‘We’re telling y’all that we’re being sexually harassed, and you come back and the first thing you want to do is just put us all on hoe squad.’”

    David Farabough, who oversees the state’s 20,000 acres of prison farms, said Arkansas’ operations can help build character.

    “A lot of these guys come from homes where they’ve never understood work and they’ve never understood the feeling at the end of the day for a job well-done,” he said. “We’re giving them purpose. … And then at the end of the day, they get the return by having better food in the kitchens.”

    In addition to giant farms, at least 650 correctional facilities nationwide have prisoners doing jobs like landscaping, tending greenhouses and gardens, raising livestock, beekeeping and even fish farming, said Joshua Sbicca, director of the Prison Agriculture Lab at Colorado State University. He noted that corrections officials exert power by deciding who deserves trade-building jobs like welding, for example, and who works in the fields.

    In several states, along with raising chickens, cows and hogs, corrections departments have their own processing plants, dairies and canneries. But many states also hire out prisoners to do that same work at big private companies.

    The AP met women in Mississippi locked up at restitution centers, the equivalent of debtors’ prisons, to pay off court-mandated expenses. They worked at Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen and other fast-food chains and also have been hired out to individuals for work like lawn mowing or home repairs.

    “There is nothing innovative or interesting about this system of forced labor as punishment for what in so many instances is an issue of poverty or substance abuse,” said Cliff Johnson, director of the MacArthur Justice Center at the University of Mississippi.

    In Alabama, where prisoners are leased out by companies, AP reporters followed inmate transport vans to poultry plants run by Tyson Foods, which owns brands such as Hillshire Farms, Jimmy Dean and Sara Lee along with a company that supplies beef, chicken and fish to McDonald’s. The vans also stopped at a chicken processor that’s part of a joint-venture with Cargill, which is America’s largest private company. It brought in a record $177 billion in revenue in fiscal year 2023 and supplies conglomerates like PepsiCo.

    Though Tyson did not respond to questions about direct links to prison farms, it said that its work-release programs are voluntary and that incarcerated workers receive the same pay as their civilian colleagues.

    Some people arrested in Alabama are put to work even before they’ve been convicted. An unusual work-release program accepts pre-trial defendants, allowing them to avoid jail while earning bond money. But with multiple fees deducted from their salaries, that can take time.

    The AP went out on a work detail with a Florida chain gang wearing black-and-white striped uniforms and ankle shackles, created after Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey took office in 2012. He said the unpaid work is voluntary and so popular that it has a waitlist.

    “It’s a win-win,” he said. “The inmate that’s doing that is learning a skill set. … They are making time go by at a faster pace. The other side of the win-win is, it’s generally saving the taxpayers money.”

    Ivey noted it’s one of the only remaining places in the country where a chain gang still operates.

    “I don’t feel like they should get paid,” he said. “They’re paying back their debt to society for violating the law.”

    Elsewhere, several former prisoners spoke positively about their work experiences, even if they sometimes felt exploited.

    “I didn’t really think about it until I got out, and I was like, ‘Wow, you know, I actually took something from there and applied it out here,’” said William “Buck” Saunders, adding he got certified to operate a forklift at his job stacking animal feed at Cargill while incarcerated in Arizona.

    Companies that hire prisoners get a reliable, plentiful workforce even during unprecedented labor shortages stemming from immigration crackdowns and, more recently, the coronavirus pandemic.

    In March 2020, though all other outside company jobs were halted, the Arizona corrections department announced about 140 women were being abruptly moved from their prison to a metal hangar-like warehouse on property owned by Hickman’s Family Farms, which pitches itself as the Southwest’s largest egg producer.

    Hickman’s has employed prisoners for nearly 30 years and supplies many grocery stores, including Costco and Kroger, marketing brands such as Eggland’s Best and Land O’ Lakes. It is the state corrections department’s largest labor contractor, bringing in nearly $35 million in revenue over the past six fiscal years.

    “The only reason they had us out there was because they didn’t want to lose that contract because the prison makes so much money off of it,” said Brooke Counts, who lived at Hickman’s desert site, which operated for 14 months. She was serving a drug-related sentence and said she feared losing privileges or being transferred to a more secure prison yard if she refused to work.

    Counts said she knew prisoners who were seriously hurt, including one woman who was impaled in the groin and required a helicopter flight to the hospital and another who lost part of a finger.

    Hickman’s, which has faced a number of lawsuits stemming from inmate injuries, did not respond to emailed questions or phone messages seeking a response. Corrections department officials would not comment on why the women were moved off-site, saying it happened during a previous administration. But a statement at the time said the move was made to “ensure a stable food supply while also protecting public health and the health of those in our custody.”

    Some women employed by Hickman’s earned less than $3 an hour after deductions, including 30 percent taken by the state for room and board, even though they were living in the makeshift dormitory.

    “While we were out there, we were still paying the prison rent,” Counts said. “What for?”

    FOLLOWING THE MONEY

    The business of prison labor is so vast and convoluted that tracing the money can be challenging. Some agricultural programs regularly go into the red, raising questions in state audits and prompting investigations into potential corruption, mismanagement or general inefficiency.

    Nearly half the agricultural goods produced in Texas between 2014 and 2018 lost money, for example, and a similar report in Louisiana uncovered losses of around $3.8 million between fiscal years 2016 and 2018. A separate federal investigation into graft at the for-profit arm of Louisiana’s correctional department led to the jailing of two employees.

    Correctional officials say steep farming expenditures and unpredictable variables like weather can eat into profits. And while some goods may do poorly, they note, others do well.

    Prisons at times have generated revenue by tapping into niche markets or to their states’ signature foods.

    During the six-year period the AP examined, surplus raw milk from a Wisconsin prison dairy went to BelGioioso Cheese, which makes Polly-O string cheese and other products that land in grocery stores nationwide like Whole Foods. A California prison provided almonds to Minturn Nut Company, a major producer and exporter. And until 2022, Colorado was raising water buffalo for milk that was sold to giant mozzarella cheesemaker Leprino Foods, which supplies major pizza companies like Domino’s, Pizza Hut and Papa John’s.

    But for many states, it’s the work-release programs that have become the biggest cash generators, largely because of the low overhead. In Alabama, for instance, the state brought in more than $32 million in the past five fiscal years after garnishing 40 percent of prisoners’ wages.

    In some states, work-release programs are run on the local level, with sheriffs frequently responsible for handling the books and awarding contracts. Even though the programs are widely praised – by the state, employers and often prisoners themselves – reports of abuse exist.

    In Louisiana, where more than 1,200 companies hire prisoners through work release, sheriffs get anywhere from about $10 to $20 a day for each state prisoner they house in local jails to help ease overcrowding. And they can deduct more than half of the wages earned by those contracted out to companies – a huge revenue stream for small counties.

    Jack Strain, a former longtime sheriff in the state’s St. Tammany Parish, pleaded guilty in 2021 in a scheme involving the privatization of a work-release program in which nearly $1.4 million was taken in and steered to Strain, close associates and family members. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison, which came on top of four consecutive life sentences for a broader sex scandal linked to that same program.

