ReportWire

Tag: Pentagon

  • Pentagon-backed RTP startup eyes Johnston County for rare-earth magnets plant

    [ad_1]

    A Pentagon-backed Research Triangle Park startup could announce as soon as Tuesday plans for a major manufacturing plant in Johnston County — a deal that, if consummated, could make North Carolina a U.S. hub for rare-earth magnets.

    RTP-based Vulcan Elements earlier this month announced a $1.4 billion deal with the federal government that would help the company meet its goal of producing up to 10,000 metric tons of Neodymium Iron Boron magnets over several years. The magnets are used in commercial products such as medical devices, electric vehicles, wind turbines, computer chips, and in defense applications such as fighter jets, nuclear submarines and satellites.

    People familiar with the effort told WRAL that the company has been considering an expansion that could create upwards of 1,000 jobs and an investment approaching $1 billion. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the negotiations. 

    There is no guarantee North Carolina will land the plant, the people said. Vulcan Chief Executive John Maslin told WRAL News this month that the company was engaged in a monthslong, multi-state hunt for expansion sites and that the company expected to make an announcement by the end of November. 

    A Vulcan spokesman on Monday declined to comment on the company’s plans. 

    The Johnston County Board of Commissioners on Tuesday morning is holding a special public hearing, where it could approve a proposed economic development agreement for an undisclosed manufacturer considering an expansion in Banner Township. The hearing would follow a meeting of the state Commerce Department’s Economic Investment Committee, which approves state incentives for companies with plans to expand in North Carolina. After the meetings, Gov. Josh Stein is scheduled to make an economic development announcement at an industrial property near the Johnston County town of Benson. 

    County economic development officials declined to identify the company or describe the project, which was described in a public hearing notice that also didn’t identify the company. David Rhoades, a spokesman for the state Department of Commerce, also declined to discuss the nature of the state’s meeting, adding that the state’s corporate recruiters frequently have discussions with companies about expansion plans. “We don’t comment on those discussions until the companies make a public announcement of their decision,” he said.

    Other people familiar with the negotiations told WRAL News that Vulcan would be the subject of those discussions and the announcement. 

    Economic development deals are often kept secret, protected from the state’s open records laws to enable state and local governments to negotiate with companies and to allow companies to explore options before finalizing major decisions. 

    It’s common for state and local officials to coordinate the timing of economic development meetings around corporate announcements. Officials often vote on incentives ahead of major economic development announcements, and often on the same day. Public meetings intended to discuss incentives are typically scheduled only after a company has committed to a location.

    Stein’s announcement is at the Crosspoint Logistics Center. The project identified in the county notice is proposing its expansion at Crosspoint,  which is south of the nexus of Interstate 95 and I-40. 

    The state’s performance-based incentives packages are often reserved for companies that plan to create lots of jobs that pay above the county average. Grants are typically paid out if the company meets annual hiring and investment targets. 

    The county is considering a proposal that includes economic incentives in the form of annual cash grants over a 15-year period — to be paid only after job-creation and investment targets have been met, according to the county notice. 

    “The county believes this project will help stimulate the local economy, result in new taxable capital investments in real and personal property increasing the tax base, and cause the creation by the company of a substantial number of new, permanent jobs,” the county’s hearing announcement said. 

    Federal funding boost

    The federal government’s interest in Vulcan is centered on its efforts to strengthen the nation’s domestic supply of rare-earth magnets.

    The U.S. Department of Commerce said Nov. 3 that it struck a preliminary agreement to receive a $50 million equity stake in Vulcan. The company’s expansion would be financed in part by a $620 million direct loan from the Pentagon’s Office of Strategic Capital, $50 million of federal incentives from the Department of Commerce under the CHIPS and Science Act, and $550 million in private capital, the company said. Indiana-based ReElement Technologies would also expand its recycling and processing capabilities under the deal, with help from an $80 million direct loan from the Pentagon, matched by private capital.

    The planned federal incentives for Vulcan would fund equipment used for the domestic production of its magnets. ReElement Technologies processes end-of-life magnets, electronic waste, and mined concentrates into high-purity rare earth oxides.

    “We know that here in the United States, we need resilient, secure supply chains, both for national security, but also for economic resilience,” Maslin, the Vulcan CEO, told WRAL News in an interview after the deal was struck with the federal government. “If we want to win the AI race, these go in data centers, if we want to build out drones for agriculture, consumer delivery, if we want to lead the robotics revolution, if we want to build cars in this country, we need to make sure that we have capacity of critical components here in the US.

    Vulcan Elements’ magnets have already been delivered to customers in the defense and technology sectors. Vulcan and ReElement have worked together to help strengthen domestic supply of rare-earth magnets to build security around some of the nation’s most important sectors, executives said.

    “Our investment in Vulcan Elements will accelerate U.S. production of rare earth magnets for American manufacturers,” U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said in a statement after the federal financing deal was struck earlier this month. “We are laser-focused on bringing critical mineral and rare earth manufacturing back home, ensuring America’s supply chain is strong, secure and perfectly reliable.” 

    WRAL State Government Reporter Will Doran contributed to this report. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Suspicious package sickens several at Joint Base Andrews, home to Air Force One

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    A Joint Base Andrews spokesperson says several people are ill after a suspicious package was opened at Joint Base Andrews at approximately 1 p.m. Thursday. 

    Base medical personnel responded immediately and treated multiple individuals who reported feeling sick, officials said. All patients were listed in stable condition and later released.

    “As a precaution, the building and connecting building were evacuated, and a cordon was established around the area,” the spokesperson said in a statement to Fox News. “Joint Base Andrews first responders were dispatched to the scene, determined there were no immediate threats, and normal operations have resumed. An investigation is currently ongoing.”

    US NAVAL ACADEMY IN ANNAPOLIS ON LOCKDOWN AS ACTIVE THREAT REPORTED

    The sign for Joint Base Andrews is seen on March 26, 2021, at Andrews Air Force Base, Md.  (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

    Authorities have not disclosed what the package contained or what may have caused the symptoms. The base was temporarily locked down while emergency crews assessed the situation.

    The base was temporarily locked down so that the installation and emergency personnel could assess the situation.

    A shot of Air Force One on an airport runway

    Air Force One lands at Joint Base Andrews.  (National Geographic/Renegade Pictures)

    SHOOTING AT GEORGIA’S FORT STEWART INJURES 5 SOLDIERS; SUSPECT IN CUSTODY

    Several of the individuals were taken to Malcolm Grow Medical Center on the base for evaluation.

    Joint Base Andrews is home to Air Force One and other aircraft that support the president, vice president and senior U.S. leaders.

    Trump waves as he boards Air Force One

    President Donald Trump gestures as he boards Air Force One, as he departs for New York at Joint Base Andrews, Md., on Friday, Sept. 26, 2025.  (Reuters/Elizabeth Frantz)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Officials said the investigation remains active as they work to determine the source and nature of the package.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dick Cheney dies; vice president unapologetically supported wars in Iraq, Afghanistan

    [ad_1]

    Richard B. Cheney, the former vice president of the United States who was the architect of the nation’s longest war as he plotted President George W. Bush’s thunderous global response to the 9/11 terror attacks, has died.

    Vexed by heart trouble for much of his adult life, Cheney died Monday night due to complications of pneumonia and cardiac and vascular disease, according to a statement from his family. He was 84.

    “For decades, Dick Cheney served our nation, including as White House Chief of Staff, Wyoming’s Congressman, Secretary of Defense, and Vice President of the United States,” the statement said. “Dick Cheney was a great and good man who taught his children and grandchildren to love our country, and to live lives of courage, honor, love, kindness, and fly fishing. We are grateful beyond measure for all Dick Cheney did for our country. And we are blessed beyond measure to have loved and been loved by this noble giant of a man.”

    To supporters and detractors alike, Cheney was widely viewed as the engine that drove the Bush White House. His two-term tenure capped a lifetime of public service, both in Congress and on behalf of four Republican presidents.

