ReportWire

Tag: Mexico-United States Border

  • Healey team to dissuade migrants at border

    Healey team to dissuade migrants at border

    [ad_1]

    BOSTON — Gov. Maura Healey is dispatching members of her administration to the U.S.-Mexico border in an effort to dissuade asylum seekers from coming to the state amid an ongoing surge of immigration.

    The Healey administration announced Tuesday that a state delegation is headed to the southern border to meet with officials from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Joint Task Force-North, relocation agencies and families “to educate them about the lack of shelter availability.”

    Retired Gen. Scott Rice, the state’s emergency assistance director, said the purpose of the trip is “to meet with families arriving in the U.S. and the organizations that work with them at the border to make sure they have accurate information about the lack of shelter space in Massachusetts.”

    “It is essential that we get the word out that our shelters are full so that families can plan accordingly to make sure they have a safe place to go,” he said in a statement.

    The delegation, which includes state emergency management officials and representatives from refugee organizations, is expected to visit several Texas communities along the border this week, including San Antonio, Hidalgo, McAllen and Brownsville, according to the Healey administration.

    Those border communities have been identified as the primary waypoints for migrants heading to Massachusetts after entering the country.

    The move comes as the state continues to see an influx of migrants that has pushed its emergency shelter system to the brink of collapse.

    Healey declared a state of emergency last August and deployed the National Guard to help deal with the influx. Her administration also set a 7,500-family cap on the number of people eligible for emergency housing in October. Hundreds of families are currently on a waiting list for housing.

    The governor signed a bill limiting migrants to nine months in emergency shelter, with up to two 90-day extensions for veterans, pregnant women and those in work training programs. The first round of eviction notices, covering 150 families, are set to go out in the next week, officials said.

    The bill also pumped an additional $251 million into the shelter system to cover housing, food and other costs. The state expects to spend about $1 billion this year on migrants. Pleas from state leaders for additional federal funds from the Biden administration have gone largely unanswered.

    Republicans and conservative groups have long argued that the state’s right-to-shelter law — which requires it to offer temporary housing regardless of immigration status — is drawing migrants here. They have pressed Healey to suspend the law, set residency requirements or significantly scale back its provisions.

    Amy Carnevale, chairwoman of the state Republican Party, called Healey’s move to dispatch officials to the southern border a “publicity stunt” that won’t reduce the influx of migrants. Carnevale said there’s a “disconnect” between Healey’s words and actions, and because of “political pride and partisanship” she refuses to take the “necessary steps” to solve the roots of the migrant crisis.

    “They can engage in rhetoric and publicity stunts all they want, but without concrete steps to limit access to emergency housing, nothing will change,” Carnevale said in a statement. “To stop incentivizing migrants from coming to the commonwealth, the right to shelter law must be amended to restrict program access based on the duration of residency in the commonwealth.”

    Paul Craney, a spokesman for the conservative Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance, said Healey’s decision to send a delegation of “midlevel bureaucrats on a field trip instead of going herself will not solve the problem.”

    “If the governor wants to send a message, the best way to do that is simply by removing the state’s very generous right to shelter law and welfare benefits to nonresidents,” Craney said.

    The Healey administration contends that workforce development and rehousing programs have resulted in a “steady increase” in families leaving the shelter system. About 3,700 individuals in shelters have qualified for federal work authorization, the administration said, with 1,114 placed in jobs.

    But the decision to dispatch a delegation to the border to dissuade migrants from heading to Massachusetts shows the influx of new arrivals is continuing to stress the state’s emergency shelter system.

    The tactic is similar to one used by New York City Mayor Eric Adams, whose administration distributed flyers at the U.S.-Mexico border last July telling newly arrived migrants to “consider another city” because there is “no guarantee we will be able to provide shelter and services to new arrivals.”

    New York is required to provide shelter for those without homes, regardless of their immigration status, under a decades-old consent decree stemming from a class-action lawsuit. The city has seen an influx of more than 180,000 migrants over the past year, with about 65,000 under its care.

    Christian M. Wade covers the Massachusetts Statehouse for North of Boston Media Group’s newspapers and websites. Email him at cwade@cnhinews.com.

    [ad_2]

    By Christian M. Wade | Statehouse Reporter

    Source link

  • New Rule Requires Migrants To Find Lawyer Within 4 Hours of Border Crossing

    New Rule Requires Migrants To Find Lawyer Within 4 Hours of Border Crossing

    [ad_1]

    According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, migrants crossing the border into the United States illegally are now required to find a lawyer to represent their case within four hours of crossing if they want to argue their exemption from the asylum restrictions enacted by President Biden on Tuesday. What do you think?

    “That’s why the Statue of Liberty is engraved with that 800 number.”

    Rizwan Oneill, Inflation Predictor

    “Introducing them to convoluted bureaucracy early on will help them assimilate faster.”

    John Smart, Road Manager

    “It’s barbaric that we’re asking them to interact with lawyers.”

    Valerie Cordero, Systems Analyst

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Rumor sends hundreds of migrants rushing for U.S. border at El Paso, but they hit a wall of police

    Rumor sends hundreds of migrants rushing for U.S. border at El Paso, but they hit a wall of police

    [ad_1]

    Ciudad Juarez, Mexico — Hundreds of people tried to storm the U.S.-Mexico border on Sunday, after a rumor that migrants would be allowed to cross into the United States. Around noon, a large crowd of mainly Venezuelans began to gather near the entrance of a bridge connecting Mexico’s Ciudad Juarez to El Paso, Texas in the southern United States.

    Frustrated by delays and difficulties in applying for asylum in the United States after journeys thousands of miles long through Central America and Mexico, some told AFP they thought they would be allowed entry because of a supposed “day of the migrant” celebration.

    el-paso-border-rush-march23.jpg
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials, Border Patrol Agents, and El Paso Police are seen, lower left, on the Texas side of the Paso Del Norte International Bridge which links El Paso to Juarez, Mexico, via a border crossing, as migrants gather on the other side, March 12, 2023.

    City of El Paso/Handout


    Images on social media showed a group that included many women and children running towards the border, shouting “to the USA.”

    They quickly encountered barbed wire, orange barricades and police with shields.

    US border guards “of course” moved to close the bridge, said Enrique Valenzuela, a civil society worker who helps migrants in Juarez.

    Jackson Solis, a 23-year-old Venezuelan, was among those who came to the bridge on Sunday to see if the rumor was true.

    “We all ran and they put a fence with barbed wire around us. They threw tear gas at us,” he said.

    Solis told AFP he had been waiting six months to try to schedule an appointment to apply for asylum in the United States, where he wants to work. Appointments must now be booked through a Customs and Border Protection mobile app that was introduced this year as asylum seekers were required to apply in advance rather than upon arrival.


    Biden meets with president of Mexico to discuss border policy changes

    04:33

    The Biden administration has been hoping to stem the record tide of migrants and asylum seekers undertaking often dangerous journeys organized by human smugglers to get to the United States.

