ReportWire

Tag: PayPal

  • The Writer Of Minecraft’s Ending Poem Got High And Made It Free

    The Writer Of Minecraft’s Ending Poem Got High And Made It Free

    [ad_1]

    Minecraft Steve flies across the screen while other characters watch.

    Image: Mojang / Nintendo / Kotaku

    The controversial ending to Mojang Studios’ Minecraft has sparked plenty of conversation over the years. A poem scrolls on-screen following after players defeat the Ender Dragon for a whopping nine minutes. Quotes from the “End Poem,” as the swan song is titled, have been inked on fans skins and turned into merch. But the story behind the prose is tantalizing in itself.

    In a lengthy Twitter thread, Irish writer Julian Gough recounted meeting Minecraft creator, Markus Persson 11 years ago and writing the narrative ending for the adventure game, Minecraft’s End Poem. Gough said he was pressured into signing a contract with Mojang Studios, and later Microsoft after the company purchased the studio back in 2014, after the ending had already been implemented in the game. The contract would sign over Gough’s rights to Mojang and later parent company Microsoft. According to Gough, he was never under contract with Mojang when he wrote the game’s ending, meaning he owned the copyright over the poem, not the corporation. In the thread, Gough uploaded a photo of the contract Microsoft allegedly sent that Gough refused to sign in 2011 and in 2014.

    “I’m lucky in that I don’t give a shit about working in the video games industry, so I can just tell the truth and whatever happens, happens,” Gough told Kotaku. “Video games are a great artform, potentially the greatest artform, but the industry as a whole frequently doesn’t treat writers with respect or understanding, and so it often doesn’t get the best out of them. It’s tragic, because the best writers can really elevate the whole game, at every level.”

    After taking shrooms in the Netherlands, Gough decided to take the Minecraft Poem End under public domain through a Creative Commons license, according to his own account of the story, which he shared on Substack in December 2022. Gough said he put Minecraft’s ending under the public domain was so that players would be free to do whatever they liked with it, whether that’s using the poem in a school play, making T-shirts and posters of it, or painting it on the side of a van.

    “But there’s no point giving people a present if they don’t KNOW they’ve been given it. So I wrote a long piece on Substack, telling the story,” Gough wrote in the Twitter thread. “It went mildly viral. A terrific editor at a major global media organisation read the piece, and got in touch.”

    When the undisclosed media organization reached out to Microsoft, Gough says the company refused to reply. According to the writer, Microsoft’s silence was the company’s way of circumventing the Streisand effect. Rather than making a big deal out of news only to make the news become a bigger story, the article was scrapped.

    “And… it worked. Silence worked. The lawyers at the media organisation, understandably but annoyingly, lost their nerve,” Gough wrote. “Without a comment, even a ‘no comment’, it was impossible to tell what Microsoft knew or planned to do. And that was too much risk for the media organisation’s lawyers, because Microsoft [has] 1700 lawyers and unlimited financial firepower.”

    Kotaku reached out to Microsoft for comment but did not receive a reply.

    Had Gough’s ending been for “some tiny little indie company with no legal department,” he says getting news out about his ending poem, would not have faced such high levels of “scrutiny” and obsessive fact-checking by lawyers.

    “If they said or did anything, we could have reacted to it. If they made a good objection, we could have changed a few lines, and published,” Gough wrote. “If they made a bad objection, we could have shown them proof that we were right, and published.”

    Gough told Kotaku its been interesting seeing his Twitter thread receive a support from fellow writers and folks in the video games industry.

    “I’ve even received PayPal donations from Microsoft employees! That was a pleasant surprise,” Gough said. “And I’ve had some eye-opening DMs from writers, and other creatives, who feel they were screwed over by big games companies, but who are afraid to say anything in public, because they worry they will be quietly blacklisted. There’s a lot of hurt out there.”

    At the end of his thread, Gough encouraged players to read and share the original Minecraft game’s ending, which can be seen in the YouTube video below.

    SuperDuperCrazyDude

    [ad_2]

    Isaiah Colbert

    Source link

  • PayPal’s Gabrielle Rabinovitch on Being the Only Woman in the Room

    PayPal’s Gabrielle Rabinovitch on Being the Only Woman in the Room

    [ad_1]

    Michael Weschler

    In ELLE.com’s monthly series Office Hours, we ask people in powerful positions to take us through their first jobs, worst jobs, and everything in between. This month we spoke with Gabrielle Rabinovitch, PayPal’s acting chief financial officer and SVP of investor relations and treasurer (say that five times fast!), who knows male-dominated spaces all too well after starting her career in investment banking. She recalls once working on an M&A assignment for a company that made industrial-sized boilers; when she asked to see them, she was directed outside, approximately 100 yards away, in the freezing cold—to an empty building. “It was a big ‘gotcha’ moment,” she confesses. Ever since, Rabinovitch has prided herself on being aligned with the values of the company she works for. “Caring about the mission and vision, caring about what they do, and caring about how they take care of their people is very important to me,” she says. That includes helping provide a service that allows people to buy what they want, when they want, and how they want, especially during the holiday season. Here’s how she got there.