    Incarcerated people also have been contracted to companies that partner with prisons. In Idaho, they’ve sorted and packed the state’s famous potatoes, which are exported and sold to companies nationwide. In Kansas, they’ve been employed at Russell Stover Chocolates and Cal-Maine Foods, the country’s largest egg producer. Though the company has since stopped using them, in recent years they were hired in Arizona by Taylor Farms, which sells salad kits in many major grocery stores nationwide and supplies popular fast-food chains and restaurants like Chipotle Mexican Grill.

    Some states would not provide the names of companies taking part in transitional prison work programs, citing security concerns. So AP reporters confirmed some prisoners’ private employers with officials running operations on the ground and also followed inmate transport vehicles as they zigzagged through cities and drove down country roads. The vans stopped everywhere from giant meat-processing plants to a chicken and daiquiri restaurant.

    One pulled into the manicured grounds of a former slave plantation that has been transformed into a popular tourist site and hotel in St. Francisville, Louisiana, where visitors pose for wedding photos under old live oaks draped with Spanish moss.

    As a reporter watched, a West Feliciana Parish van emblazoned with “Sheriff Transitional Work Program” pulled up. Two Black men hopped out and quickly walked through the restaurant’s back door. One said he was there to wash dishes before his boss called him back inside.

    The Myrtles, as the antebellum home is known, sits just 20 miles away from where men toil in the fields of Angola.

    “Slavery has not been abolished,” said Curtis Davis, who spent more than 25 years at the penitentiary and is now fighting to change state laws that allow for forced labor in prisons.

    “It is still operating in present tense,” he said. “Nothing has changed.”

    [ad_2]

    Robin McDowell and Margie Mason

    Source link

  • Inside the Bureau of Prisons, a federal agency plagued by understaffing, abuse, disrepair

    Inside the Bureau of Prisons, a federal agency plagued by understaffing, abuse, disrepair

    [ad_1]

    The United States federal prison system has 157,000 inmates in its custody and locks up some of the most dangerous and high-profile criminals in the world.

    Serial killers and terrorists are among those inside its 122 prisons, which include supermax penitentiaries and minimum security camps. The cost to American taxpayers is more than $8 billion a year.

    Tonight, we will take you inside the Federal Bureau of Prisons, an agency in crisis.

    A series of government investigations has found the bureau’s workforce is dangerously understaffed and, inside its women’s prisons, there is an alarming pattern of abuse.

    Colette Peters is in charge of fixing the Bureau of Prisons. She’s the sixth director in six years. 

    This is Aliceville – a low-security women’s prison in rural Alabama where more than 1,400 inmates are serving time. 

    Colette Peters: People drive past prisons every day.

    Cecilia Vega: Yeah, they’re terrified of them.

    Colette Peters: Or they don’t think about them at all. Right, it’s kind of like this forgotten zone. I don’t want people to forget about this place. 

    Colette Peters became director of the Bureau of Prisons in August 2022.

    After a 20-year career in corrections, she’s built a reputation as a reformer – before becoming director, she was credited with shaping Oregon’s state prison system by prioritizing staff mental health support and advocating for the compassionate treatment of inmates. 

    Colette Peters: I have this very early memory in kindergarten where an individual came in with a pocket knife and was marched to the principal’s office. And I just remember in that moment saying, “I wanna help him.”

    Colette Peters and Cecilia Vega
    Colette Peters and Cecilia Vega

    60 Minutes


    Cecilia Vega: Many people in your custody are there because of horrific crimes. Why do they deserve compassion?

    Colette Peters: Because 95% of them are gonna come back to our community someday, and I want them to be productive, tax-paying citizens who no longer commit crimes. 

    But the Bureau of Prisons is so inadequately staffed it is struggling to fulfill its mission: rehabilitating inmates and keeping its prisons safe.

    Government watchdogs have documented disrepair in all of its institutions – requiring more than $2 billion in fixes.

    And employees rank the Bureau of Prisons the worst place to work in the federal government.

    Cecilia Vega: It’s very rare for the media to be allowed inside a federal prison. Why are we here?

    Colette Peters: I truly believe in transparency. Are we perfect? No. Do we have issues we need to resolve? Absolutely. But I want people to see the good stuff.

    We toured Aliceville with Director Peters… 

    And saw where inmates live… learn new trades…and work… on this day, sewing sleeping bags for the military — a coveted job because it pays $1.15 an hour.

    This ceremony is for inmates graduating from a faith-based program preparing them for life on the outside by connecting them with community leaders and teaching them life skills — like anger management. 

    But the reality is nearly half of federal inmates will end up back behind bars or arrested within three years of getting out. 

    Cecilia Vega: A lot of those faces in there, who have so much promise and hope today, could end up right back in here.

    Colette Peters: Yeah. You know, I think we have a lot of work to do to dial down that recidivism rate. We have to send fewer people to prison for shorter periods of time. And then when they’re here do things like this.

    Cecilia Vega: You also have a major staffing issue, and people can’t get these classes that they need.

    Colette Peters: Right. Staffing was a problem before the pandemic, and so tha– those recruitment efforts and those retention efforts have gotten hard.

    Cecilia Vega: How many correctional officers do you need on staff to get you out of this staffing crisis?

    Colette Peters: So we hope to have that real number for– you and the public– very soon.

    Cecilia Vega: That seems like a critical number. How was that not on your desk when you s– took this job on day one, and– and still not there a year later?

    Colette Peters: So the good news is this was a problem the bureau was trying to solve before I got here, and we’re in the process of solving it.

    Director Peters says she expects to have the number of officers needed by October – more than two years after taking office. 

    But Shane Fausey, the recently retired president of the federal prison employees union, says he knows what that number is now – 

    Shane Fausey: We’re short about 8,000 positions nation-wide. 

    Shane Fausey
    Shane Fausey

    60 Minutes


    Cecilia Vega: How bad is it?

    Shane Fausey: It results in one of us losing our lives. And it’s that bad. We can’t continue with this course.

    By the union’s count, the Bureau of Prisons is down about 40% of the correctional officers it needs…

    Shane Fausey: The less supervision you have, the more bad things happen. 

    Shane Fausey: Misconduct increases.

    Shane Fausey: Violence increases.

    And because there are not enough officers, the bureau relies on other prison staff to step in. It’s a controversial practice called augmentation.

    Shane Fausey: Teachers, nurses– doctors, food service people, the people that maintain facilities,

    Cecilia Vega: They’re doing what now?

    Shane Fausey: They’re in a housing unit, supervising offenders.

    Cecilia Vega: Do they have training in that?

    Shane Fausey: They do. But I can tell you I’m no better a plumber than they are a correctional officer. 

    Shane Fausey: I can walk into a housing unit and tell you something’s right or somethin’s wrong. You develop that over years of experience. 

    Cecilia Vega: Let’s break this down. We are talking about HVAC repairmen and accountants who are now guarding inmates. That doesn’t sound safe.

