ReportWire

Tag: netflix bid

  • Paramount files lawsuit in pursuit of Warner Bros. Discovery and threatens proxy fight

    [ad_1]

    Paramount is taking its pursuit of Warner Bros. Discovery to court.On Monday, Paramount CEO David Ellison announced a lawsuit in Delaware Chancery Court, where shareholders typically bring corporate disputes, as it attempts a hostile takeover of the iconic entertainment company.Ellison criticized Warner Bros. Discovery, also known as WBD, for a “lack of transparency” around its decision to favor Netflix’s bid for Warner Bros. and HBO.A WBD spokesperson had no immediate response, but an escalation in the form of a lawsuit had been predicted by Wall Street analysts.Ellison has been trying for months to buy all of WBD, but his entreaties have been rebuffed.So he is trying to gain control of WBD by offering to buy up shares for $30 each, and he is also threatening a proxy fight, vowing to nominate a Paramount-friendly slate of board members to take over the WBD board.Those board members, he said, would “exercise WBD’s right under the Netflix agreement to engage on Paramount’s offer and enter into a transaction with Paramount.”The proxy fight is a backup plan of sorts, in case a sufficient number of WBD shareholders don’t agree to sell their shares to Paramount in the coming weeks.Warner’s annual shareholder meeting has yet to be scheduled. Last year, it took place in June.WBD has said that it is moving forward with its signed agreement to sell its Warner Bros. and HBO assets to Netflix for $27.75 per share, with $23.25 in cash and the rest in Netflix stock.Netflix said last week that it is in talks with U.S. and EU regulators to receive the necessary approvals for the deal.But Paramount’s hostile takeover bid means that a giant question mark looms over the entire media empire.Ellison said on Monday that WBD’s decision-making “just doesn’t add up — much like the math on how WBD continues to favor taking less than our $30 per share all-cash offer for its shareholders.”WBD has raised a variety of concerns about Paramount’s debt financing, onerous conditions connected to the bid and other matters.The WBD board has also cited the potential value of its cable assets, which Netflix is not acquiring. Those channels, including CNN, are being broken off into a new, publicly traded company called Discovery Global this summer.Paramount has argued that the channels have little equity value. The lawsuit in Delaware will pursue more information about the valuation “so that,” Ellison said, “WBD shareholders have what they need to be able to make an informed decision as to whether to tender their shares into our offer.”Major WBD shareholders have been split over Paramount, with some calling it a superior bid and others siding with the Netflix deal.Meanwhile, President Trump has said that he will be personally involved in reviewing any merger, raising questions about whether his personal predilections will come into play.Over the weekend, he posted a link on Truth Social to a month-old opinion piece from One America News Network titled “Stop The Netflix Cultural Takeover.” The column said “it is time to say no to a woke media monopoly.”Netflix has exuded confidence in its ability to get the deal across the finish line in the next 12 to 18 months.

    Paramount is taking its pursuit of Warner Bros. Discovery to court.

    On Monday, Paramount CEO David Ellison announced a lawsuit in Delaware Chancery Court, where shareholders typically bring corporate disputes, as it attempts a hostile takeover of the iconic entertainment company.

    Ellison criticized Warner Bros. Discovery, also known as WBD, for a “lack of transparency” around its decision to favor Netflix’s bid for Warner Bros. and HBO.

    A WBD spokesperson had no immediate response, but an escalation in the form of a lawsuit had been predicted by Wall Street analysts.

    Ellison has been trying for months to buy all of WBD, but his entreaties have been rebuffed.

    So he is trying to gain control of WBD by offering to buy up shares for $30 each, and he is also threatening a proxy fight, vowing to nominate a Paramount-friendly slate of board members to take over the WBD board.

    Those board members, he said, would “exercise WBD’s right under the Netflix agreement to engage on Paramount’s offer and enter into a transaction with Paramount.”

    The proxy fight is a backup plan of sorts, in case a sufficient number of WBD shareholders don’t agree to sell their shares to Paramount in the coming weeks.

    Warner’s annual shareholder meeting has yet to be scheduled. Last year, it took place in June.

    WBD has said that it is moving forward with its signed agreement to sell its Warner Bros. and HBO assets to Netflix for $27.75 per share, with $23.25 in cash and the rest in Netflix stock.

    Netflix said last week that it is in talks with U.S. and EU regulators to receive the necessary approvals for the deal.

    But Paramount’s hostile takeover bid means that a giant question mark looms over the entire media empire.

