ReportWire

Tag: non-fungible tokens

  • OpenSea CEO teases acquisitions amidst NFT market shakeup

    OpenSea CEO teases acquisitions amidst NFT market shakeup

    [ad_1]

    OpenSea chief executive officer Devin Finzer has disclosed that the New York-based marketplace for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) is open to M&A opportunities.

    In an interview with DLNews, Finzer revealed that OpenSea has been charting new waters, openly expressing interest in acquiring and potentially being acquired, amid the fluctuating fortunes of the NFT world.

    “We think that if the right partnership comes along, then that’s something we should certainly consider,” Finzer said in the interview.

    However, while acknowledging that OpenSea is receptive to such prospects, Finzer did not provide details on the timing or the interested parties. He also emphasized that currently, OpenSea is not pursuing an active search for buyers.

    In the interview, Finzer conveyed an agile strategy for navigating the uncertain tides of the digital collectibles space, indicating that OpenSea is ready to embrace partnerships that align with its vision for the future.

    The sharp decline in trading volumes witnessed in 2023 has challenged the NFT marketplace’s dominance, bringing it down from a peak that encapsulated 90% of the market to a mere $171 million.

    And while relatively newer platforms like Blur have surged ahead with aggressive tactics and token airdrops, Finzer insisted that OpenSea still maintains a stronghold on user safety, having weeded out fraudulent collections to protect its community.

    OpenSea maintains positive outlook

    The disruption of the NFT market hasn’t dampened Finzer’s outlook, which he says remains focused on developing OpenSea into a brand synonymous with trust and user protection, even amidst potential consolidation in the industry.

    Earlier in the month, Finzer doubled down on the potential of NFTs. In a dialogue with Bloomberg, he expressed OpenSea’s vision to unearth the most compelling applications for non-fungible tokens, even as market metrics appear to wane.

    At the time, tracking sources such as DappRadar pinpointed that OpenSea’s trading volumes had been hovering around $3.5 million. Blur had edged out the competition with trading volumes of $20.8 million, followed by OKX NFT at $4.4 million. 

    Even then, Finzer emphasized that OpenSea’s forward-looking strategy was not anchored to the fleeting trends of the NFT market’s dynamics, claiming that trading volumes don’t always paint the full picture due to promotional tokens used by other platforms to spur trading.

    According to him, OpenSea is not sitting idly by in the face of decreasing trading volumes but instead is innovating with “OpenSea 2.0,” which promises a bespoke user experience by tuning its interface to cater to specific needs—such as visualizing ticket NFTs in a calendar format. 

    Moreover, the platform is taking proactive steps to fortify its defenses against fraud by enhancing the detection of counterfeit NFT collections and malicious web addresses, aiming to shield its patrons from digital asset theft. The official debut date for this upgraded version remains under wraps for the moment.


    Follow Us on Google News

    [ad_2]

    Julius Mutunkei

    Source link

  • Nike to dive into video game wearables, explores NFT fashion

    Nike to dive into video game wearables, explores NFT fashion

    [ad_1]

    The digital wearables branch of Nike, .Swoosh has hinted at diving deeper into the domain of video game fashion. The company has also expressed doubts over its non-fungible token (NFT) expansion plans, according to a Jan. 12 blog post. 

    Nike unveils virtual journey

    .Swoosh, the digital flagship of Nike’s sportswear giant has told in a recent announcement about its endeavors and previews some upcoming plans.

    Nike also plans to strengthen its position in the video game space by launching a new line of virtual products called “Nike In-Game Wearables.”

    The team says these wearables can be purchased and worn directly within one’s favorite video games, virtually bringing actual realness into gaming.

    The post highlights that the emphasis is on the joy of collecting and self-expression rather than mere transactions.

    Nike intends to deepen its engagement with the community by offering exclusive physical products tied to in-game wearables, fostering a sense of appreciation for loyal members.

    Beyond digital collectibles

    An interesting aspect of Nike’s strategy is the recognition that creators should benefit financially. By the second half of the year, Nike aims for users to be able to transfer their digital collectibles into personal wallets that would enable trading on third-party marketplaces.

    This move aligns with the company’s policy aimed at providing royalties for art to its creators and promoting collaborative creation.

    However, Nike adds that it will not develop its own marketplace, but rather focus on creating products and stories.

    This approach aims to focus on what matters most to Nike and its community — a decision rooted in a dedication to product quality and member satisfaction.

    Scammers target OpenSea users with Nike NFT scam

    Nike’s strategic shift into Web3, scammers jumped on the bandwagon to take advantage of all the hype surrounding NFT.

    Leading NFT marketplace OpenSea was a target, with scammers sending phishing emails offering an exclusive partnership between Nike and RTFKT with a promise of an NFT offering. 

    One recipient, MasterJew.eth, co-founder of ApeFathersNFT, took to X to alert the public about the fraudulent scheme.

    This incident highlights the need for users to exercise caution and verify communications from trusted sources in the rapidly evolving NFT landscape.

    Nike web3-enabled platform

    .Swoosh, described on Nike’s official blog as a “web3-enabled platform,” serves as a digital community fostering inclusivity for athletes, digital creators, and collectors.