    Colette Peters: So it is. So they have the exact same training as the correctional officers.

    Colette Peters: Now what I will say is augmentation should only be l– used in the short-term. We’ve used this now to solve a long-term retention and recruitment problem. And that isn’t right.

    On this point the union and management agree: prison staff – like teachers and doctors – need to be able to do their jobs so that inmates don’t lose access to critical services and programs.

    Shane Fausey: Their buzz phrase is, “Everybody’s a correctional officer first.” That sounds good on paper. But if you take the teacher out of the classroom, and nobody’s teaching the offender the skills to go back out to society, we’re just back to warehousing people.

    While we walked the halls of Aliceville, classrooms were packed but several inmates told us that much of what we saw on our tour was staged.

    Aliceville
    Federal Correctional Institution, Aliceville

    60 Minutes


    Cecilia Vega: Am I getting a real look at what life is like in here today? 

    Female Voice: Absolutely not.

    Female Voice: Unh-uh (negative).

    Female Voice: No definitely not.

    Female Voice: Absolutely not.

    Female Voice: The staff is very disrespectful here.

    Female Voice: Even though we made mistakes– when we’re out here, we’re not treated with respect.

    Cecilia Vega: Do you feel safe here?

    Female Voice: Sometimes.

    Female Voice: I mean, prison is prison. You see what I’m sayin’?

    Cecilia Vega: Tell me about staffing.

    Female Voice: They’re short staffed all the time.

    Female Voice: There’s times where you don’t know if you’re gonna be able to go outside because somebody didn’t come to work.

    Cecilia Vega: And if you were to speak up about some of these issues that you’re telling me about, what would happen?

    Female Voice: You’d go into the SHU.

    Female Voice: You’re goin’ to jail.

    Female Voice: You’re goin’ to the SHU.

    The SHU, short for special housing unit, is the jail inside a prison – where inmates are segregated from the general population and seldom let outside of their cells… 

    Cecilia Vega: Make you nervous to talk to me right now?

    Female Voice: Little bit.

    Cecilia Vega: The director is coming today. What does she need to know about Aliceville?

    Female Voice: Fix it.

    Female Voice: We need more education, more, like, opportunity to grow and rehabilitate. Cause we don’t have that here.

    Cecilia Vega: I’ve talked to a handful of inmates here today, and they say, “Look, you’re gettin’ a cleaned up version of what life is really like.” 

    Colette Peters: I’ve been doing this work for a long time– so I can see when things have been swept under the rug, if you will. I’m not naïve. And when anybody comes to your house you clean it up.

    Of all the issues plaguing the Bureau of Prisons- perhaps none is more disturbing than the rampant sexual abuse of female inmates by the male officers who are supposed to protect them. 

    Women are housed in nearly a quarter of federal prisons.

    And a 2022 Senate investigation found that bureau staff have sexually abused female prisoners in at least two-thirds of those facilities over the past decade.

    Aliceville is no exception. Three officers have been convicted of sexual abuse since 2020; including one who pleaded guilty earlier this month.

    Cecilia Vega: Those are just the cases that we know about. How does this keep happening?

    Colette Peters: You can’t predict human behavior. But what I can tell you is the things that we’re putting in place to manage to that misconduct I think are the right things, and sending a clear message that this type of behavior is egregious, horrendous, and unexcusable.

    But female inmates at a women’s prison in Northern California accuse Director Peters and the Bureau of Prisons of failing to protect them

    Its official name is Federal Correctional Institution, Dublin. But it’s known by inmates and staff as “the rape club.”

    Seven Dublin officers, including the warden and the chaplain, have been convicted of sexually abusing nearly two dozen inmates from 2018-to-2021. 

    And, this past August, eight inmates filed suit claiming “sexual abuse…continues to this day.”

    Tess Korth
    Tess Korth

    60 Minutes


    Tess Korth: These are mothers, they’re daughters, they’re sisters. 

    Tess Korth worked as a correctional officer at Dublin for 25 years. She resigned in 2022 after she says she was retaliated against for whistleblowing. 

    Tess Korth: They train us in the red flags to look for. And then when we report, “Hey, they’re– every red flag, this guy meets. You need to go deal with this,” they don’t do anything.

    Cecilia Vega: What was the chaplain doing that made you suspicious?

    Tess Korth: One time I came in on a weekend. He didn’t know I was there. His office was dark. And he had an inmate in there with him. And I don’t know what they were doing…

    Cecilia Vega: That’s a red flag.

    Tess Korth: Oh, definitely.

    Former Officer Korth says she reported the chaplain and other officers who she suspected of sexually abusing inmates to an Internal Affairs investigator but was ignored for years – until federal investigators stepped in. 

    Cecilia Vega: What happened to the officers that you accused?

    Tess Korth: Most of ’em– have been or in the process of being convicted. And a lot of ’em are– named in lawsuits right now.

    Cecilia Vega: How’s that make you feel?

    Tess Korth: Good. 

    The Bureau of Prisons has a backlog of nearly 8,000 open misconduct investigations – hundreds of which contain allegations of sexual abuse.

    Director Peters hired more staff to tackle the backlog, but she says it will take two years to clear those cases. 

    In response to the Dublin lawsuit, Bureau of Prisons’ lawyers say inmates’ claims have been investigated and that “no threat remains.” 

    Colette Peters: We’ve done a tremendous job in the last year rebuilding that culture and creating– a institution that is more safe, where individuals feel comfortable coming forward and reporting claims

    Cecilia Vega: You just used the phrase, “tremendous job” in Dublin. Eight inmates have filed a class action lawsuit, and they’ve got testimony from more than 40 current and former Dublin inmates who say that the abuse is ongoing.

    Colette Peters: That means the– the process is working, that they have the ability to come forward. They have the right to bring that class action lawsuit together.

    Cecilia Vega: These Dublin inmates say that they are facing retaliation for speaking out.

    Colette Peters: I have been very clear that retaliation will not be stood on my watch. And so when allegations of retaliation come forward, they are investigated, and we will hold those people accountable.

    Cecilia Vega: It’s one thing for you to say that retaliation is not tolerated, but it sounds like it’s actually still happening.

    Colette Peters: Again, I would say those are allegations. I would like to be more grounded in fact around proven retaliation.

    The fact is that an additional 19 staff members have been accused of abusing inmates.

    The bureau says those staff members have been put on leave, new management has been brought in, and there are now working security cameras in areas where inmates were abused.

    Cecilia Vega: What are these victims owed?

    Colette Peters: To have individuals who are in our care, who rely on us for their safety and security, and to have that be violated, I don’t know that you can– bring anything– that– that would undo that wrong.

    Cecilia Vega: What about an apology? The victims in Dublin say they’ve never received an apology.

    Colette Peters: Well, I will tell you—that is our mission to keep them safe. That is our job.

    Cecilia Vega: Is your job to apologize for what happened in Dublin?

    Colette Peters: I don’t know that my job is to apologize. Is it heartbreaking and horrendous to have something like that happen– when you are proud of your profession, as a corrections professional? Absolutely.

