ReportWire

Tag: medical expenses

  • Most Americans fear rising health care costs, poll finds | Long Island Business News

    Most U.S. adults are worried about health care becoming more expensive, according to a new AP-NORC poll, as they make decisions about next year’s health coverage and a government shutdown keeps future health costs in limbo for millions.

    About 6 in 10 Americans are “extremely” or “very” concerned about their health costs going up in the next year, the survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds — a worry that extends across age groups and includes people with and without health insurance.

    Many Americans have other health care anxieties, too. The poll found that about 4 in 10 Americans are “extremely” or “very” concerned about not being able to pay for health care or medications they need, not being able to access health care when they need it, or losing or not having health insurance.

    Medicare beneficiaries are already shopping for next year’s coverage, and open enrollment periods for many other health plans are approaching quickly in November. Federal policies have left millions of people at risk of skyrocketing health insurance premiums or of losing their health insurance altogether. The findings show that many Americans are feeling vulnerable to spiking health care costs, with some expressing concerns about whether they’ll have coverage at all.

    Latoya Wilson, an independent nurse consultant in Lafayette, Louisiana, currently uses a health insurance plan from the Affordable Care Act marketplace. But in the past two weeks, the 46-year-old has applied for more jobs than she had previously in her life, largely because she’s concerned about her premiums going up and wants the stability of employer-sponsored insurance.

    “Even before these health care cuts came into play, I was already having a significant issue getting the care that I needed this year,” she said. “Anything worse than what I already have is pretty scary.”
    Health care remains important to Americans when it’s center stage in Washington

    About 8 in 10 U.S. adults say the issue of health care is “extremely” or “very” important to them personally. That includes about 9 in 10 Democrats and three-quarters of Republicans, and it puts health care next to the economy among Americans’ top issue priorities.

    That significant attention on the issue raises the political stakes in what’s already been a crucial moment for federal health policy in the nation’s capital.

    President Donald Trump’s mega-bill passed this summer cuts more than $1 trillion from federal health care and food assistance over a decade, largely by imposing work requirements on those receiving aid and by shifting certain federal costs onto the states. Republicans say the cuts will prevent people who don’t need aid from gaming the system, but the cuts will ultimately result in millions of people losing health insurance coverage, according to projections from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

    More urgently, a congressional deadlock over Affordable Care Act subsidies that expire this year has thrown the federal government into a shutdown that’s dragged into a fourth straight week with no end in sight. Democratic lawmakers want any funding bill they sign to extend the subsidies, which have made ACA premiums less expensive for millions of people. Republicans in Congress have expressed willingness to negotiate on the issue, but only after the government is reopened.

    In interviews, some Americans said they doubted government leaders would take the necessary action to address their concerns on health care.

    “It is the federal government’s job to provide a better way of life for its people,” said Caleb Richter, a 30-year-old certified nursing assistant in Belleville, Wisconsin, who identifies as an independent. ”Right now, it just feels like they’re not trying.”

    But the poll reveals a deep ideological divide over what the government’s role should be, with Democrats far more likely than Republicans to say it’s the federal government’s job to make sure all Americans have health coverage. About 8 in 10 Democrats say this, compared with about one-third of Republicans.
    Most US adults disapprove of Trump’s handling of health care, the poll finds

    Health care continues to be a weakness for Trump. Only about 3 in 10 U.S. adults approve of the Republican president’s handling of health care, which hasn’t changed meaningfully since September. Almost all Democrats disapprove of his approach, but so do about 8 in 10 independents and about one-third of Republicans.

    Wilson, a Democrat, said she thinks Trump should be “doing things that affect the good of the group” when it comes to health care, including catering more to working-class Americans.

    But Michelle Truszkowski, a disabled veteran in Sterling Heights, Michigan, who is politically conservative, said she appreciates how Trump is focused on cutting fraud and abuse in the health care system.

