ReportWire

Tag: Ofcom

  • Ofcom launches formal investigation into X over Grok AI deepfakes – Tech Digest

    Share


    The UK’s media watchdog has launched a formal investigation into Elon Musk’s social media platform, X.

    Ofcom is examining whether the site failed in its legal duty to protect users from illegal content generated by its Grok AI chatbot. The probe follows a wave of deeply concerning reports that the tool was being used to create and share “undressed” images of people and sexualized depictions of children.

    The investigation was triggered after X failed to satisfy regulators during an urgent inquiry last week. Ofcom had set a firm deadline of Friday, 9 January, for the platform to explain its safeguards, but an expedited assessment of the evidence led to today’s escalation.

    Investigators will now determine if X violated the Online Safety Act by failing to prevent the spread of non-consensual intimate images and child sexual abuse material.

    “Reports of Grok being used to create and share illegal non-consensual intimate images and child sexual abuse material on X have been deeply concerning,” an Ofcom spokesperson said.

    “Platforms must protect people in the UK from content that’s illegal in the UK, and we won’t hesitate to investigate where we suspect companies are failing in their duties, especially where there’s a risk of harm to children.”

    The watchdog’s inquiry will specifically look at whether X performed adequate risk assessments before deploying Grok and if it used “highly effective age assurance” to keep minors away from pornography.

    Under the law, Ofcom has the power to issue massive fines of up to £18 million or 10% of X’s global revenue. In the most serious cases, the regulator can even apply for court orders to block access to the site in the UK.

    While government ministers have signalled they would support a ban if X refuses to comply, the move has been met with defiance from Elon Musk, who accused the UK of wanting to suppress free speech. Ofcom has stated it will progress the investigation as a matter of “the highest priority” to ensure the safety of UK users.

    More information here. 


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv


    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Grok restriction of ‘nudify’ feature to premium users an ‘insult to victims’, government claims – Tech Digest

    By moving these features behind a paywall, X creates a layer of accountability that experts say could deter malicious actors. Paying subscribers must have verified payment information on file, effectively removing the anonymity that often shields those generating abusive content.

    Furthermore, the restriction eliminates the ability for “troll” accounts or automated bots to perform mass-generation of “nudified” images for free. While it doesn’t physically prevent a paid user from attempting a harmful prompt, it forces them to attach their identity to the action.

    However, speaking on Friday, Downing Street said the move “simply turns an AI feature that allows the creation of unlawful images into a premium service”. The prime minister was “abundantly clear that X needs to act and needs to act now”, his spokesperson said.

    “It is time for X to grip this issue, if another media company had billboards in town centres showing unlawful images, it would act immediately to take them down or face public backlash,” they added.

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • UK government cracks down on cyberflashing with heavy fines for tech giants – Tech Digest

    Share

    The dating app Bumble has launched Private Detector, an AI-powered feature that automatically detects and blurs nudity in images sent within chat

    As of today (January 8th, 2026), the UK government has officially designated “cyberflashing” as a “priority offence” under the Online Safety Act, shifting the legal burden from victims to the tech companies themselves.

    Cyberflashing is the act of sending unsolicited sexual images (commonly referred to as ‘dick pics’) via social media, dating apps, Bluetooth, or data-sharing services. While the act was first criminalized in 2022, carrying a penalty of up to two years in prison for perpetrators, this new update to the law targets the platforms that facilitate the abuse.

    Under the new regulations, firms that fail to implement preventative measures could be fined up to 10% of their global annual revenue or face being blocked entirely in the UK.

    The move comes as a response to the staggering prevalence of digital harassment. Statistics show that one in three teenage girls and 40% of women aged 18 to 34 have been targeted by unsolicited sexual images. By making it a priority offence, the government is requiring tech firms to use proactive technology to stop these images before they ever reach a user’s inbox.

    Technology Secretary Liz Kendall stated that the government is “turning up the heat” on tech firms to ensure the internet is a space where women and girls can thrive. Jess Phillips, Minister for Safeguarding, added that the responsibility must lie with companies to block content rather than expecting women to “endure” the abuse.

    Some platforms have already begun to adapt. The dating app Bumble has pioneered the use of “Private Detector,” an AI-powered tool that automatically blurs suspected nudity. The recipient is then given the choice to view, block, or report the image.

