ReportWire

Tag: NNT

  • Trump says he’ll send troops to Portland to handle ‘domestic terrorists’

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Saturday he will send troops to Portland, Oregon, “authorizing Full Force, if necessary” to handle “domestic terrorists” as he expands his controversial deployments to more American cities.


    What You Need To Know

    • President Donald Trump says he’ll send troops to Portland, Oregon, “authorizing Full Force, if necessary” to handle what he is calling “domestic terrorists”
    • He’s expanding his controversial deployments to more American cities
    • He made the announcement Saturday on social media, writing that he was directing the Department of Defense to “provide all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland”
    • Trump deployed the National Guard and active-duty Marines to Los Angeles over the summer and as part of his law enforcement takeover in the District of Columbia

    He made the announcement on social media, writing that he was directing the Department of Defense to “provide all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland.”

    Trump said the decision was necessary to protect U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities, which he described as “under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists.”

    Since the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, the Republican president has escalated his efforts to confront what he calls the “radical left,” which he blames for the country’s problems with political violence.

    He deployed the National Guard and active-duty Marines to Los Angeles over the summer and as part of his law enforcement takeover in the District of Columbia.

    The ICE facility in Portland has been the target of frequent demonstrations, sometimes leading to violent clashes. Some federal agents have been injured and several protesters have been charged with assault. When protesters erected a guillotine earlier this month, the Department of Homeland Security described it as “unhinged behavior.”

    Trump, in comments Thursday in the Oval Office, suggested some kind of operation was in the works.

    “We’re going to get out there and we’re going to do a pretty big number on those people in Portland,” he said, describing them as “professional agitators and anarchists.”

    Earlier in September, Trump had described living in Portland as “like living in hell” and said he was considering sending in federal troops, as he has recently threatened to do to combat crime in other cities, including Chicago and Baltimore.

    “Like other mayors across the country, I have not asked for -– and do not need -– federal intervention,” Portland’s mayor, Keith Wilson, said in a statement after Trump’s threat. Wilson said his city had protected freedom of expression while “addressing occasional violence and property destruction.”

    In Tennessee, Memphis has been bracing for an influx of National Guard troops, and on Friday Republican Gov. Bill Lee said they will be part of a surge of resources to fight crime in the city.

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Netanyahu says Israel ‘must finish the job’ against Hamas during U.N. address

    UNITED NATIONS –– In a speech Friday broadcast to the Gaza Strip via loudspeakers and through the takeover of Palestinians’ cellphones, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended his country’s efforts to destroy Hamas and told world leaders that Israel was “not done yet.” 


    What You Need To Know

    • In a speech Friday broadcast to Gaza via loudspeakers and through the takeover of Palestinians’ cell phones, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended his country’s efforts to destroy Hamas and told world leaders that Israel was “not done yet” 
    • As Netanyahu came to the podium to commence his remarks, dozens of delegates from multiple countries walked out, but others in the room applauded at the start of his speech and periodically throughout his address.
    • Netanyahu denounced calls for a Palestinian state, saying that his country would not let other nations “shove a terror state down our throats”
    • The Israeli leader also vociferously rejected allegations that his country was committing genocide in Gaza and weaponizing hunger, during his address to the United Nations General Assembly

    “Thanks to the resolve of our people, the courage of our soldiers and the bold decisions we took, Israel rebounded from its darkest day to deliver one of the most stunning military comebacks in history,” Netanyahu said during his United Nations General Assembly address. “But we are not done yet. The final elements, the final remnants of Hamas are holed up in Gaza City.

    “That is why Israel must finish the job,” he said.

    As Netanyahu came to the podium to begin his remarks, dozens of delegates from multiple countries walked out. Others in the room applauded at the start of his speech and periodically throughout the address.

    Netanyahu has faced growing international calls for an end to the war in Gaza, which began when Hamas-led militants killed roughly 1,200 people and took 251 others hostage. The Gaza Health Ministry recently estimated that 65,000 Palestinians have been killed and more than 167,000 injured since October 2023.

    During his address Friday, Netanyahu said that “special efforts” by Israeli intelligence had taken over the cellphones of Gazans to broadcast his remarks live. He called on remaining Hamas leaders to free the hostages and lay down their weapons or Israel would “hunt you down.”

    Netanyahu said that Israel has brought back 207 hostages, and about 20 of the 48 remaining in Gaza are still believed to be alive.

    He then read the names of the 20 hostages aloud, saying he wanted to speak directly to them by way of speakers pointing into the territory for his remarks, speaking first in Hebrew and then in English.

    “We will not rest until we bring all of you home,” he said.

    Shortly after Netanyahu concluded his remarks, President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House that an agreement on Gaza may be “very close.”

    “I think it’s a deal that will get the hostages back,” Trump said, without providing additional details. “It’s going to be a deal that will end the war. It’s going to be a dea l— it’s going to be peace.” 

    Allowing a Palestinian state would be ‘sheer madness,’ Netanyahu says

    Netanyahu denounced calls for a Palestinian state, saying that his country would not let other nations “shove a terror state down our throats.”

    “Giving the Palestinians a state one mile from Jerusalem after Oct. 7 is like giving al-Qaida a state one mile from New York City after Sept. 11,” he said. “This is sheer madness, and we won’t do it.”

    In the last few weeks, several countries –– including France, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia –– joined some 150 others around the world in formally recognizing a Palestinian state. The U.N. General Assembly also voted overwhelmingly this month to pass a nonbinding resolution, supporting a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict and urging Israel to commit to a Palestinian state.

    The Israeli leader said Friday that these nations sent a message that “murdering Jews pays off.”

    The Israeli prime minister’s address came a day after Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas gave a virtual address to the U.N., during which he thanked countries for recognizing a Palestinian state. Abbas said that the Palestinian Authority, which oversees the West Bank, was prepared to take over governance of Gaza and that Hamas would have no future role in leading the territory. 

    The Palestinian leader also condemned the planned expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Israel announced in August that it approved an expansion of settlements to divide the West Bank –– a move that Palestinians and rights groups say would divide much of the West Bank and destroy hopes for a future Palestinian state.

    Later Thursday, Trump told reporters gathered at the Oval Office that he wouldn’t allow Israel to annex the occupied West Bank. Possible annexation has been floated in Israel in response to U.S. allies moving to recognize a Palestinian state. 

    Netanyahu refutes accusations of genocide in Gaza

    The Israeli leader vociferously rejected allegations Friday that his country was committing genocide in Gaza and weaponizing hunger.

    A United Nations Human Rights Council report earlier this month contended that Israel was committing genocide, and the world’s leading authority on food crisis declared last month that famine was occurring in Gaza City –– both charges that Israel refutes.

    Netanyahu called the allegations of genocide “antisemitic lies,” saying efforts by his country to encourage Gazans to leave the largest city in the territory disproved the charge.

    “Would a country committing genocide plead with a civilian population it is supposedly targeting to get out of harm’s way?” he said. He also blamed Hamas for stealing food intended for Gazans. 

    Many Palestinians are unwilling to be uprooted, while others are too weak or can’t afford to leave, international aid groups say.

    Netanyahu calls for ‘snapback’ sanctions on Iran

    Netanyahu praised Trump for “his bold and decisive action” in bombing Iran’s nuclear enrichment sites earlier this year

    “President Trump and I promised to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, and we delivered on that promise,” Netanyahu said, later adding, “We lifted a dark cloud that could have claimed millions and millions of lives.”

    Netanyahu called Iran’s stockpiles of enriched uranium to be “eliminated” and for “snapback” sanctions to be reinstated over its failure to comply with conditions of the 2015 nuclear deal. 

    A 30-day deadline triggered by France, Germany and the United Kingdom is set to end Sunday. However, the U.N. Security Council is expected to vote Friday on whether to delay the reimposition of sanctions by six months.

    During his own address to the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian blamed the United States and Israeli attacks for “dealing a grievous blow upon international trust.” 

    The Associated Press contributed to this reporting.

    Christina Santucci

    Source link

  • Netanyahu says Israel ‘must finish the job’ against Hamas during U.N. address

    UNITED NATIONS –– In a speech Friday broadcast to the Gaza Strip via loudspeakers and through the takeover of Palestinians’ cellphones, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended his country’s efforts to destroy Hamas and told world leaders that Israel was “not done yet.” 


    What You Need To Know

    • In a speech Friday broadcast to Gaza via loudspeakers and through the takeover of Palestinians’ cell phones, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended his country’s efforts to destroy Hamas and told world leaders that Israel was “not done yet” 
    • As Netanyahu came to the podium to commence his remarks, dozens of delegates from multiple countries walked out, but others in the room applauded at the start of his speech and periodically throughout his address.
    • Netanyahu denounced calls for a Palestinian state, saying that his country would not let other nations “shove a terror state down our throats”
    • The Israeli leader also vociferously rejected allegations that his country was committing genocide in Gaza and weaponizing hunger, during his address to the United Nations General Assembly

    “Thanks to the resolve of our people, the courage of our soldiers and the bold decisions we took, Israel rebounded from its darkest day to deliver one of the most stunning military comebacks in history,” Netanyahu said during his United Nations General Assembly address. “But we are not done yet. The final elements, the final remnants of Hamas are holed up in Gaza City.

    “That is why Israel must finish the job,” he said.

    As Netanyahu came to the podium to begin his remarks, dozens of delegates from multiple countries walked out. Others in the room applauded at the start of his speech and periodically throughout the address.

    Netanyahu has faced growing international calls for an end to the war in Gaza, which began when Hamas-led militants killed roughly 1,200 people and took 251 others hostage. The Gaza Health Ministry recently estimated that 65,000 Palestinians have been killed and more than 167,000 injured since October 2023.

    During his address Friday, Netanyahu said that “special efforts” by Israeli intelligence had taken over the cellphones of Gazans to broadcast his remarks live. He called on remaining Hamas leaders to free the hostages and lay down their weapons or Israel would “hunt you down.”

    Netanyahu said that Israel has brought back 207 hostages, and about 20 of the 48 remaining in Gaza are still believed to be alive.

    He then read the names of the 20 hostages aloud, saying he wanted to speak directly to them by way of speakers pointing into the territory for his remarks, speaking first in Hebrew and then in English.

    “We will not rest until we bring all of you home,” he said.

    Shortly after Netanyahu concluded his remarks, President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House that an agreement on Gaza may be “very close.”

