Beyoncé makes an unexpected cameo via text message in the final episode of Harry & Meghan, the Netflix documentary series telling the story of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. The episode dives into what happened after Meghan and Harry opened up to Oprah in a March 2021 interview, following the couple the next day as they deal with the aftermath. The pair are sitting side by side when Meghan mentions that people have been reaching out all day, and she just got a text from Beyoncé.
Harry gasps. “Shut up!” he says theatrically.
Meghan, a longtime fan of the singer, expresses some dismay. “I still can’t believe she knows who I am.” Then Meghan paraphrases the text out loud. “She said she wants me to feel safe and protected. She admires my bravery and vulnerability and thinks I was selected to break generational curses that need to be healed.”
Beyoncé first expressed her affection for Meghan when she and Jay-Z displayed a portrait of Meghan in the background as they accepted the BRIT Award for their song “Apeshit” in February 2019. Then, in July, the two couples met in person at the London premiere of The Lion King. During that meeting, Jay-Z reportedly said, “The best advice I can give you: always find time for yourself.”
Though Meghan shared the text message from Beyoncé and the cameras also captured her talking to Tyler Perry after the interview, one communiqué is only mentioned and not revealed. Harry notes that he just got a text from Prince William, later in the day after William told a reporter that he would be reaching out.
Listen to Vanity Fair’s DYNASTY podcast now.
Content
This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.
LONDON — Prince Harry and his wife, Meghan, are expected to vent their grievances against the British monarchy on Thursday, when Netflix releases the final episodes of a series about the couple’s decision to step away from royal duties and make a new start in America.
After the first three installments of “Harry & Meghan” focused on the British media’s coverage of the couple and the way it was influenced by racism, California-based streaming giant Netflix promoted the latest episodes with a trailer in which Harry alleges the couple were victims of “institutional gaslighting.”
“They were happy to lie to protect my brother,” Harry says in the trailer, referring to Prince William, the heir to the throne. “They were never willing to tell the truth to protect us.”
While it is unclear who “they” are, the trailer suggests a combination of the media and palace officials are the most likely alleged culprits. The quote is delivered over a shot of Buckingham Palace and video of William and Harry walking side-by-side during the funeral of their grandfather, Prince Philip, in April 2021.
The potentially explosive new episodes come at a crucial moment for the monarchy as King Charles III tries to show that the institution remains alive and vibrant after the death of Queen Elizabeth II, whose personal popularity damped criticism of the crown during her 70-year reign. Charles is making the case that the House of Windsor can help unite an increasingly diverse nation by personally meeting with representatives of the ethnic groups and faiths that make up modern Britain — trying to show that whatever the allegations against him, the reality is different.
Pauline Maclaran, author of “Royal Fever: The British Monarchy in Consumer Culture,” said the royal family are likely to be awaiting the final three episodes with “bated breath” after the first three contained few direct attacks on the institution.
“It’s very provocative and looks like there’s kind of a war being declared,” she said ahead of the release. “But let’s wait and see.”
Harry’s 2018 marriage to the former Meghan Markle, a biracial American actress, was once seen as a public relations coup for the royal family, boosting the monarchy’s effort to move into the 21st century by making it more representative of a multicultural nation. But the fairy tale, punctuated with a horse-drawn carriage ride and massive wedding at Windsor Castle, soon unraveled amid relentless media attention, including allegations that Meghan was self-centered and bullied her staff.
“I wasn’t being thrown to the wolves, I was being fed to the wolves,” Meghan says in one clip included in the trailer.
The series is Harry and Meghan’s latest effort to tell their own story after the couple stepped back from royal life in early 2020 and moved to the wealthy Southern California enclave of Montecito. Their life on an estate overlooking the Pacific Ocean has been partly funded by lucrative contracts with Netflix and Spotify.
The first three episodes featured extensive comments from Harry and Meghan, alongside interviews with friends and allies, as well as experts on race and racism in British society. There were no comments from the newspapers mentioned.
Race became a central issue for the monarchy following Harry and Meghan’s interview with Oprah Winfrey in March 2021. Meghan alleged that before their first child was born, a member of the royal family commented on how dark the baby’s skin might be.
Prince William defended the royal family after the interview, telling reporters, “We’re very much not a racist family.”
Buckingham Palace faced renewed allegations of racism earlier this month when a Black advocate for survivors of domestic abuse said a senior member of the royal household interrogated her about her origins during a reception at the palace. Coverage of the issue filled British media, overshadowing William and his wife Kate’s much-anticipated visit to Boston, which the palace had hoped would highlight their environmental credentials.
The Netflix series is problematic for the palace because Harry and Meghan are appealing to the same younger, more culturally diverse demographic that William and Kate are trying to win over, Maclaran said.
“I think, it has to be worrying for the royal family in terms of their future, because they really need to get this young generation on their side, to an extent, if they’re going to survive,’’ she said. “They will have to make a very big effort to make themselves appear more diverse, and I think we do see that happening a little bit, but not enough.”
The final three episodes of the series are set to drop on Thursday, with their contents teased in a new clip that dropped on Monday.
In it, Harry is seen celebrating on what he calls a “freedom flight” – presumably as he and Meghan left the U.K. for the U.S. – before he calls out “institutional gaslighting.”
“I wonder what would have happened to us had we not got out when we did,” he begins.
Harry is then heard saying: “They were happy to lie to protect my brother. They were never willing to tell the truth to protect us.”
Meghan also says: “I wasn’t being thrown to the wolves, I was being fed to the wolves.”
The trailer highlights the couple’s new beginnings in the U.S., with Meghan noting how the move had given them “a chance to create that home that we had always wanted.”
“I’ve always felt that this was a fight worth fighting for,” Harry adds.
Prince William, the Prince of Wales.
Max Mumby/Indigo via Getty Images
The “unprecedented and in-depth” docuseries, directed by Oscar-nominated Liz Garbus, was billed as a Netflix global event, with Harry and Meghan sharing “the other side of their high-profile love story.”
Netflix and the royal family later clashed over whether the institution had been contacted for comment on the series, as a statement that opens the show claims.
A royal source told HuffPost that Netflix made no attempt to contact members of the royal household, Kensington Palace or Buckingham Palace.
However, a Netflix source insisted to HuffPost that both King Charles and Prince William’s offices were contacted and were given time to respond ahead of the docuseries release.
The first three episodes of Harry & Meghan are available on Netflix now, with the final three dropping on Thursday.
Over the last five years, Meghan Markle has become a weirdly divisive figure in media, especially in the UK. But few things prove exactly how deep these divisions go like the reaction to the first three episodes of Harry & Meghan, her Netflix documentary series with Prince Harry. In these early episodes, the couple has avoided causing drama so completely that one common line of attack is aimed at Netflix for paying millions for something so boring.
