ReportWire

Tag: maternity leave

  • How 1 LinkedIn Post Shows the Ruthless Reach of the Starbucks Layoffs

    [ad_1]

    What’s colder than a mocha frappuccino? Losing your job while on maternity leave.

    That’s the reality former Starbucks recruiter Leslee Hemenway faces after being laid off by the coffee chain, according to her LinkedIn post on Monday. Hemenway worked at Starbucks for seven years and was one of their retail management interns during college, her LinkedIn profile reads. She was one of the 900 non-retail employees laid off from Starbucks last week.

    “Being laid off while on maternity leave feels like a sick joke, but it’s the reality I’m presently facing,” Hemenway’s post said.

    Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol said the layoffs were a “difficult decision” to tighten the company’s costs, he announced online. Employees were instructed to work from home on the day laid-off employees were notified. Affected employees will receive “generous severance and support packages including benefits extensions,” according to Niccol. Starbucks did not return a request for comment by the time of publication to offer a more detailed explanation.

    “I know these decisions impact our partners and their families, and we did not make them lightly,” Niccol said in a company announcement. “I believe these steps are necessary to build a better, stronger, and more resilient Starbucks that deepens its impact on the world and creates more opportunities for our partners, suppliers, and the communities we serve.”

    In addition to corporate layoffs, Starbucks is also closing hundreds of its U.S. stores, including its flagship Reserve Roastery near its Seattle headquarters. The company said it was closing locations where they don’t see “a path to financial performance,” and they’re unable “to create the physical environment our customers and partners expect.” Baristas working at the closing stores are being transferred to other locations, when possible, Niccol said. In cases where transfers are not possible, these workers will be given a severance and are encouraged to “come back” when new stores and roles open.

    As for Hemenway, she’s going to use the severance package she received to take time to bond with her newborn.

    “After the birth of my daughter this summer, I’m going to savor the time I have with her and not actively pursue a new role for now,” Hemenway said on LinkedIn. “However, if you know of something that might be a particularly good fit in recruiting or talent management, please feel free to send it my way.”

    [ad_2]

    Kayla Webster

    Source link

  • Katie Couric SLAMS Her Former Today Co-Host Bryant Gumbel! Damn!! – Perez Hilton

    Katie Couric SLAMS Her Former Today Co-Host Bryant Gumbel! Damn!! – Perez Hilton

    [ad_1]

    Katie Couric hasn’t forgotten how Bryant Gumbel allegedly treated her on Today.

    In an interview with Bill Maher for his Club Random Podcast posted on Sunday, the journalist opened up about the old days of hosting Today with Bryant — both the highs and the lows. While she admitted that he was a “talent,” a “seamless broadcaster,” and “eloquent,” she remembers him as “a guy’s guy.” You know, the type that wasn’t particularly understanding of women.

    Related: Whoopi Goldberg Has Had ENOUGH Of Travis Kelce! Watch Her Go Off!

    She recalled a time in the early ’90s when she had her first baby and Bryant was apparently less than understanding about her maternity leave:

    “He got mad at me because I was doing something on maternity leave and he was giving me endless s**t for taking, like, a month or two off. I was having my first baby. And he was like, ‘Why don’t you just drop it in the field and come back to work right away,’ or something.”

    WTF! All that fuss for just a month or two?? Jeez…

    The 67-year-old continued:

    “No, he was kidding, but he was giving me a lot — he was goofing on me but giving me a lot of s**t, but it was sort of emblematic of an incredibly sexist attitude.”

    Sounds like it… We mean come on, dude! What the hell?! See her full interview (below):

    The two co-anchored Today from 1991 until 1997 when Bryant left. Katie shares daughters Elinor, 32, and Caroline, 28, with her late ex-husband Jay Monahan. Thoughts, Perezcious readers?? We know the “drop it in the field” comment is a joke, but the sexism around it ain’t cool!! What do U think?! Let us know in the comments below…

    [Images via Club Random Podcast, NBC, & CBS/YouTube]

    [ad_2]

    Perez Hilton

    Source link

  • When It Comes to American Parental Leave, The Kyte Baby Fiasco Is the Tip of the Iceberg

    When It Comes to American Parental Leave, The Kyte Baby Fiasco Is the Tip of the Iceberg

    [ad_1]

    Welcoming a new baby into your home should be a joyous event—but one mom’s experience shows how American work culture can make it anything but.

    Marissa Hughes, an employee at baby clothing company Kyte Baby, and her husband adopted a newborn named Judah in December 2023. However, Judah was born prematurely at 22 weeks, which meant he was looking at a lengthy stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. Complicating things even further was that Hughes and her husband lived in Dallas, TX, and Judah was 9 hours away, in El Paso.

