ReportWire

Tag: mia wasikowska

  • ‘Leviticus’ Review: A Sad, Frightening Conversion-Therapy Horror From Australia

    [ad_1]

    While the happy and only barely tortured gay romance of Heated Rivalry sweeps the nation, nay the world, it might be instructive, if depressing, to remind ourselves that there are many young queer people who have a much harder time realizing their desires. The new film Leviticus, from director Adrian Chiarella, is a solemn and frightening acknowledgment of that reality, albeit one allegorized into supernatural horror. 

    The film takes place in a dreary town in Victoria, Australia, a drab industrial backwater whose people — or, at least some of whom — flock to religion to give their lives the brightness of hope and higher purpose. Teenager Niam (Joe Bird) has just moved to town with his mum (a deceptively sinister Mia Wasikowska) but already yearns to escape it. He finds some deliverance, of the emotional kind anyway, in a classmate, Ryan (Stacy Clausen), a handsome ruffian with whom Niam shares a special bond. They have found love, or at least affectionate lust, in a hopeless place, just as many kids have done before them, since time immemorial.

    Leviticus

    The Bottom Line

    A stylish, urgent allegory.

    Venue: Sundance Film Festival (Midnight)
    Cast: Joe Bird, Stacy Clausen, Mia Wasikowska
    Director and writer: Adrian Chiarella

    1 hour 26 minutes

    Chief on the film’s mind is what happens when the relative innocence of that blush of first infatuation — neither boy seems particularly troubled by his proclivity — is spoiled by outside forces, like family and the church. As a hardcore religious right gains traction around the globe, Leviticus challenges the notion, made too easy to accept by the Heartstoppers and Love, Simons of the world, that coming out isn’t really such a big deal anymore. It is still — perhaps increasingly so, in this moment of backslide — monumental and dangerous for plenty of young people, often plunging their lives into horror.

    Chiarella is particularly interested in the abuses of conversion therapy, which hideously imagines that something innate can be excised or, at least, wholly ignored. It is a form of torture, one whose effects can cause lingering and sometimes fatal harm. Such trauma is made manifest in Leviticus, in which these afflicted kids are stalked by a sinister force that, cruelly and perversely, takes the form of the person they most want in the world.

    It’s a grim and clever conceit, even if its rules don’t always make total sense. What the device does most effectively is force the audience to think about the real-world analog of these characters’ psychic (and physical) pain: the many young people who have been told that their sexual and romantic desire will destroy them, that a fundamental human attraction is something they must flee from in mortal terror. How heartbreaking, and how vile, that any adult claiming compassion would seek to imbue a child with that extreme allergy to their own self. 

    Leviticus has a enough gore and jumpy moments to qualify it as a proper horror film. But its true scariness is of the forlorn kind, as Naim and Ryan grow distrustful of each other, not sure if the needful, seductive person they see before them is real or a menacing specter who means to kill them. That doleful eeriness is the film’s best asset, adding a tragic queer love story to the template of youth-curse films like It Follows and Talk to Me. Both Bird and Clausen play this mounting nightmare with the appropriate ache and desperation, elevating the emotional tenor of Chiarella’s sad, frequently bleak film. Sure, Clausen is pretty enough that one wonders why he doesn’t just monetize his Instagram and flee to Sydney, but otherwise both he and Bird appropriately register as two small-towners trapped in a toxic community, starkly rendered in Chiarella’s drab austerity. 

    Though his metaphors are awfully on the nose, Chiarella convincingly insists on their power. He has made his argumentative trick work quite well, even if the movie’s messaging sometimes crosses into the obvious or didactic. And anyway, maybe we are at a time, yet again, when such simple lessons bear repeating, when it is not lame or dated to highlight the terrible violations of the most basic kind of homophobia. 

    There is also, perhaps, a slightly radical suggestion teased out toward the end of Chiarella’s film, one that harkens back to so many narratives of the past: Those stories told of uncles and sons and countless others who fled their oppression in search of something they knew to be true and decent, waiting for them in distant, glittering cities. Leviticus has the sturdy nerve and conviction to plainly state that sometimes home and family are irredeemable and worth abandoning. It is not so concerned with changing hearts and minds, but with saving lives. 

