ReportWire

Tag: Media/Entertainment

  • Elon Musk’s X apocalyptic moment

    Elon Musk’s X apocalyptic moment

    [ad_1]

    Is this the beginning of the end for X, the social-media site previously known as Twitter?

    In the last two days, major advertisers, ranging from IBM Corp. IBM, Apple Inc. AAPL, Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. LGF.A, Walt Disney Co. DIS, even the European Union, have pulled their ads from X, after Elon Musk appeared to endorse antisemitic conspiracy theories and because these big spenders weren’t thrilled with the algorithm’s product placement nestled alongside pro-Nazi posts.

    Earlier…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • IBM pulls ads from X after Elon Musk’s incendiary comments over white pride

    IBM pulls ads from X after Elon Musk’s incendiary comments over white pride

    [ad_1]

    IBM Corp.
    IBM,
    +0.31%

    has abruptly pulled ads from X, formerly Twitter, amid a maelstrom of controversial comments from billionaire owner Elon Musk and the placement of IBM ads.

    “IBM has zero tolerance for hate speech and discrimination and we have immediately suspended all advertising on X while we investigate this entirely unacceptable situation,” the company said in a statement emailed to MarketWatch.

    IBM suspended advertising following a report by the Financial Times on Thursday that IBM ads appeared next to posts supporting Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. A Media Matters study also found ads from Apple Inc.
    AAPL,
    +0.90%
    ,
    Oracle Corp.
    ORCL,
    +0.53%
    ,
    and Comcast Corp.’s
    CMCSA,
    -0.28%

    Xfinity and Bravo were adjacent to pro-Nazi content.

    On Wednesday, Musk agreed with a post on X supportive of an antisemitic conspiracy theory that Jewish people hold a “dialectical hatred” of white people. “You have said the actual truth,” Musk wrote in response to the post.

    Compounding matters, Musk on Thursday said on X it was “super messed up” that white people are not, in the words of one far-right user’s tweet, “allowed to be proud of their race.”

    Adding fuel to the fire, Musk said on Wednesday that the Jewish advocacy group the Anti-Defamation League “unjustly attacks the majority of the West, despite the majority of the West supporting the Jewish people and Israel.” (Musk has threatened to sue the ADL because of its criticism of lax moderation practices on X that it says have allowed antisemitism to spread.)

    The cascading conflagration prompted Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -3.81%

    bull and investment adviser Ross Gerber to grumble on X: “Getting a flood of messages from clients wanting out of tesla and anything to do with Elon Musk. Many saying they are selling their cars as well. What is he doing to the tesla brand??!!?!?”

    Earlier this year, Gerber backed down from his “friendly activist” efforts to join Tesla’s board, saying he felt his concerns had been addressed. His firm, Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management, has its own ETF, AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki 
    GK,
     which has Tesla as its top investment, and has attracted many clients with Tesla shares in its portfolios

    In an interview on CNBC late Thursday, Gerber said that while he is not selling his Tesla stock, ” I’m not going to mince words about it anymore as a shareholder. It’s absolutely outrageous, his behavior and the damage he’s caused to the brand.”

    Gerber said Musk has essentially abdicated his responsibilities as Tesla CEO: “It’s all about Twitter, and what he can tweet, and how many people he can piss off… What’s going to happen to Tesla over the next 10 years, are they gonna achieve their mission if the CEO isn’t actually the CEO? Because he’s certainly not acting as the CEO of Tesla.”

    An X executive told MarketWatch that the company did a “sweep” of the accounts next to the IBM ads. Those accounts “will no longer be monetizable” and specific posts will be labeled “Sensitive Media.”

    The executive said 99% of measured ad placements on X this year have appeared adjacent to content scoring “above the brand safety floor” criteria set by industry standards.

    Late Thursday, X’s chief executive, Linda Yaccarino, tweeted: “X’s point of view has always been very clear that discrimination by everyone should STOP across the board — I think that’s something we can and should all agree on. When it comes to this platform — X has also been extremely clear about our efforts to combat antisemitism and discrimination. There’s no place for it anywhere in the world — it’s ugly and wrong. Full stop.”

    The posts and ad placement come amid a wave of antisemitism on digital forums including X and a downturn in advertising on the platform linked to hate speech and misinformation. Musk said in July that ad revenue had plunged about 50%.

    The latest kerfuffle is likely to complicate the efforts of Yaccarino, who was hired in June from Comcast Corp.’s
    CMCSA,
    -0.28%

    NBCUniversal to sway advertising agencies and major brands to stay on, or initiate relationships with, the platform now known as X.

    Tesla shares fell nearly 4% on Thursday but are still up about 90% to date in 2023.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia—What Tech Stocks Hedge Funds Are Buying and Selling

    Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia—What Tech Stocks Hedge Funds Are Buying and Selling

    [ad_1]

    It’s filing season for a string of major hedge funds, and big tech names like Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia were among the most-traded equities in the third quarter.

    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • Honda joins Toyota in raising U.S. wages for its auto workers as unionization push looms

    Honda joins Toyota in raising U.S. wages for its auto workers as unionization push looms

    [ad_1]

    Honda Motor Co.’s U.S. unit joined other foreign carmakers in raising their automobile workers’ wages in the wake of historic wins for the United Auto Workers and as the union has vowed to intensify its organizing push.

    Honda
    7267,
    -4.11%

    gave U.S. production workers an 11% raise that will go into effect in January. Honda also cut down the time to reach a top wage from six years to three years, and added benefits, the company said Friday.

    The Wall Street Journal on Friday first reported the raises, citing a memo it had reviewed.

    UAW President Shawn Fain has said numerous times the union wants to expand its base into the nonunionized automobile workforce beyond the Midwest.

    At an address to UAW members in mid-October, for instance, Fain said that the UAW was “going to organize non-union auto companies like we’ve never organized before.”

    Don’t miss: Ford and GM inventories rise despite UAW strike, but demand concerns linger

    U.S. auto workers at foreign carmakers such as Honda and Volkswagen AG
    VOW,
    -1.12%
    ,
    which have their major factories in the Southeast, are not unionized. Neither are auto workers at Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    +2.22%
    ,
    which has car-making factories in California and Texas.

    Auto workers went on strike for six weeks starting in mid-September, hitting several factories and facilities of Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    +1.65%
    ,
    General Motors Co.
    GM,
    +0.75%

    and Stellantis NV
    STLA,
    +1.57%
    .

    The labor action, which the UAW dubbed a “stand-up strike,” called on select local unions to stand up and walk out. It marked a break from tradition: Going back decades, the UAW would strike at one company at a time, mostly to save its picket-line firepower and strike fund.

    Related: There’s a new Tesla bear in town: EV maker is a ‘very expensive company,’ HSBC says

    The new strategy yielded big results, including pay raises of around 25% over the life of the four-year contract plus cost-of-living adjustments, the end of several wage tiers, and better retirement benefits.

    At an event Thursday to celebrate the UAW deal and the reopening of a Stellantis factory in Illinois, President Joe Biden seemed to support the UAW’s unionization push.

    “I want this type of contract for all auto workers,” Biden said. “And I have a feeling UAW has a plan for that.”

