Your CFO’s spreadsheet shows IT expenses as a consistent monthly line item. Software licenses: $8,400. Hardware amortization: $2,100. Support contract: $3,500. Same numbers month after month, regardless of whether you’re running three shifts or down for maintenance, whether you shipped 5,000 units or 12,000 units, whether production is at your main facility or distributed across multiple locations.
This seems normal. IT is infrastructure, and infrastructure costs are fixed, right? Except manufacturing companies that think this way are overpaying during slow periods and underserving their operations during growth periods. The fixed-cost model for IT made sense twenty years ago. Today, it’s leaving money on the table.
The Legacy Model That Doesn’t Make Sense Anymore
Traditional manufacturing IT was built on ownership and fixed capacity:
- Buy servers upfront and depreciate them over five years
- Purchase perpetual software licenses for a set number of users
- Pay an annual maintenance contract regardless of usage
- Staff internal IT for peak capacity needs, even during valleys
This model treated IT like you’d treat a building or production equipment—capital investments with predictable ongoing costs.
But here’s the problem: your production equipment scales with production volume. Raw material costs scale. Labor scales (at least partially). Energy costs scale. Nearly every other aspect of manufacturing operations flexes with business activity.
Your IT costs? They stay exactly the same whether you’re at 40% capacity or 110% capacity. That’s a mismatch that’s costing manufacturers money in ways that never show up clearly in financial statements.
Where Manufacturing IT Should Be Variable But Isn’t
Let’s look at the expenses that manufacturers treat as fixed but could and should vary with business needs:
Computing Infrastructure
You sized your servers for peak production capacity. During slow periods, you’re paying for and maintaining infrastructure you’re not fully using. During unexpectedly high production periods, you’re constrained by capacity you can’t quickly expand.
Cloud infrastructure (whether public or hybrid) can scale with actual usage. You pay for what you need this month, not what you might need at some theoretical peak.
Software Licensing
Your ERP system has licenses for 75 users. During seasonal slowdowns, maybe 50 people are actually working. During peak production with temporary labor, you’re scrambling to share licenses or paying rush fees for additional seats.
Modern subscription-based licensing can flex with actual user counts. Add users when you need them, reduce licenses when you don’t.
Storage Capacity
You bought storage arrays based on projections of data growth. Those projections are always either too conservative (forcing expensive emergency expansions) or too generous (wasting money on unused capacity).
Cloud storage or consumption-based storage solutions charge you for what you’re actually using, scaling automatically as needs change.
Support and Maintenance
Your IT support contract covers all your locations whether they’re operating or not. When you temporarily idle a facility, you’re still paying for comprehensive support coverage you’re not using. When you open a new location, you’re either uncovered or paying for a contract amendment.
The right manufacturing IT solutions provide support models that can flex with operational changes—adding or reducing coverage as facilities open, close, or change activity levels.
Disaster Recovery and Backup
You’re paying for backup infrastructure and disaster recovery capabilities sized for your entire operation, whether you’re running one shift or three, whether seasonal production is high or low.
Modern backup and DR solutions can scale with actual data volumes and recovery needs, reducing costs during periods when less comprehensive coverage is acceptable.
The Hidden Costs of the Fixed Model
Beyond paying for unused capacity during slow periods, the fixed-cost IT model creates other problems:
Delayed Response to Growth
When business expands faster than planned, your fixed IT infrastructure becomes a bottleneck. You can’t quickly add capacity because everything requires capital approval, procurement, installation, and configuration.
By the time you’ve expanded IT capacity, you may have already lost production efficiency, turned away orders, or frustrated customers with delayed deliveries—all because your IT couldn’t scale with demand.
Reluctance to Experiment
New production lines, pilot programs, market tests, temporary facilities—all of these require IT infrastructure. When every IT expense is a fixed capital commitment, there’s institutional resistance to trying new things.
Variable IT costs make experimentation less risky. If the pilot program doesn’t work out, you’re not stuck with infrastructure you can’t use.
Overbuying or Underbuying
You either overbuy capacity (wasting money on unused infrastructure) or underbuy (constraining operations and requiring emergency expansions). It’s nearly impossible to size fixed IT infrastructure perfectly because business needs change faster than IT replacement cycles.
Misaligned Incentives
Your CFO is trying to minimize fixed costs, which creates pressure to underbuy IT capacity. Your operations team needs adequate infrastructure to meet production requirements. These conflicting goals lead to compromises that satisfy nobody.
What Variable IT Costs Look Like in Practice
Manufacturers moving toward variable IT models aren’t abandoning infrastructure—they’re structuring it differently:
Hybrid Cloud Infrastructure
Core systems still run on-premise for production floor requirements and data sovereignty. But capacity can burst to cloud resources during peak periods, and non-critical systems can run entirely in cloud with costs scaling to actual usage.
This isn’t all-or-nothing. It’s strategic use of cloud resources where they provide flexibility while maintaining on-premise infrastructure where it’s necessary.
