ReportWire

Tag: peace prize

  • Machado’s Nobel Peace Prize speech: A call to resist tyranny and reclaim democracy

    Ana Corina Sosa, daughter of Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado is greeted by vice-chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee Asle Toje as she represents her mother at the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony at Oslo City Hall on December 10, 2025 in Oslo, Norway. The 2025 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Machado for her efforts to bring democracy to Venezuela, challenging the iron-fisted rule of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who has been president since 2013. (Photo by Odd ANDERSEN / AFP via Getty Images)

    Ana Corina Sosa, daughter of Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, is greeted by the vice-chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Asle Toje, as she represents her mother at the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony at Oslo City Hall on December 10, 2025 in Oslo, Norway. The 2025 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Machado for her efforts to bring democracy to Venezuela, challenging the iron-fisted rule of Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro.

    AFP via Getty Images

    Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado used her Nobel Peace Prize lecture on Wednesday to deliver a sweeping account of her country’s two-decade struggle against authoritarianism, portraying Venezuela’s crisis not only as a national tragedy but as a global warning about the fragility of democracy and the cost of freedom.

    Machado was unable to leave Venezuela — where she is living in hiding — in time to attend the ceremony in Oslo. Her remarks were read on her behalf by her daughter, Ana Corina Sosa Machado, before members of Norway’s royal family and international diplomats. Even in her absence, Machado said, the message carried the voice of a nation — the echo of “millions of Venezuelans who rose, once again, to reclaim the destiny that was always theirs.”

    Moments after receiving the prize on her mother’s behalf, Sosa announced that she expected to embrace Machado in Oslo within hours — and that the opposition leader intends to return to Venezuela “very soon.”

    “I must say that my mother never breaks a promise. And that’s why, with all the joy in my heart, I can tell you that in just a few hours we will be able to hug her here in Oslo after 16 months,” she told attendees at the ceremony. She added that while she and her mother have waited two years for this moment, she was mindful of “the other daughters and sons who today will not be able to see their mothers.”

    “This is what drives her, what drives all of us,” Sosa continued. “She wants to live in a free Venezuela and will never give up that goal. That is why we all know — I know — that she will soon be back in Venezuela.” Until then, Sosa said she carries “the difficult task of giving voice to her mother’s words, the speech she prepared for this occasion.”

    She opened with “infinite gratitude” on behalf of her family and the country to the Norwegian Nobel Committee for recognizing that “the struggle of an entire people for truth, freedom, democracy, and peace is today recognized throughout the world.”

    “I am here on behalf of my mother, María Corina Machado, who has united millions of Venezuelans in an extraordinary effort that you, our hosts, have honored with the Nobel Peace Prize,” she said.

    Over the next 40 minutes, her daughter read Machado’s speech, which traced the arc of Venezuelan history, from independence to the oil-fueled prosperity of the 20th century and the subsequent dismantling of democratic institutions under Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro. The lecture was both a tribute to ordinary citizens who resisted repression and a roadmap to what she described as Venezuela’s imminent democratic transition.

    “Freedom is not something we wait for, but something we become,” she said, arguing that authoritarianism took root not only through the ambitions of rulers but through a society convinced its democracy was unshakable. “My generation was born in a vibrant democracy, and we took it for granted. We assumed freedom was as permanent as the air we breathed.”

    Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado
    Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado JONATHAN LANZA NurPhoto via AFP

    She said the concentration of oil revenue in state hands created “perverse incentives,” turning public wealth into a tool of political control and eroding the civic culture needed to sustain a republic. When Chávez — a former coup leader — won the 1998 election, many believed charisma could replace institutions. “From 1999 onward, the regime dismantled our democracy,” she said. “They eroded institutions, politicized the military, censored the press and criminalized dissent.”

    The collapse, Machado added, was moral as well as economic. Oil wealth “was not used to uplift, but to bind,” she said, recalling televised handouts of appliances that masked rising poverty. In two decades, the economy contracted by more than 80 percent. Poverty exceeded 86 percent. Nearly nine million people fled — an exodus she described as “an open wound” that tore families across continents.

    Yet exile, she said, ultimately forged unity. In 2023, when the opposition organized primary elections despite repression and scarce resources, Venezuela “rediscovered itself.” With no access to media and campaign events held amid blackouts and fuel shortages, supporters spread the message “by conviction alone.”

    Machado recounted a teacher who convinced her local ruling-party captain to support the opposition after her son, living in Peru, urged her to vote for change. In a mountain town controlled by guerrillas, flags hidden for years out of fear reappeared on rooftops. “That day, love defeated fear,” she said. “That day, courage defeated oppression.”

    The primaries on Oct. 22, 2023, became a civic uprising, she said, with Venezuelans at home and abroad lining up to vote even after ballots ran out. Machado won by a landslide, only to be barred from running for president. The opposition later rallied behind Edmundo González Urrutia, a former diplomat then little known to the public. “They underestimated the resolve of millions,” she said.

