[ad_1]
ad
[ad_2]
Lizzie Lanuza
Source link
[ad_1]
Though King Charles III introduced a number of new traditions for this year’s royal Christmas celebration, one thing remained the same: The family’s morning walk to Norfolk’s St. Mary Magdalene Church continued as it has for years, with Charles and Queen Camilla leading the charge.
Kate Middleton, Prince William, and children Prince Louis, Princess Charlotte, and Prince George also enjoyed the walk, which was observed on both sides by ardent fans, many bearing gifts. One such offering, a giant Lindor chocolate egg, thrilled the 7-year-old Louis, who snatched it from his father’s hands.
[ad_2]
Stefania Conrieri
Source link
[ad_1]
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
All King Charles III seems to want for Christmas, after all the turmoil he’s endured this year, is a “digital detox.”
After the British royal family stepped out for its annual Christmas Day church outing, it gathered around the television to watch the monarch’s Christmas broadcast.
The speech was filmed earlier this month inside the Lady Chapel of Westminster Abbey in London, People magazine reported.
KATE MIDDLETON TAKES CENTER STAGE AT ROYAL CHRISTMAS WALK AS ANDREW IS FROZEN OUT
King Charles III’s annual Christmas speech was broadcast on Christmas Day, Dec. 25, 2025. (Samir Hussein/WireImage/Getty Images)
The first royal Christmas speech was delivered by King George V in 1932.
Charles described how “our world seems to spin even faster,” arguing that this makes it more important than ever to slow down, get to know our neighbors and make new friends. He noted that taking that pause can quiet our minds and give us “the still point of the turning world,” borrowing a phrase from T.S. Eliot.
A Buckingham Palace spokesperson later clarified that Charles was hinting at taking a “digital detox.”
WATCH: PRINCE HARRY LOOKING TO RECONCILE WITH KING CHARLES, ROYAL FAMILY
“When His Majesty references that lovely phrase about the ‘still point in the turning world’ at a time when, as he puts it, it’s ‘spinning ever faster,’ he has in mind the effect that new technologies can have on society and how they can impact both community cohesion and general well-being, especially for younger people,” the rep told the Daily Mail.

King Charles III arrives at the parade ground at Britannia Royal Naval College Dec. 19, 2025, in Dartmouth, England. (Chris Jackson/Getty Images)
“I think His Majesty hopes that, if nothing else, Christmas might afford a moment when people could experiment with something of a ‘digital detox’ to focus more on our friendships, our families and our faith, for those who practice,” the rep shared.
“In this way, the king hopes our minds may find greater peace, our souls can renew and our communities grow stronger.”

Queen Camilla and King Charles III attended the Christmas morning service at Sandringham Dec. 25, 2025. (Jordan Peck/Getty Images)
For the king, shutting out the relentless media scrutiny surrounding certain family members could offer a measure of long-sought peace of mind.
Charles also spoke candidly about “reconciliation” as his family continues to navigate the challenges and upheavals of the past year.
On Oct. 30, Charles stripped his disgraced brother, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, of his prince title amid growing scrutiny surrounding the ex-royal’s ties to late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The 65-year-old and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, have until Jan. 31 to vacate Royal Lodge, their 30-room mansion.

Prince Andrew was stripped of his royal titles and honors by King Charles III Oct. 30, 2025. He will no longer be styled “Prince Andrew” or “His Royal Highness” and will instead be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor (Steve Parsons/WPA Pool/Getty Images)
There is also the strained relationship the king has with his younger son, Prince Harry.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped back as senior royals in 2020 and moved to California. (Karwai Tang/WireImage/Getty Images)
The Duke of Sussex and his wife stepped back as senior royals in 2020, citing the unbearable intrusions of the British press and a lack of support from the palace.
After moving to California, they aired their grievances in interviews and documentaries. Harry’s 2023 memoir, “Spare,” which laid bare embarrassing details about the House of Windsor, worsened his relationship with the royals.

Prince Harry’s memoir, “Spare,” was published in 2023. (Vincenzo Izzo/LightRocket via Getty Images)
In September, Harry, 41, reunited with his father for the first time in 18 months. Their meeting reportedly lasted a little under an hour. People magazine reported a rift remains between the duke and the royals. Sources close to the prince previously told the outlet Charles wouldn’t answer his letters or phone calls.

