ReportWire

Tag: Minimum Wage

  • Coerced Colorado prison labor amounts to involuntary servitude, judge rules

    [ad_1]

    Colorado Department of Corrections officials forced inmates to work prison jobs through coercion that ultimately amounted to involuntary servitude, a Denver judge ruled Friday.

    The state’s prisons unconstitutionally coerced labor by levying severe punishments — including solitary confinement — against prisoners who refused to work, Denver District Court Judge Sarah Wallace found in the 61-page ruling.

    “By creating a framework where failure to work triggers a sequence of restrictions that culminate in a more restrictive ‘custody level’ and physical isolation, CDOC has established a system of compulsion that overrides the voluntariness of the (prisoners’) labor,” Wallace wrote.

    The ruling comes out of a 2022 lawsuit in which state prisoners claimed the Department of Corrections’ approach to prison labor amounted to involuntary servitude or slavery, which Colorado voters outlawed in 2018 via Amendment A.

    The lawsuit, which went to trial in October, was brought by Towards Justice, a nonprofit law firm headed by David Seligman, a candidate in the 2026 race for Colorado attorney general.

    Prisoners in Colorado are expected to work prison jobs, which include food preparation, janitorial services and other positions within their facilities. They are paid well below minimum wage for the work.  They can choose not to work, but doing so is a disciplinary infraction for which prisoners are punished, according to court filings.

    State attorneys argued during the October trial that prisoners’ labor was voluntary, and that punishments for failing to work, while “uncomfortable,” did not rise to the level of coercion legally required to constitute involuntary servitude.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Is your state raising its minimum wage in 2026? Here’s the list.

    [ad_1]

    Almost two dozen states are raising their minimum wage in 2026, providing American workers a pay bump at a time when many are struggling to cover basic necessities.

    In total, 88 jurisdictions — including 22 states and 66 cities and counties — are slated to increase their minimum wages at some point in 2026, according to a recent report from the National Employment Law Project (NELP), an advocacy organization for workers. 

    The wage floor will reach or exceed $15.00 per hour, double the amount of the federal minimum wage, in most of those locations.

    The bulk of the wage boosts took effect starting Jan. 1, 2026. For instance, the minimum rose to $17.00 at the start of this year in New York City, Long Island and Westchester County.

    Despite repeated attempts to raise the federal minimum wage, the national baseline hourly rate has remained at $7.25 since 2009. In the meantime, many states and municipalities have boosted their wage floors through a patchwork of ballot measures and legislation. These changes are often framed as a way to combat inflation, which has cooled since 2022 but remains a pain point for many Americans. 

    Read on to see how the minimum wage where you live stacks up against other states across the U.S., based on NELP’s report.

    States with a new minimum wage, effective Jan. 1, 2026

    • Arizona: $15.15
    • California: $16.90
    • Colorado: $15.16 
    • Connecticut: $16.94
    • Hawaii: $16
    • Maine: $15.10 
    • Michigan: $13.73
    • Minnesota: $11.41 
    • Missouri: $15 
    • Montana: $10.85
    • Nebraska: $15
    • New Jersey: $15.92 
    • New York: $17.00 for New York City, Long Island and Westchester; $16.00 for the rest of the state
    • Ohio: $11 
    • Rhode Island: $16 
    • South Dakota: $11.85 
    • Vermont: $14.42
    • Virginia: $12.77
    • Washington State: $17.13

    States with minimum wage increases expected later in 2026

    • Alaska: $14
    • Florida: $15
    • Oregon: Between $14.05 to $16.30, depending on location

    States not raising wages

    The following states’ minimum wage is above $7.25, but won’t increase in 2026.

    • Arkansas: $11
    • Delaware: $15
    • Illinois: $15
    • Maryland: $15
    • Massachusetts: $15
    • Nevada: $12
    • New Mexico: $12
    • West Virginia: $8.75

    The remaining states have a minimum wage of $7.25. Georgia and Wyoming both have a minimum wage of $5.15, which is superseded by the federal minimum wage.

    • Alabama
    • Georgia
    • Idaho
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Mississippi
    • New Hampshire
    • North Carolina
    • North Dakota
    • Oklahoma
    • Pennsylvania
    • South Carolina
    • Tennessee
    • Texas
    • Utah
    • Wisconsin
    • Wyoming

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These laws start New Year’s Day in Virginia, Maryland, DC – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Health, social media and paychecks are among the topics addressed in a wide-range of legislation that hits the books in Virginia, D.C. and Maryland on Jan. 1, 2026.

    A wide range of legislation hit the books on New Year’s Day in Virginia, Maryland and D.C.

    Health, social media and paychecks are among the topics addressed in the laws that began on Jan. 1, 2026.

    Here a few of the new laws beginning in the new year:

    Virginia

    You can find details on any Virginia laws on the state law portal.

    Kids get social media limits

    Is a break from social media on your list of New Year’s resolutions? Virginia has banned kids under 16 from using social media for more than one hour a day, under the Consumer Data Protection Act.

    The law allows parents to adjust that daily limit as they see fit. Some exceptions to the law include platforms that are mostly used for email or direct messaging, streaming services and news sites.

    Social media companies are required to accurately verify a young person’s age under the new law. And companies are not allowed to use the age information for anything else.

    There are questions about the law’s practicality and whether it will be effective, including from Jennifer Golbeck, a professor at the University of Maryland’s College of Information, who said it’s unclear whether the law will have its intended effect.

    Solicitors’ repeated texts 

    There may be an avenue to reel in unwanted texts or calls from solicitors under the Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act.

    If you reply to a solicitor’s text with “UNSUBSCRIBE” or “STOP,” they are required by law to listen.

    In fact, the seller won’t be allowed to reach back out to you for at least 10 years after being told to stop.

    Ignoring requests to stop contact could land a solicitor with a fine, which increases with each violation.

    Toxic metal in baby food

    Baby food sold in Virginia needs to be tested for toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury.

    The law bans the sale or distribution of products that exceed limits on toxic heavy metals, set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

    The Baby Food Protection Act also requires information about toxic heavy metals to be listed on the manufacturer’s website and on the product itself. Consumers can report baby food that they believe violates the FDA limits.

    Coverage for breast exams, prostate cancer screenings

    Beginning on Jan. 1, insurance companies can’t charge patients for diagnostic or follow-up breast examinations, under HB 1828. The bill requires insurance providers to cover the cost of certain mammograms, MRIs and ultrasounds.

    Similarly, Virginia also updated the coverage requirements for prostate cancer screenings through SB 1314. Insurance companies will need to cover the cost of updated tests for prostate cancer for men over the age of 50 or high-risk men age 40 or older.

    Minimum wage bump

    Minimum wage is going up to $12.77 per hour starting Jan. 1, 2026.

    That’s a jump of 36 cents from the current minimum wage of $12.41 per hour. State law mandates that the wage will incrementally increase until it reaches $15 per hour in 2028.

    Beginning in January 2029, the minimum wage will be adjusted based off increases in the consumer price index.

    Unemployment benefits

    Those on unemployment will see a bump in their weekly benefits. The payments will go up by $52 from the existing rate.

    Maryland

    The Maryland General Assembly has an outline of new laws for 2026 online. Here’s a breakdown of a few notable laws.

    Tax protections for homeowners and heirs

    A revision to the state’s tax code looks to protect homeowners and heirs who owe taxes on a property. Counties are required to withhold certain properties where heirs live from unpaid property taxes.

    Maryland extended the period of time between a warning and when a property is sold for taxes owed on real estate. It’s also creating a statewide registry for heirs.

    Anesthesia coverage

    No one wants to wake up to a surprise medical bill. Maryland has banned time limits on the delivery of anesthesia to patients when it’s recommended by a medical professional.

    That means if your insurance agrees to cover anesthesia, they have to provide coverage for the entire medical procedure, according to the law.

    It applies to groups that provide medical coverage, such as the Maryland Medical Assistance Program, managed care organizations, certain insurers, nonprofit health service plans and health maintenance organizations.

    Domestic violence awareness for cosmetologists 

    Hairdressers, nail techs and other cosmetologists in Maryland are being required to take a new type of training that’s centered around looking out for clients who may be facing abuse at home.