    Ofcom is now set to consult on new codes of practice that will dictate the specific technical steps platforms must take. The crackdown is part of a broader government mission to halve violence against women and girls, signalling an end to the “lawless” era of the digital world.


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv


    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • Emmerdale under fire again as shocking April episode prompts viewer Ofcom complaints

    Emmerdale is facing another wave of Ofcom complaints following harrowing scenes involving April Windsor that aired last week.

    The episode has sparked fresh backlash, adding to the hundreds of complaints the soap has already received over the summer.

    April went through something awful (Credit: ITV)

    Ofcom complaints over April storyline in Emmerdale

    According to Ofcom, 60 viewers contacted the broadcasting regulator after the episode that aired on Thursday, October 30. While Ofcom has not confirmed which scenes triggered the objections, it is widely believed viewers were reacting to the disturbing storyline in which April was sold for sex by Celia Daniels.

    The episode showed April being sent to meet Callum, who had paid to be with her. Although he initially appeared sympathetic and told April she didn’t have to do anything she didn’t want to, his attitude quickly changed.

    Callum then told her it was going to happen and began unbuttoning his shirt. Terrified, April hit him over the head with a bottle, leaving him apparently dead on the bed.

    The following day, a panicked April called Ray. He came to collect the body and cover everything up. Celia then reinforced her control over April, telling her she “owns her” – a moment that viewers widely described as “repulsive.

    April believes she has killed a man, but viewers now know the truth. In Wednesday’s episode (November 5), Callum appeared alive, bandaged and complaining about what happened, but otherwise fine.


    Mike beat Vinny Dingle up and viewers complained (Credit: ITV)

    Other Emmerdale complaints

    This controversy follows a string of other complaints aimed at the soap over the summer. In an episode broadcast on August 12, Vinny Dingle was violently attacked in a homophobic assault by newcomer Mike, who had pretended to befriend him online.

    The brutal scenes, which aired before the watershed, drew 279 complaints. Viewers objected to violent and sexual content being shown so early.

    More trouble followed on August 21, when John Sugden hunted down Mackenzie Boyd with a bow and arrow. He then appeared to kill him by smashing a rock onto his head. These graphic scenes prompted a further 158 complaints.

    Emmerdale continues to court controversy as the April storyline intensifies, and with more unsettling episodes on the horizon, it seems Ofcom may not be done hearing from viewers just yet.

    Read more: Emmerdale shares first pic of Jason Donovan’s special episode 

    Emmerdale usually airs weeknights on ITV at 7.30pm, with an early release on ITVX at 7am.

    Leave us a comment on our Facebook page @EntertainmentDailyFix and let us know what you think!

    Carena Crawford

    Source link

  • UK regulator fines 4chan for ignoring Online Safety Act demands

    Ofcom has slapped 4chan with a £20,000 ($26,700) fine for failing to comply with the internet and telecommunications regulator’s request for information under the UK’s Online Safety Act of 2023. The regulator has released an update for 11 of the investigations it opened after the first of its online safety codes became enforceable in March this year. Apparently, 4chan has ignored its requests for a copy of its illegal harms risk assessment and to provide information about its qualifying worldwide revenue. This is the first fine Ofcom has handed down under the new law, which was designed to prevent children from accessing harmful content online and which has prompted websites like Reddit and X to put up age verification measures.

    When the regulator launch its probe into 4chan in June, it said it received complaints about illegal content on the anonymous online board. It doesn’t exactly come as a surprise that 4chan refuses to give the regulator information about the risks of illegal content on its website: Back in August, the service filed a lawsuit against Ofcom, arguing that the enforcement of the UK’s Online Safety Act violates Americans’ freedom of speech. “This fine is a clear warning to those who fail to remove illegal content or protect children from harmful material,” said Liz Kendall, the UK Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology. The regulator is also imposing an additional penalty of £100 ($133) per day on 4chan until it complies with its requests for information.

    Ofcom has announced the results of other investigations, as well, such as finding “serious compliance concerns” with two file-sharing services that have now deployed an automated tool that can detect and quickly remove uploads with child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Four other file-sharing services that were also under investigation for CSAM chose to geoblock access from UK IP addresses instead, so the regulator closed their cases.