    During the UAW strike, some Wall Street analysts said that Tesla would benefit from the increased costs to unionized factories following the labor agreements. One analyst noted that even before any wage increases, the Big Three automakers were paying their workers 38% more than comparable Tesla workers earned.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Who is having the most influence over your money in 2023? Meet the MarketWatch 50.

    Who is having the most influence over your money in 2023? Meet the MarketWatch 50.

    [ad_1]

    What do Elon Musk, Warren Buffett, Shawn Fain and Lina Khan have in common? On the surface, it might not seem like much — one is an impetuous tech-bro genius, another is a buy-and-hold nonagenarian investor, and the other two are a tough union boss and a business-busting regulator. 

    But each of them are having a serious impact on your money. They all appear on this year’s MarketWatch 50 list of the most influential people in markets. The MarketWatch 50 is our tally of the investors, CEOs, policymakers, AI players and financial…

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Inside Kanye West’s troubled Adidas partnership: Tears. Rage. Thrown shoes. Even a scrawled swastika.

    Inside Kanye West’s troubled Adidas partnership: Tears. Rage. Thrown shoes. Even a scrawled swastika.

    [ad_1]

    The ending of the partnership between the artist Kanye West, who now goes by Ye, in October 2022 appeared to come after weeks of his comments about Jewish people and Black Lives Matter, but the New York Times is reporting that the relationship was troubled from the very start.

    At a meeting on the collaborative creation of the very first shoe in 2013, Adidas
    ADS,
    -0.10%

    ADDYY,
    -0.03%

    designers were stunned when West rejected all of the ideas that were presented using fabric swatches on a table and a mood board, the seven-month investigation found. Instead, West, the Times reports, grabbed a sketch and drew a swastika in marker.

    The move shocked the Germans in the room. Germany has a strict ban on displaying the symbol of the Nazi era apart from for artistic purposes. Adding to the sense of horror, the company’s founder — Adolf, or “Adi,” Dassler, who died in 1978 — was a Nazi Party member, and the meeting took place close to Nuremberg, where leaders of the Third Reich were famously tried for crimes against humanity.

    A year ago this week, Adidas threw in the towel.

    West’s fixation on the Nazi era continued, the Times reports, when he later told a Jewish manager at Adidas to kiss a portrait of Adolf Hitler every day. He also told Adidas workers that he admired Hitler’s use and command of propaganda.

    West also brought porn to the workplace and made crude, sexual comments at meetings, according to the Times report. Before the swastika episode, West, according to the Times, had made Adidas executives watch porn at a meeting in his Manhattan apartment.

    In 2022 he reportedly ambushed executives with a porn film. Other workers complained to top managers that he had made angry sexual comments to them.

    The artist, said to have been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, also frequently cried or became angry during meetings, according to the Times investigation. In one instance in 2019, he reportedly moved the operation designing his shoes to Cody, Wyo., and ordered the Adidas team to relocate. In a meeting to discuss his demands with executives, he threw shoes around the room, the Times reports.

    Adidas sought to adapt to this behavior, given how valuable the West-established Yeezy brand was to the company, locked in a perennial battle for both revenue and buzz with its U.S.-based rival Nike Inc.
    NKE,
    -2.04%
    .
    Yeezy sales would rapidly surpass $1 billion a year and help Adidas resonate with young American customers.

    Ratings Game (July 2020): Gap hopes it can burnish its image with a new Kanye West clothing line, repeating the rapper’s brand success with Adidas

    Managers launched a group text chain they called the “Yzy hotline” to discuss his behavior. To reduce stress on individuals, the company is said to have rotated managers in and out of dealing directly with West.

    Over time, meanwhile, Adidas sweetened the terms of West’s deal. Under a 2016 contract, he was entitled to a 15% royalty on sales with a $15 million upfront payment as well as millions of dollars in Adidas stock. In 2019, a further $100 million a year was earmarked for marketing, but, in reality, West could spend those funds at will.

    A year ago this week, though, as public awareness of West’s problematic attitudes are remarks spiked, Adidas threw in the towel, and as sales of Yeezy shoes fell away, it warned it would record its first annual loss in decades. As West’s net worth plummeted, the company wrestled with the decision of how to dispense with its final $1.3 billion in Yeezy products, mulling options including disassembly and repurposing, donation to charity, and outright disposal.

    When a decision was reached to sell the product — in release batches — with some of the proceeds directed to charity and most of the rest flowing to Adidas, West, even then, was entitled to royalties.

    From the archives (October 2022): Kanye West is no longer a billionaire after Adidas shelves Yeezy partnership

    Also see (November 2022): Nike parts ways with Kyrie Irving as controversy swirls over Brooklyn Nets star’s apparent endorsement of antisemitic film

    After bottoming in October 2022, Adidas shares have mounted a 67% comeback, with relief over the company’s not having had to book a damaging loss on the Yeezy line one factor in the restoration of investor confidence.

    Adidas is quoted as having told the Times that it “has no tolerance for hate speech and offensive behavior, which is why the company terminated the Adidas Yeezy partnership,” while West reportedly declined requests for interviews and comment.

    The Times investigation is said to have been based on access to hundreds of previously undisclosed internal records.

    Read on: Michael Jordan is now worth $3 billion. Here’s what billionaire athletes have in common.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ford’s stock drops 4% after carmaker pulls guidance, EV unit loses $1.3 billion

    Ford’s stock drops 4% after carmaker pulls guidance, EV unit loses $1.3 billion

    [ad_1]

    Ford Motor Co.’s stock dropped 4% after hours Thursday after the carmaker reported lower-than-expected quarterly earnings and withdrew its guidance for the year, citing the pending agreement with the United Auto Workers.

    Ford
    F,
    -1.65%

    also reported an adjusted loss of $1.3 billion for its EV unit, which was wider than Wall Street expected, saying that customers interested in EVs are “unwilling” to pay the vehicles’ premium prices. The company paused billions of long-term investment in EVs due to that disconnect.

    “Our business is never short of challenges, especially right now with the evolution of the EV market,” Chief Executive Jim Farley told analysts in a call following results.

    Ford earned $1.2 billion, or 30 cents a share, in the third quarter, swinging from a loss of $827 million, or 21 cents a share, in the year-ago period.

    Adjusted for one-time items, Ford earned 39 cents a share. Adjustments included a $2.7 billion impairment charge related to the investment in the shuttered, Ford-backed Argo AI driverless-car company.

    Revenue rose 11% to $43.8 billion, the carmaker said.

    Analysts polled by FactSet expected Ford to report adjusted earnings of 46 cents a share on sales of $43.94 billion.

    Ford said that its EV business segment recorded an EBIT loss of $1.3 billion, thanks to “continued investment in next-generation EVs and challenging market dynamics.”

    Many customers in North America interested in EVs are “unwilling to pay premiums for them,” which “sharply” flattens EV prices and profit, Ford said.

    The carmaker said it was “poised to deliver profitability” within its previous EBIT guidance range of $11 billion to $12 billion before it decided to withdraw the year’s outlook pending the agreement with its workers.

    The results come as striking employees at Ford are returning to work after the carmaker and the United Auto Workers reached a tentative agreement, which was announced late Wednesday.

    The agreement is going through ratification steps, and negotiations between the union and General Motors Co.
    GM,
    -1.59%

    and Stellantis NV
    STLA,
    -2.17%

    are said to be “active.”

