ReportWire

Tag: martin scorsese

  • Martin Scorsese Announces New ‘Film About Jesus’ While Meeting Pope Francis 

    Martin Scorsese Announces New ‘Film About Jesus’ While Meeting Pope Francis 

    [ad_1]

    By Melissa Romualdi.

    Martin Scorsese is making another film inspired by religion.

    The famed director, fresh off his “Killers of the Flower Moon” standing ovation at Cannes Film Festival, met with Pope Frances at the Vatican in Italy, where he announced his plans to create a film about Jesus.

    “I have responded to the Pope’s appeal to artists in the only way I know how: by imagining and writing a screenplay for a film about Jesus,” Scorsese reportedly announced during a conference in Rome on Saturday, as per Variety.


    READ MORE:
    ‘Killers Of The Flower Moon’ Trailer: Leonardo DiCaprio And Robert De Niro Star In Martin Scorsese’s New Epic

    “And I’m about to start making it,” the Oscar winner added.

    Prior to the conference, Scorsese and his wife, Helen Morris, were introduced to Pope Francis during a private audience.

    Variety also reports that Antonio Spadaro – the editor of the religious periodical whom organized the conference, titled “The Global Aesthetics of the Catholic Imagination” – shared some details from the event on the publication’s website, noting that Scorsese and the Pope’s conversation included references to the director’s films and personal anecdotes. Scorsese also explained “how the Holy Father’s appeal ‘to let us see Jesus’ moved him,” Spadaro said.


    READ MORE:
    Ray Romano Recalls Getting Cast By Martin Scorsese Who Had ‘No Clue’ Who He Was: ‘He Liked What He Saw’

    The upcoming film won’t be Scorsese’s first project inspired by religion. In 1988 he released “The Last Temptation of Christ”; 1997’s “Kundun” told the story of the Dalai Lama’s life and in 2016 he debuted “Silence” about Jesuit Christians.

    [ad_2]

    Melissa Romualdi

    Source link

  • ‘Killers of the Flower Moon”s Cannes Debut Met With Praise From All Corners

    ‘Killers of the Flower Moon”s Cannes Debut Met With Praise From All Corners

    [ad_1]

    The American West came to the South of France this weekend for the debut of Martin Scorsese’s new epic, The Killers of the Flower Moon. To say that the picture was well-received is an understatement. The Apple Original Films project, which will have a theatrical run care of Paramount in October despite its 206-minute running time (more is more, Marty!), knocked the critics on their croisettes at the Cannes Film Festival, where the movie premiered out-of-competition. 

    V.F.’s Richard Lawson wrote that the new project, which stars frequent Scorsese collaborators Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro, is unlike anything else in the master’s long resume. He added it might be his “most tragic, condemnatory film to date,” which, for the man who made Mean Streets, Taxi Driver, Casino, The Wolf of Wall Street and 2019’s The Irishman is sure saying something. He concluded that the lengthy movie “shocks, resounds, and haunts.” 

    The film is based on David Grann’s bestselling nonfiction work of the same name, though the book’s title includes the secondary clause The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI. Scorsese and co-writer Eric Roth ended up shifting the focus of the story considerably, to make it less of a cop story and more about the Osage Nation, whose discovery of oil on their land in Oklahoma at the beginning of the 20th century brought them enormous wealth and, following that, many troubles.

    In a series of tweets that have since gone viral, Jim Gray, a former Principal Chief of the Osage Nation and direct descendent of someone depicted in the film, wrote that though he was not at Cannes, he did get a chance to see the movie, and detailed how Scorsese and the production worked with the Osage community. Despite initial “legitimate concerns that the movie industry might miss the point of the story,” he wrote that “the dignity and care for the Osage perspective was genuine and honest throughout the process and the Osage responded with the kind of passion and enthusiasm that met this historic moment.” In short, he wrote that the man behind The Last Temptation of Christ, Kundun, My Voyage to Italy, Silence, and the founder of the World Cinema Project came correct. You can read the thread below.