    In January, the White House proposed expanding a controversial rule to allow border guards to turn away more would-be migrants if they arrive by land.

    “Do not just show up at the border,” President Joe Biden said in a speech at the time.

    Mr. Biden took office vowing to give refuge to asylum seekers and end harsh detention policies for illegal border crossers, but since he commissioned new asylum eligibility rules in a February 2021 executive order, three people with direct knowledge of the debates told CBS News’ Camilo Montoya-Galvez there have been disagreements within the administration over how generous the regulations should be.

    Some top administration officials have voiced concern about issuing rules that could make additional migrants eligible for asylum and make it more difficult to deport them while the administration is focused on reducing unlawful border crossings, the sources told CBS News.


    Migrant crossings at Canadian border skyrocket

    02:44

    About 200,000 people try to cross the border from Mexico to the United States each month, but the number of migrants apprehended by U.S. border patrol agents after illegally crossing into the U.S. dropped by roughly 40% in January — when the Biden administration announced its revamped strategy to discourage unlawful crossings, according to preliminary government data obtained by CBS News last month.

    Border Patrol agents recorded approximately 130,000 apprehensions of migrants who entered the U.S. between official ports of entry along the border with Mexico in January, compared to the near-record 221,000 apprehensions in December, the internal preliminary figures show. The number of Border Patrol apprehensions in November and October totaled 207,396 and 204,874, respectively.

    Most are from Central and South America, and they typically cite poverty and violence in their home nations in requesting asylum.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Woman traveling with 4 kidnapped Americans in Mexico alerted police when they didn’t meet up with her in Texas

    Woman traveling with 4 kidnapped Americans in Mexico alerted police when they didn’t meet up with her in Texas

    [ad_1]

    A woman who traveled to the Mexican border with the four Americans who were kidnapped in the country said that she warned police when the group didn’t return on schedule. 

    Cheryl Orange told the Associated Press via text message that she was with Eric Williams, Latavia McGee, Zindell Brown and Shaeed Woodard. McGee was scheduled to have cosmetic surgery in the Mexican city of Matamoros on Friday, and the other three were meant to cross back into the United States and reconvene with Orange in the Texas city of Brownsville within 15 minutes of dropping her off. 

    Instead, the four friends were attacked. The FBI told CBS News that they were fired upon by drug cartel factions, and the white van they were driving crashed. A Mexican woman was killed in the initial attack, and the four Americans were kidnapped. 

    On Tuesday, Mexican and American officials said that the four had been rescued. Brown and Woodard were dead, officials said, and Williams was injured. McGee and Williams were repatriated to the United States

    Officials were still “in the process of working to repatriate the remains” of the two victims who were killed, State Department spokesperson Ned Price said. 


    Authorities in Mexico searching for suspects in kidnapping of four American citizens

    04:24

    The attack and kidnappings remain under investigation. 

    “(McGee) simply went for a cosmetic surgery, and that’s it,” Orange told the AP. “That’s all, and this happened to them.” 

    Orange said that she had stayed in the group’s Brownsville hotel room, awaiting their return, because she had forgotten her identification and couldn’t cross the border. According to the AP, Orange told authorities that she had the group’s luggage. She also tried to contact her four friends several times, but there was no answer. 

    It’s not clear exactly when Orange alerted police that her friends were missing. 

    It’s not yet known when the FBI was informed of the missing group. Officials have not offered many details on how the group was recovered, though the attorney general in Tamaulipas, the state where Matamoros is located, said that it was through joint search operations with American and Mexican entities. 

    Tamaulipas is one of several Mexican territories that is under a “Do Not Travel” advisory from the U.S. State Department. The department has cited concerns such as crime and kidnapping. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • 31 bodies found in clandestine graves in Mexico region plagued by drug cartel violence

    31 bodies found in clandestine graves in Mexico region plagued by drug cartel violence

    [ad_1]

    Tlajomulco de Zúñiga, Mexico — Thirty-one bodies have been exhumed by authorities from two clandestine graves in western Mexico, officials said Thursday. The first grave was found on February 1 in the town of San Isidro Mazatepec in Jalisco state, a region hit by violence linked to organized crime. A second grave was found after several days of investigation and the extraction of bags containing bodies.

    “We have already counted 31 victims,” Jalisco state prosecutor Luis Joaquin Mendez told reporters.

    Jalisco, which is controlled by the powerful Jalisco New Generation Cartel, is among the Mexican states most heavily impacted by organized crime violence. Last year, 301 bodies were discovered in the state in 41 clandestine graves, and 544 bodies were found in 2020, the highest number to date.

    MEXICO-CRIME-VIOLENCE-MASS GRAVE
    Personnel of Jalisco’s Forensic Institute work at the site where a clandestine mass grave was discovered in Tlajomulco de Zuniga, Jalisco State, Mexico, in a January 13, 2020 file photo. Two more clandestine mass graves were discovered in the same area in February 2023, containing the remains of at least 31 people.

    ULISES RUIZ/AFP/Getty


    Mexico’s homicide rate has tripled since 2006 — when an intensification of the government’s war on drug cartels triggered a spiral of violence — from 9.6 murders per 100,000 inhabitants to 28 in 2021.

    Joaquin Mendez, the Jalisco prosecutor, said authorities had sufficient evidence to identify about half of the bodies found this week so they can be returned to their families.

    Civilians are often caught up in the killing. As of late last year, more than 100,000 people were officially missing across the country. Mexican police and other authorities have struggled for years to devote the time and other resources required to hunt for the clandestine grave sites where gangs frequently bury their victims.

    That lack of help from officials has left dozens of mothers and other family members to take up search efforts for their missing loved ones themselves, often forming volunteer search teams known as “colectivos.”


    Hunting for hidden graves in Mexico

    02:45

    In 2018, CBS News’ Haley Ott spent a day with the members of one colectivo in the Mexican state of Nayarit, just north of Jalisco. Every member of the group had lost a loved one, and they met twice every week to hunt for burial sites, relying largely on tips from community members.

    One of the group members, María, told CBS had been looking for her son for months, since he was grabbed off a street and thrown into a van as she ran to try to reach him.

    “They had taken him. He was in a truck a street away,” she said. “Like I have my son, others have their children, their siblings, their spouses, their parents. There’s every kind of person. That’s why we’re here; to search.”

    Over the last few years, even the mothers searching for their missing children have been targeted by the cartels. At least five were murdered in 2021 and 2022.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Fentanyl seizures rise at U.S.-Mexico border — here’s why

    Fentanyl seizures rise at U.S.-Mexico border — here’s why

    [ad_1]

    The spike in fentanyl-related overdose deaths in the U.S. has fueled a national conversation and a redoubling of the government’s efforts to curb its smuggling. In 2021, 90% of some 80,000 opioid-related deaths involved fentanyl, federal statistics show.

    Most fentanyl is being smuggled,  into the U.S. along the southern border, often in vehicles driven by American citizens, as cartels and other criminal groups in Mexico have turned the production of the synthetic opioid into a clandestine industry that has become the primary source of fentanyl in the U.S., according to the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). 

