ReportWire

Tag: Paramount

  • Netflix drops $83 billion bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, paving way for Paramount Skydance deal

    [ad_1]

    Netflix said on Thursday that it will not match Paramount Skydance’s latest bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, clearing the way for a massive merger that could shake up the entertainment and media industry. 

    Netflix agreed in December to buy part of Warner Bros. Discovery for $27.75 a share, or $82.7 billion. But Paramount Skydance had made a $30 a share all-cash offer to buy all of the company, and on Tuesday raised its offer for Warner Bros. Discovery to $31 a share (Paramount Skydance owns CBS News.)

    Earlier on Thursday, Warner Bros. Discovery’s board of directors notified Netflix that Paramount’s $31 per share offer constituted a “superior proposal” for the company.

    “The transaction we negotiated would have created shareholder value with a clear path to regulatory approval,” Netflix co-CEOs Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters said in a statement Thursday. “However, we’ve always been disciplined, and at the price required to match Paramount Skydance’s latest offer, the deal is no longer financially attractive, so we are declining to match the Paramount Skydance bid.”

    Paramount Skydance didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 

    Warner Bros. Discovery owns streaming and film studios, along with cable channels including CNN, Food Network, HBO, HGTV, TBS, TNT and Turner Classic Movies.

    The merger of Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery will require approval from federal antitrust enforcers. Paramount Skydance executives have said that combining the companies would benefit consumers and help boost the entertainment industry, which has struggled to recover from the pandemic. 

    Some entertainment industry groups and lawmakers have raised concerns that uniting two major Hollywood studios could undermine competition. 

    For its part, Paramount Skydance executives had argued that a union of Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery, which owns streaming platform HBO Max, was likely to arouse antitrust objections.

    In enhancing its offer this week, Paramount Skydance said it would pay a $7 billion termination fee if its acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery collapsed over regulatory concerns. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Netflix backs out of bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, giving studios, HBO, and CNN to Ellison-owned Paramount | TechCrunch

    [ad_1]

    In a flurry of deal offers in the high tens of billions of dollars, the bidding war for Warner Bros. Discovery is over. David Ellison-owned Paramount will acquire Warner Bros. Discovery.

    On Thursday, Warner Bros. Discovery announced that Paramount Skydance’s newest offer of $31 a share was a “superior proposal,” giving Netflix four business days to counter. Netflix then said it would not raise its $82.7 billion all-cash bid for the legacy studio, and would walk away from the deal.

    “The transaction we negotiated would have created shareholder value with a clear path to regulatory approval,” said Netflix co-CEOs Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters in a statement Thursday. “However, we’ve always been disciplined, and at the price required to match Paramount Skydance’s latest offer, the deal is no longer financially attractive, so we are declining to match the Paramount Skydance bid.”

    Per the terms of the original deal, Warner Bros. Discovery will have to pay a $2.8 billion termination fee to Netflix to end the existing agreement. Paramount’s renewed offer — backed by the world’s sixth-richest person, Oracle’s executive chair, and David Ellison’s father, Larry Ellison — includes paying that breakup fee.

    The new deal will see Paramount, which was bought just last year by Ellison’s Skydance Media with heavy financial backing from his father, acquiring the entirety of Warner Bros. Discovery, including its studios, HBO, its streaming service, its games and entertainment divisions, and linear television networks like CNN, TBS, TNT, Discovery, and HGTV.

    Ellison, whose Paramount already owns major studios, entertainment, and news businesses, has warned of significant job cuts. His ownership of news network CBS has also attracted controversy and has largely been seen as a sympathetic turn toward the Trump administration, with reporting critical of the administration shelved or facing increased scrutiny by Ellison and CBS’s editor-in-chief, the conservative provocateur Bari Weiss. Larry Ellison is a major donor and supporter of President Trump.

    Netflix had announced its intent to acquire WBD in December, offering nearly $83 billion for its studios and streaming service alone. Despite several hostile takeover bids by Paramount, Warner Bros. Discovery reaffirmed to shareholders its belief that Netflix’s offer was superior to Paramount’s, which offered $108 billion for the full company including its linear television networks. Paramount’s newest bid, of $31 a share, values WBD at about $111 billion.

    Techcrunch event

    Boston, MA
    |
    June 9, 2026

    Paramount will take on the about $33 billion in debt held by Warner Bros. Discovery, according to the deal. Larry Ellison, whose net worth is $201 billion, according to Bloomberg, has agreed to supply the additional equity to fulfill Paramount’s bid. Paramount’s market cap is about $12 billion.

    The deal is also being financed by a $57.5 billion debt commitment from Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Citi, and Apollo Global Management.

    Netflix shares jumped as much as 10% in after-hours trading in New York. Shares in Paramount were up 4.5%.

    [ad_2]

    Graham Starr

    Source link

  • Netflix Declines To Raise Its Offer To Buy Warner, Says Deal Is ‘No Longer Financially Attractive’ – KXL

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK (AP) — Netflix is declining to raise its offer to buy Warner Bros. Discovery’s studio and streaming business, in a stunning move that effectively puts Paramount in a position to take over the fellow storied Hollywood giant.

    On Thursday, after Warner’s board announced that Skydance-owned Paramount’s offer was superior to the agreement it had previously struck with Netflix, the streaming giant said the new price that would be required to buy Warner would make it a deal that is “no longer financially attractive.”

    Unlike Netflix’s bid, Paramount wants all of Warner’s operations, including networks like CNN and Discovery. That would put CNN under the same roof as Paramount’s CBS and combine two of Hollywood’s last five remaining studios.

    The owner of HBO Max, DC Studios and popular titles like “Harry Potter” had backed Netflix’s proposal for months. But after Skydance-owned Paramount upped its rival bid for the entire company to $31 per share, in addition to other revisions, Warner’s board on Thursday said that the offer “constitutes a ‘company superior proposal.’”

    A Paramount buyout Warner’s business would vastly reshape Hollywood and the wider media landscape. Paramount’s CBS has seen significant editorial shifts, notably with the installation of Free Press founder Bari Weiss at CBS News, under new Skydance ownership. And if Paramount’s acquisition of Warner is successful, many expect the reach of those changes to only grow.

    A Paramount-Warner combo would also combine two of Hollywood’s five legacy studios that remain today, in addition to their theatrical channels. Beyond “Harry Potter,” Warner movies like “Superman,” “Barbie,” and “One Battle After Another” — as well as hit TV series like “The White Lotus” and “Succession” — would join Paramount’s content library.

