ReportWire

Tag: PBS

  • Trump ties his stance on Greenland to not getting Nobel Peace Prize, European officials say

    [ad_1]

    President Donald Trump linked his aggressive stance on Greenland to last year’s decision not to award him the Nobel Peace Prize, telling Norway’s prime minister that he no longer felt “an obligation to think purely of Peace,” two European officials said Monday.Trump’s message to Jonas Gahr Støre appears to ratchet up a standoff between Washington and its closest allies over his threats to take over Greenland, a self-governing territory of NATO member Denmark. On Saturday, Trump announced a 10% import tax starting in February on goods from eight nations that have rallied around Denmark and Greenland, including Norway.Those countries issued a forceful rebuke. But British Prime Minister Keir Starmer sought to de-escalate tensions on Monday. While the White House has not ruled taking control of the strategic Arctic island by force, Starmer said he did not believe military action would occur.”I think this can be resolved and should be resolved through calm discussion,” he said.Still, the American leader’s message to Gahr Støre could further fracture a U.S.-European relationship already strained by differences over how to end the nearly four-year war in Ukraine, previous rounds of tariffs, military spending and migration policy.In a sign of how tensions have increased in recent days, thousands of Greenlanders marched over the weekend in protest of any effort to take over their island. Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said in a Facebook post Monday that the tariff threats would not change their stance.“We will not be pressured,” he wrote.Meanwhile, Naaja Nathanielsen, Greenland’s minister for business, minerals, energy, justice and equality, told The Associated Press that she was moved by the quick response of allies to the tariff threat and said it showed that countries realize “this is about more than Greenland.”“I think a lot of countries are afraid that if they let Greenland go, what would be next?”Trump sends a message to the Norwegian leaderAccording to two European officials, Trump’s message to Gahr Støre read in part: “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.”It concluded: “The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.”The officials, who were not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, said it had been forwarded to multiple European ambassadors in Washington. PBS first reported on the content of Trump’s note.U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent defended the president’s approach in Greenland during a brief Q&A with reporters in Davos, Switzerland, which is hosting the World Economic Forum meeting this week.“I think it’s a complete canard that the president would be doing this because of the Nobel,” Bessent said, immediately after saying he did not “know anything about the president’s letter to Norway.”Bessent insisted Trump “is looking at Greenland as a strategic asset for the United States,” adding that “we are not going to outsource our hemispheric security to anyone else.”The White House did not respond to questions about the message or the context for Trump sending it.Gahr Støre confirmed Monday that he had received a text message the day before from Trump but did not release its contents.The Norwegian leader said Trump’s message was a reply to an earlier missive sent on behalf of himself and Finnish President Alexander Stubb, in which they conveyed their opposition to the tariff announcement, pointed to a need to de-escalate, and proposed a telephone conversation among the three leaders.“Norway’s position on Greenland is clear. Greenland is a part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and Norway fully supports the Kingdom of Denmark on this matter,” the Norwegian leader said in a statement. “As regards the Nobel Peace Prize, I have clearly explained, including to President Trump what is well known, the prize is awarded by an independent Nobel Committee and not the Norwegian Government.”He told TV2 Norway that he hadn’t responded to the message, but “I still believe it’s wise to talk,” and he hopes to talk with Trump in Davos this week.The Norwegian Nobel Committee is an independent body whose five members are appointed by the Norwegian Parliament.Trump has openly coveted the peace prize, which the committee awarded to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado last year. Last week, Machado presented her Nobel medal to Trump, who said he planned to keep it though the committee said the prize can’t be revoked, transferred or shared with others.Starmer says a trade war is in no one’s interestIn his latest threat of tariffs, Trump indicated they would be retaliation for last week’s deployment of symbolic numbers of troops from the European countries to Greenland — though he also suggested that he was using the tariffs as leverage to negotiate with Denmark.European governments said that the troops traveled to the island to assess Arctic security, part of a response to Trump’s own concerns about interference from Russia and China.Starmer on Monday called Trump’s threat of tariffs “completely wrong” and said that a trade war is in no one’s interest.He added that “being pragmatic does not mean being passive and partnership does not mean abandoning principles.”Six of the eight countries targeted are part of the 27-member European Union, which operates as a single economic zone in terms of trade. European Council President Antonio Costa said Sunday that the bloc’s leaders expressed “readiness to defend ourselves against any form of coercion.” He announced a summit for Thursday evening.Starmer indicated that Britain, which is not part of the EU, is not planning to consider retaliatory tariffs.“My focus is on making sure we don’t get to that stage,” he said.Denmark’s defense minister and Greenland’s foreign minister are expected to meet NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte in Brussels on Monday, a meeting that was planned before the latest escalation.___Associated Press writers Josh Boak in West Palm Beach, Florida; Emma Burrows in Nuuk, Greenland; and Bill Barrow in Atlanta contributed to this report.

    President Donald Trump linked his aggressive stance on Greenland to last year’s decision not to award him the Nobel Peace Prize, telling Norway’s prime minister that he no longer felt “an obligation to think purely of Peace,” two European officials said Monday.

    Trump’s message to Jonas Gahr Støre appears to ratchet up a standoff between Washington and its closest allies over his threats to take over Greenland, a self-governing territory of NATO member Denmark. On Saturday, Trump announced a 10% import tax starting in February on goods from eight nations that have rallied around Denmark and Greenland, including Norway.

    Those countries issued a forceful rebuke. But British Prime Minister Keir Starmer sought to de-escalate tensions on Monday. While the White House has not ruled taking control of the strategic Arctic island by force, Starmer said he did not believe military action would occur.

    “I think this can be resolved and should be resolved through calm discussion,” he said.

    Still, the American leader’s message to Gahr Støre could further fracture a U.S.-European relationship already strained by differences over how to end the nearly four-year war in Ukraine, previous rounds of tariffs, military spending and migration policy.

    In a sign of how tensions have increased in recent days, thousands of Greenlanders marched over the weekend in protest of any effort to take over their island. Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said in a Facebook post Monday that the tariff threats would not change their stance.

    “We will not be pressured,” he wrote.

    Meanwhile, Naaja Nathanielsen, Greenland’s minister for business, minerals, energy, justice and equality, told The Associated Press that she was moved by the quick response of allies to the tariff threat and said it showed that countries realize “this is about more than Greenland.”

    “I think a lot of countries are afraid that if they let Greenland go, what would be next?”

    Trump sends a message to the Norwegian leader

    According to two European officials, Trump’s message to Gahr Støre read in part: “Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.”

    It concluded: “The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland.”

    The officials, who were not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, said it had been forwarded to multiple European ambassadors in Washington. PBS first reported on the content of Trump’s note.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent defended the president’s approach in Greenland during a brief Q&A with reporters in Davos, Switzerland, which is hosting the World Economic Forum meeting this week.

    “I think it’s a complete canard that the president would be doing this because of the Nobel,” Bessent said, immediately after saying he did not “know anything about the president’s letter to Norway.”

    Bessent insisted Trump “is looking at Greenland as a strategic asset for the United States,” adding that “we are not going to outsource our hemispheric security to anyone else.”

    The White House did not respond to questions about the message or the context for Trump sending it.

    Gahr Støre confirmed Monday that he had received a text message the day before from Trump but did not release its contents.

    The Norwegian leader said Trump’s message was a reply to an earlier missive sent on behalf of himself and Finnish President Alexander Stubb, in which they conveyed their opposition to the tariff announcement, pointed to a need to de-escalate, and proposed a telephone conversation among the three leaders.

    “Norway’s position on Greenland is clear. Greenland is a part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and Norway fully supports the Kingdom of Denmark on this matter,” the Norwegian leader said in a statement. “As regards the Nobel Peace Prize, I have clearly explained, including to President Trump what is well known, the prize is awarded by an independent Nobel Committee and not the Norwegian Government.”

    He told TV2 Norway that he hadn’t responded to the message, but “I still believe it’s wise to talk,” and he hopes to talk with Trump in Davos this week.

    The Norwegian Nobel Committee is an independent body whose five members are appointed by the Norwegian Parliament.

    Trump has openly coveted the peace prize, which the committee awarded to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado last year. Last week, Machado presented her Nobel medal to Trump, who said he planned to keep it though the committee said the prize can’t be revoked, transferred or shared with others.

    Starmer says a trade war is in no one’s interest

    In his latest threat of tariffs, Trump indicated they would be retaliation for last week’s deployment of symbolic numbers of troops from the European countries to Greenland — though he also suggested that he was using the tariffs as leverage to negotiate with Denmark.

    European governments said that the troops traveled to the island to assess Arctic security, part of a response to Trump’s own concerns about interference from Russia and China.

    Starmer on Monday called Trump’s threat of tariffs “completely wrong” and said that a trade war is in no one’s interest.

    He added that “being pragmatic does not mean being passive and partnership does not mean abandoning principles.”

    Six of the eight countries targeted are part of the 27-member European Union, which operates as a single economic zone in terms of trade. European Council President Antonio Costa said Sunday that the bloc’s leaders expressed “readiness to defend ourselves against any form of coercion.” He announced a summit for Thursday evening.

    Starmer indicated that Britain, which is not part of the EU, is not planning to consider retaliatory tariffs.

    “My focus is on making sure we don’t get to that stage,” he said.

    Denmark’s defense minister and Greenland’s foreign minister are expected to meet NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte in Brussels on Monday, a meeting that was planned before the latest escalation.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Josh Boak in West Palm Beach, Florida; Emma Burrows in Nuuk, Greenland; and Bill Barrow in Atlanta contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rocky Mountain PBS reacts to Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s vote to dissolve

    [ad_1]

    The letter of the day is “D,” for dissolved.