    Cosmetologists will be required to take training on domestic violence awareness as a requirement to maintain their license starting Jan. 1.

    The lessons will go over how to spot signs of domestic violence and ways to talk things through with a client who may be in need of help.

    Cancer screenings for firefighters

    Counties that offer self-insured employee health benefit plans have to cover the cost of preventive cancer screenings for firefighters. Those firefighters who qualify won’t have to pay for those screenings.

    The James “Jimmy” Malone Act also requires the Maryland Health Commission to study the impact of increasing access to cancer screenings

    Pediatric hospitals 

    Insurance providers cannot require prior authorization for a child to be transferred to a pediatric hospital, under this Maryland law. The same rules go for the Maryland Medical Assistance Program and the Maryland Children’s Health Program.

    DC

    D.C.’s full library of laws can be accessed online.

    Criminal records

    There are new rules in D.C. that call for automatic expungements in certain scenarios, under a provision of the Second Chance Amendment Act.

    Starting in the new year, any qualifying case will be automatically expunged within 90 days.

    The change applies to cases where the charge has been legalized or found unconstitutional.

    For certain misdemeanors that do not end in a conviction, the records will be automatically sealed.

    If a person is convicted, the record will be sealed automatically, 10 years after the completed sentence. There are exceptions under the law. Violent crimes, sexual abuse and driving under the influence are among the misdemeanor charges that do not qualify.

    Health care for low income residents

    Under the 2026 fiscal year budget, low income residents will see changes to their health care coverage starting Jan. 1, 2026. The budget changed the eligibility requirement for Medicaid, tightening the income requirement for childless adults and adult caregivers.

    Those low-income residents who are no longer eligible for Medicaid could be moved to a Basic Health Plan, administered by D.C. Some services covered by Medicaid are not covered under the Basic Health Plan, including dental and vision for adults.

    Ambulance fees 

    The District is raising the cap for the cost of being transported by an ambulance — a cost it says will mostly fall on insurance companies, not patients.

    Fees will increase from $1,750 to $2,000 for patients on life support. Any patient who is transported in an ambulance is charged by ground transport mileage; that rate is increasing from $26.25 to $30 per loaded mile.

    For the most part, D.C. Fire and EMS says insurance should cover ambulance bills in most cases. The fees help offset taxes related to funding EMS services, according to the department’s website.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Jessica Kronzer

    Source link

  • Denver minimum wage rises to $19.29 in 2026

    [ad_1]

    Workers sort materials by hand inside Republic Services’ recycling center in north Denver. Nov. 11, 2025.

    Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite

    Denver’s minimum wage will rise for most workers from $18.81 to $19.29 an hour starting on New Year’s Day. 

    That’s more than twice the national minimum wage of $7.25 and the highest in the state. Colorado’s minimum wage will be $15.16, except in communities like Denver with higher local minimum wages.

    The other cities with local minimum wages are:

    • Edgewater at $18.17
    • Boulder and Boulder County at $16.82

    Denver will also raise its tipped minimum wage — the base wage that must be paid to workers who get tips, such as restaurant servers.

    Gov. Jared Polis and other lawmakers had pressed the city to freeze or lower the tipped minimum, saying restaurant labor costs are too high, but Denver lawmakers declined to intervene.



    How Denver’s minimum wage is set

    Each year, Denver’s Department of Finance changes the minimum wage based on inflation — as measured by the Consumer Price Index — in an attempt to keep up with the rising cost of living. This year, the minimum wage hike will be smaller than last year’s, as inflation has slowed. 

    Nearly all workers, regardless of immigration status, must be paid minimum wage. The exceptions include food and beverage workers. Tipped minimum wages will increase from $15.79 to $16.27 at the start of the year in Denver. 

    The tipped minimum is the amount that employers must pay in addition to tips. If tips are slow, the employer also has to kick in additional money to ensure that tipped employees are receiving at least the regular minimum wage when combining tips and wages.

    The tipped minimum has been controversial because it has risen alongside the regular minimum wage in Denver. Some restaurant owners (and lobbyists) have argued that it is putting eateries out of business. In response, a recent state law gave cities the power to freeze or lower the tipped minimum, even if they are raising the regular minimum.

    “With this new legislative tool, I call on local governments in Denver, the City of Boulder, Edgewater, and unincorporated Boulder County to take action to address the tip credit and ameliorate pay disparities between front and back-of-house,” Polis said at the time.

    Only Edgewater has taken advantage of that new power. Denver lawmakers have not signaled any intention to change the city’s formula. Labor advocates have argued that tipped workers are struggling to survive and should be paid more.



    Who has the highest minimum wage?

    Municipalities in the states of Washington and California have some of the highest local minimum wages in the country, with a couple in Washington topping $21 an hour.

    Washington also has had the highest statewide minimum in recent years, and it is set to reach $17.13 in 2026.

    Workers who believe they are not being paid minimum wage should contact Denver Labor online, email [email protected], or call 720-913-WAGE (9243).

    Denverite editor Andrew Kenney contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • These laws start New Year’s Day in Virginia, Maryland, DC – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    Health, social media and paychecks are among the topics addressed in a wide-range of legislation that hits the books in Virginia, D.C. and Maryland on Jan. 1, 2026.

    A slew of new laws will go into effect in Virginia, Maryland and D.C. on New Year’s Day.

    Health, social media and paychecks are among the topics addressed in the wide range of legislation that hits the books on Jan. 1, 2026.

    Here a few of the new laws beginning in the new year:

    Virginia

    You can find details on any Virginia laws on the state law portal.

    Kids get social media limits

    Is a break from social media on your list of New Year’s resolutions? Virginia has banned kids under 16 from using social media for more than one hour a day, under the Consumer Data Protection Act.

    The law allows parents to adjust that daily limit as they see fit. Some exceptions to the law include platforms that are mostly used for email or direct messaging, streaming services and news sites.

    Social media companies are required to accurately verify a young person’s age under the new law. And companies are not allowed to use the age information for anything else.

    There are questions about the law’s practicality and whether it will be effective, including from Jennifer Golbeck, a professor at the University of Maryland’s College of Information, who said it’s unclear whether the law will have its intended effect.

    Solicitors’ repeated texts 

    There may be an avenue to reel in unwanted texts or calls from solicitors under the Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act.

    If you reply to a solicitor’s text with “UNSUBSCRIBE” or “STOP,” they are required by law to listen.

    In fact, the seller won’t be allowed to reach back out to you for at least 10 years after being told to stop.

    Ignoring requests to stop contact could land a solicitor with a fine, which increases with each violation.

    Toxic metal in baby food

    Baby food sold in Virginia needs to be tested for toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury.

    The law bans the sale or distribution of products that exceed limits on toxic heavy metals, set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

    The Baby Food Protection Act also requires information about toxic heavy metals to be listed on the manufacturer’s website and on the product itself. Consumers can report baby food that they believe violates the FDA limits.

    Coverage for breast exams, prostate cancer screenings

    Beginning on Jan. 1, insurance companies can’t charge patients for diagnostic or follow-up breast examinations, under HB 1828. The bill requires insurance providers to cover the cost of certain mammograms, MRIs and ultrasounds.

    Similarly, Virginia also updated the coverage requirements for prostate cancer screenings through SB 1314. Insurance companies will need to cover the cost of updated tests for prostate cancer for men over the age of 50 or high-risk men age 40 or older.

    Minimum wage bump

    Minimum wage is going up to $12.77 per hour starting Jan. 1, 2026.

    That’s a jump of 36 cents from the current minimum wage of $12.41 per hour. State law mandates that the wage will incrementally increase until it reaches $15 per hour in 2028.

    Beginning in January 2029, the minimum wage will be adjusted based off increases in the consumer price index.

    Unemployment benefits

    Those on unemployment will see a bump in their weekly benefits. The payments will go up by $52 from the existing rate.

    Maryland

    The Maryland General Assembly has an outline of new laws for 2026 online. Here’s a breakdown of a few notable laws.

    Tax protections for homeowners and heirs

    A revision to the state’s tax code looks to protect homeowners and heirs who owe taxes on a property. Counties will be required to withhold certain properties where heirs live from unpaid property taxes.

