ReportWire

Tag: Michael

  • Canadian GP: Pierre Gasly hits out at Carlos Sainz as Ferrari driver receives penalty for impeding incident

    Canadian GP: Pierre Gasly hits out at Carlos Sainz as Ferrari driver receives penalty for impeding incident

    Pierre Gasly was angry after being knocked of Q1 having been impeded by Carlos Sainz; Sainz was later given a three-place grid penalty for Sunday’s Canadian Grand Prix; watch the Canadian GP live on Sky Sports F1 at 7pm on Sunday, with build-up from 5:30pm

    Last Updated: 18/06/23 12:12am

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Pierre Gasly was furious with Carlos Sainz for impeding him and contributing to his exit from Q1, while the Ferrari driver criticised the Frenchman for shouting his frustrations over team radio

    Pierre Gasly was furious with Carlos Sainz for impeding him and contributing to his exit from Q1, while the Ferrari driver criticised the Frenchman for shouting his frustrations over team radio

    Alpine’s Pierre Gasly has accused Carlos Sainz of “unacceptable and unfair” driving after being impeded by the Ferrari during Canadian Grand Prix Qualifying.

    In a dramatic end to the first part of the wet session, Sainz slowed down approaching the final corner, creating chaos as the cars following him were left at risk of not crossing the start-finish line in time to set a final flying lap.

    Gasly, who was coming down the main straight – that precedes the final chicane – at full speed, was forced to run off track and lost the opportunity to set a flying lap, which resulted in him being knocked out in 17th.

    Sainz finished eighth, but was given a three-place penalty by the stewards for the incident, demoting him to 11th on the grid for Sunday’s race.

    “I don’t think any words can express the disappointment and frustration right now,” Gasly told Sky Sports F1.

    Alpine's Gasly was furious after taking evasive action to avoid Sainz as he missed out on Q2

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Alpine’s Gasly was furious after taking evasive action to avoid Sainz as he missed out on Q2

    Alpine’s Gasly was furious after taking evasive action to avoid Sainz as he missed out on Q2

    “You put so much work into free practice, building your weekend, extracting everything out of Qualy. We did everything right, that lap was good enough for top six. Even if I lost a couple of tenths with a bit of traffic it would have been good enough for top 10.

    “Carlos did the worst job possible to stay completely on the racing line. For me that’s completely unacceptable and unfair. I have no words to explain what happened.”

    Asked if he held Sainz or the Ferrari pit wall responsible for the incident, Gasly continued: “You rely a lot on the team but the whole team, when they come to Canada know it’s a dangerous one.

    “We know that last chicane, everyone is bumping into each other and you have to pay extra attention. The bare minimum is to at least be off line. First this was impeding and second it was extremely dangerous.

    Max Verstappen secured pole once again at the Canadian Grand Prix, while Nico Hulkenberg claimed a surprise second as Haas will start on the front row for the first time

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Max Verstappen secured pole once again at the Canadian Grand Prix, while Nico Hulkenberg claimed a surprise second as Haas will start on the front row for the first time

    Max Verstappen secured pole once again at the Canadian Grand Prix, while Nico Hulkenberg claimed a surprise second as Haas will start on the front row for the first time

    “If I smash him at 300kph it puts him in danger and also myself. It’s completely unfair.

    “Today it ruined my entire day. Tomorrow we will start in P17 so it will impact my race.

    “Obviously, there should be something [punishment] but, at the end of the day, it won’t give us back what we should have had and this is what I care the most. I’m just really gutted.”

    Sainz: It depends how much you shout on the radio

    Sainz appeared to dismiss Gasly’s criticism, suggesting the incident was only highlighted because of the Frenchman’s reaction on radio, which initially saw him call for the Spaniard to be “banned”.

    “It was very tight with the flag, it was about to fall,” Sainz said.

    “I got impeded seven times today and I’m not shouting on the radio at Turn 13. Other drivers choose to use the radio more than others. Today I was impeded many, many times.

    A red flag was issued during final practice after Sainz hit the wall as the rain came down in Canada

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    A red flag was issued during final practice after Sainz hit the wall as the rain came down in Canada

    A red flag was issued during final practice after Sainz hit the wall as the rain came down in Canada

    “Some incidents are under investigation, some are not. It depends how much you shout on the radio.

    “I had to let other cars go and I couldn’t get out of the way. I did my best to get out of the way and tried to go.

    “I had to go, if not I would have missed my qualifying lap also. I was getting impeded at the time too.”

    Sainz had endured a challenging final practice earlier on Saturday, slamming into the barrier and leaving his team with a repair job that continued right up until just a few minutes before the start of Qualifying.

    During that time Sainz had already been to see the stewards, having been summoned for impeding Williams’ Alex Albon on two occasions on the same part of the track.

    Sainz escaped punishment as the stewards take a more lenient approach to practice incidents.

    He added: “One of the trickiest (Qualifying) by far in my career, especially coming from the incident (in P3).”

    Source link

  • Canadian GP: Charles Leclerc says it is ‘worrying’ Ferrari don’t know reasons for ‘really bad’ feeling in car

    Canadian GP: Charles Leclerc says it is ‘worrying’ Ferrari don’t know reasons for ‘really bad’ feeling in car

    Charles Leclerc says Ferrari were unable to identify the issues in his car that resulted in an early qualifying exit at the Spanish GP; Leclerc doesn’t expect a big step forward at this weekend’s Canadian GP; watch the Canadian GP live on Sky Sports F1 all weekend

    Last Updated: 15/06/23 11:24pm

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Ferrari drivers Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz address the team’s recent struggles and what they need to do to improve going forward

    Ferrari drivers Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz address the team’s recent struggles and what they need to do to improve going forward

    Charles Leclerc admits it is “worrying” Ferrari do not know the reasons for the car troubles that led to his Q1 exit in Spanish GP Qualifying.

    Leclerc qualified 19th in Barcelona after being blighted by handling problems, especially through left-hand corners.

    Ferrari changed the whole rear end of his car ahead of the race – in which Leclerc finished P11 – but the Monegasque revealed ahead of this weekend’s Canadian GP that they had failed to find a cause for his issues.

    “Qualifying in Barcelona was a very particular one and I think I wasn’t the only one to struggle. We need to understand these things and for now we don’t have the reasons,” Leclerc said on Thursday.

    “This is a little bit more worrying and that’s where we need to push and try to understand the reasons of it because obviously the feeling was really bad.”

    Ferrari's Charles Leclerc was left frustrated after failing to qualify for Q2 in Barcelona, finishing 19th at the Circuit de Catalunya

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc was left frustrated after failing to qualify for Q2 in Barcelona, finishing 19th at the Circuit de Catalunya

    Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc was left frustrated after failing to qualify for Q2 in Barcelona, finishing 19th at the Circuit de Catalunya

    Leclerc’s team-mate Carlos Sainz had managed to put his Ferrari on the front row in Spain, but he finished the Grand Prix in fifth after Ferrari’s lack of race pace reared its head again.

    Ferrari have just one podium finish in 2023 and are fourth in the constructors’ championship, already 187 points behind leaders Red Bull. Leclerc meanwhile finds himself seventh in the drivers’ championship on just 42 points.

    The Scuderia were being tipped as title contenders in pre-season, and Leclerc has urged the team to bring updates to the underperforming SF23 as swiftly as possible.

    “Overall I think all the team is not satisfied with the performance we are showing at the moment on track and it is very far off expectations at the beginning of the season,” Leclerc said.

    Simon Lazenby shares his most memorable moments from the Canadian Grand Prix ahead of this weekend's race in Montreal

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Simon Lazenby shares his most memorable moments from the Canadian Grand Prix ahead of this weekend’s race in Montreal

    Simon Lazenby shares his most memorable moments from the Canadian Grand Prix ahead of this weekend’s race in Montreal

    “Looking ahead we just need to keep pushing, try and bring upgrades as quickly as possible and regularly which is our aim now to try and close the gap to the guys in front and also close the gap especially in terms of race pace.

    “Even though I struggled a lot in qualifying on the Saturday, the Sunday wasn’t great either – and if we look at Carlos he had a great Saturday and then on Sunday we struggled again with the race pace. That’s where we are trying to push at the moment.”

    Leclerc reiterated he still had faith in Ferrari’s project, saying: “What gives me confidence though is that there is a clear direction of where we want to work and improve and this is what makes me believe in the project.”

    Leclerc not expecting miracles this weekend

    Sky F1's Karun Chandhok takes a look at the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve of this weekend's Canadian Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Sky F1’s Karun Chandhok takes a look at the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve of this weekend’s Canadian Grand Prix

    Sky F1’s Karun Chandhok takes a look at the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve of this weekend’s Canadian Grand Prix

    Leclerc’s troubles in Spain came on the first weekend that Ferrari ran their major upgrades to the SF23, and while he thinks the team will have an improved showing in Montreal on a track that should suit their car better, the 25-year-old is not expecting huge progress.

    “On this track we don’t have anything new so I don’t think we’ll have any miracles. But we need to just try and maximise our package, understand more this package, set-up the car in order to maximise it.

    “In Spain we were quite easily off the window and then we were losing a lot of performance. We have learnt a lot and pretty sure we will be in a better place for this weekend but I don’t think it will be a huge step forward.

    “Last year [when Ferrari finished second and fifth) we were in a very different situation. We expect Aston Martin to be very strong this weekend, we expect Red Bull to be very strong this weekend, we struggle to understand where Mercedes will be compared to us.

    “We have to focus on ourselves, try to maximise our package. It’s a very challenging track and with the weather, we don’t really know which side it’s going to go. We’ll just focus on ourselves and see what we can do.”

    A look back at some of the most dramatic moments from the Canadian Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    A look back at some of the most dramatic moments from the Canadian Grand Prix

    A look back at some of the most dramatic moments from the Canadian Grand Prix

    Sky Sports F1‘s live Canadian GP schedule

    Friday June 16
    6pm: Canadian GP Practice One (session starts at 6.30pm)
    7.45pm: The F1 Show
    9.45pm: Canadian GP Practice Two (session starts at 10pm)

    Saturday June 17
    5.15pm: Canadian GP Practice Three (session starts at 5.30pm)
    8pm: Canadian GP Qualifying build-up
    9pm: Canadian GP Qualifying
    11pm: Ted’s Qualifying Notebook

    Sunday June 18
    5.30pm: Grand Prix Sunday Canadian GP build-up
    6:55pm: The Grandstand with Daniel Ricciardo and Will Arnett (via red button)
    7pm: THE CANADIAN GRAND PRIX
    9pm: Chequered Flag Canadian GP reaction
    10pm: Ted’s Notebook

    Source link

  • Lewis Hamilton could sign new Mercedes deal before Canadian GP, says Toto Wolff

    Lewis Hamilton could sign new Mercedes deal before Canadian GP, says Toto Wolff

    Toto Wolff on Lewis Hamilton’s Mercedes contract: “It is going to happen soon, and we are talking more days than weeks. We are trying hard [to get it done before the Canadian Grand Prix]. I will see him today and maybe we will talk about it. We have such a good relationship”

    Last Updated: 13/06/23 9:17am

    Lewis Hamilton could sign a new Mercedes deal before the weekend, says team principal Toto Wolff

    Lewis Hamilton’s Formula 1 future could be resolved before this weekend’s Canadian Grand Prix, according to Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff. 

    Hamilton has six months to run on his £40m-a-season deal with Mercedes, but Wolff said his superstar driver is on the brink of agreeing new terms.

    “It is going to happen soon, and we are talking more days than weeks,” Wolff told CNBC’s Squawk on the Street programme in New York when asked about Hamilton’s contract negotiations.

    “We are trying hard [to get it done before the Canadian Grand Prix]. I will see him today and maybe we will talk about it.

    “We have such a good relationship that we dread the moment that we need to talk about money.”

    Hamilton, 38, met with Wolff the day after the last round in Spain, in the hope of rubber-stamping a fresh contract with the Silver Arrows.

    It is anticipated that the British driver’s extension will be a multi-year deal, extending his stay in F1 beyond his 40th birthday.

    “Lewis is the most important personality in the sport,” added Wolff.

    “He is so multi-faceted, not only with the racing, but also off track, so we need to keep him in the sport for as long as possible.

    “From a team’s perspective, Lewis and Mercedes have gone back a long time. He has never raced for any other brand than Mercedes.

    “We both joined the team in 2013 together, and from a professional relationship, we now have a friendship. It has been a wonderful time.”

    Lewis Hamilton says he's meeting with Toto Wolff on Monday to discuss a new contract at Mercedes

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Lewis Hamilton says he’s meeting with Toto Wolff on Monday to discuss a new contract at Mercedes

    Lewis Hamilton says he’s meeting with Toto Wolff on Monday to discuss a new contract at Mercedes

    Hamilton, who has not won a race since his contentious championship defeat to Max Verstappen at the 2021 season finale in Abu Dhabi, is already 83 points off the title pace this year.

    But Mercedes’ recent upturn in form has provided Hamilton, who finished runner-up to Red Bull’s Verstappen at Barcelona’s Circuit de Catalunya, with renewed hope that his dream of a record eighth world title is not over.

    However, Wolff warned: “The result in Spain was a well-deserved reward for everyone’s efforts at Brackley and Brixworth to bring our update package to the track.

    “We were pleased with how it performed, and it will provide a new baseline for us to build from.

    “But we must also manage our expectations. It was a circuit that suited our car, and we should expect our direct competitors to be stronger in the next races.

    “The gap to Red Bull is large and it will take lots of hard work to close that down. Nevertheless, we’re up for the challenge.”

    Source link

  • Ferrari boss Frederic Vasseur admits SF-23 is ‘very difficult to understand’ after Spanish GP struggles

    Ferrari boss Frederic Vasseur admits SF-23 is ‘very difficult to understand’ after Spanish GP struggles

    Ferrari dropped more points to Mercedes and Aston Martin in the constructors’ championship after Carlos Sainz finished fifth and Charles Leclerc was 11th at the Spanish Grand Prix; watch the Canadian GP from June 16-18 with all sessions live on Sky Sports F1

    Last Updated: 08/06/23 3:14pm

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Sky F1’s Damon Hill and Rachel Brookes discuss Mercedes’ chances of challenging the Red Bulls for race wins this season

    Sky F1’s Damon Hill and Rachel Brookes discuss Mercedes’ chances of challenging the Red Bulls for race wins this season

    Ferrari team principal Frederic Vasseur has admitted their 2023 car is “very difficult to understand” after a tough Sunday at the Spanish Grand Prix.

    Carlos Sainz started on the front row but dropped to fifth behind Lewis Hamilton, George Russell and Sergio Perez.

    Meanwhile, Charles Leclerc failed to get out of Q1 in Qualifying but failed to finish in the points as he struggled with tyre wear and car inconstancies.

    Leclerc told Sky Sports F1 he “didn’t understand” what Ferrari were doing wrong as the car handled differently throughout the race, even when using the same tyre compound.

    Ferrari brought a significant upgrade package to Barcelona, including new sidepods, but didn’t appear to go forward.

    “You can’t compare Miami and Barcelona in terms of layout, tarmac and energy on the tyres, but I would say that the global picture is the same,” said Vasseur.

    “We are there in qualifying, and we are not there in the race. We are still inconsistent on the same car between compounds and sometimes between the same compounds.”

    Charles Leclerc can't understand what is wrong with his Ferrari after finishing P11 at the Spanish Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Charles Leclerc can’t understand what is wrong with his Ferrari after finishing P11 at the Spanish Grand Prix

    Charles Leclerc can’t understand what is wrong with his Ferrari after finishing P11 at the Spanish Grand Prix

    He continued: “We have 1,000 people [working] on this now and it is very difficult to understand and to fix it because it’s not always the same problem.

    “It’s true that in qualifying, you are in free air and in the race you are not. I think Charles struggled a lot in the first stint as he was a lot closer to the car in front of him.

    “The main issue for us is not the potential on the lap on [high-speed] corners, the main issue is the inconsistency.

    “On Charles’ car for example, between the first and third stints with the same compound, one the balance was out of place, and the last one was OK, and with Carlos, he did a decent first stint, and in the middle, he lost 15 or 20 seconds.”

    Red Bull chief technology officer Adrian Newey admitted he gave serious consideration to joining Team Ferrari twice in the 1990s

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Red Bull chief technology officer Adrian Newey admitted he gave serious consideration to joining Team Ferrari twice in the 1990s

    Red Bull chief technology officer Adrian Newey admitted he gave serious consideration to joining Team Ferrari twice in the 1990s

    Vasseur: Ferrari can fight Mercedes

    Mercedes’ updates did work as their new front suspension and sidepod design saw them take a double podium at the Spanish GP, with Hamilton in second and Russell in third.

    Vasseur thinks Ferrari are keeping up with Mercedes in the development race and can beat them once their consistency is solved.

    “I think as soon as we will unlock the situation with consistency we can imagine to fight with them [Mercedes] all over the race,” he said.

    “With Red Bull, it’s another story, especially with Verstappen. He is still much faster than us in qualy, much faster in the race.”

    Charles Leclerc finished has gone through a tough run of results in Miami, Monaco and Spain

    Charles Leclerc finished has gone through a tough run of results in Miami, Monaco and Spain

    Are Ferrari going in the wrong direction?

    Ferrari are fourth in the constructors’ championship at 32 points adrift of Aston Martin and 52 points behind Mercedes

    Damon Hill and Rachel Brookes told the latest Sky Sports F1 Podcast that Ferrari are very difficult to predict.

    “It’s a funny season in a way because we have seen quite a lot of disparity between apparent form on one circuit and the same form, or expectations, on another circuit,” said Hill. “Everyone is scratching their heads apart from Red Bull, who are delivering on every track.

    Ferrari are fourth in the constructors' championship ahead of the Canadian Grand Prix

    Ferrari are fourth in the constructors’ championship ahead of the Canadian Grand Prix

    “Then what can you say about Ferrari? When one is up, the other is down. It’s like they are running with one leg all the time. So going forward, you have got the development curve and cost-cap restrictions to think about.”

    Brookes added: “My worry is Ferrari are going in the opposite direction. They changed their car and we saw a very different Ferrari in Spain, they are now trying to chase that route as well.

    F1 returns in Canada from June 16-18 with all sessions live on Sky Sports F1, including race coverage from 5.30pm on Sunday June 18

    Source link

  • Fernando Alonso predicts ‘tight’ Spanish Grand Prix Qualifying; Max Verstappen ‘very comfortable’ in Red Bull

    Fernando Alonso predicts ‘tight’ Spanish Grand Prix Qualifying; Max Verstappen ‘very comfortable’ in Red Bull

    Fernando Alonso’s last win in Formula 1 came 10 years ago at the Spanish Grand Prix; the Aston Martin driver was narrowly beaten to pole position by Max Verstappen last time out in Monaco and thinks Qualifying at the Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya on Saturday will be very close

    Last Updated: 02/06/23 7:33pm

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Aston Martin’s Fernando Alonso says he is feeling the benefits of the recent upgrades and he’s hoping to put on a show in front of his home fans.

    Aston Martin’s Fernando Alonso says he is feeling the benefits of the recent upgrades and he’s hoping to put on a show in front of his home fans.

    Fernando Alonso believes just “one or two tenths” will change the grid at the Spanish Grand Prix after a close second practice.

    Alonso was 0.170 seconds behind Max Verstappen in the second session on Friday, with the top 17 split by less than one second around the Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya.

    It was a contrast to Practice One, where championship leader Verstappen was more than three-quarters of a second ahead of the field.

    “I think it’s so tight that one or two tenths will put you in a completely different spot on the classification. So don’t bring too much attention on the times,” said Alonso.

    “We went through all the programmes that we had before practice, which is a good thing – learning about the tyres, the track is slower maybe than what we predicted, so there’s still more time to find more tweaks on the set-up, but it was a productive Friday.”

    Sky F1's David Croft and Anthony Davidson review Friday's practice sessions at the Circuit de Catalunya.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Sky F1’s David Croft and Anthony Davidson review Friday’s practice sessions at the Circuit de Catalunya.

    Sky F1’s David Croft and Anthony Davidson review Friday’s practice sessions at the Circuit de Catalunya.

    Asked if Aston Martin’s upgrades at the Spanish GP worked as intended, Alonso added: “Absolutely. There is not a new part that we put on the car that is not helping the performance. That’s something that has always been the case with the team since Bahrain.

    “So, happy with the upgrades and let’s see tomorrow, when everyone goes to full power, where we are.”

    Verstappen: The car was in a good window

    Verstappen, who won his maiden F1 race at the 2016 Spanish GP, is looking for consecutive pole positions for the first time this season.

    The Red Bull driver enjoyed driving through the fast penultimate corner after the slow-speed chicane was ditched ahead of this year’s event.

    Max Verstappen says he felt 'very comfortable' in his Red Bull as he topped both P1 and P2 ahead of the Spanish Grand Prix.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Max Verstappen says he felt ‘very comfortable’ in his Red Bull as he topped both P1 and P2 ahead of the Spanish Grand Prix.

    Max Verstappen says he felt ‘very comfortable’ in his Red Bull as he topped both P1 and P2 ahead of the Spanish Grand Prix.

    “It’s been a lot more fun to drive. F1 cars in general feel better in high speed so for me the last two corners are much better to drive,” he said.

    “I tried to follow a few cars as well and it seemed quite OK through there as well. Positively surprised for the overtaking and overall we had a very good day.

    “The car was in a good window and you try to fine tune a few things here and there but short run, long run everything seemed quite good.

    “From my side I felt very comfortable in the car looking after the tyres. I still need to look at the lap times of others but from our side it was a good day. [The bumps] are not too bad. This track has been resurfaced a few years ago and it’s still quite decent.”

    Alonso hopes to put on ‘good show’ for fans

    Alonso’s popularity in Spain has seen a sea of green fans turn out around the Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya, representing the green of Aston Martin.