    In addition to the lawsuit filed this past August, more than 45 current and former Dublin inmates have filed lawsuits alleging sexual abuse by Bureau of Prisons staff. 

    Produced by Natalie Jimenez Peel. Associate producer, Matthew Riley. Broadcast associate, Katie Jahns. Edited by Daniel J. Glucksman.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Alabama inmate put to death in first U.S. nitrogen gas execution

    Alabama inmate put to death in first U.S. nitrogen gas execution

    [ad_1]

    Alabama inmate put to death in first U.S. nitrogen gas execution – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    In a groundbreaking and controversial move, Alabama executed an inmate using nitrogen gas, a method never before tested or used in the United States. CBS News’ Lilia Luciano reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • First U.S. execution by nitrogen gas set for Thursday

    First U.S. execution by nitrogen gas set for Thursday

    [ad_1]

    First U.S. execution by nitrogen gas set for Thursday – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Kenneth Eugene Smith, a death row inmate in Alabama, is expected to become the first person in the U.S. executed with nitrogen gas. Manuel Bojorquez reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • He killed his ex-girlfriend with a bomb in an Aliso Viejo spa. He'll spend life in prison

    He killed his ex-girlfriend with a bomb in an Aliso Viejo spa. He'll spend life in prison

    [ad_1]

    A severed leg in the parking lot. Bloodied victims in spa robes. A burned-out shell where an Aliso Viejo business used to be.

    The grisly aftermath of a 2018 explosion that rocked Orange County was laid out at a sentencing hearing in federal court for Stephen William Beal — convicted last year of planting a homemade package bomb that killed his ex-girlfriend and injured two others.

    During the Friday hearing in downtown Los Angeles, 64-year-old Beal, dressed in a white prison jumpsuit, said he would “always maintain my innocence in this case.”

    Soon afterward, Judge Josephine L. Staton handed down a life sentence, plus an additional 30 years, after noting that Beal had not taken responsibility for the crime.

    “The cold, calculating nature of this crime is chilling,” Staton said to a courtroom of more than two dozen people, including victims, reporters and law enforcement. “The court believes the defendant is likely to remain a danger to the public for the rest of his life.”

    Outside the courthouse after the verdict, U.S. Attorney Martin Estrada said Beal had murdered his ex-girlfriend, Ildiko Krajnyak, “in one of the most depraved and despicable ways possible.”

    “Justice has been served,” Estrada said. “Mr. Beal will spend the rest of his days in a federal penitentiary.”

    FBI and the Orange County Sheriff’s Department investigate an explosion at a day spa in Aliso Viejo in May 2018.

    (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)

    On May 15, 2018, Krajnyak opened a cardboard box she found at her day spa, Magyar Kozmetika. The resulting blast caused the 48-year-old’s midsection, arms and hands to disintegrate, according to prosecutors.

    A mother and daughter who were inside the spa when the bomb went off escaped the burning building through a blown-out wall. They were both hospitalized and one of them lost an eye because of shrapnel.

    At a four-week trial last year, evidence showed Beal became obsessed with Krajnyak after she tried to distance herself from him. At one point, prosecutors said, Beal threatened to kill himself after Krajnyak said she needed space.

    A woman smiles next to an orange flower.

    Ildiko Krajnyak, 48, was killed by a package bomb sent by Stephen William Beal, who was convicted last year.

    (U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California)

    On a trip to Portugal two months before the explosion, Beal examined Krajnyak’s phone and discovered she’d been seeing other men. During the trip, he took pictures of her text messages with one of them.

    Beal had access to the spa, knowledge of Krajnyak’s habits, and “decades of experience in rocketry,” combining skill in electronics and chemistry that made it possible to build a bomb without blowing himself up, Assistant U.S. Atty. Mark Takla said during the trial.

    When investigators searched Beal’s home after the explosion, they found more than 130 pounds of explosive precursor chemicals, explosive mixtures and wires of the same type found in the ceiling at the blast site.

    During the trial, defense attorney Meghan Blanco had described her client as “nothing more than a hobbyist” who tinkered with rockets and pyrotechnics, and said authorities had rushed to judgment.

    “Is it a very common hobby? No,” she said. “Does it make Mr. Beal a bomber? No.”

    In July, jurors found Beal guilty of using a weapon of mass destruction resulting in death and three other felonies related to the blast.

    During his sentencing, Beal continued trying to deflect blame, telling the judge, “I just wish the person who actually committed this crime was sitting here, not me.”

    Beal kept his back turned as victims shared the trauma they had endured after the blast, including fear of opening mail and hearing loud noises.

    Rebekah Radomski, who was working at a mental health clinic near the salon at the time of the blast, described the “sheer terror of this near-death experience.”

    “To this day, it remains truly challenging to rationalize how because a man had his feelings hurt by a former lover, he reacted with cowardly violence and zero regard for human life,” Radomski said. “He deserves to never see the light of day again except from a prison yard.”

    Krajnyak’s cousin, Eva Boni, said Beal had “single-handedly destroyed my family.”

    Takla, the U.S. attorney, called it “a miracle” that the two women inside the spa had survived. He read a letter from one of them, who described her physical disfigurement, scarring and hearing loss. Less visible, she wrote, is the emotional trauma.

    “Fear has become my foundation and worry my reality,” she wrote. “I’m a different, lesser version of who I used to be.”

    Outside the courthouse after the verdict, O.C. Sheriff Don Barnes criticized Beal for continuing to proclaim his innocence.

    “It was an insult to the criminal justice process that he did that,” Barnes said. “We have the right guy, we had the right guy all along. He got a fair trial, he’s held accountable, he will die in prison one day.”

    [ad_2]

    Brittny Mejia

    Source link

  • 'Every woman's worst nightmare': Lawsuit alleges widespread sexual abuse at California prisons for women

    'Every woman's worst nightmare': Lawsuit alleges widespread sexual abuse at California prisons for women

    [ad_1]

    Warning: This article contains graphic descriptions of sexual abuse.

    It was after the daily 9 p.m. head count at the California Institution for Women in Chino when she was taken out of her cell by a correctional officer she thought was her friend.

    She was 21 and not even 100 pounds and the officer, who stood about 6-foot-7, was twice her size. “It was unheard of to be popped after the head count. I knew something was up,” she said. “He told me the lieutenant wanted to see me.”

    But when she got to the office, it was dark. “He started to kiss me and put his tongue in my mouth,” the woman said, recalling the 2014 incident. The Times is not naming her as she is a sex crime victim. “He put his hand in my pants. I tried to pull back, but he was persistent. Then he put his fingers inside me.” The next day, she said, he acted as if nothing had happened.

    The woman is one of 130 former inmates at California’s women’s prisons at Chino and Chowchilla, suing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and more than 30 current and ex-correctional officers who they say abused them in prison. They are seeking unspecified damages for sexual assault, battery, negligence, infliction of emotional distress and violations of civil rights.