    The agency that helped bring us Sesame Street and Mister Rogers, is no more. The leaders of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) have voted to dissolve the organization.

    Created in 1967, CPB was a private agency that steered federal funding to PBS, NPR and hundreds of public television and radio stations across the country, including more than 50 in Colorado.

    In May, President Donald Trump gave final approval to strip CPB of all its funding. CPB had been winding down since then. Its board of directors chose Monday to shutter CPB completely instead of keeping it in existence as a shell.

    “CPB’s final act would be to protect the integrity of the public media system and the democratic values by dissolving, rather than allowing the organization to remain defunded and vulnerable to additional attacks,” said Patricia Harrison, the organization’s president and CEO.

    Many Republicans have long accused public broadcasting, particularly its news programming, of being biased toward liberals but it wasn’t until the second Trump administration — with full GOP control of Congress — that those criticisms were turned into action.

    Politics

    Colorado TV, radio stations weigh in on public broadcasting funding cuts

    Denver7 anchor Shannon Ogden reached out to Rocky Mountain PBS, the largest public broadcasting operation in Colorado, to get their reaction of the vote by CPB to dissolve. RMPBS leadership was not available for an interview. However, the company’s president and CEO, Amanda Mountain, sent Ogden a statement:

    “After 58 years serving all Americans with integrity, foresight and care, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting will shut down. Even my deepest thanks feel inadequate, but I am sending them nonetheless alongside my sincerest hope for a brighter future for all who rely upon public media for community connection, trusted companionship and critical resources that improve and save lives. The task ahead is to steward decades of impact and service for future generations, regardless of whatever challenges exist and arise. Godspeed to us all! Failure is not an option.”

    Rocky Mountain PBS receives roughly 10% of its annual funding from the federal government. In an additional statement to Ogden regarding its finances, RMPBS said this:

    “In the past, federal dollars would have flowed to Rocky Mountain Public Media through an annual grant from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) that underpins our statewide broadcasting infrastructure supporting the emergency alert system, children’s educational programming and outreach, and community journalism. Those grants accounted for about 10% of our annual operating budget, or roughly $3 million each year. The remaining 90% of our funding came from members, foundations, business sponsorships, and other earned revenue.”

    About two-thirds of CPB’s annual $1.1billion in funding goes to about 1,500 locally operated public TV and radio stations. NPR radio stations rely on federal dollars for about 15% of their budgets.

    Denver7

    Denver7 | Your Voice: Get in touch with Shannon Ogden

    Denver7 evening anchor Shannon Ogden reports on issues impacting all of Colorado’s communities, but specializes in covering local government and politics. If you’d like to get in touch with Shannon, fill out the form below to send him an email.

    [ad_2]

    Shannon Ogden

    Source link

  • The continuing popularity of Sherlock Holmes

    [ad_1]


    The continuing popularity of Sherlock Holmes – CBS News









































    Watch CBS News



    As Benedict Cumberbatch returns to PBS playing a modern-day Sherlock Holmes, Mo Rocca dons a deerstalker and tries to solve the mystery of the lasting appeal of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s great detective.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Ken Burns’ ‘American Revolution’ Review: History Maestro Delivers Greatest Hits Plus More In Timely PBS Series

    [ad_1]

    In many ways, Ken Burns is the Van Halen of historical documentary directors.

    Before you jump, hear me out.

    Watching the acclaimed filmmaker’s upcoming The American Revolution with some apprehension, it became clear that the six-part PBS series is the soulmate to Van Halen’s seminal but commercially disappointing 1981 album Fair Warning – in a very good way.

    Debuting Sunday on PBS stations, the often-languorous American Revolution has all the slow pans across paintings and maps that appear in all of Burns’ work from 1981’s Brooklyn Bridge to The Civil War, 2009’s National Parks, biographies of Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin, 2011’s Prohibition, 2017’s The Vietnam War and last year’s Leonardo da Vinci.

    Along with Burns and his and co-directors David P. Schmidt and Sarah Botstein’s use of evocative locations and out-of-focus re-creations, American Revolution has narration by Peter Coyote, and high-definition but measured sit-down interviews with historians.

    With techniques made famous and mockingly infamous by The Civil War and subsequent Burns projects, American Revolution uses letters and meticulous examination of the time to represent ordinary men and women in extraordinary situations. Like so many Burns projects, there are those celebrity voice-overs from the likes of Samuel L. Jackson, Meryl Streep Tom Hanks, Paul Giamatti (playing, you guessed it, John Adams), poet Amanda Gorman, Hamilton vet Jonathan Groff (not playing who you think) and Michael Keaton to name but a handful.

    (L-R) Tom Hanks, Paul Giamatti, Amanda Gorman, Michael Keaton, Meryl Streep, Samuel L. Jackson and Jonathan Groff

    Getty Images/Rich Polk for Deadline

    Yes, there is a lot of the Burns tried and true in American Revolution. Add to that the fact that you know how it all turns out and, even as a student of American history, you get my trepidation going in.

    So, let’s get back to that Van Halen comparison for a second.

    Similar to the fourth album release from the David Lee Roth-fronted rockers, Burns’ take on the war that created America does stick to the decades-old methods and formats that have worked for him since The Civil War exploded on the small screen in 1990. When Fair Warning came out in 1981, some critics noted that it too had all the hallmarks of previous Van Halen albums and no real evolution.

    Yet, some also acknowledged “Eddie [Van Halen]’s latest sound effects” and the submerged introduction of synthesizers to the band’s palate. The latter revelation was a game changer obvious to anyone who over the years followed the band after its synth-heavy blockbuster 1984.

    In that context, when it comes to the quietly ambitious American Revolution, you don’t need to look too hard to notice something different going on under the surface from previous Burns works. Let’s put it this way: You don’t need to look too hard at a calendar, your local defunded PBS station or much else to see 2025 is almost as far away from 1990 as it is from 1981 or 1776.

    The world has changed, the medium has changed, America has changed, and the stakes have definitely changed.

    ‘The American Revolution’

    PBS

    On the most integral level, the past decade in our frayed Republic has seen a domination by MAGA madness and the largely toxic discharge of social media. So, to put it mildly, there’s a lot of blood in the water in the culture and our sense of our collective history.

    Having spent most of the past decade making American Revolution, Ken Burns clearly knows that. To that, like Van Halen’s Fair Warning, there is an urgent undercurrent that wasn’t in Burns’ previous films. Something is stirring in him, and in us — and the saga of the creation of this often unruly nation has something to tell us about what is happening now.

    How that manifests itself for viewers likely depends on your own patience with the long series, and your voter-registration card.

    Regardless of where you stand on the political spectrum or regarding Flat Earthers, there is no denying the inviolable sense of time and place in American Revolution. It’s as if Eddie Van Halen, without telling anyone, added an extra two strings on his guitar to reverberate through his Marshall stack, and the ages.

    Eddie Van Halen

    Eddie Van Halen

    AP Photos

    This is not the kind of American history MAGA loyalists like, and not just for the reasons you might think. To that, with the almost last breath of the Van Halen analogy, part of the success of The American Revolution is how it is loud and proud in a quiet way.

    For another thing that perhaps won’t land well with MAGA crowd: it’s also complicated and quite diverse.

    Which is to say, if you are looking for the Founding Fathers and their friends to be the guys in the white hats, you might want look somewhere else. For instance, not all the good guys are white (the David Oyelowo-voiced Olaudah Equiano is one example), and not all of them are guys (the Maya Hawke voice of Betsy Ambler).

    Burns’ American Revolution also burns to a crisp the prevailing notion of the Great Man of American History.

    Sorry George Washington and Alexander Hamilton fans, but there’s a lot more going on in the taverns where much of it happens than those infectious Lin-Manuel Miranda tunes tell you. Opening up the aperture, American Revolution often stares straight into the ugly and unsavory realpolitik of nation creation, with broken and bumbling men and women, well-meaning or not, stumbling into an idea of a better tomorrow.

    Between the incomprehensibility and the incompetence on the side of the British Empire and the side of the American rebels that Burns outlines in American Revolution, the chaotic colonists’ attempts to free themselves from the rule of George III could have had all the hallmarks of a prequel to The Poseidon Adventure, with more boats.

    As the losses and bodies pile up for the rebels (I’m not saying Battle of Long Island, but I’m saying Battle of Long Island), you many even wonder why they just didn’t give up to fight another day — you won’t be alone. That feeling and, dare I say it without seeming too fancy, the contemporary subtext, is part of Burns and gang’s genius with American Revolution.

    You want to look away because it is almost painful to be so deep in the muck, and you know how it ends, so why must we be stuck in this muck? Can’t we get to the glories of Independence Hall? Yet despite those typical barriers to belief, you should keep watching.

    Why?

    Truth be told, with all the mishaps (to put it politely) and egos among the deeply divided rebels, as the episodes move along something delightful and insightful emerges over the talking-head historians, history lessons and trivia.

    Even in this dank decade for American democracy that we are living in now, the recently neglected sense of the near universal inspiration created by our centuries-old revolution springs to life anew. Turns out, the tale of the wild American dogs chasing the Brits back over the pond and beginning one of the greatest leaps of faith in human history still makes for pretty damn good history, on the small screen and otherwise.

    Or, in the words of Van Halen: “Change, nothin’ stays the same/Unchained, and ya hit the ground runnin’.

    You also get some unconventional wisdom from American Revolution amidst stories you’ve heard a million times before — great stuff to show off at your kids’ school recitals and soccer practices.

