ReportWire

Tag: Nebraska State Capitol

  • NU President: Budget cuts ‘incredibly painful’ but ‘necessary’ for university survival

    [ad_1]

    Dr. Jeffrey Gold, president of the University of Nebraska system, gives his first “State of the University” address in the Nebraska State Capitol. Sept. 4, 2025. (Photo by Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    LINCOLN — University of Nebraska President Jeffrey Gold said Thursday that impending systemwide budget cuts of more than $40 million will be “incredibly painful” but “necessary” for NU’s survival.

    Dr. Gold, speaking at his inaugural “State of the University” address, said NU will still embark on what he’s coined the “Odyssey to the Extraordinary.” He set out his vision one year ago during the formal ceremony celebrating him as NU’s ninth president. Gold returned Thursday to say he still seeks to make an “already good, already excellent” NU “something more.”

    Dr. Jeffrey Gold, president of the University of Nebraska system, talks with reporters in the Warner Chamber of the Nebraska State Capitol after giving his first “State of the University” address. Sept. 4, 2025. (Photo by Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    Gold didn’t shy away from NU’s challenges, such as slowing state support and uncertainty in federal research dollars or policies, in an event believed by NU officials to be the first NU presidential address of its kind, and which Gold hopes to make an annual tradition.

    “While the challenges are significant, I see this as a time of profound opportunity,” Gold said Thursday. “An opportunity to actively reimagine our university. An opportunity to lead. An opportunity to help define what higher education in the next decades must look like.”

    Thursday’s address and Gold’s 2024 investiture were both held in the Nebraska State Capitol, which Gold said was purposefully in the “people’s house.”

    Fiscal uncertainties

    Gold said Thursday that since 2016, NU has had an average annual net loss of $206 million across the NU system, when accounting for inflation and state funding growth. He said the university system is funded to about 74% of where it would be if available money had matched inflationary expectations.

    Tuition increases have also been kept lower over the past six years than many of NU’s national peers, increasing tuition by 13.8% in that time frame, slightly more than half what many other universities increased tuition by during that period. 

    Combined, those pressures mean an NU budget that has annually been about $260 million leaner in recent years.

    Speaker of the Nebraska Legislature John Arch, left, talks with former Speaker Jim Scheer of Norfolk. Scheer now serves on the University of Nebraska Board of Regents. June 6, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    Speaker of the Nebraska Legislature John Arch, left, talks with former Speaker Jim Scheer of Norfolk. Scheer now serves on the University of Nebraska Board of Regents. June 6, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    Under President Donald Trump, NU now also faces a tightening research environment in which competition is growing for more-limited funding. Universities also need to absorb the costs of more cutting-edge research, Gold said, which he said isn’t sustainable in the long term. He said federal research dollars often make discoveries possible.

    “Fewer federal resources put this nationwide research enterprise at risk,” Gold said.

    At NU, nearly three out of every four students are Pell Grant-eligible, stressing federal dollars, and Gold noted that student demographics are also shifting. Instead of 18-year-old high school graduates, NU is seeing more teenagers taking dual-credit courses to get a leg up or attending community college first. Many also prefer online courses or online-only degree programs.

    Combined with inflation and a smaller-than-requested bump in state dollars this spring, NU faces a $20 million shortfall by the end of this year. That comes even as the NU Board of Regents raised tuition by 5% ahead of this academic year.

    ‘Cannot cut out way to excellence’

    NU’s four main campuses in Lincoln, Omaha and Kearney have already unveiled how much each campus will have to cut to shore up that systemwide deficit and campus-specific structural deficits, though specifics of most of these cuts have yet to be announced:

    • University of Nebraska-Lincoln: $27.5 million.

    • University of Nebraska Medical Center: $9.1 million.

    • University of Nebraska at Kearney: $4.5 million.

    • University of Nebraska at Omaha: $1.9 million. 