    Today, Paramount’s lineup of titles include “Top Gun,” “Titanic” and “The Godfather.” And beyond CBS, it owns networks like MTV and Nickelodeon, as well as the Paramount+ streaming service.

    Executives at Paramount have argued that merging will be good for consumers and the wider industry. But lawmakers and entertainment trade groups have sounded the alarm — warning that a Warner takeover would only further consolidate power in an industry already run by just a few major players. Critics say that could result in job losses, less diversity in filmmaking and potentially more headaches for consumers who are facing rising costs of streaming subscriptions as is.

    Combined, that raises tremendous antitrust concerns. The U.S. Department of Justice has already initiated reviews, and other countries are expected to do so, too.

    Netflix, Warner and Paramount have spent the last couple of months in a heated, public back and forth over whose deal has a better regulatory path — and offers more value for Warner shareholders. Thursday’s announcement arrived shortly after Paramount upped the ante on its offer.

    Beyond increasing its proposed purchase price for Warner, the company also agreed to a regulatory termination fee of $7 billion. And Paramount pledged to move up a previously-promised “ticking fee.” The company initially said it would pay 25 cents per share for every quarter the deal drags on past the end of the year. Now it’s agreed to pay that amount if the deal doesn’t go through by the end of September, Warner said.

    But Paramount is taking on billions of dollars in debt to finance its offer. And David Ellison’s father, Oracle founder Larry Ellison, is heavily backing the bid for his son’s company. Foreign sovereign wealth funds have also provided equity for the offer, drawing scrutiny.

    The Ellisons also have a close relationship with President Donald Trump — bringing more politics into question. Trump previously made unprecedented suggestions about his involvement in seeing a deal through, before walking back those statements and maintaining that regulatory approval will be up to the Justice Department.

    The push to acquire Warner also arrives just months after Skydance closed its own buyout of Paramount — in a contentious merger approved just weeks after the company agreed to pay the president $16 million to settle a lawsuit over editing at CBS’ “60 Minutes” program. Still, Trump has continued to publicly lash out at Paramount and “60 Minutes” since.

    More about:

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Vawter

    Source link

  • Paramount Skydance raises bid for Warner Bros. Discover to $31 per share

    [ad_1]

    Warner Bros. Discovery said on Tuesday that Paramount Skydance had raised its bid to acquire the entertainment and media company to $31 per share.

    The revised offer raises the heat on streaming giant Netflix, which in December agreed to buy Warner Bros. Discovery deal for $27.75 per share, or $82.7 billion, to match Paramount Skydance’s bid or abandon the deal. 

    Still, Warner Bros. Discovery said in a news release that its board of directors has not determined whether Paramount Skydance’s latest offer is superior to Netflix’s deal. 

    “WBD will engage further with [Paramount Skydance] to determine if a proposal that constitutes a ‘Company Superior Proposal,’ as defined in the Netflix Merger Agreement, can be reached,” Warner Bros. Disovery said.

    Paramount Skydance’s revised offer includes a $7 billion termination fee if the deal fails to close because of regulatory concerns, according to Warner Bros. Discovery. Paramount Skydance would also cover a $2.8 billion termination fee that Warner Bros. Discovery would be required to pay if it ends the Netflix deal. 

    The sweetened bid comes a week after Warner Bros. Discovery said it would resume talks with Paramount Skydance, the owner of CBS News, to discuss its previous $30 per share bid.

    Earlier in the day, Warner Bros. Discovery said in a statement that its merger agreement with Netflix remains in effect and that its board of directors ” continues to recommend” the deal.

    The latest development raises the stakes in the contest over Warner Bros. Discovery, which, along with its streaming and film studios, also owns cable channels including Food Network, HBO Max, HGTV, TBS and TNT. 

    Paramount Skydance has said that its bid represents a superior financial offer for Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders, while also describing Netflix’s bid as likely to run afoul of U.S. antitrust laws. 

    Netflix’s deal is only for Warner Bros. Discovery’s studio and streaming business, with the takeover slated to occur after Warner spins off its television networks. Paramount Skydance is bidding to acquire all of Warner Bros. Discovery’s assets.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • ‘Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem 2’ Release Shifts to August 2027

    [ad_1]

    Are you excited for the sequel to Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem? If so, good news; it’s coming out on… oh, it’s been moved again.

    On Friday, Variety revealed the film’s been moved by Paramount to August 13, 2027. That’s a ways away, but at least this new date moves it a month up from its previous date of September 17 that same year. And before that, you might remember it was first scheduled to hit theaters later this year on October 9. So at time of writing, we’re on our third release date, with the potential for more in either direction on the horizon.

    All this shifting is eventful for a movie we haven’t seen or know anything about, other than that it’ll pit this latest incarnation of the Turtles against the Shredder. Mutant Mayhem 2 is far from the only movie to hop around on the calendar, but the announcement is funny after the recent news of Paramount recommitting to the Ninja Turtles as a property. Sometime after this Mutant Mayhem sequel hits, we’re supposed to get a big expansion of the franchise with licensed restaurants, a web series for kids, and a live-action/animated movie due out in 2028. Maybe. We’ll see.

    While you’re waiting for Mutant Mayhem 2, you can go ahead and watch the original film, or the short film Chrome Alone 2 – Lost in New Jerseywhich is on Paramount+ as a special feature for the first Mutant movie. It came last year, and it sounds like fans who saw it liked it.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Justin Carter

    Source link

  • Robert Duvall Ripped Tony Scott ‘A New A–hole’ Making Tom Cruise Movie

    [ad_1]

    The late Robert Duvall passed away earlier this week, and in a recent post on social media, a co-star of his on a 1990 Tom Cruise action movie recounted a story about his time on set.

    What movie did Robert Duvall yell at Tony Scott over?

    In a recent post on X, Randy Quaid recounted a brief story that took place while filming the 1990 sports action movie Days of Thunder. Quaid joked that, now that both Duvall and director Tony Scott have passed away, he hopes to never see someone “rip a director a new a–hole quite like Duvall did on Days of Thunder.”

    While Quaid didn’t go further into details on just what happened, the story quickly had fans laughing about the situation. Quaid appeared alongside Duvall and Cruise in the film, which followed the story of a young hotshot racer recruited by Quaid’s character to drive for his NASCAR team. The film was a success, earning more than $150 million at the box office.

    Duvall is best known for his performances in The Godfather films, Apocalypse Now, Tomorrow, True Grit, MAS*H, To Kill a Mockingbird, and more. The legend was also known amongst the world of theater as well, having acted in a number of plays, while also starring in a litany of television shows, including The Defenders, Playhouse 90, and more.