    It often fell to Cheney, not President Bush, to make an assertive, unapologetic case for the American-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and for the controversial antiterrorism measures such as the Guantánamo Bay prison. And after the election of President Obama, it was once again Cheney, not Bush, who stood among the new president’s fiercest critics on national security.

    In an October 2009 speech — one emblematic of the role he embraced after leaving the White House — Cheney blasted the Obama administration for opening a probe of “enhanced” interrogations of suspected terrorists conducted during the Bush years.

    “We cannot protect this country by putting politics over security, and turning the guns on our own guys,” he said. The rhetoric was textbook Cheney: blunt, unvarnished, delivered with authority.

    While Cheney at the time was attempting to occupy the leadership vacuum in the GOP in the age of Obama, there was little doubt that he also was motivated to preserve a legacy that appears to be as much his as former President Bush‘s. For eight years, Cheney redrew the lines that defined the vice presidency in a way no predecessor had. His office enjoyed greater autonomy than others before it, while working to keep much of his influence from plain sight. That way of operating led to a challenge before the Supreme Court as well as a criminal investigation over a leak of classified information.

    Moreover, the image of a powerful backroom operator managing the Bush administration’s “war on terror,” combined with his service as Defense secretary during the Persian Gulf War and his stint as a chairman of defense contracting giant Halliburton, made Cheney a towering bête noire to liberals worldwide. To them, he embodied a dangerous fusion of politics and the military-industrial complex — and they viewed his every move with deep suspicion.

    To his champions, however, he was the firm-jawed, hulking, resolute defender of American interests.

    Standing with the administration was more than a duty to Cheney; it was an article of faith. The invasion of Iraq “was the right thing to do, and if we had to do it over again, we’d do exactly the same thing,” Cheney said in a 2006 interview, even as the nation slowly learned that U.S. intelligence suggesting Saddam Hussein’s regime possessed weapons of mass destruction was simply not true.

    Three years earlier, Cheney had pledged that the U.S. would be greeted in Iraq as “liberators” — a comment that haunted him as insurgents in the country gained strength, killed thousands of allied troops and extended the conflict for years. The war in Afghanistan would drag on for 20 years, ending in 2021 as it had begun, with the Taliban back in control.

    While Cheney will largely be remembered for his leading role in the response to the 9/11 terror attacks, he had long worked the corridors of power in Washington. He was a White House aide to President Nixon and later chief of staff to President Ford. As a member of the House from Wyoming, he rose quickly to become part of the Republican leadership during the 1980s. In the early ’90s, he ran the Pentagon during the Gulf War.

    Richard Bruce “Dick” Cheney was born in Lincoln, Neb., on Jan. 30, 1941, and spent much of his teenage years in Casper, Wyo. His father worked for the U.S. Soil Conservation Service.

    As a young man, he was more interested in hunting, fishing and sports than in academics, and a stint at Yale University was short-lived. He eventually obtained bachelor’s and master’s degrees from the University of Wyoming and studied toward a doctorate at the University of Wisconsin.

    In 1964, he married Lynne Ann Vincent, who became a lifelong political partner while strongly influencing Cheney’s conservatism. Daughter Elizabeth, who was elected to Congress in 2017, was born in 1966 and her sister, Mary, arrived three years later. The sisters became embittered years later when Elizabeth — who preferred Liz — took a stance opposing same-sex marriage, which seemed a slap to Mary and her wife. Cheney, however, offered his support for such unions, an early GOP voice for same-sex marriage. Years later, he came to Liz’s defense when she broke with fellow Republicans and voted to impeach President Trump following the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. In addition to his wife and daughters, Cheney is survived by seven grandchildren.

    A fellowship sent Cheney to Washington, where he soon began working for a politically shrewd House member who also was a lifetime influence, Donald H. Rumsfeld. When Rumsfeld joined the Nixon administration, Cheney followed.

    After Ford succeeded Nixon in the wake of Watergate, Rumsfeld served as chief of staff, with Cheney at his side. Ford eventually appointed Rumsfeld secretary of Defense, and Cheney, at 34, ran the White House. Even then, his calm reserve was a hallmark.

    Although nearly everyone working for him was older, “He was very self-assured,” James Cannon, a member of Ford’s White House team, said years later. “It didn’t faze him a bit to be chief of staff.”

    Ford lost a narrow election to Jimmy Carter in 1976, but Cheney’s Washington career was just getting underway. He headed back to Casper and in little more than a year was running for Congress.

    His health, though, already was a factor. In 1978, at age 37 and in the midst of a primary election campaign, he had a heart attack, the first of several. He would undergo multiple surgeries, including a quadruple bypass, two angioplasties, installation of a heart pump and — in 2012 — a transplant. His frequent trips to the hospital and seeming indestructibility provided fodder for late-night talk show hosts during Cheney’s vice presidency.

    With the help of television ads reminding voters that Dwight D. Eisenhower and Lyndon B. Johnson had served full White House terms despite having had heart attacks, he narrowly won the Republican nomination and, in November 1978, secured election to the House of Representatives from Wyoming’s single district.

    In Congress, he was known as a listener more interested in problem-solving than conservative demagoguery, even as he quietly built a voting record that left no doubt about where he stood on the political spectrum. He quickly moved into the ranks of GOP leadership.

    Cheney stepped into the public spotlight after he was named Defense secretary by President George H.W. Bush in 1989. As the Berlin Wall fell and the Cold War cooled, Cheney was charged with overseeing a Pentagon that was more fractious than usual. In a test of political and managerial will, he oversaw major reductions in the Defense budget, a profound downsizing of forces and the closing of obsolete military bases. He helped implement the U.S. invasion of Panama in 1989 to oust the country’s leader, Manuel Noriega, for drug trafficking and racketeering.

    But Cheney — along with his hand-picked chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Colin Powell — made his mark in the American response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Cheney played a key role in persuading the Saudi royal family to allow American troops to be stationed in Saudi Arabia to defend against a looming attack from Hussein’s forces.

    The Cheney-led Pentagon then shifted to offense in 1991, amassing an enormous American force that totaled more than 500,000 soldiers, nearly twice the number employed in the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq. The U.S. military, with help from allied countries, overwhelmed the Iraqi forces in Kuwait in only 43 days and easily entered Iraq.

    Characteristically, Cheney would defend the then-controversial decision to halt the U.S. advance toward Baghdad, which left Hussein in power. “I would guess if we had gone in there, we would still have forces in Baghdad today. We’d be running the country,” he said in a 1992 speech. “We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home.”

    Cheney’s efforts to station U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia, considered critical to the push to repel Iraq, would have unforeseen ramifications. The military presence there helped radicalize young Islamic militants such as Osama bin Laden.

    After President Clinton’s victory in 1992, Cheney left government service. Three years later, he assumed the helm of Halliburton, one of the world’s leading oil field companies and a prominent military contractor. The company thrived under Cheney’s leadership: Its relationship with the Pentagon flourished, its international operations expanded and Cheney grew wealthy.

    In 2000, then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush, the Republican nominee for president, asked Cheney to head up the search for his running mate, then ultimately chose Cheney for the job instead. He brought to the ticket an element of maturity and Washington gravitas that the inexperienced Bush did not possess.

    Cheney’s lack of design on the presidency, and his willingness to return to government 10 days shy of his 60th birthday, seemingly gave Bush the benefit of his experience and earned Cheney a measure of trust — and thus authority — commanded by few presidential advisors.

    Once in office, Cheney, mindful of lessons learned in the Ford White House, sought to revitalize an executive office he believed had become too hemmed in by Congress and the courts. He termed it a “restoration.”

    “After Watergate, President Ford said there was an imperiled president, not an imperial presidency,” said presidential historian Robert Dallek. Cheney, he said, felt “he badly needed to expand the powers of the presidency to assure the national security.”

