ReportWire

Tag: memoirs

  • Kevin Federline Tells VF He’s “Just Trying to Help” Britney Spears With His New Memoir

    [ad_1]

    It’s not, by any means, the hottest take in the literary world to say, “Gee, a lot of Kevin Federline’s memoir was about Britney Spears, huh?” Federline and Spears married in September 2004 after a whirlwind courtship of just a few months. Two years and two kids later, Spears filed for divorce.

    Federline is now 47 years old, but damn if that brief marriage nearly two decades back doesn’t take up the majority of ink in You Thought You Knew, his new memoir, which hit shelves Tuesday. Not only does the 228-page tome provide plenty of insight into what Federline thinks of his ex-wife’s past and current mental state, it’s a remarkable case study of he-said, she-said hypocrisy. Federline and ghostwriter Alex Holstein, editor-in-chief of boutique publisher Listenin, deliver a tale of a man who feels he’s been wronged by a woman, while engaging in some of the same behaviors he demonizes her for.

    Federline told Vanity Fair that the book in which he accuses his ex-wife of doing hard drugs while breastfeeding their children, shares details of their intimate encounters, and openly questions whether her 13-year legal conservatorship should have been lifted, is in pursuit of a better life for Spears.

    “I’m just trying to help,” he says. “This isn’t about hurting or bringing anybody down. It’s about trying to get to a place where it’s like, come on, there is still a path forward that involves you and the kids and people around you that love you, that want to bridge that gap.”

    It’s OK when Kevin does it—for varying definitions of “it”—but not Britney. Spears published her own New York Times bestselling memoir, The Woman In Me, almost exactly two years ago. Federline makes appearances, though less prominently than the role she plays in his book. Federline says he has read her memoir, but he hesitated when asked if he felt it accurately depicted their time together.

    “Look, I feel like she has the right to tell her story, and I don’t know how accurate all of it was, but I think a lot of people will stay silent on it because they just want to see her get better,” he tells VF. “Like I said, everybody has a right to tell their story.”

    Spears has already publicly pushed back on Federline’s allegations. (He says he hasn’t heard from her directly: “I haven’t spoken to her in years. We haven’t been able to communicate like that for a long time.”) Before the book’s publication date, Spears wrote on X, “The constant gaslighting from ex-husband is extremely hurtful and exhausting. I have always pleaded and screamed to have a life with my boys.” She continued, “Relationships with teenage boys is complex. I have felt demoralized by this situation and have always asked and almost begged for them to be a part of my life.”

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • To Understand the Present, Read These 10 Political Novels from the Past

    [ad_1]

    Fiction has a way of probing the reality of a particular moment in history that you can’t always get from pure fact. Whether it’s a tale of historical fiction or something altogether imagined but imbued with political truth, the best political novels tend to resonate on a deep emotional level, affecting the reader and imparting a sense of the stakes beyond what can be gleaned from mere dates, figures and even the events themselves.

    To that end, here’s a brief list of must-read political novels from the past hundred years that have something vital to impart about the world we live in today. They span a range of countries and contexts, but all address the world’s most looming issues in unique and engaging ways. This list is by no means intended to be comprehensive, so feel free to let us know what essential titles we’ve missed.

    [ad_2]

    Nick Hilden

    Source link

  • Britney Spears’s Ex Kevin Federline Is Still ‘Profiting Off Her’

    [ad_1]

    They’re both authors now.
    Photo: Michael Caulfield/WireImage for Sony BMG Music Entertainment

    Britney Spears doesn’t appreciate her ex-husband Kevin Federline making it sound like she was a “Toxic” parent. In his new memoir, Federline is alleging new disturbing details from Sean Preston and Jayden James’ child, as well as critiquing the #FreeBritney movement. Federline and Spears were married from 2004 to 2007, and during that time they had two children together. Shortly after Federline’s kids aged out of child support age, he’s telling all in a new memoir. Spears is addressing his claims, and what she terms as his “gaslighting.” Here’s everything we thought we knew about Kevin Federline’s You Thought You Knew.

    In his upcoming memoir, You Thought You Knew, out October 21, Federline alleges that Spears sometimes used to watch their sons sleep “with a knife in her hand.”