    “I like that people who shouldn’t be getting benefits from the government are getting kicked off of them,” the 48-year-old said. “Health care is not a right. It’s a privilege.”
    Democrats trusted more than Republicans on health care, but many trust neither

    About 4 in 10 U.S. adults say they trust the Democrats to do a better job handling health care, compared with about one-quarter who trust the Republicans more. About one-quarter trust neither party, and about 1 in 10 trust both equally.

    Americans are more likely to trust their own party on health care, generally speaking, but 76% of Democrats trust their party more on health care, while only 57% of Republicans have more trust in theirs.

    Independents are especially likely to trust neither party on health care — about half of independents say this. But the remaining independents are more likely to trust the Democrats.

    Richter, in Wisconsin, said he wishes Congress would put more faith and funding into hospital staffers who know how to help patients. He said he’d be fine with paying higher taxes if it meant ensuring health care for people who need it.

    But instead of working toward solutions, he said, federal lawmakers are acting “like a bunch of high school kids arguing.”

    “My faith that something will get done is very, very low at this point,” Richter said. “It just feels like they don’t really care.”


    The Associated Press

    Source link

  • Why is the cost of hearing aids so expensive in Canada? – MoneySense

    Why is the cost of hearing aids so expensive in Canada? – MoneySense

    Pretty cool, right? But these advanced hearing aids are not cheap. They’re essentially driven by “mini computers,” and there are costs associated with customization, distribution and professional services, says Glista. 

    At Hotel Dieu Shaver, the independent Niagara Region clinic where I went, non-AI hearing aids range from $3,551 (Phonak L50-R model) to $5,561 (Phonak L90-R model) after the $1,000 Ontario discount has been applied. In contrast, prices for Starkey AI hearing aids range from around $5,000 for the mid-level model (Genesis AI 16) to $7,000 for the highest tech level (Genesis AI 24), again with the $1,000 Ontario discount applied.  

    Yet another high-cost contributor is that, unlike over-the-counter aids that you purchase directly from the manufacturer, today’s digital hearing aids provided through an audiologist are often tweaked through a computer. 

    Using hearing-aid fitting software, an audiologist can select, program and fine-tune the hearing aids. “This includes programming related to sound level and frequency-specific adjustments, based on the person’s hearing loss,” says Glista. “Programming customization also includes other measurements such as real-ear measures to capture how large the person’s ear canal is and ensure that the hearing aids deliver the correct amount of amplification at the eardrum.”

    When you visit a hearing clinic, ask for a detailed breakdown of costs associated with different treatment options, payment options including insurance and government assistance, and follow-up and support services offered. Some hearing health-care providers bundle follow-up maintenance of the hearing aids into their pricing, says Glista. They may also spend time helping patients to develop a listening strategy they can use at work, at home and while participating in hobbies.  

    How much does a hearing test cost?

    Before you get a pair of hearing aids, you’ll want to get your hearing tested at a clinic, which is also where you’ll buy and be fitted for your hearing aids. Some hearing clinics offer hearing tests for free, while others charge about $100. 

    Do insurance and government benefits cover hearing aids?

    Financial support for hearing aids may be available in your province or territory, as part of a broader program for assistive devices and disability supports. For instance, Ontario’s Assistive Devices Program (ADP) pays up to $500 per ear toward the purchase of new hearing aids, for approved applications. (You’ll have to pay for the hearing assessment or find a free one, though—the ADP doesn’t cover that cost.) To qualify, you must be an Ontario resident, have a valid health card, and need the hearing aids for at least six months. Income isn’t a consideration for the ADP.

    So, if you’re an Ontario resident and you buy a $5,000 pair of hearing aids, the audiologist will deduct the $1,000 paid for by the ADP, bringing your cost to $4,000. (There’s no sales tax on hearing aids.) If you’re in a 20% marginal income tax bracket, after claiming the balance you paid as a medical expense at tax time, your end cost is reduced to $3,200. Note, however, that for the 2024 tax year, you can only claim eligible medical expenses minus 3% of your net income or $2,759 (whichever is less)—so, some or all of your medical expenses save no tax. (Learn more about claiming medical expenses.)