    Ahead of the July 2024 presidential election, activists built a vast volunteer network to protect the vote — using QR-scanning apps, clandestine Starlink antennas hidden in fruit trucks and training sessions in church basements. On election day, turnout surged. Volunteers photographed tally sheets and carried them by hand, mule and canoe. “What began as a mechanism to legitimize leadership became the rebirth of a nation’s confidence in itself.”

    González won with 67 percent of the vote, Machado said. The regime responded with “state terrorism,” she said — arrests, disappearances, torture and sexual abuse, even of minors. She accused authorities of hunting down citizens who shared tally sheets from the vote and forcing detained children to incriminate themselves under electric shocks. “These are crimes against humanity,” she said, noting United Nations documentation of abuses.

    Still, Machado insisted the country has crossed a point of no return. “During these past sixteen months in hiding we have built new networks of civic pressure and disciplined disobedience, preparing for Venezuela’s orderly transition to democracy,” she said. The prize, she added, was proof the world stands with Venezuelans at a decisive hour.

    Machado framed the struggle not as partisan but existential — a fight for truth, for life and for the right to reunite families. She imagined the future in intimate scenes: political prisoners stepping into sunlight, children hearing stories of their parents’ bravery, students debating freely, streets filled again with music and laughter.

    “The world will witness one of the most moving sights of our time,” she said. “Our loved ones coming home.”

    Machado vowed to stand at the Simón Bolívar bridge — once a route of mass exodus — to welcome returning Venezuelans, “the greatest blood loss our country has ever suffered.”

    Throughout the speech, Machado rejected the idea that peace can exist without democracy. Peace, she said, “is ultimately an act of love,” attained only when citizens defend freedom with “willingness and courage.” Venezuela’s struggle, she added, belongs to humanity — both a warning and an example.

    She ended by naming those she said share the peace prize: political prisoners, persecuted families, journalists, human rights defenders, activists and the millions who sheltered and protected the resistance.

    “To them belongs this honor. To them belongs this day. To them belongs the future,” her daughter read, voice breaking at the final words.

    Antonio Maria Delgado

    el Nuevo Herald

    Galardonado periodista con más de 30 años de experiencia, especializado en la cobertura de temas sobre Venezuela. Amante de la historia y la literatura.

    Antonio María Delgado

    Source link

  • Should Trump have won the Nobel prize? New poll reveals consensus among Americans

    Most Americans do not think President Donald Trump deserved the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize, according to a new YouGov poll.

    Most Americans do not think President Donald Trump deserved the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize, according to a new YouGov poll.

    White House

    President Donald Trump was passed over for the Nobel Peace Prize, and most Americans think it was the right call, according to a new YouGov poll.

    The Nobel Peace Center announced on Oct. 10 that Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado won the 2025 peace prize. A vocal critic of President Nicolas Maduro, she was credited with fighting for democracy and human rights.

    The highly anticipated decision comes after Trump spent months advocating that he be given the award, one of the world’s most prestigious honors.

    In July, he phoned Norway’s finance minister to discuss his effort to obtain the prize, according to Politico, and in September, he told the U.N. General Assembly, “Everyone says I should get the Nobel Peace Prize.”

    Multiple world leaders also nominated the Republican president for this year’s Nobel Peace Prize, including for his efforts to resolve foreign conflicts. And Machado, in accepting her own award this year, said she “dedicate(d) this prize to the suffering people of Venezuela and to President Trump for his decisive support of our cause!”

    Reacting to Trump’s loss, White House communications director Steven Cheung wrote on X, “Trump will continue making peace deals, ending wars, and saving lives. He has the heart of a humanitarian, and there will never be anyone like him who can move mountains with the sheer force of his will. The Nobel Committee proved they place politics over peace.”

    Critics of the president argue he was undeserving of the honor previously awarded to figures like Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela, citing his support for Israel’s war in Gaza and accusations that he has targeted political opponents and cracked down on free speech.

    Public opinion on Trump’s peace prize bid

    The YouGov poll — conducted with 2,725 U.S. adults on Oct. 9 — asked respondents, “Do you think Donald Trump should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize?”

    A majority, 58%, said he should not be given the prize, the winner of which is selected by the five-member Norwegian Nobel Committee.

    Meanwhile, 25% said he does deserve the award, and 18% said they were not sure.

    This question elicited markedly different responses among partisans.

    Most Republicans, 56%, said Trump should be awarded the peace prize, while most Democrats and independents — 87% and 63%, respectively — said he should be passed over.

    Views on Israel/Hamas peace deal

    The survey, which has a margin of error of 3 percentage points, also asked respondents about the peace deal reached between Israel and Hamas, which Trump said he helped broker.

    A majority, 54%, said they strongly or somewhat approve of the deal, while just 7% said they strongly or somewhat disapprove. An additional 39% said they were not sure. Most Republicans and Democrats said they favored the agreement.

    Trump announced on Oct. 8 that Israel and Hamas had agreed to an initial phase of a peace deal, which includes a ceasefire and hostage swap.

    It comes two years into the war in Gaza, which has led to the death of more than 67,000 Palestinians, many of whom are women and children, according to Gaza health officials. Many more have suffered from famine and starvation due, in part, to Israeli restrictions on aid, with hundreds killed near aid sites, according to the U.N.

