ReportWire

Tag: NVIDIA Corp

  • Nasdaq is making a big change to its most popular index. Here’s how it might impact your portfolio.

    Nasdaq is making a big change to its most popular index. Here’s how it might impact your portfolio.

    Big Tech has gotten too big for Nasdaq’s liking.

    So the exchange has decided to make some changes to the Nasdaq 100 index, its most popular index, according to company representatives, ostensibly to diminish the concentration risk that accompanies having an index that derives more than half of its value from just seven companies.

    Nasdaq announced late last week that the Nasdaq 100
    NDX,
    +1.24%

    will undergo a special rebalancing that will take effect prior to the market open on July 24. It’s only the third time that Nasdaq has announced such an impromptu rejiggering of how much individual stocks contribute to the index. Although Nasdaq can also reconstitute the index regularly every December, and there’s also a mechanism to rebalance every quarter as well.

    In a statement announcing the move, the exchange alluded to the fact that the largest companies in the technology sector have too much sway over the index’s price. Nasdaq said special rebalancing can be implemented “to address overconcentration in the index by redistributing the weights.”

    The rebalancing comes at a critical time. The Nasdaq 100 has risen 40% since the start of 2023, largely thanks to the “Magnificent Seven,” a handful of megacap technology names that have powered much of the U.S. stock market’s rally this year.

    These gains have pushed the index to its highest level since mid-January 2022, meaning that Big Tech has now retraced nearly all of last year’s losses, and might soon be headed for the all-time highs from November 2021.

    As of Thursday, the Magnificent Seven stocks — Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    +3.53%
    ,
    Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    +0.90%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +1.42%
    ,
    Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    +1.57%
    ,
    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    +0.82%
    ,
    Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +3.70%

    and Alphabet Inc.’s Class A
    GOOGL,
    +1.53%

    and Class C
    GOOG,
    +1.62%

    shares — accounted for 55% of the Nasdaq 100’s market capitalization, while the top five names account for more than 45%.

    According to Nasdaq’s official methodology, the goal is to keep the aggregate weighting of the biggest stocks below 40%. In fact, it’s possible that Tesla Inc. surpassing 4.5% of the index earlier this month triggered the Nasdaq’s rebalancing announcement, according to analysts from UBS Group AG
    UBS,
    +1.87%
    .

    Exactly how it plans to accomplish this isn’t yet known. Nasdaq said the new weighting scheme will be unveiled on Friday, likely after the U.S. market close. But the UBS team has an educated guess.

    “The quarterly reviews would dictate that the aggregate weight to securities exceeding 4.5% be set to 40%. If that’s the approach Nasdaq takes, then we’d expect the weights of Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Alphabet, Amazon, and Tesla to be reduced,” the team said in a note shared with MarketWatch.

    For investors trying to anticipate how this might impact their portfolios, here the answers to a few key questions.

    Could the rebalancing kill the U.S. stock market rally?

    Not likely. Or rather: if the rally in Big Tech does falter, history suggests it won’t be because of the rebalancing.

    Here’s more on that from Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, who discussed the topic in commentary emailed to MarketWatch on Wednesday.

    “…[T]here is the natural inclination to think that the upcoming special reweighting is a sign that large cap disruptive tech is set to roll over because a handful of names have so handily outpaced the rest of its notional peers,” Colas said.

    “History suggests otherwise. The last 2 one-off reweights were in 2011 and 1998. Neither proved to be the end of a Nasdaq 100/tech stock bull market. Not even close, really.”

    More immediately, ETF experts expect trading around the rebalancing will be relatively muted.

    “While it sounds scary, Investors are well positioned — this has been well bantered about,” said David Lutz, head of ETF Trading at Jones Trading, in comments emailed to MarketWatch.

    How could this benefit investors?

    Since megacap technology stocks don’t pay much, if anything, in dividends, the rebalancing could increase the amount of dividends that ETF investors receive each year, according to a team of analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co.

    Since the largest constituents pay a dividend yield well below the index average, the redistribution of weight from them to the rest of the index will result in a “meaningful boost” to the regular payouts received by investors, which will boost the total return of Nasdaq 100-tracking ETFs and mutual funds.

    Will there be any short-term costs associated with the rebalancing?

    There might be. Since the new index weightings will be announced in advance, investors will have plenty of time to front-run the rebalancing trade.

    Still, there are plenty of hedge funds and proprietary trading firms that run strategies explicitly designed to profit from rebalancing. These firms profits have to come from somewhere, and the logical place would be the fund managers of the Invesco QQQ exchange-traded fund
    QQQ,
    +1.26%

    QQQM,
    +1.27%
    .

    “There are prop traders and hedge funds that run the strategy of providing liquidity to indexes with the expectation that they’ll earn profits,” said Roni Israelov, president and CIO at Wealth Manager NDVR, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    “if they are earning profits by providing that liquidity, the expectation is those profits are being paid by investors in those funds.”

    So far at least, markets appear to have taken news of the rebalancing in stride. Megacap technology names tumbled earlier this week, but they’ve since recouped those losses and then some.

    The Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +1.15%
    ,
    another Nasdaq index that isn’t quite as heavily weighted toward Big Tech, rose 1.2% to 13,918.96.

    Source link

  • Forget the hype: Barclays identifies global ‘A.I. winners’ for the long term

    Forget the hype: Barclays identifies global ‘A.I. winners’ for the long term

    Source link

  • How to enjoy retirement without busting your budget

    How to enjoy retirement without busting your budget

    The goal of many (or most) savers and long-term investors is to achieve financial independence. The combination of building up a nest egg, paying down debt and eventually receiving Social Security payments or another source of retirement income might put you in a comfortable position, but even people who have worked together to achieve financial independence may disagree on what to do after their careers end.

    Quentin Fottrell — the Moneyist — heard from one couple who are facing a quandary. They have been financially responsible, but as they near retirement, the wife wishes to be very careful with their combined investment portfolio, while the husband wants to begin spending a significant portion of it. They both make reasonable arguments. Here’s what they should do.

    From the Help Me Retire column: My 57-year-old husband works three shifts and is burned out. Can he retire?

    You have to get there first

    A behavioral study finds a correlation between having one specific type of conversation and taking action to build wealth.


    Getty Images

    Doing this even once might help encourage you or someone you know to begin saving and investing for the long term.

    The ‘Magnificent Seven’ stocks may not remain at the top

    Salesforce is among the companies passing a Goldman Sachs screen for growth of sales and earnings.


    Getty Images

    Even an index that includes hundreds of stocks can be heavily concentrated. Large technology-oriented companies have led this year’s 16% rebound for the S&P 500
    SPX,
    -0.29%
    ,
    following last year’s 18% decline (both with dividends reinvested). But the index is weighted by market capitalization, which means the “Magnificent Seven” — Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    -0.59%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    -1.19%
    ,
    two common share classes of Alphabet Inc.
    GOOGL,
    -0.52%

    GOOG,
    -0.65%
    ,
    Amazon.com Inc.
    AMZN,
    +1.11%
    ,
    Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    +0.95%
    ,
    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -0.76%

    and Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    -0.50%

    — make up 27.9% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY,
    -0.25%
    .

    In the Need to Know column, Barbara Kollmeyer lists companies that might turn out to be among the next Magnificent Seven, based on a Goldman Sachs screen.

    Getting back to the current Magnificent Seven, you may be surprised to see which of the stocks is cheapest — by far — per one commonly used valuation metric.

    Related: Top investment newsletters aren’t bullish on tech, Tesla or Meta Platforms. Here’s what they do like.

    A thrill ride for EV makers

    An electric Rivian R1S.


    Rivian

    There has been a lot of news in the electric-vehicle space this week. Here are lists of coverage organized by topic.

    Rising unit sales among EV makers:

    Legacy automakers report sales increases, including a tremendous increase in EV unit sales for Ford
    F,

    :

    Reaction from analysts and investors:

    In other news, Mullen Automotive Inc.
    MULN,
    -12.97%

    has started to deliver electric vehicles. Further developments for the company this week included the announcement of a stock-buyback plan and possible action against naked short sellers.

    A changing job market

    The employment numbers for June from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics showed the lowest level of job creation since late 2020. Then again, the demand for labor in the U.S. remains high, despite the Federal Reserve’s efforts to slow economic growth.

    If you are looking to make a career change, what does all this mean to you? Andrew Keshner points to a development in the employment market that may have you thinking twice about jumping ship.

    Threads and Twitter

    Meta’s Threads app has signed up as many as 50 million users in its first two days of operation, some reports say.


    AFP via Getty Images

    Meta rolled out its new Threads service on Wednesday to compete directly with Twitter and has already signed up 50 million users, according to some reports.

    Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino was quick to respond.

    More reaction:

    Consumer spending may spike

    U.S. shoppers have been taking it slow during a period of high inflation, but the overall economy has been stronger than expected even as the Federal Reserve continues tightening its monetary policy.

    The coming flurry of July sales events at Amazon, Walmart Inc.
    WMT,
    -2.30%

    and Target Corp.
    TGT,
    -0.60%

    could signal a turnaround for consumers, as James Rogers reports.

