ReportWire

Tag: oppenheimer

  • Director-writer Christopher Nolan on latest masterpiece

    Director-writer Christopher Nolan on latest masterpiece

    [ad_1]

    Director-writer Christopher Nolan on latest masterpiece “Oppenheimer,” Hollywood strike – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Five-time Oscar nominee Christopher Nolan, whose films include “Dunkirk” and “Tenet,” joins “CBS Mornings” to discuss his highly-anticipated new film “Oppenheimer” about a famed scientist who oversaw the development of the first atomic bomb.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Blow Up the Patriarchy, Or: The Barbenheimer Experience

    Blow Up the Patriarchy, Or: The Barbenheimer Experience

    [ad_1]

    Perhaps what they don’t warn you about with regard to “the Barbenheimer experience” is just how jarring it actually is. Certainly, that’s the entire “point” of pairing these two films together, the reason the internet has gone apeshit: because they’re so “divergent.” In fact, the phenomenon has proven to be such an excitement to people that they’ve gone “through the archives” to find similar instances of unlikely movie pairings released the same week. Such examples include Jumanji and Heat, The Matrix and 10 Things I Hate About You and The Dark Knight and Mamma Mia! It’s really only the latter example (complete with also featuring a Christopher Nolan movie) that comes vaguely close to capturing the sort of genre/color palette dichotomy that Barbie and Oppenheimer do. But, on a deeper level than that, watching Oppenheimer the same day or week serves as an even more blatant method for underscoring the horrifying patriarchal system that Barbie does. 

    In Oppenheimer’s case, of course, it’s unintentional. Because never was patriarchy in America at its strongest and most accepted than in the mid-twentieth century. Nor could Nolan have planned for a movie about garden-variety male toxicity to have coincided so seamlessly with an actual moviegoing trend/phenomenon. The pairing of these two films fundamentally speaking to how patriarchy destroys lives in far more literal ways than figurative ones. While Barbie (Margot Robbie) at least gets to experience life as it should be under matriarchy in Barbie Land, maybe it’s almost worse to know what that sense of peace and freedom is like only to be forced to enter Real World territory, where males rule with an iron/button-pushing (a bomb allusion) fist. 

    Upon seeing how things are done in Real World, Ken (Ryan Gosling) decides he can no longer be subjected to the “tyranny” of matriarchal dominance. Of being unable to force a Barbie to do anything he wants them to (i.e., return his affection), least of all the specific one he’s pining over. Because, in Barbie Land, men a.k.a. Kens are just background. In J. Robert Oppenheimer’s (Cillian Murphy) world, it’s women who are very much peripheral, serving only as vague sexual impressions. Yet there’s never any issue with making a woman “his.” Except his on-again, off-again paramour, Jean Tatlock (Florence Pugh). Unfortunately for Oppenheimer, she’s the type of “Berkeley free spirit” who can never seem to be pinned down. Oppenheimer’s eventual wife, Katherine (Emily Blunt), on the other hand, is only too eager to take a fourth husband in “Oppi.” 

    And yet, for as important as these women are in Oppenheimer’s life (not to mention being the only sign of women anywhere within this filmic landscape), they’re really just cursory and occasional “presences” that only interrupt the “real” work he’s doing. The truly “significant” aspect of his life. Which becomes helping male politicians destroy the world in the name of war. With Oppenheimer himself growing (like a mushroom cloud) so consumed and titillated by the resources (financial or otherwise) the government provides him with in the name of scientific research, he loses sight of the monster he’s actually creating. Perhaps as Ruth Handler (Rhea Perlaman) once did as well. Not knowing that the woman she unleashed onto the world—the one quite literally made to show girls that they could be anything—only served to further highlight all the things they would never be, both body-wise and career-wise. Therefore, Handler ended up actually accenting a more palpable and depressing divide between reality and what should be…as opposed to conjuring a beacon of hope and feminism in Barbie. And yes, it bears noting that, despite all her evolutions, Mattel has never seen fit to release a “Body Positivity” Barbie. Maybe because they know just how hollow that would come across at this juncture. Though false intentions never stopped a capitalist from trying to make a fast buck. In short, to capitalize

    Obviously, Handler and Oppenheimer are by no means comparable for what they created—though each one did offer up, in some sense, a kind of Frankenstein. Gerwig appears to know that only too well by making Handler a prominent character in Barbie. A conceit that might seem a bit out of left field to some, but is actually entirely appropriate considering she was the brainchild behind Mattel’s best-selling and most iconic toy. And it’s cruelly ironic that Handler’s “ghost” should be left to haunt the seventeenth floor of corporate headquarters while the suits with no insight into women benefit from her invention. For yes, she was eventually forced to resign from Mattel in 1974 after the taxman cracked down on her for false financial reporting (something Gerwig refers to with a joke that Ruth herself makes in the movie).

    Difficulty getting along with the government appears to be a common characteristic in those who simply want to create. For Oppenheimer, too, was viewed with malice and contempt by the very political machine that was dependent upon him for developing an atomic weapon. One that turned out, in the end, to be rather needless as Japan would have surely surrendered without it. But such is the nature of patriarchy, with every man “in charge” needing to prove that his power is authoritative and incontrovertible by swinging his dick around while lives hang in the balance. 