Still, controversies have arisen; notably, one moment that has come under scrutiny in the British press is when Meghan and Harry discuss her first meeting with the late queen. ITV’s Chris Shiptweeted out the scene along with a fairly neutral description of what happens in it. “Meghan describes meeting the late Queen Elizabeth for the first time and how she did not understand why she needed to curtsy to Harry’s grandmother,” he wrote. “He looks a little uncomfortable about the whole thing.”
To me, an American in my early 30s, Ship’s description of the scene, while not incorrect, doesn’t sum up the nuances of the joke, which is clearly that Meghan is theatrically exaggerating her own unfamiliarity with the realities of being around the royals. She is the butt of the joke here, not the queen or even royal protocol. The scene is presented about 36 minutes into the second episode of the series, serving as an illustration of Meghan’s excitement and early discomfort while integrating into Harry’s family.
The story begins with Harry’s recollection. “My grandmother was the first senior member of the family that Meghan met,” he says. “She had no idea what it all consisted of. It was a bit of a shock to the system for her.”
Meghan continues: “I mean, it’s surreal. There wasn’t, like, some big moment of, ‘Now you’re gonna meet my grandmother.’ I didn’t know I was going to meet her until moments before. We were in the car and we were going to Royal Lodge for lunch. And he was like, ‘Oh, my grandmother is here. She’s going to be there after church.’ I remember, we were in the car, driving, and he’s like, ‘You know how to curtsy, right?’ And I just thought it was a joke.”
Harry explains that there is something sensitive about introducing someone to this part of his life. “How do you explain that to people, that you bow to your grandmother and that you would need to curtsy, especially to an American? That’s weird,” he says.
But Meghan eventually embraces the challenge. “Now I’m starting to realize this is a big deal. I mean, Americans would understand this. We have Medieval Times Dinner & Tournament,” Meghan says, emphasizing the name of the restaurant in a theatrical bellow. “It was like that. Like, I curtsied as though I was like…” She pauses to curtsy dramatically, but she’s sitting, so she is almost falling off of the couch.
She comes back up and says, “Pleasure to meet you, Your Majesty,” with the awkward smile of a people pleaser, adding, “Like, was that okay?” At first, Harry does look pretty confused—I think he might not get the joke she’s making—but he cracks a smile as she comes back up with her huge grin.
I think it’s important to point out that she is not saying that the practice is “medieval,” as in outdated or cruel, as various reports have implied. She’s referring to the Texas-based chain of dinner theater restaurants with 11 locations across North America, where actors and circus performers dressed in garb that hearkens back to the Middle Ages perform for patrons as they eat a four-course meal of garlic bread, soup, roasted chicken, and dessert. Medieval Times Dinner & Tournament is not at all historically accurate, and I have never been, so I can’t testify to its quality. But it looms large in the American psyche, perhaps because it is such a perfect encapsulation of what American commerce can do with even the strangest source material. (It was also in headlines recently because groups of performers from the Lyndhurst, New Jersey, and California outposts have unionized.)
In this scene, Meghan is describing how she learned, in real time, that most of her knowledge of the way things work with royalty was secondhand, and in her eagerness to please Harry and the late queen, she overdid her first real curtsy. She’s doing a slapstick bit to say she had a deep understanding of the importance of meeting the queen, but a shallow understanding of how to properly do the thing that demonstrates it. To me, it’s hilarious, and it’s made even funnier by the fact that, as Meghan expects with the “Americans would get this” preface, her British husband has no idea what she is trying to say, until he sees the grin on her face and gets the gist.
The first volume of the docuseries launched on the streaming platform Thursday, taking the British media to task for what the Duke and Duchess of Sussex say is racist, intruding and unkind coverage of Markle over the years — and it’s sent many of the tabloid newspapers into overdrive.
Britain’s press did not hold back their outrage Friday, clearly taking umbrage with the televised dressing-down.
While none of the major tabloids used their front pages to address the specific claims levelled at them, some splashed angry headlines attacking the couple and channelling their ire into unflattering screengrabs from the series.
Story continues below advertisement
The Daily Mail’s headline accused the couple of an “assault on the queen’s legacy,” and cited palace insiders who claim “it’s as if” the Sussexes “want to bring down the monarchy.”
The series, so far, takes a deep dive into the toxic but symbiotic relationship between the palace and the press. The palace relies on the media to share its messaging, but the tabloid newspapers also feel entitled to publish intimate (and sometimes false) stories about members of the Royal Family, since British taxpayers fund their lives.
This unwritten contract, Harry and Markle explain, often leaves members of the Royal Family feeling as though they have to “perform” for the media — they call it a “we pay, you pose” arrangement.
The Daily Express accused Harry of hurling “slurs” that it claims have made members of the Royal Family “deeply upset.”
So far, for the record, neither the palace nor any senior members of the family have officially commented on the contents of the documentary. They royals are notoriously tight-lipped, and it’s generally accepted protocol that they rarely publicly respond to matters of the press or politics.
Story continues below advertisement
Front page: So hurtful! Royals ‘deeply upset’ by Harry’s slurs #TomorrowsPaperToday
The Mirror went a different direction, leading with the documentary but chastizing all parties — it included a photo of the Sussexes as well as a photo of Prince William and Kate Middleton — for sparring while the British people endure a cost-of-living crisis. “Meanwhile, thousands of ordinary Brits are choosing between heating and eating,” the subhead read.
Even the broadsheet newspapers, like The Guardian and The Times of London, featured the Sussexes on their front pages, though their coverage was decidedly less sensational and focused more on the series’ content than reaction.
Guardian front page, Monday 5 December 2022: ‘Sicker and poorer’: report reveals Britain’s widening health divide pic.twitter.com/j94txZzfBJ
Meanwhile, royal experts, critics and columnists across the U.K. have been offering their takes on the series, ranging from anger to pure indifference.
Nick Bullen, editor-in-chief of True Royalty TV, told Reuters it was the most “self-serving piece of television” he had seen in quite a while, describing it as more like a reality show than a documentary.
Lester Holloway, editor of The Voice, Britain’s only Black national newspaper, was more impressed, calling it a “love story” which talked about the struggles and challenges they have faced as a couple and their battles with the media.
Key takeaways from Harry and Meghan’s explosive new doc series
Other critics found it a satisfying glimpse into the private lives of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
“Does Meghan and Harry’s Netflix documentary live up to its no-holds-barred expectations?” wrote Jessie Thompson from British newspaper The Independent. “Well, within the first five minutes we’ve seen a makeup-less Meghan, hair wrapped in a towel, crying into her phone camera — so I’m going to say yes.”
