ReportWire

Tag: prince william county schools

  • How Prince William Counnty schools’ data leak impacts students, families – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Prince William County schools mistakenly shared student and parent personal information with Hazel Health, a third-party partner of the school division.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partner InsideNoVa.com. Sign up for InsideNoVa.com’s free email subscription today.

    Prince William County schools mistakenly shared student and parent personal information with Hazel Health, a third-party partner of the school division.

    The division on Dec. 19 sent a notification to the affected families notifying them that on Dec. 16 Hazel Health inadvertently sent a welcome text to families who had not opted into the provider’s service.

    Hazel Health is the division’s contracted provider of mental telehealth services to students at no cost to families.

    Following the mistaken welcome text, the school system discovered it had “unintentionally disclosed” personal identifiable information for those who had not opted into the service, the division said in its statement to the affected families.

    The disclosed information included the following parent contact details: name, mobile phone number, email address, physical address, guardian status, relationship to the student and contact order preference.

    Student information included: student ID, district ID, state testing ID, name, gender, birth date, grade level and details related to the child’s school including school code, school name and school address.

    As soon as the incident was discovered, the school system “took immediate steps to ensure Hazel Health destroyed the information,” according to the school system’s notification.

    “Hazel Health is an approved vendor of PWCS and has met the division’s standards for data security,” the division said. “PWCS has corrected the data file to prevent this error in the future and updated internal processes to prevent similar incidents in the future.”

    The school system was unable to provide further information due to most employees being on leave for winter break.

    Parent reacts

    One parent in the school division, Rochelle, told InsideNoVa she was among the parents who received a text message from Hazel Health despite not enrolling her two children in the service.

    Rochelle, who did not want to publicly disclose her last name for fear of retribution by the school system, said she and her husband chose not to enroll their children in the Hazel Health services because she trusted her children to come to them if they needed help.

    The opt-out process, she said, was complicated. In the back-to-school packet, parents had the option to opt-in to a number of programs, including the Hazel Health service.

    If a parent wanted to opt-out of any of the programs, parents were meant to leave those boxes unchecked. With several opt-in and opt-out options on one page and an electronic signature required to move to the next page, Rochelle said it would have been easy for a parent who’s not tech savvy to accidentally opt-in.

    The data leak incident, Rochelle said, gives her “zero faith” in the county to handle and protect her children’s personal information.

    While the school system said it took steps to destroy the information shared with Hazel Health, Rochelle was skeptical.

    “They can say that they destroyed it. How do you prove that, though?” Rochelle said.

    While she said it’s necessary for schools to maintain records on students and hold personal information such as medical history, contact information and beyond, Rochelle said she’d like to see the school system stop including additional services and programs in the back-to-school packet.

    Instead, she suggested, if somebody needs access to any of the services the school system provides, they can go directly to the school and ask for the necessary resources.

    “Let it be your kids’ information, medical information, emergency detail information, emergency pickup information and that’s it,” Rochelle said of the back-to-school packet.

    [ad_2]

    Tadiwos Abedje

    Source link

  • Prince William Co. schools accidentally shares student, parent data with third-party partner – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Prince William County schools mistakenly shared student and parent personal information with Hazel Health, a third-party partner of the school division.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partner InsideNoVa.com. Sign up for InsideNoVa.com’s free email subscription today.

    Prince William County schools mistakenly shared student and parent personal information with Hazel Health, a third-party partner of the school division.

    The division on Dec. 19 sent a notification to the affected families notifying them that on Dec. 16 Hazel Health inadvertently sent a welcome text to families who had not opted into the provider’s service.

    Hazel Health is the division’s contracted provider of mental telehealth services to students at no cost to families.

    Following the mistaken welcome text, the school system discovered it had “unintentionally disclosed” personal identifiable information for those who had not opted into the service, the division said in its statement to the affected families.

    The disclosed information included the following parent contact details: name, mobile phone number, email address, physical address, guardian status, relationship to the student and contact order preference.

    Student information included: student ID, district ID, state testing ID, name, gender, birth date, grade level and details related to the child’s school including school code, school name and school address.

    As soon as the incident was discovered, the school system “took immediate steps to ensure Hazel Health destroyed the information,” according to the school system’s notification.

    “Hazel Health is an approved vendor of PWCS and has met the division’s standards for data security,” the division said. “PWCS has corrected the data file to prevent this error in the future and updated internal processes to prevent similar incidents in the future.”

    The school system was unable to provide further information due to most employees being on leave for winter break.

    [ad_2]

    Ciara Wells

    Source link

  • ‘Confused and a bit perplexed’: Fairfax Co. superintendent reacts to ‘high-risk status’ from Education Department – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    In an interview with WTOP, Superintendent Michelle Reid said the division is “a bit confused and a bit perplexed as to how best to address this, because there really is not a relevant exemplar in recent years that anyone can recall that called out anything of this nature.”

    Days after the Department of Education placed five Northern Virginia school systems that didn’t change their bathroom policies on high-risk status, Fairfax County’s superintendent said the state’s largest school district is reviewing the agency’s message and considering next steps.

    In an interview with WTOP, Superintendent Michelle Reid said the division is “a bit confused and a bit perplexed as to how best to address this, because there really is not a relevant exemplar in recent years that anyone can recall that called out anything of this nature.”