    The current conflict began in October 2023, when Hamas militants attacked Israel, killing some 1,200 Israelis and taking about 250 hostage, according to U.S. officials.

    The YouGov poll also questioned respondents about the role Trump played in achieving the peace deal.

    A plurality, 34%, said he played a major role, while 24% said he played a minor role. Sixteen percent said Trump took no part in it, and 25% said they were not sure.

    Most Republicans, 63%, credited Trump with being deeply involved in the deal, while less than a third of Democrats (15%) and independents (26%) said the same.

    Brendan Rascius

    McClatchy DC

    Brendan Rascius is a McClatchy national real-time reporter covering politics and international news. He has a master’s in journalism from Columbia University and a bachelor’s in political science from Southern Connecticut State University.

    Brendan Rascius

    Source link

  • Does campaigning for the Nobel Peace Prize work? Experts weigh in on Trump’s bid

    President Donald Trump has said he wants to win a Nobel Peace Prize. But experts warn that his remarks could “backfire.”

    President Donald Trump has said he wants to win a Nobel Peace Prize. But experts warn that his remarks could “backfire.”

    Photo from the Norwegian Nobel Committee

    In recent months, President Donald Trump has repeatedly promoted himself as deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize, one of the world’s most prestigious awards.

    “Everyone says I should get the Nobel Peace Prize,” he said in his address to the U.N. General Assembly in September.

    Justifying this view, he’s stated that he resolved seven foreign wars, including between Israel and Iran and between India and Pakistan.

    “Nobody’s ever done that,” he told a group of military leaders in late September. “Will you get the Nobel Prize? Absolutely not. They’ll give it to some guy that didn’t do a damn thing.”

    And, in July, the Republican president called Jens Stoltenberg, Norway’s finance minister, to discuss tariffs and his effort to secure the Nobel Peace Prize, according to Politico.

    A number of U.S. and foreign officials have also formally nominated Trump for the high honor , McClatchy News previously reported.

    Has this kind of public lobbying campaign been done before? And will it help or hurt Trump’s chances of winning? McClatchy News spoke with experts ahead of Oct. 10, the date the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize will be announced.

    Have there been lobbying campaigns before?

    “It is not common diplomatic practice for individuals to present themselves as candidates for the Nobel Peace Prize,” Annika Bergman Rosamond, a professor of international relations at the University of Edinburgh, told McClatchy News. “Thus, past winners have not tended to actively put themselves forward as potential winners.”

    “Typically those who might be candidates don’t advertise their brazen self-interest,” Michael Barnett, a professor of international affairs at George Washington University, told McClatchy News. “You want people to seem like they are genuinely committed to making the world a better place and not for their own glory.”

    The Norwegian Nobel Committee, which awards the prize, consists of five individuals appointed by the Norwegian parliament. It accepts nominations from a number of qualified people, including government officials, academics and past winners. Nominations for the 2025 prize must have been submitted by Jan. 31.

    Some experts pointed out that, while public pressure campaigns are unusual, there have been occasional instances of discreet self-advocacy among Nobel Peace Prize hopefuls.

    “There have been a few times where there is a campaign,” Barnett said. “Usually a whisper campaign though. Elie Wiesel if the rumors are to be believed.”

    Wiesel, an author and Holocaust survivor, won the prize in 1986.

    Kjetil Tronvoll, a professor of peace and conflict studies at Oslo New University College, told McClatchy News that “an Asian politician” had lobbied for their own nomination about 20 years ago.

    Kim Dae-jung, the former president of South Korea, won the peace prize in 2000. It was revealed three years later that he had established a secret campaign to secure the award, thereby tarnishing his reputation.

    Will it work?

    Trump’s track record on promoting peace aside, experts cautioned that his intense efforts to obtain the peace prize are likely counterproductive.

    “The Norwegian cultural attitude of non self-promotion (the Jante rule) runs deep — and to campaign for the prize will be looked down upon and backfire, having a negative effect on the prize committee’s inclination to entertain the idea of offering the prize to such a candidate,” Tronvoll said.

    The Law of Jante is a Scandinavian cultural tradition that states that personal success must not be enjoyed publicly.

    “The Nobel Committee is not particularly happy about blatant campaigns, and my hunch is that they will view self-promotion with particular skepticism,” Nils Petter Gleditsch, a research professor at the Peace Research Institute Oslo, told McClatchy News.

    Asle Toje, the deputy leader of the present Norwegian Nobel Committee, echoed the view that promotional campaigns are ineffective.

    “These types of influence campaigns have a rather more negative effect than a positive one,” Toje told Reuters. “Because we talk about it on the committee. Some candidates push for it really hard and we do not like it.”

    “We are used to work(ing) in a locked room without being attempted to be influenced,” Toje added. “It is hard enough as it is to reach an agreement among ourselves, without having more people trying to influence us.”

    This story was originally published October 9, 2025 at 6:36 PM.

    Brendan Rascius

    McClatchy DC

    Brendan Rascius is a McClatchy national real-time reporter covering politics and international news. He has a master’s in journalism from Columbia University and a bachelor’s in political science from Southern Connecticut State University.

    Brendan Rascius

    Source link