    On the call with analysts, Farley said that once the deal is ratified, Ford will provide Wall Street “a deeper look at the contract and its impact on our business.”

    Ford, GM and Stellantis each have had several factories and distribution centers offline due to the strike. GM and Stellantis are expected to follow with agreements of their own.

    Ford was the first company to face walkouts at a key factory, as workers at Ford’s Kentucky pickup-truck plant walked out on Oct. 11.

    GM earlier this week detailed some of the impacts of the strike, particularly through the end of the current quarter, and also withdrew its guidance.

    See also: UAW strike moves to GM’s key SUV plant

    Ford shares have underperformed the broader equity market, and are losing about 1.6% so far this year, which contrasts with gains of around 8% for the S&P 500 index
    SPX.

    The underperformance holds for the past three months, with Ford shares down 16% compared with the index’s 8% drop in the period.

    The union said that the current four-year deal grants a 25% increase in base wages through April 2028. It will cumulatively raise the top wage at Ford by more than 30% to more than $40 an hour, and starting wages by 68% to over $28 an hour.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Meta’s Earnings Story Will Be a Good Ol’ Rebound in Ads

    Meta’s Earnings Story Will Be a Good Ol’ Rebound in Ads

    [ad_1]

    In recent quarters, Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been talking more about artificial intelligence and cost cutting, while focusing less and less on the company’s multibillion-dollar investment in the metaverse. Expect more of the same when the parent of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Threads reports results after the close Wednesday. 

    Continue reading this article with a Barron’s subscription.

    View Options

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UAW won’t expand auto workers strike

    UAW won’t expand auto workers strike

    [ad_1]

    The United Auto Workers said Friday it has made progress in the negotiations with the Big Three carmakers, and didn’t announce any new plants that would expand its ongoing strike.

    Nearly 34,000 workers at Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    +0.95%
    ,
    General Motors Co.
    GM,
    +1.13%

    and Stellantis NV
    STLA,
    -0.37%

    are on strike, with the most recent labor-movement expansion hitting Ford’s highly profitable Kentucky pickup truck factory earlier this month.

    There was “serious movement” in negotiations at GM and Stellantis, UAW President Shawn Fain said Friday in an address to the membership.

    “The bottom line is we’ve got cards left to play and they’ve money left to spend. That’s the hardest part of a strike. Right before a deal, is when there’s the most aggressive push for that last mile,” Fain said.

    Earlier Friday, GM made new proposal to auto workers, reinstating cost-of-living adjustments and offering compounded raises of about 25% over four years.

    Auto workers started the strike at the stroke of midnight Sept. 14, walking out at one plant each of GM, Ford, and Stellantis NV
    STLA,
    -0.37%
    .
    The union expanded the labor action to more factories and facilities as the weeks went by.

    Striking at all Big Three at once was a departure from the long-standing UAW tradition striking at one car company at a time, to save picket-line firepower and the strike fund.

    During his address Friday, Fain vowed to intensify efforts to unionize at more auto plants.

    “We are going to organize non-union auto companies like we’ve never organized before,” he said.

    Tesla Inc.
    TSLA,
    -3.69%

    has for years fended off efforts to unionize its factory in Fremont, Calif. Several foreign automakers have U.S. plants in the Southeast, where union traditions are not as the Midwest.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Dividend stocks are dirt cheap. It may be time to back up the truck.

    Dividend stocks are dirt cheap. It may be time to back up the truck.

    [ad_1]

    The stock market always overreacts, and this year it seems as if investors believe dividend stocks have become toxic. But a look at yields on quality dividend stocks relative to the market underlines what may be an excellent opportunity for long-term investors to pursue growth with an income stream that builds up over the years.

    The current environment, in which you can get a yield of more than 5% yield on your cash at a bank or lock in a yield of 4.57% on a10-year U.S. Treasury note
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    or close to 5% on a 20-year Treasury bond
    BX:TMUBMUSD20Y
    seems to have made some investors forget two things: A stock’s dividend payout can rise over the long term, and so can it is price.

    It is never fun to see your portfolio underperform during a broad market swing. And people have a tendency to prefer jumping on a trend hoping to keep riding it, rather than taking advantage of opportunities brought about by price declines. We may be at such a moment for quality dividend stocks, based on their yields relative to that of the benchmark S&P 500
    SPX.

    Drew Justman of Madison Funds explained during an interview with MarketWatch how he and John Brown, who co-manage the Madison Dividend Income Fund, BHBFX MDMIX and the new Madison Dividend Value ETF
    DIVL,
    use relative dividend yields as part of their screening process for stocks. He said he has never seen such yields, when compared with that of the broad market, during 20 years of work as a securities analyst and portfolio manager.

    Dividend stocks are down

    Before diving in, we can illustrate the market’s current loathing of dividend stocks by comparing the performance of the Schwab U.S. Equity ETF
    SCHD,
    which tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, with that of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
    SPY.
    Let’s look at a total return chart (with dividends reinvested) starting at the end of 2021, since the Federal Reserve started its cycle of interest rate increases in March 2022:


    FactSet

    The Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index is made up of “high-dividend-yielding stocks in the U.S. with a record of consistently paying dividends, selected for fundamental strength relative to their peers, based on financial ratios,” according to S&P Dow Jones Indices.

    The end results for the two ETFs from the end of 2021 through Tuesday are similar. But you can see how the performance pattern has been different, with the dividend stocks holding up well during the stock market’s reaction to the Fed’s move last year, but trailing the market’s recovery as yields on CDs and bonds have become so much more attractive this year. Let’s break down the performance since the end of 2021, this time bringing in the Madison Dividend Income Fund’s Class Y and Class I shares:

    Fund

    2023 return

    2022 return

    Return since the end of 2021

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

    14.9%

    -18.2%

    -6.0%

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    -3.8%

    -3.2%

    -6.9%

    Madison Dividend Income Fund – Class Y

    -4.7%

    -5.4%

    -9.9%

    Madison Dividend Income Fund – Class I

    -4.7%

    -5.3%

    -9.7%

    Source: FactSet

    Dividend stocks held up well during 2022, as the S&P 500 fell more than 18%. But they have been left behind during this year’s rally.

    The Madison Dividend Income Fund was established in 1986. The Class Y shares have annual expenses of 0.91% of assets under management and are rated three stars (out of five) within Morningstar’s “Large Value” fund category. The Class I shares have only been available since 2020. They have a lower expense ratio of 0.81% and are distributed through investment advisers or through platforms such as Schwab, which charges a $50 fee to buy Class I shares.

    The opportunity — high relative yields

    The Madison Dividend Income Fund holds 40 stocks. Justman explained that when he and Brown select stocks for the fund their investible universe begins with the components of the Russell 1000 Index
    RUT,
    which is made up of the largest 1,000 companies by market capitalization listed on U.S. exchanges. Their first cut narrows the list to about 225 stocks with dividend yields of at least 1.1 times that of the index.