Bob Seely, a lawmaker with the governing Conservative Party, said he would try to introduce a bill in Parliament to strip the couple of their royal titles, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Seely said Prince Harry was attacking important British institutions, “as well as trashing his family and monetizing his misery for public consumption.”
Employment Minister Guy Opperman branded the couple “utterly irrelevant” in an interview with BBC and urged people “to boycott Netflix and make sure that we actually focus on the things that matter.”
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex on a walkabout at Trinity College during their visit to Dublin, Ireland.
Joe Giddens / Getty Images
King Charles declined to comment on the series during public engagements in London on Thursday or during a visit Friday to Welsh soccer club Wrexham AFC, where he met the team’s owners, Hollywood actors Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney.
Story continues below advertisement
King Charles III and Camilla, Queen Consort, meet with co-owners of Wrexham AFC, Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney, during their visit to Wrexham Association Football Club (AFC) on Thursday in Wrexham, Wales.
Arthur Edwards / Getty Images
Both said they had not watched the series, with McElhenney joking, “I’ve never heard of it.”
— With files from The Associated Press and Reuters
“It’s a family at the end of the day, and for Harry and Meghan to once again be airing their grievances in public, it’s hurtful. I just don’t see how the Sussexes can come back from this,” said one family friend, adding that the absence of titles for the couple’s children, Archie and Lilibet, who are technically a prince and princess now that Charles is king, is no coincidence. Added the source: “A lot rests on what Harry and Meghan say next. There is actually more concern over Harry’s book and what he alleges in that, as that is likely to be far more intimate and personal about his life and growing up royal than the TV show.”
Doria Ragland, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
By BEN STANSALL/ Getty Images.
While Meghan’s relationship with her family was covered in great detail in the first three episodes of the show, there was very little about Harry’s relationship with his own family. Other than Harry’s suggestion that his father and brother married women who fit “the mold,” Charles was largely absent from the first half of the show, with the couple instead focusing on Diana, who was prominently featured.
According to one former courtier, “The fact that Harry has made Diana so central to his narrative will I’m sure be upsetting for William. William is Diana’s son too, and for Harry to compare Meghan to Diana is quite insensitive.”
Paul Burrell, Diana’s former butler, added, “I knew Diana very well, and she and Meghan were very different women, although it’s interesting that Harry met Meghan when she was 36, the age Diana died. Diana would not approve of what Harry is doing to the monarchy, and she would be devastated by the rift between the brothers.”
It is a rift that looks set to deepen rather than heal, with Harry claiming that there is a “huge level of unconscious bias” within the royal family. There was no mention of Charles’s years of work promoting race tolerance and interfaith relations in Britain, and while the couple did not directly accuse the royal family of racism, as they did during their Oprah interview, the undertones were there, with Harry saying he had “sleepwalked” through most of his adult life when it came to race and that he would always regret the occasion when he wore a Nazi costume to a fancy dress party. Pointedly, he made no mention of the time he used a highly offensive word to describe a Pakistani fellow soldier when he was training at Sandringham.
The first half of the Harry & Meghan docuseries — consisting of three episodes released in Thursday’s early-morning hours — doesn’t take any major jabs at the Royal Family, but instead offers an in-depth criticism of the U.K.’s tabloid newspapers. It delivers on the Netflix promise of a series that “explores…the challenges that led (Markle and Harry to feel) forced to step back from their full-time roles in the institution.”
Viewers are given perspectives from Harry, Markle and their inner circle of friends and colleagues. But anyone holding their breath for salacious stories or gossip about the inner workings of Britain’s most influential family will have to hold on until the next three episodes are released on Dec. 15 — if those type of stories are told at all.
Much of the docuseries, so far, goes deeper into topics addressed in last year’s interview with Oprah Winfrey, including Markle’s difficult transition into life as a royal, the unfortunate fallout with certain members of her own family and the ruthlessness of the U.K.’s tabs.
Instead of a hit job on the Royal Family, as some expected, viewers are given a more intimate, albeit entirely uncritical, look at how Harry and Markle have navigated their relationship — from the beginning of their secret courtship to glimpses of their current life in Montecito, California.
From the couple’s meeting to surprise guest interviews and the drama that unfolded during the early days of their relationship, here are five of the top moments from the first volume of Harry & Meghan.
Markle’s mom, Doria, speaks out for the first time
The world caught glimpses of Doria Ragland accompanying her daughter during her 2018 wedding to Harry, but up until now she’s never shared her side of the story with the press.
She makes her debut in Episode 2 of the series, telling the camera that “the last five years have been challenging,” but she’s now “ready to have (her) voice heard, that’s for sure.”
Story continues below advertisement
This official christening photograph released by the Duke and Duchess shows Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex with their son, Archie and the Duchess of Cornwall, Britain’s Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, Doria Ragland, Lady Jane Fellowes, Lady Sarah McCorquodale, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge at Windsor Castle, near London, Britain July 6, 2019.
Chris Allerton/Pool via REUTERS
Ragland gives her take several times throughout the second and third episodes, speaking about her first impression of Harry — she noticed he was “handsome” and “really nice” upon first meeting him, with “really great manners — as well as documenting the fear she felt while being “stalked by the paparazzi” in the U.S.
“I felt unsafe a lot. I can’t just go walk my dogs. I can’t just go to work. There was always someone there waiting for me,” she explained.
Doria Ragland.
Netflix
At one point, Ragland also expressed regret for not candidly speaking to Markle about the judgement she might face one day as a mixed-race woman.
Story continues below advertisement
“As a parent, in hindsight, absolutely, I would like to go back and have that kind of real conversation about how the world sees you.”
Harry and Markle’s surprising meet cute and secret courtship
Perhaps one of the most interesting revelations of the series is that Harry and his bride initially met through Instagram in 2016, which also means that Harry had (has?) a secret Instagram account.
“I was scrolling through my feed, and someone who was a friend had this video of the two of them, like a Snapchat,” Harry recalled.
Harry & Meghan: Official trailer
After seeing the snap of Markle with a dog-ears filter, the prince was curious to know more.
“I was like, ‘Who is THAT?’” he shared.
Story continues below advertisement
The mutual friend told Markle that “Prince Haz” wanted to meet her, but she wasn’t familiar with the royal’s nickname.
“Who’s that?” she remembered, saying she then scrolled his feed as a “barometer” and was impressed by his nature photography and philanthropic work in Africa.