    Positioned as a space to shape the future of sports, .Swoosh allows members to explore and purchase virtual collectibles, including shoes and jerseys, soon wearable in digital games and immersive experiences.

    Per data from CoinGecko, the global NFT market cap is over $28.1 billion, with a -3.6% decline and trading volume of over $2.8 billion in the last 24 hours.


    Follow Us on Google News

    [ad_2]

    Ogwu Osaemezu Emmanuel

    Source link

  • Pudgy Penguins: Webkinz-like online game will launch in 2024

    Pudgy Penguins: Webkinz-like online game will launch in 2024

    [ad_1]

    NFT toys startup Pudgy Penguins has set its sights on joining the virtual gaming industry with the Webkinz-like experience, a game the creators have named “Pudgy World.”

    According to the company’s CEO Luca Schnetzler, the interactive virtual world powered by zksync will launch its alpha mode sometime in 2024, specifically before April, and will be available to Pudgy Penguin NFT holders. 

    They’ll be chilling in “Pudgy World” – an interactive digital playground for Pudgy Penguins NFT holders and toy owners as well as the uninitiated. The platform’s early-access version will launch sometime before next April, offering players both narrative-driven and open-ended gameplay options.”

    Pudgy Penguins CEO Luca Schnetzler Speaking at the Art Basel Miami 2023 event 

    Schnetzler believes Pudgy World will enable Pudgy Penguins “stans” to connect and “interact with their characters,” saying the virtual world is going to revolutionize their fandom. The NFTs, created from the real-life toy brand of plushies and figurines, were launched around July 2021 and have become quite a popular selection among NFT enthusiasts.

    Per NFT marketplace OpenSea, there are currently about 8,888 Pudgy Penguin NFTs currently in possession of 4403 holders. The digital collections’ floor price is about 11.788 Ethereum (ETH), equivalent to approximately $27,000, data from NFTPriceFloor shows.

    At the end of November, Pudgy Penguins announced its GIFs and Stickers had reached more than 10 billion views on GIPHY on X (formerly Twitter). The toy company said the views garnered allowed it to “cement the Pudgy Penguins IP in internet culture,” as a brand more people show interest in every day.

    After management changes that almost tarnished the startup’s name, Pudgy Penguin-related assets saw a massive growth in sales, and it now aims to sell toys in about 2,000 Walmart stores across the U.S. 

    According to reports from the company, every Pudgy Penguins toy will include a scannable code that provides a digital ‘Forever Pudgy’ birth certificate or a distinctive character dwelling within the Pudgy World.

    The company stated that Pudgy World players will have the opportunity to venture into the virtual world as unique characters of their own. Additionally, the virtual world will introduce the brand’s first-ever “Hero Characters,” named Pudgy and Peaches.


    Follow Us on Google News

    [ad_2]

    Julius Mutunkei

    Source link

  • Yuga Labs, Magic Eden unveil Ethereum NFT marketplace

    Yuga Labs, Magic Eden unveil Ethereum NFT marketplace

    [ad_1]

    Yuga Labs, the creators of Bored Ape Yacht Club and Magic Eden, are collaborating to launch an Ethereum NFT marketplace that will ensure creators receive their right royalties.  

    In a statement shared on their X platform, Magic Eden expressed enthusiasm for collaborating with Yuga Labs and their joint efforts in building an ETH marketplace. They emphasized the importance of supporting creators, as they believe that without them, web3 cannot thrive. 

    This partnership aims to prioritize the rights of creators by ensuring they receive their exact royalties from NFT sales. Together, they aim to strengthen the digital collectibles ecosystem by fostering creativity and innovation.

    Via this collaboration, there will be an obligation where Magic Eden will be responsible for sharing a portion of secondary market sales proceeds from their NFT collections with Yuga Labs. 

    Yuga Labs’ stance on OpenSea and royalty enforcement

    Yuga Labs has recently taken a position regarding OpenSea and royalty enforcement. They have decided to reduce their support for OpenSea due to OpenSea’s announcement about discontinuing its own chain royalty enforcement tool called Operator Filter

    Introduced in November 2022, the Operator Filter allowed creators to restrict sales of their NFTs to platforms that offer royalties. The intention was to filter out platforms that didn’t adhere to these principles, including ones like Blur.

    However, OpenSea surprised everyone by revealing in August that they would be “sunsetting” the Operator Filter. 

    Bored Ape Yacht Club’s performance amidst challenges 

    The NFT market encountered challenges in August, experiencing its lowest transaction volumes in two years. There was a decrease in the number of active participants trading NFTs.

    Despite struggles faced by the NFT market, the floor price of BAYC NFTs increased on Oct. 30, reaching 30 ETH.  

    Magic Eden’s Solana-powered cNFTs

    Magic Eden is expanding its support for the Solana-powered compressed NFTs (cNFTs). The cNFTs feature make it easier for creators to mint NFTs on the Solana network.

    Magic Eden grabbed headlines by supporting BRC 20 tokens on its Chain platform. The company believes that supporting cNFTs is a game-changing feature that will significantly impact the world of digital collectibles. At a time when NFT trading volume is facing challenges, Magic Eden’s approach has the potential to inject vitality into the market.