    Correctional officers at the California Institution for Women in Chino and Central California Women’s Facility committed widespread sexual abuse against the female detainees whom they guarded, according to a lawsuit filed last month. In many cases, the officers targeted and allegedly isolated the inmates and forced them to perform sexual acts, the lawsuit said.

    The lawsuit documents graphic incidents of sexual abuse stretching back a decade and reveals that the women, when they were at their most vulnerable, were punished and sometimes the victim of further abuse and punitive actions if they reported their assailants.

    “Every woman’s worst nightmare is being locked inside a facility filled with sexual predators with no means of escape,” said Doug Rochen, an attorney at ACTS Law who is representing the women. “And that’s exactly what each of these women, and likely thousands more, were subjected to for decades. California paid no attention to their well-being, left them to suffer at the hands of the worst kinds of sexual deviants, and made them relive their pain daily while being locked behind bars.”

    The lawsuit accused one sergeant at the Chino prison of more than 40 rapes — incidents of violence that often caused bleeding — and sexual misconduct involving a female inmate in 2015. Out of fear of retaliation and further confinement, one plaintiff, identified only as Jane CL-1 25 Roe, never reported the sexual misconduct, assuming the complaints would be “unanswered, dismissed, ignored, and buried without investigation or redress, thereby allowing the sexual misconduct to continue.”

    One of the women is a victim of an accused serial-rapist correctional officer, Gregory Rodriguez, who is charged with 96 counts of sex crimes involving nearly a dozen women at the Chowchilla prison during his tenure, the lawsuit alleges. The 27-year-old woman in 2014 was allegedly forced to perform oral sex acts on the guard at a time she was pregnant, according to the lawsuit.

    Another woman alleges she was sexually abused by then-correctional officer Israel Trevino in 2014 when she was 25. Trevino was terminated in 2018 after other allegations of sexual abuse. Several pending lawsuits accuse Trevino of abusing numerous victims. Trevino has since died.

    That same former inmate, identified as Jane MS0 8 Roe, alleges she was also victimized by two other correctional officers, one who groped her and another who groped her and penetrated her vagina, according to the lawsuit.

    Sexual abuse would occur in areas throughout the prisons, including cells, closets and storage rooms, the lawsuit alleges. In one alleged victim’s case, she was sexually abused in a cleaning supplies cupboard five times and eventually reported it to another correctional officer, who declined to take action. Rochen said it was part of a pattern of prison officials who systematically ignored complaints of sexual abuse.

    California prison officials didn’t reply to a request for comment on the litigation.

    Sexual abuse of incarcerated women is a widespread problem in facilities nationwide, with government surveys suggesting that more than 3,500 women are sexually abused by prison and jail workers annually.

    In addition to the sexual misconduct by prison workers, the lawsuit alleged the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation had inadequate hiring practices, procedures and training to prevent the sexual abuse and conduct.

    The lawsuit is the latest in a series targeting sexual abuse in California’s female prisons. Last summer, another law firm filed litigation involving more than 100 other plaintiffs, including victims of Rodriguez.

    State law gives victims of sexual assault by police and correctional officers up to 10 years after their assailants have been convicted of sexual assault or a crime in which sexual assault was initially alleged to sue. Victims can also sue up to 10 years after their assailants left the law enforcement agency they were working at when the assault occurred.

    [ad_2]

    Richard Winton

    Source link

  • Alabama prisoners’ bodies returned to families with hearts, other organs missing, lawsuit claims

    Alabama prisoners’ bodies returned to families with hearts, other organs missing, lawsuit claims

    [ad_1]

    The bodies of two men who died while incarcerated in Alabama’s prison system were missing their hearts or other organs when returned to their families, a federal lawsuit alleges.

    The family of Brandon Clay Dotson, who died in a state prison in November, filed a federal lawsuit last month against the Alabama Department of Corrections and others saying his body was decomposing and his heart was missing when his remains were returned to his family.

    In a court filing in the case last week, the daughter of Charles Edward Singleton, another deceased inmate, said her father’s body was missing all of his internal organs when it was returned in 2021.

    Lauren Faraino, an attorney representing Dotson’s family, said via email Wednesday that the experience of multiple families shows this is “absolutely part of a pattern.”

    The Associated Press sent an email seeking comment late Wednesday afternoon to the Alabama Department of Corrections.

    Dotson, 43, was found dead on Nov. 16 at Ventress Correctional Facility. His family, suspecting foul play was involved in his death, hired a pathologist to do a second autopsy and discovered his heart was missing, according to the lawsuit. His family filed a lawsuit seeking to find out why his heart was removed and to have it returned to them.

    “Defendants’ outrageous and inexcusable mishandling of the deceased’s body amounts to a reprehensible violation of human dignity and common decency,” the lawsuit states, adding that “their appalling misconduct is nothing short of grave robbery and mutilation.”

    Dotson’s family, while seeking information about what happened to his heart, discovered that other families had similar experiences, Faraino said.

    The situation involving Singleton’s body is mentioned in court documents filed by Dotson’s family last week. In the documents, the inmate’s daughter, Charlene Drake, writes that a funeral home told her that her father’s body was brought to it “with no internal organs” after his death while incarcerated in 2021.

    She wrote that the funeral director told her that “normally the organs are in a bag placed back in the body after an autopsy, but Charles had been brought to the funeral home with no internal organs.” The court filing was first reported by WBMA.

    A federal judge held a hearing in the Dotson case last week. Al.com reported that the hearing provided no answers about the location of the heart.

    The lawsuit filed by Dotson’s family contended that the heart might have been retained during a state autopsy with the intention of giving it to the medical school at the University of Alabama at Birmingham for research purposes.

    Attorneys for the university said that was “bald speculation” and wrote in a court filing that the university did not perform the autopsy and never received any of Dotson’s organs.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Column: Tinkering with Prop. 47 won't lower crime. Fixing San Quentin will

    Column: Tinkering with Prop. 47 won't lower crime. Fixing San Quentin will

    [ad_1]

    In 2020, after the tragic murder of George Floyd, there was a moment when it seemed as if America, California included, was ready to reform our broken and discriminatory criminal justice system.

    In 2024, as the California Legislature returns from vacation, criminal justice is once again at the forefront. But now, the proverbial pendulum has swung and a new tough-on-crime era seems to be creeping up through the cracks of our good intentions.

    Proposition 47, which helped lower California’s prison population by changing certain nonviolent crimes from felonies to misdemeanors, is likely to be rolled back, if not undone this year.

    The California Highway Patrol has been called in to stop retail theft, despite the fact that no one is entirely sure just how big a problem it is.

    Drug dealers are being charged with murder as deaths from fentanyl overdoses continue to spike, a new tactic in a new war on drugs, little different from the one that led to overincarceration of Black and brown people during the crack epidemic of the ’80s when we insisted we could arrest our way out of poverty and addiction.

    It is a troubling reversal of both attitude and reform that, as history has proven, will not lead to the safer communities we all want.

    But what is about to happen inside San Quentin State Prison has the potential to fundamentally change crime and punishment in the Golden State, and beyond.

