ReportWire

Tag: MMR vaccine

  • CDC website changed to include false claims that link autism and vaccines

    (CNN) — Scientific information on the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s website was replaced Wednesday with anti-vaccine talking points that don’t rule out a link between vaccines and autism, despite an abundance of evidence that there’s no connection.

    Bullet points on the top of the page now state that “vaccines do not cause autism is not an evidence-based claim” because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism.

    The language is a common tactic used to cast doubt on the safety of vaccines, said Alison Singer, president and co-founder of the Autism Science Foundation.

    “You can’t do a scientific study to show that something does not cause something else,” she said Thursday.

    “All we can do in the scientific community is point to the preponderance of the evidence, the number of studies, the fact that the studies are so conclusive,” Singer said. “These studies all agree. They’re very clear, and it’s time to move on.”

    The preponderance of scientific evidence shows that vaccines do not cause autism, Singer said.

    No environmental factor has been better studied as a potential cause of autism than vaccines. This includes vaccine ingredients as well as the body’s response to vaccines,” the Autism Science Foundation said in a statement Thursday.

    Dr. Paul Offit agrees. In a post on Substack on Thursday, Offit, a pediatrician and director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, said scientific studies can “never prove never.”

    “If RFK Jr. wanted to be honest with the American public, he would make it clear on the CDC’s website that chicken nuggets also might cause autism, which has never been and will never be disproven,” Offit wrote.

    HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said Thursday, “We are updating the CDC’s website to reflect gold standard, evidence-based science.”

    However, Dr. Marty Makary, commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration, recently told CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta on an episode of his “Chasing Life” podcast that he doesn’t think vaccines cause autism.

    “I think there’s no medicine that’s 1,000% safe,” Makary said. “And I think we have to remember that with everything. I think the absolutism around some of this stuff creates mistrust. And when we say they’re 1,000% safe and it’s impossible for there to be a single complication of a vaccine, that’s the kind of rhetoric, I think, that doesn’t resonate well. So I think we have be humble and take a very honest approach.”

    Studies find no relationship

    Other bullets on the updated CDC page say studies supporting a link between vaccines and autism have been ignored by health authorities. This too is not true: Studies showing a connection between vaccines and autism have proved to be poorly done or were fraudulent. There are, however, many well-done, credible studies that find no such relationship.

    One of the largest studies looking at this question was published in 2019. Researchers in Denmark enrolled more than 650,000 children born between 1999 and 2011 and followed them from the time they were 1 year of age until the end of August 2013. Roughly 6,500 children were diagnosed with autism during the study period.

    When the researchers compared those who received the MMR vaccine with those who did not, they found no significant difference in the risk of developing autism. That held true whether the kids got other vaccines, such as the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine; whether they had siblings with autism; or a host of other factors, such as whether certain kids might be prone to developing a form of regressive autism after getting their shots.

    “This study strongly supports that MMR vaccine does not increase the risk for autism,” the authors wrote in the conclusion.

    This study is not cited on the CDC’s updated “state of the evidence” on MMR vaccines, however. Instead, it mentions older evidence reviews and raises questions about aluminum, an ingredient added to some vaccines to boost their protection.

    The new CDC updates do mention another recent Danish study, published in 2025, which found no link between aluminum in childhood vaccines and any of 50 disorders, including neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism. But instead of accepting the overall conclusion of the study, the new CDC page tries to cast doubt on it by homing in on details of data in a supplementary table, saying the findings and other “warrant further investigation” into aluminum exposure and chronic diseases.

    The CDC page also says the US Department of Health and Human Services has launched a comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism, including investigations on plausible biologic mechanisms and potential causal links.

    Singer said this is a waste of valuable research money and a distraction from strong science showing that most cases of autism can be traced to genes that affect a baby’s brain development.

    The main heading on the page states that “Vaccines do not cause Autism,” but it has an asterisk that directs readers to a footnote: “The header ‘Vaccines do not cause autism’ has not been removed due to an agreement with the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee that it would remain on the CDC website.”

    The footnote seems to refer to a commitment by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to Sen. Bill Cassidy, a physician and Republican from Louisiana, during his confirmation process that language on the CDC website “pointing out that vaccines do not cause autism” would not be removed. Cassidy described the promise in a speech in which he explained his support for Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist.