The two then set out on an intense, clandestine courtship. They met for drinks and dinner in the following two days, before she had to return to North America for work.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in the early days of their romance.
Netflix
Two weeks later, on a leap of faith, she met up with Harry in Botswana. Shielded from prying press, the two began their romance in the African bush, sleeping in a tent for five days.
That time together was critical, said Harry. “We had to get to know each other before the rest of the world, and the media, sort of joined it.”
Story continues below advertisement
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle together in Botswana.
Netflix
The unrelenting U.K. media followed Markle to Toronto
After just a few months of dating, with Markle making frequent under-the-radar trips to royal properties in the U.K., the press finally got hip to the fact Harry was dating an American actress.
Knowing the story would be in the papers the next morning, Harry and Markle had one last hurrah in late October 2016, a Halloween gathering with a few friends where they dressed up in costumes and partied the night away.
Markle said she felt tremendous relief when the news first broke. Everyone seemed thrilled for them, both in the U.K. and stateside. The press was favourable and she was lauded for her philanthropic work.
It didn’t take long, though, for the press patina to wear off. Markle, who had returned to Toronto to begin filming another season of Suits, recalled members of the U.K. media sleeping in their cars outside her house. She also claimed they had paid neighbours to install livestream cameras that would point into her backyard.
Scared, she said she approached Toronto police, but they ignored her pleas for help and protection.
“I would say to the police, ‘If any other woman in Toronto said to you, I have six grown men who are sleeping in their cars around my house and following me everywhere that I go, and I feel scared, wouldn’t you say that was stalking?’” she said in the documentary.
A still shot from “Harry & Meghan.”
Courtesy / Netflix
Toronto police allegedly said they couldn’t help her because of “who you’re dating,” she said.
Story continues below advertisement
An in-depth look at the tabloids’ racist turn against Markle
What was first painted in those tabloids as a fairytale story of a biracial woman joining the Royal Family with the potential to boost the monarchy’s modernization, soon spiralled into negative stories about Markle being an entitled actor who did nothing more than bully her staff.
Harry, along with expert voices in the series, explain an “unwritten contract” that exists between the tabloids and the Royal Family. The palace, they said, has granted privileged access to six newspapers that feel they are entitled to learn intimate details about members of the Royal Family, since British taxpayers fund their lives.
‘Harry & Meghan’ trailer
Harry and Markle said they initially tried to follow palace advice to remain silent about the press coverage as other members of the family said it was a rite of passage. But the couple said they felt compelled to tell their story because there was something different about the way Markle was treated.
Story continues below advertisement
“The difference here is the race element,” Harry said.
The series dissects how the U.K. media –— specifically the tabloid newspapers — feed into societal racism that is, in part, bolstered by a history of racism inflicted by the British Empire, which enslaved Black people and extracted wealth from British colonies in the Caribbean, Africa, India and Asia.
Historian David Olusoga explains that while large numbers of Black and Asian people moved to Britain after World War II, changing the face of the nation, those changes aren’t reflected in the media.
Black people make up about 3.5 per cent of Britain’s population but account for just 0.2 per cent of the journalists, Olusoga said.
“We have to recognize that this is a white industry,” he said. “So people who come up with these headlines, they are doing so in a newsroom that’s almost entirely white, and they get to decide whether something has crossed the line of being racist.”
Harry blames himself for Markle’s fallout with her dad
In Episode 3, we learn that Harry thinks he’s the one to blame for the unresolved rift between Markle and her dad, Thomas Markle.
Story continues below advertisement
In the days leading up to their 2018 wedding, the world learned Thomas had declined to attend, despite previously agreeing to escort his daughter down the aisle on her wedding day.
The fallout happened when the media revealed that Thomas had accepted $100,000 from a U.K. tabloid in exchange for staged photos and planted stories in the weeks before the May nuptials. When Markle questioned him on it and asked him to tell the truth, he refused the allegations, but she said she believes he lied to her.
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle on their wedding day in 2018.
Ben STANSALL – WPA Pool/Getty Images
Ragland also weighed in on her ex-husband’s public drama in the docuseries.
“I felt sad that the media would run with this. That he would capitalize… Certainly, as a parent, that’s not what you do. That’s not parenting,” she said.
Story continues below advertisement
Days before the ceremony, Thomas also claimed he had a heart attack and was unable to fly to the U.K. to see his daughter get married. Markle said in the documentary that she was desperate to help her dad and make sure he was OK, but claimed he refused to answer her texts.
Harry said he feels “incredibly sad” and blames himself for Markle no longer speaking to her father.
“Now she doesn’t have a father. I shouldered that. Because if Meg wasn’t with me, then her dad would still be her dad,” Harry explained, referring to the photo scandal. “It’s amazing what people would do when offered a huge amount of money. Fifty thousand, a hundred thousand (dollars), to hand over photographs, to create a story. And thank God most of them said no.”
— With a file from The Associated Press
Queen Elizabeth death: Princes William and Harry greet well-wishers outside Windsor Castle
No one has as stronger a hold on our collective purchasing decisions than Meghan Markle. And with her Netflix documentary with Prince Harry just one day away from its release date and plenty of events on the calendar, we’re about to enter a period of Markle-inspired spending—guaranteed. Just take her latest look, for example, which she wore to the 2022 Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Ripple of Hope Gala held in New York City.
For the glamorous event, which saw the couple take home an award for their work pertaining to racial justice and mental health with the Archewell Foundation, Markle chose a stark white, long-sleeve dress by Louis Vuitton, which featured a high slit and an off-the-shoulder neckline. Custom made by the brand’s womenswear designer Nicolas Ghesquière, it was a clear symbol of hope, the perfect message to send at the evening’s occasion. With her dress, she added Princess Diana’s aquamarine ring that she wore on her wedding day, Cartier Love bracelets, and a Givenchy clutch.
After seeing the look, one dress immediately came to mind: Reformation’s new Maves dress, a similarly off-the-shoulder style with long sleeves and a mini hemline. Equally gorgeous with a much smaller price tag—it rings up to just under $300—the dress is a perfect alt for Markle’s custom Louis Vuitton pick. Shop it and more off-the-shoulder options below.
She and Prince Harry attended the 2022 Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Ripple of Hope Award Gala in New York City, where the couple received an award for their charitable work through the Archwell foundation. For the occasion, Ghesquière designed a minimalist, ivory-colored off-the-shoulder dress with a tapered tulip skirt and gentle draping. To accompany the look, Markle also wore a shoulder-grazing pair of earrings by CH Carolina Herrera and black pumps.
Markle also went minimalist on the beauty front, pulling her hair into a sleek, low bun — which has become one of the Duchess’ signature looks — embracing her naturally glow-y skin and enhancing her eyes with a subtly smoky effect.