    The Madison team calculates a stock’s relative dividend yield by dividing its yield by that of the S&P 500. Let’s do that for the Schwab U.S. Equity ETF
    SCHD
    (because it tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index) to illustrate the opportunity that Justman highlighted:

    Index or ETF

    Dividend yield

    5-year Avg. yield 

    10-year Avg. yield 

    15-year Avg. yield 

    Relative yield

    5-year Avg. relative yield 

    10-year Avg. relative yield 

    15-year Avg. relative yield 

    Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

    3.99%

    3.41%

    3.20%

    3.16%

    2.6

    2.1

    1.8

    1.6

    S&P 500

    1.55%

    1.62%

    1.79%

    1.92%

    Source: FactSet

    The Schwab U.S. Equity ETF’s relative yield is 2.6 — that is, its dividend yield is 2.6 times that of the S&P 500, which is much higher than the long-term averages going back 15 years. If we went back 20 years, the average relative yield would be 1.7.

    Examples of high-quality stocks with high relative dividend yields

    After narrowing down the Russell 1000 to about 225 stocks with relative dividend yields of at least 1.1, Justman and Brown cut further to about 80 companies with a long history of raising dividends and with strong balance sheets, before moving further through a deeper analysis to arrive at a portfolio of about 40 stocks.

    When asked about oil companies and others that pay fixed quarterly dividends plus variable dividends, he said, “We try to reach out to the company and get an estimate of special dividends and try to factor that in.” Two examples of companies held by the fund that pay variable dividends are ConocoPhillips
    COP,
    -0.29%

    and EOG Resources Inc.
    EOG,
    +0.52%
    .

    Since the balance-sheet requirement is subjective “almost all fund holdings are investment-grade rated,” Justman said. That refers to credit ratings by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service or Fitch Ratings. He went further, saying about 80% of the fund’s holdings were rated “A-minus or better.” BBB- is the lowest investment-grade rating from S&P. Fidelity breaks down the credit agencies’ ratings hierarchy.

    Justman named nine stocks held by the fund as good examples of quality companies with high relative yields to the S&P 500:

    Company

    Ticker

    Dividend yield

    Relative yield

    2023 return

    2022 return

    Return since the end of 2021

    CME Group Inc. Class A

    CME,
    +0.47%
    2.04%

    1.3

    31%

    -23%

    1%

    Home Depot, Inc.

    HD,
    -0.39%
    2.79%

    1.8

    -3%

    -22%

    -25%

    Lowe’s Cos., Inc.

    LOW,
    +0.27%
    2.17%

    1.4

    3%

    -21%

    -19%

    Morgan Stanley

    MS,
    -1.54%
    4.24%

    2.7

    -3%

    -10%

    -13%

    U.S. Bancorp

    USB,
    -0.25%
    5.89%

    3.8

    -22%

    -19%

    -37%

    Medtronic PLC

    MDT,
    -4.32%
    3.62%

    2.3

    1%

    -23%

    -22%

    Texas Instruments Inc.

    TXN,
    -0.21%
    3.30%

    2.1

    -3%

    -10%

    -12%

    United Parcel Service Inc. Class B

    UPS,
    -0.16%
    4.17%

    2.7

    -8%

    -16%

    -23%

    Union Pacific Corp.

    UNP,
    +1.52%
    2.52%

    1.6

    2%

    -16%

    -15%

    Source: FactSet

    Click on the tickers for more about each company, fund or index.

    Click here for Tomi Kilgore’s detailed guide to the wealth of information available for free on the MarketWatch quote page.

    Now let’s see how these companies have grown their dividend payouts over the past five years. Leaving the companies in the same order, here are compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for dividends.

    Before showing this next set of data, let’s work through one example among the nine stocks:

    • If you had purchased shares of Home Depot Inc.
      HD,
      -0.39%

      five years ago, you would have paid $193.70 a share if you went in at the close on Oct. 10, 2018. At that time, the company’s quarterly dividend was $1.03 cents a share, for an annual dividend rate of $4.12, which made for a then-current yield of 2.13%.

    • If you had held your shares of Home Depot for five years through Tuesday, your quarterly dividend would have increased to $2.09 a share, for a current annual payout of $8.36. The company’s dividend has increased at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.2% over the past five years. In comparison, the S&P 500’s weighted dividend rate has increased at a CAGR of 6.24% over the past five years, according to FactSet.

    • That annual payout rate of $8.36 would make for a current dividend yield of 2.79% for a new investor who went in at Tuesday’s closing price of $299.22. But if you had not reinvested, the dividend yield on your five-year-old shares (based on what you would have paid for them) would be 4.32%. And your share price would have risen 54%. And if you had reinvested your dividends, your total return for the five years would have been 75%, slightly ahead of the 74% return for the S&P 500 SPX during that period.

    Home Depot hasn’t been the best dividend grower among the nine stocks named by Justman, but it is a good example of how an investor can build income over the long term, while also enjoying capital appreciation.

    Here’s the dividend CAGR comparison for the nine stocks:

    Company

    Ticker

    Five-year dividend CAGR

    Dividend yield on shares purchased five years ago

    Dividend yield five years ago

    Current dividend yield

    Five-year price change

    Five-year total return

    CME Group Inc. Class A

    CME,
    +0.47%
    9.46%

    2.44%

    1.55%

    2.04%

    20%

    42%

    Home Depot Inc.

    HD,
    -0.39%
    15.20%

    4.32%

    2.13%

    2.79%

    54%

    75%

    Lowe’s Cos, Inc.

    LOW,
    +0.27%
    18.04%

    4.14%

    1.81%

    2.17%

    91%

    109%

    Morgan Stanley

    MS,
    -1.54%
    23.16%

    7.62%

    2.69%

    4.24%

    80%

    108%

    U.S. Bancorp

    USB,
    -0.25%
    5.34%

    3.60%

    2.78%

    5.89%

    -39%

    -26%

    Medtronic PLC

    MDT,
    -4.32%
    6.65%

    2.90%

    2.10%

    3.62%

    -20%

    -9%

    Texas Instruments Inc.

    TXN,
    -0.21%
    11.04%

    5.24%

    3.10%

    3.30%

    59%

    82%

    United Parcel Service Inc. Class B

    UPS,
    -0.16%
    12.23%

    5.56%

    3.12%

    4.17%

    33%

    56%

    Union Pacific Corp.

    UNP,
    +1.52%
    10.20%

    3.37%

    2.07%

    2.52%

    34%

    49%

    Source: FactSet

    This isn’t to say that Justman and Brown have held all of these stocks over the past five years. In fact, Lowe’s Cos.
    LOW,
    +0.27%

    was added to the portfolio this year, as was United Parcel Service Inc.
    UPS,
    -0.16%
    .
    But for most of these companies, dividends have compounded at relatively high rates.

    When asked to name an example of a stock the fund had sold, Justman said he and Brown decided to part ways with Verizon Communications Inc.
    VZ,
    -0.94%

    last year, “as we became concerned about its fundamental competitive position in its industry.”

    Summing up the scene for dividend stocks, Justman said, “It seems this year the market is treating dividend stocks as fixed-income instruments. We think that is a short-term issue and that this is a great opportunity.”

    Don’t miss: How to tell if it is worth avoiding taxes with a municipal-bond ETF

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Apple says it will fix app software problems blamed for making iPhone 15 models too hot to handle

    Apple says it will fix app software problems blamed for making iPhone 15 models too hot to handle

    [ad_1]

    Apple Inc. is blaming a software bug and other issues tied to popular apps such as Instagram and Uber for causing its recently released iPhone 15 models to heat up and spark complaints about becoming too hot to handle.

