ReportWire

Tag: national security

  • Mayor announces another business shuttered and creation of Human Trafficking Task Force

    METHUEN — The city has followed up a “declaration of war” against human trafficking with the investigation of another business and the creation of a task force.

    On Monday, city inspectors shut down Eastern Bodywork Therapy, which officials allege is a front for human trafficking. Mayor D.J. Beauregard, who had announced the crackdown on Sunday, said in a press release that the task force would hold both the perpetrators and landlords accountable.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAm%96 D9FE 5@H? @7 E96 3FD:?6DD 7@==@HD E96 2CC6DE 2?5 7:=:?8 @7 492C86D 282:?DE 2 >2?286C 2E E96 q62FEJ v2C56? $A2[ H9@ A@=:46 92G6 244FD65 @7 D6I EC277:4<:?8 2>@?8 @E96C 4C:>6D]k^Am

    kAm“%96 |6E9F6? wF>2? %C277:4<:?8 %2D< u@C46 H:== 5C2H 7C@> E96 C6D@FC46D @7 @FC 4:EJ 286?4:6D 2?5 A2CE?6CD[ :?4=F5:?8 |6E9F6?’D x?DA64E:@?D 2?5 w62=E9 s:G:D:@?D[ E96 |6E9F6? !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E[ 2?5 4@>>F?:EJ A2CE?6CD 2?5 ?@?AC@7:E 286?4:6D[” q62FC682C5 D2:5] “(6 H:== H@C< E@86E96C E@ :56?E:7J EC277:4<6CD[ D9FEE6C :==682= 3FD:?6DD6D E92E AC@7:E 7C@> E9:D 6G:=[ 2?5 9@=5 =2?5=@C5D 244@F?E23=6 :7 E96J 92C3@C 2?5 AC@7:E 7C@> DF49 24E:G:E:6D]”k^Am

    kAm(96? :?DA64E@CD G:D:E65 `f w2>AD9:C6 $E][ E96J 7@F?5 E96 D:E6 H2D 36:?8 FD65 2D 2? F?=:46?D65 3@5JH@C< 6DE23=:D9>6?E[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 AC6DD C6=62D6] r:EJ 6>A=@J66D 2=D@ 5:D4@G6C65 6G:56?46 @7 923:E2E:@? 2?5 E96 42D6 H2D C676CC65 E@ A@=:46]k^Am

    kAm“r@>>6C4:2= DA246D 2C6 ?@E 56D:8?65 @C A6C>:EE65 7@C C6D:56?E:2= FD6[ 2?5 =:G:?8 😕 E96> A@D6D D6C:@FD D276EJ C:D2<6 DFC6 2?J D6CG:4632D65 3FD:?6DD E96J G:D:E 92D :ED AC@A6C =:46?D6 A@DE65[ H9:49 😀 C6BF:C65 3J =2H[” s:C64E@C @7 !F3=:4 w62=E9 r26=: %682? +2>A249 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmx?DA64E@CD :DDF65 2 462D6 2?5 56D:DE @C56C E@ E96 3FD:?6DD]k^Am

    kAmq62FC682C5 E92?<65 !@=:46 r9:67 $4@EE |4}2>2C2[ E96 |6E9F6? !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E[ w62=E9 s:C64E@C r26=: %682? +2>A249[ E96 56A2CE>6?ED @7 w62=E9[ wF>2? $6CG:46D[ 2?5 x?DA64E:@?D 2?5 E96 4@?46C?65 ?6:893@CD 2?5 D>2== 3FD:?6DD @H?6CD H9@ 42>6 7@CH2C5 H:E9 E96:C 4@?46C?D]k^Am

    kAm“(6 >FDE 5@ >@C6 — 😕 A2CE?6CD9:A H:E9 @FC 7656C2= 2?5 DE2E6 =2H 6?7@C46>6?E 2==:6D[ 2=@?8D:56 @FC ?6:893@CD 96C6 😕 E96 |6CC:>24< ‘2==6J — E@ F?>2D< D96== 4@CA@C2E:@?D E92E 9:56 3FD:?6DD @H?6CD[ DFAA@CE DFCG:G@C46?E6C65 =2H 6?7@C46>6?E DEC2E68:6D[ 2?5 4=@D6 E96 =@@A9@=6D 😕 E96 4@>>6C4:2= C62= 6DE2E6 :?5FDECJ E92E EC277:4<6CD 6IA=@:E[” q62FC682C5 D2:5] “|6E9F6? 92D K6C@ E@=6C2?46 7@C E9@D6 H9@ AC@7:E 7C@> 9F>2? DF776C:?8 😕 @FC 4:EJ]”k^Am

    kAm%96 :?G6DE:82E:@? :?E@ t2DE6C? q@5JH@C< %96C2AJ 😀 24E:G6 2?5 @?8@:?8[ 244@C5:?8 E@ E96 AC6DD C6=62D6k^Am

    By Teddy Tauscher | ttauscher@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • Methuen mayor declares ‘war on human trafficking’ after spa owner’s arrest

    METHUEN — The manager of Beauty Garden Spa on Wallace Street is facing human trafficking charges after a lengthy police investigation.

    Suping Zhu, 38, of Flushing, New York, is to be arraigned Monday in Lawrence District Court on charges that include deriving support from prostitution and trafficking person for sexual servitude.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmx? 2 DE2E6>6?E :DDF65 $F?52J 27E6C?@@?[ |2J@C s]y] q62FC682C5 2?5 !@=:46 r9:67 $4@EE |4}2>2C2 D2:5 E96 2CC6DE 2?5 4=@DFC6 @7 E96 DA2 😀 @?=J E96 368:??:?8 @7 2 =2C86C 4C24<5@H? @? 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8 6IA64E65 😕 E96 4:EJ]k^Am

    kAm+9F H2D 2CC6DE65 uC:52J H:E9@FE :?4:56?E[ 244@C5:?8 E@ A@=:46]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D @A6C2E:@? >2CA2:8? E@ 6C25:42E6 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8 2?5 D6IF2= D6CG:EF56 😕 |6E9F6?[” |4}2>2C2 D2:5] “%96 |6E9F6? !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E[ DE2?5:?8 F?:E65 H:E9 |2J@C q62FC682C5[ 😀 D6?5:?8 2 4=62C 2?5 F?>:DE2<23=6 H2C?:?8 E@ 6G6CJ ?672C:@FD AC@AC:6E@C CF??:?8 E96D6 G:=6 @A6C2E:@?Di H6 2C6 4@>:?8 7@C J@F[ 2?5 H6 H:== D9FE 5@H? J@FC :==682= 6?E6CAC:D6D H:E9 56E6C>:?65 24E:@?]”k^Am

    kAmsFC:?8 2 D62C49 @7 E96 DA2 2E d (2==246 $E][ A@=:46 7@F?5 =:G:?8 BF2CE6CD 7@C EH@ H@>6? 😕 E96 32D6>6?E @7 E96 4@>>6C4:2==J K@?65 3F:=5:?8] !@=:46 D2:5 E96 :?G6DE:82E:@? H2D AC@>AE65 3J 4@?46C?D 7C@> C6D:56?ED]k^Am

    kAm|4}2>2C2 :DDF65 2 H2C?:?8 E@ E96 4FDE@>6CD @7 :==:4:E DA2D]k^Am

    kAm“%@ E96 ‘;@9?D’ 7F6=:?8 E9:D 56DA:423=6 EC256[ @H E9:Di J@F 2C6 ?@E :?G:D:3=6[ 2?5 H6 2C6 E2C86E:?8 J@F ?6IE H:E9 E96 7F== >:89E @7 E96 =2H[” 96 D2:5] “wF>2? EC277:4<:?8 2?5 D6IF2= D6CG:EF56 2C6 ?@E G:4E:>=6DD 4C:>6D] %96J 6IA=@:E E96 GF=?6C23=6[ 56DEC@J =:G6D[ 2?5 A@:D@? @FC 4@>>F?:EJ] (6 H:== C6=6?E=6DD=J AFCDF6 6G6CJ A6CA6EC2E@C E@ 6?DFC6 E96J 7246 ;FDE:46] %9:D 😀 @?=J E96 368:??:?8[ 2?5 E96 |6E9F6? !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E[ 324<65 3J @FC 4@>>F?:EJ 2?5 =2H 6?7@C46>6?E A2CE?6CD[ H:== ?@E C6DE F?E:= E96D6 4C:>6D 2C6 6C25:42E65 7C@> @FC 4:EJ]”k^Am

    kAmq62FC682C5 D2:5 96 😀 564=2C:?8 2 “H2C @? 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8]”k^Am

