ReportWire

Tag: Michael O'Malley

  • The Cleveland Catholic Diocese Has a List of Clergy Credibly Accused of Child Abuse. Advocates Want the Church to Finally Release It

    The Cleveland Catholic Diocese Has a List of Clergy Credibly Accused of Child Abuse. Advocates Want the Church to Finally Release It

    [ad_1]

    click to enlarge

    Mark Oprea

    Anne Barrett Doyle, the co-director of Bishop Accountability, an anti-abuse non-profit, spoke near the steps of the Cathedral of St. John the Evangelist on Wednesday.

    In 2002, following a groundbreaking investigation by the Boston Globe into child sexual abuse by Catholic priests and the steps the church took to protect them, Cleveland prosecutors and grand jurors soon came up with a list of 145 local priests who allegedly abused children.

    The problem then, even after years of work by then County Prosecutor Bill Mason and the grand jury, only a handful of the suspects were charged. The rest contained on the list remained secret due to a judge’s ruling on the secrecy of grand jury proceedings and it took years for the Catholic Diocese of Cleveland, after cultural pushback, to release some (52 to date) of the names themselves.

    On Wednesday, in front of the catherdral of St. John the Evangelist, a team of anti-child abuse advocates called once again for the full grand jury list of offenders to be released.

    The push, led by activists Anne Barrett Doyle and Claudia Vercellotti, arrives just a week after officials at St. Ignatius High School in Ohio City admitted that a former priest of theirs, a Fr. Frank Canfield, had likely abused at least one former student.

    Speaking in front of poster boards with victims’ portraits and silouhettes of accusers, Doyle, co-director of Bishop Accountability, directed her accusations to Bishop Edward Malesic, whom she believes carries the power to unveil the remaining hundred or so names of the alleged.

    “The single most compassionate thing a bishop can do when he says he cares about victims… It’s not a healing mass. It’s not a healing garden. It’s not even praying for them. It’s releasing information,” Doyle said. “When the church acknowledges that someone has been credibly accused and they release information about the abuse, you know what happens? More victims come forward.”

    The group, as part of the press conference, published the names of 50 clerics they say have been credibly accused but who have not been named by the diocese.

    Doyle’s hunch is reflected in the incident at St. Ignatius. Canfield, originally from the Diocese of Toledo, was accused in 2022 of abusing a student at Saint John’s Jesuit High School. In 2023, an investigation by the Midwest Province Jesuits concluded the allegation was credible. Other schools Canfield worked at were informed.

    By December, a St. Ignatius alum came forward, accusing Canfield of abusing him during the 2011-2012 school year. (Canfield had died in June.)

    click to enlarge Doyle's accusations were focused on Bishop Edward Malesic, who she believes carries the power to release the names of priests in the Diocese of Cleveland who've received sex abuse allegations in the past two decades. - Mark Oprea

    Mark Oprea

    Doyle’s accusations were focused on Bishop Edward Malesic, who she believes carries the power to release the names of priests in the Diocese of Cleveland who’ve received sex abuse allegations in the past two decades.

    In a letter to the public, St. Ignatius president Raymond Guiao explained that transparency in the situation with Canfield was paramount to securing trust, and encouraged other students who may have experienced abuse to reach out.

    “I invite you to join me in prayer for our alumnus, for all victims of clerical sexual abuse, and for all of those impacted in the wake of such a tragedy,” Guiao wrote. “Should anyone wish to discuss this or any other situation with me personally, my door is always open.”

    Doyle’s list, held up for cameras multiple times during her speech on Wednesday, contains some 50 clerics who spent at least some of their career in the Cleveland diocese. Thirty-eight, she said, had already been “credibly-accused” by another bishop, or some religious superior. Many, she said, are deceased.

    As for reasons Bishop Malesic’s hasn’t shared the remaining names, Doyle believes that the cleric’s refusal is in direct infringment of Pope Francis’ sexual abuse accountability law, created to hold all those accused of abuse in the Catholic Church accountable. The law made expanded and made concrete in canonical proceedings last March.

    It’s given Doyle, who had been working in anti-abuse advocacy since the Boston scandal, a particular sense of urgency.

    “Where are those priests now? Do their neighbors know what they did? Are they working in schools? Are they counselors?” Doyle said. “We find that even when priests are released from the priesthood, if they’re abusers, they find a way to work with young people and children again.”

    The Diocese of Cleveland’s own list, which came to light in April 2002 and was revised in 2018, contains the names of 53 member clerics found guilty of abuse, those who’ve admitted to abusing minors, who those whose actions have been proven true “by canonical procedure.”