    Maryland extended the period of time between a warning and when a property is sold for taxes owed on real estate. It’s also creating a statewide registry for heirs.

    Anesthesia coverage

    No one wants to wake up to a surprise medical bill. Maryland has banned time limits on the delivery of anesthesia to patients when it’s recommended by a medical professional.

    That means if your insurance agrees to cover anesthesia, they have to provide coverage for the entire medical procedure, according to the law.

    It applies to groups that provide medical coverage, such as the Maryland Medical Assistance Program, managed care organizations, certain insurers, nonprofit health service plans and health maintenance organizations.

    Domestic violence awareness for cosmetologists 

    Hairdressers, nail techs and other cosmetologists in Maryland are being required to take a new type of training that’s centered around looking out for clients who may be facing abuse at home.

    Cosmetologists will be required to take training on domestic violence awareness as a requirement to maintain their license starting Jan. 1.

    The lessons will go over how to spot signs of domestic violence and ways to talk things through with a client who may be in need of help.

    Cancer screenings for firefighters

    Counties that offer self-insured employee health benefit plans have to cover the cost of preventive cancer screenings for firefighters. Those firefighters who qualify won’t have to pay for those screenings.

    The James “Jimmy” Malone Act also requires the Maryland Health Commission to study the impact of increasing access to cancer screenings

    Pediatric hospitals 

    Insurance providers cannot require prior authorization for a child to be transferred to a pediatric hospital, under this Maryland law. The same rules go for the Maryland Medical Assistance Program and the Maryland Children’s Health Program.

    DC

    D.C.’s full library of laws can be accessed online.

    Criminal records

    There are new rules in D.C. that call for automatic expungements in certain scenarios, under a provision of the Second Chance Amendment Act.

    Starting in the new year, any qualifying case will be automatically expunged within 90 days.

    The change applies to cases where the charge has been legalized or found unconstitutional.

    For certain misdemeanors that do not end in a conviction, the records will be automatically sealed.

    If a person is convicted, the record will be sealed automatically, 10 years after the completed sentence. There are exceptions under the law. Violent crimes, sexual abuse and driving under the influence are among the misdemeanor charges that do not qualify.

    Health care for low income residents

    Under the 2026 fiscal year budget, low income residents will see changes to their health care coverage starting Jan. 1, 2026. The budget changed the eligibility requirement for Medicaid, tightening the income requirement for childless adults and adult caregivers.

    Those low-income residents who are no longer eligible for Medicaid could be moved to a Basic Health Plan, administered by D.C. Some services covered by Medicaid are not covered under the Basic Health Plan, including dental and vision for adults.

    Ambulance fees 

    The District is raising the cap for the cost of being transported by an ambulance — a cost it says will mostly fall on insurance companies, not patients.

    Fees will increase from $1,750 to $2,000 for patients on life support. Any patient who is transported in an ambulance is charged by ground transport mileage; that rate is increasing from $26.25 to $30 per loaded mile.

    For the most part, D.C. Fire and EMS says insurance should cover ambulance bills in most cases. The fees help offset taxes related to funding EMS services, according to the department’s website.

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    Jessica Kronzer

    Source link

  • DFW one of the hardest areas for minimum-wage workers to afford rent, study says

    [ad_1]

    The sun rises behind downtown Fort Worth’s skyline on Friday, September 9, 2022.

    The sun rises behind downtown Fort Worth’s skyline on Friday, September 9, 2022.

    Fort Worth Star Telegram

    Dallas-Fort Worth is one of the hardest regions in the United States for minimum-wage workers to afford rent, according to a study.

    According to an analysis by Realtor.com, two workers making Texas’ $7.25 minimum hourly wage would have to work 80 hours per week each to afford the Dallas-Fort Worth metro area’s median rent price of $1,441 in December for apartments up to two bedrooms. The only metro areas in the country where earners would have to work more hours are Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Atlanta, Nashville, Charlotte, Raleigh, Pittsburgh and San Jose.

    Just five of the country’s 50 largest metro areas have median rent prices that the study deemed affordable for minimum wage workers without having to work overtime. All of those metros — Buffalo, N.Y., Rochester, N.Y., St. Louis, Phoenix, and Kansas City, Mo. — have a statewide minimum wage higher than the federal minimum wage of $7.25.

    Detroit and Jacksonville are expected to join that list in 2026 after Michigan and Florida pass upcoming legislation to raise their wage floors.

    In Buffalo, the most affordable metro area in the country according to the study, two workers making New York’s state minimum wage of $15.50 would need to work just 30 hours per week each to afford the medium rent price of $1,176 in December.

    Dallas-Fort Worth’s December median rent price of $1,441 for apartments two bedrooms or smaller is below the $1,693 median rent price for all the nation’s top 50 metros combined. But because of Texas’ low minimum wage rate of $7.25, Dallas-Fort Worth is still one of the hardest metro areas for those workers to afford rent, according to the analysis.

    Minimum wage earners in Texas’ other major metro areas in Texas, including Houston, Austin and San Antonio, are required to work fewer hours to make their city’s median rent price than they are in Dallas-Fort Worth. In Houston, it would take 76 hours to afford the median rent of $1,369. In San Antonio, it would take 67 hours to afford the $1,207 median rent.

    Other cities around the country deemed more cost-friendly for minimum-wage workers include Los Angeles, New York City, Washington, Miami, Seattle, Denver and Chicago. Although all of those metro areas have higher median rent prices, they are also in states that have sustainably higher wages floors.

    Rent prices in Fort Worth and across the country as a whole have slowly dropped in recent years, but the overall median rent cost between the top 50 metros combined was still 17% higher than it was before the COVID-19 pandemic in November 2019.

    Samuel O’Neal

    Fort Worth Star-Telegram

    Samuel O’Neal is a local news reporter at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram covering higher education and southwest Fort Worth. He joined the team in December 2025 after previously working as a staff writer at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He graduated from Temple University, where he served as the Editor-in-Chief of the school’s student paper, The Temple News.

    [ad_2]

    Samuel O’Neal

    Source link

  • Venezuelans Worried About Economic Turmoil Shun Black Friday Deals

    [ad_1]

    CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) — Window displays advertising 30% discounts and shoes for $20 were not enough to draw throngs of bargain hunters this Black Friday to a popular mall in Venezuela’s capital. Even the newly opened H&M store was virtually empty in the morning.

    The country’s suffocating economy, Venezuelans said, not the threats of U.S. military action, is to blame for Friday’s stark contrast to other post-pandemic years when enthusiastic shoppers formed lines outside stores. Years of experiences riding the twists and turns of their country’s complex crisis have taught them to focus on their immediate individual needs, like buying food or medicines, and not the collective long term, like a possible military strike.

    “The country’s economy is based on day-to-day survival. What do I do to survive today and live tomorrow?” physician Luisa Torrealba said outside an appliance store. “We don’t have the luxury of stopping because there’s going to be a war, because there’s a psychological war going on, because the government says one thing or the United States says another.”

    A day earlier, U.S. President Donald Trump increased pressure on his Venezuelan counterpart, Nicolás Maduro, by suggesting during a Thanksgiving address to troops that the military could “very soon” begin hitting alleged drug-trafficking targets within the South American country. So far, a monthslong U.S. military operation has killed 80 people in strikes against vessels in international waters in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.

    Since returning to office, Trump has increased the pressure on Maduro and his allies, including by doubling to $50 million the reward for information that leads to his arrest on narcoterrorism charges. Maduro, who denies the accusations, and his allies have repeatedly said that the U.S. military operation is designed to force a government change in Venezuela.

    But while White House evaluates if and when to strike on Venezuelan soil, the country’s economy continues to suffer and millions of Venezuelans struggle to buy food.

    Families these days need more than $500 to buy the basics for a month. Yet, Venezuela’s monthly minimum wage of 130 bolivars, or $0.52, has not increased since 2022, putting it well below the United Nations’ measure of extreme poverty of $2.15 a day.

    Many public sector workers survive on roughly $160 per month, while the average private sector employee earned about $237, according to the independent Venezuelan Observatory of Finances.

    On Friday, Marian García expected to see a crowd outside a shoe store at the mall in Caracas where she wanted to buy a pair of boots. But she found herself being the first in line.