    University of Nebraska-Lincoln Chancellor Rodney Bennett speaks at the University of Nebraska President Jeffrey Gold’s investiture ceremony. Sept. 5, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    University of Nebraska-Lincoln Chancellor Rodney Bennett speaks at the University of Nebraska President Jeffrey Gold’s investiture ceremony. Sept. 5, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    At UNL, for example, costs have outpaced revenues. UNL Chancellor Rodney Bennett, the lone campus chancellor not to attend Gold’s address, is expected to announce UNL’s proposed cuts next week. UNL’s target of $27.5 million in cuts is greater than the combined budgets of the UNL College of Journalism and Mass Communications, UNL College of Architecture and Nebraska College of Law.

    Gold said the Office of the NU President also would make cuts. He did not specify by how much, but said the combined efforts are required for a “sustainable, viable future” for an NU that still contributes to students, the state’s economy and communities.

    “Make no mistake: We cannot cut our way to excellence, and certainly we cannot cut our way to our extraordinary destiny,” Gold said.

    Gold told reporters that cuts would likely include eliminating whole degree programs and possibly departments, along wit combining some departments or degrees, while some new degrees might be established.

    Any cuts of that nature would need the approval of the eight-member NU Board of Regents, likely by the board’s December meeting. Most campuses hope to finalize budget decisions by late October.

    Changing state dynamics

    Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen served as an NU regent for 10 years before becoming governor in 2023, a period that included confirming Gold as UNMC chancellor in 2013.

    Pillen in January initially proposed cutting NU’s budget by 2% over the next two fiscal years. Gold and Pillen negotiated, landing at a staggered increase this fiscal year and a smaller bump next year.

    Asked whether P

    U.S. Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., and Gov. Jim Pillen joined a dozen speakers in favor of President Jeffrey Gold’s installation as head of the University of Nebraska system. Sept. 5, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    U.S. Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., and Gov. Jim Pillen joined a dozen speakers in favor of President Jeffrey Gold’s installation as head of the University of Nebraska system. Sept. 5, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    illen had indicated whether NU would not get its increase next year, a 0.625% increase, Gold said no. He said Pillen has also not asked NU to make deeper cuts.

    Laura Strimple, a Pillen spokesperson, said Thursday that Nebraska provides more than $720 million to NU each year, equivalent to 13% of state tax spending and the largest spending area that comes out of the main state piggy bank. She said Nebraskans expect fiscal responsibility across state government.

    “Governor Pillen applauds the university for recent steps to curb spending and notes that more can and should be done as a good steward of taxpayer dollars to meet the mission of educating students and ultimately making sure that the university’s focus is on improving graduate outcomes,” Strimple said.

    A recent third-party analysis of NU’s annual economic impact, done at NU’s direction, indicates an impact of $6.4 billion and a return on investment for every state dollar of $10. NU also educates one in seven working-age Nebraskans and represents 9% of Nebraska’s gross domestic product.

    Lawmaker reactions

    State Sen. Dave Murma of Glenvil, chair of the Legislature’s Education Committee, was one of about a dozen lawmakers to attend Gold’s event. He said NU is vital as an economic driver and for research and education that officials hope to build and grow, even in tight budget times.

    “We will do what we can to fund the university,” Murman said. “Our goal is that the university will continue to be the premier university in Nebraska … and one of the best universities nationwide.”

    Nebraska State Treasurer Tom Briese of Albion, left, and State Sen. Dave Murman of Glenvil, chair of the Legislature’s Education Committee, talk during a break of a School Financing Review Commission meeting on Aug. 12, 2025. Briese and Murman attended the 2025 “State of the University of Nebraska” address by NU President Jeffrey Gold on Thursday. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    Nebraska State Treasurer Tom Briese of Albion, left, and State Sen. Dave Murman of Glenvil, chair of the Legislature’s Education Committee, talk during a break of a School Financing Review Commission meeting on Aug. 12, 2025. Briese and Murman attended the 2025 “State of the University of Nebraska” address by NU President Jeffrey Gold on Thursday. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    State Sen. Danielle Conrad of Lincoln, also a member of the Education Committee and the Legislature’s most senior member at 11 years of service, said she is proud of NU’s accomplishments but placed the blame for NU’s challenges on Pillen and the Legislature.

