ReportWire

Tag: ovarian cancer

  • NICU nurse gifted Patriots playoff, Super Bowl tickets amid cancer battle

    Regardless of the outcome of Sunday’s game, the New England Patriots are already making dreams come true.Shelly Sepulveda, a local NICU nurse, has been battling cancer for the last two years. The mother of six, five of whom were adopted, has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer three times since 2024.”I know I have limited time here on this Earth, so I created a bucket list and one of the things on that bucket list was to go to a Pats game,” she said.Sepulveda didn’t go to just any game; she went to last week’s playoff game against the Los Angeles Chargers.”I got to go on the field, I got to go in and see the players up close and personal,” she said. “I cried when I went on the field. It was just an amazing experience.”The game was a highlight for Sepulveda in what has been an unimaginable two years.The Kraft Foundation heard she was a fan and invited her to the game. And the excitement didn’t stop there.Kraft gifted her a ticket to the Super Bowl. “I’ve been on Cloud Nine ever since, even though I had some unfortunate news,” Sepulveda said.This past Tuesday, she found out her body is no longer responding to chemotherapy.She’s now trying to get into a clinical trial.The Super Bowl ticket is giving her hope and inspiration as she fights this disease.”I know that it’s a gift from them, but I don’t know really if they really understand how much it impacts me mentally, physically,” she said. “I want them to know how much this is keeping me going. And I have the Pats to thank for that.”

    Regardless of the outcome of Sunday’s game, the New England Patriots are already making dreams come true.

    Shelly Sepulveda, a local NICU nurse, has been battling cancer for the last two years.

    The mother of six, five of whom were adopted, has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer three times since 2024.

    “I know I have limited time here on this Earth, so I created a bucket list and one of the things on that bucket list was to go to a Pats game,” she said.

    Sepulveda didn’t go to just any game; she went to last week’s playoff game against the Los Angeles Chargers.

    “I got to go on the field, I got to go in and see the players up close and personal,” she said. “I cried when I went on the field. It was just an amazing experience.”

    The game was a highlight for Sepulveda in what has been an unimaginable two years.

    The Kraft Foundation heard she was a fan and invited her to the game.

    And the excitement didn’t stop there.

    Kraft gifted her a ticket to the Super Bowl.

    “I’ve been on Cloud Nine ever since, even though I had some unfortunate news,” Sepulveda said.

    This past Tuesday, she found out her body is no longer responding to chemotherapy.

    She’s now trying to get into a clinical trial.

    The Super Bowl ticket is giving her hope and inspiration as she fights this disease.

    “I know that it’s a gift from them, but I don’t know really if they really understand how much it impacts me mentally, physically,” she said. “I want them to know how much this is keeping me going. And I have the Pats to thank for that.”

    Source link

  • Jury says Johnson & Johnson owes $40M to 2 cancer patients who used talcum powders

    A Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million on Friday to two women who claimed that talcum powder made by Johnson & Johnson caused their ovarian cancer.

    The giant health care company said it would appeal the jury’s liability verdict and compensatory damages.

    The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body power was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, a cancer that strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.

    In October, another California jury ordered J&J to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with the carcinogen asbestos.

    In the latest case, the jury awarded $18 million to Monica Kent and $22 million to Deborah Schultz and her husband. “The only thing they did was be loyal to Johnson & Johnson as a customer for only 50 years,’’ said their attorney, Daniel Robinson of the Robinson Calcagnie law firm in Newport Beach, California. “That loyalty was a one-way street.’’

    Erik Haas, J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation, said in a statement that the company had won “16 of the 17 ovarian cancer cases it previously tried” and expected to do so again upon appealing Friday’s verdict.

    Haas called the jury’s findings “irreconcilable with the decades of independent scientific evaluations confirming that talc is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer.”

    Johnson & Johnson replaced the talc in its baby powder sold in most of North America with cornstarch in 2020 after sales declined.

    In April, a U.S. bankruptcy court judge denied J&J’s plan to pay $9 billion to settle ovarian cancer and other gynecological cancer litiation claims based on talc-related products.