    “I think it’s a deal that will get the hostages back,” Trump said, without providing additional details. “It’s going to be a deal that will end the war. It’s going to be a dea l— it’s going to be peace.” 

    Allowing a Palestinian state would be ‘sheer madness,’ Netanyahu says

    Netanyahu denounced calls for a Palestinian state, saying that his country would not let other nations “shove a terror state down our throats.”

    “Giving the Palestinians a state one mile from Jerusalem after Oct. 7 is like giving al-Qaida a state one mile from New York City after Sept. 11,” he said. “This is sheer madness, and we won’t do it.”

    In the last few weeks, several countries –– including France, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia –– joined some 150 others around the world in formally recognizing a Palestinian state. The U.N. General Assembly also voted overwhelmingly this month to pass a nonbinding resolution, supporting a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict and urging Israel to commit to a Palestinian state.

    The Israeli leader said Friday that these nations sent a message that “murdering Jews pays off.”

    The Israeli prime minister’s address came a day after Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas gave a virtual address to the U.N., during which he thanked countries for recognizing a Palestinian state. Abbas said that the Palestinian Authority, which oversees the West Bank, was prepared to take over governance of Gaza and that Hamas would have no future role in leading the territory. 

    The Palestinian leader also condemned the planned expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Israel announced in August that it approved an expansion of settlements to divide the West Bank –– a move that Palestinians and rights groups say would divide much of the West Bank and destroy hopes for a future Palestinian state.

    Later Thursday, Trump told reporters gathered at the Oval Office that he wouldn’t allow Israel to annex the occupied West Bank. Possible annexation has been floated in Israel in response to U.S. allies moving to recognize a Palestinian state. 

    Netanyahu refutes accusations of genocide in Gaza

    The Israeli leader vociferously rejected allegations Friday that his country was committing genocide in Gaza and weaponizing hunger.

    A United Nations Human Rights Council report earlier this month contended that Israel was committing genocide, and the world’s leading authority on food crisis declared last month that famine was occurring in Gaza City –– both charges that Israel refutes.

    Netanyahu called the allegations of genocide “antisemitic lies,” saying efforts by his country to encourage Gazans to leave the largest city in the territory disproved the charge.

    “Would a country committing genocide plead with a civilian population it is supposedly targeting to get out of harm’s way?” he said. He also blamed Hamas for stealing food intended for Gazans. 

    Many Palestinians are unwilling to be uprooted, while others are too weak or can’t afford to leave, international aid groups say.

    Netanyahu calls for ‘snapback’ sanctions on Iran

    Netanyahu praised Trump for “his bold and decisive action” in bombing Iran’s nuclear enrichment sites earlier this year

    “President Trump and I promised to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, and we delivered on that promise,” Netanyahu said, later adding, “We lifted a dark cloud that could have claimed millions and millions of lives.”

    Netanyahu called Iran’s stockpiles of enriched uranium to be “eliminated” and for “snapback” sanctions to be reinstated over its failure to comply with conditions of the 2015 nuclear deal. 

    A 30-day deadline triggered by France, Germany and the United Kingdom is set to end Sunday. However, the U.N. Security Council is expected to vote Friday on whether to delay the reimposition of sanctions by six months.

    During his own address to the U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian blamed the United States and Israeli attacks for “dealing a grievous blow upon international trust.” 

    The Associated Press contributed to this reporting.

    Christina Santucci

    Source link

  • Transportation Department tightens rules for foreign-born truck drivers

    WASHINGTON — Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Friday that the federal government is tightening its rules for foreign truck drivers and is pursuing enforcement actions against California for noncompliance in issuing commercial driver’s licenses. He called the process for granting licenses to foreign-born drivers “100% broken” and a threat to public safety.


    What You Need To Know

    • Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Friday that the federal government is tightening its rules for foreign truck drivers and is pursuing enforcement actions against California for noncompliance in issuing commercial driver’s licenses
    • He called the process for granting licenses to foreign-born drivers “100% broken” and a threat to public safety
    • Effective Friday, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration will restrict so-called non-domiciled commercial driver’s licenses to individuals who have lawfully entered the United States under a narrow set of employment-based visas
    • FMCSA announced on Friday a “preliminary determination of substantial noncompliance with the standards of issuing CDLs” in California and said the state risked losing federal highway funding or having its CDL program terminated if it doesn’t comply with federal rules


    “The current federal regulations are allowing dangerous, unqualified drivers on American roadways,” Duffy said after detailing several fatal crashes involving foreign-born truck drivers this year. “This means that even when the rules are being followed, dangerous individuals who shouldn’t be near a big rig are getting behind the wheel and causing crashes on our roadways.”

    Citing “deeply flawed” eligibility requirements for foreign-born truck drivers, Duffy announced two immediate actions. Effective Friday, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration will restrict non-domiciled commercial driver’s licenses to individuals who have lawfully entered the United States under a narrow set of employment-based visas.

    Going forward, foreign-born drivers will only be eligible for a non-domiciled CDL if they have an H-2B, H-2A or E-2 visa, FMCSA Chief Counsel Jesse Elison said. H-2Bs and H-2As are issued for jobs that are seasonal or intermittent when there are not enough U.S.-born workers for the position. E-2s are issued to nationals of a country with which the U.S. has a treaty that involve substantial capital investments in the U.S.

    The new rule mandates that states issuing non-domiciled CDLs verify a driver’s immigration documents with the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, system. Under the new rule, Elison said non-domiciled CDLs will expire when the employment visa ends or in one year — whichever comes first. Drivers will need to renew their licenses in person, he said.

    The new rule stems from a nationwide audit the Transportation Department conducted into non-domiciled CDLs earlier this year that revealed a “systematic breakdown among states to follow the law and issue licenses properly,” Duffy said.

    He said the audit found states were not following basic procedures and had uncovered “a gross lack of oversight in the states that issue CDLs. This means that thousands of licenses that should never have been issued actually were issued.”

    The new rulemaking only applies to new non-domiciled CDLs, according to the FMCSA. It does not impact the 200,000 drivers who currently hold non-domiciled CDLs or the 20,000 drivers who have acquired learner’s permits in the U.S., Elison said, adding that about 5% of all CDLs issued for interstate commerce are to foreign-born drivers.

    He estimated that if the rule applied to current non-domiciled CDL holders, 95% would no longer be able to drive.

    Elison and Duffy singled out California for a new enforcement action. FMCSA announced on Friday a “preliminary determination of substantial noncompliance with the standards of issuing CDLs” in California and said the state risks losing federal highway funding or having its CDL program terminated if it doesn’t comply with federal rules.

    As part of the enforcement, the FMCSA will require California to immediately pause issuing non-domiciled CDLs and learner’s permits. The state must also identify all expired non-domiciled CDLs, conduct an internal audit and notify FMCSA of its audit findings, including the number of expired non-compliant CDLs.

    Elison said there are over 60,000 non-domiciled CDLs in California, 15% of which are in violation of federal regulations.

    “They need to avoid and rescind improperly issued non-domiciled CDLs and reissue them in compliance with the new federal regulations,” Elison said, adding that California has 30 days to respond to the FMCSA noncompliance letter sent Friday.

    The California Department of Motor Vehicles did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the FMCSA enforcement action.

    Duffy first suggested the DOT would pull federal highway funding from the state in August, following a fatal crash in Florida involving India-born driver Harjinder Singh. The California DMV told Spectrum News in August that its issuance of a non-domiciled CDL to Singh had followed all federal and state laws and that it confirmed Singh’s legal presence in the United States with the SAVE system before issuing him a REAL ID.  

    While the FMCSA enforcement action was only taken against California, Elison said the agency is asking all states to pause their issuance of non-domiciled CDLs to ensure compliance with the new federal rule.

    “We saw during COVID how important our truck drivers are to moving in supplies, goods, food throughout our country,” Duffy said. “This is not about the movement of goods. We have a lot of drivers who are U.S. citizens who are ready and willing and able to take these loads. This will not impact the flow of goods at all. We don’t need non-domiciled drivers to make sure our goods flow freely throughout the country.”

    The trade group representing the U.S. trucking industry “supports steps to strengthen credentialing standards and ensure that non-domiciled CDL holders have and maintain the proper authorization and qualifications required under federal law,” American Trucking Associations CEO Chris Spear said in a statement about the DOT’s new regulation.

    “Rules only work when they are consistently enforced, and it’s imperative that all state driver licensing agencies comply with federal regulations. We appreciate USDOT taking these steps to guarantee that happens, and we look forward to reviewing the rule in detail and providing specific feedback in our official comments.”

    Susan Carpenter

    Source link

  • Ex-FBI Director James Comey indicited by Justice Department

    WASHINGTON — James Comey was charged Thursday with lying to Congress in a criminal case filed days after President Donald Trump appeared to urge his attorney general to prosecute the former FBI director and other perceived political enemies.

    The indictment makes Comey the first former senior government official involved in one of Trump’s chief grievances, the long-concluded investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, to face prosecution. Trump has for years derided that investigation as a “hoax” and a “witch hunt” despite multiple government reviews showing Moscow interfered on behalf of the Republican’s campaign, and has made clear his desire for retribution.


    What You Need To Know

    • James Comey has been charged with making a false statement to Congress and obstruction of a criminal proceeding
    • The charges come in a criminal case filed days after President Donald Trump appeared to urge his attorney general to prosecute the former FBI director and other perceived political enemies
    • The indictment Thursday makes Comey the first former senior government official to face prosecution in connection with one of Trump’s chief grievances: the long-concluded investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election
    • Trump and his supporters have long derided that investigation as a “hoax” and a “witch hunt” despite multiple government reviews showing Moscow interfered on behalf of the Republican’s campaign
    • Comey, in a video he posted after his indictment, said: “My heart is broken for the Department of Justice but I have great confidence in the federal judicial system, and I’m innocent. So let’s have a trial”

    The criminal case is likely to deepen concerns that the Justice Department under Attorney General Pam Bondi is being weaponized in pursuit of investigations and now prosecutions of public figures the president regards as his political enemies. It was filed as the White House has taken steps to exert influence in unprecedented ways on the department, blurring the line between law and politics at an agency where independence in prosecutorial decision-making is a foundational principle.

    Trump on Thursday hailed the indictment as “JUSTICE FOR AMERICA!” Bondi, a Trump loyalist, and FBI Director Kash Patel, a longtime vocal critic of the Russia investigation, issued similar statements. “No one is above the law,” Bondi said.