King Charles III arrives at Clarence House Sept. 10, 2025, in London. The monarch had a private tea with his son, Prince Harry. (Belinda Jiao/Getty Images)
People reported the Duke and Duchess of Sussex didn’t appear to be invited to the family’s Christmas gathering. Instead, they spent the holiday in Montecito with their two young children.
“It seems to me that we need to cherish the values of compassion and reconciliation, the way our Lord lived and died,” the king said.

Sarah Ferguson and her ex-husband, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, must vacate Royal Lodge by Jan. 31. (Mark Cuthbert/UK Press via Getty Images)
“This year, I’ve heard so many examples of this, both here and abroad. These stories of the triumph of courage over adversity give me hope for our venerable military veterans, to selfless humanitarian workers in this century’s most dangerous conflict zones, to the ways in which individuals and communities display spontaneous bravery, instinctively placing themselves in harm’s way to defend others.”
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

King Charles III attends an advent service at Westminster Abbey Dec. 10, 2025, in London. (Chris Jackson/Getty Images)
Toward the end of the speech, Charles mentioned reconciliation again.
“Prayer for peace and reconciliation — for ‘doing to others as we would have them do to us’ — which rang out over the fields near Bethlehem more than two thousand years ago, still reverberates from there and around the world today.”
“It is a prayer for our times and our communities too as we journey through our lives,” he noted.

King Charles and Queen Camilla arrive with German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier and wife Elke Büdenbender ahead of the state banquet at Windsor Castle Dec. 3, 2025, in Windsor, England. (Carlos Jasso/Pool/Getty Images)
Charles avoided any direct reference to personal family matters in his address.
In May, Harry told the BBC he was ready to reconcile, saying, “There’s no point in continuing to fight anymore. I don’t know how much longer my father has.”
On Dec. 12, Charles, 77, revealed doctors have scaled back his cancer treatment plan after what he described as a positive response during an emotional televised address.

Earlier this month, King Charles shared some good news about his cancer diagnosis in an emotional video. (Channel 4/Bango Studios)
The Times of London recently reported that Harry’s hopes of reconciling with his father were damaged by a misguided accusation that the monarch’s aides leaked details of their meeting in an effort to “sabotage” the relationship.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Prince Harry told the BBC in May he’s ready to reconcile with his family. (Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images)
British royals expert Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital that Charles was “rather surprised and saddened” by the news, while The Times reported that friends of the king said he was “disappointed.”
The outlet reported Harry has not spoken to his father since their reunion in September and remains out of contact with Prince William and Kate Middleton. A source in London called suggestions that Harry and his father are on speaking terms “laughable.”

Prince Harry and his older brother Prince William are said to not be on speaking terms. (Samir Hussein/WireImage/Getty Images)
A spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex told Fox News Digital the report was “entirely speculative.”

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex live in the wealthy, coastal city of Montecito with their two young children. (Chris Jackson/Getty Images)
“We wouldn’t comment on the Duke or Duchess’s relationship with their family,” the rep added.
Fox News Digital’s Ashley Papa contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
No prior connection between Jeffrey Epstein and Nassar was publicly known. The note makes a reference to “our president”—at that point, Donald Trump, in his first term—and a seeming predilection for “young, nubile girls.” Epstein’s opening greeting also may refer to an intention to end his own life.
The additional files related to Jeffery Epstein released by the Justice Department on Tuesday, December 23 include a note addressed to “L.N.” signed by “J. Epstein.”
“Dear L.N.,” the letter reads, “As you know by now, I have taken the ‘short route’ home. Good luck! We shared one thing … our love and caring for young ladies and the hope they’d reach their full potential. Our President also shares our love of young, nubile girls. When a young beauty walked by, he loved to ‘grab snatch,’ whereas we ended up snatching grub in the mess halls of the system. Life is unfair.”
[ad_2]
Kase Wickman
Source link
[ad_1]
ad
[ad_2]
Lizzie Lanuza
Source link
[ad_1]
ad
[ad_2]
Lizzie Lanuza
Source link
[ad_1]
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Democrats from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released another batch of photos from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate Friday, one of which included Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
“Oversight Dems received 95,000 new photos from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate. These disturbing images raise even more questions about Epstein and his relationships with some of the most powerful men in the world. Time to end this White House cover-up. Release the files!” Oversight Dems said Friday on X.
Also included in the photos are other prominent figures, including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton and Woody Allen.
Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released an image of Bill Gates and former Prince Andrew as part of its Jeffrey Epstein investigation. (House Oversight Dems)
Many of the photos have already circulated to the public. The photo of Andrew was taken at the Malaria Summit in London in April 2018. In the original photo found on Getty Images, King Charles, Prince of Wales at the time, appears with Bill Gates and Andrew. In the photo released by the committee, King Charles was cropped out.