    Cassidy told CNN on Thursday that he had spoken with Kennedy.

    In a statement posted on X on Thursday, Cassidy said, “I’m a doctor who has seen people die from vaccine-preventable diseases. What parents need to hear right now is vaccines for measles, polio, hepatitis B and other childhood diseases are safe and effective and will not cause autism. Any statement to the contrary is wrong, irresponsible, and actively makes Americans sicker.”

    ‘Dangerous health disinformation’

    Dr. Peter Hotez, who is director of the Center for Vaccine Development at Texas Children’s Hospital and wrote a book called “Vaccines Did Not Cause Rachel’s Autism” about his daughter’s diagnosis, said the updated information on the CDC’s page follows a well-worn playbook.

    “They’ve decided they want to prove vaccines cause autism. So they keep making a series of assertions,” Hotez said, going back to debunked research that claimed the MMR vaccines caused autism and a retracted 2005 Rolling Stone article by Kennedy that asserted the preservative thimerosal caused autism.

    There have also been claims that aluminum in vaccines was a cause of autism, and those have been disproved, Hotez said.

    Hotez says the updates to the CDC’s page are “pure garbage.”

    “I consider it a piece of dangerous health disinformation, and it needs to be removed right away,” he said.

    Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, who recently resigned as director of the CDC’s National Center on Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said on social media late Wednesday that the changes are “a national embarrassment.”

    “The weaponization of the voice of CDC is getting worse. This is a public health emergency,” he wrote.

    Daskalakis said the agency’s scientists were completely blindsided by the page update.

    “This distortion of science under the CDC moniker is the reason I resigned with my colleagues,” he told CNN.

    Rather than restoring trust in America’s health agencies, moves like this have undermined it, said Dr. Sean O’ Leary, a pediatrician who chairs the Committee on Infectious Diseases for the American Academy of Pediatrics.

    “I fear that it’s going to lead to fewer children being vaccinated, children suffering from diseases they didn’t need to suffer from,” O’Leary said.

    This is the latest move by the Trump administration to alter longstanding US vaccine policy and practice and cast doubt on vaccinations.

    Kennedy has hired longtime anti-vax allies – including David Geier, a discredited researcher who was once disciplined by the Maryland State Board of Physicians for practicing medicine without a license, and Lyn Redwood, a nurse who was president of the World Mercury Project, which later became Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine group Kennedy ran before campaigning for office – to undertake new evaluations of government data in an effort to prove conspiracy theories that hazards of vaccines have long been hidden from the public.

    The rate of routine childhood vaccinations has dropped in the United States, allowing preventable diseases including measles and whooping cough to surge. In a call with state health officials Monday, the CDC disease detectives leading the measles response suggested that the US status as a country that has eliminated continuous measles spread was in jeopardy.

    Brenda Goodman and CNN

    Source link

  • Why the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine is combined

    President Donald Trump wants the combined MMR vaccine that protects against measles, mumps and rubella, broken up into separate shots. 

    Individual vaccines against measles, mumps and rubella are not currently available in the United States. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s acting director called for manufacturers to develop separate shots and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said officials are evaluating the feasibility of separating the vaccines.

    The MMR vaccine has been combined since 1971, and it would take years for separate vaccines to be tested and licensed in the U.S.

    Trump’s repeated calls to “break up the MMR shot” and “take them separately” might have Americans wondering whether they can get separate shots and how and why the vaccines were ever combined. Here are some answers to common MMR vaccine questions. 

    Q: Why is the MMR vaccine combined, anyway? 

    A: Public health officials wanted to make it easier for people to get vaccinated, because that increases overall vaccination rates and decreases cases of these diseases. 

    Measles, mumps and rubella vaccines were good candidates for combination because they were typically given on the same schedule. Combining them meant fewer doctor’s visits and fewer needles in arms, which can be stressful for kids and parents. 

    Combining the vaccines was also possible because all three rely on weakened versions of the viruses to trigger immune responses that teach the body to fight the live viruses, said Dr. Walter Orenstein, an epidemiologist who directed the U.S. Immunization Program from 1998 to 2004.

    These vaccines had similar ingredients and manufacturing processes, which made it possible to combine them, Orenstein said.

    Scientists rigorously tested whether these vaccines could safely and effectively be combined without reducing the immune responses to each individual illness.