    The two-time world champion says 67 per cent of the fans at the Spanish GP were wearing the Aston Martin colours on Friday.

    “It’s amazing. I think this is going back to the 2005/06/07 years, where everything was in one colour,” added Alonso, who last won in F1 10 years ago at his home event.

    “I really feel that support, that special energy. The fan forum this morning was amazing. While driving I cannot hear them, but I feel how enthusiastic they are. So hopefully we put a good show for them.”

    Fernando Alonso testing new parts on his Aston Martin during Friday practice for the Spanish Grand Prix

    Fernando Alonso testing new parts on his Aston Martin during Friday practice for the Spanish Grand Prix

    Sky Sports F1’s live Spanish GP schedule

    Saturday June 3
    9.25am: F3 Sprint
    11.15am: Spanish GP Practice Three (session starts 11.30am)
    1.10pm: F2 Sprint
    2.15pm: Spanish GP Qualifying build-up
    3pm: Spanish GP Qualifying
    6.15pm: IndyCar – Detroit GP Qualifying

    Sunday June 4
    8.50am: F3 Feature Race
    10.20am: F2 Feature Race
    12.30pm: Grand Prix Sunday Spanish GP build-up
    2pm: THE SPANISH GRAND PRIX
    4pm: Chequered Flag Spanish GP reaction
    5.45pm: Indy NXT – Detroit GP
    8pm: IndyCar – Detroit GP

    Will Red Bull’s winning run in F1 2023 continue at the Spanish GP? Watch all the action live on Sky Sports F1, with Qualifying at 3pm on Saturday and the race at 2pm on Sunday. Get Sky Sports

    Source link

  • Young F1 fans to present Hungarian Grand Prix live on Sky Sports

    Young F1 fans to present Hungarian Grand Prix live on Sky Sports

    In a TV first, three young F1 fans will present the Hungarian Grand Prix alongside Natalie Pinkham, Nico Rosberg, and Danica Patrick; You can tune in to the F1 Juniors broadcast on the 23rd of July live on Sky Sports

    Last Updated: 31/05/23 1:00pm

    Young F1 fans will get hands on alongside current F1 presenters such as Natalie Pinkham

    Young Formula 1 fans are set to present the Hungarian Grand Prix live on Sky Sports in a TV first.

    Sky Sports F1 presenters will be joined by three young fans who will commentate, present and interview drivers at the event, while regular coverage will be available as usual on Sky Sports F1.

    Over the course of the race week, the young recruits will try their hand at various broadcasting roles including interviews with their favourite drivers and other big names from the paddock, co-hosting with Natalie Pinkham and the Sky Sports F1 team, and commentating live during the race.

    The F1 Juniors will also showcase their knowledge on all things F1, presenting their analysis and punditry after the race as with traditional F1 coverage.

    Zac, a young go-kart racer, and Braydon and Scarlett who present Sky Kids show FYI, will join F1 world champion Nico Rosberg and former NASCAR and IndyCar racer Danica Patrick as they present F1 Juniors, live from Budapest’s Hungaroring.

    Formula 1 will provide a dedicated international feed, including bespoke graphics, sound effects and special features such as 3D augmented graphics on specific camera angles that will enhance the broadcast for younger audiences in the UK and Germany.

    Sky Sports F1‘s Jenson Button said: “We are really excited about giving the next generation of F1 fans a platform to show their passion and excitement for the sport as F1 continues to grow in popularity amongst younger audiences.

    “We may just find our next Crofty or Naomi Schiff!”

    Ian Holmes, Director of Media Rights and Content Creation at Formula 1 said: “We want to ensure that our fans of all ages can enjoy and fall in love with Formula 1, so working with our long-standing partners at Sky on this project to target younger audiences is really exciting.

    “This is a first of its kind in motorsport and I am excited to see the broadcast come to life and to watch the next generation of presenting talent!”

    Our Premier League Juniors team bring you the best of the action from Brentford's 3-1 win against Liverpool.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Our Premier League Juniors team bring you the best of the action from Brentford’s 3-1 win against Liverpool.

    Our Premier League Juniors team bring you the best of the action from Brentford’s 3-1 win against Liverpool.

    F1 Juniors follows December’s Premier League Juniors which saw young football fans join Kelly Cates as they took on similar roles during the Premier League fixture between Brentford and Liverpool.

    Young F1 fans can tune in to the F1 Juniors broadcast on the 23rd of July live on Sky Sports

    Source link

  • Mercedes upgrades: What to expect from W14 changes at Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix in Imola

    Mercedes upgrades: What to expect from W14 changes at Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix in Imola

    After weeks of speculation, Mercedes’ long-awaited upgrades to their W14 car are finally set to arrive for this weekend’s Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix in Imola.

    The Silver Arrows realised as early as the beginning of March at the season-opening Bahrain Grand Prix that they had made an error by sticking with their design concept from the previous year.

    There had been hope that untapped potential remained in the eye-catching ‘zero-sidepod’ look first seen on their previous W13 model, but it quickly became clear the new car would be unable to challenge Red Bull, who in 2022 emphatically ended Mercedes’ eight-year streak of constructors’ titles and have won all five races to start the new campaign.

    Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton said as early as Friday practice in Bahrain that they were on the “wrong track” before team principal Toto Wolff conceded that the W14 design “didn’t work out”.

    Ahead of this weekend's Emilia Romagna Grand Prix, look back at some of the most dramatic moments to have taken place around Imola

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Ahead of this weekend’s Emilia Romagna Grand Prix, look back at some of the most dramatic moments to have taken place around Imola

    Ahead of this weekend’s Emilia Romagna Grand Prix, look back at some of the most dramatic moments to have taken place around Imola

    Since then, it has been a case of damage limitation with Mercedes battling Aston Martin and Ferrari to finish behind the Red Bulls, and seven-time world champion Hamilton admitting he has been “counting the days” until the upgrades arrive.

    There have already been repercussions in Mercedes’ senior leadership team, with James Allison returning as technical director in place of Mike Elliott, who moved into the broader chief technical officer role.

    With the waiting almost over, we have collated the most notable comments coming from the Brackley outfit to answer the key questions ahead of the upgrades being unveiled at Friday practice in Imola, live on Sky Sports F1.

    Sky Sports' Natalie Pinkham breaks down what to expect from the Emilia Romagna GP as F1 heads to the iconic Italian circuit

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Sky Sports’ Natalie Pinkham breaks down what to expect from the Emilia Romagna GP as F1 heads to the iconic Italian circuit

    Sky Sports’ Natalie Pinkham breaks down what to expect from the Emilia Romagna GP as F1 heads to the iconic Italian circuit

    Why have the upgrades taken this long?

    Given Mercedes realised they needed to make major changes at the first race of the season, some may wonder why it has taken them two-and-a-half months to have them ready.

    Toto Wolff made an early concession that Mercedes had gone wrong with their 2023 car design

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Toto Wolff made an early concession that Mercedes had gone wrong with their 2023 car design

    Toto Wolff made an early concession that Mercedes had gone wrong with their 2023 car design

    Mercedes trackside engineering director Andrew Shovlin last week explained: “If we go all the way back to the test and race in Bahrain, that was where we realised that we didn’t have a package that was going to allow us to fight for a world championship – if we continued on that same development direction, we wouldn’t end up in a position where we felt we could challenge Red Bull.

    “It was around that time that we took some decisions on how we develop the car, how the car works aerodynamically, and how we shape the characteristics of the car. In essence, how it is in terms of handling for the drivers to drive.

    “What we are going to be bringing to the track in Imola is the first step of that work. This takes quite a long time to develop in the wind tunnel and you can’t just do these things overnight.”

    Mercedes trackside engineering director Andrew Shovlin has been explaining the upgrade process

    Mercedes trackside engineering director Andrew Shovlin has been explaining the upgrade process

    Discussing upgrades on the Sky Sports F1 Podcast, Karun Chandok added: “They take as long as they take. I think that’s what people don’t understand – you can’t just think of an idea and just put it on the car for the next race.

    “There’s a six-to-eight week lead time. You come up with an idea, design it in CFD (computational fluid dynamics) in the virtual world, then once you’re happy with that, you make a model which goes in the wind tunnel – there’s x amount of testing that has to happen with that.

    “Then it goes to the composite department to make the parts and get them to the actual race, and that whole process is six-seven weeks at least.”

    Are Mercedes ditching their ‘zero-sidepod’ concept?

    When Mercedes unveiled their 2022 W13 model in Bahrain last year, the car’s lack of sidepods stunned the paddock.

    Given the team’s incredible streak of titles and reputation for excellence, most assumed it was another moment of genius that would ensure more success.

    Mercedes' 'zero-sidepod' look was first revealed at 2022 pre-season testing

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Mercedes’ ‘zero-sidepod’ look was first revealed at 2022 pre-season testing

    Mercedes’ ‘zero-sidepod’ look was first revealed at 2022 pre-season testing

    While the sidepods aren’t the only reason Mercedes haven’t reached the level they aspire to, they are undoubtedly a key element and appear set for a radical change in Imola.

    As early as the Bahrain GP, then technical director Elliott said of new planned sidepods: “It won’t be the same as other people’s and it won’t be the same as we’ve got, it’ll be different.

    “We have got a very different sidepod coming – I say very different, a different sidepod that’s coming.”

    So yes, we can be pretty sure the sidepods are going to look different, but plenty of mystery remains around exactly what form they will take.

    What other changes will there be?

    Speaking at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix in March, Hamilton made it very clear that changing the sidepods alone wouldn’t solve Mercedes’ issues.

    “People keep talking about getting the new sidepods on the car but it’s not as simple as that,” the Brit said.

    “You put the Red Bull sidepods on our car and it won’t change a thing, it literally won’t change a thing, it might even go slower.

    Ted Kravitz looks at Mercedes' changes at technical director, where James Allison returns to the role replacing Mike Elliott

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Ted Kravitz looks at Mercedes’ changes at technical director, where James Allison returns to the role replacing Mike Elliott

    Ted Kravitz looks at Mercedes’ changes at technical director, where James Allison returns to the role replacing Mike Elliott

    “It’s about aero characteristics, it’s how the car is balanced through the corners. There’s so many different elements that people of course would not know because they’re not aerodynamicists and you can’t see it – there’s a lot more to it.”

    Aside from the sidepods, Mercedes had largely been reluctant to share much information about what would be changing, but Wolff gave his most detailed answer at the Miami Grand Prix earlier in May.

    “What we are doing is we’re introducing a new bodywork and we’re introducing a new floor and we’re doing a new front suspension,” he said.

    “That’s a pretty large operation, a large surgery and so there is going to be a lot of learning.”

    Will the upgrades enable Mercedes to challenge Red Bull?

    Red Bull have won all five races this season in dominant fashion, with Max Verstappen topping the drivers’ standings as he seeks a third successive title.

    Given the stunning pace of the RB19, it’s difficult to see anyone closing the 122-point lead Red Bull have already opened up in the constructors’ standings, but just competing with them for wins would undoubtedly be a triumph.

    Asked in Miami what he is expecting from the upgrades, Wolff said that in the “virtual world” the car is producing a “good lap time” but has repeatedly warned that suddenly challenging Red Bull is highly unlikely.

    Max Verstappen wins the Miami Grand Prix, Sergio Perez finishes in second to bring home another Red Bull one-two, with Fernando Alonso claiming another podium

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Max Verstappen wins the Miami Grand Prix, Sergio Perez finishes in second to bring home another Red Bull one-two, with Fernando Alonso claiming another podium

    Max Verstappen wins the Miami Grand Prix, Sergio Perez finishes in second to bring home another Red Bull one-two, with Fernando Alonso claiming another podium

    “We need to manage our own expectations,” Wolff said. “Because we are bringing an update package that is going to consist of new suspension parts and bodywork and some other things but I have never in my 15 years in Formula 1 seen a silver bullet being introduced where suddenly you unlock half a second of performance. I very much doubt this is going to happen here.

    “What I’m looking for is that we take certain variables off the table where we believe we could have introduced something that we don’t understand in the car and to have a stable platform. We shall see what our baseline is and what we can do from there.”

    While Wolff is keen to manage expectations, Hamilton’s revelation that he’s been “counting the days” until the upgrades suggests that there is internal confidence of significant improvement.

    Sky F1's Martin Brundle and Nico Roseberg explain how Mercedes' concept differs from Red Bull's and assess the 'massive job' they face to close the gap

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Sky F1’s Martin Brundle and Nico Roseberg explain how Mercedes’ concept differs from Red Bull’s and assess the ‘massive job’ they face to close the gap

    Sky F1’s Martin Brundle and Nico Roseberg explain how Mercedes’ concept differs from Red Bull’s and assess the ‘massive job’ they face to close the gap

    While it must be noted that Ferrari are also expected to bring major upgrades to Imola, Sky Sports F1’s Karun Chandhok believes Mercedes are hoping to establish themselves as Red Bull’s nearest challengers.

    “I believe there’s a decent upgrade coming to the Mercedes in Imola, and I’m really intrigued to see where that moves them,” Chandhok said.

    “I don’t think it will move them into Red Bull territory, but I think they’re hoping it will clear them ahead of Aston and Ferrari, that’s their ambition I think, but we’ll see.”

    Will more Mercedes upgrades follow?

    Once upon a time, Mercedes would have quite literally been able to build a completely different ‘B-spec’ car, but Formula 1’s budget cap and the sliding scale of aero testing allowed puts limitations on what they can do.

    Despite those measures, Wolff confirmed that Mercedes have enough funds remaining to continue on the path they will reveal in Imola.

    Wolff said: “Yes we do, because if you embark on a new development direction it’s that one project you concentrate on so that should be fine.”

    While Wolff has said he believes Mercedes can win races this season, the ultimate aim of the concept change is to ensure the Silver Arrows can get back to competing with Red Bull over a full campaign.

    Shovlin explained in his Miami GP review: “We do hope that it is quicker, we hope that it’s better in terms of qualifying and race pace.

    “The key thing though is that we are not just looking to bring a lap time update, we are looking to head off in a different development direction. One that we think gives us a better chance in the long term of being able to challenge for race wins and world championships.”

    Formula 1 returns to Imola for the Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix from May 19-21. Watch every session live on Sky Sports F1 including the race from 2pm on Sunday May 21.

    Source link

  • Miami GP: LL Cool J’s pre-race introduction reviewed by Lewis Hamilton, Max Verstappen and other drivers

    Miami GP: LL Cool J’s pre-race introduction reviewed by Lewis Hamilton, Max Verstappen and other drivers

    Formula 1’s drivers were introduced to the grid at the Miami Grand Prix by musician LL Cool J in a ceremony that lasted more than seven minutes; Max Verstappen, Lewis Hamilton and several others offered a range of opinions on the event

    Last Updated: 08/05/23 7:01am

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Musician LL Cool J introduces the starting grid at the Miami Grand Prix

    Musician LL Cool J introduces the starting grid at the Miami Grand Prix

    Formula 1 drivers have offered a split verdict after the sport tried out a new look with musician LL Cool J introducing the drivers onto the grid ahead of Sunday’s Miami Grand Prix.

    The 20 drivers were introduced one-by-one in a ceremony that lasted more than seven minutes, and required the usual pre-race schedule to be altered.

    Formula 1’s rapid growth in recent years has motivated those running the sport to maintain an innovative approach, as they seek to continue to extend its reach.

    Along with LL Cool J’s appearance, fellow musician Will.i.am released an F1 inspired single on Sunday to coincide with the race.

    Highlights of the Miami Grand Prix at the fifth race of the season

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Highlights of the Miami Grand Prix at the fifth race of the season

    Highlights of the Miami Grand Prix at the fifth race of the season

    The proceedings appeared to have little negative impact on the drivers, with an extremely clean race playing out as Max Verstappen caught Red Bull team-mate Sergio Perez to extend his world championship lead.

    However, the consensus after the race appeared to be that drivers feel like too much is being asked of them as they prepare to deliver an elite performance.

    Here’s what they had to say:

    Max Verstappen, Red Bull:

    Red Bull driver Max Verstappen reflects on victory at Miami after climbing up from P9 to P1

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Red Bull driver Max Verstappen reflects on victory at Miami after climbing up from P9 to P1

    Red Bull driver Max Verstappen reflects on victory at Miami after climbing up from P9 to P1

    “Personally, I think it is just a personality thing. Some people like to be more in the spotlight, some other people don’t. I personally don’t, so for me I think that naturally what they did today is not necessary.

    “I prefer to just talk to my engineers then put my helmet on and drive but of course I understand the entertainment value.

    “I just hope we don’t have that every single time because it is a long season so we don’t need an entry like that every time but it also depends a bit on the crowd I think in terms of what you want.

    “I think it is just a personal preference as well from the drivers.”

    Sergio Perez, Red Bull:

    Red Bull driver Sergio Perez pays homage to teammate Max Verstappen for being the stronger driver and taking victory at the Miami Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Red Bull driver Sergio Perez pays homage to teammate Max Verstappen for being the stronger driver and taking victory at the Miami Grand Prix

    Red Bull driver Sergio Perez pays homage to teammate Max Verstappen for being the stronger driver and taking victory at the Miami Grand Prix

    “I think as long as we don’t do it on too many occasions.

    “I think it is nice to do it once for the crowd but we also have to be very respectful of the drivers.

    “We need our own time to get ready and it is just minutes before the race starts and I think as long as it doesn’t happen very often it is ok.”

    Fernando Alonso, Aston Martin:

    Following his third-place finish at the Miami Grand Prix, Fernando Alonso says victory was 'a little bit too easy for Max Verstappen'

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Following his third-place finish at the Miami Grand Prix, Fernando Alonso says victory was ‘a little bit too easy for Max Verstappen’

    Following his third-place finish at the Miami Grand Prix, Fernando Alonso says victory was ‘a little bit too easy for Max Verstappen’

    “I understand the point of view of everybody but I am not a big fan of those things just before the race.

    “If we have to do it, I think we need to remove some of the other stuff we are doing like the parade lap or something like that because it is really in the middle of the preparations and the strategy meeting.

    “I disagree a little bit with if we do it we don’t have to do it everywhere because I don’t think the Miami fans are better than the Italian fans in Imola or in Spain or in Mexico or in Japan.

    “I think we need to make everyone with the same rules and the same show before the race.”

    George Russell, Mercedes:

    “We spoke about it as drivers on Friday night. Everybody has got different personalities, I guess it is the American way of doing things and doing sport.

    “Personally, it is probably not for me but that is just my personal opinion because I am here to race. I am not here for the show, I am here to drive and I am here to win, but I guess we have to roll with it.

    Mercedes driver George Russell reflects on a successful Miami Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Mercedes driver George Russell reflects on a successful Miami Grand Prix

    Mercedes driver George Russell reflects on a successful Miami Grand Prix

    “It is distracting because we were on the grid for half an hour in our overalls in the sun and I don’t think there is any other sport in the world where 30 minutes before you go out to do your business that you are out there in the sun, all the cameras on you, making a bit of a show of it.

    “I can appreciate that in the entertainment world but, as I said, we only want the best for the sport and we are open to changes but we wouldn’t want to see it every weekend.

    “I don’t think it will be at every weekend, I think it will be at the big races.

    “The thing I love every single race is the national anthem. That sort of pumps you up and is respectful to the country you are racing at but I have mixed feelings on the additional show.”

    Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes:

    Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton says he enjoyed racing at the Miami Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton says he enjoyed racing at the Miami Grand Prix

    Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton says he enjoyed racing at the Miami Grand Prix

    “I think it is cool that the sport is continuously growing and evolving and they are not just doing the same things they have done in the past.

    “They are trying new things, they are trying to improve the show and I am in full support of it.

    “I grew up listening to LL Cool J and then he is there, that was cool.

    “You have got Will.i.am, who is an incredible artist. You have got Serena and Venus (Williams) standing there. It was cool.”

    What’s next?

    There’s a brief pause for breath before Formula 1 returns to Europe for a triple-header of back-to-back races.

    The first of those is the Emilia-Romagna Grand Prix in Imola from May 19-21, with Mercedes and Ferrari expected to bring significant upgrades which they hope will move them closer to Red Bull.

    All eyes will be on Ferrari at the first of their two home races this season, with the team’s inconsistent start to the campaign likely to come under major scrutiny in front of the tifosi.

    Source link

  • Charles Leclerc says Miami GP Qualifying crash unacceptable after hitting barriers in same place in practice

    Charles Leclerc says Miami GP Qualifying crash unacceptable after hitting barriers in same place in practice

    Charles Leclerc crashed at Turn Seven in the closing stages of Q3 at the Miami GP having hit barriers at same corner in practice; Leclerc to start Sunday’s race from seventh; watch Miami GP live on Sky Sports F1 at 8:30pm Sunday

    Last Updated: 07/05/23 12:30am

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Ferrari driver Charles Leclerc reflects on a disappointing qualifying session after he crashed into the barriers at the Miami Grand Prix.

    Ferrari driver Charles Leclerc reflects on a disappointing qualifying session after he crashed into the barriers at the Miami Grand Prix.

    Charles Leclerc admits his crash in Miami GP Qualifying was “unacceptable” after also hitting the barriers in the same place during Friday practice.

    Leclerc was pitched into a high-speed spin after losing control of his Ferrari at Turn Seven during his final Q3 run. The crash brought out the red flag and prevented anyone else getting in a second lap as Sergio Perez took pole.

    It was a case of déjà vu for Leclerc after his Friday practice had been curtailed by a crash through the same corner.

    Charles Leclerc had a massive crash in his Ferrari towards the end of Q3, bringing out the red flag and in the process handing pole to Red Bull's Sergio Perez.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Charles Leclerc had a massive crash in his Ferrari towards the end of Q3, bringing out the red flag and in the process handing pole to Red Bull’s Sergio Perez.