Bill Gates, Prince Andrew and King Charles at the Malaria Summit April 18, 2018, in London, England (Dominic Lipinski-WPA Pool/Getty Images)
People reports that the House Oversight Committee told the outlet the photo “arrived that way from the estate.”
Also notably missing in the picture was Epstein. However, according to People, the evidence also included a screenshot of an email Epstein sent in March 2011 to someone listed as “The Duke,” believed to be Andrew, who was then the Duke of York.

The photo didn’t feature Epstein and Andrew together. (Steve Parsons/WPA Pool/Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER
“you ok? these stories are complete ant utter fantasy,” Epstein wrote. “I don’t know and have never met Al gore. CLinton was never on the island.. the telephone book is not mine. it was stolen by my houseman who is curreently in prison for doing so.”
In response to the photos the House Oversight Committee released, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson accused Democrats of “selectively releasing cherry-picked photos with random redactions to try and create a false narrative.”
“Here’s the reality: Democrats like Stacey Plaskett and Hakeem Jeffries were soliciting money and meetings from Epstein AFTER he was a convicted sex offender,” Jackson added.
“The Democrat hoax against President Trump has been repeatedly debunked, and the Trump administration has done more for Epstein’s victims than Democrats ever have by repeatedly calling for transparency, releasing thousands of pages of documents and calling for further investigations into Epstein’s Democrat friends.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., previously has fired back at accusations he may have had dinner with Jeffrey Epstein or solicited donations from the disgraced financier. A House GOP effort to censure Plaskett also failed in mid-November.
A White House official also told Fox News Digital Friday that the photos chosen by the House Democrats were selectively chosen with random redactions for political purposes, adding that none of the documents released showed wrongdoing on Trump’s part.
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

