ReportWire

Tag: michael cohen

  • Star witness Michael Cohen directly implicates Trump in testimony at hush money trial

    Star witness Michael Cohen directly implicates Trump in testimony at hush money trial

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — Donald Trump was intimately involved with all aspects of a scheme to stifle stories about sex that threatened to torpedo his 2016 campaign, his former lawyer said Monday in matter-of-fact testimony that went to the heart of the former president’s hush money trial.

    “Everything required Mr. Trump’s sign-off,” said Michael Cohen, Trump’s fixer-turned-foe and the prosecution’s star witness in a case now entering its final, pivotal stretch.

    In hours of highly anticipated testimony, Cohen placed Trump at the center of the hush money plot, saying the then-candidate had promised to reimburse the lawyer for the money he fronted and was constantly updated about behind-the-scenes efforts to bury stories feared to be harmful to the campaign.

    John Santucci has the latest on the trial.

    “Stop this from getting out,” Cohen, the prosecution’s star witness, quoted Trump as telling him in reference to porn actor Stormy Daniels’ account of a sexual encounter with Trump a decade earlier.

    A similar episode occurred when Cohen alerted Trump that a Playboy model was alleging that she and Trump had an extramarital affair. “Make sure it doesn’t get released,” Cohen said Trump told him. The woman, Karen McDougal, was paid $150,000 in an arrangement that was made after Trump received a “complete and total update on everything that transpired.”

    “What I was doing was at the direction of and benefit of Mr. Trump,” Cohen testified.

    Cohen is by far the prosecution’s most important witness, and though his testimony lacked the electricity that defined Daniels’ turn on the stand, he nonetheless linked Trump directly to the payments and helped illuminate some of the drier evidence such as text messages and phone logs that jurors have seen.

    Michael Cohen testifies on the witness stand with a National Enquirer cover story about Donald Trump displayed on a screen in Manhattan criminal court, May 13, 2024, in New York.

    Elizabeth Williams via AP

    The testimony of a witness with such intimate knowledge of Trump’s activities could heighten the legal exposure of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee if jurors deem him sufficiently credible. But prosecutors’ reliance on a witness with such a checkered past – Cohen pleaded guilty to federal charges related to the payments – also carries sizable risks with a jury and could be a boon to Trump politically as he fundraises off his legal woes and paints the case as the product of a tainted criminal justice system.

    The men, once so close that Cohen boasted that he would “take a bullet” for Trump, had no visible interaction inside the courtroom. The sedate atmosphere was a marked contrast from their last courtroom faceoff, when Trump walked out of the courtroom in October after his lawyer finished questioning Cohen during his civil fraud trial.

    This time around, Trump sat at the defense table with his eyes closed for long stretches of testimony as Cohen recounted his decade-long career as a senior Trump Organization executive, doing work that by his own admission sometimes involved lying and bullying others on his boss’s behalf.

    Jurors had previously heard from others about the tabloid industry practice of “catch-and-kill,” in which rights to a story are purchased so that it can then be quashed. But Cohen’s testimony, which continues Tuesday, is crucial to prosecutors because of his direct communication with the then-candidate about embarrassing stories he was scrambling to suppress.

    Cohen also matters because the reimbursements he received from a $130,000 hush money payment to Daniels, which prosecutors say was meant to buy her silence in advance of the election, form the basis of 34 felony counts charging Trump with falsifying business records. Prosecutors say the reimbursements were logged, falsely, as legal expenses to conceal the payments’ true purpose.

    Under questioning from a prosecutor, Cohen detailed the steps he took to mask the payments. When he opened a bank account to pay Daniels, an action he said he told Trump he was taking, he said it was for a new limited liability corporation but withheld the actual purpose.

    “I’m not sure they would’ve opened it,” he said, “if it stated: ‘to pay off an adult film star for a non-disclosure agreement.’”

    To establish Trump’s familiarity with the payments, Cohen said Trump had promised to reimburse him and called him while the lawyer was on a December 2016 family vacation. Trump told him: “Don’t worry about that other thing. I’m going to take care of it when you get back.”

    The two men even discussed with Allen Weisselberg, a former Trump Organization chief financial officer, how the reimbursements would be paid as “legal expenses” over monthly installments, Cohen testified.

    And though Trump’s lawyers have said he acted to protect his family from salacious stories, Cohen described Trump as preoccupied instead by the impact they would have on the campaign. He said Trump implored him to delay finalizing the Daniels transaction until after Election Day so he wouldn’t have to pay her.

    “Because,” Cohen testified, “after the election it wouldn’t matter” to Trump.

    Cohen also gave jurors an insider account of his negotiations with David Pecker, the then-publisher of the National Enquirer, who was such a close Trump ally that Pecker told Cohen his publication maintained a “file drawer or a locked drawer” where files related to Trump were kept. That effort took on added urgency following the October 2016 disclosure of an “Access Hollywood” recording in which Trump was heard boasting about grabbing women sexually.

    The Daniels payment was finalized several weeks after that revelation, but Monday’s testimony also centered on a deal earlier that fall with McDougal.

    Cohen testified that he went to Trump immediately after the National Enquirer alerted him to a story about the alleged McDougal affair. “Make sure it doesn’t get released,” he said Trump told him.

    Trump checked in with Pecker about the matter, asking him how “things were going” with it, Cohen said. Pecker responded: “‘We have this under control, and we’ll take care of this,’” Cohen testified.

    Cohen also said he was with Trump as Trump spoke to Pecker on a speakerphone in his Trump Tower office.

    “David stated it would cost $150,000 to control the story,” Cohen said. He quoted Trump as saying: “No problem, I’ll take care of it,” meaning that the payments would be reimbursed.

    To lay the foundation that the deals were done with Trump’s endorsement, prosecutors elicited testimony from Cohen designed to show Trump as a hands-on manager. Acting on Trump’s behalf, Cohen said, he sometimes lied and bullied others, including reporters.

    “When he would task you with something, he would then say, ‘Keep me informed. Let me know what’s going on,’” Cohen testified. He said that was especially true “if there was a matter that was troubling to him.”

    Defense lawyers have teed up a bruising cross-examination of Cohen, telling jurors during opening statements that he’s an “admitted liar” with an “obsession to get President Trump.”

    Prosecutors aim to blunt those attacks by acknowledging Cohen’s past crimes to jurors and by relying on other witnesses whose accounts, they hope, will buttress Cohen’s testimony. They include a lawyer who negotiated the hush money payments on behalf of Daniels and McDougal, as well as Pecker and Daniels.

    Cohen’s role as star prosecution witness further cements the disintegration of a mutually beneficial relationship. After Cohen’s home and office were raided by the FBI in 2018, Trump showered him with affection on social media, praising him as a “fine person with a wonderful family” and predicting – incorrectly – that Cohen would not “flip.”

    Months later, Cohen did exactly that, pleading guilty that August to federal campaign-finance charges in which he implicated Trump. By that point, the relationship was irrevocably broken, with Trump posting on the social media platform then known as Twitter: “If anyone is looking for a good lawyer, I would strongly suggest that you don’t retain the services of Michael Cohen!”

    Cohen later admitted lying to Congress about a Moscow real estate project that he had pursued on Trump’s behalf during the heat of the 2016 campaign. He was sentenced to three years in prison, but spent much of it in home confinement.

    Copyright © 2024 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

    [ad_2]

    AP

    Source link

  • 5/13: CBS Evening News

    5/13: CBS Evening News

    [ad_1]

    5/13: CBS Evening News – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Michael Cohen testifies about Stormy Daniels payment at Donald Trump’s criminal trial; How conductor Xian Zhang is breaking barriers

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Trump trial live updates as Michael Cohen testifies today

    Trump trial live updates as Michael Cohen testifies today

    [ad_1]

    In the summer of 2016, Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model, was trying to sell her story about an alleged sexual encounter she had with Trump, which he denies. Her attorney, Keith Davidson, approached the National Enquirer about a deal that June.

    Cohen said Pecker and Howard flagged the story to him. He said he thought it would have had a “significant” impact on Trump’s campaign and that he told Trump about it “immediately.”

    “I told him about what I had just learned. I asked him if he knew who Karen McDougal was, if he knew about the story. His response to me was, ‘She’s really beautiful,’” Cohen remembered Trump saying. “OK, but right now there’s a story that’s being shopped.”

    “Make sure that it doesn’t get released,” Cohen said Trump told him.

    Cohen said Pecker and Howard kept him updated on the negotiations with McDougal, and Cohen in turn told Trump about developments “frequently.” 

    Prosecutors showed a series of texts between Cohen and Keith Schiller, Trump’s bodyguard, in June 2016. Cohen was asking Schiller if Trump was available to speak. Call logs showed a phone call with Schiller right after the texts. Cohen testified that the call was about “the updates that I received about the Karen McDougal matter.”

    Pecker called Trump while Cohen was in the room soon after, Cohen testified, and Trump put the call on speakerphone. 

    “He asked him how things were going with the matter, and David said we have this under control and we will, we’ll take care of this,” Cohen said. “So David had stated that it’s going to cost them $150,000 to control the story, to which Mr. Trump replied, ‘No problem, I’ll take care of it.’”

    The deal was finalized in August. Cohen said he believed that “effectively the story has now been caught.” He described Trump’s reaction: “Fantastic. Great job.”

    Trump never paid back the $150,000 AMI put forward to secure the rights to McDougal’s story, Pecker testified.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • From Trump’s ‘attack dog’ to star witness: Michael Cohen set to testify in hush money trial

    From Trump’s ‘attack dog’ to star witness: Michael Cohen set to testify in hush money trial

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — For nearly a decade, Michael Cohen was Donald Trump‘s trusted adviser, personal attorney, and self-described “attack dog with a law license.”

    But Monday morning, Cohen is set to serve as the star witness in Trump’s New York criminal hush money trial, potentially delivering testimony that could cement the Manhattan district attorney’s case and send Cohen’s former boss to prison.

    Prosecutors hope his testimony will support their allegations of criminal conduct against Trump in front of a jury that has already heard from 19 different witnesses and seen 200 pieces of evidence. While the jury has seen Trump’s signatures on the allegedly fraudulent checks at the center of the case, some witnesses have seemingly distanced Trump from the alleged unlawful conduct — leaving Cohen with the burden of pinning Trump to the crime.

    According to prosecutors, Cohen was in the room when Trump and former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker agreed to a catch-and-kill scheme to illegally hide negative information about Trump from 2016 voters; coordinated with Pecker to kill two stories about Trump; and himself made a $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels to buy her silence about an alleged 2006 sexual encounter with Trump.

    RELATED: Prosecutors focus on phone records in Trump’s hush money trial as Michael Cohen’s testimony awaits

    The former president, who has denied the encounter took place, is on trial for allegedly falsifying business records related to Cohen’s reimbursement in 2017.

    While prosecutors have already warned the jury that many witnesses have “baggage” and have asked jurors to “keep an open mind,” Cohen’s value to the prosecution’s case could be endangered by the disbarred lawyer’s credibility issues. Cohen in 2018 pleaded guilty to tax evasion, campaign finance violations, and lying to Congress in what Cohen says was an effort to protect Trump. The former president’s lawyers have argued that Cohen perjured himself again when he testified at Trump’s civil fraud trial last year, and accuse Cohen of making his livelihood off books and podcasts that antagonize Trump.