    In office barely a week, Cheney created a national energy policy task force in response to rising gasoline prices. A series of meetings with top officials from the oil, natural gas, electricity and nuclear industries were closed to the public, and Cheney refused to reveal the names of the participants. Cheney would exert similar influence over environmental policy and, with an office on Capitol Hill, forcefully advance the president’s legislative agenda.

    A lawsuit seeking information about the task force made its way to the Supreme Court, which ruled in the vice president’s favor in 2004. One of the justices in the majority was Antonin Scalia, who was a friend and, it was later revealed, had recently gone duck hunting with the vice president.

    Another hunting trip gone awry earned Cheney embarrassing headlines in 2006 when he accidentally shot and wounded a member of the party with a round of birdshot while quail hunting on a Texas ranch.

    More troubling to Cheney was a federal criminal probe in connection with the 2003 leak of the identity of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson. The investigation resulted in the conviction four years later of Cheney aide I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby for perjury and obstruction of justice. Libby was later pardoned by President Trump.

    Cheney, however, will be largely remembered for his unwavering belief that the U.S. invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq — especially the latter — were essential, a stance he maintained even as the missions in both theaters evolved from rooting out suspected terrorists to nation-building, and even as the casualties skyrocketed and it became clear the 20-year mission was doomed.

    When U.S. troops and civilians were pulled out of Afghanistan in a fraught and fatal departure in 2021, it was Cheney’s daughter who spoke up.

    “We’ve now created a situation where as we get to the 20th anniversary of 9/11, we are surrendering Afghanistan to the very terrorist organization that housed al Qaeda when they plotted and planned the attacks against us,” Rep. Liz Cheney (R.-Wyo.) said.

    The former vice president’s steely resolve was captured years later in “Vice,” a 2018 biographical drama in which Christian Bale portrayed Cheney as a brainy yet uncompromisingly uncharismatic leader.

    It was Cheney who insisted early on that Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. “There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us,” Cheney said in August 2002. The U.S. eventually determined that Iraq had no such weapons.

    He argued forcefully that Hussein was linked to the 2001 terror attacks. When other administration officials fell silent, Cheney continued to make the connections even though no shred of proof was ever found. In a 2005 speech, he called the Democrats who accused the administration of manipulating intelligence to justify the war “opportunists” who peddled “cynical and pernicious falsehoods” to gain political advantage.

    Cheney also frequently defended the use of so-called extreme interrogation methods, such as waterboarding, on al Qaeda operatives. He did so in the final months of the Bush administration, as both the president’s and Cheney’s public approval ratings plunged.

    “It’s a good thing we had them in custody and it’s a good thing we found out what they knew,” he said in a 2008 speech to a friendly crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

    “I’ve been proud to stand by him, the decisions he made,” Cheney said of Bush. “And would I support those same decisions today? You’re damn right I would.”

    Oliphant and Gerstenzang are former Times staff writers.

    Staff writer Steve Marble contributed to this story.

    [ad_2]

    James Oliphant, James Gerstenzang

    Source link

  • President Trump threatens possible military action in Nigeria

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump said on Saturday that he is directing the Pentagon to prepare for possible military action in Nigeria, as he accused the country’s government of failing to stop the killing of Christians. “If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing,’ to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities,” Trump wrote on social media. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, whom the Trump administration is now referring to as the Secretary of War, responded soon after with his own post, saying, “Yes sir.” “The killing of innocent Christians in Nigeria — and anywhere — must end immediately,” Hegseth wrote.On Friday, Trump also said he would designate Nigeria “a country of particular concern” for allegedly failing to rein in the persecution of Christians. Nigeria’s President Bola Ahmed Tinubu responded on social media Saturday, saying his administration is open to deepening cooperation with the United States and the international community to protect people of all faiths. He also acknowledged the country’s security challenges but rejected Trump’s framing of his government’s response. “The characterisation of Nigeria as religiously intolerant does not reflect our national reality, nor does it take into consideration the consistent and sincere efforts of the government to safeguard freedom of religion and beliefs for all Nigerians,” Tinubu said. More from the Washington Bureau:

    President Donald Trump said on Saturday that he is directing the Pentagon to prepare for possible military action in Nigeria, as he accused the country’s government of failing to stop the killing of Christians.

    “If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing,’ to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities,” Trump wrote on social media.

    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, whom the Trump administration is now referring to as the Secretary of War, responded soon after with his own post, saying, “Yes sir.”

    “The killing of innocent Christians in Nigeria — and anywhere — must end immediately,” Hegseth wrote.

    On Friday, Trump also said he would designate Nigeria “a country of particular concern” for allegedly failing to rein in the persecution of Christians.

    Nigeria’s President Bola Ahmed Tinubu responded on social media Saturday, saying his administration is open to deepening cooperation with the United States and the international community to protect people of all faiths. He also acknowledged the country’s security challenges but rejected Trump’s framing of his government’s response.

    “The characterisation of Nigeria as religiously intolerant does not reflect our national reality, nor does it take into consideration the consistent and sincere efforts of the government to safeguard freedom of religion and beliefs for all Nigerians,” Tinubu said.

    More from the Washington Bureau:

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pentagon will reportedly award SpaceX a $2 billion contract to help develop the ‘Golden Dome’

    [ad_1]

    SpaceX will reportedly receive a $2 billion contract to develop satellites for the US government, according to the . The WSJ‘s report detailed that SpaceX will be tasked with developing up to 600 satellites that can track missiles and aircraft and will be used for President Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” project.

    in May, the president introduced a project to build an anti-missile defense system that would intercept missile attacks before reaching their target. The Golden Dome is reminiscent of Israel’s system, but the Pentagon has yet to reveal concrete details about the project. Considering the scale of the project, it’s worth noting that SpaceX’s reported $2 billion contract could be one of many associated with the Golden Dome. According to the report, companies like Anduril Industries and Palantir Technologies could also be involved with the development, which the Trump administration wants to complete before the end of his presidential term.

    Beyond the Golden Dome, the WSJ reported that the Pentagon is planning to use SpaceX’s extensive satellite network for other purposes, including military communications and vehicle tracking. While the numbers are constantly fluctuating, SpaceX currently has more than 8,000 satellites for its Starlink service.

    [ad_2]

    Jackson Chen

    Source link

  • Pentagon

    [ad_1]

    The Pentagon said the U.S. is deploying the Navy’s newest and most advanced aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, to the Caribbean, along with its strike group. The move comes as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted Friday that the U.S. military carried out its tenth strike at sea on alleged drug vessels. Ret. Army Maj. Mike Lyons, a military analyst, joins CBS News to discuss.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. strikes 8th alleged drug vessel, this time on the Pacific side

    [ad_1]

    The U.S. struck another alleged drug vessel Tuesday night, this time on the Pacific side of South America, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed Wednesday.

    In what is the eighth known U.S. attack on a boat since Sept. 2, two individuals aboard the vessel were killed, Hegseth said. The other seven strikes targeted vessels in the Caribbean.

    Hegseth wrote on social media that the Defense Department conducted the strike at President Trump’s direction and alleged the vessel was operated by a “designated terrorist organization and conducting narco-trafficking in the Eastern Pacific.”

    He continued: “The vessel was known by our intelligence to be involved in illicit narcotics smuggling, was transiting along a known narco-trafficking transit route, and carrying narcotics. There were two narco-terrorists aboard the vessel during the strike, which was conducted in international waters.”

    Hegseth said no U.S. forces were harmed in the strike. He also shared a video of the strike, in which viewers see a vessel moving through the water, and then hit and engulfed in flames.

    Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona said Sunday on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” “We want to keep fentanyl out of the United States, … but those routes through the Caribbean on boats are predominantly used to bring cocaine to Europe,” not to the U.S. And fentanyl tends to be transported to to the U.S. “from a different way,” Kelly added. 

    The Pentagon has not yet responded to a request for information about the nationalities of the individuals on the boat.

    Kelly also told “Face the Nation” that when administration officials briefed Congress on the drug vessel strikes, they “had a very hard time explaining to us the rationale, the legal rationale for doing this and the constitutionality of doing it.” He said lawmakers were told there is “a secret list of over 20 narco organizations, drug trafficking cartels,” but U.S. officials did not share the list with Congress.  