    The MMR vaccine is administered in two doses and given to children first at 12 to 15 months old and then between ages 4 and 6. Getting your child fully vaccinated against these three diseases requires two visits to your pediatrician’s office and two shots.

    If the MMR vaccine were split up and you wanted to get your child vaccinated at separate medical appointments — something Trump has also advised — it could take six visits. That means scheduling six appointments, paying for six doctor visits and your child receiving six injections. 

    When it is difficult to get fully vaccinated, fewer people do it. 

    “If you’re separating the vaccine, there’s an inconvenience,” said Dr. Amesh Adalja, an infectious disease expert at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. “It’s also more likely that one or more of those vaccines slips through the cracks.”

    Q: Does any science support separating the MMR vaccine? 

    A: No. 

    “There is no published scientific evidence showing any benefit in separating the combination MMR vaccine,” Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health posted Oct. 8 on Facebook. Other vaccine experts echoed this sentiment

    The White House provided no studies or reports that support separating the MMR vaccine into three vaccines. 

    Vials of the MMR measles mumps and rubella virus vaccine sit in a refrigerator with other medicine Feb. 25, 2025, in Lubbock, Texas. (AP)

     

    Q: Are other vaccines combined? 

    A: Yes. The DTaP vaccine series protects against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis or whooping cough. Like the MMR vaccine, separate vaccines aren’t available in the U.S. for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. 

    The Pediarix vaccine protects against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and polio and the Pentacel vaccine protects against diphtheria, tetanus, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b or Hib. 

    Q: If combination vaccines are intended to improve convenience, why aren’t all vaccines combined? 

    A: In a perfect world, all the vaccine protection a person needs could be delivered in one combined shot, Adalja said. 

    That’s not possible because physicians administer vaccines when the protection will be most valuable. 

    “The vaccine schedule is not created arbitrarily,” he said. “There’s different times (of life) when you might be exposed to something, different times when the risk for severe disease is higher.”

    It’s also impossible to combine certain vaccines.

    Some ingredients in inactivated vaccines — or vaccines that use a killed version of a germ to prompt immune response — could kill the weakened live viruses used in the measles, mumps and rubella vaccines, Orenstein said. 

    Lead medical assistant Maria Teresa Diocales administers the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine to 1-year-old at International Community Health Services, Sept. 10, 2025, in Seattle. (AP)

    Q: Do separate MMR vaccines exist anywhere? 

    A: No country’s government recommends using three separate vaccines to protect against measles, mumps and rubella, but separate vaccines are available in some countries for use in certain circumstances, according to the United Kingdom government

    In France, infants 6 months to 11 months can be given a separate measles vaccine if necessary following an exposure to measles or ahead of plans to travel somewhere with high numbers of measles cases. After that, however, French public health experts still recommend children receive a combined MMR vaccination following the vaccine schedule.  

    Japan recommends a combined measles and rubella vaccine and does not routinely vaccinate against mumps, but a separate mumps vaccine is available. 

    Q: Can separate vaccines be tested and licensed for use in the U.S.? 

    A: If it could be done at all, it would likely take years to accomplish, experts said. 

    “It would depend upon what regulatory requirements the (Food and Drug Administration) placed on the company in order to prove safety and efficacy of that vaccine,” Adalja said. 

    In May, a Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson told The Washington Post that all new vaccines would be required to “undergo safety testing in placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure.” 

    That raises ethical issues when it comes to clinical testing of individual vaccines against measles, mumps and rubella. 

    Oversight boards that review and approve clinical trials would not approve trials with placebo groups for measles, mumps and rubella because an existing vaccine is effective, said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan. 

    Exposing children to potentially deadly illnesses is unethical, she said. 

    There’s also no guarantee that vaccine manufacturers would even attempt to separate the vaccines. 

    “Vaccines are not very lucrative, and they’re becoming less and less lucrative based on the environment that we have in the United States,” Adalja said. 

    Merck and GSK manufacture combined MMR vaccines used in the U.S. GSK did not respond to PolitiFact’s questions about whether they will respond to the administration’s calls to separate the MMR vaccine.

    In a statement to PolitiFact, Merck said splitting the MMR vaccine would essentially involve creating three new, experimental and separately licensed vaccines, each requiring full clinical testing and regulatory review. 