    kAm“(6 H:== :56?E:7J 2?5 2AAC696?5 EC277:4<6CD[ D9FE 5@H? 6G6CJ 3FD:?6DD 😕 |6E9F6? E92E AC@7:ED 7C@> E9:D 6G:=[ 2?5 9@=5 =2?5=@C5D 244@F?E23=6 :7 E96J 92C3@C E96> – H6 H:== 7:?5 J@F[ 2?5 H6 2C6 4@>:?8 27E6C J@F ?6IE] |6E9F6? 92D K6C@ E@=6C2?46 7@C E96D6 E6CC:3=6 4C:>6D 😕 @FC 4:EJ[” 96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmsFC:?8 E96:C :?G6DE:82E:@?[ A@=:46 :?E6CG:6H65 EH@ H@>6? H9@ H@C<65 2E E96 DA2 2?5 C6G:6H65 4@>AFE6CD[ A9@?6D 2?5 3FD:?6DD C64@C5D] p7E6C E96 D62C49[ E96 4:EJ’D s6A2CE>6?E @7 w62=E9[ wF>2? $6CG:46D 2?5 x?DA64E:@? D9FE 5@H? E96 3FD:?6DD[ H9:49 92D C6>2:?65 4=@D65]k^Am

    kAm“{:G:?8 😕 2 3FD:?6DD @C 4@>>6C4:2= F?:E 😀 F?D276[ G:@=2E6D >F?:4:A2= 2?5 DE2E6 4@56D[ 2?5 H:== 36 DF3;64E E@ 6?7@C46>6?E[” s:C64E@C @7 !F3=:4 w62=E9 r26=: %682? +2>A249 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmq62FC682C5 E92?<65 =@42= A@=:46[ DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= =2H 6?7@C46>6?E[ +2>A249[ E96 4:EJ’D 962=E9 56A2CE>6?E 2?5 E96 4@?46C?65 C6D:56?ED H9@ >256 E96 :?:E:2= C6A@CED E92E =65 E@ E96 :?G6DE:82E:@?]k^Am

    kAm|4}2>2C2 D2:5 =@42= A@=:46 H6C6 2DD:DE65 😕 E96 >@?E9D=@?8 :?G6DE:82E:@? 3J E96 {2HC6?46 !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E[ tDD6I r@F?EJ s:DEC:4E pEE@C?6J’D ~77:46[ w@>6=2?5 $64FC:EJ x?G6DE:82E:@?D[ E96 x?E6C?2= #6G6?F6 $6CG:46 2?5 &]$] x>>:8C2?E 2?5 rFDE@>D t?7@C46>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%96C6 >2J 36 255:E:@?2= 492C86D A6?5:?8 E96 :?G6DE:82E:@?’D @FE4@>6[ A@=:46 D2:5]k^Am

    By Teddy Tauscher | ttauscher@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • BREAKING NEWS: Methuen mayor declares ‘war on human trafficking’ after spa owner’s arrest

    METHUEN — The manager of Beauty Garden Spa on Wallace Street is facing human trafficking charges after a lengthy police investigation.

    Suping Zhu, 38, of Flushing, New York, is to be arraigned Monday in Lawrence District Court on charges that include deriving support from prostitution and trafficking person for sexual servitude.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmx? 2 DE2E6>6?E :DDF65 $F?52J 27E6C?@@?[ |2J@C s]y] q62FC682C5 2?5 !@=:46 r9:67 $4@EE |4}2>2C2 D2:5 E96 2CC6DE 2?5 4=@DFC6 @7 E96 DA2 😀 @?=J E96 368:??:?8 @7 2 =2C86C 4C24<5@H? @? 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8 6IA64E65 😕 E96 4:EJ]k^Am

    kAm+9F H2D 2CC6DE65 uC:52J H:E9@FE :?4:56?E[ 244@C5:?8 E@ A@=:46]k^Am

    kAm“%9:D @A6C2E:@? >2CA2:8? E@ 6C25:42E6 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8 2?5 D6IF2= D6CG:EF56 😕 |6E9F6?[Q |4}2>2C2 D2:5] Q%96 |6E9F6? !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E[ DE2?5:?8 F?:E65 H:E9 |2J@C q62FC682C5[ 😀 D6?5:?8 2 4=62C 2?5 F?>:DE2<23=6 H2C?:?8 E@ 6G6CJ ?672C:@FD AC@AC:6E@C CF??:?8 E96D6 G:=6 @A6C2E:@?Di H6 2C6 4@>:?8 7@C J@F[ 2?5 H6 H:== D9FE 5@H? J@FC :==682= 6?E6CAC:D6D H:E9 56E6C>:?65 24E:@?]Qk^Am

    kAmsFC:?8 2 D62C49 @7 E96 DA2 2E d (2==246 $E][ A@=:46 7@F?5 =:G:?8 BF2CE6CD 7@C EH@ H@>6? 😕 E96 32D6>6?E @7 E96 4@>>6C4:2==J K@?65 3F:=5:?8] !@=:46 D2:5 E96 :?G6DE:82E:@? H2D AC@>AE65 3J 4@?46C?D 7C@> C6D:56?ED]k^Am

    kAm|4}2>2C2 :DDF65 2 H2C?:?8 E@ E96 4FDE@>6CD @7 :==:4:E DA2D]k^Am

    kAm“%@ E96 ‘;@9?D’ 7F6=:?8 E9:D 56DA:423=6 EC256[ @H E9:Di J@F 2C6 ?@E :?G:D:3=6[ 2?5 H6 2C6 E2C86E:?8 J@F ?6IE H:E9 E96 7F== >:89E @7 E96 =2H[Q 96 D2:5] QwF>2? EC277:4<:?8 2?5 D6IF2= D6CG:EF56 2C6 ?@E G:4E:>=6DD 4C:>6D] %96J 6IA=@:E E96 GF=?6C23=6[ 56DEC@J =:G6D[ 2?5 A@:D@? @FC 4@>>F?:EJ] (6 H:== C6=6?E=6DD=J AFCDF6 6G6CJ A6CA6EC2E@C E@ 6?DFC6 E96J 7246 ;FDE:46] %9:D 😀 @?=J E96 368:??:?8[ 2?5 E96 |6E9F6? !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E[ 324<65 3J @FC 4@>>F?:EJ 2?5 =2H 6?7@C46>6?E A2CE?6CD[ H:== ?@E C6DE F?E:= E96D6 4C:>6D 2C6 6C25:42E65 7C@> @FC 4:EJ]Q k^Am

    kAmq62FC682C5 D2:5 96 😀 564=2C:?8 2 QH2C @? 9F>2? EC277:4<:?8]Qk^Am

    kAm “(6 H:== :56?E:7J 2?5 2AAC696?5 EC277:4<6CD[ D9FE 5@H? 6G6CJ 3FD:?6DD 😕 |6E9F6? E92E AC@7:ED 7C@> E9:D 6G:=[ 2?5 9@=5 =2?5=@C5D 244@F?E23=6 :7 E96J 92C3@C E96> – H6 H:== 7:?5 J@F[ 2?5 H6 2C6 4@>:?8 27E6C J@F ?6IE] |6E9F6? 92D K6C@ E@=6C2?46 7@C E96D6 E6CC:3=6 4C:>6D 😕 @FC 4:EJ[Q 96 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmsFC:?8 E96:C :?G6DE:82E:@?[ A@=:46 :?E6CG:6H65 EH@ H@>6? H9@ H@C<65 2E E96 DA2 2?5 C6G:6H65 4@>AFE6CD[ A9@?6D 2?5 3FD:?6DD C64@C5D] p7E6C E96 D62C49[ E96 4:EJVD s6A2CE>6?E @7 w62=E9[ wF>2? $6CG:46D 2?5 x?DA64E:@? D9FE 5@H? E96 3FD:?6DD[ H9:49 92D C6>2:?65 4=@D65]k^Am

    kAm“{:G:?8 😕 2 3FD:?6DD @C 4@>>6C4:2= F?:E 😀 F?D276[ G:@=2E6D >F?:4:A2= 2?5 DE2E6 4@56D[ 2?5 H:== 36 DF3;64E E@ 6?7@C46>6?E[Q s:C64E@C @7 !F3=:4 w62=E9 r26=: %682? +2>A249 D2:5]k^Am

    kAmq62FC682C5 E92?<65 =@42= A@=:46[ DE2E6 2?5 7656C2= =2H 6?7@C46>6?E[ +2>A249[ E96 4:EJVD 962=E9 56A2CE>6?E 2?5 E96 4@?46C?65 C6D:56?ED H9@ >256 E96 :?:E:2= C6A@CED E92E =65 E@ E96 :?G6DE:82E:@?]k^Am

    kAm|4}2>2C2 D2:5 =@42= A@=:46 H6C6 2DD:DE65 😕 E96 >@?E9D=@?8 :?G6DE:82E:@? 3J E96 {2HC6?46 !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E[ tDD6I r@F?EJ s:DEC:4E pEE@C?6J’D ~77:46[ w@>6=2?5 $64FC:EJ x?G6DE:82E:@?D[ E96 x?E6C?2= #6G6?F6 $6CG:46 2?5 &]$] x>>:8C2?E 2?5 rFDE@>D t?7@C46>6?E]k^Am

    kAm%96C6 >2J 36 255:E:@?2= 492C86D A6?5:?8 E96 :?G6DE:82E:@?VD @FE4@>6[ A@=:46 D2:5]k^Am

    By Teddy Tauscher | ttauscher@eagletribune.com

    Source link

  • ‘SIM Farms’ Are a Spam Plague. A Giant One in New York Threatened US Infrastructure, Feds Say

    The phenomenon of SIM farms, even at the scale found in this instance around New York, is far from new. Cybercriminals have long used the massive collections of centrally operated SIM cards for everything from spam to swatting to fake account creation and fraudulent engagement with social media or advertising campaigns. The SIM cards are typically housed in so-called SIM boxes that can control more than a hundred cards at a time, which are in turn connected to servers that can then control thousands of SIMs each.