    The store’s windows promised shoes for $20, an unbeatable deal for García, who had set her eyes on boots that regularly range from $60 to $80, or more than 10% of the monthly combined income with her partner.

    “It’s difficult to indulge in luxuries,” García, 26, said. “Due to the current economic situation, people are cutting back and only spending on the essentials, such as food.”

    Yarbelis Revilla, who works three jobs and considers herself a master bargain hunter, also looked around the mall for deals on shoes. She checked out offers at different stores but in the end felt that many of this year’s Black Friday discounts did not feel like a steal.

    Amid the country’s conditions, Revilla explained that looking for shoes may seem like “vanity,” but she works hard to meet her needs and does not dwell on the future.

    “I am a Christian, and the Bible says, ‘Do not worry. Do not make plans for the future because you won’t really know what’s coming,’” she said.

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Santa Fe tackles rental rates with first-in-US minimum wage approach

    [ad_1]

    SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — Santa Fe has long referred to itself as “The City Different” for its distinct atmosphere and a blending of cultures that stretches back centuries. Now, it’s trying something different — something officials hope will prevent a cultural erosion as residents are priced out of their homes.

    It’s the first city in the United States to directly link wages to housing affordability, aiming to counter high rents by tying minimum wage increases to consumer prices as well as fair market rental prices.

    Many see the new ordinance as a big step forward for workers, but Mayor Alan Webber also sees it as an important tool for addressing an affordability crisis that threatens the very fabric of Santa Fe.

    “The purpose is to make a serious difference in assuring that people who work here can live here,” he said. “Santa Fe’s history and culture is really reflected in the diversity of our people. It’s that diversity that we’re trying to preserve.”

    Santa Fe is not alone. Rising rents and housing prices have squeezed households nationwide, leaving many with less income to pay for other necessities. Experts say the financial pressure on renter households has increased compared to pre-pandemic conditions.

    How the ordinance works

    Santa Fe’s minimum wage will increase to $17.50 starting in 2027. The annual increase historically has been tied to consumer prices, but going forward a new blended formula will be used to calculate the annual increase, with the Consumer Price Index making up one half and fair market rent data making up the other.

    There’s a 5% cap in case costs skyrocket, and if consumer prices or rents tank in any particular year, the minimum wage will not be reduced.

    Santa Fe first adopted a living wage in 2002. The ordinance has been expanded over the years and the mission this time was to deal with median housing prices and rental costs that were far above any other major market in New Mexico.

    University of New Mexico finance professor Reilly White presented the city with 25 years of data that showed changes in fair market rents and consumer prices. He said people earning minimum wage were falling behind.

    “It became clear that any index that was made had to be duly weighted in favor of some of this real estate side and some of the cost of living side,” White said.

    Crafting the ordinance was like threading a needle, the mayor said, explaining that the aim was to benefit workers while not overly burdening the mom-and-pop shops that are the backbone of Santa Fe’s economy.

    Who benefits

    About 9,000 workers will see a bump in wages once the ordinance kicks in. That’s about 20% of the city’s workforce.

    Diego Ortiz will be among them. The 42-year-old father has called Santa Fe home for nearly three decades, working construction jobs to support his family.

    Choosing between paying rent, buying groceries and helping his children is a constant worry. He also talked about wanting his children to be able to focus on their studies. His son is having to delay school so he can work and save money, he said.

    “If there’s economic stability where we can get a good wage with the sweat of our brow, then we’re going to be able to pay our rent, pay our bills, or get a house,” he said. “Our families will be better and that will be a big change.”

    According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, the lowest income renters are disproportionately Black, Native American and Latino.

    “Raising the minimum wage is an important thing to do in terms of affordability. Certainly part of the problem is an income problem,” said Dan Emmanuel, a senior researcher with the coalition. But he also warned that raising wages wouldn’t address affordability for seniors or those with disabilities who are not part of the workforce but make up a large share of low-income renters.

    More tools

    Providing an income boost to a subset of the population also won’t necessarily resolve the underlying shortage of housing that’s driving up prices overall, said Issi Romem, an economist and fellow at the Terner Center for Housing Innovation at the University of California-Berkeley.

    That’s why Santa Fe officials say they’re working to permit more homes and apartment units.

    On the edge of town, leasing flags whipped in the wind Wednesday as construction crews were busy building new complexes with adjacent swaths of dirt cleared for more. Mayor Webber said the uptick in permitting already is paying off — rental prices grew by just 0.5% this year.

    Santa Fe also is counting on revenue from a so-called mansion tax, which targets home sales over $1 million, to fuel a trust fund for affordable housing projects.

    Webber said the stakes are high and the city must tackle affordability from every angle.

    “Can the people who work here afford to live here?” he asked. “Can we keep Santa Fe diverse? Can we continue to be ‘The City Different’ in spite of the economic pressures that are at work?”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Santa Fe Tackles Rental Rates With First-In-US Minimum Wage Approach

    [ad_1]

    SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — Santa Fe has long referred to itself as “The City Different” for its distinct atmosphere and a blending of cultures that stretches back centuries. Now, it’s trying something different — something officials hope will prevent a cultural erosion as residents are priced out of their homes.

    It’s the first city in the United States to directly link wages to housing affordability, aiming to counter high rents by tying minimum wage increases to consumer prices as well as fair market rental prices.

    Many see the new ordinance as a big step forward for workers, but Mayor Alan Webber also sees it as an important tool for addressing an affordability crisis that threatens the very fabric of Santa Fe.

    “The purpose is to make a serious difference in assuring that people who work here can live here,” he said. “Santa Fe’s history and culture is really reflected in the diversity of our people. It’s that diversity that we’re trying to preserve.”

    Santa Fe’s minimum wage will increase to $17.50 starting in 2027. The annual increase historically has been tied to consumer prices, but going forward a new blended formula will be used to calculate the annual increase, with the Consumer Price Index making up one half and fair market rent data making up the other.

    There’s a 5% cap in case costs skyrocket, and if consumer prices or rents tank in any particular year, the minimum wage will not be reduced.

    Santa Fe first adopted a living wage in 2002. The ordinance has been expanded over the years and the mission this time was to deal with median housing prices and rental costs that were far above any other major market in New Mexico.

    University of New Mexico finance professor Reilly White presented the city with 25 years of data that showed changes in fair market rents and consumer prices. He said people earning minimum wage were falling behind.

    “It became clear that any index that was made had to be duly weighted in favor of some of this real estate side and some of the cost of living side,” White said.

    Crafting the ordinance was like threading a needle, the mayor said, explaining that the aim was to benefit workers while not overly burdening the mom-and-pop shops that are the backbone of Santa Fe’s economy.

    About 9,000 workers will see a bump in wages once the ordinance kicks in. That’s about 20% of the city’s workforce.

    Diego Ortiz will be among them. The 42-year-old father has called Santa Fe home for nearly three decades, working construction jobs to support his family.

    Choosing between paying rent, buying groceries and helping his children is a constant worry. He also talked about wanting his children to be able to focus on their studies. His son is having to delay school so he can work and save money, he said.

    “If there’s economic stability where we can get a good wage with the sweat of our brow, then we’re going to be able to pay our rent, pay our bills, or get a house,” he said. “Our families will be better and that will be a big change.”

    According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, the lowest income renters are disproportionately Black, Native American and Latino.

    “Raising the minimum wage is an important thing to do in terms of affordability. Certainly part of the problem is an income problem,” said Dan Emmanuel, a senior researcher with the coalition. But he also warned that raising wages wouldn’t address affordability for seniors or those with disabilities who are not part of the workforce but make up a large share of low-income renters.

    Providing an income boost to a subset of the population also won’t necessarily resolve the underlying shortage of housing that’s driving up prices overall, said Issi Romem, an economist and fellow at the Terner Center for Housing Innovation at the University of California-Berkeley.

    That’s why Santa Fe officials say they’re working to permit more homes and apartment units.

    On the edge of town, leasing flags whipped in the wind Wednesday as construction crews were busy building new complexes with adjacent swaths of dirt cleared for more. Mayor Webber said the uptick in permitting already is paying off — rental prices grew by just 0.5% this year.