White House officials accused House Democrats of cherry-picking photos to push their own narrative. (Alex Brandon/AP Photo)
The release of the photos comes as Andrew made his first public outing since being stripped of his royal title, attending daughter Princess Beatrice’s younger daughter’s christening.
Representatives for Buckingham Palace, Andrew, Clinton, Gates and Allen did not respond Friday to requests for comment from Fox News Digital.
Fox News Digital’s Greg Norman and The Associated Press contributed to this report
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
In the latest round of yearslong scrutiny related to Jeffrey Epstein’s trail of sexual abuse and the high-profile company he kept, MAGA architect Steve Bannon has played a prominent part, with a recently released cache of emails between him and Epstein showing the two men exchanging advice about a range of political and media issues. On Friday, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released yet another batch of materials from Epstein’s estate, which added a visual component to the stew of intrigue. Among the 19 images on display was one of Bannon and Epstein, standing in front of a mirror and gazing at their half-smiling reflections as Epstein snapped a photo with his iPhone.
As with Bannon, the men depicted in these photos, which were gleaned from Epstein’s email account and released without additional context or details of their provenance, are already known to have associated with Epstein. They include Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Richard Branson, Larry Summers, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, and, in four instances, Woody Allen. (Representatives for these men and Bannon did not immediately return requests for comment.) One image features a bowl of condoms, produced by a New York novelty shop, bearing a caricature of Trump’s face with the text “I’m HUUUUGE!” Another shows Trump standing among six women wearing Hawaiian leis whose faces have been concealed, his arm around one of their waists.
House Oversight Committee Democrats.
House Oversight Committee Democrats.
“It is time to end this White House cover-up and bring justice to the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and his powerful friends,” House Oversight Committee member Robert Garcia said in a statement. “These disturbing photos raise even more questions about Epstein and his relationships with some of the most powerful men in the world. We will not rest until the American people get the truth. The Department of Justice must release all the files, NOW.”
The photos come a week before a deadline established by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law last month, which requires the DOJ to release all unclassified materials related to its investigations of Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell within 30 days. The scope of that release remains unclear: The bill includes a provision that the DOJ is permitted to withhold certain information that “would jeopardize an active federal investigation,” and just days before it was signed, Trump wrote on Truth Social, “I will be asking A.G. Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice, together with our great patriots at the FBI, to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement and relationship with Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman, J.P. Morgan, Chase, and many other people and institutions, to determine what was going on with them, and him.”
House Oversight Committee Democrats.
House Oversight Committee Democrats.
The new images offer some glimpses of Epstein’s MO when it came to collecting influential friends and associations. There is an element of haphazardness, for instance, in a new image of Bannon and Allen engaged in ostensibly affectionate conversation, and Epstein was long known for bringing together successful figures from seemingly far-flung worlds at his Manhattan gatherings. While the release of new Epstein materials invariably provides new fodder for observers of the broader spectacle—earlier on Friday, the New York Post reported that his antique Viennese desk went up for sale at a New Jersey auction house—it has also, in the lead-up to the release of the Epstein files, sometimes come with real consequences. Summers, who is pictured in the new images on a plane with Allen, took a leave of absence from Harvard and resigned from several advisory roles after cozy emails between him and Epstein surfaced last month.
[ad_2]
Dan Adler
Source link
[ad_1]
ad
[ad_2]
Lizzie Lanuza
Source link
[ad_1]
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor struck a chord with Princess Diana during her marriage to King Charles. New reports of how the Princess of Wales felt about her brother-in-law emerged as his titles got stripped away.
According to Andrew Lownie’s book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, Diana depicted Andrew as “very, very noisy and loud,” and wondered if “there was something troubling” him. He added that she noted that his personality “wasn’t for [her],” observing that he was “very happy to sit in front of the television all day watching cartoons and videos.” Diana observed that Andrew was not “not a doer.”
Related: The Eerie Meaning Behind Princess Diana’s Funeral Dress Revealed Decades After Her Death
“One moment he would be diligent and polite, the next aggressive and rude,” Lownie wrote of Andrew. “Like his father [Prince Philip], he had a short temper, a rather Germanic sense of humor, and did not bear fools gladly.”
Royal expert Ingrid Seward wrote in her book My Mother and I about Queen Elizabeth that the late-monarch wanted Diana to be with Andrew instead of Charles because of the age difference. Andrew was born a year before Diana, while Charles had an age gap of almost 13 years. “I think some of Diana’s friends thought that Andrew would be more fun for her than Charles because [Andrew] was very much her age and he was full of fun and everything else,” Seward previously told Us Weekly. But, Seward said, “Diana wasn’t interested in Andrew. It was Charles she was interested in.”