    Since President Joe Biden took office, Republicans have sought to link the spike in fentanyl-related overdose deaths with the record numbers of migrants who have entered U.S. custody along the Mexican border. The Biden administration’s handling of a historic influx of illegal border crossings, Republican lawmakers claim, has allowed fentanyl to be smuggled into the U.S. at higher rates and fueled the opioid crisis.

    The debate over how the deadly drug is being smuggled was on full display earlier this week, when the Republican-led House of Representatives held its first hearing on U.S. border policy.

    While no Biden administration officials were called to testify, House Judiciary Committee Democrats accused Republicans of spreading misinformation. “What I find particularly pernicious is the attempt to conflate the issues of migrants seeking asylum through our legal processes with the very real scourge of fentanyl trafficking,” said Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon, Democrat of Pennsylvania.

    “Do you care precisely whether or not fentanyl is coming through ports of entry or between ports of entry when your family was directly impacted because fentanyl is flooding into our communities?” said GOP Rep. Chip Roy, of Texas. 

    During a briefing with reporters Thursday, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said it was “unequivocally false that fentanyl is being brought to the United States by non-citizens encountered in between the ports of entry who are making claims of credible fear and seeking asylum.”

    “The vast, vast majority is sought to be smuggled through the ports of entry and tractor-trailer trucks and passenger vehicles,” Mayorkas added.

    While successful fentanyl smuggling rates aren’t calculated by the government, seizures of fentanyl along the southern border have in fact risen sharply in recent years. Experts say only a fraction of fentanyl is seized by Border Patrol agents between the ports of entry, with virtually none transported by migrants seeking asylum within the United States.

    “People just don’t believe that others would be so brazen as to bring drugs through a legal crossing point where they know there’s a potential for them to be checked. They just think logically, it makes more sense to try to sneak [them] in,” said David Bier, associate director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute. “It’s actually a lot easier for Border Patrol to spot a human crossing a border than it is for an inspector to spot drugs within a tractor-trailer full of goods.”

    Where is fentanyl being seized?

    According to the DEA, most of the fentanyl is smuggled over land across the U.S.-Mexico border. Smaller amounts are smuggled by air from China.

    Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the agency responsible for interdicting illicit drugs along the U.S. borders, has reported that the vast majority of its fentanyl seizures along the southern border have occurred at ports of entry, where officials screen returning American citizens, foreign travelers and commercial trucks. 

    In fiscal year 2022, 84% of the 14,104 pounds of fentanyl seized along the Mexican border were detected by officers at ports of entry overseen by the Office of Field Operations, a CBP branch, according to government data.

    On the other hand, Border Patrol, which apprehends migrants who enter the U.S. illegally, seized 2,200 pounds of fentanyl, or 16% of all fentanyl seized along the southern border, in fiscal year 2022. Moreover, many of those seizures occurred at interior checkpoints, where Border Patrol agents screen commercial and passenger vehicles.

    How much fentanyl is entering the United States? How many Americans are dying?

    Last year, the DEA seized enough fentanyl to kill every American — more than 50 million fentanyl-laced pills and over 10,000 pounds of fentanyl powder. 

    More than 70,000 people died of overdose from synthetic opioids alone in 2021, according to the CDC — a number representing two out of three of all fatal drug overdoses and more lives lost than the combined equivalent of U.S. military personnel killed during the wars in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.

    During the pandemic, from 2019-2021, annual deaths from fentanyl nearly doubled.

    Along with the COVID-19 pandemic, overdose deaths have driven average life expectancy down in the U.S. over the past two years.

    Appearing before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, Brandon Dunn, co-founder of “Forever 15,” a nonprofit group dedicated to raising awareness about fentanyl poisoning said his son “was murdered by a drug dealer selling counterfeit Percocet pills. The pill contained no Percocet, just 8 milligrams of fentanyl — four times the DEA’s estimate of a lethal dose.

    Dunn told lawmakers that parents suffering a similar loss have encouraged him to “come up here and let people know this is a border issue, not an immigration issue.”

    Who is smuggling fentanyl into the U.S.?

    Years ago, at the start of the opioid epidemic, direct flows of fentanyl came primarily from China. Nowadays, officials say the larger challenge is curbing Chinese-sourced fentanyl precursors from entering a U.S.-bound pipeline.

    “We were originally seeing a lot more fentanyl coming in through international mail facilities pre-pandemic,” said a CBP official granted anonymity to speak openly about the challenge. “The majority of it is now coming in through the southern border field offices and ports of entry.”

    Mexican cartels and transnational criminal organizations producing synthetic opioids next door are now largely responsible for fentanyl production, according to the DEA. They typically tried to smuggle fentanyl into the U.S. on vehicles entering official ports of entry along the southern border.

    For years, the Sinaloa Cartel controlled most trafficking across the U.S.-Mexico border. But officials from DHS’ investigative arm, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) tell CBS News they’re tracking an uptick in activity by the Jalisco New Generation Cartel or CJNG. “They [also] have the contacts to China and then furthermore, the distribution networks to get things across the United States, the smuggling networks,” one official added.

    But these criminal networks rely on the cooperation of Americans, too. Data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission shows that between 2017–2021, 86% of fentanyl trafficking offenders were American citizens.

    According to officials at Homeland Security Investigations, a DHS branch, cartels routinely “utilize, organize and recruit American citizens” to smuggle drugs into the U.S., but the individuals working to transport synthetic opioids are not typically high-ranking members within a criminal network.

    Have fentanyl seizures along the southern border increased?

    At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, from 2019-2021, fentanyl seizures at ports of entry nationwide quadrupled.

    The U.S. government’s ban on most legal cross-border traffic amid the public health emergency prompted a switch to the easier-to-conceal synthetic opioid, fentanyl.

    “Closures of ports of entry massively restricted the amount of cross border travel during the pandemic, which means that in order to supply the same market, [organizations] either needed a lot more trips into the United States, a lot more smugglers to make those trips, or you needed to switch [to] the more potent substance. That’s actually what happened very shortly after travel was restricted,” said Bier. “The amount of fentanyl being trafficked increased substantially.”

    The synthetic opioid is about 50 times more potent than heroin, according to the DEA.

    “This is not like the old days of [criminals] smuggling the big heavy marijuana bales — where you had to bring a lot of it in to make a profit,” a CBP official said. “With fentanyl, a little bit goes a long way.”

    In fiscal years 2021 and 2022, CBP officials at ports of entry carried out 91% and 83% of all fentanyl seizures along the southern border, respectively. 

    That disparity has only grown in recent months. Last December, CBP seized nearly 4,500 pounds of fentanyl – more than 8 times the amount seized during the same month in 2022. Of the 4,471 pounds of fentanyl captured by CBP, less than 5 pounds – roughly 0.1% – were discovered by Border Patrol agents.

    Do record migrant arrivals impact drug flows?

    U.S. government data and federal law enforcement accounts reveal fentanyl is largely smuggled into the country at ports of entry in coordination with cartels and transnational criminal groups.