    Charles Leclerc had a massive crash in his Ferrari towards the end of Q3, bringing out the red flag and in the process handing pole to Red Bull’s Sergio Perez.

    Having also made an error on his first Q3 run, Leclerc will start seventh on Sunday and he could not hide his anger at himself afterwards.

    “More than the track, I think what’s unacceptable is doing twice the same mistake in the same corner. I am really disappointed with myself,” Leclerc told Sky Sports F1.

    “You can always find excuses in those situations, the wind was really strong, it was really tricky, the set up of the car was really tricky also but I put myself in this condition. I wanted this set up and I knew it would be tricky, but I thought I would be able to extract the maximum out the car in Q3, which is normally one of my strong points.

    “I know that I’m also taking more risks than others in Q3, which is why most of the time why I’m doing good Q3s but this is too much.

    “Very disappointed with myself, I did the same mistake yesterday and this shouldn’t happen.”

    Ferrari's Charles Leclerc had a heavy collision with the wall as a red flag was brought out during P2.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc had a heavy collision with the wall as a red flag was brought out during P2.

    Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc had a heavy collision with the wall as a red flag was brought out during P2.

    Asked if he was putting too much pressure on himself in Q3 sessions, Leclerc replied: “I don’t think so. It’s paying off most of the time, but this weekend I did too much and I cannot hide my disappointment.”

    There is the possibility of rain affecting Sunday’s race, and Leclerc says his initial focus is just on staying out of trouble.

    “Now looking forward to tomorrow we are starting seventh, weather looks to be quite tricky so hopefully we’ll have a clean race and be able to come back to the front,” he said.

    “The Astons look strong in race pace so I don’t know exactly where we are going to be, a podium would be a really good finish tomorrow considering our race pace.”

    Anthony Davidson was at the SkyPad to analyse how Charles Leclerc could have avoided crashing his Ferrari in the final part of qualifying.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Anthony Davidson was at the SkyPad to analyse how Charles Leclerc could have avoided crashing his Ferrari in the final part of qualifying.

    Anthony Davidson was at the SkyPad to analyse how Charles Leclerc could have avoided crashing his Ferrari in the final part of qualifying.

    Brundle: Leclerc doing a lot of damage at key times

    As well as his crash on Friday, Leclerc ended up in the barriers of the Sprint Shootout at last weekend’s Azerbaijan GP when trying to improve his SQ3 time.

    High-profile crashes have littered Leclerc’s F1 career, and Sky Sports F1’s Martin Brundle thinks the 25-year-old is too often pushing beyond his limits.

    “Leclerc was just totally lit up through there, too hard. We see that a lot with Charles, he doesn’t seem to quite know where the limit is,” Brundle said on commentary.

    “His determination and his speed is so incredible, but there’s no cut off point until he hits something, we’ve seen it a lot through his career and a lot lately as well.

    “He’s just got to take a quarter of a per cent out of it somewhere. He’s doing a lot of damage to that Ferrari and at critical times.”

    The Formula 1 season continues with the Miami GP – watch Sunday’s race live on Sky Sports F1 from 7pm, lights out at 8.30pm. Get Sky Sports

    Source link

  • Miami GP: Lewis Hamilton says Mercedes’ gap to Red Bull is ‘kick in guts’ and has no expectation for Qualifying

    Miami GP: Lewis Hamilton says Mercedes’ gap to Red Bull is ‘kick in guts’ and has no expectation for Qualifying

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Lewis Hamilton was despondent following the performance of his Mercedes during Friday’s practice at the Miami Grand Prix.

    Lewis Hamilton was despondent following the performance of his Mercedes during Friday’s practice at the Miami Grand Prix.

    Lewis Hamilton says it was a “kick in the guts” for Mercedes to be so far behind Red Bull at the end of Friday practice and is going into qualifying day at the Miami GP with no expectations.

    Signs had initially looked promising for Mercedes after George Russell led Hamilton in a surprise one-two in Practice One, albeit their times being set when track conditions were at their best.

    But Friday afternoon saw Mercedes’ difficulties return as Hamilton finished the session seventh, 0.928s off Max Verstappen’s leading time and behind Fernando Alonso and Lando Norris as well as the two Ferraris and Red Bulls. Russell, meanwhile, ended up 15th.

    “We’re not particularly quick and it’s a struggle out there,” Hamilton said on Friday evening.

    “We’re trying lots of different things. P1 looked quite good and then to come into P2 and the true pace came out – it’s a kick in the guts.

    “It’s difficult to take sometimes but it’s OK, we’ll keep on working on it and we’ll regroup tonight and see if we can make some set-up changes and get the car in a sweeter spot.”

    He added: “I’m trying to stay positive with it and we’re working as hard as we can. It’s just we’re dying, desperately need those upgrades for sure.

    “Just got to keep our head down for one more race and then hopefully we’ll start a new path next race.”

    Lewis Hamilton first set the fastest time in opening practice before Mercedes teammate George Russell went even quicker towards the end of the session.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Lewis Hamilton first set the fastest time in opening practice before Mercedes teammate George Russell went even quicker towards the end of the session.

    Lewis Hamilton first set the fastest time in opening practice before Mercedes teammate George Russell went even quicker towards the end of the session.

    A year ago, Mercedes topped a Friday practice session at the inaugural Miami GP before Russell suffered a Q2 exit and Hamilton could only manage sixth in qualifying on Saturday.

    And the seven-time world champion is just hoping to be part of Q3 given the difficulty he is having with the W14 this weekend.

    “I don’t have expectation. The car I just hope I can get it into a better place tomorrow. I hope we can be in Q3 and if we can be mid-bunch of that top 10 that would be great,” Hamilton said.

    “Melbourne was night and day difference, much much nicer to drive there. Baku felt better than here also. Maybe it’s the heat or maybe it’s the balance we have at the moment.

    Sky F1's Anthony Davidson reviews Practice Two ahead of the Miami Grand Prix.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Sky F1’s Anthony Davidson reviews Practice Two ahead of the Miami Grand Prix.

    Sky F1’s Anthony Davidson reviews Practice Two ahead of the Miami Grand Prix.

    “I’m going to stay optimistic and I’m going to stay hopeful that we can get the car in a better place tomorrow and maybe be a couple of steps up.

    “But it feels like, apart from last year we had large-scale bouncing, it generally feels like we’re racing pretty much the same car and that’s the difficult thing.”

    Russell: We can still get ahead of Ferraris, Astons

    George Russell is confident Mercedes can still be the second-quickest team behind frontrunners Red Bull at the Miami Grand Prix.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    George Russell is confident Mercedes can still be the second-quickest team behind frontrunners Red Bull at the Miami Grand Prix.

    George Russell is confident Mercedes can still be the second-quickest team behind frontrunners Red Bull at the Miami Grand Prix.

    Russell’s difficult second session saw him at one point complain that his car felt like it was “three-wheeling” through Turn Two.

    The 25-year-old believes he and the team understand why he struggled on his soft tyre attempts on Friday and retains hope that Mercedes can still get ahead of the Ferraris and Aston Martins come race day.

    “It’s fine margins,” Russell said.

    “If we get things right, there’s no reason why we can’t be ahead of Ferrari and Aston Martin – that’s the aim.

    George Russell had to take to the run-off area during second practice, while Aston Martin's Fernando Alonso had a dig at previous employers Alpine over team radio.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    George Russell had to take to the run-off area during second practice, while Aston Martin’s Fernando Alonso had a dig at previous employers Alpine over team radio.

    George Russell had to take to the run-off area during second practice, while Aston Martin’s Fernando Alonso had a dig at previous employers Alpine over team radio.

    “I think we’ve seen in these first four races now it’s really tight between those three teams, so if only that was for the win and pole position, it would be exciting. But it’s good because it shows if we can get things right, we can be rewarded and jump ahead of them.

    “I think we need to make some improvements overnight. We know we’ve got the potential because we saw it in FP1 and we saw it at the start of FP2, but for sure we just need to get things aligned.”

    Max: I always felt good | Perez: I’ve not driven well

    Red Bull driver Max Verstappen reflects on a positive practice day at the Miami Grand Prix.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Red Bull driver Max Verstappen reflects on a positive practice day at the Miami Grand Prix.

    Red Bull driver Max Verstappen reflects on a positive practice day at the Miami Grand Prix.

    Friday saw contrasting fortunes for the two Red Bull drivers and title rivals.

    Verstappen, who leads Sergio Perez by six points in the championship heading into the weekend, had dominated Practice One until the late laps from the two Mercedes and Charles Leclerc usurped him, but still finished over a second ahead of his team-mate.

    The Dutchman was then nearly half a second ahead of Perez in the afternoon session as he stamped his authority on the weekend.

    “I think it was a good day. Initially I think it was getting used to the track a bit with the new tarmac, I think it was ramping up a lot throughout the day,” Verstappen said.

    “I always felt good in the car and we had good balance.

    “Most importantly today I think we had a good balance in the car to start with, so I felt happy. There’s still a few little things we want to look at.”

    Perez admitted he needed to improve over the remainder of the weekend.

    “I haven’t had the greatest of Fridays but my lap was also pretty bad where I locked up on the final corner,” Perez said.

    “I think there is quite a bit to come together with my driving. I don’t think I drove well today, so if I can improve my driving and get myself a bit more comfortable I’ll be all right.”

    Leclerc on P2 crash: I pushed too much

    Ferrari's Charles Leclerc had a heavy collision with the wall as a red flag was brought out during P2.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc had a heavy collision with the wall as a red flag was brought out during P2.

    Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc had a heavy collision with the wall as a red flag was brought out during P2.

    Leclerc finished third in both of Friday’s practice sessions, but his afternoon running was curtailed 10 minutes early in the second of those when he crashed into the barriers after losing control at Turn Seven, bringing out the red flag.

    Ferrari are running an upgraded floor and diffuser in Miami but the rear of the car escaped undamaged in the crash.

    Leclerc said the crash was due to pushing too hard and struck a defeatist tone about the chances of reeling in Red Bull on Sunday.

    Charles Leclerc crashed his Ferrari in P2 and isn't optimistic about challenging Red Bull for the win in Sunday's race.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Charles Leclerc crashed his Ferrari in P2 and isn’t optimistic about challenging Red Bull for the win in Sunday’s race.

    Charles Leclerc crashed his Ferrari in P2 and isn’t optimistic about challenging Red Bull for the win in Sunday’s race.

    “I pushed a bit too much lost the rear, tried to recover from it, but I had no grip to recover the car. There was no damage to the rear of the car, which is the most important, and tomorrow is another day,” Leclerc said.

    “Apart from that I think the feeling is pretty good over one lap, but over the race we are so far behind. Red Bull is again in a league of it’s own, but very far in front so in the race we have a lot of time to find. In qualifying, we are more or less there.”

    Sky Sports F1’s live Miami GP schedule

    Saturday
    5.15pm: Miami GP Practice Three (session starts 5.30pm)
    8pm: Miami GP Qualifying build-up
    9pm: Miami GP Qualifying
    10.45pm: Ted’s Qualifying Notebook

    Sunday
    7pm: Grand Prix Sunday Miami GP build-up
    8.30pm: THE MIAMI GRAND PRIX
    10.30pm: Chequered Flag Miami GP reaction
    11.30pm: Ted’s Notebook

    The Formula 1 season continues with the Miami GP this weekend. Watch qualifying at 9pm on Saturday with lights out at 8.30pm on Sunday. Get Sky Sports

    Source link

  • F1 Academy: All you need to know ahead of all-female series’ inaugural season

    F1 Academy: All you need to know ahead of all-female series’ inaugural season

    F1 Academy’s inaugural season gets underway with five teams and 15 drivers (Credit: F1 Academy)

    The inaugural season of F1 Academy, the new all-female racing series, gets under way in Austria this weekend.

    The drivers and teams have had four days of pre-season testing in Barcelona and at Circuit Paul Ricard, with British driver Abbi Pulling topping both days of testing in France.

    F1 Academy will race at seven locations in 2023, with the season concluding at Formula 1’s US GP in October. Three races will be held at each venue over the course of the weekend.

    Here Sky Sports F1 breaks down the new series.

    What is F1 Academy?

    F1 Academy was launched in November 2022 by Formula 1 and aims to prepare and develop female drivers to progress to higher levels of competition.

    The category is designed to “give more access to track time, racing and testing, as well as support with technical, physical, and mental preparations”.

    It is hoped the F1 Academy will provide the experience to progress to Formula 3, and help Formula 2 and Formula 1 opportunities in the future.

    Susie Wolff, the former Williams F1 development driver and most recently team principal of Formula E team Venturi, was named managing director of the series in March.

    F1 Academy managing director Susie Wolff explains what she hopes the achieve with the new all-female series

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    F1 Academy managing director Susie Wolff explains what she hopes the achieve with the new all-female series

    F1 Academy managing director Susie Wolff explains what she hopes the achieve with the new all-female series

    Who are the drivers and teams?

    F1 Academy features five teams – ART, Campos, Rodin Carlin, MP Motorsport and Prema – each entering three cars to make up a 15-strong grid.

    All five teams also race in Formula 3 and Formula 2 and have pedigree for bringing through young talent: Lewis Hamilton and George Russell are ART alumni, Lando Norris was given his F2 debut by Campos before racing for Carlin, Charles Leclerc and Mick Schumacher both won the F2 title with Prema while MP Motorsport had last season’s F2 champion Felipe Drugovich.

    F1 Academy drivers and teams

    Driver Team Car Number Nationality Age
    Lena Buhler ART Grand Prix 7 Swiss 25
    Carrie Schreiner ART Grand Prix 8 German 24
    Chloe Grant ART Grand Prix 9 British 17
    Nerea Marti Campos Racing 1 Spanish 21
    Lola Lovinfosse Campos Racing 2 French 17
    Maite Caceres Campos Racing 3 Uruguayan 19
    Abbi Pulling Rodin Carlin 10 British 20
    Jessica Edgar Rodin Carlin 11 British 18
    Megan Gilkes Rodin Carlin 12 Canadian 22
    Amna Al Qubaisi MP Motorsport 6 Emirati 23
    Hamda Al Qubaisi MP Motorsport 4 Emirati 20
    Emely de Heus MP Motorsport 5 Dutch 20
    Marta Garcia PREMA Racing 15 Spanish 22
    Chloe Chong PREMA Racing 14 British-Canadian 16
    Bianca Bustamante PREMA Racing 16 Filipino 18

    A number of drivers have joined F1 Academy having previously raced in W Series. Among those is Pulling, who finished fourth in last season’s W Series standings.

    Speaking to Sky Sports about her ambitions for her first season in F1 Academy, Rodin Carlin’s Pulling said: “I want to win races and show consistency and show that I can be a front runner.

    “I think I showed that at times last year (in W Series) and I just want to solidify that. The team have got a really good package. There is a lot of work going on behind the scenes and I think it will all add up and amount to success.”

    Abbi Pulling is one of four British drivers on the F1 Academy grid

    Abbi Pulling is one of four British drivers on the F1 Academy grid

    Prema’s Marta Garcia is a former winner in W Series while Campos’ Nerea Marti was on the podium three times.

    And some of the youngest talents on the F1 Academy grid are British with 17-year-old Chloe Grant, 18-year-old Jessica Edgar and 16-year-old Chloe Chong joining Pulling on the grid.

    Pulling is one of two drivers on the grid affiliated already to an F1 team, with the 20-year-old part of Alpine’s academy. Lena Buhler is part of the Sauber Academy.

    What car will they be driving?

    F1 Academy is using the same chassis as Formula 4

    F1 Academy is using the same chassis as Formula 4

    F1 Academy will see all drivers race in identical cars – a Tatuus T421 chassis that is also used in Formula 4.

    The cars are powered by turbo-charged engines supplied by Autotecnica and capable of 174 horsepower, while Pirelli will supply tyres.

    The cars will have a top speed of 240 kph (149mph).

    Where will F1 Academy be racing?

    F1 Academy will race at six European tracks in its inaugural season before its finale at the US GP in October.

    F1 Academy 2023 calendar

    Round Date Venue
    1 April 28-29 Spielberg, Austria
    2 May 5-7 Valencia, Spain
    3 May 19-21 Barcelona, Spain
    4 June 23-25 Zandvoort, Netherlands
    5 July 7-9 Monza, Italy
    6 July 29-30 Le Castellet, France
    7 October 20-22 Austin, USA

    The season begins with a two-day event at the Red Bull Ring this weekend, April 28-29.

    Spain will then host two events at Valencia and Barcelona in May before summer stops in the Netherlands (Zandvoort), Italy (Monza) and France (Le Castellet).

    While only the season-finale is part of an F1 weekend in 2023, F1 president Stefano Domenicali has already confirmed F1 Academy will be held exclusively at Formula 1 race weekends in 2024.

    What is the weekend format?

    Each race weekend will feature seven sessions of track action.

    They will begin with two 40-minute practice sessions before two qualifying sessions later in the day, each lasting 15 minutes.

    Qualifying 1 will set the grid for Race 1 while Qualifying 2 sets the grid for Race 3.

    Race 2’s grid will be set by reversing the top eight drivers from Qualifying 1.

    Races 1 and 3 will both be 30 minutes long plus one lap. Race 2 is a shorter, lasting 20 minutes plus one lap.

    “The format is huge for development,” Pulling told Sky Sports. “I’ve been fighting to get some seat time and this year it looks like it will be really good.

    “Seven weekends with three races per weekend – two 30-minute and one 20-minute reverse grid race so that throws some race craft into the mix as even if someone is driving away with it, they’ll have to go back.

    “The testing that they provide…is great for developing drivers at a young age.”

    What is the points system?

    F1 Academy will have the same points scoring system as Formula 1 for Races 1 and 3, with 25 points being awarded to the winner and points being awarded down to P10.

    The points in descending order will be: 25, 18, 15, 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, 2, 1.

    The shorter Race 2 will see 10 points awarded to the race winner and points being awarded down to P8.

    The points in descending order for Race 2 will be: 10, 8, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

    F1 Academy race points system

    Race 1 Race 2 Race 3
    P1 25 points 10 points 25 points
    P2 18 8 18
    P3 15 6 15
    P4 12 5 12
    P5 10 4 10
    P6 8 3 8
    P7 6 2 6
    P8 4 1 4
    P9 2 2
    P10 1 1

    In all three races, a driver will receive an additional point if they set the fastest lap, provided they finish in the top 10.

    The driver who claims pole position in each qualifying session will also be awarded two points.

    Source link

  • American Madness

    American Madness

    This article was featured in One Story to Read Today, a newsletter in which our editors recommend a single must-read from The Atlantic, Monday through Friday. Sign up for it here.      


    On the night of June 17, 1998, a Cornell campus police officer named Ellen Brewer had just begun her shift when she noticed a tall, silhouetted figure moving slowly across the engineering quad. The man appeared to be dressed all in black. Brewer felt a whisper of danger. She slowed her car, and the shrouded figure began loping toward her. He raised a hand and hailed her as if she were a taxi driver. As he drew closer, she thought he must have been the victim of an assault, perhaps in need of medical assistance.

    Explore the May 2023 Issue

    Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.

    View More

    Suddenly, as if in a single stride, the man was at her window. He lowered his face, shiny with sweat, close to hers. He was muttering incoherently; his rust-colored beard and hair were wildly matted. He seemed to be saying that he might have killed someone, his girlfriend or perhaps a windup doll. Brewer radioed in the strange encounter, requested backup, and got out of her car.

    She thought again that the disoriented man, whose clothes were bloody, had been attacked or maybe had fallen into one of the steep gorges that famously intersect the campus, but when she tried to steer him out of the road, he leaped back, a large hand clenched into a fist.

    The police station was all of 100 yards away, on Campus Road, and officers were already coming toward them, some on foot, others in cars. They escorted the man, whose name was Michael Laudor, to Barton Hall, the looming stone fortress that the campus police shared with the athletics department.

    Once inside, Michael didn’t need much prodding to answer questions, but whenever he mentioned possibly harming his girlfriend, whom he sometimes referred to as his fiancée, he added, “or a windup doll.”

    When Sergeant Philip Mospan, the officer in charge that night, asked Michael if he was hurt, he received a simple no. In that case, “where did the blood all over your person come from?” Michael told him it was Caroline’s blood.

    “Who is Caroline?” the sergeant asked.

    “She’s my girlfriend,” Michael said. “I hurt her. I think I killed her.”

    Was Michael sure about that?

    He thought so, but asked, “Can we check on her?”

    His concern seemed urgent and genuine, though puzzlingly he said this had happened in Hastings-on-Hudson, New York, 220 miles away.

    Mospan prefaced his request to the Hastings-on-Hudson dispatcher by saying, “This may sound off the wall …” Because who kills someone in Westchester County, drives to Binghamton, and takes a bus to Ithaca, as Michael said he had done, only to surrender to campus police? The dispatcher asked him to wait a moment, and then a detective came on the line. “Hold him!” the detective said. “He did just what he said he did.” They had people at the apartment. The woman was dead, the scene ghastly.

    And so it was that my best friend from childhood, who had grown up on the same street as me; gone to the same sleepaway camp, the same schools, the same college; competed for the same prizes and dreamed the same dream of becoming a writer, was arrested for murdering the person he loved most in the world.

    When police officers from Hastings-on-Hudson showed up the next morning to bring Michael back there, they were surprised to find reporters, photographers, and TV cameras waiting outside the Ithaca jail. Jeanine Pirro, then the Westchester district attorney, who charged Michael with second-degree murder, would call him “the most famous schizophrenic in America,” a perverse designation, though strangely in tune with the aura of specialness that had characterized so much of his life, and that had shaped the expectations we’d grown up with. Michael was famous for brilliance. He’d gone to Yale Law School after developing schizophrenia, and was called a genius in The New York Times, which led to book and movie deals. Brad Pitt was attached to star.