    Financial crime

    Lukas I. Alpert writes the Financial Crime column. Have you ever wondered how you might steal a lot of cash from a company that is likely to have rather tight accounting controls in place? This week Alpert explains how the manager of an Amazon warehouse managed to scale the heights of criminal achievement to collect $10 million — and a 16-year jail sentence.

    Also read: Silver dealer ordered to pay $146 million in case of 500,000 missing coins

    Want more from MarketWatch? Sign up for this and other newsletters to get the latest news and advice on personal finance and investing.

    Source link

  • Tech IPO drought reaches 18 months despite Nasdaq’s sharp rebound in first half of 2023

    Tech IPO drought reaches 18 months despite Nasdaq’s sharp rebound in first half of 2023

    Karl-Josef Hildenbrand | AFP | Getty Images

    Car-sharing service Turo filed its IPO prospectus in January 2022. A month earlier, Reddit said it submitted a draft registration for a public offering. Instacart’s confidential paperwork was filed in May of last year.

    None of them have hit the market yet.

    Despite a bloated pipeline of companies waiting to go public and a rebound in tech stocks that pushed the Nasdaq up 30% in the first half of 2023, the IPO drought continues. There hasn’t been a notable venture-backed tech initial public offering in the U.S. since December 2021, when software vendor HashiCorp debuted on the Nasdaq.

    Across all industries, only 10 companies raised $100 million or more in U.S. initial share sales in the first six months of the year, according to FactSet. During the same stretch in 2021, there were 517 such transactions, highlighted by billion-dollar-plus IPOs from companies including dating site Bumble, online lender Affirm, and software developers UiPath and SentinelOne.

    As the second half of 2023 gets underway, investors and bankers aren’t expecting much champagne popping for the rest of the year.

    Many once high-flying companies are still hanging onto their old valuations, failing to reconcile with a new reality after a brutal 2022. Additionally, muted economic growth has led businesses and consumers to cut costs and delay software purchases, which is making it particularly difficult for companies to comfortably forecast the next couple of quarters. Wall Street likes predictability.

    So if you’re waiting on a splashy debut from design software maker Canva, ticket site StubHub or data management company Databricks, be patient.

    “There’s a disconnect between valuations in 2021 and valuations today, and that’s a hard pill to swallow,” said Lise Buyer, founder of IPO consultancy Class V Group in Portola Valley, California. “There will be incremental activity after a period of absolute radio silence but it isn’t like companies are racing to get out the door.”

    The public markets tell an uneven story. This year’s rally has brought the Nasdaq to within 15% of its record from late 2021, while an index of cloud stocks is still off by roughly 50%.

    Some signs of optimism popped up this month as Mediterranean restaurant chain Cava went public on the New York Stock Exchange. The stock more than doubled on its first day of trading, indicating high demand from retail investors. Buyer noted that institutions were also enthused about the deal.

    Last Friday, Israeli beauty and tech company Oddity, which runs the Il Makiage and Spoiled Child brands, filed to go public on the Nasdaq.

    That all comes after a big month for secondary offerings. According to data from Goldman Sachs, May was the busiest month for public stock sales since November 2021, driven by a jump in follow-on deals.

    Apple, Nvidia outperform

    While investors are craving new names, they’re much more discerning when it comes to technology than they were at the tail end of the decade-long bull market.

    Mega-cap stocks Apple and Nvidia have seen outsized gains this year and are back to trading near all-time highs, boosting the Nasdaq because of their hefty weightings in the index. But the advances are not evenly spread across the industry.

    In particular, investors who bet on less mature businesses are still hurting. The companies that held the seven-biggest tech IPOs in the U.S. in 2021 have lost at least 40% of their value since their debut. Coinbase, which went public through a direct listing, is down more than 80%.

    That year’s IPO class featured high-growth businesses with even higher cash burn, an equation that worked fine until recession concerns and rising interest rates pushed investors into assets better positioned to withstand an economic slowdown and increased capital costs.

    Employees of Coinbase Global Inc, the biggest U.S. cryptocurrency exchange, watch as their listing is displayed on the Nasdaq MarketSite jumbotron at Times Square in New York, April 14, 2021.

    Shannon Stapleton | Reuters

    Bankers and investors tell CNBC that optimism is picking up, but ongoing economic concerns and the valuation overhang from the pre-2022 era set the stage for a quiet second half for tech IPOs.

    One added challenge is that fixed income alternatives are back. Following a lengthy stretch of near-zero interest rates, the Federal Reserve this year lifted its target rate to between 5% and 5.25%. Parking money in short-term Treasurys, certificates of deposit and high-yield savings offerings can now generate annual returns of 5% or more.

    “Interest rates are not only about the cost of financing, but also getting investors to trade out of 5% risk-free returns,” said Jake Dollarhide, CEO of Longbow Asset Management. “You can make 15%-20% in the stock market but lose 15%-20%.”

    Dollarhide, whose firm has invested in milestone tech offerings like Google and Facebook, says IPOs are important. They offer more opportunities for money managers, and they generate profits for the tech ecosystem that help fund the next generation of innovative companies.

    But he understands why there’s skepticism about the window reopening. Perhaps the biggest recent bust in tech investing followed the boom in special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), which brought scores of less mature companies to the public market through reverse mergers.

    Names like Opendoor, Clover Health, 23andMe and Desktop Metal have lost more than 80% of their value since hitting the market via SPAC.

    “It seems the foul odor of failure from the 2021 SPAC craze has spoiled the appetite from investors seeking IPOs,” Dollarhide said. “I think that’s done some harm to the traditional IPO market.”

    Private markets have felt the impact. Venture funding slowed dramatically last year from record levels and has stayed relatively suppressed, outside of the red-hot area of artificial intelligence. Companies have been forced to cut staff and close offices in order to preserve cash and right-size their business

    Pre-IPO companies like Stripe, Canva and Klarna have taken huge hits to their valuations, either through internal measures or markdowns from outside investors.

    The waiting game

    Few have been hit as hard as Instacart, which has repeatedly slashed its valuation, from a peak of $39 billion to as low as $10 billion in late 2022. Last year, the company confidentially registered for an IPO, but still hasn’t filed publicly and doesn’t have immediate plans to do so.

    Similarly, Reddit said in December 2021 that it had confidentially submitted a draft registration statement to go public. That was before the online ad market took a dive, with Facebook suffering through three straight quarters of declining revenue and Google’s ad sales also slipping.

    Now Reddit is in the midst of a business model shift, moving its focus beyond ads and toward generating revenue from third-party developers for the use of its data. But that change sparked a protest this month across a wide swath of Reddit’s most popular communities, leaving the company with plenty to sort through before it can sell itself to the public.

    A Reddit spokesperson declined to comment.

    Thousands of Reddit pages go dark in protest over company's new third-party app policy

    Turo was so close to an IPO that it went beyond a confidential filing and published its full S-1 registration statement in January 2022. When stocks sold off, the offering was indefinitely delayed. To avoid withdrawing its filing, the company has to continue updating its quarterly results.

    Like Instacart, Turo operates in the sharing economy, a dark spot for investors last year. Airbnb, Uber and DoorDash have all bounced back in 2023, but they’ve also instituted significant job cuts. Turo has gone in the opposite direction, more than doubling its full-time head count to 868 at the end of March from 429 at the time of its original IPO filing in 2021, according to its latest filing. The company reportedly laid off about 30% of its staff in 2020, during the Covid pandemic.

    Turo and Instacart could still go public by year-end if market conditions continue to improve, according to sources familiar with the companies who asked not to be named because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

    Byron Deeter, a cloud software investor at Bessemer Venture Partners, doesn’t expect any notable activity this year, and says the next crop of companies to debut will most likely wait until after showing their first-quarter results in 2024.

    “The companies that were on file or were considering going out a little over a year ago, they’ve pulled, stopped updating, and overwhelmingly have no plans to refile this calendar year,” said Deeter, whose investments include Twilio and HashiCorp. “We’re 10 months from the real activity picking up,” Deeter said, adding that uncertainty around next year’s presidential election could lead to further delays.

    In the absence of IPOs, startups have to consider the fate of their employees, many of whom have a large amount of their net worth tied up in their company’s equity, and have been waiting years for a chance to sell some of it.

    Stripe addressed the issue in March, announcing that investors would buy $6.5 billion worth of employee shares. The move lowered the payment company’s valuation to about $50 billion from a high of $95 billion. Deeter said many late-stage companies are looking at similar transactions, which typically involve allowing employees to sell around 20% of their vested stock.

    He said his inbox fills up daily with brokers trying to “schlep little blocks of shares” from employees at late-stage startups.

    “The Stripe problem is real and the general liquidity problem is real,” Deeter said. “Employees are agitating for some path to liquidity. With the public market still pretty closed, they’re asking for alternatives.”

    G Squared is one of the venture firms active in buying up employee equity. Larry Aschebrook, the firm’s founder, said about 60% of G Squared’s capital goes to secondary purchases, helping companies provide some level of liquidity to staffers.

    Aschebrook said in an interview that transactions started to pick up in the second quarter of last year and continued to increase to the point where “now it’s overwhelming.” Companies and their employees have gotten more realistic about the market reset, so significant chunks of equity can now be purchased for 50% to 70% below valuations from 2021 financing rounds, he said.

