ReportWire

Tag: President Donald Trump

  • Note President Trump Allegedly Sent To Epstein Is Released By Congress – KXL

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released on Monday a sexually suggestive letter to Jeffrey Epstein purportedly signed by President Donald Trump, which he has denied.

    The letter was included as part of a 50th birthday album compiled in 2003 for Epstein, a wealthy and well-connected financier who was once a friend of Trump’s. Epstein killed himself in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial in 2019 on charges that said he sexually abused and trafficked dozens of underage girls.

    Trump has said he did not write the letter or create the drawing of a curvaceous woman that surrounds the letter, and he filed a $10 billion lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal for earlier reporting on his link to the letter.

    “As I have said all along, it’s very clear President Trump did not draw this picture, and he did not sign it,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement posted on X. “President Trump’s legal team will continue to aggressively pursue litigation.”

    White House deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich posted various pictures on X of Trump’s signature over the years and wrote, “it’s not his signature.”

    The release of the drawing comes as the president has for months faced increasing pressure to force more disclosure in the case of Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. Epstein was accused of paying underage girls hundreds of dollars in cash for massages and then molesting them, while Maxwell was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by him.

    It also once again puts a spotlight on Trump’s former friendship with Epstein, which the president has said ended two decades ago after a falling-out. Trump said recently that he cut ties with Epstein because he “stole” young women — including Virginia Giuffre, who was among Epstein’s most well-known sex trafficking accusers — who worked for the spa at his Mar-a-Lago resort.

    The case against Epstein was brought more than a decade after he secretly cut a deal with federal prosecutors in Florida to dispose of nearly identical allegations. Trump had suggested during the presidential campaign that he’d seek to open the government’s files into Epstein, but much of what the government has released so far had already been out there.

    Democrats on the House Oversight Committee received a copy of the birthday album on Monday as part of a batch of documents from Epstein’s estate.

    Trump has denied writing the letter and creating the drawing, calling The Wall Street Journal report on it “false, malicious, and defamatory.”

    “These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don’t draw pictures,” Trump said.

    The letter released by the committee looks exactly as described by The Wall Street Journal in its report.

    The letter bearing Trump’s name and what appears to be his signature includes text framed by a hand-drawn outline of a curvaceous woman.

    “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret,” the letter says.

    The letter’s disclosure comes amid a bipartisan push in Congress for the release of the so-called Epstein files amid years of speculation and conspiracy theories. Calls for the release of the records came from Republicans, including Vice President JD Vance, before he was sworn into the country’s No. 2 position.

    The Justice Department in August began turning over records from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation to the House Oversight Committee.

    The committee subpoenaed the Epstein estate for documents last month. In addition to the birthday book, lawmakers requested Epstein’s last will and testament, agreements he signed with prosecutors, his contact books, and his financial transactions and holdings.

    More about:


    [ad_2]

    Grant McHill

    Source link

  • Federal immigration operations ramping up in Chicago and Boston as other sanctuary cities are on alert

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — Immigration enforcement operations are ramping up in Chicago and Boston, marking the latest escalation between the Trump administration and Democratic-led cities that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

    The Department of Homeland Security on Monday announced “Operation Midway Blitz” aimed at targeting “criminal illegal aliens who flocked to Chicago and Illinois because they knew Governor (JB) Pritzker and his sanctuary policies would protect them and allow them to roam free on American streets.”

    The heightened rhetoric from President Donald Trump and his top officials aligns with how the White House plans to push forward its aggressive agenda aimed at undocumented immigrants. Ongoing arrests in Chicago are expected to expand as a federal presence builds up in a weeks-long, phased approach, according to officials familiar with the plans who stressed it’s still in flux.

    Operations in Boston and Chicago are modeled after the June immigration sweeps in Los Angeles that the Supreme Court ruled Monday can continue under certain circumstances. The Homeland Security official charged with immigration operations in Los Angeles, Gregory Bovino, was deployed to Chicago to do the same there, officials told CNN, with one describing Chicago as “Los Angeles on the road.”

    The escalating actions also follow a massive raid last week at a Hyundai plant in Georgia that, while not in a sanctuary city, previews forthcoming worksite operations, border czar Tom Homan told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Sunday.

    “You can expect action in most sanctuary cities across the country,” Homan said, decrying as “problem areas” the next targets of the sweeping nationwide immigration enforcement agenda that helped propel Trump to a second term but Americans largely oppose.

    In tandem with those moves, more Democratic-led cities also are bracing for the Trump administration to decide — “over the next day or two,” the president said Sunday — where to further deploy National Guard troops to crack down on violent crime, a purported problem the White House sometimes has linked with immigration.

    This image from video provided by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement shows a person being handcuffed at the Hyundai Motor Group’s electric vehicle plant in Ellabell, Georgia, on Thursday. Credit: Corey Bullard / AP via CNN Newsource

    The Department of Homeland Security on Sunday blamed Boston Mayor Michelle Wu for sanctuary polices that “not only attract and harbor criminals but also place these public safety threats above the interests of law-abiding American citizens.” Crossing the border or overstaying a visa and being undocumented in the United States generally is a civil infraction, not a criminal one.

    Calling up the National Guard is “always on the table” for Chicago, Homan told CNN, even after a federal judge last week ruled Trump broke federal law by using the US military to help with law enforcement activities in and around Los Angeles — while use of the guard in Washington, DC, is unlike anywhere else.

    “We used them in Los Angeles, and we use them in Washington, DC,” Homan said. “They’re a force multiplier.”

    Sen. Dick Durbin, the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat, said in a statement Monday that such enforcement won’t make people feel safer.

    “They are a waste of money, stoke fear, and represent another failed attempt at a distraction,” he said.

    Cities push back against Trump threats

    In Washington, DC, where more than 2,200 armed National Guard troops have roamed for weeks, officials are suing the Trump administration, accusing the president of violating the Constitution and federal law by sending soldiers into the city without consent from local leaders.

    The lawsuit, filed Thursday by DC’s attorney general, claims the troops — many from out of state — have been deputized by the US Marshals office and are patrolling neighborhoods, conducting searches and making arrests, despite federal laws that generally bar the military from acting as local police.

    The Trump administration has touted its efforts in the capital city, pointing to a sharp drop in violent crime since ramping up federal law enforcement last month. But critics argue the National Guard deployment is unnecessary and costly, with taxpayers footing an estimated $1 million a day, while troops take photos with tourists, pick up trash and lay mulch.

    Members of the National Guard patrol inside the Lincoln Memorial on the National Mall in Washington, DC, on August 28. Credit: Win McNamee / Getty Images via CNN Newsource

    Trump has also repeatedly slammed nearby Baltimore for its crime, calling the city a “hellhole” and suggesting the National Guard could be deployed there next.

    “We don’t need an occupation,” Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott told CNN’s Manu Raju on Sunday. Scott said he’d explore all options when asked whether he would sign an order like Chicago’s that tells local police not to cooperate with federal law enforcement should they be deployed.

    On Sunday evening, Trump told reporters Chicago is a “very dangerous place,” adding to anticipation of troops there. The president said he could “solve Chicago very quickly,” but stopped short of committing to deploy the guard.

    The next morning, he lashed out at Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, questioning the Democrat’s supposed aversion to federal intervention: “WHY??? … Only the Criminals will be hurt” by any federal efforts, Trump wrote on his social media platform, adding crime is “ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE!!!”

    Pritzker denounced DHS operations in the state Monday, saying in a post on X that the operation “isn’t about fighting crime.”

    “That requires support and coordination — yet we’ve experienced nothing like that over the past several weeks,” he said, adding that the administration has chosen to focus “on scaring Illinoisians.”

    The governor’s office has still not recieved any “formal communication or information” from the Trump administration and that they are often learning of operations through social media, said Matt Hill, spokesperson for Pritzker.

    Seven people were killed in Chicago from Friday evening through Sunday, preliminary police figures show. At least six victims were men, ages 21 to 42.

    Still, fatal shootings in the city are down 34.2% this year through September 6 compared with the same period in 2024, with 237 killed in 2025, mayor’s office data shows.

    The Windy City has prepared for more than a week for looming National Guard deployments and Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, from the governor bracing for a court fight to parade planners postponing.

    Fears gripped Chicago over the weekend

    On the Lower West Side of Chicago, the start of Mexican Independence Day celebrations typically marks a raucous weekend of parties and parades drawing hundreds of thousands of attendees. While some crowds did gather Saturday waving green, white and red flags in the predominantly Latino Pilsen neighborhood, an undercurrent of caution persisted.

    As costumed performers and children with baskets of treats paraded through the community, bright orange whistles swung from their necks, each one ready to cut through the music should federal immigration agents appear.

    Keilina Zamora prepares to participate in the Mexican Independence Day parade in Chicago’s Pilsen neighborhood on Saturday. Credit: Scott Olson / Getty Images via CNN Newsource
    People watch the Mexican Independence Day parade in Chicago’s Pilsen neighborhood on Saturday. Credit: Scott Olson / Getty Images via CNN Newsource

    Elsewhere, celebrations were muted.

    In Wauconda, a village northwest of Chicago, the annual Latino Heritage Festival was canceled due in part to “immigration concerns in our area,” the Wauconda Police Department said in a Friday social media post.