    “He has a goal, an obsession with getting Trump, and you’re going to hear that,” defense lawyer Todd Blanche told jurors during his opening statement. “I submit to you that he cannot be trusted.”

    Prosecutors have attempted to preempt the defense’s attacks on Cohen by emphasizing that he was acting on Trump’s orders when he committed crimes and has since atoned for his actions.

    “You’ll also learn that Cohen has publicly committed to making sure the defendant is held accountable for his role in this conspiracy,” prosecutor Matthew Colangelo told jurors, later adding, “I suspect the defense will go to great lengths to get you to reject his testimony precisely because it is so damning.”

    Vital testimony

    Cohen’s importance as a witness largely stems from his deep involvement in the alleged criminal conduct, allegedly coordinating the catch-and-kill scheme with Trump and Pecker and devising the repayment scheme with Trump and former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg.

    During his opening statement, Colangelo mentioned Cohen’s name over 90 times, ultimately telling jurors that Cohen’s role was “to take care of problems for the defendant.”

    Defense lawyer Todd Blanche similarly focused on the conduct of the so-called “fixer” during his opening statement, mentioning Cohen over 30 times. Blanche argued that once Cohen pleaded guilty to federal crimes in 2018, he decided “to blame President Trump for virtually all of his problems.”

    “You’ll learn that Mr. Cohen has misrepresented key conversations where the only witness who was present for the conversation was Mr. Cohen and, allegedly, President Trump,” Blanche argued.

    According to prosecutors, Cohen and Trump participated in the August 2015 meeting where Pecker agreed to serve as the “eyes and ears” of Trump’s presidential campaign by looking out for negative stories about Trump related to women. Pecker testified that he coordinated with Cohen after identifying two negative stories that the National Enquirer eventually spent $180,000 to kill on Trump’s behalf.

    During Cohen’s testimony, jurors will likely hear a secret recording of a conversation between Cohen and Trump in September 2016 where Cohen discussed repaying Pecker for an $150,000 payment that National Enquirer parent company AMI made for the exclusive rights to former Playboy playmate Karen McDougal’s allegations of an affair with Trump, which he denies.

    “I need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend, David,” Cohen said in the recording, which the jurors briefly heard during the testimony of a custodial witness.

    “So, what do we got to pay for this? One-fifty?” Trump said later in the recording.

    While that meeting was memorialized with a surreptitious audio recording, the jury will have to rely on Cohen’s recollection for most of his meetings with Trump, including his conversation with Trump once Cohen learned that Stormy Daniels was shopping around her allegations of an affair.

    In his 2020 book “Disloyal,” Cohen wrote that Trump approved the payment to Daniels despite being “torn” about the personal and political dilemma.

    “A hundred and thirty thousand is a lot less than I would have to pay Melania,” Cohen recounted Trump saying. “If it comes out, I’m not sure how it would play with my supporters. But I’d bet they think it’s cool that I slept with a porn star.”

    Prosecutors allege that Cohen discussed with Trump and Weisselberg his plan to pay Daniels out of his own pocket and later get reimbursed.

    “But before putting up his own money, Cohen confirmed with Trump that Trump would pay him back,” Colangelo said. “And at Trump’s request, Cohen agreed to lay out his own money for the payment to keep Stormy Daniels quiet.”

    Jurors are expected to see a record of two telephone calls on October 26, 2016, when Cohen allegedly confirmed the plan with Trump before creating the shell company to pay Daniels.

    “Cohen made that payment at Donald Trump’s direction and for his benefit, and he did it with a specific goal of influencing the outcome of the election,” Colangelo said.

    Prosecutors also allege that Cohen and Weisselberg met with Trump in 2017 to confirm the plan to repay Cohen $420,000 for the Daniels payment and other expenses — a payment that would result in the 34 allegedly falsified records that sit at the center of the case.

    Trump’s ‘pit bull’

    Michael Cohen began working for Donald Trump in 2007 after he helped perform a series of legal favors for the then-reality television star.

    At the time, Cohen had considered himself partially retired after amassing a small fortune as a private lawyer and an owner of multiple lucrative taxi medallions — but he said the offer from Trump excited him.

    “I’d read ‘The Art of the Deal’ when it was published in the 1980s, not once but twice, and I considered the book to be a masterpiece,” Cohen wrote. “Secretly in my heart of hearts, I thought I possessed some of Trump’s best qualities.”

    A resident of Trump Park Avenue, Cohen first helped Trump resolve a dispute with the building’s condo board before helping Trump settle issues with Trump International Resort’s casino board and performing other legal favors.

    By 2007, Trump offered Cohen a job at the Trump Organization. Cohen accepted the role of Executive Vice President and Special Counsel to Donald Trump and moved into an office formerly occupied by Ivanka Trump.

    Cohen described his own role within the company as “Trump’s spokesperson, thug, pit bull and lawless lawyer,” and once bragged that he would take a bullet for Trump.

    “Over time, as Trump became a patriarchal figure to me and I fell under the trance-like spell of the real estate tycoon, I would come to understand that questions of right and wrong didn’t matter to Trump in the slightest — all that counted to him, and then to me, was winning and displaying blind loyalty,” Cohen wrote.

    Cohen’s 2018 guilty plea

    Cohen never formally served on Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, though prosecutors say he served an integral role in the catch-and-kill scheme that helped Trump hide negative information from voters.

    Cohen left the Trump Organization in 2017 to serve as the personal attorney to President Trump, though one witness testified that Cohen not getting a job in the Trump administration left him “depressed and despondent.”

    “He said something to the effect of, ‘Jesus Christ, can you f—— believe I’m not going to Washington? After everything I’ve done for that f—— guy, I can’t believe I’m not going to Washington. I’ve saved that guy’s ass so many times, you don’t even know,” Stormy Daniels’ former lawyer Keith Davidson testified.

    In a 2017 phone call with Davidson that Cohen secretly recorded, he vented about his relationship with Trump and the actions he took on Trump’s behalf ahead of the 2016 election.

    “For me, this has not, you know, this has not been easy … What would you do if you were me?” Cohen said. “Would you write a book, would you break away from the entire Trump, you know, we’ll call it doctrine, you know, would you go completely rouge?”

    In April 2018, federal agents raided Cohen’s home and office after receiving a referral from special counsel Robert Mueller as part of his probe into the Trump campaign.

    RELATED: Stormy Daniels spars with Trump defense attorney in hush money trial

    At the time, Trump defended Cohen, calling the raid a “disgraceful situation.” In an April 2018 tweet — which the jury saw on Friday — Trump complained that reporters “are going out of their way to destroy Michael Cohen and his relationship with me in the hope that he will ‘flip.’” Prosecutors argue that the tweet was part of a coordinated pressure campaign from Trump to prevent Cohen from cooperating with authorities.

    By August 2018 — after Cohen pleaded guilty to tax evasion and campaign finances related to the 2018 election — Trump changed his tone on Cohen, suggesting he made “up stories in order to get a ‘deal.’”

    “If anyone is looking for a good lawyer, I would strongly suggest that you don’t retain the services of Michael Cohen!” Trump said in a tweet shown to jurors.

    Cohen was sentenced to three years in prison, eventually serving more than 13 months behind bars and completing his sentence in home confinement. Before he reported to prison, he testified before Congress about Trump’s business conduct, ultimately leading to the New York attorney general’s civil fraud case against Trump.

    Cohen’s last time on the stand

    Cohen himself served as a vital witness in Trump’s civil fraud trial last year, testifying that Trump inflated his net worth to increase his position on the Forbes ranking of billionaires. The judge in the case, Arthur Engoron, ordered Trump to pay a fine of nearly half a billion dollars with interest, after determining that the former president had engaged in a decade of business fraud.

    Defense lawyers in Trump’s hush money case have argued that Cohen perjured himself again during his testimony in the civil fraud trial, further diminishing his credibility.

    “And when are they going to look at all the lies that Cohen did in the last trial? He got caught lying in the last trial,” Trump said after the opening statements in his criminal trial.

    In a February 2024 ruling, Judge Arthur Engoron acknowledged that while Cohen’s credibility was “significantly compromised” and the “animosity between the witness and the defendant is palpable,” his testimony was credible because it was backed by evidence.

    Prosecutors in Trump’s hush money trial have similarly argued that while Cohen might have baggage, the evidence and testimony from the other witnesses will back up his testimony.

    “A less-forgiving factfinder might have concluded differently, might not have believed a single word of a convicted perjurer,” Judge Engoron wrote in his decision in the fraud case. “This factfinder does not believe that pleading guilty to perjury means that you can never tell the truth. Michael Cohen told the truth.”

    Copyright © 2024 ABC News Internet Ventures.

    [ad_2]

    ABCNews

    Source link

  • From Trump’s ‘attack dog’ to star witness: Michael Cohen set to testify in hush money trial

    From Trump’s ‘attack dog’ to star witness: Michael Cohen set to testify in hush money trial

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — For nearly a decade, Michael Cohen was Donald Trump‘s trusted adviser, personal attorney, and self-described “attack dog with a law license.”

    But Monday morning, Cohen is set to serve as the star witness in Trump’s New York criminal hush money trial, potentially delivering testimony that could cement the Manhattan district attorney’s case and send Cohen’s former boss to prison.

    Prosecutors hope his testimony will support their allegations of criminal conduct against Trump in front of a jury that has already heard from 19 different witnesses and seen 200 pieces of evidence. While the jury has seen Trump’s signatures on the allegedly fraudulent checks at the center of the case, some witnesses have seemingly distanced Trump from the alleged unlawful conduct — leaving Cohen with the burden of pinning Trump to the crime.

    According to prosecutors, Cohen was in the room when Trump and former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker agreed to a catch-and-kill scheme to illegally hide negative information about Trump from 2016 voters; coordinated with Pecker to kill two stories about Trump; and himself made a $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels to buy her silence about an alleged 2006 sexual encounter with Trump.

    RELATED: Prosecutors focus on phone records in Trump’s hush money trial as Michael Cohen’s testimony awaits

    The former president, who has denied the encounter took place, is on trial for allegedly falsifying business records related to Cohen’s reimbursement in 2017.

    While prosecutors have already warned the jury that many witnesses have “baggage” and have asked jurors to “keep an open mind,” Cohen’s value to the prosecution’s case could be endangered by the disbarred lawyer’s credibility issues. Cohen in 2018 pleaded guilty to tax evasion, campaign finance violations, and lying to Congress in what Cohen says was an effort to protect Trump. The former president’s lawyers have argued that Cohen perjured himself again when he testified at Trump’s civil fraud trial last year, and accuse Cohen of making his livelihood off books and podcasts that antagonize Trump.

    “He has a goal, an obsession with getting Trump, and you’re going to hear that,” defense lawyer Todd Blanche told jurors during his opening statement. “I submit to you that he cannot be trusted.”

    Prosecutors have attempted to preempt the defense’s attacks on Cohen by emphasizing that he was acting on Trump’s orders when he committed crimes and has since atoned for his actions.