    Mark Douglas Wessel

    Source link

  • Why are fertility treatments so expensive in Canada? – MoneySense

    Why are fertility treatments so expensive in Canada? – MoneySense

    Ribecco’s journey, however, shows the enormous potential expense of just conceiving a child—let alone the cost of raising one. National Bank, citing Statistics Canada data, pegged the cost of raising a child to their late teens at up to $300,000.

    Ribecco still considers herself lucky. She has two beautiful sons, and a great job that allowed her to attend countless appointments without being docked pay or using her vacation time. 

    “People with hourly rate jobs would lose wages or a whole day’s work to make appointments,” she pointed out.

    The costs of fertility treatments can vary for couples

    LGBTQ+ couples, she added, can pay even more. Female couples need to pay for a sperm donor, and male couples need to pay for egg donation, IVF and surrogacy expenses. Egg or embryo donations can also add up if the woman has egg quality issues.

    As with any foreseeable life expense, would-be parents should start a budget and savings plan as soon as they are able, said Ravy Pung, a Quebec-based financial planner with National Bank.

    “It’s difficult to figure out what the total costs of [fertility treatments] will be, because it really depends on everyone’s personal situation,” she said, highlighting unexpected costs such as extra testing or failed IVF procedures, and extra expenses around surrogacy.

    Pung recommended investing within a tax-free savings account (TFSA), so investment returns are tax-sheltered. 

    There should always be a back-up plan, she added, just in case “there’s not enough liquidity, not enough savings. You should plan on how to obtain a personal line of credit or a mortgage line of credit.”

    The Canadian Press

    Source link

  • GoFundMe Is a Health-Care Utility Now

    GoFundMe Is a Health-Care Utility Now


    GoFundMe started as a crowdfunding site for underwriting “ideas and dreams,” and, as GoFundMe’s co-founders, Andrew Ballester and Brad Damphousse, once put it, “for life’s important moments.” In the early years, it funded honeymoon trips, graduation gifts, and church missions to overseas hospitals in need. Now GoFundMe has become a go-to for patients trying to escape medical-billing nightmares.

    One study found that, in 2020, the number of U.S. campaigns related to medical causes—about 200,000—was 25 times higher than the number of such campaigns on the site in 2011. More than 500 campaigns are currently dedicated to asking for financial help for treating people, mostly kids, with spinal muscular atrophy, a neurodegenerative genetic condition. The recently approved gene therapy for young children with the condition, by the drugmaker Novartis, costs about $2.1 million for the single-dose treatment.

    Perhaps the most damning aspect of all this is that paying for expensive care with crowdfunding is no longer seen as unusual; instead, it is being normalized as part of the health system, like getting blood work done or waiting on hold for an appointment. Need a heart transplant? Start a GoFundMe in order to get on the waiting list. Resorting to GoFundMe when faced with bills has become so accepted that in some cases, patient advocates and hospital financial-aid officers recommend crowdfunding as an alternative to being sent to collections. My inbox and the Bill of the Month project (run by KFF Health News, where I am the senior contributing editor, and NPR) have become a kind of complaint desk for people who can’t afford their medical bills, and I’m gobsmacked every time a patient tells me they’ve been advised that GoFundMe is their best option.

    GoFundMe itself acknowledges the reliance of patients on the company’s platform. Ari Romio, a spokesperson for the company, said that “medical expenses” is the most common category of fundraiser it hosts. But she declined to say what proportion of campaigns are medically related, because people starting a campaign self-select the purpose of the fundraiser. They might choose the family or travel category, she said, if a child needs to go to a different state for treatment, for example. So although the company has estimated in the past that a third of the funds raised on the site are medical-related, that could be an undercount.