    SIM farms allow “bulk messaging at a speed and volume that would be impossible for an individual user,” one telecoms industry source, who asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the Secret Service’s investigation, told WIRED. “The technology behind these farms makes them highly flexible—SIMs can be rotated to bypass detection systems, traffic can be geographically masked, and accounts can be made to look like they’re coming from genuine users.”

    The telecom industry source adds that the images of SIM servers and boxes published by the Secret Service indicate a “really organized” criminal operation may have been behind the setup. “This means that there is great intelligence and significant resources behind it,” the person added.

    The SIM farm found by the Secret Service, Unit 221b’s Coon says, isn’t the biggest operation he’s learned of in the US. But it’s the most concentrated in such a small single geographic area. SIM boxes, he notes, are illegal in the US, and the hundreds of them found in the Secret Service’s investigation must have been smuggled into the US. In one case he was involved in, Coon says, the boxes were imported from China, disguised as audio amplifiers.

    The “clean, tidy racks” of equipment in a well-lit room shows that the operation may be well-organized and professional, says Cathal Mc Daid, VP of technology at telecommunication and cybersecurity firm Enea. Photos released by the Secret Service show multiple racks of telecom equipment neatly set up, with individual pieces of tech numbered and labeled, plus cables on the floor being covered and protected with tape. Each SIM box, Mc Daid says, appears to include around 256 ports and associated modems. “This looks more professional than many of the SIM farms you see,” says Mc Daid.

    Mc Daid notes, however, that he’s tracked similar operations discovered in Ukraine—some of which have been as large or even larger than the one revealed on Tuesday by the Secret Service. Over the course of the last few years, law enforcement officials in Ukraine have discovered tens of thousands of SIM cards being used in SIM farms allegedly set up by Russian actors. In one case in 2023, around 150,000 SIM cards were reportedly found. These SIM farms have been used to operate fake social media profiles that can spread disinformation and propaganda.

    Additional equipment found in the New York–area SIM farm sites.

    Courtesy of The U.S. Secret Service

    Andy Greenberg, Lily Hay Newman, Matt Burgess

    Source link

  • Oracle will manage TikTok’s algorithm for US users under Trump administration deal

    WASHINGTON — Tech giant Oracle will receive a copy of the algorithm powering TikTok to operate for U.S. users, according to a senior official in President Donald Trump’s administration on Monday.

    Determining next steps for the algorithm, currently owned by the Beijing-based ByteDance, has been one of the most closely watched issues during negotiations over TikTok’s future.

    The Trump administration official, who insisted on anonymity to discuss the emerging deal, said they believe the plan will satisfy national security concerns if TikTok divests from its Chinese parent, ByteDance. President Joe Biden signed bipartisan legislation before leaving office requiring the Chinese company to sell its assets to an American company or face a ban.

    American officials have previously warned the algorithm that fuels what users see on the app is vulnerable to manipulation by Chinese authorities, who can use it to shape content on the platform in a way that’s difficult to detect.

    “It wouldn’t be in compliance if the algorithm is Chinese. There can’t be any shared algorithm with ByteDance,” said a spokesperson for the House Select Committee on China.

    Oracle would receive a copy of the algorithm and oversee the app’s security operations.

    The algorithm would be “fully inspected and retrained,” the senior White House official said Monday. In a call with reporters, the official later emphasized that the content recommendation formula would be retrained only on U.S. data in order to make sure the system is “behaving appropriately.” It is currently unclear if retraining the U.S. copy of the algorithm on local data would essentially create a separate TikTok experience just for domestic users.

    “What the president will sign later this week is an executive order, essentially declaring that the terms of this deal meets America’s national security needs,” the White House official said. He notes that China is expected to sign and approve a framework deal for TikTok’s divestment by the end of the week, upon which Trump will issue a 120 day reprieve, giving both nations time to get necessary agreements finalized.

    Full details on investors have not been released. However, the official confirmed that the U.S. operations will be a new joint venture with a board of directors that will have a majority of American members — Oracle and Silver Lake, a private equity firm, are the only confirmed consortium participants so far.

    The White House official also said that under the preliminary deal — which still requires Chinese officials to sign off on a framework agreement — the United States will not take equity stake in the new venture or have representation on the controlling committee.

    Trump, a Republican, has extended the deadline several times as he worked to reach a deal to keep TikTok available. He spoke to Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday.

    Source link

  • Netanyahu accuses Ben-Gvir of leaking details on Red Cross prison visits to the press

    The proposal, staunchly opposed by National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and the Israel Prison Service, will be discussed in another forum, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir of leaking details about potential cabinet votes to the media, KAN reported Friday.

    “Before and during the cabinet meeting, I saw briefings on Arutz Sheva, Israel Hayom, and other places about who supports and opposes the decision on Red Cross visits to prisons,” Netanyahu said during the cabinet meeting after standing up and accusing Ben-Gvir. He then removed the proposal for Red Cross visits from the agenda, to be discussed in another forum.

    Sources indicate that this is the “humanitarian cabinet,” which consists of Netanyahu, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, and MK Arye Deri, which meets on occasion to discuss humanitarian aid being sent to Gaza.

    What was the National Security proposal on Red Cross visits?

    The proposal in question, put forward by the National Security Council, would have allowed Red Cross workers to visit terrorists in Israeli prisons. However, it was reportedly removed, due to the National Security Council understanding that it would never gain a majority of support from the ministers.

    The proposal had two major points.

    International Red Cross vehicles drive by on the day of the handover of Israeli-American hostage Edan Alexander to the International Red Cross, in the Gaza Strip May 12, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/Ramadan Abed)

    First, in accordance with Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) recommendations, it would be prohibited for the Red Cross workers to visit or receive information about prisoners from Gaza, as well as prisoners affiliated with Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

    Secondly, the Red Cross would be allowed to visit all other terrorist prisoners, subject to restrictions from security officials.

    This was meant to be a balance High Court of Justice rulings and international obligations with the need to tighten restrictions on terrorists linked to the main groups in Gaza.

    However, Ben-Gvir had still voiced his opposition.

    “While Hamas continues to hold hostages in Gaza, it is impossible for terrorists to benefit from visits and preferential conditions,” he said. “The National Security Council’s proposal is a serious mistake that signals weakness to the enemy.”

    Source link

  • A DHS Data Hub Exposed Sensitive Intel to Thousands of Unauthorized Users

    The Department of Homeland Security’s mandate to carry out domestic surveillance has been a concern for privacy advocates since the organization was first created in the wake of the September 11 attacks. Now a data leak affecting the DHS’s intelligence arm has shed light not just on how the department gathers and stores that sensitive information—including about its surveillance of Americans—but on how it once left that data exposed to thousands of government and private sector workers and even foreign nationals who were never authorized to see it.

    An internal DHS memo obtained by a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and shared with WIRED reveals that from March to May of 2023, a DHS online platform used by the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) to share sensitive but unclassified intelligence information and investigative leads among the DHS, the FBI, the National Counterterrorism Center, local law enforcement, and intelligence fusion centers across the US was misconfigured, accidentally exposing restricted intelligence information to all users of the platform.

    Access to the data, according to a DHS inquiry described in the memo, was meant to be limited to users of the Homeland Security Information Network’s intelligence section, known as HSIN-Intel. Instead it was set to grant access to “everyone,” exposing the information to HSIN’s tens of thousands of users. The unauthorized users who had access included US government workers focused on fields unrelated to intelligence or law enforcement such as disaster response, as well as private sector contractors and foreign government staff with access to HSIN.

    “DHS advertises HSIN as secure and says the information it holds is sensitive, critical national security information,” says Spencer Reynolds, an attorney for the Brennan Center for Justice who obtained the memo via FOIA and shared it with WIRED. “But this incident raises questions about how seriously they take information security. Thousands and thousands of users gained access to information they were never supposed to have.”

    HSIN-Intel’s data includes everything from law enforcement leads and tips to reports on foreign hacking and disinformation campaigns, to analysis of domestic protest movements. The memo about the HSIN-Intel breach specifically mentions, for instance, a report discussing “protests relating to a police training facility in Atlanta”—likely the Stop Cop City protests opposing the creation of the Atlanta Public Safety Training Center—noting that it focused on “media praising actions like throwing stones, fireworks and Molotov cocktails at police.”