    My first job

    My first teenage job was folding sweaters, but my first real corporate job was as an M&A analyst at an investment bank. I worked on the mergers and acquisitions team for about two years, right out of college. Obviously, it was a very high-paced environment. Also, an environment where I was one of very few women; I think I was the only woman on my floor. Investment banking, management consulting—those types of areas are amazing training grounds to build executive presence, be given a ton of responsibility, and have an opportunity to be highly visible and gain a lot of on-the-job training. I thought it was a great way to start my career. I’m a big proponent of getting that diverse experience in your career and digging right in. What you get is what you give.

    On being the only woman in the room

    I felt like an outsider a lot of the time. I felt like I didn’t relate; I felt like I wasn’t included in the joke or the conversation. There were instances where I would be at a business dinner and a client would literally say, “I want to tell this joke, but I won’t tell it in mixed company.” Then I would get up and go to the bathroom, and I would come back and people would be laughing. Because I was the most junior person on the team, I would often go down and greet our guests and bring them up to a conference room and they would say, “Honey, can you get me a cup of coffee?” I had many of those experiences. One time, I corrected a senior banker when I was called upon to explain an analysis, and he said, “How do you know that? I’d think you’d be spending your time reading fashion magazines all day.” He said it in front of an entire group, and it really, really took me aback. It was an opportunity where I realized, this was not academia, this is not a meritocracy; you’re viewed in a certain way and there are certain preconceived ideas. It was eye-opening.

    gabrielle rabinovitch office hours

    How I went from investment banking to PayPal

    First, I went to Williams-Sonoma, and I got to the point where I wanted to take on more. I felt like I had stopped growing in my current role, and it was really an opportune time for me to move on. At the same time, PayPal had just become a separate public company, which was a very unique situation, to birth a company with a $41 billion market cap. It’s such an important leader within the digital payment space that, when I heard about the role, I was particularly excited, because it brought together my interest in technology, corporate formulation and business association and government, and it was also a much bigger platform for me to develop as a leader. So, I applied for the job, and I was definitely not at the top of the list—the recruiter made that pretty clear. I called him every week to let him know I was interested. Then I got to the point where I had another offer from a very prominent company, so I took the risk of letting the recruiter know, and very shortly thereafter I was meeting with PayPal’s former CFO. I prepped so much for that interview, because I knew it was my one opportunity. There was nothing that I wasn’t prepared to answer. I put so much pressure on myself, and fortunately, I was able to impress the team.

    Best career advice I’ve ever received

    Taking calculated risks, and that is really consistent with what my transition to PayPal was.

    gabrielle rabinovitch

    Why PayPal’s mission is critical

    The whole idea of democratizing access is so incredible: how expensive it is to be poor, and the fact that PayPal sits between merchants and consumers to make transactions easier, safer, and more secure. This whole idea about how we facilitate and enable both person-to-person payments and consumer payments was incredibly exciting to me. And also [being] right at the nascency of just becoming a public company with an incredibly rich history behind it: founded in 1998, acquired by eBay in 2002, and this whole story which then developed into corporate activism and separation.

    What I love about working in tech

    PayPal really is a meritocracy; it is truly a place where lots of people thrive. What I find different about working at PayPal versus other jobs I’ve had is the consistency of such capable, excellent, smart people. It’s very fast-paced, so, initially, I felt like my head was spinning. It was a real learning curve with digital payments. I gave myself 90 days to know everything, because you can only ask so many questions before you lose credibility. There’s a very “come as you are” attitude. I’ll show up dressed up, and other people will show up in T-shirts and flip-flops; no one is judging people based on how they look. They want people who are thoughtful and engaged and passionate about the business.

    How I psyched myself up to be CFO

    By reminding myself that nobody would be asking me to do this if they didn’t think I could. I’m sure I seemed a little shaky at moments in time when I was finding my footing, but each successive week felt more natural, and it felt like I started to develop a good rhythm, not without challenges, but it started to take shape. To me, it’s about serving our people. Somebody needs to be in this role, and it requires a ton of energy, so I really wanted to be in service to our teams as we were moving through this transitional time. This year, as with many companies, has been one of intense change. So I needed to step up and give back.