    The motivations behind Benedict Arnold’s turn to the British side, for example, actually turns out to be much more about the heart and of the divine than they ever taught us in school. Gen. Arnold (voiced by Keaton, who you are kinda dying for him to say “I am a traitor” in a “I am Batman” way) was all too human, it seems.

    To be honest, especially when it comes to the American rebels partnering with the French and their despotic monarchy against George III and the Redcoats, Arnold’s betrayal of Washington (the latter voiced by the once George W. Bush-portraying Josh Brolin) and alliance with the British makes some degree of sense, at least from his perspective.

    Which is to say, if you are interested in real people, real battles (literal, social, racial and political) and the messiness of what 1776 was and is all about, American Revolution is a tome well worth sticking with until the end – even though we all know how it ends.

    Or do we?

    To paraphrase that great American poet and hopefully future Ken Burns subject Gil Scott-Heron: The American Revolution will be televised, and it will be well worth watching.

    [ad_2]

    Dominic Patten

    Source link

  • MotorWeek at 45: The show that taught America how to buy a car (and still does) – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    A national show with local ties is now in season 45. And it’s a must watch for ANYONE who’s in the market for a car … or who wants to learn more about them.

    A national show with D.C.-area ties is now in season 45.

    And it’s a must watch for anyone who’s in the market for a car … or who wants to learn more about them.

    MotorWeek host and creator John Davis joined John Aaron and Michelle Basch on Wednesday to document the occasion.


    Motorweek’s John Davis joins WTOP’s John Aaron and Michelle Basch (WTOP)

    • Michelle Basch:

      A special episode of MotorWeek is celebrating the show’s 45th anniversary. What should viewers expect to see — aside from a younger you

    • John Davis:

      Our 45th anniversary episode will be on tonight at 7:30 on stations of Maryland Public Television. So 7:30 we kick off with basically a rear view mirror look back at all the old stunts we proved we did before, some tire burning, what I looked like way back in 1981, some of the great talent from before is joining us. We have a special tribute, of course, to Pat Goss, the late Pat Goss, who was our resident technician for over 30 years. It’s just a fun ride backward and a little bit of a look forward of all 45 years of Motor Week.

    • Michelle Basch:

      How did the show start in the first place? And did you expect it to be around all these years later?

    • John Davis:

      No, I thought it would be something fun to do for about five years. I was already producing at Maryland Public Television. I was the head producer for Wall Street Week with Louis Rukeyser. And my boss asked me to come up with a new idea. And I’m a southern guy. I had gasoline in my veins. No one had brought the automotive magazine to TV, so I gave it a crack. We did a pilot in ’78 and got on the air in ’81 and haven’t looked back from there.

    • John Aaron:

      More interesting than stock market news, for sure, for people like me, at least. All right, so what are the themes for season 45 and the 2026 model year for cars?

    • John Davis:

      I think it’s all about hybrids. I mean, we’ve seen the continued growth of SUVs, and of course, the appetite for pickup trucks by Americans seems to have no limits. But now that the EV subsidies have gone away, and even before that, people were turning more to hybrids, gasoline/electric hybrids, where you get some of the advantages of an EV, but you continue to have the long-range driving possibilities of a gasoline powered vehicle. And I think, well, for instance, last month, hybrid sales made up over half of the sales of Honda, way up at Hyundai, Ford. So hybrids, I think, are going to be the new efficiency champion for almost every automaker going forward, and it’s fun to watch.

    • Michelle Basch:

      What particular cars and/or features are you most excited about right now?

    • John Davis:

      Everybody that drives every day, especially if you go out on the Capital Beltway, people are driving faster. They seem to be paying less attention to a lot of the rules of the road that we were taught growing up. So a lot of the extra safety features that are being added to cars, I think they’re really important. And if you’re buying a car, you need to make sure it’s got things like lane keep assist that keeps you from getting sideswiped. Almost all new cars now have a very good emergency braking system, but there’s also something called rear traffic alert, so when you’re backing out of a parking lot, it lets you know if a car is coming from either side that you can’t physically see. So the latest in safety aspects, I think, is really important, and we’re spending a lot more time on that, along with infotainment systems, all the new entertainment options available inside the car.

    • John Aaron:

      In terms of convenience, parking, I mean, you see these cars with the top view cameras and the sensors on the side, even on the back, that tell you the number of inches left until you hit something. It’s really remarkable.

    • John Davis:

      The surround view camera system, which was actually a Nissan invention, has taken over the market, and I wouldn’t buy a new vehicle if it didn’t have it.

    • Michelle Basch:

      We’ve been talking about earlier this morning in another aspect, another story, that people are keeping their cars, though, longer, over more years.

    • John Davis:

      Last time I checked, it was well over 12 years now, and when we started the show, it was something under seven. I mean, cars are just more reliable. They cost a lot more to buy, so I think it’s only natural people keep them longer. Unfortunately, that also means the congestion on the road is getting, roads are getting worse, because we’re churning out like 16 million new ones a year every year.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Will Vitka

    Source link

  • Ken Burns, Sarah Botstein bring

    [ad_1]

    A 12-hour documentary series centered on the United States’ war for independence is premiering on PBS in November. Co-directors Ken Burns and Sarah Botstein join “The Takeout” to discuss what went into making “The American Revolution” and what they discovered in the process.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Josh Groban, Jamie Lee Curtis Among Stars to Appear on PBS SoCal Telethon Supporting Public TV In Wake of Trump’s Elimination of Funding

    [ad_1]

    In the wake of the Trump administration’s defunding of public broadcasting, local stations PBS SoCal (KOCE and KCET) are planning a telethon next week from the PBS outfit’s Burbank Studios home. “We ❤ Public Television!” is billed as a live, three hour telethon “honoring 55 remarkable years of public television – America’s trusted, free public media service that reaches every city, town and rural community across the nation.​.. This program celebrates the extraordinary musical artists and personalities who have graced PBS stages and screens, showcasing the cultural richness that public media and local PBS stations offer all Americans.”

    Set to take place on Saturday, Nov, 8 at 4 p.m. PT, Rickey Minor will serve as music director for the telecast. Guests right now are scheduled to include Josh Groban, Jamie Lee Curtis, Ken Burns, Ziggy Marley, Lily Tomlin, Henry Louis Gates, Jr., Marlee Matlin, Nicholas Ralph, Noel Paul Stookey, Rick Steves, David Foster and Katharine McPhee, Adam Arkin, Courtney Vance, Martha Plimpton, Joe Bonamassa, Sheléa, Jesse Cook, Judy Blume, Celtic Woman, Sarah Silverman, Mychal the Librarian, Lindsey Stirling and more.

    The telethon will also feature performances from Nashville PBS including Kathy Mattea, Sierra Hull, Molly Tuttle and Ketch Secor.

    After its initial broadcast on PBS SoCal, “We ❤ Public Television” will air on PBS stations across the country on Thursday, Nov. 27 (Thanksgiving night). It will also be available on the PBS app from Nov. 27 to Dec. 24. Additionally, PBS SoCal will rebroadcast the event on Thanksgiving night at 7 p.m. PT.

    “This telethon is going to be a giant lovefest celebrating public television,” said Maura Daly Phinney, who is serving as exec producer of the telethon for PBS SoCal. “We will feature great music, some classic clips from viewers’ favorite PBS series and a few surprises. Every contribution that viewers make will go to their local public television station and help them fill the gap created by the loss of our federal funding.”

    Besides the live musical performances and celebrity appearances, “We ❤ Public Television!” will include viewer testimonials and archival material from public television shows including “Masterpiece,” “Austin City Limits,” “Great Performances” and “Sesame Street.”

    [ad_2]

    Varietyschneider

    Source link

  • As Trump Bleeds Public TV Dry, Bob Ross Paintings Go Up for Auction to Support Local Stations

    [ad_1]

    Earlier this year, under the Trump administration’s suggestion, Congress defunded America’s public broadcasting networks to the tune of $1.1 billion. Trump and his cronies insisted that the stations were “woke” garbage that needed to be eliminated. In particular, MAGA cast its hateful eye at NPR, with Trump acolytes like Marjorie Taylor Greene moronicly accusing the program of being “communist.”

    Thanks to their donor networks, outlets like NPR and PBS are still chugging along, for now. But many of the hundreds of other public stations that have long relied on public funding are in crisis, as they search for new revenue streams and funding.

    Now, a good Samaritan is pitching in to try to fill the funding gap. The organization behind iconic painter Bob Ross has announced a series of auctions of his works, and the proceeds will be distributed to public TV channels. Joan Kowalski, president of Bob Ross Inc., described the painter as a man who had “dedicated his life to making art accessible to everyone.” She added: “This auction ensures his legacy continues to support the very medium that brought his joy and creativity into American homes for decades.”

    The first auction, which will take place in Los Angeles next month, will involve three of Ross’s paintings, while additional auctions will follow in other cities around the world, the Associated Press reports. All of the profits from the auctions will then be distributed to public stations to help them pay for licensing fees, the outlet notes.

    Ross was a longtime staple of public television. His program, The Joy of Painting, was produced and aired on public stations between 1983 and 1994. The show featured Ross teaching viewers how to paint in a charming, low-fi setting.

    It’s unclear how far a few Bob Ross paintings will go towards filling the gaping financial hole left by the federal defunding effort, but I guess it’s better than nothing.