    Following Spears’s 72-hour involuntary psychiatric hold at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in 2008, which Federline describes in his book as “one of the hardest nights of my life,” he was granted sole custody of Sean and Jayden. Federline suggests in the book that the children had reason to be afraid of staying with Spears, who was placed under a conservatorship after the psychiatric hold. “They would awaken sometimes at night to find her standing silently in the doorway, watching them sleep — ‘Oh, you’re awake?’ — with a knife in her hand,” he alleges, per the New York Times. “Then she’d turn around and pad off without explanation.”

    In the second-to-last chapter of You Thought You Knew, Federline says the #FreeBritney movement “started from a good place,” but argues that Spears’s long-term well-being is now at risk because professionals may fear being vilified if they try to help her. “All those people who put so much effort into that should now put the same energy into the ‘Save Britney’ movement,” he reportedly urges in his writing. “Because this is no longer about freedom. It’s about survival.” According to Federline’s book, he feels like “the clock is ticking” before something bad happens to Spears. Noting that he’s worried about his sons having to deal with the fallout, he called for fans to stand by Spears, Sean, and Jayden. “Now, more than ever, they need your support,” he writes. “I’ve been their buffer for years, but now it’s bigger than me. It’s time to sound the alarm.”

    “With news from Kevin’s book breaking, once again he and others are profiting off her and sadly it comes after child support has ended with Kevin,” a representative for Spears said in a statement to Entertainment Weekly. “All she cares about are her kids, Sean Preston and Jayden James and their well-being during this sensationalism. She detailed her journey in her memoir.” Spears stopped paying child support to Federline last November, the same month that Jayden turned 18 and reportedly reunited with her; Federline has denied to Entertainment Tonight that money “is at the root of” his book.

    Spears also went on Twitter to more personally address what she called “gaslighting” from Federline. “I have always pleaded and screamed to have a life with my boys,” she wrote. “Relationships with teenage boys is complex. I have felt demoralized by this situation and have always asked and almost begged for them to be a part of my life.” According to Spears, her relationship with her children was damaged because they “witnessed the lack of respect shown by own father for me.” She says one child spent 45 minutes with her in the past 5 years, and the other had 4 visits total in that time. “Trust me, those white lies in that book, they are going straight to the bank and I am the only one who genuinely gets hurt here,” she wrote. “ I am actually a pretty intelligent woman who has been trying to live a sacred and private life the past 5 years. I speak on this because I have had enough and any real woman would do the same.”

    This post has been updated.

    [ad_2]

    Jennifer Zhan

    Source link

  • The Many Lives of Danny Rensch

    [ad_1]

    Danny Rensch grew up in a village on the edge of a great forest, in the mountains outside Payson, Arizona. He spent his days with roving packs of children, building forts, playing cops and robbers in the woods, or splashing around in a septic dump, unmindful of the shit and of the bears and javelinas that sometimes came down from the hillsides in search of food and water. When Rensch was nine, he saw a movie, “Searching for Bobby Fischer,” about a boy in New York City who plays chess in a public park with homeless men and discovers that he’s a prodigy. Rensch and his friend Dallas found a cheap chess set and started playing constantly. One day, Dallas took Rensch to play chess with his grandfather Steven Kamp.

    Kamp was not just Dallas’s grandfather; he was the leader of a cult to which almost everyone in the town, Tonto Village, belonged. The members of the Church of Immortal Consciousness, also known as the Collective, followed the teachings of a Dr. Pahlvon Duran, who, they believed, lived the last of his many lifetimes as an Englishman in the fifteenth century. Duran spoke to the Collective through Steven’s wife, Trina, and he preached that the goal of life was to fulfill one’s “Purpose” and to live “in Integrity.” Ego was discouraged. So was private property. Families were moved from house to house, and were sometimes reconfigured, too. Rensch had only recently learned that Dallas was actually his stepbrother.

    Like most of the members of the Collective, Rensch often didn’t have enough to eat. At times, he didn’t have shoes. Kamp had his own house. He had Cheerios and cigars. He also had books about chess and his own wooden set. He had been following the world championship in New York between Garry Kasparov and Viswanathan Anand. Kamp, a good chess player, saw that Rensch had talent. “Chess made me special,” Rensch writes, in “Dark Squares,” his new memoir, “and to be special in the eyes of Steven Kamp is to be special in the eyes of God.”