    Comey, in a video he posted after his indictment, said: “My heart is broken for the Department of Justice but I have great confidence in the federal judicial system, and I’m innocent. So let’s have a trial.”

    Comey was fired months into Trump’s first administration and since then has remained a top target for Trump supporters seeking retaliation related to the Russia investigation. He was singled out by name in a Saturday social media post in which Trump appeared to appeal directly to Bondi bring charges against Comey and complained that Justice Department investigations into his foes had not resulted in criminal cases.

    “We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility,” Trump wrote, referencing the fact that he himself had been indicted and impeached multiple times. “JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!”

    Turmoil in the office that filed the case

    The office that filed the case against Comey, the Eastern District of Virginia, was thrown into turmoil last Friday following the resignation of chief prosecutor Erik Siebert, who had not charged Comey and had faced pressure to bring charges against another Trump target, New York Attorney General Letitia James, in a mortgage fraud investigation.

    The following evening, Trump lamented in a Truth Social post aimed at the attorney general that department investigations had not resulted in prosecutions. He nominated as the new U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, a White House aide who had been one of Trump’s personal lawyers but has not previously served as a federal prosecutor.

    Halligan had rushed to present the case to a grand jury this week because prosecutors evaluating whether Comey lied to Congress during testimony on Sept. 30, 2020, had until Tuesday to bring a case before the five-year statute of limitations expired. The push to move forward came even as prosecutors in the office had detailed in a memo concerns about the pursuit of an indictment.

    The sparse two-count indictment does not deal with the substance of the Russian investigation but instead consists of charges of making a false statement and obstructing a congressional proceeding.

    It accuses Comey of lying to the Senate Judiciary Committee when he said he had not authorized anyone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about a particular investigation. Though the indictment does not mention the investigation or its subject, it appears from the context to refer to an FBI inquiry related to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who ran for president against Trump in 2016.

    It also alleges that he did “corruptly endeavor to influence, obstruct and impede the due and proper exercise” of the Senate’s inquiry.

    Lingering focus on the Russia investigation

    Trump has for years railed against both a finding by U.S. intelligence agencies that Russia preferred him to Clinton, a Democrat, in the 2016 election as well as criminal investigation that tried to determine whether his campaign had conspired with Moscow to sway the outcome of that race.

    Prosecutors led by special counsel Robert Mueller did not establish that Trump or his associates criminally colluded with Russia, but they did find that Trump’s campaign had welcomed Moscow’s assistance.

    The indictment comes against the backdrop of a Trump administration effort to recast the Russia investigation as the outgrowth of an effort under Democratic President Barack Obama to overhype Moscow’s interference in the election and to undermine the legitimacy of Trump’s victory.

    Administration officials, including CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, have declassified a series of documents meant to chip away at the strength of an Obama-era intelligence assessment that said Moscow had engaged in a broad campaign of interference at the direction of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    A senior Justice Department official in Republican President George W. Bush’s administration, Comey was picked by Obama to lead the FBI in 2013 and was director when the bureau opened the Russia investigation in the summer of 2016.

    Comey’s relationship with Trump was strained from the start and was exacerbated when Comey resisted a request by Trump at a private White House dinner to pledge personal loyalty to the president. That overture so unnerved the FBI director that he documented it in a contemporaneous memorandum.

    Trump fired Comey in May 2017, an action later investigated by Mueller for potential obstruction of justice.

    After being let go, Comey authorized a close friend to share with a reporter the substance of an unclassified memo that documented an Oval Office request from Trump to shut down an FBI investigation into his first national security adviser, Michael Flynn. Trump and his allies later branded Comey a leaker, with the president even accusing him of treason. Comey himself has called Trump “ego driven” and likened him to a mafia don.

    The government’s handling of the Trump-Russia investigation is among the most studied chapters of modern American history, with multiple reviews and reports dedicated to it, and yet prosecutors have not pursued cases against senior FBI officials.

    Prosecutors in the first Trump Justice Department declined to prosecute Comey following an inspector general review into his handling of memos documenting his conversations with Trump in the weeks before he was fired. He also was not charged by a special counsel, John Durham, who scrutinized the FBI’s handling of the Trump-Russia investigation.

    Earlier this year, the department fired Comey’s daughter, Maurene Comey, from her job as a prosecutor in the Southern District of New York. She has since sued, saying the termination was carried out without any explanation and was done for political reasons.

    Separately, Comey’s son-in-law, Troy Edwards, resigned as a federal prosecutor in the Eastern District of Virginia minutes after Comey was indicted. Troy Edwards wrote in a one-sentence resignation letter addressed to Halligan that he quit his job “to uphold my oath to the Constitution and the country.”

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Amazon to pay $2.5B to settle FTC allegations

    SEATTLE — Amazon has reached a historic $2.5 billion settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, which said the online retail giant tricked customers into signing up for its Prime memberships and made it difficult for them to cancel after doing so.


    What You Need To Know

    • Amazon has reached a historic $2.5 billion settlement with the Federal Trade Commission which said the online giant tricked customers into signing up for its Prime memberships, and made it difficult to cancel after they did so
    • The Seattle company will pay $1 billion in civil penalties — the largest fine in FTC history, and $1.5 billion will be paid to consumers who were unintentionally enrolled in Prime, or were deterred from canceling their subscriptions
    • Amazon admitted no wrongdoing in the settlement

    The Seattle company will pay $1 billion in civil penalties — the largest fine in FTC history, and $1.5 billion will be paid to consumers who were unintentionally enrolled in Prime, or were deterred from canceling their subscriptions, the agency said Thursday. Eligible Prime customers include those who may have signed up for a membership via the company’s “Single Page Checkout” between June 23, 2019 to June 23, 2025.

    The Federal Trade Commission sued Amazon in U.S. District Court in Seattle two years ago alleging more than a decade of legal violations. That included a violation of the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, a 2010 law designed to ensure that people know what they’re being charged for online.

    Amazon admitted no wrongdoing in the settlement. It did not immediately respond to requests by The Associated Press for comment Thursday.

    Amazon Prime provides subscribers with perks that include faster shipping, video streaming and discounts at Whole Foods for a fee of $139 annually, or $14.99 a month.

    It’s a key and growing part of Amazon’s business, with more than 200 million members. In its latest financial report, the company reported in July that it booked more than $12 billion in net revenue for subscription services, a 12% increase from the same period last year. That figure includes annual and monthly fees associated with Prime memberships, as well as other subscription services such as its music and e-books platforms.

    The company has said that it clearly explains Prime’s terms before charging customers, and that it offers simple ways to cancel membership, including by phone, online and by online chat.

    “Occasional customer frustrations and mistakes are inevitable — especially for a program as popular as Amazon Prime,” Amazon said in a trial brief filed last month.

    But the FTC said Amazon deliberately made it difficult for customers to purchase an item without also subscribing to Prime. In some cases, consumers were presented with a button to complete their transactions — which did not clearly state it would also enroll them in Prime, the agency said.

    Getting out of a subscription was often too complicated, and Amazon leadership slowed or rejected changes that would have made canceling easier, according to an FTC complaint.

    Internally, Amazon called the process “Iliad,” a reference to the ancient Greek poem about the lengthy siege of Troy during the Trojan war. The process requires the customer to affirm on three pages their desire to cancel membership.

    The FTC began looking into Amazon’s Prime subscription practices in 2021 during the first Trump administration, but the lawsuit was filed in 2023 under former FTC Chair Lina Khan, an antitrust expert who had been appointed by Biden.

    The agency filed the case months before it submitted an antitrust lawsuit against the retail and technology company, accusing it of having monopolistic control over online markets.

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Starbucks to close hundreds of stores, lay off 900 workers

    Starbucks said Thursday it’s closing hundreds of U.S. and Canadian stores and laying off 900 nonretail employees as it focuses more of its resources on a turnaround.


    What You Need To Know

    • Starbucks said Thursday it’s closing hundreds of U.S. and Canadian stores and laying off 900 nonretail employees so it can focus resources on its turnaround plan
    • The Seattle coffee giant wouldn’t say exactly how many stores it’s closing
    • But the company expects to end its fiscal year this Sunday with 434 fewer stores than it had at the end of June
    • Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol said in a letter Thursday that the company is closing stores that don’t have a path to financial stability or have physical spaces that don’t meet customers’ expectations

    The Seattle coffee giant said store closures would start immediately. The company wouldn’t give a number of stores that are closing, but it said it expects to have 18,300 North American locations when its fiscal year ends on Sunday, which is 124 fewer than it had at the end of its 2024 fiscal year. As of June 29, the company had 18,734 locations.

    Starbucks said workers in its stores will be offered transfers to other locations where possible and severance packages.

    Starbucks said it will notify nonretail employees whose positions are being eliminated early Friday. Starbucks asked employees who can work from home to do so on Thursday and Friday.

    In a letter sent to employees Thursday, Starbucks Chairman and CEO Brian Niccol said a review of the company’s stores identified locations where the company doesn’t see a path to financial stability or isn’t able to create the physical environment customers expect. Those stores are being closed.

    “Each year, we open and close coffeehouses for a variety of reasons, from financial performance to lease expirations,” Niccol wrote. “This is a more significant action that we understand will impact partners and customers. Our coffeehouses are centers of the community, and closing any location is difficult.”

    Starbucks said it expects to spend $1 billion on the restructuring, including $150 million on employee separation benefits and $850 million related to the physical store closing and the cost of exiting leases.

    Starbucks shares were down less than 1% in morning trading Thursday.

    It was not immediately clear how many of the stores that are closing are unionized. Workers at 650 company-owned U.S. Starbucks stores have voted to unionize since 2021, but they have yet to reach a contract agreement with the company.

    Starbucks Workers United, the labor group organizing workers, said Thursday that the closures were made without input from Starbucks’ baristas. The union said it intends to engage in bargaining at every union-represented store that is closing to ensure workers can be placed at another store they prefer.

    “Fixing what’s broken at Starbucks isn’t possible without centering the people who engage with the company’s customers day in and day out,” the union said.

    News of the store closures came just over a week after unionized employees in three states sued Starbucks over its new dress code, saying the company refused to reimburse workers who had to buy new clothes.

    Starbucks said it used a consistent set of criteria to determine the stores that are closing and union representation wasn’t a factor.

    It’s rare for Starbucks to shrink its store count during a fiscal year.

    Niccol said Starbucks plans to increase its North American store count in its next fiscal year. The company said it also plans to redesign more than 1,000 locations in the next 12 months to give them a warmer, more welcoming feel.