    In total, according to the memo about the DHS internal inquiry, 439 I&A “products” on the HSIN-Intel portion of the platform were improperly accessed 1,525 times. Of those unauthorized access instances, the report found that 518 were private sector users and another 46 were non-US citizens. The instances of foreign user accesses were “almost entirely” focused on cybersecurity information, the report notes, and 39 percent of all the improperly accessed intelligence products involved cybersecurity, such as foreign state-sponsored hacker groups and foreign targeting of government IT systems. The memo also noted that some of the unauthorized US users who viewed the information would have been eligible to have accessed the restricted information if they’d asked to be considered for authorization.

    “When this coding error was discovered, I&A immediately fixed the problem and investigated any potential harm,” a DHS spokesperson told WIRED in a statement. “Following an extensive review, multiple oversight bodies determined there was no impactful or serious security breach. DHS takes all security and privacy measures seriously and is committed to ensuring its intelligence is shared with federal, state, local, tribal, territorial, and private sector partners to protect our homeland from the numerous adversarial threats we face.”

    Andy Greenberg

    Source link

  • What to know after US says it has reached framework deal with China to keep TikTok in operation

    TikTok users in the U.S. may get a reprieve from the threat of a shutdown after the Trump administration announced it has reached a framework deal with China for the ownership of the popular social video platform.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a press conference after the latest round of trade talks between the world’s top two economies concluded in Madrid that U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would speak Friday to possibly finalize the deal. He said the objective of the deal would be to switch to American ownership.

    He did not disclose the terms of the deal, saying that it is between two private parties, but added that “the commercial terms have been agreed upon.”

    Little is known about the actual deal in the works, including what companies are involved and whether the United States would have a stake in TikTok. Li Chenggang, China’s international trade representative, said the two sides have reached “basic framework consensus” to properly solve TikTok-related issues in a cooperative way, reduce investment barriers and promote related economic and trade cooperation, according to China’s official news agency Xinhua.

    Oracle Corp. has been floated as a likely buyer for the platform. Representatives for the company did not immediately respond to a message for comment on Monday.

    In Madrid, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the team was “very focused on TikTok and making sure that it was a deal that is fair for the Chinese,” but also “completely respects U.S. national security concerns.”

    Wang Jingtao, deputy director of China’s Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission, told reporters in Madrid there was consensus on authorization of “the use of intellectual property rights such as (TikTok’s) algorithm” — a main sticking point in the deal.

    The sides also agreed on entrusting a partner with handling U.S. user data and content security, he said.

    Though he has no clear legal basis to do so, Trump has continued to extend the deadline for TikTok to avoid a ban in the U.S. This gives his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership. The next deadline is on Sept. 17, and Trump has already signaled he would extend it if needed.

    It is not clear how many times Trump can keep extending the ban as the government continues to try to negotiate a deal for TikTok, which is owned by China’s ByteDance. While there is no clear legal basis for the extensions, so far, there have been no legal challenges against the administration. Trump has amassed more than 15 million followers on TikTok since he joined last year, and he has credited the trendsetting platform with helping him gain traction among young voters. He said in January that he has a “warm spot for TikTok.”

    For now, TikTok continues to function for its 170 million users in the U.S. Tech giants Apple, Google and Oracle were persuaded to continue to offer and support the app, on the promise that Trump’s Justice Department would not use the law to seek potentially steep fines against them.

    Americans are even more closely divided on what to do about TikTok than they were two years ago.

    A recent Pew Research Center survey found that about one-third of Americans said they supported a TikTok ban, down from 50% in March 2023. Roughly one-third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they weren’t sure.

    Among those who said they supported banning the social media platform, about 8 in 10 cited concerns over users’ data security being at risk as a major factor in their decision, according to the report.

    During his first term as president, Trump led the effort to ban TikTok, saying it posed a threat to U.S. national security. But his tune changed when he returned to the White House a second time, signing an executive order on his first day in office to keep the app running.

    During Joe Biden’s Democratic presidency, Congress and the White House used national security grounds to approve a U.S. ban on TikTok unless its Chinese parent company sold its controlling stake.

    U.S. officials were concerned about ByteDance’s roots and ownership, pointing to laws in China that require Chinese companies to hand over data requested by the government. Another concern became the proprietary algorithm that populates what users see on the app.

    ___

    This story corrects Chinese President Xi Jinping’s title.

    Source link

  • China launches probes targeting US semiconductors ahead of Madrid trade talks

    TAIPEI, Taiwan — China launched two probes targeting the U.S. semiconductor sector Saturday ahead of talks between the two nations in Spain this week on trade, national security and the ownership of social media platform TikTok.

    China’s Ministry of Commerce announced an anti-dumping investigation into certain analog IC chips imported from the U.S. The investigation will target some commodity interface IC chips and gate driver IC chips, which are commonly made by U.S. companies such as Texas Instruments and ON Semiconductor.

    The ministry separately announced an anti-discrimination probe into U.S. measures against China’s chip sector.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is set to meet Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Madrid between Sunday and Wednesday, He’s office said.

    U.S. measures such as export curbs and tariffs “constitute the containment and suppression of China’s development of high-tech industries” such as advanced computer chips and artificial intelligence, a Chinese commerce ministry spokesperson said.

    The announcements of the probes follow the U.S. on Friday adding 23 Chinese companies to an “entity list” of businesses that will face restrictions for allegedly acting against U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. The list includes two Chinese companies accused of acquiring chipmaking equipment for major Chinese chipmaker SMIC.

    The meetings between Bessent and He in Madrid will be the latest in a series of negotiations aimed at reducing trade tensions and postponing the enactment of higher tariffs on each other’s goods.

    U.S. and Chinese counterparts previously held discussions in Geneva in May, London in June and Stockholm in July. The two governments have agreed to several 90-day pauses on a series of increasing reciprocal tariffs, staving off an all-out trade war.

    Bessent described the talks during the last round in Stockholm as “very fulsome.”

    “We just need to de-risk with certain, strategic industries, whether it’s the rare earths, semiconductors, medicines, and we talked about what we could do together to get into balance within the relationship,” Bessent said at the time.

    U.S. President Donald Trump and former President Joe Biden placed curbs on China’s access to advanced semiconductors including restrictions on the sale of chipmaking equipment to the country. While Washington cites national security concerns, China argues the curbs are part of a U.S. strategy to contain its growth.

    Source link

  • Bessent will meet Chinese officials in Spain for trade and TikTok talks

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will travel to Madrid this weekend for negotiations with his Chinese counterparts over tariffs and national security issues related to the ownership of social media platform TikTok.

    Bessent is slated to meet Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Madrid to discuss national security and economic issues, a Treasury news release states.

    This will be the fourth round of discussions between U.S. and Chinese counterparts after meetings in London, Geneva and Stockholm. The two governments have agreed to several 90-day pauses on a series of increasing reciprocal tariffs, staving off an all-out trade war.

    During the last round of discussions in Stockholm, Bessent described his talks with the Chinese as “ very fulsome.”

    “We just need to de-risk with certain, strategic industries, whether it’s the rare earths, semiconductors, medicines, and we talked about what we could do together to get into balance within the relationship,” Bessent said at the time.

    China remains one of the biggest challenges for the Trump administration after it has struck deals over elevated tariff rates with other key trading partners, such as Britain, Japan and the European Union.

    The U.S. and China delegations are also expected to continue discussions about ownership of TikTok.

    Congress approved a U.S. ban on the popular video-sharing platform unless its parent company, ByteDance, sold its controlling stake. President Donald Trump said last month that he will keep extending the sale deadline until there’s a buyer.

    But Trump has so far extended the deadline three times during his second term — with the next deadline coming up Wednesday.

    A Pew Research Center survey conducted in late February and early March found that about one-third of Americans said they supported a TikTok ban, down from 50% in March 2023. Roughly one-third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they weren’t sure.

    The Treasury Department also says Bessent will meet Spanish government counterparts to discuss the relationship between Spain and the United States.

    After his Spain trip, Bessent is expected to travel to the U.K. to join Trump for his official state visit with Britain’s King Charles at Windsor Castle.

    Source link

  • Peabody police hosting 20th Citizens Academy

    PEABODY — The Peabody Police Department is accepting applications for its 20th session of its Citizens Academy.

    Classes for this session will be held each Wednesday from 6-9 p.m. starting on Oct. 15 and running through Dec. 17.


    This page requires Javascript.

    Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

    kAmpAA=:42E:@?D 2C6 5F6 @? ~4E] g] $62ED 2C6 =:>:E65 2?5 H:== 36 7:==65 😕 E96 @C56C 2AA=:42E:@?D 2C6 C646:G65[ E96 A@=:46 56A2CE>6?E D2:5]k^Am

    kAm“(6 9@A6 2?5 6IA64E E92E A2CE:4:A2?ED H:== 8C25F2E6 7C@> E96 r:E:K6?D p4256>J H:E9 2 ?6H7@F?5 2AAC64:2E:@? 7@C H92E H6 2D A@=:46 @77:46CD 5@[” AC@8C2> 5:C64E@C r2AE] $4@EE #:492C5D D2:5 😕 2 DE2E6>6?E]k^Am

    kAm“!2CE:4:A2?ED H:== 7:?:D9 H:E9 2 8@@5 562= @7 7:CDE92?5 @H=6586 @7 9@H E96 56A2CE>6?E @A6C2E6D 2?5 E96 492==6?86D E92E A@=:46 @77:46CD 7246 52:=J] xE H:== 36 2 C62= 6J6@A6?6C]”k^Am

    kAm%@A:4D E92E H:== 36 4@G6C65 😕 E96D6 4=2DD6D :?4=F56[ 3FE 2C6 ?@E =:>:E65 E@[ A@=:E:4D 😕 A@=:4:?8[ E6CC@C:D>[ E96 =682= AC@46DD[ >@E@C G69:4=6 =2H[ A2EC@= AC@465FC6D[ 5@>6DE:4 G:@=6?46[ 4C:>:?2= :?G6DE:82E:@?D 2?5 4@>>F?:EJ A@=:4:?8]k^Am

    kAm$EF56?ED H:== 92G6 56>@?DEC2E:@?D 😕 zh FD6 2?5 5C@?6D 2?5 H:== E2<6 2 7:C62C>D 4=2DD 2E E96 !623@5J !@=:46 $E2E:@?’D @FE5@@C 7:C:?8 C2?86] %96J H:== 2=D@ E@FC E96 DE2E:@? 2?5 E96 |:55=6E@? w@FD6 @7 r@CC64E:@?D[ 2?5 A2CE:4:A2E6 😕 >@E@C G69:4=6 DE@A D46?2C:@D]k^Am

    kAmx?DECF4E@CD :?4=F56 >6>36CD @7 E96 !623@5J !@=:46 s6A2CE>6?E[ tDD6I r@F?EJ s:DEC:4E pEE@C?6J’D ~77:46 2?5 tDD6I r@F?EJ $96C:77’D ~77:46]k^Am

    By News Staff

    Source link

  • Defense Department Scrambles to Pretend It’s Called the War Department

    The Pentagon’s website and social media channels were overhauled Friday at President Donald Trump’s behest to reflect the United States Defense Department’s new “Department of War” persona, shifting from Defense.gov to War.gov—a symbolic rebranding that highlights the administration’s preference for projecting strength through the language of war rather than the idiom of defense.

    Trump on Friday signed an executive order directing the Pentagon to once again be named the so-called Department of War, reviving a name retired after World War II to mark America’s turn to deterrence as the principle bulwark against nuclear annihilation.

    At an Oval Office ceremony, Trump said the change was about attitude, declaring, “It’s really about winning.”

    “We won the First World War, we won the Second World War, we won everything before that and in between,” Trump said during the order’s signing. “And then we decided to go woke and we changed the name to the Department of Defense.”

    The order authorizes defense secretary Pete Hegseth and other officials to use titles such as “secretary of war” in official correspondence, though Trump also instructed Hegseth to recommend steps needed to make the change permanent.

    “We’re going to go on offense, not just on defense. Maximum lethality, not tepid legality. Violent effect, not politically correct,” Hegseth said during Friday’s signing ceremony. “We’re going to raise up warriors, not just defenders.”

    Every prior name change—from the War Department created by Congress in 1789, to the National Military Establishment in 1947, to the Department of Defense in 1949—came through legislation. Allies in Congress quickly introduced a bill to back Friday’s change to the so-called Department of War, but the administration appears to be seeking a workaround anyway, as it has done in the past, whether by invoking sweeping emergency powers or withholding congressionally approved foreign aid. Currently, “Department of War” is a “secondary” title after the Department of Defense.

    Within hours of Trump’s order, Pentagon officials rebranded the department’s social media platforms. The Department of Defense’s official Facebook, Instagram, and X accounts quietly rolled out the “Department of War” name and seal, adopting labels at odds with its legal identity.

    As of around 6 pm ET on Friday, the new Department of War page still lists all the department’s other social channels and its website as using the “Defense” name, as did its YouTube channel.

    How far the rebranding might go is unclear, but any comprehensive effort would saddle taxpayers with costs in the hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars, as every sign, logo, uniform, computer system, and piece of official paperwork tied to the Pentagon’s identity across the globe would need to be replaced.

    A prior effort to recommend changes at military installations commemorating the Confederacy carried a projected cost of $39 million and covered only nine bases. The Defense Department’s real property portfolio spans hundreds of thousands of facilities, from major bases to small outposts worldwide.

    Dell Cameron

    Source link

  • List reveals which items FBI seized from John Bolton’s home during raid

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The FBI raid on John Bolton’s home last month led to the seizure of multiple computers, cell phones, USB drives and documents in folders labeled “Trump,” among other items, court documents revealed Thursday.

    The list of over a dozen items seized from the Bethesda, Md., home of President Donald Trump’s former national security advisor was included in search warrant documents filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.

    Among the technology seized from Bolton’s home were two iPhones – a red one with two camera lenses and a black one in a black case – and three computers, including a silver Dell XPS laptop with cables, a Dell Precision Tower computer model 3620 and a Dell Inspiron 2330 computer. One Seagate hard drive and two Sandisk 64 gigabyte USB drives were also seized.

    The list shows the FBI also took a white binder labeled, “Statements and Reflections to Allied Strikes…” and typed documents in folders labeled “Trump I-IV.”

    BOLTON MAY BE IN HOT WATER AS FBI INVESTIGATION EXPANDS BEYOND CONTROVERSIAL BOOK

    FBI agents carry boxes out of former national security adviser John Bolton’s house, Friday, Aug. 22, 2025, in Bethesda, Md. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

    Four boxes containing what federal officials called “printed daily activities” were also hauled from Bolton’s home.

    The FBI raid on Aug. 22 is reportedly linked to a probe of mishandling classified documents.

    John Bolton in suit waving outside his home

    Bolton waves as he arrives at his house Friday, Aug. 22, 2025, in Bethesda, Md. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

    During Trump’s first administration, a probe into classified documents was launched but later shut down by the Biden administration. The Justice Department argued that Bolton’s 2020 memoir, “The Room Where It Happened,” contained classified material and attempted to block it from being published.

    Days after the raid on his home, Bolton unleashed a blistering critique of Trump’s Ukraine policy in an op-ed published in the Washington Examiner, claiming it is marked by “confusion, haste and disarray.” 

    THE HISTORY OF HOW TRUMP AND BOLTON’S RELATIONSHIP FELL TO TATTERS

    Bolton said Trump’s attempt to fast-track a peace deal was “inevitably” doomed, arguing the Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Aug. 15 was arranged at a pace “almost surely unprecedented in modern history.”

    Donald Trump and John Bolton

    Bolton listens as Trump holds a meeting in the Oval Office at the White House on July 18, 2019, during Trump’s first term. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

    When reporters asked Trump about the raid shortly after it unfolded, the president didn’t hold back his disdain for his former adviser.

    “I’m not a fan of John Bolton. He’s a real lowlife,” Trump told reporters, adding that he did not know about the raid ahead of time, claiming he saw it on television. He went on to call Bolton “not a smart guy” and said “he could be very unpatriotic.”

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Bolton was Trump’s national security advisor in 2018 and 2019, until the pair had a falling out. Trump revoked Bolton’s security clearance and Secret Service detail in January 2025.

    Fox News Digital’s Rachel Wolf and Morgan Phillips contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • Trump urges Supreme Court to uphold his worldwide tariffs in a fast-track ruling

    President Trump has asked the Supreme Court for a fast-track ruling that he has broad power acting on his own to impose tariffs on products coming from countries around the world.

    Despite losing in the lower courts, Trump and his lawyers have reason to believe they can win in the Supreme Court. The six conservative justices believe in strong presidential power, particularly in the area of foreign policy and national security.

    In a three-page appeal filed Wednesday evening, they proposed the court decide by next Wednesday to grant review and to hear arguments in early November.

    They said the lower court setbacks, unless quickly reversed, “gravely undermine the President’s ability to conduct real-world diplomacy and his ability to protect the national security and economy of the United States.”

    They cited Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s warning about the potential for economic disruption if the court does not act soon.

    “Delaying a ruling until June 26 could result in a scenario in which $750 billion-$1 trillion have already been collected and unwinding them could cause significant disruption,” he wrote.

    Trump and his tariffs ran into three strong arguments in the lower courts.

    First, the Constitution says Congress, not the president, has the power “to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises,” and a tariff is an import tax.

    Second, the 1977 emergency powers law that Trump relies on does not mention tariffs, taxes or duties, and no previous president has used it to impose tariffs.

    And third, the Supreme Court has frowned on recent presidents who relied on old laws to justify bold, new, costly regulations.

    So far, however, the so-called “major questions” doctrine has been used to restrict Democratic presidents, not Republicans.

    Three years ago, the court’s conservative majority struck down a major climate change regulation proposed by Presidents Obama and Biden that could have transformed the electric power industry on the grounds it was not clearly based on the Clean Air Act of the 1970s.