    [ad_2]

    Richard Lawson

    Source link

  • Mia Wasikowska Is ‘Pretty Content’ With Her Decision to Leave Hollywood

    Mia Wasikowska Is ‘Pretty Content’ With Her Decision to Leave Hollywood

    [ad_1]

    In the early 2010s, Mia Wasikowska was a Hollywood “It girl,” starring in everything from indie darlings to high-profile studio films. But after her 2016 film Alice Through the Looking Glass was deemed a critical and commercial flop, Wasikowska seemed to take an extended and noticeable break from the limelight. In a recent interview with IndieWire, Wasikowska reveals that the choice to step away from the industry was by design: “I want to do more things in life other than be in a trailer.”  

    Born in Australia, Wasikowska burst onto the scene in the US as Sophie, a depressed gymnast, in the first installment of HBO’s drama series In Treatment, starring Gabriel Byrne, in 2008. She quickly established herself as one of Hollywood’s most in-demand starlets, racking up lead roles in films like Cary Fukunaga’s Jane Eyre and David Cronenberg’s Maps to the Stars. Her busiest year may have been 2010, when she starred in the best-picture-nominee The Kids Are All Right opposite Julianne Moore and Annette Bening and also booked the coveted role of Alice in Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland franchise, starring opposite Helena Bonham Carter, Anne Hathaway, and Johnny Depp. 

    But while she seemed to be living the dream of many aspiring actors, Wasikowka revealed to IndieWire that life on the Hollywood hamster wheel was ultimately not for her. 

    “I didn’t entirely like the lifestyle of going back to back to back. I felt really disconnected from any greater community,” she said. “I was doing it since I had been 17, well more like 15, but really working a lot from 17. I spent 10 to 15 years, completely like, new city, new country, every three months, and it’s like starting school again every few months. Especially when you’re younger, when you don’t have that base, I found that really hard.”

    Not only did Wasikowska find the pace to be a poor fit, she wasn’t necessarily fulfilled by the work. “Maybe if the payoff is good and you feel really great doing it, then that’s okay, but I didn’t. So I wanted to establish that for myself on a personal level and have more of a sense of somewhere I belong that’s not just on a film set that ends every few weeks.”

    Wasikowska did so by leaving Hollywood and moving back to her native Sydney, Australia, in the late 2010s. She’s still acting, but less frequently and mainly in indie films with auteurs she admires. Most recently, Wasikowska starred as Amy in Mia Hansen-Løve’s critically acclaimed film Bergman Island opposite Vicky Krieps. She returns to the screen this year as Abby, an oceanographer, in the eco-conscious indie Blueback, directed by veteran Aussie filmmaker Robert Connolly and costarring Eric Bana.

    “I’m pretty content,” Wasikowska told IndieWire of her decision to step back from Hollywood. “If I can have the best of both worlds, which is dip in and out of it occasionally, I’d be really happy, but I wouldn’t ever be in that place where I was just on a treadmill. I want to do more things in life other than be in a trailer. It’s great, and there are lots of great things, [but] the perception of it is quite different from the reality and it didn’t suit me as a person. You can really lose perspective because you’re treated quite strangely. When that’s your only reality, it’s quite strange.”

    While she’s happy to be off the Hollywood treadmill, there is one role that slipped through her fingers that she wished she’d gotten a hold of, per IndieWire: shopgirl Therese Belivet in Todd Haynes’s queer period romance Carol, starring Cate Blanchett. “I was attached to it a long time ago, and then a few things happened, and the shoot got pushed, and I signed on to Guillermo [del Toro]’s film Crimson Peak. So I signed on to that and started having conversations with Guillermo and Carol came back, and they’re like, ‘We’re going!’ And I was like, ‘I can’t now,’ so yeah, it was a bummer.”

    The role ultimately went to Rooney Mara, who won best actress at Cannes and was nominated for best supporting actress at the Oscars. “It’s just part of it,” said Wasikowska. “You win some, you lose some.”

    [ad_2]

    Chris Murphy

    Source link