ReportWire

Tag: Meteorologist Shawnie Caslin

  • Why Election Day is on a Tuesday in November

    Why Election Day is on a Tuesday in November

    [ad_1]

    Election Day falls on Tuesday, Nov. 5, this year. Like every year, it’s the Tuesday following the first Monday in November

    There’s solid reasoning behind why Election Day follows an unusual calendar process. That’s partly related to the weather.


    What You Need To Know

    • Election Day always falls on the Tuesday following the first Monday in November
    • Early November was after the harvest, but still ahead of winter
    • Tuesday was the most convenient day for farmers to get to the polls


    While the date itself may not align conveniently to most modern-day schedules, the date wasn’t just picked at random.

    When Congress agreed to make one national election day in 1845, they selected the date centering it around the lifestyles of farmers at the time. That included considering when the growing season ended. 

    Why November?

    Like daylight saving time, much of the decision to select a date for Election Day was geared toward the farmers, since they made up the bulk of the labor population back in the day.

    Farmers spent much of the spring, summer and early fall months dedicated to their cultivating crops, leaving them little to no time to head to the polls. However, their schedules opened up again once the harvest was complete.

    (AP Photo/Seth Perlman)

    Choosing an early November date seemed to be the wisest option. Not only was it after the harvest, but it also occurred before winter. This allowed many citizens to get to the polls without worrying about the bitter cold or winter storms.

    Why a Tuesday?

    Carving out time to head to the polls on Tuesday may come as a modern-day inconvenience. But that wasn’t the case back in 1845, when Congress set that day of the week as a nationwide date to vote.

    Many 19th century farmers usually spent Sundays as a day of rest and worship. After the harvesting season, they would spend Wednesday through Saturday working in the marketplace.

    With that, Mondays and Tuesdays were the only two days farmers were available to vote. Unlike today, polling centers were few and far between, leaving only one or a select few within a day’s travel by foot or animal.

    As a result, farmers used Monday for travel, leaving Tuesday the designated Election Day.

    (AP Photo/Steve Karnowski)

    Election Day sometimes falls on the first Tuesday of November, but not always is the first Tuesday of the month.

    Rather, it falls on the Tuesday following the first Monday of November.

    This was to avoid Nov. 1, which many Christians honor as All Saints’ Day. As a result, Election Day typically falls between Nov. 2 and Nov. 8.

    A change in date is up for debate

    Even though many polling facilities stay opened for long hours on Election Day, many people nowadays argue that making it to the polls is a struggle during the workweek.

    Unlike the 1800s, though, there are now options to cast early votes. Absentee and early voting are offered by nearly all states.

    During the 2020 presidential election, implementation of the mail-in ballot was credited for the uptick in voter turnout. According to census data, approximately 66.8% of eligible Americans voted, making it the highest percentage in the century. 

    In attempts to increase voter turnout, some political leaders fought for making Election Day a national holiday to accommodate more citizens’ schedules. However, Election Day itself remains unchanged.

    Our team of meteorologists dives deep into the science of weather and breaks down timely weather data and information. To view more weather and climate stories, check out our weather blogs section.

    [ad_2]

    Meteorologist Shawnie Caslin

    Source link

  • Sustainable celebrations: Exploring alternatives to traditional fireworks

    Sustainable celebrations: Exploring alternatives to traditional fireworks

    [ad_1]

    Nothing says “Fourth of July” more than fireworks. After all, they are one of the longest held traditions of the holiday itself. But the unwanted health and environmental consequences that follow a pyrotechnic display are often overlooked.

    Between drought conditions and air quality issues, now might be the time to reconsider the centuries-old tradition.


    What You Need To Know

    • Fourth of July fireworks cause numerous environmental and health impacts every year
    • There are “cleaner” fireworks that release less smoke and other harmful substances 
    • Some places are now replacing fireworks with LED drone shows

    The Fourth of July is a holiday of traditions, and fireworks are the grand finale. Despite all their beauty while lighting up the night sky, though, fireworks can take a toll on the environment.