    One of the largest events of the Fiestas Patrias, the parade for the Mexican Independence Day in Waukegan, has been postponed for the first time in its 30-year history to November 1 from September 14. The festival is celebrated every year in the suburb along Lake Michigan just north of the Great Lakes naval base, the facility Gov. JB Pritzker said Trump is set to use as a command center for incoming immigration agents.

    Communities throughout the nation’s third-largest city are preparing for ICE presence by handing out flyers reminding families they have the right in the face of immigration enforcement to remain silent and don’t have to consent to be searched or share their birthplace or citizenship status, among other rights.

    In Pilsen, neighbors gathered this weekend to celebrate Latino culture, choosing joy despite fear: “I think now more than ever is when we need to demonstrate that we are united and we are a community,” longtime resident Araceli Lucio said.

    CNN’s Kit Maher, Alison Main, Samantha Waldenberg, Lily Hautau, Chris Boyette and Gabe Cohen contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Priscilla Alvarez, Danya Gainor and CNN

    Source link

  • Postal Traffic To US Sank 80% After Trump Administration Ended Exemption On Low-Value Parcels – KXL

    [ad_1]

    (Associated Press) -Postal traffic into the United States plunged by more than 80% after the Trump administration ended a tariff exemption for low-cost imports, the United Nations postal agency said Saturday.

    The Universal Postal Union says it has started rolling out new measures that can help postal operators around the world calculate and collect duties, or taxes, after the U.S. eliminated the so-called “de minimis exemption” for lower-value parcels.

    Eighty-eight postal operators have told the UPU that they have suspended some or all postal services to the United States until a solution is implemented with regard to U.S.-bound parcels valued at $800 or less, which had been the cutoff for imported goods to escape customs charges.

    “The global network saw postal traffic to the U.S. come to a near-halt after the implementation of the new rules on Aug. 29, 2025, which for the first time placed the burden of customs duty collection and remittance on transportation carriers or U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency-approved qualified parties,” the UPU said in a statement.

    The UPU said information exchanged between postal operators through its electronic network showed traffic from its 192 member countries — nearly all the world countries — had fallen 81% on Aug. 29, compared to a week earlier.

    The Bern, Switzerland-based agency said the “major operational disruptions” have occurred because airlines and other carriers indicated they weren’t willing or able to collect such duties, and foreign postal operators had not established a link to CBP-qualified companies.

    Before the measure took effect, the postal union sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio to express concerns about its impact.

    The de minimis exemption has existed in some form since 1938, and the administration says the exemption has become a loophole that foreign businesses exploit to evade tariffs and criminals use to get drugs into the U.S.

    Purchases that previously entered the U.S. without needing to clear customs now require vetting and are subject to their origin country’s applicable tariff rate, which can range from 10% to 50%.

    While the change applies to the products of every country, U.S. residents will not have to pay duties on incoming gifts valued at up to $100, or on up to $200 worth of personal souvenirs from trips abroad, according to the White House.

    The UPU said its members had not been given enough time or guidance to comply with the procedures outlined in the executive order U.S. President Donald Trump signed on July 30 to eliminate the duty-free eligibility of low-value goods.

    More about:


    [ad_2]

    Grant McHill

    Source link

  • Trump Administration deciding on national housing emergency declaration: What that might mean for you

    [ad_1]

    DENVER — The Trump Administration is deciding whether or not to declare a national housing emergency. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the federal government wants to lower the cost of housing while also increasing supply.

    Denver7 has extensively covered the housing affordability crisis in Colorado, and solutions some communities have come up with ways to try to help. You can find some of our coverage below.

    Denver7 also wanted to get a better idea of what a national housing emergency might mean for you.

    “I don’t think we really know what that means, what he can actually do,” Chief Lending Officer at Ent Credit Union Jon Paukovich said.

    He explained some of the options on the table could include opening federal land for housing or make additional programs available to homebuyers.

    While some factors are up in the air, Paukovich said there are still some things homebuyers should keep in mind, no matter what.

    Impacts of potential potential national housing emergency declaration for CO

    The most important thing he suggested is to understand your financial situation.

    “Start talking with a loan officer to begin the process if you’re interested in buying a home,” Paukovich said. “You may want to buy a home. It may not be the right time. You may need to get some finances in order.”

    He also warned there’s a lot more to consider than just the purchase price, especially for first-time homebuyers.

    “I think a lot of times people can get focused on, if mortgage rates fall below 6%, and I can get a 5.875%, 30-year fixed interest rate, that’ll be a great rate,” Paukovich explained. “So much in homebuying is not fixed. We’ve seen property taxes because home values have gone up, increased dramatically as well. We’ve seen if you have to repair something in your home, those costs have gone up. It can really send someone over the edge.”

    If you’re trying to save up for a down payment, Paukovich recommended looking into FHA loans, portfolio loan programs at credit unions and other down payment assistance programs.

    “It’s all about making the right financial choices and just having the discipline to do that,” he said.

    Related coverage:

    Coloradans making a difference | Denver7 featured videos


    Denver7 is committed to making a difference in our community by standing up for what’s right, listening, lending a helping hand and following through on promises. See that work in action, in the videos above.

    [ad_2]

    Rachel Wingrat

    Source link

  • Inside Congress’ warring factions over how to fund the government

    [ad_1]

    Battle lines are emerging on Capitol Hill in the fight to avert a government shutdown in three weeks — and it’s not just Republicans vs. Democrats.

    On one side, fiscal hawks are joining with the White House to keep federal agencies running on static funding levels, ideally into January or longer. On the other, Democrats and some top Republicans want to punt no further than November to buy congressional negotiators more time to cut a cross-party compromise on fresh funding totals for federal programs.

    In the end, the standoff could hinge on Speaker Mike Johnson’s appetite for trying to pass a funding package backed by President Donald Trump but not Democrats, as he did in the spring — and whether Senate Democrats once again capitulate rather than see government operations grind to a halt on Oct. 1.

    “They jammed us last time,” Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), a top appropriator, said in an interview. “And I am encouraging my Republican friends who want to do appropriations to understand that that won’t work this time.”

    Even more irate after Trump’s latest move to unilaterally cancel almost $5 billion in foreign aid through a so-called pocket rescission, Democrats are warning there will be a funding lapse if Republicans don’t negotiate with them. And while they’re being cautious not to box themselves in with ultimatums on funding totals or specific policy demands, they’re starting to flex their muscles by floating concessions Republicans could make in exchange for support across the aisle.

    That includes making a deal by the end of the year to head off the expiration of enhanced health insurance subsidies that would result in premium hikes come January for millions of Americans.

    There are glimmers of bipartisan talks happening behind the scenes: Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries recently discussed passing a short-term spending patch until November or December, though no decisions were made.

    And top House and Senate appropriators are gelling behind a hybrid approach: attempting a bill with a full year of updated funding levels for the USDA, the Department of Veterans Affairs and congressional operations, tied to a short-term extension for other agencies, to allow for more negotiations.

    But there are plenty of reasons to be skeptical about a bipartisan funding deal coming together, with Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a senior appropriator, putting the odds of a shutdown at “50-50, perhaps higher.”

    As of late last week, the top Senate leaders — Republican John Thune and Democrat Chuck Schumer — haven’t yet spoken about the upcoming funding deadline, in a further sign that cross-party talks are still nascent.

    Meanwhile, House hard-liners, backed by some of their conservative Senate counterparts, appear to be digging in to demand a lengthy stopgap bill, rather than a short-term patch meant to facilitate a more comprehensive bipartisan funding measure down the road. One Republican, granted anonymity to share the conservative strategy, said fiscal hawks want a funding patch “to 2026” or for the entirety of the coming fiscal year “if we can get it.”

    Continually running the government on stopgaps is part of White House budget director Russ Vought’s strategy to shrink federal spending as he roots for the government funding process to be “less bipartisan.”

    Those kick-the-can funding bills give the White House more leeway to shift cash while depriving Democrats of any increases in non-defense funding and GOP defense hawks the military budget increases they seek. Then, using party-line measures like the domestic-policy megabill and the $9 billion clawbacks package Congress cleared this summer, Republicans can add or subtract funding without needing to rely on the votes of Senate Democrats.

    The White House predicts that Trump’s more recent, unilateral cancellation of $4.9 billion will only help build support among GOP fiscal hawks for a “clean” continuing resolution, or CR, that simply drags out current funding levels for weeks or months more. In this scenario, Democrats will have to fall in line, a White House official told reporters late last month after Trump nixed the foreign aid funding.

    It’s very hard for me to believe that they’re going to oppose a clean CR that would cause them to be responsible for a government shutdown,” said the official, granted anonymity to speak candidly.

    The Senate’s top Democratic appropriator, Patty Murray of Washington, warned it won’t work for Republicans to blame Democrats: If the GOP goes it alone, she said last week, “well, then, that is a Republican shutdown.”

    Democrats are also still grappling with how the pocket rescission will factor into their government funding demands. Schatz called it a “point of friction” but added, “I’m not prepared to articulate any red lines to you.”

    Notwithstanding the administration’s latest attempt to revoke funding, setting static spending levels through next September would be a nonstarter for many members of both parties. For Democrats, going into next year with a stopgap bill would force them to give up their biggest point of leverage — another end-of-the-year government funding deadline — to try to get a deal on extending the enhanced Affordable Care Act tax credits that will expire Dec. 31.