    According to Kyte Baby CEO Ying Liu, the company’s parental leave policy granted two weeks of maternity leave to all new parents who had worked at the company for at least six months. When Hughes asked to work remotely after the two weeks were up so that she could stay by Judah’s bedside, Liu denied her request. In order to take care of Judah, Hughes had to forfeit her job.

    News of Hughes’ firing went viral, and Kyte Baby customers took to social media to announce that they would no longer support the company. Liu then posted an apology video to TikTok. However, viewers quickly called her out for the scripted, impersonal nature of the video, in which she stated that she had “the utmost respect for babies, families, and the adoption community” and was sorry that Hughes “didn’t feel supported.”

    Liu then posted a second, unscripted video in response to the backlash to the first video, admitting that she was the one who had denied Hughes’ remote work request. Liu also said that the company would continue to pay Hughes’ salary and benefits, even though Hugh doesn’t plan to return.

    In the meantime, Hughes and her husband are currently running a GoFundMe campaign to cover Judah’s adoption expenses.

    Two weeks of parental leave is a joke

    Underlying Liu’s problematic decision to deny Hughes’ request is Kyte Baby’s heartless parental leave policy.

    When it comes to parental leave, the U.S. remains an outlier among wealthy nations. For comparison, Canada offers 15 weeks of paid leave with options for additional time, and the U.K. offers up to 39 weeks. The U.S. on the other hand, offers 12 weeks of unpaid leave—and that’s only if a worker meets certain requirements. Any paid leave is left to the discretion of individual employers.

    Two weeks of leave is laughably inadequate when it comes to taking care of a newborn. Even if a parent isn’t recovering from the major medical event of childbirth, newborns need around-the-clock care for several weeks, and infants need intensive care and bonding for months after birth. It’s not fair to make the parents of healthy newborns scramble to find care within weeks of birth, and it’s even worse to demand that they leave NICU-bound babies to go back to work. Two weeks’ leave is a cruel policy—and the fact that it’s offered by a company specializing in baby clothing makes it especially galling.

    There’s also the matter of American work culture, which encourages employers to make ghoulish decisions like Liu’s. This incident is far from the first time a boss has denied a new parent’s accommodation request because they felt work was more important than family, and it won’t be the last.

    Kyte Baby has a chance to correct course and do right by future parents. Hopefully Liu has truly learned from her mistake; now it’s time to tackle the underlying problems that fueled it in the first place.

    (via USA Today, featured image: Urbazon/Getty Images)

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    [ad_2]

    Julia Glassman

    Source link

  • How To Ask About A Company’s Parental Leave During A Job Interview

    How To Ask About A Company’s Parental Leave During A Job Interview

    [ad_1]

    Because there is so much uncertainty in the family-building process, most of us don’t disclose a pregnancy or a potential adoption right away ― especially to a potential employer. We want privacy to figure out our schedule before making an official announcement. There’s also the unfortunate (and often valid) fear that a company may not be willing to hire you if you’re planning to go on leave. Legally, employers are prevented from practicing pregnancy discrimination in hiring, but practically speaking, it’s very challenging to prove such cases.

    If you’re considering changing jobs or are currently looking for work, you’ll want to consider an organization’s parental leave policy when making your decision. But according to a survey taken by theSkimm, 60% of job seekers, most of them women, held back on asking questions about leave during their interview process.

    HuffPost spoke to a number of employment experts about how to get the information you need without unnecessary risk. Here are some of their recommendations:

    Do some internet sleuthing.

    You may be able to find the answers to your questions without ever having to bring them up during an interview.

    “I recommend no one apply for a job without first researching the company’s family and medical leave policy and practice,” Amy Beacom, founder and CEO of the Center for Parental Leave Leadership and a co-author of “The Parental Leave Playbook,” told HuffPost.

    Every job candidate should look beyond salary ranges when considering a position. “Good companies spend an additional 30-40% on the benefits package,” Beacom explained. “If you give or plan to give care to anyone ― baby, sick relative, yourself, a parent — a strong family and medical leave benefit, combined with flexible work options, is a must.”

    There are a number of places you can look online for this information. “Some companies will share this information publicly on their websites, or it can be found on ‘best places to work’ rankings or sites like The Muse, Fairygodboss, and Glassdoor,” career coach Becca Carnahan told HuffPost.

    TheSkimm’s “Show Us Your Leave” campaign is another potential source of information. There, you can learn about the leave policies of more than 500 companies and organizations.