Diana even played matchmaker for Andrew and his now-ex-wife Sarah Ferguson after the former Duke of York complained about his love life. Lownie wrote that Diana “was in need of an ally at court” and that she invited Fergie to a royal party and “whether by luck or design,” Andrew ended up sitting next to Ferguson.
One palace source noted that Fergie “was all high-jinks and jolly-hockey sticks and practical jokes. Andy loved it, no one else did.”
[ad_2]
Lea Veloso
Source link
[ad_1]
Britain’s Prince Andrew, *** prince no more, his brother King Charles officially starting the process of stripping Andrew of his remaining royal titles and evicting him from the royal estate in Windsor. It’s the royal family’s strongest response yet to the disgraced Prince’s links to. Late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. It’s *** moment about justice, right? Epstein’s survivor Danielle Binsky responding to the news Thursday. I think it was incredibly hopeful for survivors, and it’s *** glimmer of hope that we haven’t seen, um, in *** really long time, if ever. The years-long controversy over Andrew’s friendship with Epstein intensified after the release of *** posthumous memoir by Virginia Giuffre, who alleged Andrew sexually assaulted her when she was *** teenager. Andrew has repeatedly denied all allegations against him. He claimed he never met Giuffre, who died by suicide in April at the age of 41. On Thursday, her family released *** statement reading in part, quote, Today, an ordinary American girl from an ordinary American family brought down *** British prince with her truth and extraordinary courage. Giuffre’s brother also spoke out on Thursday. I think this is *** big sense of vindication for her from. Not just the general public, but from the king himself to say I stand by survivors. Buckingham Palace also released *** statement reading in part, quote, Their Majesties’ wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been and will remain with the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse. I’m Reid Benyon reporting.
UK leader suggests former Prince Andrew should testify in US investigation into Jeffrey Epstein
Updated: 12:02 PM EST Nov 23, 2025
Pressure is increasing for the former Prince Andrew to give evidence to a U.S. congressional committee investigating the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein after Britain’s prime minister suggested he should testify.Keir Starmer declined to comment directly about King Charles III’s disgraced younger brother, but told reporters traveling with him for the Group of 20 summit in Johannesburg that as a “general principle” people should provide evidence to investigators.”I don’t comment on his particular case,” Starmer said. “But as a general principle I’ve held for a very long time is that anybody who has got relevant information in relation to these kind of cases should give that evidence to those that need it.”The former prince, now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, has so far ignored a request from members of the House Oversight Committee for a “transcribed interview” about his “long-standing friendship” with Epstein. Andrew was stripped of his royal titles and honors last month as the royal family tried to insulate itself from criticism about his relationship with Epstein.Starmer’s comments came after Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the committee’s ranking Democrat, and Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, a Democrat from Virginia, said Andrew “continues to hide” from serious questions.”Our work will move forward with or without him, and we will hold anyone who was involved in these crimes accountable, no matter their wealth, status or political party,” they said in a statement released on Friday. “We will get justice for the survivors.”
Pressure is increasing for the former Prince Andrew to give evidence to a U.S. congressional committee investigating the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein after Britain’s prime minister suggested he should testify.
Keir Starmer declined to comment directly about King Charles III’s disgraced younger brother, but told reporters traveling with him for the Group of 20 summit in Johannesburg that as a “general principle” people should provide evidence to investigators.
“I don’t comment on his particular case,” Starmer said. “But as a general principle I’ve held for a very long time is that anybody who has got relevant information in relation to these kind of cases should give that evidence to those that need it.”
The former prince, now known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, has so far ignored a request from members of the House Oversight Committee for a “transcribed interview” about his “long-standing friendship” with Epstein. Andrew was stripped of his royal titles and honors last month as the royal family tried to insulate itself from criticism about his relationship with Epstein.
Starmer’s comments came after Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the committee’s ranking Democrat, and Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, a Democrat from Virginia, said Andrew “continues to hide” from serious questions.
“Our work will move forward with or without him, and we will hold anyone who was involved in these crimes accountable, no matter their wealth, status or political party,” they said in a statement released on Friday. “We will get justice for the survivors.”
[ad_2]
[ad_1]
There’s “real panic” over ex-Prince Andrew‘s wellbeing after he was stripped of his royal titles following his association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