    Source link

  • Eating to Downregulate a Gene for Metastatic Cancer  | NutritionFacts.org

    Women with breast cancer should include the “liberal culinary use of cruciferous vegetables.”

    Both the Women’s Intervention Nutrition Study and the Women’s Health Initiative study showed that women randomized to a lower-fat diet enjoyed improved breast cancer survival. However, in the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living Study, women with breast cancer were also randomized to drop their fat intake down to 15 to 20 percent of calories, yet there was no difference in breast cancer relapse or death after seven years.

    Any time there’s an unexpected result, you must question whether the participants actually followed through with study instructions. For instance, if you randomized people to stop smoking and they ended up with the same lung cancer rates as those in the group who weren’t instructed to quit, one likely explanation is that the group told to stop smoking didn’t actually stop. In the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living Study, both the dietary intervention group and the control group started out at about 30 percent of calories from fat. Then, the diet group was told to lower their fat intake to 15 to 20 percent of calories. By the end of the study, they had in fact gone from 28.5 percent fat to 28.9 percent fat, as you can see below and at 1:16 in my video The Food That Can Downregulate a Metastatic Cancer Gene. They didn’t even reduce their fat intake. No wonder they didn’t experience any breast cancer benefit. 

    When you put together all the trials on the effect of lower-fat diets on breast cancer survival, even including that flawed study, you see a reduced risk of breast cancer relapse and a reduced risk of death. In conclusion, going on a low-fat diet after a breast cancer diagnosis “can improve breast cancer survival by reducing the risk of recurrence.” We may now know why: by targeting metastasis-initiating cancer cells through the fat receptor CD36.

    We know that the cancer-spreading receptor is upregulated by saturated fat. Is there anything in our diet that can downregulate it? Broccoli.

    Broccoli appears to decrease CD36 expression by as much as 35 percent (in mice). Of all fruits and vegetables, cruciferous vegetables like broccoli were the only ones associated with significantly less total risk of cancer and not just getting cancer in the first place, as you can see here and at 2:19 in my video.

    Those with bladder cancer who eat broccoli also appear to live longer than those who don’t, and those with lung cancer who eat more cruciferous veggies appear to survive longer, too.

    For example, as you can see below and at 2:45 in my video, one year out, about 75 percent of lung cancer patients eating more than one serving of cruciferous vegetables a day were still alive (the top line in red), whereas, by then, most who had been getting less than half a serving a day had already died from their cancer (the bottom line in green).

    Ovarian cancer, too. Intake of cruciferous vegetables “significantly favored survival,” whereas “a survival disadvantage was shown for meats.” Milk also appeared to double the risk of dying. Below and at 3:21 in my video are the survival graphs. Eight years out, about 40 percent of ovarian cancer patients who averaged meat or milk every day were deceased (the boldest line, on the bottom), compared to only about 20 percent who had meat or milk only a few times a week at most (the faintest line, on the top). 

    Now, it could be that the fat and cholesterol in meat increased circulating estrogen levels, or it could be because of meat’s growth hormones or all its carcinogens. And galactose, the sugar naturally found in milk, may be directly toxic to the ovary. Dairy has all its hormones, too. However, the lowering of risk with broccoli and the increasing of risk with meat and dairy are also consistent with the CD36 mechanism of cancer spread.

    Researchers put it to the test in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who were given pulverized broccoli sprouts or a placebo. The average death rate was lower in the broccoli sprout group compared to the placebo group. After a month, 18 percent of the placebo group had died, but none in the broccoli group. By three months, another 25 percent of the placebo group had died, but still not a single death in the broccoli group. And by six months, 43 percent of the remaining patients in the placebo group were deceased, along with the first 25 percent of the broccoli group. Unfortunately, even though the capsules for both groups looked the same, “true blinding was not possible,” and the patients knew which group they were in “because the pulverized broccoli sprouts could be easily distinguished from the methylcellulose [placebo] through their characteristic smell and taste.” So, we can’t discount the placebo effect. What’s more, the study participants weren’t properly randomized “because many of the patients refused to participate unless they were placed into the [active] treatment group.” That’s understandable, but it makes for a less rigorous result. A little broccoli can’t hurt, though, and it may help. It’s the lack of downsides of broccoli consumption that leads to “Advising Women Undergoing Treatment for Breast Cancer” to include the “liberal culinary use of cruciferous vegetables,” for example.