    Mariella Moon

    Source link

  • Internet users are getting younger; now the UK is weighing up if AI can help protect them | TechCrunch

    Internet users are getting younger; now the UK is weighing up if AI can help protect them | TechCrunch

    Artificial intelligence has been in the crosshairs of governments concerned about how it might be misused for fraud, disinformation and other malicious online activity; now in the U.K. a regulator is preparing to explore how AI is used in the fight against some of the same, specifically as it relates to content harmful to children.

    Ofcom, the regulator charged with enforcing the U.K.’s Online Safety Act, announced that it plans to launch a consultation on how AI and other automated tools are used today, and can be used in the future, to proactively detect and remove illegal content online, specifically to protect children from harmful content and to identify child sex abuse material previously hard to detect.

    The tools would be part of a wider set of proposals Ofcom is putting together focused on online child safety. Consultations for the comprehensive proposals will start in the coming weeks with the AI consultation coming later this year, Ofcom said.

    Mark Bunting, a director in Ofcom’s Online Safety Group, says that its interest in AI is starting with a look at how well it’s used as a screening tool today.

    “Some services do already use those tools to identify and shield children from this content,” he said in an interview with TechCrunch. “But there isn’t much information about how accurate and effective those tools are. We want to look at ways in which we can ensure that industry is assessing [that] when they’re using them, making sure that risks to free expression and privacy are being managed.”

    One likely result will be Ofcom recommending how and what platforms should assess, which could potentially lead not only to the platforms adopting more sophisticated tooling, but potentially fines if they fail to deliver improvements either in blocking content, or creating better ways to keep younger users from seeing it.

    “As with a lot of online safety regulation, the responsibility sits with the firms to make sure that they’re taking appropriate steps and using appropriate tools to protect users,” he said.

    There will be both critics and supporters of the moves. AI researchers are finding ever-more sophisticated ways of using AI to detect, for example, deepfakes, as well as to verify users online. Yet there are just as many skeptics who note that AI detection is far from foolproof.

    Ofcom announced the consultation on AI tools at the same time it published its latest research into how children are engaging online in the U.K., which found that overall, there are more younger children connected up than ever before, so much so that Ofcom is now breaking out activity among ever-younger age brackets.

    Nearly one-quarter, 24%, of all 5- to 7-year-olds now own their own smartphones, and when you include tablets, the numbers go up to 76%, according to a survey of U.S. parents. That same age bracket is also using media a lot more on those devices: 65% have made voice and video calls (versus 59% just a year ago), and half of the kids (versus 39% a year ago) are watching streamed media.

    Age restrictions around some mainstream social media apps are getting lower, yet whatever the limits, in the U.K. they do not appear to be heeded anyway. Some 38% of 5- to 7-year-olds are using social media, Ofcom found. Meta’s WhatsApp, at 37%, is the most popular app among them. And in possibly the first instance of Meta’s flagship image app being relieved to be less popular than ByteDance’s viral sensation, TikTok was found to be used by 30% of 5- to 7-year-olds, with Instagram at “just” 22%. Discord rounded out the list but is significantly less popular at only 4%.

    Around one-third, 32%, of kids of this age are going online on their own, and 30% of parents said that they were fine with their underaged children having social media profiles. YouTube Kids remains the most popular network for younger users, at 48%.

    Gaming, a perennial favorite with children, has grown to be used by 41% of 5- to 7-year-olds, with 15% of kids of this age bracket playing shooter games.

    While 76% of parents surveyed said that they talked to their young children about staying safe online, there are question marks, Ofcom points out, between what a child sees and what that child might report. In researching older children aged 8-17, Ofcom interviewed them directly. It found that 32% of the kids reported that they’d seen worrying content online, but only 20% of their parents said they reported anything.

    Even accounting for some reporting inconsistencies, “The research suggests a disconnect between older children’s exposure to potentially harmful content online, and what they share with their parents about their online experiences,” Ofcom writes. And worrying content is just one challenge: deepfakes are also an issue. Among children aged 16-17, Ofcom said, 25% said they were not confident about distinguishing fake from real online.