    Conrad said support for higher education, such as during her first two legislative terms in the 2000s and early 2010s under former Gov. Dave Heineman, wasn’t political. But now, NU and others are caught in the “crosshairs of ridiculous political battles” that she said have passed on the state’s “fiscal mismanagement” to NU students and families. She called it a “Pillen tax.”

    “Being a supporter of the university means more than just waving a flag on game day,” Conrad said.

    ‘Ability to emerge stronger’

    Gold said the 10:1 return is a good deal for state officials but that NU leaders will not waver from quality and growth, even if that means a deep cut in one area to help preserve NU’s ability in the others.

    “I’d rather see programs disappear than do anything to dilute the quality of what that diploma means to people,” Gold said.

    State Sens. Rita Sanders of Bellevue, left, and Danielle Conrad of Lincoln. May 12, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    State Sens. Rita Sanders of Bellevue, left, and Danielle Conrad of Lincoln. May 12, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    Any students in degree programs slated for elimination would still be guaranteed a chance to graduate, Gold said, adding: “Rest assured, we’ve got you and we’ll take care of you.”

    Gold also took his address Thursday to explain how NU is already engaging in its “odyssey” to improve despite budget challenges, including major investments in health care, a groundbreaking clinical trial in a multiple sclerosis treatment, continued emphasis on digital and precision agriculture, growing collaborations in national defense and security, athletics achievements and a record-setting year in philanthropic support (though about 99% of the $416.6 million raised is restricted and must be used for specific purposes, not for core budget functions).

    “If I were to go to the major donors and say, ‘Listen, we’ve got a leaky roof down on city campus. Maybe you’d like to help us replace that roof.’ I can only tell you that it would never work,” Gold told reporters.

    NU will also create a new center for excellence in artificial intelligence for “groundbreaking discovery” for every campus, college and NU faculty, staff or student. Gold said that for Nebraska to thrive in an increasingly complex and competitive world, it needs bold investment, particularly from state leaders.

    “We must acknowledge the hard truths of our challenges … but never lose faith in our ability to emerge stronger,” Gold said. “Our ‘Odyssey to the Extraordinary’ requires nothing less.”

    SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Petition effort seeks to halve Nebraska property taxes, cap valuations

    [ad_1]

    Eric Underwood, former chair of the NEGOP, center, leads a news conference with his new nonprofit Advocates For All Nebraskans to announce two ballot measures intended to lower property taxes and cap annual increases to property valuations. Aug. 25, 2025. (Photo by Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    LINCOLN — Advocates launched a pair of ballot measures Monday for the 2026 election, one that aims to halve property taxes and the other to cap annual property valuation increases.

    The petitions are the first of a handful being sought for 2026 by the new nonprofit “Advocates For All Nebraskans.” Leading the effort is former Nebraska Republican Party Chair Eric Underwood of Malcolm, State Board of Education member Kirk Penner of Aurora, former Nebraska State Patrol Superintendent Tom Nesbitt of Lincoln and former Lincoln talk radio host Doug Fitzgerald.

    Eric Underwood, former chair of the Nebraska Republican Party and leader of the new nonprofit Advocates For All Nebraskans. Aug. 25, 2025. (Photo by Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    The first petition would amend state law and halve the percentage of a property’s valuation subject to property taxes after 2026 — for homes, from 100% to 50%, and for agricultural or horticultural land, from 75% to 37.5%.

    A total of $5.3 billion in property taxes was assessed statewide in each of the past two years. A 50% reduction would mean a property tax savings of more than $2.6 billion. 