    Duvall won the Academy Award for Best Actor for his role as Mac Sledge in Tender Mercies (1983) and received Oscar nominations for The Godfather, Apocalypse Now, The Great Santini, The Apostle, A Civil Action and The Judge. He portrayed Tom Hagen in The Godfather (1972) and The Godfather Part II (1974), Lt. Col. Kilgore in Apocalypse Now (1979), and Augustus “Gus” McCrae in the 1989 miniseries Lonesome Dove.

    [ad_2]

    Anthony Nash

    Source link

  • Get Your AI Off Our ‘Stranger Things’ & ‘KPop Demon Hunters,’ Netflix Tells ByteDance In Latest Hollywood Cease & Desist Letter

    [ad_1]

    Netflix “will not stand by and watch ByteDance treat our valued IP as free, public domain clip art,” the streamer told the TikTok owner tonight. In a short and stern cease and desist letter over Seedance 2.0, Netflix want generated AI videos of Stranger Things, KPop Demon Hunters, Squid Game and Bridgerton shut down now.

    With their two-page correspondence and potential legal action to follow, Netflix have linked arms and attorney arsenals with Warner Bros Discovery, Paramount (their rivals to buy WBD), and the still Bob Iger-run Disney to stop the user created content that has been bastardizing their top shows, films and other moneymakers. While Amazon, Apple, Sony and Comcast-owned Universal have yet to join the party, it is clear now with the Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters-led Netflix in the C&D house, this is serious stuff.

    How serious?

    Well, Netflix litigation chief Mindy LeMoine isn’t making as personal as WBD’s Wayne M. Smith did earlier Tuesday with his predecessor and now ByteDance Global General Counsel John Rogovin. Then again, LeMoine does cut to the chase with very specific citations:

    “Current forensic evidence indicates that Seedance is being used to generate unauthorized derivative works including, but not limited to:

    Bridgerton: Unauthorized depictions of Season 4 content, specifically featuring characters in a masquerade ball setting. These outputs mirror specific, narratively important costumes like Sophie Baek’s “Lady in Silver” gown. ByteDance has even promoted this content using #Bridgerton tags via its own official social media channels, such as @BytePlusGlobal.

    Stranger Things: High-fidelity reboots of the series finale, which feature detailed reproductions of the iconic cast as well as the monsters from the series, including Demogorgons and the Mindflayer.

    Squid Game: Seedance has generated recreations of the “Red Light, Green Light” sets and the iconic Young-hee doll. These include unauthorized crossovers, such as inserting real-world figures like Elon Musk into the Squid Game environment.

    KPop Demon Hunters: Seedance has reproduced the specific visual style and character designs from our animated musical feature, including the lead character Rumi.”

    ‘KPop Demon Hunters’

    Netflix

    The C&D letter goes on to state: “Netflix has never authorized ByteDance to use our content to generate these images or videos. ByteDance’s activities are willful, and constitute direct and secondary copyright infringement. The use of copyrighted works to create a competing commercial product, especially one that regurgitates the original, is not protected by fair use.”

    Unlike Disney, Paramount and WBD, Netflix are in full FAFO-mode here and give the Chinese tech company three days to set things straight. This comes one day after ByteDance swore they are “taking steps to strengthen current safeguards as we work to prevent the unauthorised use of intellectual property and likeness by users.” 

    Netflix isn’t buying it.

    “To avoid immediate litigation, Netflix demands that ByteDance:

    1. Cease Generative Output: Immediately implement technological guardrails to prevent Seedance from generating any content that resembles Netflix’s protected characters, titles, or settings.

    2. Remove Infringing Content: Remove all unlawfully obtained Netflix-owned content from training datasets, and also scrub all existing Seedance-generated videos featuring Netflix IP from all ByteDance-controlled platforms.

    3. Identify All Infringements: Provide an accounting of all instances where Seedance has generated content based on prompts related to Netflix’s IP.

    4. Revoke Third-Party Access: Revoke access for any commercial partners or API users currently utilizing Seedance to generate unauthorized Netflix derivative works.”

    So, as Netflix awaits ByteDance’s response later this week, will it be Amazon, Apple, Sony or Universal sending the next letter? Stay tuned.

    [ad_2]

    Dominic Patten

    Source link

  • Stephen Colbert slams CBS, says lawyers told him James Talarico interview could not air on

    [ad_1]

    “The Late Show” host Stephen Colbert criticized CBS on Monday night, saying the network blocked his interview with U.S. Senate hopeful James Talarico from airing. 

    “You know who is not one of my guests tonight? That’s Texas State Representative James Talarico,” Colbert told his studio audience. “He was supposed to be here, but we were told in no uncertain terms by our network’s lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast. Then I was told in some uncertain terms that not only could I not have him on, I could not mention me not having him on. And because my network clearly doesn’t want us to talk about this, let’s talk about this.”

    Colbert said the reason CBS prevented “The Late Show” from broadcasting Talarico’s appearance was rooted in new guidance from the FCC for daytime talk shows and late-night TV programs, which requires the shows to provide equal time to opposing candidates.

    While “The Late Show” didn’t air Talarico’s interview on TV, it did post it on YouTube, where FCC rules don’t apply.  

    “The network says I can’t give you a URL or a QR code, but I promise you, if you go to our YouTube page, you’ll find it,” Colbert said.

    Talarico, a Democrat, has served as a Texas state representative since 2018 and is campaigning in the Democratic primary to represent his state in the U.S. Senate.  

    CBS said in a statement: “THE LATE SHOW was not prohibited by CBS from broadcasting the interview with Rep. James Talarico. The show was provided legal guidance that the broadcast could trigger the FCC equal-time rule for two other candidates, including Rep. Jasmine Crockett, and presented options for how the equal time for other candidates could be fulfilled. THE LATE SHOW decided to present the interview through its YouTube channel with on-air promotion on the broadcast rather than potentially providing the equal-time options.”

    CBS News has reached out to the FCC for comment.

    FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, who was nominated by former President Joe Biden, said Tuesday that CBS is protected under the First Amendment “to determine what interviews it airs.”

    “That makes its decision to yield to political pressure all the more disappointing,” Gomez wrote on social media. “Corporate interests cannot justify retreating from airing newsworthy content.”

    The FCC issued a notice last month that daytime talk shows and late-night programs must give equal time to opposing candidates. The announcement hinged on a decades-old federal law requiring any FCC-licensed broadcaster that lets a political candidate appear on its airwaves to also offer “equal opportunities” to all other candidates running for the same office. The law exempts “bona fide newscasts” and news interviews from the equal time rule.   