    Ingrid Lunden

    Source link

  • BBC ‘Needs to Adapt or Risk Losing Trust of Audiences,’ Says Culture Secretary as U.K. Government Publishes Mid-Term Review

    BBC ‘Needs to Adapt or Risk Losing Trust of Audiences,’ Says Culture Secretary as U.K. Government Publishes Mid-Term Review

    The U.K. government is giving more power to the BBC and media regulator Ofcom to handle complaints as part of its mid-term review into the corporation’s functioning.

    The Royal Charter is the constitutional basis for the BBC. The current Charter began on Jan. 1 and ends on Dec. 31 2027. The U.K. government’s mid-term review of the Charter, which began in May, 2022, focused on governance and regulatory arrangements. 

    The review states that audiences will be given greater certainty that their complaints about BBC TV, radio and on demand content – including concerns about bias – are dealt with fairly, through greater scrutiny of its complaints process, which is to be made more independent from program makers. A new legally binding responsibility on the BBC board will require it to actively oversee the BBC’s complaints process to assure audiences that their concerns are being fairly considered. 

    In addition, Ofcom oversight will be extended to parts of the BBC’s online public services, including the BBC News website, to “enable Ofcom to hold the BBC to account in a more robust way,” the review says. Ofcom will be given a new legally binding responsibility to review more of the BBC’s complaints decisions.

    The review also stresses the need for the BBC to clearly demonstrate how it will meet its obligations on distinctiveness over the remainder of the Charter period, and for it to “meaningfully engage with its competitors, such as radio stations and local newspapers, when it is considering a change to its services.”

    Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer said: “The government wants to see a strong, independent BBC that can thrive in the years to come as a major contributor to the nation’s successful creative industries. In a rapidly changing media landscape the BBC needs to adapt or risk losing the trust of the audiences it relies on. Following constructive conservations with the BBC and Ofcom, we have recommended reforms that I believe will improve accountability while boosting public confidence in the BBC’s ability to be impartial and respond to concerns raised by licence fee payers.”

    “These changes will better set up the BBC to ask difficult questions of itself, and make sure Ofcom can continue to hold the broadcaster to account. We all rely on the BBC being the best it can be and this review will help ensure that is what the British public gets,” Frazer added.

    Responding to the review, a BBC spokesperson said: “No other organization takes its commitment to impartiality more seriously. We have well-established and detailed plans to sustain and further improve standards. We know this matters to audiences and the BBC continues to be the number one source for trusted news, with the highest scores for impartiality and accuracy.  

    “During discussions over the mid-term review, we proposed and implemented a number of reforms, including strengthening our complaints procedures, which now form part of the conclusions.  We are pleased the government has fully taken our proposals onboard. We remain committed to continuous improvement to ensure we deliver for all licence fee payers.

    “The BBC is operationally and editorially independent and we will continue to engage constructively with government, and our regulator Ofcom, over the second half of this Charter and as we look ahead to a new Charter in 2028.”

    Naman Ramachandran

    Source link

  • Sky Censured By Ofcom For Second Time In A Year Over Swearing, This Time On ‘Entourage’ Repeat

    Sky Censured By Ofcom For Second Time In A Year Over Swearing, This Time On ‘Entourage’ Repeat

    Sky has been rapped by Ofcom for the second time in the space of a year over swearing in one of its repeat shows, this time Entourage.

    Ofcom said a pre-watershed repeat of Entourage on the Sky Comedy channel in August failed to provide a mandatory pin code to protect under-18s, and the word “f***ing” was broadcast. Sky stressed that the word came very soon after the show started and it was pulled with just three minutes having elapsed.

    In the UK, Ofcom’s code requires that people under 18 are protected from “unsuitable material” in programs.

    Ofcom allows shows with sex, violence or swearing to air before the evening watershed as long as they are protected by a pin code. In this instance, the pin code failed and younger viewers were exposed to the swearword. Sky said it introduced two immediate changes to prevent a reoccurrence, which “add further fail-safe resilience into the process.”

    HBO smash comedy Entourage has been available as a Sky boxset for nearly a decade and is regularly repeated.

    ‘Game of Thrones’ incident

    Sky added that there is a “difference” between the Entourage incident and what happened with Game of Thrones last year, when a repeat of the mega-hit aired in the morning without a pin code and under-18s were able to easily access an episode “which contained multiple use of offensive language including ‘c**t’, ‘f**ck’ and ‘s**t’.”