    Because as much as we want to believe that a single law, more police or a tougher sentence can protect us, the truth is that the best way to cut crime is to stop it from happening in the first place — not with the pounding fist of punishment that for decades has left us with jails and prisons where more than a third of people return within a few years of release.

    But instead by helping people to find other paths, and giving them opportunities to survive in ways that uplift rather than prey upon our communities — an approach with proven results both in the U.S. and other countries, where incarceration decades ago embraced rehabilitation not as an option but a mandate.

    Last year, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced that he wanted to transform San Quentin, California’s oldest and most famous prison, into a new kind of incarceration facility modeled after Scandinavian principles of rehabilitation, where that mandate for changing lives is written into law.

    With his love of catchphrases, he dubbed it the California Model and left the details for later. On Friday, a long-awaited explanation of what the California Model will look like in practice was released, providing both an ideal and a blueprint for what is a radical, subversive and important shift in what it means to be in prison.

    “This is a big deal,” Darrell Steinberg told me. He helped chair the committee that created the recommendations, and is the mayor of Sacramento, a city as plagued as any by the drug addiction, mental illness and homelessness that have driven much of the shift in attitudes around crime. So he knows as well as any that voters want results, not experiments.

    “This will enhance public safety for the self-evident reason that when people have the tools to succeed on the outside they will have better lives and are much less likely to commit another crime,” he said.

    It is visionary, he said, but also doable.

    A core part of the transition involves changing the job of correctional officers from enforcers and adversaries to participants in rehabilitation, a metamorphosis that the union representing correctional officers supports. Under the plan, officers would take college-level classes on trauma-informed practices, and be expected to interact with inmates as mentors and guides.

    San Quentin itself would also receive a makeover, albeit one curtailed by our current economic realities. Cramped cells that currently house two people in 46 square feet, about half the size of a decent bathroom, would be removed to allow for single-occupancy spaces that Steinberg said are the minimum dignity demands.

    Correctional officers would also see an upgrade. Housing prices are so high in Marin County, where San Quentin is located, that it is impossible for many to live close enough for a daily shift (a two-bedroom averages more than $3,000 a month), leaving them with hours-long commutes.

    So some officers have resorted to “dry camping” in trailers with homeless-like conditions that lack running water, electricity or even sewers. They are packing a week’s worth of work into a few days just to get by. The new plan would give correctional officers a campground with basic facilities and access to showers and safe spaces to relax — perhaps making the job less stressful.

    For incarcerated people, the change will mean that on Day 1 of their sentences, there is a coordinated effort to arrange services — mental health care, education, job training, substance abuse treatment. And that there are people to implement those plans, and support them.

    While that seems basic, it doesn’t happen now. People are largely left to their own devices to navigate an opaque and inefficient system that is so archaic that some of it isn’t even computerized. Wait lists are long and information can be hard to come by.

    If the ideas laid out in the plan makes it through the upcoming budget negotiations (in a year with a large and unexpected deficit), it will be a culture change inside the most infamous prison in the country’s second-largest state prison system (Texas is the only state with a larger incarcerated population).

    Though taking the California Model from paper to practice is the work of years, the proposal for San Quentin has the potential to be the largest and most meaningful criminal justice reform in decades — if we get it right, which of course is always an if when it comes to government.

    But it is a big swing with the potential for real payoff — not the knee-jerk anger and fear of proposals like gutting Proposition 47, which will only repeat the mistakes of the past.

    There will always be predators and there will always be crime. And admittedly, it all sounds touchy-feely and nebulous, like we are about to spend a bunch on money on holding criminals’ hands while they talk about their childhoods and get their GED.

    And to be honest, that’s part of it, one we shouldn’t ignore.

    At its root, the California Model is about dignity and compassion, creating policy around the belief that healing isn’t just for the innocent, and it isn’t soft.

    Fixing humans, especially ones broken enough to hurt others, is the hardest of tasks.

    But it can be done.

    And if California turns San Quentin into a place where that happens, we will all be safer.

    [ad_2]

    Anita Chabria

    Source link

  • Myanmar military government pardons more than 9,000 prisoners

    Myanmar military government pardons more than 9,000 prisoners

    [ad_1]

    Annual amnesty marking Independence Day takes place during crisis in the north that poses threat to military rulers.

    Myanmar’s military government has pardoned more than 9,000 prisoners, including 114 foreign nationals, to mark the country’s Independence Day.

    Friends and families of prisoners gathered outside the high-security Insein Prison in the commercial capital Yangon as the releases were set to start on Thursday and expected to take place over several days.

    The identities of those slated for release were not yet known, and there was no indication that any political prisoners would be freed.

    Thursday’s announced amnesty, part of an annual release, comes as the government faces a crisis in the country’s north, where ethnic armed groups have captured military and border posts, threatening to block trade with China.

    Against this roiling backdrop, the Independence Day celebrations were devoid of the usual pomp and circumstance, and military chief Min Aung Hlaing was notably absent from the proceedings. In a statement, his administration said 9,652 prisoners would be freed.

    The military came to power in a coup in February 2001 after ousting civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi, brutally suppressing protests and cracking down on all forms of dissent.

    Suu Kyi, 78, is currently in prison, sentenced to 33 years on an array of politically motivated charges from corruption to flouting COVID-19 restrictions. Her party was dissolved last year after failing to comply with tough new party registration laws.

    Since the power grab, military leaders have been accused of murdering dozens of prisoners and covering up their deaths as escape attempts. According to the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (AAPP) monitoring group, more than 25,730 people were arrested for opposing the coup, and almost 20,000 are still in detention.

    The AAPP reports that at least 4,277 civilians, including pro-democracy activists, have been killed by security forces. In 2022, the generals drew international condemnation after executing four pro-democracy leaders and activists in the country’s first use of the death penalty in decades.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bangladesh court sentences Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus to 6 months in jail for violating labor laws

    Bangladesh court sentences Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus to 6 months in jail for violating labor laws

    [ad_1]

    A labor court in Bangladesh’s capital Monday sentenced Nobel Peace Prize winner Muhammad Yunus to six months in jail for violating the country’s labor laws.

    Yunus, who pioneered the use of microcredit to help impoverished people, was present in court and was granted bail. The court gave Yunus 30 days to appeal the verdict and sentence.

    Grameen Telecom, which Yunus founded as a non-profit organization, is at the center of the case.

    Sheikh Merina Sultana, head of the Third Labor Court of Dhaka, said in her verdict that Yunus’ company violated Bangladeshi labor laws. She said at least 67 Grameen Telecom workers were supposed to be made permanent employees but were not, and a “welfare fund” to support the staff in cases of emergency or special needs was never formed. She also said that, following company policy, 5% of Grameen’s dividends were supposed to be distributed to staff but was not.

    Sultana found Yunus, as chairman of the company, and three other company directors guilty, sentencing each to six months in jail. Yunus was also fined 30,000 takas, or $260.

    Yunus said he would appeal.

    “We are being punished for a crime we did not commit. It was my fate, the nation’s fate. We have accepted this verdict, but will appeal this verdict and continue fighting against this sentence,” the 83-year-old economist told reporters after the verdict was announced.