    It’s the same for reducing saturated fat. The title of an editorial in a journal of the National Cancer Institute asked: “Is It Time to Give Breast Cancer Patients a Prescription for a Low-Fat Diet?” “Although counseling women to consume a healthy diet after breast cancer diagnosis is certainly warranted for general health, the existing data still fall a bit short of proving this will help reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence and mortality.” But what do we have to lose? After all, it’s still certainly warranted for general health.

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Dietary Components That May Cause Cancer to Metastasize  | NutritionFacts.org

    Palmitic acid, a saturated fat concentrated in meat and dairy, can boost the metastatic potential of cancer cells through the fat receptor CD36.

    The leading cause of death in cancer patients is metastasis formation. That’s how most people die of cancer—not from the primary tumor, but the cancer spreading through the body. “It is estimated that metastasis is responsible for ~90% of cancer deaths,” and little progress has been made in stopping the spread, despite our modern medical armamentarium. In fact, we can sometimes make matters worse. In an editorial entitled “Therapy-Induced Metastasis,” its authors “provide evidence that all the common therapies, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, fine needle biopsies, surgical procedures and anaesthesia, have the potential to contribute to tumour progression.” You can imagine how cutting around a tumor and severing blood vessels might lead to the “migration of residual tumour cells,” but why chemotherapy? How might chemo exacerbate metastases? “Despite reducing the size of primary tumors, chemotherapy changes the tumor microenvironment”—its surrounding tissues—“resulting in an increased escape of cancer cells into the blood stream.” Sometimes, chemo, surgery, and radiation are entirely justified, but, again, other times, these treatments can make matters worse. If only we had a way to treat the cause of the cancer’s spreading.

    The development of antimetastatic therapies has been hampered by the fact that the cells that initiate metastasis remain unidentified. Then, a landmark study was published: “Targeting Metastasis-Initiating Cells Through the Fatty Acid Receptor CD36.” Researchers found a subpopulation of human cancer cells “unique in their ability to initiate metastasis”; they all express high levels of a fat receptor known as CD36, dubbed “the fat controller.” It turns out that palmitic acid or a high-fat diet specifically boosts the metastatic potential of these cancer cells. Where is palmitic acid found? Although it was originally discovered in palm oil, palmitic acid is most concentrated in meat and dairy. “Emerging evidence shows that palmitic acid (PA), a common fatty acid in the human diet, serves as a signaling molecule regulating the progression and development of many diseases at the molecular level.” It is the saturated fat that is recognized by CD36 receptors on cancer cells, and we know it is to blame, because if the CD36 receptor is blocked, so are metastases.

    The study was of a human cancer, but it was a human cancer implanted into mice. However, clinically (meaning in cancer patients themselves), the presence of these CD36-studded metastasis-initiating cells does indeed correlate with a poor prognosis. CD36 appears to drive the progression of brain tumors, for example. As seen in the survival curves shown below and at 3:21 in my video What Causes Cancer to Metastasize?, those with tumors with less CD36 expression lived significantly longer. It is the same with breast cancer mortality: “In this study, we correlated the mortality of breast cancer patients to tumor CD36 expression levels.” That isn’t a surprise, since “CD36 plays a critical role in proliferation, migration and…growth of…breast cancer cells.” If we inhibit CD36, we can inhibit “the migration and invasion of the breast cancer cells.” 

    Below and at 3:46 in my video, you can see breast cancer cell migration and invasion, before and after CD36 inhibition. (The top lines with circles are before CD36 inhibition, and the bottom lines with squares are after.)

    This isn’t only in “human melanoma- and breast cancer–derived tumours” either. Now we suspect that “CD36 expression drives ovarian cancer progression and metastasis,” too, since we can inhibit ovarian cancer cell invasion and migration, as well as block both lymph node and blood-borne metastasis, by blocking CD36. We also see the same kind of effect with prostate cancer; suppress the uptake of fat by prostate cancer cells and suppress the tumor. This was all studied with receptor-blocking drugs and antibodies in a laboratory setting, though. If these “metastasis-initiating cancer cells particularly rely on dietary lipids [fat] to promote metastasis,” the spread of cancer, why not just block the dietary fat in the first place?