    Oppenheimer makes that disgustingly clear when Henry L. Stimson (James Remar), the Secretary of War at the time, decides they shouldn’t bomb Kyoto because he and his wife honeymooned there and it’s a “lovely” place that has cultural value not just to him, but the Japanese. In other words, fuck those arbitrary shitholes, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. To see a scene like this play out is indicative of just how damaging patriarchy is, for it is a system run by a gender that thrives on violence, ego and heartless decision-making. A gender that proves, ultimately, gender is no illusion; for this particular one feeds on destruction, whereas the female one is founded metaphorically and literally on creation. The great yin and yang endeavors of each type of being. 

    So yes, more than merely a means to appreciate the contrasting cinematography styles of Hoyte van Hoytema and Rodrigo Prieto, the Barbenheimer experience does feel somehow essential. Like it shouldn’t get reduced to being categorized as “frivolous pandering to internet tastemaking,” but rather, seen as a brutal and unique way to watch how patriarchy upends male and female lives alike on a daily basis. All because someone wanted to prove he has clout and “intelligence.” Though the dumbest thing of all is to assume that one has any significance whatsoever in the grand scheme. 

    Especially a grand scheme that might now invariably include going “kabluey” because a man wanted to show off the prowess of his mind knowing full well that said result would be used for evil. Indeed, quoting from a Hindu scripture, Oppenheimer would say of his creation, “Now I am become Death, destroyer of worlds.” In some sense, Barbie destroyed worlds as well. Bringing “fire” to the “cavewomen” who were still stuck playing with (read: playing at mothering) baby dolls throughout their childhood. Accordingly, this is the very scene Greta Gerwig rightly chooses to commence Barbie with. And would that playing with/learning to emulate a “slutty” doll was the most affronting and harmful thing a man (/man-boy) ever did. 

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Barbenheimer Blitz: Just How Much Money Will ‘Barbie’ and ‘Oppenheimer’ Make?

    Barbenheimer Blitz: Just How Much Money Will ‘Barbie’ and ‘Oppenheimer’ Make?

    [ad_1]

    Things have been looking pretty bleak in Hollywood as of late—but the upcoming Barbenheimer box office looks like it may provide a bright spot amid the dual WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes. According to Deadline, Greta Gerwig’s Barbie and Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer are tracking to exceed $260 million combined at the global box office. 

    According to presale estimates, Barbie is expected to pull anywhere from $90 million–$125 million in North America, outpacing another huge summer blockbuster—Disney’s live-action Little Mermaid—which pulled in $95.5 million its opening weekend. Barbie, starring Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling, is playing at 4,200 theaters, and its studio, Warner Bros., is reportedly confident that the film will pull in at least $75 million. Per Deadline, Barbie is looking at a potential $165 million haul globally, with $60 million–$65 million coming from 69 international markets—though not Vietnam where the film is banned

    As for Oppenheimer, the first Nolan-directed feature for Universal and the last movie to hold a premiere before the actors strike is tracking to make anywhere from $40 million–$50 million domestic in 3,600 theaters, with another $45 million expected overseas—bringing the grand total to about $100 million globally. A $100 million global haul would be impressive for the three-hour, Cillian Murphy–led drama about the invention of the atomic bomb, which is already gaining buzz and has been pegged as an early Oscar front-runner. 

    Many cinephiles are planning on doing a double feature of these wildly different films, which have taken over the internet due to their differing aesthetics and subject matter. AMC has stated that over 40,000 of their AMC Stubs members have bought advance tickets to see both films on the same day. A-listers like Tom Cruise—who is not involved with either film and even has a rival IMAX movie, Mission: Impossible—Dead Reckoning, currently in theaters—have encouraged moviegoers to see both films in the hopes of supporting cineplexes at a precarious time for Hollywood. “I love a double feature, and it doesn’t get more explosive (or more pink) than one with Oppenheimer and Barbie,” tweeted Cruise.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Murphy

    Source link

  • Christopher Nolan Compares Artificial Intelligence To The Atomic Bomb

    Christopher Nolan Compares Artificial Intelligence To The Atomic Bomb

    [ad_1]

    After a screening of his new film, Oppenheimer Saturday night, director Christopher Nolan suggested that his period piece couldn’t have come at a better time, as we’re in an “Oppenheimer moment,” he said. But this time, the dangerous technology isn’t being created in a lab in a New Mexico lab; it’s coming from Silicon Valley.

    Speaking with the BBC, Nolan compared the Manhattan Project, the World War II-era effort to develop the world’s first nuclear weapons, to the current race to develop intelligent algorithms and artificial intelligence. Oppenheimer is “coming at a time when there are a lot of new technologies that people start to worry about the unintended consequences,” Nolan said.

    “When you talk to leaders in the field of AI, as I do from time to time, they see this moment right now as their Oppenheimer moment. They’re looking to his story to say, ‘What are our responsibilities? How can we deal with the potential unintended consequences?’ Sadly, for them, there are no easy answers.”

    Nolan elaborated on those concerns at a panel Saturday night in New York that followed a preview screening of his film, Variety reports. The panel was moderated by Meet the Press anchor Chuck Todd, who asked Nolan if he thought the tech industry was “re-examining Oppenheimer” as they continue to develop AI.