    Two years ago, the court in the same 6-3 vote struck down Biden’s plan to forgive hundreds of millions of dollars in student loans. Congress had said the Education Department may “waive or modify” monthly loan payments during a national emergency like the COVID-19 pandemic, but it did not say the loans may be forgiven, the court said. Its opinion noted the “staggering” cost could be more than $500 billion.

    The impact of Trump’s tariffs figures to be at least five times greater, a federal appeals court said last week in ruling them illegal.

    In a 7-4 vote, the federal circuit court cited all three arguments in ruling Trump had exceeded his legal authority.

    “We conclude Congress, in enacting the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, did not give the president wide-ranging authority to impose tariffs,” they said.

    But the outcome was not a total loss for Trump. The appellate judges put their decision on hold until the Supreme Court rules. That means Trump’s tariffs are likely to remain in effect for many months.

    Trump’s lawyers were heartened by the dissent written by Judge Richard Taranto and joined by three others.

    He argued that presidents are understood to have extra power when confronted with foreign threats to the nation’s security.

    Taranto called the 1977 law “an eyes-open congressional grant of broad emergency authority in this foreign-affairs realm” that said the president may “regulate” the “importation” of dangerous products including drugs coming into this country.

    Citing other laws from that era, he said Congress understood that tariffs and duties are a “common tool of import regulation.”

    David G. Savage

    Source link

  • Parenting 101: 5 Lessons to keep kids safe online for the new school year

    The back-to-school season is exciting – new knowledge, new digital tools, and new discoveries. But it also brings higher cybersecurity risks for both schools and children. Cybersecurity experts are urging children, parents, and school communities to stay extra alert during this period.

    “The back-to-school period requires additional efforts to keep children and school communities safe online. A new beginning means new digital tools, online searches, and registrations for learning platforms. All of that increases cyber risks that must be taken seriously,” said Karolis Arbačiauskas, head of product at NordPass, in a media release

    A new study by NordPass, in collaboration with NordStellar, reveals a worrying truth: many educational institutions are still using shockingly weak passwords to protect sensitive data. Entries like “123456”, “Edifygroup@1”, and “principal@2021” appeared frequently, showing a widespread reliance on predictable or outdated credentials that are easy for hackers to guess.

    This is why the back-to-school season is the perfect moment to talk to children about cyber hygiene – the dos and don’ts in digital environments – and to help them build strong habits for digital security and privacy. “Learning about cybersecurity can be fun. Many families of cybersecurity professionals make it a game – they host a small party with snacks and guide their children through five simple but essential exercises,” said Arbačiauskas.

    Cybersecurity experts advise to take these steps to preserve your own cybersecurity and that of your family members (it can also be used as inspiration for your family’s Cyber Party):

    • Create strong and unique passwords. Make sure every account in your family – whether it’s yours, your parents’, your significant other’s, or your children’s – uses a strong and unique password. The easiest way to do it? Use a trusted password manager to generate, store, and share them securely.
    • Turn on multi-factor authentication (MFA). Add an extra layer of security wherever you can, especially to access school portals, email accounts, and social apps. MFA helps keep hackers out even if a password gets breached – and they get breached more often than you think. A recent study by NordPass revealed that many educational institutions still use shockingly weak passwords.
    • Update devices and apps. Keep phones, tablets, and laptops up to date with the latest software. Outdated apps can contain vulnerabilities that hackers take advantage of to get backdoor access into your device. Updates patch these security holes so that cybercriminals can no longer exploit them.
    • Talk about phishing. Discuss cybersecurity with your family and why it matters. Teach them to never click suspicious links or open unknown attachments – especially in emails or messages claiming to be from the school. When in doubt, verify with the sender by using a website checker.
    • Adjust privacy settings. Review and tighten privacy settings on social media, online games, and school platforms. Limit what personal info is publicly visible and who can contact your kids online.

    – JC

    Source link

  • China Is About to Show Off Its New High-Tech Weapons to the World

    China is preparing for one of the most anticipated and politically charged military events in recent years. On September 3, in Tiananmen Square, China will celebrate the 80th anniversary of the victory over Japan in World War II with a spectacular military parade that is not only a ritual of historical remembrance but also a message to the entire world to be prepared for the war of the future.

    President Xi Jinping and several foreign leaders and officials, including Vladimir Putin, will attend the ceremony. The Russian president’s presence is reported to have prompted several European ambassadors to consider defecting from the event, fearing it would contribute to the Kremlin’s international legitimization amid the ongoing war against Ukraine.

    China’s New Weapons Send a Message

    The parade will last about 70 minutes and will see dozens of formations parading down Chang’an Avenue in the heart of Beijing. Xi, as supreme commander of the armed forces, will review the troops before the march through the square. More than 10,000 military personnel, more than 100 aircraft, and hundreds of ground vehicles will be involved.

    The official theme is the celebration of peace and international justice, but the real content will be the demonstration of the People’s Liberation Army’s ability to fight high-tech wars in new strategic domains: cyberspace, outer space, electronic and hypersonic warfare. According to leaked information from Chinese dress rehearsals and official sources, more than 100 models of weapon systems, all domestically produced and already in operational service, will be on display.

    Enter the Anti-Ship Missiles

    Among the most anticipated weapons are the new YJ (Ying Ji, “Eagle Shot”) series anti-ship missiles, designated YJ-15, YJ-17, YJ-19, and YJ-20. These are systems designed for a specific mission: to neutralize large US naval units, particularly aircraft carriers, the heart of American supremacy in the Pacific. These carriers are part of China’s A2/AD (Anti-Access/Area Denial) strategy, i.e., the creation of “defensive bubbles” that can prevent or make it too risky for enemy fleets to access the South China Sea, the Taiwan Strait, and the Western Pacific.

    China has developed a wide range of anti-ship missiles in recent decades, often starting with Soviet technologies, and then surpassing them with indigenous designs since the YJ-8 in the 1980s, derived from French Exocets. With the new series, China is aiming for a further qualitative leap, combining stealth, hypersonic speed, and artificial intelligence.

    The exact specifications are top secret, but from general tests and expert analysis, some distinguishing features come into focus. First: speed of at least Mach 4-6, thus in the range of hypersonic missiles, with terminal maneuvering capability to evade anti-missile systems. Second: range of hundreds of kilometers. Third: combined flight profile, with the cruise phase at medium-high altitude, followed by grazing descent to the sea to reduce the possibility of interception. Fourth: multiple guidance with Beidou satellite, active radar, and IR sensors. Fifth: launch versatility, adaptable to aircraft, ships, submarines, and mobile land platforms, increasing possible saturation against enemy fleets. Put together, these weapons signal to the United States that aircraft carriers are no longer untouchable, and the Pacific is no longer an “American sea.”

    Going Hypersonic

    Also expected at the parade are new launchers capable of overcoming US missile defenses and providing Beijing with credible strategic deterrence. Rehearsal images show road-mobile ballistic missile systems, an ideal weapon to ensure so-called second strikes in the event of a nuclear conflict. China is developing and deploying a new generation of advanced mobile intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), designed to ensure the survival of the nuclear deterrence force in the event of a preemptive strike.

    Among the main models is the DF-31AG, with an estimated range of more than 11,000 kilometers (6,835 miles), capable of hitting any target in the continental United States. Next up is the DF-41. Considered the most powerful intercontinental missile in China, it has a range of over 12,000 to 15,000 kilometers (7,456 to 9,320 miles) and can carry up to 10 MIRV warheads, each capable of hitting a different target. It is mobile and can be launched from both silos and rail platforms. Beijing is also banking heavily on the JL-3, an ICBM that can be launched from nuclear submarines, currently being deployed on the new Type 096 class of submarines.

    The Lethal Stealth Drone

    According to several analysts, the September 3 parade will also feature the FH-97: China’s first unmanned aircraft declared combat-ready. Nicknamed “loyal wingman,” it is capable of operating in synergy with manned fighters, carrying out reconnaissance, attack, and electronic jamming missions. If confirmed, China would become the first country in the world to have a this type of stealth drone declared “combat ready,” ahead of even the United States and Australia, which are still experimenting with similar models such as Australia’s Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat or the US Skyborg project.

    Many details remain confidential, but from what has emerged, the FH-97 can carry guided bombs and air-to-air or air-to-surface missiles, and packs sensors for reconnaissance and electronic warfare. In addition, it can network with fighters such as the J-20 or J-16, acting as a force multiplier for offensive and defensive missions. Finally, it should have artificial intelligence systems to maneuver independently, follow preprogrammed routes, avoid threats, and cooperate with manned aircraft. Showing this aircraft in public means signaling to Washington, Tokyo, and Taipei that Beijing is capable of supporting next-generation air operations that are difficult to counter with current defense doctrines.

    Block and Tackle

    Alongside hypersonic missiles and ICBM, China’s developing weapons include a less conspicuous but potentially revolutionary arsenal: electronic warfare systems and directed-energy weapons. If missiles are the weapon of visible deterrence, electronic and directed energy weapons are silent tools that can blind enemy radar and communication systems, neutralize drones and missiles in flight, and protect Chinese forces from cyber- and space attacks.