    This is the second big round of layoffs at Starbucks this year. In February, Niccol announced the layoffs of 1,100 corporate employees globally and eliminated several hundred open positions. At the time, Niccol said Starbucks needed to operate more efficiently and increase accountability for decisions.

    Niccol is a turnaround specialist who was brought into Starbucks a year ago this month to give the brand a jolt. Under Niccol’s leadership, the struggling Chipotle chain, where Niccol was CEO for about 6 years, essentially doubled its revenue and its profit, and its stock price soared.

    In July, Starbucks reported its sixth straight quarter of lower same-store sales, as weak U.S. traffic continued to be a drain on the company. Niccol is trying to turn that around by adding staff, making stores cozier and introducing software that helps prioritize orders and make sure customers can get their drink within four minutes.

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Jimmy Kimmel is set to return to his late-night show after ABC lifts suspension

    NEW YORK — Jimmy Kimmel is set to return to late-night television Tuesday after a nearly weeklong suspension that triggered a national discussion about freedom of speech and President Donald Trump’s ability to police the words of journalists, commentators and even comics.


    What You Need To Know

    • ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live” is set to return to the air, with millions of people expected to watch to see how he addresses his nearly weeklong suspension
    • Two groups of ABC affiliates that denounced Kimmel last week said they would not carry his return. 
    • Kimmel’s suspension by ABC following remarks about the aftermath of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s death triggered a national discussion about freedom of speech and President Donald Trump’s ability to police the words of journalists, commentators and even comics
    • The return reportedly came after negotiations between Kimmel and executives for ABC and its parent company, Walt Disney
    • ABC said Kimmel would return after the network had “thoughtful conversations” with the host

    But two groups of ABC affiliates that denounced Kimmel last week said they would not carry his return. Nexstar Media Group said it would continue to preempt the show, “pending assurances that all parties are committed to fostering an environment of respectful, constructive dialogue in the markets we serve.” Sinclair Broadcast Group said it would also keep Kimmel off its stations. The two corporations collectively control about a quarter of ABC affiliates.

    ABC, which suspended Kimmel’s show last Wednesday following criticism of his comments about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, announced Monday that “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” would return after the network had “thoughtful conversations” with the host.

    “Our long national late nightmare is over,” Stephen Colbert joked on his CBS show in response to Kimmel’s reinstatement.

    ABC suspended  Kimmel indefinitely after comments he made in a monologue last week. Kimmel suggested that many Trump supporters were trying to capitalize on Kirk’s death and were “desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them.”

    Trump-appointed Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr last week said it appeared that Kimmel was trying to “directly mislead the American public” with his remarks about Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old Utah man charged with Kirk’s killing, and his motives. Those motives remain unclear. Authorities say Robinson grew up in a conservative family, but his mother told investigators his son had turned left politically in the last year.

    “We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Carr said before ABC announced the suspension. “These companies can find ways to change conduct, to take action, frankly, on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”

    Those remarks set a backlash in motion, with Republican Sen. Ted Cruz saying that Carr acted like “a mafioso.” Hundreds of entertainment luminaries, including Tom Hanks, Barbra Streisand and Jennifer Aniston, signed a letter circulated by the American Civil Liberties Union that called ABC’s move “a dark moment for freedom of speech in our nation.”

    Some consumers punished ABC parent Disney by canceling subscriptions to its streaming services.

    Trump had hailed Kimmel’s suspension, even inaccurately saying the show had been canceled. Kimmel has been a relentless Trump critic in his comedy.

    Trump’s administration has used threats, lawsuits and federal government pressure to try to exert more control over the media industry. Trump sued ABC and CBS over news coverage, which the companies settled. Trump has also filed defamation lawsuits against The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times, and successfully urged Congress to strip federal funding from NPR and PBS.

    How — or even whether — Kimmel would address the controversy on his first show back remained a mystery. Millions of people are likely to watch.

    Disney and ABC executives reportedly negotiated the return for several days before announcing the resolution. The ABC statement said the suspension happened because some of Kimmel’s comments were “ill-timed and thus insensitive,” but it did not call them misleading.

    Andrew Kolvet, a spokesperson for Turning Point USA, the organization founded by Kirk and now headed by his widow, posted on X that “Disney and ABC caving and allowing Kimmel back on the air is not surprising, but it’s their mistake to make.”

    The suspension happened at a time when the late-night landscape is shifting. Shows are losing viewers, in part because many watch highlights the next day online. CBS announced the cancellation of Colbert’s show over the summer. Kimmel’s contract with ABC reportedly lasts through May.

    Colbert, in his opening monologue Monday, grabbed his recently won Emmy Award for outstanding talk series, saying, “Once more, I am the only martyr on late night!”

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • CVS Health subsidiary Omnicare files for Ch. 11 bankruptcy protection

    CINCINNATI — CVS Health subsidiary Omnicare has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

    It comes just two months after the long-term care business was ordered to pay $949 million when a federal court found it liable for filing fraudulent claims for some prescription drugs.


    What You Need To Know

    • The CVS Health subsidiary Omnicare has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
    • This comes just two months after the business was ordered to pay $949 million when a federal court found it liable for filing fraudulent claims for some prescription drugs
    • Omnicare, which CVS Health bought for more than $10 billion in cash in 2015, said in its bankruptcy petition that it had up to $10 billion in debt and up to $500 million in assets

    In 2019, the federal government joined the legal fight against CVS Health that accused Omnicare business of routinely filling prescriptions that had expired or run out of refills. The Department of Justice said that Omnicare’s pharmacies sent drugs to people living in residential facilities based on “stale, invalid prescriptions.” It accused the company of fraudulently billing government-funded programs like Medicaid and Medicare for drugs dispensed without a valid prescription from 2010 to 2018.

    CVS Health said at the time that the claims had no merit.

    Omnicare President David Azzolina said in a prepared statement Monday that the lawsuit didn’t include any allegations of harm to any Omnicare patients and that the government didn’t allege that any patient got anything other than the medicine they needed when they needed it.

    “The District Court nevertheless imposed an extreme and, we believe, unconstitutional penalty,” Azzolina said. “Given that ruling and a number of other issues facing our business, we now are taking necessary steps to move forward and ensure the continued delivery of safe and reliable pharmacy service to our customers.”

    Omnicare, which CVS Health acquired for more than $10 billion in 2015, said in its bankruptcy petition that it had up to $10 billion in debt and up to $500 million in assets.

    The Cincinnati company said that the bankruptcy filing would help it resolve issues related to the recent court ruling. Omnicare said that it was also using the process to address other financial challenges facing the broader long-term care pharmacy industry and to evaluate its restructuring options.

    CVS Health has been exploring strategic options for Omnicare as booked write-downs for the struggling business.

    Omnicare, which filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, said that it will still provide pharmacy services to long-term care facilities during the court-supervised process.

    The company said that it entered into an agreement for $110 million in debtor-in-possession financing. Once it receives court approval, Omnicare expects the financing and cash generated from operations will provide sufficient liquidity for it to meet ongoing business obligations during the court-supervised process.

    Shares of CVS Health rose 1% Tuesday.

    Spectrum News Staff, Associated Press

    Source link

  • Ryan Routh to give closing argument in Trump attempted assassination trial

    FORT PIERCE, Fla. — Closing arguments in the Ryan Routh trial begin Tuesday, before his fate is left in the hands of 12 jury members, who will decide if he is guilty of trying to assassinate then-presidential candidate Donald Trump on Sept. 15, 2024.

    Routh and the prosecutors will each have one hour and 45 minutes to make their final cases to jurors before deliberation. However, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon warned Routh that his presentation could be cut short if he doesn’t follow the rules, according to the Associated Press. 

    The jury will decide guilty or not guilty for each count, and all five counts need to be unanimous for the 12 members of the jury.

    Routh’s charges include:

    • Assassination attempt
    • Possession of a firearm to plan a crime of violence
    • Assaulting a federal officer
    • Ammunition by a felon
    • Possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number 

    Throughout the case, the prosecution put a major emphasis on the first count of attempted assassination because prosecutors need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Routh had intended to kill and took substantial steps to do that, even though the attempt was unsuccessful. 

    While the jury deliberates, they can look back at any of the evidence they need. They will have access to a computer with the digital files, and physical evidence can be brought in or they can come out to look at it. 

    Defense Rests

    After just a few hours of testimony, Ryan Routh rested his defense Monday and brought the case one step closer to being put into the hands of the jury — who will decide if he is guilty of trying to assassinate then-presidential candidate Donald Trump on Sept. 15, 2024.

    The prosecution rested its case on Friday, just over a week after Routh’s trial got underway on Sept. 11.


    What You Need To Know

    • The prosecution rested its case Friday in the trial of Ryan Routh, who is accused of attempting to assassinate then-presidential candidate Donald Trump in September 2024
    • Routh, who is representing himself, called three witnesses Monday — one expert witness and two character witnesses — before resting his case
    • Routh’s trial, which kicked off on Sept. 11, was originally expected to take up to three weeks 

    According to information from the U.S. Department of Justice, Trump was golfing at Trump International on Sept. 15, when a Secret Service agent conducting a perimeter security sweep saw the partially obscured face of a man — later identified as Routh — in the brush along the fence line near the sixth hole. The agent observed the barrel of a rifle aimed directly at him. As the agent began backing away, he saw the rifle barrel move, and the agent fired at Routh.

    A witness reported seeing Routh running across the road from the golf course and getting into a black SUV. Based on information provided by the witness, Routh was later apprehended heading northbound on I-95, a DOJ statement said.

    The prosecution rested its case Friday after dozens of witnesses and hundreds of pieces of evidence. The jury was sent home for the weekend and court was back in session on Monday.

    Routh spent most of the morning questioning his expert witness, Michael McCray, who testified that the gun allegedly involved in the attempted assassination jammed after a single shot, twice, when he did his examination of the weapon.

    That examination happened seven months after it was taken as evidence in the case against Routh.

    Prosecutors countered that the gun fired two shots consecutively at the time it was examined by investigators, and noted that acid was used to recover the gun’s serial number, which could have caused rust and other issues that would explain the firing issues encountered months later.


    When Routh asked McCray to make an estimation about the gun’s accuracy, the witness said it would be a guess, and due to the seriousness of the case, that was not something he was willing to do.

    About an hour into Routh’s questioning, the judge abruptly called for a break when Routh asked McCray about the mental capacity needed for someone to take another person’s life.