    On the GOP side, some conservatives view a full-year stopgap bill as locking in spending levels set under President Joe Biden, while defense hawks warn that it undermines the military. Those GOP divisions would make it harder, if not impossible, for Johnson and the White House to try to repeat their go-it-alone playbook from the spring.

    Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said he didn’t think a full-year, flat-funded spending bill would come to fruition: “We can talk about it all we want, we always do. Same plot, different actors.”

    Passage of a lengthy funding patch would especially sting for Republicans appropriators, who are quietly trying to retain relevance amid Trump’s escalating assault on Congress’ power through tactics to shift, freeze and cancel funding that lawmakers previously approved.

    House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole, who consistently refrains from criticizing the president, told his underlings last week that the best way for lawmakers to protect Congress’ power of the purse is to negotiate a bipartisan funding agreement now, rather than fall back on a continuing resolution.

    “The way to be successful is, get a deal done. That’s what we need to do,” the Oklahoma Republican told fellow appropriators during a recent markup. “But please don’t have any illusions that we’re cavalierly surrendering our power.”

    Still, Cole hasn’t received the blessing of his leadership to begin cross-party negotiations.

    “We are in discussions now with the administration, with the Senate, about how to proceed,” he said. “We don’t have any final goal or deadline. But I would prefer to get this done sooner rather than later, and I don’t want another CR.”

    Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Another Sunday talk show, another rejection of federal troops, denial of presidential aspirations

    [ad_1]

    Gov. Wes Moore on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday, when he talked about the economy, the president’s threat to send federal troops into Baltimore and — again — his electoral plans. (Screengrab of NBC video)

    For a man who’s not running for president, Gov. Wes Moore sure has been making the rounds of the national Sunday talk shows recently. But there’s also been plenty to talk about, from vaccines to federal troop deployments.

    Moore, appearing Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” would not say he would “completely rule it out,” when asked about a presidential bit, but he did repeat his oft-stated assertion that he is not running for president in 2028, and is focused instead on seeking reelection next year as governor of Maryland.

    “I’ll be serving a full term. I’m excited about reelection. I’m excited about what I’m going to be able to do for the people of Maryland,” he said in response to a question from moderator Kristen Welker, before reciting a list of his administration’s accomplishments..

    It was similar to the discussion he had two weeks earlier on CBS’ “Face the Nation,” when he volunteered that he is not running for president during a discussion of President Donald Trump saying Moore is not “presidential timber.” Moore’s residential aspirations did not come up on last week’s “This Week” on ABC — but he wasn’t directly asked about it.

    What Moore has been asked about in each appearance was the president’s threat to send troops into Baltimore, among other cities, to respond to crime there.

    Moore — who on Friday announced a surge of Maryland State Police into the city to help further bring down crime rates — repeated his charge that Trump’s proposal would be “performative” and ineffective. He said Guard members are not trained for law enforcement and noted that those deployed last month to Washington, D.C., have been reduced in some instances to raking mulch and picking up trash, at what he said is an estimated cost of $1 million a day.

    “You know, the president’s proposed budget actually cuts supports for the FBI and ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives] bureaus, which are things we actually could use,” Moore said. “When you’re looking at the Big Beautiful Bill, it actually cuts $30 million of funding for violence prevention programs that are happening in the city of Baltimore and across the state of Maryland.”

    Trump has said that the presence of federal troops has led to a drop in crimes that have made the District a “safe zone.” D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has said that crime was already at historic lows already, but she recently credited the presence of federal troops with a further drop in crimes.

    Moore acknowledged that crime is down in D.C., but said it has fallen just as fast, or faster, in Baltimore during the same time frame without federal intervention.

    “If you’re looking at the same time period of this D.C. occupation … if you look at assaults with a deadly weapon, they’ve actually increased in D.C. by 8%; in Baltimore, have decreased by 10%,” he said. “And on every other major indicator, from homicide, to carjacking, you could say that Baltimore has actually had the same type of drop as Washington D.C. has had during this period. And we didn’t mobilize the National Guard for it.”

    What Moore did do was announce plans Friday for a “renewed collaboration” between the Baltimore City Police Department and the Maryland State Police.

    “We are proud of the progress that we’ve been able to make, and we’re all very, very concerned about how much work still needs to happen,” Moore said at the time, flanked by Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott and city and state police officials. “If one person does not feel safe in their neighborhood, that is one too many.”

    SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump says Chicago ‘will find out why it’s called the Department of WAR’ ahead of planned crackdown

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump posted a meme on social media Saturday saying that Chicago “will find out why it’s called the Department of WAR,” as the city’s officials brace for an immigration crackdown.Related video above — ‘We’re going in’: President Trump vows National Guard deployments as judge rules against him”I love the smell of deportations in the morning … Chicago about to find out why it’s called the Department of WAR,” the post reads. Trump signed an executive order on Friday to rebrand the Pentagon as the “Department of War.”The post includes what appears to be an artificially generated image of the president wearing a hat and sunglasses, with the Chicago skyline in the background, accompanied by text reading “Chipocalypse Now.”Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker on Saturday called Trump’s post “not normal.””The President of the United States is threatening to go to war with an American city. This is not a joke. This is not normal,” Pritzker wrote on X. “Donald Trump isn’t a strongman, he’s a scared man. Illinois won’t be intimidated by a wannabe dictator.”It comes as Trump has ramped up his rhetoric against the country’s third most populous city. CNN previously reported the Trump administration’s plans to conduct a major immigration enforcement operation in Chicago, and that officials there were bracing for it to begin as early as Friday.In recent days, personnel from Immigration and Border Protection, as well as Customs and Border Protection, have begun trickling into the city, White House officials told CNN.The Trump administration has also reserved the right to call in the National Guard if there is a reaction to the operation that warrants it, the officials said. The Chicago operation is being modeled after a similar operation carried out in Los Angeles in June. A judge ruled this week that the June deployment broke federal law prohibiting the military from law enforcement activity on U.S. soil in most cases; the Trump administration has appealed.White House officials have made clear the Chicago immigration crackdown is distinct from the idea the president has floated to use federal law enforcement and National Guard troops to carry out a broader crime crackdown in the city, similar to the operation in Washington, D.C.When asked by a reporter Tuesday about sending National Guard troops into the city, Trump said, “We’re going,” adding, “I didn’t say when. We’re going in.”Democratic officials who represent Chicago and Illinois also condemned Trump’s post Saturday.”The President’s threats are beneath the honor of our nation, but the reality is that he wants to occupy our city and break our Constitution,” wrote Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson on social media. “We must defend our democracy from this authoritarianism by protecting each other and protecting Chicago from Donald Trump.”Illinois Sen. Tammy Duckworth described Trump’s post on X as “Stolen valor at its worst,” writing, “Take off that Cavalry hat, you draft dodger. You didn’t earn the right to wear it.”CNN’s Alayna Treene contributed to this report.

    President Donald Trump posted a meme on social media Saturday saying that Chicago “will find out why it’s called the Department of WAR,” as the city’s officials brace for an immigration crackdown.

    Related video above — ‘We’re going in’: President Trump vows National Guard deployments as judge rules against him

    “I love the smell of deportations in the morning … Chicago about to find out why it’s called the Department of WAR,” the post reads. Trump signed an executive order on Friday to rebrand the Pentagon as the “Department of War.”

    The post includes what appears to be an artificially generated image of the president wearing a hat and sunglasses, with the Chicago skyline in the background, accompanied by text reading “Chipocalypse Now.”

    Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker on Saturday called Trump’s post “not normal.”

    “The President of the United States is threatening to go to war with an American city. This is not a joke. This is not normal,” Pritzker wrote on X. “Donald Trump isn’t a strongman, he’s a scared man. Illinois won’t be intimidated by a wannabe dictator.”

    It comes as Trump has ramped up his rhetoric against the country’s third most populous city. CNN previously reported the Trump administration’s plans to conduct a major immigration enforcement operation in Chicago, and that officials there were bracing for it to begin as early as Friday.

    In recent days, personnel from Immigration and Border Protection, as well as Customs and Border Protection, have begun trickling into the city, White House officials told CNN.

    The Trump administration has also reserved the right to call in the National Guard if there is a reaction to the operation that warrants it, the officials said. The Chicago operation is being modeled after a similar operation carried out in Los Angeles in June. A judge ruled this week that the June deployment broke federal law prohibiting the military from law enforcement activity on U.S. soil in most cases; the Trump administration has appealed.

    White House officials have made clear the Chicago immigration crackdown is distinct from the idea the president has floated to use federal law enforcement and National Guard troops to carry out a broader crime crackdown in the city, similar to the operation in Washington, D.C.

    When asked by a reporter Tuesday about sending National Guard troops into the city, Trump said, “We’re going,” adding, “I didn’t say when. We’re going in.”

    Democratic officials who represent Chicago and Illinois also condemned Trump’s post Saturday.

    “The President’s threats are beneath the honor of our nation, but the reality is that he wants to occupy our city and break our Constitution,” wrote Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson on social media. “We must defend our democracy from this authoritarianism by protecting each other and protecting Chicago from Donald Trump.”

    Illinois Sen. Tammy Duckworth described Trump’s post on X as “Stolen valor at its worst,” writing, “Take off that Cavalry hat, you draft dodger. You didn’t earn the right to wear it.”