    Because of nondisclosure agreements, Aschebrook said he couldn’t name any private company shares he’s purchased of late, but he said his firm previously bought pre-IPO secondary stock in Pinterest, Coursera, Spotify and Airbnb.

    “Right now there’s a significant need for that release of pressure,” Aschebrook said. “We’re assisting companies with elongating their private lifecycle and solving problems presented by staying private longer.”

    WATCH: The private market index is trading up for the first time in two years

    Forge Global CEO: The private market index is trading up for the first time in two years

    Source link

  • Tech stocks close out best first half in 40 years, powered by Apple rally and Nvidia boom

    Tech stocks close out best first half in 40 years, powered by Apple rally and Nvidia boom

    Apple CEO Tim Cook stands next to the new Apple Vision Pro headset is displayed during the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference on June 05, 2023 in Cupertino, California.

    Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

    The last time technology stocks had a better first half, Apple was touting its Lisa desktop computer, IBM was the most-valuable tech company in the U.S. and Mark Zuckerberg hadn’t been born.

    On Friday, the Nasdaq wrapped up the first six months of the year with a 1.5% rally, bringing its gains so far for 2023 to 32%. That’s the sharpest first-half jump in the tech-heavy index since 1983, when the Nasdaq rose 37%.

    It’s a startling achievement, given what’s happened in the tech industry over the past four decades. Microsoft went public in 1986, sparking a PC software boom. Then came the internet browsers of the 1990s, leading up to the dot-com bubble years and the soaring prices of e-commerce, search and computer-networking stocks. The past decade saw the emergence of the mega-cap, trillion-dollar companies, which are now the most valuable enterprises in the U.S.

    While those prior eras featured sustained rallies, none of them had a start to the year rivaling 2023.

    Even more stunning, it’s happening this year while the U.S. economy is still at risk of slipping into recession and reckoning with a banking crisis, highlighted by the collapse in March of Silicon Valley Bank, the financial nucleus for much of the venture and startup world. The Federal Reserve also steadily increased its benchmark interest rate to the highest since 2007.

    But momentum is always a driver when it comes to tech, and investors are notoriously fearful of missing out, even if they simultaneously worry about frothy valuations.

    Coming off a miserable 2022, in which the Nasdaq lost one-third of its value, the big story was cost-cutting and efficiency. Mass layoffs at Alphabet, Meta and Amazon as well as at numerous smaller companies paved the way for a rebound in earnings and a more realistic outlook for growth.

    Meta and Tesla, which both got hammered last year, have more than doubled in value so far in 2023. Alphabet is up 36% after dropping 39% in 2022.

    None of those companies were around the last time the Nasdaq had a better start to the year. Meta CEO Zuckerberg, who created the company formerly known as Facebook in 2004, was born in 1984. Tesla was founded in 2003, five years after Google, the predecessor to Alphabet.

    As 2023 got going, attention turned to artificial intelligence and a flood of activity around generative AI chatbots, which respond to text-based queries with intelligent and conversational responses. Microsoft-backed OpenAI has become a household name (and was No. 1 on CNBC’s Disruptor 50 list) with its ChatGPT program, and dollars are pouring into Nvidia, whose chips are used to power AI workloads at many of the companies taking advantage of the latest advancements.

    Nvidia shares soared 190% in the first half, lifting the 30-year-old company’s market cap past $1 trillion.

    “I think you’re going to continue to see tech dominate because we’re still all abuzz about AI,” said Bryn Talkington, managing partner at Requisite Capital Management, in an interview with CNBC’s “Closing Bell” on Thursday.

    Talkington, whose firm holds Nvidia shares, said the chipmaker has a unique story, and that its growth is not shared across the industry. Rather, large companies working on AI have to spend heavily on Nvidia’s technology.

    “Nvidia not only owns the shovels and axes of this AI goldrush,” Talkington said. “They actually are the only hardware store in town.”

    Remember the $10,000 Lisa?

    Apple hasn’t seen gains quite so dramatic, but the stock is still up 50% this year, trading at a record and pushing the iPhone maker to a $3 trillion market cap.

    Apple still counts on the iPhone for the bulk of its revenue, but its latest jump into virtual reality with the announcement this month of the Vision Pro headset has helped reinvigorate investor enthusiasm. It was Apple’s first major product release since 2014, and will be available starting at $3,499 beginning early next year.

    That sounds like a lot, except when compared to the price tag for the initial Lisa computer, which Apple rolled out 40 years ago. That PC, named after co-founder Steve Jobs’ daughter, started at $10,000, keeping it far out of the hands of mainstream consumers.

    Apple’s revenue in 1983 was roughly $1 billion, or about the amount of money the company brought in on an average day in the first quarter of 2023 (Apple’s fiscal second quarter).

    Tech was the clear story for the equity markets in the first half, as the broader S&P 500 notched a 16% gain and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose just 2.9%.

    Investors searching for red flags heading into the second half don’t have to look far.

    Global economic concerns persist, highlighted by uncertainty surrounding the war in Russia and Ukraine and ongoing trade tensions with China. Short-term interest rates are now above 5%, meaning investors can get risk-free returns in the mid-single digits from certificates of deposit and high-yield savings accounts.

    Another sign of skepticism is the absence of a tech IPO market, as emerging companies continue to sit on the sidelines despite brewing enthusiasm across the industry. There hasn’t been a notable venture capital-backed tech IPO in the U.S. since late 2021, and investors and bankers tell CNBC that the second half of the year is poised to remain quiet, as companies wait for better predictability in their numbers.

    Jim Tierney, chief investment officer of U.S. concentrated growth at AllianceBernstein, told CNBC’s “Power Lunch” on Friday that there are plenty of challenges for investors to consider. Like Talkington, he’s unsure how much of a boost the broader corporate world is seeing from AI at the moment.

    “Getting to AI specifically, I think we have to see benefit for all companies,” Tierney said. “That will come, I’m just not sure that’s going to happen in the second half of this year.”

    Meanwhile, economic data is mixed. A survey earlier this month from CNBC and Morning Consult found that 92% of Americans are cutting back on spending as inflationary pressures persist.

    “The fundamentals get tougher,” Tierney said. “You look at consumer spending today, the consumer is pulling back. All of that suggests that the fundamentals are more stretched here than not.”

    WATCH: CNBC’s full interview with Ron Insana and Jim Tierney

    Watch CNBC's full interview with Contrast Capital's Ron Insana and Alliance Bernstein's Jim Tierney

    Source link

  • The tiny government agency behind a Chinese A.I. chip ban that’s weighing on Nvidia

    The tiny government agency behind a Chinese A.I. chip ban that’s weighing on Nvidia

    Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo testifies before a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., Feb. 1, 2022.

    Andrew Harnik | Reuters

    As reports swirl about potential U.S. limits on semiconductor exports to China, a small division within the sprawling U.S. Department of Commerce is taking on an outsize role.

    The Bureau of Industry and Security was described by Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo in 2021 as the “small but mighty” agency at the center of federal national security efforts. That’s especially true now, with President Joe Biden considering stricter controls on the export of powerful artificial intelligence computing chips to the world’s second-largest economy.

    The BIS is responsible for implementing the U.S. export control regime, preventing critical high-tech and defense products from getting into the hands of the wrong companies or governments. The decisions made by the BIS about who can and can’t access U.S. technology can have a major effect on corporate bottom lines.

    Chipmakers have already taken a hit as a result of BIS-imposed restrictions. In 2022, the BIS warned Nvidia that new licensing requirements precluded the export of the company’s advanced A100 and H100 chips to China without obtaining a license from the Commerce Department, part of the Biden administration’s sweeping effort to curb Chinese technological advancement.

    Nvidia warned in August 2022 that about $400 million in potential Chinese sales would be lost unless customers purchased “alternative product offerings.” Just a few months later, Nvidia began to offer a watered-down version of its flagship AI chip for the Chinese market. Dubbed the A800, its lower-end specifications exempted it from Commerce Department licensing requirements.

    But The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that even the less-powerful Nvidia offering could be restricted from export at the direction of President Biden. The BIS declined to comment on a potential tightening of export controls. Nvidia shares, which have soared 180% this year largely on AI hype, fell 2% after the WSJ story.

    Through its Commerce Control List, the BIS can define which product specifications require licenses to be sold overseas. The criteria can be so specific that only a handful of commercially available items apply.

    While the Commerce Control List isn’t intended to single out any one vendor, there are very few companies that develop the kind of high-octane processors that power AI models. Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices lead that group.

    If an export restriction were implemented, those companies would be responsible for ensuring their high-tech processors don’t end up in the Chinese markets.

    In one high-profile enforcement case, the BIS took aim at hard drive manufacturer Seagate over the company’s decision to continue supplying Huawei after the Chinese company was blacklisted in 2020. Seagate was fined $300 million by the government. But the financial effect was much greater, as Seagate had a $1.1 billion business in China.