    Former U.S. Attorney Roger Handberg said that U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has every right to make sure questions remained within the scope of a witness’ expertise.

    “So, it is the defendant’s trial, but it is the judges courtroom,” Handberg said. “And what they are supposed to do, is they are supposed to make sure that everything happens according to the federal rules of evidence and the federal rules of criminal procedure. And if someone strays or is in violation of one of those rules, the judge will call them out.”

    Routh also called two character witnesses Monday before resting his case.

    It was not immediately clear if prosecutors planned to call rebuttal witnesses before the case moves into closing arguments.

    Opening Statement Issues

    The trial got off to a rocky start on on Sept. 11, when Routh — who represented himself during the trial — was repeatedly admonished by Cannon during his opening statement.

    Prosecutors used all 40 minutes to walk jurors through a timeline of events, from the steps Routh took to plan the alleged assassination attempt, to the evidence and witnesses the jury will hear from — including the Secret Service agent who spotted Routh and the witness that heard the gunshot and took a photo of the license plate on the car leaving the scene.

    But when it was Routh’s turn to address the jury, he calmly walked up and started to speak about the beginnings of the human species, Hitler, Putin, and went over very descriptive scenes of things like campfires.

    At one point, he became emotional while speaking.

    About four minutes into his allotted 40 minutes, the judge stopped him and ordered the jury out of the room.

    Cannon told Routh that in an opening statement, he is only allowed to talk about valid evidence in an objective and non-argumentative way.

    The judge said she would give him another chance and let Routh start again.

    When the jury returned, Routh began by saying his case is about intent, doing the right thing, morals and ethics, and then continued, telling the jury that “this case means absolutely nothing.”

    The judge immediately dismissed the jury again and explained that Routh had violated the rules laid out in court and that opening statements were over.

    “I gave you one more chance and you continued to read what has no relevance for this case,” Cannon said.

    One of the first witnesses to take the stand was Tommy McGee, who was shopping for furniture in the area when the shots were fired, and saw Routh as he fled the scene.

    In his cross examination of McGee, Routh started by telling the man that “you are my hero — you are a good man,” before asking if he was a Trump supporter.

    After an objection from the prosecution, the question was stricken from the record, prompting Routh to say, “I’m sure my next question will get objected, too.”

    He ended his cross examination by telling McGee that, “I celebrate your efforts.”

    FBI witnesses, North Carolina Brothers Testify

    On Monday, an FBI witness described evidence recovered from a black SUV that investigators said Routh had been driving an living in for several weeks before the attack.

    Included in the cache of recovered items included six cellphones, three license plates, a bullet casing and notes on flights to Mexico and Colombia. FBI investigators also reported finding documents in the vehicle that contained a handwritten list of dates in August, September, and October and venues where the former President had appeared or was expected to be present.

    A separate FBI witness testified Monday that Routh’s fingerprint was found on the scope of the SKS rifle found just outside the Mar-a-Lago golf course. The weapon — which was left behind when Routh fled the scene after being spotted by a Secret Service agent — was in working order, a weapons expert testified. 

    On Wednesday, Samuel and Lazaro Plata described in Spanish through translators how Ryan Routh left a container filled with pipes, bullets, wires and other items at Lazaro Plata’s home in Greensboro, North Carolina, in April 2024 — about five months before the alleged assassination attempt.

    Spectrum News Staff, Sarah Winkelmann

    Source link

  • Oracle will manage TikTok’s algorithm for U.S. users under Trump admin deal

    WASHINGTON — Tech giant Oracle will receive a copy of the algorithm powering TikTok to operate for U.S. users, according to a senior official in President Donald Trump’s administration on Monday.


    What You Need To Know

    • A senior official in President Donald Trump’s administration says Oracle will receive a copy of TikTok’s algorithm to operate for U.S. users
    • The decision addresses U.S. national security concerns over the China-based social media platform
    • The algorithm recommends videos and has been a key issue in negotiations between Washington and Beijing
    • The Trump administration official insisted on anonymity Monday and said the plan aims to prevent potential manipulation of addictive content

    Determining next steps for the algorithm, currently owned by the Beijing-based ByteDance, has been one of the most closely watched issues during negotiations over TikTok’s future.

    The Trump administration official, who insisted on anonymity to discuss the emerging deal, said they believe the plan will satisfy national security concerns if TikTok divests from its Chinese parent, ByteDance. President Joe Biden signed bipartisan legislation before leaving office requiring the Chinese company to sell its assets to an American company or face a ban.

    American officials have previously warned the algorithm that fuels what users see on the app is vulnerable to manipulation by Chinese authorities, who can use it to shape content on the platform in a way that’s difficult to detect.

    “It wouldn’t be in compliance if the algorithm is Chinese. There can’t be any shared algorithm with ByteDance,” said a spokesperson for the House Select Committee on China.

    Oracle would receive a copy of the algorithm and oversee the app’s security operations.

    The algorithm would be “fully inspected and retrained,” the senior White House official said Monday. In a call with reporters, the official later emphasized that the content recommendation formula would be retrained only on U.S. data in order to make sure the system is “behaving appropriately.” It is currently unclear if retraining the U.S. copy of the algorithm on local data would essentially create a separate TikTok experience just for domestic users.

    “The president will sign later this week is an executive order, essentially declaring that the terms of this deal meets America’s national security needs,” the White House official said. He notes that Trump will then issue a 120 day reprieve in order to get the necessary agreements finalized.

    Full details on investors have not been released. However, the official confirmed that the U.S. operations will be a new joint venture with a board of directors that will have a majority of American members — Oracle and Silver Lake, a private equity firm, are the only confirmed consortium participants so far.

    The White House official also said that under the preliminary deal — which still requires Chinese officials to sign off on a framework agreement — the United States will not take equity stake in the new venture or have representation on the controlling committee.

    Trump, a Republican, has extended the deadline several times as he worked to reach a deal to keep TikTok available. He spoke to Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday.

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Caretaker killed by tiger at wildlife preserve in southeastern Oklahoma

    HUGO, Okla. — An animal handler was killed by a tiger under his care at a preserve for big cats in southeastern Oklahoma, the organization said Sunday.


    What You Need To Know

    • An animal handler was killed by a tiger under his care at a preserve for big cats in southeastern Oklahoma
    • Growler Pines Tiger Preserve says in a statement that Ryan Easley died Saturday in “an accident” involving a tiger at the property near Hugo, not far from the Texas border
    • All tours have been canceled until further notice
    • The preserve’s website says it is a private facility where visitors can book tours to view tigers and see demonstrations on how the animals are trained and cared for

    Growler Pines Tiger Preserve said in a statement that Ryan Easley died Saturday in “an accident” involving a tiger at the property near Hugo, not far from the Texas border.

    “This tragedy is a painful reminder of both the beauty and unpredictability of the natural world,” the preserve said on its Facebook page. “Ryan understood those risks — not out of recklessness but out of love. The animals under his care were not just animals to him, but beings he formed a connection with — one rooted in respect, daily care and love.”

    All tours have been canceled until further notice, the statement said.

    The preserve is a private facility where visitors can book tours to view tigers and see demonstrations on how the animals are trained and cared for, according to its website.

    People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals claimed Easley received his tigers from Joe Exotic, the star of the reality TV series “Tiger King.” Exotic’s real name is Joseph Maldonado. 

    Maldonado said he only let Easley keep his tigers at a zoo for one winter. In a since-deleted social media post Maldonado said Easley “took great care of his animals” and “was an advocate for tigers as well as elephants.” 

    Maldonado is currently serving a 21-year prison sentence after being convicted in a murder-for-hire plot and of multiple wildlife violations.

    PETA issued a blunt statement in response to Easley’s death.

    “It’s never safe for humans to interact directly with apex predators, and it’s never a surprise when a human is attacked by a stressed big cat who has been caged, whipped, and denied everything natural and important to them,” the animal rights group said. “PETA is calling for the remaining wild animal exhibitors who aren’t dead or in federal prison to get out of the business now and send the animals to accredited sanctuaries where they can finally live in peace.”

    Katie Streit, Associated Press

    Source link

  • UK, Australia, Canada recognize Palestinian state, defying U.S. and Israel

    LONDON — The U.K., Australia and Canada formally recognized a Palestinian state on Sunday, prompting an angry response from Israel, which ruled out the prospect.

    The coordinated initiative from the three Commonwealth nations and long-time allies reflects growing outrage at Israel’s conduct of the war in Gaza and the steps taken by the Israeli government to thwart efforts to create a Palestinian state, including by the continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank.


    What You Need To Know

    • British Prime Minister Keir Starmer says the U.K. is formally recognizing a Palestinian state despite opposition from the U.S. and Israel
    • On Sunday, Starmer said the move is intended to promote lasting peace between Israel and the Palestinians. Australia and Canada also recognized the Palestinian state on Sunday
    • Although largely symbolic, this decision is historic, as the U.K. played a role in the region’s past
    • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu blasted the three countries for proferring a “prize” to Hamas
    • “It will not happen,” he said. “A Palestinian state will not be established west of the Jordan River”
    • More countries are expected to join the list recognizing a Palestinian state at the U.N. General Assembly this week, including France, which like the U.K., is one of the five permanent members of the Security Council

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has faced pressure to take a harder line on Israel within his own governing Labour Party over the deteriorating situation in Gaza, said the U.K.’s move is intended “to revive the hope of peace for the Palestinians and Israelis.” He insisted it wasn’t a reward for Hamas, which was behind the attack on Oct. 7, 2023, in which the militants killed some 1,200 people and abducted 251 others.

    “Today, to revive the hope of peace and a two-state solution, I state clearly as prime minister of this great country that the United Kingdom formally recognizes the state of Palestine,” Starmer said in a video message. “We recognized the state of Israel more than 75 years ago as a homeland for the Jewish people. Today we join over 150 countries who recognize a Palestinian state also.”

    The moves by the three countries prompted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to say that the establishment of a Palestinian state “will not happen.”

    The U.K. announcement was widely anticipated after Starmer said in July that the U.K. would recognize a Palestinian state unless Israel agreed to a ceasefire in Gaza, allowed the United Nations to bring in aid and took other steps toward long-term peace.

    More countries are expected to join the list recognizing a Palestinian state at the U.N. General Assembly this week, including France, which like the U.K., is one of the five permanent members of the Security Council.