    “You’ll also learn that Cohen has publicly committed to making sure the defendant is held accountable for his role in this conspiracy,” prosecutor Matthew Colangelo told jurors, later adding, “I suspect the defense will go to great lengths to get you to reject his testimony precisely because it is so damning.”

    Vital testimony

    Cohen’s importance as a witness largely stems from his deep involvement in the alleged criminal conduct, allegedly coordinating the catch-and-kill scheme with Trump and Pecker and devising the repayment scheme with Trump and former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg.

    During his opening statement, Colangelo mentioned Cohen’s name over 90 times, ultimately telling jurors that Cohen’s role was “to take care of problems for the defendant.”

    Defense lawyer Todd Blanche similarly focused on the conduct of the so-called “fixer” during his opening statement, mentioning Cohen over 30 times. Blanche argued that once Cohen pleaded guilty to federal crimes in 2018, he decided “to blame President Trump for virtually all of his problems.”

    “You’ll learn that Mr. Cohen has misrepresented key conversations where the only witness who was present for the conversation was Mr. Cohen and, allegedly, President Trump,” Blanche argued.

    According to prosecutors, Cohen and Trump participated in the August 2015 meeting where Pecker agreed to serve as the “eyes and ears” of Trump’s presidential campaign by looking out for negative stories about Trump related to women. Pecker testified that he coordinated with Cohen after identifying two negative stories that the National Enquirer eventually spent $180,000 to kill on Trump’s behalf.

    During Cohen’s testimony, jurors will likely hear a secret recording of a conversation between Cohen and Trump in September 2016 where Cohen discussed repaying Pecker for an $150,000 payment that National Enquirer parent company AMI made for the exclusive rights to former Playboy playmate Karen McDougal’s allegations of an affair with Trump, which he denies.

    “I need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend, David,” Cohen said in the recording, which the jurors briefly heard during the testimony of a custodial witness.

    “So, what do we got to pay for this? One-fifty?” Trump said later in the recording.

    While that meeting was memorialized with a surreptitious audio recording, the jury will have to rely on Cohen’s recollection for most of his meetings with Trump, including his conversation with Trump once Cohen learned that Stormy Daniels was shopping around her allegations of an affair.

    In his 2020 book “Disloyal,” Cohen wrote that Trump approved the payment to Daniels despite being “torn” about the personal and political dilemma.

    “A hundred and thirty thousand is a lot less than I would have to pay Melania,” Cohen recounted Trump saying. “If it comes out, I’m not sure how it would play with my supporters. But I’d bet they think it’s cool that I slept with a porn star.”

    Prosecutors allege that Cohen discussed with Trump and Weisselberg his plan to pay Daniels out of his own pocket and later get reimbursed.

    “But before putting up his own money, Cohen confirmed with Trump that Trump would pay him back,” Colangelo said. “And at Trump’s request, Cohen agreed to lay out his own money for the payment to keep Stormy Daniels quiet.”

    Jurors are expected to see a record of two telephone calls on October 26, 2016, when Cohen allegedly confirmed the plan with Trump before creating the shell company to pay Daniels.

    “Cohen made that payment at Donald Trump’s direction and for his benefit, and he did it with a specific goal of influencing the outcome of the election,” Colangelo said.

    Prosecutors also allege that Cohen and Weisselberg met with Trump in 2017 to confirm the plan to repay Cohen $420,000 for the Daniels payment and other expenses — a payment that would result in the 34 allegedly falsified records that sit at the center of the case.

    Trump’s ‘pit bull’

    Michael Cohen began working for Donald Trump in 2007 after he helped perform a series of legal favors for the then-reality television star.

    At the time, Cohen had considered himself partially retired after amassing a small fortune as a private lawyer and an owner of multiple lucrative taxi medallions — but he said the offer from Trump excited him.

    “I’d read ‘The Art of the Deal’ when it was published in the 1980s, not once but twice, and I considered the book to be a masterpiece,” Cohen wrote. “Secretly in my heart of hearts, I thought I possessed some of Trump’s best qualities.”

    A resident of Trump Park Avenue, Cohen first helped Trump resolve a dispute with the building’s condo board before helping Trump settle issues with Trump International Resort’s casino board and performing other legal favors.

    By 2007, Trump offered Cohen a job at the Trump Organization. Cohen accepted the role of Executive Vice President and Special Counsel to Donald Trump and moved into an office formerly occupied by Ivanka Trump.

    Cohen described his own role within the company as “Trump’s spokesperson, thug, pit bull and lawless lawyer,” and once bragged that he would take a bullet for Trump.

    “Over time, as Trump became a patriarchal figure to me and I fell under the trance-like spell of the real estate tycoon, I would come to understand that questions of right and wrong didn’t matter to Trump in the slightest — all that counted to him, and then to me, was winning and displaying blind loyalty,” Cohen wrote.

    Cohen’s 2018 guilty plea

    Cohen never formally served on Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, though prosecutors say he served an integral role in the catch-and-kill scheme that helped Trump hide negative information from voters.

    Cohen left the Trump Organization in 2017 to serve as the personal attorney to President Trump, though one witness testified that Cohen not getting a job in the Trump administration left him “depressed and despondent.”

    “He said something to the effect of, ‘Jesus Christ, can you f—— believe I’m not going to Washington? After everything I’ve done for that f—— guy, I can’t believe I’m not going to Washington. I’ve saved that guy’s ass so many times, you don’t even know,” Stormy Daniels’ former lawyer Keith Davidson testified.

    In a 2017 phone call with Davidson that Cohen secretly recorded, he vented about his relationship with Trump and the actions he took on Trump’s behalf ahead of the 2016 election.

    “For me, this has not, you know, this has not been easy … What would you do if you were me?” Cohen said. “Would you write a book, would you break away from the entire Trump, you know, we’ll call it doctrine, you know, would you go completely rouge?”

    In April 2018, federal agents raided Cohen’s home and office after receiving a referral from special counsel Robert Mueller as part of his probe into the Trump campaign.

    RELATED: Stormy Daniels spars with Trump defense attorney in hush money trial

    At the time, Trump defended Cohen, calling the raid a “disgraceful situation.” In an April 2018 tweet — which the jury saw on Friday — Trump complained that reporters “are going out of their way to destroy Michael Cohen and his relationship with me in the hope that he will ‘flip.’” Prosecutors argue that the tweet was part of a coordinated pressure campaign from Trump to prevent Cohen from cooperating with authorities.

    By August 2018 — after Cohen pleaded guilty to tax evasion and campaign finances related to the 2018 election — Trump changed his tone on Cohen, suggesting he made “up stories in order to get a ‘deal.’”

    “If anyone is looking for a good lawyer, I would strongly suggest that you don’t retain the services of Michael Cohen!” Trump said in a tweet shown to jurors.

    Cohen was sentenced to three years in prison, eventually serving more than 13 months behind bars and completing his sentence in home confinement. Before he reported to prison, he testified before Congress about Trump’s business conduct, ultimately leading to the New York attorney general’s civil fraud case against Trump.

    Cohen’s last time on the stand

    Cohen himself served as a vital witness in Trump’s civil fraud trial last year, testifying that Trump inflated his net worth to increase his position on the Forbes ranking of billionaires. The judge in the case, Arthur Engoron, ordered Trump to pay a fine of nearly half a billion dollars with interest, after determining that the former president had engaged in a decade of business fraud.

    Defense lawyers in Trump’s hush money case have argued that Cohen perjured himself again during his testimony in the civil fraud trial, further diminishing his credibility.

    “And when are they going to look at all the lies that Cohen did in the last trial? He got caught lying in the last trial,” Trump said after the opening statements in his criminal trial.

    In a February 2024 ruling, Judge Arthur Engoron acknowledged that while Cohen’s credibility was “significantly compromised” and the “animosity between the witness and the defendant is palpable,” his testimony was credible because it was backed by evidence.

    Prosecutors in Trump’s hush money trial have similarly argued that while Cohen might have baggage, the evidence and testimony from the other witnesses will back up his testimony.

    “A less-forgiving factfinder might have concluded differently, might not have believed a single word of a convicted perjurer,” Judge Engoron wrote in his decision in the fraud case. “This factfinder does not believe that pleading guilty to perjury means that you can never tell the truth. Michael Cohen told the truth.”

    Copyright © 2024 ABC News Internet Ventures.

    [ad_2]

    ABCNews

    Source link

  • Here are all the bad things witnesses have said about Michael Cohen, Trump’s former fixer who is set to testify Monday

    Here are all the bad things witnesses have said about Michael Cohen, Trump’s former fixer who is set to testify Monday

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — Nobody has anything nice to say about Michael Cohen.

    Donald Trump’s former fixer and lawyer is expected to take the stand Monday as the key witness in the Manhattan district attorney’s case against the former president, prepared to give testimony connecting to Trump the $130,000 hush money payment Cohen made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election.

    Through three weeks of testimony, jurors have already heard plenty about Cohen through numerous witnesses, who have painted an unflattering portrait of an aggressive, impulsive and unlikeable attorney.

    [ad_2]

    Jeremy Herb, Kara Scannell, Lauren del Valle and CNN

    Source link

  • Michael Cohen expected to take stand in Trump trial on Monday

    Michael Cohen expected to take stand in Trump trial on Monday

    [ad_1]

    Michael Cohen expected to take stand in Trump trial on Monday – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Following a weekend rally in New Jersey, former President Trump is due back in court on Monday for the continuation of his criminal “hush money” trial. Michael Cohen, Trump’s one-time fixer, is expected to take the stand. Shanelle Kaul reports.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Michael Cohen expected to testify Monday in Trump criminal trial

    Michael Cohen expected to testify Monday in Trump criminal trial

    [ad_1]

    Michael Cohen expected to testify Monday in Trump criminal trial – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    Donald Trump will be back in court Monday for his New York trial, where key witness Michael Cohen is expected to testify. But for now, the former president is focusing his fury squarely at adult film star Stormy Daniels. Robert Costa has more.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Takeaways from Day 14 of the Donald Trump hush money trial

    Takeaways from Day 14 of the Donald Trump hush money trial

    [ad_1]

    (CNN) — Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers continued their attack on the credibility of Stormy Daniels for several hours on Thursday, with defense attorney Susan Necheles accusing the adult film star of making up the story of having sex with Trump to make money.

    Daniels pushed back on claims she was untruthful about her sexual encounter with Trump, saying that the story was true, even as she was confronted with inconsistencies in some of the small details of her account.

    “If that story was untrue, I would have written it to be a lot better,” Daniels said of her encounter with Trump.

    [ad_2]

    Jeremy Herb, Lauren del Valle, Kara Scannell and CNN

    Source link

  • Trump fined $1,000 for gag order violation in hush money case as ex-employee recounts reimbursements

    Trump fined $1,000 for gag order violation in hush money case as ex-employee recounts reimbursements

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK – The judge in Donald Trump’s hush money trial fined him $1,000 on Monday and, in his sternest warning yet, told the former president that future gag order violations could send him to jail. The reprimand opened a revelatory day of testimony, as jurors for the first time heard the details of the financial transactions at the center of the case and saw payment checks bearing Trump’s signature.