    Public programs have long provided an important service to Americans (before it was privatized and migrated to HBO, Sesame Street spent four decades at PBS), and the rightwing attack on them is just another example of a conservatism that has fundamentally gone off the rails. Of course, Trump and his friends have an alternative vision for the future of American media. Yes, MAGA would prefer a future in which our nation’s children are educated by PragerU, a private media org funded by billionaires, whose founder, Dennis Prager, once complained that it is “idiotic you can’t say the N-word.”

    [ad_2]

    Lucas Ropek

    Source link

  • How did this couple go from Charlotte restaurant stars to starring in a TV show?

    [ad_1]

    Jeff Tonidandel and Jamie Brown have proved once again that they know how to use historic buildings in Charlotte to their advantage.

    On Tuesday night, the husband-and-wife team that co-owns some of the city’s hottest restaurants — including Plaza Midwood’s Supperland and Dilworth’s Lelulia Hall, both of which are located in repurposed historic church buildings — hosted a premiere of their new PBS docu-series in a most apropos place:

    “Welcome to the beautifully restored Carolina Theatre,” Brown said to a crowd of about 800 people gathered in the renovated historic uptown room that reopened earlier this year, after overcoming a parade of construction challenges. “I’m sure a lot of you have never been here before. It’s a fantastic venue; and the two of us, I know a lot of you know, we get into some pretty crazy restoration projects.

    “So we could not dream of a better stage for tonight’s event.”

    Jamie Brown, left, and Jeff Tonidandel greet guests gathered at Carolina Theatre on Tuesday night for the premiere of their new show, “Fork & Hammer.”
    Jamie Brown, left, and Jeff Tonidandel greet guests gathered at Carolina Theatre on Tuesday night for the premiere of their new show, “Fork & Hammer.” JEFF SINER jsiner@charlotteobserver.com

    That was the segue for a Charlotte screening of Episode 1 of Season 1 of “Fork & Hammer,” a new show that over the course of 10 half-hour episodes will explore how Brown and Tonidandel have built a restaurant empire in Charlotte both figuratively and quite literally.

    Indeed, the “Fork” in the title refers to the restaurant aspect, while the “Hammer” is a nod to how heavily construction work plays into the development of their concepts. For example, most recently, the couple has received boatloads of press for heavily remodeling the building that became Lelulia Hall and for saving a 1903 building from demolition by having it picked up and moved 750 feet — onto a lot next to Lelulia, where in the coming year it will become their seventh concept. (Their existing six? Ever Andalo, Growlers Pourhouse, Haberdish, Leluia Hall, Reigning Doughnuts and Supperland.)

    We know from watching the premiere that those two projects will serve as focal points for “Fork & Hammer.”

    As for how the show came together in the first place, and what else to expect from it moving forward? We got answers from Tonidandel and Brown to those questions and more during an interview on Monday at Lelulia Hall. Here are the highlights from that conversation.

    A bird’s-eye view of Tuesday night’s post-screening discussion at Carolina Theatre, which featured former tennis star Andy Roddick interviewing his friends Jeff Tonidandel and Jamie Brown.
    A bird’s-eye view of Tuesday night’s post-screening discussion at Carolina Theatre, which featured former tennis star Andy Roddick interviewing his friends Jeff Tonidandel and Jamie Brown. JEFF SINER jsiner@charlotteobserver.com

    They’d flirted with some semblance of reality-TV stardom for a while.

    “We had heard from different agents over the years who were interested in potentially doing some sort of a television series,” Brown says. “But nothing ever panned out with those different groups.”

    One of their chief concerns about the potential concepts that had been pitched in the past …

    … was that the focus would be on “rifts between chefs and sous chefs and (other staff),” Brown says. “We didn’t want to go that direction with our team.” They felt that, because their concepts are so varied — from donuts to steak — a show about them shouldn’t have to hinge on bickering.

    Normally, Tonidandel says, “a restaurant show without drama’s a little tough, because 99% of the time you have one cuisine and you’re making the same 20 dishes over and over again. All you have to rely on is the drama. With us … we have a lot of different things going on. … Moving a building, our constant struggles and growth, and trying to get better every day adds enough layers in there for content.”

    So Brown decided to experiment with the medium on her own.

    “I had this dream, when we started working on the Leluia Hall space (in early 2022), of doing a documentary around the build-out of the restaurant,” Brown says, “because it’s a 1915 church, it had been a number of different congregations, and then retail businesses, and then, of course, a restaurant, Bonterra. I thought people would find that interesting. So Jeff bought me a really nice camera, and I came in and started taking shots all around … trying to capture some different scenes, like the first time we were up in the attic.”

    Lelulia Hall, at right, next to the Leeper & Wyatt building, which Jeff Tonidandel and Jamie Brown plan to transform into a new restaurant concept next year.
    Lelulia Hall, at right, next to the Leeper & Wyatt building, which Jeff Tonidandel and Jamie Brown plan to transform into a new restaurant concept next year. JEFF SINER jsiner@charlotteobserver.com

    Her pet project eventually evolved into a YouTube channel called “Restaurant Road” in 2023 …

    … and became more all-encompassing of their restaurant group. “We had some (content on the channel) about Leluia Hall, but not much,” Brown says. “It was mostly about our team and what we were doing, because we wanted to go more in-depth. We were finding social media to be — it’s so flashy, it’s so fast, and you don’t ever get to know the people, or the reasons why.”

    “Restaurant Road” featured everything from pastry chef Savannah Foltz walking through how to make Supperland’s carrot jam to Tonidandel talking about business-oriented challenges the couple’s restaurant group faced.

    Then in January 2024, they got a call from a producer from Charlotte-based Susie Films …

    … who had read an article about the couple and their restaurants in Charlotte magazine that had been published in December. He pitched an idea for a “docu-follow” series, Brown recalls — something “very organic,” and “very educational … more like about that ‘edutainment’-type stuff, as opposed to being people-drama-focused. … This seemed like a great fit. So we jumped on board.”

    And PBS jumped on board not long after that.

    “I think what we do has so much breadth and it’s so dynamic that getting pigeonholed to any network that’s all about food, or all about design, or all about construction, didn’t really fit for us,” Tonidandel says, “whereas PBS has been an awesome outlet and partner for us because we can just go and tell our story. We don’t have to make it about anything else.” (The main sponsors and funders of “Fork & Hammer” are the ETV Endowment of South Carolina, Trust20, the Charlotte Regional Visitors Authority and the Biltmore Estate Winery.)

    Attendees gather in the lobby of the Carolina Theatre prior to the premiere of "Fork & Hammer" on Tuesday night.
    Attendees gather in the lobby of the Carolina Theatre prior to the premiere of “Fork & Hammer” on Tuesday night. JEFF SINER jsiner@charlotteobserver.com

    Shooting for “Fork & Hammer” began in June 2024 and ended right after Leluia Hall opened on May 6 of this year …

    … with a long production pause during the second half of winter and the first half of spring as the opening sat in a holding pattern. Although the run-up to the opening of Leluia Hall is the main thread throughout the 10 episodes, the story will actually begin with the opening of Tonidandel and Brown’s first restaurant — Crepe Cellar (which was replaced by Ever Andalo) — 16 years ago. Episode One’s title? “It Started With a Crepe.”

    Brown was relieved to have the professionals take over — “because frankly, I’m not a photographer-camera person …

    … or an editor, or any of that kind of thing” — but the production team did use pieces of her original work, including footage shot on her camera and her phone.

    The show isn’t set entirely inside their restaurants.

    At one point, the film crew follows them 4,000 miles across the ocean to Spain, where they took their three children on a family vacation. Tonidandel says they “were basically just doing what we do when we go on vacation, which is do research for the restaurants, go to cool places, learn as much as we can, go to wineries. … So it was pretty cool. And exhausting. … We had filmed … three days in a row before here (in Charlotte). But we were able to go home and (get a break). There, it was just nonstop.”

    They’ve gotten to take a look at rough cuts of episodes, and they’re pleased with what they’ve seen.

    “It’s neat to see our team on there,” Brown says, but “it’s also just a very positive showcase for the restaurant business overall. I think a lot of times it gets a bad rap. The most recent show that’s out, of course, is ‘The Bear.’ It shines a really tough light on the business. And it is tough. This business is hard. … But there’s also a lot of beauty in it — people getting to showcase their talent, welcoming people in for a beautiful dining experience, to create memories — and it’s been a lot of fun to put together with everybody.”

    Jeff Tonidandel, left, and Jamie Brown chat with former tennis superstar Andy Roddick (a friend of the couple’s and a Charlotte resident) during a post-screening discussion on Tuesday night.
    Jeff Tonidandel, left, and Jamie Brown chat with former tennis superstar Andy Roddick (a friend of the couple’s and a Charlotte resident) during a post-screening discussion on Tuesday night. JEFF SINER jsiner@charlotteobserver.com

    Tonidandel and Brown are the stars, but other strong characters will emerge …

    … over the course of the season, too. Among them: Chris Rogienski and Jon Rosenberg, who during the arc of “Fork & Hammer’s” first season go from executive chef and general manager at Supperland, respectively, to the same positions at Leluia Hall; and Courtland Bradford, executive sous chef at Supperland who has worked with Rogienski for many years.

    On the other hand, Tonidandel says that out of the more than 300 staffers they employ “we have a few shy people … (who) do not want to be on”; and dating back to the days of the since-discontinued “Restaurant Road,” Brown adds, they’ve always told the staff, “‘If you don’t want to be on camera … that is perfectly fine.’ … Zero pressure.”

    While a second season is “not a done deal,” according to Tonidandel, everyone involved seems open to the possibility …

    … and there’s definitely good fodder: The concept for the historic building that was moved down the street and placed next to Leluia Hall is currently a secretive work in project that the couple hopes to open next year.