    If you’ve been contacted by a recruiter, find the job listing on Indeed.com or LinkedIn. “If they are proud of their family-friendly status, they’re going to say so,” Liz Ryan, CEO and founder of Human Workplace, told HuffPost.

    Some job candidates feel uncertain asking about benefits, but Ryan recommends that you push past this hesitation, given the far-reaching consequences of your decision.

    “Taking a job actually has more impact on the person than on the company. Obviously, when someone takes a job, that’s 100% of their income,” she said. “It becomes part of their brand, and the job affects their mental health, their physical health, their relationships, etc. So they want to really vet that employer, check them out.”

    MoMo Productions via Getty Images

    You can ask about benefits without necessarily zeroing in on parental leave.

    Ask a more general question about benefits.

    Asking directly about parental leave does send the message that you’re thinking about having a child. Again, employers aren’t allowed to use this information in their hiring decisions, but it would be extremely difficult to build a case that you were discriminated against. The company could simply say another candidate was better qualified.

    Because asking directly could leave you vulnerable, attorney Daphne Delvaux told HuffPost, “I would suggest asking about parental leave within a larger discussion about benefits and time off.”

    Delvaux offered the following phrasing: “I’m curious to hear more about the time off benefits the company provides. I know more and more companies in this industry are providing PTO, bereavement leave, time off to attend weddings of relatives, sick leave, parental leave, and other types of benefits.”

    Another way of approaching the question could be via comparison. Carnahan suggested: “I saw that XYZ company was noted on People-First Jobs as a company with strong benefits in employee health and well-being and parental leave, which is fantastic. What has your company done differently to stand out in this way?”

    If the company has a values statement on its website that mentions care for employees, you could also lead with that. Carnahan offered: “I see that employee care is an important value of the company, which really resonates with me. Could you share how that value is demonstrated within the organization?”

    Yet another strategy could be to reference the pandemic. Beacom gave the following example: “Given the unpredictability of the last few years, I’d love to hear more about your family leave, sick leave and flexible work policies. What can you tell me about those? And if you’re willing, your own personal experience with them?”

    It’s reasonable for you to expect a potential employer to be forthcoming about benefits and leaves. “If a company does not share information publicly or there is clear discomfort when faced with the question, that’s a red flag,” Carnahan said.

    “You are also interviewing the company, and your time is valuable,” she said. “Ask questions throughout your research stage and interview stage so that you know if a company is aligned with your needs and values. No one wants to spend hours interviewing only to find at the end a company has no supportive structures in place.”

    If someone tells you something like, “We have parental leave, but I was right back to work in a few week after our first child. There was too much to get done,” this too can be a red flag, Carnahan said. If there is a leave policy but most folks aren’t taking the allowed amount of leave, that tells you the company culture may not actually be family-friendly.

    Ask for the employee handbook.

    As you make your way up the ladder of the employment process, likely speaking first with a recruiter or a human resources screener and then your prospective manager, Ryan recommends that you ask for a copy of the employee handbook, or, if parts of it are protected property, at least the information about employee benefits. If they balk, that’s another warning sign.

    “That’s going to lay out the parental leave, all various kinds of leave, all the benefits,” Ryan said. “That handbook is the window to the corporate soul, right? It tells you not just their policies, but how they are, how they think, how they view their relationship with their employees.”

    Remember that job-seeking isn’t just about selling yourself. The company also needs to sell itself to you.

    You're under no legal obligation to disclose any information about family planning.

    Luis Alvarez via Getty Images

    You’re under no legal obligation to disclose any information about family planning.

    Know your rights.

    “An applicant has no legal obligation to volunteer information about having or wanting kids,” Delvaux said.

    If someone asks you during the hiring process if you’re planning on having kids, Ryan suggests you say something vague about not having any specific plan, or leaving things up to the universe.

    “Being a parent is not a protected class at work. However, if an employer asks if a candidate is a mother or has plans to have children, that can be an indicator of gender discrimination,” said Delvaux, noting that such questions are prohibited in some states, such as California, but not at the federal level. You would have to prove that you were denied the job due to gender discrimination, which would likely be a challenge. The frustration is that such questions are rarely asked of male candidates.

    You’re in a better position as a pregnant employee than a pregnant candidate, Delvaux explained. “Whether it is pregnancy or having children or child care issues, the time to disclose that is after the job offer is signed. At that point, if the employer rescinds the job or gives you a hard time, it will be easy to prove a causation,” said Delvaux, who also recommended that you “disclose the information in writing.”