    Palestinian and Israeli reactions

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu blasted the three countries for proferring a “prize” to Hamas.

    “It will not happen,” he said. “A Palestinian state will not be established west of the Jordan River.”

    Netanyahu is set to give a speech to the General Assembly on Friday before heading to see U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House Monday week. Ahead of Sunday’s announcement, Trump said he disapproved of the U.K.’s anticipated move.

    Hamas hailed the decision, calling it a “rightful outcome of our people’s struggle, steadfastness, and sacrifices on the path to liberation and return.” The Islamic militant group, which is sworn to Israel’s destruction, called on the world to isolate Israel.

    Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas stressed that Sunday’s moves constitute an important and necessary step toward achieving a just peace in accordance with international law.

    As well as arguing that recognition is immoral, critics argue that it’s an empty gesture given that the Palestinian people are divided into two territories — the West Bank and the Gaza strip— and no recognized international capital.

    Historical overlay

    The U.K. and France have a historic role in the politics of the Middle East over the past 100 years, having carved up the region following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I.

    As part of that carve-up, the U.K. became the governing power of what was then Palestine. It was also author of the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which backed the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people.”

    However, the second part of the declaration has been largely neglected over the decades. It noted “that nothing shall be done, nothing which may prejudice the civil and religious rights” of the Palestinian people.

    “It’s significant for France and the U.K. to recognize Palestine because of the legacy of these two countries’ involvement in the Middle East,” said Burcu Ozcelik, senior research fellow for Middle East Security at London-based Royal United Services Institute. “But without the United States coming on board with the idea of a Palestine, I think very little will change on the ground.”

    Husam Zomlot, the Palestinian head of mission in the U.K., told the BBC that recognition would right a colonial-era wrong. “The issue today is ending the denial of our existence that started 108 years ago, in 1917,” he said. “And I think today, the British people should celebrate a day when history is being corrected, when wrongs are being righted, when recognition of the wrongs of the past are beginning to be corrected.”

    Diplomatic shift

    The U.K. has for decades supported an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel, but insisted recognition must come as part of a peace plan to achieve a two-state solution.

    However, the government has become increasingly worried that such a solution is becoming all but impossible – and not only because of the razing of Gaza and displacement of most of its population during nearly two years of conflict, which has seen more than 65,000 people killed in Gaza, displaced around 90% of the population and caused a catastrophic humanitarian crisis.

    Last week, independent experts commissioned by the U.N.’s Human Rights Council concluded that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, a charge that Israel rejected as “distorted and false.”

    Also vexing the U.K. is Israel’s government has been aggressively expanding settlements in the West Bank, land Palestinians want for their future state. Much of the world regards Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, which is ostensibly run by the Palestinian Authority, as illegal.

    “This move has symbolic and historic weight, makes clear the U.K.’s concerns about the survival of a two-state solution, and is intended to keep that goal relevant and alive,” said Olivia O’Sullivan, Director of the U.K. in the World Programme at the London-based think tank, Chatham House.

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Trump honors Charlie Kirk as a martyr for the nation, pledges crackdown

    GLENDALE, Ariz. — President Donald Trump flew to Arizona on Sunday with a cohort of his administration’s most senior officials, the speaker of the House and a slew of Republican lawmakers to eulogize and memorialize his ally Charlie Kirk in a front of tens of thousands packed into an NFL stadium less than two weeks after the 31-year-old right-wing activist was assassinated in Utah.

    Capping off the five-hour service, Trump reiterated what he said the night the founder of the influential conservative youth organization Turning Point USA was killed: Kirk was a “a martyr now for American freedom” and, in his name, the federal government will crackdown on political foes and lead “not just a political realignment, but also a spiritual reawakening.” The remarks came a day after the president publicly demanded Attorney General Pam Bondi expedite the prosecution of his enemies.


    What You Need To Know

    • President Donald Trump flew to Arizona on Sunday with a cohort of his administration’s most senior officials, the speaker of the House and a slew of Republican lawmakers to eulogize and memorialize his ally Charlie Kirk
    • Trump said Kirk was a “a martyr now for American freedom” and, in his name, the federal government will crackdown on political foes and lead “not just a political realignment, but also a spiritual reawakening”
    • The remarks came a day after the president publicly demanded Attorney General Pam Bondi expedite the prosecution of his enemies
    • Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow and successor as Turning Point USA’s leader, said that she forgives the shooting suspect accused of killing her husband
    • Other speakers included Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Kennedy, director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, Kirk’s friends and colleagues, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump Jr.

    Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow and successor as Turning Point USA’s leader, spoke right before Trump and eulogized her husband by speaking of their shared Christian faith and saying that she forgives the shooting suspect who prosecutors say told friends and family he killed Kirk “because it was what Christ did and is what Charlie would do.”

    “The answer to hate is not hate,” Erika Kirk said. “The answer we know from the gospel is love and always love, love for our enemies and love for those who persecute us.”

    A half an hour later, halfway through his remarks, Trump said he hates his opponents and apologized to the grieving widow before touting that the Justice Department is “investigating networks of radical left maniacs who fund organized fuel and perpetrate political violence.”

    “He was a missionary with a noble spirit and a great, great purpose. He did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them,” Trump said. “That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponent, and I don’t want the best for them. I’m sorry. I am sorry Erica.”

    “I can’t stand my opponent,” Trump added.

    A banner for conservative activist Charlie Kirk is seen during a memorial service for Kirk, Sunday, Sept. 21, 2025, at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Ariz. (AP Photo/John Locher)

    On Saturday, in a message addressed to “Pam” on his Truth Social platform, Trump demanded Bondi accelerate investigations and prosecutions into his enemies, including former FBI director James Comey, California Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Lettia James. He cited the criminal prosecutions of him in between his terms in office and the impeachments from his first time as reasons why “​​we can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility.”

    “JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!” Trump wrote on Saturday evening after forcing out a U.S. attorney in Virginia over his frustration with a lack of criminal charges brought against James, who has led many legal fights against Trump’s administration and businesses. 

    On Sunday in Arizona, Trump said the Justice Department was attempting to investigate the “very bad people” that he claimed funded “paid agitators” to protest Kirk and him, dubiously claiming “the violence comes largely from the left.” Neither Trump nor the Justice Department has produced evidence that crimes committed by left-wing actors are being funded by wealthy benefactors or connected to advocacy organizations that oppose the administration.

    ‘A martyr for the Christian faith’

    The framing of Kirk as a martyr for the president’s movement who played a key role in the campaign to get him back into the White House, as well as the intertwining of Christianity and right-wing politics in the U.S. were common themes echoed by the speakers throughout the day, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Kennedy, director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, Kirk’s friends and colleagues, former Fox News host Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump Jr.

    Kirk “became convinced that we needed not just a political realignment, but also a spiritual reawakening,” Trump said. “We have to bring back religion to America, because without borders, law and order and religion, you really don’t have a country anymore. We want religion brought back to America. We want to bring God back into our beautiful USA like never before. We want God back.”

    Hegseth declared Kirk “a warrior for country, a warrior for Christ” and said the activist not only “started a political movement, but unleashed a spiritual revival.” Trump also referred to the memorial as “an old time revival.”

    Vance said he’s “talked more about Jesus Christ in the past two weeks than I have my entire time in public life” because of Kirk. In response to critics of Kirk’s politics, the vice president said that if he were still alive, he believed that Kirk “would encourage me to be honest that evil still walks among us, not to ignore it for the sake of a fake kumbaya moment, but to address it head on and honestly as the sickness that it is.”

    “My friends, for Charlie, we must remember that he is a hero to the United States of America, and he is a martyr for the Christian faith,” Vance said.

    Comments about Kirk have become a Trump administration target

    The right-wing activist had a long, well-documented history of statements and policy positions about race, Islam, Judaism, women and LGBTQ people that Democratic politicians and other critics have described as racistbigoted and antisemitic, Since his death, the administration and their allies have promised retaliation and applied pressure on organizations to fire or punish workers who voice criticisms of Kirk’s work, including getting Disney to pull late night show host Jimmy Kimmel off the air.

    In response to Kirk’s killing — by a 22-year-old Utah man who officials have said disagreed with Kirk’s politics from a left-wing perspective but have not alleged he he was aligned with any groups, other individuals or even a specific ideology — Trump also said last week he was going to designate “antifa” as a “major terrorist organization” to expedite prosecutions of left-wing activists and organizations.

    It’s unclear how Trump will do so in practice because antifa, short for “anti-fascist,” is an umbrella term for a variety of groups and ideological movements who use a wide-range of tactics, both legal and illegal. Additionally, there is no current federal law or legal framework for designating domestic groups as terrorists due to the broad First Amendment protections for political activity.

    “But law enforcement can only be the beginning of our response to Charlie’s murder,” Trump said, laying blame for “atrocities of this kind that we saw in Utah of all places” at the feet of liberals and leftists. 

    Trump’s deputy chief of staff and longtime speechwriter Stephen Miller put it in much starker terms during his speech at the service earlier in the day.

    “The day that Charlie died, the angels wept, but those tears had been turned into fire in our hearts, and that fire burns with a righteous fury that our enemies cannot comprehend or understand,” Miller said. “You have no idea the dragon you have awakened. You have no idea how determined we will be to save this civilization, to save the West, to save this republic. Because our children are strong and our grandchildren will be strong, and our children’s children’s children will be strong.”

    A man listens during a worship song before the start of a memorial for conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Sunday, Sept. 21, 2025, at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Ariz. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

    Joseph Konig

    Source link

  • Cyberattack disrupts check-in systems at major European airports

    LONDON — A cyberattack targeting check-in and boarding systems disrupted air traffic and caused delays at several of Europe’s major airports on Saturday.


    What You Need To Know

    • A cyberattack targeting check-in and boarding systems has disrupted air traffic at several major European airports
    • On Friday night, the attack hit a service provider affecting airports like Brussels and Berlin’s Brandenburg
    • Brussels Airport said the incident has forced manual check-ins, causing significant delays
    • Airports were advising travelers to check their flight status and apologize for the inconvenience

    While the impact on travelers appeared to be limited, experts said the intrusion exposed vulnerabilities in security systems.

    The disruptions to electronic systems initially reported at Brussels, Berlin’s Brandenburg and London’s Heathrow airports meant that only manual check-in and boarding was possible. Many other European airports said their operations were unaffected.

    “There was a cyberattack on Friday night 19 September against the service provider for the check-in and boarding systems affecting several European airports including Brussels Airport,” said Brussels Airport in a statement, initially reporting a “large impact” on flight schedules.