    “Lipid metabolism fuels cancer’s spread.” Cancer cells love fat and cholesterol. The reason is that so much energy is stored in fat. “Hence, CD36+ metastatic cells might take advantage of this feature to obtain the high amount of energy that is likely to be required for them to anchor and survive at sites distant from the primary tumour”—to set up shop throughout the body.

    “The time when glucose [sugar] was considered as the major, if not only, fuel to support cancer cell proliferation is over.” There appears to be “a fatter way to metastasize.” No wonder high-fat diets (HFD) may “play a crucial role in increasing the risk of different cancer types, and a number of clinical studies have linked HFD with several advanced cancers.”

    If dietary fat may be “greasing the wheels of the cancer machine,” might there be “specific dietary regimens” we could use to starve cancers of dietary fat? You don’t know until you put it to the test, which we’ll look at next.

    Michael Greger M.D. FACLM

    Source link

  • Chris Evert Fast Facts | CNN

    Chris Evert Fast Facts | CNN



    CNN
     — 

    Here is a look at the life of tennis great Chris Evert, who won at least one Grand Slam singles championship 13 years in a row (1974-1986).

    Birth date: December 21, 1954

    Birth place: Fort Lauderdale, Florida

    Birth name: Christine Marie Evert

    Father: James “Jimmy” Evert, pro tennis instructor

    Mother: Colette (Thompson) Evert

    Marriages: Greg Norman (2008-2009, divorced); Andy Mill (1988-2006, divorced); John Lloyd (1979-1987, divorced)

    Children: with Andy Mill: Colton, Nicholas and Alexander

    By age 14, she was the number one nationally ranked player in the Girls’ 14-under Division.

    At 15, she beat the number one ranked player in the world at the time, Margaret Court.

    Holds the highest winning percentage, male or female, in “Open Era” tennis history (.900).

    Her rivalry with Martina Navratilova began in 1973 and lasted until 1988, and has been called the greatest in sports history. They faced each other in 14 major finals.

    Ranked number one in the world for seven years: 1974-1978, 1980 and 1981.

    Holds 157 singles titles.

    In 52 of 56 Grand Slam tournaments over the course of her career, she reached at least the semifinals.

    Holds 18 Grand Slam singles titles and three Grand Slam doubles titles, two of which are with Navratilova.

    1971 – At 16 she reaches the US Open semifinals, losing to Billie Jean King.

    December 21, 1972 – Turns professional on her eighteenth birthday.

    1973 – Announces her engagement to men’s tennis star Jimmy Connors. They end their engagement in 1974.

    March 22, 1973 – Faces Navratilova on the court for the first time, beginning a long lived professional rivalry and personal friendship. Evert defeats Navratilova (7-6, 6-3).

    1974 – Wins the French Open, her first Grand Slam title.

    November 1975 – Signs with the World Team Tennis (WTT) Phoenix Racquets.

    1976 – Sports Illustrated names her “Sportswoman of the Year.”

    1976 – Becomes the first female athlete to earn $1 million in career prize money.

    January 1980 – Announces she will take an indefinite leave after fulfilling her upcoming tennis commitments, and plans to travel with her husband, John Lloyd.

    May 7, 1980 – Five months after announcing her plans to take a break from tennis, she competes in the first round of the Italian Open. Evert defeats unseeded Adriana Vilagran of Argentina 6-0, 6-1.

    1982 – Simon and Schuster publishes her autobiography “Chrissie: My Own Story.”

    1983-1991 – President of Women’s Tennis Association (WTA).

    April 1985 – The Women’s Sports Foundation names her the “Greatest Woman Athlete in the Last 25 Years.”

    1988 – Member of the US Olympic team.

    September 1989 – Retires from professional tennis after the US Open tournament after her defeat in the quarterfinals by Zina Garrison.

    November 11, 1989 – Becomes the first female athlete ever to host “Saturday Night Live.”

    1989 – Launches Chris Evert Charities, Inc. to fight substance abuse and children born into drug addiction.