    Santa Fe also is counting on revenue from a so-called mansion tax, which targets home sales over $1 million, to fuel a trust fund for affordable housing projects.

    Webber said the stakes are high and the city must tackle affordability from every angle.

    “Can the people who work here afford to live here?” he asked. “Can we keep Santa Fe diverse? Can we continue to be ‘The City Different’ in spite of the economic pressures that are at work?”

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Nearly a quarter of U.S. households live paycheck to paycheck, report finds

    [ad_1]

    A growing share of lower-income Americans are struggling to get by financially as their wages fail to keep up with inflation, according to a recent analysis. 

    Roughly 29% of lower-income households are living paycheck to paycheck, up slightly from 2024 and from 27.1% in 2023, data from the Bank of America Institute shows. The financial firm defines that as spending more than 95% of household income on necessities such as housing, gasoline, groceries, utility bills and internet service. 

    In 2025, nearly a quarter of all U.S. households lived paycheck to paycheck, Bank of America estimates. Several factors explain why many people are falling behind.

    First, the nation’s inflation rate this year has edged up to an annual rate of 3% after dipping to 2.3% in April. The rise in consumer prices this year is well below their pandemic-era peak of 9.1% in 2022, but remains above the Federal Reserve’s target rate of 2%. 

    “Inflation is picking back up again, and cost increases are picking back up again,” said Joe Wadford, an economist at the Bank of America Institute, which recently examined the financial pressures facing Americans by income. “That’s definitely going to put some renewed pressure on those households.”

    Second, the cost of groceries and other essentials is continuing to rise as lower-wage workers see their paychecks and purchasing power stagnate. In October, wages for lower-income households were up only 1% from a year ago, according to Bank of America deposit data. 

    “The gap between their wages and expenses has just continued to widen since the beginning of the year,” Wadford said. “When the cost of living is increasing 3% but your wages are only increasing 1%, you’re just going to really struggle to keep up.”

    Lower-wage workers experienced strong wage growth during the pandemic and subsequent economic recovery, but that rise has slowed sharply since late 2022, according to Elise Gould, senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute. One factor weighing on wage growth — a decline in job openings and the rate at which workers are leaving their jobs.

    “When people aren’t looking for other offers or quitting, that is going to cause wage growth to slow,” she said. 

    While lower-income households are struggling to scrape by, middle- and higher-income households are on firmer financial footing, buoyed by stronger wage growth. This group has seen little to no increase in the share of households living paycheck to paycheck, the Bank of America Institute found. 

    “These higher-income cohorts are more able to absorb the recent reacceleration in inflation due to their outsized wage growth,” Wadford wrote in the report.

    That bifurcation is fueling what economists refer to as the “K-shaped economy,” a term experts use to describe the divergence in spending and financial health between wealthier Americans and people with more modest incomes. 

    Gould also noted that many low-income Americans are unbanked and that Bank of America’s findings, which are drawn from an analysis of its depositor data, may not fully capture the impact of slowing wage growth on poor households.

    “You’re missing some of the bottom end and how much pain [and] economic distress they may be feeling,” she said.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Florida Republican revives effort to allow minimum wage exemption for certain workers

    [ad_1]

    An effort to cheapen labor costs has resurfaced in the Florida Legislature after failing to gain the traction it needed in order to pass earlier this year. 

    Florida Republican Ryan Chamberlin, R-Belleview, on Friday refiled a bill (HB 221) that would allow employers to legally pay certain types of workers less than the state minimum wage of $14 an hour if the worker themselves signed a waiver opting out.

    Under the proposal, to be considered during the 2026 state legislative session that begins in January, workers would be able to voluntarily accept pay below the minimum wage when employed in “work-study, internship, preapprenticeship, or other similar work-based learning opportunity.” 

    A similar proposal (HB 541) was filed by Chamberlin for consideration by the Republican-controlled Florida Legislature during the 2025 session, but failed to pass. Florida Senate leader Ben Albritton previously told reporters about the proposal, at the tail end of this year’s session, “I don’t love it, to tell you the truth.”

    Florida’s minimum wage currently sits at $14 an hour for most employees — one of the highest minimum wage rates in the U.S. South — and is $10.98 for tipped workers. Under a constitutional amendment approved by Florida voters in 2020, Florida’s minimum wage is set to increase to $15 next September and rise with inflation after that. The federal minimum wage, last adjusted in 2009, still sits at a measly $7.25 per hour.

    “The minimum wage in Florida as currently codified in our state constitution has become a weight on Florida’s economy and a hindrance to workers seeking to improve their personal finances,” Rep. Chamberlin said in a statement explaining his bill. “Wage controls are always enacted with good intentions but lead to a decrease in opportunities. We must seek alternative options like career development and continued education to ensure workers are receiving the skills needed to compete in today’s economy.”

    Chamberlin’s 2025 proposal earned harsh rebuke earlier this year from organized labor, faith leaders and student activists, with critics arguing the bill would lead to opportunities for exploitation.

    “It opens up the doors for businesses to exploit its workers, especially young people [and] low-income families, by unknowingly waiving their right to a fair wage,” argued Satin Fye, a “proud unionist” from Miami-Dade County, speaking to a Florida House committee back in April. “This bill is anti-worker, it is anti-family and it is anti-Florida,” she said.

    Critics also argued that, if the proposal passed, employers would simply redefine entry-level jobs as “internships” in order to circumvent minimum wage requirements and pay more workers less. Current federal and state law already allows employers to pay certain workers less than minimum wage, including some workers with disabilities and youth workers for the first 90 days of employment. Independent contractors and freelancers are also not guaranteed a minimum wage under federal or state law.

    “There are already multiple avenues under federal law that allow for lower minimum wages for student learners and apprentices,” Nina Mast, an economic analyst for the Economic Policy Institute, previously told Orlando Weekly. “But this Florida bill really massively expands those classifications,” she said, speaking of Chamberlin’s earlier bill.

    “I think that the concern is that it creates an opportunity for exploitation and to essentially find a rationale to pay basically anyone the lower minimum wage by characterizing your work as work-based learning,” Mast added.

    As of publication, no Senate version of Chamberlin’s bill has yet been filed for consideration during the 2026 session. In the 2025 legislative session, Republican Sen. Jonathan Martin sponsored the minimum wage proposal (SB 676) in the Florida Senate. Both chambers must approve of the proposal in order for the legislation to pass and head to the governor’s office for final approval.

    Chamberlin’s bill, as filed for the 2026 session, does include certain guardrails. It would require that employers pay all eligible workers at least the federal minimum wage. It would also make an employee’s waiver to opt out of the state minimum wage valid for up to nine months only. After that, “the employee must be paid at or above the state minimum wage regardless of his or her position or job title with the employer,” the bill reads.

    As Orlando Weekly has reported, Florida has a weak mechanism for actually enforcing the state minimum wage, and for holding employers accountable when or if they pay their employees less. A proposed amendment to Chamberlin’s 2025 bill filed by Orlando’s state Rep. Anna Eskamani sought to establish a stronger enforcement mechanism for Florida workers cheated of pay. That proposal, however, was rejected by her Republican colleagues earlier this year.

    Florida’s 2026 legislative session, meanwhile, is scheduled to convene on Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2026 and last 60 days.


    Subscribe to Orlando Weekly newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook Bluesky | Or sign up for our RSS Feed


    ‘I don’t love it, to tell you the truth,’ Florida Senate president Ben Albritton told reporters

    The proposal would in part erase local living wage laws in cities like Orlando, Tampa and Miami



    [ad_2]

    McKenna Schueler
    Source link
  • One-third of Gov. Jared Polis’ budget cuts involve Medicaid

    [ad_1]

    Almost one-third of the budget cuts and sweeps of unused money that Gov. Jared Polis used to close a $249 million budget hole will come from Medicaid, and providers are trying to figure out how much disruption that will cause for them and their patients.

    H.R. 1, known as the “Big Beautiful Bill,” blew a roughly $783 million hole in the state budget in July, because Colorado’s tax laws automatically adjust to stay in harmony with the federal government’s. The legislature opted to undo some of those changes during a special session in August and gave Polis the authority to fill the rest of the gap.