    “This immediate property tax relief and others that are out there are literally one signature and then one vote in 2026 away from becoming reality for the people,” Underwood said at a Monday news conference launching the effort.

    The second petition would amend the Nebraska Constitution to cap property valuation increases at the growth rate of Nebraska’s general fund tax receipts (as calculated at the end of each calendar year) or 3%, whichever is less.

    The valuation cap would not apply when a property is built, sold or purchased.

    Influence of valuations

    Reducing property valuations does not mean property taxes will go down at the same rate, or at all.

    There are more than 2,300 taxing subdivisions in the state, including 245 school districts, 93 counties, 528 municipalities, 408 fire districts and 327 townships. About 60% of property taxes pay for local schools, 17.2% for counties and 11.5% for municipalities.

    The proposed ballot measures would offer no replacement revenue to cover immediate reductions in property valuations.

    Qualifying for the ballot

    Voter-led changes to state law require verified signatures from at least 7% of registered voters (about 90,000). Voter-led changes to the Nebraska Constitution require signatures from at least 10% of voters (about 126,000). 

    Initiatives also need qualified signatures from at least 5% of registered voters in at least 38 of the state’s 93 counties.

    Voter totals are calculated when petitions are due to the Nebraska Secretary of State’s Office.

    Petitions seeking verification on the November 2026 ballot must be submitted in early July 2026.

    Some local officials speaking with the Nebraska Examiner after Monday’s announcement said they were still reviewing the ballot language but noted a taxing entity at or below half of its tax-asking authority could theoretically make up the difference over time.

    That would mean a school district at or below a 52.5-cent levy and counties or municipalities at or below 22.5-cent levies. The Legislature has capped how fast these three governments can increase property tax rates year over year.

    School and local government officials have in the past worried that tight spending caps could hinder growth or hurt employee recruitment or retention, and some have noted local leaders are buying products facing inflationary pressures as taxpayers are.

    Property tax rates can vary widely in the allowable range, such as for school districts. In the most recent year, Hyannis Public Schools and Humphrey Public Schools had mainline school levies of roughly 35 cents, while others were at or just below a $1.05 cap — public schools in Sidney, Plattsmouth, Medicine Valley, Gering or Walthill

    Entities within the upper half of their tax-asking authority would absorb the reduced valuations and resulting decline in tax revenue, unless they have access to additional state funding or other sources of revenue.

    In short, some Nebraskans would not receive a straight 50% reduction in property taxes.

    It’s not yet clear how lower valuations might pair with changes to the state’s main funding formula for schools. A new state commission is looking at long-term fixes to that funding, with first recommendations to the Legislature due Dec. 1.

    Leadership for the Nebraska State Education Association, Nebraska Association of County Officials and League of Nebraska Municipalities had no immediate comment Monday.

    Underwood argued property tax savings from the ballot measure would be spent in local communities, which he said would energize and boost state and local sales or income tax revenue.

    ‘Rebalancing the funding structure’

    Penner, who sat on the Aurora school board for 16 years before joining the State Board of Education in 2021, said he understands that property taxes play a balanced role in supporting schools. He said the ballot measures are “not about crippling local services. It’s about rebalancing the funding structure.”

     State Board of Education member Kirk Penner of Aurora. Aug. 25, 2025. (Photo by Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    State Board of Education member Kirk Penner of Aurora. Aug. 25, 2025. (Photo by Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    Over the next 18 months, Penner challenged local governments and taxing entities to prepare and engage with constituents to find new efficiencies and sustainable funding models. He said it could be a “new era” for transparency and direct public engagement.

    “This is where elected representation should always be: a purposeful engagement of government to their constituents in a time and manner that truly listens to the voice and embraces the will of the people,” Penner said.

    Underwood told the Examiner he understands the effort might seem a “forceful way” forward, but he asked at what point conversations would occur without the people as the “primary driver.” He said he also believes the effort could increase voter turnout in the 2026 midterm elections.