    But federal law enforcement concedes that the Department of Homeland Security is working with a “finite number of resources” to tackle simultaneous challenges of record-breaking fentanyl trafficking and migrants seeking asylum in the United States.

    “If we have a group of 200 migrants turn themselves in, we of course have to process and transport them, etc.,” one CBP official said. “When we’re doing that, we don’t necessarily know what’s going on the rest of the border.”

    In interviews with CBS News, DHS officials expressed a greater need for resources, including personnel and technology enabling greater “situational awareness” at the U.S.-Mexico border.

    What’s next?

    It’s not just fentanyl pills and powder. Federal law enforcement is now tracking precursor chemicals used to make fentanyl – including some that are legal.

    Authorities have also taken note of recent phenomena of unwitting drivers pushing drugs over the southwest border. “What we’re seeing more and more at the southwest border is people that are coming across and not knowing, but the drugs have been placed in the vehicle,” a law enforcement official told CBS News. “[Criminals] basically break into the vehicle in Mexico, conceal drugs and attach a GPS tracker to the vehicle, then find it later and recover the product.”

    CBP has witnessed a “tremendous uptick” in the use of unmanned aerial systems or drones, designed for contraband drop-offs. In fiscal year 2022, CBP detected more than 2,200 drones engaged in drug-related activity at both the northern and southern borders.

    To bolster scanning at ports of entry, the U.S. government has pledged more than half a billion dollars to add more advanced “non-intrusive inspection” technology though the program has been slow to roll out. CBP officials have acquired approximately 135 non-intrusive inspection systems, though just 10 have been deployed to operational locations in Texas, Arizona and California.

    DHS is now accepting bids from contractors to maximize the use of artificial intelligence in non-intrusive scanning equipment, Secretary Mayorkas said Thursday.

    Trying to stop chemical precursors from entering supply chains in the U.S. and Mexico is a heavy investigative lift for federal law enforcement. “China is the leader in sending precursors. And what we’re seeing is that those are generally landing in Mexico,” said U.S. officials, who say they’ve also identified a small number of labs within the U.S. that rely on precursors.

    The U.S. is “receiving good cooperation from the Mexicans,” Mayorkas said Thursday, with transnational criminal investigative units “delivering results not just in Mexico but elsewhere.” 

    “One does not remain a transit country for long before one becomes a victim country as well,” Mayorkas added.

    Still, experts and federal officers alike concede that law enforcement is only a fraction of the solution needed to address the fentanyl crisis.

    “Any kind of further crackdown on the border will just further shift the market to a more potent and more dangerous alternative,” Bier said, pointing toward harm reduction models designed to empower physicians and users to manage addiction. “Everything must be done within the United States to reduce the demand and the collateral consequences of people using this dangerous substance.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Migrant arrivals soared to record levels in December, before border crackdown was announced

    Migrant arrivals soared to record levels in December, before border crackdown was announced

    [ad_1]

    Washington — The number of migrants processed by U.S. authorities along the southern border soared to a monthly record high in December, before President Biden announced tougher enforcement measures that have reduced illegal entries, government figures released Friday show.

    Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials at the U.S.-Mexico border processed migrants 251,487 times last month, a 7% increase from November, fueled by record arrivals of migrants from Cuba and Nicaragua, according to the agency statistics. The previous monthly record was set in May 2022, when CBP recorded over 241,000 migrant encounters along the southern border.

    But the sharp increase in unlawful border crossings in December occurred before the Biden administration launched a revamped migration plan that pairs increased expulsions of those entering the U.S. unlawfully with expanded opportunities for vulnerable asylum-seekers and migrants with U.S.-based sponsors to enter the country legally.

    MEXICO-US-POLITICS-IMMIGRATION-MIGRANTS
    Migrants wait for their turn to have a Border Patrol agent write down their information in Eagle Pass, Texas, on December 20, 2022. 

    VERONICA G. CARDENAS/AFP via Getty Images


    Since those measures were announced in early January, the number of migrants apprehended along the Mexican border has plummeted. Border Patrol is currently averaging roughly 4,000 migrant apprehensions per day, a 40% drop from the daily average in December, a senior Department of Homeland Security official told CBS News Friday, requesting anonymity to share internal data.

    Still, the record number of migrant apprehensions in December, a month that has historically seen lower migration flows than warmer parts of the year, illustrates the unprecedented migrant crisis along the southern border, where migrants have been arriving in greater numbers and from more countries than ever before.

    The extraordinary migration event has been primarily driven by record arrivals of migrants from countries outside of Mexico and Central America’s Northern Triangle, the main sources of U.S.-bound unlawful migration before the COVID-19 pandemic.

    In December, U.S. officials along the Mexican border recorded 42,637 encounters with Cubans, and 35,389 encounters with Nicaraguans, all-time monthly highs for both nationalities. By contrast, U.S. border agents processed migrants from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador nearly 33,000 times last month.

    U.S. border officials were preparing in late December to discontinue a pandemic-era rule known as Title 42 that has allowed them to quickly expel some migrants without affording them an opportunity to request asylum. But the Supreme Court put Title 42’s termination, ordered by a lower court, on hold while it reviews a request by Republican-led states that want the Trump-era policy to continue.

    As part of the strategy Mr. Biden unveiled in early January, the U.S. announced that Mexico had agreed to accept 30,000 returns per month of migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela who attempted to cross into the U.S. illegally. Previously, Mexican officials generally only accepted the return of migrants from Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador expelled under Title 42.

    The Biden administration simultaneously committed to admitting up to 30,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela per month and giving them access to work permits if they have sponsors in the U.S. willing to support their arrival. Officials also announced a process for vulnerable migrants in Mexico to make appointments through a mobile app to request U.S. entry at ports of entry along the southern border.

    In December, U.S. border officials carried out 49,405 expulsions under Title 42, representing only 20% of all migrant encounters last month. That percentage, however, could change in January since Mexico has since accepted the return of additional migrant nationalities expelled by the U.S. via Title 42.

    Migrants who are not expelled are processed under regular immigration law, which allows them to request asylum. Migrant adults and families could be detained, deported under a process known as expedited removal or released into the U.S. with a court notice or instructions to check in with federal officials in their respective destinations. Unaccompanied children are generally transferred to government shelters.

    Migrant encounters do not represent individual migrants, as some try to cross the U.S. border multiple times after being expelled to Mexico. In December, 14% of migrants processed along the southern border had been previously stopped by U.S. immigration officials in the last 12 months, CBP data show.

    Moreover, not all migrants enter the U.S. illegally between legal ports of entry. In December, U.S. border officials processed 23,025 asylum-seekers determined to be vulnerable at ports of entry under humanitarian exemptions to Title 42, according to government data submitted to a federal court.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • NYC Mayor Eric Adams visits border, asks for more federal help to handle migrant arrivals

    NYC Mayor Eric Adams visits border, asks for more federal help to handle migrant arrivals

    [ad_1]

    Mayor Adams in El Paso, Texas for first-hand look at migrant crisis


    Mayor Adams in El Paso, Texas for first-hand look at migrant crisis

    02:16

    New York City Mayor Eric Adams traveled to the Texas border city of El Paso over the weekend to implore the federal government to provide additional funds and support to American cities receiving tens of thousands of migrants seeking refuge from economic crises and political tumult in Latin America.