    WATCH: How to see ‘Fork & Hammer’

    The premiere episode will debut on pbs.org and the PBS app on Monday, Oct. 13, with the initial televised airing in North Carolina set for 8 p.m. Tuesday, Oct. 14, on the North Carolina Channel (PBS NC, formerly UNC-TV). Check your local listings for details and additional showtimes. New episodes of the show will be released every week thereafter.

    Jamie Brown, left, and Jeff Tonidandel are the stars of “Fork & Hammer.”
    Jamie Brown, left, and Jeff Tonidandel are the stars of “Fork & Hammer.” JEFF SINER jsiner@charlotteobserver.com

    In the Spotlight: Ongoing, in-depth coverage from The Charlotte Observer on the issues that matter most to Charlotteans.

    This story was originally published October 8, 2025 at 5:00 AM.

    Follow More of Our Reporting on In the Spotlight

    Related Stories from Charlotte Observer

    Théoden Janes

    The Charlotte Observer

    Théoden Janes has spent more than 18 years covering entertainment and pop culture for the Observer. He also thrives on telling emotive long-form stories about extraordinary Charlotteans and — as a veteran of three dozen marathons and two Ironman triathlons — occasionally writes about endurance and other sports.
    Support my work with a digital subscription

    [ad_2]

    Theoden Janes

    Source link

  • Reading Rainbow Rebooted: Mychal Threets Leads a New Era

    [ad_1]

    The PBS program Reading Rainbow, is back after nearly 20 years to teach a new generation of readers

    Credit: Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

    Reading Rainbow, a program that launched in 1983 to encourage children to read, will be getting a reboot after nearly 20 years, with new host Mychal Threets. The show originally launched as a summer program designed to combat the “summer loss phenomena” where children lose some of their reading skills every summer due to lack of reading.

    Reading Rainbow soon became a regular program, eventually growing to be a household name and a classroom staple that encouraged children to discuss literature and visit the library. The show became the third-longest-running children’s TV series in US history, reaching more than 2 million people per week, as well as the most-watched PBS program in the classroom, featuring a library of over 150 programs.

    In the show’s 26-year run with host LeVar Burton, Reading Rainbow won more than 250 awards, including the George Foster Peabody Award, Telly Awards, Parents’ and Teachers’ Choice Awards, and 26 Emmys, including 10 for Outstanding Series.

    In 2022, the documentary “Butterfly In The Sky” highlighted the impact and legacy of Reading Rainbow. Reading Rainbow was canceled in 2006 due to a combination of funding issues and failure to adapt to new technology. 

    Announced September 29, Reading Rainbow will be returning to PBS with new host Mychal Threets, aka Mychal the Librarian, an internet sensation. Threets is a Bay Area native who grew up watching Reading Rainbow. As a child, he attended the Fairfield Civic Center Library, and after receiving a master’s degree in Library and Information Science he became the Children’s Librarian at his childhood library.

    Threets explained, “I was raised on Reading Rainbow, LeVar Burton is my hero. I am a reader, I am a librarian because LeVar Burton and Reading Rainbow so powerfully made us believe we belong in books, we belong everywhere”. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Threets started making videos for TikTok and Instagram about why the library is a vital resource and place for joy. He amassed over 2 million followers across all platforms, with his cheery personality and joy towards reading and the library.

    His videos are for both children and adults as he also provides helpful information on library resources such as tax assistance, legal help and equipment rentals. He was honored with the “I Love My Librarian Award” by the American Library Association in 2023 for his outstanding public service. In 2024, Threets was named Resident Librarian at PBS, eventually stepping down from his role at the Fairfield Civic Center Library.

    Threets has started an online book club, a podcast titled “Thoughts about Feelings” and has a children’s book titled “I’m So Happy You’re Here: A Celebration of Library Joy” set to debut in 2026. Threets is a loud advocate for libraries and access to learning, as he takes after LeVar Burton and has spoken with Congress to keep access to PBS alive. 

    The reboot, which will start airing on October 4 and run through October 25 with new episodes every Saturday, will incorporate new formats such as hands-on crafting instructions and other interactive activities to better reach the audience.

    New episodes of Reading Rainbow will be available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS app, as well as Kidzuko, Sony Pictures Television’s children’s YouTube channel. Both new and old episodes of Reading Rainbow will be available on PBS Retro FAST channel which is available on Amazon Prime Video, Roku, TCL and Vizio.

    Along with the added interactive elements, the show will feature new celebrities, including Rylee Arnold and Ezra Sosa, from Dancing With The Stars, Bellen Woodard, the 14-year-old author of “More Than Peach”, and actor Ebon-Moss Bachrach.

    New books will also be narrated by Jamie Chung, Gabrielle Union, Adam Devine, John Legend and Chrissy Teigen. It is safe to say, Reading Rainbow is in good hands with Mychal Threets, and will help a new generation of children learn to love reading.

    [ad_2]

    Taylor Ford

    Source link

  • PBS series

    [ad_1]



    PBS series “Human” explores the journey of how we became who we are – CBS News










































    Watch CBS News



    Paleoanthropologist Ella Al-Shamahi joins “CBS Mornings Plus” to discuss “Human,” the new five-part PBS NOVA series that looks back at our ancient past and explores the discoveries that shaped modern humanity.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • PBS cuts nearly 100 employees after loss of federal funding

    [ad_1]




































    Public broadcasting cuts and rural areas



    Public broadcasting funding cuts could lead to news blackouts in rural areas

    03:03

    PBS has eliminated nearly 100 jobs in recent months due to recent cuts in federal funding, according to the public media company. 

    The layoffs included 34 PBS staff members who were notified Thursday that their employment is ending, a PBS spokesperson told CBS News in an email. 

    “In this unprecedented moment, we remain focused on what matters most: ensuring our member stations can deliver quality content and services to communities across America,” the spokesperson added.

    The workforce reduction comes after Congress in July voted to eliminate $1.1 billion allocated to public broadcasting, leaving PBS’ roughly 350 stations in a state of uncertainty. No stations have shut down so far, but many have appealed for public funding to help them stay afloat. 

    In another sign of its financial struggles, PBS announced last month that it slashed its budget by 21%. Board members also voted to reduce dues paid by local stations by $35 million, a move that will slow the flow of funding PBS receives from its member network.

    New Jersey’s public television network confirmed to CBS News last month that it was planning to cut jobs because of the decrease in state and federal funding. In Spokane, Washington, 12 of PBS affiliate KSPS’ 35 staff members have either been laid off, had their hours reduced or pay cut.

    PBS and NPR radio service have historically received public funding through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. But CPB, a nonprofit that supports public radio and television stations, in August said it would wind down operations after the federal funding cuts were announced.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • PBS Short Film Fest showcases best work of member stations nationwide – WTOP News

    PBS Short Film Fest showcases best work of member stations nationwide – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The PBS Short Film Festival kicks off on Monday and runs through July 26 on all digital platforms.

    WTOP’s Jason Fraley previews PBS Short Film Fest (Part 1)

    Get ready for a collection of the best short films from PBS member stations all across the country.

    The PBS Short Film Fest returns July 15-26. (Courtesy PBS)

    The PBS Short Film Festival kicks off on Monday and runs through July 26 on all digital platforms.

    “We started back in 2012 as an effort to celebrate and highlight independent filmmakers and independent filmmaking,” PBS Director of Editorial and Brand Engagement Taryn Jackson told WTOP. “We at PBS have always done a great job of amplifying the voices of filmmakers, especially independent filmmakers, but we didn’t do it in a festival. … I think we were onto something because now we are in year 13.”

    This year’s overarching theme is “Story Time” with 15 films divided into four categories.

    “We wanted to take it back and just celebrate the art of short-form storytelling,” Jackson said. “It is very different than other types of storytelling to tell a complete and impactful story between eight and 12 minutes. There’s an art form to that, so we wanted to celebrate that this year.”

    The “Environment” category features the standout film “Boca Chica” by Reel South.

    “It’s talking about unrestricted access to beaches and how that’s a public right in Texas, but for the little-known, magical and untamed stretch of beach called Boca Chica that is curtailed when SpaceX takes flight,” Jackson said. “This film uncovers the mesmerizing beauty of this fragile coastline.”

    The “Family” category includes “The Ballad of Mae Rose” by Louisiana Public Broadcasting.

    “This is our first ever musical that is going to be presented in the PBS Short Film Festival,” Jackson said. “I’m so excited to see what viewers think about this film, because it’s a creative musical but it portrays a serious story in a new way. After Edwin Gray loses his first wife, he finds himself at the funeral of his child, Rose Mae, who despite suspicion, falls prey to a plague, so it’s a really interesting kind of whodunnit type of musical.”

    The “Heroes” category includes “Saving Super Man” by Illinois Public Media.

    “This is our first time presenting a ‘Heroes’ category, so I’m really excited,” Jackson said. “This is about a man living in Chicago, he’s 57 years old, he is on the Autism spectrum and his actual living quarters and his living situation is being threatened, so this story talks about how the town comes together as a community to help save where he lives. This story just really tugs at the heart strings and I think people are really going to enjoy it.”

    Finally, the “Society” category includes “Underground” by the Independent Television Service.

    “This film covers what happens a lot of times in the New York City subways,” Jackson said. “This is about a heavy topic of harassment and assault. There’s not a lot of space and everyone’s public space is invaded when you are on a subway system, so this is about how so many crimes can take place in broad daylight right in the eyes of so many people, but they don’t even notice it because everyone is so crammed into a subway train.”

    Find more information here.