    FCC Chair Brendan Carr, who was appointed by President Trump and is an ally of the president, wrote on X as he shared the notice: “For years, legacy TV networks assumed that their late night & daytime talk shows qualify as ‘bona fide news’ programs – even when motivated by purely partisan political purposes. Today, the FCC reminded them of their obligation to provide all candidates with equal opportunities.”

    On “The Late Show” Monday, Colbert said, “Well, sir, you’re chairman of the FCC, so FCC U, because I think you are motivated by partisan purposes yourself.”

    “Let’s just call this what it is: Donald Trump’s administration wants to silence anyone who says anything bad about Trump on TV, because all Trump does is watch TV, OK? He’s like a toddler with too much screentime. He gets cranky and then drops a load in his diaper,” Colbert said.

    CBS News has reached out to the White House for comment. 

    Talarico shared a clip on social media early Tuesday, saying, “This is the interview Donald Trump didn’t want you to see. His FCC refused to air my interview with Stephen Colbert. Trump is worried we’re about to flip Texas.”

    Tuesday marked the first day of early voting in Texas for the March 3 primary, in which Talarico faces U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett and businessman Ahmad Hassan. They are facing off to take on the winner of the Republican primary, in which longtime GOP Sen. John Cornyn is being challenged by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt. Both races could go to runoffs if no candidate in either party gets 50% of the vote.

    Networks, individual shows and talk show hosts have come under fire by Mr. Trump for what he has claimed is their politically biased programming. Mr. Trump has at times called for broadcasters to lose their FCC licenses. 

    After taking over “The Late Show” from David Letterman in 2015, Colbert is preparing to wrap his final season as its host in May, when CBS will retire the late-night franchise. Although many suggested the cancellation was politically motivated, as Colbert has been an outspoken critic of Mr. Trump and his administration, the network insisted its decision was purely financial. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Paramount Latest Studio To Hit ByteDance With Cease And Desist Letter Over AI Models

    [ad_1]

    Paramount Skydance has joined Disney as the latest Hollywood studio to slam ByteDance over AI models Seedance and Seedream that it says are ripping off intellectual property and must stop.

    “We insist that ByteDance immediately take all necessary steps to (i) prevent violations of our intellectual property rights by ensuring that our content is not used or created by ByteDance or the Seed Platforms going forward, and (ii) remove all infringing instances of Paramount’s content from ByteDance’s platforms and systems,” the David Ellison company’s attorney wrote in a cease and desist letter to Beijing-based ByteDance CEO Liang Rubo.

    The missive was viewed by Deadline.

    “ByteDance markets the Seed Platforms as image and video generation tools that facilitate the creation and dissemination of visual and audiovisual content by their users in response to searches and prompts. However, much of the content that the Seed Platforms produce contains vivid depictions of Paramount’s famous and iconic franchises and characters, which are protected under copyright law, trademark law, and the law of unfair competition (among other doctrines),” Par wrote, ticking off South Park, SpongeBob SquarePants, Star Trek, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, The Godfather, Dora the Explorer, and Avatar: The Last Airbender as just some of the properties that have been repeatedly infringed by the Seed Platforms in images and videos.

    Par also called it self-evident “that our company’s intellectual property was used to train the models that underlie these tools. Such training was also done without our consent and is a violation of the law. To be very clear, Paramount strongly objects to the use of our legally protected works in any of the manners described above—both as inputs trained upon by these types of models and as works that are created by them—without our express authorization.”

    Amid a rising tide of angst over the Seed platforms, especially video generated by the new Seedance 2.0, Disney Friday sent a cease and desist letter for IP infringement of properties from Star Wars to Marvel to Family Guy.

    The Motion Picture Association and, the Human Artistry Campaign issued statements last week slamming ByteDance.

    [ad_2]

    jillg366

    Source link

  • As ‘Scream 7’ Arrives, Its Studios Fight to Own Ghostface’s… Uh, Face

    [ad_1]

    Scream 7 hits theaters at the end of this month, and the promo game is gradually building up. While Sidney Prescott fights another Ghostface or two, franchise owners Paramount and Spyglass are in a legal fight for the rights to the villain’s iconic mask.

    Per the Hollywood Reporter, the two companies are taking SFX studio Alterian Ghost Factory to court before it can threaten copyright infringement. With this suit, Paramount and Spyglass hope to file a court order to prevent Alterian’s suit, claiming the company “intentionally slept on its purported rights in the iconic ‘Ghostface’ mask used throughout the Scream franchise for 30 years.”

    The Ghostface mask was developed for Halloween in the early ’90s by Fun World and later discovered by Scream producer Marianne Maddalena. It was later licensed for the movie and featured throughout the franchise and its different sequels, with the one exception being the MTV show. Alterian’s arguing that since it created the underlying design first, Fun World was in the legal wrong when it licensed out the final version to Paramount. Conversely, Paramount believes Fun World deserves Alterian’s ire and that Alterian lost any right to call ownership of Ghostface after spending decades without taking any legal action.

    “[It] has never legally established that it owns the rights to the Ghostface mask, and it will not be able to prove it now in this litigation,” reads Paramount’s complaint. “And seeking to disrupt the release of a completed motion picture mere weeks before its release—the seventh installment of a franchise that Alterian watched grow in silence for three decades—is an outrageous attempt to shake down [Paramount and Spyglass].”

    Scream 7 is in theaters on February 27, and the legal fight for Ghostface may continue beyond that date.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Justin Carter

    Source link

  • The Best Moment in the Worst Episode of ‘Star Trek: Voyager,’ 30 Years Later

    [ad_1]

    Thirty years ago, Star Trek: Voyager broadcast one of its most controversial episodes ever: “Threshold,” the episode that is now infamous as “The One Where Captain Janeway and Tom Paris Mutate Into Amphibians and Have Babies.” Over the years, revisitation has allowed the chance to reframe “Threshold” from one of the worst things that Star Trek has ever done to a charmingly memetic moment of camp to an episode that, while deeply flawed, still has sparks of potential.

    So to mark 30 years of this moment in Trek infamy, we decided to put aside the space amphibian sex jokes (aside from the ones we’ve already made—please, we’re only human) and look back at one of those sparks of potential, a bright spot in an otherwise very silly episode: what “Threshold” has to say about Voyager‘s rebellious conn officer, Tom Paris.

    In the early seasons of Star Trek: Voyager, one of the few recurring arcs the show engaged with on a regular basis from episode to episode was the reformation of Lieutenant Paris. Tom joins the show with a shockingly messy background: an ex-Starfleet officer drummed out of service for covering up a piloting error, jailed for pettily running into the arms of the Cardassian resistance group known as the Maquis, and then paroled by Captain Janeway on what was meant to be a brief trial run for her new ship rather than a 70,000 light-year journey home from an unexplored quadrant of the galaxy.