    The testimony from former Trump Organization controller Jeffrey McConney provided a mechanical but vital recitation of how the company reimbursed payments that were allegedly meant to suppress embarrassing stories from surfacing during Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and then logged them as legal expenses in a manner that Manhattan prosecutors say broke the law.

    McConney’s appearance on the witness stand came as the first criminal trial of a former U.S. president entered its third week of testimony. His account lacked the human drama offered Friday by longtime Trump aide Hope Hicks, but it nonetheless yielded an important building block for prosecutors trying to pull back the curtain on what they say was a corporate records cover-up of transactions designed to protect Trump’s presidential bid during a pivotal stretch of the race.

    At the center of the testimony, and the case itself, is a $130,000 payment Trump’s then-lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen made to porn actor Stormy Daniels in October 2016 to stifle her claims of an extramarital sexual encounter with Trump a decade earlier.

    The 34 felony counts of falsifying business records accuse Trump of labeling the money paid to Cohen in his company’s records as legal fees. Prosecutors contend that by paying him income and giving him extra to account for taxes in monthly installments for a year, the Trump executives were able to conceal the reimbursement.

    McConney and another witness testified that all but two of the monthly checks were drawn from Trump’s personal account. Yet even as jurors saw the checks and other documentary evidence, prosecutors did not elicit testimony Monday showing that Trump himself dictated that the payments would be logged as legal expenses — a designation that prosecutors contend was intentionally deceptive.

    McConney acknowledged during cross-examination that Trump never asked him to log the reimbursements as legal expenses and never discussed the matter with him at all. Another witness, Deborah Tarasoff, a Trump Organization accounts payable supervisor, said under questioning that she did not get permission to cut the checks in question from Trump himself.

    “You never had any reason to believe that President Trump was hiding anything or anything like that?” Trump attorney Todd Blanche asked.

    ”Correct,” Tarasoff replied.

    The testimony followed Judge Juan M. Merchan’s sober warning to Trump that additional violations of a gag order barring inflammatory out-of-court comments about witnesses, jurors and others closely connected to the case could land the former president behind bars.

    The $1,000 fine imposed Monday marks the second time since the trial began last month that Trump has been sanctioned for violating the gag order. He was fined $9,000 last week — $1,000 for each of nine violations.

    “It appears that the $1,000 fines are not serving as a deterrent. Therefore going forward, this court will have to consider a jail sanction,” Merchan said before jurors were brought into the courtroom. Trump’s statements, the judge added, “threaten to interfere with the fair administration of justice and constitute a direct attack on the rule of law. I cannot allow that to continue.”

    Trump sat forward in his seat, glowering at the judge as he handed down the ruling. When the judge finished speaking, Trump shook his head twice and crossed his arms.

    Yet even as Merchan warned of jail time in his most pointed and direct admonition, he also made clear his reservations about a step that he described as a “last resort” and said he would only do so if prosecutors recommended it.

    “The last thing I want to do is put you in jail,” Merchan said. “You are the former president of the United States and possibly the next president, as well. There are many reasons why incarceration is truly a last resort for me. To take that step would be disruptive to these proceedings, which I imagine you want to end as quickly as possible.”

    The latest violation stems from an April 22 interview with television channel Real America’s Voice in which Trump criticized the speed at which the jury was picked and claimed, without evidence, that it was stacked with Democrats.

    Once testimony resumed, McConney recounted conversations with longtime Trump Organization finance chief Allen Weisselberg in January 2017 about reimbursing Cohen for a $130,000 payment intended to buy Daniels’ silence over her account of a sexual encounter at a 2006 celebrity golf outing in Lake Tahoe, California.

    Weisselberg “said we had to get some money to Michael, we had to reimburse Michael. He tossed a pad toward me, and I started taking notes on what he said,” McConney testified. “That’s how I found out about it.”

    “He kind of threw the pad at me and said, ‘Take this down,’” said McConney, who worked for Trump’s company for about 36 years, retiring last year after he was granted immunity to testify for the prosecution at the Trump Organization’s New York criminal tax fraud trial.

    A bank statement displayed in court showed Cohen paying $130,000 to Keith Davidson, Daniels’ lawyer, on Oct. 27, 2016, out of an account for an entity Cohen created for the purpose.

    Weisselberg’s handwritten notes spell out a plan to pay Cohen $420,000, which included a base reimbursement that was then doubled to reflect anticipated taxes as well as a $60,000 bonus and an expense that prosecutors have described as a technology contract.

    McConney’s own notes, taken on the notepad he said Weisselberg threw at him, were also shown in court. After calculations that laid out that Cohen would get $35,000 a month for 12 months, McConney wrote: “wire monthly from DJT.”

    Asked what that meant, McConney said: “That was out of the president’s personal bank account.”

    McConney testified that he had instructed Tarasoff to record the reimbursements to Cohen as a legal expense, reasoning that “we were paying a lawyer so I said to post it to legal expenses in the general ledger.”

    McConney suggested it was his idea alone to log the payments that way, acknowledging under cross-examination that Trump never directed him to log Cohen’s payments as legal expenses, nor did Weisselberg relay to him that Trump wanted them logged that way.

    “Allen never told me that,” McConney testified. In fact, McConney said he never spoke to Trump about the reimbursement issue at all. Regardless, Trump lawyer Emil Bove suggested, the “legal expense” label made sense — and was not duplicitous — because Cohen was a lawyer at the time.

    “OK,” McConney responded, prompting laughter throughout the courtroom. “Sure. Yes.”

    After paying the first two checks to Cohen through a trust, the remainder of the checks, beginning in April 2017, were paid from Trump’s personal account, McConney testified.

    With Trump, the only signatory to that account, now in the White House, the change in funding source necessitated “a whole new process for us,” McConney added.

    Tarasoff, the other witness who testified Monday, said that once Trump became president, checks written from his personal account had to first be delivered, via FedEx, “to the White House for him to sign.”

    The checks would then return with Trump’s Sharpie signature. “I’d pull them apart, mail out the check and file the backup,” she said, meaning putting the invoice into the Trump Organization’s filing system.

    Prosecutors are continuing to build toward their star witness, Cohen, who pleaded guilty to federal charges related to the hush money payments, went to prison and has been disbarred. He is expected to undergo a bruising cross-examination from defense lawyers seeking to undermine his credibility with jurors.

    ___

    Tucker reported from Washington.

    Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Michael R. Sisak, Jennifer Peltz, Eric Tucker And Jake Offenhartz, Associated Press

    Source link

  • Trump Rages As Prosecutors In Hush Money Trial Estimate Two More Weeks To Finish Their Case – Update

    Trump Rages As Prosecutors In Hush Money Trial Estimate Two More Weeks To Finish Their Case – Update

    [ad_1]

    UPDATE, 3:04 PM: The judge in Donald Trump‘s hush money trial hasn’t tossed the ex-president behind bars yet for violating a gag order, but the former Celebrity Apprentice host won’t be getting out of the courtroom anytime soon either.

    On a dry day in front of Judge Juan Merchan, the jury saw prosecutors put another Trump Organization accounting employee on the stand this afternoon in the start of the third week of Trump’s trial to walk jurors through the gritty details and record-keeping behind checks signed by the Art of the Deal author to his fixer and lawyer Michael Cohen.

    Deborah Tarasoff, who still works for Trump as an accounts payable supervisor, followed her former boss, the company’s retired comptroller, Jeffrey McConney on Monday in the Manhattan courtroom.

    Their testimony took up almost the entire day in court, and Tarasoff’s turn after lunch produced the only real courtroom fireworks. Trump’s lawyer Todd Blanche complained to Judge Merchan that prosecutors gave him just 30 minutes of advance notice that Tarasoff was their next witness. 

    After Tarasoff was done and jurors were sent home, Assistant Manhattan District Attorney Joshua Steinglass took exception to Blanche’s complaint. “I don’t like the impression being left that we’re somehow sandbagging the defense,” Steinglass said, adding that Trump’s legal team has the prosecution’s entire witness list, just not where they are in the queue. 

    Steinglass cited the judge’s contempt rulings against Trump for his public statements about other case witnesses — Cohen and hush-money recipient Stormy Daniels — as a reason for limiting the defense team’s access to the prosecution’s witness calendar. 

    Steinglass also said the prosecution needs about two more weeks from tomorrow to finish its case, but called that “a very, very rough estimate.” 

    Outside the court, Trump, who has clinched the GOP nomination for his third presidential run, told pool reporters, “The government just said they want two to three more weeks. That means they want to keep me off the trail for two to three more weeks. Now, anybody in there would realize there’s no case, they don’t have a case.” 

    “This is just a political witch hunt,” Trump added. “It’s election interfering, and this is really, truly election inference and it’s a disgrace, it’s a disgrace. And every poll I’m leading by a lot.”

    Tarasoff, questioned by Assistant District Attorney Chris Conroy, identified the invoices, vouchers, ledger entries, pay stubs and signed checks that prosecutors say are the falsified business records at the heart of their case. They went month by month through a year’s worth of payments to Cohen totaling $420,000, with Conroy repeating questions to the plain-spoken, white-haired Tarasoff. 

    “Do you recognize the signature?” Conroy said, meaning Trump’s spiky, Sharpie-width handwriting. 

    “Yes,” Tarasoff replied. 

    “Whose signature is that?” Conroy asked. 

    “Mr. Trump’s,” Tarasoff replied in an exchange repeated multiple times. 

    The payments to Cohen in 2017 were coded as a “legal expense” in the company’s electronic ledger, Tarasoff testified. Prosecutors say the payments in 2017 weren’t for legal work: They were reimbursements puffed up to $420,000 and disguised as monthly taxable income so Trump could quietly cover the $130,000 Cohen paid to Daniels in 2016. 

    Cohen paid Daniels for her silence during the 2016 election about a claim of a sexual encounter years earlier between her and the married real estate mogul and Celebrity Apprentice star. Trump denies the encounter ever happened. His lawyers have suggested that Cohen — who pleaded guilty and went to jail on charges related to the payment — was acting alone. 

    They’ve also argued that non-disclosure agreements like this one are routine — and legal — in business, that Trump was trying to spare his family embarrassment whether or not stories of infidelity were true, and that he also had a right to protect himself from salacious claims in the middle of an election.

    “There is nothing wrong with trying to influence an election: It’s called democracy,” Blanche said in opening arguments.

    The case resumes on Tuesday. Steinglass said he also wants to recall an earlier witness, Georgia Longstreet, a paralegal in the DA’s office who scoured Trump’s social media history for tweets and posts on Trump’s Truth Social network that jurors saw last week. One post from October of 2016 read, “Nothing ever happened with any of these women. Totally made up nonsense.” 

    Steinglass said Longstreet had more posts to share, but her testimony was kept short to accommodate a juror who needed to leave early for a medical appointment. Over objections from Blanche, Judge Merchan said he’ll allow Longstreet another turn in the witness box later this week, where she is expected to share more Trump posts. He ordered Steinglass to give Trump’s lawyers 24 hours notice of Longstreet’s testimony schedule so they can prepare their defense and cross-examination. 

    PREVIOUSLY, 11: 20 AM: Prosecutors in Donald Trump’s hush money trial walked jurors through the financial specifics of their case against the former president. 