    CNN’s Alayna Treene contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump says Chicago ‘will find out why it’s called the Department of WAR’ ahead of planned crackdown

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — President Donald Trump posted a meme on social media Saturday saying that Chicago “will find out why it’s called the Department of WAR,” as the city’s officials brace for an immigration crackdown.

    “I love the smell of deportations in the morning … Chicago about to find out why it’s called the Department of WAR,” the post reads. Trump signed an executive order Friday to rebrand the Pentagon as the “Department of War.”

    The post includes what appears to be an artificially generated image of the president wearing a hat and sunglasses, with the Chicago skyline in the background, accompanied by text reading “Chipocalypse Now.”

    Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker on Saturday called Trump’s post “not normal.”

    “The President of the United States is threatening to go to war with an American city. This is not a joke. This is not normal,” Pritzker wrote on X. “Donald Trump isn’t a strongman, he’s a scared man. Illinois won’t be intimidated by a wannabe dictator.”

    It comes as Trump has ramped up his rhetoric against the country’s third most-populous city. CNN previously reported the Trump administration’s plans to conduct a major immigration enforcement operation in Chicago, and that officials there were bracing for it to begin as early as Friday.

    In recent days, personnel from Immigration and Border Protection as well as Customs and Border Protection have begun trickling into the city, White House officials told CNN.

    The Trump administration has also reserved the right to call in the National Guard if there is a reaction to the operation that warrants it, the officials said. The Chicago operation is being modeled off of a similar operation carried out in Los Angeles in June. A judge ruled this week that the June deployment broke federal law prohibiting the military from law enforcement activity on US soil in most cases; the Trump administration has appealed.

    White House officials have made clear the Chicago immigration crackdown is distinct from the idea the president has floated to use federal law enforcement and National Guard troops to carry out a broader crime crackdown in the city, similar to the operation in Washington, DC.

    When asked by a reporter Tuesday about sending National Guard troops into the city, Trump said, “We’re going,” adding, “I didn’t say when. We’re going in.”

    Democratic officials who represent Chicago and Illinois also condemned Trump’s post Saturday.

    “The President’s threats are beneath the honor of our nation, but the reality is that he wants to occupy our city and break our Constitution,” wrote Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson on social media. “We must defend our democracy from this authoritarianism by protecting each other and protecting Chicago from Donald Trump.”

    Illinois Sen. Tammy Duckworth described Trump’s post on X as “Stolen valor at its worst,” writing, “Take off that Cavalry hat, you draft dodger. You didn’t earn the right to wear it.”

    CNN’s Alayna Treene contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Samantha Waldenberg and CNN

    Source link

  • 3 questions with Chief Master Sgt. John Bentivegna of the US Space Force

    [ad_1]

    Sep. 5—When most people walk into a room and flip a switch, they expect lights to come on without giving much thought to where that electricity is coming from, said U.S. Space Force Chief Master Sgt. John Bentivegna.

    The same is true for the countless everyday conveniences that rely on space-based technology.

    “Everything from the GPS constellation to the finance industry, the transportation industry, the agricultural industry, those of us who have dish networks so we can watch the NFL and all the things — those are all space-related capabilities, and you just assume they’re always going to be there,” said Bentivegna, who visited Kirtland Air Force Base this week.

    Established in 2019 during President Donald Trump’s first term, the Space Force’s purpose is to organize, train and equip forces protecting U.S. interests in space. The newest — and now sixth — branch of the U.S. Armed Forces has six different bases throughout Florida, Colorado and California, according to its website.

    In New Mexico, the military branch also has a presence at KAFB with its Space Rapid Capabilities Office, which develops and delivers “operationally dominant space capabilities at the speed of warfighting relevance,” according to the Kirtland website.

    Bentivegna, who assumed the role in 2023, wants people to understand that “space is closer than you think.”

    “Space actually starts just 62 miles above us. When you think about how far you drive to go to a restaurant or visit a friend, you may be going 62 miles or more,” he said.

    What do Space Force operations look like right now in New Mexico?

    I have been wearing a uniform for over 31 years, and this is actually my first opportunity to visit Kirtland and visit the space entities, specifically, that are doing amazing work down here. It’s actually been an exciting few days for me to finally get a chance in-person to meet the men and women that are doing some of the amazing experimentation, innovation and research and development that’s here.

    So, primarily from the Space Force service perspective, what’s here is Space Systems Command and the Air Force Research Lab, both entities that work on research development, acquisition. (That) is a lot of the work that’s being done here for the Space Force. What are the capabilities and technologies that we’re going to need tomorrow and into the future? It’s the men and women here who are helping make that a reality.

    Do you see New Mexico’s role in Space Force operations developing further?

    I think there’s already discussions about a few more organizations that are either not established yet, that will be established here in Kirtland, in New Mexico, or we are moving some organizations possibly to New Mexico to consolidate where the brain trust is.

    This is the mecca, if you will, for some of the brighter minds to work on what the service will look like in the future, so we’re trying to take advantage of the community that’s here (in) New Mexico. I do anticipate additional opportunities for guardians (the name for Space Force service members), mission sets to move here.

    The Space Force today, at the end of the fiscal year, when you take into account our military and civilians — we’re only about 16,000 strong, so we’re still a relatively very small service. When we talk about moving organizations from one base to another or standing up a new unit, sometimes we’re talking numbers in the dozens, maybe 100. Unlike some of the other services, (where) it could be in numbers of the thousands.

    Can you explain what the ‘space corridor’ is?

    I’ll be honest, that’s the first time I’ve heard that term. But I will say, when you think about space from a war-fighting perspective, and as a war fighter myself, I do spend a lot of time focused on the joint fight and our ability to secure the domain, protect and defend what we have here. When you think about the economic impact that space brings to the United States, like space tourism, space cargo, the amount of money that we benefit, and the quality of life that space brings to us, having a robust space infrastructure, space industry within the United States outside the Department of Defense is very valuable.

    If there is a space corridor, especially when you start talking about more commercial and exploration, that excites me. I think there’s unlimited opportunity and potential to get there. Our role as guardians is just to ensure that there’s freedom of access, so that if investors want to explore, they have the ability to do that with no one standing in their way.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • District of Columbia sues over Trump’s deployment of the National Guard

    [ad_1]

    The District of Columbia on Thursday sued to stop President Donald Trump’s deployment of National Guard during his law enforcement intervention in Washington.The city’s attorney general, Brian Schwalb, said the surge of troops essentially amounts to an “involuntary military occupation.” He argued in the federal lawsuit that the deployment, coinciding with an executive order Aug. 11, that now involves more than 1,000 troops is an illegal use of the military for domestic law enforcement.A federal judge in California recently ruled that Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles after days of protests over immigration raids in June was illegal.The Republican administration is appealing that decision and Trump has said he is ready to order federal intervention in Chicago and Baltimore, despite staunch opposition in those Democrat-led cities. That court ruling, however, does not directly apply to Washington, where the president has more control over the Guard than in states.The White House did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment to the new lawsuit.Members of the D.C. National Guard have had their orders extended through December, according to a Guard official. While that does not necessarily mean all those troops will serve that long, it is a strong indication that their role will not wind down soon.Several GOP-led states have added National Guard troops to the ranks of those patrolling the streets and neighborhoods of the nation’s capital.Schwalb’s filing contends the deployment also violates the Home Rule Act, signed by President Richard Nixon in 1973, because Trump acted without the mayor’s consent and is wrongly asserting federal control over units from other states.The city’s attorney general, an elected official, is its top legal officer and is separate from Washington’s federal U.S. attorney, who is appointed by the president.The lawsuit is the second from Schwalb against the Trump administration since the president asserted control over the city’s police department and sent in the Guard, actions that have been with protests from some residents.Trump has said the operation is necessary to combat crime in the district, and Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, has pointed to a steep drop in offenses such as carjackings since it began.Violent crime has been an issue in the capital for years, though data showed it was on the decline at the start of Trump’s intervention.

    The District of Columbia on Thursday sued to stop President Donald Trump’s deployment of National Guard during his law enforcement intervention in Washington.

    The city’s attorney general, Brian Schwalb, said the surge of troops essentially amounts to an “involuntary military occupation.” He argued in the federal lawsuit that the deployment, coinciding with an executive order Aug. 11, that now involves more than 1,000 troops is an illegal use of the military for domestic law enforcement.

    A federal judge in California recently ruled that Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles after days of protests over immigration raids in June was illegal.

    The Republican administration is appealing that decision and Trump has said he is ready to order federal intervention in Chicago and Baltimore, despite staunch opposition in those Democrat-led cities. That court ruling, however, does not directly apply to Washington, where the president has more control over the Guard than in states.

    The White House did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment to the new lawsuit.

    Members of the D.C. National Guard have had their orders extended through December, according to a Guard official. While that does not necessarily mean all those troops will serve that long, it is a strong indication that their role will not wind down soon.

    Several GOP-led states have added National Guard troops to the ranks of those patrolling the streets and neighborhoods of the nation’s capital.

    Schwalb’s filing contends the deployment also violates the Home Rule Act, signed by President Richard Nixon in 1973, because Trump acted without the mayor’s consent and is wrongly asserting federal control over units from other states.