    Chess has been viewed as a measure of intellectual potential for centuries, and Kamp was eager not only to promote the Church of Immortal Consciousness but to dispel the notion that it was a death cult or a dangerous militia group. What if he could boost the profile of the Collective with a successful chess team? The group’s children were in a unique position to undertake such a project. They shared a sense of common mission, instilled in them by Kamp. Traditional schooling was easily ignored. And chess could become a means to privileges: trips to McDonald’s and Taco Bell and out-of-town tournaments.

    The kids played for hours every day, with a sense of freedom, and, for a time at least, they had a lot of fun. In 1996, the Shelby School—an unchartered charter in a tiny town on an Arizona mountainside, which the kids attended—placed fourth at the national elementary-school championships, conducted by the United States Chess Federation. In 1997, the school won the U.S.C.F. Super Nationals scholastic championship. In 1998, it won the national elementary-school championship, the K-9 championship, and finished in the top fifteen of the K-12 championship, despite not having any high schoolers. “Cults work,” Rensch writes. “Until they don’t.” Rensch won the national elementary-school championship that year. Trina, channelling Duran, told Rensch that chess was his Purpose.

    For a time, Rensch was moved to a house that the Collective owned in Phoenix, to be near the city’s chess club, a hangout for oddballs, chess enthusiasts, and one honest-to-God chess genius, a raging alcoholic named Igor Ivanov, who’d defected from the U.S.S.R. and suffered the usual deprivations of a vagabond professional chess player. Ivanov became Rensch’s personal coach. Most mornings, Rensch would find the man sprawled naked on a bed, and would dutifully fix him the day’s first screwdriver. After Rensch’s rise in the game slowed, when he was fourteen, he was taken from his mother and installed in the home of Kamp’s right-hand man—who happened to be Rensch’s biological father, and who seemed to harbor no feeling for him. Kamp told him this was all for the good of his Purpose.

    Rensch’s Purpose, according to Kamp, wasn’t just to play chess. It wasn’t even to become a grand master, though that was the marker of his ambition. His Purpose was to save chess. Doing so, as Rensch puts it in his book, “would prove to the world that [Kamp’s] spiritual vision held the key to understanding human nature and the meaning of life.” Rensch was convinced. “I believed it because I was a child and it’s what I’d been raised to believe,” he writes. But he also wanted to do it for his own reasons. He wanted to make the game seem fun and normal, not “dysfunctional and weird.” He wanted to make it so that the pinnacle of chess achievement didn’t look like tormented, self-destructive figures such as Ivanov but a guy like him, Danny Rensch.

    At the age of eighteen, not long after winning the national high-school chess championship, Rensch’s eardrums exploded on a flight on the way home from a tournament. He tried to return to serious competitive chess in his early twenties, but it was becoming clear that his progress had stalled and his goal of becoming a grand master, let alone a top one, was fading. By then, he was married—in the Collective, early marriages were common—and had two kids. (He and his wife, Shauna, eventually had two more.) He was still driven by a belief in his chosen status, but his life was a mess. He began to make a little money coaching chess. He also started drinking, taking painkillers, suffering from panic attacks, and compulsively buying up chess domain names: chessface.com, chesscoachlive.com, and so on. The one he wanted, Chess.com, was already taken. But, at a tournament in 2008, he met the guys who owned it—Erik Allebest and Jay Severson—and badgered them into giving him a job. Only later did he realize that he was lucky that he didn’t badger them out of one.

    Maybe they were lucky, too. In 2010, they created ChessTV, with Rensch as its star. I first encountered Rensch in 2016, on a Chess.com YouTube show called “ChessCenter.” My boyfriend, now my husband, had introduced me to the game, and I’d quickly become obsessed, waking up at 4 A.M. to play on my phone. Some couples watch Netflix together; we watched Sicilian Defense instructional videos. We also tuned into live streams of pro tournaments, and we caught up on news by watching “ChessCenter,” which was a little like ESPN’s “SportsCenter,” if “SportsCenter” ’s soundstage was the walk-in closet of a law office in Payson.