    During the trip, his first visit to the U.S.-Mexico border as mayor, Adams said cities like New York and El Paso were on the “front lines” of an unprecedented migrant crisis that recently prompted the Biden administration to adopt a new strategy designed to discourage illegal border crossings. 

    “This is a national crisis and we need a national solution,” said Adams, a Democrat who issued an emergency declaration in October over the migrant arrivals in New York.

    For the past few months, El Paso has struggled to handle a sharp increase in arrivals of migrants, mainly from crisis-stricken countries like Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela. The Democratic-led Texas city has converted a convention center and two vacant middle schools into makeshift migrant housing facilities to alleviate overwhelmed city shelters. Many migrants have still found themselves sleeping on El Paso’s streets.

    New York City, for its part, has also received tens of thousands of migrants in recent months who entered the U.S. along the southern border. Some of them traveled to the city with the help of volunteers or family members in the U.S. Others have been bused to New York by Texas’ Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, who has been transporting migrants to Democratic-led cities to protest President Biden’s border policies. 

    For several months last year, El Paso city officials also sent dozens of buses of migrants to New York. But its operation was designed to reduce overcrowding in local shelters, not to send a political message.

    Since last year, Adams has warned that New York would face dire fiscal and operational challenges without increased state and federal help to welcome migrants. The city has set up 74 shelters and four processing centers to accommodate the new arrivals, including at repurposed hotels. In all, New York has offered roughly 40,000 migrants shelter, food and other services, an effort city officials project will cost over $1 billion.

    Last week, Adams told New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, a fellow Democrat, that the situation was “pushing New York City to the brink” and urged state officials to help shelter 500 migrants.

    “We are at our breaking point,” Adams said. “Based off our projections, we anticipate being unable to continue sheltering arriving asylum seekers on our own and have submitted an emergency mutual aid request to the State of New York beginning this weekend.”

    During his trip to El Paso on Saturday and Sunday, Adams met with local volunteers, shelter officials, migrants and city leaders, including Mayor Oscar Leeser, another Democrat who also asked for, and secured, assistance from the Biden administration to shelter, feed and transport arriving migrants.

    On Sunday, Adams elicited cheers and applause from a group of migrants when he told them he would fight for their ability to work in the U.S. and fulfill the “American dream,” video of the encounter shows.

    One of the main frustrations Adams has voiced is that migrants arriving in New York City can’t legally work because of a federal law that prevents them from obtaining work permits until after their asylum applications have been pending for several months. While he has asked the federal government to lift that requirement, it can only be changed by Congress, which has not passed a major immigration law since the 1990s.

    Other Democrats have joined Adams in calling for additional federal action to help cities accommodate migrants who have been allowed by border officials to stay in the country while their asylum cases are adjudicated.

    On Sunday, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot said she “wholeheartedly” agreed with Adams’ call for increased federal support. While she expressed appreciation for the Biden administration’s efforts to deal with the humanitarian crisis along the southern border, she said additional steps needed to be taken to help address the “urgent needs” of migrants arriving in Chicago, where Texas state officials have also been busing migrants.

    “Months and thousands of migrants later, we continue to strain under the challenge of how to accommodate the rise in asylum-seekers and the escalating associated costs, which have been left primarily to cities to manage,” Lightfoot wrote on Twitter.

    The Biden administration earlier in this month unveiled its most comprehensive strategy yet to deal with the unprecedented number of migrant arrivals along the southern border. It announced it would expand expulsions of migrants who crossed into the U.S. illegally, while expanding opportunities for certain migrants to enter the country legally, including through a program for those with U.S.-based financial sponsors.

    Biden administration officials have insisted the federal government has been assisting local communities receive migrants, including by issuing funding grants through a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) program. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Border officials allow asylum-seekers to request U.S. entry through mobile app

    Border officials allow asylum-seekers to request U.S. entry through mobile app

    [ad_1]

    Washington — U.S. border officials on Thursday began allowing some asylum-seekers to use a free mobile application to request an opportunity to be processed at an official port of entry. It is part of a strategy the Biden administration hopes will dissuade migrants from entering the U.S. illegally.

    Eligible migrants in Mexico who use the app will be granted an appointment with U.S. Customs and Border Protection at a port of entry, where officials will determine whether they should be allowed into the country under humanitarian exemptions to a pandemic-era rule known as Title 42 that has limited asylum claims.

    The expansion of the mobile app, called CBP One, was first previewed by President Biden last week, when he unveiled a new border strategy that paired increased expulsions for those who cross the southern border illegally, with expanded opportunities for migrants with U.S.-based sponsors to enter the country legally.

    migrants asylum U.S.-Mexico border
    Immigrants wait overnight next to the U.S.-Mexico border fence to seek asylum in the U.S. on Jan. 7, 2023, as viewed from Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. 

    Getty Images


    The port of entry appointment process is separate from another Biden administration program that will allow up to 30,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans to fly into the U.S. each month if American citizens, or other individuals in the U.S. with legal status, agree to sponsor them.

    Migrants in central or northern Mexico who hope to be processed at a port of entry will need to prove they have a vulnerability identified by the government to merit an exemption to Title 42, which allows U.S. border officials to quickly expel migrants on public health grounds, without allowing them to request asylum.

    The vulnerabilities DHS will consider include a physical or mental illness, a disability, pregnancy and the lack of safe housing or shelter in Mexico, according to guidelines in the app. Migrants under the age of 21 or over the age of 70, and those who have been victimized in Mexico, will also be considered for the process.

    In a statement Thursday, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas called the port of entry program “an innovative solution.”

    “When Title 42 eventually lifts, this new feature will join one of the many tools and processes this Administration is providing for individuals to seek protection in a safe, orderly, and humane manner and to strengthen the security of our borders,” Mayorkas said.

    In addition to attesting to their vulnerability, the CBP One app will require migrants to submit biographical information about themselves and their families, as well as a photo of their face. They will then be given an appointment up to 14 days in advance to show up at one of eight ports of entry in Arizona, California or Texas.

    Those selected for an appointment will not be guaranteed entry into the U.S., DHS officials said, noting CBP officers have broad discretion to grant or deny migrants permission to enter the country during inspections at a port of entry.

    The application process will be free, and questions on the CBP One app are available in English and Spanish. The process will also mean that migrants seeking a humanitarian exemption to Title 42 will no longer need a referral from non-governmental organizations, which have been sending lists of vulnerable migrants to the U.S. government over the past few months.

    Under that program, the Biden administration had been processing thousands of asylum-seekers at port of entry each month. In November, the last month with available data, officials at ports of entry processed 20,696 migrants under humanitarian exemptions to Title 42, government statistics filed in federal court show.