    According to the American Pyrotechnics Association, over 16,000 fireworks displays typically take place across the nation on Independence Day.

    Fireworks explode over the Washington Monument at the National Mall during the Independence Day celebrations in Washington, D.C. on Monday, July 4, 2022. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

    Between some parts of the country combating drought conditions and others dealing with unhealthy air quality, setting off fireworks will only seem to make matters worse.

    Banning the highlight of the holiday itself could put a damper on celebrations and cause major upset to those looking forward to the event. However, more suitable alternatives are beginning to trend across the U.S.

    Eco-friendly fireworks do exist

    Despite their short time to shine, nothing beats the sight of fireworks lighting up the night sky, especially on the Fourth of July. The pyrotechnics are so mesmerizing that they often disguise the negative effects that follow.

    In standard fireworks, two “explosions” occur: one launches the firework into the sky, and the second makes the stunning bursts of color that follow.

    Both explosions are a result of a combustion reaction, usually involving gunpowder, an oxidizing agent, and for the second explosion, different metals that contribute to the color and sound of the boom.

    Despite the beauty of the second blast, the byproducts released from the series of explosions are quite harmful to the environment.

    Along with affecting wildlife, the near-ground smoke from pyrotechnics can significantly alter air quality in the hours that follow.

    Smoke from fireworks lingers over the Chicago skyline in 2005. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)

    Attempts to create “cleaner” fireworks are out there but come at a greater expense.

    With numerous fireworks shows per week, Disney invested in fireworks that launch via condensed air instead of gunpowder.

    While the secondary explosion still releases unfavorable substances into the atmosphere, this approach eliminates the first explosion needed to launch traditional fireworks, reducing smoke and other byproducts released.

     

     

    Another bonus? Launching with condensed air also sends the fireworks higher into the atmosphere, reducing the amount of fine particles circulating near the ground.

    A quieter and cleaner approach

    Standard fireworks come with hazards, even when the weather is ideal. However, when conditions are not ideal, the risks are enhanced.

    Fireworks could be a problem in extremely dry areas; the embers that fall to the ground after their vibrant blast are known to spark new wildfires year after year, damaging homes and more.

    In recent years, drought-stricken parts of the country were forced to skip their displays to prevent wildfires from happening. Even though the break from tradition may come as disappointment, some communities are opting for safer alternatives instead of fireworks.

    Many places in the West continue to replace fireworks displays with LED drone shows instead.

    Drones form an American flag during Super Bowl LI’s Halftime show on Feb. 5, 2017. (AP Photo/Business Wire/Intel Corporation)

    LED drone shows eliminate the potential fire threat and air quality issues that immediately arise in the wake of a fireworks show.

    In addition, drone shows come with less noise–at least to some extent. All booming and cracking sounds caused by fireworks will be replaced by the low humming buzz of hundreds of drones, which is barely detectable once the drones ascend high enough in the night sky.

    However, most LED drone shows are still performed with music, so don’t worry about complete silence.

    While choreographing and rehearsing the drone show itself may come with a higher price tag, it is a much more sustainable and safer route to consider. Not only is it better for the environment, but could also reduce the amount of damage and health impacts that fireworks cause.

    Eliminating the use of old school fireworks may not go away entirely, but the transition to establish new Independence Day traditions is underway.

    Our team of meteorologists dives deep into the science of weather and breaks down timely weather data and information. To view more weather and climate stories, check out our weather blogs section.

    [ad_2]

    Meteorologist Shawnie Caslin

    Source link

  • Sustainable celebrations: Exploring alternatives to traditional fireworks

    Sustainable celebrations: Exploring alternatives to traditional fireworks

    [ad_1]

    Nothing says “Fourth of July” more than fireworks. After all, they are one of the longest held traditions of the holiday itself. But the unwanted health and environmental consequences that follow a pyrotechnic display are often overlooked.

    Between drought conditions and air quality issues, now might be the time to reconsider the centuries-old tradition.


