ReportWire

Tag: Molly Rose Foundation

  • Instagram to alert parents over teens’ suicide and self-harm searches – Tech Digest

    [ad_1]

    Share


    In a shift to its safety protocols, Instagram has announced it will begin proactively alerting parents if their teenagers repeatedly search for terms related to suicide and self-harm.

    The feature marks the first time that parent company Meta will notify parents about specific search behaviours, rather than simply blocking the content and providing resources to users.

    The move comes as Meta and other tech giants face what experts are calling their “Big Tobacco” moment. CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently testified in Los Angeles Superior Court regarding allegations that Instagram’s design fosters addiction and detrimental mental health effects in minors.

    By introducing these alerts, Meta aims to provide parents with “the resources they need to support their teen” during critical windows of distress.

    How the alerts will function

    The system is designed to trigger when a teenager enrolled in Instagram’s “Teen Accounts” repeatedly searches for phrases promoting self-harm or terms like “suicide” within a short period. Notifications will be delivered to parents via email, text, WhatsApp, or through the Instagram app itself.

    Meta acknowledged that the system might “err on the side of caution,” potentially sending alerts that do not indicate a genuine crisis. However, it maintains that notifying parents is the “right starting point.”

    The rollout will begin next week in the United Kingdom, United States, Australia, and Canada, with a global release planned for later this year. Meta also intends to expand these alerts to its AI chatbots, as more children turn to artificial intelligence for emotional support.

    Backlash from safety advocates

    Despite the intended safety benefits, the Molly Rose Foundation – a charity established following the death of 14-year-old Molly Russell – has heavily criticized the plan. Chief Executive Andy Burrows warned that “forced disclosures could do more harm than good,” noting that “flimsy notifications will leave parents panicked and ill-prepared” for the sensitive conversations that follow.

    Advocates argue that the burden of safety is being shifted onto parents rather than addressed at the source. The Molly Rose Foundation cited research suggesting that Instagram’s algorithms still actively recommend harmful content to vulnerable youths.

    Similarly, Ged Flynn of the charity Papyrus stated that parents “don’t want to be warned after their children search for harmful content; they don’t want it to be spoon-fed to them by unthinking algorithms.”

    As regulators in countries like Australia move toward total social media bans for under-16s, Meta’s latest tool represents a high-stakes attempt to prove that self-regulation can still protect young users in an increasingly digital world.


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv

    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Price

    Source link

  • UK consults on social media ban for under-16s – Tech Digest

    [ad_1]

    Share


    The UK government has launched a consultation to determine if social media should be banned for Under-16s.

    It comes after more than 60 Labour MPs wrote to the prime minister about the issue, with the mother of murdered teenager Brianna Ghey also calling on the government to act.

    This potential move follows Australia’s landmark decision in December 2025 to implement the world’s first such ban, sparking a global debate on child safety online.

    Technology Secretary Liz Kendall emphasized that the government is “determined to ensure technology enriches children’s lives, not harms them.”

    As part of a broader crackdown, immediate action will allow Ofsted to inspect school phone policies, with the expectation that schools become “phone-free by default.”

    Support for the ban

    Proponents for the ban argue that drastic measures are necessary to protect vulnerable youth. Esther Ghey, mother of murdered teenager Brianna Ghey, strongly advocates for the ban, stating that social media limited her daughter’s ability to engage in real-world interactions.

    Political support is also strong, with Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch asserting her party would have already introduced such a measure.

    Education unions, including the National Education Union (NEU) and the Association of School and College Leaders, have welcomed the consultation. NEU General Secretary Daniel Kebede noted that social media often pulls children into “isolating, endless loops of content” long before they reach their GCSEs.

    14-year-old Molly Russell took her own life after viewing thousands of images online promoting suicide and self-harm


    Opposition and concerns

    However, a significant coalition of 42 organizations, including the NSPCC and the Molly Rose Foundation, argues that a blanket ban is the “wrong solution.” They warn it could create a “false sense of safety” and drive children toward even more dangerous, unmonitored areas of the internet.

    Experts, including Professor Amy Orben of the University of Cambridge, point out that there is currently “not strong evidence” that age-based bans are effective. Instead, critics suggest focusing on reducing algorithm-driven exposure to harmful content and improving digital literacy.

    The government is expected to respond to the consultation findings this summer.


    For latest tech stories go to TechDigest.tv

    Discover more from Tech Digest

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    [ad_2]

    Chris Price

    Source link