    Almost everyone on Voyager in its early days is operating with a sense of grief that their lives and futures they’d had planned were destroyed in the blink of an eye, but not Paris. Paris is living his dream, piloting a top-of-the-line starship, still getting to bite his thumb at the Maquis who joined Voyager‘s crew through necessary circumstances, and the only Starfleet authority to answer to is the woman who trusted him enough to give him a second chance in the first place. This largely manifests in one particular way in those early seasons: Tom is kind of a huge, cocky asshole, even when he is sincerely trying to prove the faith put in him was justified.

    That brings us to “Threshold” and Tom’s perfectly cocky, yet aspirational, idea of figuring out a way to breach the titular Warp 10 threshold—the long-established Star Trek lore that warp drives could not achieve faster-than-light speeds above that maximum. It’s a fascinating idea that a show with a premise like Voyager, about an isolated Starfleet vessel trapped tens of thousands of light-years from Federation space, is primed to tackle, even more so when one of its main characters is a cocky ace pilot with a chip on his padded uniform shoulder. That in and of itself is a brilliant way of the show engaging with Star Trek‘s broader legacy even while it’s isolated from it.

    But that’s not the moment we’re talking about. That moment comes after Tom’s first experimental test flights successfully see him manage a sustained speed above the warp threshold—and then have medical complications as his body undergoes what is ultimately revealed to be a rapid-onset acceleration of the evolutionary process. Tom’s body starts breaking down bit-by-bit, requiring nonstop medical treatment: his hair falls out, eyes glaze over, skin mottles and flakes, and his joints and limbs start fusing together. The dashing young hero of the hour has been turned into this broken, evolving-yet-devolving wreck of a thing.

    It’s in this form that “Threshold” delivers its greatest moment. It’s a fascinating grotesquerie: the body horror is incredibly effective for Trek and feels like Voyager building on its stunningly creepy effects work with the Vidiians the season prior, made all the more chilling by the fact that it’s one of our heroes who has been rendered horrifying. But it’s the breakdown of Paris’ persona that is most effective. The wild changes he’s undergone almost feel like the dropping of a mask, both metaphorically and literally, as parts of his face slough off.

    In one moment, he rails at Captain Janeway for taking pity on his gruesome form; the next, for her trying to diminish what he’s accomplished in breaking past warp 10. His ego, usually kept in check by his earnest desire to prove himself to the world and Janeway in particular, runs rampant, making for a scene that’s chilling and tragic in equal measures as he vacillates between the man we’ve come to know and this wretched figure. It’s a great character beat for Paris to find himself again at the heart of an accident caused by his own hubris and to respond to it by impulsively lashing out at the world around him—it’s just that this time the ugliness that marks his soul, and the filters he’s built up as he tried to redeem himself in Voyager‘s early days up to this point being stripped away in his despair and agony, are now reflected on the outside.

    Of course, that’s when we get to him kidnapping Janeway, forcing her to undergo the same process, and them having space amphibian sex before Voyager tries to move on from it, never bringing the workplace ethics nightmare of the millennia up ever again. But before that moment that would seal the infamous legacy of “Threshold” for decades to come, it shone with a moment of genuine brilliance. A fine example of even some of Star Trek‘s lowest lows having at least something worth thinking about.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    James Whitbrook

    Source link

  • Stephen Colbert to Win an Award for Yelling at His Boss

    [ad_1]

    Winner, winner, catered dinner.
    Photo: Scott Kowalchyk/CBS via Getty Images

    Stephen Colbert is living the dream: getting an award for yelling at your boss. It is also a nightmare: losing your dream job of over a decade because an increasingly authoritarian government makes an example of you. So … kind of an up-and-downer. The Writers Guild of America East is presenting Colbert with the Walter Bernstein Award at its New York ceremony this year. Named after blacklisted writer Walter Bernstein, the award “is presented to a Guild member who has demonstrated with creativity, grace and bravery a willingness to confront social injustice in the face of adversity,” the Guild said in a press release. With Colbert calling out his CBS (and Paramount, and Skydance, and U.S. government) overlords, even after The Late Show was canceled, it’s a fitting tribute.

    “It’s a great honor to receive the Walter Bernstein award from our Guild,” Colbert said in a statement. “I assume this is mostly for my work on The Dana Carvey Show (possibly available on Blu-Ray!).” In actuality, it’s for saying that CBS settling a lawsuit with Donald Trump for $16 million is a “big fat bribe,” continuing to speak out against the Trump administration and CBS after getting canceled, decrying the FCC’s attempt to rewrite its own equal-time rules related to political candidates appearing on talk shows, and even sassing George W. Bush to his face at the 2006 White House Correspondents” Dinner. Though working on The Dana Carvey Show probably didn’t hurt. Colbert will receive the Wally (we assume it’s called that) on Sunday, March 8, 2026, at New York’s Edison Ballroom.

    [ad_2]

    Bethy Squires

    Source link

  • Netflix sweetens £62bn offer for Warner Bros, iPhone users urged to restart devices – Tech Digest

    [ad_1]

    Share


    Netflix has sweetened its $83bn (£62bn) takeover bid for Warner Bros after tabling a new cash-only offer to fend off rival Hollywood bidder Paramount. The streaming giant on Tuesday said it would offer $27.75 per share in cash. Shareholders had previously been offered $23.25 in cash and $4.50 of Netflix shares, a deal Paramount had labelled too “complex”.  Netflix and Paramount, run by David Ellison, son of Oracle founder Larry Ellison, have been going head-to-head for control of Warner Bros for months. Telegraph 

    A pioneering investigation into the impact of restricting social media access for children in the UK has been announced as politicians around the world consider action on the issue. In December, Australia became the first country to ban under-16s from social media, with governments in other countries – including the UK – under pressure to do the same. However, while experts say there is evidence that aspects of social media are harmful to most children, there has been no large-scale experimental study exploring the effect of limiting time spent on social media in healthy children as a population. The Guardian 

    Apple iPhone users have been urged to restart their devices (and do so at least once a week) in the wake of a new virus scare affecting the devices. Two recently uncovered vulnerabilities in iPhones are being targeted by criminals – and despite the malware attacks being ‘highly targeted’ (diplomats, journalists or executives for example), experts at MalwareBytes have warned that they may soon be more widespread. The vulnerabilities affect Apple’s Webkit software, which powers the Safari browser and other iOS applications. Yahoo!

