ReportWire

Tag: president

  • Colorado state senator violated ethics rules by appearing intoxicated at public meeting, committee finds

    Colorado state senator violated ethics rules by appearing intoxicated at public meeting, committee finds

    [ad_1]

    Sen. Faith Winter violated Colorado Senate ethics rules when she appeared to be intoxicated at an April public meeting, a legislative committee ruled Monday.

    On a bipartisan 4-1 vote, the Senate Ethics Committee found that Winter failed to uphold the public’s trust in the legislature when she drank alcohol before taking part in a contentious community meeting in Northglenn. Winter, a Broomfield Democrat and the Senate’s assistant majority leader, previously apologized for her conduct at the meeting, where her speech appeared slurred. After it ended, police intervened to help her find a ride home.

    Democratic Sens. Julie Gonzales and Dylan Roberts and Republican Sens. Paul Lundeen and Bob Gardner agreed that Winter violated ethics rules. Democratic Sen. James Coleman was the lone no vote.

    Before the vote, Gonzales said it was up to the committee to decide what was acceptable conduct by a legislator and that holding office is an honor.

    “That’s what each one of us is expected to uphold,” she said.

    The committee recommended that Senate leadership issue a letter to Winter addressing her conduct at the Northglenn meeting and her substance use. She should be invited to address the full Senate when the chamber reconvenes in January, the members said. They also recommended that, should Winter’s conduct again raise ethics concerns because of substance use, she should face immediate action from the full Senate instead of another ethics committee process.

    Winter, who voluntarily resigned a committee chair position and entered substance-use treatment in the days after the April meeting, attended Monday’s hearing at the state Capitol but was not invited to speak.

    She did not immediately return a request for comment as the hearing concluded. In a letter to the committee last month, Winter apologized again and acknowledged that she had a drink before the Northglenn meeting.

    But she asked that the complaint be dismissed and noted the culture of alcohol use in the Capitol. Gardner, a Colorado Springs Republican who previously appeared conflicted about what actions to take in response to Winter’s behavior, said he was particularly troubled by Winter’s reference to the Senate’s culture as “justification” for her actions.

    [ad_2]

    Seth Klamann

    Source link

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. didn’t make the debate stage. He faces hurdles to stay relevant

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. didn’t make the debate stage. He faces hurdles to stay relevant

    [ad_1]

    Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. won’t be with his better-known rivals, President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, when they debate Thursday in Atlanta.Video above: Previewing the first presidential debate of 2024And aside from a livestreamed response to the debate, he also has nothing on his public schedule for the coming weeks. Nor does his running mate, philanthropist Nicole Shanahan.After a busy spring hopscotching the country for a mix of political rallies, fundraisers and nontraditional campaign events, Kennedy appears to be taking a breather.Kennedy’s absence from the debate stage and the campaign trail carries risk for his insurgent quest to shake up the Republican and Democratic dominance of the U.S. political system. He lacks the money for a firehose of television commercials, and he must spend much of the money he does have to secure ballot access. Public appearances are a low-cost way to fire up supporters and drive media coverage he needs to stay relevant.Kennedy himself says he can’t win unless voters know he’s running and believe he can defeat Biden and Trump. That problem will become increasingly acute as the debate, followed by the major party conventions in July and August, push more voters to tune into the race.Video below: Voters share their thoughts ahead of Biden-Trump debateStill, Kennedy has maintained a steady stream of social media posts and he continues to sit for interviews, most recently with talk show host Dr. Phil.“Mr. Kennedy has a full schedule for July with many public events, mostly on the East Coast and including one big rally,” said Stefanie Spear, a Kennedy campaign spokesperson. “We will start announcing the events next week.”For Thursday’s debate on CNN, the network invited candidates who showed strength in four reliable polls and ballot access in enough states to win the presidency. Kennedy fell short on both requirements.He’s cried foul about the rules, accusing CNN of colluding with Biden and Trump in a complaint to the Federal Election Commission and threatening to sue.Sujat Desai, a 20-year-old student from Pleasanton, California who supports Kennedy, said Kennedy’s absence from the debate is a major hurdle for him to overcome.“I don’t think there’s any way to get awareness if you’re not on the debate stage,” Desai said. “I think it’s a pretty lethal blow not to be in this debate, and it would be detrimental not to be in the next.”Still, Desai said he won’t be dissuaded from voting for Kennedy even if he appears to be a longshot come November.“I think this is probably the strongest I’ve seen an independent candidate in a while, so I’ll give him that,” Desai said. “I think he’s definitely doing well. His policies are strong enough to win, I just don’t know if there’s awareness.”Video below: What’s different about Biden and Trump’s 2024 presidential debate?Kennedy plans to respond in real time to the same questions posed to Biden and Trump in a livestream.Independent and third-party candidates like Kennedy face supremely long odds, but Kennedy’s campaign has spooked partisans on both sides who fear he will tip the election against them. Biden supporters worry his famous Democratic name and his history of environmental advocacy will sway voters from the left. Trump supporters worry his idiosyncratic views, particularly his questioning of the scientific consensus that vaccines are safe and effective, will appeal to people who might otherwise vote for Trump.Christy Jones, 54, a holistic health and mindfulness coach from Glendora, California, worries people won’t know Kennedy is running without him standing next to Biden and Trump at the debate. But she said he’s still all over her social media feeds and she’s confident he’s making himself visible.“I do feel like he could still win if people choose to be courageous,” she said. “If all the people that actually want change voted for him he would be in. People are asking for change.”Until recently, Kennedy’s website promoted a variety of events weeks or more in advance, including public rallies and private fundraisers. He held comedy nights with prominent comedians in Michigan and Tennessee.But since he went to the June 15 premiere of a film on combatting addiction, Kennedy has been dark, though he continues to promote in-person and virtual organizing events for his supporters.

    Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. won’t be with his better-known rivals, President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump, when they debate Thursday in Atlanta.

    Video above: Previewing the first presidential debate of 2024

    And aside from a livestreamed response to the debate, he also has nothing on his public schedule for the coming weeks. Nor does his running mate, philanthropist Nicole Shanahan.

    After a busy spring hopscotching the country for a mix of political rallies, fundraisers and nontraditional campaign events, Kennedy appears to be taking a breather.

    Kennedy’s absence from the debate stage and the campaign trail carries risk for his insurgent quest to shake up the Republican and Democratic dominance of the U.S. political system. He lacks the money for a firehose of television commercials, and he must spend much of the money he does have to secure ballot access. Public appearances are a low-cost way to fire up supporters and drive media coverage he needs to stay relevant.

    Kennedy himself says he can’t win unless voters know he’s running and believe he can defeat Biden and Trump. That problem will become increasingly acute as the debate, followed by the major party conventions in July and August, push more voters to tune into the race.

    Video below: Voters share their thoughts ahead of Biden-Trump debate

    Still, Kennedy has maintained a steady stream of social media posts and he continues to sit for interviews, most recently with talk show host Dr. Phil.

    “Mr. Kennedy has a full schedule for July with many public events, mostly on the East Coast and including one big rally,” said Stefanie Spear, a Kennedy campaign spokesperson. “We will start announcing the events next week.”

    For Thursday’s debate on CNN, the network invited candidates who showed strength in four reliable polls and ballot access in enough states to win the presidency. Kennedy fell short on both requirements.

    He’s cried foul about the rules, accusing CNN of colluding with Biden and Trump in a complaint to the Federal Election Commission and threatening to sue.

    Sujat Desai, a 20-year-old student from Pleasanton, California who supports Kennedy, said Kennedy’s absence from the debate is a major hurdle for him to overcome.

    “I don’t think there’s any way to get awareness if you’re not on the debate stage,” Desai said. “I think it’s a pretty lethal blow not to be in this debate, and it would be detrimental not to be in the next.”

    Still, Desai said he won’t be dissuaded from voting for Kennedy even if he appears to be a longshot come November.

    “I think this is probably the strongest I’ve seen an independent candidate in a while, so I’ll give him that,” Desai said. “I think he’s definitely doing well. His policies are strong enough to win, I just don’t know if there’s awareness.”

    Video below: What’s different about Biden and Trump’s 2024 presidential debate?

    Kennedy plans to respond in real time to the same questions posed to Biden and Trump in a livestream.

    Independent and third-party candidates like Kennedy face supremely long odds, but Kennedy’s campaign has spooked partisans on both sides who fear he will tip the election against them. Biden supporters worry his famous Democratic name and his history of environmental advocacy will sway voters from the left. Trump supporters worry his idiosyncratic views, particularly his questioning of the scientific consensus that vaccines are safe and effective, will appeal to people who might otherwise vote for Trump.

    Christy Jones, 54, a holistic health and mindfulness coach from Glendora, California, worries people won’t know Kennedy is running without him standing next to Biden and Trump at the debate. But she said he’s still all over her social media feeds and she’s confident he’s making himself visible.

    “I do feel like he could still win if people choose to be courageous,” she said. “If all the people that actually want change voted for him he would be in. People are asking for change.”

    Until recently, Kennedy’s website promoted a variety of events weeks or more in advance, including public rallies and private fundraisers. He held comedy nights with prominent comedians in Michigan and Tennessee.