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    In addition to DiCaprio and De Niro, Flower Moon stars Lily Gladstone, in what is the most high profile role for an American Indian woman in recent memory. In what is likely the first of many celebratory moments over this and next year for the 36-year-old actress, best known for an appearance on Reservation Dogs and co-starring in two Kelly Reichardt films, Gladstone found herself on the receiving end of a standing ovation at the Cannes debut. 

    Twitter content

    This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

    [ad_2]

    Jordan Hoffman

    Source link

  • Martin Scorsese Has Never Made a Movie Like ‘Killers of the Flower Moon’

    Martin Scorsese Has Never Made a Movie Like ‘Killers of the Flower Moon’

    [ad_1]

    Over the course of a storied career, the director Martin Scorsese has used gangsters—particularly those connected to the Mafia—as a way to talk about America. Coded in the ring-a-ding patter and bloody outburst of Goodfellas or Casino is a simulacrum of our country’s make-or-break greed, its manic excess, its ornate history of violence. Though he has made other kinds of movies, Scorsese has returned to the criminal fringes again and again, seemingly unable to shake his fascination with America’s dark economy.

    With 2019’s The Irishman, it seemed that maybe Scorsese was closing a loop, crafting a wintry portrait of a gangster at his end. But for his next act, the director has merely gone further back in time to examine another organized brutality. With Killers of the Flower Moon, which premiered here at the Cannes Film Festival on Saturday, Scorsese adapts David Grann’s nonfiction bestseller, a chronicle of the murders of Osage people in 1920s Oklahoma. Over three and a half hours, Scorsese maps out a sprawling injustice, adding another piece to his grand collage of a nation’s cruelty.

    Leonardo DiCaprio plays Ernest Burkhart, a World War I veteran of simple aims who has arrived in Osage County to work for his uncle, William Hale, a wealthy and respected rancher played with creeping slime by Robert De Niro. Hale isn’t in the oil business, but he’s surrounded by its wealth. The Osage people have discovered oil on their land, and have been granted access to much of its profits. Their home is one of the most monied places per capita in the world, its residents chauffeured around in fancy cars, bedecked in fine furs and jewelry on their way to and from well-appointed homes.

    The Osage oil boom was a rare instance of Native Americans finding themselves in control of resources, which of course was anathema to many of the white people flocking to the county to work the oil fields. Their barely clandestine efforts to steal this Native wealth are grimly laid bare in Killers of the Flower Moon, perhaps Scorsese’s most tragic, condemnatory film to date.

    Courtesy of Cannes Film Festival 

    Ernest meets a rich Osage woman, Mollie Kyle, who catches his attention for her serene beauty and playfully cool demeanor. She’s played by Lily Gladstone in a performance of quiet, but forceful, dignity; Mollie is, in some senses, the hero of the film, though she is sidelined by illness both natural and manufactured. Killers of the Flower Moon suggests a true affection between Mollie and Ernest, perverted by the rapacious predation of Ernest and his clan. The film tracks the systematic dehumanization of Mollie, her family, and her community as they are dispatched one by one—with guns and poison and bombs—and their oil rights are transferred to white people, often the husbands of Osage women.

    It’s a genocide in miniature, essentially, through which Scorsese addresses the much larger displacement and eradication of Native Americans. Unlike his other mobster pictures, Killers of the Flower Moon is never giddy about its violence. Some scenes have a propulsive energy, but the film is often as solemn and ruminative as Silence, Scorsese’s whispery epic about extreme faith. Still, by the end, the film has spoken plenty loudly about the long horror of colonialism, its horrifying reach and ruin.

    [ad_2]

    Richard Lawson

    Source link

  • Leonardo DiCaprio’s Accent In ‘Killers Of The Flower Moon’ Raises Eyebrows On Twitter

    Leonardo DiCaprio’s Accent In ‘Killers Of The Flower Moon’ Raises Eyebrows On Twitter

    [ad_1]

    Finally, a first look at Martin Scorsese’s highly anticipated “Killers of the Flower Moon” film is here.