    1990-2003 – Analyst with NBC Sports.

    January 1991 – President George H.W. Bush appoints her to serve as a board member of the President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports.

    July 16, 1995 – Becomes a member of the International Tennis Hall of Fame. She is only the fourth player to be elected unanimously.

    1996 – Opens the Evert Tennis Academy with her father, Jimmy, and brother, John.

    1999 – ESPN honors her as one of the “Top 50 Athletes of the 20th Century.”

    March 2001-2013Publisher of Tennis magazine.

    2011-present – Commentator and analyst for ESPN.

    November 2014 – Launches her tennis wear line, “Chrissie by Tail.”

    July 11, 2015 – Stars as herself in the HBO tennis mockumentary, “7 Days in Hell.”

    January 8, 2019 – The United States Tennis Association announces Evert has been appointed Chairwoman of the USTA Foundation’s Board of Directors.

    January 14, 2022 – Announces she has been diagnosed with stage 1 ovarian cancer.

    May 9, 2022 – Announces that she has completed her sixth and final chemotherapy session to treat stage 1 ovarian cancer.

    Source link

  • ‘If you’re reading this, I have passed away’: Mom, 38, goes viral for last message, final wish

    ‘If you’re reading this, I have passed away’: Mom, 38, goes viral for last message, final wish

    Casey McIntyre wanted her friends and loved ones to hear about her death directly from her, and on her own terms, her husband says.

    So on Tuesday, Nov. 14, that’s exactly how it happened.

    “A note to my friends: if you’re reading this I have passed away. I’m so sorry, it’s horse (expletive) and we both know it. The cause was stage four ovarian cancer,” a message posted to McIntyre’s X account read.

    “I loved each and every one of you with my whole heart and I promise you, I knew how deeply I was loved.”

    McIntyre was 38. She leaves behind her husband, Andrew Rose Gregory, and their 18-month-old daughter, Grace. The family lives in New York City, where she worked as a book publisher.

    Casey McIntyre (Courtesy Andrew Gregory)

    Casey McIntyre (Courtesy Andrew Gregory)

    The young mom’s death and candid message has received widespread attention on social media, as has her wish to erase other people’s medical debt through donations made to the charity RIP Medical Debt.

    The nonprofit uses the donated money to buy and pay off medical bills owed by low-income Americans. More than $138,000 was raised for a campaign in McIntyre’s name by Friday, Nov. 17.

    “I am so lucky to have had access to the best medical care,” she wrote in her final message, “and am keenly aware that so many in our country don’t have access to good care.”

    Casey McIntyre (Courtesy Emily Wood)Casey McIntyre (Courtesy Emily Wood)

    Casey McIntyre (Courtesy Emily Wood)

    ‘She tried everything’

    McIntyre was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2019 after complaining of swelling of her abdomen, her husband says. It turned out to be severe ascites, or the build-up of fluid in the space between the lining of the abdomen and the organs, according to the National Library of Medicine.

    More than one-third of women with ovarian cancer develop ascites, the Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance notes.

    McIntyre underwent chemotherapies, surgeries and some experimental immunotherapies.

    “I will just assure you that she tried everything for me, her daughter and her family,” Gregory tells TODAY.com via email.

    “She re-entered treatment in September 2021 after 18 months of no evidence of disease and was released into home hospice in June 2023. We were fortunate to have one last bonus summer together.”

    McIntyre did not have BRCA gene mutations that can raise the risk of ovarian cancer, he adds.

    The couple had planned the “medical debt jubilee” as part of her memorial when it seemed she was going to die in May. “I am happy we were able to postpone it six months,” Gregory notes.

    Her memorial will now take place in December. He says that as his wife’s friends and loved ones mourn her, they can also take comfort in knowing they helped destroy medical debt for people in need thanks to her last wish.

    “I am struggling to live my life without my wife who I purely adored, but Casey suffered so much in the last years and especially last weeks of her life,” Gregory says.

    “Ovarian cancer is crueler than you can imagine. In her last days we were all able to tell her, ‘Casey, you have done it all. The race is swum. Find rest, find peace, be free.’”