    But since he went to the June 15 premiere of a film on combatting addiction, Kennedy has been dark, though he continues to promote in-person and virtual organizing events for his supporters.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden, Trump to face off in historical presidential debate

    Biden, Trump to face off in historical presidential debate

    [ad_1]

    Biden, Trump to face off in historical presidential debate

    Tonight’s debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump differs from any other in U.S. history. The first-ever debate between a sitting president and a former president, which begins at 9 p.m. ET, is also a matchup of the two oldest candidates in U.S. history. There will be no audience and the candidates’ microphones will be muted when it’s not their turn to speak.The debate is also the first since 1988 not sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates. Instead, it’s being hosted by CNN and moderated by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash.Lastly, tonight’s debate is the earliest in history. The prior record was Sept. 21, 1980.The last time Biden and Trump shared the stage was for their last debate on Oct. 22, 2020. Check back for live updates during tonight’s debate.

    Tonight’s debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump differs from any other in U.S. history.

    The first-ever debate between a sitting president and a former president, which begins at 9 p.m. ET, is also a matchup of the two oldest candidates in U.S. history.

    There will be no audience and the candidates’ microphones will be muted when it’s not their turn to speak.

    The debate is also the first since 1988 not sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates. Instead, it’s being hosted by CNN and moderated by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash.

    Lastly, tonight’s debate is the earliest in history. The prior record was Sept. 21, 1980.

    The last time Biden and Trump shared the stage was for their last debate on Oct. 22, 2020.

    Check back for live updates during tonight’s debate.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. files complaint over rules for CNN’s presidential debate next month

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. files complaint over rules for CNN’s presidential debate next month

    [ad_1]

    Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. filed an election complaint Wednesday alleging CNN is colluding with Democratic President Joe Biden and presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump to exclude him from a debate the network is hosting next month.Kennedy alleges the requirements to participate in the June 27 debate were designed to ensure only Biden and Trump would qualify and Kennedy claims he is being held to a higher standard. “CNN is making prohibited corporate contributions to both campaigns and the Biden committee and the Trump committee have accepted these prohibited corporate contributions,” a lawyer for Kennedy, Lorenzo Holloway, wrote in a letter to the Federal Election Commission. CNN said the complaint was without merit.Biden and Trump agreed this month to the CNN debate and a second on Sept. 10 hosted by ABC, bypassing the nonpartisan commission that has organized debates for nearly four decades. The first debate will come before Biden and Trump have been formally nominated by their parties this summer.Kennedy has looked to the debates as a singular opportunity to stand alongside Biden and Trump, lending legitimacy to his longshot bid and convince people inclined to support him that he has a shot at winning. Both the Biden and Trump campaigns fear he could play spoiler. Kennedy still has time to meet the requirements, though the window is narrowing. CNN has said candidates will be invited if they have secured a place on the ballot in states totaling at least 270 votes in the Electoral College, the minimum needed to win the presidency, and have reached 15% in four reliable polls by June 20.Kennedy’s campaign says he has submitted signatures or other paperwork to appear on the ballot in nine states — California, Delaware, Hawaii, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah — with a combined 171 electoral votes, though not all have affirmed his name will be listed. California, the largest prize on the electoral map with 54 votes, will not certify any candidates until Aug. 29. “The law in virtually every state provides that the nominee of a state-recognized political party will be allowed ballot access without petitioning,” a CNN spokesperson said in a statement Wednesday. “As the presumptive nominees of their parties both Biden and Trump will satisfy this requirement. As an independent candidate, under applicable laws RFK Jr. does not. The mere application for ballot access does not guarantee that he will appear on the ballot in any state.”Kennedy also hasn’t met the polling criteria, the statement said. Biden and Trump have easily cleared the polling threshold but won’t be certified for the ballot until their parties formally nominate them. Both have secured enough delegates to lock in their nominations.

    Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. filed an election complaint Wednesday alleging CNN is colluding with Democratic President Joe Biden and presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump to exclude him from a debate the network is hosting next month.

    Kennedy alleges the requirements to participate in the June 27 debate were designed to ensure only Biden and Trump would qualify and Kennedy claims he is being held to a higher standard.

    “CNN is making prohibited corporate contributions to both campaigns and the Biden committee and the Trump committee have accepted these prohibited corporate contributions,” a lawyer for Kennedy, Lorenzo Holloway, wrote in a letter to the Federal Election Commission.

    CNN said the complaint was without merit.

    Biden and Trump agreed this month to the CNN debate and a second on Sept. 10 hosted by ABC, bypassing the nonpartisan commission that has organized debates for nearly four decades. The first debate will come before Biden and Trump have been formally nominated by their parties this summer.

    Kennedy has looked to the debates as a singular opportunity to stand alongside Biden and Trump, lending legitimacy to his longshot bid and convince people inclined to support him that he has a shot at winning. Both the Biden and Trump campaigns fear he could play spoiler.

    Kennedy still has time to meet the requirements, though the window is narrowing.

    CNN has said candidates will be invited if they have secured a place on the ballot in states totaling at least 270 votes in the Electoral College, the minimum needed to win the presidency, and have reached 15% in four reliable polls by June 20.

    Kennedy’s campaign says he has submitted signatures or other paperwork to appear on the ballot in nine states — California, Delaware, Hawaii, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah — with a combined 171 electoral votes, though not all have affirmed his name will be listed. California, the largest prize on the electoral map with 54 votes, will not certify any candidates until Aug. 29.

    “The law in virtually every state provides that the nominee of a state-recognized political party will be allowed ballot access without petitioning,” a CNN spokesperson said in a statement Wednesday. “As the presumptive nominees of their parties both Biden and Trump will satisfy this requirement. As an independent candidate, under applicable laws RFK Jr. does not. The mere application for ballot access does not guarantee that he will appear on the ballot in any state.”

    Kennedy also hasn’t met the polling criteria, the statement said.

    Biden and Trump have easily cleared the polling threshold but won’t be certified for the ballot until their parties formally nominate them. Both have secured enough delegates to lock in their nominations.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Column: What a surly California governor’s race can — and can’t — tell us about the Biden-Trump rematch

    Column: What a surly California governor’s race can — and can’t — tell us about the Biden-Trump rematch

    [ad_1]

    It was a choice few relished, in a dismal election season.

    The incumbent was deeply unpopular, spending his entire campaign on the defensive as he struggled to sell voters on his accomplishments.

    His opponent, a wealthy businessman, was equally disliked. At one point during the contest he was dragged into court to face fraud charges.

    The year was 2002, and Democrat Gray Davis was struggling mightily to win a second term as California governor.

    “The night before the election, his favorability was only 39%,” his campaign manager, Garry South, recollected. “That’s something you don’t forget.”

    Strategists for Joe Biden can no doubt relate. For the past many months, the president has dwelled in similarly abysmal polling territory. The latest aggregation of nationwide surveys pegs his approval rating at 38%.

    No two elections are alike. But there can be striking similarities, like the parallels between that surly California contest 22 years ago and Biden’s tough reelection fight.

    Davis clawed his way to a second term despite his wretched approval rating, which is not to say that Biden will win in November. (If he does, he won’t face the risk of being ousted less than a year later, the way Davis was recalled and replaced by Arnold Schwarzenegger.)

    Even strategists for Davis can’t agree on the lessons gleaned from the Democrats’ uphill reelection effort.

    South said that campaign convinced him Biden will ultimately prevail. “I’ve gone through this before,” he said.

    Paul Maslin, the pollster for Davis’ 2002 race, is less certain. He makes no predictions beyond his expectation the presidential race will be close. The only similarities Maslin sees between then and now are the candidates’ lousy approval ratings and voters’ sour mood.

    But even if past experience is no guarantor of future results, history can inform the way we view existing circumstances — which suggests that, as difficult as things look today for Biden, the president can’t be counted out.

    Mainly because of who he’s running against.

    “It’s a binary choice,” said South. “Yes, there are other candidates in the race. But in the final analysis, it’s between Biden and Trump.”

    David Doak, the chief ad-maker for Davis’ reelection campaign, agreed. He, too, tends towards a glass-half-full assessment of Biden’s chances, suggesting a race between two disliked candidates “is a very different equation than if you’re lined up against someone popular.”

    In 2002, Davis faced Republican Bill Simon Jr. The political neophyte was a bumbling candidate who ran a terrible campaign. Compounding his difficulties, Simon was slapped just a few months before election day with a $78-million fraud verdict. (The case involved his investment in a coin-operated telephone company, which, even then — five years before the iPhone was introduced — was a head-scratcher.)

    Though the verdict was overturned after just a few weeks, the political damage was done and Davis limped past Simon to a narrow victory.

    As it happens, Trump has also been tied up in court. He’s spent the last several weeks gag-ordered and squirming as his salacious behavior is examined in forensic detail at a hush-money, election-fraud trial in New York.

    But Maslin, the number-cruncher for Davis’ campaign, warned against getting too carried away with comparisons.

    For starters, he pointed out, California was a solidly Democratic state, giving Davis a considerable advantage even as his support flagged amid a recession and rolling blackouts. Biden doesn’t have that partisan edge in the roughly half-dozen toss-up states that will decide the presidential race.