    A former chief of accounting at the Trump Organization testified today that he was instructed to pay $420,000 to Trump’s lawyer, Michael Cohen, using a form of reimbursement that was totally unfamiliar to him.

    “Allen said we had to get some money for Michael,” former Trump company comptroller Jeffrey McConney said on the stand, referring to Cohen and to McConney’s supervisor, Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg, who is now in jail. 

    The company’s chief financial officer called McConney into a meeting in January of 2017 — the month of Trump’s inauguration as president — and presented him with a bank statement from Cohen that also contained handwritten notes and dollar amounts from Weisselberg.

    The bank statement listed a $130,000 payment to a lawyer representing porn actor Stormy Daniels. Prosecutors say the bank account was for a shell company set up by Cohen to pay Daniels’ lawyer. 

    Weisselberg’s notes showed dollar amounts totaling $420,000 to be paid to Cohen in monthly installments of $35,000 beginning in February of 2018.

    McConney spent three hours on the stand — over numerous defense objections — combing through invoices, emails, Trump company ledger entries, tax forms, and a government ethics filing as he was questioned by a prosecutor and then a defense lawyer about the payments to Cohen, which were billed by the company as legal work covered by a retainer agreement between Trump and Cohen.

    Prosecutors say the payments in 2017 weren’t for legal work, but were instead  reimbursements disguised as monthly taxable income so Trump could pay Cohen back for a $130,000 hush money payment to Daniels. According to prosecutors, the payments were made using illegally falsified paperwork including invoices from Cohen and official Trump company ledger entries.

    Weisselberg’s notes included an instruction to double the total amount that Cohen was claiming for expenses — $130,000 for the payment to Daniels’ lawyer, Keith Davidson, plus $50,000 to a tech company — to $360,000, which McConney interpreted as a way to cover Cohen’s tax obligations. Weisselberg also said to add a $60,000 bonus. 

    Assistant District Attorney Matthew Colangelo asked McConney if he was aware of anyone at the company ever asking for an expense reimbursement  — which isn’t something normally reported to the IRS — to be doubled to cover a tax bill. “No,” McConney said. 

    McConney testified that Weisselberg told him to hang on to Cohen’s bank statement, which McConney tucked into a payroll ledger kept in a locked cabinet in his office at Trump Tower. Weisselberg — who is serving a jail sentence on Rikers Island for perjury in connection with a civil case against Trump — never told him what specifically the payments were for beyond what he saw on the bank statement, McConney testified.

    But McConney, who recently retired after more than three decades with the Trump Organization, showed some skepticism of Cohen’s legal capabilities. 

    “What was his position?” Colangelo asked.

    “He said he was a lawyer,” McConney replied curtly. 

    Within days of McConney’s meeting with Weisselberg, he was receiving Cohen’s monthly invoices — forwarded by Weisselberg with no covering note — for $35,000 apiece “for services rendered” for each month there was an invoice. McConney forwarded the invoices to one of his staffers for payment. The checks to Cohen came initially from a trust that Trump set up to control his assets during his presidency, and later from Trump’s personal bank account — which meant that Trump had to personally sign the checks.

    “Somehow we’d have to get a package to the White House,” McConney testified.

    Emil Bove, a Trump defense lawyer, cross-examined McConney by highlighting email traffic between Cohen and Weisselberg that appeared to show Cohen was, in fact, still handling personal legal affairs for the president — now as Trump’s private attorney. After January 2017, Cohen was no longer employed by the Trump Organization. 

    Bove also pointed out that the obligations to Cohen were disclosed in the government ethics form that Trump signed and dated in May 2018, and that the ethics officer who reviewed and signed the document wrote, “I conclude that the filer is in compliance with applicable laws.”

    Over objections from the defense, Colangelo asked McConney if he had later come to learn that there were “matters that Allen Weisselberg kept you in the dark about.” McConney said yes. 

    Ted Johnson & Dominic Patten contributed to this report

    [ad_2]

    Ted Johnson

    Source link

  • The Secret Tape That Will Roil the Trump Trial

    The Secret Tape That Will Roil the Trump Trial

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Alex Kent/AFP via Getty Images

    During my career as a prosecutor, anytime I worked a case involving a large mafia takedown, defense lawyers would sidle up throughout arraignment day and ask this one key question: “So, is this a tape case?” There’s no insider lingo involved here; tape meant “tape,” as in, “Do you have my guy on tape?” When I’d answer “nope,” I’d see eyebrows raise in a Maybe there’s hope for my guy yet manner. But when I answered “yes,” I’d typically get a quick nod communicating that the defense lawyer understood it would be all about negotiating a guilty plea from that point on.

    Indeed, tapes are the prosecutor’s best friend — usually. But when Michael Cohen secretly recorded a phone call with his own client Donald trump in September 2016, he created a piece of evidence that could become a key part of Trump’s defense in his ongoing criminal trial in Manhattan.

    It’s not all bad news for the prosecutors, of course. The tape confirms an important pillar of the district attorney’s case: Trump plainly knew about and approved of hush money payments to women with whom he had allegedly had sexual dalliances years before. But that was never seriously in dispute. Trump’s lawyer conceded as much during his opening statement.

    Remember that the crime here is not payment of hush money — it’s falsification of business records around those payments to evade campaign-finance laws. The crime, in other words, lies in the accounting behind the hush-money payments. And Cohen’s tape casts doubt on a central element that the prosecution must prove to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt: that Trump was involved in the fraudulent scheme to structure reimbursements to Cohen to make the hush-money payments look like legal expenses.

    Let’s set the scene for Cohen’s recording of Trump. It’s September 2016, two months before the election. Cohen decides — for reasons that remain unclear but surely will be explored in depth when he testifies — to record a phone call with Trump without Trump’s knowledge. While it wasn’t illegal for Cohen to record his client, it was bizarre and brazenly unethical. Ask any defense lawyer whether he’s ever secretly recorded a client and watch him respond like you’ve just asked whether he ever ate a banana with the peel on. He’ll be more confused than offended. Why would anyone do that? Perhaps tellingly, Cohen never voluntarily came forward with the recording. Rather, the FBI seized it from his office when they executed a search warrant in 2018.  

    Any plausible explanation here will hurt Cohen’s credibility as a witness. Did Cohen secretly record other clients, too? Did he tape conversations with Trump beyond this one? If so, did he preserve or delete those recordings? Any claim by Cohen that he was playing good cop and trying to catch Trump in the act won’t fly. Cohen stayed by Trump’s side and continued to do his bidding for nearly another two years before he flipped in 2018 after the FBI search.

    The September 2016 call begins with Trump talking to somebody offline about unrelated business. When Trump turns his attention to the call, Cohen opens with “Great poll, by the way.” It’s jarring now, given Cohen’s all-consuming public hatred for Trump, to recall a time when Cohen was an eager sycophant, yelping giddily about any snippet of good news for the boss man.

    Cohen quickly raises the then-ongoing effort to pay off former Playboy model Karen McDougal, to “catch and kill” her story — to buy the rights and then bury it, that is. (The McDougal payoff is not part of the indictment, but the judge has ruled that the DA can introduce it as evidence to support the charged crimes, which center on a separate but similar scheme to pay off Stormy Daniels.)

    Cohen explains to Trump that “I need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend David [Pecker], you know, so that — I’m going to do that right away … And I’ve spoken to Allen Weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up with …” Pecker was the DA’s first witness at trial; he was the chair of AMI, the company that published the National Enquirer, and he worked closely with Trump and Cohen to execute the “catch and kill” strategy. Weisselberg is the longtime Trump Organization chief financial officer, currently behind bars for committing perjury in the Trump Organization civil fraud trial earlier this year.

    Read Cohen’s words again and ask: Who exactly set up the accounting behind the hush-money payments? Remember — the crime isn’t the payment, it’s the structuring of those payments to make them look like legal expenses. On the recording, Cohen (the lawyer) explains to Trump (the client) that he has spoken with Weisselberg (the CFO) “about how to set the whole thing up.” Trump is characteristically uninterested in the nuances. He cuts Cohen off with a bottom-line question: “So what do we got to pay for this? One-fifty?” Trump obviously knows about and agrees to make the payments. But importantly, Cohen never actually explains to Trump how the payments will be structured. All Cohen says is that he and Weisselberg will “set the whole thing up.”

    Moments later, after some irrelevant cross talk, this exchange happens:

    COHEN: So, I’m all over that. And, I spoke to Allen about it, when it comes time for the financing, which will be —

    TRUMP: Wait a sec, what financing?

    COHEN: Well, I’ll have to pay him something.

    TRUMP: [Unintelligible] pay with cash …

    COHEN: No, no, no, no, no. I got it.

    TRUMP: … check.

    Once again, the dynamic is apparent. Trump is fine with paying McDougal to ensure her silence. But Cohen is the one handling the mechanics and internal accounting behind those payments. If anything, Trump seems clueless. It’s a bit unclear whether Trump suggests they pay by cash or by check. Either way, Cohen has something more complicated in mind — “the financing,” as he puts it. And when Trump suggests a straightforward one-time payment (“pay with cash,” likely meaning pay up front without financing, as a former Trump lawyer has reasonably explained), Cohen blows him off in favor of something more complicated: “No, no, no, no, no. I got it.”

    This, folks, is a problem for the prosecutors. Sure, they’ll advocate for a more favorable interpretation of the call. They’ll argue that the tape shows Trump knew about the McDougal hush-money payments (which he did) and that he spoke with Cohen about how to make those payments. But the tape makes plain that when it came to how those payments would be structured, transmitted, and internally logged — the actual crime charged, with respect to the Daniels payments — Cohen and Weisselberg led the way with Trump dimly apprised, if at all.

    The DA’s case has come in smoothly, so far, and it remains more likely than not that the jury will find Trump guilty. But I assure you: Prosecutors wish Cohen had never hit “record” on that call with his own client. Even if Cohen’s secret recording is a stalemate of sorts — even if it cuts both ways, helps and hurts both sides in some measure — that’s a problem for prosecutors. They’re the ones who have to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. As we prosecutors would sometimes say: If you’re explaining, you’re losing.

    This article originally appeared in the free CAFE Brief newsletter. You can find more analysis of law and politics from Elie Honig, Preet Bharara, Joyce Vance, and other CAFE contributors at CAFE.com

    [ad_2]

    Elie Honig

    Source link

  • Second gag order hearing, new testimony in Trump’s criminal trial

    Second gag order hearing, new testimony in Trump’s criminal trial

    [ad_1]

    Second gag order hearing, new testimony in Trump’s criminal trial – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The judge in former President Donald Trump’s “hush money” criminal trial weighed comments made by Trump about the jury hearing the case. CBS News’ Errol Barnett and Katrina Kaufman have more on the second gag order violation hearing held since the trial began.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fact check: Trump’s false courthouse claims about his trial

    Fact check: Trump’s false courthouse claims about his trial

    [ad_1]

    Washington (CNN) — Former President Donald Trump delivered a barrage of false claims to media cameras this week as he entered and exited the Manhattan courtroom where he is on trial on charges of falsifying business records in relation to a hush money scheme during the 2016 presidential election.