    In a four-page letter sent to Prince William County Superintendent LaTanya McDade on Monday, and obtained by WTOP, Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said the division has to submit a corrective action plan within 30 days. It also told the district to submit plans for compliance with all federal laws.

    The step marks a significant escalation in the back-and-forth between the federal agency and the five Northern Virginia districts.

    Arlington, Alexandria, Loudoun, Prince William and Fairfax counties’ schools all rejected a request to change their bathroom policies, which currently allow students to use intimate facilities based on their gender identity. While the school districts said their practices align with current law, the education department said they violate Title IX.

    “We were really disappointed that the Department of Education wouldn’t engage in any kind of thoughtful collaboration, and rather, sent this letter in response,” Reid said. “We were very disappointed with this.”

    In the letter to Prince William County schools, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, McMahon said despite an extension to the deadline to change bathroom policies, the district “stated it does not intend to make the necessary policy changes to come into compliance with Title IX.” The division is on high-risk status so the agency can “ensure taxpayer dollars are not being spent on illegal activity.”

    There hasn’t been funding withheld to date, and school districts routinely apply for reimbursement when the funding is tied to federal grants.

    In Fairfax, Reid said it’s unclear what the high-risk status means, “because we recently received a very clean federal audit on our Title II grant. And in fact, as we read the regulation around this high-risk language, we’re in compliance with all elements of operation in terms of these federal grants.”

    Despite the uncertainty, Reid said the district is confident that “appropriated Congressional funds will continue to be appropriated.” The school districts have 10 business days to ask for a reconsideration of the high-risk designation.

    In the case of Fairfax County, Reid said practices “are aligned with Virginia law and the rulings of the federal Court of Appeals in the Fourth Circuit.”

    The district is planning to reach out the federal agency for clarification, she said.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Scott Gelman

    Source link

  • Prince William Co. School Board discusses new boundary planning process – WTOP News

    Prince William Co. School Board discusses new boundary planning process – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The Prince William County School Board is considering changes to the division’s boundary planning process following a Sept. 18 presentation from the school division.

    This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partner InsideNoVa.com. Sign up for InsideNoVa.com’s free email subscription today.

    The Prince William County School Board is considering changes to the division’s boundary planning process following a Sept. 18 presentation from the school division.

    The changes come after the school division enlisted outside consultant National Demographics Corporation to conduct a review of the policy.

    The division and National Demographics Corporation co-hosted a virtual town hall on the proposed changes at the end of August, where roughly 50 attendees learned about the changes.

    Community members would have multiple options for input, including town hall meetings, parent focus groups, outreach to traditionally underrepresented families and involving school principals.

    The proposal also includes changes to the policy criteria the division should consider when setting or changing boundaries.

    “We’ve gone from a very general and kind of haphazard list that’s in the current policy to these four categories that are defined in much more definition in the regulation,” Johnson said.

    The refined categories are as follows:

    1. Optimize capacity — schools will be no more than 5% over capacity and no more than 20% under capacity

    2. Student demographics — demographics of affected schools and neighborhoods should be considered

    3. Local geography — considers proximity to school, walkability/transportation patterns, topography, minimize splitting neighborhoods, feeder patterns, contiguity

    4. Student stability — try to avoid student school reassignments when possible

    Under the proposed plans, the process for redistricting would be triggered by either the opening or closing of a school or by the board’s initiative following a capacity study report or other report to the board.

    Occoquan School Board member Richard Jessie said it was important that both the School Board and principals are involved early in the process, something recommended by the consultants.

    “ … because in the past, what happened, we were involved at the end, and then there are some things that we wanted to do. But it was sort of awkward, because the committee had already voted on it,” Jessie said.

    Potomac School Board member Justin Wilk expressed concern about overcrowding at Covington Harper Elementary School, which currently has eight trailers.

    Overcrowding at the school and other schools in the surrounding area has been a concern for Wilk and his constituents.

    Wilk said he wanted options in the proposed policy changes that address what he called “inefficiencies related to the capacity management of Covington Harper elementary.”

    Woodbridge District School Board member Loree Williams shared many of the same concerns as Wilk, primarily because changes in the Potomac District could have an impact on Woodbridge District schools.

    “When you change a boundary to an existing school, it can affect a lot more than just the surrounding schools,” Williams said. “I have landlocked schools, we’re already overcrowded, they’re Title One schools, my buildings are some of the oldest … we’re already starting to have a problem before we even vote on the new boundary process.”

    Jennifer Wall, the Gainesville District member, said she liked the focus on maximizing capacity utilization and the flexible approach to priorities when making boundary planning decisions rather than a stricter, hierarchical approach.

    While Wall said she likes the incorporation of principals and more community engagement, she said she was concerned it could become “fraught with politics,” with community members lobbying principals to get their way.

    “I am concerned a little bit that the focus groups could get unwieldy if we get too many and they’re too big,” Wall said.

    In response to the concerns shared by School Board members, Superintendent LaTanya McDade stepped in, noting the policy changes the division put together are all based on feedback from the board and stakeholders.

    “If there’s anything, any adjustments that the board would like to make, then the team is ready and willing to do that,” McDade said.

    The superintendent cautioned against delaying making changes any further, as the division is required to update the policy every five years.

    School Board Chairman Dr. Babur Lateef echoed McDade’s comments, telling his fellow board members they will have time to give further feedback to the division on the policy before the board takes an official vote on the policy, expected Oct. 2.

    [ad_2]

    Matt Small

    Source link