    Moreover, Maslin noted, Simon was a little-known commodity, which left the Davis campaign free to define him in harshly negative terms. Trump, by contrast, has been America’s dominant political figure for nearly a decade. His reputation, for good and ill, is firmly fixed; there are plenty of voters who won’t be dissuaded — by rain, sleet, snow, a sexual-assault verdict, multiple criminal indictments — from voting for Trump come November.

    Perhaps most significant, Biden is the oldest president in American history and, at 81, very much looks it. Davis’ age — he was 59 when he sought his second term — was never remotely a campaign issue.

    “There are many millions of voters who, even if they appreciate Biden’s achievements, still question his ability to serve on the job, much less for four more years,” Maslin said. “I’m not saying that’s accurate, but that’s what they’re thinking.”

    Davis, for his part, expects Biden to be reelected, given his record and the contrast he offers to the wayward, unprincipled ex-president. Biden, he noted, has been repeatedly underestimated.

    “I experienced that when I ran for governor,” said Davis, who was considered an exceeding long-shot before he romped to victory in the 1998 Democratic primary. “Everyone told me I had no chance to make it, so I know the fire that burns inside you when people say that.”

    He’s loath to offer the president advice — “he’s got access to the best minds in the world” — but Davis had this to say to hand-wringing Democrats: “We have a winner. Stick with him. Get excited about him.”

    “Because,” the former governor added, “another four years of Trump and you’re not going to recognize this country.”

    [ad_2]

    Mark Z. Barabak

    Source link

  • Former CPUC president calls out agency for skyrocketing PG&E rates

    Former CPUC president calls out agency for skyrocketing PG&E rates

    [ad_1]

    The former president of the California Public Utilities Commission is criticizing the regulatory agency, claiming its current commissioners are failing to protect consumers from skyrocketing utility bills.”I know what the job of the PUC is, or what it’s supposed to be, which is to protect consumers while we ensure adequate electric and gas service,” Loretta Lynch told KCRA 3 Investigates’ Lysée Mitri during a one-on-one interview. “I believe that this PUC is failing in that job, because they are allowing this enormous bucket of costs to grow and grow without controlling the utilities costs.” PG&E customers saw two rate increases hit their bills this year.”PG&E asked, and the PUC said, ‘Sure, we’ll give it to you,’” said Lynch, describing what she calls a “dangerous trend.” In the first quarter of this year, PG&E announced its earnings rose to $732 million — a jump of more than $160 million over that same timeframe last year. Meanwhile, the average customer saw monthly bills surge by more than $30 in January. That was the first and largest of two increases to take effect this year following approval from the PUC.Much of the increases are meant to cover wildfire prevention projects, like burying miles and miles of power lines underground. “PG&E customers are getting hit with a double whammy,” Lynch said. “It’s all about making wise choices that are cost-effective, that actually prevent wildfires and don’t just plump up PG&E’s profits.” PG&E declined an in-person interview but responded to our questions via email.”The CPUC approved our 2023-2026 General Rate Case in November, 2023, through an open, transparent and public process which included multiple parties and stakeholders. More than 85% of our proposed increased, originally submitted in 2021, was to reduce risk in our gas and electric operations,” said PG&E Spokesperson Lynsey Paulo.The utility said most of its rate increases have been to “reduce risk in gas and electric operations.”In response to KCRA 3 Investigates’ questions about PG&E’s increased earnings, the utility said, “We are reinvesting the vast majority of our profits back into the business to continue making improvements for our customers. More than 99% are re-invested back into the business to improve how we serve customers and support our return to financial health, so that we can continue to attract the investments we’ll need to build the safe, climate-resilient system for customers. Restoring PG&E’s financial health allows us to continue to make operational progress at the lowest cost. We’re on a path to return to investment grade, which would reduce the costs of financing that we pass on to customers.”KCRA 3 Investigates also reached out to each of the CPUC commissioners. None of them agreed to an on-camera interview. On Thursday, the commission will be in Sacramento, voting on another change that could impact PG&E customers. This time it is not at the request of the utility. It is a change that is actually required by a state law. Commissioners will consider a proposal to decrease the price of electricity based on usage while also establishing a fixed charge, reallocating how customers are billed in accordance with Assembly Bill 205.”Our electricity is way out of whack on its price,” said Mike Campbell, the assistant deputy of energy with the California Public Advocates Office.The proposal would cut how much people pay per kilowatt-hour by 5-7 cents, aiming to make it more affordable to electrify homes and cars.It would also shift other costs customers are currently paying for in their usage rate into a flat rate of $24.15 a month instead. It would go toward things, like the cost of the infrastructure that actually connects customers to the grid.| RELATED | Will your PG&E bill go up or down? How a key vote by California regulators could impact you”That fixed charge amount is the same really as what SMUD customers pay,” Campbell said. That means the change would mainly impact PG&E customers in our area. The Public Advocates Office believes the proposal would be an improvement for customers.”Having all of your energy costs be associated with your usage makes it very volatile,” Campbell said. “So, especially if you have a heatwave for a week, you kind of cringe waiting for that bill to arrive.” In addition, the fixed charge will be lower for customers who qualify for low-income assistance programs. For instance, customers enrolled in the California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) program will be charged a discounted flat rate of $6 per month while customers enrolled in the Family Electric Rate Assistance Program (FERA) will qualify for a discounted flat rate of $12 per month. This means, overall, they should save on their monthly bills, along with people who use a lot of energy.However, the proposal is designed to be revenue-neutral for utilities, so if some customers save money, then others may pay more. It may mean a bigger bill for those who just missed qualifying for a low-income discount and already keep their power usage to a minimum.”If you’re on the really high end of a bill impact, I’m thinking that’s $7 a month with the super high end but, again, these are customers who are not the low-income customers,” Campbell said.The PUC is scheduled to meet at the Warren Alquist State Energy Building at 1516 9th Street in Sacramento at 11 a.m. Thursday.Should commissioners approve the change, it would take effect starting in 2026 for PG&E customers.See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app.

    The former president of the California Public Utilities Commission is criticizing the regulatory agency, claiming its current commissioners are failing to protect consumers from skyrocketing utility bills.

    “I know what the job of the PUC is, or what it’s supposed to be, which is to protect consumers while we ensure adequate electric and gas service,” Loretta Lynch told KCRA 3 Investigates’ Lysée Mitri during a one-on-one interview. “I believe that this PUC is failing in that job, because they are allowing this enormous bucket of costs to grow and grow without controlling the utilities costs.”

    PG&E customers saw two rate increases hit their bills this year.

    “PG&E asked, and the PUC said, ‘Sure, we’ll give it to you,’” said Lynch, describing what she calls a “dangerous trend.”

    In the first quarter of this year, PG&E announced its earnings rose to $732 million — a jump of more than $160 million over that same timeframe last year. Meanwhile, the average customer saw monthly bills surge by more than $30 in January. That was the first and largest of two increases to take effect this year following approval from the PUC.

    Much of the increases are meant to cover wildfire prevention projects, like burying miles and miles of power lines underground.

    “PG&E customers are getting hit with a double whammy,” Lynch said. “It’s all about making wise choices that are cost-effective, that actually prevent wildfires and don’t just plump up PG&E’s profits.”

    PG&E declined an in-person interview but responded to our questions via email.

    “The CPUC approved our 2023-2026 General Rate Case in November, 2023, through an open, transparent and public process which included multiple parties and stakeholders. More than 85% of our proposed increased, originally submitted in 2021, was to reduce risk in our gas and electric operations,” said PG&E Spokesperson Lynsey Paulo.

    The utility said most of its rate increases have been to “reduce risk in gas and electric operations.”

    In response to KCRA 3 Investigates’ questions about PG&E’s increased earnings, the utility said, “We are reinvesting the vast majority of our profits back into the business to continue making improvements for our customers. More than 99% are re-invested back into the business to improve how we serve customers and support our return to financial health, so that we can continue to attract the investments we’ll need to build the safe, climate-resilient system for customers. Restoring PG&E’s financial health allows us to continue to make operational progress at the lowest cost. We’re on a path to return to investment grade, which would reduce the costs of financing that we pass on to customers.”

    KCRA 3 Investigates also reached out to each of the CPUC commissioners. None of them agreed to an on-camera interview.

    On Thursday, the commission will be in Sacramento, voting on another change that could impact PG&E customers.

    This time it is not at the request of the utility. It is a change that is actually required by a state law.

    Commissioners will consider a proposal to decrease the price of electricity based on usage while also establishing a fixed charge, reallocating how customers are billed in accordance with Assembly Bill 205.

    “Our electricity is way out of whack on its price,” said Mike Campbell, the assistant deputy of energy with the California Public Advocates Office.

    The proposal would cut how much people pay per kilowatt-hour by 5-7 cents, aiming to make it more affordable to electrify homes and cars.

    It would also shift other costs customers are currently paying for in their usage rate into a flat rate of $24.15 a month instead. It would go toward things, like the cost of the infrastructure that actually connects customers to the grid.

    | RELATED | Will your PG&E bill go up or down? How a key vote by California regulators could impact you

    “That fixed charge amount is the same really as what SMUD customers pay,” Campbell said. That means the change would mainly impact PG&E customers in our area.

    The Public Advocates Office believes the proposal would be an improvement for customers.