    The proudest moment of my career

    Without a doubt, being acting CFO. One of my main influences for my interest in business was my mother. She had a career and then took a step back to have kids and stay at home, and she always regretted not returning to work. She passed away in 2005. I always think, “This would’ve been the moment where she’d be so proud.” I’m a people pleaser by nature.

    This interview has been edited and condensed.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Why Bitcoin Is Not Like PayPal Or Venmo

    Why Bitcoin Is Not Like PayPal Or Venmo

    [ad_1]

    This is an opinion editorial by Mark Maraia, an entrepreneur, author of “Rainmaking Made Simple” and a Bitcoiner.

    Bitcoin is not like PayPal or Venmo. This would be obvious to anyone who understands money. As Shakespeare might say, “Ay, there’s the rub.” Almost no one understands money. We are never taught about how fiat money actually works at home or at school or at work … even when you work on Wall Street or you run the country. I’m confident very few politicians could pass a simple exam on money. I’m almost sure none of our federal employees could. And I’d hazard a guess that very few CEO’s or CFO’s of Fortune 500 companies could either.

    [ad_2]

    Mark Maraia

    Source link

  • PayPal Fines Up To $2,500 For Intolerance: Bitcoin Fixes This

    PayPal Fines Up To $2,500 For Intolerance: Bitcoin Fixes This

    [ad_1]

    PayPal has a fine in place for “intolerance” for up to $2,500 embedded into its terms and conditions.

    Located in PayPal’s User Agreement, the company states:

    “You acknowledge and agree that $2,500.00 U.S. dollars per violation of the Acceptable Use Policy is presently a reasonable minimum estimate of PayPal’s actual damages.”

    The Acceptable Use Policy includes a clause that warns against “the promotion of hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory or the financial exploitation of a crime, [and] items that are considered obscene.”

    [ad_2]

    Shawn Amick

    Source link

  • Transparency For Payment Processors

    Transparency For Payment Processors

    [ad_1]

    Recently, PayPal released an update to its terms of service that said it would fine people using its service for spreading disinformation. It faced an immediate free speech backlash on social media. Former PayPal President David Marcus tweeted this policy was against everything the company believed. He seemed to think it was “insanity” for payment companies to refuse service “if you say something they disagree with.” Elon Musk tweeted his agreement.

    The company quickly reversed itself, saying the release was a mistake.

    But the controversy led libertarian lawyer Eugene Volokh to look more carefully at PayPal’s terms of service and he was horrified to discover that PayPal has a long-standing acceptable use policy that forbids “the promotion of racial intolerance or other forms of discriminatory intolerance.” As a good First Amendment lawyer he pointed out that “sharply criticizing a religion or government officials could be construed as the promotion of hate—and could theoretically violate that policy.” To protect himself from this danger and to protest this form of censorship he closed his PayPal account and urged others to do the same.

    Good luck finding an alternative. The reality is that payment companies have always had acceptable use policies, and for good reason.

    For one thing, they have legal responsibilities to stop money laundering and terrorist financing. So, they have to know who their customers are and what they are spending their money on. They also have a specific legal obligation to block unlawful internet gambling transactions. Payment companies also have policies against the use of their systems for illegal transactions and most of them take special precautions against copyright violations and child porn.

    Beyond these legal issues, payments systems restrict who they do business with for ethical and brand reasons. Amex doesn’t allow its services to be used by pornographers, even though pornography is protected by the First Amendment. Neither do Stripe, Amazon Pay, or Square.

    Visa and Mastercard allow their member banks to provide service to legal pornography merchants, but they also allow the banks to refuse this business and many of them do. This tolerance has its limits, however. The payment networks recently cut ties with Pornhub after revelations that it didn’t do much to control depictions of rape on its site.

    Both payment systems have broad brand protection clauses in their contracts with merchants and banks. They can withdraw service from “brand-damaging” transactions and reserve the right to unilaterally define what those transactions are.

    Some of these payment company restrictions seem idiosyncratic, to say the least. Amazon Pay, for instance, won’t pay for “occult services.” So, witches and warlocks stay away!

    But many of them seem right. In particular, the bans on hate speech that mimic PayPal’s. Amazon Pay prohibits “hate literature.” Square rejects “hate or harmful products.” Swipe bans a company or individual “that engages in, encourages, promotes or celebrates unlawful violence toward any group based on race, religion, disability, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, or any other immutable characteristic.”