    Casey McIntyre (Courtesy Andrew Gregory)Casey McIntyre (Courtesy Andrew Gregory)

    Casey McIntyre (Courtesy Andrew Gregory)

    Symptoms of ovarian cancer

    Only about 20% of ovarian cancers are found early, according to the American Cancer Society, mainly because the symptoms can be vague.

    The warning signs include:

    • Bloating or belly swelling with weight loss

    • Pelvic or abdominal pain

    • Trouble eating or feeling full quickly

    • Urinary symptoms such as always feeling like you have to go or having to go often

    • Fatigue

    • Upset stomach

    • Back pain

    • Pain during sex

    • Constipation

    • Period changes, such as heavier bleeding than normal or irregular bleeding

    Besides inherited genetic mutations, risk factors include getting older, having obesity, having children for the first time after age 35 or never giving birth, taking hormone therapy after menopause; and having a family history of ovarian, breast or colorectal cancer.

    There’s no routine screening for ovarian cancer and no early detection test.

    The CA-125 blood test can detect high levels of certain tumor markers that are often found in women who have ovarian cancer, the National Library of Medicine notes.

    But the test isn’t ordered during routine checkups for women because it’s very non-specific, Dr. Jason Wright, chief of gynecologic oncology at Columbia University in New York, previously told TODAY.com.

    “Any type of inflammation, any type of infection, things like fibroids, endometriosis, all of those things can cause an elevation in CA-125 levels,” he noted.

    Regular pelvic exams may help with detection because an OB-GYN can feel a mass on an ovary, but often the cancer has already spread by that point, Wright said. Another tool to find tumors is a transvaginal ultrasound.

    Because the warning signs are “very vague,” women have to be their own advocates, Wright advised. If the symptoms persist, get worse or aren’t getting better with other treatments, women should raise the possibility of ovarian cancer with their doctor, he noted.

    This article was originally published on TODAY.com

    Source link

  • The next big advance in cancer treatment could be a vaccine

    The next big advance in cancer treatment could be a vaccine

    SEATTLE — The next big advance in cancer treatment could be a vaccine.

    After decades of limited success, scientists say research has reached a turning point, with many predicting more vaccines will be out in five years.

    These aren’t traditional vaccines that prevent disease, but shots to shrink tumors and stop cancer from coming back. Targets for these experimental treatments include breast and lung cancer, with gains reported this year for deadly skin cancer melanoma and pancreatic cancer.

    “We’re getting something to work. Now we need to get it to work better,” said Dr. James Gulley, who helps lead a center at the National Cancer Institute that develops immune therapies, including cancer treatment vaccines.

    More than ever, scientists understand how cancer hides from the body’s immune system. Cancer vaccines, like other immunotherapies, boost the immune system to find and kill cancer cells. And some new ones use mRNA, which was developed for cancer but first used for COVID-19 vaccines.

    For a vaccine to work, it needs to teach the immune system’s T cells to recognize cancer as dangerous, said Dr. Nora Disis of UW Medicine’s Cancer Vaccine Institute in Seattle. Once trained, T cells can travel anywhere in the body to hunt down danger.

    “If you saw an activated T cell, it almost has feet,” she said. “You can see it crawling through the blood vessel to get out into the tissues.”

    Patient volunteers are crucial to the research.

    Kathleen Jade, 50, learned she had breast cancer in late February, just weeks before she and her husband were to depart Seattle for an around-the-world adventure. Instead of sailing their 46-foot boat, Shadowfax, through the Great Lakes toward the St. Lawrence Seaway, she was sitting on a hospital bed awaiting her third dose of an experimental vaccine. She’s getting the vaccine to see if it will shrink her tumor before surgery.

    “Even if that chance is a little bit, I felt like it’s worth it,” said Jade, who is also getting standard treatment.

    Progress on treatment vaccines has been challenging. The first, Provenge, was approved in the U.S. in 2010 to treat prostate cancer that had spread. It requires processing a patient’s own immune cells in a lab and giving them back through IV. There are also treatment vaccines for early bladder cancer and advanced melanoma.