    A star-studded trailer for the Western crime drama hit the internet on Thursday.

    Leonardo DiCaprio stars as Ernest Burkhart, the nephew of an influential local rancher (Robert De Niro) who gets involved in the sickening Osage Nation murders. Burkhart is married to an Indigenous woman (Lily Gladstone) who has inherited an oil fortune but at deathly costs.

    While fans agree on how epic the trailer is, many have quickly pointed out one concerning detail on Twitter: DiCaprio’s accent.

    On the other hand, other Twitter users didn’t seem to mind the Oscar-winning actor’s accent.

    Set in Oklahoma during the 1920s, “Killers of the Flower Moon” is based on David Grann’s best-selling book of the same name.

    The film tells the true story of a series of massacres known as the “Reign of Terror,” in which members of the Osage Nation were murdered and extorted by white interlopers seeking their oil fortune.

    JaNae Collins, Lily Gladstone, Cara Jade Myers and Jillian Dion in “Killers of the Flower Moon,” coming soon to Apple TV+.

    In typical Scorsese fashion, the film’s trailer cleverly conveys the dark history of the Osage murders, all while careful not to give away too many plot details — yet still managing to deliver an ominous atmosphere.

    The nearly two-minute teaser is crawling with forewarnings of death, blazing fires and a forbidding voiceover from DiCaprio’s character who portentously hints at the danger of “hungry wolves.”

    The film, set to run for a whopping three hours and 26 minutes, marks the seventh on-screen collaboration between DiCaprio and Scorsese.

    It also stars Jesse Plemons, Tantoo Cardinal, Cara Jade Myers, JaNae Collins and Jillian Dion.

    “Killers of the Flower Moon” hits select theaters on Oct. 6 before expanding on Oct. 20. The film will move to Apple TV+ later.

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Martin Scorsese set to stir Cannes again, 47 years after ‘Taxi Driver’

    Martin Scorsese set to stir Cannes again, 47 years after ‘Taxi Driver’

    [ad_1]

    When Martin Scorsese premieres his latest film, “Killers of the Flower Moon,” at the Cannes Film Festival on May 20th, it will return Scorsese to a festival where he remains a key part of its fabled history.

    Scorsese premiered his masterpiece of urban alienation, “Taxi Driver,” in Cannes in 1976. Its debut was one of the most fevered in Cannes history, drawing boos and some walkouts for the violence in Scorsese’s tale of the disillusioned New York cab driver Travis Bickle (Robert De Niro). The playwright Tennessee Williams, then the jury president, condemned the film.

    “Films should not take a voluptuous pleasure in spilling blood and lingering on terrible cruelties as though one were at a Roman circus,” Williams said.

    Yet “Taxi Driver” nevertheless won Cannes’ top honor, the Palme d’Or. Having heard of Williams’ disapproval, Scorsese and company had already flown home, with dashed hopes of any big award.

    “I got a call from (publicist) Marion Billings around five in the morning saying, ‘You’ve won the Palme d’Or,’” Scorsese later recalled to The Hollywood Reporter. “We thought we might get screenplay or best actor for De Niro, so it was very surprising.”

    “Taxi Driver” wasn’t Scorsese’s first time in Cannes. Two years earlier, he had premiered his breakthrough feature, “Mean Streets,” in Directors Fortnight, a selection of films typically from up-and-coming directors that plays outside Cannes’ main stage, the Palais des Festival.

    “Cannes was the international platform for ‘Mean Streets,’ a film I didn’t think would even get distributed,” Scorsese said in a 2018 Cannes talk commemorating the film’s debut.

    “My visit was almost the best time, in terms of anonymity. And trying very hard to change that!” he said. “I was able to go from table to table on the Croisette and meet actors, directors, and so many others. It was still a period of discovery, not just for new filmmakers but older, neglected filmmakers.”