    Follow Us on Google News

    [ad_2]

    Ogwu Osaemezu Emmanuel

    Source link

  • Blockchain Could Help Us Combat Climate Change — Here’s How. | Entrepreneur

    Blockchain Could Help Us Combat Climate Change — Here’s How. | Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    90% of corporations now view sustainability as a crucial part of their organization’s strategy. But turning recognition of the importance of sustainability into concrete action is often easier said than done. Notably, only 60% of organizations actually have a sustainability strategy in place — representing a 30% gap between the number that view this as important and the number that are actually taking action.

    As part of the effort to get more companies to adopt eco-conscious initiatives, carbon credits have become an increasingly important part of the modern sustainability narrative. But challenges to the effective adoption and use of carbon credits remain. However, with digital carbon spurring a new wave of green entrepreneurship, this is poised to change.

    Read on to learn more about digital carbon credits and how they could potentially play a role in your own efforts to go green.

    Related: Digital Ads Are Fueling a Climate Disaster. Take These Steps to Offset The Industry’s Hidden Toll on Our Planet.

    So, what are carbon credits?

    First, it’s important to understand what carbon credits are and what their role looks like in the current corporate environment. Carbon credits are designed to offset the greenhouse gas emissions of corporations and nations.

    There are two main types of carbon credits. The first is often referred to as a “permit to pollute” or “regulatory compliance credits,” in which a company essentially buys carbon credits equivalent to the amount that they went over the allowed rate. As Investopedia explains, companies are granted a specific number of credits, with each credit allowing for the emission of one ton of carbon dioxide.

    These credits are designed to decline over time, and companies can sell or trade their excess credits. Essentially, the idea is that having credits to “cap” carbon emissions will create a financial incentive for businesses to lower their emissions.

    For example, a country might require companies to limit their greenhouse emissions to 50,000 tons per year. A business that previously produced 70,000 tons of emissions per year must either buy carbon credits or find a way to lower its emissions. Even for smaller businesses, these guidelines can serve as a good way to consider how you can lower your emissions over time.

    The other type of credit (known as “voluntary offset credits”) is obtained when a company offsets its own emissions through its voluntary participation in an environmental project. An organization that invests in a project in areas such as renewable energy or forestry can then obtain carbon offset credits as a way of quantifying their environmental impact.

    Related: Sustainability In Business: Why Change Is Needed Now

    How digital carbon enhances the existing carbon credit market

    Currently, the standard market for creating, selling and trading carbon credits leaves a lot of room for interpretation. “Permit to pollute” credits are government issued — but in many parts of the world, participation in these carbon credit exchanges is relatively limited.

    For example, the United States only has two state-based emissions trading programs. These are the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), which is limited to power sector emissions in several Northeastern states, and California’s AB-32 Cap-and-Trade Program.

    Because of this, most businesses only participate in the carbon offsets voluntary market — obtaining carbon credits by investing in sustainability projects. However, offset credits aren’t regulated by the government, which can create challenges for selling, trading and verifying carbon offsets. How can your business manage carbon credits effectively without a clear system in place?

    This is where digital carbon can help level the playing field, improving accessibility and streamlining processes. As a report from Changeblock reveals, digital carbon offers digital credits representing proportional ownership of climate-backed tokens. A central digital platform enables these tokens to be gathered as a single asset that is easily traded. Rather than needing to buy individual tokens from different sellers or marketplaces, digital carbon credits can represent one ton’s worth of emissions from several offsetting projects.

    With blockchain management, each digital carbon credit comes with a comprehensive data packet detailing the transaction. This includes details on emissions reductions quantity and pricing. In some cases, it could even provide transparent access to raw data from sensors such as gas chromatography devices, scales, pressure monitoring systems and more to verify the amount of carbon offset associated with each digital credit.

    This actionable insight and the accessibility of a digital platform help bring offset carbon credits to a significantly broader audience, incentivizing more organizations and individuals to participate in climate change initiatives. Digital carbon credits open up this concept to the masses — so even if you’re “too small” for a traditional carbon credit program, you can still access digital credits.

    Key advantages of digital carbon

    Digital carbon offers several noteworthy benefits that, when properly implemented, allow carbon credits to become more effective in driving the transition to a global net-zero economy.

    By using a digital platform as a central location for tracking and trading carbon credits, these processes will naturally become more efficient and transparent. For organizations that are seeking to sell, trade or verify their carbon credits, this provides a much-needed layer of trust in what is still a largely unregulated industry.

    A digital platform also enhances the potential for organizations to offset emissions on a global scale by being able to support and gain carbon credits for sustainability projects anywhere. This also makes carbon credits more easily accessible to individuals and organizations that might not have the capabilities to undertake carbon reduction projects on their own. For example, you could partner with another sustainability organization, donating whatever money or resources you can, rather than needing to spearhead a sustainability project on your own.

    In many ways, digital carbon is set to support a significant expansion in new sustainability-focused partnerships worldwide by making it easier for companies of all sizes to invest in environmental projects of varied scope and focus.

    Related: 3 Ways You Can Bring Sustainability to Your Workplace

    Creating the future of sustainability

    Demand for carbon credits is only expected to increase in the coming years. As businesses and governments seek to curb their impact on the environment, the ability to effectively create, track and trade carbon and other environmental credits will become even more important.