    At least 34 people have been killed in U.S. strikes on alleged drug boats. The Trump administration has told Congress the U.S. is in a “non-international armed conflict” with drug cartels, arguing that the narcotics they smuggle kill tens of thousands of Americans every year, and this constitutes an “armed attack.”

    Two men survived a U.S. strike on a suspected drug-trafficking submersible vessel in the Caribbean last week, and the U.S. repatriated the men, one from Ecuador and one from Colombia. Ecuador released the man, identified as Andrés Fernando Tufiño, after authorities said they had found no evidence that he had committed a crime.

    The Colombian citizen remains hospitalized after his repatriation. Interior Minister Armando Benedetti said he “arrived with brain trauma, sedated, drugged, breathing with a ventilator.” Authorities there said he would face prosecution. Two other men were killed in the strike on the submersible vessel.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Hegseth cracks down on Pentagon staff speaking to Congress

    [ad_1]

    The Defense Department is significantly changing its policy of interacting with Congress, according to a new, five-page memo obtained by NBC News.

    The memo, whose authenticity was confirmed by a Defense Department official, instructs all Pentagon personnel, except for the inspector general’s office, to seek approval before they communicate with lawmakers and staff members on Capitol Hill and other elected officials.

    Dated Oct. 15, the memo, which is signed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg, appears to order Pentagon officials — including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — to obtain permission from the department’s legislative affairs office for any communication with Capitol Hill.

    The memo says that “effective immediately,” personnel “must coordinate all legislative affairs activities” through the office of legislative affairs.

    It’s a departure from current practice; previously, Defense Department agencies were free to manage their own interactions with Capitol Hill.

    But under Hegseth, the department has sought stricter control over messaging coming out of the Pentagon. Dozens of reporters turned in their badges and left the building last week, when most news agencies refused to sign unprecedented restrictions Hegseth imposed that threatened consequences for journalists who reported information he had not approved for release, even if it was unclassified.

    The new directive, which would further curb information flow from the Pentagon to Congress, is designed “to achieve our legislative goals,” Hegseth and his deputy wrote in the memo.

    “Unauthorized engagements with Congress by DoW personnel acting in their official capacity, no matter how well-intentioned, may undermine Department-wide priorities critical to achieving our legislative objectives,” the memo says, using the initialism for the “Department of War,” the Defense Department’s secondary but unofficial name used by the Trump administration.

    Breaking Defense first reported news of the memo. The Defense Department did not immediately respond to questions about it.

    The highest-ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, accused Hegseth and his team of being “afraid of the truth.”

    Reed called the memo “symptomatic” of “the paranoia that is emanating from the Defense Department.”

    “We don’t want any lawyers, we don’t want any press, we don’t want anybody from Congress,” he said. “And you know, and as a result, I think they’re, they’re positioning themselves— we do what we want, no one checks us. The press doesn’t, Congress doesn’t, the courts, well, that’ll be a few years from now. So it’s a disparaging development.”

    Meanwhile, the committee’s chairman, Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., said he “wouldn’t be able to comment about” the memo. In recent weeks, Wicker has repeatedly told reporters he would not answer questions in the hallways of the Capitol.

    Frank Thorp V contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Julie Tsirkin and Courtney Kube | NBC News

    Source link

  • Hegseth cracks down on Pentagon staff speaking to Congress

    [ad_1]

    The Defense Department is significantly changing its policy of interacting with Congress, according to a new, five-page memo obtained by NBC News.

    The memo, whose authenticity was confirmed by a Defense Department official, instructs all Pentagon personnel, except for the inspector general’s office, to seek approval before they communicate with lawmakers and staff members on Capitol Hill and other elected officials.

    Dated Oct. 15, the memo, which is signed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg, appears to order Pentagon officials — including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — to obtain permission from the department’s legislative affairs office for any communication with Capitol Hill.

    The memo says that “effective immediately,” personnel “must coordinate all legislative affairs activities” through the office of legislative affairs.

    It’s a departure from current practice; previously, Defense Department agencies were free to manage their own interactions with Capitol Hill.

    But under Hegseth, the department has sought stricter control over messaging coming out of the Pentagon. Dozens of reporters turned in their badges and left the building last week, when most news agencies refused to sign unprecedented restrictions Hegseth imposed that threatened consequences for journalists who reported information he had not approved for release, even if it was unclassified.

    The new directive, which would further curb information flow from the Pentagon to Congress, is designed “to achieve our legislative goals,” Hegseth and his deputy wrote in the memo.

    “Unauthorized engagements with Congress by DoW personnel acting in their official capacity, no matter how well-intentioned, may undermine Department-wide priorities critical to achieving our legislative objectives,” the memo says, using the initialism for the “Department of War,” the Defense Department’s secondary but unofficial name used by the Trump administration.

    Breaking Defense first reported news of the memo. The Defense Department did not immediately respond to questions about it.

    The highest-ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, accused Hegseth and his team of being “afraid of the truth.”

    Reed called the memo “symptomatic” of “the paranoia that is emanating from the Defense Department.”

    “We don’t want any lawyers, we don’t want any press, we don’t want anybody from Congress,” he said. “And you know, and as a result, I think they’re, they’re positioning themselves— we do what we want, no one checks us. The press doesn’t, Congress doesn’t, the courts, well, that’ll be a few years from now. So it’s a disparaging development.”

    Meanwhile, the committee’s chairman, Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., said he “wouldn’t be able to comment about” the memo. In recent weeks, Wicker has repeatedly told reporters he would not answer questions in the hallways of the Capitol.

    Frank Thorp V contributed.

    [ad_2]

    Julie Tsirkin and Courtney Kube | NBC News

    Source link

  • Is Trump’s ‘heat’ on Venezuela the start of a wider campaign for regime change?

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    President Donald Trump said he believes Venezuela is “feeling heat” amid his administration’s war against alleged drug boats in the Caribbean, which has taken out at least two vessels in just the past week. 

    Although Trump has said the strikes are intended to curb the influx of drugs into the United States, experts and some lawmakers contend that they serve another purpose: to exert pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro so he’s ousted from power. 

    “The Trump administration is likely attempting to force Maduro to voluntarily leave office through a series of diplomatic moves, and now military action and the threat thereof,” Brandan Buck, a foreign policy analyst at the Cato Institute, said in an email to Fox News Digital Thursday. “Whether this constitutes a ‘regime change’ or something else is a question of semantics.” 

    HOW TRUMP’S STRIKES AGAINST ALLEGED NARCO-TERRORISTS ARE RESHAPING THE CARTEL BATTLEFIELD: ‘ONE-WAY TICKET’

    Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro gestures as he holds a press conference, amid rising tensions with the United States over the deployment of U.S. warships in the Southern Caribbean and nearby waters.  (Reuters)

    The Trump administration repeatedly has said it does not recognize Maduro as a legitimate head of state, but instead, a leader of a drug cartel. In August, the Trump administration upped the reward for information leading to Maduro’s arrest to $50 million, labeling him “one of the largest narco-traffickers in the world.”

    So far, the Trump administration has been tight-lipped when asked about Maduro, and Trump declined to answer Wednesday when asked if the CIA had the authority to “take out” Maduro. 

    However, Trump confirmed that he authorized the CIA to conduct covert operations in Venezuela, after the New York Times reported Wednesday he signed off on the move. Trump told reporters he did so because Venezuela has released prisoners into the U.S., and that drugs were coming into the U.S. from Venezuela through sea routes. 

    Additionally, Trump confirmed Friday that Maduro offered to grant the U.S. access to Venezuelan oil and other natural resources, claiming the Venezuelan leader didn’t want to “f*** around” with the U.S. 

    Still, these recent strikes are unlikely to majorly undermine drug flow into the U.S., according to Buck. 