    And those procedures end in a series of punishments: removed (like 14 priests) from all regular church duties—saying Mass, hearing confessions, wearing priestly garb; given a life of prayer and penance; obligated to “live alone in prayer” (like one priest).

    Others, like six priests on the Diocese’s list, were removed from ministry permanently. (Thirty had died before accusations were brought to light.)

    In response to accusations against Malesic, a Diocese spokesperson told Scene that their own list doesn’t include clergy from other dioceses, or those who belong to a religious order—”only clerics of the Diocese of Cleveland.”

    “The Catholic Diocese of Cleveland is steadfastly committed to the protection and safety of children, as demonstrated in its robust policies regarding background checks, its education and training, its commitment to reporting all allegations of child sexual abuse to civil authorities,” the statement read, “and by the fact that no cleric in the Diocese of Cleveland against whom a substantiated allegation has been made is permitted to ever again serve in ministry.”

    Both Doyle and Vercellotti said that they’ve received lackluster responses from Attorney General Dave Yost and County Prosecutor Michael O’Malley, yet have faith in institutions like St. Ignatius to surface names they believe belong in the public eye.

    “It takes seconds to abuse a child and a lifetime to overcome it,” Vercellotti said. “Ohio deserves better. Ohio kids deserve better.”

    Subscribe to Cleveland Scene newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

    [ad_2]

    Mark Oprea

    Source link

  • Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Octavius Williams in Attempted Murder Case His Brother Has Since Confessed To

    Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Octavius Williams in Attempted Murder Case His Brother Has Since Confessed To

    [ad_1]

    Octavius Williams, the 27-year-old Clevelander accused and convicted of attempted murder in 2011, will finally get a chance to officially clear his name.

    Eighth District Appellate Court Judges Eileen Gallagher, Lisa Forbes and Kathleen Ann Keough on Thursday issued a ruling that Williams’ previous denial for a new trial by a Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court judge would be “reversed, vacated and remanded.”

    Williams was granted a judicial release but not fully exonerated despite the recommendation of the county’s Conviction Integrity Unit, which investigated his case. He appealed to the Eighth District for a new trial.

    The bulk of reasoning behind the judges’ decision seems to stem from Williams’ brother Ricky’s owning up to the crime himself, through a series of written and oral statements to police in the mid-2000s.

    It’s exactly what the trio of district judges weighed on during oral arguments at Case Western in October.

    “The confessions are consistent with evidence presented at trial,” an opinion filed Thursday in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas read. “These confessions amount to newly discovered evidence, and the court erred by denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.”

    On November 1, 2010, dozens of people gathered at Ardy Williams’ home in Union-Miles for a Halloween party. Octavius, who was 17 and went by Tay-Tay at the time, was present, along with his brother Ricky. A fight broke out. Shots were fired between rivaling parties. A little after midnight, Dennis Cole was shot.

    Following a five-day trial, a jury convicted Octavius of attempted murder. Judge Deena Calabrese sentenced him to 15 years in prison, a sentence that leaned heavily on the following: police, after hearing Cole’s description of his shooter, found Octavius the best suspect.

    He would spend the next 3,091 days incarcerated before the CIU investigated his case and, in a compromise reached between the prosecutor’s office and his defense team, granted judicial release and placed on probation.

    While he’s been free since then, he is still a felon: Prosecutor Mike O’Malley didn’t believe Octavius was actually innocent, but felt there were enough questions that he should no longer be in jail.

    “You’ve got to use your human intuition and life experience to come up with the best decisions,” O’Malley told Scene in 2020. “What is justice in this case? I think in this particular case, we did the best we could. I think we did what was right.”

    Arguments favoring a new day in court revolved mostly around what was considered “new” evidence, October’s arguments at Case Western’s School of Law showed. Is Ricky’s confession a decade ago outdated? Did Cole’s blood-alcohol content at the time matter? Should Ricky have given proper testimony?

    “The core argument here is: Does every confession mean a new trial?” a Cuyahoga County assistant prosecutor said during the hearing. “The question for this court was whether or not the trial court decision was reasonably based on the facts of this case.”

    Judge Gallagher scrutinized the notion: “It all goes back to what Ricky knew at the time, what he says happened at the time, and what the main people say happened at the time,” she told prosecutor. “Is it new, or is it just available to us now?”

    If Williams’ legal team succeeds, he could receive a full not-guilty verdict and total exoneration, if O’Malley decided to re-try the case. If he doesn’t, the verdict will remain vacated.

    Not only would either remove the felon tag from his record, but it would open the possibility of Williams seeking compensation from the state for being wrongfully convicted.

    Subscribe to Cleveland Scene newsletters.

    Follow us: Apple News | Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed



    [ad_2]

    Mark Oprea

    Source link