    “Having all of your energy costs be associated with your usage makes it very volatile,” Campbell said. “So, especially if you have a heatwave for a week, you kind of cringe waiting for that bill to arrive.”

    In addition, the fixed charge will be lower for customers who qualify for low-income assistance programs. For instance, customers enrolled in the California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) program will be charged a discounted flat rate of $6 per month while customers enrolled in the Family Electric Rate Assistance Program (FERA) will qualify for a discounted flat rate of $12 per month. This means, overall, they should save on their monthly bills, along with people who use a lot of energy.

    However, the proposal is designed to be revenue-neutral for utilities, so if some customers save money, then others may pay more.

    It may mean a bigger bill for those who just missed qualifying for a low-income discount and already keep their power usage to a minimum.

    “If you’re on the really high end of a bill impact, I’m thinking that’s $7 a month with the super high end but, again, these are customers who are not the low-income customers,” Campbell said.

    The PUC is scheduled to meet at the Warren Alquist State Energy Building at 1516 9th Street in Sacramento at 11 a.m. Thursday.

    Should commissioners approve the change, it would take effect starting in 2026 for PG&E customers.

    See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • With furry costumes, water jugs and tambourines, this tiny California college became a Gaza flashpoint

    With furry costumes, water jugs and tambourines, this tiny California college became a Gaza flashpoint

    [ad_1]

    Before dawn Tuesday, more than 100 law enforcement officers in riot gear marched into the quad of Cal Poly Humboldt, clutching guns and batons.

    They encircled a small group of protesters — including a furry one in a lime-green costume — who knelt on the ground, holding hands and reciting native chants.

    “Resistance is justified!” the crowd yelled as officers informed them they were being arrested before pulling them up, one by one, and fastening their hands with zip ties.

    The scene capped an extraordinary weeklong protest at this public university that has emerged as California’s strongest epicenter of civil disobedience over Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza.

    Students at the state’s major campuses, including USC and Berkeley, have made the news over the last week. But Cal Poly Humboldt, tucked at the base of a redwood forest in rural Northern California and home to 5,976 students in Arcata, has taken on an out-sized role. Students have engaged in more vigorous disruption, occupying an academic and administrative building, painting buildings with graffiti and twice forcing police to retreat.

    Humboldt is one of the smallest and most isolated of the Cal State schools, a hub for students in the rural towns and former logging communities of California’s far north coast and interior.

    Yet those on campus understand why it has become such flashpoint.

    Faculty leaders say activism is in the college’s DNA, noting that students and professors have practiced nonviolent civil disobedience for more than half a century — from the Vietnam War in the 1960s and 1970s to the forest defense movement of the 1980s and 1990s.

    “People ask, ‘Well, why do they occupy? Why don’t they do what everybody else does and sit outside in tents?’ ” said Anthony Silvaggio, the chair of the sociology department.

    “It’s because we’re Humboldt,” he said, noting that as a graduate student in 1997 he was arrested during the Headwaters Campaign to save the last remaining old-growth redwood forests. “We occupy space! We have a rich history of taking over space and a long genealogy of direct-action tactics.”

    After resisting multiple attempts by police in riot gear to remove them from a building, students renamed it “Intifada Hall.” They scrawled slogans such as “land back,” “destroy all colonial walls” and “pigs not allowed” up and down its corridors and wrote “BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS” across the wood-paneled walls of President Tom Jackson Jr.’s office.

    They said they would not leave until the university disclosed all holdings and collaborations with Israel, cut all ties with Israeli universities, divested from companies “complicit in the occupation of Palestine” and publicly called for a cease-fire. They also called for the dropping of any legal charges against student organizers.

    Jackson said Tuesday “it breaks my heart” to see arrests. “Unfortunately, serious criminal activity that crossed the line well beyond the level of a protest had put the campus at ongoing risk.”

    But some faculty and students reject that narrative, accusing administrators and authorities of escalating a peaceful situation by bringing in riot police the first evening of the occupation. The closure of the entire campus, they argue, was unnecessary.

    “These are the actions of conscientious individuals working to end a genocide, not the actions of criminals,” the faculty union, the university chapter of the California Faculty Assn., said in a statement

    One of the activists arrested, assistant professor Rouhollah Aghasaleh, vowed to reject any bond and embark on a hunger strike until he and all his students were released.

    “I refuse to accept the label of criminal for standing up for an ethical reason.” he wrote in a statement before his arrest.
    ::

    At the heart of the showdown is a dispute that stretches beyond the Middle East to the question of how central activism is to the university’s mission.

    Faculty leaders blame Jackson, who became president in 2019 and has overseen the university’s transition to a polytechnic. The new designation, made in 2022, was designed to increase sagging enrollment with high-demand STEM education and research offerings.

    Officials hope the changes will result in a better university. But critics accuse Jackson of being out of sync with campus culture and failing to appreciate the university’s long history of environmental and social justice activism.

    According to Silvaggio, Jackson has ruffled feathers by telling faculty, “We’re not here to train activists.”

    Silvaggio — who said he learned tactics of non-violent civil disobedience from his professors, who were activists on the defense of native forests — now teaches courses in community organizing and social movements.

    He noted that last week was hardly the first occupation of a Humboldt campus building: In 2015, students occupied the university’s Native American Forum for a week to protest the abrupt firing of the then-chair of the Indian Natural Resource Science & Engineering Program.

    At the time, the university’s president visited the sit-in to talk to students, praising their action as “a real demonstration of your commitment to student access, achievement and completion.”

    “Look at our mission,” Silvaggio said, pointing to the university’s purpose and vision statement, which commits to being a “campus for those who seek above all else to improve the global human condition.” It also commits to “partnering with indigenous communities to address the legacy of colonialism.”

    Still, the occupation involved far more disruption than the one in 2015. Supporters of the movement acknowledge that they have developed bolder tactics and become more willing to eschew rules and leaders in the last decade with the coalescing of movements such as Black Lives Matter and the Black Bloc.

    “There is no organization or leader,” Silvaggio said. “When these rudderless movements happen, you’re gonna have property destruction, vandalism. That’s the natural course of occupations these days.”

    ::

    The occupation of Cal Poly Humboldt began April 22 when students showed up at Siemens Hall, an academic building that includes the university president’s office, with sleeping bags, board games and decks of cards. They barricaded the entrance with chairs and tables and erected a banner that said, “STOP THE GENOCIDE.”

    Students planned a peaceful sit-in in the president’s office to protest Israel’s actions in Gaza, said a 23-year-old student from San Jose who asked to be known only as “Mango” because he feared retaliation. Transgender indigenous students started holding a prayer, he said, and then police showed up and started hitting.

    The university gave a different account, saying students and faculty had to be evacuated as protesters disrupted classes and vandalized university property. In addition to defacing the building with graffiti, the university said, protesters blocked entrances and elevators with tents and in some locations shut doors using chains and zip ties, violating fire codes and “creating extreme safety hazards for those inside.”

    Video taken from inside showed protesters blocked law enforcement from entering, a police officer beat a protester with a baton and a protester beat an officer’s helmet with an empty five-gallon water jug — a scene that swiftly turned viral, inspiring “jug of justice” memes with the catchphrase “Bonk the police.”

    Three students were arrested. Citing safety concerns, officials announced a hard closure of campus, first through last Wednesday, then Sunday, and eventually for the rest of the semester.

    Hundreds of students living on campus were told they could leave their dorms only if they had a valid reason and could be cited for trespassing.

    Aaron Donaldson, a lecturer in the communications department and secretary of the faculty union, said students who tried to leave campus to get groceries complained of confrontations with police. He had 50 outlines to grade, but could not go get them for fear of arrest.

    After another standoff Friday — police moved in that evening to enforce an order to disperse, students resisted and police ultimately withdrew — the university again condemned activists, claiming the occupation “has nothing to do with free speech or freedom of inquiry.”

    But the administration said it would “continue to talk to anyone willing to have productive and respectful dialogue.”

    In a gesture of good faith, the occupiers moved out of Siemens Hall on Sunday, clearing the building and moving their occupation to outdoor space.

    ::

    By Monday afternoon, the tree-lined campus with glimmering views of Humboldt Bay had the feel of a nearly deserted, surreal summer camp.

    Activists in pink, brown, and white furry costumes roamed outside the main administration building and quad, which was encircled with barricades of chairs, tables, trash bins and fencing.

    After a faculty led teach-in about ablism, there was a march, followed by a Passover seder. As some munched matzo, others chanted: “From the river to the sea.”

    As dusk fell, some activists put on goggles and helmets, carried makeshift shields, jangled tambourines and beat drums as they prepared for another standoff with law enforcement.

    Just after 9:30 p.m., a patrol car rolled through campus, broadcasting a recorded message urging demonstrators to immediately disperse. If they did not move, protesters could face rubber bullets and chemical spray.

    “Cops off campus!” the crowd chanted in unison.

    Many faculty, barred from campus, massed on the street outside, saying they wanted to bear witness to what was happening to their students.

    Dominic Corva, a professor of sociology, said he blamed Cal Poly Humboldt’s president for creating conditions that led to the standoff.

    “This [university] has a president … completely at odds with [the] culture and pedagogy of the university,” Corva said. “His actions have escalated the situation.”