    Between “Mean Streets” and “Taxi Driver,” Cannes played a pivotal role in announcing Scorsese’s arrival as a major filmmaking talent. He has ever since maintained a close relationship with the festival, though it’s become rarer for Scorsese to launch a film there.

    “Killers of the Flower Moon,” his much-awaited adaptation of the David Grann bestseller, is his first new film to premiere in the Cannes official selection since “After Hours” in 1986. That film, a darkly comic nocturnal New York escapade, won Scorsese best director.

    His latest, which Apple, in partnership with Paramount Pictures, will open in theaters Oct. 6, isn’t playing in competition in Cannes. Festival Director Thierry Frémaux, in announcing this year’s lineup, said he urged Scorsese to put it into competition for the Palme d’Or but was rebuffed.

    “Killers of the Flower Moon,” with a 206-minute runtime, is about a series of murders of Native Americans in 1920s Oklahoma and the FBI investigation that followed. The cast includes Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert De Niro, Lily Gladstone, Jesse Plemons, Cara Jade Myers, JaNae Collins, Jillian Dion and Tantoo Cardinal.

    In between, Scorsese has often attended Cannes in other capacities. He was president of the jury in 1998 that chose Theo Angelopoulos’ “Eternity and a Day” for the Palme. He also chaired the Cinéfondation jury in 2002.

    And Scorsese has regularly been connected with other films at Cannes, either as an executive producer (for, among others, Joanna Hogg’s two-part “The Souvenir” ) or to unveil newly restored classics by the Film Foundation, the film preservation nonprofit he founded. This year, the Film Foundation, with the Walt Disney Co., will debut a stored “Spellbound,” Alfred Hitchcock’s 1945 thriller.

    Before a Cannes screening in 2009 of Film Foundation’s screening of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger’s 1948 masterpiece “The Red Shoes,” Scorsese said restoration only matters if people see the work.

    “The more audiences see these films, the more they want to see other films like them, and then what happens is the audience changes which means the movies that are being made change,” Scorsese said. “There is an audience for special movies, and good movies, for a different way of looking at the world — and not just blockbusters.”

    ___

    Follow AP Film Writer Jake Coyle on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/jakecoyleAP

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • David Grann Talks Mutiny, Martin Scorsese, and Searching for Truth

    David Grann Talks Mutiny, Martin Scorsese, and Searching for Truth

    [ad_1]

    In 1740, amid an imperial war with Spain, the Wager—a tricked-out merchant ship—set sail from England on a mission to capture a Spanish galleon laden with silver. The mission went awry. Two years later, a glorified raft washed up on Brazil’s shores, carrying only 30 of the original 250-odd crewmen. They told a heroic story of survival against all odds: illness, shipwreck, starvation on a desolate island. Six months later, three more survivors turned up on the coast of Chile, with an accusation of mutiny. 

    In The Wager: A Tale of Shipwreck, Mutiny and Murder (Doubleday), David Grann untangles the dueling narratives, bringing a nearly 300-year-old drama to life. Drawing from ship logs, survivor accounts, and court records—with context and color from the works of Lord Byron, Charles Darwin, and Herman Melville—The Wager zeroes in on the experiences of a handful of central figures, from Captain David Cheap to a 16-year-old midshipman named John Byron (the poet’s grandfather). The result: a genre-defying literary naval-history thriller, part Master and Commander, part Lord of the Flies.

    “One of my pet interests has always been mutiny,” Grann told VF. “I’m interested in military organizations that are designed by the state to enforce order. What is it that suddenly causes them to disorder? In literature and film, there’s always this question: Are they these extreme outlaws, or are they these romantic figures who are rebelling against something rotten at the core of the system?” 