    WATCH: Geopolitical tensions will benefit Korean memory makers

    Source link

  • How stocks reacted to Fed chief’s comments and why Nvidia trimmed most of its losses

    How stocks reacted to Fed chief’s comments and why Nvidia trimmed most of its losses

    Source link

  • What the potential U.S. ban of A.I. chips to China could mean for Nvidia

    What the potential U.S. ban of A.I. chips to China could mean for Nvidia

    Source link

  • A.I. is not all hype. It’s the ‘fourth industrial revolution playing out,’ says Wedbush’s Dan Ives

    A.I. is not all hype. It’s the ‘fourth industrial revolution playing out,’ says Wedbush’s Dan Ives

    Generative artificial intelligence is all the rage now but the AI boom is not just all hype, said Dan Ives from Wedbush Securities, who calls it the “fourth industrial revolution playing out.”

    “This is something I call a 1995 moment, parallel with the internet. I do not believe that this is a hype cycle,” the managing director and senior equity research analyst told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Asia” on Wednesday.

    The fourth industrial revolution refers to how technological advancements like artificial intelligence, autonomous vehicles and the internet of things are changing the way humans live, work and relate to one another.

    “I think this is really transformational changes to technology that I think would change the tech space for the next 20-30 years,” said Ives. “I think we are just starting what we believe is the start of a new tech bull market, despite many of the bears continuing to really being skeptical.”

    Adoption of AI technology surged after ChatGPT — OpenAI’s viral chatbot — went viral due to its ability to generate humanlike responses to users’ prompts, which amazed researchers and the general public.

    Read more about tech and crypto from CNBC Pro

    “I think it really comes down to the guidance heard around the world with Nvidia’s $4 billion guidance range. I think that’s the tip of the iceberg,” he said.

    U.S. chip maker Nvidia produces graphics chips for gaming and AI. Those chips help drive the technology behind ChatGPT and Alphabet‘s Bard chatbots.

    Nvidia said it expects sales of about $11 billion in the second quarter — more than 50% higher than Wall Street’s $7.15 billion estimate, which Ives called a “jaw dropping guidance.”

    Nvidia stunned investors and analysts by reporting better-than-expected first-quarter profit of more than $2 billion and revenue of $7 billion in May.

    “We’re going to have a trillion dollars of incremental spend over the next decade. That could be conservative — that wasn’t here six months ago,” said Ives.

    That’s why I think what you’re seeing is the multiple expansion. Investors recognize this isn’t an AI gold rush, which I really view is something. The only parallel would be 1995 Internet and 2007 Apple iPhone moments in terms of what I’ve seen in my career,” said the analyst.

    Source link

  • Nvidia, AMD stocks fall on report of new U.S. ban on AI chip exports to China

    Nvidia, AMD stocks fall on report of new U.S. ban on AI chip exports to China

    Shares of Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. slumped in the extended session Tuesday following a report that the Biden administration is considering a new ban on sales of AI chips to China.

    Nvidia shares
    NVDA,
    +3.06%

    A fell 3% after hours, following a 3.1% gain to close at $418.76, while AMD shares
    AMD,
    +2.68%

    also fell 3%, after a 2.7% gain in the regular session to close at $110.39.

    Late Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal reported the Commerce Department could further block sales of AI chips to China unless U.S. companies first obtain a special license.

    The ban would follow upon similar actions last year that threatened $400 million in Nvidia sales, but the company found a workaround in supplying a version of products that avoided the ban.

    Read: AMD launches new data-center AI chips, software to go up against Nvidia and Intel

    Both Nvidia and AMD have launched new AI chips this year: Nvidia in March and AMD earlier in the month. Last year’s release of Open AI’s ChatGPT generative AI — with billions of dollars invested by Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +1.82%

    — resulted in an explosion of interest in artificial-intelligence technology, prompting luminaries to herald the technology as the biggest thing in tech since … you name it.

    Read: Bill Gates says AI is only the second revolutionary tech advancement in his lifetime

    News of the possible ban happened to follow a claim earlier in the day from Baidu Inc.
    BIDU,
    +3.09%

    on the Chinese search company’s blog, which said its Ernie 3.5 version AI outperformed ChatGPT’s earlier version “in comprehensive ability scores,” and its latest iteration, GPT-4, which was released in mid-March, “in several Chinese-language capabilities.”

    Baidu’s claim appeared to be based upon performance metrics published in China Science Daily. On Wall Street, ADRs of Baidu were down 0.7% after hours, following a 3.1% gain to close at $143.90.

    As of Tuesday’s close, Nvidia shares were up 187% in 2023, and AMD shares were up 70% for the year.

    Read: Snowflake adds partnerships with Nvidia and Microsoft for AI double play

    Shares of Super Micro Computer Inc.
    SMCI,
    +4.47%
    ,
    which have benefited from AI, also declined 3% after hours, while shares of Intel Corp.
    INTC,
    +2.28%
    ,
    which supplies chips to data centers, saw shares decline 1% after hours.

    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: Tech, meet reality

    CNBC Daily Open: Tech, meet reality

    A shopper stands in front of a Tesla Motors showroom at a retail shopping mall in Hong Kong.

    Sebastian Ng | Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our new, international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    What you need to know today

    Tech sell-off
    Major
    U.S. indexes fell Monday, dragged down by a sell-off in technology stocks. Stock futures, however, inched up. Markets in Asia-Pacific traded mixed Tuesday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 fell for the fourth straight day, but analysts think the rally in Japanese stocks, which began in late May, isn’t a bubble like the one that burst in 1990.

    Leaders speak
    In his first televised address since the Wagner Group marched on Moscow, Russian President Vladimir Putin said organizers of the armed mutiny will be “brought to justice” and that his military would have crushed the rebellion. Separately, U.S. President Joe Biden said the U.S. “had nothing to do with [the events], this was part of a struggle within the Russian system.”

    Microsoft wants explosive growth
    Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella wants the tech giant to hit $500 billion in revenue by fiscal 2030, according to a court filing. That’s more than double its $198.26 billion in revenue for 2022, implying revenue growth of at least 10% per year. Indeed, Nadella sketched out a “20/20” goal, which involves growing revenue and operating income by 20% year over year.

    On track for 5%
    China is on track to hit its annual growth target of “around 5%,” said Chinese Premier Li Qiang at the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting of the New Champions. China’s economy has been struggling lately, with economic activity growing slower than expected in May. Separately, Aramco’s CEO Amin Nasser thinks oil demand from China and India will continue growing and prop up the market this year.

    [PRO] Imminent drop in the S&P?
    Mile Wilson, Morgan Stanley’s chief U.S. equity strategist, thinks the “risks for a major correction [in the stock market] have rarely been higher” because of four factors that will weigh down on markets. Wilson, who predicted the fall in markets last year, thinks the S&P 500 will drop to 3,900 in the fourth quarter. That’s around 10% lower from its Monday close, among the most bearish outlooks on Wall Street.

    The bottom line

    The attempted insurrection in Russia across the weekend dominated headlines, but it didn’t seem to occupy investors’ minds. Instead, “macro factors are likely to remain the main drivers of risk assets,” wrote Barclays’ Global Chairman of Research Ajay Rajadhyaksha in a Monday note.

    Indeed, tech stocks slumped across the board as investor enthusiasm over artificial intelligence fizzled out and was replaced by a more clear-eyed view of today’s economic conditions.

    Alphabet fell 3.27% after UBS downgraded the company, citing stiff competition in the AI sector. Nvidia and Meta fell in sympathy, losing more than 3% each. But that wasn’t as bad as Tesla’s plunge of 6.06% after Goldman Sachs downgraded the electric car maker because of a “difficult pricing environment for new vehicles.”

    The sell-off in tech put pressure on the Nasdaq Composite, which sank 1.16%. The S&P 500 fell 0.45% while the Dow Jones Industrial Average dipped 0.04%.

    There might be more pain to come. The tech rally is “running out of steam,” according to Berenberg, a German bank. Tech, as a future-oriented sector, needs lower interest rates if it wants to continue rising.

    But with the Federal Reserve emphasizing it’d keep rates high for now, lower rates would imply “a sharp economic slowdown,” Jonathan Stubbs, equity strategist at Berenberg, wrote. Stubbs mentioned that such a scenario would “be to tech’s disadvantage,” but, really, no one would benefit from it.

    Nonetheless, with just a few days left before June ends, the three major indexes are poised to finish the second quarter higher. The recession is still months away, it seems — as it’s been for the past year. Fingers crossed we manage to elude it for so long that it gets tired of catching up with us.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: Tech confronts reality

    CNBC Daily Open: Tech confronts reality

    A Tesla Inc. store in Beijing, China, on Wednesday, May 31, 2023.

    Bloomberg | Getty Images

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our new, international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    What you need to know today

    Tech sell-off
    Major
    U.S. indexes fell Monday, dragged down by a sell-off in technology stocks. Stock futures, however, inched up. European markets traded mixed. The pan-European Stoxx 600 dipped 0.1%, continuing its five consecutive days of falling last week, even as S&P Global Ratings doubled its 2023 gross domestic product forecast for the euro zone from 0.3% to 0.6%.

    Leaders speak
    In his first televised address since the Wagner Group marched on Moscow, Russian President Vladimir Putin said organizers of the armed mutiny will be “brought to justice” and that his military would have crushed the rebellion. Separately, U.S. President Joe Biden said the U.S. “had nothing to do with [the events], this was part of a struggle within the Russian system.”