    About $79.2 million of the $252 million in cuts came from the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, which runs Medicaid in the state. The list includes a mix of reductions in the rates paid to people who provide care, unused funds swept from specific programs and plans to review some care types more strictly before paying.

    The largest cut, worth roughly $38.3 million, would roll back most of a 1.6% increase that most providers expected to get this year. Since providers received slightly higher rates in the first months of the fiscal year, it will work out to about a 0.4% increase, which is in line with recent years, the department said.

    Denver Health estimated the rollback would cost the city’s safety-net hospital about $5 million. The health system isn’t planning any layoffs or service reductions, but could cut back on nonessential maintenance and technology updates, CEO Donna Lynne said. As it was, the increase only partially offset growth in costs in recent years, she said.

    “We were already trying to absorb the difference between medical inflation and the 1.6%,” she said. The American Hospital Association estimated hospital costs rose about 5.1% in 2024.

    [ad_2]

    Meg Wingerter

    Source link

  • McDonald’s criticizes US restaurant industry for uneven wage policies

    [ad_1]

    McDonald’s is criticizing the restaurant industry for allowing tipped wages, which let managers pay servers less than the minimum wage as long as customer tips make up the difference.

    McDonald’s Chairman and CEO Chris Kempczinski said in an interview on CNBC Tuesday that he supports President Donald Trump’s efforts to eliminate federal taxes on tips. But since McDonald’s workers don’t earn tips, the policy doesn’t help them.

    Kempczinski also noted that in many states, sit-down restaurants are allowed to pay servers as little as $2.13 per hour, a federal minimum set in 1991, with tips making up the rest of their pay.

    “So right now, there’s an uneven playing field. If you are a restaurant that allows tips or has tips as part of your equation, you’re essentially getting the customer to pay for your labor and you’re getting an extra benefit from no taxes on tips,” Kempczinski said.

    Seven states – including California, Nevada and Minnesota – require restaurants to pay their servers a minimum wage before tips are added. Kempczinski said that policy helps lower poverty levels and employee turnover.

    “We just need to do that, I think, across all 50 states. And we’ve said repeatedly, we’re open to conversations on raising the federal minimum wage,” Kempczinski said.

    Kempczinski was promoting McDonald’s new Extra Value Meals, which offer discounted prices for an entree, side and drink. Kempczinski said the company is trying to appeal to lower- and middle-income customers who have cut back on their visits as fast food prices have risen.

    As the average price of a combo meal has crept above $10 across the U.S., McDonald’s and other fast food chains are competing more directly with sit-down chains. Chili’s, for example, currently offers an entree, drink and appetizer for $10.99.

    But Kempczinski implied that sit-down restaurants can offer deals like that in part because many pay their servers a sub-minimum wage.

    McDonald’s feels so strongly about the issue that it is no longer a member of the National Restaurant Association, an industry trade group that represents more than 500,000 restaurants and bars. The association confirmed Friday that McDonald’s has stepped away from the group “due to a policy difference.”

    “The Association remains committed to representing the full spectrum of the restaurant industry and continues to advocate for policies that support sustainable growth and workforce development,” the association said.

    McDonald’s shares fell less than 1% Friday.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • McDonald’s CEO is grappling with a ‘two-tier economy’ as he slashes prices on value meals—and signals backing for a minimum wage increase

    [ad_1]

    McDonald’s is banking on burgers and fries to tell a bigger story about the American economy. Chief executive Chris Kempczinski is slimming down the cost of the fast-food giant’s value meals as he grapples with what he calls a “two-tier economy”—a widening divide between consumers who are still spending freely and those who are pulling back.

    For years, dating back to the 2022 inflation wave, McDonald’s and its fast-food rivals have contended with shopper frustration over rising menu prices, with combo meals increasingly breaking into double digits. Customers at the higher end of the income spectrum continue to order premium products and use delivery apps at healthy rates. Lower-income diners, however, are cutting back, Kempczinski argued in an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, treating fast food less as a daily convenience and more as an occasional splurge. He told the anchors that McDonald’s has been on a “value journey” over the past year or so.

    “Particularly with middle- and lower-income consumers, they’re feeling under a lot of pressure right now,” Kempczinski told the CNBC anchors. ”There’s a lot of commentary around, ‘What’s the state of the economy, how’s it doing right now?’ And what we see is, it’s really kind of a two-tier economy. If you’re upper-income, earning over $100,000, things are good … What we see with middle- and lower-income consumers, it’s actually a different story.” He cited traffic for these demographics being down double digits, and they’re skipping breakfast or eating at home.

    Kempczinski was pressed on some political issues by the CNBC anchors, including whether McDonald’s fits in with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy’s MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) goals, and the policy around no taxes on tips. Kempczinski said he personally supported the no taxes on tips policy, but clarified that it didn’t help McDonald’s much, as it doesn’t allow tips. A tips restaurant requires a minimum wage of just $2.13 per hour, he added, which hasn’t changed since 1991, calling this an “uneven playing field” as “you’re essentially getting the customer to pay for your labor,” plus the tax-free benefit. He called for one federal minimum wage for all kinds of restaurants, and then said McDonald’s was “open” to raising the federal minimum wage, adding that the company was “in dialogue” with the White House about several issues including this one.

    The current federal minimum wage in the United States is $7.25 per hour, a rate that has gone unchanged since July 24, 2009. This long-standing rate has held for over 16 years without a federal increase, the longest period in U.S. history without an update to the minimum wage. However, many states and localities have adopted higher minimum wage rates, some reaching as high as $18 per hour, such as in the District of Columbia.

    In 2025, significant new legislation called the Raise the Wage Act was introduced in Congress. This proposed law would incrementally increase the federal minimum wage to $17 per hour by the year 2030, phasing out subminimum wage rates for tipped workers, workers with disabilities, and youth workers. Additionally, a Senate bill was proposed to raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour starting Jan. 1 of the first year after its passage. These legislative efforts indicate active momentum at the federal level to increase the minimum wage after more than a decade of stagnation.

    Different from the Great Recession

    Kempczinski added that this isn’t like what McDonald’s saw during the Great Recession, “when everyone traded down.” And so McDonald’s has to be creative to play both sides of the issue. Increased accessibility for lower-income consumers now comes in the form of a revamped $5 meal bundle, along with more aggressive price promotions in flagship markets. Advertising campaigns are leaning heavily on the theme of value, a message designed to resonate with cost-conscious families forced to make sharper trade-offs in their daily spending.

    The strategy underscores a balancing act for McDonald’s. As one of the few global chains with the size and procurement power to cut prices without immediately crippling profitability, the company can play offense where smaller rivals cannot. Still, franchisees—who operate most U.S. locations—are wary that thinner price points could turn into margin squeezes just as wages, rent, and insurance remain high. Still, Kempczinski told the CNBC anchors that the move toward more value was “almost unanimous” among franchisees, to a surprised reaction.

    The broader retail picture

    McDonald’s dual-track strategy echoes a broader split visible across much of the U.S. economy. Big-box retailers like Walmart and Target report a similar trend that Dollar General CEO Todd Vasos put his finger on in March: “Many of our customers report that only have enough money for basic essentials.” Delta Air Lines, a proxy for demand among the affluent consumer cohort, has largely gone from strength to strength as America’s most profitable airline, although it has lowered guidance during 2025, owing to uncertainty from the Trump tariff regime.

    The trends recall an economic pattern established during the pandemic: the “K-shaped” economy. As Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon, explained to Fortune in 2023, this means that middle and lower-income consumers are one leg of the “K,” pointing down and to the right, while the upper-income cohort is doing better and better.

    McDonald’s, though, has to master the “K” to get the most out of its consumers. That means fighting to maintain its decades-old position as the go-to spot for an affordable meal, even as it courts higher-margin opportunities to keep shareholders satisfied. Whether that balancing act proves sustainable may depend on just how long America’s two-track consumer economy sticks around.

    For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. 

    Fortune Global Forum returns Oct. 26–27, 2025 in Riyadh. CEOs and global leaders will gather for a dynamic, invitation-only event shaping the future of business. Apply for an invitation.