    Here’s a fact check of four of the claims he made about the trial. (For this particular article, we’ll leave aside the false claims he made in the courthouse about a variety of other subjects.)

    Courthouse security

    [ad_2]

    Daniel Dale and CNN

    Source link

  • The Latest | Trump prosecutors claw back at defense’s portrait of tabloid deal

    The Latest | Trump prosecutors claw back at defense’s portrait of tabloid deal

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK – Defense lawyers in Donald Trump’s hush money trial dug Friday into assertions of the former publisher of the National Enquirer and his efforts to protect Trump from negative stories during the 2016 election.

    David Pecker returned to the witness stand for the fourth day as defense attorneys tried to poke holes in his testimony, which has described helping bury embarrassing stories Trump feared could hurt his campaign.

    Pecker has painted a tawdry portrait of “catch and kill” tabloid schemes — catching a potentially damaging story by buying the rights to it and then killing it through agreements that prevent the paid person from telling the story to anyone else.

    The cross-examination, which began Thursday, will cap a consequential week in the criminal cases the former president is facing as he vies to reclaim the White House in November.

    The charges center on $130,000 in payments that Trump’s company made to his then-lawyer, Michael Cohen. He paid that sum on Trump’s behalf to keep porn actor Stormy Daniels from going public with her claims of a sexual encounter with Trump a decade earlier. Trump has denied the encounter ever happened.

    Prosecutors say Trump obscured the true nature of those payments and falsely recorded them as legal expenses. He has pleaded not guilty to 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

    The case is the first-ever criminal trial of a former U.S. president and the first of four prosecutions of Trump to reach a jury.

    Currently:

    — Key moments from the Supreme Court arguments on Donald Trump’s immunity claims

    — Trading Trump: Truth Social’s first month of trading has sent investors on a ride

    — These people were charged with interfering in the 2020 election. Some are still in politics today

    — Key players: Who’s who at Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial

    — The hush money case is just one of Trump’s legal cases. See the others here

    Here’s the latest:

    PROSECUTORS CLAW BACK AT PORTRAIT OF TABLOID DEAL

    Before breaking for lunch Friday, prosecutors in Donald Trump’s hush money trial in Manhattan clawed back at the defense’s contention that an arrangement with the National Enquirer wasn’t unique to Trump, eliciting testimony from former publisher David Pecker that underscored the unusual nature of their deal.

    “Is it standard operating procedure for AMI to be consulting with a presidential candidate’s fixer about amendments to a source agreement?” Steinglass asked, using initials for the tabloid’s parent company. “No,” Pecker responded.

    Several similar questions followed suit, with Pecker acknowledging that he had not previously sought out stories and worked the company’s sources on behalf of a presidential candidate, nor allowed political fixers close access to internal decision-making.

    “It’s the only one,” Pecker said.

    BEGINNING OF ‘REDIRECT’ AND THEN LUNCH

    As court broke for lunch, Donald Trump stopped to confer with aide Jason Miller just outside the courtroom doors at his hush money trial Friday in Manhattan. He left without making any remarks to reporters waiting nearby.

    Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass had begun conducting what the legal world calls “redirect” examination — a follow-up round of questioning in response to what defense lawyers asked former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker. The defense’s cross-examination of that key witness ended earlier Friday.

    And the defense can then conduct a “recross.” The sides can go back and forth, but they generally can’t just re-ask questions or delve into new topics that weren’t raised in prior questioning.

    CROSS-EXAMINATION OF EX-PUBLISHER PECKER ENDS

    The defense’s cross-examination of former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker in Donald Trump’s hush money trial in New York ended around midday Friday, his fourth day on the witness stand.

    As Trump lawyer Emil Bove wrapped up his cross-examination, Pecker said, “I’ve been truthful, to the best of my recollection.”

    Bove earlier argued that Pecker’s testimony has been inconsistent with statements to federal prosecutors in 2018.

    Pecker testified that Trump thanked him for his help handling potential news stories involving former Playboy model Karen McDougal and a Trump Tower doorman, during a White House visit in 2017.

    But Bove said Pecker previously told federal authorities Trump did not express any gratitude at the meeting. Pecker stuck Friday to the story he has given in court.

    ATTENTIVENESS AND WHISPERS IN THE COURTROOM

    In their fourth day of hearing testimony from former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker, jurors in Donald Trump’s hush money trial in New York remained attentive Friday even as cross-examination turned technical.

    As Pecker and Trump defense lawyer Emil Bove parsed a 2018 nonprosecution agreement between federal authorities and the Enquirer’s parent company, members of the jury variously watched them, looked at the document on big screens or appeared to take notes.

    Trump sat chatting and gesturing with lawyer Susan Necheles while the other lawyers had an extended conversation with Judge Juan Merchan at the bench.

    After the sidebar conversation broke up for a few minutes, Trump leaned over to another of his lawyers, Todd Blanche, whispering something to him. Blanche then leaned toward Trump and covered his mouth as he whispered a response, while Bove resumed questioning Pecker.

    PUBLISHER CHALLENGED ON PAST STATEMENTS

    In the most confrontational moment so far Friday in Donald Trump’s hush money trial, defense lawyer Emil Bove said former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker’s testimony has been inconsistent with statements to federal prosecutors in 2018.

    Pecker testified that Trump thanked him for his help handling potential stories involving former Playboy model Karen McDougal and Dino Sajudin, a Trump Tower doorman, during a White House visit on Jan. 6, 2017.

    But according to notes cited by Bove in court, Pecker had previously told federal authorities that Trump did not express any gratitude to him or American Media during the meeting.

    Pecker stuck Friday to the story he has given in court.

    “I know what the truth is,” he said.

    FORMER PLAYBOY MODEL’S WORK HIGHLIGHTED

    A lawyer for Donald Trump in his hush money trial turned Friday to the 2016 deal the National Enquirer’s parent reached with former Playboy model Karen McDougal.

    The $150,000 agreement gave American Media exclusive rights to McDougal’s account of any relationship with “any then-married man.” McDougal claims she and Trump had an affair. Trump denies it.

    The contract also called for McDougal to do work for various American Media titles. Former Enquirer publisher David Pecker earlier testified the provision was really about keeping McDougal’s story from becoming public and influencing Trump’s chances at the presidency.

    But under questioning Friday from Trump lawyer Emil Bove, Pecker added that American Media had pitched itself as a venue to help McDougal restart her career.

    When American Media signed its agreement with her, “you believed it had a legitimate business purpose, correct?” Bove asked.

    “I did,” Pecker said.

    The company ended up running more than 65 stories in her name, he said.

    McDougal’s story, and American Media’s deal with her, ultimately became public anyway, in a Wall Street Journal article four days before the 2016 election, after early and absentee voting had started.

    PROSECUTORS OBJECT TO USE OF ‘PRESIDENT’ TRUMP

    The insistence of Donald Trump’s defense in his hush money trial to refer to him as “President Trump,” even when describing events that took place before his election, is rankling prosecutors.

    Trump’s lawyers said at the outset of the trial that they’d refer to their client as “president” out of respect for the office he held from 2017 to 2021.

    But Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass suggested Friday that using the title is anachronistic and confusing when tacked onto questions and testimony that involve things that happened while he was campaigning in 2015 and 2016.

    “Objection. He wasn’t President Trump in June of 2016,” Steinglass noted after one such mention. The judge sustained the objection.

    QUESTIONING TURNS TO EARLIER SALACIOUS TESTIMONY

    A lawyer for Donald Trump in the former president’s hush money trial Friday got to a salacious story at the center of former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker’s earlier testimony.

    Emil Bove brought out that the Enquirer’s parent company — not Trump or his former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen — paid a former Trump Tower doorman $30,000 in 2015 for the rights to an unsubstantiated claim that Trump had fathered a child with an employee there.

    Pecker testified earlier that the Enquirer thought the tale would make for a huge tabloid story if it were accurate but eventually concluded the story was “1,000% untrue” and never ran it. Trump and the woman involved both have denied the claims.

    Bove asked Pecker whether he would run the story if it were true. Pecker replied: “Yes.”

    SPECIFICS OF HELPING TRUMP CAMPAIGN

    Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker has testified in Donald Trump’s hush money trial that he hatched a plan with Trump and former Trump henchman Michael Cohen in August 2015 for the tabloid to help Trump’s presidential campaign.

    But under questioning by Trump’s lawyer, Pecker acknowledged Friday there was no mention at that meeting of the term “catch-and-kill,” which describes the practice of tabloids purchasing the rights to story so they never see the light of day.

    Nor was there discussion at the meeting of any “financial dimension,” such as the Enquirer paying people on Trump’s behalf for the rights to their stories, Pecker said.

    Pecker also acknowledged that the National Enquirer had been running negative stories about Trump’s 2016 rival Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, long before the August 2015 meeting. Pecker previously testified that stories about the Clintons boosted sales of the supermarket tabloid.

    DIGGING INTO NATIONAL ENQUIRER’S EDITORIAL PROCESS

    Donald Trump’s lawyer Emil Bove is getting under the hood of the National Enquirer’s editorial process, seeking to show the tabloid had its own incentives unrelated to any deal with Trump, in the fourth day of testimony in the former president’s hush money trial.

    To underscore his point, Bove pulled up five unflattering headlines that ran in 2015 about Ben Carson, who ran against Trump in the 2016 GOP primary. Bove noted the information was pulled from publicly available information published in other outlets, including The Guardian.

    In his testimony, former Enquirer publisher David Pecker, on the stand for a fourth day, acknowledged that it was standard practice at the publication to recycle stories from other outlets with a new slant.

    “Because it’s good, quick and cost efficient, and you would’ve done it without President Trump?” Bove asked.

    “Um, yes,” Pecker replied.

    JUDGE ISSUES INSTRUCTIONS, AND QUESTIONING RESUMES

    The jury’s day in Donald Trump’s hush money trial began Friday with an instruction from the judge that it’s OK for prosecutors or defense lawyers to meet with witnesses ahead of a trial to help them prepare to testify.

    That pertains to testimony that came out toward the end of Thursday, when Trump lawyer Emil Bove was cross-examining former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker.

    Bove resumed questioning Pecker as the fourth day of testimony began in a Manhattan courtroom.

    TRUMP WISHES MELANIA A HAPPY BIRTHDAY

    Donald Trump entered court Friday in his hush money trial in Manhattan carrying a thick stack of bound papers, which he said was a report put out by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee about the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.

    The former president said he had not read the report, “but it could be interesting.”

    Trump told reporters that he wanted to wish his wife, former first lady Melania Trump, a happy birthday, saying, “It would be nice to be with her, but I’m in a courthouse.”

    He said he planned to fly home to Florida, where she is, Friday evening after court wraps for the week.

    PECKER OFFERED INSIGHT INTO THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER

    Even by National Enquirer standards, testimony by its former publisher David Pecker at Donald Trump’s hush money trial this week has revealed an astonishing level of corruption at America’s best-known tabloid and may one day be seen as the moment it effectively died.

    “It just has zero credibility,” said Lachlan Cartwright, executive editor of the Enquirer from 2014 to 2017. “Whatever sort of credibility it had was totally damaged by what happened in court this week.”