    A ‘mortgage catastrophe’
    The U.K. is facing a “mortgage catastrophe,” warned the country’s shadow finance minister. The Bank of England’s 50 basis points rate hike last week will push mortgages up. That, in turn, will bring the number of households without savings by the end of the year to 7.8 million, or 30% of households nationwide, estimated the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, an independent think tank.

    Apple’s new shoots
    Apple’s new Vision Pro headset aside, the tech company is reportedly planning to refresh all its major products in the next 12 months. On track to be released are a second version of the Apple Watch Ultra, a new 30-inch iMac (which would be the company’s largest all-in-one desktop to date), iPad Pros with OLED screens, MacBook Pros equipped with Apple’s new M3 chip, among other products.

    [PRO] Imminent drop in the S&P?
    Mile Wilson, Morgan Stanley’s chief U.S. equity strategist, thinks the “risks for a major correction [in the stock market] have rarely been higher” because of four factors that will weigh down on markets. Wilson, who predicted the fall in markets last year, thinks the S&P 500 will drop to 3,900 in the fourth quarter. That’s around 10% lower from its Monday close, among the most bearish outlooks on Wall Street.

    The bottom line

    The attempted insurrection in Russia across the weekend dominated headlines, but it didn’t seem to occupy investors’ minds. Instead, “macro factors are likely to remain the main drivers of risk assets,” wrote Barclays’ Global Chairman of Research Ajay Rajadhyaksha in a Monday note.

    Indeed, tech stocks slumped across the board as investor enthusiasm over artificial intelligence fizzled out and was replaced by a more clear-eyed view of today’s economic conditions.

    Alphabet fell 3.27% after UBS downgraded the company, citing stiff competition in the AI sector. Nvidia and Meta fell in sympathy, losing more than 3% each. But that wasn’t as bad as Tesla’s plunge of 6.06% after Goldman Sachs downgraded the electric car maker because of a “difficult pricing environment for new vehicles.”

    The sell-off in tech put pressure on the Nasdaq Composite, which sank 1.16%. The S&P 500 fell 0.45% while the Dow Jones Industrial Average dipped 0.04%.

    There might be more pain to come. The tech rally is “running out of steam,” according to Berenberg, a German bank. Tech, as a future-oriented sector, needs lower interest rates if it wants to continue rising.

    But with the Federal Reserve emphasizing it’d keep rates high for now, lower rates would imply “a sharp economic slowdown,” Jonathan Stubbs, equity strategist at Berenberg, wrote. Stubbs mentioned that such a scenario would “be to tech’s disadvantage,” but, really, no one would benefit from it.

    Nonetheless, with just a few days left before June ends, the three major indexes are poised to finish the second quarter higher. The recession is still months away, it seems — as it’s been for the past year. Fingers crossed we manage to elude it for so long that it gets tired of catching up with us.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: Skimming off the froth

    CNBC Daily Open: Skimming off the froth

    Traders work the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York City on May 31, 2023. 

    Spencer Platt | Getty Images

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our new, international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    What you need to know today

    Oh, snap
    Major U.S. indexes
    fell across the board Friday and snapped their multiweek winning streaks. Stock markets in Europe traded lower too. Asia-Pacific markets were mostly lower Monday, with South Korea’s Kospi being the only major index that traded higher, climbing 0.5%, as of publication time. Separately, oil prices rose amid fears that supply would be disrupted after the Wagner Group’s attempted insurrection in Russia.

    Rebellion in Russia
    On Saturday, Wagner Group mercenaries took control of Rostov, a southern city in Russia, and marched toward Moscow. Less than 24 hours after that, Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin declared his rebellion over. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the events revealed “cracks” in Russia that “weren’t there before.” As for Prigozhin, Ian Bremmer, president of Eurasia Group, called him “a dead man walking.”

    Debts, defaults and distress
    There have been 41 corporate defaults in the U.S. so far — the most globally and more than double during the same period last year, according to Moody’s Investors Service. Troublingly, Moody’s expects the global default rate to rise to 5% by April 2024, compared with the long-term average of 4.1%. Analysts blame high interest rates for this tumult.

    High demand, low supply
    Bitcoin’s price has jumped over the past week and is comfortably hovering above the $30,000 barrier, its highest in two months. Market watchers think it’s pushed up by news that BlackRock is planning to launch a spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund. But CNBC found it’s more likely because large institutional investors are buying bitcoin as liquidity remains low.

    [PRO] Markets on an even footing
    Markets may have declined last week, but CNBC Pro’s Michael Santoli thinks there’s still a “favorable underlying market trend.” Despite worries about a banking crisis, narrow rallies and speculative stocks, the S&P 500 is still nearly up 15% for the year — which points to a market on even footing, ready to climb further.

    The bottom line

    Last week wasn’t pretty for U.S. stocks — but that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

    On Friday, all major indexes fell and closed lower for the week. On a weekly basis, the S&P 500 was down 1.4%, its first week-over-week loss after five consecutive weeks of gains. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell almost 1.7% to snap its three-week positive run. The Nasdaq Composite slipped 1.4%, ending an eight-week winning streak to post its worst weekly performance since March.

    Those figures may sound disappointing, but Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth Management, thinks it’s just the markets finding their balance after being overbought, meaning that stocks have been trading above what they were worth. As Barclays strategist Venu Krishna notes, “the broader Tech sector appears frothy.” That is to say, even though the S&P technology sector has rallied nearly 40% this year, the rest of the index has remained flat.

    Going by both those analysts’ logic, the dip in markets last week, then, may be a positive sign that some of the froth around tech is being skimmed off. (Indeed, Nvidia shares lost 1.9%, Microsoft slipped 1.38% and Tesla sank 3.03% Friday.) Investors, then, can focus again on what’s beneath the froth: The financial health of companies amid inflation and interest rates. Compared with excitement over artificial intelligence, that’s a much better indication of stocks’ long-term trajectory.

    On that note, the core personal consumption expenditures index, the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of inflation, comes out Friday, and will give a clearer picture of whether the Fed will continue hiking rates after leaving them unchanged in June. Froth is, by nature, hollow: A slight increase in heat will cause it to melt completely.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • CNBC Daily Open: Skim off the froth

    CNBC Daily Open: Skim off the froth

    Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on June 01, 2023 in New York City.

    Spencer Platt | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    This report is from today’s CNBC Daily Open, our new, international markets newsletter. CNBC Daily Open brings investors up to speed on everything they need to know, no matter where they are. Like what you see? You can subscribe here.

    What you need to know today

    Oh, snap
    Major U.S. indexes
    fell across the board Friday and snapped their multiweek winning streaks. Stock markets in Europe traded lower too. The pan-European Stoxx 600 dipped 0.34%, weighed down by Siemens Energy’s 26.22% plunge after the company warned technical problems in wind turbine components could affect the broader sector.

    Black skies for Goldman
    Goldman Sachs may have to absorb a large write-down on its attempted sale of GreenSky, CNBC has learned. In September 2021, the investment bank, under CEO David Solomon, bought the fintech lender for $2.24 billion as part of its push into consumer finance. But just 18 months later, Solomon said he’s selling the business amid stumbles in Goldman’s consumer ambitions.

    Debts, defaults and distress
    There have been 41 corporate defaults in the U.S. so far — the most globally and more than double during the same period last year, according to Moody’s Investors Service. Troublingly, Moody’s expects the global default rate to rise to 5% by April 2024, compared with the long-term average of 4.1%. Analysts blame high interest rates for this tumult.

    Rebellion in Russia
    On Saturday, Wagner Group mercenaries took control of Rostov, a southern city in Russia, and marched toward Moscow. Less than 24 hours after that, Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin declared his rebellion over, in a deal brokered by Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the events revealed “cracks” in Russia that “weren’t there before.”

    [PRO] Markets on an even footing
    Markets may have declined last week, but CNBC Pro’s Michael Santoli thinks there’s still a “favorable underlying market trend.” Despite worries about a banking crisis, narrow rallies and speculative stocks, the S&P 500 is still nearly up 15% for the year — which points to a market on even footing, ready to climb further.

    The bottom line

    Last week wasn’t pretty for U.S. stocks — but that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

    On Friday, all major indexes fell and closed lower for the week. On a weekly basis, the S&P 500 was down 1.4%, its first week-over-week loss after five consecutive weeks of gains. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell almost 1.7% to snap its three-week positive run. The Nasdaq Composite slipped 1.4%, ending an eight-week winning streak to post its worst weekly performance since March.

    Those figures may sound disappointing, but Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth Management, thinks it’s just the markets finding their balance after being overbought, meaning that stocks have been trading above what they were worth. As Barclays strategist Venu Krishna notes, “the broader Tech sector appears frothy.” That is to say, even though the S&P technology sector has rallied nearly 40% this year, the rest of the index has remained flat.