    “We estimate that, in total, it could take more than 10 years before Merck could obtain FDA approvals and begin manufacturing and commercialization,” the company said.

    A sign is seen outside a clinic with the South Plains Public Health District, Feb. 23, 2025, in Brownfield, Texas. (AP)

    Q: What would happen if the combined MMR vaccine were no longer offered in the U.S.?

    A: The most immediate effect would be that vaccination would stop because there is no alternative. But even if separate measles, mumps and rubella vaccines were eventually tested, approved and available, vaccine uptake likely would drop because getting vaccinated would require more effort, Rasmussen said. 

    Either way, that would mean more cases of measles, rubella and mumps. 

    “We will see more longer term impacts too,” she said. That might include increased infertility from mumps, increased disability from measles and congenital rubella syndrome, more stillbirths and miscarriages from rubella and more cases of SSPE, a progressive brain disorder that stems from measles infection. 

    Replacing the MMR vaccine with separate vaccines “is a preventable tragedy and terrible mistake for public health,” Rasmussen said. 

    Editor’s note: Google Translate was used throughout the research of this story to translate websites and statements into English.

    RELATED: How do countries without school vaccination requirements maintain high vaccination rates?

    RELATED: Why is metal used in vaccines? Is it safe? Here’s what to know about aluminum in vaccines. 

    RELATED: Hepatitis B vaccine Q&A: Why do babies need the shot?

    Source link

  • With CDC signoff, CVS says Covid-19 vaccines will be available nationwide without a prescription

    (CNN) — The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention signed off on a recommendation that patients must consult a health care provider to get a Covid-19 vaccine, although they don’t necessarily need a prescription.

    The updated CDC recommendation — made by a new panel of vaccine advisers chosen by US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — shifted away from a broader push in past years for most people to get an updated Covid-19 vaccine. It became final with signoff from Acting CDC Director Jim O’Neill.

    The new recommendations mean people ages 6 months and older can get Covid-19 vaccines after consulting with a qualified health care provider, which keeps the shots available but may also create more barriers to access than in past years.

    Before the finalized recommendation this year, access to Covid-19 shots has differed from state to state as pharmacies and providers navigated new federal vaccine policies. CVS, which had previously limited access to Covid-19 shots in some places, said Monday that it was “updating our systems to be able to offer the updated COVID-19 vaccines to patients nationwide” and that “prescriptions from outside prescribers will no longer be required in any states.”

    The signoff is also coming later than usual for the fall respiratory virus season. With the recommendation, the government can finally distribute Covid-19 vaccines through its Vaccines for Children program, which provides free inoculations to about half of US children.

    The CDC’s independent vaccine advisers, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, voted unanimously last month that people who want a Covid-19 vaccine should consult with a health care provider, a process called shared clinical decision-making. However, they narrowly voted down a recommendation that a prescription should be required to get the shot.

    In August, the US Food and Drug Administration moved to limit approval of Covid-19 vaccines to adults 65 and older as well as younger people who are at higher risk of severe illness because of other health conditions.

    study published last month in the journal JAMA Network Open found that a universal Covid-19 vaccine recommendation — as had been in place for the US in recent years — could save thousands more lives than limiting the recommendation to high-risk groups.

    Experts said that even requiring shared clinical decision-making could make Covid-19 shots harder to get.

    The recommendation “assumes health care and insurance,” said Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, who recently resigned as head of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “We do not have universal health care in this country, and we know millions of people are losing insurance.”

    HHS said it was bringing back “informed consent” ahead of vaccination.

    “CDC’s 2022 blanket recommendation for perpetual COVID-19 boosters deterred health care providers from talking about the risks and benefits of vaccination for the individual patient or parent. That changes today,” O’Neill, who is also the deputy secretary of HHS, said in a statement.

    Another new recommendation will mean toddlers get their first vaccines against measles and chickenpox separately, around their first birthdays. In this case, the ACIP guidance formalizes an existing recommendation, which is designed to reduce a very rare, slightly elevated risk of seizures when the two shots are combined into a single injection.

    The CDC advisers said that the single-dose measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine was not recommended before age 4 and that younger kids should get the varicella vaccine, which protects against chickenpox, separately from the shot that protects against measles, mumps and rubella.

    Brenda Goodman, Katherine Dillinger and CNN

    Source link