    With the growing wave of digital carbon initiatives, much-needed transparency and efficiency can make these efforts more effective than ever before. As you consider how your own business can become more environmentally friendly, don’t overlook the potential value of digital carbon.

    [ad_2]

    Lucas Miller

    Source link

  • A twisted tale of celebrity promotion, opaque transactions and allegations of racist tropes | CNN Business

    A twisted tale of celebrity promotion, opaque transactions and allegations of racist tropes | CNN Business

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    Sitting across from Jimmy Fallon on “The Tonight Show,” Paris Hilton, wearing a sparkling neon green turtleneck dress and a high ponytail, looked at a picture of a glum cartoon ape and said it “reminds me of me.” The audience laughed. It did not look like her at all.

    Hilton and Fallon were chatting about their NFTs – non-fungible tokens, typically digital art bought with cryptocurrency – from the Bored Ape Yacht Club. The camera zoomed in on framed printouts of the ape cartoons. “We’re both apes,” Fallon said. Hilton, with her signature vocal fry, replied, “Love it.”

    “The Tonight Show” episode from January 2022 is a YouTube time capsule showing the temporary alliance between celebrity marketing and the crypto industry. Bored Ape Yacht Club was not the biggest crypto phenomenon, but it was one of the top beneficiaries of celebrity hype. That celebrity hype, in turn, helped draw new consumers to crypto — an industry rife with manipulation and fraud, and one that US regulators are now giving more scrutiny in the wake of the collapse of crypto exchange FTX. But for a time, when crypto’s prices seemed to have no limit, the money appeared too good for some to ask questions — questions like: Why are some of those apes wearing prison clothes?

    “That was a very significant moment, because the audience for that show is very different from the typical crypto person,” explained Molly White, a software engineer and a fellow at the Harvard Library Innovation Lab. The Bored Apes — a computer-generated collection of 10,000 cartoons — were being presented as a status symbol, membership in an exclusive club. Hilton, Fallon, and other celebrities had joined — and viewers could join, too, if they bought an NFT.

    A class action lawsuit, filed in December, alleges Hilton, Fallon, and other celebrities conspired in a “vast scheme” to artificially inflate the price of Bored Ape NFTs and enrich themselves, the crypto payments company they used to get the apes, MoonPay, and the company that made the Bored Apes, Yuga Labs.

    Hilton and Fallon did not respond to requests for comment.

    In April 2021, Yuga Labs released the Bored Ape Yacht Club collection of cartoon apes with a computer-generated combination of features and accessories, such as gold fur, a sailor hat, laser eyes, 3-D glasses, a cigarette, as well as “hip hop” clothes, a “pimp coat,” a prison jumpsuit, a pith helmet, and a “sushi chef” headband. The founders were anonymous, known only by their online screen names.

    That fall, Hollywood agent Guy Oseary reached out to Yuga Labs, eventually investing in the company and joining its board. Soon celebrities started posting their Bored Apes on social media — including Oseary’s client Madonna, along with Steph Curry, Lil Baby, DJ Khaled, Snoop Dogg, Gwyneth Paltrow, and more. Bored Apes started selling for hundreds of thousands of dollars. Justin Bieber bought an ape for $1.3 million. By March 2022, Yuga got a $450 million venture capital investment, and was valued at $4 billion.

    Guy Oseary and Madonna at a 2016 Billboard Women In Music event. Oseary said both bought NFTs from Bored Ape Yacht Club.

    The class action lawsuit claims, “this purported interest in” Bored Apes “by high-profile taste makers was entirely manufactured by Oseary at the behest of” Yuga Labs. “In order to make the promotion of, and subsequent interest in, the BAYC NFTs appear to be organic (as opposed to being solely the result of a paid promotion), the Company needed a way to discreetly pay their celebrity cohorts.” The suit alleges they did this through MoonPay.

    When Jimmy Fallon introduced his audience to crypto, he also presented a frictionless way to buy in: MoonPay, a payments company that allows customers to buy crypto through most major payment systems like with a credit card. In November 2021, Fallon said on “The Tonight Show” that he’d bought his first NFT through MoonPay. “MoonPay? MoonPay! I did my homework — Moonpay, which is like PayPal but for crypto,” Fallon said. The following January, when Hilton showed her ape on the show, she said, “You said you got it on MoonPay, so I went and I copied you.”

    A few months later, in April 2022, MoonPay announced more than 60 celebrities and influencers had invested in the firm. MoonPay spokesman Justin Hamilton told CNN that Hilton became an investor, but not until after she spoke with Fallon on “The Tonight Show.” The FTC generally requires an endorser to disclose when they have a financial interest in promoting a company.

    The celebrity hype and unbelievable prices generated enormous media interest. “Rolling Stone” minted NFTs of the magazine with Bored Apes on the cover. Guy Oseary was on the cover of “Variety” under the headline “NFT King.”

    Independent journalists, under the names of Coffeezilla and Dirty Bubble Media, noticed blockchain ledger records suggesting not everything was as it appeared. Cryptocurrency is traded on the blockchain, a permanent and public ledger of every transaction. That means it can reveal financial relationships, if you figure out the right questions to ask.