    The Cupertino, Calif., company
    AAPL,
    +0.30%

    said Saturday that it is working on an update to the iOS17 system that powers the iPhone 15 lineup to prevent the devices from becoming uncomfortably hot and is working with apps that are running in ways “causing them to overload the system.”

    Instagram, owned by Meta Platforms
    META,
    -1.23%
    ,
    modified its social media app earlier this week to prevent it from heating up the device on the latest iPhone operating system.

    Read: The Magnificent Seven could be considered the messy seven after a ‘meh’ third quarter

    Uber
    UBER,
    -0.33%

    and other apps such as the video game Asphalt 9 are still in the process of rolling out their updates, Apple said. It didn’t specify a timeline for when its own software fix would be issued but said no safety issues should prevent iPhone 15 owners from using their devices while awaiting the update.

    “We have identified a few conditions which can cause iPhone to run warmer than expected,” Apple in a short statement provided to The Associated Press after media reports detailed overheating complaints that are peppering online message boards.

    The Wall Street Journal amplified the worries in a story citing the overheating problem in its own testing of the new iPhones, which went on sale a week ago.

    Read: Here’s what Apple’s iPhone 15 says about the world

    It’s not unusual for new iPhones to get uncomfortably warm during the first few days of use or when they are being restored with backup information stored in the cloud — issues that Apple already flags for users. The devices also can get hot when using apps such as video games and augmented reality technology that require a lot of processing power, but the heating issues with the iPhone 15 models have gone beyond those typical situations.

    In its acknowledgement, Apple stressed that the trouble isn’t related to the sleek titanium casing that houses the high-end iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max instead of the stainless steel used on older smartphones.

    Apple also dismissed speculation that the overheating problem in the new models might be tied to a shift from its proprietary Lightning charging cable to the more widely used USB-C port that allowed it to comply with a mandate issued by European regulators.

    Although Apple expressed confidence that the overheating issue can be quickly fixed with the upcoming software updates, the problem still could dampen sales of its marquee product at time when the company has faced three consecutive quarters of year-over-year declines in overall sales.

    The downturn has affected iPhone sales, which fell by a combined 4% in the nine months covered by Apple’s past three fiscal quarters compared with a year earlier.

    Apple is trying to pump up its sales in part by raising the starting price for its top-of-the-line iPhone 15 Pro Max to $1,200, an increase of $100, or 9%, from last year’s comparable model.

    Investor worries about Apple’s uncharacteristic sales funk already have wiped out more than $300 billion in shareholder wealth since the company’s market value closed at $3 trillion for the first time in late June.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Tesla’s quarterly deliveries, profit seen lower by Citi

    Tesla’s quarterly deliveries, profit seen lower by Citi

    [ad_1]

    Analysts at Citi on Thursday dialed down their expectations for Tesla Inc.’s third-quarter deliveries and profit, saying they based their new numbers on China sales, global registration data and an implied production pace for the EV maker.

    Tesla
    TSLA,
    +2.44%

    and General Motors Co.
    GM,
    +2.50%

    are scheduled to report third-quarter vehicle sales next week, while Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    +1.37%

    and a few others are slated to report September sales.

    Earlier this week, a Deutsche Bank analyst warned that there was “meaningful downside risk” to current 2024 Tesla projections due to limited volume growth, and cut his price target on Tesla stock.

    J.D. Power on Thursday estimated another double-digit gain for U.S. new-car sales in September. GM, Ford and Stellantis NV
    STLA,
    +2.45%

    are facing a strike affecting some of its assembly plants and, in the case of GM and Stellantis, auto-parts distribution centers.

    The Citi analysts, led by Itay Michaeli, said they trimmed their Tesla quarterly sales estimates to 450,000 vehicles, from a previous expectation of 468,500 vehicles.

    See also: Tesla sued for racial discrimination, retaliation by EEOC

    They lowered their forecast for adjusted per-share earnings to 75 cents in the quarter, from a prior estimate of an adjusted EPS of 81 cents for the quarter.

    The Citi’s expectations compare with FactSet consensus of Tesla deliveries of 462,000 vehicles in the quarter, and consensus around an adjusted EPS of 79 cents for the quarter.

    “We will revisit our model post the [third-quarter] delivery report,” the Citi analysts said. They kept the equivalent of a hold rating on the stock.

    The update on the sales estimates was based on recent weekly China data “in part reflecting the Model 3 refresh transition,” as the compact sedan in some parts of the world is getting a minor update; the latest available global Tesla registration data; and their observations on production rate and “inventory discounting, with our estimates assuming some [quarter-on-quarter] de-stocking,” the analysts said.

    Given Tesla’s production pace and the Model 3 changes, “we see a greater range of delivery outcomes vs. typical quarters,” they said.

    Tesla shares have doubled so far this year, compared with gains of around 12% for the S&P 500 index
    SPX.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Ford pauses work on $3.5 billion EV battery plant in Michigan

    Ford pauses work on $3.5 billion EV battery plant in Michigan

    [ad_1]

    Ford Motor Co. said late Monday it has halted work on a $3.5 billion battery factory in Michigan, just days after the carmaker made concessions to its striking workers.

    “We’re pausing work and limiting spending on construction on the [Marshall, Mich.] project until we’re confident about our ability to competitively operate the plant,” a Ford
    F,
    +1.21%

    spokesperson said. “We haven’t made any final decision about the planned investment there.”

    Ford said in February it was investing $3.5 billion to build the facility in Marshall, about 100 miles west of Detroit. The plant, which Ford called BlueOval Battery Park Michigan, is part of Ford’s “commitment to American manufacturing,” the company said then.

    The plant was expected to employ about 2,500 workers at the start of production, scheduled for 2026. The $3.5 billion investment is part of Ford’s commitment to invest more than $50 billion in electric vehicles globally through that year.

    Employees in some parts of a Michigan Ford plant making Broncos and Rangers have been on strike since Sept. 14, part of a first wave of United Auto Workers’ labor action also hitting one plant each of General Motors Co.
    GM,
    +1.47%

    and Stellantis NV
    STLA,
    -0.57%

    after the union’s contract expired without progress in the negotiations.

    Read more: UAW strike: 5 things to know

    The UAW on Friday expanded the strike to 38 GM and Stellantis distribution centers across 20 states, but didn’t extend the labor action at Ford because it said it had won some concessions for the automaker, such as a return of cost-of-living adjustments.

    Ford was showing the UAW that it was “serious about reaching a deal,” union leadership said at the time.

    The strike comes at a time the legacy automakers are stretched thin to make investments in EVs, with batteries an especially critical — and pricey — components.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UAW expands strike to 38 GM and Stellantis auto-parts distribution centers in 20 states

    UAW expands strike to 38 GM and Stellantis auto-parts distribution centers in 20 states

    [ad_1]

    The United Auto Workers on Friday expanded its strike to 38 General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV auto-parts distribution centers in 20 states, hobbling the two carmakers’ repair networks.

    UAW President Shawn Fain said that the union has made “some real progress” in negotiations with Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    +1.89%
    ,
    which agreed to cost-of-living increases, some job protections and other concessions, and it won’t be striking at additional Ford plants.

    “Ford is showing us they are serious about reaching a deal,” Fain said.

    Nearly 13,000 UAW members have been on strike since last Friday at a Missouri GM plant making GMC Canyons and Colorados, an Ohio Stellantis plant making Jeep Wranglers and Gladiators, and portions of a Michigan Ford plant making Broncos and Rangers.