    While crossing into the U.S. between ports of entry is illegal, U.S. asylum law allows migrants on American soil to request asylum, regardless of how they entered the country. But the government has used Title 42 to partially suspend asylum law, expelling hundreds of thousands of migrants without a court hearing or an interview. Migrants have also been generally blocked from seeking asylum at ports of entry under Title 42.

    After defending it as a key public health measure for over a year, the Biden administration tried to end Title 42 in the spring of 2022, but Republican-led states convinced a judge to block the termination. 

    Then, in November, another federal judge declared Title 42 unlawful. His order, however, was suspended by the Supreme Court, which kept Title 42 in place at the request of the group of Republican-controlled states that have argued the policy’s end will fuel an even greater increase in border arrivals.

    While the Biden administration’s recently announced strategy includes an expansion of Title 42 to expel migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua and Haiti who were previously not subject to the policy, the expansion of the CBP One app could open the U.S. asylum system to significant numbers of migrants stranded in Mexico.

    Andrea Flores, a former National Security Council official who worked on border issues during the first year of the Biden administration, called the new port of entry process “long overdue,” saying it “advances President Biden’s original promise to reopen access to the asylum system.”

    “Allowing migrants to register for an exemption to Title 42 is a more humane alternative than leaving them vulnerable to misinformation from smugglers,” Flores told CBS News. “This type of innovation in border processing is the future of orderly migration at the southern border.”

    Still, some advocates for asylum-seekers expressed concern about the new process, saying it will exclude the destitute migrants who don’t have access to Wi-Fi or phones, as well as those who don’t speak English or Spanish, or who face imminent danger in Mexico and can’t wait for an appointment.

    “This will exclude the most vulnerable of migrants,” said Erika Pinheiro, the executive director of Al Otro Lado, a California group that offers legal counsel to asylum-seekers in Mexico.

    Priscilla Orta, an attorney based in south Texas who represents migrants for the group Project Corazon, criticized the vulnerability guidelines in the CBP One app, saying they don’t explicitly consider LGBTQ migrants as vulnerable.

    “The world knows that some of the most persecuted people on this planet are those who are members of the LGBTQ+ community,” Orta said, saying some of her clients face victimization in Mexico because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. 

    The ports of entry participating in the Title 42 exemption process are located in Nogales, Arizona; the Texas cities of Brownsville, Eagle Pass, Hidalgo, Laredo and El Paso; and the California cities of Calexico and San Diego. The first appointments under the expanded process are set to occur on Jan. 18. DHS officials said they would make additional days available every morning.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden makes first trip to U.S.-Mexico border

    Biden makes first trip to U.S.-Mexico border

    [ad_1]

    Biden makes first trip to U.S.-Mexico border – CBS News


    Watch CBS News



    President Biden is in Mexico City for the North American Leaders’ Summit with his counterparts from Mexico and Canada. One of the biggest topics on the agenda will be immigration. Before the summit, Mr. Biden made his first trip to the U.S.-Mexico border since taking office.

    Be the first to know

    Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Court rejects GOP states’ request to delay end of Title 42 border expulsions

    Court rejects GOP states’ request to delay end of Title 42 border expulsions

    [ad_1]

    Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday declined to delay the cancellation of pandemic-era border restrictions that are set to end next week, dismissing a request by Republican state officials who had warned that the termination of the policy, known as Title 42, will fuel a greater increase in migrant arrivals along the U.S. southern border.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit refused to suspend a lower court ruling that will require the federal government to stop expelling migrants under the public health measure on Dec. 21.

    Unless it is superseded by a Supreme Court order, the appeals court’s decision will pave the way for the termination of the Title 42 expulsion policy next week. The 19 Republican-led states seeking to delay the end of Title 42 previously said they would ask the Supreme Court to intervene if the Washington-based appeals court denied their request.

    First invoked by the Trump administration in March 2020 at the start of the coronavirus pandemic, Title 42 is a public health law dating back to the late 19th century that the federal government has argued allows border officials to quickly expel migrants from the U.S. on the grounds that they may spread a contagious disease.

    Citing Title 42, U.S. border officials under Presidents Trump and Biden have expelled migrants 2.5 million times to Mexico or their home country, without allowing them to request humanitarian protection, a right that asylum-seekers have under U.S. and international refugee law, federal government figures show.

    While it reversed other Trump-era border policies, the Biden administration continued the Title 42 expulsions and has relied on the measure to manage an unprecedented flow of hundreds of thousands of migrants who have arrived along the U.S.-Mexico border over the past year and a half.

    The emergency request decided on Friday was made by Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming.

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) offers a free bus to Washington, DC for recently crossed migrants in a move to highlight Bidens border policies which he believes are lax.
    Migrants, including families with small children, join hands to fight the current as they wade across the Rio Grande near the Eagle Pass-Piedras Negras International Bridge on August 12, 2022 in Eagle Pass, Texas. 

    Sarah L. Voisin/The Washington Post via Getty Images


    The three-judge panel that reviewed the Republican-controlled states’ request said the states waited too long to try to intervene in the case over Title 42’s legality, which started in early 2021 due to a lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU has argued the policy is unlawful and violates the rights of asylum-seekers.

    “In this case, the inordinate and unexplained untimeliness of the States’ motion to intervene on appeal weighs decisively against intervention,” the panel wrote in its four-page opinion on Friday.

    The court-mandated revocation of Title 42 next week has alarmed Republican lawmakers and some moderate Democrats, who have expressed concern about the Biden administration’s preparations for the spike in migrant arrivals that’s projected to occur once the measure is lifted.

    In fiscal year 2022, U.S. officials along the Mexican border stopped migrants over 2.3 million times, a record high, and carried out just over 1 million expulsions under Title 42, government data show. In recent days, the Texas border city of El Paso has seen a sharp increase in arrivals of Nicaraguan migrants that has strained the local shelter system.

    But progressives and advocates for migrants have said Title 42’s end will allow the Biden administration to fully comply with its legal obligation to consider the cases of all asylum-seekers on U.S. soil. Title 42, they have argued, has made migrants easy prey to victimization in dangerous parts of northern Mexico.

    Since the start of the Biden administration in January 2021, human rights researchers have recorded over 13,000 reports of kidnappings, rape and other attacks against migrants stranded in Mexico, according to a report released Friday by Human Rights First, a U.S.-based advocacy group.

    “Ending Title 42 will save lives,” Lee Gelernt, the ACLU lawyer who challenged the pandemic rule, told CBS News. “This is not some technical abstract policy. It sends families with small children directly into the hands of waiting cartels.”

    The Biden administration, meanwhile, has insisted it is prepared to lift Title 42 next week. It has also argued that the implementation of regular immigration procedures, such as deportations that come with multi-year banishments under U.S. immigration law and prosecutions of repeat border crossers, will gradually reduce the high number of illegal crossings.