    The group intends a “staged” release of petitions for 2026, Penner said, with the first two. He pledged another petition would “ensure our schools are properly funded while still moving them away from heavy reliance on property taxes.” He said the school funding mechanism is “broke” and has been for a while.

     Doug Fitzgerald, a former talk radio host in Lincoln, Aug. 25, 2025. (Photo by Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    Doug Fitzgerald, a former talk radio host in Lincoln, Aug. 25, 2025. (Photo by Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    Underwood said subsequent petitions would prioritize local control and lead to a “historical rebalancing of schools” with a focus on caring for teachers and ensuring student education.

    The group did not further detail or offer a timeline for when future petitions would be released.

    Countering or pairing with EPIC Option

    The Nebraska Constitution requires ballot measures to contain no more than a “single subject,” barring detailed but interconnected changes from appearing as a single item and requiring signatures to be gathered across multiple petitions, with each voted on separately.

    However, juggling multiple petitions has proven challenging, as indicated in past years for medical cannabis advocates or the similarly tax-centered “EPIC Option.”

    The “EPIC Option,” an acronym for the effort to eliminate property, income, inheritance and corporate taxes, is trying again for November 2026 with a “2.0” version that would take effect in 2028. Instead of two petitions to detail an alternative consumption tax, supporters landed this cycle on a single sentence. 

    If the EPIC Option is successful, the Legislature would be left to devise alternative revenue.

     Then-State Sen. Steve Erdman of Bayard leads a news conference at the Nebraska State Capitol on his EPIC Option tax proposals at the Nebraska State Capitol. May 21, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    Then-State Sen. Steve Erdman of Bayard leads a news conference at the Nebraska State Capitol on his EPIC Option tax proposals at the Nebraska State Capitol. May 21, 2024. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    Underwood told reporters Monday that his group’s effort no way counters EPIC and can be complementary or parallel.

    “We don’t think there’s going to be confusion,” Underwood said.

    However, former State Sen. Steve Erdman of Bayard, an EPIC creator and spokesperson, said while the Underwood-led effort might make Nebraska’s tax system better, it won’t fix the issue.

    “There’s only one way to fix it, and that’s start over,” Erdman told the Examiner.

    Erdman said he is worried about confusion because the more explaining his team had to do with EPIC, it hurt signature gathering in the past year, compared to now. He also expressed concern about whether the Legislature would carry out the intended 50% property tax reduction or whether capping valuations up to 3% would instead lock in unfair valuations.

    State Sens. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha and Bob Andersen of north-central Sarpy County are continuing to look at legislative ways to tackle property valuations, including a cap as Underwood’s team proposed. 

    The Andersen-Kauth effort did not advance past the Revenue Committee this spring, but the pair has not given up ahead of the 2026 legislative session, with hopes to reach the 2026 ballot, too.

    ‘Historic, lawful power’

    Underwood, who led the Nebraska Republican Party between 2022 and 2025, and his fellow ballot sponsors said the Legislature has not listened to the public on property taxes, an argument Erdman has also championed.

     Retired Nebraska State Patrol Superintendent Tom Nesbitt. Aug. 25, 2025. (Photo by Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    Retired Nebraska State Patrol Superintendent Tom Nesbitt. Aug. 25, 2025. (Photo by Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)

    The 49-member, officially nonpartisan Legislature, where members do not formally caucus by party, has a Republican supermajority. Underwood and his supporters are Republicans.

    Fitzgerald said he’s heard loud and clear from Nebraskans fed up with the state’s “property tax nightmare.”

    Nesbitt said he appreciates the one-house Legislature, the only statehouse of its kind in the country. But he said that “over the years, I’ve watched an erosion of something fundamental: the will of the people taking a back seat to the machinery of government.”

    “Our petitions aren’t radical by any means, or even partisan,” Nesbitt said. “They’re to return to a historic, lawful power of Nebraskans to legislate of, by and for the people.”

    SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

    [ad_2]

    Source link