    Ellison said on Monday that WBD’s decision-making “just doesn’t add up — much like the math on how WBD continues to favor taking less than our $30 per share all-cash offer for its shareholders.”

    WBD has raised a variety of concerns about Paramount’s debt financing, onerous conditions connected to the bid and other matters.

    The WBD board has also cited the potential value of its cable assets, which Netflix is not acquiring. Those channels, including CNN, are being broken off into a new, publicly traded company called Discovery Global this summer.

    Paramount has argued that the channels have little equity value. The lawsuit in Delaware will pursue more information about the valuation “so that,” Ellison said, “WBD shareholders have what they need to be able to make an informed decision as to whether to tender their shares into our offer.”

    Major WBD shareholders have been split over Paramount, with some calling it a superior bid and others siding with the Netflix deal.

    Meanwhile, President Trump has said that he will be personally involved in reviewing any merger, raising questions about whether his personal predilections will come into play.

    Over the weekend, he posted a link on Truth Social to a month-old opinion piece from One America News Network titled “Stop The Netflix Cultural Takeover.” The column said “it is time to say no to a woke media monopoly.”

    Netflix has exuded confidence in its ability to get the deal across the finish line in the next 12 to 18 months.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Warner Bros rejects takeover offer from Paramount, tells shareholders to stick with Netflix bid

    [ad_1]

    Warner Bros. again rejected Paramount’s latest takeover bid and told shareholders Wednesday to stick with a rival offer from Netflix.Warner’s leadership has repeatedly rebuffed Skydance-owned Paramount’s overtures — and urged shareholders just weeks ago to back the sale of its streaming and studio business to Netflix for $72 billion. Paramount, meanwhile, has sweetened its $77.9 billion offer for the entire company and gone straight to shareholders with a hostile bid.Warner Bros. Discovery said Wednesday that its board determined Paramount’s offer is not in the best interests of the company or its shareholders. It again recommended shareholders support the Netflix deal.Late last month Paramount announced an “irrevocable personal guarantee” from Oracle founder Larry Ellison — who is the father of Paramount CEO David Ellison — to back $40.4 billion in equity financing for the company’s offer. Paramount also increased its promised payout to shareholders to $5.8 billion if the deal is blocked by regulators, matching what Netflix already put on the table.The battle for Warner and the value of each offer grows complicated because Netflix and Paramount want different things. Netflix’s proposed acquisition includes only Warner’s studio and streaming business, including its legacy TV and movie production arms and platforms like HBO Max. But Paramount wants the entire company — which, beyond studio and streaming, includes networks like CNN and Discovery.If Netflix is successful, Warner’s news and cable operations would be spun off into their own company, under a previously-announced separation.A merger with either company will attract tremendous antitrust scrutiny. Due to its size and potential impact, it will almost certainly trigger a review by the U.S. Justice Department, which could sue to block the transaction or request changes. Other countries and regulators overseas may also challenge the merger.

    Warner Bros. again rejected Paramount’s latest takeover bid and told shareholders Wednesday to stick with a rival offer from Netflix.

    Warner’s leadership has repeatedly rebuffed Skydance-owned Paramount’s overtures — and urged shareholders just weeks ago to back the sale of its streaming and studio business to Netflix for $72 billion. Paramount, meanwhile, has sweetened its $77.9 billion offer for the entire company and gone straight to shareholders with a hostile bid.

    Warner Bros. Discovery said Wednesday that its board determined Paramount’s offer is not in the best interests of the company or its shareholders. It again recommended shareholders support the Netflix deal.

    Late last month Paramount announced an “irrevocable personal guarantee” from Oracle founder Larry Ellison — who is the father of Paramount CEO David Ellison — to back $40.4 billion in equity financing for the company’s offer. Paramount also increased its promised payout to shareholders to $5.8 billion if the deal is blocked by regulators, matching what Netflix already put on the table.

    The battle for Warner and the value of each offer grows complicated because Netflix and Paramount want different things. Netflix’s proposed acquisition includes only Warner’s studio and streaming business, including its legacy TV and movie production arms and platforms like HBO Max. But Paramount wants the entire company — which, beyond studio and streaming, includes networks like CNN and Discovery.

    If Netflix is successful, Warner’s news and cable operations would be spun off into their own company, under a previously-announced separation.

    A merger with either company will attract tremendous antitrust scrutiny. Due to its size and potential impact, it will almost certainly trigger a review by the U.S. Justice Department, which could sue to block the transaction or request changes. Other countries and regulators overseas may also challenge the merger.

    [ad_2]

    Source link