A source told Radar Online in a report published on November 16 that Andrew is in a “dark and fragile” state amid his royal exile, which includes the removal of his titles as “Prince” and the “Duke of York,” as well as his eviction from his home at the Royal Lodge.
“There is real panic behind the scenes. Andrew is now completely isolated and feels he’s lost everything – his title, his home, his dignity. The family are terrified he might do something drastic. He’s told people he has nothing left to live for,” the insider said, describing Andrew as “broken and withdrawn.”
The source continued, “This was his final lifeline to any kind of purpose. The titles, the lodge, the sense of being part of something bigger – all gone overnight. He’s humiliated, angry, and deeply depressed.”
Along with the loss of his home and royal titles, the insider also confirmed that Andrew’s relationship with his brother, King Charles, who is believed to be the main force behind his royal exile, has deteriorated dramatically.
“Charles has at last decided to sever ties with Andrew entirely,” the source said. “It’s a harsh move, but it had to be done. The public simply won’t accept him continuing a life of privilege on royal property.”
While the loss of his relationship with his brother and his royal titles have been hard on Andrew, former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond told The Mirror that it’s the eviction from his home that has had the greatest effect on him.
“It seems to me that Andrew’s life will entail him being even more of a hermit than in recent years, and that’s saying something. The Sandringham estate is vast, some 20,000 acres with about 150 properties, including villages and hamlets. So I suppose Andrew could be part of a new community, although it seems rather doubtful that many communities would welcome him in their midst,” she said.
The source added, “The King has extended him a modicum of mercy, allowing him to live on his private estate where he will not even indirectly incur any expense to taxpayers. Whether he will have any staff remains to be seen. Can he cook for himself Has he ever had to sort out the shopping or do the cleaning The answer is probably no. Perhaps he will now have to learn.”
Radar Online’s source also confirmed the British royal family’s concern for Andrew now that he’s on his own. “People are genuinely afraid he’ll shut himself off completely once he’s at Sandringham. No one can say how he’ll manage on his own – there’s real concern for his state of mind,” the insider said.
[ad_2]
Jason Pham
Source link
[ad_1]
Andrew and Fergie have been in the middle of scandal after scandal for years. And yet, it is only now that they’re facing some level of consequences for their own actions. So what do two people who are used to doing what they want and never being held accountable do at this point? The answer might just be to run away.
But not to the United States, where the two might be compelled to testify against Congress, according to royal biographer Andrew Lownie. ”Andrew will not respond or testify in front of Congress,” he told NewsNationNow.
Related: Here’s what each royal inherited from Queen Elizabeth
”He — or his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson — will never travel to the United States again. Neither want to be arrested or forced to testify in front of Congress about their friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.”
With the so-called Epstein files being released in the United States, there’s fear that more scandalous revelations about their association with the convicted sex offender could be coming out. “Both of them were much friendlier with Epstein than people imagine,” Lownie said, explaining it is expected that upcoming leaks will prove “that their friendship with Epstein began much earlier than previously thought and that it lasted much longer than people say.”
That’s not all, according to Lownie. “We’re going to get other names of people who were trafficked to Andrew, particularly girls younger than Virginia. We are also going to get a stronger sense of the sort of monies that were exchanged and paid to Sarah Ferguson.”
Ferguson has claimed she “borrowed” $15,000 from Epstein, but the royal biographer says that’s underselling it. By a lot. ”The total (amount given to Ferguson by Epstein over the years) was $2 million,” he said. “He felt it was a good investment as (the Yorks) would introduce him to other royals.”
This contradicts earlier reports from Rob Shuter’s ShuterScoop, which had suggested Fergie was planning a “major relocation” to either Palm Beach or Beverly Hills to get away from the “relentless scrutiny” in England.
“America feels like freedom to her,” a source told the publication. “In London, the whispers never stop. In the U.S., she thinks she can blend in with every other famous face who reinvented themselves.” At the time, there were no reports of Andrew moving with her, but the two have remained close despite their divorce and even lived together at Royal Lodge for over a decade.
Now, however, they will both have to leave the property. Andrew is said to be moving to his brother’s estate in Sandringham, where all his expenses will be paid by the King. There has been no confirmation of where Fergie will live, though some reports indicate she could be moving in with one of her daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie.
Wherever the two end up, considering all that is coming out about Epstein in the US and all that’s likely to come out in the days ahead, we probably won’t see Andrew or Fergie follow in the footsteps of Harry and Meghan and relocate to the United States.
[ad_2]
Lizzie Lanuza
Source link
[ad_1]