    Going by both those analysts’ logic, the dip in markets last week, then, may be a positive sign that some of the froth around tech is being skimmed off. (Indeed, Nvidia shares lost 1.9%, Microsoft slipped 1.38% and Tesla sank 3.03% Friday.) Investors, then, can focus again on what’s beneath the froth: The financial health of companies amid inflation and interest rates. Compared with excitement over artificial intelligence, that’s a much better indication of stocks’ long-term trajectory.

    On that note, the core personal consumption expenditures index, the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of inflation, comes out Friday, and will give a clearer picture of whether the Fed will continue hiking rates after leaving them unchanged in June. Froth is, by nature, hollow: A slight increase in heat will cause it to melt completely.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Rebellion in Russia could trigger selloff in U.S. stocks and flight to safe assets, analysts say. Here’s what investors should know.

    Rebellion in Russia could trigger selloff in U.S. stocks and flight to safe assets, analysts say. Here’s what investors should know.

    Watch what happens over the next 36 hours.

    That was the advice from one financial analyst as U.S. investors awoke on Saturday to news of an apparent armed rebellion against Moscow led by Yevgeny Prigozhin, the owner of the powerful Russian mercenary organization Wagner Group.

    Others speculated that the crisis in Russia could drive U.S. stocks lower, as some traders were already betting on a selloff once markets reopen on Monday due to this sudden spike in geopolitical risk.

    “The developments in Russia are ultimately going to suggest President Putin’s leadership is weakening quickly and that resources may shift away from the war with Ukraine. It is too early to say how this will impact Wall Street, but the risk of desperate measures from Putin might make some investors nervous,” Edward Moya, senior market analyst at Oanda, said Saturday.

    A simmering feud between Prigozhin, the leader of the military contractor whose mercenary forces have been fighting alongside Russian military troops in Ukraine, and the Russian Defense Ministry came to a head early Saturday as Prigozhin led his troops to successfully overtake a Russian military outpost near the Ukrainian frontier, which the Kremlin has used as its command center for overseeing the war in Ukraine.

    Amid the mixture of reliable information and unfounded speculation, market analysts have scrambled to make sense of the situation and what it might mean for financial markets and the global economy.

    The main theme that has emerged so far is that U.S. stocks would suffer unless the Russian military managed to quickly suppress the rebellion, as may have occurred with reports late Saturday that Prigozhin had halted a Wagner advance on Moscow and, in fact, might be relocating to neighboring Belarus. But how would something that could potentially cut short the war in Ukraine — which has been a bugbear for markets since the full-scale invasion by Russian forces in February 2022 — be a negative for stocks?

    The answer is that chaos leads to uncertainty, and that uncertainty is anathema to markets — especially when it could disrupt global oil and food supplies.

    “I’d bet on this creating more uncertainty which is generally going to be negative for risk … in the short term at least you see higher geopolitical risk premia — longer term the risks are on both sides really: does this precipitate the collapse of the Russian front and the war ends?” said Neil Wilson, chief market analyst at Finalto, in a note to clients on Saturday.

    Others noted that the crisis is coming at a vulnerable time for U.S. markets, while Michael Antonelli, a market strategist at R.W. Baird & Co., suggested in a tweet that the crisis “has to be” bearish for U.S. stocks.

    The S&P 500 index
    SPX,
    -0.77%

    closed out its worst week since March on Friday as a series of interest-rate hikes in the U.K. and across Europe last week sparked fresh fears of a global recession. Some analysts noted that the pullback swiftly followed signs that investors are growing more bullish following a powerful rally that sent stocks to their highest levels in 14 months. There are concerns that this shift in sentiment could presage investors’ final capitulation.

    Sven Henrich, founder and lead strategist of Northman Trader, noted that the Cboe Volatility Index
    VIX,
    +4.11%
    ,
    the market’s so-called fear gauge, which measures the stock market’s expectations for volatility over the next 30 days, managed to finish last week below 13.5, its lowest level since January 2020, even as stocks pulled back.

    If stocks do continue to slide, that would mean new lows for the Vix have proved to be a reliable counterindicator, suggesting that investors had grown complacent before being walloped by a fresh shock.

    Asian markets will be the first to react to ongoing developments by Sunday evening Eastern time, but derivatives traders using CME Group’s Globex platform to trade swaps tracking the value of U.S. equity indexes are already betting on a selloff.

    Meanwhile, bitcoin
    BTCUSD,
    +0.11%
    ,
    an asset that does reliably trade 24/7, was down just 0.8% at $30,675, a slight pullback after achieving its highest level in a year late last week. By Saturday evening the leading cryptocurrency has reversed that earlier dip.

    Where might investors turn for safety if markets do become chaotic?

    Finalto’s Wilson said investors could seek shelter in the currency market, where the U.S. dollar
    DXY,
    +0.47%
    ,
    Swiss franc
    USDCHF,
    -0.02%

    and maybe the euro
    EURUSD,
    +0.32%

    and British pound
    GBPUSD,
    +0.02%

    could benefit from a spike in demand. More “de-risking” could send investors into ultrasafe government bonds like U.S. Treasurys
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    3.741%
    ,
    which could help to push yields lower, as bond yields move inversely to prices.

    Wilson anticipated that European indexes could be “more exposed to de-risking due to makeup and proximity to Russia and the war in Ukraine.” He also noted the possibility that this latest crisis could send the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    -1.01%

    higher if investors decided to seek shelter in high-quality growth names like Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    -0.17%
    ,
    Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    -1.90%

    or Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    -1.38%
    ,
    which have helped to drive this year’s equity-market rally.

    Whatever happens, the outcome of the crisis should be more clear within the next 35 hours, Wilson said.

    “[H]ow the market opens after the weekend will depend on what happens in the next 36 hours. … [I]t could all be over by then,” Wilson said.

    Regardless, one of the first to interpret the market’s reaction on Monday will be Melbourne-based Chris Weston, head of research at online broker Pepperstone.

    Until then, he cautioned investors against reading too much into the Wagner situation, since analysts’ visibility into a very complicated geopolitical situation is “poor.”

    “The humble market participant would simply say they have no edge in knowing how this plays out and our visibility to read this through to markets is currently poor — the information is often biased and it’s hard to truly know what is fact and what is fed to influence. … [W]ill this lead to genuine regime change, fail or perhaps inflame and lead to a market shock?” Weston said in comments provided to MarketWatch.

    “At this point we simply don’t know, but it feels like we get enough clarity on potential outcomes and even timelines in the next 24-48 hours — at this point the prospect of modest downside risk on Monday is elevated and naturally we’ll be watching crude and EU assets most closely,” he said.

    Terry Haines, founder of Pangea Policy, said in an email to clients that the ongoing uncertainty fueled by the Wagner rebellion reveals the fragility of the Putin regime, and might marginally boost chances of a Ukraine victory.

    But Haines also conceded that it’s a “developing and unstable situation with various facets that on net add to geopolitical uncertainties, to which markets usually react negatively.” Investors must also consider that, should that rebellion fail, it could be “replaced by stronger Russian control” or create further instability as “Wagner disintegrates.”

    In that same vein, Jim Bianco, head of Bianco Research, offered up a joke aimed at all the armchair geopolitical analysts suddenly flocking to Twitter.

    Markets may take a look at this crisis and view it as a “bullish development after some initial volatility, the Kobeissi Letter’s editor in chief and founder, Adam Kobeissi, told MarketWatch in Saturday comments.

    “After all, the end of the war in Ukraine is the market’s top geopolitical driver right now, and if this increases the odds of a peace agreement and/or Russia withdrawing from Ukraine, it is likely to be perceived as bullish over the next few weeks,” he said.

    He recommended that investors keep an eye on prices of oil and gold, which could be particularly sensitive to any fresh developments.

    “If this means more conflict,” he said, “then oil
    CL.1,
    +0.51%
    ,
    bonds
    TMUBMUSD10Y,
    3.741%

    and gold
    GC00,
    +0.04%

    are poised to rally.”

    Source link

  • Option demand explodes in June as investors use bullish bets to chase stock-market rally

    Option demand explodes in June as investors use bullish bets to chase stock-market rally

    Trading in U.S. stock option contracts has surged in 2023 as retail and institutional traders have harnessed bullish call options to chase a runaway rally in U.S. stocks, market analysts told MarketWatch.

    As of Friday, 46 million option contracts linked to U.S. equity indexes, individual stocks and exchange-traded funds have traded hands every trading session on average this month, according to an analysis by Callie Cox, a U.S. equity strategist at eToro.

    This means that, barring a sudden drop-off in trading activity, June is on track to be the busiest month for option traders ever, Cox said. That is particularly notable given that the summer months are typically more placid on Wall Street.

    “It’s pretty incredible for a summer month. It shows how engaged investors are after such a strong rally,” said Callie Cox, a U.S. equity strategist at eToro, during an interview with MarketWatch.


    ETORO

    Much of the demand has centered on call options: trading volume in these contracts has averaged 26 million a day so far, leaving June on track for the heaviest month of call buying since November 2021, Cox said.

    Several overlapping trends have contributed to the surge in option demand, market analysts said.

    Investors wary about a rally that recently carried the S&P 500 index to its highest level in 14 months have opted to buy short-dated calls. Often these are contracts tied to the S&P 500 or the index-tracking SPDR S&P 500 exchange-traded fund with less than 24 hours left until expiration, a class of options referred to as “0DTEs” for “zero days to expiration.”