    “It is more likely that those strikes are part of this incremental effort to dislodge Maduro than merely an effort to wage war on the cartels,” Buck said. “Pacific and overland routes through Mexico are considerably more prolific, and Venezuela itself is a relatively minor player, especially when it comes to fentanyl.” 

    The Trump administration has employed maritime forces to address drug threats, and has bolstered naval assets in the Caribbean in recent months. For example, Trump has sent several U.S. Navy guided missile destroyers to enhance the administration’s counter-narcotics efforts in the region starting in August.

    TRUMP UNLEASHES US MILITARY POWER ON CARTELS. IS A WIDER WAR LOOMING?

    U.S. strike on drug-trafficking boat

    The U.S. killed six alleged drug traffickers on a boat in international waters near Venezuela, President Donald Trump announced Oct. 14, 2025. (realDonaldTrump/Truth Social)

    Geoff Ramsey, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council international affairs think tank, said that the Trump administration wants these additional forces to encourage the Venezuelan military to take matters into their own hands. 

    “What President Trump is hoping is that this deployment will signal to the Venezuelan military that they should rise up against Maduro themselves,” Ramsey said in a Thursday email to Fox News Digital. “The problem is that we haven’t seen this approach bear fruit in twenty years of trying. Maduro is terrible at governing, but good at keeping his upper ranks fat and happy while the people starve.”

    “What is needed here is some kind of a road map, or a blueprint for a transition, that can be more attractive to the ruling party and those around Maduro who might secretly want change but need to see a future for themselves in a democratic Venezuela,” Ramsey said. 

    Meanwhile, the second Trump administration has adopted a hard-line approach to address the flow of drugs into the U.S., and designated drug cartel groups like Tren de Aragua, Sinaloa and others as foreign terrorist organizations in February.

    Additionally, the White House sent lawmakers a memo Sept. 30 informing them that the U.S. is now participating in a “non-international armed conflict” with drug smugglers, and has conducted at least six strikes against vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The U.S. seized survivors from the most recent strike Thursday — the first one involving survivors. At least 28 other individuals have died from previous strikes. 

    Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have voiced concerns over the legality of the strikes, and Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Tim Kaine, D-Va., filed a war powers resolution in September to bar U.S. forces from engaging in “hostilities” against certain non-state organizations.

    TRUMP TOUTS US STRIKE AS MADURO SLAMS MILITARY ‘THREAT’ OFF VENEZUELA

    Sen. Adam Schiff

    Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., pictured here, and Tim Kaine, D-Va., filed a war powers resolution in September to bar U.S. forces from engaging in “hostilities” against certain non-state organizations. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    The resolution failed in the Senate by a 51–48 margin on Oct. 8, but Republicans Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska voted alongside their Democratic counterparts for the resolution.

    On Friday, Schiff, Kaine and Paul introduced another narrower war powers resolution that would block U.S. armed forces from participating in “hostilities” against Venezuela specifically. The lawmakers said the resolution came in response to Trump’s comments considering land operations in Venezuela. 

    “The Trump administration has made it clear they may launch military action inside Venezuela’s borders, and won’t stop at boat strikes in the Caribbean,” Schiff said in a statement Friday. “In recent weeks we have seen increasingly concerning movements and reporting that undermine claims that this is merely about stopping drug smugglers. Congress has not authorized military force against Venezuela. And we must assert our authority to stop the United States from being dragged—intentionally or accidentally—into full-fledged war in South America.”

    When asked about lawmakers’ concerns about the legality of the strikes, Trump dismissed them and said that lawmakers were informed the vessels carried drugs. 

    “But they are given information that they were loaded up with drugs,” Trump said on Tuesday. “And that’s the thing that matters. When they’re loaded up with drugs, they’re fair game. And every one of those ships were and they’re not ships, they’re they’re boats.” 

    The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • SOUTHCOM commander announces sudden retirement amid Trump drug war in Caribbean

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The commander of U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM), whose area of operations includes the Caribbean waters where the strikes against the alleged drug boats have been conducted, announced he is retiring suddenly by the end of the year. 

    Navy Adm. Alvin Holsey, who became the commander of SOUTHCOM in November 2024, announced Thursday that he would retire from the Navy in December. No reason for his abrupt departure was provided. 

    “The SOUTHCOM team has made lasting contributions to the defense of our nation, and will continue to do so,” Holsey said in a statement SOUTHCOM shared on social media. “I am confident that you will forge ahead, focused on your mission that strengthens our nation and ensures its longevity as a beacon of freedom around the globe.” 

    The New York Times first reported that Holsey was departing his post. 

    Department of War Secretary Pete Hegseth commended Holsey for his service, and wished Holsey and his family continued success. 

    “Throughout his career—from commanding helicopter squadrons to leading Carrier Strike Group One and standing up the International Maritime Security Construct—Admiral Holsey has demonstrated unwavering commitment to mission, people, and nation,” Hegseth said in a post on social media on Thursday. “His tenure as Military Deputy Commander and now Commander of United States Southern Command reflects a legacy of operational excellence and strategic vision.” 

    This is a breaking news story and will be updated. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Donald Trump’s Dream Palace of Puffery

    [ad_1]

    The President then interrupted him. “Did you ever think I was going to be called the peacemaker?”

    Glenn replied, “Actually, I did.”

    His question, when he got around to it, was about Alyssa Farah, a former aide in Trump’s first-term White House who is now a co-host of the popular ABC daytime talk show “The View” and a vocal critic of Trump’s. According to Glenn, Farah had promised to wear a Make America Great Again hat on TV if he actually managed to secure the release of Israeli hostages being held in Gaza, but she had not yet done so. After explaining all this to the President, his query to Trump was just two words: “Your response?”

    A day later, Glenn was back in front of Trump, at a press conference featuring the President and the director of the F.B.I., Kash Patel. The event’s news, among other things, was Trump complaining that law-enforcement agencies should investigate and prosecute more of his political enemies and confirming that he had secretly ordered the C.I.A. to carry out operations inside Venezuela. Glenn, however, wanted to make a point about one of Trump’s longtime preoccupations—what the President calls the “rigged election” of 2020. “By the way, you won Georgia three times,” Glenn shouted over other reporters trying to ask questions. Ed O’Keefe, of CBS News, standing in front of Glenn, could be seen shaking his head with what appeared to be exasperation. It was the last part of the exchange that really stood out, though. In response to Glenn, Trump said, “Yeah, I agree. Do you agree with me?” After Glenn replied, “I do,” the President quickly jumped back in: “And he’s the media! He’s the media!”

    I can think of no more perfect encapsulation of why the Trump Administration has done what it has to eviscerate the century-old tradition of independent reporting from the White House. In his second term, it was no longer enough to call the real news fake; now it’s the fake news that gets to displace actual journalists in order to playact the real thing. And when Trump wants validation, whether for his false claims of election fraud or some other lie, he can now claim “the media” gave it to him. How long can it be until there are only Brian Glenns in that room?

    You might think that the Kremlinization of the White House press pool doesn’t really matter at a moment when there are so many other Trump-generated crises in the country. Or that it is simply self-serving of journalists to complain about their own perks being taken away. Or that the President has no obligation, legal or otherwise, to answer questions from anyone. All of which are fair points.

    But the reason to pay attention to what’s happening with the coverage of the Presidency is that Trump cares about it perhaps more than anything else. There has never been a more media-obsessed President, nor one for whom the regard of others, even if it is suck-uppery in the crudest form, matters so much. He is known to spend hours a day consuming cable-news reports about himself. There is no detail of his public portrayal that does not concern him. In a lengthy social-media post this week, he berated Time for a cover about his Middle East diplomacy which was so complimentary it was headlined “His Triumph.” Trump’s beef was with the accompanying photo of himself, which he deemed “the Worst of All Time.” The point being: there is no pleasing a leader whose need for affirmation is so bottomless.