    Michael’s friends and family and his supporters at Yale had thought intelligence could save him, allow him to transcend the terrible disease that was causing his mind to detach from reality. Michael was arrested on a campus where he’d spent six happy weeks at an elite program for high-school kids in the summer of 1980, when we were 16. I sometimes wondered if he was trying to get back to a time when his mind was his friend and not his enemy, but a forensic psychiatrist who examined Michael for the prosecution set me straight: Michael thought his fiancée was a “nonhuman impostor” bent on his torture and death, and in his terrified delusional state, he had fled hours to Cornell hoping to evade destruction and call the police. In other words, he was seeking asylum.

    Asylum was also what Michael needed in the months before he killed Carrie. Not “an asylum” in the defunct manner of the vast compounds whose ruins still dot the American landscape like collapsing Scottish castles, but a respite from tormenting delusions—that his fiancée was an alien, that his medication was poison. Because he was very sick but did not always know it, Michael had refused the psychiatric care that his family and friends desperately wanted for him but could not require him to get.

    Michael needed a version of what New York City Mayor Eric Adams called for in November, when announcing an initiative to assess homeless individuals so incapacitated by severe mental illness that they cannot recognize their own impairment or meet basic survival needs—even if that means bringing them to a hospital for evaluation against their will. “For too long,” Adams proclaimed, “there’s been a gray area where policy, law, and accountability have not been clear, and this has allowed people in need to slip through the cracks. This culture of uncertainty has led to untold suffering and deep frustration. It cannot continue.”

    Though 89 percent of recently surveyed New York City residents favored “making it easier to admit those who are dangerous to the public, or themselves, to mental-health facilities,” attacks on the mayor’s modest adjustments to city policy began immediately. News stories suggested that a great roundup of mentally ill homeless people was in the offing. “Just because someone smells, because they haven’t had a shower for weeks,” Norman Siegel, a former head of the New York Civil Liberties Union, told the Times, “because they’re mumbling, because their clothes are disheveled, that doesn’t mean they’re a danger to themselves or others.”

    Never mind that these were not the criteria outlined in the Adams plan. Paul Appelbaum, the director of the Division of Law, Ethics, and Psychiatry at Columbia, says that the government has an interest in protecting people who are unable to meet their basic needs, and that he believes the mayor’s proposal has been largely misunderstood. “There’s an intrinsic humanitarian imperative not to stand by idly while these people waste away,” Appelbaum recently told Psychiatric News.

    The people Adams is trying to help have been failed by the same legal and psychiatric systems that failed Michael. They all came of age amid the wreckage of deinstitutionalization, a movement born out of a belief in the 1950s and ’60s that new medication along with outpatient care could empty the sprawling state hospitals. Built in the 19th century to provide asylum and “moral care” to people chained in basements or abandoned to life on the streets, these monuments of civic pride had deteriorated over time, becoming overcrowded and understaffed “snake pits,” where patients were neglected and sometimes abused. Walter Freeman, notorious for the ice-pick lobotomy (which is exactly what it sounds like), was so horrified by the naked patients crammed into state hospitals, shockingly featured in a famous 1946 Life article, that he developed a new slogan: “Lobotomy gets them home.”

    But getting people home was never going to be a one-step process. This would have been true even if the first antipsychotic medications, developed in the ’50s, had proved to be a pharmaceutical panacea. And it would have been true even if the neighborhood mental-health clinics that psychiatrists had promised could replace state hospitals had been adequately funded. During the revolutions of the ’60s, institutions were easier to tear down than to reform, and the idea of asylum for the most afflicted got lost along with the idea that severe psychiatric disorders are biological conditions requiring medical care. For many psychiatrists of the era, mental illness was caused by environmental disturbances that could be repaired by treating society itself as the patient.

    The questions that should have been asked in the ’60s, and that might have saved Michael and Carrie, are relevant to Mayor Adams’s policies now: Will there be follow-up care, protocols for complying with treatment, housing options with supportive services and a way to fund them? Will there be psychiatrists and hospital beds for those who need them? But it would be ironic if all of the past failures at the federal, state, and local levels became an argument against making a first small step toward repair.

    Michael Laudor and his fiancée, Caroline Costello, in a photo found by the police in their apartment in Hastings-on-Hudson (Photographer unknown; Tolga Tezcan / Getty)

    If I had known Michael only as he appeared grimly on the front pages of the tabloids 25 years ago, or Caroline Costello as half of a smiling picture all the more tragic for being so full of innocence and hope, I would not have understood how much is at stake in the current efforts to improve the care given to people with severe mental illness. Neither Adams’s policies—nor the more comprehensive measures advanced by Governor Gavin Newsom, in California—will bring about a sweeping transformation; only incremental changes, and many accompanying efforts at all levels of government, will make a difference. And these will not be possible without a shift in the way people think about the problem.

    Now when I think about the frenzied moments before Michael killed Carrie, when violence was imminent and intervention was necessary but impossible, I understand that it isn’t on the brink of crisis but earlier that something can be done—though only by a culture that is capable of making difficult choices and devoting the resources to implement them.

    But I knew Michael before he thought Nazis were gunning for him. I knew him before the lurid headlines, the Hollywood deal, the publishing contract, and the New York Times profile that proclaimed him a genius. I knew him as a 10-year-old boy, when I was also 10 and he was my best friend.

    The Cuckoo’s Nest

    I met Michael as I was examining a heap of junk that the previous owners of the house we had just moved into in New Rochelle had left in a neat pile at the edge of our lawn. It was 1973. A boy with shaggy red-brown hair and large, tinted aviator glasses walked over to welcome me to the neighborhood. He was tall and gawky but with a lilting stride that was oddly purposeful for a kid our age, as if he actually had someplace to go.

    His habit of launching himself up and forward with every step, gathering height to achieve distance, was so distinctive that it earned him the nickname “Toes.” He was also called “Big,” which is less imaginative than “Toes,” but how many kids get two nicknames? And Michael was big. Not big like our classmate Hal, who appeared to be attending fifth grade on the GI Bill, but big through some subtle combination of height, intelligence, posture, and willpower.

    Even standing still, he would rock forward and rise up on the balls of his feet, trying to meet his growth spurt halfway. He stood beside me on Mereland Road in that unsteady but self‑assured posture, rising and falling like a wave. He was socially effective in the same way he was good at basketball—through uncowed persistence. I often heard in later years that people found him intimidating, but for me it was the opposite. Despite my shyness—or because of it—Michael’s self‑confidence put me at ease. I fed off his belief in himself.

    Was Michael bouncing a basketball the day I met him? He often had one with him, the way you might take a dog out for a walk. I’d hear the ball halfway down the block, knocking before he knocked.

    Even today, when I hear the taut report of a basketball on an empty street, the muffled echo thrown back a split second later like the after-pulse of a heartbeat, I have a visceral memory of Michael coming to fetch me for one‑on‑one or H‑O‑R‑S‑E, or simply to shoot around if we were too deep in conversation for a game or if I was tired of losing.

    Michael might just as easily have had a book the day he introduced himself. He often had several tucked under one arm, and he would dump them unceremoniously at the base of the schoolyard basketball hoop. It was always an eclectic pile: Ray Bradbury, Hermann Hesse, Zane Grey Westerns, books his father assigned him—To Kill a Mockingbird or a prose translation of Beowulf—stirred in with the Dune trilogy and Doc Savage adventures.

    Our fathers were both college professors, but Michael’s father, who taught economics, sported a leather bomber jacket and spoke in a booming Brooklyn manner. My father, who taught German literature, wore tweed jackets from Brooks Brothers, spoke with a soft Viennese accent, and named me and my sister for his parents, who had been murdered by the Nazis.

    Michael had all four grandparents, something I’d seen only in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. They did not all sleep in one bed, like Charlie’s grandparents, but he saw a lot of them. His Russian-born grandparents still lived in Brighton Beach, Brooklyn, where his father had grown up and his grandmother Frieda had stuffed money into a hole in the bathroom wall until a plumber came and stole it one day. Michael recounted stories about “crazy” Frieda with such amused affection that it was a shock when he told me, years later, that she had schizophrenia.

    Every weekday morning during the school year, I’d walk to the bottom of our one‑block street, ring Michael’s bell, and wait for him to step groggily out from the household chaos. We’d hike up the hidden steps behind his house that led to the basketball court, climb a second flight of outdoor stairs, and slip into the school through a side door that felt like a private entrance.

    Thanks to Michael, I became a big fan of Doc Savage, originally published in pulp-fiction magazines in the 1930s but reissued as cheap paperbacks starting in the ’60s. We joked about the archaic language and dated futurisms—long‑distance phone calls!—but Doc Savage, charged with righteous adrenaline, formed an important part of the archive of manly virtues that I received secondhand from Michael, who got them wholesale from his father, his grandfathers, old movies, and assorted dime novels.

    Like Doc Savage, Michael had a photographic memory. He also read at breakneck speed. I was a fast talker but a slow reader; Michael burned through the assigned reading with such robotic swiftness that he was allowed to read whatever he wanted to, even during regular class time.

    He kept stacks of paperbacks on his desk at school, working his way through fresh piles every day. He didn’t just read the books; he read them all at the same time, like Bobby Fischer playing chess with multiple opponents. After a few chapters of one, he’d reach for another and read for a while before grabbing a third without losing focus, as if they all contained pieces of a single, connected story.

    I was a direct beneficiary of all that reading. He seemed to have almost as much of a compulsion to tell me about the books as he did to read them, and I acquired a phantom bookshelf entirely populated by twice-told tales I heard while we were shooting baskets, going for pizza, or walking around the neighborhood.

    2 photos: boy with 1970s haircut smiling with other children; group photo of 10 people
    Left: Michael Laudor at the author’s house in New Rochelle, New York, 1976. Right: Farm Camp Lowy , in Windsor, New York, summer 1977. The author is second from the left in the second row, in a Yankees T-shirt; Michael sits two seats to his left, looking upward in a dark T-shirt. (Courtesy of Jonathan Rosen; Studiocasper / Getty; Petekarici / Getty)

    Michael’s precocity made him seem like someone who had lived a full life span already and was just slumming it in childhood, or living backwards like Benjamin Button or Merlyn. My parents were amused by the speed with which he took to calling them Bob and Norma, and the ease with which he held forth on politics while I waited for him to finish so we could play Mille Bornes or go outside. I knew that the president was a crook—but Michael knew who Liddy, Haldeman, and Ehrlichman were and what they had done, matters he expounded as if Deep Throat had whispered to him personally in the schoolyard.

    Michael also saw more R-rated movies than I did. In 1976, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, which was about a sane wiseass named Randle McMurphy locked in a mental hospital by a crazy culture, won the Academy Award for Best Picture. Michael explained that the hospital tries drugging McMurphy into submission and shocking his brain until his body writhes, then finishes him off with a lobotomy, all because he won’t behave.

    I’d never heard of a lobotomy, but Michael assured me it was real; they stuck an ice pick in your head and wiggled it until you went slack like a pithed frog, docile enough to be dissected alive. This was a far cry from the “delicate brain operation” that Doc Savage performed on criminals to make them good so they would not have to rot in prison.

    The lobotomy in Cuckoo’s Nest reduces McMurphy to zombie helplessness. His friend Chief Bromden smothers him to death with a pillow and escapes out a window so the other inmates will still have a hero to believe in. Like a lot of things in the ’70s, the movie sent a mixed message, exposing the abuses of psychiatric hospitals while justifying the killing of a mentally impaired person.

    The summer before college, I found myself filled with optimism. I’d always been the tortoise to Michael’s hare, but we both got into Yale, and for the ninth year in a row we would be going to the same school. I was surprised when Michael told me one afternoon, as we lounged on my parents’ patio, that he did not think we would see much of each other at Yale. When I asked him why, he told me that I was simply too slow.

    We did see less of each other in college, but when I’d run into Michael on Metro-North, heading home for vacation, we’d talk in the old way, nonstop until New Rochelle.

    Impatient as always, Michael decided to graduate in three years. He also informed me that he had decided to become rich, as if that were something you could declare like a major. He had been recruited by a Boston-based management consulting firm called Bain & Company, a place, he explained, where the supersmart became the superrich.

    He was ironic about his choice to join the ranks of the young, upwardly mobile philistines the media had taken to calling yuppies, but wanted me to know that he was not abandoning intellectual or artistic aspirations: His plan was to spend a decade making gold bricks for Pharaoh, after which he would buy his freedom and become a writer.

    I lost track of Michael during his time at Bain, though once or twice I’d hear my name on Mereland Road while home for a visit. Turning, I’d see him loping up the hill, grinning as if we were still fifth graders and his fancy trench coat was a costume.

    But I learned later that he was having a rough time. The pressure at Bain was constant. Michael began complaining that his heart raced, his digestion was bad, and Machiavellian higher‑ups were “out to get him” but would never let him go because of his value to the firm, which seemed unlikely even for a place known as “the KGB of the consulting world.” He quit Bain in 1985 and began writing in earnest—the 10-year plan had become a one-year plan. Even after he quit, Michael thought his phone was being tapped and Bainies were spying on him.

    Still, his life sounded like the fulfillment of a dream. He was living in the attic of a grand house with a private beach at the south end of New Rochelle owned by the parents of a friend. The mansion might have drifted north and west from the gilded north shore of Long Island. Michael called it “the Gatsby House” and claimed that he could see a green light glinting far out on the water as he stayed up late, writing stories and staring into the night. He wanted to be Fitzgerald and Gatsby both, the dreamer and the dream. Didn’t we all?

    The friend’s parents happened to be Andy and Jane Ferber, community psychiatrists who had dedicated their life to liberating people with severe mental illness from state institutions. The Ferbers were at the center of an overlapping collection of friends and colleagues who referred to themselves as “the Network,” drawn together by their experience in community psychiatry and a sincere desire to leave the world better than they’d found it.

    They’d been inspired by the Scottish psychiatrist R. D. Laing, who called insanity “a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world,” and books such as Asylums, Erving Goffman’s 1961 landmark study that focused on the impact psychiatric institutions had on the behavior and personality of patients rather than on the illnesses that sent them there. A sociologist, Goffman frequently put the term mental illness in quotation marks, though he abandoned the practice in later writing, after his wife’s suicide.

    Most of the Network had met in the ’60s, when President John F. Kennedy had vowed to replace the “cold mercy of custodial isolation” with the “open warmth of community concern.” The Community Mental Health Act of 1963, which Kennedy signed on October 31 of that year, promised that an “emphasis on prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation will be substituted for a desultory interest in confining patients in an institution to wither away.” It was the institution’s turn to wither away, replaced by the sort of communal care offered by the center that Jane Ferber had run in downtown New Rochelle, with its workshops, visits to patients in board-and-care facilities, and drop-in services.

    One problem was that nobody knew how to prevent severe mental illness; another was that rehabilitation was not always possible, and could only follow treatment, which was easily rejected. And despite having been created to replace hospitals caring for the most intractably ill, community mental-health centers, as their name suggested, aimed to treat the whole of society, a broad mandate that favored a population with needs that could be addressed during drop-ins. “It wasn’t that we weren’t interested in dealing with difficult cases,” writes the psychologist Roger B. Burt, looking back at the community center he ran in Baltimore in the late ’60s, but that he and his idealistic colleagues feared that “to blindly accept ‘dumping’ [of severely ill patients from the old asylums] would have bled the staff of time and taken services away from people who would benefit from it.” The only recourse for families caring for severely ill relatives in acute distress was to call the police, who would arrest them.

    The police didn’t like this, and who can blame them? They did not sign up to be caretakers of people suffering psychotic episodes. Meanwhile, the most vulnerable members of the community were being criminalized.

    The Network’s values were well expressed in Crisis: A Handbook for Systemic Intervention, which Jane Ferber and a colleague had published in the late ’70s, written for mental-health professionals who “feel in some way oppressed by the existence of mental hospitals, jails, reform schools, hierarchical corporations or governments of covert nepotism.”

    One of the manual’s case histories described an elderly woman with “regressive psychosis” who had been wandering the halls of her Upper West Side boardinghouse naked. Members of Jane’s team were called in to help get the woman into a nursing home; instead, they coached her on “how to avoid being committed.” They gave her tips like “wear your clothes at all times” and “evacuate in the toilet instead of the floor,” and they reminded her to smile at the nurses “no matter what.”

    Keeping people out of the hospital was the hospitals’ policy too, even if it had more to do with legal constraints and available beds than faith in community care. Around the time that Michael moved into the Gatsby house, there were newspaper stories about a woman with schizophrenia named Joyce Brown who had been hospitalized against her will as part of a new program to prevent people from dying on the streets, a sort of precursor to Mayor Adams’s initiative. The program included a broader interpretation of commitment laws and promised appropriate housing upon discharge.

    Brown slept on a sidewalk grate; ran into traffic; defecated on herself; screamed racial epithets at Black men (though she was Black herself); and tore up dollar bills, set them on fire, and urinated on them. But a judge ordered her released. He agreed with her lawyers at the New York Civil Liberties Union, headed by Norman Siegel at the time, and said that her behavior was the result of homelessness rather than its cause. Though burning money “may not satisfy a society increasingly oriented to profit‑making and bottom‑line pragmatism,” the judge wrote, Brown’s behavior was “consistent with the independence and pride she vehemently insists on asserting.”

    Her sisters, who had struggled to care for Brown in their homes before psychosis, drug abuse, and violent behavior had made it impossible, came to a different conclusion. If the judge believed that a Black woman shrieking obscenities and lifting her skirt to show passersby her naked buttocks was living a life of “independence and pride,” they said after the ruling, he must be a racist who thought such degradation was “good enough for her, not for him or his kind.” If that were his sister on the street, they had no doubt, he “would not stand for it.”

    Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who had served on President Kennedy’s mental-health task force as a young assistant secretary of labor, had helped draft the report that led to the Community Mental Health Act. Years later, as a U.S. senator representing New York, he looked back with deep regret. In a 1989 letter to the Times, written in a city “filled with homeless, deranged people,” he wondered what would have happened if someone had told Kennedy, “Before you sign the bill you should know that we are not going to build anything like the number of community centers we will need. One in five in New York City. The hospitals will empty out, but there will be no place for the patients to be cared for in their communities.” If the president had known, Moynihan wrote, “would he not have put down his pen?”

    The Locked Ward

    While I was studying English literature in graduate school at UC Berkeley, and learning from Foucault that mental illness is a “social construct” invented to imprison enemies of the state, Michael was being hounded by Nazis in New Rochelle. Even if they were imaginary, they ran him off the road when he was driving and tried to run him down when he was walking. Characters from a thriller he was writing stalked him. Even after he burned the novel, he brought a baseball bat into bed with him.

    Jane found Michael a psychiatrist from the Network whose intellectual manner appealed to him. He went home to his parents’ house but remained a part of the Network’s extended family.

    One cold winter morning before work in 1987, my father saw him in the flapping remnant of his fancy trench coat, walking distractedly up Mereland Road like someone with no place to go in a hurry. My father was waiting outside for his ride to the train station. The closer Michael got, the worse he looked, and my father asked him what was wrong.

    I haven’t been well, Michael told him, uncharacteristically laconic. My father was deeply affected by Michael’s drawn and distracted features, his almost palpable aura of affliction. My father wanted to stay and talk more, but his ride arrived. He got in the car with the feeling that he was abandoning someone in crisis.

    A few days later, my parents called me. They sounded so grave and strange that I thought my grandmother must have died, but my father said they were calling about Michael Laudor. The formal use of his full name was an acknowledgment of how far apart we’d drifted and a portent of bad news: Michael was in the psychiatric unit of Columbia-Presbyterian.

    My mother told me that Michael thought his parents were Nazis, and that he’d been patrolling his house with a kitchen knife. Ruth had been unable to convince Michael that she was his mother and not a Nazi, so she’d locked herself in her bedroom and called the police.

    As soon as I got off the phone, I called the Laudors. I still knew the number by heart, though it had been years since I’d dialed it. Michael’s father, Chuck, encouraged me to call Michael, who was up on 168th Street in a locked ward. This was the first time I’d heard that terrible phrase. No phones in the rooms, just a payphone in the corridor.

    Sometimes, Chuck said, the doctors gave Michael special drugs, and if he was “tuned in,” he would talk. The notion affected me almost as much as “locked ward.” The idea that someone so verbal needed to be “tuned in” was hard to imagine.

    I dialed the number Chuck gave me, and Michael answered in a groggy voice, as if he’d been waiting by the payphone and fallen asleep. I was afraid he wouldn’t recognize me or want to talk—I’d been afraid he wouldn’t be able to talk—but he knew me right away and sounded pleased, in a weary way, that I was on the phone.

    His voice was leaden and far off, but I felt the muffled intensity of his familiar presence. “I’ve never been in prison before,” he said ruefully when I asked how he was doing. The “day room” was full of noise and cigarette smoke, the TV on all the time. “I don’t like smoky rooms with televisions,” he told me, “but they say if you want to leave, you have to go there and interact.”

    It sounded bleak. Was there nothing else to do?

    “Eight a.m. breakfast. Twelve p.m. lunch. Five p.m. dinner.”

    It was only after I’d laughed that I realized this might not be deadpan humor, just deadpan delivery. Disconcertingly, I wasn’t sure. Michael hadn’t lost his old way of saying things, and I was still listening with ingrained expectations. Could he still be ironic? Could he still tell a joke?

    I wanted to apologize for laughing, but didn’t. I felt Michael’s need to talk, to tell me things more than to converse. He was “tuned in,” as Chuck put it, though to a different frequency from the one I was used to.

    “Dr. Ferber says I have a delicate brain,” he told me with a hint of pride that only enhanced the pathos of his abject situation.

    I’d called half-hoping that Michael wouldn’t come to the phone, but I heard myself asking if he wanted a visitor. He was eager for one. We agreed that I’d visit on the coming Tuesday. I gave him my phone number in Manhattan and had to repeat each number very slowly.