    Jackson could not be reached for comment Tuesday. But in a statement, he said: “Our focus for the entire time has been on doing all we could do to protect the safety of all involved, and we were very patient and very disciplined with that.”

    Donaldson said the standoff between activists and administrators had reinforced some key lessons of the social advocacy class he taught this semester: Direct democracy, he said, is fundamentally about non-violence and is never convenient; the point is to interrupt and to stop and to say, “Wait, we have to talk and pay attention.”

    For Rick Toledo, 32, a student organizer on campus who did not occupy the building but supported the movement, the most pressing concern Tuesday morning was raising $10,000 per person for bail.

    There had been some conflicts among activists over strategy and the value of graffiti, Toledo said. But in the course of the occupation, they had tried to come to a consensus and develop some rules.

    “When you have varying ideologies and no strict guidelines, clashes are bound to happen,” Toledo said.

    Going forward, Toledo hoped activists could develop guidelines before they occupied again.

    “The movement can’t die here,” he said. “There’s so much pain in Palestine. What the students have done is huge and we need to keep that momentum.”

    [ad_2]

    Jessica Garrison, Jenny Jarvie

    Source link

  • 20 Pomona College protesters arrested after storming, occupying president’s office

    20 Pomona College protesters arrested after storming, occupying president’s office

    [ad_1]

    What began as a peaceful pro-Palestinian demonstration on Friday afternoon at Pomona College, quickly devolved after protesters stormed and then occupied the college president’s office. By the end of the evening, 20 students had been arrested and booked by riot-gear-wearing local police forces.

    Nineteen students were charged with misdemeanor trespassing, and one with obstruction of justice, according to the Claremont Police Department. Police from Claremont, Pomona, Azusa, and La Verne responded to the scene.

    The protest started over the college’s dismantling of a piece of student-erected pro-Palestinian protest art on the Claremont campus, which had been standing since March 28.

    The 32-foot-long, eight-paneled “apartheid wall” outside the Smith Campus Center was a physical and artistic protest designed to highlight “the unequal treatment of the Palestinian people living under the brutal conditions of the illegal Israeli Occupation,” and underscore the administration’s refusal to heed the will of students, who voted in February for the college to divest from companies seen as aiding Israel.

    “Civil disobedience and peaceful protests by students were met with tactical gear and assault rifles,” wrote members of the Claremont Consortium Faculty for Justice in Palestine in a statement about the event. “Students who are scheduled to graduate in less than a month are being threatened with suspension for non-violent protest. This response is shameful.”

    A letter sent out Friday by Gabrielle Starr, the Pomona College president, described the situation as “an escalating series of incidents on our campus, which has included persistent harassment of visitors for admission tours.”

    She said protesters had refused to identify themselves to campus authorities, and had verbally harassed staff, “even using a sickening, anti-black racial slur in addressing an administrator.”

    On Friday morning, students were told the campus would be taking down the wall. Many students had been camping there since the wall was erected in late March, but according to Eve Oishi, a professor of cultural studies at Claremont Graduate University, had packed up and disassembled their encampment.

    Oishi said she stopped by the wall late Friday morning in order to drop off books and snacks for the few students sitting at a table nearby. They requested “unhealthy snacks,” she said, because they’d been living off donated and shared granola bars for days.

    The wall consisted of eight wooden panels including maps of Palestinian territory since 1946, and large lettering with phrases such as “Disrupt the Death Machine,” “Apartheid College; We are all Complicit,” and “Smash Imperialism, Long Live Int’l Solidarity.”

    Oishi said the wall “was not highly unusual at all” in terms of the kinds of art, installations and protests often seen around campus. “I don’t understand why it was seen as such a threat.”

    At around 1:15 p.m., college staff began to take apart the wall “in preparation for events scheduled on Sunday, and in line with our policy,” wrote Starr in a statement, describing the “occupiers” as masked — which is against college policy.

    It was at this point, alleged Starr, that the students “proceeded to verbally harass campus staff” and used a racial slur.

    According to a statement from the Claremont Consortium Faculty for Justice in Palestine, college staff removed half of the installation’s panels, while students “protected the other panels from removal.”

    At 4 p.m., 18 of the demonstrators entered Alexander Hall, “under false pretenses,” according to Starr, and made their way up a staircase and into Starr’s office.

    According to a news release from Pomona Divest Apartheid, “the 18+ students sitting in Starr’s office were barricaded in by Campus Safety Officers, who positioned themselves in front of the exits.”

    Fifty more protesters spilled into the building in a second wave, after a protester unlocked a door to let them in. They occupied the hallway outside Starr’s office.

    According to the Claremont Courier, local police arrived roughly an hour later in riot gear, and then exited with 19 arrested students.

    Social media photos and videos of the events show police physically pushing student reporters out of the room, and closing window blinds to prevent them from documenting the situation.

    The arrested students were taken to the Claremont Police Department, where a demonstration quickly grew.

    At 12:20 a.m., the 20 students were released.

    According to Oishi, the students were from Pomona, Scripps and Pitzer colleges. She said the students have been expelled from campus and “not allowed back into their dorm rooms. Some of them are a month away from graduation. They have no place to to stay. No way to eat, no way to get to finish their classes.”

    In Starr’s statement, she wrote that any Pomona students involved in the protest would be subject to immediate suspension, whiles students from the other Claremont Colleges would be banned from Pomona’s campus and “subject to discipline on their own campuses.”

    Oishi said faculty would be looking into the “due process policies that the President used extraordinary emergency powers that were not merited, given the lack of community threat.”

    She said campus security had sent out an announcement saying there was no threat to the community.

    “So why were heavily armed and militarized police necessary?” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Susanne Rust

    Source link

  • President of Raleigh’s William Peace University to step down. Who will replace him?

    President of Raleigh’s William Peace University to step down. Who will replace him?

    [ad_1]

    William Peace University president Brian Ralph speaks to graduates during the commencement.

    William Peace University president Brian Ralph speaks to graduates during the commencement.

    ehyman@newsobserver.com

    Brian Ralph, the 11th president of William Peace University in Raleigh, will step down at the end of the academic year, the university announced Friday.

    Ralph has held the presidency of the private university since 2015. With a background in admissions and enrollment, he came to Peace after previous roles at Queens College in Charlotte, Bethany College in West Virginia and Hocking College in Ohio.

    At Peace, Ralph led the university through the COVID-19 pandemic and added multiple academic programs, sports and partnerships to the university’s offerings.

    “William Peace University is a special place that my family and I have had the privilege to call home for almost 9 years,” Ralph said in a news release Friday. “I am grateful for all that we have accomplished together and I want to express my deep appreciation for the faculty, staff, alumni, Board of Trustees, and the many friends of WPU in the Raleigh region for the roles they have played in advancing this wonderful institution.”

    Ralph said he was “most proud of the Peace students I have had the privilege to know and engage with whether it was at a theater performance, athletic event, research presentation, or a casual conversation on campus. Our students are not only remarkable individuals but also make up a very special community.”

    “It has also been rewarding to watch them go on to accomplish amazing things after their time at 15 E. Peace Street,” he said.

    Brian Ralph, president of William Peace University.
    Brian Ralph, president of William Peace University. Courtesy of William Peace University

    New leader named for two years

    Also Friday, the university announced that the WPU Board of Trustees had appointed one of its own members, Lynn Morton, to serve as president for two years while the university prepares to conduct a national search for its next president.

    Morton joined the board last year after a decades-long career in higher education, including a five-year term as president of Warren Wilson College, a private, liberal-arts college in Swannanoa, near Asheville.

    At Warren Wilson, Morton “led multiple initiatives to increase enrollment, introduced two new scholarship programs to offer greater access to a Warren Wilson education, fostered relationships with the local community as well as regionally and nationally, and had notable fundraising results year over year,” the WPU news release said Friday.

    Morton also worked for more than 30 years on the faculty and in leadership roles at Queens College, spending almost a decade as the school’s provost and vice president for academic affairs.

    Lynn Morton will serve as president of William Peace University for two years as the university conducts a search for its next leader.
    Lynn Morton will serve as president of William Peace University for two years as the university conducts a search for its next leader. Courtesy of William Peace University

    “It will truly be a privilege to serve Peace University, located on a beautiful historic campus in thriving downtown Raleigh. As a Board member I’ve been impressed to see the intentional ways that Peace draws on its urban location to offer career-focused immersive learning to both traditional undergraduates and adult learners,” Morton said.

    “My heart is in education, and my experiences as a faculty member and administrator in student-focused intimate learning environments like Peace have shown me how this model of education can transform lives.”

    Related stories from Charlotte Observer

    Korie Dean covers higher education in the Triangle and North Carolina for The News & Observer. She was previously part of the paper’s service journalism team. She is a graduate of the Hussman School of Journalism and Media at UNC-Chapel Hill and a lifelong North Carolinian.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker endorses Nikki Haley for president at Stockyards rally

    Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker endorses Nikki Haley for president at Stockyards rally

    [ad_1]

    Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker called Nikki Haley an inspiring candidate with a vision for the future.

    Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker called Nikki Haley an inspiring candidate with a vision for the future.

    hmantas@star-telegram.com

    Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker bucked the trend of most prominent Texas politicians by endorsing former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley for president.