    Since its enactment, Title 42 has fueled a high rate of repeat crossings among migrant adults who try to enter the U.S. multiple times after being expelled to Mexico. The Biden administration said that recidivism rate will be curtailed once repeat crossers face the threat of detention, prosecution or multi-year exiles from the U.S.

    “To be clear: the lifting of the Title 42 public health order does not mean the border is open,” c spokesperson Abdullah Hasan said in a statement to CBS News. “Anyone who suggests otherwise is doing the work of smugglers spreading misinformation to make a quick buck off of vulnerable migrants.”

    Migrants from Venezuela cross the Rio Grande
    Border Patrol Officers are on duty as migrants from Venezuela cross the Rio Grande, for reaching to the border after United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) extended the Temporary Protected Status designation for migrants from Venezuela on September 14, 2022.

    Christian Torres/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images


    Title 42 was first authorized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in March 2020. While Trump administration officials portrayed the rule as a pandemic response measure, Title 42 was approved over the objection of CDC experts who questioned the public health rationale for the unprecedented policy.

    Despite rescinding some Trump-era asylum and border restrictions, the Biden administration decided to keep Title 42, and defended it, including in federal court, as a critical public health rule to curb COVID-19 outbreaks.

    The Biden administration sought to end Title 42 in the spring of 2022, pointing to the improving pandemic environment — and drop in coronavirus infections — but a coalition of Republican-led states convinced a federal court in Louisiana to block the policy’s termination on procedural grounds.

    Then, on Nov. 15, another federal judge in Washington, D.C., declared Title 42 illegal, saying the government had not sufficiently explained the public health justification for the measure, or considered its impact on asylum-seekers. 

    In a filing in a separate court case on Friday, the Biden administration said it was prepared to comply with the ruling and officially halt the expulsions at 12 a.m. EST on Wednesday.

    According to an internal notice by top U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services official Ted Kim on Friday, the agency is training volunteers to conduct an increased number of interviews of asylum-seekers once Title 42 expires. Those interviews determine whether migrants have credible fear of persecution, and should be allowed to request asylum.

    Biden administration officials are also considering adopting certain policies designed to deter migration, including an asylum restriction that would render migrants ineligible for U.S. protection if they did not ask for refuge in other countries first. Those measures could be paired with expanded opportunities for asylum-seekers to enter the country legally if they have U.S.-based financial sponsors.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco on end of Title 42 border policy

    Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco on end of Title 42 border policy

    [ad_1]

    With Title 42 set to end next week, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said she is “concerned about the increase in illegal immigration” as well as “human smuggling” and “drug smuggling.” 

    “There is a growing concern that there will now be a tsunami of fentanyl flowing through the southern border when Title 42 ends next week. Is that something you’re concerned about?” “CBS Evening News” anchor and managing editor Norah O’Donnell asked Monaco in an interview Wednesday. 

    “Absolutely we’re concerned about that, which is why we are focusing, as I said, relentlessly on these two ruthless criminal drug organizations, the Sinaloa Cartel and the Jalisco New Generation Cartel,” Monaco said.

    Monaco, who oversees the Drug Enforcement Administration, said the agency is using “intelligence,” “cyber means,” “informants” and “data” to “attack” the supply chain. 

    A court ruling invalidated Title 42, a public health order that the U.S. has used to expel migrants en masse from the border during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Justice Department said it would appeal the ruling

    Watch more of Norah O’Donnell’s interview with Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco tonight on the “CBS Evening News.” 


    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Arizona Governor Building Illegal Makeshift Border Wall During Final Days In Office

    Arizona Governor Building Illegal Makeshift Border Wall During Final Days In Office

    [ad_1]

    Arizona Gov. Doug Doucey is erecting an illegal border wall of double-stacked shipping containers along parts of the U.S.–Mexico border, which runs through federal and tribal land, as a final act before he leaves office in January. What do you think?

    “The best security measures are always makeshift.”

    Jewell Arnold, Propaganda Strategist

    “I don’t understand why he can’t just do it legally.”

    Lamarcus Conroy, Well Digger

    “Fine. I’ll fly to Mexico.”

    Theo Mell, Vengeance Consultant

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Biden administration weighs Trump-like asylum limits as it braces for end of Title 42 border restrictions

    Biden administration weighs Trump-like asylum limits as it braces for end of Title 42 border restrictions

    [ad_1]

    Washington — Bracing for the court-mandated termination of pandemic-related border restrictions that have been in place since 2020, the Biden administration is considering enacting an asylum restriction resembling a Trump-era policy struck down in court, two people familiar with the matter told CBS News.

    The proposed policy, which would bar certain migrants from seeking U.S. asylum if they failed to previously seek protection in other countries, has not received a final approval within the administration, according to the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

    But the partial asylum ban is one of several policies under consideration by top officials at the White House and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as the administration prepares for the end of Title 42, a public health order that has allowed U.S. border authorities to quickly expel hundreds of thousands of migrants, mostly to Mexico, without allowing them to request asylum.

    Marsha Espinosa, a spokesperson for DHS, called reports about how U.S. policy may change inaccurate, saying “no such decisions have been made.”

    “The Administration is committed to continuing to secure our borders while maintaining safe, orderly and humane processing of migrants,” Espinosa added. “This will remain the case when Title 42 is lifted.”

    The administration has also considered expanding the processing of asylum-seekers at ports of entry along the southern border, as well as a program that has allowed some Venezuelans to enter the U.S. legally at airports if they have financial sponsors in the U.S.

    On Nov. 15, a federal judge declared the Title 42 policy unlawful and later gave the Biden administration until Dec. 21 to stop using the public health authority, which was first invoked under former President Donald Trump in March 2020. The Justice Department said in a court filing Friday that the administration will decide whether to appeal the court ruling by Dec. 7.

    While it was always supposed to be a temporary, emergency measure, the end of Title 42 has raised concerns about even greater numbers of migrants reaching the U.S.-Mexico border and straining the federal government’s capacity to process them. Republican lawmakers, and some moderate Democrats, have expressed concerns about the administration’s ability to manage a bigger influx of illegal crossings.

    MEXICO-US-MIGRATION-BORDER
    A group of migrants, mostly from African countries, walk to an open gate on the border wall to be processed by the border patrol after crossing the US-Mexico border seen from Tijuana, Baja California state, Mexico, on November 11, 2022.

    GUILLERMO ARIAS/AFP via Getty Images


    In fiscal year 2022, a 12-month time span, U.S. Customs and Border Protection stopped migrants over 2.3 million times, a record high, though many of those encounters involved repeat border crossings. During that time span, U.S. border officials carried out over 1 million Title 42 expulsions, expelling the majority of Mexican and Central American adults who they processed, federal data show.

    The consideration of the asylum limits, first reported by Axios earlier this week, has alarmed advocates for asylum-seekers, who have called on the Biden administration to reject deterrence-focused policies they say ignore international and domestic refugee law, which allows migrants to request humanitarian protection, even if they entered the country illegally.

    In 2019, the Trump administration enacted a similar policy, known as the “transit ban,” to disqualify most non-Mexican migrants from U.S. asylum. But the policy was ultimately struck down in federal court.