Subscription-Based Software
Moving from perpetual licenses to subscription models where user counts can flex monthly or quarterly. Yes, you might pay more per user annually, but you’re only paying for users you actually need right now.
For seasonal manufacturers, this can reduce software costs by 30-40% compared to maintaining peak capacity licenses year-round.
Consumption-Based Services
Storage, backup, DR, and specialized computing resources billed based on actual consumption rather than fixed capacity. You’re not pre-paying for capacity you might need—you’re paying for capacity you’re actually using.
Flexible Support Models
Manufacturing IT solutions providers who can scale support coverage with your operational needs. Full support during production periods, reduced coverage during planned downtime, rapid scaling when you bring new facilities online.
The CFO Conversation That Needs to Happen
Here’s the discussion most manufacturing companies should be having but aren’t:
Current State Analysis:
“Our IT costs are $52,000 monthly regardless of production volume. During our slow season when production is down 35%, we’re still paying full IT costs. During peak season when we’re running overtime and weekend shifts, we’re sometimes constrained by IT capacity we can’t quickly expand.”
Variable Cost Opportunity:
“If we restructured 40% of our IT costs to variable models—cloud bursting, flexible licensing, consumption-based services—we could reduce IT spending by $15,000 monthly during slow periods while having better capacity to handle unexpected peaks.”
Annual Impact:
“Over a year, that’s $90,000 in reduced costs during slow periods, plus improved operational flexibility during peaks. We’d probably spend slightly more during peak periods, but net savings would be $60,000+ annually with significantly better operational agility.”
Most CFOs would approve this immediately if the analysis were presented clearly. The problem is that IT expenses are rarely examined from this angle—they’re just accepted as fixed overhead.
The Obstacles That Keep Manufacturers Locked Into Fixed Costs
If variable IT costs are so obviously beneficial, why aren’t more manufacturers adopting them?
Inertia and Familiarity
“This is how we’ve always done IT” is a powerful force. The capital expenditure model is familiar, budgeted, and doesn’t require changing anything.
Misunderstanding of Cloud Economics
Some manufacturers tried cloud solutions, saw that per-unit costs were higher than owned infrastructure, and concluded cloud was more expensive. They didn’t account for the flexibility value or avoided costs of unused capacity.
Control Concerns
There’s comfort in owning infrastructure. Moving to consumption-based or cloud models feels like losing control, even when it actually provides better operational flexibility.
Incomplete Analysis
Most financial analysis compares total annual costs under different models but doesn’t account for the business value of flexibility, faster scaling, or avoided costs of overcapacity during slow periods.
IT Department Resistance
Internal IT staff sometimes resist variable cost models because they reduce the empire and change job responsibilities. This isn’t universal, but it’s a real factor in some organizations.
What Actually Makes Sense for Manufacturing
Not every IT expense should be variable. The right approach for most manufacturers is hybrid:
Keep Fixed:
- Core production floor infrastructure that must be reliable and low-latency
- Specialized manufacturing systems where cloud isn’t viable
- Security and compliance infrastructure that needs to be constant
- Base capacity for minimal operations
Make Variable:
- Excess capacity beyond base requirements
- Non-production systems (email, file storage, business applications)
- Development and test environments
- Disaster recovery and backup above minimum requirements
- Support coverage during temporary shutdowns or seasonal fluctuations
This approach maintains reliability for critical operations while gaining flexibility where it provides value.
The Questions to Ask Your IT Provider
If you’re working with manufacturing IT solutions providers, ask them:
- Which of our current fixed IT costs could be restructured as variable expenses?
- How would our costs change during different production scenarios (seasonal low, normal operations, peak demand)?
- What’s the total cost comparison including flexibility value, not just direct expense?
- What infrastructure needs to stay fixed, and what could flex with business needs?
- How quickly can we scale capacity up or down in response to demand changes?
If they can’t answer these questions thoughtfully, they’re probably locked into traditional fixed-cost thinking themselves.
The Competitive Advantage Hidden in IT Flexibility
Manufacturers who’ve moved toward variable IT costs describe benefits beyond direct cost savings:
Faster Response to Opportunities
When a large unexpected order comes in, IT doesn’t become the constraint preventing you from accepting it. Capacity can scale quickly to support increased production.
Lower Risk in Market Testing
Testing new products or markets requires less upfront IT investment, reducing risk and enabling more experimentation.
Better Cash Flow Management
IT costs flex with business activity, improving cash flow during slow periods when you need it most.
Easier Facility Changes
Opening, closing, or consolidating facilities doesn’t require major IT capital projects with long lead times.
Your competitors operating with fully fixed IT costs don’t have these advantages. That’s worth something beyond just the direct cost comparison.
The conversation with your CFO shouldn’t be about whether IT is expensive. It should be about whether your IT cost structure aligns with how your manufacturing business actually operates. Fixed costs made sense when IT was all about owned infrastructure. Today, manufacturers have options that create flexibility and better align IT spending with business activity.
The question is whether you’re taking advantage of those options or still operating like it’s 2005.
Related