    Parker introduced Haley at a packed rally Monday at Tannehill’s Tavern in the Stockyards. She called the former South Carolina governor’s message a hopeful vision for the future.

    “Each of you are here because you’re voting for someone, not against the status quo,” Parker said. She called Haley inspirational, adding that Haley inspires people to be better together.

    Gov. Greg Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn and several North Texas congressional representatives support former President Donald Trump.

    However, prominent Fort Worth Republicans including Parker, former Mayor Betsy Price, and former Fort Worth city council member Steve Murrin have all shown support for Haley.

    Price, who spoke to the Star-Telegram before introducing Haley at a February event in Dallas, said Haley is more of a public servant than a politician.

    “I’m just really not sure we need somebody that’s got all that baggage,” Price said.

    Haley’s visit to Fort Worth comes on the eve of Super Tuesday, where 15 states, including Texas, will hold primary elections.

    Haley trails Trump by a tally of 244 delegates to 43. They each need 1,215 delegates to win the nomination.

    She’s also behind Trump in the latest University of Houston poll, with 80% supporting Trump and 19% supporting Haley.

    Still, people at Monday’s rally said they are supporting Haley for her ability to bring people together. Several blamed Trump for divisions in the Republican party and argued that Haley would stand a better chance of beating President Joe Biden in the general election in November.

    Cathy Hartman, 66, said she supported Trump in 2016 at a time when the country needed his style of what she called raw truth.

    “I think it’s kind of falling on deaf ears now. It’s not sexy anymore,” Hartman said.

    Patrice Lucas, a retired nurse from Fort Worth, was more blunt in her assessment of Trump.

    “I don’t want someone who is old and facing jail time, and it would be nice if someone could speak in complete sentences,” Lucas said.

    She also said she’s tired of the toxic political culture embodied by Trump, who often focuses on bashing his political opponents rather than talking about policy to make the country better.

    Haley picked up on that point in her stump speech, referencing the way Trump lashed out at her after she secured 43% of the vote in the New Hampshire Republican primary.

    “All he’s doing is talking about himself, and the thing is, this isn’t about him. This is about the American people,” Haley said, drawing booming applause from the roughly 1,000 people gathered Monday.

    Haley’s speech was interrupted at least a dozen times by protesters calling for a ceasefire in Israel’s war against Hamas. While the crowd chanted her name to drown out the protesters, Haley urged her supporters to be civil.

    “My husband and his military brothers and sisters sacrifice every day for their right to be able to (protest),” she said.

    Haley ended her speech with a call to normalcy. Biden calling his opponents fascists and Trump calling his opponents vermin is not normal, Haley said.

    She noted that many young Americans can’t afford to buy a house and believe their children will be worse off.

    “If you join this movement, if you make your voices heard, I promise you our best days are yet to come,” she said.

    Related stories from Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Harrison Mantas has covered the city of Fort Worth’s government, agencies and people since September 2021. He likes to live tweet city hall meetings, and help his fellow Fort Worthians figure out what’s going on.

    [ad_2]

    Harrison Mantas

    Source link

  • Under the Dome: Primary election is 2 days away. Will NC set the stage for Nov. 5?

    Under the Dome: Primary election is 2 days away. Will NC set the stage for Nov. 5?

    [ad_1]

    Each week, join Dawn Vaughan for The News & Observer and NC Insider’s Under the Dome podcast, an in-depth analysis of topics in state government and politics for North Carolina.

    Each week, join Dawn Vaughan for The News & Observer and NC Insider’s Under the Dome podcast, an in-depth analysis of topics in state government and politics for North Carolina.

    Hello and welcome to your Under the Dome newsletter. Kyle Ingram here.

    The primary election is on Tuesday and will set the electoral stage for November, shaping how North Carolina — a notorious swing state — could affect national politics.

    Could NC split the ticket (again)?

    On Tuesday, North Carolinians will decide who they want to run for the state’s highest office, but they’ll also have a say in who gets the nomination for president.

    Our Dawn Baumgartner Vaughan reports that the state’s voters may not pick candidates from the same party for each of those offices come November.

    In 2020, the state voted for Republican Donald Trump in the presidential race, but also elected Roy Cooper, a Democrat, as governor.

    That split could happen again in 2024 as presidential hopefuls set their sights on North Carolina.

    President Joe Biden is likely to face off with Trump again in November. As for the governor’s race, Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson is the frontrunner for the Republican nomination and Attorney General Josh Stein is the likely Democratic nominee.

    Issues like abortion are expected to dominate the race, following the state’s enactment of a 12-week abortion ban last year. But some political analysts say it won’t be the issues that determine who wins, at least at the national level, but rather the personalities of the candidates.

    “You’ve got two older white guys from the Northeast, and everybody already knows exactly what they think about them,” Stephen Wiley, director of the House GOP Caucus, said. “And it’s a personality-driven election these days; that’s really what it comes down to.”

    Get the full story from Dawn here.

    Remember voting rules have changed

    If you haven’t voted already, keep in mind that there are new rules at the polls this year.

    Most notably, voters now need to show an ID to vote. A list of acceptable IDs can be found on the State Board of Elections website. Voters who don’t have an ID can fill out an ID exception form at the polling place.

    If you’re voting by mail, your ballot needs to arrive at the county board of elections office by 7:30 p.m. on election day. Previously, mail-in ballots were counted if they arrived within three days of the election; a bill passed last year removed this grace period.

    If you’re worried that your absentee ballot may not make it in time via mail, you can drop it off in-person at your local county board of elections office.

    For a full list of new election rules, check our website.

    REMEMBER TO READ THE N&O CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRES

    Be sure to read The News & Observer and The Charlotte Observer’s online candidate questionnaires ahead of the primary election on Tuesday. Candidates’ answers appear online as part of our voter guide.

    Visit newsobserver.com/voter-guide to read candidates’ answers.

    That’s all for today. Check your inbox on Tuesday for more #ncpol news.

    Kyle Ingram is a politics reporter for the News & Observer. He reports on the legislature, voting rights and more in North Carolina politics. He is a graduate of the Hussman School of Journalism and Media at UNC-Chapel Hill.

    [ad_2]

    Kyle Ingram

    Source link

  • Trump Rejoices After ‘Loser’ Jimmy Kimmel Suggests He May Be Retiring From Late Night

    Trump Rejoices After ‘Loser’ Jimmy Kimmel Suggests He May Be Retiring From Late Night

    [ad_1]

    Opinion

    Source YouTube: Fox News, Jimmy Kimmel Live!

    The former President Donald Trump is celebrating after the radically liberal late night host Jimmy Kimmel suggested that he may be retiring from late night.

    Trump Trashes ‘Loser’ Kimmel

    “They could get a far more talented person, who would also get better Ratings, for 5% of what they are paying this Loser!” Trump wrote on his Truth Social social media platform alongside a link to an ABC News article that was titled “Jimmy Kimmel hints at retiring from talk show: ‘I think this is my final contract.”

    “I think this is my final contract,” Kimmel told the Los Angeles Times. “I hate to even say it, because everyone’s laughing at me now — each time I think that, and then it turns out to not be the case.”

    “I still have a little more than two years left on my contract, and that seems pretty good,” he added. “That seems like enough.”

    Kimmel recently celebrated the 21st anniversary of his late night talk show “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”

    Related: Jimmy Kimmel Openly Fantasizes About Death Of Donald Trump

    Kimmel’s Future Plans

    As for how he plans to occupy his time when he retires, Kimmel said,  “I don’t know exactly what I will do.”

    “It might not be anything that anyone other than me is aware of,” he continued. “I have a lot of hobbies — I love to cook, I love to draw, I imagine myself learning to do sculptures. I know that when I die, if I’m fortunate enough to die on my own terms in my own bed, I’m going to think, ‘Oh, I was never able to get to this, and I was never able to get to that.’ I just know it about myself.”

    Kimmel admitted that the idea of dying without accomplishing everything that he wants to do in life “bums [him] out a little bit.”

    “I know that when I die, if I’m fortunate enough to die on my own terms in my own bed, I’m going to think, ‘Oh, I was never able to get to this, and I was never able to get to that,’” Kimmel added. “I just know it about myself.”

    Related: Bill Burr Trashes Anti-Trump ‘Idiot Liberal’ Late Night Host Jimmy Kimmel On His Own Show

    Kimmel Responds To Trump

    Kimmel has long had one of the worst cases of Trump derangement syndrome of anyone in television. Last night, he responded to Trump calling him a “loser” for suggesting he may retire.

    “This apparently caught the attention of America’s most famous tangerine,” Kimmel said in his monologue.

    “And I got to say that is a hell of a way to find out you’re not going be somebody’s running mate,” he continued. “He has no idea how delighted I am by something like this. I’m going to try to enjoy it, because he probably won’t be able to do this when they take away his phone in prison, so I’m going really like, soak it in.”

    Check out his full comments on this in the video below.

    Kimmel has shown time and time again over the past few years that he truly is a loser, so we applaud Trump for calling him out. In the end, the world of television will be a far better place if Kimmel does indeed retire, so we can only hope that he follows through with his plan!

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    An Ivy leaguer, proud conservative millennial, history lover, writer, and lifelong New Englander, James specializes in the intersection of… More about James Conrad

    [ad_2]

    James Conrad

    Source link

  • The Real Difference Between Trump and Biden

    The Real Difference Between Trump and Biden

    [ad_1]

    Listen to this article

    Produced by ElevenLabs and NOA, News Over Audio, using AI narration.