    GTA 6 is scheduled to launch this November… assuming it isn’t delayed again (Rockstar Games)

    A list of the most anticipated games of 2026 from Sony has garnered attention for not including GTA 6. Even if you’re not personally excited for GTA 6, there’s no denying that it’s the most important game release of the year, if not decade. After all, no other game has other publishers scrambling to avoid launching their titles within the same time frame. As such, GTA 6 is guaranteed a slot, if not the top one, in any ‘most anticipated video games of 2026’ lists from gaming websites and blogs. Metro

    Elon Musk has suggested he could buy budget airline Ryanair after demanding CEO Michael O’Leary be fired in his latest online war of words. The world’s richest man claimed the Ryanair boss “needs to be fired” in a series of posts on X replying to an official airline post. Musk asked the airline, “How much would it cost to buy you?” as he relayed his fantasy about putting someone called Ryan in charge of Ryanair. Independent 

    The Institute of Customer Service (ICS) has today published their first biannual UK Customer Satisfaction Index for 2026 (January), which reveals that Tesco Mobile was – for the second consecutive report – the only mobile and broadband (telecoms) provider to make it into their table of the country’s top 50 organisations. But both Virgin Mobile and Three UK were still named among the most improved. The research typically reflects the results from a large online survey of over 15,000 customers – balanced to be representative of the UK adult population. ISPreview


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv


    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Netflix Shows David Zaslav the Money

    [ad_1]

    Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos and Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav, as spotted at this month’s Golden Globes.
    Photo: Neilson Barnard/Getty Images

    Netflix is taking its Warner Bros. Discovery fight to Paramount. On the heels of a splashy Times interview last week meant to reassure skeptics of its theatrical intentions, the streaming giant has amended its bid for Warner Bros.’s streaming and studios business into an all-cash offer — one meant to counter Paramount’s hostile push to take over the company. Netflix’s ticket price that won the original bidding war for WBD still stands unchanged at $82.7 billion (or $27.75 per share), but the tweaked offer “provides enhanced certainty around the value WBD stockholders will receive at closing, eliminating market-based variability,” Netflix and WBD said in a joint statement.

    One of the risks of Netflix’s earlier cash-and-stock offer was that a remainder of the final payout to shareholders could fluctuate when WBD was ultimately sold. Netflix’s change eliminates that concern and brings its bid more in line with Paramount’s $108.4 billion bid (or $30 per share), which seeks to buy not just Warner’s streaming and studios business but its declining cable assets known as Discovery Global. Netflix tweaked its offer in one other way, according to a proxy statement filed to the SEC this morning by WBD: It will reduce the debt load on Discovery Global by about $260 million, “in light of the stronger than previously anticipated 2025 cash flow performance of Discovery Global.”

    Netflix is putting its money where its mouth is, in other words. The adjustment was expected after Paramount CEO David Ellison launched a hostile-takeover bid and proxy fight, suing WBD for info about how it valued the cable assets. Netflix’s amended bid landed in inboxes the morning ahead of its latest quarterly earnings report, covering the tail end of 2025, and its timing feels strategic in another way: Though any victor in this war will have to pass regulatory hurdles, WBD and Netflix’s joint statement touts a “faster path to a stockholder vote” expected by April 2026. Is it an acknowledgment that everyone’s tired of talking about this?

    [ad_2]

    Eric Vilas-Boas

    Source link

  • Netflix revises its offer for Warner Bros. Discovery to make it an all-cash transaction

    [ad_1]

    Netflix is revising its $72 billion offer for Warner Bros. Discovery to make it an all-cash transaction, sweetening the bid as rival Paramount Skydance continues with its hostile takeover attempt for the Hollywood studio.

    Netflix initially offered a cash and stock deal valued at $27.75 per Warner Bros. share, giving it a total enterprise value of $82.7 billion, including debt. 

    On Tuesday, Netflix said the revised offer simplifies the transaction structure, providing more clarity on its value for Warner Bros. stockholders and speeding up the path to a Warner Bros. shareholder vote.

    The companies said the all-cash transaction is still valued at $27.75 per share. Stockholders will also receive shares of Discovery Global following its separation from Warner Bros.

    The revised offer comes amid Netflix’s tussle with Paramount Skydance, the parent company of CBS News, for ownership of Warner Bros. Earlier this month, Warner Bros. Discovery’s board of directors rejected Paramount Skydance’s revised hostile bid, saying that its terms are inferior to Warner’s $82.7 billion merger agreement with Netflix.

    Last week, Paramount took another step in pursuing its hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros., saying that it would name its own slate of directors before the next shareholder meeting of the Hollywood studio.

    The boards of both Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery have approved the amended all-cash deal. 

    Netflix’s stock rose 61 cents, or 0.7%, to $88.62 in early trading. Warner Bros. Discovery shares slipped 0.7%.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • The Fight for Warner Bros. Is Paramount’s Most Embarrassing Moment Yet

    [ad_1]

    Ever since Disney got the green light to acquire Fox, every corporation’s decided it’d like to do the same thing. What was once a thing that frankly shouldn’t have happened and hasn’t tangibly benefitted anyone beyond letting folks say “[x IP] is awesome again!” and “Wolverine can fight the Hulk!” is now just an average part of our day as corps keep trying to out-acquire one another and turn themselves into empires.

    Warner Bros. is the latest company under threat of acquisition, with Netflix and Paramount both trying to be the next owner of Batman and Game of Thrones. At first, it seemed Netflix would easily bring another addition to its (mostly) anti-theatrical stable, but Paramount (which merged with Skydance just last year) just won’t have it. Current CEO David Ellison has complained, cried foul, and more recently filed a lawsuit as a means of blocking the deal WB’s shareholders already approved. At time of writing, a judge ruled that the Transformers studio hasn’t “identified [or suffered] any cognizable, irreparable harm” from the deal to come and therefore can’t fast track said suit as WB continues finalizing its deal with Netflix. He’s not giving up, though, as he’s now looking to rally European support to continue his efforts.

    For those not keeping track at home, Ellison’s tried at least a dozen times now (again, at the time of writing) to convince Warner Bros.’ shareholders to let Paramount be the one to acquire it. And each time, those shareholders have told him in no uncertain terms their eyes are on Netflix and his offers are no good. Whether that’s the actual reason or there’s some lingering beef from last year’s war over South Park streaming rights, getting WB has become Ellison’s white whale, his hill to die on in the hopes of gaining near-total control over middle America on the entertainment and news level.