    Hours before Justin Bieber bought an ape for the equivalent of $1.3 million on January 29, 2022, Bieber received Ethereum worth about $2.5 million in his crypto wallet, the blockchain shows. A couple weeks before Post Malone released a music video in November 2021 in which he bought a Bored Ape through MoonPay, MoonPay transferred cryptocurrency then worth about $760,000 into the artist’s wallet, and sent two more payments, worth about $640,000, a couple weeks after. MoonPay admits it paid for the placement in Post Malone’s video but says other celebrities paid full price for their service in US dollars.

    Many celebrities who got apes thanked MoonPay on social media. Gwyneth Paltrow tweeted, “Joined @BoredApeYC ready for the reveal? Thanks @moonpay concierge.” The rapper Gunna posted on Instagram, “I Bought A @boredapeyachtclub NFT worth 300K No Cap ! His Name is BUTTA Thanks @moonpay !” Lil Baby mentioned MoonPay in his song “Top Priority.”

    The blockchain shows MoonPay paying high prices for the apes, and then transferring them to purported celebrity wallets for free. MoonPay explains this as a service that helps wealthy people buy NFTs without setting up their own crypto wallet.

    The company says the “white-glove” service was created because MoonPay’s CEO, Ivan Soto-Wright, had a lot of celebrity friends, and many of them asked how they could get an NFT. Jimmy Fallon, Lil Baby — they were Soto-Wright’s friends, Hamilton said.

    CNN spoke to several former MoonPay employees who said they were skeptical the celebrities paid for their NFTs, because there was no evidence on the blockchain.

    The company’s ape purchases have been significant. Since 2021, one of its wallets, “MoonPayHQ,” has spent at least $25 million on NFTs — 60% or about $15 million of that was spent on Bored Apes. The company told CNN they had 14 apes in a cold storage wallet, which offers more safety. It said that five of those NFTs were “purchased by concierge clients that are in the process of being transferred.” The last ape was purchased in April 2022, 10 months ago, according to blockchain records.

    One influencer has said he was approached about an ape. In a Twitter Spaces audio chat last year, celebrity jeweler Ben Baller said, “Real talk: not once, not twice, three times, I’ve been offered a Bored Ape through MoonPay. … The fact that some of these super top-tier all-star NBA players have them? And I was like, ‘Yo this is all cap [lies.]’ They didn’t buy this sh*t.” Baller did not respond to CNN’s request for comment. MoonPay’s spokesman said this didn’t happen.

    Oseary, the Hollywood agent and MoonPay/Yuga investor, texted CNN in response to a question: “NO ONE is paid to join the club and Yuga do NOT and have NOT given away any apes.” He said he paid full price for his Bored Ape, and so did Madonna.

    Yuga Labs declined an on-the-record interview with CNN. In a statement, the company said, “In our view, these claims are opportunistic and parasitic. We strongly believe that they are without merit, and look forward to proving as much.” Hamilton, MoonPay’s spokesman, said of the lawsuit, “We look forward to it being dismissed.”

    “The fine art market is a scam – that’s OK, at least there’s art going on,” said Max Gail, who’s been a blockchain developer since 2010, and founded Omakasea and Eth Gobblers.com. (Gail hosted the Twitter Space in which Baller discussed Bored Apes.) The NFT market, he said, “is like a parody of the fine art market. They took the same strategies that had been employed in the fine art market, but then distorted it with some strange crypto economics.”

    Anonymous buyers and sellers dealing in items whose values are difficult to calculate has made the fine art market susceptible to money laundering, a Senate investigation found in 2020. In 2022, an average of more than half of NFT trading volume on the Ethereum blockchain was “wash” trading, according to an analysis at Dune Analytics. (Most NFTs are on Ethereum.) Essentially, wash trades are a transaction in which the buyer and seller are the same person, or they’re working together. Wash trading has been illegal in traditional finance since the Great Depression, because it can distort the market by making people believe there is a high volume of interest in the investment. The ability to open many anonymous cryptocurrency wallets makes wash trading NFTs easier. A Chainalysis report found one “prolific NFT wash trader” made 830 sales to self-financed wallets in 2021.

    Though NFTs have been celebrated as the future of digital art, and a way for artists to earn royalties, many NFT collections operate more like securities — a financial instrument, like stocks or bonds, that hold some monetary value. “People will say that the technology itself has provided this whole new way of creating digital art,” Harvard’s Molly White said. “It’s not that unique. The unique part of it is the speculative bubble.”

    Mad Dog Jones' SHIFT// goes on view as part of 'Natively Digital: A Curated NFT Sale' at Sotheby's in June 2021. NFTs have been celebrated as the future of digital art.

    The NFT marketplace does not always make sense even to those who benefit from it. “Bored Apes have gone from $100 to $100,000 in a year. Nothing appreciates that fast,” a successful NFT artist said. The artist’s own works had gone from a couple hundred dollars to tens of thousands. One of the artist’s major collectors “treats me as a commodity and my art is a commodity and he’s always pumping and dumping it. … It’s being treated as a financial vehicle.”

    But there is pressure not to raise questions about the system. The NFT artist did not want to go on the record, saying it would be career suicide. “The big collectors watch for artists that FUD. And as soon as an artist FUDs, they get cancelled,” the artist said. FUD is “fear, uncertainty, and doubt,” or criticism of crypto.