Prince Harry is shutting down a recent report that accused him of telling a friend “Those Brits need to learn a lesson” ahead of the couple’s bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey last year.
The global press secretary for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex told HuffPost that “this is a baseless hit piece masquerading as journalism.’”
“This story is riddled with inaccuracies, not least of which is a quote erroneously attributed to Prince Harry,” the spokesperson said Sunday.
“To accuse a man who spent 10 years serving his country of wanting to teach that same country a lesson is not only an attempted distraction but an unfortunate and predictable tabloid strategy,” she added. “To pit him against his country is shameful and manipulative, especially when Prince Harry has never spoken ill of the British public.”
The Sun did not immediately respond to a HuffPost request for further comment.
The story and response come on the heels of Prince William and Kate Middleton’s recent, three-day tour of Boston, where they were for the Earthshot Prize Awards.
As the tour nearly coincided with the release of Harry and Meghan Markle’s forthcoming Netflix docuseries, a palace source prior to the trip said the Prince and Princess of Wales wouldn’t “be distracted by other things.”
A trailer for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s six-part series with the streaming giant dropped on the second day of William and Kate’s royal tour, leading many to question the timing of its release.
In the teaser, a voice asks Harry, “Why did you want to make this documentary?”
“No one sees what happens behind closed doors,” the prince responds. “I had to do everything I could to protect my family.”
“When the stakes are this high, doesn’t it make sense to hear our story from us?” Meghan later adds in the clip.
One black and white shot showed Meghan looking at him lovingly as he strummed the instrument, while another showed a guitar in the background of a selfie.
Other sweet pics shown in the clip included a beautiful one of Meghan showing off her baby bump, as well as another of the pair dancing at their wedding reception.
Harry and Meghan, who tied the knot in May 2018, share son Archie, 3, and daughter Lilbet, 1, together.
They famously stepped down as senior royals in March 2020 before moving to start a new life in California.
Netflix confirmed the docuseries was “coming soon.”
The teaser was released as Prince William and Kate Middleton headed to Boston for the Earthshot Prize awards ceremony, with some saying the timing wasn’t the best in case it overshadowed the Cambridges’ U.S. trip.
To quote Taylor Swift, what if I told you none of it was accidental? Meghan Markle’s most recent outfit may seem unexpected at first, but there’s actually a hidden meaning behind the color combination she chose to wear. Listen, I don’t blame you if you were too focused on Meghan Markle’s empowering discussion to notice the color of her shoes, but you know we’re all about style and substance here at Who What Wear, so you can bet I’ll be talking about both.
Markle attended a fundraiser for the Women’s Fund of Central Indiana, which runs programs for women on intimate violence prevention, executive leadership, mental health, and more. For the event, the Duchess of Sussex wore a green Giorgio Armani dress with purple Manolo Blahnik shoes.
As Page Six smartly pointed out, green and purple, along with white, are actually the official colors of International Women’s Day. The organization explained the significance on its website: “Purple signifies justice and dignity. Green symbolizes hope. The colors originated from the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) in the UK in 1908.” So there you have it: It was all by design because she’s a mastermind. Okay, I’ll stop with the Taylor Swift references now. Scroll down to see Meghan Markle’s outfit and shop similar pieces.
“No one sees what’s happening behind closed doors,” Prince Harry says in a brand-new Netflix trailer. He and Meghan Markle are starring in an upcoming docuseries that will explore their decision to leave royalty behind and embark on charitable lives in the U.S. “I had to do everything I could to protect my family,” Prince Harry says. And who could blame him for that?
Featuring the sweetest never-before-seen candid photos of the couple, including dancing at their wedding reception, posing in a photo booth, and showing off Markle’s baby bump, the trailer is everything I could have asked for—and more. Scroll down to watch the new Netflix teaser trailer.
These are the stories making headlines in fashion on Tuesday.
Cuyana partners with Smart Works and Meghan Markle For Giving Tuesday, Cuyana is donating 500 of its Classic Structured Totes to the UK-based charity Smart Works in partnership with its patron, Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex. Smart Works aims to empower women who need help getting into the workforce. Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex said in a statement, “I am proud to bring [Cuyana and Smart Works] together to further our shared mission of uplifting and empowering women all around the globe.” {Fashionista inbox}
Shannon Abloh gives first interview since Virgil Abloh’s passing A little over one year after her husband’s passing, Shannon Abloh sat down with The New York Times to discuss her plans to take charge of his legacy. She said, “After his passing, so many people came up to me and said, ‘Virgil was my best friend’ […] A lot of his collaborators, or even people who maybe weren’t that close to him, feel ‘I can do this to help his legacy, or I can do that to help his legacy.’ It’s like this train that’s going 500 miles per hour, and I just thought: I have to stay on this train, because if I don’t, I don’t know where it’s going to go.” {The New York Times}
Photo: Courtesy of Benefit Cosmetics
Scroll to Continue
Benefit Cosmetics launches EmpowHERment Post initiative benefiting Planned Parenthood For the holiday season, Benefit Cosmetics has launched the EmpowHERment Post initiative, which encourages the brand’s community to send a postcard for free to someone who empowers them. Benefit will donate $5 for each card sent to Planned Parenthood. You can send a postcard to someone who empowers you at BenefitCosmetics.com. {Fashionista inbox}
Coach launches re-issue of the Demi Bag The new silhouette is a re-imagination of Coach‘s original Demi Bag, a popular style in the early 2000s. The new bag comes in a variety of colors including pink, green and blue. The signature jacquard is made from a blend of organic cotton and recycled plastic bottles, and the leather is produced from leather shavings and scraps at Coach’s tannery. You can shop the bag now at Coach.com. {Fashionista inbox}
Forbes releases its 30 under 30 list for 2022 Forbes has released its annual 30 under 30 list and it includes a number of fashion and beauty founders like Olamide Olowe, cofounder of Topicals, Francesca Aiello, founder of Frankies Bikinis and more. You can view the full list at Forbes.com. {Forbes}
Released Tuesday, the podcast featured discussions under the title of “Good Wife/Bad Wife, Good Mom/Bad Mom,” exploring themes of loneliness and the unattainable expectations many mothers and wives face.
The episode opened with Markle recalling a visit she had with Grégoire Trudeau and their children over the summer — they spent a day at Prince Harry and Markle’s Montecito pool, chatting and drinking wine, while the kids enjoyed the water.
Markle and her “dear friend” Grégoire Trudeau met around seven years ago when Markle was working and living in Toronto.
Markle described the reunion as a relaxed and low-key affair.