    Ellison is clearly not above using his family connections and ameliorating federal interest to get the deals he wants—that’s already been cause for concern in how Paramount’s been going; it’s understandable there are corners of Hollywood that fear the same is happening with his desperation for WB. More than the unrestricted access to hundreds of IPs, new and old, he wants CNN as a means of making himself look worthwhile to U.S. president Trump and twisting another legacy news outlet into a vessel for ego stroking and appeasement.

    In a just, better world, Warner Bros. would look at its successful run of films in 2025 and declare itself not for sale at all, actually. After five years of being jerked around by different parent companies and rebranding itself 80 times, it certainly could’ve used the back half of the 2020s using that momentum to get back to what it does best. There is no legitimate reason for either Paramount or Netflix to own it; monopolies are bad, corporate interference is worse, and like many studios, WB has been at its best when it gets out of its own way.

    Instead, we’re all forced to watch a man with more money than he needs and who owns one of Hollywood’s biggest studios fail to repeat his “success.” This is all so many things at once: it’s predictable (and scary) that Ellison’s looking to make his mark on the world just by buying as much of the entertainment industry as possible, just as it’s darkly hilarious that he’s managed to torch CBS News and 60 Minutes but can’t seal the deal here. Were this a recurring gag on a season of TV like The Studio or 30 Rock, it might be an entertaining one to watch him get slapped down each time he goes to WB’s shareholders.

    But this isn’t a TV show; it’s real life, and it’s just dumb that this is all happening. Corporate acquisitions have always been bad, and since the Disney-Fox merger, they’ve become a spectacle unto themselves, from announcing that discussions have been had to the eye-rollingly cringe celebratory video when the deal is completed. By now, we know there’s no real “magic” to come out of these, just layoffs and exhaustion. Whoever ultimately gets Warner Bros., Paramount’s dogged pursuit of the studio makes all this more exhausting than usual—and unfortunately, it’s likely to inspire other corps to not take multiple “no’s” for an answer.

    Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

    [ad_2]

    Justin Carter

    Source link

  • ‘Landman’ season 3: what we know about Taylor Sheridan’s plans

    [ad_1]

    Billy Bob Thornton says he remains completely in the dark about what comes next for Landman.

    Speaking in December 2025, he explained that creator Taylor Sheridan shares very little about upcoming storylines, even with the cast.

    Thornton said he doesn’t “know anything” about Season 3 yet in a recent interview with Men’s Journal.

    “Taylor plays it very close to the vest,” he said. “He doesn’t tell any of us what he’s up to. He’ll probably tell me, maybe after I get the first script. Then he’ll tell me a few things that are going to happen.”

    That lack of insight reflects the wider picture around the recently confirmed third season of the hit Paramount+ series. While the studio officially renewed the show in December 2025, it has not released any plot details, cast lists or timelines for when production will begin and what fans can expect.

    Still, the series’ recent performance and its consistent release pattern can provide early indications of what could follow. Here is everything that we know about Landman Season 3, so far.

    What Is ‘Landman’ About?

    Landman, created by Taylor Sheridan and Christian Wallace and inspired by Wallace’s podcast Boomtown, focuses on the oil industry in Texas.

    At its center is Tommy Norris, played by Thornton, a petroleum landman and company fixer who becomes president of M‑Tex Oil in the series. The show explores the political, financial and personal pressures tied to the region’s boom‑and‑bust energy economy, alongside Tommy’s attempts to balance the demands of the job with his responsibilities at home.

    The series premiered on Paramount+ on November 17, 2024. It was renewed in March 2025, with Season 2 debuting almost exactly a year later, on November 16, 2025.

    Its strong viewership helped secure the Season 3 renewal soon afterward.

    Paramount+ said the Season 2 premiere became the most‑watched debut for any original series on its streaming service, drawing 9.2 million streaming views in its first two days.

    That reportedly represented a 262 percent increase from the show’s Season 1 opener.

    What Do We Know About ‘Landman’ Season 3?

    Showrunner Wallace has said the series has a lot of runway but that nothing is changing about its direction for now.

    Still, Paramount+ has not yet confirmed which actors will return for Season 3, which it officially announced on December 5, 2025.

    Most of the Season 2 cast is expected to come back, including Thornton (Tommy), Demi Moore (Cami), Ali Larter (Angela), Michelle Randolph (Ainsley), Jacob Lofland (Cooper), Paulina Chávez (Ariana), Colm Feore (Nate/Nathan), James Jordan (Dale), Kayla Wallace (Rebecca) and Sam Elliott (T.L.).

    Paramount+ has not given a release date for Season 3, and an update is unlikely before late summer.

    The streamer announced Season 2’s premiere date in August 2025, suggesting a similar schedule for the next reveal. Based on previous timing, Season 3 would likely arrive in November 2026 or sometime in the fourth quarter of this year.

    Sadly, for fans there is no official synopsis out yet, and even the cast appears to be waiting for details.

    For now, viewers can continue watching Landman Season 2 on Paramount+. All episodes of Season 1 are also available on the streaming platform.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Next ‘Paranormal Activity’ Movie Lands Summer 2027 Date From Paramount

    [ad_1]

    Paramount is keeping May spooky, and will release the next Paranormal Activity movie on May 21, 2027.

    The untitled feature is produced by franchise newcomer James Wan and directed by Ian Tuason, with plot details kept under wraps.

    This will be the eighth film in the franchise that began life with Oren Peli’s ultra low-budget, 2007 film that grossed $194.2 million and is considered one of the most profitable movies of all time. Originally shot for just $15,000, Jason Blum discovered the feature and injected additional funds into the film before releasing it and turning it into a sleeper hit that helped popularize the found footage genre.

    Blum will produce for his and Wan’s Blumhouse-Atomic Monster, while Peli produces for his Solana Films. Paramount is co-producing and co-financing with Blumhouse-Atomic Monster.

    May has become a surprise strong month for scares, with New Line’s Final Destination: Bloodlines earning $315.9 million globally after opening May 16 last year. This year, Focus Features has the Toronto sensation Obsession bowing May 15.

    In addition to the original film, the Paranormal franchise entries include Paranormal Activity 2 (2010), Paranormal Activity 3 (2011), Paranormal Activity 4 (2012), The Marked Ones (2014), The Ghost Dimension (2015), and Next of Kin (2021). In all, they have grossed a combined $900 million globally.

    “I’ve been a huge admirer of Paranormal Activity since the brilliant first movie, with its creeping slow burn and subtle ability to make the unseen terrifying. I’m looking forward to expanding on its legacy and helping shape the next evolution of this scary found-footage franchise,” Wan last month when the film was announced.