For the last 15 years, the royal formerly known as Prince Andrew has faced scrutiny over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, but as new emails and documents emerge, the fallout has intensified. King Charles III made the decision to strip his brother of his titles, honors, and style late last month, renaming him Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Now the institutions Andrew worked with during his decades as a senior royal are trying to figure out how to remove his ceremonial plaques from their walls.
From the large to the small, these organizations are doing their best to erase any trace of the disgraced royal from their public spaces.
He Lost His Final Military Role
Despite losing most of his royal military titles in 2022, when he settled a lawsuit with accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre in which Andrew rejected any claim of wrongdoing and accepted no liability, news broke that Andrew still held on to one final role as honorary Vice Admiral in the Royal Navy. But on November 5, Secretary of Defence John Healey announced that the Royal Navy was trying to remove that title as well. “We’ve had Andrew surrender the honorary positions he’s had throughout the military, and—guided again by the king—we are working now to remove that last remaining title of Vice Admiral that he has,” Healey told the BBC. “This is a move that’s right, it’s a move the King has indicated we should take and we’re working on that at the moment.”
He Was Removed From Plaques on the Falkland Islands
Earlier this month, there was a reprieve when the Ministry of Defence announced that Andrew would be allowed to keep the medals he earned when he served in the Falklands War in 1982. But the Falkland Islands themselves are not so fond of the association. In the decades since he made his name as a military hero in the small territory off the coast of Argentina, he made multiple visits to celebrate the ties between the UK and the land it fought to defend. But in 2022, after Andrew settled out of court with Giuffre, his plaque was taken down from King Edward VII Memorial Hospital in Stanley, the islands’ capital city.
According to the Daily Express, all signs of Andrew’s name have now been erased from the islands following this year’s developments. A plaque with his name was removed from the Mount Pleasant Airport, which he opened in 2002, and another was taken down from a wildlife center run by his former patronage, the Falklands Conservation trust. “He was removed as patron and the plaque at the field centre has gone,” a staff member said, as reported by the Daily Mirror. His plaque at the center was also scrapped, and a spokesperson confirmed that Andrew is “no longer connected to our school.”
Town Councils Across the UK Regret Their One-Time Exuberance
When the king announced that Andrew would no longer be a prince, town councils across the UK had to weigh what to do with the streets named in his honor. The New York Times documented the debate in Heldeson, a village in eastern England that adopted the street name “Prince Andrew” when he was born in 1960. (He was the first child born to a sitting monarch in more than 100 years, which caused a fair degree of media excitement at the time.)
According to one town councillor who spoke to the newspaper, the change wouldn’t be an easy one to accomplish in the small town of 11,000 residents. “It would be very difficult to obtain a consensus of all residents,” Shelagh Gurney told the Times. “My emails clearly indicate that this would not be achieved.”
[ad_2]
Erin Vanderhoof
Source link
[ad_1]
Sarah Ferguson is reportedly worried about her ex-husband Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s safety after his titles were stripped. The situation is causing turmoil within the family behind closed doors.
According to sources to The Sun, the former Duchess of Sussex is “leaning on staff” after it was reported that she’s losing her security staff at Royal Lodge, their longtime residence, where they will be kicked out soon.
“Sarah, in particular, is panicking about what comes next, and she is not in a good place,” a source told the publication. “She fears being caught in the crosshairs and is worried about herself and her and Andrew’s daughters, Beatrice and Eugenie.”
However, more emphasis is put on her ex. “But she is particularly fearful for Andrew as she knows he was at the centre of the Epstein scandal. She has talked about ‘dark forces’ potentially targeting him.”
RadarOnline.com reported that he could face criminal charges now that he’s got no titles to protect him. A source told the outlet, “Andrew’s in a very precarious position now. Without the protection his royal titles gave him, he’s more wide open to legal action.”
“The Palace has clearly distanced itself, and he’s been left to deal with the fallout over his links to Epstein alone. He is a sitting duck for law enforcement, and very vulnerable. He should be getting a top legal team in place now.”
Another source added, “Andrew has never been this exposed, both legally and in the public eye. His title once gave him a degree of protection, but that safety net has vanished. If authorities in the U.S. or U.K. uncover new evidence, he’ll be under huge pressure to answer for it just like anyone else.”
“Andrew is going to be charged with various public offences and misconduct in public office… he’ll probably go to jail,” the author of a recent royal biography on Andrew and ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, Andrew Lownie, told NewsNation. “The case against him is pretty clear. He’s absolutely, he’s toast.”
However, according to Lownie, Andrew won’t go down for his connections to Epstein or the trafficking accusations. “He won’t go down for sex trafficking,” Lownie explained. “It will be for financial impropriety.” It all ties back to the fact that the former Prince reportedly overspent on his trips as a trade envoy, and not just that, asked a protection officer to dig up dirt on Virginia Giuffre.
[ad_2]
Lea Veloso
Source link
[ad_1]
ad
[ad_2]
Lizzie Lanuza
Source link
[ad_1]
ad
[ad_2]
Lea Veloso
Source link