    The Entourage error, Sky said, was due to a fault with the “EPG meta data that activates the PIN demand on some of our Sky Platforms, not an ‘excess of data’ in the system.” It stressed that Game of Thrones and Entourage are the only two breaches out of 23,000 hours worth of similar content broadcast since the introduction of the pin code in 2020.

    Ofcom took into account Sky’s pulling of the Entourage repeat almost immediately after the swearword along with its attempts since to protect viewers from future slip-ups. However, the regulator still found the pay-TV giant to be in breach of its code.

    A recent Ofcom report found that viewers main fears around profane content center on the need to protect children, rather than any impact these shows can have on individual adults.

    Max Goldbart

    Source link

  • I'm A Celebrity fans threaten to call Ofcom over Nella Rose staying as they ask ITV to share breakdown of results

    I'm A Celebrity fans threaten to call Ofcom over Nella Rose staying as they ask ITV to share breakdown of results

    I’m A Celebrity fans have threaten to contact the broadcasting regulator over campmate Nella Rose not leaving the jungle.

    Narked Nella detractors fumed on Sunday (December 3) evening as Frankie Dettori (read his ED! profile here) was the first celebrity campmate to be voted off the 2023 series.

    Rattled viewers who wanted to see Nella go claimed the result was a “fix” – and demanded an investigation.

    There were also calls ITV to release the “proper results” amid mocking posts from other users slamming the “embarrassing” behaviour of those knocking Nella.

    Nella Rose and Frankie Dettori wait to hear who is first out of I’m A Celebrity 2023 (Credit: ITV)

    I’m A Celebrity news: Nella survives vote off

    YouTuber Nella had been tipped by the bookies as the favourite to depart ITV’s reality show Down Under.

    That came as she was exempted from a fourth challenge over the weekend. However, Nella was selected for yet another Bushtucker Trial, and took part in the Fright at the Museum, winning nine stars.

    Nonetheless, when it came to between her and Frankie in the vote to send someone home, Nella survived – much to the chagrin of those fans of the show who have made it clear they’re not supporters of Nella.

    I'm A Celebrity campmate Nella Rose hugs Frankie Dettori
    I’m A Celebrity campmate Nella Rose hugs Frankie Dettori after it is confirmed he’s on his way (Credit: ITV)

    Viewer complaints to Ofcom

    One person tweeted: “Dear @Ofcom can we see the proper results from @itv @imacelebrity first vote off?”

    This provoked a response from someone else on the platform, who emphasised their point with crying emojis.

    They quote-tweeted the original poster, adding: “This is so embarrassing. Ofcom don’t give a [blank].”

    Not people filing Ofcom complaints.

    Additionally, another post scoffed: “Not people filing Ofcom complaints. Actually stay mad lol #ImaCeleb.”

    ED! has approached a representative for I’m A Celebrity for comment.

    ‘I’ll be reporting to Ofcom and they can investigate!’

    Furthermore, other users who believe approaching Ofcom is appropriate for their concerns also mentioned Nella’s name online in connection with the communications regulator.

    Additionally, someone else wrote: “Wouldn’t surprise me Nella and Nigel in final. IF Nella wins I’ll be reporting to Ofcom and they can investigate!”

    “@Ofcom have to investigate the numbers here because I’ve never thought it before but Nella not being out first as a definite sign of a fix,” claimed another incredulous viewer.

    Additionally, another seethed: “I think this was a fix tonight and needs looking into. I didn’t give her any votes nor did my son. So that’s 10 Nella lost in one household. Would love Freedom of Information Act to look into the voting, or Ofcom.”

    Meanwhile someone else sighed: “People making complaints to Ofcom about Nella Rose. Seriously does the UK know what Ofcom is about? Stop wasting their time over nonsense, they have more important things to consider.”

    Read more: I’m A Celebrity’s Ant and Dec deny show is fixed

    I’m A Celebrity 2023 continues on ITV tonight, Monday December 4, at 9pm.

    Meanwhile, leave us a comment on our Facebook page @EntertainmentDailyFix and let us know what you think of this story.

    Robert Leigh

    Source link