    What You Need To Know

    • Fourth of July fireworks cause numerous environmental and health impacts every year
    • There are “cleaner” fireworks that release less smoke and other harmful substances 
    • Some places are now replacing fireworks with LED drone shows

    The Fourth of July is a holiday of traditions, and fireworks are the grand finale. Despite all their beauty while lighting up the night sky, though, fireworks can take a toll on the environment.

    According to the American Pyrotechnics Association, over 16,000 fireworks displays typically take place across the nation on Independence Day.

    Fireworks explode over the Washington Monument at the National Mall during the Independence Day celebrations in Washington, D.C. on Monday, July 4, 2022. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

    Between some parts of the country combating drought conditions and others dealing with unhealthy air quality, setting off fireworks will only seem to make matters worse.

    Banning the highlight of the holiday itself could put a damper on celebrations and cause major upset to those looking forward to the event. However, more suitable alternatives are beginning to trend across the U.S.

    Eco-friendly fireworks do exist

    Despite their short time to shine, nothing beats the sight of fireworks lighting up the night sky, especially on the Fourth of July. The pyrotechnics are so mesmerizing that they often disguise the negative effects that follow.

    In standard fireworks, two “explosions” occur: one launches the firework into the sky, and the second makes the stunning bursts of color that follow.

    Both explosions are a result of a combustion reaction, usually involving gunpowder, an oxidizing agent, and for the second explosion, different metals that contribute to the color and sound of the boom.

    Despite the beauty of the second blast, the byproducts released from the series of explosions are quite harmful to the environment.

    Along with affecting wildlife, the near-ground smoke from pyrotechnics can significantly alter air quality in the hours that follow.

    Smoke from fireworks lingers over the Chicago skyline in 2005. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)

    Attempts to create “cleaner” fireworks are out there but come at a greater expense.

    With numerous fireworks shows per week, Disney invested in fireworks that launch via condensed air instead of gunpowder.

    While the secondary explosion still releases unfavorable substances into the atmosphere, this approach eliminates the first explosion needed to launch traditional fireworks, reducing smoke and other byproducts released.

     

     

    Another bonus? Launching with condensed air also sends the fireworks higher into the atmosphere, reducing the amount of fine particles circulating near the ground.

    A quieter and cleaner approach

    Standard fireworks come with hazards, even when the weather is ideal. However, when conditions are not ideal, the risks are enhanced.

    Fireworks could be a problem in extremely dry areas; the embers that fall to the ground after their vibrant blast are known to spark new wildfires year after year, damaging homes and more.

    In recent years, drought-stricken parts of the country were forced to skip their displays to prevent wildfires from happening. Even though the break from tradition may come as disappointment, some communities are opting for safer alternatives instead of fireworks.

    Many places in the West continue to replace fireworks displays with LED drone shows instead.

    Drones form an American flag during Super Bowl LI’s Halftime show on Feb. 5, 2017. (AP Photo/Business Wire/Intel Corporation)

    LED drone shows eliminate the potential fire threat and air quality issues that immediately arise in the wake of a fireworks show.

    In addition, drone shows come with less noise–at least to some extent. All booming and cracking sounds caused by fireworks will be replaced by the low humming buzz of hundreds of drones, which is barely detectable once the drones ascend high enough in the night sky.

    However, most LED drone shows are still performed with music, so don’t worry about complete silence.

    While choreographing and rehearsing the drone show itself may come with a higher price tag, it is a much more sustainable and safer route to consider. Not only is it better for the environment, but could also reduce the amount of damage and health impacts that fireworks cause.

    Eliminating the use of old school fireworks may not go away entirely, but the transition to establish new Independence Day traditions is underway.

    Our team of meteorologists dives deep into the science of weather and breaks down timely weather data and information. To view more weather and climate stories, check out our weather blogs section.

    [ad_2]

    Meteorologist Shawnie Caslin

    Source link

  • Moon mountain named in honor of Melba Mouton

    Moon mountain named in honor of Melba Mouton

    [ad_1]

    Few humans can say they were a part of the mission that allowed astronauts to land on the moon in 1969. Only the prestigious can claim they have a mountain in their name – not on earth, but on the moon.