    Some traders see these cheap short-term bets as a particularly affordable, if risky, strategy for reaping gains as the market marches higher, according to market analysts and portfolio managers who spoke with MarketWatch.

    And when stocks pull back, investors often change their strategy and instead of buying calls, opt to take advantage by buying or selling put options.

    While a call represents a bet that a given index, stock or currency will rise, a put represents the opposite.

    In addition to betting on calls tied to popular equity indexes and exchange-traded funds like the S&P 500 or the Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1 ETF
    QQQ,
    -0.99%
    ,
    investors are also scooping up bullish options tied to Nvidia Corp. and other market leaders, hoping to maximize any returns from the artificial intelligence boom.

    The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week that trading in call options tied to shares of Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    -1.90%

    and two other chip stocks, Advanced Micro Devices
    AMD,
    -0.62%

    and Intel Corp.,
    INTC,
    +0.89%

    has surged fivefold since the beginning of the year, citing data from Cboe Global Markets, owner of the world’s largest options exchange.

    But demand for calls has expanded beyond megacap technology names into areas of the market that have trailed since the start of the year, including small-cap stocks and others, which have rallied in June.

    The Russell 2000
    RUT,
    -1.44%
    ,
    an index that tracks small-cap stocks traded in the U.S., is up nearly 5% year-to-date. As of the end of May, it was marginally negative for the year, options experts said.

    “With mega cap technology leading the indexes higher, investors started to play catch-up by trying to buy the second-tier and heavily shorted companies,” said Alon Rosin, head of equity derivatives at Oppenheimer, in emailed commentary shared with MarketWatch.

    This means that investors’ rush to try to keep up with the market hasn’t only benefited hot AI-stocks.

    Amy Wu Silverman, head of derivatives strategy at RBC Capital Markets, made a similar observation in a recent note to clients where she pointed out that call buying has surged for both companies expected to benefit from the AI boom, as well as stocks in an RBC basket of companies that are threatened by it — stocks like Robert Half International
    RHI,
    -0.54%
    ,
    Chegg Inc.
    CHGG,
    -4.00%

    and Yext Inc.
    YEXT,
    -2.74%
    ,
    she said.

    Silverman said heavy call buying in this group is indicative of the market’s “extreme call exuberance.”

    Call buying has helped send popular indicators of positioning like the put-call ratio and skew, which measures the cost of downside protection via puts vs. demand for upside exposure via calls, to their lowest levels of the year earlier this month.

    “People are reaching for upside via calls, and you’re seeing skew falling due to the fact that everybody has been buying calls,” said Mark Callahan, head of trading and a portfolio manager at Aptus Capital Advisors, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    Callahan manages several active exchange-traded funds that require heavy option trading.

    U.S. stocks have marched higher this year, with the S&P 500 rising for five straight weeks through June 16, its longest streak of weekly gains since November 2021. The Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    -1.01%

    has seen even stronger performance, and its eight-week win streak has been heralded as the tech-heavy index’s longest rally since 2019, according to FactSet data.

    The S&P 500 has risen more than 13% so far this year, while the Nasdaq has gained more than 30%. Both have erased much of their losses from 2022, which was the worst year for stocks since 2008. Last week, both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq hit their highest levels since April 2022.

    However, there are some signs that the torrid rally might be in the midst of a pullback as the S&P 500, Nasdaq and Dow Jones Industrial Average
    DJIA,
    -0.65%

    are all on track to finish the week lower on Friday.

    Source link

  • Here’s what an overbought market and endless negativity tell me to do this week

    Here’s what an overbought market and endless negativity tell me to do this week

    Jim Cramer on Squawk on the Street, June 30, 2022.

    Virginia Sherwood | CNBC

    Not a great setup. There are too many articles and postings about how we are overdoing artificial intelligence, and how there’s not enough substance to justify recent market moves.

    There’s no question that the market, particularly the Nasdaq, has rallied endlessly on what amounts to the same information: Nvidia (NVDA) makes great cards; Adobe‘s (ADBE) putting them to use; so is Meta Platforms (META) but we don’t know how; as are Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet‘s (GOOGL) Google and, most importantly, Oracle (ORCL); but don’t forget Broadcom (AVGO) and Marvell (MVRL).

    Source link

  • A Nvidia-backed platform that turns text into A.I.-generated avatars boosts valuation to $1 billion

    A Nvidia-backed platform that turns text into A.I.-generated avatars boosts valuation to $1 billion

    An animated avatar generated by the AI video platform Synthesia.

    Synthesia

    Synthesia, a digital media platform that lets users create artificial intelligence-generated videos, has raked in $90 million from investors — including U.S. chip giant Nvidia, the company told CNBC exclusively.

    The London-based company raised the cash in a funding round led by Accel, an early investor in Facebook, Slack and Spotify. Nvidia came in as a strategic investor, putting in an undisclosed amount of money. Other investors include Kleiner Perkins, GV, FirstMark Capital and MMC. 

    related investing news

    CNBC Pro

    Founded in 2017 by researchers and entrepreneurs Victor Riparbelli, Matthias Niessner, Steffen Tjerrild and Lourdes Agapito, Synthesia develops software that allows people to make their own digital avatars to deliver corporate presentations, training videos — or even compliments to colleagues in over 120 different languages.

    Its ultimate aim is to eliminate cameras, microphones, actors, lengthy edits, and other costs from the professional video production process. To do that, Synthesia has created animated avatars which look and sound like humans, but are generated by AI. The avatars are based on real-life actors who speak in front of a green screen.

    “Productivity can be improved because you are reducing the cost of producing the video to that of making a PowerPoint,” Philippe Botteri, at Accel, the lead investor in Synthesia’s Series C, told CNBC, adding that adoption of video has been proliferated by consumer platforms such as YouTube, Netflix and TikTok.

    “Video is a much better way to communicate knowledge. When we think about the potential of the company and the valuation, we think about what it can return, [and] in the case of Synthesia, we’re just scratching the surface.”

    Synthesia is a form of generative AI, similar to OpenAI’s ChatGPT. But the company says it has been working on its own proprietary generative AI for years, and that although ChatGPT may have only recently emerged into public consciousness, generative AI itself isn’t a new technology.

    Read more about tech and crypto from CNBC Pro

    Synthesia sells to enterprise clients, including Tiffany’s, IHG, and Moody’s Analytics. The company doesn’t disclose its sales or revenue metrics, though it says it “consistently driven triple digit growth,” with over 12 million videos produced on the platform to date. The number of users on Synthesia spiked 456% year over year, the company said.

    Synthesia plans to ramp up investment into its technology, with a particular focus on advancing its AI research and making Synthesia avatars capable of performing more tasks. 

    “We work with 35% of the Fortune 100 [with a focus on] product marketing, customer support, customer success — areas of the company you have a lot of text that you want to turn into video,” Riparbelli told CNBC.

    “As we’re progressing to the next phase of the next generation of Synthesia technology, it’s all about making the avatars more expressive, be able to do more things, walk around in a room, have conversations,” he added.

    Riparbelli explained Nvidia isn’t just a semiconductor manufacturer — it’s also a powerhouse of research and development talent with an army of engineers, academics and researchers who produce papers on the subject.

    “They’re not just a chip producer,” he said. “They have amazing research teams that are very much leading in terms of, how do you actually train these large models? What works, what doesn’t work?”

    Investor interest in A.I.

    Business Insider previously reported that Synthesia was in talks with investors to raise between $50 million and $75 million in new funds at a valuation of around $1 billion.

    The report didn’t include detail about Nvidia’s involvement, nor mention the total $90 million sum raised.

    Synthesia is one of many firms attracting interest from investors with AI and enterprise software that can reduce costs involved in certain business processes. Companies are looking to reduce expenses everywhere they can to combat climbing inflation and prepare for a possible recession. 

    Last week, French business planning software company Pigment raised $88 million from investors including Iconiq Growth, Felix Capital, Meritech IVP and FirstMark, in part to ramp up its investment in AI.

    We're in the early stage of the A.I. hype cycle, says venture capital fund

    Generative AI has been a rare bright spot in a European tech market reeling from declining funding and a pullback in valuations. Investors have rotated out of high-growth tech firms into value sectors with more resilient income generation, such as financials, industrials, energy and consumer staples.

    Recently, a report from the venture capital firm Atomico showed funding for Europe’s technology startups was on track to fall a further 39% in 2023 to $51 billion from $83 billion in 2022.

    However, AI was one area that drew more investments, Atomico said, with generative AI accounting for 35% of total investment into AI and machine learning firms last year — the highest share ever and a big jump from 5% in 2022.

    Ethical concerns about deepfakes

    There are concerns that the use of video AI tools as advanced as Synthesia could lead to deepfakes, videos which take a user’s likeness and manipulate it to make it appear as though they are saying or doing something they’re not.

    There has also been an increasing number of calls from tech leaders and academics for a global pause on AI development beyond systems like OpenAI’s GPT-4, because of fears that the technology is becoming so advanced it may pose an existential risk to humanity.