    “If it’s the Trump transit ban, or something similarly flawed, we will sue immediately, as we did during the Trump administration,” said Lee Gelernt, an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) attorney who challenged the 2019 asylum restriction.

    The U.S. asylum system was designed to protect migrants fleeing persecution because of their race, nationality, political views, religion or membership in a social group. But a mounting backlog of cases has crippled the government’s ability to decide asylum cases in a timely fashion, placing asylum-seekers in limbo and creating an incentive for other migrants to use the system to work in the U.S.

    For months, the Biden administration has publicly said it has been making preparations for the end of Title 42, which the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention (CDC) tried to end this spring, though it was blocked from doing so by a lawsuit from Republican-led states.

    A DHS plan released at the time called for a surge in resources and personnel to the southern border, increased collaboration with migrant services groups, a crackdown on human smugglers and efforts with countries in Latin America to deter U.S.-bound mass migration.

    The plan also called for increased prosecutions of certain migrants, including those who crossed the border illegally multiple times, and the use of expedited removal, a decades-old process that allows U.S. border agents  to quickly deport migrants who don’t request asylum or who fail to establish credible fear of persecution. 

    In a call with Latin American press last week, Blas Nuñez Neto, the acting assistant DHS secretary for border and immigration policy, said the U.S. would seek to prosecute migrants who try to evade Border Patrol and to deport those who enter the country illegally under expedited removal, which includes a 5-year banishment from the U.S.

    However, like under Title 42, the U.S. may not be able to deport all migrants under the expedited removal process due to logistical and diplomatic reasons. Countries like Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela have, in recent years, limited or rejected U.S. deportations. 

    Mexico, on the other hand, has generally only accepted the return of its own citizens and migrants from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. In mid-October, Mexico agreed to accept some Venezuelans expelled under Title 42, but that legal authority is set to expire later this month.

    Nuñez Neto said last week that the U.S. now has the ability to carry out deportations to Nicaragua. It is also talking to Mexico and other countries to see if they can facilitate the return of Venezuelan migrants under U.S. immigration law, Nuñez Neto said.

    A Biden administration policy designed to weed out weak asylum claims has shown signs of success, rejecting 50% of asylum-seekers at the initial screening phase and granting asylum to eligible migrants within months, instead of years. But the program has been implemented on a very limited scale since launching in June.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Bus carrying 28 migrants from Texas arrives in Philadelphia, including girl with dehydration and fever

    Bus carrying 28 migrants from Texas arrives in Philadelphia, including girl with dehydration and fever

    [ad_1]

    Philadelphia — A bus carrying 28 migrants from Texas arrived in Philadelphia on Wednesday, including a 10-year-old girl suffering from dehydration and a high fever who was whisked to a hospital for treatment. Advocates who welcomed them as they arrived before dawn said the families and individuals came from Colombia, the Dominican Republic and Cuba. The city and several nonprofit groups were ready to provide food, temporary housing and other services.
     
    “In general, people feel relieved. We want them to know that they have a home here,” said Philadelphia City Council member Helen Gym, who accompanied several of the migrants onto a second bus taking them to a site where their needs could be assessed.
     
    “There’s a 10-year-old who’s completely dehydrated. It’s one of the more inhumane aspects that they would put a child who was dehydrated with a fever now, a very high fever (on the bus),” Gym said. “It’s a terrible situation.”

    Transporting-Migrants-Philadelphia
    Migrants sent by Texas Governor Greg Abbott arrive on a bus near 30th Street Station in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, November 16, 2022. 

    Joe Lamberti/AP


    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced on Tuesday that Philadelphia would be the next destination for migrants the state is transporting from the U.S.-Mexico border by the thousands to Democratic-led locales, putting a new bus on the road a week after the Republican easily won reelection.

    CBS News immigration reporter Camlio Montoya-Galvez said the move was the latest escalation of Abbott’s efforts to repudiate the Biden administration and its Democratic allies for the federal government’s handling of an unprecedented wave of migration along the U.S.-Mexico border over the past two years.

    Before Philadelphia, Texas officials had already bused more than 13,000 migrants to Washington, D.C.New York City and Chicago, three Democratic-led cities with “sanctuary” policies that limit local law enforcement cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) deportation agents, according to state statistics.


    Buses from the Border: New York strained by migrants caught in a broken system | 60 Minutes

    12:57

    Advocates who greeted the group early Wednesday morning, which included 21 adults, said it was not clear how long the bus journey took, but one said it would typically take about 40 hours. 

    “The important thing is they got to Philadelphia, and they were received with open arms,” said Emilio Buitrago of the nonprofit Casa de Venezuela.
     
    “The kids are frightened, they’re exhausted, they’re tired,” he said. “They’re going to go to a place… where they’re going to have comfy, warm beds with a blanket, and warm food. From there, we’re going to work on relocation.”
     
    Some of the families hope to unite with relatives or friends in other locations, Gym said.

    Texas Governor Greg Abbott
    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott at an election night rally in McAllen, Texas, on Nov. 8, 2022.

    Jordan Vonderhaar/Bloomberg/Getty


    Critics have waved off the buses as a political stunt, but voters rewarded Abbott last week with a record-tying third term as Texas governor in his race against Democrat Beto O’Rourke. Abbott made a series of hardline immigration measures the centerpiece of his campaign. 

    Nearly 6 in 10 voters favored Abbott’s decision to send migrants to northern cities, according to AP VoteCast, an expansive survey of almost 3,400 voters.
     
    In the statement announcing the bus trips to Philadelphia, Abbott’s office said Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney “has long-celebrated and fought for sanctuary city status, making the city an ideal addition to Texas’ list of drop-off locations.”

    In a statement, Kenney said: “It is truly disgusting to hear today that Governor Abbott and his Administration continue to implement their purposefully cruel policy using immigrant families – including women and children – as pawns to shamelessly push his warped political agenda.”
     
    Kenney said the city had been working with more than a dozen local organizations to provide the migrants with shelter space, emergency health screening, food, water, language interpretation and more. Some will likely make their way to other states.
     
    Arizona and Florida have also sent migrants to northern U.S. cities.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Detainee shot, killed by Border Patrol agents in El Paso

    Detainee shot, killed by Border Patrol agents in El Paso

    [ad_1]

    A person was shot and killed by U.S. Border Patrol agents in El Paso Tuesday afternoon, authorities said. The victim was in the custody of Border Patrol at the time.

    The shooting occurred at 12:45 p.m. local time at the Ysleta Border Patrol Station, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) said in a news release Tuesday evening.

    The victim was transported to a hospital, and later died, CBP confirmed to CBS News.

    The victim was not immediately identified. The circumstances that led up to the shooting were not released.

    In a statement, the Mexican Consulate in El Paso said the victim was a Mexican national who was being processed for criminal charges.

    The FBI, El Paso Police Department and U.S. U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Office of Professional Responsibility are  involved in the investigation. 

    [ad_2]

    Source link