    Beyond how the Bored Ape NFTs are traded, what they depict is at issue in yet another Yuga Labs legal battle.

    In the fall of 2021, accusations began swirling on social media that the Bored Ape Yacht Club contained visual references to racist memes from the troll site, 4chan. The artist Ryder Ripps — who’s worked with stars like Kanye West and Tame Impala — started tweeting about the claims of racist imagery. Ripps claims Guy Oseary, the Hollywood agent on Yuga’s board, called to pressure him to stop talking about the claims. (Oseary told CNN, “I can’t speak on active litigation.”)

    Ripps doubled down and made a website cataloging the claims. Then, in an act he says was meant to protest the alleged racism and comment on the idea you can’t copy an NFT, Ripps made copycat NFTs he sold as RR/BAYC. Yuga sued Ripps for trademark infringement, and argues that his maligning of the Yuga apes is nothing more than a profiteering tactic. Ripps says Yuga is trying to silence its critics, and has doubled down on his claims as part of his defense in the trademark suit.

    Yuga Labs called the accusations “the incoherent ramblings of a small group of for-profit conspiracy theorists.” However, the Yuga lawsuit against Ripps could affect the class action lawsuit against Yuga. Ripps’s lawyers have issued subpoenas to Paris Hilton and Jimmy Fallon.

    To assert its trademark rights, Yuga must show that consumers associate its logos with its products, and it did so in a legal filing, in part, by pointing to celebrity owners “including TV host Jimmy Fallon…”

    Ripps’s lawyer, Louis Tompros, asserts Yuga compensated celebrities for promoting its NFTs, and they did not disclose it. “And by doing that, in our view, they have gotten this public notoriety for their brand improperly,” Tompros told CNN. “And so having gotten it improperly, they now can’t go and assert that they have these rights.”

    This week Yuga co-founder Wylie Aronow published a 24-page letter explaining that he was stepping back from the company and addressing widespread rumors that the company and its products were connected to the alt-right.

    “I will soon call out this utter bullsh*t under oath,” he wrote.

    So what are the racist references alleged by Ripps and others? To start, there’s what’s right on the surface: some of the NFTs are pictures of apes in “hip hop” clothes, a “pimp coat,” a prison uniform, a bone necklace, gold and diamond grills. Record executive Dame Dash, a crypto enthusiast, pointed out on a podcast last year that monkeys and apes are old racist tropes.

    “Think if you were a racist, like ‘Guess what I’m gonna do? I’mma get Black people to love monkeys so much that they gonna buy them, wear them on their neck… go to something called ApeFest and they’re gonna like it!’ Wouldn’t that sound funny?” Dash said on the podcast. “That’s what’s happening.”

    Dash told CNN he hadn’t intended to target Yuga directly. But he’d started to wonder if he was being trolled, given the ubiquity of apes in crypto. “Racism is different these days — you can’t be so overt about it. You have to kind of troll,” Dash said.

    This week Yuga agreed to settle a lawsuit with a developer who worked with Ripps, with the developer agreeing to pay them $25,000 and saying he would reject all disparaging statements against Yuga Labs.

    Ryan Hickman, a software engineer who also worked with Ripps on RR/BAYC, is also being sued separately by Yuga. Hickman, who is Black, thought the Bored Apes looked like stereotypical portrayals of Black people as stupid or lazy. He said he thought this would be obvious to most people the second they saw an image of a Bored Ape. But, he said, “then somebody says, ‘Well, it’s worth $100,000.’ They say, ‘Okay well, tell me more.’”

    In a statement, Yuga said, “Our company and founders strongly condemn the spread of hate, in any form, against any group.” Hollywood agent Oseary said he’d never been on the troll site 4chan.

    The crypto community has adopted a lot of terms — rekt, frens, wagmi — that were popularized on 4chan, and it’s not always clear if the person using them understands where they came from. “I doubt that they were a massive alt-right troll campaign,” Harvard’s Molly White said. “I do think it’s likely that the creators of the project basically included some nods to 4chan.”

    “It’s not one thing that makes it racist. It’s everything together as a package,” programmer and 8chan founder Fredrick Brennan said, looking at comparisons between Pepe the Frog memes and Bored Apes. Brennan took an interest in the claims that Yuga referenced 4chan memes, because he’d seen them so often when he was running 8chan, a similar troll site. He quit 8chan in 2016, and in 2019 pushed for it to be taken down because it had become a hub for extremist violence. He began to suspect the Yuga founders were like the people he used to know.

    Take one of the apes’ characteristics, which Yuga calls a “sushi chef headband.” Brennan reads and speaks Japanese, and saw the headband actually said “kamikaze,” which has been used as a slur against Japanese people. A similar headband appeared on a Pepe meme. “That one was the most shocking,” he told CNN.

    In a legal filing connected to the Ripps case, Yuga said the apes reflected a combination of many traits, “not any person’s purported racism.”

    “I was hoping, in my eternal optimism,” Brennan said, “that people would become a lot more skeptical of tech bros. … And that liberal — so-called — celebrities in Hollywood would view these people with suspicion. Apparently not.”