    [ad_2]

    Nick Lichtenberg

    Source link

  • New anti-poverty bill takes omnibus approach

    [ad_1]

    STATE HOUSE, BOSTON — In a state where more than 10% of residents live in poverty, lawmakers are pitching an omnibus bill to expand cash benefit programs, raise wages, and create state-run initiatives to help families build wealth.

    [ad_2]

    By Sam Drysdale | State House News Service

    Source link

  • Despite signals the U.S. economy is strong, voters are wary

    Despite signals the U.S. economy is strong, voters are wary

    [ad_1]

    Despite signals the U.S. economy is strong, voters are wary – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Wall Street has seen six straight weeks of gains and with unemployment near a 50-year low, there are signs the economy is strong. However, the cost of everyday essentials is still a top-of-mind issue for voters, and although the rate of inflation is at a three-year low, consumers are still complaining food prices remain high. Michael George reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Debate over pay of tipped workers rages as election nears

    Debate over pay of tipped workers rages as election nears

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A union backed proposal to pay tipped workers the state’s minimum wage goes before voters in November, but critics say its passage would hurt Main Street bars and restaurants and drive up consumer costs.

    Question 5 asks voters in the November election to decide if the state should require bars, restaurants, hotels and other hospitality venues to pay tipped workers the state’s $15 per hour wage floor, in addition to gratuities.

    The plan calls for phasing out the tipped wage for workers over five years, allowing workers to earn up to $15 per hour and keep their tips. It would also allow restaurants to “pool” tips and distribute them equally among all workers, such as cooks, dishwashers and others who don’t interact with customers.

    Supporters of phasing out the tipped-wage law — which includes labor organizations and worker advocacy groups — say it would improve wages for underpaid workers who are struggling to survive with the state’s high cost of living.

    Saru Jayaraman, president of pro-Question 5 group One Fair Wage, said its passage would ensure that tipped workers “finally receive fair wages, giving them the financial stability they need to support themselves and their families.”

    “Since the pandemic, restaurant workers have left the industry in droves. Many of them are tired of barely scraping by on poverty wages and tips that are unpredictable at best,” she said. “It’s time we end the injustice of the subminimum wage and create an industry that truly values and compensates its workers with dignity.”

    But critics, like the Massachusetts Restaurant Association and “No on 5” Committee to Protect Tips, argue the plan would increase costs for bars and restaurants that already operate on narrow margins, and lead to higher prices for consumers.

    “This would put a massive increase on the costs of small businesses at a time when they are still recovering from COVID,” said Chris Keohan, a spokesman for the “No on 5” opposition group. “This would increase the costs of the average restaurant by about $300,000 a year.”

    He said the increased labor costs would push some bars and restaurants out of business or accelerate the shift away from full-service establishments, as employers hire less staff and move to automated operations like McDonald’s and Dunkin’s new self-serve kiosks.

    Municipal leaders representing communities including Newburyport, Methuen, Haverhill and Gardner also oppose the proposal, arguing it would devastate Main Street restaurants that are still recovering from the economic effects of the pandemic.

    Massachusetts law requires workers to be paid at least $15 an hour — under the “grand bargain” package the Legislature brokered to avert a proposal to cut the state’s sales tax and other proposals. But the 2018 law also allows bars and restaurants to pay tipped workers $6.75 per hour.

    The state is home to some 50,000 waiters and waitresses, 20,000 bartenders, and 5,000 manicurists and pedicurists, according to the latest labor data.

    If Question 5 is approved, Massachusetts would be the first state in decades to eliminate its tipped minimum wage, which observers say makes it hard to know how the transition will play out in the post-pandemic economy.

    The closest example is the District of Columbia, which is two years into a five-year phase-out of its tipped wage, the report noted. Some Washington, D.C., restaurants have set-service fees — ranging from 3% to 20% — to offset the higher labor costs. Critics point to data showing some restaurants have closed in the law’s wake.

    A recent report by Tufts University’s Center for State Policy Analysis said restaurants and other tip-dependent businesses will face higher costs from having to cover the full minimum wage, and will likely compensate for that with a mix of price increases, new fees, reduced hiring, and potentially lower profits.

    But phasing out the state’s tipped wage will translate into higher pay for most service employees who currently depend on the extra money, according to the report.

    In June, the state Supreme Judicial Court tossed out a challenge by restaurant groups alleging the proposal violates a requirement in the state Constitution that initiative petitions must contain only ‘related or mutually dependent’ subjects.

    The justices unanimously concluded that Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office correctly certified the question for the November ballot.

    The Massachusetts Restaurant Association and Committee to Protect Tips filed a complaint with the state Ballot Law Commission alleging that backers of the ballot question submitted “fraudulent” signatures from people who aren’t registered to vote, among other claims.

    But the groups withdrew their objections at the last minute, citing a lack of time to conduct a thorough review and make their arguments before the panel.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Should California’s minimum wage be $18? Voters will soon decide

    Should California’s minimum wage be $18? Voters will soon decide

    [ad_1]

    LOS ANGELES — Voters will decide in November whether California should raise its hourly minimum wage to $18 by 2026 and pay workers what would be the highest statewide minimum wage in the country.

    That would be on par with Hawaii, where workers are on track to get paid at least $18 per hour by 2028 under a law passed two years ago.

    Five states — including Alabama, South Carolina and Tennessee — do not have a minimum wage, though they are subject to the federal hourly minimum wage of $7.25.

    California’s ballot measure, Proposition 32, would raise the state’s current minimum wage of $16 to $17 for the remainder of 2024 for employers with at least 26 employees, increasing to $18 per hour starting in January 2025. Without it, the state’s minimum wage is set to increase to $16.50 per hour next year.

    Small businesses with fewer than 26 employees would be required to start paying employees $17 an hour in January 2025 and $18 per hour in 2026.

    Proponents of the measure say it will help low-wage workers to support their families in one of the most expensive states to live in in the country. Joe Sanberg, a wealthy investor and anti-poverty advocate, said the increase would give a raise of $3,000 a year to more than 2 million Californians who earn minimum wage.

    He called the current situation happening in California “corporate welfare” because minimum-wage workers who work full-time don’t make enough to survive without government help.

    “If someone who’s working full-time needs food stamps, doesn’t that mean that we as taxpayers are subsidizing the difference between what their employer should be paying them so that they could afford food and what they actually are paying them?” Sanberg said.

    Opponents of the California measure say it would be hard for businesses to implement, particularly small employers with thin profit margins. They argue the cost would be passed onto consumers and could lead to job cuts.

    “This increase, and the significance of how quickly it’s going to increase will really have a huge impact on them and their ability to maintain their business operations,” said Jennifer Barrera, president of the California Chamber of Commerce.

    Nearly 40 California cities — including San Francisco, Berkeley, and Emeryville in Northern California — already have local minimum wages higher than the state’s. Since July, workers in Los Angeles have been paid an hourly minimum of $17.28.

    West Hollywood has an hourly minimum wage of $19.08, but business owners there aren’t happy either. A survey of 142 businesses commissioned by the city council found 42% of them said they had to lay off employees or reduce their hours because of the ordinance.

    Fast food workers across the state received a bump to $20 an hour in April under a law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom. The Democrat also approved legislation gradually raising wages for health care workers to $25 an hour by July 2026.

    Fast food prices increased 3.7% after the law took effect while employment stayed relatively stable, according to a working paper from the University of California, Berkeley. But franchises in Southern California reported having to cut hours for workers as a result of the wage increase.

    University of Pennsylvania professor Ioana Marinescu, who studies the labor market and wage determination, said increasing the minimum wage has not shown to have any net effect on the overall employment rate.

    “There’s some positive, some negative, but on average the effect on employment is close to zero and that’s quite consistent across many studies,” Marinescu said.

    Another common argument against raising the minimum wage is that those low-paying jobs are often filled by students or younger workers used as stepping stones to higher paying jobs.

    But a report from the California Legislative Analyst’s Office found roughly half of low-wage workers were over the age of 35 and more than a quarter were over 50. The state’s largest low-wage occupation is home health and personal care aides and more than half of low-wage workers are Latino.

    Small businesses already have been grappling with inflation impacting their bottom line, said Juliette Kunin, who owns a gift store in Sacramento called Garden of Enchantment. The business employs about six workers.