    “They say that they do,” Nolan responded. “It’s helpful that that’s in the conversation, and I hope that that thought process will continue. I am not saying Oppenheimer’s story offers any easy answers to those questions, but it at least can show where some of those responsibilities lie and how people take a breath and think, ‘Okay, what is the accountability?’”

    At present, though, Nolan worries that that question of accountability isn’t being asked enough by people in Hollywood. “People in my business talking about it, they just don’t want to take responsibility for whatever that algorithm does,” he said. “Applied to AI, that’s a terrifying possibility. Terrifying.”

    The use of AI is one of the sticking points in the current WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes, the latter of which prompted the stars of Oppenheimer to formally walk off at the red carpet premiere last week.

    Matt Damon, Emily Blunt, Cillian Murphy and Florence Pugh pose on the red carpet at the UK premiere of “Oppenheimer.” Photo by HENRY NICHOLLS/AFP via Getty Images

    HENRY NICHOLLS/Getty Images

    “With the labor disputes going on in Hollywood right now, a lot of it—when we talk about AI, when we talk about these issues—they’re all ultimately born from the same thing, which is when you innovate with technology, you have to maintain accountability,” Nolan said Saturday. 

    Nolan has also stated support of striking actors and writers, and has said that he won’t start work on another film until the strikes conclude. “No, absolutely,” he told the BBC when asked if he’d be writing during the strike period. “It’s very important that everybody understands it is a very key moment in the relationship between working people and Hollywood.”

    “This is about jobbing actors, this is about staff writers on television programs trying to raise a family, trying to keep food on the table,” he said. “This is not about me, this is not about the stars of my film.”

    [ad_2]

    Eve Batey

    Source link

  • What If We Just…Paid Writers More?

    What If We Just…Paid Writers More?

    [ad_1]

    We are entering day 73 of the Writer’s Guild strike, where writers for all your favorite TV shows have stopped writing altogether in the midst of contract negotiations. Yes, that indeed means your fave shows are being delayed…you may as well say goodbye to
    Euphoria, which now is projected to be released in 2026 due to the strike. (Safe to say they could cancel it at this point.)


    And if you thought,
    That’s okay! We still have movies! You’re wrong, dead wrong. Enjoy these last few blissful moments of Barbie press tours featuring Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling still in character and new red carpet outfits. The Screen Actor’s Guild has been in talks with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers in an effort to re-negotiate contracts. As per usual, Hollywood needs more money and the studios won’t budge.

    Things are getting serious, quickly. The members of SAG-AFTRA agreed to strike if the two entities couldn’t reach a fair agreement…and after a mediator was brought in as a “last ditch effort”, it’s not looking good. Christopher Nolan even informed the attendees of the
    Oppenheimer screening that the stars left in solidarity of the looming strike.

    The
    Oppenheimer viewing was even moved up in anticipation for the strike, as all actors in the film agreed they would participate alongside the SAG members. They agreed that the minute the strike was called, they were going home to picket. So when we’re streaming Disney Plus, or any of those big platforms, remember what they’re taking from us right now.

    SAG-AFTRA’s President, Fran Drescher said in a statement,

    “SAG-AFTRA negotiated in good faith and was eager to reach a deal that sufficiently addressed performer needs, but the AMPTP’s responses to the union’s most important proposals have been insulting and disrespectful of our massive contributions to this industry. The companies have refused to meaningfully engage on some topics and on others completely stonewalled us. Until they do negotiate in good faith, we cannot begin to reach a deal. We have no choice but to move forward in unity, and on behalf of our membership, with a strike recommendation to our National Board. The board will discuss the issue this morning and will make its decision.”

    As I write this article, it has been reported that for the first time since 1960, both the SAG and Writer’s Guild are on strike at the same time. So say goodbye for now to your favorite shows and movies and get ready to say hello to re-runs and YouTube clips. Enjoy the Barbenheimer double feature on July 21 and buckle up…This could take a while.

    And honestly, it’s always appalling to me that people even have to consider paying writers more money. It’s not because I’m biased, but because I’ve learned that they are the backbone of media. But the financial catastrophe this will eventually cause for these big corporations will show them in due time why writers need to be paid more.

    [ad_2]

    Jai Phillips

    Source link

  • Asteroid City: Wes Anderson’s “Sci-Fi” Movie Is About A Collective and Resigned Sense of Doom More Than It Is 50s Americana

    Asteroid City: Wes Anderson’s “Sci-Fi” Movie Is About A Collective and Resigned Sense of Doom More Than It Is 50s Americana

    [ad_1]

    A palpable shift has occurred in Wes Anderson’s style and tone since the release of 2021’s The French Dispatch. One doesn’t want to use a cliché like “mature” to describe what’s been happening since that perceptible tonal pivot in his filmography, so perhaps the better way to “define” what’s happening to Anderson and his storytelling is that it’s gotten, as Cher Horowitz would note, “Way existential.” Not to say there wasn’t that element to some degree in previous films, but now, it’s amplified—ratcheted up to a maximum that was never there before. Some might proffer it’s because Anderson has transitioned to a new era of his life, therefore possesses a greater concern with mortality; others could posit that our world and society has become so fragile in the years since 2020, that even privileged white men have been rattled by it enough to let it color their work. Whatever the case, the increased focus on mortality and “the meaning of life” in Anderson’s oeuvre is no surprise considering one of his greatest directorial influences is Woody Allen. Yes, he might be cancelled, but that doesn’t change the effect he’s had on Anderson.