    Andrea Coy of Fort Collins, Colorado, turned to GoFundMe in 2021 as a last resort after an air-ambulance bill tipped her family’s finances over the edge. Her son Sebastian, then a year old, had been admitted with pneumonia to a local hospital and then transferred urgently by helicopter to Children’s Hospital Colorado in Denver when his oxygen levels dropped. REACH, the air-ambulance transport company that contracted with the hospital, was out-of-network, and billed the family nearly $65,000 for the ride—more than $28,000 of which Coy’s insurer, UnitedHealthcare, paid. Even so, REACH continued sending Coy’s family bills for the remaining balance, and later began regularly calling Coy to try to collect, enough that she felt the company was harassing her, she told me.

    Coy made multiple calls to her company’s human-resources department, REACH, and UnitedHealthcare for help in resolving the case. She applied to various patient groups for financial assistance and was rejected again and again. Eventually, she got the outstanding balance knocked down to $5,000, but even that was more than she could afford on top of the $12,000 the family owed out-of-pocket for Sebastian’s actual treatment.

    That’s when a hospital financial-aid officer suggested she try GoFundMe. But, as Coy said, “I’m not an influencer or anything like that,” so the appeal “offered only a bit of temporary relief—we’ve hit a wall.” They have gone deep into debt and hope to climb out of it.

    In an emailed response, a spokesperson for REACH noted that they could not comment on a specific case because of patient-privacy laws, but that, if the ride occurred before the federal No Surprises Act went into effect, the bill was legal. (That act protects patients from such air-ambulance bills and has been in force since January 1, 2022.) But the spokesperson added, “If a patient is experiencing a financial hardship, we work with them to find equitable solutions.” What is “equitable”—and whether that includes seeking an additional $5,000, beyond a $28,000 insurance payment, for transporting a sick child—is subjective, of course.

    In many respects, research shows, GoFundMe tends to perpetuate socioeconomic disparities that already affect medical bills and debt. If you are famous or part of a circle of friends who have money, your crowdfunding campaign is much more likely to succeed than if you are middle-class or poor. When the family of the former Olympic gymnast Mary Lou Retton started a fundraiser on another platform, *spotfund, for her recent ICU stay at a time when she was uninsured, nearly $460,000 in donations quickly poured in. (Although Retton said she could not get affordable insurance because of her preexisting condition—dozens of orthopedic surgeries—the Affordable Care Act prohibits insurers from refusing to cover people because of their prior medical histories, or charging them abnormally high rates.)

    And given the price of American health care, even the most robust fundraising can feel inadequate. If you’re looking for help to pay for a $2 million drug, even tens of thousands is a drop in the bucket.

    Rob Solomon, the CEO of the platform from 2015 to March 2020, who was named one of Time magazine’s 50 most influential people in health care, has said that he “would love nothing more than for ‘medical’ to not be a category on GoFundMe.” He told KFF Health News that “the system is terrible. It needs to be rethought and retooled. Politicians are failing us. Health-care companies are failing us. Those are realities.”

    But despite the noble ambitions of its original vision, GoFundMe is a privately held for-profit company. In 2015, the founders sold a majority stake to a venture-capital investor group led by Accel Partners and Technology Crossover Ventures. And when I asked about medical bills being the most common reason for GoFundMe campaigns, the company’s current CEO, Tim Cadogan, sounded less critical than his predecessor of the health system, whose high prices and financial cruelty have arguably made his company famous.

    “Our mission is to help people help each other,” he said. “We are not, and cannot, be the solution to complex, systemic problems that are best solved with meaningful public policy.”

    And that’s true. Despite the site’s hopeful vibe, most campaigns generate only a small fraction of the money owed. Almost all of the medical-expense campaigns in the U.S. fell short of their goal, and some raised little or no money, a 2017 study from the University of Washington found. The average campaign made it to just about 40 percent of the target amount, and there is evidence that yields—measured as a percent of their target—have gotten worse over time.