    The template for Trump’s second term so far has been to remake the White House as a place increasingly devoid of constraints or criticism. Gone are the first-term advisers such as John Kelly or Jim Mattis who saw themselves as checks on Trump’s tendency to go rogue. Only yes-men and flatterers need apply, and more and more they seem to be competing with one another to come up with the most over-the-top compliments possible for the boss. Last weekend, during a rally in Tel Aviv to celebrate the Trump-brokered deal to release the Israeli hostages, Trump’s Middle East negotiator, Steve Witkoff, proclaimed him “the greatest President in American history.” It doesn’t take much imagination to think what talk like that from his advisers does to a man with Trump’s ego. Those questions from reporters may soon be the last thing left tethering the President to at least some form of reality.

    This is why it’s not hard to anticipate where all this is going. Trump, it appears, is building a dream palace of endless puffery for himself, a gilded safe space where there will be no more tough questions, no more pesky reporters or impertinent demands for information that he does not want to give. And imagine how very powerful the President, who already believes the Constitution gives him the power “to do whatever I want,” will feel then. The Pentagon’s move to effectively ban journalism from its halls this week was not an outlier—it was a preview. ♦

    [ad_2]

    Susan B. Glasser

    Source link

  • Commentary: I turned in my Pentagon credential — not my commitment – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    After 20 years of covering the U.S. military, WTOP National Security Correspondent J.J. Green turned in his Pentagon press pass after it enacted its new policy.

    After twenty years of covering the U.S. military, I turned in my Pentagon press credential today.

    My photo will soon come down from the wall outside the briefing room, where it’s hung among so many much more talented colleagues who’ve chronicled the story of American defense for decades.

    That’s all that changes; My commitment to covering the men and women of the U.S. military and the institution they serve remains exactly the same.

    The Pentagon has introduced a new policy requiring journalists to sign a memo warning that press credentials can be revoked for “soliciting” even unclassified information that hasn’t been officially cleared for release.

    The 17-page document also restricts reporters’ movements inside the building and bars them from holding or obtaining “unauthorized material.” Those who choose not to sign will lose their credentials.

    I declined.

    That decision wasn’t an act of protest. It was an act of principle. For two decades, my work has depended on trust, accuracy and respect. I’ve never asked anyone to reveal classified information, and no one has ever offered it. What I have done is ask questions, sometimes hard ones. And I’ve listened carefully to those who serve.

    That’s how journalism works in a democracy. It’s how the public learns what its military is doing in its name.

    I first covered the military as an embedded reporter in 2005, a journey that took me from U.S. bases to Canada, Scotland, Romania, Turkey, Germany, Iraq, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan and Djibouti. Along the way, I met extraordinary people — soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and civilians who remain friends and trusted sources to this day. They taught me that transparency isn’t a threat to security, it’s a reflection of strength.

    Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lt. Gen. Robert P. Ashley, Jr., left, speaks with WTOP radio National Security Correspondent J.J. Green after the DIA Mentoring Summit, Jan. 17, 2019, at the DIA headquarters. (Courtesy Robert Kanizar/DVIDS)

    WTOP has trusted me to bring those stories home; stories about deployment struggles, family separations, post-combat reintegration and the quiet courage of service members whose names never make headlines. Those experiences, and those voices, are what keep me committed to this work — credential or not.

    It’s difficult to see veteran reporters, people who’ve walked those halls every day for decades suddenly told to sign or get out. The Pentagon has always represented, to me, not just power but the ideals behind it: accountability, integrity and public service. Walking those corridors reminded me that the building was designed not to keep people out, but to connect the American military to the citizens it serves.

    So yes, I’ll lose a photo on the wall. But I will continue to do what I’ve always done, which is ask questions, seek facts and tell the stories that matter.

    Access isn’t a badge, it’s a responsibility. And that responsibility doesn’t end at the Pentagon’s doors.

    I surrendered my credential, not my voice.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    J.J. Green

    Source link

  • Commentary: I turned in my Pentagon credential — not my commitment – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    After 20 years of covering the U.S. military, WTOP National Security Correspondent J.J. Green turned in his Pentagon press credential. He explains why.

    After twenty years of covering the U.S. military, I turned in my Pentagon press credential today.

    My photo will soon come down from the wall outside the briefing room, where it’s hung among so many much more talented colleagues who’ve chronicled the story of American defense for decades.

    That’s all that changes; My commitment to covering the men and women of the U.S. military and the institution they serve remains exactly the same.

    The Pentagon has introduced a new policy requiring journalists to sign a memo warning that press credentials can be revoked for “soliciting” even unclassified information that hasn’t been officially cleared for release.

    The 17-page document also restricts reporters’ movements inside the building and bars them from holding or obtaining “unauthorized material.” Those who choose not to sign will lose their credentials.

    I declined.

    That decision wasn’t an act of protest. It was an act of principle. For two decades, my work has depended on trust, accuracy and respect. I’ve never asked anyone to reveal classified information, and no one has ever offered it. What I have done is ask questions, sometimes hard ones. And I’ve listened carefully to those who serve.

    That’s how journalism works in a democracy. It’s how the public learns what its military is doing in its name.

    I first covered the military as an embedded reporter in 2005, a journey that took me from U.S. bases to Canada, Scotland, Romania, Turkey, Germany, Iraq, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan and Djibouti. Along the way, I met extraordinary people — soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and civilians who remain friends and trusted sources to this day. They taught me that transparency isn’t a threat to security, it’s a reflection of strength.

    WTOP has trusted me to bring those stories home; stories about deployment struggles, family separations, post-combat reintegration and the quiet courage of service members whose names never make headlines. Those experiences, and those voices, are what keep me committed to this work — credential or not.

    It’s difficult to see veteran reporters, people who’ve walked those halls every day for decades suddenly told to sign or get out. The Pentagon has always represented, to me, not just power but the ideals behind it: accountability, integrity and public service. Walking those corridors reminded me that the building was designed not to keep people out, but to connect the American military to the citizens it serves.

    So yes, I’ll lose a photo on the wall. But I will continue to do what I’ve always done, which is ask questions, seek facts and tell the stories that matter.

    Access isn’t a badge, it’s a responsibility. And that responsibility doesn’t end at the Pentagon’s doors.

    I surrendered my credential, not my voice.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    J.J. Green

    Source link

  • ‘Without precedent’: Virtually all news outlets reject restrictive Pentagon press policy

    [ad_1]

    An extraordinary new policy from the Defense Department that equates basic reporting methods to criminal activity has prompted a revolt among Pentagon journalists that could leave the nation’s largest agency and the world’s largest military without a press corps.

    The new policy, from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, is a dramatic departure from historic standards at the department, which previously required credentialed reporters to sign a simple, single-page document laying out safety protocols.

    Replacing that document is a 21-page agreement that warns reporters against “soliciting” information, including unclassified material, without the Pentagon’s official authorization, characterizing individuals who do so as a “security risk.”

    The policy would force journalists and media organizations to refrain from publishing any material that is not approved by the military — a clear violation of 1st Amendment protections to free speech, lawyers for media outlets said.

    Major news organizations including the New York Times, Washington Post and Wall Street Journal, as well as right-leaning outlets such as Newsmax and the Washington Times, have refused to sign the document, with only one far-right outlet — the cable channel One American News — agreeing to do so.

    The Los Angeles Times also will not agree to the policy, said Terry Tang, the paper’s executive editor.

    In a rare joint statement, ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News and NBC said that the policy “is without precedent and threatens core journalistic protections.”

    “We will continue to cover the U.S. military as each of our organizations has done for many decades, upholding the principles of a free and independent press,” the news outlets said.

    But Hegseth, who has aggressively pursued leaks and sources of unfavorable news stories since the start of his turbulent tenure as secretary, has doubled down in recent days, posting emojis on social media waving goodbye as media organizations have issued statements condemning the policy. Journalists were given a deadline of 2 p.m. PDT on Tuesday to either sign the document or relinquish their credentials.

    It is unclear whether it will be viable for the Pentagon to maintain the policy, leaving the secretary without a traveling press corps to highlight his official duties or public events. And it is also uncertain whether President Trump approves of the extreme measure.