    On Thursday, Pecker was back on the witness stand to tell more about the arrangement he made to boost Trump’s presidential candidacy in 2016, tear down his rivals and silence any revelations that may have damaged him.

    GAG ORDER HEARING RESCHEDULED DUE TO CAMPAIGN EVENTS

    A change in the court schedule means Donald Trump won’t be forced off the campaign trail next week to attend a hearing in his hush money criminal trial in New York.

    Judge Juan M. Merchan moved a hearing on the former president’s alleged gag order violations to next Thursday, avoiding a conflict with his scheduled campaign events next Wednesday.

    Merchan had initially set the hearing for next Wednesday, the trial’s regular off day. Trump is scheduled to hold campaign events that day in Michigan and Wisconsin. His lawyers have urged the judge not to hold any proceedings on Wednesdays so he can campaign.

    The hearing — now set for 9:30 a.m. next Thursday, May 2 — pertains to a prosecution request that Trump be penalized for violating his gag order this week on four separate occasions.

    The order bars Trump from making comments about witnesses and others connected to the case. Merchan is already mulling holding Trump in contempt of court and fining him up to $10,000 for other alleged gag order violations.

    Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Associated Press

    Source link

  • Trump lashes out at

    Trump lashes out at

    [ad_1]

    Trump lashes out at “hush money” trial judge on Truth Social – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    The judge in Donald Trump’s “hush money” criminal trial is reviewing if the former president’s Truth Social posts violate the court’s gag order. CBS News’ Errol Barnett and Graham Kates have the latest.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A Porn-Star Payoff or a Threat to Democracy?

    A Porn-Star Payoff or a Threat to Democracy?

    [ad_1]

    The scene from Monday’s opening arguments in Donald Trump’s criminal trial.
    Art: Isabelle Brourman

    There was a simple question at the heart of Monday morning’s opening arguments in Donald Trump’s criminal trial in Manhattan: What’s the big deal? You may think it would be unnecessary to establish the stakes of the first prosecution of an ex-president, taking place amid a campaign that could very well return him to office. If Trump were going on trial for any of the other crimes, in other jurisdictions, that he is accused of committing — violating the Espionage Act, using political pressure to try to overturn the election in Georgia, subverting the peaceful transfer of power on January 6 — the answer would be self-evident. Yet this morning in Manhattan, Trump went on trial for the least of his offenses, making payoffs to a porn star.

    Criminal law is not about narrative proportion, though — it deals in binary choices. Trump is accused of breaking the law, and though this trial may not be about his worst offense, he will still face a jury of 12 New Yorkers inside the scaffolding-shrouded criminal courthouse on Centre Street. It’s a fitting place to judge a squalid crime. The 15th floor, where the trial is being held, is locked down every morning, but elsewhere inside, the routine of arraignments, plea hearings, and sentencings keeps grinding forward. The grungy bathrooms smell like smoke, and sometimes you can find balled-up jail jumpsuits on the floor, left behind by perps who just got released.

    Judge Juan Merchan’s courtroom is unadorned. There is a little American flag — the type schoolkids wave for a presidential motorcade — tacked to a bulletin board on the wall, a few feet from a paper sign that reads “Active Shooter” with safety instructions beneath. The defendant in the case of People v. Donald Trump came in with a large retinue of aides and attorneys and took his seat at the defense table. As always, a group of five pool photographers rushed in and photographed him for a few moments as he sat there seething like a caged animal. Then he sat back, wearing a blue tie and a blank look on his face, as Matthew Colangelo, representing the Manhattan district attorney’s office, rose to begin the case for prosecution.

    “This is a case about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up,” Colangelo said in his opening words to the jury, “a criminal scheme to influence the 2016 election.”

    It is easy to understand why Colangelo — a former Justice Department official who came to New York to handle the trial — wanted to start with some reframing. The “hush money” case, as it is often called, is one that even some prosecutors were reluctant to bring. It was originally a component of a wide probe into Trump’s finances that had been initiated under former New York district attorney Cyrus Vance, who charged the longtime chief financial officer of the Trump Organization, Allen Weisselberg, with evading taxes on his compensation in an effort to flip Weisselberg against his boss. But he refused to turn on Trump. After a new district attorney, Alvin Bragg, was elected in 2021, he decided not to pursue the financial-fraud case. (Attorney General Tish James pursued it as a civil lawsuit, which resulted in a $455 million judgment against Trump.) All that was left after the investigation fizzled was a subset of charges related to payments to Stormy Daniels.

    Under Vance, the DA’s office had been hesitant to pursue the Daniels case on its own for reasons both philosophical and tactical. If you were going to try Trump, it seemed to some of the key prosecutors involved, it should be for a major crime. And the Daniels affair seemed more seedy than felonious. The underlying facts concern a $130,000 deal that Michael Cohen, Trump’s then–personal attorney, made to buy silence from the actress when she was trying to sell a story about a sexual liaison with Trump to a tabloid. (Trump denies the affair happened.) The following year, after Trump became president, he allegedly arranged for his company to pay Cohen $420,000 to cover the payoff, expenses, taxes, and a bonus, all disguised as a “retainer agreement” for his legal services. Cohen pleaded guilty to federal crimes related to the payments in 2018, after which he became a cooperating witness for the DA’s office. Still, he was hardly an ideal witness: a convicted felon whose agenda was evident from the title of his memoir, Disloyal, and its sequel, Revenge.

    Under New York State law, the crime Trump has been charged with, falsifying business records, is a misdemeanor unless it is committed in the course of another felony. It is not illegal to pay off a mistress or to reimburse a lawyer. Thus, in his opening statement, Colangelo had to explain how the $420,000 paid to Cohen had been part of a larger criminal scheme. In the prosecutor’s telling, it was all part of a plot initiated in 2015 in a meeting at Trump Tower between Cohen, his boss, and David Pecker, who was then the chief executive of the company that owned the National Enquirer. “Those three men formed a conspiracy at that meeting,” Colangelo said.

    The “Trump Tower conspiracy,” as the prosecutor called it, allegedly had three elements: The Enquirer would publish positive stories about Trump and negative stories about his opponent, and most important, according to the prosecution, Pecker agreed to act as Trump’s “eyes and ears” down in the gutter. On at least three occasions, including with Daniels, Pecker or his subordinates alerted Trump to salacious stories about him that were being shopped, and they helped him get the stories snuffed out by persuading the sources to agree to sell the rights to their stories to the Enquirer or to entities controlled by Cohen in an industry practice known as “catch and kill.”

    “You will hear the defendant in his own voice,” Colangelo promised, indicating that the prosecutors plan to play tapes of Trump’s involvement in the catch-and-kill negotiations. “You’ll even hear him suggest, in his own voice, you will hear Mr. Trump suggest paying cash.”

    None of this will surprise anyone who has followed Trump’s symbiotic relationship with the tabloid press — for which he has long been both a character and a source — or who has any familiarity with the transactional nature of that business. But according to the prosecution’s theory, the rules changed for Trump in 2015 whether he realized it or not. What might have been merely a sleazy deal when he was a celebrity became a felony because he was running for president. “Look, no politician wants bad press, but the evidence at the trial will show this was not spin or communications strategy,” Colangelo said. “It was election fraud, pure and simple.” The prosecutor said that as Trump began racking up states on Election Night in November 2016, the ramifications set in for one of the lawyers who represented Daniels in the hush-money deal.

    “What have we done?” the attorney texted a top editor at the National Enquirer.

    If you believe Trump should be held accountable for everything he did after that — a familiar litany of high crimes and misdemeanors, for which he was twice impeached — it may be easy to shrug off any concerns about proportionality or technical imperfections in the hush-money case. Al Capone, as anyone who has seen The Untouchables knows, was put away for tax evasion, not the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre. In the weeks before this Trump trial began, some legal experts who had previously minimized its importance came around to the opinion that, in its grubby simplicity, the hush-money case had its merits. “Now, everybody’s coming to the table and saying, ‘We need to take another look at this case because we all dismissed it,’” says Karen Friedman Agnifilo, a former top lieutenant to Vance in the DA’s office. “Dismiss it at your peril.” Even some of Trump’s loudest defenders have trouble seeing a route to an acquittal. “In New York,” says the famed attorney and former Trump lawyer Alan Dershowitz, paraphrasing the legal adage, “if you indict a ham sandwich named Trump, you’ll get a conviction.”

    “President Trump is innocent,” his lead attorney, Todd Blanche, said as he began his own opening statement. “He is cloaked in innocence. That cloak of innocence does not leave President Trump today, it does not leave him at any point in this trial, and it does not leave him when you deliberate.”

    Blanche previewed the elements of his defense. On one level, it is not much different than the case made by most every other defense attorney representing most every other defendant who passes through the Manhattan criminal-courts building. The prosecution has the burden of proof; the star witness is a fink. “He’s a convicted perjurer. He’s an admitted liar,” Blanche said of Cohen. Just the night before the trial, the attorney claimed, Cohen had talked about wanting “to see President Trump in an orange jumpsuit.” He claimed Daniels had lied about the sexual encounter and had threatened to go public with it in “an attempt to extort President Trump.”

    “Objection,” one of the prosecutors said.

    “Sustained,” said Judge Merchan.

    Still, the jury heard the word extort, and maybe Blanche succeeded in planting a seed of doubt. His objective over the rest of the trial, which is scheduled to last six to eight weeks, will be to grow it, little by little, asking the jurors, Was this really as big a deal as the prosecutors suggested? Was it really election fraud? Did it really change history? Or was this trial just about some money and a nondisclosure agreement signed between two consenting adults, one of whom was running for president and wanted to avoid an embarrassing scandal?

    “I have a spoiler alert: There’s nothing wrong with trying to influence an election,” Blanche said. “It’s called democracy.”


    See All



    [ad_2]

    Andrew Rice

    Source link

  • Trump trial set for opening statements and first witness testimony: Live updates

    Trump trial set for opening statements and first witness testimony: Live updates

    [ad_1]

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump exits the courtroom for the day at Manhattan Criminal Court during his trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments on April 19, 2024 in New York City. 

    Spencer Platt | Via Reuters

    This is developing news. Check back for updates.

    Prosecutors and defense lawyers in the New York hush money trial of Donald Trump are set Monday to deliver opening statements and start calling witnesses to testify.

    The prosecution is expected to call David Pecker, the former CEO of National Enquirer publisher American Media, as its first witness, a source with direct knowledge told NBC News.

    Pecker was deeply involved in alleged efforts ahead of the 2016 presidential election to “catch and kill” negative information about Trump, the Republican nominee in that contest.

    Pecker allegedly warned Trump’s then-attorney Michael Cohen in late 2016 about porn star Stormy Daniels’ claim that she had sex with Trump years earlier while he was married. Cohen paid $130,000 to Daniels less than two weeks before the election, which Trump went on to win.

    American Media earlier in 2016 also allegedly paid $150,000 to former Playboy model Karen McDougal, who also says she had an extramarital affair with Trump.

    Trump faces 34 counts of falsifying business records in order to conceal his reimbursement to Cohen for paying off Daniels. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg accuses Trump of doing so to influence the 2016 election.