    Visa and MasterCard could ban such merchants under their brand-protection programs, even without an explicit prohibition. What reputable business would want to be associated with companies or groups promoting hate speech? Responsible payment card companies flee contact with such people and they are right to do so.

    Of course, enforcement can often be controversial. In 2019 PayPal applied its policy against hate speech to Gab and Infowars, which brought cries of censorship from conservative activists. But displeasing some critics comes with the territory. Controversies over standards enforcement are an inevitable part of being in the payment business.

    I talked about these issues with former general counsel for the National Security Agency and current partner at Steptoe & Johnson LLP Stewart Baker on his October 17 Cyberlaw podcast (around 32:40). He’s more suspicious of payment card hate speech standards than I am but we agree that a good step forward would be transparency. Payment card companies should be required to disclose their standards, explain their disconnection decisions, and provide adequate opportunities for challenging them.

    Laws providing for this kind of transparency for social media companies are already on the books in some U.S. states and in Europe. Existing financial regulations should be supplemented to require similar transparency rules for payment card companies, to be enforced by the powerful regulators that already supervise financial institutions.

    Transparency has another advantage. It can reveal behind-the-scenes government pressure on card companies to withhold service. This apparently happened in December 2010 when Wikileaks began to release the contents of confidential diplomatic cables. Senator Joe Lieberman, then-Chair of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, publicly called for card companies to disconnect Wikileaks. But PayPal said that it received secret pressure from the State Department. Visa, MasterCard, and PayPal soon suspended Wikileaks’ accounts.

    Government agencies should not exert shadowy pressure on payment companies to disconnect disfavored companies and groups. A little sunlight on such hidden agency nudges would be a good disinfectant and transparency requirements would provide it.

    [ad_2]

    Mark MacCarthy, Contributor

    Source link

  • Control Releases Square Integration

    Control Releases Square Integration

    [ad_1]

    Press Release



    updated: May 25, 2017

    Control, a leading transaction analytics and alerts platform for SaaS, subscription and eCommerce businesses, has added an integration with Square.

    As the first standalone analytics and reporting tool to integrate with Square, Control now offers merchants that accept payments online and offline the efficiency of seeing all their analytics on one dashboard, rather than having disjointed data that will require manual calculation.

    “We are excited to be working together with Square. Square changed the way businesses accept payments, removing the friction that came with acquiring and setting up antiquated POS systems. The future of commerce for smaller businesses is a blend of online and offline. Teaming up with Square ensures that these operators have the analytics and business intelligence they need to grow their company.”

    Kathryn Loewen, Founder and CEO of Control

    “We are excited to be working together with Square,” says Kathryn Loewen, Founder and CEO of Control. “Square changed the way businesses accept payments, removing the friction that came with acquiring and setting up antiquated POS systems. The future of commerce for smaller businesses is a blend of online and offline. Teaming up with Square ensures that these operators have the analytics and business intelligence they need to grow their company.”

    A 2015 study conducted by IDC found that a shopper who buys on both online and offline channels has 30% higher lifetime value than those who only participate on one channel. Monitoring the spending habits of customers is not only crucial for big companies, but for smaller ones too. However, smaller businesses don’t have access to all-in-one enterprise tools. They are restricted by price and size of staff. They use different softwares stacks to accomplish various tasks such as payment — arguably the most important task for any business of any size.

    Through its integration with Square, Control becomes the cost-effective, time-saving solution for small to medium-sized business, doing business online and offline, needing critical data in real-time.  

    “Access to real-time data and insights is critical for any business, whether it’s learning more about your customers or tracking sales performance,” said Pankaj Bengani, Square’s Partnerships Lead. “We’re excited to give sellers more tools to run their business and take payments with Square.”

    In addition to Square, Control also added John J. McDonnell, COO of Deep Labs — a transaction processing and risk management platform — to the board of directors. McDonnell has been in the FinTech sector for over 20 years. After McDonnell earned his B.A. degree with honors from Stanford University and his J.D. from UCLA law school, he held executive roles at Visa, CyberSource, Paymo (now BOKU), PaylinX and TNS. 

    Media Contact:
    Elliot Chan
    Marketing Manager
    elliot@getcontrol.co

    About Control: (https://www.getcontrol.co)
    Control is a leading transaction analytics and alerts platform for SaaS, subscription, and eCommerce, enabling instant intelligence anywhere via its Android, iOS, and web-based products. Control combines data from multiple sources such as PayPal, Stripe and Square to provide key metrics, without the need for manual calculation or spreadsheets.

    Source: Control Mobile Inc.

    [ad_2]

    Source link