    In terms of federal legislation when it comes to parental leave, the Family Medical Leave Act entitles workers to 12 weeks of unpaid leave “for specified family and medical reasons” including the birth, adoption or foster placement of a child. You cannot be fired for taking this leave. Note, however, that FMLA only applies to employers that have more than 50 employees, and you need to have been with your employer for 12 months in order to use this benefit.

    Know your comfort level.

    In some cases, if you are confident in marketing yourself, you might decide to be upfront about something like family or child care plans.

    You’re under no obligation, however, to make this kind of disclosure. It may not even make sense to do so, depending on your hiring process. If the people you are interviewing with are from an outside firm and will not be your direct supervisors, it would probably make more sense to hold off on making such a statement.

    “I would suggest never disclosing any plans to build a family. Not only is this too speculative and uncertain, it would essentially be giving an employer an opportunity to preemptively discriminate against you,” Delvaux said. Unless you need time off to pursue fertility treatments, she recommended waiting until you are pregnant to tell your employer.

    “If you’re pregnant now, or if you’re in the adoption process and this child could arrive before a year, you do not have to say you’re pregnant, of course,” Ryan said. You can wait to see if you get the job offer, and then tell your employer when you’re ready. Keep in mind, however, that you may not be eligible for paid or job-protected leave until after you reach a certain number of months with the company ― as with the FMLA benefits, which kick in after one year.

    Until it is required for companies to describe their leave benefits in job postings, Beacom believes it’s important for candidates of all ages and gender identities to ask about leave.

    “This has the added benefit of helping companies confront their unconscious bias that leave policy is only about women of a certain age,” she said. “A company’s parental leave policy speaks volumes about the work culture, and whether that company is a human-friendly place to work for all employees.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • A new bipartisan push for paid family and medical leave | CNN Politics

    A new bipartisan push for paid family and medical leave | CNN Politics

    [ad_1]



    CNN
     — 

    A cocktail party on Capitol Hill is often hardly notable.

    But at one recent soiree, the clinking of glasses had a different ring. Members of both parties joined together to kick off a renewed effort to solve a uniquely American problem: no universal paid family and medical leave.

    It’s been 30 years since the Family and Medical Leave Act became law. It guaranteed workers the right to unpaid, job-protected time off.

    But the United States is one of only seven countries in the world without some form of universal paid family and medical leave.

    A bipartisan congressional duo is trying to change that.

    “We live in the greatest nation in the world, and we do so many things well, but when you’re talking about families, this is one area that we have struggled,” Republican Rep. Stephanie Bice of Oklahoma told CNN during an interview in her Capitol Hill office last month.

    Sitting beside her, nodding, was Democratic Rep. Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania.

    “It’s frankly an embarrassment that we are one of the seven nations or so that doesn’t have this kind of focus on the family,” Houlahan said. “It’s really, really important that we lead by our example.”

    At the end of January, determined to find a solution to the lack of universal paid family and medical leave in America, the congresswomen officially launched their House Bipartisan Paid Family Leave Working Group.

    “We are action-oriented, and we are committed to having open eyes and ears,” Houlahan said, addressing policy advocates and politicians alongside Bice at the group’s launch party.

    Their task force is composed of six House members: three from each party, including Democrats Colin Allred of Texas and Haley Stevens of Michigan and Republicans Julia Letlow of Louisiana and Mariannette Miller-Meeks of Iowa. Such a partnership across the aisle, Bice insisted, is not that uncommon.

    “More of that happens than people realize back home,” the Oklahoma Republican told CNN. “There’s a lot of bipartisanship that goes on behind the scenes, trying to bring everyone together and move the country forward. And this is one way we’re doing that.”

    Houlahan represents a blue-leaning district in eastern Pennsylvania that includes parts of the Philadelphia suburbs. Bice represents a reliably red seat that includes parts of Oklahoma City. They’re both relatively new to Congress – elected in 2018 and 2020, respectively. They shared committee assignments – and previously a hallway in a House office building – and “just kind of connected,” said Bice.

    But the two have something else in common: They’re both mothers with daughters.

    Bice said she worked in the private sector when her daughters were born and had the ability to take paid family leave through her company. That was 20 years ago. “[It] was almost unheard of,” she shared. She said she doesn’t know what she would have done without that opportunity for paid time off.

    The Oklahoma native acknowledges that her circumstance was the exception, not the rule, when it came to paid family leave. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, only 1 in 4 workers had access to paid family leave in 2022.

    Families in the lowest 25% of wage earners had even less access. Only 13% of those low-income workers were eligible for paid family leave last year.

    “I was incredibly fortunate,” Bice said.