    Early cancer vaccine research faltered as cancer outwitted and outlasted patients’ weak immune systems, said Olja Finn, a vaccine researcher at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

    “All of these trials that failed allowed us to learn so much,” Finn said.

    As a result, she’s now focused on patients with earlier disease since the experimental vaccines didn’t help with more advanced patients. Her group is planning a vaccine study in women with a low-risk, noninvasive breast cancer called ductal carcinoma in situ.

    More vaccines that prevent cancer may be ahead too. Decades-old hepatitis B vaccines prevent liver cancer and HPV vaccines, introduced in 2006, prevent cervical cancer.

    In Philadelphia, Dr. Susan Domchek, director of the Basser Center at Penn Medicine, is recruiting 28 healthy people with BRCA mutations for a vaccine test. Those mutations increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancer. The idea is to kill very early abnormal cells, before they cause problems. She likens it to periodically weeding a garden or erasing a whiteboard.

    Others are developing vaccines to prevent cancer in people with precancerous lung nodules and other inherited conditions that raise cancer risk.

    “Vaccines are probably the next big thing” in the quest to reduce cancer deaths, said Dr. Steve Lipkin, a medical geneticist at New York’s Weill Cornell Medicine, who is leading one effort funded by the National Cancer Institute. “We’re dedicating our lives to that.”

    People with the inherited condition Lynch syndrome have a 60% to 80% lifetime risk of developing cancer. Recruiting them for cancer vaccine trials has been remarkably easy, said Dr. Eduardo Vilar-Sanchez of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, who is leading two government-funded studies on vaccines for Lynch-related cancers.

    “Patients are jumping on this in a surprising and positive way,” he said.

    Drugmakers Moderna and Merck are jointly developing a personalized mRNA vaccine for patients with melanoma, with a large study to begin this year. The vaccines are customized to each patient, based on the numerous mutations in their cancer tissue. A vaccine personalized in this way can train the immune system to hunt for the cancer’s mutation fingerprint and kill those cells.

    But such vaccines will be expensive.

    “You basically have to make every vaccine from scratch. If this wasn’t personalized, the vaccine could probably be made for pennies, just like the COVID vaccine,” said Dr. Patrick Ott of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.

    The vaccines under development at UW Medicine are designed to work for many patients, not just a single patient. Tests are underway in early and advanced breast cancer, lung cancer and ovarian cancer. Some results may come as soon as next year.

    Todd Pieper, 56, from suburban Seattle, is participating in testing for a vaccine intended to shrink lung cancer tumors. His cancer spread to his brain, but he’s hoping to live long enough to see his daughter graduate from nursing school next year.

    “I have nothing to lose and everything to gain, either for me or for other people down the road,” Pieper said of his decision to volunteer.

    One of the first to receive the ovarian cancer vaccine in a safety study 11 years ago was Jamie Crase of nearby Mercer Island. Diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer when she was 34, Crase thought she would die young and had made a will that bequeathed a favorite necklace to her best friend. Now 50, she has no sign of cancer and she still wears the necklace.

    She doesn’t know for sure if the vaccine helped, “But I’m still here.”

    ___

    The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    Source link

  • Consider Fallopian Tube Removal to Avoid Ovarian Cancer

    Consider Fallopian Tube Removal to Avoid Ovarian Cancer

    Feb. 10, 2023 — All women who have finished having children should consider having their fallopian tubes removed at the time of other scheduled pelvic surgery in order to lower their risk of developing ovarian cancer, even if they aren’t at increased risk for the deadly disease, a leading research organization has advised. 

    Doctors currently recommend that women with high genetic risk for ovarian cancer have their ovaries and fallopian tubes removed once they’ve finished having children.

    In new messaging, the Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance is now encouraging all women, even those without a genetic mutation, to have their fallopian tubes removed during a planned gynecologic surgery. 

    There is increasing evidence that many types of ovarian cancers start in the fallopian tube, and fallopian tube removal has been shown to dramatically reduce risk for a later diagnosis, the organization said. 

    The new advice replaces the decades old focus on symptom awareness and early detection of ovarian cancer through screening. 