“This wasn’t our day of being the wives and moms, all perfectly quaffed with updos and pearls and demure smiles,” said Markle.
Royal family praised for letting Harry, Meghan go
“This was the other version of us both with wild curly hair and swimsuits and loose linen and huge belly laughs. Big cuddles with our little ones, quiet whispers of girl talk on the terrace, giddy like absolute schoolgirls.
“We were just having so much fun.”
Prince Harry chats with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as they watch a sledge-hockey match Mattany at the Athletic Centre on May 2, 2016 in Toronto, Canada.
Chris Jackson/Getty Images
Markle had nothing but warm things to say about the Prime Minister’s wife, describing how Grégoire Trudeau would send her “little meditations” during her first pregnancy and voice notes “of encouragement.”
She also shared that she’s relied on Grégoire Trudeau’s advice over the years.
The Duchess said: “So she’s not just a wife or a first lady. She’s the type of person who cares really deeply about her friends.
Sophie Grégoire Trudeau and daughter Ella-Grace greet revelers at Canada Day celebrations at Parliament Hill on July 01, 2019 in Ottawa, Canada.
The Canadian Press
“She knows what it feels like to be a mom and a partner and specifically a mom and a partner in the public eye.
Story continues below advertisement
“And also how crushing the guilt of expectations can become.”
The pair chatted about the scrutiny they’ve each felt over the years.
Was media scrutiny responsible for Harry and Meghan leaving?
“I don’t want to get too emotional, but the stress and anxiety that people are feeling these days — whether it’s the pandemic, whether it’s because you’re a struggling mom and your kids can’t make it to school, whatever your situation is — the stress and anxiety is real,” revealed Grégoire Trudeau.
“And our sense of community has completely exploded. We have sisters who can mother, we have aunties who can mother, we have friends who can mother; mothering is a way of being, it’s not just biological,” she continued, as the pair chatted about how lonely motherhood can be, agreeing that the “villages” once available to help mothers raise their children have diminished over the years.
Story continues below advertisement
Markle then asked Grégoire Trudeau to describe her childhood self in three words.
“Sensitive, courageous and funny,” replied Grégoire Trudeau.
When asked what three words she’d use to describe herself now, Grégoire Trudeau responded with the same three words, adding: “I’ve been doing so much work to go back to that little Sophie inside of me. Through all the adversity, through all my own struggles, and I found her. So I’m going to continue to take care of her.”
Markle had high praise for her longtime friend, saying that Grégoire Trudeau is “emblematic of strength that comes from embracing your humanity, even in the face of all these family and home and public pressures.”
INGLEWOOD, CALIFORNIA: In this image released on May 2, Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex, speaks … [+] onstage during Global Citizen VAX LIVE: The Concert To Reunite The World at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California. Global Citizen VAX LIVE: The Concert To Reunite The World will be broadcast on May 8, 2021. (Photo by Kevin Winter/Getty Images for Global Citizen VAX LIVE)
Getty Images for Global Citizen VAX LIVE
The first rumors that Harry might be wanting to tone down some of his recollections in his $20-million as-told-to autobiography, Spare, surfaced in the publishing lunchrooms of Manhattan last summer, which is to say, after Harry returned from the rather grand but toned down April funeral of his grandfather, Prince Philip. It was at that funeral in Windsor that Harry came face to face with his immediate family and his larger, extended family, seeing many of them for the first time since the announcement of his upcoming book, and since he and Meghan Markle sat for their extended televised sit-down with Oprah Winfrey in the CBS /global broadcasting event in March 2021.
His grandfather’s funeral — that of a rather grand and blustery old-school patriarch — would ordinarily be an occasion for the Windsors to come together to celebrate a long, well-lived life. But the event was the opposite of that for the prince. He soldiered through it, and, though he was seen speaking with them, not a lot of his family really knew what they should do with him. There was a distinct distance and a chill that most of them kept. Kate made a notable effort to include him, and Harry and his brother walked up the hill together. But what Harry confronted, two years after moving to Canada and thence to the States, was that his strivings in Hollywood, on television, on podcasts, in speeches and in print, had had an effect back home.
The title of the his upcoming book is simple, quite blunt, and carries gravitas precisely because it deftly exploits the old rhymed cliche “an heir and a spare,” the British polity’s wry gift to the language, rooted in Cockney rhyming-slang, in assessment of their monarch’s breeding duties to ensure the stability of succession. Suffice it to say, Charles and Diana gave Britain an exact fulfillment of the cliche’s requirements. Prince Harry would likely have himself joked about and/or been robustly teased with the designation across decades, at Eton, at Sandhurst, in the Army, wherever his crew of blokes would have wanted to rag him.
But whether or not he came up with the idea of using it in this instance, the act of taking on the cutting derogation as his book title is Harry’s own move. It’s a bold one, and it dovetails nicely with what we know of the straight-spoken combat chopper pilot and his two tours in Afghanistan. The prince’s use of the word opens a cosmos of connotations, bringing weaponly swagger as well as going straight into Harry’s role as an outsider in the monarchy. There’s power in that level of ownership; this usage shows Prince Harry recognizes it. Not least, it makes deft literary and enormous marketing sense. You want a tome on a royal family from an outsider who gives his book a title like that. There could be no better or simpler flag to get the browsing masses to ask themselves this book-buying question: What could lie between the covers of that?
Seven thousand miles east of Montecito, California, the proud use of the word as a derogatory noun — along with a few other words describing the book’s narrative in the promotional jacket copy, notably, the participle “unflinching” — will have caused some concern in Buckingham Palace. To say that King Charles, Prince William, and/or their senior courtiers have been “dreading” the book is arguably an overstatement, with the possible exception of those courtiers whose direct mandates include spinning webs of positivity around any negative anecdotal flotsam coming off the book’s reviews or its drop date of January 10. Those courtiers would be well within their rights to dread the first few weeks of the British press playing hacky-sack with the thing. But the regent Charles, and the lone heir in the cliche that the book’s title so eloquently evokes, William, have a kingdom to run and with it, more productive things to do than worry about how they’re being portrayed by Harry. Harry’s given Charles, particularly, a couple of good solid years of practice. Charles can take it.
That’s not to say that the book won’t have impact. Spare will make an enormous splash, first, across America and the 54 countries of the Commonwealth, and secondly on the Continent, some of whose royal families are related to the Windsors, and whose people still look to the British royals as the preeminent noble family in Europe. Harry is particularly beloved on the Continent for his Invictus Games in service of disabled military veterans, the next installment of which will be held in Düsseldorf, Germany, a few short months after his book drops.