    Of course, Anderson has managed to take the puerility of Allen’s lead characters and render them “quirky,” “oddball” and “postmodern” instead. What’s more, Anderson has the “marketing sense” not to make his characters come across as “too Jewy,” lest it “scandalize” the often white bread audiences he tends to attract. Some might argue that Asteroid City is his whitest offering yet—which is really saying something. And yes, like Allen, Anderson has begun to favor the “screenwriting technique” of setting his movies in the past, so as not to have to deal with the “vexing” and “unpleasant” complications of trying to address post-woke culture in his casting and narrative decisions. Defenders of Anderson would bite back by remarking that the director creates alternate worlds in general, and should be left to do his own thing without being subjected to the “moral” and “ethical” issues presented by “modern filmmaking requirements.” For the most part, that’s remained the case, even as occasional hemming-and-hawing about his “movies so white” shtick crops up when he releases a new film. But to those who will follow Anderson anywhere, the trip to Asteroid City does prove to be worth it. If for no other reason than to show us the evolution of an auteur when he’s left alone, permitted to be creative without letting the outside voices and noise fuck with his head.

    In many regards, the “town” (or rather, desert patch with a population of eighty-seven) is a representation of the same bubble Anderson exists in whenever he writes and directs something. To the point of writing, Anderson returns to the meta exploration of what it means to create on the page (as he did for The French Dispatch), anchored by the playwright Conrad Earp (Edward Norton). Although he’s not one of the more heavily featured characters, without him, none of the characters we’re seeing perform a televised production of Asteroid City would exist. If that sounds too meta already, it probably is. With the host (Bryan Cranston) of an anthology TV series serving as our guide, the movie commences in black and white as he stares into the camera and proceeds to do his best impersonation of Rod Serling at the beginning of The Twilight Zone. Indeed, it’s clear Anderson wants to allude to these types of TV anthology series that were so popular in the post-war Golden Age of Television. And even on the radio, as Orson Welles showcased in 1938, with his adaptation of The War of the Worlds. A broadcast that caused many listeners to panic about an alien invasion, unaware that it wasn’t real. In fact, Cranston as the host is sure to forewarn his viewers, “Asteroid City does not exist. It is an imaginary drama created expressly for this broadcast.” That warning comes with good reason, for people in the 50s were easily susceptible to being bamboozled by whatever was presented to them on the then-new medium of TV. Because, “If it’s on TV, it must be true.” And the last thing anyone wanted to believe—then as much as now—is that there could be life on other planets. Sure, it sounds “neato” in theory, but, in reality, Earthlings are major narcissists who want to remain the lone “stars” of the interplanetary show.

    Set in September of 1955, Asteroid City centers its narrative on a Junior Stargazer convention, where five students will be honored for their excellence in astronomy and astronomy-related innovations. Among those five are Woodrow (Jake Ryan), Shelly (Sophia Lillis), Ricky (Ethan Josh Lee), Dinah (Grace Edwards) and Clifford (Aristou Meehan). It’s Woodrow who arrives to town first, courtesy of his war photographer father, Augie Steenbeck (Jason Schwartzman). Although they’ve arrived to their destination, Augie still has to take the broken-down car to the mechanic (Matt Dillon). After much fanfare and tinkering, The Mechanic concludes that the car is kaput. Augie decides to phone his father-in-law, Stanley Zak (Tom Hanks), to come pick up Woodrow and Augie’s three daughters, Andromeda (Ella Faris), Pandora (Gracie Faris) and Cassiopeia (Willan Faris). Stanley doesn’t immediately agree, instead opting to remind Augie that he was never good enough for his daughter (played briefly, in a way, by Margot Robbie) and that he ought to tell his children that their mother died. Three weeks ago, to be exact. But withholding this information is just one of many ways in which Augie parades his emotional stuntedness. Something that ultimately enchants Hollywood actress Midge Campbell (Scarlett Johansson), who also happens to be the mother of another Junior Stargazer, Dinah.

    All the while, the vibrant, almost fake-looking set seems there solely to reiterate that all vibrancy is belied by something darker beneath it. That was never truer than in postwar America. And talking of vibrant cinematography and explosions, if Barbie’s color palette had a baby with Oppenheimer’s explosive content, you’d get Asteroid City (which, again, features Margot “Barbie” Robbie herself). With regard to explosions, it bears noting that the intro to the movie includes a train plugging along, bound for Asteroid City carrying all manner of bounty: avocados, pecans and, oh yes, a ten-megaton nuclear warhead with the disclaimer: “Caution: DO NOT DETONATE without Presidential Approval.” So much about that wide array of “transported goods” speaks to the very dichotomy of American culture. Priding itself on being a land of plenty while also doing everything in its power to self-destruct all that natural wealth. What’s more, the presence of hazardous material on trains is only too relevant considering the recent tragedy that befell East Palestine, Ohio. And yet, these are the sorts of environmentally-damaging behaviors that were set in motion in the postwar economic boom of America. Complete with the “miracle” of Teflon.