    “It’s hard to work the pen right now,” he said.

    A taciturn attendant with keys on a ring like a jailer’s in a movie unlocked the heavy door of Michael’s ward. The door had a small, thick window at eye level. The attendant locked the door behind us, and I felt a clinch of claustrophobia. Locked ward was not a metaphor.

    I followed the attendant. Michael was sitting rigidly on his bed, trancelike. His parents, in chairs near the bed, leaped up when I came in. Ruth hugged me hard and Chuck shook my hand. After they left the room to give us a chance to talk, Michael seemed marginally more relaxed, but he was apparently past thinking they were Nazis. He shifted uncomfortably on the bed, an occasional tremor running through his body.

    At this point, no one had yet named Michael’s illness for me, saying only that he’d had “a break.” Michael referred to himself as paranoid, but who isn’t? The doctors were giving him drugs, he told me, but not much beyond that. He felt like a television set with bad reception; nobody knew what to do except move the antenna around and bang on one side and then the other, hoping the picture would improve.

    Before he wound up in the hospital, he had applied to the top seven law schools in the country. They’d all accepted him, though by then he was in no condition to do anything about it, so he’d asked his brother to reject all of them except Yale, which he deferred for a year.

    It was, in a way, a typical Michael story: He had rejected the law schools, not the other way around.

    Michael said it was easier to walk than to sit, so we went out into the corridor and walked up and down together. He carried himself with effortful stillness, cautiously erect. At one point he led me to a barred window that looked out over fire escapes, water towers, the windowless back ends of buildings exposed by demolition, things not meant to be seen.

    “Look what’s become of me,” he said pitiably, as if he were the view.

    Michael volunteered that he could leave whenever he wanted to, because he had—at his father’s urgent insistence—signed himself in. This surprised me, not only because he hated being there but also because of the dramatic story I’d heard about his arrival.

    It would not have occurred to me that someone marching around with a kitchen knife might not be considered a danger to himself or others. Michael had carried the knife, and slept with the baseball bat, because he’d thought his parents had been replaced by surgically altered Nazis who had murdered them and wanted to kill him. His psychiatrist considered that defensive, not aggressive, behavior.

    The doctors at Columbia-Presbyterian believed he ought to be there. The longer they could keep him, the more time he would have to receive treatment and to heal, a process much slower than the temporary abatement of florid symptoms that medication provided. He was persuaded to stay, or was at least afraid to leave.

    Visiting Michael, I found it impossible to pretend that he was suffering from a “social construct.” I disliked the hospital, but even with its heavy locked door, I knew it wasn’t a branch of the “carceral state” devised by a power‑mad society to torment him.

    Michael spent eight months in the locked ward at Columbia-Presbyterian, which, he murmured guiltily, cost even more than Yale. His long stay gave his doctors time to find the least incapacitating dose of the powerful drugs that were supposed to have eliminated mental hospitals years before.

    Michael’s medication was calibrated carefully enough that he was no longer convinced Josef Mengele was preparing to remove his brain without anesthesia. He had his suspicions, but, as he later said, he’d stopped trying to bash his skull against the sink in a preemptive effort to destroy his own brain. Now when hallucinations came calling, Michael could often recognize them for what they were and “change the channel,” as he put it.

    Michael left the hospital to live among the ruins of multiple systems. He would have to continue taking antipsychotic medication, though 15 percent of people with schizophrenia were “treatment resistant,” according to the psychiatrist E. Fuller Torrey, the author of the 1983 book Surviving Schizophrenia: A Family Manual. “Treatment resistant” referred to patients who weren’t helped by medication, not those who resisted taking it. That percentage was much higher than 15 percent, in part because the conviction that you weren’t sick was often an aspect of the illness, especially at times of acute psychosis.

    Before Michael’s psychotic break tipped the balance one way, and medication tipped it back the other, he had seemed to both know and not know what was happening to him—a state strangely mirrored by those around him, who had also recognized and ignored his illness by turns. I’d experienced for myself how rational his reasoning manner made unreasonable things appear. Ruth and Chuck had helped Michael install debugging devices on his phone, and by the time they realized that they’d been played by his delusions, he’d reclassified them as double agents.

    I felt sadness when I saw Michael struggling through an intermediate existence after he got out of the hospital. His slowed speech, stiff formality, and dark suit, a hand‑me‑down from his former self, made me think of an undertaker in an old movie. I also felt sympathy, aversion, affection, and fear in unfamiliar and shifting combinations. When I saw him on Mereland, his collar was half up and half down. I wanted to smooth it down for him, or lift up the other side, but did neither.

    Halfway

    Michael moved into a halfway house in White Plains called Futura House. Suburbs didn’t like halfway houses or group homes, and New York suburbs had been very successful at excluding them. Michael’s mother said he was lucky to get into one, given how many fewer spaces there were than people seeking them.

    The real trouble with halfway houses was that they were short‑term solutions for people with long‑term needs. Residents might do everything expected of them, take their medication, and follow all the rules, and still not be ready to move on after the one‑ or two‑year limit.

    Supportive housing that combined psychiatric and social services with affordable lodging hardly existed at the time. People might shuttle between transitional housing, a family home, a hospital, a board‑and‑care facility, the home of a different relative, followed by another hospital, though never for long. Federal benefits excluded state hospitals, creating an incentive for states to offload costly patients. The process would start again, but never moving in a straight line as it followed the course of an illness that waxed and waned, and responded better or worse to medication at different times. The disability checks Michael received, and the Medicaid payments he was eligible for, did not create a community, let alone a caring one. Checks and pills were what remained of a grand promise, the ingredients of a mental-health-care system that had never been baked but were handed out like flour and yeast in separate packets to starving people.

    Most of Michael’s disability check went straight to the halfway house. He was poor, he said, and not in a temporary or bohemian way.

    As part of its congressional testimony in the 1980s about the crisis in care for people with schizophrenia, the National Institute of Mental Health prepared a chart showing that only 17 percent of adults with schizophrenia were getting outpatient care; 6 percent were living in state hospitals, 5 percent in nursing homes, and 14 percent in short‑term inpatient facilities. That left a full 58 percent of the schizophrenic population unaccounted for. Would Michael end up among the lost population?

    Michael didn’t like Futura House, but he still heard its loud clock ticking. Every few months, he had a “resident review,” where counselors talked about a “life plan” and “vocational readiness.” (Futura House and the day program at St. Vincent’s Hospital had relationships with local businesses.) The counselors emphasized small steps, low stress, and a noncompetitive environment. Not necessarily forever, but definitely for now. One possibility, endorsed by the psychiatrists at the hospital, was for Michael to work as a cashier at Macy’s, a suggestion that fell like a hammer blow of humiliation.

    Michael told the story of his father taking him to Macy’s, where they watched beleaguered clerks get pushed around by impatient customers, as an epiphanic moment. The verdict was clear: Yale Law School would be a lot less stressful.

    Prometheus at Yale

    For the network watching over Michael, choosing Yale Law School was a no-brainer. He might be suffering from a thought disorder, but his brilliance would save him. Michael agreed: “I may be crazy,” he liked to say, “but I’m not stupid.” It was hard to believe that Michael could go straight from a program of slow steps and daily skills, like using a checkbook and planning a meal, to the top-ranked law school in the country. But if you agreed that Macy’s would destroy him, it followed that Yale would set him free. I believed this. Michael’s parents believed this. So did the law school’s dean, Guido Calabresi, and the professors who became Michael’s mentors.

    Michael was as quick to tell his professors about his schizophrenia as he was determined to keep it from his classmates. He made it clear that he didn’t want sympathy or special consideration, and his professors, who understood that he was asking for both, were deeply affected by his intelligence and vulnerability.

    He told them how he awoke each morning to find his room on fire, lying in fear until his father called to convince him that the flames weren’t real. “Does it burn?” his father asked after telling him to put out a hand. “Does it burn? No? Good!” Then he ordered Michael to do the same with his other hand. “Is it hot? Does it burn? Does it burn?” Little by little, until Michael was standing upright on the burning floor.

    His professors all heard the story of the burning room and repeated it to one another as a parable of his struggle and strength. He was like Prometheus having his liver eaten by an eagle every morning, growing it back every night in time to be tortured again at dawn.

    bearded man in suit leans against gothic pillar in dimly lit building near stairs up
    Michael, photographed for The New York Times at Yale Law School, October 25, 1995. The image the Times conveyed, in this photo and in the article that it accompanied, belied the depth of Michael’s continuing struggles. (Jim Estrin / The New York Times / Redux; T_Kimura / Getty)

    It was a feature of Michael’s confessional style that his account of disabling mental illness communicated extraordinary mental ability, so that even after his professors realized he could not do the work, their sense of his brilliance remained. As one of his mentors later explained, many of the law school’s real success stories didn’t become lawyers at all. He thought Michael could be an eloquent advocate for people with schizophrenia, someone who had been to Yale Law School rather than someone who was a Yale lawyer.

    But Yale lawyer was a phrase Michael already applied to himself. Recalling his struggle with the day-program doctors, Michael would say: “Why would I bag groceries when I could be a Yale lawyer?” Becoming a Yale lawyer was the whole point.

    The Laws of Madness

    Michael and Carrie had overlapped as undergraduates but began dating when Michael was in law school and Carrie, a literature major with a knack for computers, was living in New Haven and working for IBM. The mutual friend who brought them together loved and admired them both, but had doubts about them becoming a couple. He had lived with Michael his first summer during law school and remembered asking his roommate through a locked door if he wanted to come out for dinner, only to learn that Michael feared that he would be on the menu.

    Michael waited months before telling Carrie he had schizophrenia; if she suspected something before that, she didn’t say. She wouldn’t have been the first person to not notice, or to ascribe symptoms such as surface tremors and apocalyptic utterances to the hidden depths of a complex soul.

    Carrie wept when Michael told her. She did not reproach him for having kept his illness a secret. She showed no anger or fear or regret, only pain for his pain. She wept at the unfairness of what he had suffered in the past and was still suffering. She knew it was a terrible illness, but she loved him, and that was that.

    Michael’s dream was to be a professor at Yale. He reported proudly that the law school had created a postgraduate fellowship just for him, in recognition of his genius. But there remained a certain gap between his ambitions and his mentors’ hopes for him. “I have thought to myself from time to time,” one of Michael’s professors told me: “Gee, if I hadn’t been so busy being proud of what a great place the Yale Law School was to have admitted Michael Laudor, I might have paid closer attention to him.”

    When Michael began applying for teaching jobs, he was unable to explain in interviews why he had never clerked for a judge or worked at a law firm beyond a single summer that had not gone well. Advised to avoid any mention of schizophrenia—a “career killer”—Michael said that such work lacked the intellectual stimulation he required. He got no offers at all, a bitter setback.

    But in the fall of 1995, while Michael was still mourning his father, who had died of cancer, something happened that changed his fortunes almost overnight. On November 9, The New York Times ran an article called “A Voyage to Bedlam and Part Way Back.” A second headline modified the first: “Yale Law Graduate, a Schizophrenic, Is Encumbered by an Invisible Wheelchair.”

    The reporter, Lisa W. Foderaro, offered a sort of alternative résumé: “Mr. Laudor, 32 and by all accounts a genius, is a schizophrenic who emerged from eight months in a psychiatric unit at Columbia‑Presbyterian Medical Center to go to Yale Law School.” The story centered on Michael’s newfound determination to find a job as a law-school professor without denying or disguising his schizophrenia.

    When Michael came out of the closet, he came out all the way. “Dubbing himself a ‘flaming schizophrenic,’ ” Foderaro wrote, “Mr. Laudor said that his decision to make his illness public and work closely with others with mental disabilities was a political and religious one.”

    It was a glowing profile that captured Michael’s wry sense of humor (“I went to the most supportive mental health care facility that exists in America: the Yale Law School”) as well as his knack for harrowing formulations: “My reality was that at any moment, they”—the Nazi doctors—“would surgically cut me to death without any anesthesia.” He recalled the pain of his hospitalization with touching frankness: “I spent my 26th birthday there crying on my bed.”

    He poured his private life onto the pages of the Times, confiding even his experience of the interview with liberated eloquence: “I feel that I’m pawing through walls of cotton and gauze when I talk to you now,” Michael told Foderaro. “I’m using 60 or 70 percent of my effort just to maintain the proper reality contact with the world.”

    Brilliance was the fulcrum of the story, the point at which Michael was lifted above the stereotypes of schizophrenia, much as intelligence had elevated him above ordinary expectations before he got sick. “Far from knowing that Mr. Laudor had a severe mental illness,” Foderaro wrote, “the other students were somewhat in awe.”

    The article threw into stark relief the indignities of interviewing for jobs. “One interviewer asked if he was violent,” Foderaro wrote, “which Mr. Laudor said reflected a common and painful stereotype.” I understood Michael’s indignation, but I also knew that before he was medicated, Michael had armed himself with a knife in fear of his impostor parents. I wished the article had addressed the question even a little instead of leaving it to Michael to dismiss in a way that made you feel as if even to ask was an insult.

    One of the things that haunted me about Michael’s breakdown was how frightened his parents had been. Without a father capable of bluffing and threatening Michael into signing himself in for his own good, he might not have gotten those eight months of care he’d so desperately needed.

    Michael sounded exhilarated and slightly manic when we talked on the phone that winter. Book editors were in a bidding war for a memoir Michael was going to write, called The Laws of Madness, which was also going to be a Ron Howard movie. The deals would net him more than $2 million.

    Like the Times profile, his 80‑page book proposal caused an electric stir. How often did anyone narrate schizophrenia from the inside out? Michael described what it had felt like to discover that his parents were evil imitations of themselves: “I soon burst in at 3 in the morning to accuse my parents of being impostors, of having killed my real parents while they themselves were neo‑Nazi agents altered by special surgery and trained to mimic my parents.”

    The tone was reminiscent of countless sci-fi stories Michael had summarized for me in the schoolyard—he’d seen a secretary at Bain with “blood dripping from her teeth as her clawed hands reached for me”—but the proposal rose from the depths of such delusions, tracing the archetypal tale of a young man’s triumph and a father’s love. Even as it offered glimpses of bloody fangs and Nazi spies, the narrative arc bent toward Yale Law School. Michael’s agent escorted him to publishing houses, where he spoke with undaunted fluency.

    When an editor asked Michael if he still hallucinated, he told her, “I’m hallucinating right now.” The room grew quiet as Michael described a burning waterfall emptying into a lake of fire. He also saw a peaceful house with shutters and vines. Michael explained that he managed these and other competing images by arranging them on a great screen in his mind, in a hierarchy of terror from greatest to least.

    The movie people found his method of controlling his hallucinations a perfect cinematic conceit.

    Michael made little progress on his memoir, possibly none. The movie, meanwhile, raced along like the river outside the window of his apartment in Hastings-on-Hudson, where he had moved with Carrie. It wasn’t the first time a screenwriter had needed to base a movie on a book that didn’t exist. It could even be an advantage.

    But for Michael, leaving his story to Hollywood was unthinkable. The closer The Laws of Madness got to becoming a movie, the more important the book became, a chance to restore the dream of creative achievement that had gone up in smoke.

    In an effort to bolster Michael’s resolve, his editor Hamilton Cain took the train to Hastings‑on‑Hudson. Cain brought a tape recorder, hoping an interview might jump‑start the process. He and Michael envisioned a series of sessions.

    The interview began with Michael talking about Mereland Road and me: “There were only six or seven houses in the most immediate part of our neighborhood, our street. I was inseparable from a friend who moved in when I was in fifth grade, Jonathan.” We were both going to be writers, he told Cain: “He’s done it; he is a novelist. I was sure that I, too, would be one.”

    Cain and Michael talked all day. The apartment grew dim as the December sun crossed the river and disappeared behind New Jersey. Michael had never turned on the lights, and made no move to do so as the winter dusk crept inside. Cain was scribbling in the interior gloom, eager to capture a few last thoughts from what he felt had been a very successful session. Suddenly Michael spoke in a voice that seemed to have dropped an octave. Startled, Cain looked up and saw Michael, still sitting across from him, rocking back and forth.

    “I’m very tired,” Michael said in a deep, denatured voice. “I think you’d better go.”

    “We’ll wrap it up,” Cain said, turning back to his notebook. He was scribbling fast when he became aware that Michael had risen and come over to the couch where Cain was sitting. He sensed his looming presence, rocking back and forth. Cain felt the hairs on the back of his neck stand straight. Michael was towering over him, his face utterly transformed.

    “Is everything okay?” Cain asked.

    “I think you should go now,” Michael said, his voice deep and slow. “I’m really, really tired.”

    Cain was all speed, gathering up his tape recorder, notebook, backpack, coat, but by the time he was at the door saying good-bye, Michael had recovered his old self and insisted, with customary gallantry, on walking him to the train station. He talked easily on the short walk, and at the platform gave Cain a hug.

    Neither of them mentioned the anomalous moment in the gloom. Still, the impression troubled Cain, and stayed with him on the train back to the city.

    “We Can’t Do Anything”

    To the seasoned observers of the Network watching over Michael, his relationship with Carrie was one more example of his exceptional nature. In their experience, it was unusual for people with schizophrenia to sustain long‑term relationships.

    For Carrie’s colleagues, the equation was reversed: Michael’s illness was evidence of Carrie’s exceptional nature. But she did not like to talk about the times when she came home from work and Michael refused to let her into their apartment, because he didn’t believe she was who she said she was. No matter how much Carrie insisted, she couldn’t convince him of the truth. How could he trust her words when he didn’t believe it was her body? At such times, the terror and fury on the other side of the door were enough to send her to a friend’s couch. Those were hard nights.

    That the tough times were getting worse was no secret to the members of the Network, who now watched over Carrie as well.

    One evening in June 1998, Jane Ferber had dinner with her friend Myrna Rubin and conveyed her distress about Michael’s backward slide. Myrna had heard that Michael had stopped taking his medication and that nobody had been able to get him to go back on it, but she was shocked when she heard that he thought Carrie was an alien. Still, delusions were no more a justification for forced medication than refusing medication was a justification for forced hospitalization. The only question was whether Michael was violent, and the Network didn’t see him that way.

    Elizabeth Ferber, Jane’s daughter, had been hearing reports about Michael’s decline from her mother. That he was losing control was disturbing, but it was the constrained intensity of her mother’s voice, the sadness and resignation, that affected her most. Surely now was the time to act.

    But when Elizabeth demanded to know what was being done, her mother told her, “We can’t do anything.”

    What Elizabeth heard in her mother’s voice wasn’t fear of Michael, but fear for him. The danger that weighed most heavily on the members of the Network was that Michael would suffer a break from which he might never recover—that he would end up in the revolving door of endless hospitalizations. They doubted the efficacy of the system but feared its capacity for destruction, and they desperately wanted to save him from it.

    On Wednesday, June 17, the day before her work team was flying to Chicago for a big meeting, Carrie called her office to say she had a personal emergency and would not be coming in. It was unusual for Carrie to miss a day of important preparation, but her boss had no doubt she would be there the next morning with her materials in order.

    Too Late

    It was a day of frantic phone calls and failed efforts at intervention. Michael had been bombarding his mother, making wild accusations and irrational threats. After Michael ranted about suicide and murder, Ruth called back in a panic. Michael picked up, and Ruth told him to give the phone to Carrie. Michael said he couldn’t do that, because he’d killed her.

    Ruth called the police at 4:17 p.m. She urged speed and gave few details. The desk sergeant heard the panic in her voice and put out a radio call to check on the welfare of a couple in the River Edge apartments.

    Officers rang Michael and Carrie’s bell and got no response. The door was locked, so they radioed their sergeant, who called Lieutenant Vince Schiavone, the department’s executive officer, at home. Schiavone told them to get the key from the super and check out the place at once.

    man in suit holds open car door as bearded man in blue jumpsuit exits car
    June 18, 1998: Detectives escort Michael into the Hastings-on-Hudson police station, after driving him back from Ithaca the day after he killed Carrie. (Mitch Jacobson / AP / Shutterstock; LiliGraphie / Getty)

    The officers found a woman’s body in the kitchen, lying in a pool of blood. There were multiple stab wounds, and her throat had been cut. Schiavone visited the crime scene briefly, then drove with an officer to New Rochelle to deliver the news to 28 Mereland Road in person. Ruth peered through the glass, opened the door, and asked, “Is she …?”

    “Yes,” Schiavone told her. “She is.”

    Ruth burst into tears. Schiavone would never forget the look on her face. It seemed to say, Oh my God, we didn’t move fast enough.

    “I knew something like this could happen,” Ruth said, explaining that her son had schizophrenia. “But he was getting happy. They were going to be married …”

    Her anguish was intense. They’d been trying to get him the help he needed, she said. Not that he wasn’t getting help already. She wanted Schiavone to know, he felt, that they’d been working on this, and it had gotten away from them somehow.

    The medical examiner’s report, released quickly, told its stark forensic story. The death was a homicide. The cause was “sharp force injuries of head, neck, back and upper extremity involving lungs, aorta, esophagus and thyroid cartilage.”

    An additional piece of information deepened the tragedy: Carrie was pregnant.

    Michael’s photo was on the cover of the New York Post under a massive one‑word headline, printed in white-on-black “knockout type”: PSYCHO.

    Seeing Michael looking out from the far side of that tabloid window like the Son of Sam was shocking. The photo filled the left side of the page; the right half announced, also in white‑on‑black type: “Twisted genius charged with savage slaying of pregnant fiancee.” At the bottom right was a picture of Carrie smiling with hopeful innocence. A footer running the width of the page flagged coverage of Michael’s ill‑fated movie: “Universal Studio honchos on hot seat page 32.”