    Americans likely face a choice this fall between two men they don’t want for president. Or they can stay home and get one of the two guys they don’t want for president anyway. The reasons for voter disdain are clear enough: Poll respondents say Joe Biden is too old, an impression reinforced by last week’s special-counsel report, and they have always been troubled by Donald Trump’s judgment and character (though a majority think he’s too old too.)

    Voters have genuine questions about both men. But we’ve seen each occupy the presidency. One thing the two administrations have made clear is that whereas Biden follows an approach to governance that seems to offset some of his weaknesses, Trump’s preferred managerial style seems to amplify his.

    Many people treat elections as a chance to vote a single individual into office; as a result, they tend to focus disproportionately on the personality, character, and temperament of the people running. But voters are also choosing a platform—a set of policies as well as a set of people, chosen by the president, who will shape and implement them. The president is the conductor of an orchestra, not a solo artist. As the past eight years have made very clear, the difference in governance between a Trump administration and a Biden administration is not subtle—for example, on foreign policy, border security, and economics—and voters have plenty of evidence on which to base their decision.

    But for the sake of argument, let’s consider the potential effects of Biden’s failures of memory and Trump’s … well, it’s a little tough to say what exactly is going on with Trump’s mental state. The former president has always had a penchant for saying strange things and acting impulsively, and it’s hard to know whether recent lapses are indications of new troubles or the same deficits that have long been present. His always-dark rhetoric has become more apocalyptic and vengeance-focused, and he frequently seems forgetful or confused about basic facts.

    To what extent would either of their struggles be material in a future presidential term? One key distinction is that Biden and Trump have fundamentally different conceptions of the presidency as an office. Biden’s approach to governance has been more or less in keeping with the traditions of recent decades. Biden’s Cabinet and West Wing are (for better or worse) stocked with longtime political and policy hands who have extensive experience in government. Cabinet secretaries largely run their departments through normal channels. Policy proposals are usually formulated by subject-area experts. The president’s job is to sit atop this apparatus and set broad direction.

    Biden doesn’t always defer to experts, and he has clashed with and overruled advisers on some topics, including, notably, the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. Such occasional clashes are fairly typical—as long as they’re occasional. As my colleague Graeme Wood wrote this week, “The presidency is an endless series of judgment calls, not a four-year math test. In fact, large parts of the executive branch exist, in effect, to do the math problems on the president’s behalf, then present to him all those tough judgment calls with the calculations already factored in.”

    This doesn’t mean that Biden’s readily apparent aging doesn’t bring risks. The presidency requires a great deal of energy, and crises can happen at all hours and on top of one another, testing the stamina of any person. The oldest president before Biden, Ronald Reagan, struggled with acuity in his second term, an administration that produced a huge, appalling scandal of which he claimed to be unaware.

    In contrast to the model of the president as the ultimate decision maker, Trump has approached the presidency less like a Fortune 500 CEO and more like the sole proprietor of a small business. (Though he boasts about his experience running a business empire, the Trump Organization also ran this way—it is a company with a large bottom line but with concentrated and insular management by corporate standards.) As president, Trump had a tendency to micromanage details—the launching system for a new aircraft carrier, the paint scheme on Air Force One—while evincing little interest in major policy questions, such as a long-promised replacement for Obamacare.

    At times, Trump has described his role in practically messianic terms: “I alone can fix it,” he infamously said at the 2016 Republican National Convention. He has claimed to be the world’s foremost expert on a wide variety of subjects, and he often disregarded the views of policy experts in his administration, complaining that they tried to talk him out of ideas (when they didn’t just obstruct him). He and his allies have embarked on a major campaign to ensure that staffers in a second Trump administration would be picked for their ideological and personal loyalty to him. Axios has reported that the speechwriter Stephen Miller could be the next attorney general, even though Miller is not an attorney.

    Perhaps as a result of these different approaches to the job, people who have served under the men have divergent views on them. Whereas Biden can seem bumbling and mild in public, aides’ accounts of his private demeanor depict an engaged, incisive, and sometimes hot-tempered president. That’s also the view that emerges from my colleague Franklin Foer’s book The Last Politician. “He has a kind of mantra: ‘You can never give me too much detail,’” National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan has said. “The most difficult part about a meeting with President Biden is preparing for it, because he is sharp, intensely probing, and detail-oriented and focused,” Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said last weekend. (As Jon Stewart noted on Monday night, the public might be more convinced were these moments videotaped, like the gaffes.)

    Former Trump aides are not so complimentary. Former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly called Trump “a person that has nothing but contempt for our democratic institutions, our Constitution, and the rule of law,” adding, “God help us.” Former Attorney General Bill Barr said that he “shouldn’t be anywhere near the Oval Office.” Former Defense Secretary Mark Esper described him as “unfit for office.” Of 44 former Cabinet members queried by NBC, only four said they supported Trump’s return to office. Even allowing for the puffery of politics, the contrast is dramatic.

    None of this is to say that Biden’s memory lapses aren’t worth concern or that he is as vigorous as he was as a younger man. But someone voting for Biden is selecting, above all, a set of policy ideas and promises that he has laid out, with the expectation that the apparatus of the executive branch will implement them.

    Voting for Trump is opting for a charismatic individual who brings to office a set of attitudes rather than a platform. Considering the presidency as a matter of individual mental acuity grants the field to Trump’s own preferred conception of unified personal power, so it’s striking that the comparison makes the dangers posed by Trump’s mentality so stark.

    [ad_2]

    David A. Graham

    Source link

  • Former Democrat Congressman: It’s Time To Talk About Replacing Biden

    Former Democrat Congressman: It’s Time To Talk About Replacing Biden

    [ad_1]

    Opinion

    Screenshot: Fox News

    Harold Ford Jr. believes Special Counsel Robert Hur’s damning report outlining the President’s struggles with cognitive thinking means his party needs to start having uncomfortable conversations about replacing Joe Biden.

    Ford, a former Democrat congressman from Tennessee and current Fox News contributor, believes the report is evidence that Biden has “lost his fastball.”

    Hur’s report indicated the President won’t be charged in the matter because he’s a “well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory” and it would be difficult to get a jury to convict somebody that feeble.

    According to the report, Biden “did not remember when he was vice president” or “when his son Beau died,” and exhibited “diminished faculties” and “significant limitations” during his interview with the special counsel.

    “I think these questions now are going to come more to the fore,” Ford told Fox News host Brian Kilmeade. “This was a tough night for the president, and I think many in the Democratic Party, which is my party, are going to have serious questions going forward about what this means.”

    RELATED: GOP Rep Claudia Tenney Formally Requests AG Garland Pursue 25th Amendment Against Biden, Senator Josh Hawley Calls On Democrats To Do The ‘Patriotic’ Thing

    Ford Thinks His Party Needs To Talk About Replacing Biden

    A couple of things come to mind regarding Ford’s comments that Democrats need to consider replacing President Biden on the Democrat ticket.

    One, he didn’t just “lose his fastball” with this report: his fastball has been gone for quite a while. Good of you to catch up.

    Two, has Ford been in a haze himself for the past three years? These questions have been “to the fore” for his entire term in the White House.

    Ford stated the obvious in that clips of Biden’s press conference angrily declaring that he “knows what the hell he’s doing” and the special counsel report is destined to become campaign fodder against an already deeply unpopular President.

    “This last night will be the closing ad in a campaign against President Biden as we get to November,” he said.

    “The question is, are Democrats willing to go forward between now and November with a candidate that many in the country may not think is up to the job for four more [years]?” he added.

    RELATED: Biden Angrily Declares ‘I Know What The Hell I’m Doing’ To Reporters – Then Confuses Two World Leaders and Says He’ll Be President For Red And ‘Green States’

    25th Amendment?

    Ford went on to suggest that President Biden’s disaster of a press conference – in which he referred to Egyptian President Abdel Fatah El-Sisi as the “president of Mexico” and forgot the name of the church where a rosary that he wears “every day” in his son’s honor came from – was evidence of what the special counsel report had discovered.

    “President Biden last night, I think even in that interview, even in the press conference there, demonstrated to a lot of Americans what Mr. Hur wrote,” he said.

    Ford added that he would have thought it extremely unlikely that Biden would be forced to halt his re-election campaign prior to yesterday’s events.

    “But as of right now, I think Democrats are going to have to grapple with this over the next several weeks and few months,” he added. “And there are a few elders in the party that can perhaps have this conversation, and we’ll see if they do.”

    Republicans have escalated calls for Biden’s cabinet to invoke the 25th amendment.

    Contrary to Ford’s suggestion that Democrats grapple with the problem, they seem content with defending Biden despite the obvious signs he is not physically or mentally capable of carrying out the duties of President of the United States.

    Rep. Susan Wild (D-PA) vociferously defended Biden after a closed-door meeting with Democrats.

    “He did so well in this discussion with members,” Wild told NBC News. “He’s very sharp, no memory issues, and his only stumbling is when he trips over words consistent with his lifelong speech impediment.”

    Apparently, a stutter caused Biden to, at the meeting Wild is referencing, declare he is a leader of both red and “green states.”