    The city’s attorney general, an elected official, is its top legal officer and is separate from Washington’s federal U.S. attorney, who is appointed by the president.

    The lawsuit is the second from Schwalb against the Trump administration since the president asserted control over the city’s police department and sent in the Guard, actions that have been with protests from some residents.

    Trump has said the operation is necessary to combat crime in the district, and Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, has pointed to a steep drop in offenses such as carjackings since it began.

    Violent crime has been an issue in the capital for years, though data showed it was on the decline at the start of Trump’s intervention.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to face questions Thursday after recent CDC shakeups

    [ad_1]

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to face questions after recent CDC shakeups

    Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is set to answer tough questions from Senators following his controversial decisions regarding CDC leadership and vaccine policy changes.

    Updated: 3:35 AM PDT Sep 4, 2025

    Editorial Standards

    Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will face serious concerns from senators on Thursday regarding his handling of public health matters, following his decision to force out the recently sworn-in CDC Director Susan Monarez and replace her with Jim O’Neill, who has a background in business.On Wednesday, more than 1,000 current and former Health and Human Services employees who worked with Kennedy called for his resignation in a letter, accusing him of prioritizing politics over science. Kennedy has been reshaping the nation’s vaccine policies and has voiced skepticism about the safety and effectiveness of long-established shots. He’ll be answering questions on Thursday before the Senate Finance Committee. “The CDC was once the world’s most trusted guardian of public health,” Kennedy said in a video message posted ahead of the hearing. “Its mission was simple and noble, protect Americans from infectious disease, but over the years, the agency drifted. Bureaucracy politicized science and mission creed corroded that mission and squandered the public trust.”Republican Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana expressed his concerns, saying, “What I’m most interested in is restoring the confidence of the American people in public health in America, and so far that hasn’t been done.”Last week, under Kennedy’s leadership, the FDA changed COVID-19 vaccine guidelines, limiting their use for younger adults and children. Keep watching for the latest from the Washington News Bureau:

    Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will face serious concerns from senators on Thursday regarding his handling of public health matters, following his decision to force out the recently sworn-in CDC Director Susan Monarez and replace her with Jim O’Neill, who has a background in business.

    On Wednesday, more than 1,000 current and former Health and Human Services employees who worked with Kennedy called for his resignation in a letter, accusing him of prioritizing politics over science.

    Kennedy has been reshaping the nation’s vaccine policies and has voiced skepticism about the safety and effectiveness of long-established shots. He’ll be answering questions on Thursday before the Senate Finance Committee.

    “The CDC was once the world’s most trusted guardian of public health,” Kennedy said in a video message posted ahead of the hearing. “Its mission was simple and noble, protect Americans from infectious disease, but over the years, the agency drifted. Bureaucracy politicized science and mission creed corroded that mission and squandered the public trust.”

    Republican Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana expressed his concerns, saying, “What I’m most interested in is restoring the confidence of the American people in public health in America, and so far that hasn’t been done.”

    Last week, under Kennedy’s leadership, the FDA changed COVID-19 vaccine guidelines, limiting their use for younger adults and children.

    Keep watching for the latest from the Washington News Bureau:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Will Trump’s push for stricter voter laws impact Tennessee? What to know ahead of 2026 elections

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump is moving forward with attempts to change election rules, despite court rulings determining he lacks the authority to do so.

    On Aug. 30, Trump announced plans to sign an executive order requiring voters to present identification in all elections. A previous executive order signed in March, which mandated government-issued proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections, has been blocked by the courts, USA TODAY reported.

    In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote: “Voter I.D. Must Be Part of Every Single Vote. NO EXCEPTIONS! I Will Be Doing An Executive Order To That End!!!”

    He did not specify what kind of identification would be required, when the order would be signed or the legal basis for enforcing it.

    “The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections,” U.S. District Judge Denise Casper of Massachusetts wrote in June. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., reached the same conclusion in April.

    Here’s what to know in Tennessee.

    Why does Trump want to enforce stricter voting laws?

    Trump has long questioned the U.S. electoral system and continues to falsely claim that his 2020 loss to Democratic President Joe Biden was the result of widespread fraud.

    Trump and his Republican allies have also made baseless claims about widespread voting by noncitizens, which is illegal and rarely occurs, USA TODAY reported.

    What are Tennessee’s voter laws?

    A voter hands their identification to a poll worker at Pleasant Ridge Elementary School during primary Election Day for Knoxville City Council at on August 26, 2025.

    Thirty-six states have laws requesting or requiring voters to show some form of identification at the polls, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The remaining 14 states and Washington, D.C., use other methods to verify the identity of voters, for example: non-photo forms of identification such as a bank statement with name and address.

    Tennessee is considered to have “strict” photo ID laws.

    All voters must present a federal or Tennessee state ID containing the voter’s name and photograph when voting at the polls, whether voting early or on Election Day, according to the Secretary of State.

    If a voter cannot present a photo ID, the voter votes on a provisional ballot and must return within two days to show an acceptable form of ID.

    What voter identification is required in Tennessee?

    First-time voter Alexander Pack hands his identification card to a poll worker at Woodland Elementary School on Election Day in Oak Ridge, Tenn., on Tuesday, November 5, 2024.

    First-time voter Alexander Pack hands his identification card to a poll worker at Woodland Elementary School on Election Day in Oak Ridge, Tenn., on Tuesday, November 5, 2024.

    Tennessee accepts the following ID’s, even if expired:

    • Tennessee driver license with your photo

    • Photo ID issued by the Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security

    • Photo ID issued by the federal or Tennessee state government

    • United States Military photo ID

    • Tennessee handgun carry permit with your photo

    First time voters who register by mail or using Online Voter Registration must also present one of the following if the ID is expired:

    • Copy of a current utility bill

    • Paycheck or other government document that shows the voter’s name and address

    Trump’s voter ID push aligns with 2026 Tennessee governor race

    Former President Donald Trump gives a kiss to U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee before they embark on a townhall Sept. 27, 2024 at Macomb Community College in Warren, Michigan.

    Former President Donald Trump gives a kiss to U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee before they embark on a townhall Sept. 27, 2024 at Macomb Community College in Warren, Michigan.

    Trump’s push for stricter voting laws coincides with the 2026 gubernatorial elections, during which 36 states, including Tennessee, will elect new governors.

    In Tennessee, two prominent Republicans have entered the race — U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn, a staunch Trump ally, and U.S. Representative John Rose. According to reports from the White House, Trump has struggled to decide which candidate to endorse.

    “I’ll probably be forced to do it. I wish I didn’t have to do it. But you know, I’ll probably be forced to do it,” Trump is quoted as saying in an X post by USA TODAY White House Correspondent Joey Garrison. The president also called both candidates “fantastic.”

    Rose first announced his bid for the Republican primary ticket in March, while Blackburn didn’t announce her candidacy until August. The two candidates are the only Republicans who have thrown their hats into the ring so far ahead of the 2026 election, but there are a number of Democrats vying for the position as well, the Tennessean previously reported.

    Who is running for Tennessee governor? Marsha Blackburn and John Rose are not the only ones. What to know

    What are the arguments for and against voter IDs?

    Proponents argue that stricter identification requirements can help prevent in-person voter fraud and boost public trust in the election process.

    However, critics contend that such fraud is rare, and that these measures place undue burdens on voters, potentially infringing on their right to vote. Furthermore, critics argue that the laws impose unnecessary costs and administrative challenges on elections officials.

    Regardless of the verification rules in place, all voters are subject to perjury charges if they cast a ballot under false pretenses, added the National Conference.

    What does the Constitution say?

    The Constitution’s so-called elections clause says that the “Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.” The clause also says Congress can “make or alter such Regulations.”

    Contributing: USA TODAY, Joyce Orlando

    Diana Leyva covers trending news and service journalism for the Tennessean. Contact her at Dleyva@gannett.com or follow her on X at @_leyvadiana

    This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: President Trump seeks stricter elections: What to know in Tennessee

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • US military kills 11 in strike on alleged drug boat tied to Venezuelan cartel, Trump says

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — The United States conducted a deadly military strike against an alleged drug boat tied to the cartel Tren de Aragua, President Donald Trump said Tuesday.

    The US president said 11 people were killed in the strike in “international waters.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the “lethal strike” as taking place in the “southern Caribbean” against “a drug vessel which had departed from Venezuela.”

    The use of military force against Latin American drug cartels represents a significant escalation by the Trump administration and could have serious implications for the region.

    “Earlier this morning, on my Orders, U.S. Military Forces conducted a kinetic strike against positively identified Tren de Aragua Narcoterrorists in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility. TDA is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, operating under the control of Nicolas Maduro, responsible for mass murder, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and acts of violence and terror across the United States and Western Hemisphere,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

    “Please let this serve as notice to anybody even thinking about bringing drugs into the United States of America. BEWARE!” he wrote.

    The State Department designated Tren de Aragua, which originated in Venezuela, as a foreign terrorist organization and specially designated global terrorists in February.

    The US has amassed a large number of military assets around the Caribbean and Latin America, drawing the ire of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.

    CNN has asked the Venezuelan government for comment.

    In remarks before he departed on a trip to Mexico and Ecuador on Tuesday, Rubio said the “counter-drug mission” would continue.