    Michael was charged with second‑degree murder. Because of the nature of the crime, no bail was set. But Michael’s lawyer did request that Michael receive psychiatric treatment. Now that he’d killed someone, it was no longer necessary to prove that he was an imminent danger to himself or others—he could finally get the care and medication he needed. The state, eager to have him fit to stand trial for murder, would provide him with both.

    “Untreated Psychosis Kills”

    A month after Carrie’s killing, another gruesome event eclipsed and extended Michael’s story. A 41-year-old man named Russell Weston Jr. walked into the Capitol in Washington, D.C., and shot a police officer in the back of the head with a .38‑caliber revolver. He exchanged shots with another officer, wounding him and a tourist, then raced down a corridor and through a door that led to a suite of offices used by Majority Whip Tom DeLay, where he shot a plainclothes detective in the chest, killing him.

    It did not take long to discover that Weston had rejected treatment for paranoid schizophrenia and was severely delusional. He had stormed the Capitol to access an override console for the Ruby Satellite System, stored in the Senate safe, which was the only way to avert the cannibal apocalypse and plague that were about to destroy the world.

    Despite their radically different backgrounds, Michael Laudor was immediately joined to Russell Weston: Both suffered from a severe mental illness, had rejected medication, and in the grip of psychosis had killed people.

    Torrey, the psychiatrist, wrote about the two men for The Wall Street Journal in an article called “Why Deinstitutionalization Turned Deadly.” The stories of the “Yale Law School graduate” and the “drifter,” the psychiatrist wrote, “are only the most publicized of an increasing number of violent acts by people with schizophrenia or manic‑depressive illness who were not taking the medication they need to control their delusions and hallucinations.”

    Weston’s anguished father, Russell Sr., was quoted in a New York Times column about the impossibility of helping his son: “He was a grown man. We couldn’t hold him down and force the pills into him.” Weston’s father could do nothing, Frank Rich wrote, because “a comprehensive system of mental‑health services, including support for parents with sick adult children who refuse treatment, doesn’t exist. If it had, the Westons might have had more success in rescuing their son—as might the equally loving family of Michael Laudor.”

    For politicians, the outrage of after was easier than the work of before. President Bill Clinton denounced the violence of an unmedicated psychotic man nobody felt authorized to treat as “a moment of savagery at the front door of American civilization.” Diagnosed in his late 20s, Weston had spent 53 days in a state hospital in 1996 after threatening an emergency-room worker. Once he no longer seemed imminently dangerous, he had been released with pills that he eventually stopped taking, perhaps because he did not consider himself mentally ill.

    “The total number of individuals with active symptoms of schizophrenia or manic‑depressive illness is some 3.5 million,” Torrey wrote. “The National Advisory Mental Health Council has estimated that 40% of them—roughly 1.4 million people—are not receiving any treatment in any given year. It is therefore not a question of whether someone will follow Michael Laudor and Russell Weston into the headlines. It is merely a question of when.”

    Torrey did not see Michael’s killing of Carrie as a “tragic inevitability,” which is how the law professor who had once imagined Michael becoming an advocate for people with schizophrenia described it to me years later.

    Nor did Torrey believe that the 1,000 annual homicides he attributed to people with severe unmedicated mental illness should indict the population of those with similar diagnoses. But he did want to prevent those homicides, as well as an even larger number of suicides, and he wanted to reduce the growing number of mentally ill homeless people, and do something about a prison population swelled by people suffering from mental illness who received no care. His sister had schizophrenia, and he did think there was a difference between being in your right mind and being out of it.

    The arguments Torrey made about Michael in The Wall Street Journal in 1998 informed the Treatment Advocacy Center, which he created that year to focus on the medical, moral, and legal imperatives of treating people whose severe mental illness prevents them from knowing they need help. Now 85, Torrey was recently profiled in The New York Times, which credited him with inspiring assisted outpatient treatment programs—present in 47 states—as well as Mayor Adams’s new initiative and a larger transformation in the understanding of severe mental illness at the policy level.

    Last spring, Adams appointed Brian Stettin, who had been working as the Treatment Advocacy Center’s policy director, to be his administration’s senior adviser on severe mental illness—a title that itself announces a policy shift. Adams hired Stettin not long after he published an op-ed in the Daily News about the death of Michelle Go, who had been pushed in front of a subway train in January 2022 by a man who’d been hospitalized more than 20 times.

    Stettin noted that the man who killed Go should have been in an assisted outpatient treatment program, but had fallen through the holes of a porous system. He began his article by recalling Kendra Webdale, who also had been pushed in front of a subway train and killed 23 years earlier. A young assistant attorney general at the time, Stettin had been tasked by his new boss, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, with drafting legislation to prevent horrors like the one that had befallen Webdale. Her killer had been hospitalized 13 times in two years and on one occasion had literally walked into Bellevue Hospital demanding help. The man, who suffered from severe mental illness, wanted to return to housing on the grounds of Creedmoor Psychiatric Center, in Queens, but to qualify, he would have to be hospitalized there first, and he couldn’t be hospitalized, because no beds were available. He was given the phone number of a mobile crisis unit by a social worker, who noted that he had no phone.

    When they asked Webdale’s parents to lend their daughter’s name to legislation creating assisted outpatient treatment programs across New York State, Spitzer and Stettin discovered that the family had received letters of support not only from parents who had lost children to violence but from parents who had written to say of the killer, “That might have been my son.” Webdale’s mother wanted to know what the attorney general was going to do for those parents.

    I experienced something similar when I spent time with Nick and Amanda Wilcox, whose daughter, Laura, a 19-year-old sophomore at Haverford College, was killed in 2001 while working at a mental-health clinic during her Christmas break. Laura’s Law is California’s version of Kendra’s Law, passed county by county with the tireless support of the Wilcoxes, who faced opposition from the ACLU and fellow Quakers, who consider assisted outpatient treatment programs a threat to civil liberties.

    It was heartbreaking to stand in Laura’s childhood bedroom and hear the terrible comfort the Wilcoxes took in learning that the pen their daughter had gripped so tightly in death suggested that she had died instantly. I knew they had refused to seek the death penalty for their daughter’s killer—who killed two more people at a nearby restaurant, where he believed he was being poisoned. But hearing them say “He’s in the right place”—a state mental hospital—after he was found not competent to stand trial, and realizing it was treatment they wished for him, was a humbling astonishment. The anger they expressed was directed at a system that had resisted committing a severely ill, dangerous man known to have an apartment filled with unregistered guns, in part to avoid the cost of sending him to a county with a suitable facility.

    I was the childhood friend of someone who had killed a woman not unlike the Wilcoxes’ daughter. Amanda gave me advice about reaching out to Carrie’s parents. “Say you’re sorry for what your friend did,” she told me. “That’s what I would want to hear.” Although Carrie’s family wrote back to tell me it was simply too painful to talk about, I was grateful I’d been able to express my sorrow.

    E. Fuller Torrey sees what is happening in New York and California—where Governor Gavin Newsom has signed the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Act—as part of a sea change. He has no illusions about the challenges—New York State still hasn’t recovered all of the 1,000 psychiatric beds repurposed for COVID use during the pandemic—but he believes that change starts with the recognition that denying care to people too impaired to know they need it is a medical and moral failure. He thought it a hopeful portent that when a disability-rights group tried to block the CARE Act, the group’s Sacramento offices were picketed by relatives, friends, and other supporters of people with severe mental illness carrying signs saying UNTREATED PSYCHOSIS KILLS and HOSPITALS NOT PRISONS. When I asked Torrey what he considers the biggest threat to reform, he said pessimism, the resigned conviction that after 40 years of failed efforts, nothing can be done.

    Katherine Koh is a psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital. As part of the street team at the Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, she works with the most neglected population in the country, people struggling to meet basic needs even if they are not suffering from a mental illness. Though she spoke of involuntary commitment as “a difficult, nuanced, and thorny issue” that “haunts and plagues” her, she told me that the biggest improvements in people’s mental health can happen when they are involuntarily hospitalized, provided there is a plan in advance and care afterward.

    Koh also told me a story that she’d heard from her mentor, Jim O’Connell, the founding physician at Boston Health Care for the Homeless. The story is about a woman he spent many years caring for on the street, who was often on the psychiatric brink, though O’Connell, determined to honor her autonomy and dignity, never committed her. Finally, the police did it for him. After the hospital, and time spent stably housed, the woman moved on to other systems of support, slowly recovered her balance, began working again, and eventually joined the board of an organization that sponsored the event where she and O’Connell reunited after many years. When the woman saw him—as Koh recalled her teacher’s vivid recounting—she said, “You son of a bitch! You left me out on the street for 10 years!” And then a further lesson: “If I were bleeding, you would have taken me in. But since it was my brain, you left me out there.”

    Laurie Flynn, who was the executive director of the National Alliance on Mental Illness when Michael killed Carrie, burst into tears when she learned what had happened. Michael had been a hero to many at NAMI, the largest grassroots organization in America dedicated to supporting people with severe mental illness and their families. He had seemed so emblematic of a new era, promising the rejection of shame and stigma, that the “Michael Laudor Tragedy,” as Flynn called it, became part of a complex reckoning that filled many in the organization with the understandable fear of stigma.

    Violence and mental illness have been legally entangled ever since dangerousness, rather than illness, became the de facto prerequisite for hospitalization. If a hospital could produce a bed, or mandate treatment, only for someone actively threatening harm, you could hardly blame the general population for mixing up the very sick and the very violent, or mental hospitals and prisons. Today the Twin Towers Correctional Facility, in Los Angeles, is described—by the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department—as “the nation’s largest mental health facility.”

    And you can hardly blame advocates for wanting to erase even the suggestion of violence as a precondition for eliminating stigma. But denying all distinctions can be as destructive as exaggerating them. Many of the critics of Adams’s proposal highlighted the involuntary hospitalization of mentally ill people “even if they posed no threat to others,” as if hospitalizing a gravely ill person who didn’t threaten someone’s life made no sense.

    For Flynn, the problem is a system that forces families to “sit and watch someone they love deteriorate, unable to get them help until they are dangerous.” Acknowledging distinctions, in order to address people’s needs, will do more than denial does to reduce stigma. It will also keep people alive.

    In the Daily News op-ed, Stettin wrote, “There are fundamental differences between the 4% of the population with severe diagnoses and the rest of us who experience various mental health challenges over the course of our lives. A big one is that without treatment, people with severe mental illness lose their connection to reality.” He is at pains to emphasize that the mayor’s initiative is directed at a fractional subset of that percentage, people without shelter who are too sick to care for themselves or recognize their own impaired condition.

    It has been 25 years since Michael killed Carrie. For most of that time, he has been in a secure psychiatric facility surrounded by a 16‑foot‑high fence topped with razor wire. He lives with 280 other men and women sent there by court order, attended to by twice that number of staff.

    Michael was found not responsible by “means of mental defect,” bolstered by the finding of Park Dietz, the forensic psychiatrist hired by the prosecution, who was known for his narrow definition of insanity. Dietz had found both John Hinckley and Jeffrey Dahmer legally sane, but he determined that Michael truly thought he was killing a doll or a robot.

    I know there is no going back to the time before Michael killed Carrie, just as there is no going back to the monumental hospitals that long ago ceased to be worthy of the concept of asylum that created them. Just as there can be no going back to the utopian vision of the people who destroyed them, whose faith in their own expertise and dream of community care failed to fulfill their promise to the people whose desperate need had justified the demolition.

    I also know that there can be no going forward without a reckoning, however partial and imperfect. Not to apportion blame, but to make it easier to change or clarify a law, or to narrow the focus of an initiative—while expanding its resources—to address a fraction of the population whose illnesses are so severe, they can make sufferers unaware of their own deterioration. Above all, it should be harder to impose imaginary solutions on real problems.

    Two years before Michael killed Carrie, a Times article had quoted him, identified as a legal scholar with a history of schizophrenia, expressing outrage that a medical student—who had stopped taking medication for his bipolar disorder and was alarming psychiatrists and fellow students with what they considered violent and threatening behavior—had “lost five weeks of his life” to forced hospitalization. The article was called “Medical Student Forced Into a Hospital Netherworld,” but who among Michael’s friends would not wish now that the same had happened to him, if five weeks could have helped return him to the treatment he needed, saved Carrie’s life, and prevented Michael’s destruction?

    I remain haunted by my last phone conversation with Michael before he killed Carrie. He was vague, equivocal, even as we picked a date to see each other that I suspected, perhaps hoped, would pass like the others. “I have to go,” he said abruptly. “I’m having bad thoughts I need to not be having.”

    I knew something was dreadfully wrong, but I buried that abject statement, and kept myself from considering its meaning.


    This article has been adapted from Jonathan Rosen’s forthcoming book, The Best Minds: A Story of Friendship, Madness, and the Tragedy of Good Intentions. It appears in the May 2023 print edition with the headline “American Madness.” When you buy a book using a link on this page, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.

    Jonathan Rosen

    Source link

  • Australian Grand Prix: Red Bull, Mercedes, Ferrari, Aston Martin and the rest assessed by Ted Kravitz

    Australian Grand Prix: Red Bull, Mercedes, Ferrari, Aston Martin and the rest assessed by Ted Kravitz

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Ted Kravitz takes a look back at a chaotic Australian Grand Prix

    Ted Kravitz takes a look back at a chaotic Australian Grand Prix

    After a chaotic Australian Grand Prix, won by Red Bull’s Max Verstappen, how are each of the 10 teams feeling as they fly home from Melbourne?

    The sold-out Albert Park crowd were treated to a thrilling race of crashes, battles and a sprinkling of controversy. While Max Verstappen fought back to win Red Bull’s first race in Australia since 2011, he was joined on the podium by Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso. Reliability, collisions and penalties caused pain for many, including George Russell and the Ferraris of Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz.

    Ted Kravitz delivers his verdict on all 10 teams…

    Red Bull – ‘Super-duper DRS is half their advantage’

    Max Verstappen gets DRS on Lewis Hamilton and makes an easy overtake to take the lead of the Australian Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Max Verstappen gets DRS on Lewis Hamilton and makes an easy overtake to take the lead of the Australian Grand Prix

    Max Verstappen gets DRS on Lewis Hamilton and makes an easy overtake to take the lead of the Australian Grand Prix

    It was a weekend of mixed fortunes for Red Bull, who have often struggled in Australia as Verstappen won, while Sergio Perez limited the points lost to his title rival after a horrible Saturday that saw him crash out of qualifying after three corners.

    TED’S VERDICT: Max Verstappen P1 – it was a terrible lap one with Verstappen down to P2 – the Mercedes got past him, Lewis pushed him off.

    But Max eventually breezed past Hamilton with the magic DRS.

    What word shall we think of to describe this DRS? ‘Super-duper DRS’.

    It is an advantage – the engineers in the pitlane estimate that it’s worth two-tenths or three-tenths of a second on that lap compared to another car with DRS.

    Highlights of the Australian Grand Prix at Albert Park Circuit

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Highlights of the Australian Grand Prix at Albert Park Circuit

    Highlights of the Australian Grand Prix at Albert Park Circuit

    So, this Red Bull super-duper DRS is worth rather a lot.

    When you consider that Red Bull’s entire advantage is two-tenths or three-tenths, that’s quite a handy advantage to have.

    I don’t think it is their entire advantage – there’s a great car, it’s aerodynamically efficient, it’s engineered well and all the rest of it, but it could be half of their advantage that is down to their super-duper DRS – food for thought for the other teams.

    Watch as Red Bull's Max Verstappen moves further forward before launching on the second red flag restart

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Watch as Red Bull’s Max Verstappen moves further forward before launching on the second red flag restart

    Watch as Red Bull’s Max Verstappen moves further forward before launching on the second red flag restart

    Sergio Perez pitted twice under the first Safety Car, got the hard tyres out of the way, got boxed in at the start – that was his problem, and then, after that, it was a quieter weekend for Checo.

    He made his way through, but it’s a missed opportunity – I think after qualifying and after the problems they had on Saturday with the brakes, it is a missed opportunity for Red Bull and Perez – he should have been P2 or higher.

    Mercedes – ‘They’re happy around here’

    George Russell makes a great start and takes the lead from Max Verstappen as Charles Leclerc crashes out and brings out the safety car on the opening lap!

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    George Russell makes a great start and takes the lead from Max Verstappen as Charles Leclerc crashes out and brings out the safety car on the opening lap!

    George Russell makes a great start and takes the lead from Max Verstappen as Charles Leclerc crashes out and brings out the safety car on the opening lap!

    Despite Russell’s fiery end to the race, Mercedes will be generally pleased as they appear to have made progress, taking the fight to Aston Martin and Ferrari in the competition for the second-quickest car – only three-tenths off Verstappen in qualifying, will future developments help them fight for future wins?

    TED’S VERDICT: They should be happy at Mercedes because Lewis Hamilton was second.

    George Russell DNF, it’s an engine failure – went pop, apparently it wasn’t a leak.

    George Russell's car sets on fire and he is out of the race with a power unit issue!

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    George Russell’s car sets on fire and he is out of the race with a power unit issue!

    George Russell’s car sets on fire and he is out of the race with a power unit issue!

    Poor George had already been done over by the red flag caused by gravel.

    Lewis Hamilton got Max Verstappen at the start, stayed out before Max got him back.

    Mercedes' Lewis Hamilton says his P2 finish is a great result and gives the team hope as they look to catch up with Red Bull

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Mercedes’ Lewis Hamilton says his P2 finish is a great result and gives the team hope as they look to catch up with Red Bull

    Mercedes’ Lewis Hamilton says his P2 finish is a great result and gives the team hope as they look to catch up with Red Bull

    Lewis was challenging Russell before Russell pitted, but I thought Lewis managed it all very well and secured P2, so I think they are happy around here.

    Aston Martin – ‘They got a bit of luck today’

    After finishing third at the Australian GP, Fernando Alonso admits he was confused as to what exactly was happening after a red flag caused pandemonium at the end of the race

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    After finishing third at the Australian GP, Fernando Alonso admits he was confused as to what exactly was happening after a red flag caused pandemonium at the end of the race

    After finishing third at the Australian GP, Fernando Alonso admits he was confused as to what exactly was happening after a red flag caused pandemonium at the end of the race

    Aston Martin were rare in that both drivers had good days, finishing third and fourth – something they may not have seen coming after the second restart, which saw Alonso spin out and Lance Stroll off into the gravel.

    TED’S VERDICT: Fernando Alonso’s got his third podium in three races and he got a bit of luck even if it was the correct interpretation of the rules.

    Alonso stays P3 and Lance Stroll stays P4, and both benefited from the gravel red flag.

    Alonso challenged Max Verstappen in race two and then he chased Lewis Hamilton, but he said it was difficult to get close.

    Fernando Alonso is tagged by Carlos Sainz which causes a long line of accidents at the second race restart and brings out yet another red flag!

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Fernando Alonso is tagged by Carlos Sainz which causes a long line of accidents at the second race restart and brings out yet another red flag!

    Fernando Alonso is tagged by Carlos Sainz which causes a long line of accidents at the second race restart and brings out yet another red flag!

    It was a disastrous red flag too – Alonso spun, but they got that reinstated.

    Solid race from Stroll, [as he] got stuck behind Pierre Gasly and Carlos Sainz’s fight.

    McLaren – ‘Woo! Gravel!’

    McLaren's Oscar Piastri grew up in Melbourne where he scored his first F1 points on Sunday

    McLaren’s Oscar Piastri grew up in Melbourne where he scored his first F1 points on Sunday

    McLaren leave Melbourne with their local boy scoring his first F1 points as a rookie at his home race and the team moving off the bottom of the table after two torrid races in the Middle East.

    TED’S VERDICT: They have scored their first points of the year, so well done McLaren – 12 points and that puts them straight into P5 in the Constructors’ Championship – Lando Norris P6, Oscar Piastri P8.

    I’ve got ‘Woo! Gravel’ here.

    They were very much advantaged by the red flag for gravel, both into ninth and 10th with the free pit stop.

    McLaren chief executive Zak Brown insists there is no exit clause in Lando Norris' contract and he has no concerns about the prospect of him leaving the team

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    McLaren chief executive Zak Brown insists there is no exit clause in Lando Norris’ contract and he has no concerns about the prospect of him leaving the team

    McLaren chief executive Zak Brown insists there is no exit clause in Lando Norris’ contract and he has no concerns about the prospect of him leaving the team

    Oscar Piastri lost out at the restart, dropped to P12 and then he got up to P11 ahead of Yuki.

    Lando was really quick, did so well – well done McLaren.

    Haas – ‘That was scary’

    Haas thought Kevin Magnussen suffered a wheel puncture after the Danish driver completely loses his right rear tyre after clipping the wall

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Haas thought Kevin Magnussen suffered a wheel puncture after the Danish driver completely loses his right rear tyre after clipping the wall

    Haas thought Kevin Magnussen suffered a wheel puncture after the Danish driver completely loses his right rear tyre after clipping the wall

    At one stage, it looked as though Nico Hulkenberg was going to score his first F1 podium, but despite their protests, he moves back to seventh to at least score points after his team-mate’s wheel came off – it was that sort of crazy day.

    TED’S VERDICT: DNF for Kevin Magnussen with that spin and it’s Hulkenberg with P7.

    Hulkenberg nearly hit Alex Albon when he span – that was scary, he said.

    Magnussen lost out at the red flag and restarted last, he then ran brilliantly, Lando Norris then challenged him and got P8, then Magnussen spun and crashed, putting wheel-rim debris all over the track.

    Alfa Romeo – ‘Would have been much more than it was’

    Alfa Romeo scored just two points as they lost out during a red flag

    Alfa Romeo scored just two points as they lost out during a red flag

    Safety Cars and red flags can cause teams to roll a dice hoping for double sixes, but Alfa Romeo came away missing out – Valtteri Bottas’ mullet in Melbourne clearly was not the lucky charm they were hoping for.