    Melba Roy Mouton is now one of the handful of scientists and mathematicians that do.


    What You Need To Know

    • Melba Mouton was an accomplished Black mathematician and computer programmer for NASA from 1959 to 1973
    • Despite being a minority, her strong leadership skills and willpower allowed her to excel in a groundbreaking career
    • One of Mouton’s biggest successes includes her contributions to the Apollo 11 Moon landing
    • NASA recently named a mountain on the moon in honor of her

    While Melba Mouton was not one of the “hidden figures” unveiled and featured for their success at NASA during the late 1950s and 1960s, her story is no different. As a Black female working in a prominently male-dominated field, she too faced the brutal reality of discrimination.

    Yet, her relentless determination and curiosity allowed her to overcome obstacles. All of which lead her to become a prominent leader as a mathematician and computer programmer in the Space Race era.

    The life of Melba Mouton

    Melba Mouton was born in the late 1920s and spent much of her childhood in Virginia during the difficult times of the Great Depression and Word War II. Despite this, she still pursued her passion for math.

    She attended the historically Black college, Howard University, earning both a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in mathematics.

    Mouton began her NASA career at the Goddard Space Flight Center in 1959. By the early 1960s, she worked as a lead computer programmer for the Mission and Trajectory Analysis Division’s Program Systems Branch, to compute where spacecraft were in orbit and their trajectories.

    This eventually put her as the head mathematician, helping to track the Echo 1 and 2 satellites.

    (Photo by NASA)

    NASA awarded Mouton the Apollo Achievement Award for all of her contributions toward the famed Apollo 11 mission, that allowed astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to first step foot on the moon (while third crewmember Michael Collins piloted the command module).

    Ending her career at NASA as the Assistant Chief of Research Programs for the agency’s Trajectory and Geodynamics Division, Mouton finally retired in 1973. Years later, doctors diagnosed Mouton with brain cancer and she passed away in 1990 at age 61.

    What’s in a name

    On Feb. 15, 2023, NASA announced they would name a mountain on the moon after Mouton in honor of all her accomplishments during her time at the agency. With all mountains on the moon referred to as mons, “Mons Mouton” is now the official name of the lunar mountain near the South Pole.

    Naming a mountain, or any other topographic features, on the moon isn’t as easy as you think. NASA can only suggest potential names, but it does not have the final say in determining whether the name is confirmed.

    Only the International Astronomical Union (IAU) can approve a name and there’s a designated committee that handles that: the Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature (WGPSN).  

    The WGPSN has certain guidelines it must follow when accepting and choosing a name, whether it be a mountain on the moon or any other astronomical object. To view the set of rules they must abide by, click here.

    According to NASA, the IAU declared that the name for lunar mountains must reflect “scientists who have made outstanding or fundamental contributions to their fields.”

    Given all her accomplishments in the field, it makes sense that the name Mouton was a strong candidate, and thus, approved by the IAU.

    The future of Mons Mouton

    Since Mons Mouton has a relatively flat top, NASA claims it is one of the potential landing spots for Artemis III, the first manned mission to the moon, scheduled in 2026.

    Although Mons Mouton will first serve as the location for NASA’s Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover (VIPER) mission set to happen later in 2024. 

    Please be sure to check out the tribute video NASA put together honoring Melba Mouton, while discussing its plans for Mons Mouton as a potential landing and research site on the moon.

    Whether Mons Mouton is the selected landing site for the Artemis III mission or not, the gesture of honoring one of NASA’s greatest scientists comes full circle. With all her efforts to get us to the moon, it is only fitting that her name and her legacy earn a spot among the stars.

    Our team of meteorologists dives deep into the science of weather and breaks down timely weather data and information. To view more weather and climate stories, check out our weather blogs section.

    [ad_2]

    Meteorologist Shawnie Caslin

    Source link

  • Warming temperatures and gender disparities in sea turtles

    Warming temperatures and gender disparities in sea turtles

    [ad_1]

    Few species have their sex determined by temperatures, but for sea turtles it’s almost a certainty.