    Questions like these have long animated Grann’s writing. Among his features for The New Yorker, where he’s been a staff writer since 2003, are a profile of the French serial imposter Frédéric Bourdin and the story of a Polish novelist charged with murder. And his books are cinematic, both narratively and actually, including The Lost City of Z, an account of a British explorer who went in search of El Dorado (Charlie Hunnam stars in the film version); the collection The Devil and Sherlock Holmes (notching Robert Redford a best-actor Golden Globe nomination for the adaptation of Grann’s piece “The Old Man and the Gun”); and the best-selling Killers of the Flower Moon, about the 1920s murders of members of the Osage Nation (with Martin Scorsese joint starring Leonardo DiCaprio coming to theaters soon). In the wake of finishing Killers, as phrases like “alternative facts” and “post-truth” proliferated, Grann began researching the Wager. He had been desperately hoping that his next book might feature living figures he could call up on the phone, but “this weird 18th-century story felt like a parable for our time.” 

    Vanity Fair: Your writing often includes some kind of grappling with how to tell the story you’re telling, or otherwise engages with the act of storytelling. 

    David Grann: I think early on I was telling stories more straight and traditionally. And then, over time, you start to become more sensitive to the way people are telling their stories, or shading their stories, and also of your own challenges in trying to render the truth. 

    I have a sense of my own inadequacy now. I started off as a young reporter—you watch All the President’s Men and you say, Well, this is how it’s going to be. And then you start to realize that getting to the truth is really murky and hard. I am a zealous believer in the truth, but accessing it and knowing it and documenting it… 

    Sometimes projects lead to other projects. With Killers of the Flower Moon, I was so interested in the fact that here was one of the worst racial injustices and sinister crimes in American history, and yet I had never heard of it. Most people outside the Osage Nation had not heard of it. And it’s like, why weren’t we taught this? Why did this not become part of history? That was something that haunted me. And so when I found the story of the Wager, it seemed like here you could really see the way people were shading their stories, but then also how nations and empires shade their stories and create their own narratives and their own mythic tales. 

    More and more, I’m acutely aware of parts of the story that have been scrubbed or whitewashed, and sometimes really tragically can’t be accessed anymore. Sometimes what haunts me when I do a story, it’s not the things I know, even when it’s a horrible crime, but actually the things I don’t know. 

    [ad_2]

    Keziah Weir

    Source link

  • Brendan Fraser is back. But to him, ‘I was never far away’

    Brendan Fraser is back. But to him, ‘I was never far away’

    [ad_1]

    NEW YORK — In a darkened hotel room in New York’s Soho neighborhood, Brendan Fraser kindly greets a reporter with an open plastic bag in his hand. “Would you like a gummy bear?”

    Fraser, the 54-year-old actor, is in many ways an extremely familiar face to encounter. Here is the once ubiquitous ’90s presence and action star of “The Mummy” and “George of the Jungle,” whose warm, earnest disposition has made him beloved, still, many years later.

    But Fraser, little seen on the big screen for much of the last decade, is also not quite as you might remember him. His voice is softer. He’s more sensitive, almost intensely so. He seems to bear some bruises from an up-and-down life. If Fraser seems both as he was once was but also someone markedly different, that’s appropriate. In Darren Aronofsky’s “The Whale,” he gives a performance unlike any he’s given before. And it may well win him an Academy Award.

    Fraser’s performance been hailed as his comeback — a word, he says, that “doesn’t hurt my feelings.” But it’s not the one he’d choose.

    “If anything, this is a reintroduction more than a comeback,” Fraser says. “It’s an opportunity to reintroduce myself to an industry, who I do not believe forgot me as is being perpetrated. I’ve just never been that far away.”

    Fraser is very close at hand, indeed, in “The Whale.” In the adaptation of Samuel D. Hunter’s play, which A24 releases in theaters Friday, Fraser is in virtually every scene. He plays a reclusive, obese English teacher named Charlie whose overeating stems from past trauma. As health woes shrink the time he has left, the 600-pound Charlie struggles to reacquaint himself to his estranged daughter (Sadie Sink).

    Fraser’s performance, widely celebrated since the film’s Venice Film Festival premiere, has two Oscar-friendly traits going it for: A comeback narrative and a physical metamorphosis. For the role, Fraser wore a massive body suit and prosthetics crafted by makeup artist Adrian Morot that required hours in makeup each morning.