    China has invested heavily in the field, seeing it as decisive in winning “informatized” and “intelligentized” conflicts. China’s mobile land and naval systems can jam the frequencies used by airborne radars, cruise missiles, and satellites, while some People’s Army brigades combine cyberattacks and electronic jamming, simultaneously targeting enemy hardware and software. Direct-energy weapons, on the other hand, use concentrated beams of energy (lasers, microwaves, high-power electromagnetic waves) to strike targets without traditional projectiles.

    Also on display will be the latest models of reconnaissance drones and combat drones, including unmanned underwater ones, expanding Chinese surveillance capabilities in disputed waters. The debut at the September 3 parade of these systems has strong symbolic value: Beijing wants to show that it has not only caught up with the West, but in some areas, aims to surpass it.

    This story originally appeared on WIRED Italia and has been translated from Italian.

    Lorenzo Lamperti

    Source link

  • DOGE Put Everyone’s Social Security Data at Risk, Whistleblower Claims

    As students returned to school this week, WIRED spoke to a self-proclaimed leader of a violent online group known as “Purgatory” about a rash of swattings at universities across the US in recent days. The group claims to have ties to the loose cybercriminal network known as The Com, and the alleged Purgatory leader claimed responsibility for calling in hoax active-shooter alerts.

    Researchers from multiple organizations warned this week that cybercriminals are increasingly using generative AI tools to fuel ransomware attacks, including real situations where cybercriminals without technical expertise are using AI to develop the malware. And a popular, yet enigmatic, shortwave Russian radio station known as UVB-76 seems to have turned into a tool for Kremlin propaganda after decades of mystery and intrigue.

    But wait, there’s more! Each week, we round up the security and privacy news we didn’t cover in depth ourselves. Click the headlines to read the full stories. And stay safe out there.

    Since it was first created, critics have warned that the young and inexperienced engineers in Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) were trampling over security and privacy rules in their seemingly reckless handling of US government data. Now a whistleblower claims that DOGE staff put one massive dataset at risk of hacking or leaking: a database containing troves of personal data about US residents, including virtually every American’s Social Security number.

    The complaint from Social Security Administration chief data officer Charles Borges, filed with the Office of the Special Counsel and reviewed by The New York Times, states that DOGE affiliates explicitly overruled security and privacy concerns to upload the SSA database to a cloud server that lacked sufficient security monitoring, “potentially violating multiple federal statutes” in its allegedly reckless handling of the data. Internal DOGE and SSA communications reviewed by the Times shows officials waving off concerns about the data’s lack of sanitization or anonymization before it was uploaded to the server, despite concerns from SSA officials about the lack of security of that data transfer.

    Borges didn’t allege that the data was actually breached or leaked, but Borges emphasized the vulnerability of the data and the immense cost if it were compromised. “Should bad actors gain access to this cloud environment, Americans may be susceptible to widespread identity theft, may lose vital health care and food benefits, and the government may be responsible for reissuing every American a new Social Security number at great cost,” Borges wrote.

    Nearly 10 months have passed since the revelation that China’s cyberespionage group known as Salt Typhoon had penetrated US telecoms, spying on Americans’ calls and texts. Now the FBI is warning that the net cast by those hackers may have been far broader than even previously thought, encompassing potential victims in 80 countries. The bureau’s top cyber official, Brett Leatherman, told The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post that the hackers had shown interest in at least 600 companies, which the FBI notified, though it’s not clear how many of those possible targets the hackers breached or what level of access they achieved. “That global indiscriminate targeting really is something that is outside the norms of cyberspace operations,” Leatherman told the Journal. The FBI says that Salt Typhoon’s telecom hacking alone resulted in the spies gaining access to at least a million call records and targeted the calls and texts of more than a hundred Americans.

    Days after Donald Trump’s Alaska summit with Vladimir Putin, the White House moved to gut its own intelligence ranks. A senior CIA Russia analyst—29 years in service and slated for a coveted overseas post—was abruptly stripped of her clearance, The Washington Post reported. She was one of 37 officials forced out under an August 19 memo from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The order listed no infractions. To colleagues, it looked like a loyalty purge. The firings have reportedly unsettled the CIA’s rank and file, sending a message that survival depends on hewing intelligence to fit the president’s views.

    On Monday, Gabbard unveiled what she calls “ODNI 2.0,” a restructuring that cuts more than 500 positions and shutters or folds whole offices she deems redundant. The Foreign Malign Influence Center and the Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center are being pared back, while the National Intelligence University will be absorbed into the Pentagon’s defense school. Gabbard says the plan will save $700 million a year and depoliticize intelligence. Critics noted, however, a fact sheet published by Gabbard on Monday itemized only a fraction of those savings, and tjeu warned that the overhaul could hollow out the very coordination ODNI was created post-9/11 to provide—discarding expertise and leaving the intelligence fragmented at a time of escalating threats.

    Andy Greenberg, Lily Hay Newman, Dell Cameron

    Source link

  • Trump administration is investing in US rare earths in a push to break China’s grip

    OMAHA, Neb. — U.S. production of crucial components in electric vehicles, smartphones and fighter jets is set to expand rapidly in the coming years, as the Trump administration intensifies efforts to build up the critical mineral industry in the United States to work to break the chokehold that China has on the global supply chain.

    The federal government is pumping hundreds of millions of dollars into American companies, has made an agreement with one firm to set a minimum price for some U.S.-produced critical minerals, and has launched an investigation into foreign-made supplies.

    “This is the Manhattan Project moment for rare earths,” said Joshua Ballard, CEO of USA Rare Earth, which plans next year to start making the rare-earth magnets that appear in many products.

    The White House has made it a priority to revive the domestic critical minerals industry, which is proving urgent after Beijing leveraged its near-monopoly on the products to force the U.S. to the negotiating table during a trade war.

    President Donald Trump said this week that China “intelligently went and they sort of took a monopoly of the world’s magnets,” but he expressed confidence in securing supplies because the U.S. has “much bigger and better cards.”

    “We’re going to have a lot of magnets in a pretty short period of time. In fact, we’ll have so many, we won’t know what to do with them,” he said as he hosted South Korean President Lee Jae Myung.

    Industry insiders, analysts and lawmakers have warned for years that America’s dependence on China for critical minerals — a list of 50 minerals that includes 17 sought-after rare-earth elements — is a national vulnerability.

    The hard-to-pronounce elements are needed in smartphones, wind turbines and robots as well as missiles, submarines and fighter jets.

    “Our national and economic security are now acutely threatened by our reliance upon hostile foreign powers’ mineral production,” an executive order from Trump declared in March.

    It was not until Beijing rolled out export restrictions on several rare earths in April — leading to a temporary halt of Ford’s electric vehicle production — that “the problem that for over a decade seemed far away hit close to home,” said Gracelin Baskaran, director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    Trump said Monday that he could charge 200% tariffs on Chinese goods if Beijing does not export magnets to the U.S. but noted “that’s perhaps behind us.” Instead, he said he could withhold airplane parts to ground China’s American-made Boeing jets.

    When asked about the leverage, Guo Jiakun, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, said Tuesday that Beijing “follows the principle of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence and mutually beneficial cooperation” in dealing with the U.S.

    “We hope the U.S. will work with us to jointly promote the steady, sound and sustainable development of bilateral ties,” Guo said.

    The Pentagon is investing $400 million in rare-earth producer MP Materials. It gave the U.S. company a $150 million loan this month, has promised to ensure every magnet made at its massive new plant is bought and set a minimum price for its neodymium and praseodymium products for a decade.

    “It looks like we’re going to finally do something to address that issue and make these projects a reality,” said Mark Smith, CEO of NioCorp, an American company working to raise $1.2 billion to produce niobium, titanium, scandium and rare earths in Nebraska.

    Over four decades, Smith said he’s seen how the U.S. ceded the industry to China, which came to dominate the supply chain by brushing aside environmental concerns, investing in mines worldwide, developing advanced processing technology and setting low prices to squeeze out competition.

    Previous efforts by U.S. companies to eke out a viable business proved futile when China flooded the market with low-priced products, chasing away potential investors.

    NioCorp recently secured up to $10 million from the Pentagon, which helped pay for exploratory drilling this summer.

    While it is unclear if the government would extend a minimum-price deal to other U.S. companies, Smith said the current support is “unbelievable” compared with the past. A price floor, he said, “just takes away the Chinese modus operandi that they’ve had for forever.”

    About 220 miles away from where MP Materials is building a magnet plant in Fort Worth, Texas, Noveon Magnetics runs America’s only factory currently making rare-earth magnets. Located south of Austin, it is ramping up production to make 2,000 tons of magnets a year.

    “I certainly hope and think it actually is not what may be the last of the efforts by the U.S. government,” Noveon Magnetics CEO Scott Dunn said of the Pentagon-MP Materials partnership.

    Even with all the new production aiming to come online in the next few years, American companies are still nowhere near being able to satisfy North America’s demand for roughly 35,000 tons of magnets a year, analysts at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence estimate. And the demand could double in the next decade.