    Airports said the issue centered around a provider of check-in and boarding systems — not airlines or the airports themselves.

    Collins Aerospace, whose systems help passengers check themselves in, print boarding passes and bag tags and dispatch their luggage from a kiosk, cited a “cyber-related disruption” to its MUSE (Multi-User System Environment) software at “select airports.”

    ‘A very clever cyberattack’

    It was not immediately clear who might be behind the cyberattack, but experts said it could turn out to be hackers, criminal organizations, or state actors.

    Travel analyst Paul Charles said he was “surprised and shocked” by the attack that has affected one of the world’s top aviation and defense companies.

    He said “it’s deeply worrying that a company of that stature who normally have such resilient systems in place have been affected.”

    “This is a very clever cyberattack indeed because it’s affected a number of airlines and airports at the same time — not just one airport or one airline, but they’ve got into the core system that enables airlines to effectively check in many of their passengers at different desks at different airports around Europe,” he told Sky News.

    As the day wore on, the fallout appeared to be contained.

    Brussels Airport spokesperson Ihsane Chioua Lekhli told broadcaster VTM that by mid-morning, nine flights had been canceled, four were redirected to another airport and 15 faced delays of an hour or more. She said it wasn’t immediately clear how long the disruptions might last.

    Axel Schmidt, head of communications at the Brandenburg airport, said that by late morning, “we don’t have any flights canceled due to this specific reason, but that could change.” The Berlin airport said operators had cut off connections to affected systems.

    Heathrow, Europe’s busiest airport, said the disruption has been “minimal” with no flight cancellations directly linked to the problems afflicting Collins. A spokesperson would not provide details as to how many flights have been delayed as a result of the cyberattack.

    The airports advised travelers to check their flight status and apologized for any inconvenience.

    Frustration at the counters

    Some passengers voiced annoyance at the lack of staff. With many, if not most, checking in individually, airlines have reduced the number of people operating at the traditional check-in counters.

    Maria Casey, who was on her way to a two-week backpacking holiday in Thailand with Etihad Airways, said she had to spend three hours at baggage check-in at Heathrow’s Terminal 4.

    “They had to write our baggage tabs by hand,” she said. “Only two desks were staffed, which is why we were cheesed off.”

    Collins, an aviation and defense technology company that is a subsidiary of RTX Corp., formerly Raytheon Technologies, said it was “actively working to resolve the issue and restore full functionality to our customers as quickly as possible.”

    “The impact is limited to electronic customer check-in and baggage drop and can be mitigated with manual check-in operations,” it said in a statement.

    Airline industry is vulnerable through the use of third-party platforms

    Still, experts said the attack pointed to vulnerabilities — ones that hackers are increasingly trying to exploit.

    Charlotte Wilson, head of enterprise at cybersecurity firm Check Point, said the aviation industry has become an “increasingly attractive target” for cybercriminals because of its heavy reliance on shared digital systems.

    “These attacks often strike through the supply chain, exploiting third-party platforms that are used by multiple airlines and airports at once,” she said. “When one vendor is compromised, the ripple effect can be immediate and far-reaching, causing widespread disruption across borders.”

    Experts said it was too early to tell who might be behind the attack, and were trying to read some clues.

    “It looks almost more like vandalism than extortion, based on the information we have,” said James Davenport, a professor of information technology at the University of Bath in England. “I think significant new details would have to emerge to change this view.”

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • ICE denies using excessive force as it broadens immigration arrests in Chicago

    PARK RIDGE, Ill. — It was 3:30 a.m. when 10 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers gathered in a parking lot in the Chicago suburbs for a briefing about a suspect they were hoping to arrest. They went over a description of the person, made sure their radios were on the same channel and discussed where the closest hospital was in case something went wrong.


    What You Need To Know

    • An immigration enforcement operation in the Chicago area is troubling immigrants and activists because of what they say are increasingly aggressive tactics
    • But top official with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement denies that officers are using excessive force
    • The operation began Sept. 8 and has led to the arrests of nearly 550 people
    • The aim is to enforce President Trump’s immigration policies in a city known for strong laws against local cooperation with federal immigration efforts

    “Let’s plan on not being there,” said one of the officers, before they climbed into their vehicles and headed out.

    Across the city and surrounding suburbs, other teams were fanning out in support of ” Operation Midway Blitz.” It has unleashed President Donald Trump’s mass deportations agenda on a city and state that has had some of the strongest laws preventing local officials from cooperating with immigration enforcement.

    ICE launched the operation on Sept. 8, drawing concern from activists and immigrant communities fearful of the large-scale arrests or aggressive tactics used in other cities targeted by the Republican president. They say there has been a noticeable uptick in immigration enforcement agents, although a military deployment to Chicago has yet to materialize.

    The Associated Press went on a ride-along with ICE in a Chicago suburb — much of the recent focus — to see how that operation is unfolding.

    A predawn wait, then two arrests

    A voice came over the radio: “He got into the car. I’m not sure if that’s the target.”

    Someone matching the description of the man that ICE was searching for walked out of the house, got into a car and drove away from the tree-lined street. Unsure whether this was their target, the officers followed. A few minutes later, with the car approaching the freeway, the voice over the radio said: “He’s got the physical description. We just can’t see the face good.”

    “Do it,” said Marcos Charles, the acting head of ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations.

    Agents in multiple vehicles soon overtook the car and boxed it in. After talking to the man, they realized he was not the person being sought for but that he was in the United States illegally, so they took him into custody.

    Eventually, a little after dawn broke on the one- and two-story brick houses, the man they were looking for came out of the house and got into a car. ICE officers closed in. The man got out of the car and was arrested. ICE said both men were in the country illegally and had criminal records.

    Charles called it a “successful operation.”

    “There was no safety issues on the part of our officers, nor the individuals that we arrested. And it went smoothly,” he said.

    ‘ICE does not belong here’

    Activists and critics of ICE say that’s increasingly not the norm in immigration operations.

    They point to videos showing ICE agents smashing windows to apprehend suspects, a chaotic showdown outside a popular Italian restaurant in San Diego, and arrests like that of a Tufts University student in March by masked agents outside her apartment in Somerville, Massachusetts, as neighbors watched.

    Charles said ICE is using an “appropriate” amount of force and that agents are responding to suspects who increasingly are not following commands.

    There has been “an uptick in people that are not compliant,” he said, blaming inflammatory rhetoric from activists who, he said, are encouraging people to resist.

    Alderman Andre Vasquez, who chairs the Chicago City Council’s committee on immigrant and refugee rights, strenuously objected to that description, faulting ICE for any escalation.

    “We’re not here to cause chaos. The president is,” Vasquez. He accused immigration enforcement agents of trying to provoke activists into overreacting in order to justify calling in a greater use of force such as National Guard troops. “ICE does not belong here.”

    Shooting death of immigrant by ICE officer heightens tensions

    Chicago was already on edge when a shooting Sept. 12 heightened tensions even more.

    The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said an ICE officer fatally shot Silverio Villegas González, a Mexican immigrant who tried to evade arrest in a Chicago suburb by driving his car at officers and dragging one of them. The department said the officer felt his life was threatened and had opened fire, killing the man.

    Charles said he could not comment because there is an open investigation. But he said he met with the officer in the hospital, saw his injuries and felt that the force used was appropriate.

    The officer was not wearing a body camera, Charles said.

    Gov. JB Pritzker, D-Ill., has demanded “a full, factual accounting” of the shooting. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum condemned the death and said Mexico is demanding a thorough investigation.

    “These tactics have led to the loss of life of one of our community members,” said Democratic state Rep. Norma Hernandez.

    In another use of force incident under “Midway Blitz” that has drawn criticism, a U.S. citizen was detained by immigration agents alongside his father and hit by a stun gun three times Tuesday in suburban Des Plaines, the man’s lawyer said.

    Local advocates have also condemned ICE agents for wearing masks, failing to identify themselves, and not using body cameras — actions that starkly contrast with Chicago Police Department policy.

    ‘It was time to hit Chicago’

    Charles said there is no timeline for the ICE-led operation in the Chicago area to end. As of Thursday, immigration enforcement officials have arrested nearly 550 people. Charles said 50% to 60% of those are targeted arrests, meaning they are people whom immigration enforcers are specifically trying to find.

    He pushed back on criticism that ICE randomly targets people, saying agents weren’t “going out to Home Depot parking lots” to make indiscriminate arrests.

    Charles said ICE has brought in more than 200 officers from around the country for the operation.

    He said that for too long, cities such as Chicago that limited cooperation with ICE had allowed immigrants, especially those with criminal records, to remain in the country illegally. It was time to act, he said.

    “It was time to hit Chicago.”

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Uber Eats will soon launch U.S. drone delivery in partnership with Flytrex

    Uber Eats will soon be making some meal deliveries with drones.

    Uber Technologies said Thursday that it’s partnering with drone company Flytrex Inc. The companies expect to begin deliveries in test markets by the end of this year. Uber didn’t say where those markets will be, but Flytrex is already operating in Texas and North Carolina.


    What You Need To Know

    • Uber Eats will soon be using drones to deliver some meals. Uber said Thursday that it’s partnering with drone company Flytrex Inc.
    • The companies expect to begin deliveries in test markets by the end of this year, but Uber didn’t say where those markets will be
    • It’s the latest partnership in the fast-growing drone delivery space
    • Flytrex, which is based in Tel Aviv, Israel, also makes deliveries for Uber Eats’ rival DoorDash

    It’s the latest partnership in the fast-growing drone delivery space. Flytrex, which is based in Tel Aviv, Israel, also makes deliveries for Uber Eats’ rival DoorDash.

    Wing, a drone company owned by Google parent Alphabet, works with DoorDash and Walmart. Zipline, a drone company based in South San Francisco, works with Walmart and Panera Bread and also makes deliveries for hospitals. Amazon also making deliveries with its own Prime Air drones.

    “Autonomous technology is transforming mobility and delivery faster than ever before,” said Sarfraz Maredia, Uber’s president of autonomous mobility and delivery, in a company statement. “With Flytrex, we’re entering the next chapter—bringing the speed and sustainability of drone delivery to the Uber Eats platform, at scale, for the first time.”