    But regardless of all the role’s transformation trappings, Fraser’s performance resides in his sad, soulful eyes and compassionate interactions with the characters that come in and out of his home. (Hong Chau plays a friend and nurse.) It adds up to Fraser’s most empathetic performance, one that has returned him to the spotlight after years making quickly forgotten films like “Hair Brained” (2013) and the straight-to-DVD “Breakout” (2013). On stages now from London to Toronto, standing ovations have trailed Fraser — a leading man reborn — wherever he goes.

    For Fraser, who spent much of his previous heyday in Hollywood swinging on vines and racing through pyramids, playing Charlie in “The Whale” has a cosmic symmetry. He could identify with him, Fraser says, “in ways that might surprise you.” When he was in his late 20s trying to be as fit as he could be for “George of the Jungle,” Fraser encountered his own body-image issues.

    “All I knew is that I never felt like it was enough. I questioned myself. I felt scrutinized, judged, objectified, often humiliated,” Fraser says. “It did play with my head. It did play with my confidence.”

    Some have questioned whether Fraser’s role in “The Whale” ought to have gone to someone who was authentically heavy. But Fraser, who collaborated with the Obesity Action Coalition in building the performance, says he intimately understands a different kind of appearance-based judgment.

    “The term was ‘himbo,’” he says. “I wasn’t sure if I appreciated it or not. I know that’s bimbo, which is a derogatory term, except it’s a dude. It just left me with a feeling of profound insecurity. What do I have to do to please you?”

    “It didn’t matter, really, because life took over. I did other things. I now arrive at a place where I see the flip side of the coin.”

    After seeing the play 10 years ago at Playwrights Horizon, Aronofsky, the director of “Pi,” “Requiem for a Dream” and “Black Swan,” spent years contemplating different actors who could play the protagonist of “The Whale” without any success. Then he had Fraser come in and read for the part.

    “It wasn’t like I went into this with a calculation: Oh, a forgotten American-Canadian treasure,” says Aronofsky. “He was the right guy for the right role at the right time. If anything, I was wondering would people think it was a silly choice or something. There wasn’t any cool factor that I could see.”

    Aronofsky instead depended on his gut and an old axiom: “Once a movie star, always a movie star.” Plus, Fraser was hungry. He wanted the part desperately and was ready to put in all the work, all the time in the make-up chair. Still, Aronofsky would later marvel, watching a clip reel of Fraser at an awards ceremony, at the juxtaposition of “The Whale” with movies like “Encino Man,” “Bedazzled” and “Airheads.”

    “He plays this kind of very present, truthful, innocent goofus kind of guy,” says Aronofsky. “Then you intercut it with ‘The Whale.’ It was kind of jaw-dropping to me that this was one human being. There’s a gap in between of a lot of years.”

    Fraser never stopped working, but his movie star days mostly dried up in the years after his 2008 films “The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor” and the 3D “Journey to the Center of the Earth.” Around that time, he and his wife, Afton Smith, with whom he has three sons, divorced.

    “I took some personal time. It was important,” says Fraser. “Mostly connecting with my life as a father. It gave me an appreciation for my capacity to love. What I learned informs the latter half of my professional life now.”

    “Now I know my purpose. Take everything I’ve learned. Own it. And, if possible, let if fuel the work that comes before me,” adds Fraser. “It’s a nice idea, but what work will come before me?”

    At a Beverly Hills, California, luncheon in 2003, Fraser was groped by Hollywood Foreign Press Association member Philip Berk, Fraser said in 2018. (Berk disputed Fraser’s account.) The experience, Fraser told GQ, made him feel like “something had been taken away from me” and “made me retreat.”

    Last month, Fraser announced he won’t attend the Golden Globes in January, whether he’s nominated or not. “My mother didn’t raise a hypocrite,” Fraser said. Still, the nature of awards campaigns will likely keep Fraser in the public eye through the Oscars in March. Is he at all trepidatious about being back in the spotlight?