    A defense lawyer criticized the ruling, saying it was unfair and against the law. “We have been deprived of justice,” said attorney Abdullah Al Mamun.

    Nobel Peace Laureate Dr Muhammad Yunus Arrive At Labour Court In Dhaka
    Professor Muhammad Yunus is gesturing in front of the court after being sentenced to six months of imprisonment in Dhaka, Bangladesh, on January 1, 2024.

    Kazi Salahuddin Razu/NurPhoto via Getty Images


    But the prosecution was happy with what they said was an expected verdict.

    “We think business owners will now be more cautious about violating labor laws. No one is above the law,” prosecutor Khurshid Alam Khan told The Associated Press.

    Grameen Telecom owns 34.2% of the country’s largest mobile phone company, Grameenphone, a subsidiary of Norway’s telecom giant Telenor.

    As Yunus is known to have close connections with political elites in the West, especially in the United States, many think the verdict could negatively impact Bangladesh’s relationship with the U.S.

    But Foreign Secretary Masud Bin Momen on Monday said relations between Bangladesh and the U.S. would likely not be affected by an issue involving a single individual.

    “It is normal not to have an impact on the state-to-state relations for an individual,” the United News of Bangladesh agency quoted Momen as saying.

    The Nobel laureate faces an array of other charges involving alleged corruption and embezzlement.

    Yunus’ supporters believe he’s being harassed because of frosty relations with Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Bangladesh’s government has denied the allegation.

    Monday’s verdict came as Bangladesh prepares for its general election on Jan. 7, amid a boycott by the country’s main opposition party, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, led by former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia, Hasina’s arch-enemy. The party said it didn’t have any confidence the premier’s administration would hold a free and fair election.

    In August, more than 170 global leaders and Nobel laureates in an open letter urged Hasina to suspend all legal proceedings against Yunus.

    The leaders, including former U.S. President Barack Obama, former U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and more than 100 Nobel laureates, said in the letter that they were deeply concerned by recent threats to democracy and human rights in Bangladesh.

    Hasina responded sharply and said she would welcome international experts and lawyers to come to Bangladesh to assess the legal proceedings and examine documents involving the charges against Yunus.

    In 1983, Yunus founded Grameen Bank, which gives small loans to entrepreneurs who would not normally qualify for bank loans. The bank’s success in lifting people out of poverty led to similar microfinancing efforts in other countries.

    Hasina’s administration began a series of investigations of Yunus after coming to power in 2008. She became enraged when Yunus announced he would form a political party in 2007 when a military-backed government ran the country and she was in prison, although he did not follow through on the plan.

    Yunus had earlier criticized politicians in the country, saying they are only interested in money. Hasina called him a “bloodsucker” and accused him of using force and other means to recover loans from poor rural women as head of Grameen Bank.

    In 2011, Hasina’s administration began a review of the bank’s activities. Yunus was fired as managing director for allegedly violating government retirement regulations. He was put on trial in 2013 on charges of receiving money without government permission, including his Nobel Prize award and royalties from a book.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Gypsy Rose Blanchard released from prison after serving 7 years for mother’s killing

    Gypsy Rose Blanchard released from prison after serving 7 years for mother’s killing

    [ad_1]

    Gypsy Rose Blanchard released from prison after serving 7 years for mother’s killing – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Gypsy Rose Blanchard was released on parole from a Missouri prison Thursday after serving more than seven years for her role in the murder of her mother, who she testified had been abusive. Blanchard’s ex-boyfriend was convicted of carrying out the murder and is serving a life-sentence.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Former L.A. County sheriff's deputy, sentenced to death for murder, dies in prison

    Former L.A. County sheriff's deputy, sentenced to death for murder, dies in prison

    [ad_1]

    A former Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputy convicted and sentenced to death for murder died in custody Thursday, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

    Stephen M. Redd was pronounced dead after prison staff found him unresponsive in his cell at San Quentin Rehabilitation Center, where he’s been incarcerated since 1997. He was 78.

    His cause of death remains under investigation.

    Redd was sentenced to death after being convicted in 1997 of first-degree murder, first-degree robbery, second-degree burglary, second-degree robbery and attempted murder.

    The sentence stemmed from a robbery Redd committed at a Yorba Linda supermarket in 1994.

    During the robbery, Redd shot and killed the store’s manager, 34-year-old Timothy McVeigh. Redd evaded arrest for eight months before he was arrested in San Francisco.

    Redd’s death sentence has been suspended since 2006, the year California last executed a prisoner. Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a formal moratorium on the death penalty in 2019.

    [ad_2]

    Jeremy Childs

    Source link

  • Prison for man who shot three people in Auckland CBD, including Jay-Jay Feeney’s brother – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    Prison for man who shot three people in Auckland CBD, including Jay-Jay Feeney’s brother – Medical Marijuana Program Connection

    [ad_1]

    Poull Andersen and two others were injured in the shooting on Fort St, Auckland, in March 2022. Photo / Supplied

    A man with gang ties who wounded three people with a single shot from a homemade firearm outside a central Auckland kebab shop – including business owner Poull Andersen, the brother of well-known radio personality Jay-Jay Feeney – has been sentenced to prison.

    The defendant, now 20 and with continuing interim name suppression, appeared before Judge Kathryn Maxwell in Auckland District Court this morning as she mused over his unusually substantive criminal history for someone so young.

    He has spent some of his time since the March 5, 2022, shooting remanded in a maximum security jail cell, where he has at times spent 23 hours per day in lockdown.

    “You have to take some responsibility, though, of course, for that difficulty on remand,” the judge said, blaming the difficult conditions on “how you are acting in prison”.

    The defendant was ordered to serve a sentence of five years and seven months for three counts of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm with a firearm and a concurrent six-month sentence for receiving $1700 worth of stolen goods as the result of an unrelated road rage incident.

    He was 18 when arrested last year for the shooting, which took place around 2am on a Saturday on central Auckland’s Fort St, where some businesses catering to the nightclub scene remained open.

    Court documents state the teen…

    Original Author Link click here to read complete story..

    [ad_2]

    MMP News Author

    Source link

  • Men Imprisoned For Decades Freed As Several Wrongful Convictions Overturned

    Men Imprisoned For Decades Freed As Several Wrongful Convictions Overturned

    [ad_1]

    At least six men around the country were freed this week after being wrongfully convicted of serious crimes that put them behind bars for a combined 180-plus years.

    The string of overturned convictions came just in time for the holidays. But their releases are also part of a trend: According to the National Registry of Exonerations, the number of people being exonerated for charges like drug possession, homicide or sexual assault has spiked over the last several years.

    The prisoners freed this week were all men of color who were teens or young adults at the time of their supposed crimes.

    Marvin Haynes, 35, is hugged by supporters as he walks out of the Minnesota Correctional Facility at Stillwater on Monday, Dec. 11.