    “We are going to wage combat against drug cartels that are flooding American streets and killing Americans,” Rubio said. He said the route from Venezuela was a “common” one.

    Asked by CNN about the legal authority for militarily targeting the cartels, Rubio said, “I’m not going to answer for the White House counsel, suffice it to say that all of those steps were taken in advance.”

    “The president has designated these as terrorist organizations, which is what they are,” he said.

    Trump on Tuesday afternoon said the US military “just over the last few minutes, literally shot out a boat, a drug carrying boat.”

    “It just happened moments ago, and our great general, head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff … he gave us a little bit of a briefing,” Trump said.

    “There’s more where that came from,” he said, noting that “a lot of drugs” are “pouring into” the US from Venezuela.

    A senior defense official confirmed a “precision strike” against an alleged drug vessel in the southern Caribbean, but did not offer further details about the operation.

    CNN previously reported that the US military was deploying more than 4,000 Marines and sailors to the waters around Latin America and the Caribbean as part of a ramped-up effort to combat drug cartels, according to two US defense officials — a show of force that has given the president a broad range of military options should he want to target drug cartels.

    The Trump administration has taken an aggressive approach to combating Latin American drug cartels, designating many of them as foreign terrorist organizations and specially designated global terrorists.

    Tom Karako, a senior fellow of the Defense and Security Department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said while he didn’t know of an instance of such action being taken against a drug cartel in the past, “on the other hand I’m not sure that we would (know).”

    “It would not surprise me in the slightest if there were a dozen instances that we don’t talk about,” he said.

    On Friday, Rubio visited the headquarters of US Southern Command, which has responsibility for the deployed assets. The top US diplomat had previously suggested that military action against the cartels was a possibility.

    The robust military presence in the region has drawn heated remarks from Maduro. The Trump administration has increased the bounty for the Venezuelan president to $50 million for drug trafficking.

    “It is an extravagant threat… absolutely criminal, bloody. They have wanted to move forward with what they call maximum pressure, and in the face of maximum military pressure, we have prepared maximum readiness,” Maduro said Monday, adding that he will not “bow to threats.”

    CNN’s Kylie Atwood, Natasha Bertrand, Haley Britzky, Stefano Pozzebon, Ivonne Valdes Garay, Sol Amaya and Lauren Kent contributed to this report.

    This story and headline have been updated with additional details.

    [ad_2]

    Jennifer Hansler and CNN

    Source link

  • President Trump Says US Has Carried Out Strike Against Drug-Carrying Vessel That Departed From Venezuela – KXL

    [ad_1]

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says the U.S. has carried out a strike in the southern Caribbean against a drug-carrying vessel that departed from Venezuela.

    The president offered scant details on the operation.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Tuesday on X that the vessel was being operated by a “designated narco-terrorist organization.”

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Grant McHill

    Source link

  • ‘Workers Over Billionaires’ and anti-Nazi protests in downtown Indianapolis

    [ad_1]

    People gathered outside the Indiana Statehouse as part of another national demonstration critical of the current administration and President Donald Trump.

    Indiana State Police estimated about 1,000 people attended the 2-hour protest on Labor Day. Organizers said only about 250 people officially registered online.

    The volunteer-led 50501 movement — which stands for 50 protests in 50 states on 1 day — has organized several national protests since February. The group is responsible for the April 5 “Hands off!” demonstration and the June 14 “No Kings” protest. They collaborated with other organizations like Indiana Resistance Alliance for the Sept. 1, 2025 event, marching around the statehouse multiple times with chants.

    The protest’s theme, “Workers over billionaires,” focused on keeping pressure not only on the Trump administration, but also on the billionaires who support or benefit from his policies.

    Workers Over Billionaires nationwide protests

    Around 1,000 people marched around the Indiana Statehouse downtown for the Labor Day protests against President Donald Trump and his administration on Sept. 1, 2025.

    Labor unions and community activists gathered for mass protests on Labor Day, hoping to remind Americans of the power of the working class at a time when billionaires are playing an outsized role in national politics, according to USA Today.

    Although signs in Indianapolis expressed different topics like deportation, the Epstein list, women’s rights, and even opposition to Nazism, Ryleigh Beckett, a leader with the 50501 movement, said the primary message was about labor rights.

    ‘It’s gonna get worse if we don’t do something…’

    Around 1,000 people marched around the Indiana Statehouse downtown for the Labor Day protests against President Donald Trump and his administration on Sept. 1, 2025.

    Around 1,000 people marched around the Indiana Statehouse downtown for the Labor Day protests against President Donald Trump and his administration on Sept. 1, 2025.

    “We want to recognize the history that has come with Labor Day and how the Trump administration is dismantling a lot of the labor rights that we have fought and earned for with blood, sweat, and tears, namely the weakening of unions, which is a sign of fascism,” Beckett said.

    John Steenbergen, 71, said he attended the protest because Trump is different from any president he’s seen in his 50 years of following politics. While he disagreed with Republican presidents like Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, he believed they cared about doing what they thought was best for the United States.But Trump is “cruel” and a “wannabe dictator,” Steenbergen said, pointing to the president’s mass deportation campaign as an example. The Indianapolis resident said he’s worried for his children and grandchildren.“It’s gonna get worse if we don’t do something about it,” he said.

    Morrigan McCoy, 23, led the marches around the Indiana Statehouse and gave the introductory speech before the marches. He has strong opinions about Trump, including “attempts to gerrymander our election.”

    Beckett said she feels in the current climate in Indiana, people feel isolated, but the new goal for the movement is to have people and organizations come together for a common goal and connect people with their neighbors.

    “I think this is the beauty of American culture. We come from all different walks of life, and we may not know our neighbors’ points of view, but we come together and we see that we’re really not alone.”

    The event, which was planned until 3 p.m., ended at 2 p.m. since another protest was planned on Monument Circle.

    People protest Nazis, carry guns

    Just weeks after a small group marched around Monument Circle with Nazi flags, Hoosiers returned to the Circle the afternoon of Sept. 1 to respond with an “anti-Nazi rally.”

    The protest was put together over the past week, organizers told IndyStar. A handful of people carried guns, a reference to the weapons the pro-Nazi protesters had carried, but most appeared unarmed.

    “Left, right and center, I think we can all come together and agree that Nazis aren’t welcome in Indianapolis,” organizer Max Haddad said while speaking to the crowd.

    Among the protesters was a family of four, including two children. Parents Andrew Bodiker and Steph Piercefield, who both wore firearms across their body, told IndyStar they came to the protest to support marginalized communities. The weapons, they said, served as a symbolic response to pro-Nazi protest.

    “We’re just trying to stand up for everybody,” Piercefield said.

    Jesse Kearly, another speaker, said the idea of using the Second Amendment was not popular, but it’s to show that they can protect themselves from people who might have ill intentions.

    Jade Jackson is a Public Safety Reporter for the Indianapolis Star. You can email her at Jade.Jackson@IndyStar.com and follow her on X, formerly Twitter @IAMJADEJACKSON. Contact Marissa Meador at mmeador@gannett.com or find her on X at @marissa_meador.

    This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Indianapolis protesters fight for labor protections, against Nazis

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Chicago braces for federal immigration enforcement operation while Trump criticizes local officials

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — Officials in Chicago are bracing for a major federal immigration enforcement operation that could begin as soon as this week, with the city’s mayor signing an order over the weekend aimed at resisting the Trump administration’s planned crackdown.

    Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said Sunday such a move would be an “invasion” and that he has had no communication with the Trump administration about reported plans to send National Guard troops to Chicago.

    “No one in the administration – the president or anybody under him – has called anyone in my administration, or me. So, it’s clear that in secret they’re planning this – well, it’s an invasion with US troops, if they in fact do that,” Pritzker said Sunday.

    The operation is expected to kick off in Chicago by this Friday and could involve agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, and potentially be backed by guard forces in a peacekeeping role, according to multiple sources familiar with the planning.

    “We’ve already had ongoing operations with ICE in Chicago and throughout Illinois and other states, making sure that we’re upholding our laws, but we do intend to add more resources to those operations,” Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said on CBS News’ “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

    An immigration operation in the city would further escalate a clash between the White House and Democratic-led cities and comes as President Donald Trump and his aides have repeatedly slammed Chicago over policies that limit cooperation between local authorities and federal immigration enforcement.

    Asked about expanding these operations beyond Chicago, Noem said that the Trump administration has “not taken anything off the table,” and specifically named San Francisco and Boston in addition to Chicago. She suggested that Republican-led cities with crime problems were “absolutely” also being evaluated.

    Chicago has been preparing to try to resist Trump’s planned immigration crackdown with Mayor Brandon Johnson signing an executive order Saturday providing guidance and directives to the city’s agencies and law enforcement “in the midst of escalating threats from the federal government.”

    The mayor’s order “affirms” that Chicago police will not “collaborate with federal agents on joint law enforcement patrols, arrest operations, or other law enforcement duties including civil immigration enforcement.” It also “urges” federal law enforcement officers to use body cameras and refrain from wearing masks.

    Exterior view of the Illinois Army National Guard building, housing a recruiting office, on August 27, in Chicago. Credit: Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu/ / Getty Images via CNN Newsource

    “We may see militarized immigration enforcement. We may also see National Guard troops. We may even see active duty military and armed vehicles in our streets. We have not called for this. Our people have not asked for this, but nevertheless, we find ourselves having to respond to this,” Johnson said before signing the executive order on Saturday.