    “I don’t want to see anybody not being able to support themselves and working full time,” said Kunin, who has mixed feelings about the measure. “But, yeah, if it doesn’t pencil out for us, then we aren’t going to be able to survive.”

    Workers picketed outside the Sheraton Grand Sacramento Hotel this week to demand higher pay and better benefits. Across the U.S. this year, thousands of hotel workers have gone on strike to fight for fair pay and workloads in the wake of COVID-era cuts.

    Christian Medina makes $16 an hour in addition to tips as a banquet captain at the Sheraton Grand. He supports the proposition and hopes it helps workers better provide for their families.

    “It’s hard getting paid $16 an hour,” he said. “I want to be able to save money for my daughter so she can go to school, go to a good college.”

    Some say that even if the measure passes, it wouldn’t go far enough.

    Carmen Riestra, a uniform attendant at the hotel who makes $19 an hour, said an $18 minimum wage would still not be enough to afford living in Sacramento.

    Riestra loves her job and has worked at the Sheraton Grand for 11 years, but the employees’ workloads have increased in recent years due to job cuts, she said.

    “And the payment’s only $19?” she said. “That’s not fair.”

    ___

    Austin reported from Sacramento, Calif. She is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Follow Austin on Twitter: @ sophieadanna

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Question 5: Should tipped workers be paid minimum wage?

    Question 5: Should tipped workers be paid minimum wage?

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — A union-backed proposal to pay tipped workers the state’s minimum wage goes before voters in November, but critics say its passage would hurt Main Street bars and restaurants and drive up consumer costs.

    Question 5 asks voters to decide if the state should require bars, restaurants, hotels and other hospitality venues to pay tipped workers the state’s wage floor of $15 per hour, in addition to gratuities.

    The plan calls for phasing out the tipped wage for workers over five years, allowing workers to earn up to $15 per hour and keep their tips. It would also allow restaurants to “pool” tips and distribute them equally among all workers, such as cooks, dishwashers and others who don’t interact with customers.

    Supporters of phasing out the tipped-wage law — which includes labor organizations and worker advocacy groups — say it would improve wages for underpaid workers who are struggling to survive with the state’s high cost of living.

    Saru Jayaraman, president of pro-Question 5 group One Fair Wage, said its passage would ensure that tipped workers “finally receive fair wages, giving them the financial stability they need to support themselves and their families.”

    “Since the pandemic, restaurant workers have left the industry in droves. Many of them are tired of barely scraping by on poverty wages and tips that are unpredictable at best,” Jayaraman said. “It’s time we end the injustice of the subminimum wage and create an industry that truly values and compensates its workers with dignity.”

    But critics, like the Massachusetts Restaurant Association and “No on 5” Committee to Protect Tips, argue the plan would increase costs for bars and restaurants that already operate on narrow margins, and lead to higher prices for consumers.

    “This would put a massive increase on the costs of small businesses at a time when they are still recovering from COVID,” said Chris Keohan, a spokesman for the “No on 5” opposition group. “This would increase the costs of the average restaurant by about $300,000 a year.”

    He said the increased labor costs would push some bars and restaurants out of business or accelerate the shift away from full-service establishments, as employers hire less staff and move to automated operations like McDonald’s and Dunkin’s new self-serve kiosks.

    Municipal leaders representing communities including Newburyport, Methuen, Haverhill and Gardner also oppose the proposal, arguing it would devastate Main Street restaurants that are still recovering from the economic effects of the pandemic.

    Massachusetts law requires workers to be paid at least $15 an hour — under the “grand bargain” package the Legislature brokered to avert a proposal to cut the state’s sales tax and other proposals. But the 2018 law also allows bars and restaurants to pay tipped workers $6.75 per hour.

    The state is home to some 50,000 waiters and waitresses, 20,000 bartenders, and 5,000 manicurists and pedicurists, according to the latest labor data.

    If Question 5 is approved, Massachusetts would be the first state in decades to eliminate its tipped minimum wage, which observers say makes it hard to know how the transition will play out in the post-pandemic economy.

    The closest example is the District of Columbia, which is two years into a five-year phase-out of its tipped wage, the report noted. Some Washington, D.C., restaurants have set-service fees — ranging from 3% to 20% — to offset the higher labor costs. Critics point to data showing some restaurants have closed in the law’s wake.

    A recent report by Tufts University’s Center for State Policy Analysis said restaurants and other tip-dependent businesses will face higher costs from having to cover the full minimum wage, and will likely compensate for that with a mix of price increases, new fees, reduced hiring, and potentially lower profits.

    But phasing out the state’s tipped wage will translate into higher pay for most service employees who currently depend on the extra money, according to the report.

    In June, the state Supreme Judicial Court tossed out a challenge by restaurant groups alleging the proposal violates a requirement in the state Constitution that initiative petitions must contain only ‘related or mutually dependent’ subjects.

    The justices unanimously concluded that Attorney General Andrea Campbell’s office correctly certified the question for the November ballot.

    The Massachusetts Restaurant Association and Committee to Protect Tips filed a complaint with the state Ballot Law Commission alleging that backers of the ballot question submitted “fraudulent” signatures from people who aren’t registered to vote, among other claims.

    But the groups withdrew their objections at the last minute, citing a lack of time to conduct a thorough review and make their arguments before the panel.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • Prince George’s Co. considers tying minimum wage to inflation – WTOP News

    Prince George’s Co. considers tying minimum wage to inflation – WTOP News

    [ad_1]

    The Prince George’s County Council is considering tying minimum wage to the rate of inflation, leading to automatic increases in the years to come.

    The Prince George’s County Council is considering tying minimum wage to the rate of inflation, leading to automatic increases in the years to come.

    The bill was drafted by District 1 Council member Tom Dernoga, and has the backing of a majority of the council already. It passed a committee vote earlier this week even as some warnings and concerns were expressed about the potential impact it could have on an already tight county budget.

    “We’ve got tens of thousands of people in the county making substandard wages who are falling further and further behind,” said Dernoga.

    The effort mirrors an already existing law in neighboring Montgomery County, and Dernoga admitted he was doing it in part to put pressure on lawmakers in Annapolis to tie minimum wage to inflation statewide.

    At the current rate of inflation, Dernoga said it would mean the minimum wage would increase from $15 per hour to $15.45 per hour next year. But some who testified on behalf of business interests said they’re still adjusting to an increase that took effect at the start of this year.

    “It went from $13.25 to $15 per hour, which is a 13.2% increase, well above inflation,” said Brendan Mahoney, who is with the Restaurant Association of Maryland.

    “This would be about a 16% increase that businesses have needed to shoulder in the past year and a half,” Mahoney added, arguing for the council to change the date it would take effect from July 1 to Jan. 1.

    Amy Rohrer, with the Maryland Hotel Lodging Association, said it would also harm tourism in the county.

    “If we raise rates to accommodate the increased expense, we risk losing business in a highly competitive industry,” she said. “Prince George’s County as a destination is competing with surrounding counties in Maryland and surrounding states that have a lower minimum wage. Our guests are extremely sensitive to price and rates can only go so high before guests will choose to go elsewhere.”

    Progressive advocates lobbied outside the county council building before the committee hearing Monday, and some also testified in favor of the bill.

    “There will be $20 million more in wages for workers that will be taxed, the taxes will be paid into here, so that money will offset some of the costs that will come up with this bill,” said Rion Dennis with Progressive Maryland.

    While the bill passed a committee vote unanimously, some on the council did express hesitation and concern about what it might do to county finances.

    An analyst estimated an impact of more than $1 million on a county budget that sees a majority of spending go toward education and public safety, two areas that expect significant increases in the years ahead. And it was noted that the last time the minimum wage was increased by the county, there were some surprise impacts members of the council weren’t ready for.

    “From my heart, intentionality, I want to support but at the same token I think we need some more time to dot some I’s and cross some T’s,” said Council Vice Chair Sydney Harrison, who still voted to pass the bill out of committee.

    “We don’t know right now how difficult it would be,” said Council Chair Jolene Ivey. “Every little bit extra, I worry about.”

    Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

    © 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

    [ad_2]

    John Domen

    Source link