    Mark Vancleave via Associated Press

    Faulty Eyewitness Evidence

    Marvin Haynes was just 16 when he was arrested for the shooting death of 55-year-old Harry “Randy” Sherer at a Minneapolis flower shop during an attempted robbery in 2004.

    Police interrogated the teen for hours while he denied having hurt anybody or even having been into the flower shop. He had no reason to rob anybody, he said. But he was found guilty the following year and sentenced to life in prison.

    One eyewitness claimed to recognize Haynes as the gunman after previously saying it was another man who, as it turned out, was in another state at the time of the killing.

    “Mr. Haynes’ conviction rested almost exclusively on eyewitness identification,” Hennepin County attorney Mary Moriarty said in a statement, adding that there was no DNA, fingerprint or video evidence tying Haynes to the crime.

    “To Marvin Haynes: You lost the opportunity to graduate from high school, attend prom, have relationships, attend weddings and funerals, and be with your family during holidays. For that, I am so deeply sorry. And for that, I commit to correcting other injustices and to making sure that we do not participate in making our own,” Moriarty said.

    A Hennepin County judge signed an order setting aside Haynes’ conviction on Monday.

    “I just want people to know that I am innocent. I was innocent from the very beginning,” Haynes told CNN the day after his release. “And I’m just happy that people just recognize it and understand my story.”

    Four Decades Behind Bars

    A pair of cousins, Jimmy Soto and David Ayala, were young adults when they were arrested and charged with the 1981 murders of two teenagers in Chicago.

    A drive-by shooting in the city’s Pietrowski Park left 16-year-old Julie Limas and 18-year-old Marine Hector Valeriano dead of gunshot wounds. A third person, an alleged gang member, was injured nearby.

    Soto and Ayala received life sentences despite a lack of physical evidence linking either to the crime. A man who said he was the getaway driver served as a state’s witness in the case against the cousins.

    While in prison, Soto earned a bachelor’s degree as part of Northwestern University’s Prison Education Program and plans to attend law school, he told CNN. He said he’s already taken the LSAT.

    “If there’s somebody sitting in a cell, male or female, who feels all hope is lost, it’s my hope I can reach back and help one of them,” Soto told NBC Chicago.

    The two are believed to be the longest-held wrongfully convicted people in Illinois state history, according to CBS Chicago.

    Two Teens Blamed For Two Crimes

    Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón announced this week that two men, Miguel Solario and Giovanni Hernandez, would be released after being wrongfully imprisoned for separate crimes.

    Solario was arrested for a drive-by shooting that left 81-year-old Californian Mary Bramlett dead in 1998. Los Angeles prosecutors alleged that Solario, who was 19 at the time, had been in the car with several gang members. He received a life sentence.

    “Miguel’s 25 years of wrongful incarceration shows how important it is for law enforcement to follow all leads and avoid tunnel vision, to present witnesses with a particular suspect only one time, and to recognize that, according to the new scientific consensus, when witnesses don’t identify the suspect, it points to their innocence,” Sarah Pace, an attorney for Solario, said in a statement. Pace works for the Northern California Innocence Project, which helped with the case.

    Hernandez was just 14 years old when he was arrested for a drive-by Culver City shooting in 2006 that killed 16-year-old Gary Ortiz.

    The teen was sentenced “to die in prison for a crime he did not commit,” Marisa Harris, an attorney in his case, said in a statement. Harris works for the Juvenile Innocence and Fair Sentencing Clinic at Loyola Law School.

    “These cases not only highlight the tragic impact on the lives of those directly affected but also underline the impact to the family and friends left behind,” Gascón said.

    “I am committed to ensuring that lessons are learned from this grave error, “he added, “and that steps are taken to prevent similar injustices from occurring in the future.”

    ‘Ready To Begin Life Again’

    Chicago man Brian Beals spent 35 years behind bars after he was wrongfully convicted in the killing of a 6-year-old boy.

    On Tuesday, Beals walked out of prison after a judge vacated his sentence and dismissed all charges, The Associated Press reported.

    In 1988, when Beals was a 22-year-old college student, he got into an altercation with a drug dealer before getting in his car and driving away. While driving away, someone fired a gun in Beals’ direction and hit the boy and his mother.

    Beals was later convicted of murder despite several witnesses saying they saw someone else fire the gun.

    His conviction was overturned thanks in part to the Illinois Innocence Project, which found five witnesses to confirm that Beals wasn’t the shooter.

    “Relief, happiness, it was just amazing to walk out of there,” Beals told The Associated Press following his release. “I’m ready to begin life again.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Many Russians disapprove of Putin method for filling military ranks

    Many Russians disapprove of Putin method for filling military ranks

    [ad_1]

    A poll released on Friday found that more than half of Russians do not support pardoning prisoners who have previously committed serious crimes if they take part in the war in Ukraine upon release.

    Russian Field, a nonpartisan Moscow-based research company, released its findings on Telegram. According to the poll, 55 percent of respondents said they do not support the idea of pardoning participants in the Ukraine war who were convicted of serious crimes prior to joining Russian troops. Thirty-two percent of respondents said they do support pardoning prisoners who fight for Russia.

    The independent Russian media outlet Meduza reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin signed decrees in June that pardons prisoners who agree to fight in Ukraine. Putin reportedly said the recidivism rate among prisoners who become soldiers is low. However, there have been multiple media reports of former prisoners accused of committing serious crimes—including murder—after they returned home from the front lines of Ukraine.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin is pictured Thursday during a combined call-in show and press conference in Moscow. A new poll found over half of Russian respondents said they do not support Putin’s plan to pardon convicts of their crimes if they fight in the Ukraine war.
    Photo by Getty Images

    Ivan Rossomakhin, a former inmate who had been convicted of murder three years ago, returned home from the war in Ukraine this summer. Less than 10 days after his military release, he reportedly confessed to stabbing an elderly lady to death.

    When Dmitry Peskov—Putin’s press secretary—was asked in November about convicted felons being granted pardons for their war service, he answered: “They atone with blood for crimes on the battlefield, in assault brigades, under bullets, under shells.”

    Newsweek reached out to the Kremlin via email on Friday night for comment.

    Women were more likely to oppose the idea of pardoning prisoners who serve in the military, with 60 percent stating they are against it, compared to 27 percent in favor of pardons. Forty-eight percent of men oppose the pardon plan, and 39 percent said they support it.

    Younger respondents and people with higher incomes and/or higher education levels were more likely to oppose pardoning prisoners, according to Russian Field.

    The survey involved 1,600 respondents and was conducted from December 4 to December 12. Russian Field did not provide a margin of error.

    The recruitment of inmates from Russian penal colonies first became a practice publicized by the Wagner Group of Russian mercenaries before reports alleged the Russian Ministry of Defense was also taking in convicts.

    The United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defense said in May that Russia had ramped up” its recruitment of prison inmates this year due to its military not satisfying personnel staffing goals, but the effort reportedly was not keeping pace with Russia’s casualty rate in Ukraine.

    Reports in recent weeks also indicate the Kremlin has been hesitant to turn to another wave of mobilization out of fear that such a move could harm Putin’s campaign for reelection in 2024.