    [ad_2]

    Louisa Thomas

    Source link

  • Presley Memoir

    Presley Memoir

    [ad_1]

    Photo: Dimitrios Kambouris/WireImage

    “It’s difficult to go about your day without hearing an Elvis song out in the world,” Riley Keough writes in her new memoir, From Here to the Great Unknown, which she co-authored with her late mother, Lisa Marie Presley. That may sound like an obvious statement, but it’s a true one: For decades, the tragedy and mythology of rock-and-roll legend Elvis Presley — what he ate, who he loved, what he was like — have felt like they belonged to his fans just as much as they did the Presley family. When Lisa Marie Presley died in the winter of 2023, she’d last been publicly seen at the Golden Globes with her children, there to promote Baz Luhrmann’s Elvis. A few days later, she was gone.

    From Here to the Great Unknown tells Lisa Marie’s story through two voices: her own and that of Keough, who was helping her mother go through tapes and write the memoir at the time of her death. Keough weaves both voices together in a dual narrative demarcated by type: Lisa Marie’s words are in a serif font, and her own are sans serif. (It’s a little unusual at first, though easy to understand in context.) What emerges is less of a retelling of Presley’s life — though there is plenty of that — and more of a conversation between mother and daughter about parents and children, what we expect of those who raise us and what they impart to us when they leave.

    The memoir lays out an introspective therapy session between mother and daughter, something more intimate than the usual Presley-industrial complex offerings. Stories narrated regaled by Lisa Marie, spoken aloud into tapes, now have an audience. When Presley details the sexual abuse she allegedly endured from Priscilla Presley’s boyfriend Michael Edwards, Keough allows the story to stand in full before writing: “Hearing my mother describe these incidents broke my heart. I know what happened was one of her deepest childhood traumas but I don’t think she — or any of us who knew her — fully considered how it may have contributed to some of the fundamental feelings she carried, like shame and self-hatred.”

    Having Keough’s response contextualizes her mother’s pain: Lisa Marie is telling this story to not just us but those closest to her. In the abstract, writing a book can feel like shouting into a void, but in the case of From Here to the Great Unknown, Keough is always listening on the other side. Sometimes, she’s there to correct the record: When Lisa Marie suggests that she got pregnant with Keough by her then-boyfriend Danny Keough, she says she didn’t “mean to” trap him with a baby. Keough herself writes: “My mom subsequently told me every detail of timing her ovulation for that moment in Aruba. And she absolutely meant to trap my dad.” Keough’s responses are rarely, if ever, judgmental; she’s more keen to explain that this is just the person her mother was, a reflection of her own upbringing. The Presleys and Keoughs exist within their own context. For all that they’ve been subject to tabloid-magazine covers and public speculation, these are the people who’ve grappled with these myths hanging over their heads.

    The early stretches of the memoir are told in detailed ramblings, but as the chronology progresses, Lisa Marie’s dispatches grow shorter and shorter. “I don’t know who I am,” Presley writes. “I never really got the chance to uncover my own identity. I didn’t have a family. I didn’t have a childhood, and though some of it was fun, there was also constant trouble.” Although the last 15 years of her life were marked by addiction and grief — Lisa Marie’s only son, and Keough’s younger brother, Ben, died in 2020 — what Keough proves through her writing is that Lisa Marie, though she did not know it, did have a family. She did have her own identity. “Where there are gaps in her story, I fill them in,” Keough writes. Even when things spiraled out, there was room for a family vacation to Hawaii or a trip to England to catch up with friends. “Despite all this love she had inside her, and all her effort to live, we could all see it. We could all feel it coming,” Keough notes. The final years of Lisa Marie’s life feel — through both their writings — like a horrible inevitability.