    “I think it’s going to be for the rest of my career,” Fraser replies. “No. I have an obligation to do this. I feel duty bound to, as politely as a I can, to use that casual prejudice to describe this character, to remind them that there’s a better way of doing that. Obesity is the last domain of accepted, casual bigotry that we still abide.”

    During shooting on a sound stage in Newburgh, New York, Chau was often impressed by how Fraser worked steadily with a hundred pounds of cumbersome prosthetics on him and crew members buzzing around him before every take.

    “I just thought Brendan was such an angel and so gracious in the way he managed that and compartmentalized all that was going on around him,” says Chau. “I naturally felt like taking care of him on set. Making sure his water bottle was someplace close by. Holding his hand and making sure he got up off the couch OK.”

    Little about the film, or Fraser’s journey with it, was inevitable. His first meeting with Aronofsky was in February 2020. The pandemic nearly led to the production’s cancellation.

    “I gave it everything I had every day,” he says. “We lived under existential threat of COVID. An actor’s job is to approach everything like it’s the first time. I did but also as if it might be the last time.”

    Instead, Fraser’s performance opened an entire new chapter for him as an actor. He recently shot a supporting role in Martin Scorsese’s upcoming “Killers of the Flower Moon.” Pondering what comes next, though, will have to wait until another day. When the time for the interview is through, Fraser stands up and graciously pulls a bag out of his pocket.

    “Gummy bear for the road?” Fraser asks. “I recommend pineapple.”

    ———

    Follow AP Film Writer Jake Coyle on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/jakecoyleAP

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • If Scorsese’s ‘Goncharov’ Is Not Real, Explain This | The Mary Sue

    If Scorsese’s ‘Goncharov’ Is Not Real, Explain This | The Mary Sue

    [ad_1]

    The Internet has been going wild over Martin Scorsese’s famous “lost film,” Goncharov. Even Scorsese himself has commented on the renewed interest in his work. Some accuse Goncharov of being “overrated,” or even “not a real film.” But if that were true, how would you explain the massive fandom that’s sprung up around it?

    Since the film’s rediscovery, a new generation of fans has latched onto it, creating gorgeous fan-arts, covers of the theme, and a record-breaking 633 fanfics on Archive of Our Own. Not since the premiere of Rogers the Musical has a fandom sprouted up seemingly overnight—and that musical was based on one of the greatest superheroes of all time.

    Many newcomers have latched onto “mafia wives” Katya and Sofia, who are, respectively, the wife and mistress of the main character, Goncharov. Despite this, Katya’s actions throughout the film seem mainly focused on keeping Sofia close, and many cite the tension of the lipstick scene as being sexual, rather than of two women fighting over the same man.

    But some are baffled by the celebration of the homoerotic gangster film. Why celebrate a film with “queer subtext” when there are many other films that are actually about the queer experience?

    Ultimately, I think this opens up an interesting argument about queer subtext vs. queer text.

    A brief history of queer subtext

    We’ve written at length about the dangers of queerbaiting and fake representation. But it’s important to remember that, for much of cinema’s history, being queer on screen was practically illegal. The Hayes Code prevented queer characters from having happy endings, assuming they were allowed to exist in the first place. As such, queer subtext in cinema was text for decades.

    Films like Tea and Sympathy and Rebecca (1940) were made pre-Stonewall riots, when homosexuality and crossdressing were criminalized. So, much like in real life, queer characters had to exist in a space that assumed straightness and punished queerness.

    Now that queerness is becoming more accepted, people are looking back at these works and seeing not just subtext, but a history of queerness in film.

    Goncharov‘s emerging fandom

    The fact that Goncharov is a movie in which both the leading ladies have agency and survive also lends itself to fandom, especially in a male-dominated genre like the gangster movie. If anything, the lack of pre-existing fandom also helps because there are no fans to try and take it away from us.

    Many movies like Top Gun have queer subtext, but also have male-dominant fandoms that refuse to open up that conversation. In a smaller fandom, every reading is just as legitimate as another, and we don’t have to worry about bros on YouTube calling us delusional.