    [ad_2]

    Aaron Couch

    Source link

  • Ryan Reynolds’ Underrated Family Comedy Is Dominating on Streaming

    [ad_1]

    A family comedy movie featuring Ryan Reynolds has found considerable success on streaming after reaching a broader audience. Thanks to its strong viewership on Paramount+, IF has managed to rank high on streaming analytics charts. Notably, the film, helmed by John Krasinski, premiered in theaters on May 17, 2024, to mixed critical reception.

    Ryan Reynolds’ IF is ranking high on Paramount+’s streaming charts

    As of January 16, 2026, Ryan Reynolds’ family comedy movie is doing well on Paramount+.

    IF is the #7 movie on the streaming platform, with 70 popularity points on FlixPatrol. It is also ranked either #7 or #6 in several international territories.

    Accordingly, the film is outranked by Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning (#1, 223 points), The Naked Gun (#2, 163 points), Night Hunter (#3, 137 points), High Ground (#4, 133 points), The Stranger in My Home (#5, 107 points), and World War Z (#6, 83 points). However, it outranks Take Cover (#8, 47 points), Trust (#9, 42 points), and Mean Girls (#10, 40 points).

    On Rotten Tomatoes, IF has a Tomatometer score of 57 percent but a robust Popcornmeter score of 85 percent. Meanwhile, Metacritic, which uses a weighted average to determine scores, gave the film a Metascore of 46, based on 39 critical reviews, and a user score of 6.2, drawn from 151 user ratings.

    Following its release, IF also grossed $190.5 million worldwide against a reported budget of $110 million. (via Box Office Mojo)

    The live-action fantasy comedy follows Bea, a 12-year-old girl who goes to live with her grandmother Margaret in the latter’s apartment while her father goes to the hospital for heart surgery. Her life turns upside down when she realizes one day that she can see imaginary friends of other children.

    Bea later meets a man named Cal, also capable of seeing the same imaginary friends. The two subsequently work together to place the friends with new children, as the ones they were originally friends with have grown up and moved on without them.

    In addition to directing the film, John Krasinski also wrote the screenplay and co-produced with Ryan Reynolds, Andrew Form, and Allyson Seeger.

    The film includes a mix of live-action actors and voice actors. The live-action cast includes Reynolds, Krasinski, Cailey Fleming, Fiona Shaw, Alan Kim, Liza Colón-Zayas, and Bobby Moynihan. Meanwhile, the voice cast includes Steve Carell, Phoebe Waller-Bridge, Awkwafina, Emily Blunt, George Clooney, Matt Damon, Bradley Cooper, and Blake Lively.

    [ad_2]

    Abdul Azim Naushad

    Source link

  • Why Primate Is the Scariest Surprise Movie of the Week

    [ad_1]

    Screams, silence, and stunned reactions followed this unforgettable Paramount screening

    From the moment you pass through the gates of Paramount Studios, the feeling is always unique. The Paramount lot is striking, with its classic production buildings standing like monuments to another era of Hollywood. This is where films that shaped generations were made, including The Godfather, Forrest Gump and Titanic, works that are not merely successful films but integral parts of global cinematic memory. Walking through the studios, you feel the weight of that history and the energy of a place where some of the most compelling stories in cinema were written.

    Jessica Alexander as “Hannah” and Miguel Torres Umba as “Ben” in Primate from Paramount Pictures.
    Credit: Paramount Pictures

    Paramount Pictures created a distinctive, welcoming event, bringing together top influencers, film professionals and content creators. The exceptionally young cast of Primate set the tone for the evening, radiating freshness, confidence and a rare combination of professionalism and speed. Johnny Sequoyah, Jessica Alexander,  Gia Hunter, Charlie Mann and the rest of the team moved comfortably among the guests, posing for photos, laughing and projecting the feeling of a group that fully believes in the final result. The first part of the evening was light, fun and filled with positive energy, almost celebratory.

    The arrival at Paramount’s Sherry Lansing Theatre intensified the anticipation even further. It is an iconic venue, defined by timeless elegance and a sense that cinema here is treated with genuine respect. The audience was eager, conversations were animated and the seats filled quickly. Nothing in this initial atmosphere hinted at the shock that was about to follow.

    We had heard things. We had read reactions. Yet no one was truly prepared for just how terrifying Primate would be.

    Troy Kotsur as “Adam” and Gia Hunter as “Erin” in Primate from Paramount Pictures.
    Credit: Paramount Pictures

    From its very first scenes, it becomes clear that this is not simply a horror film. It is a creature horror with a clear identity and tightly controlled storytelling. The story unfolds in an isolated mansion in Hawaii, a beautiful home that initially feels idyllic and almost dreamlike. Nature, light and architecture create a false sense of safety. That illusion quickly collapses. The house turns into a trap. It’s very design works against the characters. There is no escape. There is no safety.

    And then the terror begins.

    The theater reacted constantly. Screams, nervous laughter, moments of absolute silence followed by sudden eruptions of fear. People jumped from their seats, covered their faces and then looked back at the screen, unable to resist. It was one of those screenings where the audience feels like a single organism, experiencing fear simultaneously.

    The chimpanzee is not portrayed merely as an uncontrollable threat. It feels almost human, intelligent, with memory and a dark instinct. The tension is built not only through violence but through anticipation. Every appearance makes time slow down for a few seconds before the next shock lands.

    The young cast is essential to the film’s impact. These characters are not invulnerable. They are afraid, they panic and they make mistakes. That vulnerability makes the horror immediate and real. Troy Kotsur’s father figure adds a deeply unsettling layer through the use of sound and silence. In several moments, the absence of sound is more terrifying than any scream.  Troy Kotsur, the Oscar-winning actor from CODA, was born deaf, grew up using American Sign Language (ASL), and is a prominent advocate for the Deaf community in Hollywood. 

    Victoria Wyant as “Kate”, Jessica Alexander as “Hannah”, Gia Hunter as “Erin”, and Johnny Sequoyah as “Lucy” in Primate from Paramount Pictures.
    Credit: Paramount Pictures

    The contrast between the glamorous, joyful, welcoming event and the raw brutality of the film is what made the night unforgettable. We entered the theater relaxed and left with racing hearts, adrenaline at its peak and images that linger long after the credits rolled.

    For fans of the genre, Primate is pure intensity. It is raw, modern and relentless. It does not attempt to explain fear. It imposes it. It does not let you leave untouched. It follows you beyond the screening and forces you to confront just how far a horror film can go when it understands exactly how to push its audience.

    Based on the reaction of the crowd and the power of the experience, Primate appears poised for a strong run at the box office in the United States and internationally. And if a sequel eventually arrives, a second chapter to this story, it will surprise no one. The legend has only just begun.

    [ad_2]

    George Satsidis

    Source link