    Follow Rusty on X

    Senator Chris Murphy Makes Bizarre Admission: Illegal Immigrants Are Who Democrats ‘Care About Most’

    Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

    Rusty Weiss has been covering politics for over 15 years. His writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, Fox… More about Rusty Weiss



    [ad_2]

    Rusty Weiss

    Source link

  • Why Republican Politicians Do Whatever Trump Says

    Why Republican Politicians Do Whatever Trump Says

    [ad_1]

    The story Donald Trump tells about himself—and to himself—has always been one of domination. It runs through the canonical texts of his personal mythology. In The Art of the Deal, he filled page after page with examples of his hard-nosed negotiating tactics. On The Apprentice, he lorded over a boardroom full of supplicants competing for his approval. And at his campaign rallies, he routinely regales crowds with tales of strong-arming various world leaders in the Oval Office.

    This image of Trump has always been dubious. Those boardroom scenes were, after all, reality-TV contrivances; those stories in his book were, by his own ghostwriter’s account, exaggerated in many cases to make Trump appear savvier than he was. And there’s been ample reporting to suggest that many of the world leaders with whom Trump interacted as president saw him more as an easily manipulated mark than as a domineering statesman to be feared.

    The truth is that Trump, for all of his tough-guy posturing, spent most of his career failing to push people around and bend them to his will.

    That is, until he started dealing with Republican politicians.

    For nearly a decade now, Trump has demonstrated a remarkable ability to make congressional Republicans do what he wants. He threatens them. He bullies them. He extracts from them theatrical displays of devotion—and if they cross him, he makes them pay. If there is one arena of American power in which Trump has been able to actually be the merciless alpha he played on TV—and there may, indeed, be only one—it is Republican politics. His influence was on full display this week, when he derailed a bipartisan border-security bill reportedly because he wants to campaign on the immigration “crisis” this year.

    Sam Nunberg, a former adviser to Trump, has observed this dynamic with some amusement. “It’s funny,” he told me in a recent phone interview. “In the business world and in the entertainment world, I don’t think Donald was able to intimidate people as much.”

    He pointed to Trump’s salary negotiations with NBC during Trump’s Apprentice years. Jeff Zucker, who ran the network at the time, has said that Trump once came to him demanding a raise. At the time, Trump was making $40,000 an episode, but he wanted to make as much as the entire cast of Friends combined: $6 million an episode. Zucker countered with $60,000. When Trump balked, Zucker said he’d find someone else to host the show. The next day, according to Zucker, Trump’s lawyer called to accept the $60,000. (A spokesperson for the Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment.)

    Contrast that with the power Trump wields on Capitol Hill—how he can kill a bill or tank a speakership bid with a single post on social media; how high-ranking congressmen are so desperate for his approval that they’ll task staffers to sort through packs of Starbursts and pick out just the pinks and reds so Trump can be presented with his favorite flavors.

    “I just remember that there’d be a lot of stuff that didn’t go his way,” Nunberg told me, referring to Trump’s business career. “But he has all these senators in the fetal position! They do whatever he wants.”

    Why exactly congressional Republicans have proved so much more pliable than anyone else Trump has contended with is a matter of interpretation. One explanation is that Trump has simply achieved much more success in politics than he ever did, relatively speaking, in New York City real estate or on network TV. For all of his tabloid omnipresence, Trump never had anything like the presidential bully pulpit.

    “It stands to reason that [when] the president and leader of your party is pushing for something … that’s what’s going to happen,” a former chief of staff to a Republican senator, who requested anonymity in order to candidly describe former colleagues’ thinking, told me. “Take away the office and put him back in a business setting, where facts and core principles matter, and it doesn’t surprise me that it wasn’t as easy.”

    But, of course, Trump is not the president anymore—and there is also something unique about the sway he continues to have over Republicans on Capitol Hill. In his previous life, Trump had viewers, readers, fans—but he never commanded a movement that could end the careers of the people on the other side of the negotiating table.

    And Trump—whose animal instinct for weakness is one of his defining traits—seemed to intuit something early on about the psychology of the Republicans he would one day reign over.

    Nunberg told me about a speech he drafted for Trump in 2015 that included this line about the Republican establishment: “They’re good at keeping their jobs, not their promises.” When Trump read it, he chuckled. “It’s so true,” he said, according to Nunberg. “That’s all they care about.” (Nunberg was eventually fired from Trump’s 2016 campaign.)

    This ethos of job preservation at all costs is not a strictly partisan phenomenon in Washington—nor is it new. As I reported in my recent biography of Mitt Romney, the Utah senator was surprised, when he arrived in Congress, by the enormous psychic currency his colleagues attached to their positions. One senator told Romney that his first consideration when voting on any bill should be “Will this help me win reelection?”

    But the Republican Party of 2015 was uniquely vulnerable to a hostile takeover by someone like Trump. Riven by years of infighting and ideological incoherence, and plagued by a growing misalignment between its base and its political class, the GOP was effectively one big institutional power vacuum. The litmus tests kept changing. The formula for getting reelected was obsolete. Republicans with solidly conservative records, such as House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, were getting taken out in primaries by obscure Tea Party upstarts.

    To many elected Republicans, it probably felt like an answer to their prayers when a strongman finally parachuted in and started telling them what to do. Maybe his orders were reckless and contradictory. But as long as you did your best to look like you were obeying, you could expect to keep winning your primaries.

    As for Trump, it’s easy to see the ongoing appeal of this arrangement. The Apprentice was canceled long ago, and the Manhattan-real-estate war stories have worn thin. Republicans in Congress might be the only ostensibly powerful people in America who will allow him to boss them around, humiliate them, and assert unbridled dominance over them. They’ve made the myth true. How could he possibly walk away now?

    [ad_2]

    McKay Coppins

    Source link

  • Joe Biden wins South Carolina Democratic primary

    Joe Biden wins South Carolina Democratic primary

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden won the South Carolina primary election on Saturday, defeating Democratic opponents Representative Dean Phillips and author Marianne Williamson, according to Associated Press (AP) projections.

    The outlet called South Carolina’s Democratic primary for Biden about 25 minutes after the polls across the state closed at 7 p.m. Biden, who is seeking a second term, is being challenged by Phillips, who represents Minnesota’s 3rd Congressional District and Williamson, a progressive author and spiritual leader.

    The president garnered more than 96 percent of the vote, with Williamson in second at 1.6 percent and Phillips receiving 1.2 percent, according to results from AP at the time of publication.

    The president reacted to his projected victory shortly after 7:30 p.m. in a post on X, formerly Twitter.

    “In 2020, it was the voters of South Carolina who proved the pundits wrong, breathed new life into our campaign, and set us on the path to winning the Presidency,” Biden said in the post. “Now in 2024, the people of South Carolina have spoken again and I have no doubt that you have set us on the path to winning the Presidency again—and making Donald Trump a loser—again.”

    Newsweek reached out via email on Saturday to representatives for Biden, Phillips and Williamson for comment.

    President Joe Biden speaks at the “Biden for President 2024” campaign headquarters on Saturday in Wilmington, Delaware.

    ROBERTO SCHMIDT / AFP/Getty

    Biden also urged people to vote in November, saying the stakes in this election “could not be higher.”

    “There are extreme and dangerous voices at work in the country—led by Donald Trump—who are determined to divide our nation and take us backward, the president said. “We cannot let that happen.”

    Phillips, who is not on the Nevada Democratic primary ballot, congratulated Biden on his South Carolina victory but showed no indication of dropping out of the race.

    “Cracking four digits never felt so good! Congratulations, Mr. President, on a good old-fashioned whooping,” the congressman wrote in a post on X. “See you in Michigan.”

    Last month, Biden defeated Phillips and Williamson with his write-in campaign in New Hampshire, which his supporters in the state launched for him after he declined to appear on its ballot over a dispute about the New England state’s placement in the primary schedule. Despite having to rely on a write-in campaign, the president won the January 23 election by double digits, amassing more than 63 percent of the votes while Phillips came in second with 19.6 percent, according to results shared by the AP. Williamson received about 4 percent of the vote in New Hampshire’s Democratic primary, the outlet reported.

    The victories in New Hampshire and South Carolina were much needed for Biden, whose popularity among voters has been a major talking point in the 2024 campaign. The president’s approval rating percentage has steadily been in the low 40s for most of his term. It was at its highest when Biden first took office in January 2021 at 53.1 percent and at its lowest in July 2022 at 38.2 percent, according to poll aggregator FiveThirtyEight.

    Several polls have also shown that a majority of Democrats would prefer an alternative candidate. Despite this, Phillips has struggled to make headway since he announced his primary challenge in October 2023. While the congressman launched his campaign by saying that he respected Biden and aligned with the president’s agenda, he raised concerns the incumbent would lose against former President Donald Trump in November.

    Meanwhile, Trump also won the New Hampshire primary with 54.5 percent of the vote, ahead of his Republican opponent Nikki Haley with 44.7 percent. He also won the Republican Iowa caucus, winning 51 percent support. Republicans will make their selection in South Carolina on February 24.

    Democratic voters in Nevada, which is a swing state in the general election, will make their picks on February 6.

    Update 2/3/24, 8:55 p.m. ET: This article was updated with additional information.