    WTOP’s Jason Fraley previews PBS Short Film Fest (Part 2)

    Listen to our full conversation here.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Fraley

    Source link

  • Alfonso Ribeiro joins WTOP to share excitement about hosting ‘A Capitol Fourth’ again on PBS – WTOP News

    Alfonso Ribeiro joins WTOP to share excitement about hosting ‘A Capitol Fourth’ again on PBS – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Alfonso Ribeiro returns for a second year hosting “A Capitol Fourth” from the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol airing nationwide on PBS at 8 p.m. Thursday.

    WTOP’s Jason Fraley previews ‘A Capitol Fourth’ with Alfonso Ribeiro (Part 1)

    He’s known for “The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air,” “America’s Funniest Home Videos” and “Dancing with the Stars.”

    This Fourth of July, Alfonso Ribeiro returns for a second year to host the annual music and fireworks show “A Capitol Fourth” from the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol that’s airing nationwide on PBS starting at 8 p.m.

    “I had to come back,” Ribeiro told WTOP. “It went fantastic (last year), I just enjoyed every minute of it and had such a blast. It was a wonderful show, the show was put together incredibly and I just enjoyed every moment. It was funny, when the show ended, there was a little after-event that we went to and the producers were like, ‘Hey, we’d love to offer you to do it again next year,’ and I said, ‘Absolutely, we’ll see you again,’ so it was a win-win.”

    This year’s event features hit talent like Smokey Robinson, Fantasia, Darren Criss, Sheila E., Fitz & Noelle from Fitz & The Tantrums, Chloe Flower, Sister Sledge featuring Sledgendary, Loren Allred, Shawn Johnson East and Britt Stewart.

    You’ll also see the National Symphony Orchestra, Choral Arts Society of Washington, Ministers of Music, U.S. Army Band, U.S. Army Herald Trumpets, U.S. Army Presidential Salute Battery and Military District of Washington.

    “We’ve got a full show,” Ribeiro said. “We’ve got the greatest fireworks in all of the land, so it’s going to be an incredible evening. … We’re going to kick the show off with me singing and doing a little dancing with Britt Stewart from ‘Dancing with the Stars,’ so we’re gonna kick it off, we’re gonna have some fun (and) have such a great night.”

    You’ll notice that neither Tom Jones nor The Sugarhill Gang are on the lineup, so don’t expect Ribeiro to bust out “The Carlton Dance” or the “Jump On It” dance from his iconic TV sitcom “The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air” (1990-1996).

    “There is a likelihood that you will not see either; I try to not do those whenever possible,” Ribeiro said.

    “I was fans and friends (of DJ Jazzy Jeff and Will Smith), we had hung out before ever doing the show. … We actually went to Disneyland together, a group of us, and I met them when they were performing at an Endless Summer Jam here in Los Angeles and became friends with them. I was a big fan of their music, so it was cool getting to work with them.”

    Since 2015, he has hosted the good, clean, family fun of ABC’s “America’s Funniest Home Videos.”

    “I love the fact that I get to do that show,” Robeiro said.

    “I truly, truly enjoy it. I’m honored that I got to follow in the footsteps of Tom Bergeron and Bob Saget. … It’s making people from all ages have a great time and laugh and enjoy themselves on a Sunday night before getting ready to start a busy week, being able to sit down and enjoy something together. Family entertainment doesn’t really exist much anymore — we’re one of the last.”

    Ribeiro also currently hosts ABC’s “Dancing with the Stars” after winning Season 19 as a contestant.

    “I’m creating my own new path from being a contestant on the show to being a co-host to now being one of the hosts with Julianne Hough,” Robeiro said.

    “It’s a great show, I love the show, I wanted to be on the show from the very beginning. It took them 19 seasons to let me on, I don’t know what that was, it took forever, but I finally got on and was lucky enough to win. … I can’t wait to find out who we’ve got this year, I’m sure it’ll be a great group.”

    WTOP’s Jason Fraley previews ‘A Capitol Fourth’ with Alfonso Ribeiro (Part 2)

    Listen to our full conversation on the podcast below:

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Jason Fraley

    Source link

  • Broadway’s ‘Purlie Victorious,’ starring Leslie Odom Jr., to air on PBS

    Broadway’s ‘Purlie Victorious,’ starring Leslie Odom Jr., to air on PBS

    [ad_1]

    Fans who didn’t make it to New York City to catch the Broadway revival of “Purlie Victorious: A Non-Confederate Romp Through the Cotton Patch,” starring Leslie Odom, Jr., can catch the comedic play on TV later this month.

    PBS will broadcast “Purlie Victorious” on Friday, May 24, at 9 p.m. as part of its Emmy-winning performing arts series “Great Performances.” The show will also be available to watch on the PBS website and app.


    MORE: Kevin Hart makes FaceTime cameo on ‘Abbott Elementary’


    “Purlie Victorious” follows a Black preacher’s scheme to reclaim his inheritance and win back his church from a plantation owner. Odom, who grew up in East Oak Lane and attended the Philadelphia High School for Creative and Performing Arts, received a Tony Award nomination last month for playing the titular role. The “Purlie Victorious” revival opened in September 2023 and closed in February. The play, written by Ossie Davis, made its original Broadway debut in 1961 starring Davis.

    “I have loved this piece and its author, Mr. Davis, for well over half my life,” Odom said in a release. “We endeavored to live up to the demands of a challenging text and the legacy of a great American. I was thrilled beyond measure to be part of the revival company and now for it to be part of the rich tradition of ‘Great Performances’ on PBS.”  

    The PBS broadcast of the play was recorded live at the Music Box Theatre in January. It will be part of the “Great Performance” Broadway Best series, which also includes the Free Shakespeare in the Park production of “Hamlet,” Audra McDonald’s 2022 London Palladium concert, and 2023’s “My Favorite Things: The Rodgers & Hammerstein 80th Anniversary Concert,” also from London.          

    Odom, best known for his Tony-winning breakout role as Aaron Burr in the hit Broadway musical “Hamilton,” has earned a Grammy award and been nominated for multiple Emmys and Oscars throughout his career. He was named to Time’s “100 Most Influential People of 2024” list in April, and joined Philly’s Walk of Fame in 2023.

    His fifth full-length album, “When A Crooner Dies,” was released in November, and he stopped by Philadelphia earlier this month to perform a concert at the Miller Theater for his “My Favorite Things” tour.

    [ad_2]

    Franki Rudnesky

    Source link

  • ‘Fire Through Dry Grass’ Team on Making a COVID Doc Inside a Nursing Home: “We Were Fighting for Our Lives”

    ‘Fire Through Dry Grass’ Team on Making a COVID Doc Inside a Nursing Home: “We Were Fighting for Our Lives”

    [ad_1]

    The horrors and resilience of people during the biggest global pandemic since the height of HIV in the ’80s and ’90s has been captured again and again by documentaries over the last several years.

    Inside looks at the country’s emergency rooms as they raced to save lives have been cast against theaters trying to weather human and artistic loss as they faced unprecedented challenges amid governmental shutdowns. But not many documentaries have seen artists take viewers inside one of the hardest hit — and frequently forgotten — communities during the height of COVID-19: nursing homes and long-term care facilities.

    Enter the filmmaking team of Fire Through Dry Grass. Andres “Jay” Molina and Alexis Neophytides followed several residents of the 815-bed chronic care facility NYC Health + Hospitals/Coler — formerly known as Coler-Goldwater Specialty Hospital and Nursing Facility — as they challenged administration along with local and state officials’ policy in an effort to stop the endangerment of residents at the care facility on New York City’s Roosevelt Island.

    The group at the heart of the doc belong to Reality Poets, a collective of gun violence survivors turned artists, poets and musicians who reside at Coler’s nursing home, and who worked in conjunction with filmmakers and artists to chronicle their months-long lockdown. The film follows their life during the COVID wave that plagued New York City following former Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s decision to allow COVID-positive patients to return to or be admitted alongside previously unexposed residents at care facilities across the state.

    Refusing to be left out of sight and out of mind, this group of Black and brown artists worked to hold their institution — and home — accountable for what was going on inside its walls. This effort soon led to a movement complete with news stories on the struggles of nursing staff, petitions, protests supported by other Roosevelt Island residents and eventually their regained right to access life outside of the facility.

    Molina, Neophytides, producers and residents spoke to The Hollywood Reporter about how Fire Through Dry Grass captured the pandemic experience from inside Coler’s halls, the life and death stakes of their disability advocacy and why the documentary space needs more brown and Black disabled filmmakers.

    Can you talk about your decision to film your experiences inside Coler, and how you got involved in filmmaking in general?

    ANDRES “JAY” MOLINA I taught myself how to use Premiere Pro and After Effects, so I’ve been making short films for a while. The pandemic hits — it was chaos — and it happened to be that they put a patient in my room in the bed right next to me who had COVID. I have underlying conditions, so to me, if I had gotten COVID, I would probably be dead. So I called administration, and I told them about it. They said they were going to do something, but they didn’t do nothing. They left the patient right there. I called Jenny Lee Brewster, who was the director of [disabled artist collective] Open Doors at that time, and I told her about the situation. She was feeling for me, the fact that we were there locked up and had COVID all around us. She told me, “Jay you are filmmakers, so let’s make a movie about this.”

    I’d been working with [Alexis Neophytides] for a few years already, and I got a Saving the City grant from the Mayor’s Office here in New York, to work with a professional to teach me about filmmaking. We were working together for a while, so it was a no-brainer to invite her to co-direct this film with me. When we presented the project to her, and I told her everything that happened to me — what was going on not just with me but with us — she decided that she wanted to join in.