    However, this natural occurrence could become a biological disadvantage as global temperatures continue to rise, leading to larger gender disparities.


    What You Need To Know

    • A sea turtle’s gender is determined by the temperatures in its surrounding environment
    • Higher nest temperatures produce females, while cooler temperatures yield males
    • A warming planet will likely upset gender diversity in the sea turtle population

    Temperature-driven gender reveals

    The differences in reproduction between humans and sea turtles extend beyond the obvious ‘one lays eggs while the other does not.’ One key difference between the two is how sex is determined.

    For humans and many other species, gender is determined from the by sex chromosomes when fertilization occurs. But this is not the case with sea turtles and other reptiles, given that they lack sex chromosomes.

    For them, the gender of their offspring is determined after fertilization, and the deciding factor all depends on temperature. This kind of sexual determination is called temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD).

    Building their nest onshore, a female will lay their eggs in the sand, where they will continue to develop before hatching about two months later.

    A baby Olive Ridley sea turtle crawls to the sea past discarded turtle eggs at Ostional beach on the northern Pacific coast of Costa Rica, Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2007. (AP Photo/Kent Gilbert)

    During that time, the temperature of the surrounding sand can activate an enzyme, aromatase, in the embryos responsible for converting sex hormones, and determining gender.

    Higher temperatures stimulate more aromatase activity. This yields an increase in female hormones and thus, the baby sea turtle will hatch as a female.

    On the contrary, cooler temperatures limits aromatase activity. This promotes male hormones to dominate, and so the sea turtles that hatch will be male.

    (AP Photo/Cody Jackson)

    According to NOAA, sand temperatures of 88.8 degrees or more will yield female sea turtles, while sand temperatures of 81.86 degrees or less will produce males.

    Eggs incubated in sand temperatures falling between these two thresholds will cause a mix of male and female sea turtles.

    A warming world and gender inequality

    Following the world’s warmest year on record in 2023, rising global temperatures will likely upset gender diversity within sea turtle populations in the years to come.

    (NOAA)

    Researchers from Florida Atlantic University Marine Lab announced warmer nest temperatures in recent years have produced more female hatchlings, some years even recorded no male offspring at all. 

    As the male sea turtle populations continue to decrease, growing disparities in gender could ultimately endanger the species’ existence in the future.

    Our team of meteorologists dives deep into the science of weather and breaks down timely weather data and information. To view more weather and climate stories, check out our weather blogs section.

    [ad_2]

    Meteorologist Shawnie Caslin

    Source link

  • The most sustainable and cost-effective ways to heat your home

    The most sustainable and cost-effective ways to heat your home

    [ad_1]

    Winter just began, and the coldest days of the season are on the horizon. Through much of the country, many will reach to their thermostats to crank up the heat… some places more than others.

    It’s important to know what options work best when it comes to heating your home.


    What You Need To Know

    • A large portion of the country needs to heat their homes in the winter
    • Most American homes are heated by a furnace, boiler or heat pump
    • Electricity and natural gas are the most common fuel sources

    The methods of how we heat our homes range from clean and green to the kind that literally cause smoke to rise out of a chimney.

    However, the most sustainable and cost-effective way to heat a home is subjective. The answer varies from one place to another and comes down to what type of fuel sources are most accessible in that location.

    Weather and climate play a role, too. Colder regions favor certain methods over others and vice versa.

    It all stems from the fuel source

    Electricity and natural gas are, by far, the most common heating fuel sources in the U.S. Other sources include propane, wood and oil.

    According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) 2020 Residential Energy Consumption Survey, about 25% of households in the U.S. rely solely on electricity to heat their homes. Electric heating systems are typically the most eco-friendly, but they often come at a higher cost.

    Of course, it’s hard to pin down exact amounts, since energy prices vary by location and fluctuate over time.

    Electric heating is more suitable across the southern U.S., where winters are usually milder and the demand for heating isn’t as high. Using this fuel source across the northern half of the country where it gets and stays colder for longer can send electricity bills soaring.