    Accordingly, it’s no coincidence that as the “progress” associated with modern life accelerated at a rate not seen since the first Industrial Revolution, some were concerned about the potential fallout of such “development.” After all, with technological advancement could arise as many inconveniences as conveniences (see also: AI). For those who came of age after the so-called war to end all wars, a natural skepticism vis-à-vis “advancement” was also to be expected. Perhaps the fear of modern existence, with all the implications of war and invasion being “leveled up” due to “better” technology (i.e., the atomic bomb), planted the seed of suddenly seeing flying saucers all the time starting in the 40s and 50s. A phenomenon that many government officials were keen to write off as being somehow related to atomic testing (this being why the Atomic Age is so wrapped up in the alien sightings craze of the 50s). The sudden collective sightings might also have been a manifestation of the inherent fear of what all this “progress” could do. Especially when it came to increasing the potential for interplanetary contact. For it was also in the 50s that the great “space race” began—spurred by nothing more than the competitive, dick-swinging nature of the Cold War between the U.S. and USSR. That was all it took to propel a “they’re among us” and “hiding in plain sight” mentality, one that was frequently preyed upon by the U.S. government via the Red Scare. Such intense fear- and paranoia-mongering does fuck with the mind, you know. Enough to make it see things that may or may not really be there (literally and figuratively). The term “alien,” therefore, meaning “foreigner” or “other” as much as extraterrestrial as the 50s wore on.

    So it was that Americans did what they always do best with fear: monetize it! To be sure, Asteroid City itself only exists to commodify the terror of an asteroid hitting Earth and leaving such a great impact thousands of years ago. Then, when news of an alien infiltrating the Junior Stargazer convention leaks, a fun fair materializes to sell merch (“Alien Gifts Sold Here”) related to commemorating the “event.” As such, the train that goes to Asteroid City suddenly becomes the “Alien Special” and there’s now “Alien Parking,” as well as signs declaring, “Asteroid City U.F.O.” and “Spacecraft Sighting.” With this American zeal for exploitation in mind, plus the alien element, there’s even a certain Nope vibe at play throughout Asteroid City as well. And a dash of Don’t Worry Darling, to boot. Mainly because of the unexplained sonic booms that go on in the background while the housewives are trying to kiki.

    Anderson extracts the paranoia element that might have been present in films of the day (like Flying Saucers Attack!) and instead relates the discovery of an alien life form to the added feeling of being insignificant as a human in this universe. To highlight that point, J.J. Kellogg (Liev Schreiber), father to Junior Stargazer Clifford, demands of his son’s escalating antics related to performing unasked dares, “Why do you always have to dare something?” He replies meekly, “I don’t know. Maybe it’s because I’m afraid otherwise nobody’ll notice my existence in the universe.” To be sure, the reason most people behave obnoxiously is to get the kind of attention that will convince themselves they matter. They mean something in this grand abyss.

    Even Midge, a movie star, feels mostly unseen. So when Augie takes her picture in such an intimate way, she can’t help but feel allured by him. Seen by him. That, in the end, is what everyone wants. In the spirit of alluding to 50s Americana, Midge herself seems to be a loose representation of Marilyn Monroe, also prone to pills and alcohol, and constantly referred to as a brilliant comedienne despite flying under the radar as such. Then there’s another six degrees of Marilyn separation when Willem Dafoe appears as Saltzburg Keitel, an overt homage to Elia Kazan and his Actors Studio—a version of which we see when Earp shows up to a class to try to get insight on how to convey a certain scene. And yes, the concern with whether or not the acting in the play is being done “right” keeps coming up, reaching a crest as a metaphor for what Asteroid City is all about: what is anyone’s place in the universe? Does any of it mean anything? So yeah, again with the Woody Allen influence.

    Toward the end of the play/movie, Jones Hall, the actor playing Augie, asks Schubert Green (Adrien Brody), the director, “Do I just keep doing it?” He could be asking about his performance as much as his very existence itself. Schubert assures, “Yes.” Jones continues, “Without knowing anything? Isn’t there supposed to be some kind of answer out there in the cosmic wilderness?” When Jones then admits, “I still don’t understand the play,” that phrase “the play” doubles just as easily for “life.” Schubert insists, “Doesn’t matter. Just keep telling the story.” In other words, just keep rolling the dice and living as though any of it means anything at all.

    And maybe nihilism, for some people, is part of compartmentalizing that meaninglessness. This much appears to be the case for Midge, who tells Augie stoically, “I think I know now what I realize we are… Two catastrophically wounded people who don’t express the depths of their pain because…we don’t want to. That’s our connection.” But a connection is a connection—and that’s all anyone on Earth is really looking—starving—for…no matter how many decades fly by and how many according “advancements” are made. It’s likely the convention-interrupting alien could sense and see that desperation among the humans during his brief landing.

    So it is that Augie tells Midge afterward, “I don’t like the way that guy looked at us, the alien.” Midge inquires, “How did he look?”  “Like we’re doomed.” Midge shrugs, “Maybe we are.” “Maybe” being a polite euphemism for “definitely.” But even though we are, maybe the art will make sense of it all in the end. Even if only to “just keep telling the story.” For posterity. For whoever—or whatever—might come across the ruins and relics in the future. Hopefully, they’ll learn from the mistakes that we ourselves didn’t.