    – CORRECTION: This story has been updated to clarify when Paris Hilton invested in MoonPay. Jimmy Fallon is not an investor, a company spokesman said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 5 Bear Market Lessons From a Crypto Entrepreneur

    5 Bear Market Lessons From a Crypto Entrepreneur

    [ad_1]

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

    2022 was an important year for the crypto space. We will all remember the bankruptcies of major global companies: Luna, Celsius Network, FTX, BlockFi and others that left investors with massive losses. The bear market has dramatically affected the crypto economy and investors’ portfolios.

    Just like in 2013 and 2017, the market moves in cycles. First, we had the crypto summer, where everybody was hyped about their profits and gains. Then came the crypto autumn, and investors started to see red in their portfolios. But investors’ portfolios started bleeding when the crypto winter got underway, and even some big reliable companies went underwater.

    In this article, I want to focus on some of the most important lessons I have taken for myself and my company after living through one more winter of the crypto market.

    Related: Will Crypto Make a Comeback in 2023?

    1. Money management strategies are everything

    2022 is the year of fallen legends. Companies believed to be reliable borrowers, like Alameda Research, borrowed funds without collateral and ultimately went bankrupt due to improper money management. On top of that, other standout names in the crypto space, such as Luna, Celsius Network, FTX, and BlockFi, also went bankrupt against all market expectations.

    2022 showed that different approaches need to be used to track company assets, oversee their liquidity and provide collateral for obligations. The mistake many made was blindly placing faith in a company because of its size and reputation instead of analyzing the fundamentals.

    Related: How to Manage Your Money With Confidence

    2. Stay away from toxic assets

    The future market leaders are the companies who survived unscratched problems related to Luna, Celsius Network, FTX or BlockFi and do not hold toxic assets. These are the companies with the potential to launch new products and ideas.

    From personal experience, I can say that 2022 was when my company delved into exploring new directions. It proved that the standard earning tools on the market just recently have no future. So we chose to focus on developing new products that can fix the ongoing problems of the crypto market. I believe that doing this — answering a pain point of the sector and providing a reliable service to alleviate it — is a crucial step in maintaining your company’s viability in tumultuous market conditions.

    3. Watch out for tokenomics

    When looking at a company, all performance indicators are important. What good is it to have great management and a business model if the tokenomics are not good? People are first and foremost investing in the token itself, making tokenomics an essential piece of providing a stable development.

    Bad tokenomics often gives valuable insight into whether the company’s business model is sustainable over the long term. Look for projects with tokenomics designed to serve the investors, not the developers. Watch out for high inflation rates and other red flags, which are often signs of an unsustainable business model designed to enrich the very few.

    Related: 8 Smart Ways to Analyze Crypto Token Before Investing in It

    4. Don’t follow the hype

    This year proves that the market is often wrong. During the crypto summer, many coins and companies grew on hype. Investors hopped on the train and followed the crowd ignoring the lack of solid fundamentals and prospects of future growth. However, when the bubble popped, their portfolio suffered.

    Luna, for example. The company had $50 million in assets but still promised 20% interest payments in its own stablecoin currency. That meant $10 billion in payouts to people holding funds in its protocols. The business plan was too good to be true, but tons of people fell for it and lost everything when the stablecoin proved not to be that stable after all.

    Related: Is Crypto and NFTs a Passing Fad?

    5. Teamwork is essential

    In times of market turmoil, teamwork is more important than ever. The keyword is flexibility; the market is unpredictable, so it’s the team’s job to adapt to any changes rapidly.

    The market has very short business phases meaning that companies need to be highly flexible and able to adapt to new realities. Bear markets often make it impossible to plan too far ahead. Focus on what’s in front of you, prioritize clients’ objectives, predict what products the next phase of the market will be interested in, and prepare them in advance.

    Furthermore, the bear market can also be a great time to generate revenue and offer products that alleviate investors’ fears. Additionally, with the right money management skills, companies can alleviate clients’ anxiety by investing their funds in discounted assets.

    Stay positive. The bear market will be over soon

    The bear market is not easy, but staying optimistic is essential. Take a step back and realize that earning on the crypto market is a long-term game; that’s the wealth-building secret.

    My opinion is based on analyzing past phases, where typically, the crypto winter lasts 4-6 months, then comes the spring. It will be essential for companies to enter with a big user base, good products and opportunities to scale up their own business.

    Companies need to pay attention to the costs and build teams out of people who believe in the market more than ever. Teams should have crypto enthusiasts that understand the market and products well. Having pros on the team is essential, so do not let them slip through your fingers.

    Related: The Bear Market is A Blessing For Web3’s Future. Here’s Why.

    [ad_2]

    Vladimir Gorbunov

    Source link

  • Online creators hit with IP and copyright lawsuits | CNN Business

    Online creators hit with IP and copyright lawsuits | CNN Business

    [ad_1]


    New York
    Business
     — 

    It’s weird when wrestling superstar Randy Orton, Netflix’s romance “Bridgerton,” TikTok, a tattoo artist, Instagram, NFTs and Andy Warhol’s portrait of Prince all show up in the same law school textbook.

    A series of hot-button lawsuits have linked all those unlikely creators and platforms in litigation that goes as high as the US Supreme Court. The litigation deals with issues of intellectual property, copyright infringement and fair use in a rapidly changing new-media landscape.