    Joining them are 3,475 workers at 18 GM fulfillment centers and 2,150 workers at 20 Stellantis centers across the U.S. The workers at the auto-parts distribution centers started to walk off at noon Eastern on Friday.

    GM said that the strike’s “escalation” was “unnecessary.”

    “We have contingency plans for various scenarios and are prepared to do what is best for our business, our customers, and our dealers,” the company said in a statement Friday. “We will continue to bargain in good faith with the union to reach an agreement as quickly as possible.”

    Don’t miss: Tesla may be the winner of the Big Three labor woes

    Stellantis said later Friday that it made a “very competitive offer” on Thursday that included a pay raise of 21% over the four-year life of the contract for some of its full-time hourly workers and a “significant product allocation that allows for workforce stability through the end of the contract.”

    “And yet, we still have not received a response to that offer. We look forward to the UAW leadership’s productive engagement so that we can bargain in good faith to reach an agreement that will protect the competitiveness of our company and our ability to continue providing good jobs,” said Stellantis, which was formed in 2021 with the merger of Fiat Chrysler and France’s Groupe PSA and is headquartered in the Netherlands.

    Meanwhile, Wall Street seemed encouraged by the progress with Ford negotiations.

    That was “encouraging,” suggesting that the Big Three could “perhaps reach a labor agreement sooner than some have been expecting,” measured in days and weeks and not months, Citi analyst Itay Michaeli said in a note Friday. The new strikes at auto-parts distribution facilities would likely immediately impact “a relatively smaller yet high-margin revenue stream” for GM, Michaeli said.

    A potential parts shortage could add pressure on the carmakers to reach an agreement sooner, he said. Compared with the possibility of strike at full-size truck plants, at the heart of the automakers’ profits, however, “today’s update seems somewhat more encouraging.”

    Wedbush analyst Dan Ives called the UAW action “an aggressive move that essentially goes at the hearts and lungs of auto operations for GM and Stellantis.”

    A settlement with Ford is likely over the coming week, Ives said. “The UAW and GM/Stellantis now have crossed the invisible line and the UAW strike is about to get a lot nastier.”

    Since the strike began, the union and the automakers have said they are engaging in constant talks as they try to reach a compromise on a new national contract.

    The union is demanding wage increases, an end to tiers, the restoration of pensions and cost-of-living adjustments and other concessions. Although both the union and companies have claimed progress during talks, GM President Mark Reuss said in a recent opinion piece in the Detroit Free Press that the UAW’s demands are “untenable.” That’s in line with Ford President Jim Farley’s characterization of the union’s wage proposal as “unsustainable” for the company before the strike deadline.

    Fain mentioned Reuss’s “untenable” comment in his update Friday via webcast. GM and Stellantis “are going to need some serious pushing” to meet union demands, he said.

    See: 5 things to know about the UAW strike


    Uncredited

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UAW expands strike to 38 GM and Stellantis auto-parts distribution centers in 20 states

    UAW expands strike to 38 GM and Stellantis auto-parts distribution centers in 20 states

    [ad_1]

    The United Auto Workers on Friday expanded its strike to 38 General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV auto-parts distribution centers in 20 states, hobbling the two carmakers’ repair networks.

    UAW President Shawn Fain said that the union has made “some real progress” in negotiations with Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    +1.89%
    ,
    which agreed to cost-of-living increases, some job protections and other concessions, and it won’t be striking at additional Ford plants.

    “Ford is showing us they are serious about reaching a deal,” Fain said.

    Nearly 13,000 UAW members have been on strike since last Friday at a Missouri GM plant making GMC Canyons and Colorados, an Ohio Stellantis plant making Jeep Wranglers and Gladiators, and portions of a Michigan Ford plant making Broncos and Rangers.

    Joining them are 3,475 workers at 18 GM fulfillment centers and 2,150 workers at 20 Stellantis centers across the U.S. The workers at the auto-parts distribution centers started to walk off at noon Eastern on Friday.

    GM said that the strike’s “escalation” was “unnecessary.”

    “We have contingency plans for various scenarios and are prepared to do what is best for our business, our customers, and our dealers,” the company said in a statement Friday. “We will continue to bargain in good faith with the union to reach an agreement as quickly as possible.”

    Don’t miss: Tesla may be the winner of the Big Three labor woes

    Stellantis said later Friday that it made a “very competitive offer” on Thursday that included a pay raise of 21% over the four-year life of the contract for some of its full-time hourly workers and a “significant product allocation that allows for workforce stability through the end of the contract.”

    “And yet, we still have not received a response to that offer. We look forward to the UAW leadership’s productive engagement so that we can bargain in good faith to reach an agreement that will protect the competitiveness of our company and our ability to continue providing good jobs,” said Stellantis, which was formed in 2021 with the merger of Fiat Chrysler and France’s Groupe PSA and is headquartered in the Netherlands.

    Meanwhile, Wall Street seemed encouraged by the progress with Ford negotiations.

    That was “encouraging,” suggesting that the Big Three could “perhaps reach a labor agreement sooner than some have been expecting,” measured in days and weeks and not months, Citi analyst Itay Michaeli said in a note Friday. The new strikes at auto-parts distribution facilities would likely immediately impact “a relatively smaller yet high-margin revenue stream” for GM, Michaeli said.

    A potential parts shortage could add pressure on the carmakers to reach an agreement sooner, he said. Compared with the possibility of strike at full-size truck plants, at the heart of the automakers’ profits, however, “today’s update seems somewhat more encouraging.”

    Wedbush analyst Dan Ives called the UAW action “an aggressive move that essentially goes at the hearts and lungs of auto operations for GM and Stellantis.”

    A settlement with Ford is likely over the coming week, Ives said. “The UAW and GM/Stellantis now have crossed the invisible line and the UAW strike is about to get a lot nastier.”

    Since the strike began, the union and the automakers have said they are engaging in constant talks as they try to reach a compromise on a new national contract.

    The union is demanding wage increases, an end to tiers, the restoration of pensions and cost-of-living adjustments and other concessions. Although both the union and companies have claimed progress during talks, GM President Mark Reuss said in a recent opinion piece in the Detroit Free Press that the UAW’s demands are “untenable.” That’s in line with Ford President Jim Farley’s characterization of the union’s wage proposal as “unsustainable” for the company before the strike deadline.

    Fain mentioned Reuss’s “untenable” comment in his update Friday via webcast. GM and Stellantis “are going to need some serious pushing” to meet union demands, he said.

    See: 5 things to know about the UAW strike


    Uncredited

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • U.S. stocks end lower, S&P 500 drops third straight week as Fed worries linger

    U.S. stocks end lower, S&P 500 drops third straight week as Fed worries linger

    [ad_1]

    U.S. stocks ended modestly lower Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average falling for a fourth consecutive day in its longest daily losing streak since June. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq each logged a third-straight weekly decline as rising bond yields rocked equities in the wake of the Federal Reserve meeting on Wednesday.

    How stock indexes traded

    • The Dow Jones Industrial Average
      DJIA
      fell 106.58 points, or 0.3%, to close at 33,963.84.

    • The S&P 500
      SPX
      shed 9.94 points, or 0.2%, to finish at 4,320.06.