    The book concludes at Graceland, the Memphis estate and museum where Elvis lived, where both Lisa Marie and her son, Ben, are buried along with her father. In May 2024, Keough fought against Graceland’s foreclosure and won, though she’s still seeking control of the estate after a loan Lisa Marie took out on the property was never paid back. Despite the ongoing struggle to keep Graceland with the Presley family, much of the press for From Here to the Great Unknown has been centered there. Keough sat down with Oprah Winfrey, both clad in white, in Elvis’s white living room, and the estate itself is selling an exclusive copy with a signed lithograph from Keough. With the book now out in the world, the story of the Presley family goes back to the people — to consume, to speculate about, to admonish or worship — but the dialogue between Presley and Keough, as a daughter finds her mother in transcription, stays bound between its covers, going back and forth until the end.

    [ad_2]

    Fran Hoepfner

    Source link

  • Melania Trump’s Publisher Demanded $250,000 From CNN for an Interview About Her Book: Report

    Melania Trump’s Publisher Demanded $250,000 From CNN for an Interview About Her Book: Report

    [ad_1]

    Melania Trump’s memoir, Melania, will be released next week, a newsworthy event given her status as both a former and possibly future first lady. That means media outlets will want to cover the book and, if they can, score an interview with the author. CNN, for example, reportedly reached out to Trump’s publisher two months ago to request an interview, and after “several exchanges” about one, it appeared it might actually happen—if the organization was willing to cough up a quarter of a million dollars.

    Yes, CNN reports that last week, Trump’s publisher, Skyhorse Publishing, emailed a document marked “Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Agreement.” The agreement, per the outlet, “laid out strict terms for an interview and use of material from the book,” and “On top of that, the agreement stipulated that ‘CNN shall pay a licensing fee of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000).’” The document, CNN reports, specified that “the payment would be for an interview with a media company—CNN—as well as for licensing photos and excerpts from the book.”

    After a reporter from the media organization asked the company about the highly unusual fee, the publisher claimed it was a mistake. “Neither Melania nor anyone from her team knew anything about the NDA and the document that was sent reflected an internal miscommunication,” Skyhorse’s president and publisher told CNN. “Had CNN signed an NDA, in the normal course of business, we would have approached Melania’s team to discuss [specifics of the interview].”

    As CNN notes, it is absolutely not standard practice for a public figure to be paid for an interview—especially one who is the spouse of a political candidate—and newsrooms “tend to have strict guidelines against” doing so. And while Skyhorse has insisted that the former first lady knew nothing of the request, the figure initially demanded just so happens to be in the exact same ballpark as fees she has been paid in the past:

    Last month, CNN revealed that the former first lady spoke at two political fundraisers for the Log Cabin Republicans this year, and she was paid $237,500 for an April event, according to former president Donald Trump’s latest financial disclosure form. The payment was listed as a “speaking engagement.”

    Records show Melania Trump was also paid $250,000 for a [Log Cabin Republicans] event in December 2022, one of three payments for $250,000 or more that she received for speaking that month, just after the former president announced he was running for reelection, according to Donald Trump’s prior-year financial disclosure form.

    Regarding the $250,000 request made to CNN, journalist Kate Andersen Brower, author of First Women: The Grace and Power of America’s Modern First Ladies, told the outlet, “It’s totally unprecedented. No former first lady has ever done that.”

    Paying for an interview “incentivizes the subject to alter what they’re saying to make it more valuable to the organization, to exaggerate or sensationalize,” Kelly McBride, senior vice president and chair of the Craig Newmark Center for Ethics and Leadership at the Poynter Institute, told CNN. “Your goal when you interview people is to bring their perspective in so you can get closer to the truth, and if they have some sort of incentive to distort that you are failing your audience.” She added, “It’s super suspect that a political figure’s spouse would want to be paid for something.”

    A spokesperson for Melania Trump declined CNN’s request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Bess Levin

    Source link

  • Britney Spears Vows to “Never Return to the Music Industry”

    Britney Spears Vows to “Never Return to the Music Industry”

    [ad_1]

    Being a fan of Britney Spears has always been full of twists and turns, a rollercoaster of “what’s going on?” set to catchy tunes. While it’s a perpetual mystery what she’ll get up to next, Spears herself has confirmed one thing she won’t be doing, via an Instagram caption Wednesday evening: Recording a comeback album.

    “Just so we’re clear most of the news is trash !!! They keep saying I’m turning to random people to do a new album … I will never return to the music industry !!!” she wrote alongside a portion of Guido Reni’s 17th-century painting Salomè con la testa del Battista (Salome with the Head of John the Baptist), depicting a woman holding a platter with the decapitated head of John the Baptist. Vivid!