    White House officials have made clear that these immigration enforcement plans are distinct from the idea the president has floated over the past week to use federal law enforcement and National Guard troops to carry out a broader crime crackdown in Chicago, similar to the current surge in Washington, DC.

    Trump took to social media Monday morning with a post celebrating what he called a massive victory over crime in the nation’s capital and taking sharp aim at Democratic leaders across the country for refusing his floated plans for an aggressive federal anti-crime strategy in their states as well.

    He contrasted politicians who are resisting his plans with what he sees as a more welcoming stance from Washington DC’s leadership. In the Truth Social post, Trump said DC Mayor Muriel Bowser’s “statements and actions were positive, instead of others like Pritzker, Wes Moore, Newscum, and the 5% approval rated Mayor of Chicago, who spend all of their time trying to justify violent Crime, instead of working with us to completely ELIMINATE it.”

    Trump officials have been quick to criticize the Illinois governor and defend potential federal policing in the state by pointing to crime statistics.

    Noem pointed to homicide statistics in Chicago on Sunday in a dig to the governor, saying Pritzker “can talk about what a great job he’s doing as governor, but he’s failing these families. … This seems like it’s more about Gov. Pritzker’s ego now rather than actually protecting his people.”

    In a warning to Pritzker on Saturday, Trump told the governor to quickly “straighten” out crime in Chicago or the federal government will intervene.

    “Six people were killed, and 24 people were shot, in Chicago last weekend, and JB Pritzker, the weak and pathetic Governor of Illinois, just said that he doesn’t need help in preventing CRIME. He is CRAZY!!! He better straighten it out, FAST, or we’re coming!” Trump posted on Truth Social.

    At least 54 people were shot – seven of them fatally – in Chicago over the holiday weekend. Roughly 32 shootings have been reported since Friday at 10:32 p.m., with victims ranging in age from 14 to 48, according to incident notifications published by the Chicago Police Department.

    Meanwhile, the Chicago mayor’s office last week touted a 21.6% decrease in overall violent crime and a 32.3% decrease in homicides so far this year.

    [ad_2]

    Shania Shelton and CNN

    Source link

  • Democrats scramble for a redistricting counteroffensive against Trump

    [ad_1]

    Democrats are scrambling to keep their nascent crusade against President Donald Trump’s national redistricting push from fizzling out.

    House Democrats are considering establishing an organization to raise and spend for their remapping efforts as they look to counter an aggressive Republican move that could determine control of the chamber next year, according to three people granted anonymity to describe private conversations. And House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has privately discussed redistricting with blue-state governors, according to another person.

    The Center for American Progress is urging blue states to abandon their independent redistricting commissions. And, through private strategy sessions and public appeals, Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu is asking Democrats across red and blue states to take a no-holds-barred approach to resisting GOP redistricting. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin praised Wu during a meeting in Minneapolis last week for “igniting a national movement within this party.”

    “This is an all-out call to arms,” Wu, who helped lead Texas Democrats’ quorum break, said in an interview. “That chorus of ‘everyone needs to get off their ass and do something’ is growing louder and louder. And more and more elected Democrats who are seen as doing nothing — their commitment to our country is going to be questioned.”

    But Democrats face a lopsided fight.

    They’re hamstrung by constitutional restrictions or independent commissions in some states, while Republicans are generally free of those legal barriers and have leadership trifectas in Indiana, Florida, Missouri and Ohio, promising state lawmakers fewer restrictions to draw Democratic rivals out of their seats.

    Against this backdrop, Democrats are grasping for ways to counter Trump’s maximalist campaign to redraw congressional maps to protect Republicans’ three-seat House majority in the midterms. With a counteroffensive already underway in California, Democrats are turning to other blue states to take up the charge — and finding some open-minded participants in governors with 2028 ambitions.

    Democrats see the promise of netting three seats in Maryland and Illinois, whose governors — Wes Moore and JB Pritzker, respectively — have spoken with Jeffries about redistricting, according to one person granted anonymity to describe those private conversations. The minority party is also eyeing a pickup opportunity in Utah, after a judge ruled the state must redraw its map. Jeffries has also spoken with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, though any changes in the Empire State are unlikely before 2028 and thus wouldn’t impact the upcoming midterms.

    The blowback started as a tit-for-tat response to Trump’s efforts to grow the GOP’s majority next year, kicking off with a push for five more red House seats in Texas. Now Missouri is moving ahead with a new map as the White House bears down on Indiana.

    One national Democratic operative, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the tumultuous situation, described jumping into the redistricting arms race as “the price for entry to the 2028 presidential primary.”

    Caifornia Gov. Gavin Newsom, whose popularity is soaring as he emerges as Democrats’ remapping champion, has been encouraging his counterparts to follow his lead, saying at POLITICO’s California Summit Wednesday, “We’re going to have to see other governors move in a similar direction.”

    An array of party officials and organizations are lining up.

    The National Democratic Redistricting Committee is fielding calls, providing technical support and legal expertise to state leaders looking at their own congressional maps, according to a person directly familiar with their efforts.

    Wu, the Texas House Democrats leader, discussed messaging and other tactics with legislators from seven states where Republicans are eyeing redistricting during a Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee strategy session last week, per a summary of the call provided to POLITICO. And former President Barack Obama called Texas state Rep. James Talarico — a potential U.S. Senate candidate — to voice support for his role in his state’s redistricting battle.

    But in some states, messaging is all Democrats can do. Republicans in Indiana, for example, hold a supermajority and can pass any map without a single Democrat in the chamber.

    It’s not just Democratic officials who are getting involved. Unions that banded together to condemn Republicans’ gerrymandering in Texas are now pledging to put manpower behind Newsom’s ballot campaign in California and holding strategy discussions about combating Trump’s next moves in other states. And activists affiliated with the progressive group Indivisible have made roughly 5,000 calls to governors and lawmakers across 15 states with Democratic trifectas urging them to responsively redistrict.

    “This isn’t something we had to go pitch people on the importance of. This is something people were banging down our doors about,” said Andrew O’Neill, Indivisible’s national advocacy director.

    And it “does seem that this is something that has broken through with these governors and has the potential to create what I’ve been calling a productive ambition,” O’Neill said. “These people might be thinking about future job prospects for themselves and they view being a leader in this fight as a route to do that.”

    Democrats’ pressure campaign is struggling in Colorado, Washington and Oregon, whose governors have all but closed the door to redistricting, and the party lacks the legislative means or the interest to change their maps.

    Colorado Democratic Party Chair Shad Murib sent a recent memo to county officers outlining the near-insurmountable challenges in mimicking California’s ballot campaign, according to a copy obtained by POLITICO. Petitions attempting to circumvent the state’s independent redistricting commission are being filed without the state party’s backing.

    Washington Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen shut down the possibility in a letter to a concerned constituent shared with POLITICO, noting Washington’s Democratic-heavy congressional delegation already does not reflect the political makeup of the state. And state Democratic Party Chair Shasti Conrad acknowledged “lots of pressure and desire” to take up redistricting, but pointed to a broad recognition that it’s “practicably impossible.”

    On the East Coast, New Jersey Democrats are similarly hamstrung by state constitutional issues and though Moore told POLITICO “everything’s on the table” when it comes to redistricting, a state court tossed Maryland Democrats’ previous attempt to gerrymander.

    But Democratic activists are increasingly discontent to let anyone in their party sit on the sidelines as they fight what they view as Trump’s latest power grab.

    “These are serious times, and I’m not sure how much more serious things have to be for [Democratic governors] to get off their ass and get in the batters box and swing for the fences,” said California-based Democratic strategist Michael Trujillo. “This is infuriating.”

    Natalie Fertig and Brakkton Booker contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Cleveland’s mayor wants Democrats to know millennials like him are impatient and ready to lead

    [ad_1]

    The age of the millennial politician is here — nowhere more obviously than in city halls around the country. Cleveland Mayor Justin Bibb surprised Ohio’s political establishment in 2021 by soaring to victory at the age of 34. The former Obama intern-turned-Key Bank executive is now the president of the Democratic Mayors’ Association and a rising star within the party.

    I met up with Bibb — clad in his signature round tortoiseshell glasses and a slim-cut navy suit suit even on a hot and humid Sunday in July. We talked about his city and its relationship with the federal government — from the impact federal cuts may have on his city’s hospital system to his desire to work with Republicans and President Donald Trump on permitting reform.

    Over a plate of mac and cheese at trendy Cleveland bistro Luxe, Bibb said that Democrats at large have missed the fact that millennials are impatient — not willing to wait their turn to run for office, deeply entrepreneurial and chomping at the bit to solve the crises they’ve spent their entire lives navigating.

    “When I ran for mayor, a lot of folks — a lot of establishment Democrats in the party — told me to wait my turn,” Bibb explained. “We are impatient about this country, because we know what crises look like … because we’ve experienced them firsthand.”

    This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

    You’re from Cleveland.

    Born and raised in Cleveland. I live in the southeast side, in the Mount Pleasant/Union Miles neighborhood.

    I’m not that familiar with Cleveland. So tell me what that means, vibes- or identity-wise.