    • The Nasdaq Composite
      COMP
      dropped 12.18 points, or 0.1%, to end at 13,211.81.

    For the week, the Dow fell 1.9%, the S&P 500 dropped 2.9% and the Nasdaq Composite slumped 3.6%. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq each booked their biggest weekly percentage drop since March, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    What drove markets

    Stocks slipped after two days of selling sparked by the Federal Reserve projecting its policy interest rate would remain above 5% well into next year.

    The notion in markets that the Fed would be cutting rates soon was “offsides,” leading to a “knee-jerk reaction” in bond markets that hurt stocks, said Michael Skordeles, head of U.S. economics at Truist Advisory Services, in a phone interview Friday. In his view, the central bank may cut its benchmark rate just once in the second half of next year, if at all, as inflation remains too high in a “resilient” U.S. economy with a “still fairly strong” labor market.

    Rapidly rising Treasury yields have been blamed for much of the pain in stocks. The yield on the 10-year Treasury note
    BX:TMUBMUSD10Y
    climbed 11.7 basis points this week to 4.438%, dipping on Friday after on Thursday rising to its highest level since October 2007, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    Senior Fed officials who spoke Friday voiced support for the more aggressive monetary policy path signaled by Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday.

    Boston Federal Reserve President Susan Collins said rates are likely to stay “higher, and for longer, than previous projections had suggested,” while Fed Gov. Michelle Bowman said it’s possible the Fed could raise rates further to quell inflation. The latest Fed “dot plot,” released following the close of the central bank’s two-day policy meeting on Wednesday, showed senior Fed officials expect to raise rates once more in 2023.

    Meanwhile, the S&P 500 finished Friday logging a third straight week of declines, with consumer-discretionary stocks posting the worst weekly performance among the index’s 11 sectors by dropping more than 6%, according to FactSet data.

    “Markets weakened this week following an extended period of calm, as the hawkish tone adopted by Fed Chair Powell following the FOMC meeting caused the decline,” said Mark Hackett, Nationwide’s chief of investment research, in emailed comments Friday. “Bears have wrestled control of the equity markets from bulls.”

    Economic data on Friday showed some weakness in the U.S. services sector, while manufacturing activity recovered slightly but remained in contraction, according to S&P U.S. purchasing managers indexes.

    Still the U.S. economy has been largely resilient despite a hawkish Fed, with “strong economic growth driving fears of continued inflation pressure,” said Hackett. He also pointed to concerns that a “too strong” economy and “developing clouds” such as strikes, a potential government shutdown, and student loan repayments “will impact consumer activity.”

    Read: Government shutdown: Analysts warn of ‘perhaps a long one lasting into the winter’

    Jamie Cox, managing partner at Richmond, Virginia-based wealth-management firm Harris Financial Group, said by phone on Friday that he’ll become concerned about the impact of a government shutdown on markets if it stretches for longer than a month.

    “I’m only worried if it goes past a month,” said Cox, explaining he expects “little” economic impact if a government shutdown lasts a couple weeks.

    Meanwhile, United Auto Workers President Shawn Fain said Friday that the union is expanding its strike to 38 General Motors Co.
    GM,
    -0.40%

    and Stellantis NV’s
    STLA,
    +0.10%

    auto-parts distribution centers in 20 states, hobbling the two carmakers’ repair network.

    “We’re seeing strike after strike,” which overtime could fuel wage growth that’s already “robust,” said Truist’s Skordeles. That risks adding to inflationary pressures in the economy, he said. And while U.S. inflation has eased “dramatically,” said Skordeles, “it isn’t down to where it needs to be.”

    Companies in focus

    Steve Goldstein contributed to this report.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Instacart, Ford, Pinterest, Coty, Dollar General, Intel, and More Stock Market Movers

    Instacart, Ford, Pinterest, Coty, Dollar General, Intel, and More Stock Market Movers

    [ad_1]


    • Order Reprints
    • Print Article
    [ad_2]
    Source link

  • UAW strike sets the stage for the 4-day work week — and a win could take it mainstream

    UAW strike sets the stage for the 4-day work week — and a win could take it mainstream

    [ad_1]

    Striking United Auto Workers want better wages, improved job security, retiree pay increases, and a 32-hour work week that could turbocharge broader acceptance of shorter work weeks.

    Right now, nearly 13,000 UAW workers have walked off the job at Ford Motor Co.
    F,
    -0.08%
    ,
    General Motors Co.
    GM,
    +0.86%

    and Jeep and Chrysler parent Stellantis
    STLA,
    +2.18%
    ,
    still considered the influential Big Three for car makers.

    If the union gets a win from on its 32-hour work week demand, that could be a big deal for momentum behind the broader four-day work week movement, experts say.

    Four days of work is “still in the early-adoption phase,” said Alex Soojung-Kim Pang, director at Four Day Week Global, where he advises companies considering how to implement a curtailed traditional work week.

    A UAW win on the 32-hour demand “would help move the four-day week from being something you do if you have a bold leader and you want to stand out in your industry, to a mainstream aspiration for every worker and business owner,” said Soojung-Kim Pang.

    “A lot more people can look at the four-day week and say if they are doing this in an auto factory, I absolutely can do it here in my small plant, or in my business,” he added.

    Even if the 32-hour work week doesn’t make it to the final deal, it’s a “game changer” that the demand is there at all, he said. The demand could plant the idea in labor talks far beyond the UAW-company standoff.

    A UAW win on the 32-hour week would cause a “massive reverberation,” said Cathy Creighton, of Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations.

    The demand’s presence is a sign of the COVID-19 pandemic’s lasting effects, said Creighton. While five days of in-person office attendance seems like a thing of the past, “we’ve had fundamental changes in how workers and employers view work life and work-life balance.”

    Many factory workers may not be able to pull off remote work but they can press for a shortened week on the physically demanding work, she noted. Historically, the UAW was one of the first unions to deliver health benefits, vacation and pensions for its members, she noted.

    “I think the labor movement has been playing it safe for a long time, and now they are not,” Creighton said. The UAW’s 32-hour work week demand is a prime example, she said. “The five-day work week is so ingrained in our psyche that to think of something different is like an earthquake.”

    Some research indicates people are ready for a shake-up. Nearly six in 10 people who work five days say they would prefer four 10-hour days, according to an August poll in an ongoing look at worker attitudes run by academic researchers.

    “We all know that living in a plant seven days a week, 12 hours a day, isn’t a living at all. We need real work-life balance. Auto workers deserve a life,” UAW president Shawn Fain told members in a video update days before the targeted strike.

    Roughly 12,700 UAW members so far have walked off the job at a Ford Motor plant in Michigan, a GM plant in Missouri and an Ohio plant for Stellantis NV, the maker of brands like Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep and Ram Trucks.

    Of course, there’s no guarantee how far the demand gets. The companies have counter proposals for the array of union asks, as a chart shows from researchers at Evercore ISI. They don’t yet have counters on the 32-hour work week.

    Switching to a 32-hour week with a 40-hour pay rate would be a sharp labor cost on top of the wage increases the UAW is already seeking, a Stellantis spokeswoman said. It would require hiring at least 25% more workers to stick with current manufacturing schedules, she said.

    “We are extremely disappointed by the UAW leadership’s refusal to engage in a responsible manner to reach a fair agreement in the best interest of our employees, their families and our customers,” the company said in a statement.