    Synthesia first attracted mainstream attention in 2019 for a deepfake video that featured a digitally animated version of celebrity footballer David Beckham speaking about a campaign to end malaria in nine languages.

    While that was done with the consent of Beckham and for a good cause, more widespread use of deepfake technology has led to worries about the potential for misinformation.

    A.I. generated image went viral showing fake explosion outside the Pentagon

    To address that, Synthesia says it has kept ethics in mind while developing its software. The company requires consent from the people who feature as avatars in its software, and uses a mix of humans and machine learning to target material such as profanity and hate speech.

    It is also signed up to Responsible Practices for Synthetic Media, a voluntary industrywide framework for the ethical and responsible development, creation and sharing of synthetic media.

    “There are many different discourses going on right now. There’s one about the very long-term existential sort of risk scenarios. I think they’re important to talk about as well. But I’d love to see more focus on where are we today?” Riparbelli told CNBC in an interview.

    “These technologies are already powerful. How do we deal with hallucinations? How do we deal with all of the problems that arise?” he added. “There’s definitely pitfalls. But there’s also just so much opportunity in it, I think, leveling the playing field and enabling people to do much more with less.”

    Source link

  • How a hawkish Fed could kill a baby bull-market rally in U.S. stocks

    How a hawkish Fed could kill a baby bull-market rally in U.S. stocks

    It is the notion that the Federal Reserve could deliver a hawkish jolt to markets even if it refrains from raising rates when its two-day policy meeting ends on Wednesday.

    There are concerns that such an outcome could spark a turnaround in U.S. stocks, especially if an uncomfortably strong reading on May inflation — due this coming Tuesday just as the Fed’s policy meeting is slated to begin — pushes the central bank toward something even more extreme, like delivering a rate increase on Wednesday despite intimating that it plans to abstain.

    The May consumer-price index is forecast to rise 4.0% for the year, down from a rise of 4.9%, while the core index, excluding food and energy prices, is seen easing to a rise of 5.3% from 5.5%.

    On the other hand, signs that the economy has weakened and inflation has continued to fade would help the Fed to justify skipping a rate increase in June — as several senior officials have suggested it will — while signaling that a potential hike at its following meeting in July could be the final increase for the cycle.

    “Softening U.S. data should support calls that a June skip could eventually turn into a July pause. Next week, most of the data is expected to remain weak or little changed: retail sales could be flat m/m, the Fed regional surveys should remain in negative territory, and consumer sentiment will waver,” said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at OANDA, in emailed commentary.

    See: The Fed’s crystal ball on inflation appears off the mark again. Here’s comes another fix.

    Wednesday’s meeting comes at a critical time for the market. U.S. stocks have powered ahead for more than six months, with the S&P 500
    SPX,
    +0.11%

    having risen more than 20% off its Oct. 12 closing low, according to FactSet. Just this past week, the index exited bear-market territory for the first time in a year.

    The index is up 12% so far in 2023, reversing some of its 19.4% decline from 2022, its biggest calendar-year drop since 2008, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    So far this year, highflying tech stocks have helped to paper over weakness in other areas of the market. This has started to change over the past two weeks, as small-cap and value-stocks have lurched suddenly higher, but there are fears that the Fed could hurt the most interest-rate sensitive technology names if Chairman Jerome Powell hints at rates rising higher than investors presently anticipate.

    The so-called “Megacap eight” stocks — a group that includes both classes of Alphabet Inc. stock
    GOOG,
    +0.16%

    GOOGL,
    +0.07%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +0.47%
    ,
    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    +4.06%
    ,
    Microsoft Corp.
    MSFT,
    +0.47%
    ,
    Netflix Inc.
    NFLX,
    +2.60%
    ,
    Nvidia Corp.
    NVDA,
    +0.68%
    ,
    Meta Platforms Inc.
    META,
    +0.14%

    — have driven nearly all of the S&P 500’s gains this year, according to Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, who included his analysis in a note to clients.

    But since the beginning of June, the Russell 2000
    RUT,
    -0.80%
    ,
    a gauge of small-cap stocks in the U.S., has risen more than 6.6%, according to FactSet data. The Russell 1000 Value Index
    RLV,
    -0.15%

    has also gained nearly 3.7% in that time. During this period, both have outperformed the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite
    COMP,
    +0.16%
    ,
    although the Nasdaq remains the market leader, having risen 26.7% since Jan. 1.

    Concerns about the Fed’s plans intensified this week after the Bank of Canada delivered a surprise interest-rate hike, ending a four-month pause. The BOC’s decision followed a similar move by the Reserve Bank of Australia, and partly as a result, U.S. Treasury yields rose and tech-heavy stocks tumbled, with the Nasdaq logging its biggest drop since April 25, according to FactSet.

    While small-caps held up amid the chaos, the reaction stoked fears that something similar might be in store for markets when the Fed delivers its latest decision on interest rates Wednesday.

    Consequences of a ‘hawkish pause’

    Stocks could be in for more turbulence if the Fed signals it plans to follow the BOC and RBA with a hawkish surprise of its own. And it wouldn’t necessarily need to hike rates to pull this off, market strategists said.

    Emerging signs of complacency in the market could complicate its reaction. That the Cboe Volatility Index has fallen back below 15
    VIX,
    +1.32%

    for the first time since before the arrival of COVID-19 is one such sign that investors aren’t worried enough about a potential selloff, said Miller Tabak + Co.’s Chief Market Strategist Matt Maley.

    Another analyst likened the potential fallout from a hawkish Fed to the bad old days of 2022.

    “If the Fed signals that rates will be going up again, the market playbook could read more like 2022 than what we have seen so far in 2023,” said Will Rhind, the founder and CEO of GraniteShares, during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    Perhaps the biggest wild card is Tuesday’s inflation report. If the numbers come in hot, Powell and his peers could face pressure to hike rates without priming the market first.

    For this reason, Rhind believes investors are underestimating the likelihood of a hike next week, even as Fed funds futures currently see a roughly 70% probability that the central bank will stand pat, according to the CME’s FedWatch tool.

    And Rhind isn’t the only one. Leslie Falconio, chief investment officer at UBS Global Wealth Management, says the Tuesday inflation report could be a make-or-break moment for markets, summing up fears expressed elsewhere on Wall Street in a recent note to clients.

    “We believe another rate increase is on the table, and that the CPI release on 13 June, a day before the Fed decision, will be decisive. In our view, another hike won’t have a material impact on the pace of economic growth,” Falconio said.

    What should investors watch out for?

    Assuming the Fed does forego a hike in June, there are a few key tells that investors should watch for to determine whether a “hawkish pause” is under way.

    Perhaps the most important will be how the Fed handles changes to its closely watched “dot plot.” A modestly higher median dot would send an unmistakable signal to the market that the Fed will continue with its campaign of tightening monetary policy, perhaps to the detriment of the market, said Patrick Saner, head of macro strategy at the Swiss Re Institute.

    “If the Fed skips but wanted to avoid the impression of the hiking cycle being done, it would need to include a revision of the dot plot. They could justify that with a more resilient GDP forecast and a higher inflation outlook. So I think it is the dots and then the statement that will be in focus,” Saner said during a phone interview with MarketWatch.

    Beyond that, whatever the Fed does or says will likely be viewed through the lens of economic data that is due out next week. In addition to the Tuesday inflation report, a report on May retail sales is due out Thursday, and a on consumer sentiment from the University of Michigan will land on Friday. All these data points could influence investors’ impressions of the state of the U.S. economy, and their expectations for how the Fed will behave as a result.

    See also: Puzzled by the ebb and flow of recession worries? Then the MarketWatch weekly recession worry gauge is for you.

    Source link

  • Cramer: This is my game plan for the week ahead after Friday’s surprise rally

    Cramer: This is my game plan for the week ahead after Friday’s surprise rally

    US President Joe Biden, accompanied by Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California, arrives for the annual Friends of Ireland luncheon on St. Patrick’s Day at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on March 17, 2023.

    Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

          

    What the heck really did happen on Friday, when the Dow jumped 700 points on a strong jobs reading? Why such a viscerally positive reaction to an employment number that was hotter than expected? Was it because wages didn’t spike? Was it all that perfect — a Goldilocks report?

    Here’s my take on Friday’s rally. Going into the debt ceiling crisis, there was a belief that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy couldn’t control his own Republican party. Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer wasn’t much better off with the Democrats. Both had lost control of their parties to the extremists. That meant the United States would default on its debt. It seemed pretty logical.

    I truly believe the extremists never believed a default would mean more than a few weeks of setbacks and more brinkmanship. Who can blame them? President Joe Biden lamely floated that he could invoke the 14th Amendment to avoid this and any future debt limit fights; the amendment includes a clause that some legal scholars say overrides the statutory borrowing limit set by Congress.

    No matter what, it was pretty clear that chaos was our destiny. But when McCarthy and Biden agreed to temporarily suspend the debt ceiling and cap some federal spending in order to prevent a default, we got a deal that was even less contentious than the 2011 bargain. (The coming together brought to mind the legendary coalition of President Ronald Reagan and House Speaker Tip O’Neil in the 1980s, memorialized in Chris Matthews’ “Tip and the Gipper: When Politics Worked.”)

    Source link