    All of that can lead to a liberating experience for queer readers. We don’t have to put labels on Katya and Sofia, arguing about whether they’re lesbians or bisexual—we can just enjoy their relationship and create a world where they can run the mafia together.

    What do you think of Goncharov and people re-evaluating the queer subtext of older films?

    The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

    Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

    [ad_2]

    Kimberly Terasaki

    Source link

  • Jack White Cast In Martin Scorsese’s ‘Killers Of The Flower Moon’

    Jack White Cast In Martin Scorsese’s ‘Killers Of The Flower Moon’

    [ad_1]

    By Anita Tai.

    Jack White is showing off his acting chops.

    The musician is the latest addition to legendary filmmaker Martin Scorsese’s next film “Killers of The Flower Moon”. Randall Poster revealed the casting choice when he appeared on Brian Koppelman’s “The Moment” podcast.


    READ MORE:
    Jack White Shares Heartfelt Tribute To Loretta Lynn: ‘Like A Mother Figure To Me’

    Jason Isbell had already been announced as part of the film, but to Koppelman’s surprise, the famous singer wouldn’t be performing music in the film.

    “Yeah, he’s terrific in it. Jason Isbell, Jack White, uhh, oh, my god, who’s [that] famous blues harpist, older cat, it’s not Toots Thielemans — anyhow, there’s like four musicians in the movie that don’t play music,” said the music supervisor.


    READ MORE:
    Jack White ‘Surprised’ His Wife With Onstage Marriage: ‘I Figured It Was A Good Time’

    It won’t be White’s first time acting as he’s appeared in 2003’s “Cold Mountain” and 2007’s “Walk Hard”.

    “Killers of the Flower Moon” is a Western crime drama which follows a series of murders in Oklahoma in the 1920s. It stars Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert De Niro, Jesse Plemons, Lily Gladstone and Brendan Fraser with a premiere set for the Cannes Film festival in 2023.

    [ad_2]

    Anita Tai

    Source link

  • Martin Scorsese Calls Interest in Box Office Totals ‘Repulsive’

    Martin Scorsese Calls Interest in Box Office Totals ‘Repulsive’

    [ad_1]

    Martin Scorsese is no stranger to making claims that upset the Hollywood establishment. Recently he insisted there’s no correlation between quality and profit. After his comments about his distate for Marvel movies caused some serious uproar in the film industry, it seems he’s doubling down on his opinions.

    For a long time, it seems that there’s been some kind of conception that profitability is somehow directly correlated to the quality of art. While the whole thing is extremely subjective, the opinions of critics and the audience are often at odds. Whether we’re talking about movies, TV, video games, or music, there’s often a huge disparity between how much money something made, and the consensus on its quality.

    Sometimes, this makes for a cult classic. Other times, people decry critical darlings as pretentious garbage. What Scorsese has to say does hold a very large grain of truth. Scorsese himself didn’t win any major awards until the release of The Departed, a movie that came out well into his career. During a speech he made to introduce his new film Personality Crisis: One Night Only at the New York Film Festival, he better articulated his opinions. He shared the following feelings:

    Since the ’80s, there’s been a focus on numbers. It’s kind of repulsive. The cost of a movie is one thing. Understand that a film costs a certain amount, they expect to at least get the amount back, plus, again. The emphasis is now on numbers, cost, the opening weekend, how much it made in the U.S.A., how much it made in England, how much it made in Asia, how much it made in the entire world, how many viewers it got. As a filmmaker, and as a person who can’t imagine life without cinema, I always find it really insulting. I’ve always known that such considerations have no place at the New York Film Festival, and here’s the key also with this: There are no awards here. You don’t have to compete. You just have to love cinema here.

    Regardless of if you think Scorsese is just being a grump about his chosen art form, it’s difficult to deny at least a kernel of truth in his concerns.

    10 Actors Who Were Way Older Than Their Characters

    [ad_2]

    Cody Mcintosh

    Source link