    Carol Justice, a recently retired civil servant and a longtime union member in Portland, Oregon, turned to GoFundMe after she faced a mammoth unexpected bill for bariatric surgery at Oregon Health & Science University.

    She had expected to pay about $1,000, the amount left in her deductible, after her health insurer paid the $15,000 cap on the surgery. She didn’t understand that a cap meant she would have to pay the difference if the hospital, which was in-network, charged more.

    And it did, leaving her with a bill of $18,000, to be paid all at once or in monthly $1,400 increments. “That’s more than my mortgage,” she told me. “I was facing filing for bankruptcy or losing my car and my house.” She made numerous calls to the hospital’s financial-aid office, many unanswered, and received only unfulfilled promises that “we’ll get back to you” about whether she qualified for help.

    So, Justice said, her health coach—provided by the city of Portland—suggested starting a GoFundMe. The campaign yielded about $1,400, just one monthly payment, including $200 from the health coach and $100 from an aunt. She dutifully sent each donation directly to the hospital.

    In an emailed response, the hospital system said that it couldn’t discuss individual cases, but that “financial assistance information is readily available for patients, and can be accessed at any point in a patient’s journey with OHSU. Starting in early 2019, OHSU worked to remove barriers for patients most in need by providing a quick screening for financial assistance that, if a certain threshold is met, awards financial assistance without requiring an application process.”

    This particular tale has a happy-ish ending. In desperation, Justice went to the hospital and planted herself in the financial-aid office, where she had a tearful meeting with a hospital representative who determined that—given her finances—she wouldn’t have to pay the bill.

    “I’d been through the gamut and just cried,” she said. She told me that she would like to repay the people who donated to her GoFundMe. But so far, the hospital won’t give the $1,400 back.



    Elisabeth Rosenthal

    Source link

  • The new CDCP: Here’s when seniors can apply for the federal government’s dental plan – MoneySense

    The new CDCP: Here’s when seniors can apply for the federal government’s dental plan – MoneySense

    “Far too many people have avoided getting the care that they need simply because it was too expensive, and that’s why this plan is essential,” Mark Holland, the federal health minister, said at a press conference on Dec. 11, 2023. He also noted that the plan is “going to help make life better for eligible Canadian residents because they won’t have to make the choice between paying their bills and getting the care that they absolutely need.”

    The plan will cost $13 billion over the next five years, and $4.4 billion annually in subsequent years.

    When can you apply for the federal dental plan for seniors?

    The government has announced that application dates for the CDCP will be rolled out gradually. According to its website, it will mail letters to potentially eligible seniors aged 87 and older in mid-December; ages 77 to 86 in January 2024; ages 72 to 76 in February 2024; and ages 70 to 71 in March 2024. The letters will contain a personalized application code and instructions to call Service Canada and apply by phone.

    Letters will only go out to those who had an adjusted family net income of less than $90,000 in 2022, based on their tax return for that year, and they will be mailed to the address used in that tax return. (Haven’t filed your 2022 taxes? It’s a good time to catch up!) There’s no information yet on what to do if you think you qualify for the CDCP but don’t receive a letter, but you could try calling a CDCP representative at 1-833-537-4342. And if your address has changed, contact the Canada Revenue Agency to ensure its records are up to date.

    Starting in May 2024, potentially eligible Canadians aged 65 to 69, and those aged 70 and up who received a letter but could not apply by phone, can apply for the CDCP online. Those who are approved for the CDCP will be enrolled in the program by Sun Life, the service provider that has been contracted to manage the dental plan. 

    When can other eligible Canadians apply for the federal dental care plan?

    For children under age 12, applications for the Canada Dental Benefit are open until June 30, 2024—here’s how to apply

    The government will start accepting CDCP applications for children under 18 and adults who have a valid disability tax credit certificate starting in June 2024. All other eligible Canadians can apply in 2025.

    Who qualifies for the Canadian Dental Care Plan?

    To qualify for the CDCP, the government says that you must:

    Jaclyn Law

    Source link