    Ballard, whose USA Rare Earth plans to start making about 600 tons of magnets in Oklahoma next year, said the government can provide incentives to stop American buyers from falling back on cheap Chinese products once they are widely available again.

    This year’s big tax and spending cut bill includes $2 billion for the Pentagon to boost the U.S. stockpile of critical minerals and $5 billion more through 2029 to invest in those supply chains.

    Between 2020 and 2024, the Pentagon said it had awarded more than $439 million to establish supply chains for domestic rare earths.

    Domestic investments aside, Trump has tried to secure access to critical minerals outside of the U.S., including from Greenland and Ukraine. A peace deal the administration helped broker between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda might provide access to critical minerals, but it’s too early to tell if those efforts will succeed.

    Derek Scissors, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, said he’s concerned that Trump could consider it a success if China agrees to guarantee rare-earth supplies in trade talks.

    “I don’t think there will be such a deal or, if there is, that it will last,” Scissors said. “But it is a threat to U.S. economic independence.”

    David Abraham, a rare-metals expert who wrote the book “The Elements of Power,” said new U.S. mines are years away.

    “Everyone agrees the U.S. still has to work out a deal with the Chinese because American companies need more rare earths and specialized magnets than can be produced domestically,” he said.

    ___

    Tang reported from Washington.

    Source link

  • Bolton may be in hot water as FBI investigation expands beyond controversial book

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The FBI’s raid on John Bolton’s home and office is tied to an investigation that reaches beyond his controversial book, a source told Fox News Digital, fueling speculation that the former Trump adviser could face criminal charges.

    The scope of any potential charges against Bolton, who served under President Donald Trump before falling out of favor with him in 2019, is uncertain, but legal experts tend to agree that Bolton has some legal exposure.

    Prominent D.C.-based attorney Mark Zaid, who specializes in national security, said that while there are many unknowns about the Department of Justice’s investigation into Bolton, his memoir, “The Room Where It Happened,” could be an area of vulnerability for him.

    “With respect to Bolton’s book, he is potentially vulnerable if he maintains any copies of early drafts which were determined to contain ‘voluminous’ amounts of classified information when it was first submitted to the White House for review,” Zaid told Fox New Digital. “Those drafts were likely disseminated, per normal course of business, to his literary agent, publisher and lawyer.”

    THE HISTORY OF HOW TRUMP AND BOLTON’S RELATIONSHIP FELL TO TATTERS

    John Bolton waving outside his home after an FBI search of his house. (REUTERS/Tasos Katopodis)

    Zaid added that those transmissions could be unlawful under the Espionage Act, a serious set of charges used throughout history to punish spies and leakers of government secrets.

    During the first Trump administration, Attorney General Bill Barr opened an investigation into Bolton and brought a civil lawsuit against him over the book days before it was set for release.

    The DOJ alleged in the lawsuit that Bolton skipped over normal prepublication review processes and allowed his publisher to move forward with printing a book that contained several passages of classified national security information.

    In court papers, Bolton said he did not initially believe his memoir contained classified information, but then he edited some information out of the book after consulting with the National Security Council. Bolton never received a final signoff from the National Security Council before moving forward with publishing. He argued in court papers that the Trump administration’s refusal to approve the memoir’s contents violated his First Amendment rights and that the National Security Council’s review process “had been abused in an effort to suppress” the book, which contained harsh criticisms of Trump.

    DEMOCRATS OPPOSED JOHN BOLTON FOR YEARS — UNTIL THEY SOUGHT HIM AS AN ALLY AGAINST TRUMP

    FBI John Bolton raid

    FBI agents left John Bolton’s office in Washington after obtaining documents on Aug. 22, 2025. (Fox News Digital/Emma Woodhead)

    Judge Royce Lamberth, a D.C.-based Regan appointee, denied the Trump DOJ’s request to block publication of Bolton’s book because, among several reasons, it had already been exposed to publishers. Still, Lamberth faulted Bolton.

    “Defendant Bolton has gambled with the national security of the United States,” Lamberth wrote in an order at the time. “He has exposed his country to harm and himself to civil (and potentially criminal) liability.”

    Lamberth found it was likely Bolton “jeopardized national security by disclosing classified information” in violation of various nondisclosure agreements he signed as part of his national security role.

    The DOJ never brought charges against Bolton, and the investigation was closed under the Biden administration. The Biden DOJ dismissed the civil lawsuit against Bolton over his book in June 2021.

    JD VANCE INSISTS FBI SEARCHING BOLTON HOME ‘NOT AT ALL’ ABOUT POLITICAL RETRIBUTION

    John Bolton speaks to security panel

    In this Feb. 19, 2020, file photo, former national security adviser John Bolton takes part in a discussion on global leadership at Vanderbilt University, in Nashville, Tenn. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey, File)

    While Bolton’s book controversy has been at the forefront since the raids at his home and office, one well-placed source familiar with the investigation told Fox News Digital on Monday the investigation is far more expansive than the book. 

    The search warrants, which were authorized by a judge, were based on evidence collected overseas by the CIA, the New York Times reported.

    Critics note Bolton is the latest target of the Trump DOJ, which despite pledging to end “weaponization” has pursued several of the president’s political rivals. The department has launched grand jury probes into New York Attorney General Letitia James and Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and is examining Obama-era national security officials who Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says tried to undermine Trump’s 2016 victory. Trump has also urged an investigation of former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, citing “criminal acts” tied to the George Washington Bridge lane-closure scandal.

    Former U.S. Attorney John Fishwick of Virginia suggested the line between honest scrutiny of potential wrongdoing and political revenge has become blurred.

    “Trump DOJ targeting enemies of Trump — Letitia James, Adam Schiff, Federal Reserve Governor [Lisa] Cook and now John Bolton. Trump appears to want them harmed for personal/political reasons but if they broke the law are the investigations justified?” Fishwick told Fox News Digital in a statement. “That question is putting an incredible stress test on our legal system.”

    Zaid noted that Bolton could bring claims of a selective or vindictive prosecution if he were indicted but that those are difficult to prove.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Attorney Jason Kander, an army veteran and former secretary of state of Missouri, said on the podcast Talking Feds that even if the DOJ does not secure a conviction against Bolton, the legal process itself is punishment.

    “It’s not just harassment. It’s potential financial ruin,” Kander said. “When they come after you like this it doesn’t matter if there isn’t a scintilla of evidence. It’s a minimum half a million bucks in legal fees in a situation like this.”

    Source link

  • Democrats ask Trump to resume a major offshore wind project near Rhode Island

    A nearly complete wind farm off the coast of Rhode Island and Connecticut faces an uncertain future as the states’ Democratic governors, members of Congress and union workers are calling Monday for the Trump administration to let construction resume.

    The administration halted construction on the Revolution Wind project last week, saying the federal government needs to review the project and address national security concerns. It did not specify what the concerns are. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management said Monday it’s not commenting further at this time.

    The politicians are getting involved because stopping work on Revolution Wind threatens local jobs and their states’ climate goals, and could drive up electricity prices throughout the region. All of the project’s underwater foundations and 45 out of 65 turbines are already installed.

    Large, ocean-based wind farms are the linchpin of government plans to shift to renewable energy, particularly in populous East Coast states with limited land for wind turbines or solar arrays.

    President Donald Trump has made sweeping strides to prioritize fossil fuels and hinder renewable energy projects. Those include reviewing wind and solar energy permits, canceling plans to use large areas of federal waters for new offshore wind development and stopping work on another offshore wind project under construction for New York, although construction was later allowed to resume.

    Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont is scheduled to go to State Pier in New London, Connecticut, on Monday, where components for the Revolution Wind project are kept before being taken out to sea. Rhode Island Gov. Dan McKee is headed to North Kingstown, Rhode Island, where the logistics and operations hub for the project is located.

    McKee says Revolution Wind is critical to the region’s economy and energy future.

    Both governors will be joined by Democratic congressmen and labor leaders. About 1,000 union members have been working on Revolution Wind, and those jobs are now at risk.

    Revolution Wind is expected to be Rhode Island and Connecticut’s first large offshore wind farm, capable of powering more than 350,000 homes. Power would be provided at a rate of 9.8 cents per kilowatt hour, locked in for 20 years. That is cheaper than the average cost of electricity in New England.

    The developer, Danish energy company Orsted, is evaluating the financial impact of stopping construction and considering legal proceedings.

    The project site is more than 15 miles (24 kilometers) south of the Rhode Island coast, 32 miles (51 kilometers) southeast of the Connecticut coast and 12 miles (19 kilometers) southwest of Martha’s Vineyard. Rhode Island is already home to one offshore wind farm in state waters, the five-turbine Block Island Wind Farm.

    The Trump administration previously stopped work on Empire Wind, the New York offshore wind project. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said it appeared former President Joe Biden’s administration had “rushed through” the approvals, although the developer Equinor spent seven years obtaining permits. Construction was allowed to resume in May after two of the state’s Democratic leaders, U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer and Gov. Kathy Hochul, intervened.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Isabella O’Malley in Philadelphia contributed to this report.

    ___

    The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

    Source link