    Spears’ adamant statement comes on the heels of reports, attributed to “unnamed sources,” that musical heavy hitters like Charli XCX and Julia Michaels had been recruited to collaborate with Spears on a comeback album. The singer’s most recent full-length studio album, Glory, was released in 2016.

    In her recently released memoir, The Woman In Me, the audiobook of which was narrated by Michelle Williams, Spears discussed the trauma of her legal conservatorship from 2008 to 2021 and being forced to perform onstage, whether she wanted to or not. Her relationship with music, and to sharing it with the world, was altered.

    “Pushing forward in my music career is not my focus at the moment,” she wrote in the memoir. She called recording the single “Hold Me Closer” with Elton John a “fantastic experience” and said that it “didn’t feel good—it felt great.” In a post days after the memoir’s release, Spears shared that she’d written a new song, evidently titled “Hate You to Like Me,” though no recording or lyrics have yet surfaced. (She shared the news with a photo of herself “giving ego with my eyes closed because I hear important people do that these days.”)

    “It’s time for me not to be someone who other people want; it’s time to actually find myself,” she wrote in her memoir.

    Spears, in her latest missive, claims to be living and loving the ghostwriter life for other artists.

    “When I write, I write for fun or I write for other people !!!” her caption continued. “For those of you who have read my book, there’s loads that you don’t know about me … I’ve written over 20 songs for other people the past two years !!! I’m a ghostwriter and I honestly enjoy it that way !!!”

    An unnamed source “close to Spears’ project-in-the-works” told Rolling Stone, however, that executives had in fact brought on Charli XCX and other talent in hopes of tempting Spears back into the recording studio.

    “Right now, management and A&R are trying to get her excited for the music,” the source said. “As of right now, she’s not actively in recording but they’re getting [songs] done to present to her.”

    “Nothing is cemented or in stone,” the source continued. “The hype around this is that everyone wants her to make music again, but I don’t know if she’s there yet.”

    Representatives for Britney Spears did not immediately return a request for comment.

    [ad_2]

    Kase Wickman

    Source link

  • David Anthony Rooney Unveils His Book, 'Journey Through Anxiety: A Troubadour's Tale'

    David Anthony Rooney Unveils His Book, 'Journey Through Anxiety: A Troubadour's Tale'

    [ad_1]

    Renowned singer/songwriter David Anthony Rooney, an Emmy Award-winning and Guinness World Record-breaking musician and filmmaker, takes readers on an intimate exploration of his three-decade-long battle with anxiety in his newly released book, “Journey Through Anxiety: A Troubadour’s Tale.”

    In this authentic and gripping memoir, Rooney invites readers into the depths of his personal struggles with anxiety, offering a raw and honest account of his journey toward triumph. The book, now available on Amazon, has already garnered acclaim for its genuine portrayal of the human experience.

    Rooney, a captivating performer who has held a nightly residency at Mandalay Bay on the Las Vegas Strip for the past decade, uses his platform to shed light on mental health issues. A staunch supporter and speaker on the subject, he brings his insights and experiences to the forefront in “Journey Through Anxiety,” aiming to provide positive reinforcement to those grappling with this pervasive affliction.

    Readers have hailed the book as “Authentically Inspiring,” “Life Changing,” and a “Real Human Experience.” Rooney’s narrative not only chronicles his personal triumph but also serves as a call to arms for those facing similar challenges.

    With a reputation for vocal prowess and songwriting excellence, Rooney brings his signature genuine, honest, and humorous touch to the written word. The book stands as a testament to his multifaceted talents, resonating with audiences around the world.

    “Journey Through Anxiety: A Troubadour’s Tale” is not just a book; it is a beacon of hope and understanding in a world grappling with mental health issues. Rooney’s poignant storytelling and uplifting message make this a must-read for anyone seeking inspiration and connection.