Ergo, the coverage will be global, and varied. We can look forward to much of the same breathless television coverage that attends Prince Harry and Meghan Markle whatever they do or wherever they go, both pro and con. Some of Prince Harry’s and Meghan Markle’s more vocal detractors in England — such as Fox broadcaster Piers Morgan, who was fired by his former network, ITV, for not publicly apologizing for expressing his opinions about Meghan Markle on air, when in fact his opinions were one big reason for his and his program’s immense popularity — will be quick off the mark, both on air and in print. More sympathetic interlocutors will be scheduled by Harry and his hardworking phalanx of publicists with certain outlets. Certainly, with Oprah Winfrey and CBS This Morning’s Gayle King being friends with the couple, those bookings will be widely awaited. This is not to mention the robust advertising campaign that the publisher will be engineering.
The point is that, no matter the platform and no matter the slant — whether it is Harry himself making an appearance on at a book-signing, Piers Morgan exploding on talkTV about Harry’s take on certain royal family events, or Tina Brown creatively doubling down upon and/or having to eat her words that the book would “never see the light of day” — Spare will be Topic A for weeks.
The security around the Spare manuscript, in whatever format, has been admirably and understandably tight thus far. Eventually, actual review copies will have to be sent out, presumably with some architecture of an embargo. With an embargo or without, at that review-copy moment, the cat’s out of the bag on Fleet Street. Some sort of leak will occur. Somebody — and there are a thousands of somebodies on both sides of the Atlantic who can be classified as parties whose commercial interests would mean that they’d be highly interested in a peek at an advance copy of Spare — will get a leak. It can be digital, it can be in manuscript form, it can be incomplete, or it can be read and simply chatted about over drinks. And that leak, in whatever form, will find its way to the people who care about it the most, namely, Fleet Street. Whether that happens this month or next will matter to Harry and his publisher, which is why security is tight, but its date of occurrence doesn’t materially affect what happens when the dam is eventually breached, which will be that the British press will kick into high gear and begin parsing Harry’s every adjective about his family. The appetite will be especially great among those actors who have axes to grind, such as the Daily Mail, or any of the publishers whom Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have sued and/or personally blacklisted from any kind of cooperation.
First serial rights, meaning, the publication of a serious extract from the book rather than quotes and/or opinions of it, can have been retained by Harry and team or can reside with the publisher. It can be assumed that they will be spectacularly sold, but it also can be that, in this special instance, they remain unexercized in favor of making the January 10 splash all that much bigger. Usually, first serial are considered, a way to recoup part of an advance, and as good advertisement for the book. But it’s unclear whether first serial would work for any periodical trying to bring a chunk of it out.
Most significantly, the production and news-stand (read: sales) time is getting short between now and January 10 for a monthly, or even for a weekly, to wade in with presumably big cash for a piece of the Spare action. That (theoretical) excerpt would have to be in the teeth of production (fact checking, copy editing and art) now, for a monthly to recoup any sales. For a weekly, the latest they would want to put it into production would be by early December. Time would be capable of performing what they call “crashing” the story into print somewhat later than that, but not many others could do it. It’s not outside the realm of possibility for anybody to do it of course, given the manpower, and it would only be entertaining if they did, but for a monthly, the editors would really have to be on their toes. It’s possible that a bright and tidy excerpt could go to one of Prince Harry’s and Meghan Markle’s few friends in print journalism. Edward Enninful, editor of British Vogue, springs to mind.
Whether first serial rights are exercised or not, it seems Harry’s book will debut on two very different stages at once. The first stage will be rather more serious, involving book review pages, critics, and that possible serialization. That will be international, but its starting point will be in New York, seat of Penguin Random House US and of many of the best periodicals in the English-speaking world. The second, far louder stage will be the book’s minute, generally hostile dissection in the UK, where Fleet Street will instantly put it through the food processor and then probe the resulting puree for any possible inaccuracy, exaggeration and/or insult to the Crown, the Queen, Charles, or William made by Harry.
For his part, Harry’s dad is a busy king. Charles has shown a remarkably fleet turn of foot since the day after his mother’s death on September 8, blasting out to seal the official transfer of the crown before the parliaments of Scotland, Northern Ireland, England, and the Welsh Senedd. During all that, he seamlessly led the nation in mourning from Balmoral down to Buckingham Palace and on to Westminster, where Elizabeth lay in state. Those stages of the cross included not just the grand military sendoff procession from Balmoral, in Scotland, but the Vigil of the Princes both in Scotland and in London, as well as the reception of Commonwealth and world leaders.
At each turn Charles gave short, graceful speeches, open about his own grief, taking the time to thank everyone for their moving tributes to his mother. In short, he led. It was what he was brought up to do.
GALLIPOLI, TURKEY – APRIL 25: Prince Harry chats with Prince Charles, Prince of Wales during a visit … [+] to The Nek, a narrow stretch of ridge in the Anzac battlefield on the Gallipoli Peninsula, as part of commemorations marking the 100th anniversary of the Battle of Gallipoli on April 25, 2015 in Gallipoli,Turkey. Turkish and Allied powers representatives, as well as family members of those who served, are commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Gallipoli campaign with ceremonies at memorials across the Gallipoli Peninsula. The Gallipoli land campaign, in which a combined Allied force of British, French, Australian, New Zealand and Indian troops sought to occupy the Gallipoli Peninsula and the strategic Dardanelles Strait during World War I, began on April 25, 1915 against Turkish forces of the Ottoman Empire. The Allies, unable to advance more than a few kilometers, withdrew after eight months. The campaign cost the Allies approximately 50,000 killed and up to 200,000 wounded, the Ottomans approximately 85,000 killed and 160,000 wounded. (Photo by Niall Carson-Pool/Getty Images)
Getty Images
He’s limning his mother still, making the Commonwealth and parliamentary rounds, ushering Liz Truss out the door of 10 Downing and welcoming Rishi Sunak in, full of old-fashioned get-up-and-go. Nothing gets in his way. In shaping his team, he’s quietly drawing his younger siblings Edward and Anne into the day-to-day core family team in the absence of Harry. In the ultra-traditional latter-day Greek stage play that the British Royal Family present when they publicly appear, Charles’ has been a performance that perfectly communicated the thousand-year monarchy’s one basic message: Continuity. It’s going to be a fun, fit, no-nonsense reign. He lets nothing get in his way.
Not so Charles III’s younger son. Though Harry’s been back to England and to his family since he left for his “vacation” in western Canada in 2019, perhaps his most remarkable accomplishment is his thorough alienation of himself from his family, beginning with his father and brother. Harry was caught somewhat flat-footed down in London by his grandmother’s death in early September. He had refused an invitation from her to Balmoral; this was to be a charity trip for him and for Meghan Markle, including a pop over to Germany to check on Invictus preparations for next year.