    TED’S VERDICT: Let me tell you the sorry tale of Alfa Romeo’s race because after pitting early on the first Safety Car, they could have been set for many points, so they are frustrated at the red flag for gravel.

    They don’t really know why the red flag happened and they were always catching up from that point on.

    Alfa Romeo's Valtteri Bottas believes his victory at the 2019 Australian Grand Prix was the best of his career

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Alfa Romeo’s Valtteri Bottas believes his victory at the 2019 Australian Grand Prix was the best of his career

    Alfa Romeo’s Valtteri Bottas believes his victory at the 2019 Australian Grand Prix was the best of his career

    Valtteri Bottas P11 and Zhou Guanyu P9, so well done Zhou Guanyu, he’s got two points.

    Both benefitted from the gravel early on [when they pitted under the Safety Car] but then lost out when there was a red flag [the second of the three] – it would have been much more than it was.

    AlphaTauri – ‘This is what we have, I’m sorry’

    AlphaTauri scored their first point of the season with Yuki Tsunoda in Melbourne

    AlphaTauri scored their first point of the season with Yuki Tsunoda in Melbourne

    It’s been a tricky start to the season for AlphaTauri with an uncompetitive car, but Yuki Tsunoda managed to score the Red Bull junior team’s first points of the season.

    TED’S VERDICT: They got a point, Yuki Tsunoda had a point and I think that’s AlphaTauri’s first point of the season.

    Yuki restarted P8, Nyck de Vries got clonked on the restart too by Ocon.

    Yuki struggled with the set-up of the car, the balance of the car, the engineer said ‘this is what we have, I’m sorry’.

    Check out all the funniest Formula 1 moments from the weekend in Australia

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Check out all the funniest Formula 1 moments from the weekend in Australia

    Check out all the funniest Formula 1 moments from the weekend in Australia

    De Vries was struggling with the car for the whole race, after that clonk, he said that the car was not right, he pitted, Yuki also pitted on the Magnussen safety car and lost out because of the red flag – he would have been much further up.

    Ferrari – ‘Groans, a thunderous face but a little bit of pace’

    Carlos Sainz is furious at being handed a five-second time penalty for causing a collision with Fernando Alonso

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Carlos Sainz is furious at being handed a five-second time penalty for causing a collision with Fernando Alonso

    Carlos Sainz is furious at being handed a five-second time penalty for causing a collision with Fernando Alonso

    Leclerc crashed out on lap one and Sainz was taken from fourth [to] out of the points due to a controversial penalty that he called “unacceptable” – Ferrari boss Fred Vasseur reportedly has a bad back and these race results will only add to the pain.

    TED’S VERDICT: It’s Sainz P12 and Leclerc DNF.

    Carlos Sainz, [his penalty was] very unfair I think he believes, and by the look on his face, which is worse than thunder, I would imagine he knows that that result is not going to be adjusted.

    Fernando Alonso is tagged by Carlos Sainz which causes a long line of accidents at the second race restart and brings out yet another red flag!

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Fernando Alonso is tagged by Carlos Sainz which causes a long line of accidents at the second race restart and brings out yet another red flag!

    Fernando Alonso is tagged by Carlos Sainz which causes a long line of accidents at the second race restart and brings out yet another red flag!

    It was never going to be adjusted – let’s face it – but they had to give it a go and test the theory.

    Charles Leclerc, a real fan favourite, groans in the grandstand when he has had the incident with Lance Stroll.

    And when you qualify badly in P7 and you’re in the carbon-fibre zone, this kind of thing can happen.

    As for Sainz, it was a good fight on lap one, pitted under the Safety Car before the gravel caused the red flag, and that sunk him to P11, then he got stuck behind Gasly for quite a while, but got through and was going to be P4 but then got the five-second penalty for clonking into Alonso, which he thought was a racing incident.

    Ferrari's Charles Leclerc was left frustrated after being taken out by Lance Stroll on the opening lap of the Australian Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc was left frustrated after being taken out by Lance Stroll on the opening lap of the Australian Grand Prix

    Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc was left frustrated after being taken out by Lance Stroll on the opening lap of the Australian Grand Prix

    But at least Ferrari had some pace, and that’s an interesting little upside for Ferrari going forward.

    Alpine – ‘A costly result’

    Karun Chandhok analyses the onboard view as Alpine's Esteban Ocon and Pierre Gasly collided at the end of the Australian Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Karun Chandhok analyses the onboard view as Alpine’s Esteban Ocon and Pierre Gasly collided at the end of the Australian Grand Prix

    Karun Chandhok analyses the onboard view as Alpine’s Esteban Ocon and Pierre Gasly collided at the end of the Australian Grand Prix

    To quote Sky Sports’ Sam Johnston, who was reporting from Australia, Alpine were looking “frisky” and were set to score points with both of their drivers, but the French team was one of the biggest losers as both Esteban Ocon and Pierre Gasly got caught up in the manic final restart.

    TED’S VERDICT: I hope dinner’s good because they’ve ended up with two wrecked cars and no points.

    Not their fault – it was the first time that the drivers had come together – we always thought they would, but actually it wasn’t a thing because they were just innocent with each other.

    Carlos Sainz passes Pierre Gasly with a brilliant dummy move on the Alpine man!

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Carlos Sainz passes Pierre Gasly with a brilliant dummy move on the Alpine man!

    Carlos Sainz passes Pierre Gasly with a brilliant dummy move on the Alpine man!

    Ocon pitted at the end of lap one, Gasly benefited from the red flag.

    It was all going well, and then Gasly went wide, rejoined and clonked into his team-mate, so you’ve got to feel sorry for them because that is a costly result from a race where they should have had 10, 11, 12 plus points down here at Alpine.

    Williams – ‘Alex absolutely gutted’

    Alex Albon was flying during qualifying, and looked like scoring points in his low drag and low downforce car – it was the lack of downforce that may have caused his huge crash and that left Williams pointless.

    TED’S VERDICT: It’s a DNF for Alex Albon, it’s P16 for Logan Sargeant.

    Alex Albon absolutely gutted – it had been a great weekend, he was P6 when the rear let go, he spun it into the wall and out.

    Logan Sargeant pitted under the first Safety Car, put on the hard tyre and then he went onto the medium, he said ‘this tyre is terrible, we have to get off it’, and then he had some more fruity words on the radio and they said ‘careful on the radio Logan, we don’t like those kind of words’.

    There you go, another lesson for Logan in his Formula 1 debut season

    Source link

  • Australian GP Qualifying: Max Verstappen beats Mercedes duo George Russell and Lewis Hamilton to pole

    Australian GP Qualifying: Max Verstappen beats Mercedes duo George Russell and Lewis Hamilton to pole

    Max Verstappen claims his first Australian GP pole position: Red Bull team-mate Sergio Perez crashed out in Q1; Mercedes’ George Russell second ahead of team-mate Lewis Hamilton; watch the Australian GP live on Sunday at 6am on Sky Sports F1, with build-up from 4:30am

    Last Updated: 01/04/23 8:13am

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Max Verstappen takes pole in Australia, George Russell out qualifies teammate Lewis Hamilton to second on the grid.

    Max Verstappen takes pole in Australia, George Russell out qualifies teammate Lewis Hamilton to second on the grid.

    Max Verstappen held off a surprise Mercedes charge in Australian Grand Prix Qualifying to beat George Russell and Lewis Hamilton to pole position.

    The reigning world champion became an overwhelming favourite for pole when his Red Bull team-mate Sergio Perez crashed out in Q1, but in challenging cool and windy conditions at Albert Park, Mercedes posed an unexpected challenge.

    Hamilton was just nine thousandths of a second off Verstappen after the first set of runs in Q3, but the Dutchman was able to pull out a clear 0.2s advantage as he delivered a 1:16.732 in the closing moments.

    It was Russell who was able to snatch a place on the front row, edging out Hamilton by further tenth and out-qualifying his seven-time world champion team-mate for the third time in as many races this season.

    George Russell on Lewis Hamilton react to securing second and third on the grid for the Australian GP.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    George Russell on Lewis Hamilton react to securing second and third on the grid for the Australian GP.

    George Russell on Lewis Hamilton react to securing second and third on the grid for the Australian GP.

    Fernando Alonso, who has finished on the podium behind Red Bull one-twos in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, was only able to finish fourth for Aston Martin, while his team-mate Lance Stroll was sixth.

    Carlos Sainz split the Aston Martins in fifth, pulling off a rare Qualifying triumph over his Ferrari team-mate Charles Leclerc, who was seventh.

    Alexander Albon produced a hugely impressive performance to take eighth, as a Williams driver reached Q3 for the first time this season, finishing ahead of Alpine’s Pierre Gasly and Haas driver Nico Hulkenberg, who continued his strong start to the campaign.

    Drive onboard with Max Verstappen as he takes pole position at the Australian GP for Red Bull.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Drive onboard with Max Verstappen as he takes pole position at the Australian GP for Red Bull.

    Drive onboard with Max Verstappen as he takes pole position at the Australian GP for Red Bull.

    Australian GP Qualifying Result
    1) Max Verstappen, Red Bull
    2) George Russell, Mercedes
    3) Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes
    4) Fernando Alonso, Aston Martin
    5) Carlos Sainz, Ferrari
    6) Lance Stroll, Aston Martin
    7) Charles Leclerc, Ferrari
    8) Alexander Albon, Williams
    9) Pierre Gasly, Alpine
    10) Nico Hulkenberg, Haas

    What happened to Perez?

    Sergio Perez brings out the red flag in Qualifying as he beaches his Red Bull at the Australian GP.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Sergio Perez brings out the red flag in Qualifying as he beaches his Red Bull at the Australian GP.

    Sergio Perez brings out the red flag in Qualifying as he beaches his Red Bull at the Australian GP.

    Having delivered a hugely impressive performance to beat Verstappen in Saudi Arabia two weeks ago, Perez’s hopes of mounting a world championship challenge had been a hot topic coming into the weekend in Melbourne.

    However, the Mexican endured one of the worst days of his Formula 1 career, initially struggling badly in final practice on Saturday morning as he went off track several times after missing the beginning of the session while his mechanics worked on his car.

    Light rain in the moments before Qualifying meant conditions remained challenging as the session began, with Logan Sargeant’s early spin in his Williams at Turn 13 a clear warning to other drivers.

    After suffering multiple issues in final practice, Sergio Perez then crashed out of Q1 to ensure he'll start last at the Australian Grand Prix.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    After suffering multiple issues in final practice, Sergio Perez then crashed out of Q1 to ensure he’ll start last at the Australian Grand Prix.

    After suffering multiple issues in final practice, Sergio Perez then crashed out of Q1 to ensure he’ll start last at the Australian Grand Prix.

    However, Perez didn’t learn, and as he had done in practice, locked up on the way into Turn 3, before running into the gravel and becoming beached in mud just before the barrier.

    While Verstappen was able to fight back from 15th on the grid to finish second in Saudi Arabia, Perez faces a huge task to extend Red Bull’s streak of one-twos to start the season.

    Mercedes come from nowhere to create Q3 drama

    It has been all doom and gloom so far this season at Mercedes given Red Bull’s dominance, with team principal Toto Wolff confirming the implementation of major changes to their design philosophy are under way.

    Russell and Hamilton said after Friday practice that the third row of the grid was the best they could hope for in Qualifying, but as the pole position shootout played out – with Perez absent – it became clear the W14s were Verstappen’s biggest challengers.

    Max Verstappen just avoids colliding with a bird calmly walking across the Albert Park Circuit during qualifying.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Max Verstappen just avoids colliding with a bird calmly walking across the Albert Park Circuit during qualifying.

    Max Verstappen just avoids colliding with a bird calmly walking across the Albert Park Circuit during qualifying.

    Verstappen was only able to knock Hamilton off provisional pole by the narrowest of margins as the first runs concluded, and the prospect of a first pole since December 2021 for the 38-year-old suddenly seemed realistic.

    However, with time left for only one flying lap after the field pitted for fresh tyres, Verstappen delivered a stunning lap which would be enough to seal a first pole at Albert Park for the two-time world champion.

    Russell was able to get within 0.3s, with Hamilton a further half-tenth behind his team-mate having had his preparations for his lap hindered by Hulkenberg, who didn’t leave a clear path for the Mercedes to pass.

    Australian GP Qualifying Timesheet

    Driver Team Time
    1) Max Verstappen Red Bull 1:16.732
    2) George Russell Mercedes +0.236
    3) Lewis Hamilton Mercedes +0.372
    4) Fernando Alonso Aston Martin +0.407
    5) Carlos Sainz Ferrari +0.538
    6) Lance Stroll Aston Martin +0.576
    7) Charles Leclerc Ferrari +0.637
    8) Alex Albon Williams +0.877
    9) Pierre Gasly Alpine +0.943
    10) Nico Hulkenberg Haas +1.003
    Out in Q2
    11) Esteban Ocon Alpine 1:17.768
    12) Yuki Tsunoda AlphaTauri 1:18.099
    13) Lando Norris McLaren 1:18.119
    14) Kevin Magnussen Haas 1:18.129
    15) Nyck de Vries AlphaTauri 1:18.335
    Out in Q1
    16) Oscar Piastri McLaren 1:18.517
    17) Zhou Guanyu Alfa Romeo 1:18.540
    18) Logan Sargeant Williams 1:18.557
    19) Valtteri Bottas Alfa Romeo 1:18.714
    20) Sergio Perez Red Bull no time

    Source link

  • Lewis Hamilton: George Russell rejects Mercedes team-mate’s claims over setup ‘luck’

    Lewis Hamilton: George Russell rejects Mercedes team-mate’s claims over setup ‘luck’

    Lewis Hamilton suggested after the Saudi Arabian GP that Mercedes team-mate George Russell had benefitted from good fortune after they chose alternative car setups; watch the Australian GP live on Sky Sports F1 this weekend, with Sunday’s race live at 6am

    Last Updated: 30/03/23 7:51am

    George Russell finished ahead of Lewis Hamilton at the Saudi Arabian GP

    George Russell has rejected Mercedes team-mate Lewis Hamilton’s claims that his superior performance at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix was based on luck.

    Russell comfortably outqualified Hamilton in Jeddah before finishing the race where he started it in fourth, a place ahead of Hamilton who recovered from seventh on the grid.

    With the Mercedes pair having chosen alternative setups going into the weekend, Hamilton said after the race that “more often than not” Russell’s would have been the “wrong one”, and that consequently he “could only match his pace rather than be quicker”.

    “I don’t think there’s any luck in it at all,” Russell said on Thursday ahead of this weekend’s Australian Grand Prix, when asked to address Hamilton’s comments.

    “I think it’s down to the preparation you put in before the event.

    Hamilton spoke about Russell's set up after the Saudi Arabian GP

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Hamilton spoke about Russell’s set up after the Saudi Arabian GP

    Hamilton spoke about Russell’s set up after the Saudi Arabian GP

    “The changes we made overnight, I knew that was going to be the right direction with the work we did with the team. And I believed it was going to be better than the setup that Lewis opted for.

    “I think everybody’s got different preferences, I was happy with the direction I took and the work I’m doing with the engineers.”

    Russell impressively outperformed Hamilton in his debut campaign with Mercedes last year, finishing 35 points ahead of the seven-time world champion in the drivers’ standings, and also claiming the team’s only win of the season.

    Mercedes driver George Russell’s battle for P3 followed some confusion around Aston Martin Fernando Alonso’s five-second penalty at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Mercedes driver George Russell’s battle for P3 followed some confusion around Aston Martin Fernando Alonso’s five-second penalty at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix

    Mercedes driver George Russell’s battle for P3 followed some confusion around Aston Martin Fernando Alonso’s five-second penalty at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix

    Hamilton, along with Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff, repeatedly suggested throughout 2022 that his willingness to experiment with alternate setups on their troublesome W13 car was the reason he lost ground to Russell.

    Hamilton: Russell did a great job

    Speaking shortly after Russell in Melbourne on Thursday, Hamilton sought to clarify the comments he had made in Jeddah.

    “I think people probably, from my choice of words at the weekend… I want to reiterate how great a job George did on the weekend,” the seven-time world champion said.

    “I think the thing I was commenting on is that there’s one specific thing that you can change in the suspension that you have to do over Friday night.

    Hamilton says Mercedes are hoping for rain at the Australian Grand Prix to make 'racing more exciting' and also reflects on the end of his working relationship with performance coach Angela Cullen

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Hamilton says Mercedes are hoping for rain at the Australian Grand Prix to make ‘racing more exciting’ and also reflects on the end of his working relationship with performance coach Angela Cullen

    Hamilton says Mercedes are hoping for rain at the Australian Grand Prix to make ‘racing more exciting’ and also reflects on the end of his working relationship with performance coach Angela Cullen

    “And when you make that change, once you start P3 (final practice), you can’t change it for the rest of the weekend, so when you make that change, you’re basically rolling the dice – sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t.

    “I’ve done it in the past, sometimes it hasn’t worked, sometimes it has, and it worked great for George and he did a great job.

    “And the thing that I was lacking in the race was a lot of front end, which that setup gives you, so, in hindsight, that would’ve been great.”

    Sky F1's Karun Chandhok takes a look at the Albert Park Circuit ahead of this weekend's Australian Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Sky F1’s Karun Chandhok takes a look at the Albert Park Circuit ahead of this weekend’s Australian Grand Prix

    Sky F1’s Karun Chandhok takes a look at the Albert Park Circuit ahead of this weekend’s Australian Grand Prix

    “We took lots of learnings from it – I think race pace was quite decent, particularly in the second stint.

    “And for us to move forward and get fourth and fifth place was great points for the team and a great result considering where we are in terms of performance deficit.”

    Hamilton goes into Sunday’s race in Melbourne two points ahead of Russell in the 2023 drivers’ standings, with the team focused on attempting to close their deficit to Red Bull, who are seeking a third successive one-two to start the season.

    Watch the Australian Grand Prix live on Sky Sports F1 this weekend, with Sunday’s race live at 6am. Get Sky Sports

    Source link

  • Saudi Arabian GP: Lewis Hamilton says Red Bull faster than Mercedes have ever been

    Saudi Arabian GP: Lewis Hamilton says Red Bull faster than Mercedes have ever been

    Lewis Hamilton was left frustrated as Mercedes remained off the pace of Red Bull at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix; Sergio Perez led a one-two from Max Verstappen as Hamilton finished fifth behind team-mate George Russell

    Last Updated: 20/03/23 6:03am

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Max Verstappen breezes past Lewis Hamilton to take P8 at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix.

    Max Verstappen breezes past Lewis Hamilton to take P8 at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix.

    Lewis Hamilton says Red Bull’s 2023 advantage over the rest of the Formula 1 field is greater than anything Mercedes managed during their streak of eight successive constructors’ championships.

    Hamilton finished fifth in Sunday’s Saudi Arabian Grand Prix as Mercedes remained well off the pace of Red Bull, who secured a second one-two in as many races this season.

    Sergio Perez won from pole position in Jeddah, but reigning world champion Max Verstappen’s effortless advance through the field from 15th on the grid – following a technical failure in Qualifying – provided further evidence of Red Bull’s stunning pace.

    “I have definitely never seen a car so fast,” said Hamilton, who claimed six of his seven world championships during Mercedes streak of constructors’ titles between 2014 and 2021.

    “When we were fast, we were not that fast. It is the fastest car I have seen, especially compared to the rest.

    Highlights of the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix at Jeddah Corniche Circuit.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Highlights of the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix at Jeddah Corniche Circuit.

    Highlights of the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix at Jeddah Corniche Circuit.

    “I don’t know how, but he [Verstappen] came past me with some serious speed and I didn’t even bother to block him because there was a massive speed difference.

    “Everyone wants to see a close battle, but it is the way it is. It is not my problem, it is not my fault.”

    Hamilton cut a despondent figure after qualifying more than three tenths – and four places – behind his team-mate George Russell, but was able to gain two places in the race to finish directly behind the other Mercedes and in front of both Ferraris.

    While Hamilton said there were “positives” to take from his Sunday, the 38-year-old remained frustrated by his team’s deficit to Red Bull and Aston Martin’s Fernando Alonso, who took the final spot on the podium for a second successive race.

    Lewis Hamilton and George Russell acknowledged Red Bull are the clear frontrunners after finishing fifth and third respectively.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Lewis Hamilton and George Russell acknowledged Red Bull are the clear frontrunners after finishing fifth and third respectively.

    Lewis Hamilton and George Russell acknowledged Red Bull are the clear frontrunners after finishing fifth and third respectively.

    “(We are) still a long, long way off Red Bull,” Hamilton said. “(It’s) definitely strange to see that Ferrari are behind us and it’s positive for us.

    “It’s a different surface here and we don’t really understand why on this surface our car works one way and different on another.

    “It will be up and down through the first three races. Hopefully we can get some upgrades ASAP and try to close that gap to the Astons.”

    Red Bull driver Max Verstappen was pleased enough to finish second after starting in 15th at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Red Bull driver Max Verstappen was pleased enough to finish second after starting in 15th at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix.

    Red Bull driver Max Verstappen was pleased enough to finish second after starting in 15th at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix.

    Hamilton, who finished behind Russell last season in his younger team-mate’s first year with Mercedes, suggested his deficit in Saudi Arabia was caused by a “50-50” set up choice that went against him.

    “The strategy didn’t really work out for me, the set up was a little bit off – if I had the set up George had, I would have been in a better position,” Hamilton said.

    “There was a 50-50 choice, I chose one way and he chose the other, and more often than not, the way he went was the wrong one but it just happened to work.

    “I could only match his pace rather than be quicker this weekend, but I’ll work hard to make sure we’re in a better position next time.”