    For decades, so-called “copycat” lawsuits boiled down to ‘you stole my song/book/idea.’ Now, as the number of platforms to showcase artistic content have multiplied, these court cases are testing the rights of fans, creators and rivals to reinterpret other people’s intellectual property.

    At issue, particularly in social media or new technology, is exactly how much you have to transform something to profit and get credit for it, literally, to make it your business.

    Three weeks ago, in a first-of-its-kind case, a jury in an Illinois federal court ruled that tattoo artist Catherine Alexander’s copyright was violated when the likeness of her client, World Wrestling Entertainment star Randy Orton, was depicted in a video game. Alexander has tattooed Orton’s arms from his shoulders to his wrists.

    She won, but not much: $3,750, because the court ruled that, though her copyright had been violated, her tattoos didn’t impact game profits. Nonetheless, it set a precedent.

    The ruling calls into question the abilities of people with tattoos “to control the right to make or license realistic depictions of their own likenesses,” said Aaron J. Moss, a Hollywood litigation attorney specializing in copyright matters.

    Blame the rise of remix culture. For most of the twentieth century, mass content was created and distributed by professionals,” said Moss. “Individuals were consumers. Legal issues were pretty straightforward. But, now, most of the time, the content is being repurposed, remixed or repackaged.”

    “It’s all new and it’s all a mess,” said Victor Wiener, a fine-art appraiser who’s consulted for Lloyd’s of London and serves as an expert witness in art-valuation court cases. Over the past several decades, the distinctions between professionals and amateurs, artists and copycats and between production and consumption have blurred. In such gray areas, said Wiener, “it can come down to who the judge, or the tryer of fact, believes.”

    Streaming service Netflix late last month settled a copyright lawsuit against fans of their Regency romance “Bridgerton” who wrote and workshopped an “Unofficial Bridgerton Musical” on TikTok.

    In January 2021, a month after the Netflix show premiered, singer Abigail Barlow teamed up with musician Emily Bear to create their own interpretation of the hit series. In a souped-up version of fan fiction, the two women began to write and to perform songs they had written, often using exact dialogue from the series.

    It was a huge hit on TikTok, in part because the duo invited feedback and participation, making it a crowd-sourced artwork.

    At first Netflix applauded the effort and even okayed the recording of an album of songs. But when the creators took their show on the road and sold tickets, Netflix sued.

    Producer and series creator Shondra Rhimes, in a statement released when the suit was filed in July, said “what started as a fun celebration by [fans] on social media has turned into the blatant taking of intellectual property.”

    Cases like this turn on “fair use,” matters such as how much of another work someone appropriates. Or whether it dents the original creator’s ability to profit. In the case of “Bridgerton,” neither side has commented on the resolution of the suit, but a planned performance of the musical at Royal Albert Hall scheduled for last month was cancelled.

    Uncontrolled misappropriation is particularly common in the relatively new NFT art field.

    “Today, a 15-year-old can copy your work and spread it across the Internet like feral cat pee at no cost and with little effort. The intellectual capital of an artist can be appropriated on a massive, global scale unimaginable by the people who wrote copyright laws,” said John Wolpert, co-founder of the IBM blockchain and of several blockchain projects.

    And the relatively new phenomenon of trading art NFTs with cryptocurrency “has created a perverse new incentive to misappropriate an artist’s work and to claim it as your own and charge people to purchase it,” he added.

    In one of several NFT suits finding their way to the courts, fashion giant Hermes sued L.A. artist Mason Rothschild after he created 100 NFT’s that depicted Hermes Birkin bags wrapped in fake fur.

    Hermes filed a lawsuit in January in the court of the Southern District in New York charging trademark infringement and injury to business reputation, not to mention “rip off,” with Hermes requesting a quick summary judgment.

    But in the past, courts have often bent over backward to give an artist leeway in critique and parody. Rebecca Tushnet, a Harvard Law professor and expert on copyright and trademark law who represents the artist, has argued his “MetaBirkins” art project is essentially protected as it comments on the relationship between consumerism and the value of art.

    Last month, the Central District court of California ruled on a doozy of a copyright lawsuit that arose via Instagram: Carlos Vila v. Deadly Doll.

    In 2020, the photographer had taken an image of model Irina Shayk. She was wearing sweatpants from fashion company Deadly Doll that featured a large illustration of a woman carrying a skull. The photographer subsequently licensed his image of the model for reproduction. Deadly Doll posted Vila’s photo on their Instagram account and he sued. They counter-sued, arguing he was the infringer. The suit, detailed by litigator Moss in his Copyright Lately blog, is moving forward in California.

    Perhaps the most important case has nothing to do with new media – it concerns Andy Warhol’s altered photograph of the late artist Prince that ran in Vanity Fair magazine years ago. But it is expected to set a precedent.

    Right now, the US Supreme Court is hearing this landmark case regarding Warhol’s alleged misappropriation of photographer Lynn Goldsmith’s work in his silkscreens of Prince. The court is set to determine how, and how much, an artist or creator must transform a work to make it their own – guidelines that will surely create as much of a buzz as the intellectual property itself.

    [ad_2]

    Source link