    [ad_2]

    Genna Rivieccio

    Source link

  • Emily Blunt Is Taking a Year-Long Acting Break: “I Just Felt That In My Bones”

    Emily Blunt Is Taking a Year-Long Acting Break: “I Just Felt That In My Bones”

    [ad_1]

    After a string of high-profile projects, including Into the Woods, A Quiet Place, and Mary Poppins Returns, Emily Blunt says she’s taking a year-long break from acting.

    “This year, I’m not working,” she revealed on a recent episode of the Table for Two with Bruce Bozzi podcast. “I worked quite a bit last year, and my oldest baby is nine, so we’re in the last year of single digits.” Blunt shares her two daughters—Hazel, 9, and Violet, 7—with husband and fellow actor John Krasinski, whom she wed in 2010. “I just feel there are cornerstones to their day that are so important when they’re little,” she continued. “And it’s, ‘Will you wake me up? Will you take me to school? Will you pick me up? Will you put me to bed?’ And I just need to be there for all of them for a good stretch. And I just felt that in my bones.”

    Blunt, who next appears in Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer as Kitty Oppenheimer, the wife of Cillian Murphy’s J. Robert Oppenheimer, said accepting roles that require time away from her kids come at a great “emotional cost,” and that she’s “very prone to guilt.” The actress added, “I think maybe all mothers are. You’re just prone to feeling bad for, God forbid, wanting something outside of being a mother. I am huge advocate for it—I’m a huge advocate for women being ambitious. It’s just dreams with purpose, it’s not an ugly word.”

    In addition to Oppenheimer, Blunt has a few more projects set for release during her hiatus, including David Yates’ crime drama Pain Hustlers opposite Chris Evans and David Leitch’s action film The Fall Guy, in which she stars alongside Ryan Gosling.

    [ad_2]

    Savannah Walsh

    Source link

  • John Krasinski “Photo Bombs” Robert Downey Jr.’s “Oppenheimer” Cast Photo

    John Krasinski “Photo Bombs” Robert Downey Jr.’s “Oppenheimer” Cast Photo

    [ad_1]

    Robert Downey Jr.’s attempt to snap the perfect “Oppenheimer” cast photo was hilariously thwarted by John Krasinski. The “Iron Man” actor posted two photos featuring his “Oppenheimer” costars on Instagram on July 9, but one of them featured an interloper in the form of Emily Blunt’s husband. “Linking up with my Oppenheimer cast mates…wait, is that a Krasinski photo bomb or might there be a surprise cameo???” Downey captioned his post.

    When it comes to movies from director Christopher Nolan, it’s always best to expect the unexpected, but it seems unlikely Krasinski will pop up in the film. Instead, he was most likely on hand to support Blunt, who plays a key role in the movie about J. Robert Oppenheimer, the man who led the Manhattan Project. Blunt joined Downey in the photos, alongside their fellow castmates Matt Damon and Cillian Murphy.

    Krasinski’s scene-stealing moment isn’t the only thing that caught the attention of Downey’s Instagram followers. Many of Murphy’s fans commented on the post to share how surprised they were to see the actor smiling. Over the years, Murphy has made a name for himself playing serious roles on TV (“Peaky Blinders”) and in film (“Oppenheimer,” “28 Days Later”). As a result, he rarely ever gets to break out a genuine grin on screen.

    “Cillian wasn’t just smiling, he’s wide smiling. this doesn’t feel right,” one commenter wrote. Another person wrote, “Never seen cillian this happy,” while YouTuber Brittany Broski added, “I am crying! How did you get Cillian to smile!”

    The answer to that question seems pretty simple: it was clearly due to Krasinski putting his years of pulling faces on “The Office” to good use in the background. Check out both cast photos below to see Krasinski’s expert photo-bombing skills in action, as well as a rare smile from Murphy.

    [ad_2]

    Sabienna Bowman

    Source link

  • Barbie, Baby!

    Barbie, Baby!

    [ad_1]

    Growing up as a girl, I played with all sorts of dolls: American Girl, Bratz, Polly Pocket, and of course, Barbies. I had the Dream House, the Dream Car, the color changing mermaid, and don’t forget about Ken. But as I aged, Barbie became a bit more problematic.

    Suddenly, we grew up and realized that Barbie wasn’t representing diversity (by any means) very well. She was dimensionally impossible, but she grew up as our role model! How could we spend our lives aspiring for blonde-haired, cinched-waisted, pink-loving Barbie if the girl selling the dream was unattainable?

    And then there were the controversial Barbies…1965 Slumber Party Barbie had a scale set to 110 pounds and a dieting book titled “How To Lose Weight” with the advice “Don’t Eat!” Not our role model promoting eating disorder culture!

    1965 Slumber Party Barbie

    Daily Mail

    Mattel was failing to realize that by making Barbie a doctor, lawyer, homeowner, extraordinaire, she truly was our role model as little girls. We were looking at these dolls potentially seeing what our future could look like. And if it meant being 110 pounds to have the Dream Car, that sends the opposite message.

    But there is no one I have more faith in than Greta Gerwig to do the injustices of Barbie justice. We have just under one month until Gerwig’s
    Barbie movie releases into theaters…on the same day as Christopher Nolan’s polar opposite Oppenheimer, which has started its own collection of memes for a double-header day.