    Source link

  • Saudi Arabian GP 2023: Watch Formula 1’s return to Jeddah’s street circuit live on Sky Sports F1

    Saudi Arabian GP 2023: Watch Formula 1’s return to Jeddah’s street circuit live on Sky Sports F1

    F1’s biggest-ever season continues as Saudi Arabia hosts the second round of 2023; watch every session from Jeddah’s stunning street circuit live on Sky Sports F1, starting with Practice One at 1pm on Friday

    Last Updated: 12/03/23 7:07pm

    Formula 1 returns to the fastest street circuit on the calendar this week for the Saudi Arabian GP, with the thrilling layout bound to ensure drama that will take your breath away.

    After reigning world champion Max Verstappen made a strong start to his title defence in Bahrain, the rest of the field are looking to hit back in Jeddah.

    Ferrari are confident set-up changes will unlock more performance at a circuit that should suit them, while all eyes will be on Aston Martin and Fernando Alonso to see if their dramatic ascent to the front of the grid can be maintained.

    Verstappen is chasing a second successive win in Saudi Arabia, having come out on top in a thrilling battle for victory with Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc last year, which displayed the thrilling potential for wheel-to-wheel racing at the Jeddah Corniche Circuit.

    Mercedes will also be looking to bounce back from a disappointing opening race, with all eyes on Lewis Hamilton following his apparent criticism of the team following their Bahrain struggles.

    Ted Kravitz shares his most memorable moments from the Jeddah circuit ahead of the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Ted Kravitz shares his most memorable moments from the Jeddah circuit ahead of the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix

    Ted Kravitz shares his most memorable moments from the Jeddah circuit ahead of the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix

    There is also plenty of intrigue surrounding the midfield battle, with the change of track characteristics potentially shaking up the order from Bahrain.

    Sky Sports F1’s live Saudi Arabian GP schedule

    Thursday
    2:30pm: Drivers’ Press Conference

    Friday
    10.50pm: F2 Practice
    1pm: Saudi Arabian GP Practice One (session starts 1.30pm)
    2:55pm: F2 Qualifying
    4:45pm: Saudi Arabian GP Practice Two (session starts 5pm)
    6:15pm: The F1 Show: Saudi Arabia

    Saturday
    1.15pm: Saudi Arabian GP Practice Three (session starts 1:30pm)
    3:05pm: F2 Sprint Race
    4pm: Saudi Arabian GP Qualifying build-up
    5pm: SAUDI ARABIAN GP QUALIFYING

    Sunday
    1:35pm: F2 Feature Race
    3.30pm: Grand Prix Sunday Saudi Arabian GP build-up
    5pm: THE SAUDI ARABIAN GRAND PRIX
    7pm: Chequered flag: Saudi Arabian GP Reaction

    New for 2023: Ride onboard with any driver

    Sky Sports F1 viewers can experience live races from inside the car of their favourite driver thanks to a stunning new innovation for the 2023 season.

    Sky customers with a Sky Sports F1 subscription just need to download the Sky Sports App and log in to ride with Lewis Hamilton, Max Verstappen, Charles Leclerc or any driver of their choice.

    In addition to the 20 driver onboard streams, viewers will also be able to experience the Sky Sports ‘Battle Channel’, a split-screen offering focusing on a battle between up to three cars.

    If you prefer to jump onboard through your TV screen, the service will also be available through Sky Q and Sky Glass.

    This is in addition to the Race Control streams that have been available in previous seasons, including multi-screen, timing screen, driver tracker and onboard mix.

    Watch the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix live on Sky Sports F1 this weekend with Sunday’s race live at 5pm. Get Sky Sports

    Source link

  • Mercedes say team ‘won’t panic or look for scapegoats’ after disappointing start to 2023 Formula 1 season

    Mercedes say team ‘won’t panic or look for scapegoats’ after disappointing start to 2023 Formula 1 season

    Mercedes made a disappointing start to their 2023 campaign as Lewis Hamilton and George Russell were left well off the pace of Red Bull in Bahrain; Speculation has followed over Hamilton’s future with the team; watch the Saudi Arabian GP on Sky Sports F1 next weekend

    Last Updated: 11/03/23 10:37am

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Lewis Hamilton believes he extracted the best out of his Mercedes in finishing fifth in Bahrain but acknowledges they need to improve performance.

    Lewis Hamilton believes he extracted the best out of his Mercedes in finishing fifth in Bahrain but acknowledges they need to improve performance.

    Mercedes have insisted they will not “panic or look for scapegoats” after a disappointing start to the 2023 Formula 1 season in Bahrain last weekend.

    Following a torrid 2022 campaign which saw their eight-year streak of constructors’ titles ended by Red Bull, Mercedes had been bullish during the winter over a return to contention this year, but that optimism faded as they were outperformed by not only the dominant reigning champions but also Ferrari and Aston Martin.

    Recriminations followed with seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton publicly questioning the team’s decision to ignore his advice over the design of their 2023 car, and team principal Toto Wolff describing the Bahrain GP as “one of the worst days in racing”.

    With speculation raging about Hamilton’s future with the team, along with other key members of staff, the team released a letter addressed to their fans on Saturday morning in an apparent attempt to calm the situation.

    The letter said: “Bahrain hurt. It hurt each one of us, who head into every season determined to fight for world championships. It hurt the team as a whole, after pouring so much hard work into a car that hasn’t met our expectations.

    “The situation we face right now isn’t the one that any of us wanted – but it’s the one we have. That’s the reality of it. And the simple questions are: what can we do about it, and what will we do about it?

    “We won’t panic or make knee-jerk reactions. In a spotlight as fierce as F1, people are quick to point fingers, or look for scapegoats. But you know us better than that. Inside the team, we talk about having the courage to fail, the character to be accountable and the strength to see failure as an opportunity.

    “We have been open and searingly honest about where we find ourselves. And we are working urgently and calmly to build our recovery plan, focusing on what needs to happen short term, medium term, and long term to win. We already have developments in the pipeline for the next races – and there will be more to come. But this won’t be the work of a moment; there are no silver bullets in F1.”

    With Mercedes having made a poor start to the season, Sky F1's Naomi Schiff contemplates whether Hamilton will ever win a record eighth world title. You can listen to the latest episode of the Sky Sports F1 Podcast every Tuesday.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    With Mercedes having made a poor start to the season, Sky F1’s Naomi Schiff contemplates whether Hamilton will ever win a record eighth world title. You can listen to the latest episode of the Sky Sports F1 Podcast every Tuesday.

    With Mercedes having made a poor start to the season, Sky F1’s Naomi Schiff contemplates whether Hamilton will ever win a record eighth world title. You can listen to the latest episode of the Sky Sports F1 Podcast every Tuesday.

    Hamilton, who finished fifth in Bahrain ahead of team-mate George Russell in seventh, has repeatedly expressed a desire to remain with Mercedes in F1 beyond the end of the season, when his current contract expires.

    Both the 38-year-old and Wolff had previously suggested agreeing an extension would be a formality, but the team’s apparent failure to provide him with a championship-contending car for a second straight season has led to speculation over whether he could choose to retire or look for a move elsewhere.

    There is also great interest in how Mercedes will proceed with the development of their W14 car after Wolff suggested in Bahrain that the team had accepted their current concept will not work.

    Toto Wolff says the team had one of the 'worst days in racing' after Mercedes finished fifth and seventh at the Bahrain Grand Prix.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Toto Wolff says the team had one of the ‘worst days in racing’ after Mercedes finished fifth and seventh at the Bahrain Grand Prix.

    Toto Wolff says the team had one of the ‘worst days in racing’ after Mercedes finished fifth and seventh at the Bahrain Grand Prix.

    The statement continued: “We will keep our heads held high – and take this journey step by step, together. We are Mercedes. We know the standards we aspire to, and nobody is flinching when we look at the mountain we must climb. It won’t be easy – but where’s the value in something easy?

    “These are the times when character is forged; the times when a team becomes greater than the sum of its parts, tackling difficult problems and conquering them. We’re together through thick and thin – from Toto, Lewis and George, to every single woman and man in the factories in Brackley and Brixworth. And we love that challenge.”

    Hamilton and Mercedes will be back in action next weekend at the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix, with every session live on Sky Sports F1, starting with first practice on Friday at 1:30pm.

    Source link

  • Formula 1 terms explained: Key words and phrases for following Sky Sports F1 2023 coverage

    Formula 1 terms explained: Key words and phrases for following Sky Sports F1 2023 coverage

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Formula One is back! Here’s David Croft to tell you everything you need to know in 60 seconds ahead of the first race in Bahrain. Catch all the action live on Sky Sports

    Formula One is back! Here’s David Croft to tell you everything you need to know in 60 seconds ahead of the first race in Bahrain. Catch all the action live on Sky Sports

    As Formula 1 returns for the 2023 season, we’ve explained the key phrases you will hear while following Sky Sports F1’s coverage of the sport’s biggest ever season.

    The exciting, innovating and high-speed sport can be complex and confusing for existing fans, never mind new ones.

    So, ahead of the opening race of the 2023 season in Bahrain this weekend, here are some F1 terms that can be confusing but crucial during a Grand Prix weekend.

    Pole position

    Max Verstappen takes pole in the final race of the 2022 season in Abu Dhabi.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Max Verstappen takes pole in the final race of the 2022 season in Abu Dhabi.

    Max Verstappen takes pole in the final race of the 2022 season in Abu Dhabi.

    What you might hear – “Fernando Alonso is on pole position.”

    What you might think – Where’s the pole?

    What it actually means – The driver on pole position is the one who set the fastest lap time during qualifying. Usually, that will mean the driver on pole starts the Grand Prix at the front. However, during a Sprint weekend, the pole-sitter will start the Sprint on Saturday at the front, but the finishing order from the Sprint decides the starting order for the Grand Prix on Sunday.

    DRS

    The DRS board tells drivers where they can activate the system

    The DRS board tells drivers where they can activate the system

    What you might hear – “Yuki Tsunoda has got DRS.”

    What you might think – DRS could be a medical term or the decision review system, like cricket.

    What it actually means – DRS stands for drag reduction system, which allows drivers to move a flap in the rear wing of their car that decreases the air resistance, giving the car up to 7.5mph more speed. The system is designed to deliver more overtaking, but can only be activated when a car is within one second of the car ahead.

    Slipstream

    Max Verstappen uses a slipstream to pass Lewis Hamilton on the final lap in Abu Dhabi to win the 2021 F1 Championship!

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Max Verstappen uses a slipstream to pass Lewis Hamilton on the final lap in Abu Dhabi to win the 2021 F1 Championship!

    Max Verstappen uses a slipstream to pass Lewis Hamilton on the final lap in Abu Dhabi to win the 2021 F1 Championship!

    What you might hear – “Oscar Piastri is in Alex Albon’s slipstream.”

    What you might think – Is this a new type of streaming?

    What it actually means – When a driver is directly behind another car, they can go faster because there is less air resistance, in the same way you might hide behind your friend so they block the wind getting to you. Getting a slipstream should enhance a driver’s chances of pulling off an overtake. Team-mates may also intentionally give each other a slipstream in Qualifying to help set the fastest lap.

    Chicane

    Daniel Ricciardo lost control of his McLaren and crashed into the barriers at Monaco's swimming pool chicane.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Daniel Ricciardo lost control of his McLaren and crashed into the barriers at Monaco’s swimming pool chicane.

    Daniel Ricciardo lost control of his McLaren and crashed into the barriers at Monaco’s swimming pool chicane.

    What you might hear – “And here they come through the swimming pool chicane.”

    What you might think – Are they racing in the water these days?

    What it actually means – A chicane is a sequence of corners that sees two changes in direction in quick succession. The swimming pool chicane is one of the sport’s most famous chicanes, as the cars thread their way through a remarkably tight section around Monaco’s swimming pool.

    Oversteer/understeer

    Anthony Davidson takes a look at the understeer suffered by Max Verstappen in his Red Bull during practice at the French GP.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Anthony Davidson takes a look at the understeer suffered by Max Verstappen in his Red Bull during practice at the French GP.

    Anthony Davidson takes a look at the understeer suffered by Max Verstappen in his Red Bull during practice at the French GP.

    What you might hear – “Logan Sargeant prefers his car to oversteer.”

    What you might think – I’m only used to one type of steering.

    What it actually means – Depending on the setup of the car and how it is driven, a driver may either oversteer or understeer. If a car oversteers, the car is very sensitive to the driver turning the steering wheel, often leading to the rear of the car sliding – it looks cool, but can be slower, worse for the tyres and lead to accidents.

    Understeer happens when the car won’t turn as much as the driver would like. This can lead to the car running wide and also going slower. The perfect car would have no understeer or oversteer, but this is not a perfect world, so sometimes the drivers and teams must choose between the two evils.

    Going purple

    The F1 timing screen shows data in purple if it is the best of anyone

    The F1 timing screen shows data in purple if it is the best of anyone

    What you might hear – “Max Verstappen is currently fastest, but Charles Leclerc is going purple.”

    What you might think – Charles Leclerc must be angry.

    What it actually means – When a driver completes a sector of a track faster than anyone, the timing screens will go purple for that sector. A purple sector would tend to indicate that a driver is on a highly competitive lap, which has a chance of being the fastest of the session or race.

    Undercut/overcut

    Lewis Hamilton gets the double-bubble by undercutting Max Verstappen and overtaking Daniel Ricciardo.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Lewis Hamilton gets the double-bubble by undercutting Max Verstappen and overtaking Daniel Ricciardo.

    Lewis Hamilton gets the double-bubble by undercutting Max Verstappen and overtaking Daniel Ricciardo.

    What you might hear – “Lewis Hamilton has undercut Carlos Sainz to take the lead.”

    What you might think – Hamilton has done some sort of boxing move.

    What it actually means – During a race, Hamilton has come into the pits earlier than Sainz, who he was behind on track. That allows him to go faster on fresh tyres, meaning by the time Sainz has pitted a lap or two later, he would come out of the pits behind Hamilton.

    The overcut is the opposite of this and can happen when newer tyres make a car slower, so the driver that pits later comes out ahead. This would be likely to happen on a cold day when the tyres take a while to get up to a higher temperature and become hot and grippy.

    Locking up

    Lewis Hamilton locks up at Silverstone

    Lewis Hamilton locks up at Silverstone

    What you might hear – “Lando Norris has locked up going into turn one.”

    What you might think – Norris has been imprisoned – perhaps for speeding.

    What it actually means – Norris has tried to slow his car down by braking, but there is not enough grip and his tyre is sliding across the tarmac. Lock ups usually create a puff of smoke and cause a car to run off line, while significant damage can be done to the tyre.

    Apex

    George Russell runs wide at the 2021 British Grand Prix

    George Russell runs wide at the 2021 British Grand Prix

    What you might hear – “Sergio Perez has missed the apex there.”

    What you might think – Is this racing or climbing?

    What it actually means – The apex is the point of the corner that the car should go through for no time to be lost – so if Perez missed the apex, he might have gone wide, losing time.

    Backmarker

    The blue flag tells slower cars to get out of the way of faster cars coming up behind

    The blue flag tells slower cars to get out of the way of faster cars coming up behind

    What you might hear – “The blue flags are going to need to come out soon as the leaders catch the backmarkers.”

    What you might think – Who are they marking?

    What it actually means – Backmarkers are the slower cars at the back that will often be lapped by the leading cars. A blue flag is shown to a backmarker to tell the driver to get out of the way as the faster car comes through. Backmarkers can sometimes interfere with racing between the leaders.

    Degradation (Deg)

    As the countdown continues to this weekend's highly anticipated Azerbaijan Grand Prix, we take a look back at last year's memorable race in Baku.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    As the countdown continues to this weekend’s highly anticipated Azerbaijan Grand Prix, we take a look back at last year’s memorable race in Baku.

    As the countdown continues to this weekend’s highly anticipated Azerbaijan Grand Prix, we take a look back at last year’s memorable race in Baku.

    What you might hear – “The deg on that Ferrari today has been really bad.”

    What you might think – Did I hear that correctly?

    What it actually means – Degradation happens as tyres wear – or become damaged – during a stint, and there are two main types of degradation. ‘Blistering’ happens when the tyre overheats and bubbles up on the surface and ‘graining’ when the tyres slide across the tarmac, crumbling apart like a ball of mozzarella might. ‘Deg’, as drivers will often refer to it, can have serious consequences – see the video above!

    Marbles

    Tyre 'marbles' gather at the edge of the track

    Tyre ‘marbles’ gather at the edge of the track

    What you might hear – “Look at all the marbles on the track.”

    What you might think – Has someone dropped their marble collection onto the track?

    What it actually means – As the tyres fall apart – or grain – the bits of rubber can gather on the track, creating a surface which feels to the drivers like they are driving on marbles. There is not a lot of grip if you drive on marbles, but after the race, drivers will drive onto the marbles to pick up rubber and add to the car’s mass to ensure the car weighs enough to comply with rules.

    Bottoming out

    Sparks fly from Max Verstappen's Red Bull

    Sparks fly from Max Verstappen’s Red Bull

    What you might hear – “George Russell has gone wide and bottomed out on the kerb.”

    What you might think – It sounds a little rude.

    What it actually means – F1 cars are really low because the closer the ground, the more speed drivers can take through corners. Often, the bottom of the car scrapes along the ground, bottoming out and creating sparks.

    Delta

    The driver can see on their steering wheel what the delta to their rivals is

    The driver can see on their steering wheel what the delta to their rivals is

    What you might hear – “The soft compound of tyre has a delta of half a second to the hard compound.”

    What you might think – Isn’t delta part of the Greek alphabet?

    What it actually means – You’d be correct. Delta is part of the Greek alphabet, but also means difference. So in the example above, the softer tyres are quicker than the hard tyres by half a second per lap. Delta might also be used to describe the difference in pace between different drivers or cars.

    Parc ferme

    Teams can make very limited changes to the cars when they are in parc ferme

    Teams can make very limited changes to the cars when they are in parc ferme

    What you might hear – “The cars are in parc ferme conditions”

    What you might think – It’s hard enough understanding F1 without needing to speak French!

    What it actually means – It is French for secure park. After qualifying, an expensive car park is created with no maintenance allowed to take place on cars before the race without the permission of the FIA – F1’s governing body. FIA officials scrutineer the cars to ensure no changes are made that shouldn’t be.

    Source link

  • F1 Academy: 2023 race calendar for inaugural all-female championship

    F1 Academy: 2023 race calendar for inaugural all-female championship

    The F1 Academy is an all-female racing championship for younger drivers; the inaugural 2023 season will feature five teams, each entering three cars to make up a 15-strong grid; the season finale will serve as a support event at the US Grand Prix in October

    Last Updated: 23/02/23 9:05am

    The new F1 Academy series will see younger female drivers run in the same chassis as Formula 4 (above)

    The race calendar for the inaugural 2023 season of the F1 Academy has been announced, with a total of 21 races over seven rounds, including a season finale which will serve as a support event at the US Grand Prix in Austin, Texas.

    The brand-new all-female championship is for younger drivers and will feature five teams – ART, Campos, Carlin, MP Motorsport and Prema – each entering three cars to make up a 15-strong grid.

    The 15 competing cars will take to the track for the first time on April 11-12 at the Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya for an official test session, with the season getting under way on April 28-29 in Spielberg, Austria.

    F1 Academy 2023 calendar

    Round Date Venue
    1 April 28-29 Spielberg, Austria
    2 May 5-7 Valencia, Spain
    3 May 19-21 Barcelona, Spain
    4 June 23-25 Zandvoort, Netherlands
    5 July 7-9 Monza, Italy
    6 July 29-30 Le Castellet, France
    7 October 20-22 Austin, USA

    Spain will host two events in May, in Valencia and Barcelona, with summer stops in the Netherlands (Zandvoort), Italy (Monza) and France (Le Castellet), before the season-ender in the US on October 20-22.

    There will also be 13 more days of testing throughout the season, to be revealed in the coming weeks.

    Bruno Michel, general manager of the F1 Academy, said: “Our goal was to be able to race on as many Formula 1 Grand Prix tracks as possible, with circuits that could be a great challenge for the drivers.

    “The teams know these layouts very well, so they will be able to help their young talents get to grips quickly.

    “We had announced that F1 Academy would be racing alongside Formula 1 at one event, so it’s fantastic to be part of the F1 Grand Prix package in Austin, where we will also conclude the first season, in front of the F1 paddock and the American crowd.”

    Reigning W Series champion Jamie Chadwick expresses her excitement as she steps into Indy NXT with ambitions to race in Formula One.

    Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

    Reigning W Series champion Jamie Chadwick expresses her excitement as she steps into Indy NXT with ambitions to race in Formula One.

    Reigning W Series champion Jamie Chadwick expresses her excitement as she steps into Indy NXT with ambitions to race in Formula One.

    Race Weekend Format

    Each race weekend will consist of two free practice sessions of 40 minutes each, followed by two qualifying sessions of 15 minutes each.

    F1 Academy 2023 points allocation

    Race 1 Race 2 Race 3
    1st – 25 points 1st – 10 points 1st – 25 points
    2nd – 18 2nd – 8 2nd – 18
    3rd – 15 3rd – 6 3rd – 15
    4th – 12 4th – 5 4th – 12
    5th – 10 5th – 4 5th – 10
    6th – 8 6th – 3 6th – 8
    7th – 6 7th – 2 7th – 6
    8th – 4 8th -1 8th – 4
    9th – 2 9th – 2
    10th – 1 10th – 1

    All events will have three races: Races 1 and 3 will be 30 minutes long, and Race 2 will be 20 minutes. Qualifying 1 will set the Grid for Race 1 and Qualifying 2 will set the grid for Race 3.

    The first eight finishers in Qualifying 1 will start Race 2 in reverse order, cars finishing in ninth position and below will start in the position they qualified in that session.

    The drivers who take pole position for Races 1 and 3 following the final classification of the Qualifying sessions will be awarded with two points.

    In each race, one point will be awarded to the driver who achieves the fastest lap time, providing she was in the top 10 positions of the final race classification.

    Source link