    It’s got a crazy identity in terms of its history. At the height of Cleveland’s prominence — and we were once the fifth largest city in the United States — it was a Jewish middle-class neighborhood. Then you have white flight, redlining, and it became a Black middle class neighborhood.

    To this day, there’s still remnants of that. When I was growing up in the 1990s at the height of the crack epidemic in the city, it still had a strong Black middle class, still strong main streets. And one of the reasons why I ran was to try to reverse that decline.

    In an interview earlier this year, you mentioned that housing was a policy space where this Congress might make some progress. Have you seen anything helpful since then?

    Nothing yet. And what concerns me is that with the passage of this “big beautiful bill,” it’s adding to the deficit, which is going to lead to an increase in interest rates, which is going to lead to an increase in the cost of buying a home.

    If there was one space where I think Trump could have some real bipartisan support, it’s around housing. He’s a builder, right?

    I think every mayor or governor you talk to wants to see Congress support us on permitting reform at every level of government. And every mayor or governor you talk to wants HUD to streamline regulations so it’s easier to build in America.

    Are there other places you see a missed opportunity, where interests align?

    I know that the administration is looking at opportunity zones and … childcare tax credits.

    And then on immigration reform … The best thing for us to do to be a competitive economy is to pass common sense immigration reform. So instead of all this theater and chaos and this other bullshit, let’s get back to work and let’s find common sense immigration reform. Everybody wants a secure border, but we also need to give people a pathway to citizenship, because if we don’t, we can’t be globally competitive.

    You have connections with many other mayors because of the Democratic Mayors Association. Is there any housing policy you’re seeing in other cities that excites you?

    A lot of us right now focus on permitting reform. Cleveland will be launching that effort this fall, where we’re streamlining the process to upload your drawings and to get a permit from City Hall.

    Really proud of the work that Mayor Todd Gloria has done in San Diego, where he has really worked quickly to decrease street homelessness in the downtown parts of San Diego. That’s declined over 60 percent since he took office.

    I look at what Andre Dickens has done in Atlanta, where he has taken old shipping containers and vacant lots and made it a homeless shelter where people have dignity and support to get the second chance they deserve.

    What about some of the cuts that have come out of D.C. recently, on education funding or Medicaid. Are you finding any ways to backfill these cuts? 

    I think every mayor in the country will agree with this: There is no replacement that we can find to plug in the gaps from the federal government.

    Cleveland is home to our only safety net hospital, Metro Hospital, and they could go out of business if these cuts go through. What’s striking is that [Trump] worked to put some provisions in this bill with Republican senators to help rural hospitals, but nothing to support urban hospitals. That’s gonna decimate our public health infrastructure.

    And residents in Ohio are going to feel any impacts sooner, because Ohio also rolled back state Medicaid expansion — right?

    Correct.

    The state cuts … will put a further strain on hospitals like the Cleveland Clinic, Metro Health and emergency hospitals. It’s an issue of public safety, because people may be committing crimes out of survival now, because we no longer have a strong social safety net.

    All these things are interconnected. It’s easy for the president and Republicans in DC to try to say, “Democrat-run cities are unsafe.” But they’re the ones making our country less safe by passing these uncompassionate, crazy bills.

    I totally understand that you can’t replace the federal cuts. But you said at your State of the City address that you were looking for philanthropic avenues to try to help in other ways. 

    I’ll be convening healthcare CEOs and hospitals, I’ll be convening my foundation leaders, to figure out what we can do to stand in the gap until we get change from the federal government.

    One idea is how do we start to promote more preventative care to make sure that folks aren’t getting sick before they need to go to hospital. I’ll be working with Metro Health Hospital, our local social safety net hospital, to get folks enrolled in the exchanges before these changes occur so they can get the care they need. And I have a mobile health clinic that we deploy at my department of public health as well. So all of the above is on the table.

    You’re a millennial. What are Democrats missing about millennials?

    That we’re impatient.

    Say more. 

    When I ran for mayor, a lot of folks — a lot of establishment Democrats in the party — told me to wait my turn. We are impatient about this country, because we know what crises look like … because we’ve experienced them firsthand — from 9/11 to the great recession to two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to the pandemic.

    But we’re also the most entrepreneurial generation as well.

    Follow-up question — though I don’t know how qualified we (millennials) are to talk for them — about Gen Z. In the 2024 election, nationally, millennials stayed the most blue. Gen Z swung toward Trump. 

    Gen Z sees a rigged system.

    But we (millennials) do too, right? Why does it hit different?

    I think for Gen Z … they see all the massive amount of wealth being created because of technology and the proliferation of Amazon, Uber, what have you. They don’t understand why we can’t get our shit together and fix this stuff quickly.

    They looked to someone like Donald Trump, who is the disrupter, to fix it.

    The reason why he’s losing his base on Epstein and the Epstein files is because they thought they could trust him as the disruptor. He would be transparent. We want transparency … and now they’re not getting that.

    What do you want Democrats in D.C. to do more of?

    Listen to mayors. We are closest to the challenges and the pain of what this federal destruction looks like, but we’re also closest to the damn solutions. We know how to fix America’s housing problem because we’re doing it. We’re fixing public safety in cities like Cleveland, Baltimore, Atlanta. We know how to create good quality jobs with union and labor being a key partner.

    The answer to the Democratic Party’s future and problems will not come from congressional D.C. Democrats. It needs to come from America’s mayors and America’s governors.

    Your summer playlist — What are you listening to right now?

    Drake is solid. I listen to a lot of Jungle, I love Jungle. I’ve been in a classic Jay Z mode too, recently. I feel like Jay Z [and] Memphis Bleak is like my quintessential growing up in this city [in the] summer vibe that gets me in a good mood.

    I just sent my barber my [Spotify] day list. It was called “luxury barber shop Sunday afternoon.” And he’s like “Dude, it’s straight bangers.”

    You know he’s playing it at the barbershop right now … And they’re like, “this is the mayor’s playlist.”

    [laughing] Exactly, yeah.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump’s crime strategy ‘performative,’ Gov. Moore says

    [ad_1]

    Maryland Gov. Wes Moore characterized the deployment of National Guard troops to combat crime as “performative” in an interview that aired Sunday.

    Speaking to host Martha Raddatz on ABC’s “This Week,” the Maryland Democrat said: “The National Guard is completely performative because the National Guard is not even trained for it.”

    Moore has been critical of President Donald Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops to Washington and invited him to spend time with him in Baltimore, another city in Trump’s sights. The president has repeatedly mocked Moore.

    “The National Guard is not trained for municipal policing,” Moore said to Raddatz. “You know who is trained for municipal policing? Things like local law enforcement, and things like FBI agents and ATF agents.”

    Raddatz noted that Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser has said the current deployment in her city has reduced crime. Moore said using the National Guard is not a long-term solution to a complicated problem, and that it absorbs funds that could be better spent in other ways.

    “Do you know what I would tell him?” Moore said, referring to Trump. “I would tell him things like: We need to make sure we’re increasing funding for local law enforcement. And we have to invest in our community groups and community organizations. Like, that’s a serious approach how to address this issue, but asking me to deploy my National Guard — people who are not trained for municipal policing — is just not a serious approach.”

    Raddatz asked Moore why it seemed that he preferred to “fight with the president” rather than work with him.

    “I have no interest in fighting with the president,” Moore said, “but I have an interest in fighting for my communities and fighting for our people, and I respect Mayor Bowser, and I’m glad that the trend that she has seen over these past few weeks has continued the downward trend that D.C. has seen over the past year. That’s wonderful.”

    But he added: “The idea of introducing the National Guard into every major American city it is, it is not sustainable, particularly when you’re looking at the cost.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The US government drops its CHIPS Act requirements for Intel

    [ad_1]

    Intel no longer has to fulfill certain requirements or meet milestones that it was originally supposed to under the CHIPS Act, now that the government is taking a stake in the company. According to the Wall Street Journal, Intel said in a filing that it can now receive funding from the government, as long as it can show that it has already spent $7.9 billion on projects that it agreed to take on under a deal with the Commerce Department last year. Reuters notes that Intel has already spent $7.87 billion on eligible CHIPS Act-funded projects.

    In addition, the company doesn’t have to share a percentage of the total cumulative cash flow it gets from each project with the Commerce Department anymore. It doesn’t have to adhere to some of the CHIPS Act’s workflow policy requirements and most other restrictions, as well. However, it still can’t use the funds it gets from the government for dividends and to repurchase shares.

    If you’ll recall, the government recently decided to take a 10 percent stake in Intel instead of proceeding with their original CHIPS Act deal. President Donald Trump previously called for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign, prompting a meeting between them that led to the new agreement. “He walked in wanting to keep his job and he ended up giving us 10 billion dollars for the United States,” Trump said. “So we picked up 10 billion.” Intel eventually announced that the US government will “make an $8.9 billion investment in Intel common stock.” The purchase will be made up of the $5.7 billion previously earmarked for Intel as part of the CHIPS act, while the rest ($3.2 billion) will be awarded as part of the Secure Enclave program.

    Intel CEO David Zinser recently revealed that the company already received $5.7 billion from the government on Wednesday night. The government also previously awarded Intel $2.2 billion in grants under the CHIPS Act, bringing the government’s total involvement with the company to $11.1 billion.

    [ad_2]

    Mariella Moon

    Source link