    Can you talk about the feedback you got from the facility at the time? The doc doesn’t really get a lot of official statements but you do chronicle your efforts to hold them accountable along the way.

    PETER YEARWOOD Feedback back from the facility, it was like this: We are now fighting for our lives. What can you do to us now that that’s really gonna matter? I believe that’s where we got the courage from to just go ahead and do what we had to do, film what we had to film, get information from wherever we had to get it from. That was the least thing on our mind: fear of retaliation. At first, it was there, and then it just didn’t matter anymore because we were fighting for our lives now. So there’s nothing you could do to me now that’s really going to matter.

    JENNILIE BREWSTER Someone on Coler’s [Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Center] staff — I guess the head of inpatient relations — told me that they weren’t allowed to film because of HIPAA. I said, “HIPAA doesn’t apply to them. They’re residents.” So we really did ask some folks and find out what their legal rights were. But there was some pushback. I mean, they flat-out lied, said they can’t do it, and then when I called them on it, they backed down. There was some other pushback about some social media that we were doing that administration told us to stop.

    Vincent, the doc details your journey with hospital and political officials about addressing the issues at the residency. Did you believe when you were having those discussions that the city and these officials genuinely wanted to help, or did you feel like those meetings were little more than PR?

    VINCENT PIERCE The first meeting I really had was with the H&H CEO, Dr. Katz, and at first I did feel like he wanted to help. In the film, I said that yeah, he was cool. But I realized, he was just trying to protect H&H, trying to protect [former CEO] Robert Hughes. He was doing what he was told. No matter what, he’s going to protect his $300,000 a year and not worry about people’s lives. So yeah, I did believe, but realized that when it comes to sitting down with administration and sitting down with Dr. Katz, they talked a good talk, but really were trying to get me to stop. As for other government officials, the [then] Manhattan Borough president Gale Brewer helped out a lot. She really supported us, really got on camera, on the news and supported us.

    Had any of you run into advocacy issues, in terms of getting what you needed, prior to the pandemic?

    PIERCE Yes, definitely. There were issues going on before the pandemic. Voices definitely were not being heard. Before the pandemic, even the new CEO brought that up and said, “Yeah, we know that there were issues that the pandemic just brought out.” Even at the beginning of the pandemic, our voices were not being heard by us being on platforms and speaking up until some travel nurses went to the [New York] Post, and were saying some of the same things we were saying. Now we have everyone wanting to listen or pretend like they want to listen.

    YEARWOOD Call it luck, if you will, but we had a lot of good friends, a lot of good allies, especially in the community at large — the Roosevelt Island community — who helped us out tremendously by getting the local politicians involved in this. I think that’s when they started paying attention, when our politicians or local electeds started voicing for us. It was mentioned before, the borough president, there were council members, even had Congresswoman [Carolyn B.] Maloney at one time. That’s when they started paying attention. Before — like Ben said — we were something on the back burner they weren’t really concerned about.

    This is all happening on an island historically known for isolating people from everyone else — hospitals for the poor and infected with smallpox, a workhouse and prison, an overcrowded asylum. These were also people who frequently didn’t have agency over themselves or protected rights. In the doc, you address having someone else isolate you and control your contact to the outside world. How much did that directly exacerbate the experiences you had?

    MOLINA They first used to tell us that they are doing that to protect us, but they don’t really know the damage that they were doing to us — not being able to see our families or our friends. One thing they used to say to us that we used to hate was that, “it’s bad out there. You don’t want to be out there.” Yeah, but you can be out there. You have that choice. We don’t have that choice. You’re basically violating our human rights. Then they will just say that they’re protecting us. In the Town Hall meeting, the CEO back then, Mr. Hughes, was asked that question about isolation, about us going out. One thing he said that really pissed me off was, “We are asking them not to go outside, and they are complying.” Bullshit.

    They were forcing us to stay here. They were telling us that if any one of us steps one foot out of the facility, we will automatically go to a fifth floor of isolation for 14 days. They would put us in a unit with other people that had COVID. That’s the way they were protecting us, supposedly. Basically taking our freedom away and putting us with people that will actually give us the virus even if we didn’t have it.

    YEARWOOD This island does have a history of it being a dumping ground, if you will, for the city’s undesirables. And yeah, there were times when I used to think that. That we were in the way and we weren’t really wanted on this island. But boy were we so wrong. Especially the way this community came out to support us. It’s something that I’ll never forget. I used to read about it in newspapers. There were news clippings on how a community would step up in times of crisis, but I’d never really experienced it.

    The way they didn’t just show up, but put up. They showed up for us like we were family. As far as the isolation, I think Jay touched on this one time when he said, “because we’re here, we’re isolated from the rest of New York City. So they think that they can do just what the hell they want to do, and nobody’s got to know anything.” But I think that a lot of the success we’ve had so far, I would just thank the community for that. Because they just amplify their voices through the whole process of the lockdown.

    You were filming this basically over a two-year span. Can you talk about the shared filming process we see in the doc and how you determined which moments mattered?

    MOLINA We had three GoPros. I would always have one on my chair. Then periodically, I would put one on Pete’s chair, Vince’s chair or [LeVar “Var” Lawrence’s] chair. Sometimes I went to their rooms while they were in bed and I’d film from there with their permission.

    ALEXIS NEOPHYTIDES I was filming the outside stuff. Open Doors started recording the preliminary meetings to keep a record of what was going on before we started the film, which I think was about a month into the pandemic. Var had actually filmed some stuff himself on his phone also, because he was so enraged at what was going on. He was texting people what was happening. Some of those small first videos — the one that’s orange and grainy, where his roommate is coughing in the back and you can’t really see anything — he moves his wheelchair with a stylus on his phone, and he was recording. That was actually, if not the first thing, one of the first things that was was filmed.

    Jay and I had a huge G-drive, we’d upload footage and then review what there was. We made shot lists of what he could film in the inside with the GoPro. In terms of putting together the beats of the story, everyone was living it as we were filming, so the story was unfolding. Every time we thought we had a section of what the film was going to be, something else huge would happen. There was a second wave, and continuously still locked down inside. So I think it became clear when they were finally allowed out that that was an ending to the film and that we could frame it in that way — the year of lockdown.

    Part of this film is about profiling the life of adults in this care facility, as residents, people with disabilities and artists. How did you want to approach those profiles, which are somewhat distinct through things like animation from the larger story happening around you?

    MOLINA I became a motion graphics artist and I know how to use After Effects, which you can do a lot of animation with. At the beginning, me and Alexi were debating whether to have me do some type of work in the film. I also do a lot of greenscreen and Alexi told me, “Jay that’s not how traditional documentary is made — not with greenscreens.” So then we landed on animation. We were able to find a real fantastic animator in Argentina. He did some work on our series, so we contacted him and worked like three years with him. He did all this great animation and we ended up using it in the profiles. We are the Reality Poets, and I wanted this animation to be part of us. So what better than our background stories?

    BREWSTER It was also really important to you because we initially thought we were gonna do a short, and Jay really felt from the beginning it needed to be a feature because you wanted the audience to have time to get to know people.

    MOLINA We had so much footage that I started thinking, we could put all this together and have an hour. We need a feature, so we spoke about it and agreed to make a feature.

    NEOPHYTIDES Jay wanted to make a film about the Reality Poets, highlighting their work and who these amazing people were, before the pandemic, so some of those early interviews are in the film. Then the pandemic happened, and we didn’t want to erase that idea. The new idea then became how to merge that and share the poet’s work in the midst of this pandemic, and how they were now using their art for activism. They were already close, but [we wanted to explore] how that brought them together even closer into a community and a brotherhood.

    It was always to center the Reality Poets, their artwork and their stories. And they had already done some previous telling of their own stories on a podcast that they had put together, so we farmed a lot of that stuff. Then we did some retakes and things. Jay’s story was newly recorded for this, but some of some Var’s and Vince’s were from previous podcasts that they had already done and were things that they wanted to share about their life in in that work.

    YEARWOOD It was really easy because that’s what we do anyway. That’s what Open Doors is known for, the storytellers. Even before the pandemic, at the start of Open Doors, we did outreach across the city, spoke to different age groups of people. We told our story with the intent to deter young people from a life of a street violence. So I think that part of it came real natural for us to be able to tell our backstory.

    These facilities can already be really isolating beyond any COVID policy, especially for younger long-term patients who they aren’t really built for. How did you think about portraying that isolation, the outside versus inside experience? Did you want one to feel harsher than the other, visually?

    NEOPHYTIDES We thought about that a lot — how to present the inside versus the outside, and almost from the point of view of Jay and I as the two directors, one of us from inside and one of us from outside. We wanted it to highlight the claustrophobia and the horror that you were feeling through the Zoom box and through small claustrophobic shots from inside the nursing home and then come out into this expanse of glory on the island. To be able to go outside and hear the birds and sit under a tree or something and breathe some air that wasn’t the same recycled air that you were breathing was such a luxury that they weren’t afforded and it was right outside the gate. It was so fucked up. So we talked about that a lot in the edit, in the sound design, in the music. What kind of sounds we were going to use in the songs in the score.

    Another thing I will add is that I actually grew up on Roosevelt Island. That’s how Jay and I were introduced to each other, and I loved it. In the film, when Pete is narrating you see some footage of late ’70s roller skating. That was when I was a baby. It’s really idyllic in my mind. For me, I wanted that to come through, this magic of the island, which I think a lot of the Roosevelt Island residents feel. It’s a really special place to live. I know that’s a real feeling amongst the Coler residents. Yeah, it is isolated, but it’s also an amazing place to go and live. You have freedom, you can go and sit by the water. The community is great. It’s beautiful.