    David Anthony Rooney, an award-winning singer/songwriter originally from Dublin, Ireland, has captivated audiences worldwide with his vocal prowess and songwriting talent since the mid-’90s. Beyond his musical achievements, Rooney is an Emmy Award-winning filmmaker, a Guinness World Record breaker, and a passionate advocate for mental health. “Journey Through Anxiety: A Troubadour’s Tale” marks his debut as an author, bringing a powerful and much-needed message of resilience and triumph in the face of anxiety.

    To purchase the book, visit Amazon at https://www.amazon.com/Journey-Through-Anxiety-Troubadours-Tale/dp/B0CNH26WX2/. For additional information about the author, his speaking, and programs, go to his website at https://daverooneyspeaker.com. Follow Dave on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100068690732961, on Instagram at https://www.instagram.com/daverooneyspeaker, and on TikTok at https://www.tiktok.com/@daverooneyspeaker. For media inquiries, interviews or review copies, please contact Dave Rooney at connect@daverooneyspeaker.

    Source: Dave Rooney

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Inside Barbra Streisand’s World

    Inside Barbra Streisand’s World

    [ad_1]

    “This is the opening of a film about Sarah Bernhardt, if I could get anyone to do it,” she says, drawing her hand through the air. “You start on a mirror, and the hand comes in the frame, and someone is trying to put on the eyeliner and it’s smudging. You have to erase it and start again. You don’t even know who it is.”

    We’ve been talking about makeup. For most of her career—from her nightclub gigs when she was 18 right through to her major films—Barbra Streisand did her own. At first because there was no one else to do it, and then because no one could do it better. In her autobiography, My Name Is Barbra, out November 7, she tells the story of her film test for Funny Girl. The makeup people came to attend to her, and she thought, “Great, they’re the experts. Let’s see what they can do.” But she didn’t love the result. “I said, ‘Thank you very much,’ ” Streisand writes, “but then I asked, ‘Would it be all right if we also did a test with just me making myself up?’ The studio said, ‘Fine.’ ”

    A previously unpublished photograph of Barbra Streisand, by Richard Avedon, photographed on April 1, 1970. Hair by Anna Gallant; styled by Polly Mellen. With special thanks to the Richard Avedon Foundation.© COPYRIGHT RICHARD AVEDON FOUNDATION.

    The cinematographer picked Streisand’s.

    Streisand is 81 now, and though her hands remain steady, she finds it harder to achieve that straight line across the eyelid. That’s the genesis of the Sarah Bernhardt idea—Bernhardt at an older age, still potent, still inimitable. “You know, she played Juliet when she was 74,” she says.

    I am at Streisand’s house in Malibu in July, two days before the Screen Actors Guild declares a strike, to talk to her about her book. I’m one of only a handful of people who’ve read it at this point.

    My Name Is Barbra is 992 pages of startling honesty and self-reflection, deadpan parenthetical asides (including a running bit about how much she loves going to the dentist), encyclopedic recall of onstage outfits, and rigorous analyses of her films, many of which she rewatched for the first time in decades. There’s the chilling story, which she’s never told before, of the origins of her legendary stage fright. There’s her hilarious opening line to James Brolin, who she’s been with for 27 years. There’s a page and a half correcting the record on the Streisand Effect, a term that refers to the way efforts to minimize a story can backfire, generating exponentially more press; it derives from legal action she took against a person who publicized the location of her home. (More on all this later.) There’s no index, so would-be browsers can’t cheat. A genius move—was it her choice? She laughs. Absolutely. If she could plug away for 10 years writing this exhaustive, exhilarating account of her life—leaving blood on the page, per her editor’s request—then we can do her the courtesy of reading it from start to finish.

    In 1984, Jackie Onassis, then an editor at Doubleday, invited Streisand to write a memoir. She turned the offer down: “Frankly, I thought at 42 I was too young, with much more work still to come.” (She wasn’t wrong, but for those keeping score, she had already won an honorary Tony, two Oscars, one Emmy, and seven Grammys.) Still, she started making notes, and in 1999 began keeping a journal, longhand. “I never learned to type,” she says, an act of defiance against her mother, who wanted her to pursue a career in school administration so that she’d have summers off. Instead, Streisand grew out her nails, precluding secretarial work, and—just to put a point on it—became a supernova.

    [ad_2]

    Radhika Jones

    Source link