    At a White House event Tuesday, Hegseth said that the policy was “common sense” and that he was “proud” of it. He said credentials should not be given to reporters who will try to get officials “to break the law by giving them classified information.”

    Asked last month whether the Pentagon should control what reporters gather and write, Trump said “no.”

    “I don’t think so,” Trump said, adding: “Nothing stops reporters.”

    But Trump said Tuesday that he understands why Hegseth is pushing for the new policy.

    “I think he finds the press to be very destructive in terms of world peace and maybe security for our nation,” Trump said. “The press is very dishonest.”

    The widespread revolt has generated a show of solidarity from the White House and State Department correspondents associations, which characterized the Pentagon policy in a joint statement Monday as an attack on freedom of the press.

    “Access inside the Pentagon has never been about convenience to reporters,” the statement reads. “The public has a right to know how the government is conducting the people’s business. Unfettered reporting on the U.S. military and its civilian leadership provides a service to those in uniform, veterans, their families and all Americans.”

    Beyond the restrictions on media outlets, the Pentagon has taken a series of steps this year to try and identify officials who are deemed disloyal or who provide information to reporters.

    In April, the Pentagon dismissed three top officials after an investigation into potential leaks related to military operational plans. That same month, Hegseth’s team began subjecting officials to random polygraph tests, a practice that was temporarily halted after the White House intervened, according to the Washington Post.

    Then, in October, the Pentagon drafted plans to renew the use of polygraphs and to require thousands of personnel to sign strict nondisclosure agreements that would “prohibit the release of non-public information without approval or through a defined process.” The nondisclosure agreements include language that is similar to what reporters are being asked to sign by Tuesday.

    Notably, many of Hegseth’s plans to target leaks have been leaked to news outlets, probably contributing to the Defense secretary’s suspicion about whom he can trust.

    The timing of his efforts are also noteworthy, as they gained traction after he personally shared sensitive details about forthcoming strikes in Yemen in a private Signal group chat that mistakenly included a reporter from the Atlantic. Hegseth also shared information about the attacks in a separate Signal chat that included his wife, a former Fox News producer who is not a Defense Department employee.

    Hegseth denied that any classified information was shared in the chat. Yet the situation led to an internal review of whether the disclosures were in violation of Defense Department policies.

    The Pentagon has taken an even more aggressive approach to restricting reporters’ access than the White House, which months ago took control over press operations from the White House Correspondents Assn. — an independent group that had organized the White House press corps for decades.

    Still, the White House has refrained from implementing changes to the briefing room seating chart, evicting outlets from workspaces within the White House complex or revoking press passes, after facing a legal challenge over an attempt to bar one major outlet — the Associated Press — from covering some presidential events at the beginning of Trump’s second term.

    Trump, meanwhile, has continued to single out individual outlets he dislikes. On Tuesday, for example, the president refused to take questions from ABC News because he said he did not like how a news anchor had treated Vice President JD Vance.

    “You’re ABC Fake News,” Trump said at a public appearance in the White House. “I don’t take questions from ABC Fake News!”

    [ad_2]

    Michael Wilner, Ana Ceballos

    Source link

  • CBS News, other media outlets, won’t sign on to new Pentagon press restrictions

    [ad_1]

    Reporters for multiple news outlets covering the Pentagon are preparing to turn in their press passes Wednesday, instead of agreeing to a new set of policies the association representing them says “on their face, appear to violate the First Amendment.”

    The five major broadcast networks released a joint statement Tuesday, saying, “Today, we join virtually every other news organization in declining to agree to the Pentagon’s new requirements, which would restrict journalists’ ability to keep the nation and the world informed of important national security issues.” 

    “The policy is without precedent and threatens core journalistic protections. We will continue to cover the U.S. military as each of our organizations has done for many decades, upholding the principles of a free and independent press,” the networks said.

    CBS News is among an array of media organizations — including Newsmax, The New York Times, The Washington Post and Fox News, which previously employed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as an on-air host — that say they will not sign the new Pentagon restrictions. 

    The Defense Department sent reporters a memo in September mandating they sign an agreement acknowledging they would need formal authorization to publish either classified or controlled unclassified information. The department said in the memo that “information must be approved before public release … even if it is unclassified.” 

    Journalists covering the Pentagon were instructed to sign the agreement by 5 p.m. Tuesday. CBS News national security correspondent David Martin said, “Walking the halls of the Pentagon was my M.O. for 40 years. I don’t know how else to cover a story except by being there.” 

    “Seeing and talking to the people you are reporting on is about as fundamental as it gets. During COVID, I tried not coming into the Pentagon but gave up after a couple days of feeling out of touch,” Martin said. “Did I find out stuff in the hallways that the people who ran the Pentagon didn’t want me to know? Of course I did. That’s what I was there for. That’s what’s being shut down.”

    The Pentagon Press Association decried the new policy in a statement on Monday.

    “When Secretary Hegseth came into office, Pentagon officials pledged to make this ‘the most transparent Department of Defense in history.’ Since then, we have seen an inordinate amount of time spent systematically limiting access to information about the U.S. military — information vital to members of the military, their families, all American taxpayers, and the general public,” the association said.

    Hegseth posted a goodbye emoji on X in response to announcements by the Atlantic, the New York Times and the Washington Post that their reporters would not agree to the new policies. 

    At least one outlet has agreed to the new restrictions, the One America News Network, the company’s president confirmed in an email to CBS News.

    “After thorough review of the REVISED press policy by our attorney, OAN staff has signed the document,” said Charles Herring. 

    News organizations including CBS News are currently assigned workspaces and credentials that allow journalists limited access in the Pentagon. The new plan also involves moving news organizations to alternative workspaces.

    CBS News reporter and producer Eleanor Watson, who covers the Pentagon, said that plan would hamper news outlets’ ability to quickly get important information to the public.

    “One of the reasons we’re in the hallway clearly marked the ‘correspondents corridor’ is to be near the public affairs office and press briefing room to communicate information about the world quickly,” Watson said. “Evicting us will slow that down, but it won’t stop our sourcing and reporting.”

    The new policy would mean that journalists would not be able to use unnamed U.S. military sources in much of their reporting, without risking loss of access to the Pentagon. 

    “Our members did nothing to create this disturbing situation,” the Pentagon Press Association said. “It arises from an entirely one-sided move by Pentagon officials apparently intent upon cutting the American public off from information they do not control and pre-approve — information concerning such issues as sexual assault in the military, conflicts of interest, corruption, or waste and fraud in billion-dollar programs.”

    Journalists who work there also point out that they do not have unhindered access to the Pentagon even now, with many parts of the vast complex off limits.

    Watson said CBS News will continue to report on the Pentagon even if it loses access to the building.

    “There is value in us being here for our reporting and for the public interest. We will continue to report and shed light on the Defense Department even after our camera here goes dark,” Watson said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • War Department pushes back on ‘false’ narrative of internal strategy split

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Rejecting reports of a split with the brass, the Department of War says the National Defense Strategy was “seamlessly coordinated” with senior civilian and uniform leaders — and that “any narrative to the contrary is false.”

    On Monday, The Washington Post reported that multiple senior officers had raised concerns about the forthcoming strategy, pointing to a divide between political leadership.

    Deputy Secretary of War Steve Feinberg pushed back on Wednesday, in an on-the-record statement to Fox News Digital.

    “The Department’s National Defense Strategy has been seamlessly coordinated with all senior civilian and military leadership with total collaboration — any narrative to the contrary is false,” Feinberg said.

    RENAMED DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COMING ‘SOON,’ TRUMP SAYS

    The Pentagon in Arlington, Va., where War Department officials, pushed back on claims of a civil-military rift and said the National Defense Strategy was fully coordinated. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

    A senior War Department official said the strategy was the product of “extensive and intensive” collaboration across the department.

    The drafting team included a policy lead, a Joint Staff deputy and representatives from the military services who consulted widely with civilian and uniformed offices.

    Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby and the acting deputy under-secretary for policy, Austin Dahmer, met with leaders from every group. The official called that level of policy-shop engagement “unprecedented.”

    SUPPORTERS HAIL TRUMP’S PENTAGON REBRAND AS ‘HONEST,’ CRITICS CALL IT RECKLESS

    General Dan Caine and Defense Secretary Hegseth

    Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, provided feedback to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

    Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, who chairs the Joint Chiefs of Staff, provided feedback directly to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Colby, the official said, and both assured him his input would be reflected in the final draft.

    The Post report said political appointees in the Pentagon policy office led the drafting and described unusually sharp pushback from some commanders over priorities and tone. 

    The War Department disputes that characterization and says the document was coordinated at the principal level and aligned closely with the National Security Strategy.

    The pushback comes a day after Hegseth addressed hundreds of commanders at Marine Corps Base Quantico.

    Pete Hegseth addresses generals at Quantico.

    War Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks during a meeting of senior military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Tuesday, in Quantico, Va. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

    TOP US MILITARY BRASS TO HOLD SECRETIVE MEETING WITH HEGSETH AS TRUMP RAMPS UP RUSSIA CRITICISM

    In a 45-minute speech, he argued the force needs tougher standards and a tighter focus on warfighting. He has recalled one-star and above officers from around the world to brief in person and has removed several senior general officers as part of a broader overhaul.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Hegseth says new directives will restore rigorous physical, grooming and leadership standards and require combat roles to meet one set of physical benchmarks.

    The Washington Post did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment. 

    Fox News Digital’s Jasmine Baehr and Morgan Phillips contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Key moments from Trump and Hegseth’s unprecedented meeting with senior military leaders

    [ad_1]



    Key moments from Trump and Hegseth’s unprecedented meeting with senior military leaders – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth addressed a rare gathering of senior military leaders in Virginia on Tuesday. CBS News Pentagon reporter Eleanor Watson has the details.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Hegseth instates ‘highest male standard only’ for combat, other changes, declaring Dept. of Defense ‘is over’

    [ad_1]

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced on Tuesday that all combat personnel would be required to meet the highest male standard in order to maintain their positions. 

    Hegseth said the department must “restore a ruthless, dispassionate and commonsense application of standards.”

    “We’re training warriors, not defenders. We fight wars to win, not to defend. Defense is something you do all the time, it’s inherently reactionary and can lead to overuse, overreach, and mission creep. War is something you do sparingly, on our own terms and with clear aims,” Hegseth said as he spoke Tuesday morning at Marine Corps Base Quantico.

    HEGSETH ORDERS ABOUT FACE ON PENTAGON’S SLIPPING GROOMING STANDARDS

    “We fight to win. We unleash overwhelming and punishing violence on the enemy,” he continued. “We also don’t fight with stupid rules of engagement. We untie the hands of our warfighters to intimidate, demoralize, hunt and kill the enemies of our country. No more politically correct and overbearing rules of engagement, just common sense, maximum lethality and authority for warfighters.”

    Secretary of War Pete Hegseth speaks to senior military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Va., on Sept. 30, 2025.  (Andrew Harnik/Pool via Reuters)

    The secretary said that now, “every member of the joint force at every rank is required to take a test twice a year, as well as meet height and weight requirements twice a year, every year of service.” Additionally, members of the joint force will be required to do PT [physical training] every duty day, something Hegseth said is standard in many units but would be officially codified.

    “If the Secretary of War can do regular hard PT, so can every member of our joint force,” he said.

    Hegseth railed against “fat troops” and “fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon,” arguing that physical standards for American service members had eroded, and it was time to raise the bar. 

    HEGSETH VOWS TO REBUILD MILITARY DETERRENCE SO ENEMIES ‘DON’T WANT TO F— WITH US’

    Hegseth runs with US troops in Germany

    Secretary of War Pete Hegseth participates in PT with the 1st Battalion, 10th Special Forces Group (Airborne), a US Army Special Forces battalion based in Stuttgart, Germany.  (DefSec Hegseth on X)

    Hegseth noted that any altered physical standards — including those changed in 2015 “when combat arms standards were changed to ensure females could qualify” — had to be returned to their original form. He said this also included standards he claimed were “manipulated to hit racial quotas,” calling them “just as unacceptable.”

    While he said that the new requirement is for troops to meet the highest male standard, Hegseth insisted that the move was not meant to prevent women from serving their country.

    “This is not about preventing women from serving. We very much value the impact of female troops. Our female officers and NCOs are the absolute best in the world. But when it comes to any job that requires physical power to perform in combat, those physical standards must be high and gender-neutral. If women can make it, excellent. If not, it is what it is,” Hegseth said. “If that means no women qualify for some combat jobs, so be it. That is not the intent, but it could be the result, so be it. It will also mean that we mean that weak men won’t qualify because we’re not playing games. This is combat. This is life or death.”

    Hegseth also announced new grooming standards. Troops are now expected to be clean-shaven and have a uniform haircut. Soldiers are able to get temporary medical exemptions or permanent religious exemptions for the shaving rules.

    “We’re going to cut our hair, shave our beards and adhere to standards. Because it’s like the broken windows theory of policing, it’s like when you let the small stuff go, the big stuff eventually goes,” Hegseth said. “If you want a beard, you can join Special Forces. If not, then shave.”

    Special Forces operators’ beard exemptions are meant to help them better blend in with certain communities and civilians, according to the nonprofit Wounded Warrior Project.

    The Army announced in July that “the new policy requires exemptions for non-religious reasons to be supported by a temporary medical profile (DA Form 3349-SG) and an exception-to-policy (ETP) memo granted by an O-5 officer in the chain of command.”

    Hegseth greets soldier

    Secretary of War Pete Hegseth greets Commandant of the Army War College Major General David Hill as he arrives to deliver remarks to students, faculty and staff at the U.S. Army War college on April 23, 2025 in Carlisle, Pa.  (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

    AIR FORCE TIGHTENS RULES ON TRANSGENDER AIRMEN; SUPPORTERS SAY IT PRIORITIZES READINESS: REPORT

    The other part of the shift that Hegseth announced included further steps to root out “toxic ideological garbage” from the department. 

    “No more identity months, DEI [diversity, equity and inclusion] offices, dudes in dresses. No more climate change worship. No more division, distraction or gender delusions,” he said. “As I’ve said before, and I’ll say again, we are done with that s—.”

    Further denouncing of wokeness in the military, Hegseth announced major changes aimed at offering leaders second chances. He said that the Department of War was well-aware that mistakes would be made with the new directives, and, as such, he also would be implementing changes to the retention of adverse information on personnel records. This means that leaders with “forgivable, earnest, or minor infractions” on their records will not spend the rest of their careers paying for those mistakes, allowing them to take control without fear.

    War Secretary Hegseth speaks on Sept. 30, 2025

    Secretary of War Pete Hegseth speaks to senior military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico, on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025 in Quantico, Va. (Andrew Harnik/Pool via AP)

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Throughout his address to military leadership, Hegseth made it clear that the reestablishment of the Department of War was more than a name change; it was also a major shift in policy. 

    “The era of the Department of Defense is over,” he declared. “From this moment forward, the only mission of the newly restored Department of War is this: War fighting. Preparing for war and preparing to win.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Pentagon Asks to Quadruple Missile Production: Report

    [ad_1]

    The Pentagon has told suppliers of missiles to the U.S. that their production of the weapons needs to as much as quadruple, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.

    This urgency to increase missile production, as the U.S. looks with concern at its stockpiles over the potential for a future war with China, was laid out at meetings between top Pentagon officials and representatives from U.S. weapons manufacturers, the Journal reported, citing unnamed people familiar with the matter.

    The depletion of missiles has been a focus of concern in recent years, particularly as the U.S. supplied Ukraine during Russia’s ongoing invasion. U.S. President Donald Trump is now weighing whether to give Ukraine Tomahawk cruise missiles.

    This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

    [ad_2]

    Source link