    YEARWOOD Jay and I, our units were the last ones to get locked down. We live on the same floor but on different sides. Three days after they locked our units down, I got sick because they had people that were positive and negative in the same space. I still haven’t had a response as to who was responsible for that? Who gave that order to lock everybody down in the same space? So I’m still trying to find out who did that. I have an idea of who might have done it, but I’m not sure. But yeah, we did feel safer outside than we did inside.

    PIERCE They were also told to treat everyone as if they had it. Another point I wanted to bring up was with the people looking out the windows — that’s a sense of being incarcerated and wanting to get out. A lot of people can’t deal with that. That really messes a lot of people mentally.

    MOLINA Outside is like a sanctuary for us. We have our area outside where we always hang out. We always talk, we basically just mill together about what happened to any of us the day before or what’s going to happen next. They took that away from us. So now we weren’t even meeting each other anymore. We were just calling each other. When they took that freedom from us, that basically broke our hearts.

    Watching this, it becomes clear how significant your work is in capturing the inside of this issue, but it’s also rare to see so many Black and brown men with disabilities not only present on screen, but shaping the filmmaking. You obviously had a lot going on during this time, but was that something that had crossed your minds while working on this?

    PIERCE Definitely. Definitely. Definitely. This is a majority, Black and brown nursing home, and it would have never happened if it was an all-white nursing home. Voices would have got heard. Like I said, our voices weren’t getting heard until travel nurses, who were white, spoke up to the Post.

    BREWSTER The question, it’s reminding me of something that Jay has often said about it being really important to you to be recognized for your talents and skills, and feeling like living in this nursing home and being a person with disability that you’re not seeing people in front of or behind the camera a lot.

    MOLINA Yes, that’s something that always intrigued me. The fact that we are disabled, Black and brown men or women, we are being treated as second class citizens. We are not given the same respect and opportunities as able-bodied people are. So I always felt that there should be more of us in film, in Hollywood. It should be more of us working, presenting ourselves as artists and as filmmakers, producers.

    YEARWOOD The sad truth about that is that there hundreds of thousands of people with disabilities that are really talented. Hollywood just seems to throw them in the shadows. They even have the audacity to have a able-bodied person playing a disabled person onscreen. That’s something I think needs to change. I’ve often wondered, where are my doctors, scientists, musicians, actors with disabilities? Where are they at? I know that they’re out there because I’ve come in contact with many, many people with disabilities through Open Doors. Really smart people. People will real skills. Why are the being kept in the shadows. Are they scared of us?

    The title’s multiple meanings — a pandemic raging through your under-resourced and under-supported community, and your fiery spirits that helped advocate for you and your fellow residents — are powerful. But was that the significance of the title? And was there ever a moment where you questioned whether you could press on?

    PIERCE I felt like it was up to us to really drill into their heads, “What are you doing? This does not make any logical sense.” I think that the little bit of progress that we were getting gave us the motivation to keep going, and still gives us motivation.

    YEARWOOD I don’t think giving up was an option for us. I think if we were still under lockdown, we’d still be filming. I think one of the things that gave us not so much the courage but the energy to keep going was because of all the support that we had. People were hearing our voices, so we can’t stop now. And I can tell you one thing — one person got it and it spread like wildfire to the whole facility. That is exactly what happened, so it was a no-brainer title for this film.

    NEOPHYTIDES Sometimes it’s like the hardest thing to come up with the title and sometimes it’s the easiest. But I hadn’t thought about it the way that you said that. They’re burning the system down.

    BREWSTER It was a working title that became the title and it’s what you nailed there — how it spreads through that facility, but also the determined activist spirit and how that then became the fire through dry grass that’s spreading. We’re seeing both the idea about the virus but also the Reality Poets’ determination, perseverance and advocacy.

    Fire Through Dry Grass is streaming on POV/PBS through the end of January.

    [ad_2]

    Abbey White

    Source link

  • How To Watch The New Hampshire Primary Results

    How To Watch The New Hampshire Primary Results

    [ad_1]

    A small contingent of journalists gathered near the Canadian border earlier this morning to watch as Dixville Notch, NH, continued its tradition of casting the first ballots on an election day.

    Nikki Haley cleaned Donald Trump‘s clock in this hamlet — 6 votes to none.

    As the day goes on, network correspondents are fanning out across the state at precincts to talk to actual voters, after months in which the first-in-the-nation primary was judged and assessed by polls. Commentary and analysis is focusing on whether

    Haley and her top surrogate, New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu, blitzed the airwaves on Monday, while Trump held a final rally in Laconia, NH, where he predicted that Haley would be out of the race after tonight. He was interrupted by climate protesters, who have been a frequent presence at events in recent days.

    There is a Democratic race, too. Joe Biden is not on the ballot, as the Democratic National Committee mandated that South Carolina hold the first-in-the-nation primary. But New Hampshire has gone forward anyway, and Biden supporters have mounted a write-in campaign, hoping to stymie efforts by Rep. Dean Phillips (D-MN) and Marianne Williamson to make some kind of surprise showing in the state.

    Broadcast networks will provide ongoing coverage of the results on their streaming channels, although special reports are possible during the primetime lineups. Polls close in some locations close at 7 p.m. ET and at 8 p.m. ET in others.

    Here are the coverage plans of the major networks:

    ABC: The streaming channel ABC News Live will provide coverage, with David Muir joining Linsey Davis at 7 p.m. ET for Your Voice, Your Vote special, with reporting from Rachel Scott, Mary Bruce, Jonathan Karl, Martha Raddatz, Eva Pilgrim, Whit Johnson and Rick Klein, among others. Donna Brazile, Reince Preibus and Sarah Isgur will provide analysis. ABC News’ Nightline will devote its full show to the caucuses.

    CBS: Norah O’Donnell will anchor CBS Evening News from Manchester, NH tonight, and she will be joined by Major Garrett for live coverage of results on CBS News Streaming starting at 8 p.m. ET. Garrett also will anchor an hourlong edition of America Decides from New Hampshire at 5 p.m. ET. Coverage also will include analysis from John Dickerson and Anthony Salvanto, with reporting from Robert Costa, Ed O’Keefe, Fin Gómez and Caitlin Huey-Burns reporting from New Hampshire. Tony Dokoupil has been reporting from the state for CBS Mornings. Dickerson will anchor a special edition of CBS News Prime Time on CBS Streaming starting at 7 p.m. ET.

    NBC: Tom Llamas will kick off coverage at 5 p.m. ET on NBC News Now, and will be joined by Hallie Jackson in New Hampshire and Chuck Todd and Steve Kornacki breaking down the results. Kristen Welker, who moderated Meet the Press from the Granite State on Sunday, will be back in New York to join Lester Holt for a network special report. She will pick up coverage from Llamas on NBC News Now starting at 10 p.m. ET.

    CNN: Following coverage throughout the day, Jake Tapper and Anderson Cooper anchor coverage starting at 6 p.m. ET, with Dana Bash anchoring live from New Hampshire, joined by Kasie Hunt, Chris Wallace and Jeff Zeleny. Erin Burnett will lead analysis with Kaitlan Collins, Abby Phillip, Audie Cornish and Manu Raju from Washington, and Audie Cornish from New York. David Chalian will provide polling and delegate analysis, and John King will break down results at the Magic Wall, and Phil Mattingly and Harry Enten will provide updates. Laura Coates and Erica HIll will anchor overnight coverage starting at 1 a.m. ET. The caucus coverage will stream live without a cable log in from 7 p.m. ET on Monday to 5 a.m. ET via CNN.com.

    Fox News: Following a two-hour Special Report with Bret Baier at 6 p.m. ET, the network plans coverage during its primetime shows Jesse Watters Primetime and Hannity. Baier and Martha MacCallum will a special Democracy 2024: New Hampshire Primary starting at 10 p.m. ET, with analysis from Brit Hume, Dana Perino, Trey Gowdy, Charles Payne and Kellyanne Conway. Bill Hemmer will analyze results on the Bill-board, while Sandra Smith will present voter analysis from New York. Trace Gallagher will anchor post-caucus analysis on Fox News @ Night at midnight ET, followed by a two-hour special at 2 a.m. ET with Mike Emanuel and Gillian Turner.

    MSNBC: Jen Psaki kicks off special coverage from New Hamoshire at 4 p.m. ET, followed by Rachel Maddow with Decision 2024 starting at 6 p.m. ET. She will be joined by Ari Melber, Joy Reid, Chris Hayes, Alex Wagner, Lawrence O’Donnell and Stephanie Ruhle. Steve Kornacki will be at the Big Board throughout the evening. Psaki will continue special coverage at midnight ET.

    PBS: Amna Nawaz and Geoff Bennett anchor coverage from Washington, D.C. starting at 6 p.m. ET, with reporting from Lisa Desjardins in New Hampshire. Desjardins will give an update at 9 p.m. ET, and live coverage will start at 11 p.m. ET.

    NewsNation: Chris Cuomo, Dan Abrams and Elizabeth Vargas will anchor Decision Desk HQ 2024: The New Hampshire Primary starting at 7 p.m. ET. Connell McShane is breaking down results, while Leland Vittert and Chris Stirewalt will offer news and analysis from the Granite State. Brian Entin, Kellie Meyer and Joe Khalil will provide additional reporting.

    C-SPAN: Starting at 8 p.m. ET, the network will provide candidate victory and concession speeches, viewer calls and social media reaction.

    [ad_2]

    tedstew1

    Source link