    In a statement, GM said it was “disappointed by the UAW leadership’s actions, despite the unprecedented economic package GM put on the table, including historic wage increases and manufacturing commitments.”

    Ford did not respond to a request for comment.

    “It’s a big game of chess that Shawn Fain is playing. We’ll see how it turns out,” Creighton said.

    “Even if they don’t get the four-day week this time, there are going to be other moves in this game in the future,” from the UAW and beyond, Soojung-Kim Pang said.

    “Even if you have to give on the four-day week now, that doesn’t mean you give on the four-day week as an ideal or a goal.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • GM and Ford’s stocks are higher as UAW strike kicks off. Their bonds tell a different story.

    GM and Ford’s stocks are higher as UAW strike kicks off. Their bonds tell a different story.

    [ad_1]

    Ford Motor Co.’s and General Motors Co.’s stocks were higher Friday as workers kicked off a strike, but their bonds have been under selling pressure for some time.

    Nearly 13,000 U.S. auto workers went on strike early Friday after the three automakers and the UAW failed to reach an agreement before their national contract expired just before midnight.

    The union has opted for targeted strikes, so workers at a Ford
    F,
    -0.04%

    plant in Michigan and a GM
    GM,
    +0.83%

    plant in Missouri were first to down tools, along with workers at a Stellantis N.V.
    STLA,
    +2.12%

    plant in Ohio.

     UAW President Shawn Fain has said others could join later and asked all 150,000 members to be ready if and when they’re called to strike.

    The strike at all three U.S. carmakers is a break with tradition, as the union for many years has elected to center strike efforts at one company to protect its strike fund and picket-line firepower.

    For more, read: UAW strike: 12,700 Ford, GM and Stellantis auto workers walk off the job

    Ford’s stock was last up 0.5%, while GM was up 1.4%.

    But as the following charts from data solutions company BondCliQ Media Services shows, the bonds have seen far more selling than buying over the last 10 days. Bondholders are often viewed as “smarter” than shareholders, because they tend to be laser-focused on a company’s financials and cash flows, to ensure they will be repaid their principal when bonds mature.


    Net customer flow of Ford and GM bonds (last 10 days). Source: BondCliQ Media Sources

    The next chart shows that Ford has seen more selling than GM.


    Ford and GM’s debt trading volumes (last 10 days). Source: BondCliQ Media Services


    Most-active Ford issues with net customer flow (last 10 days). Source: BondCliQ Media Services


    Most-active General Motors issue with net customer flow (last 10 days). Source: BondCliQ Media Services

    Stellantis, meanwhile, was seeing strong buying of its U.S. dollar-denominated bonds. The company, the former Fiat Chrysler, has far less debt than Ford and GM.

    Stellantis has about $26.5 billion of total debt, according to FactSet data, about $19.7 billion of which is in bonds.

    Ford has $143 billion of debt and $124 billion of bonds. GM has $118 billion of debt, with about $107 billion in bonds, according to FactSet.


    Most active Stellantis NV issues (USD) with net customer flow (last 10 days). Source: BondCliQ Media Services

    Fitch Ratings said earlier Friday the strike will have a limited financial impact on the auto makers, at least for now with just three plants striking.

    “It seems likely the UAW will try to ratchet up pressure on the automakers over time by shifting the strike to more impactful plants and adding more plants to the strike,” Stephen Brown, a senior director at Fitch, said in emailed comments. “The impact on the automakers of striking individual plants could be similar to the semiconductor-induced disruptions that we saw over the past few years.”

    See also: Big Three need to step up for the automotive workers who keep them profitable

    Fitch had already incorporated the potential impact of strikes in its recent decision to upgrade its ratings of Ford and GM, he said. The agency moved Ford to BBB- from BB+, moving it back into investment trade from speculative, or “junk,” status.

    “Ford, GM and Stellantis all have robust liquidity positions that will help them to withstand a potentially drawn-out period of production disruption. Based on June 30 figures, we estimate Ford has over $50 billion of cash and credit facility capacity, while GM has nearly $40 billion,” said Brown.

    Stellantis stock was up 2.2% Friday and has gained 36% in the year to date, outperforming GM’s 1.2% gain and Ford’s 9.0% gain. The S&P 500
    SPX
    has gained 17% in the same time frame.

    For live coverage of the UAW strikes, click here.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UAW strike: Ford, GM, Stellantis record profits haven’t been shared fairly with workers, Biden says

    UAW strike: Ford, GM, Stellantis record profits haven’t been shared fairly with workers, Biden says

    [ad_1]

    President Joe Biden on Friday offered his support to the United Auto Workers, as he addressed their strike aimed at the Big Three auto makers.

    Auto companies have seen record profits because of the “extraordinary skill and sacrifices” of UAW workers, Biden said in a brief speech at the White House.

    “Those record profits have not been shared fairly, in my view, with those workers,” the president added.

    “The companies have made some significant offers, but I believe they should go further to ensure record corporate profits mean record contracts for the UAW,” he also said.

    Biden gave his remarks after about 12,700 workers went on strike early Friday as their union and the Big Three automakers failed to reach an agreement before a contract expired.

    It’s a targeted strike at a Ford Motor 
    F,
    -0.08%

    plant in Michigan, a General Motors 
    GM,
    +0.86%

    plant in Missouri and a Stellantis NV 
    STLA,
    +2.18%

    plant in Ohio.

    The UAW so far has not endorsed Biden’s re-election bid, even as the AFL-CIO and other big unions have lined up behind the Democratic incumbent.

    The presidential race in 2024 could be a rematch of 2020’s contest between Biden and former President Donald Trump, who has won over some union households that historically have backed Democrats like Biden rather than Republicans.

    See: Here are the Republicans running for president

    Biden got more support than Trump from union households in the battleground states of Michigan and Wisconsin in 2020, but Trump got more support from such households in Ohio and Pennsylvania, according to Edison Research exit polls.

    Trump has seized on concerns that the car industry’s shift toward electric vehicles
    CARZ,
    which the Biden administration has promoted, could hurt American workers. “The all Electric Car is a disaster for both the United Auto Workers and the American Consumer,” the former president said Friday in a post on his Truth Social platform.

    On Friday, Biden said he hopes the UAW and car companies “can return to the negotiation table to forge a win-win agreement,” and he said he’s sending two administration officials to Detroit — Julie Su, the acting secretary of labor, and Gene Sperling, a senior adviser.

    GM posted a 2022 net profit of $11.04 billion, up from $10.38 billion in 2021, while Ford recorded a 2022 net profit of $7.62 billion, up from $6.43 billion in the prior year. For Stellantis, the parent company for brands such as Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep, last year’s net profit was $17.83 billion, up from $15.12 billion.

    UAW President Shawn Fain said in a statement after Biden’s speech that union members “agree with Joe Biden when he says ‘record profits mean record contracts.’” 

    Fain also said: “Working people are not afraid. You know who’s afraid? The corporate media is afraid. The White House is afraid. The companies are afraid.”

    Now read: Tesla may be the winner of the Big Three labor woes

    And see: Will the UAW strike push up car prices?

    Plus: UAW strike to have limited impact on Big Three, Fitch says

    Claudia Assis contributed.

     

    [ad_2]

    Source link