    Trump in a post Monday morning on Truth Social defended those payments to Cohen as he railed against the DA.

    Bragg “says that the payment of money to a lawyer, for legal services rendered, should not be referred to in a Ledger as LEGAL EXPENSE,” Trump wrote. “What other term would be more appropriate???”

    Read more about Trump’s hush money trial

    Trump in that post also complained that he is unable to campaign for president this week because he is required to attend his trial, which is expected to last around six weeks.

    “It is also the perfect Crooked Joe Biden NARRATIVE – To be STUCK in a courtroom, and not be allowed to campaign for President of the United States!” he posted.

    The opening statements and witness testimony will be delivered to a jury of 12 members and six alternates, who were seated last week for the historic trial in Manhattan Supreme Court.

    Dozens of potential jurors quickly disqualified themselves from the process by declaring they could not be fair and impartial in deciding on the charges against the former president and current presumptive Republican presidential nominee. Others were excused from service after lawyers found past social media posts criticizing Trump.

    The former president’s attorneys made about a dozen separate attempts to delay or dismiss the trial in the weeks leading up to it.

    This included a request Friday afternoon that a Manhattan appeals court pause the case, in which they argued that Trump cannot receive a fair jury in New York City, where polls show he is deeply unpopular.

    Judge Juan Merchan had seated a full jury that same day, and the appeals court swiftly rejected the last-minute effort.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Key players: Who’s who at Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial

    Key players: Who’s who at Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK – Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial shifts to opening statements Monday, followed by the start of witness testimony. A jury of seven men and five women, plus six alternates, was picked last week.

    The trial centers on allegations the former president falsified his company’s internal records to obscure the true nature of reimbursement payments to his former fixer and lawyer Michael Cohen, who arranged hush money payments to bury negative stories about him during his 2016 presidential race.

    The witnesses include a porn actor, a former tabloid publisher and Cohen, who went to federal prison for his role in the hush money matter and for other crimes, including lying to Congress. Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass forewarned prospective jurors that they have “what you might consider to be some baggage.”

    Here’s a look at the key players in the historic first criminal trial of a former U.S. president:

    DEFENDANT

    DONALD TRUMP — The former president of the United States and the presumptive Republican nominee, who parlayed his success as reality television star and celebrity businessman and won the presidential election in 2016, becoming America’s 45th president. The trial involves allegations that he falsified his company’s records to hide the true nature of payments to Cohen, who helped bury negative stories about him during the 2016 presidential campaign. He’s pleaded not guilty.

    WITNESSES

    MICHAEL COHEN — Trump’s former lawyer and fixer. He was once a fierce Trump ally, but now he’s a key prosecution witness against his former boss. Cohen worked for the Trump Organization from 2006 to 2017. He later went to federal prison after pleading guilty to campaign finance violations relating to the hush money arrangements and other, unrelated crimes.

    STORMY DANIELS — The porn actor who received a $130,000 payment from Cohen as part of his hush-money efforts. Cohen paid Daniels to keep quiet about what she says was a sexual encounter with Trump years earlier. Trump denies having sex with Daniels.

    KAREN MCDOUGAL — A former Playboy model who said she had a 10-month affair with Trump in the mid-2000s. She was paid $150,000 in 2016 by the parent company of the National Enquirer for the rights to her story about the alleged relationship. Trump denies having sex with McDougal.

    DAVID PECKER — The National Enquirer’s former publisher and a longtime Trump friend. Prosecutors say he met with Trump and Cohen at Trump Tower in August 2015 and agreed to help Trump’s campaign identify negative stories about him.

    HOPE HICKS — Trump’s former White House communications director. Prosecutors say she spoke with Trump by phone during a frenzied effort to keep allegations of his marital infidelity out of the press after the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape leaked weeks before the 2016 election. In the tape, from 2005, Trump boasted about grabbing women without permission.

    PROSECUTORS

    ALVIN BRAGG — A former civil rights lawyer and law professor, Bragg is a Democrat in his first term as Manhattan’s district attorney. He inherited the Trump investigation when he took office in 2021. He oversaw the prosecution of Trump’s company in an unrelated tax fraud case before moving to indict Trump last year.

    MATTHEW COLANGELO — A former high-ranking Justice Department official who was hired by Bragg in 2022 to lead the Trump investigation. They previously worked together on Trump-related matters at the New York attorney general’s office.

    JOSHUA STEINGLASS — A Manhattan prosecutor for more than 25 years, he has worked on some of the office’s more high-profile cases, including the Trump Organization’s tax fraud conviction in 2022, and cases involving violent crimes.

    SUSAN HOFFINGER — The chief of the district attorney’s Investigation Division, she returned to the office in 2022 after more than 20 years in private practice with her sister, Fran. She worked with Steinglass on the Trump Organization tax fraud prosecution.

    TRUMP’S LAWYERS

    TODD BLANCHE — A former federal prosecutor, Blanche previously represented Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, in a mortgage fraud case — and got it thrown out. Blanche successfully argued that the case, brought by the same prosecutor’s office now taking on Trump, was too similar to one that landed Manafort in federal prison and therefore amounted to double jeopardy.

    SUSAN NECHELES — A former Brooklyn prosecutor, Necheles is a respected New York City defense lawyer who represented Trump’s company at its tax fraud trial last year. In the past she served as counsel to the late Genovese crime family underboss Venero Mangano, known as Benny Eggs, and defended John Gotti’s lawyer, Bruce Cutler, in the early 90s.

    EMIL BOVE — A star college lacrosse player, Bove was a veteran federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York. He was involved in multiple high-profile prosecutions, including a drug-trafficking case against the former Honduran president’s brother, a man who set off a pressure cooker device in Manhattan and a man who sent dozens of mail bombs to prominent targets across the country.

    THE JUDGE

    JUAN M. MERCHAN — The judge presiding over the case. He was also the judge in the Trump Organization’s tax fraud trial in 2022 and is overseeing a border wall fraud case against longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon. Merchan has twice denied requests by Trump’s lawyers that he step aside from the case. They contend he is biased because his daughter runs a political consulting firm that has worked for Democrats, including President Joe Biden. Merchan has said he is certain of his “ability to be fair and impartial.”

    ___

    Associated Press writer Eric Tucker contributed to this report.

    Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Michael R. Sisak, Associated Press

    Source link

  • Key players: Who’s who at Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial

    Key players: Who’s who at Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK – Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial shifts to opening statements Monday, followed by the start of witness testimony. A jury of seven men and five women, plus six alternates, was picked last week.

    The trial centers on allegations the former president falsified his company’s internal records to obscure the true nature of reimbursement payments to his former fixer and lawyer Michael Cohen, who arranged hush money payments to bury negative stories about him during his 2016 presidential race.

    The witnesses include a porn actor, a former tabloid publisher and Cohen, who went to federal prison for his role in the hush money matter and for other crimes, including lying to Congress. Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass forewarned prospective jurors that they have “what you might consider to be some baggage.”

    Here’s a look at the key players in the historic first criminal trial of a former U.S. president:

    DEFENDANT

    DONALD TRUMP — The former president of the United States and the presumptive Republican nominee, who parlayed his success as reality television star and celebrity businessman and won the presidential election in 2016, becoming America’s 45th president. The trial involves allegations that he falsified his company’s records to hide the true nature of payments to Cohen, who helped bury negative stories about him during the 2016 presidential campaign. He’s pleaded not guilty.

    WITNESSES

    MICHAEL COHEN — Trump’s former lawyer and fixer. He was once a fierce Trump ally, but now he’s a key prosecution witness against his former boss. Cohen worked for the Trump Organization from 2006 to 2017. He later went to federal prison after pleading guilty to campaign finance violations relating to the hush money arrangements and other, unrelated crimes.

    STORMY DANIELS — The porn actor who received a $130,000 payment from Cohen as part of his hush-money efforts. Cohen paid Daniels to keep quiet about what she says was a sexual encounter with Trump years earlier. Trump denies having sex with Daniels.

    KAREN MCDOUGAL — A former Playboy model who said she had a 10-month affair with Trump in the mid-2000s. She was paid $150,000 in 2016 by the parent company of the National Enquirer for the rights to her story about the alleged relationship. Trump denies having sex with McDougal.

    DAVID PECKER — The National Enquirer’s former publisher and a longtime Trump friend. Prosecutors say he met with Trump and Cohen at Trump Tower in August 2015 and agreed to help Trump’s campaign identify negative stories about him.

    HOPE HICKS — Trump’s former White House communications director. Prosecutors say she spoke with Trump by phone during a frenzied effort to keep allegations of his marital infidelity out of the press after the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape leaked weeks before the 2016 election. In the tape, from 2005, Trump boasted about grabbing women without permission.

    PROSECUTORS

    ALVIN BRAGG — A former civil rights lawyer and law professor, Bragg is a Democrat in his first term as Manhattan’s district attorney. He inherited the Trump investigation when he took office in 2021. He oversaw the prosecution of Trump’s company in an unrelated tax fraud case before moving to indict Trump last year.

    MATTHEW COLANGELO — A former high-ranking Justice Department official who was hired by Bragg in 2022 to lead the Trump investigation. They previously worked together on Trump-related matters at the New York attorney general’s office.

    JOSHUA STEINGLASS — A Manhattan prosecutor for more than 25 years, he has worked on some of the office’s more high-profile cases, including the Trump Organization’s tax fraud conviction in 2022, and cases involving violent crimes.

    SUSAN HOFFINGER — The chief of the district attorney’s Investigation Division, she returned to the office in 2022 after more than 20 years in private practice with her sister, Fran. She worked with Steinglass on the Trump Organization tax fraud prosecution.

    TRUMP’S LAWYERS

    TODD BLANCHE — A former federal prosecutor, Blanche previously represented Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, in a mortgage fraud case — and got it thrown out. Blanche successfully argued that the case, brought by the same prosecutor’s office now taking on Trump, was too similar to one that landed Manafort in federal prison and therefore amounted to double jeopardy.

    SUSAN NECHELES — A former Brooklyn prosecutor, Necheles is a respected New York City defense lawyer who represented Trump’s company at its tax fraud trial last year. In the past she served as counsel to the late Genovese crime family underboss Venero Mangano, known as Benny Eggs, and defended John Gotti’s lawyer, Bruce Cutler, in the early 90s.

    EMIL BOVE — A star college lacrosse player, Bove was a veteran federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York. He was involved in multiple high-profile prosecutions, including a drug-trafficking case against the former Honduran president’s brother, a man who set off a pressure cooker device in Manhattan and a man who sent dozens of mail bombs to prominent targets across the country.

    THE JUDGE

    JUAN M. MERCHAN — The judge presiding over the case. He was also the judge in the Trump Organization’s tax fraud trial in 2022 and is overseeing a border wall fraud case against longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon. Merchan has twice denied requests by Trump’s lawyers that he step aside from the case. They contend he is biased because his daughter runs a political consulting firm that has worked for Democrats, including President Joe Biden. Merchan has said he is certain of his “ability to be fair and impartial.”

    ___

    Associated Press writer Eric Tucker contributed to this report.

    Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    [ad_2]

    Michael R. Sisak, Associated Press

    Source link