    It follows a “sobering and deeply disappointing” study that showed that regular screening for ovarian cancer with blood tests and ultrasound does not save lives, the organization said. (This was the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening published in the journal The Lancet in June 2021).

    The results of that study were “very hard to accept,” Audra Moran, OCRA president and CEO, says in an interview.

    “We have an obligation to let people know that symptom awareness and early detection will not save lives,” but preemptive removal of the fallopian tubes “absolutely will,” Moran says. 

    This advice is “reasonable and makes sense,” says Stephanie V. Blank, MD, president of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and director of gynecologic oncology for the Mount Sinai Health System in New York.

    And it’s actually not new, she says. Several years ago, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology said fallopian tube removal may be “an appropriate and feasible” strategy for ovarian cancer risk reduction. 

    “It’s getting new attention” now based on the disappointing screening study, Blank says.

    Importantly, the recommendation is for women who are already scheduled for another pelvic surgery for a benign condition, such as hysterectomy for fibroids. There is no current recommendation to have fallopian tubes removed as a standalone procedure.

    Deanna Gerber, MD, gynecologic oncologist at NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center-Long Island, says women should understand that there is still ongoing research on this topic, “but this low-risk procedure may reduce their risk of developing an ovarian or fallopian tube cancer.”

    As part of their new messaging campaign, the Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance is also encouraging women to know their personal risk for ovarian cancer. The group has launched a pilot program offering free at-home genetic testing kits to people with a personal or family history of breast, ovarian, uterine, or colorectal cancer. 

    In the United States, ovarian cancer ranks fifth in cancer deaths among women and causes more deaths than any other gynecological cancer, according to the American Cancer Society.

    Often, the symptoms are subtle, making ovarian cancer difficult to detect in its early stages. Common symptoms include bloating, pelvic or abdominal pain, trouble eating or feeling full quickly, and needing to urinate more frequently. 

    Source link

  • Four San Francisco Riders Race Across America to Support Women with Ovarian Cancer

    Four San Francisco Riders Race Across America to Support Women with Ovarian Cancer

    Press Release



    updated: Apr 23, 2015

    Four San Francisco Riders Race Across America to Support Women with Ovarian Cancer

    3,000 mile Cross-Country Bicycle Race Raises Funds for Ovarian Cancer National Alliance

    We are riding 7 days a week in preparation for this grueling race. The team will be on bikes, in shifts ’round the clock during the race, we are thankful for our volunteer crew helping throughout the race. We look forward to surpassing our fundraising goal of $100,000 for OCNA. Ovarian Cancer affects our Mothers, sisters, grandmothers, girlfriends and daughters. We race to bring awareness, support fundraising and to help find a cure.

    Lane O’Connor, RAAM 4 OCNA Team Member

    San Francisco, CA—A team of four San Francisco area men will race in shifts, relay style (non-stop) across the United States this summer with a goal of raising $100,000 to support women with ovarian cancer. Lane O’Connor, Dave O’Mara, Caleb Porter and Shawn Warthen have formed a team, ‘RACE4OCNA’ for the 2015 Race Across America (RAAM). The race, a grueling 3000-mile race covering 12 states and 170,000 vertical feet that kicks off on June 20th. Team racers have a maximum of nine days to cross the country, from Oceanside, CA, to Annapolis, MD. The RACE4OCNA team aims to complete the race in 7 days, averaging 500 miles a day, racing non-stop to cross the country. 100% of the donations raised will be donated to the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance (OCNA).

    Lane O’Connor’s mother, Diane is the inspiration for the RAAM 4 OCNA team. Diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2002, she is now a leader in both local and national ovarian cancer organizations. Diane currently serves as President of the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance Board of Directors.

    The Ovarian Cancer National Alliance is a powerful voice for everyone touched by ovarian cancer. We connect survivors, women at risk, caregivers and health providers with the information and resources they need. We ensure that ovarian cancer is a priority for lawmakers and agencies in Washington, DC, and throughout the country. We help our community raise their voices on behalf of every life that has been affected by this disease.

    For more information and the RAAM 4 OCNA team, to interview the team or learn how you can support their fundraising efforts please contact Michelle Quinn at Michelle@mwqpr.com or 805-886-3756

    ###

    Source link