    Barbie has already stolen the hearts of social media with perhaps the best marketing we’ve seen for a movie in a long time (barring the accidental chaos marketing of Don’t Worry Darling). We’ve gotten picturesque stills of BarbieLand, the Architectural Digest tour of the Dream House, hilarious trailers, and of course the iconic movie posters. The main message of the posters? Barbie (Margot Robbie) is everything, and he’s just Ken (Ryan Gosling).



    From the trailer we can tell that Barbie lives in her pink world with other Barbies and Kens, like Dua Lipa being Mermaid Barbie. But one day when Barbie throws her party (complete with synchronized dance and bespoke song), she lets a thought out:
    “Do you guys ever think about dying?” Party halts.

    Now that she’s contempating her mortality, things for Barbie become less than perfect: her heels touch the ground (gag) and she falls off her roof (gasp)..So she’s given a choice: return to her world (presented as a high heel) or go to the Real World and figure out what life’s really about (presented as a worn out Birkenstock). Unfortunately for Barbie, she has to choose the latter.

    In BarbieLand, she explains, “
    Basically everything men do in your world, women do in ours.” As for the Kens? “I honestly don’t know.” If you can tell the theme of this film so far, it’s that women are running the show.

    But what Greta Gerwig gets right with
    Barbie so far is that BarbieLand is impractical. In the Architectural Digest tour, Margot Robbie shows us how the pool is fake because there are no elements in Barbie’s world. She showers without water, has a fridge filled with decal food, and a lot, she admits with a laugh, is “not super practical, but nothing is for Barbie.”

    The success of the movie already is proving to be major. With Ryan Gosling’s fierce dedication to being Ken, you find it hard
    not to root for this movie in the box office. He’s given us quotes like “If you really cared about Ken, you would know that nobody cared about Ken” and coined the term “Ken-ergy.”

    On Jimmy Fallon, Gosling likened Ken to an un-cool accessory, saying that nobody really ever played with a Ken doll. “
    I was surprised how…some people were clutching their pearls about my Ken, as though they ever thought about Ken for a second. They never played with Ken! Nobody ever plays with Ken.”



    And we’ve already seen the blazing hot pink merchandise that has scattered stores. You can buy Barbie-inspired satin pillowcases, Barbie glassware, Barbie cookware. Our lives are suddenly immersed in our picturesque Barbie DreamWorld,
    but this time with a grown-up twist.

    We’re no longer emulating the Barbie look, per-se…but the Barbie Dream. It’s about female empowerment and uplifting others, becoming successful in your own way, and loving the color pink always. It’s more of the Barbie mindset than the Barbie body.

    With a star-studded cast consisting of Will Ferrell, Margot Robbie, Ryan Gosling, Simu Liu, Emma Mackey, Kate McKinnon, and more…and an equally studded soundtrack with features from Nicki Minaj and Ice Spice, Dua Lipa, Ava Max, Charli XCX, Khalid, Lizzo, etc. This movie radiates power.

    As a lover of all things pink, I’m here for the Barbie collabs. Here are my faves to get you ready for the movie of the summer:

    Kitsch x Barbie

    Homesick Barbie Dreamhouse Candle

    Barbie x Barbie

    Bloomingdales Barbie The Movie Popup Shop

    [ad_2]

    Jai Phillips

    Source link

  • What We Know So Far About Christopher Nolan’s ‘Oppenheimer’

    What We Know So Far About Christopher Nolan’s ‘Oppenheimer’

    [ad_1]

    The countdown is on for Cillian Murphy’s return to the silver screen as death, the destroyer of worlds, in Christopher Nolan’s much-awaited biopic Oppenheimer. The movie, in which Murphy stars alongside a star-studded cast composed of big names like Robert Downey, Jr., Emily Blunt, Matt Damon, and Florence Pugh (to name a few), is generating buzz because this is the celebrated director’s very first biographical film, and knowing his love for unconventional story-telling, with tons of twists and turns, the excitement is very much merited. Here is everything we know so far. 

    The Source Material and Nolan’s Relationship with Biopics

    1945 Portrait of J Robert Oppenheimer
    J. Robert Oppenheimer, taken in 1945 (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

    Oppenheimer is, of course, based on a true story and derives its material from the biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer called American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer written by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin. Published in 2005, the book won the  2006 Pulitzer Prize for Biography or Autobiography, as well as the 2008 Duff Cooper Prize. Its official synopsis reads as follows:

    “J. Robert Oppenheimer is one of the iconic figures of the twentieth century, a brilliant physicist who led the effort to build the atomic bomb for his country in a time of war, and who later found himself confronting the moral consequences of scientific progress. In this magisterial, acclaimed biography twenty-five years in the making, Kai Bird and Martin Sherwin capture Oppenheimer’s life and times, from his early career to his central role in the Cold War. This is biography and history at its finest, riveting and deeply informative.”

    In contrast, the film is being marketed as an “epic thriller” which, given Nolan’s background, feels more fitting. His Academy-nominated film Dunkirk, which depicted the miracle of the famous rescue mission on the beaches of France during the darkest hours of World War II, was told from three perspectives, and just like in the trailer of Oppenheimer, prominently featured a ticking clock—yet another detail Nolan is often fond of, time.