When he got the summons to Balmoral, he was late getting in the air, and his grandmother died while he was en route. A lot of things both big and small shifted for Harry as his father assumed the kingship. Over the next days of the family vigils and the funeral, Harry’s “otherness” shone through, exactly as it did at his grandfather’s funeral last year. Yes, he walked with them behind Elizabeth’s caisson down the Mall. But he was faced with the fact that, in his absence, his home and his family had changed forever.
NEW YORK (AP) — Prince Harry’s memoir, an object of obsessive anticipation worldwide since it was first announced last year, is coming out Jan. 10.
The book will be called “Spare” and is being billed by Penguin Random House as an account told with “raw, unflinching honesty” and filled with ”insight, revelation, self-examination, and hard-won wisdom about the eternal power of love over grief.”
In a statement released Thursday, Penguin Random House summoned memories of the stunning 1997 death of Prince Harry’s mother, Diana, and the subsequent image of Harry and his brother “walking behind their mother’s coffin as the world watched in sorrow — and horror.”
“As Diana, Princess of Wales, was laid to rest, billions wondered what the princes must be thinking and feeling — and how their lives would play out from that point on,” the statement reads in part.
“For Harry, this is his story at last.”
The memoir’s title is an apparent reference to “the heir and the spare,” a phrase often used to describe royal siblings. Harry’s brother, William, is now Prince of Wales and heir to the British throne. When Harry was born, he was right behind William in the line of succession but has since been pushed down. Their father , King Charles III, assumed the throne upon Queen Elizabeth II’s death last month.
Royals watchers and the public at large have speculated endlessly since the book was first announced in July 2021. Within hours of Thursday’s announcement, “Spare” was in the top 10 on Amazon.com’s bestseller list.
The Duke of Sussex had already revealed a newsmaking willingness to discuss his private life when he and his American-born wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, were interviewed by Oprah Winfrey for a bombshell March 2021 broadcast. The couple spoke of Meghan’s deep unhappiness with her new life in England, the alleged racism within the royal family and Harry’s fear that his wife’s life might be endangered had they remained in his native country.
In 1992, Diana worked with author Andrew Morton on her explosive memoir “Diana: Her True Story,” in which she described at length her unhappy marriage to the future King Charles III.
Harry and Meghan stepped back from royal duties in 2020 and moved to the U.S. Harry told Winfrey that his family cut him off financially and that he helped pay for his security with money left to him by his mother. They have launched numerous initiatives, including a Netflix production deal and the nonprofit Archewell Foundation.
Penguin Random House’s 2021 announcement included a statement from Harry.
“I’m writing this not as the prince I was born but as the man I have become,” he said. “I’ve worn many hats over the years, both literally and figuratively, and my hope is that in telling my story — the highs and lows, the mistakes, the lessons learned — I can help show that no matter where we come from, we have more in common than we think.”
The 416-page book will be published in 16 languages, from Dutch to Portuguese. Harry himself — identified by Penguin Random House as “a husband, father, humanitarian, military veteran, mental wellness advocate, and environmentalist” — will narrate the audiobook. The cover features a close-up of an unsmiling, T-shirt-clad Harry.
Financial terms were not disclosed, but Harry, Duke of Sussex, will donate proceeds from “Spare” to British charities. He has already given $1.5 million to Sentebale, an organization he co-founded with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho to help children and young people in Lesotho and Botswana affected by HIV/AIDS.
The book had been tentatively scheduled for publication this year, and the delay led to rumors that Harry was hesitating to say too much about his family, or was perhaps revising the narrative after his grandmother died in September. He has spoken of being estranged from his brother, although the siblings and their wives appeared in public together during the mourning period following the Queen’s death.
“Penguin Random House is honored to be publishing Prince Harry’s candid and emotionally powerful story for readers everywhere,” the global CEO of Penguin Random House, Markus Dohle, said in a statement. “He shares a remarkably moving personal journey from trauma to healing, one that speaks to the power of love and will inspire and encourage millions of people around the world.”
I don’t know about all of you, but I still get a rush seeing Meghan Markle in her new, extremely low-key environment in California. After years of strict dress codes at formal engagements, a sighting that involves the Duchess of Sussex relaxing with friends in what can only be described as “California casual” attire is a breath of fresh air.
For her most recent outing—a shopping trip around Montecito and Santa Barbara—Markle chose a strapless jumpsuit from Malia Mills, a straw hat from Cuyana, and a dark-green Lauren Ralph Lauren knit tied effortlessly around her shoulders. She finished off the daytime look with a Chloé bucket bag, Valentino sunglasses, and, chicest of all, a pair of flat sandals from Emme Parsons with a loop around the toe adorned with a gold, jewelry-like bauble. Think of the shoes as a modern-day take on the toe ring, just a thousand times more buy-worthy.
Clearly, the impeccable sense of style Markle displayed back in the UK hasn’t skipped a beat. All it’s done is adjust to her new, more chilled-out surroundings in California. Shop the duchess’s casual-chic footwear style below.
LONDON — Hundreds of royal fans lined up outside Windsor Castle on Thursday for the chance to pay their final respects to Queen Elizabeth II as the chapel where the late monarch is buried opened to the public for the first time since her death.
Many want to visit the queen’s tomb, which is marked by a slab of hand-carved Belgian black marble inside the King George VI Memorial Chapel, part of St. George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle. The queen’s name is inscribed on the ledger stone in brass letter inlays, alongside the names of her husband, mother and father.
Among the early arrivals was Anne Daley, 65, from Cardiff, who got to the castle at 7:30 a.m., well ahead of the 10 a.m. opening time. She was also one of the first in line as tens of thousands of people shuffled through Westminster Hall over four days to see the queen’s lying in state before her funeral.
Daley said she felt emotional thinking about the monarch’s death on Sept. 8, as well as that of her husband, Prince Philip, who died last year.
“The castle feels like empty, gloomy. Nobody’s living in it. You know, you’ve lost the queen, you’ve lost the duke, you lost the corgis,” Daly said, referring to Elizabeth’s beloved dogs. “It’s like when you’ve sold your house and all the history is gone.”
To visit the chapel, royal fans have to buy a ticket to Windsor Castle. The price for adults is 26.50 pounds ($28.75) Sunday through Friday, and 28.50 on Saturdays.
The memorial chapel sits within the walls of St. George’s Chapel, where many members of the royal family are buried. It has also been the venue for several royal weddings, including the marriage of Prince Harry to the former Meghan Markle in 2018.