    In 2022, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) stated that natural gas was 3.4 times more affordable than electricity, which is why it might be the better option for heating homes in some parts of the country. The EIA’s 2020 Residential Energy Consumption Survey reported over 50% of households in the U.S. used natural gas to heat their homes.

    Even though it might come with a slightly bigger carbon footprint, natural gas is far more cost-effective for many Americans, especially for those living in colder climates such as the Midwest and Northeast.

    (American Gas Association)

    The American Gas Association (AGA) claims that annual energy costs for an all-electric home using a cold-climate heat pump can be roughly 37% higher than a home using natural gas as its source of heating, cooking and drying clothes.

    A home heating oil delivery truck climbs a snow-covered road in the Northeast on Feb. 28, 2023. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)

    On the national scale, oil is not nearly as common as natural gas or electricity. Yet, it was once the most popular fuel in the Northeast, where it is still used in roughly 20% of homes. However, this source of heating is not as environmentally friendly and is often more expensive than electric and natural gas heat.

    The most common heating systems

    The DOE says that most Americans use either a furnace or boiler to heat their home. Both systems can be fueled by natural gas, oil or electricity, but differ in how they provide heat to dwellings.

    The biggest difference between the two is that furnaces heat air, while boilers heat water.

    Over the years, these systems have been improved to be more energy efficient. To see how efficient each furnace or boiler is, the DOE examines its annual fuel utilization efficiency (AFUE).

    The AFUE is essentially a percentage measuring how much fuel gets converted to heat. The higher the percentage, the more efficient the furnace or boiler is.

    1.) Furnaces:

    Most modern homes use a central furnace, which burns a fuel source (either oil or gas) to heat air.

    Technician works on a furnace. (Photo by Natalie Sopyla)

    The heated air then flows through a series of ducts, where it is released through vents in each room. Cooler air in the room is then sucked back through a return vent, then it goes back into the furnace to be reheated.

    This method of heating is fast and energy efficient, which is why most households use it.

    2.) Boilers:

    Radiators and baseboard heaters in older homes provide heat via a boiler. Hot water or steam travels through pipes in the home. When the hot water reaches the radiator or baseboard unit in each room, it releases its heat. The cooled water then flows back to the boiler to be reheated. 

    (Pexels)

    Since water takes longer to heat than air, this method can take longer for a home to reach the desired temperature, and might not be seen as the most efficient way to heat a home.

    That aside, boilers are usually better for people who suffer from indoor allergies, as furnace or forced air systems can blow around dust and pollen particles.

    3.) Heat pumps:

    Heat pumps are becoming more common and provide heat to the majority of homes in the Southeast. This system runs on electricity and does not require a fuel source to provide heat, which can significantly cut electricity costs compared to an electric furnace or boiler.

    Serving as both an air conditioning system and a heating system, heat pumps move warm air out and allow cooler air to flow back into a home during the summer. These systems work in reverse when it gets cold outside, and cooler air is pumped out and warmer air pumped in.

    While heat pumps are energy efficient and work well in milder climates, they are not the best option for areas that experience frequently temperatures below 40 degrees. They simply will struggle to provide enough heat, requiring the need for a secondary heating system.

    Secondary sources of heat

    Residences in colder climates will sometimes need a secondary source to generate heat, especially those that rely on heat pumps as their main system.

    To raise the temperatures up a few degrees, some people use space heaters or wood-burning stoves or fireplaces.

    (Pexels)

    These options are good at providing supplemental heat, but aren’t the best and most sustainable choices to heat a home by themselves.

    Each may be enough to heat one room, but you would need multiple fireplaces, wood-burning stoves or electric space heaters to heat an entire home. If the home is large, you could even need more than one in each room!

    Along with the additional costs associated with plugging in multiple space heaters or purchasing wood to burn, these methods come with fire hazards and can increase indoor pollutants, possibly outweighing their benefits.

    Our team of meteorologists dives deep into the science of weather and breaks down timely weather data and information. To view more weather and climate stories, check out our weather blogs section.

    [ad_2]

    Meteorologist Shawnie Caslin

    Source link