    Although this is technically Nolan’s first project focusing on a person’s life, he has on several occasions talked of having written a script that could have been a biopic on the eccentric billionaire and aviator, Howard Hughes. He described the ultimately junked screenplay as probably his best work but had decided to forgo the project after the release of Martin Scorsese and Leonardo DiCaprio’s The Aviator, which also centered on Hughes’ life. 

    The Plot

    Universal’s official summary describes the film as, “epic thriller that thrusts audiences into the pulse-pounding paradox of the enigmatic man who must risk destroying the world in order to save it.”

    As previously mentioned, Nolan is said to be basing the film on Bird and Sherwin’s book but will be adapting it himself. We can only assume that he will also most likely cover the events that transpired after the dropping of the bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as the infamous hearings that led to the revocation of Oppenheimer’s security clearance due to his ties to the Communist Party. 

    The Growing Ensemble Cast

    Matt Damon and Leslie Groves.
    (Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images for Deadline, MPI/Getty Images)

    We’ve previously broken down the film’s cast and their real-life counterparts, but there still remain several members with unnamed roles. These include Olivia Thirlby, Gary Oldman (who has previously worked with Nolan in Dark Knight as Commissioner Gordon and is confirmed to make a cameo), Tony Goldwyn, Alex Wolff, Matthias Schweighöfer, David Rysdahl, Jason Clarke, David Dastmalchian, Kenneth Branagh, Jack Quaid, Dane DeHaan, Rami Malek, and Alden Ehrenreich. Childstar Josh Peck will also be appearing as a scientist named Kenneth Bainbridge. 

    A First With Universal Pictures

    For the past two decades, Nolan’s films have always called Warner Bros. their home, but following a split during the pandemic, after issues with the release of Tenet, Oppenheimer will be opening under the banner of Universal Pictures. This is Nolan’s first film outside of the Warner Bros. lot since 2002. The decision came after Warner Bros. moved for all of its films to open in theaters on the same day they were released for streaming, a decision, according to Nolan, that had been made without any consultation.

    Familiar Faces 

    Like with his actors, Nolan is known for having a ready team he consistently works with in all of his projects. Some familiar names and faces that will be returning for Oppenheimer include Hoyte Van Hoytema for cinematography, Jennifer Lame for editing, and Ludwig Göransson for scoring (this will be his second project with Nolan, although one has to ask, where is Hans Zimmer?) Unsurprisingly, the film will be shot on both IMAX 65mm and 65mm large-format film, which were the same formats for both Tenet and Dunkirk

    Will It Be In Black and White?

    Nolan has played with black and white before with Following and Memento and, save for the explosions, Oppenheimer’s trailer is primarily in black and white as well. Perhaps it could be a girl-in-the-red-coat situation just like in Schindler’s List

    Teaser Trailer

    Now, the teaser trailer is probably one of the most interesting details about Oppenheimer so far. Released on July 28, the one-minute clip shows Cillian Murphy as the titular character getting ready before walking off with several journalists trailing behind him. A voiceover calls him the “most important man to have ever lived.” What makes this trailer interesting is that it literally set off a countdown. When you look it up on YouTube, it comes in the form of a stream that is counting down to the film’s premiere date, July 21, 2023, although some have pointed out that the clock actually runs out on July 16, 2023, which would be the 78th anniversary of Oppenheimer first calling for a test for the very first atomic bomb.  

    Official Poster

    The poster depicts Murphy in a sea of clouds and smoke with the words, “The world forever changes.” It was released just days before the teaser trailer. 

    The Trailer

    Much like its initial teaser trailer, Oppenheimer’s first full-length glimpse into the much-awaited film opens with a blaze. It gives us a quick look into the Los Alamos Laboratories—the heart of the Manhattan Project. The one-minute trailer provides a quick overview of the experiments and the creation of the atomic bomb itself. At the same time, Cillian Murphy’s J. Robert Oppenheimer ominously narrates in the background his qualms and reservations about what would be his legacy.

    “They won’t fear it until they understand it, and they won’t understand it until they’ve used it. I don’t know if we can be trusted with such a weapon,” he says in the voiceover. 

    Nolan himself has described his project as his most challenging one to date. Speaking exclusively with Total Film, the director shared his and his team’s extensive processes with Oppenheimer, particularly his love for practical effects. 

    “I think recreating the Trinity test [the first nuclear weapon detonation, [in New Mexico] without the use of computer graphics, was a huge challenge to take on. Andrew Jackson – my visual effects supervisor, I got him on board early on – was looking at how we could do a lot of the visual elements of the film practically, from representing quantum dynamics and quantum physics to the Trinity test itself, to recreating, with my team, Los Alamos up on a mesa in New Mexico in extraordinary weather, a lot of which was needed for the film, in terms of the very harsh conditions out there – there were huge practical challenges.” 

    Nolan is, of course, no stranger to practical filmmaking. For Tenet, he crashed an actual 747 into a building. There was also the truck flip in The Dark Knight and the detailed sets of Interstellar. One can only imagine what he and his team are brewing for Oppenheimer. We are definitely seated.

    Release Date

    Oppenheimer opens in theaters on July 21, 2023, just two weeks away from the anniversary of the Hiroshima bombing. 

    (featured image: Universal Pictures)

    The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    [ad_2]

    Danielle Baranda

    Source link