    “The promise of autonomous vehicles is here, redefining logistics on the ground and in the air,” said Noam Bardin, executive chairman of Flytrex. “Autonomous drones are the future of food delivery—fast, affordable, and hands-free. Flytrex has already delivered over 200,000 meals to suburban households in the past three years. Partnering with Uber—pioneers of ground-based mobility—brings together proven logistics expertise with aerial innovation. Together, we’re building the infrastructure for a future where autonomous systems seamlessly move goods through our communities, making faster, safer, and more sustainable delivery the new standard.”

    San Francisco-based Uber is making an investment in Flytrex as part of the deal. Financial details of the partnership weren’t shared Thursday.

    Flytrex, which was founded in 2013, said it has made more than 200,000 deliveries across the U.S. Flytrex Executive Chairman Noam Bardin said the partnership combines Uber’s logistics expertise with Flytrex’s aerial innovation.

    “Autonomous drones are the future of food delivery — fast, affordable and hands-free,” Bardin said in a statement.

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Uber Eats will soon launch U.S. drone delivery in partnership with Flytrex

    Uber Eats will soon be making some meal deliveries with drones.

    Uber Technologies said Thursday that it’s partnering with drone company Flytrex Inc. The companies expect to begin deliveries in test markets by the end of this year. Uber didn’t say where those markets will be, but Flytrex is already operating in Texas and North Carolina.


    What You Need To Know

    • Uber Eats will soon be using drones to deliver some meals. Uber said Thursday that it’s partnering with drone company Flytrex Inc.
    • The companies expect to begin deliveries in test markets by the end of this year, but Uber didn’t say where those markets will be
    • It’s the latest partnership in the fast-growing drone delivery space
    • Flytrex, which is based in Tel Aviv, Israel, also makes deliveries for Uber Eats’ rival DoorDash

    It’s the latest partnership in the fast-growing drone delivery space. Flytrex, which is based in Tel Aviv, Israel, also makes deliveries for Uber Eats’ rival DoorDash.

    Wing, a drone company owned by Google parent Alphabet, works with DoorDash and Walmart. Zipline, a drone company based in South San Francisco, works with Walmart and Panera Bread and also makes deliveries for hospitals. Amazon also making deliveries with its own Prime Air drones.

    “Autonomous technology is transforming mobility and delivery faster than ever before,” said Sarfraz Maredia, Uber’s president of autonomous mobility and delivery, in a company statement. “With Flytrex, we’re entering the next chapter—bringing the speed and sustainability of drone delivery to the Uber Eats platform, at scale, for the first time.”

    “The promise of autonomous vehicles is here, redefining logistics on the ground and in the air,” said Noam Bardin, executive chairman of Flytrex. “Autonomous drones are the future of food delivery—fast, affordable, and hands-free. Flytrex has already delivered over 200,000 meals to suburban households in the past three years. Partnering with Uber—pioneers of ground-based mobility—brings together proven logistics expertise with aerial innovation. Together, we’re building the infrastructure for a future where autonomous systems seamlessly move goods through our communities, making faster, safer, and more sustainable delivery the new standard.”

    San Francisco-based Uber is making an investment in Flytrex as part of the deal. Financial details of the partnership weren’t shared Thursday.

    Flytrex, which was founded in 2013, said it has made more than 200,000 deliveries across the U.S. Flytrex Executive Chairman Noam Bardin said the partnership combines Uber’s logistics expertise with Flytrex’s aerial innovation.

    “Autonomous drones are the future of food delivery — fast, affordable and hands-free,” Bardin said in a statement.

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Senate confirms 48 of Trump’s nominees at once after changing chamber’s rules

    WASHINGTON — The Senate has confirmed 48 of President Donald Trump’s nominees at once, voting for the first time under new rules to begin clearing a backlog of executive branch positions that had been delayed by Democrats.


    What You Need To Know

    • The Senate has confirmed 48 of President Donald Trump’s nominees. Republicans acted for the first time under new rules to clear a backlog of executive branch positions that had been delayed by Democrats
    • Frustrated by the stalling tactics, Senate Republicans moved last week to make it easier to confirm large groups of lower-level, non-judicial nominations
    • Democrats had forced multiple votes on almost every one of Trump’s picks, infuriating the president and tying up the Senate floor
    • The new rules allow Senate Republicans to move multiple nominees with a simple majority vote –– but don’t apply to judicial nominations or high-level Cabinet posts

    Frustrated by the stalling tactics, Senate Republicans moved last week to make it easier to confirm large groups of lower-level, non-judicial nominations. Democrats had forced multiple votes on almost every one of Trump’s picks, infuriating the president and tying up the Senate floor.

    The new rules allow Senate Republicans to move multiple nominees with a simple majority vote — a process that would have previously been blocked with just one objection. The rules don’t apply to judicial nominations or high-level Cabinet posts.

    “Republicans have fixed a broken process,” Thune said ahead of the vote.

    The Senate voted 51-47 to confirm the four dozen nominees. Thune said that those confirmed on Thursday had all received bipartisan votes in committee, including deputy secretaries for the Departments of Defense, Interior, Energy and others.

    Among the confirmed are Jonathan Morrison, the new administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Kimberly Guilfoyle as U.S. ambassador to Greece. Guilfoyle is a former California prosecutor and television news personality who led the fundraising for Trump’s 2020 campaign and was once engaged to Trump’s son, Donald Trump Jr.

    Thune’s move is the latest salvo after a dozen years of gradual changes by both parties to weaken the filibuster and make the nominations process more partisan. Both parties have obstructed each other’s nominees for years, and senators in both parties have advocated for speeding up the process when they are in the majority.

    Republicans first proposed changing the rules in early August, when the Senate left for a monthlong recess after a breakdown in bipartisan negotiations over the confirmation process and Trump told Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer to “GO TO HELL!” on social media.

    Democrats have blocked more nominees than ever before as they have struggled to find ways to oppose Trump and the GOP-dominated Congress, and as their voters have pushed them to fight Republicans at every turn. It’s the first time in recent history that the minority party hasn’t allowed at least some quick confirmations.

    Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer has said Democrats are delaying the nominations because Trump’s nominees are “historically bad.” And he told Republicans that they will “come to regret” their action — echoing a similar warning from GOP Leader Mitch McConnell to then-Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., in 2013, when Democrats changed Senate rules for executive branch and lower court judicial nominees to remove the 60-vote threshold for confirmations. At the time, Republicans were blocking President Barack Obama’s picks.

    Republicans took the Senate majority a year later, and McConnell eventually did the same for Supreme Court nominees in 2017 as Democrats tried to block Trump’s nomination of Justice Neil Gorsuch.

    “What Republicans have done is chip away at the Senate even more, to give Donald Trump more power and to rubber stamp whomever he wants, whenever he wants them, no questions asked,” Schumer said last week.

    Republicans will move to confirm a second tranche of nominees in the coming weeks, gradually clearing the list of more than 100 nominations that have been pending for months.

    “There will be more to come,” Thune said Thursday. “And we’ll ensure that President Trump’s administration is filled at a pace that looks more like those of his predecessors.”

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Trump asks Supreme Court for emergency order to remove Lisa Cook from Fed board

    WASHINGTON — The Trump administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court for an emergency order to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve’s board of governors.


    What You Need To Know

    • President Donald Trump’s administration is asking the Supreme Court for an emergency order to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve’s board of governors
    • The Republican administration turned to the high court Thursday after an appeals court refused to go along with Trump’s effort to oust Cook
    • Trump is trying to reshape the Fed’s seven-member governing board and strike a blow at its independence
    • Trump has accused Cook of mortgage fraud related to properties in Michigan and Georgia, which she denies

    The Republican administration turned to the high court after an appeals court refused to go along with ousting Cook, part of President Donald Trump’s effort to reshape the Fed’s seven-member governing board and strike a blow at its independence.

    The White House campaign to unseat Cook marks an unprecedented bid to reshape the Fed board, which was designed to be largely independent from day-to-day politics. No president has fired a sitting Fed governor in the agency’s 112-year history.

    Cook, who was appointed to the Fed’s board by President Joe Biden, a Democrat, has said she won’t leave her post and won’t be “bullied” by Trump. One of her lawyers, Abbe Lowell, has said she “will continue to carry out her sworn duties as a Senate-confirmed Board Governor.”

    Separately, Senate Republicans on Monday confirmed Stephen Miran, Trump’s nominee to an open spot on the Fed’s board. Both Cook and Miran took part in Wednesday’s vote in which the Fed cut its key interest rate by a quarter-point.

    Trump sought to fire Cook on Aug. 25, but a federal judge ruled last week that the removal probably was illegal and reinstated her to the Fed’s board. Trump has accused Cook of mortgage fraud because she appeared to claim two properties, in Michigan and Georgia, as “primary residences” in June and July 2021, before she joined the board. Such claims can lead to a lower mortgage rate and smaller down payment than if one of them was declared as a rental property or second home.

    “Put simply, the President may reasonably determine that interest rates paid by the American people should not be set by a Governor who appears to have lied about facts material to the interest rates she secured for herself — and refuses to explain the apparent misrepresentations,” Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote in his Supreme Court filing.

    But Cook has denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged with a crime. According to documents obtained by The Associated Press, Cook did specify that her Atlanta condo would be a “vacation home,” according to a loan estimate she obtained in May 2021. And in a form seeking a security clearance, she described it as a “2nd home.” Both documents appear to undercut the Trump administration’s claims of fraud.

    U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb ruled that the administration had not satisfied a legal requirement that Fed governors can only be fired “for cause,” which she said was limited to misconduct while in office. Cook did not join the Fed’s board until 2022.

    Cobb also held that Trump’s firing would have deprived Cook of her due process, or legal right, to contest the firing.

    By a 2-1 vote, a panel of the federal appeals court in Washington rejected the administration’s request to let Cook’s firing proceed.

    Trump’s lawyers have argued that even if the conduct occurred before her time as governor, her alleged action “indisputably calls into question Cook’s trustworthiness and whether she can be a responsible steward of the interest rates and economy.”

    Trump has previously won orders from the court’s conservative majority to fire the presidentially appointed leaders of other independent federal agencies, including the National Labor Relations Board and the Federal Trade Commission, even as legal fights continue.

    Those firings have been at will, with no cause given. The Supreme Court has distinguished the Federal Reserve from those other agencies, strongly suggesting that Trump can’t act against Fed governors without cause.

    In its new filing to the Supreme Court, the administration is asking Chief Justice John Roberts for a temporary order that would effectively remove Cook from the board and a more lasting order from the whole court that would be in place while her legal case continues.

    Associated Press

    Source link