    Houlahan was an active-duty officer in the Air Force when her daughter was born 30 years ago. She recalled that the policy at the time was effectively six weeks of convalescence.

    “And I know, I remember acutely that the child care on the base was a six-month waiting list,” Houlahan said. “I couldn’t figure out how to make ends meet.”

    The veteran said she struggled to find a solution: Child care on the base was affordable but not accessible, and child care off base was the opposite.

    “To be really honest, it was one of the reasons that drove me to separate from the military,” she admitted. “These are choices that are being made by husbands and wives and families across the country.”

    A lack of paid family and medical leave doesn’t just create burdens for families, Houlahan said – it hurts the economy by taking women out of the workforce, causing what she called a “vicious cycle.”

    “The domino effect of all of this kind of thing is real,” the Pennsylvania Democrat said. “When we’re talking about these issues, it’s not just about the mom. It’s not just about the family. It’s about the infrastructure and the economy as well.”

    Bice and Houlahan face what many from the outside would call insurmountable odds: a deeply partisan and divided Congress, with narrow majorities in both chambers. But Houlahan said the razor-thin majorities present an opening.

    “We have an opportunity-rich environment right now, to use a military term, to make sure that we take advantage of this really special time, honestly, where the majorities and minorities are so small and so slim that it really requires that we work together,” she said.

    “We can pretty much assure that our far edges of both parties will not necessarily be interested in working collaboratively,” Houlahan added. “So we need to find that moderate middle.”

    Bice hopes the growing number of women in the House GOP Conference will make a difference, too. There are now 33 Republican women serving in the chamber – the highest number ever. It’s still small in comparison with the 91 female House Democrats (soon to be 92) across the aisle, but it’s momentum nonetheless.

    “Having that female conservative perspective, I think, is important to bring to the conversation,” Bice said. “Many of the women in the Republican Conference are young mothers. And so I think this conversation is ripe on our side of the aisle right now.”

    GOP Rep. Stephanie Bice, seen in Oklahoma City in 2020 before her election to Congress, says the issue of paid family leave is ripe among Republicans at the moment.

    Part of the frustration in Washington – and around the country – is that universal paid family and medical leave is quite popular across the political spectrum. A Morning Consult poll this past summer found that 85% of Democrats and 66% of Republicans supported congressional action on ensuring paid family leave.

    But the two parties have deep philosophical differences about how to pay for it. It’s part of the reason successful legislation has eluded Congress – and a big obstacle for Bice and Houlahan as they start their work.

    “We want to start with a clean slate,” Bice said. “Coming at this from maybe a new fresh perspective, looking at what’s been done in the past. What legislation currently in place isn’t working? And figuring out either do we expand on that or do we pull back and look at a new policy that would actually be much more effective?”

    They’re also realistic about what’s possible. Houlahan is prepared for incremental change.

    “If we’re able to give some family leave for benefits to our federal employees and then our uniform personnel and then this population and then that population, at least we’re making progress,” she said.

    Bice and Houlahan are certainly not the first lawmakers to try to tackle the issue in recent years.

    In 2021, House Democrats pushed to get 12 weeks of universal paid leave in the sweeping Build Back Better package. They eventually pared it down to just four weeks to get the necessary votes to pass in the House along party lines. But the $1.75 trillion social spending bill stalled in the Senate. Paid family leave was then left out of Democrats’ $750 billion climate, tax and health care package, known as the Inflation Reduction Act, that was enacted last summer.

    Houlahan told CNN that she and Bice “stand on the shoulders of great people, mostly women,” who have worked on the issue for decades and across the Capitol. Currently, New York Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand and Louisiana Republican Bill Cassidy are among the senators working on solutions of their own in the upper chamber.

    The House working group co-chairs also acknowledge the importance of bringing men into the conversation. Their six-member task force includes Allred, who made headlines in 2019 when he became the first member of Congress to take paternity leave.

    “If we’re going to be pro-family, it’s going to be pro-family, Mom and Dad,” Bice said.

    This February marked three decades since the Family and Medical Leave Act became law.

    “We’ve been at this since I was pregnant,” Houlahan quipped at the launch party for their group, noting that her oldest daughter is 30 years old.

    “It’s time for there to be additional progress on this issue. It’s wonderful that you now can’t lose your job for taking time off, but that’s not enough for us to be a competitive nation. I don’t think that embodies the American values of the strengths of families as well,” she told CNN in the joint interview.

    Her Republican colleague agreed.

    “It’s time for us to find a solution and take action,” Bice said. “Thirty years is too long. You can’t sit back and watch. You got to move forward.”

    This headline has been updated.

    [ad_2]

    Source link